Trans-Canada Highway and McCallum Road Interchange Upgrade

Similar documents
IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Welcome. Public Open House Schedule. Super 8 West Kelowna 1655 Westgate Rd, West Kelowna. West Kelowna. Wednesday, March 2, :00 p.m. 8:00 p.m.

To: File From: Adrian Soo, P. Eng. Markham, ON File: Date: August 18, 2015

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

HIGHWAY 28 FUNCTIONAL DESIGN

5 VAUGHAN METROPOLITAN CENTRE AND SURROUNDING AREAS TRANSPORTATION STUDY PROGRESS

The Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

TRANSPORTATION REVIEW

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

1 Downtown LRT Connector: Draft Concept

Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Tongaat Hullette Developments - Cornubia Phase 2. Technical Note 02 - N2/M41 AIMSUN Micro-simulation Analysis

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

I-494/I-35 Interchange Vision Layout Development - BRT Station Concepts S.P B SEH No

I-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

Update on Community or Heritage Rail Project (Project Manager Services) The Engineering Department recommends that Council:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

West LRT. Alignment Update and Costing Report May Calgary Transit Transportation Planning Clifton ND Lea Consultants

Technical Memorandum. To: From: Date: October 14 th, 2018 Project #: 1302 Project Name: Subject: Distribution:

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Candidate Project List for Public Review

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

Workshop Agenda. Bransford Roundabout. Bedford Intersection/Roundabout. Section 3 Revisions (Left turn lanes) Roadway Section/Curb Type Discussion

Environmental Assessment Derry Road and Argentia Road Intersection

We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS BUSINESS MEETING ACTION ITEM. Design Endorsement for Sterling Boulevard Extension

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

GTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1

Appendix F-1 Description of the Long-Term Alternatives

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Maryland Gets to Work

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study

4 Circulation & Transportation

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

CTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

Sherman Oaks Community Traffic Plan

CHAIR AND MEMBERS CIVIC WORKS COMMITTEE MEETING ON FEBRUARY 6, 2018

Background. Request for Decision. Pedestrian Lighting Standards for Road Right-of-ways. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Mar 17, 2014

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Pace Bus Depot Location Analysis

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

November 1, Mr. Jafar Tabrizi President, Tabrizi Rugs 180 Bedford Highway. Traffic Impact Statement BH-1 and BH-2, Southgate Drive, Bedford, NS

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

FLAMBOROUGH QUARRY HAUL ROUTE STUDY HAUL ROUTE VIBRATION REPORT. itrans Consulting Inc 100 York Boulevard Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 1J8

Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017

CITY OF ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 301 E. Huron St., P.O. Box 8647 Ann Arbor, Michigan

Central Loop Bus Rapid Transit

Halifax Commuter Rail: A Fresh Concept

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

4. Transportation Plan

Port Wallace Development: Safety and Traffic Concerns. April 12, 2018

Public Information Packet FY Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

2.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Support the revitalization of urban cores STRATEGIC DIRECTION

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future

IH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY

Executive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1

City of Pacific Grove

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

APPENDIX C-2. Traffic Study Supplemental Analysis Memo

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Brigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

CTA Blue Line Study Area

TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS

Detroit River International Crossing Study. The Best Alternative At This Time For Being Considered The Preferred Alternative

800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design

Executive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a

Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

Project Description: Georgia Department of Transportation Public Information Open House Handout PI#(s): , County: Muscogee

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

Energy Technical Memorandum

Transcription:

Trans-Canada Highway and McCallum Road Interchange Upgrade A Value Added Project Prepared by: Cory Clark, P.Eng. Project Engineer ISL Engineering and Land Services Suite 301, 20338-65 th Avenue Langley, BC V2Y 0B2 Paper prepared for presentation at the Innovative Design through Value Engineering Session of the 2012 Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada Fredericton, New Brunswick

