RIETI BBL Seminar Handout

Similar documents
Future Funding The sustainability of current transport revenue tools model and report November 2014

The Status of Transportation Funding, Road Charge and Vehicle Miles Traveled in California

3/16/2016. How Our Cities Can Plan for Driverless Cars April 2016

CONTRIBUTION OF THE BIODIESEL INDUSTRY TO THE ECONOMY OF THE UNITED STATES

National Economic Estimating Conference Held July 12, 2018 FINAL Long-Run Tables

Yukon Resource Gateway Project

Transportation 2040: Plan Performance. Transportation Policy Board September 14, 2017

Sales and Use Transportation Tax Implementation Plan

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Leadership NC. November 8, 2018

Car Sharing at a. with great results.

Federal And New York Tax Incentives For Alternative Fuels

The Coalition for Transportation Productivity

An Overview of High Speed Rail. David Randall Peterman Congressional Research Service

Policy Options to Decarbonise Urban Passenger Transport

Electric Vehicle Adoption in the South African Context

Redefining Mobility Ready or not: Autonomous and connected vehicle planning and policy, now and in the future

INCENTIVIZING ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE PURCHASES IN VERMONT

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

National Health Care Expenditures Projections:

Logistics Costs: Trends and Implications. Joseph Bryan Managing Director, Global Trade and Transportation Global Insight

Net Metering in Missouri

Activity-Travel Behavior Impacts of Driverless Cars

ROADS GRADE: D WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S ROADS CAPACITY

The Road to Automated Vehicles. Audi of America Government Affairs

Planning of the HSR Network

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 30, 2013 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2012 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

Appendix B STATISTICAL TABLES RELATING TO INCOME, EMPLOYMENT, AND PRODUCTION

Transportation accomplishments

The Value of Travel-Time: Estimates of the Hourly Value of Time for Vehicles in Oregon 2007

Opening statements EUROPEAN TRUCK PLATOONING CHALLENGE 21 MARCH Jack Martens BRUSSELS. Chairman of ACEA task-force platooning

Washington State Road Usage Charge Assessment

Breakout Session. The Mobility Challenges of Our Growing & Sprawling Upstate

Todd Litman Victoria Transport Policy Institute. Presented at the Sixth Regional Forum on Environmentally Sustainable Transport In Asia

FUTURE MOBILITY IN WYOMING:

The Boston South Station HSIPR Expansion Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. High Speed Intercity Passenger Rail Technical Appendix

Oregon s Road Usage Charge Program

State Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT

CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6

Senate Standing Committees on Economics 27 June 2014 PO Box 6100 Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 By

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EDT, THURSDAY, AUGUST 27, 2015

Bella Vista Bypass Benefit Cost Analysis

Los Angeles and California: Leading in Clean Technology

Pametno gospodarenje cestovnom infrastrukturom Smart Management of Road Infrastructure Christophe Nicodème, ERF

2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT

Planning for Future Mobility In a Performance-Based World Steven Gayle, PTP

TRANSFORMING TRANSPORTATION

USDOT CMAQ Program. Southeast Diesel Collaborative Annual Conference September, 2017

STATISTICAL TABLES RELATING TO INCOME, EMPLOYMENT, AND PRODUCTION

REPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES

Respecting the Rules Better Road Safety Enforcement in the European Union. ACEA s Response

When Do We Talk About the Future?

Proposal for a Traffic Management Policy. National Committee for Economic Development (NCED) 18 th August 2004

Reducing CO 2 emissions from vehicles by encouraging lower carbon car choices and fuel efficient driving techniques (eco-driving)

Mississauga Moves: A City in Transformation icity Symposium Hamish Campbell

Self-Driving Cars: The Next Revolution. Los Angeles Auto Show. November 28, Gary Silberg National Automotive Sector Leader KPMG LLP

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES Nevada Dept. of Motor Vehicles

WASHINGTON STATE ROAD USAGE CHARGE ASSESSMENT

Connected Vehicle and Autonomous Vehicle (CV/AV) Mobility and Technology

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 31, 2007 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER 2006 (ADVANCE)