ABSTRACT Trans-Canada Highway and McCallum Road Interchange Upgrade: A Value Added Project The City of Abbotsford indicated that the McCallum Road interchange along Highway 1 represents one of their most significant transportation issues within the City (1). The existing interchange dates back to the early 1960 s and had only a 2-lane bridge crossing the Trans- Canada Highway (TCH). Combined with inefficiencies in the surrounding road network and poor safety performance at the interchange, this meant congestion and access in and out of the city were a problem. The project budget was $25-million and was cost-shared by the City of Abbotsford, the Province of British Columbia, and the Federal Government. The later was part of the Infrastructure Stimulus Program which originally required the project to be completed by March 31, 2011. This dictated a tight project schedule that required the design to be completed by early spring to take advantage of the 2010 construction season. In August 2009, the City of Abbotsford retained ISL Engineering and Land Services (ISL) to provide preliminary and detailed design services. The design was to be based on the City s business case that selected a conceptual interchange configuration (Option 4) for implementation (1). This concept proved unviable within the budget, based on the scope. ISL led a team of consultants through a value analysis to identify a feasible alternative within the budget. The final solution (Option 7b), was a diamond interchange configuration with roundabout intersections and included BC s first two-lane, six-legged roundabout. The project exceeded the owners original aims and objectives. The cost effective design solution combined with lower bids received at the time of contract tendering, resulted in significant cost savings. These cost savings allowed the City and the BC Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure to add further road and facility upgrades to the project during the construction phase. Even with these additions, the project still came in on budget and was completed to the approved schedule and later-released extension of the Federal Stimulus Program (October 2011).

1.0 BACKGROUND The city of Abbotsford is located approximately 60 kilometers east of the city of Vancouver in the Fraser River Valley in southern British Columbia. The Trans-Canada Highway (Route 1) runs east-west through the city of Abbotsford, effectively dividing the city in two. The McCallum Road interchange is located in central Abbotsford and serves as a primary access to the City s commercial centre as well as institutions and key community amenities north and south of the highway. Some of these destinations include the Abbotsford Regional Hospital and Cancer Centre, the Abbotsford Entertainment & Sports Complex (a 7000-seat sports arena), and the University of the Fraser Valley. The interchange also links local and regional commuters to their places of work throughout the Fraser Valley and Metro Vancouver by connecting to this vital highway. In addition, the high density residential area just north of the McCallum Road interchange is forecast to grow by as much as 60% by the year 2031 (1). The City of Abbotsford indicated that the McCallum Road interchange along Highway 1 represents one of their most significant transportation issues within the City (1). The existing interchange dates back to the early 1960 s and had only a 2-lane bridge crossing the Trans- Canada Highway (TCH). Combined with inefficiencies in the surrounding road network and poor safety performance at the interchange, this meant congestion and access in and out of the city were a problem. Some operational and geometric issues of the existing interchange (2) are shown in Exhibit 1 of this paper. The project budget was $25-million and was cost-shared by the City of Abbotsford, the Province of British Columbia, and the Federal Government. The later was part of the Infrastructure Stimulus Program which originally required the project to be completed by March 31, 2011. This dictated a tight project schedule that required the design to be completed by early spring to take advantage of the 2010 construction season. In August 2009, the City of Abbotsford retained ISL Engineering and Land Services (ISL) to provide preliminary and detailed design services to upgrade the McCallum Road interchange. The design was to be based on the City s business case that selected a conceptual interchange configuration (Option 4) for implementation (1). 1

2.0 INTERCHANGE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT 2.1 Business Case Preferred Option The City s business case selected a conceptual interchange design, referred to as Option 4, as the preferred option. This option is shown in Figure 1 below. Figure 1: Business Case Option 4 Concept (1) The main features of this option include widening McCallum Road to four lanes and a new four lane overpass over the TCH. Ramp improvements include a new eastbound off-ramp to McCallum Road southbound, modifying the existing eastbound off-ramp loop to McCallum Road northbound, a new westbound to southbound off-ramp overpass connecting to King Road, modifying the existing westbound off-ramp to McCallum Road northbound, and modifying the existing McCallum Road northbound to the TCH westbound on-ramp loop. In addition, the scope of the preferred option was enhanced to include a park and ride facility within the project as shown in Figure 1. 2.2 Analysis of Option 4 Early in the development of the interchange design, ISL conducted an analysis of the business case preferred option (Option 4) to become familiar with the project issues and constraints (3). This option was developed further based on the Transportation Association of Canada s Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads (TAC guidelines) (4) and is shown in Figure 2 below. 2

Figure 2: Further Developed Option 4 Design Concept (3) The further developed concept was significantly influenced by a project objective to avoid private property impacts if at all possible and if unavoidable, minimized as much as possible. The two signalized intersections along King Road at McCallum Road and the TCH two-way ramp intersection would remain an essential part of the interchange operation. Access from McCallum Road north of the highway to the TCH eastbound, via the two signals on King Road, would remain indirect similar to existing conditions as shown in Exhibit 1. Some key elements required for this design concept to operate effectively are provided below. Eastbound Off-ramp This off-ramp provides an eastbound exit off the TCH and a second successive exit where the eastbound to southbound ramp diverges from the eastbound to northbound ramp. The desirable ramp length to change speed 100km/h to 50km/h, based on TAC guidelines, is a total of about 600 metres from the closest ramp bullnose. As a result, two ramp lanes are required parallel to the highway at a property constraint point. To avoid property impacts requires a shift in the TCH eastbound lanes towards the highway median for a distance of about 1.2 kilometres. Also, retaining walls are required on each side of the eastbound to southbound ramp due to the grade change. The eastbound to southbound ramp would significantly improve the deceleration distance provided over existing condition, however, traffic destined to the sports arena and university would have to travel through two signalized intersections on King Road compared to one signal in the existing condition. Eastbound to Northbound Off-ramp Loop A loop ramp is required for the eastbound to northbound traffic movement. The existing loop ramp has a 90 metre radius which achieves minimum TAC guidelines for a 50km/h design speed. Option 4 reduced the radius, and as a result the design speed of this loop ramp. Thus it provided space for the park and ride facility and avoided conflict with the new overpass for westbound to southbound off-ramp. TAC guidelines, however, 3

indicate that for a roadway design speed of 100km/h, the ramp design speed domain ranges from 90km/h to 50km/h. Therefore, from a safety perspective, it is desirable that this loop ramp remain at 50km/h. Northbound to Westbound On-ramp Loop The northbound to westbound loop ramp is similar to the loop ramp described above with a reduced design speed. It is considered less of a concern in this instance as this loop ramp is going from a lower speed on McCallum Road to a higher speed on the highway. As McCallum Road has a 50km/h posted speed, however, it is desirable to have a 50km/h design speed on this loop ramp. Westbound Off-ramp The westbound off-ramp is similar to the eastbound off-ramp in that it provides an exit off the TCH and then a split for the northbound and southbound traffic movements. Once again the desirable ramp length is about 600 metres from the closest ramp bullnose. There is also a property constraint point that requires a shift of the TCH westbound lanes towards the highway median. Westbound to Southbound Off-ramp The westbound to southbound off-ramp in Figure 2 is shown between the TCH and the westbound to northbound off-ramp. This requires retaining walls on each side of the ramp due to the grade change. Two other options considered were, to switch the ramps for the northbound and southbound traffic movements, and a westbound to southbound left lane exit. These options were considered not desirable from a safety perspective as they are uncommon and would have sight distance limitations due to site constraints. Park and Ride Facility Option 4 created space for a park and ride facility on the south side of the highway (not shown in Figure 2). A full movement access could be provided to the two-way TCH ramps to the east. Also, a right-in/right-out access could be provided on McCallum Road for reasonable access to the TCH. Access from McCallum Road from the north side of the TCH and from the TCH eastbound off-ramp, however, would have to use McCallum Road southbound, King Road eastbound, and then part of the TCH eastbound on-ramp. An estimate of probable costs was prepared for the full Option 4 and the estimated capital cost was $52.6-million (5). This was more than double the project budget of $25-million. Therefore, Option 4 proved unviable within the budget based on the scope. 2.3 Value Analysis ISL led a team of consultants through a value analysis to identify a feasible alternative within the budget. This included a review of the scope of Option 4 as well as other options that had been previously considered in the interchange business case (1) and conceptual design report (2). The City s aims and objectives for the interchange upgrade, and are provided below, were reviewed and examined throughout the value analysis process. 4