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #DisruptiveTransportation

Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis II Traffic Services Victoria Transport Policy Institute (

Parking Management Element

Implementation of Future Transportation Technologies: Getting Beyond the Low Hanging Fruit without Chopping Down the Tree

Modern Regulatory Frameworks for a Flexible, Resilient, & Connected Grid

Autonomous Vehicles: Status, Trends and the Large Impact on Commuting

Business Information Session August 8, Harmonized Sales Tax (HST)

Clean Transportation Manufacturing Opportunities

Planning for Sustainable Urban Transport Systems in India - Strengths and Weaknesses

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, THURSDAY, JANUARY 30, 2014 GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT: FOURTH QUARTER AND ANNUAL 2013 (ADVANCE ESTIMATE)

A fair deal for cars. Strategies for internalisation. Huib van Essen, 6 December 2012

Written Testimony of Josh Fisher Manager, State Government Affairs, Association of Global Automakers, before the Ohio House Transportation and Public

FUTURE OF MOBILITY. ACEC-PEPP Capital Improvements Design & Construction Seminar. Art Reinhardt, PE, CFM JANUARY 25, 2019

Planning for Autonomous Vehicles

Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department. AAPA Annual Convention

Made in Texas Plan to Create a Million New Jobs. Oil Sign Policy

SUBJECT: Shared Autonomous Vehicle project agreement between County Connection and Livermore Amador Valley Transportation Authority.

Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 23, 2014

TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING SERVICES: Street Project Management

Infrastructure Investment How Much Do You Need?

National Health Care Expenditures Projections:

An Asset Management Plan for Transit And Access Transit Fleet

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

Bob Costello Chief Economist & Vice President American Trucking Associations. Intermodal Freight Transportation Institute October 30, 2012

BIODIESEL CHAINS. Biofuels in Poland

Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS

DRAFT Subject to modifications

Autonomous Vehicles in California. Bernard C. Soriano, Ph.D. Deputy Director, California DMV

Gold Saskatchewan Provincial Economic Accounts. January 2018 Edition. Saskatchewan Bureau of Statistics Ministry of Finance

N ational Economic Trends

BASELINE STUDY ON VEHICLE INVENTORY AND FUEL ECONOMY FOR MALAWI (KEY FINDINGS)

Submission to the Transport and Public Works Committee s inquiry into the operations of toll roads in Queensland

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EST, TUESDAY, DECEMBER 22, 2015

EMBARGOED UNTIL RELEASE AT 8:30 A.M. EDT, THURSDAY, MAY 29, 2014

May ATR Monthly Report

Practical Issues in Market Design

Transcription:

Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) RIETI BBL Seminar Handout Autonomous Vehicles, Infrastructure Policy, and Economic Growth September 25, 2018 Speaker: Clifford Winston https://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/index.html

Autonomous Vehicles, Infrastructure Policy, and Economic Growth Clifford Winston Brookings Institution

Preliminaries It is useful to think about the broader economic effects of a transportation system. Consider the Stone Age and a lack of transportation. The current US system is riddled with inefficiencies from mispricing, suboptimal investment, inflated production costs, and the time costs to build work zones and regulatory delays. Expenditures on an inefficient system will be compromised. Efficient pricing is critical: signals efficient investment and generates many benefits 2

Motivation for AVs: Markets Addressing Government Failure Significant concerns about highway system performance delays, deterioration, and safety Autonomous vehicles (AVs) can greatly improve roads by improving safety, reducing delays, and improving reliability Technical and legal issues being resolved as adoption evolves Critical economic issue to be addressed before adoption The symbiotic relationship between this technical advance and policymakers policy response will determine whether the US fully realizes the potentially large benefits from AVs 3

Outline AV operations and adoption Benefits to the transportation and other sectors Further considerations in the assessment Efficient government policy responses before AVs are adopted Why might this time be different? 4

AV Operations and Adoption: How a Car Drives Itself 5

What the Car Sees 6

Private Sector Motivation Urmson Equation: 3 Annual Trillion VMT* $0.10/mile= $300 billion per year The $0.10 per mile charge could be larger creating a larger industry Competition from: US and foreign automakers, technology companies, as well as interest throughout the world 7