City s Aims and Objectives for the Interchange Upgrade The City of Abbotsford required cost-effective solutions to the interchange upgrade that would accommodate traffic volumes, and improve access to Abbotsford s public institutions, key community amenities, and other local destinations. The aim was to improve traffic mobility, reliability, and safety for all road users. Specifically, the project included the following main objectives: Reduce congestion by widening McCallum Road over the highway with a new 4- lane bridge structure and modifying/upgrading the associated interchange ramp connections; Allow space for the future addition of a lane in each direction on the highway for a total of three lanes in each direction; Encourage transit use with a Park and Ride facility (with provision for a future transit exchange on the south side of the interchange); Improve safety and mobility for vulnerable road users with dedicated 1.5m wide cycle lanes, upgraded bus stops, pedestrian sidewalks, and a pedestrianactivated signal crossing at Lynn/Cornwall Avenue; Retain existing property accesses and local road connections as required; Avoid private property impacts if at all possible and if unavoidable, minimized as much as possible; Keep traffic flowing throughout construction by maintaining the traffic operation and capacity of the existing interchange and surrounding roads; Provide interchange landscaping for aesthetic appeal; Provide appropriate drainage and stormwater management facilities; Relocate impacted municipal services (storm, sanitary, and water) and third party utilities (BC Hydro, Telus, Fortis BC, and Shaw) to fit with the new design; Modify and/or remove traffic signals as required and provide adequate street lighting; Accommodate sports arena major event traffic with consideration for sellout event traffic; Decommission the existing highway s westbound off-ramp signalized intersection at McCallum Road and the existing 2-lane bridge structure and interchange ramps that are no longer required. The value analysis process developed five variations of Option 4 that considered having property acquisition, reductions to the scope, and/or possible staging. In addition, two diamond interchange configurations were considered, one with signalized intersections (Option 7) and another with roundabout intersections (Option 7a) on either side of the highway. These later two options were similar to options considered in the interchange business case (1) and an earlier conceptual design report (2). Option 7a, however, was modified to include an additional two-way road connection from the roundabout south of the highway to the existing two-way TCH ramp intersection with King Road. This new connection was referred to as and later called the King Connector. The evaluation of the above interchange configuration options included a traffic analysis based on the 2031 average annual daily traffic (AADT) volumes. The 2031 AADT volumes are shown in Exhibit 2. The value analysis concluded that the diamond roundabout interchange 5

configuration with roundabout intersections (Option 7a) shown in Exhibit 3 was the most cost effective and feasible solution for this project (5). Option 7a was presented at meetings with project stakeholders as part of an extensive public consultation process to understand needs. Representatives of the church located closest to the proposed roundabout south of the highway expressed a desire to retain a full movement access to McCallum Road. This was similar to the existing conditions as McCallum Road was a two lane undivided roadway. The solution was to connect Hawthorne Avenue to the south roundabout. This connection effectively added a sixth leg to the south roundabout. This resulted in a local road being directly connected to a freeway interchange facility. Although this is uncommon and does not follow TAC guidelines for road classification hierarchy, it was considered feasible for this project site. The result was BC s first two-lane, six-legged roundabout shown in Exhibit 4. The new interchange configuration (Option 7b) achieved the project objectives and was the most costeffective solution within the budget. 2.4 Discussion of Option 7b The new interchange configuration (Option 7b) eliminated several of the Option 4 issues described earlier in this paper. Some of these issues included the eastbound and westbound off-ramp configurations with two lanes parallel to the highway, shifting of the TCH main line eastbound and westbound lanes toward the median to avoid property impacts, and lower loop ramp design speeds. Furthermore, access to and from the park and ride facility for local and regional commuters was improved via the south roundabout and the King Connector. The diamond interchange configuration with roundabout intersections (Option 7b) more efficiently connected the city s local road network. This can be seen as the existing interchange configuration was spread over a much larger area and included three signalized intersections. Option 7b replaced this with a smaller, more compact interchange configuration that included two roundabouts. Two of these signalized intersections, King Road & McCallum Road and King Road & the now King Connector, were retained but no longer formed a key part of the interchange operation. These two intersections could become part of the local road network adjacent to the interchange. The third signalized intersection, located on the north side of the highway, was no longer needed and was eliminated. In addition, the more compact interchange configuration maximized the surplus land within the interchange. Option 7b also allowed for better distribution of traffic. This was achieved through the addition of the King Connector which provided a second connection to King Road that was more direct to the sports arena and university east of the McCallum Road Interchange. Compared to the westbound to southbound off-ramp in Option 4, Option 7b provided a less direct connection to King Road, however, did achieve an adequate level of service for traffic. Removal of the westbound to southbound off-ramp in Option 4 eliminated the requirement for a new curved overpass structure for this ramp at significant cost savings. The King Connector, similar to this off-ramp in Option 4, also reduced the intersection requirements at King Road and McCallum Road. This intersection was surrounded by existing adjacent developments, and could not have been upgraded without impacts to private property. 6

2.5 Adding Further Value The new interchange design concept (Option 7b) was advanced to detailed design and the project contract was tendered in March 2010. The cost effective design combined with lower bids received at the time of contract tendering, resulted in significant cost savings. These cost savings allowed the City and the BC Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure to add further road and facility upgrades to the project during the construction phase. Upgrades included providing a new westbound climbing lane on the TCH, referenced in the objectives as a future third lane consideration but actually delivered within this project. The cost savings also enabled improvement of bus stop facilities, an expansion of the parking area for greater usage of the park and ride facility, as well as additional upgrades to roads north and south of the interchange to improved efficiencies in the surrounding road network. A list of value added items and locations are presented in Exhibit 4. A photograph of the completed Trans-Canada Highway and McCallum Road Interchange upgrade (6) is presented in Exhibit 5. 2.6 Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability and Aesthetic Aspects Compared to the original design (Option 4), ISL s solution (Option 7b) is expected to reduce vehicular delay in and around the interchange by 46%. ISL determined it would mean an annual reduction of 6.5 million kilometres and 650,000 hours of travel time. The reduced wait and idling times for traffic are expected to result in a 1.6 kiloton reduction in CO2 emissions per year equivalent to permanently removing 388 vehicles from the road. Other environmental benefits include a compact interchange design that minimized the construction footprint. Materials were also reused on-site or remained on-site where possible. Several underground infiltration trenches, biofiltration swales, a rain garden and an oil/water separator, serve to manage stormwater coming off the interchange to reduce peak stormwater run-off flow and improve downstream water quality. There were also significant social benefits to the project. It makes taking transit, walking and cycling safer and more convenient choices, and as a result encourages a mode shift in transportation, with the improved bus stop facilities, an expanded park and ride facility, sidewalks and dedicated cycle lanes. The project also provides commuters, residents, and visitors with a more efficient connection to the region, different parts of the city and points of interest (such as the adjacent sports arena and university). Road users, adjacent property owners and churchgoers can enjoy the attractive landscaping of rain gardens, boulevards, roundabout areas, highway median and the Park and Ride facility. The centre of the six-legged south roundabout also includes a fish-themed sculpture symbolic of the First Nation heritage in this area. In terms of wider economic benefits, the time saved for both commuters and the transport of goods has significant benefits for the local and regional economies. Overall, the new interchange facility provides a more efficient connection for commuter and commercial traffic within the city and economic region. 7