Public Sector Interest House of Representatives passed the Self-Drive Act unanimously Senate is expected to eventually pass the Act Act makes clear that federal safety regulations preempt state level rules Act allows car and technology companies to raise the number of vehicles it puts on the road with exemptions for testing purposes DOT will determine final rules that will allow the sale of self-driving vehicles for use on the road State/local authorities responsible for licensing and registration and for preparing their road systems for AVs. 8

How Long Before AVs Are Adopted? Once federal testing approval is finalized, the auto and technology companies will test their vehicles, identify problems, and develop solutions. Once DOT is convinced that AVs are safe and there is agreement on the standards that sellers have to meet, then AVs can be sold to and used by the public. This could take as long as 7 years, depending on the problems that are uncovered in tests. Adoption will proceed slowly as AVs replace non-avs and the public becomes convinced that AVs are safe. This could also take 7 years. 9

Benefits of AVs to the Transportation Sector Virtual elimination of some 40,000 fatalities, millions of injuries, and $billions in vehicle damage from accidents Eliminating the cost of vehicle insurance Significantly reducing the annual cost of congestion delay and unreliable travel times Note even if there are more vehicles on the road, AVs will eliminate incident delay Estimates of the annual benefits > $200 billion 10

Benefits of AVs to Other Sectors of the Economy from Less Delay Labor Sector: Improve workers access to and choices of employers and employers choices of workers could increase employment Urban Sector: Firms and residents benefit from spatial concentration of activities, known as agglomeration economies. Trade Sector: Travel distance and time contribute to the cost of international, intercity, and intracity trade. Industrial Sector: Firms and industries reduce their inventories and improve productivity Estimates of large macro stimulative effects: annual GDP growth = 1.4 percentage points and 2 million jobs 11

Estimating AV Benefits to Other Sectors The study was based on travel activity in California The basic model estimated the effect of congestion delay on employment, wages, productivity, and trade flows in California counties Because congestion is endogenous, I used as an instrument self-help county tax legislation. The taxes require 2/3 voter approval and allocate modest funds for projects that can reduce congestion. Based on the models that estimated the effect of congestion on the economic performance variables, I simulated the effect on those variables of reducing congestion delay by 50% and then extrapolated 12 the findings for the US.

Further Considerations in the Assessment Vehicle Safety steep learning curve and careful introduction Induced Demand Downs s Law can be repealed only by congestion pricing Urban Spatial Structure again, use pricing to address sprawl and downtown parking Urban roads suboptimal durability and traffic signaling call for efficient policy Effects on other modes and workers 13

Efficient Highway Policy and AVs Performance Congestion pricing: address induced demand, sprawl, and parking search costs. It will also discourage inefficient land use policies Pavement wear pricing and optimal investment in durability: address potholes and excessive maintenance costs Optimal highway design with less lane width and no breakdown lane will expand capacity Signaling and speed limits based on real time traffic flows will reduce travel times 14

Summary of Benefits of Policy Reforms Action Pricing Pavement-wear (axle-weight) pricing of trucks Effects on Travel Conditions Reduce pavement damage and disruptions to the traffic flow because of potholes and uneven pavement d that offsets time savings from autonomous vehicles Investment Increase pavement durability to the traffic flow because of potholes and uneven pavement Increase number of traffic lanes and make breakdown lane available for vehicle use travel times and reliability Technology adoption Optimize traffic signaling that accounts for real-time traffic flows Include a warning signal to reduce start-up delays Implement variable speed limits that account for real-time traffic flows 15

Conclusions AVs could improve highway travel and provide large benefits to the broad public But AVs must operate on a road system that enhances their technology, instead of the current system that has compromises non-autonomous vehicles Efficient highway policies would enhance AVs Why might policymakers respond this time? 16

Conclusions continued Travelers are likely to share instead of own vehicles and will be used to charges per use Government revenues will increase and policymakers can use them to finance investments in road capacity and technology Congress would have little reason to pass a large infrastructure spending bill General public will experience benefits from AVs and the costly failure to adopt efficient policies would be more transparent Billion dollar bills may be left on the sidewalk 17