3.0 CONCLUSION The Trans-Canada Highway and McCallum Road Interchange upgrade project exceeded the owners original aims and objectives. The cost effective design solution combined with lower bids received at the time of contract tendering, resulted in significant cost savings. These cost savings allowed the City and the BC Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure to add further road and facility upgrades to the project during the construction phase. Even with these additions, the project still came in on budget and was completed to the approved schedule and later-released extension of the Federal Stimulus Program (October 2011). The new interchange has significant benefits for the community. The more efficient connection provides improves access to the City s commercial centre and key destinations within the city such as the hospital, sports arena, and university. It also makes taking transit, walking and cycling safer and more convenient choices, and as a result encourages a mode shift in transportation, with the improved bus stop facilities, an expanded park and ride facility, sidewalks and dedicated cycle lanes. Compared to the original design, the new value added solution is expected to reduce vehicular delay in and around the interchange by 46%, thereby reducing CO 2 emissions to the equivalent of permanently removing 388 vehicles from the road. The time saved for both commuters and the transport of goods has significant benefits for the local and regional economies. Overall, the new interchange facility provides a more efficient connection for commuter and commercial traffic within the city and economic region. 8

4.0 REFERENCES 1. Delcan Corporation prepared for the City of Abbotsford. (2009) McCallum Road Interchange Business Case. 2. Opus Hamilton prepared for the City of Abbotsford. (2007) McCallum Road Interchange Conceptual Design. 3. ISL Engineering prepared for the City of Abbotsford. (2009) Analysis of Option 4 Concept. 4. Transportation Association of Canada (TAC). (1999) Geometric Design Guide for Canadian Roads. 5. ISL Engineering prepared for the City of Abbotsford. (2009) Cost Comparison of Option 4 and Roundabout/Diamond Option. 6. Giffels Westpro. (2011) McCallum Road Interchange Photograph 9

Existing Interchange Operational and Geometric Issues Reference: Opus Hamilton prepared for the City of Abbotsford. (2007) McCallum Road Interchange Conceptual Design. EXHIBIT 1 10

N 550 Hawthorne Avenue 9,000 McCallum Road 7,500 King Road Connector 9,200 10,150 15,200 King Road LEGEND 30 Estimated 2031 ADT McCallum Interchange 2031 AADT Volumes 11 EXHIBIT 2

Diamond Interchange Configuration with Roundabout Intersections Two-Lane, Five-Legged South Roundabout EXHIBIT 3 12

4 CORNWALL AVENUE LYNN AVENUE 5 TRANS-CANAD 6 A HIGHWAY (RO UTE 1) 1 6 5 8 HAWTHORNE AVENUE 7 KING CONNECTOR Additions During Construction Phase (Not Shown) - Tactile Mats at Letdowns and Bus Stops - Hwy 1 Enhanced Pavement Markings - Jackson St and Salton Rd Watermain Upgrades - Electrical Hardening - Additional sports arena and university signs 2 McCALLUM ROAD Additions During Construction Phase 1. Hwy 1 WB Third Lane 2. Gravel Park and Ride Lot 3. King Rd, McCallum Rd to King Connector Improvements 4. McCallum Rd, Lynn Ave to Marshall Rd Improvements 5. Pedestrian Warning Flashers 6. Hwy 1 EB and WB Off-Ramp Additional Landscaping 7. Park and Ride Pedestrian Shelter 8. Fish-themed sculpture and Revised Landscape Theme 3 KING ROAD Diamond Interchange Configuration with Roundabout Intersections Two-lane, Six-Legged South Roundabout EXHIBIT 4 13

N Looking South at the Completed Trans-Canada Highway and McCallum Road Interchange EXHIBIT 5 Reference: Giffels Westpro. (2011) McCallum Road Interchange Photograph 14