What action is expected to take place in the foreseeable future in ADRs with regard to seat belts on school buses?

Similar documents
Trial of Seat Belts on School Buses in Queensland

OBLIGATION TO FIT ISOFIX ANCHORAGES. (Discussion paper)

Pupil Transportation Safety

School bus safety behaviours and responsibilities

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards

Weight Allowance Reduction for Quad-Axle Trailers. CVSE Director Decision

Post 50 km/h Implementation Driver Speed Compliance Western Australian Experience in Perth Metropolitan Area

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia

Enhancing School Bus Safety and Pupil Transportation Safety

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2003 Session. FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Revised

THE ROYAL SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTS RoSPA RESPONSE TO THE DRIVING STANDARDS AGENCY CONSULTATION PAPER

Streamlined Application Decision Perimeter Seating Bus Additional Vehicles

Assisted School Travel Program. Eligible Service Provider Request for Increased Run Capacity

INFORMATION FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HEAVY TRUCKS AND BUSES

TRANSIT STANDARDS FOR SEATING, WHEELCHAIRS, AND WHEELCHAIR TIEDOWNS SHEILAGH SHERMAN AND TONI-MARIE TAYLOR Sunrise Medical Canada

Transport Club Guidelines

White Paper. Compartmentalization and the Motorcoach

Pupil Transportation Routing Study

PUBLIC Law, Chapter 539 LD 1535, item 1, 124th Maine State Legislature An Act To Create a Smart Grid Policy in the State

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Heavy Vehicle Underrun Protection

Freedman Seating Company Getting you there safely! CASTA Conference 2017

STANDARD 14 SAFETY RATING

Licensing and Standards Committee. Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

Item No Halifax Regional Council June 21, 2016

Minibus Policy. Reviewed: March Next Review: March Signed By Headteacher: Signed by Chair of Governors:

Child Restraint Information for Enforcement Members. Alberta Occupant Restraint Program (AORP)

Child Restraint Information for Enforcement Members Alberta Occupant Restraint Program (AORP) Purpose and Outcomes. Overview

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Seat Belt Law and Road Traffic Injuries in Delhi, India

Evaluation of the Road Safety Impact of Ontario s Speed Limiter Legislation for Large Trucks

Energy Regulation : Australian Experience. Engr.Khondkar Abdus Saleque

The following document was obtained from the State of Indiana. This document may have changed since it was obtained. Please refer to the State's

SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS: FMCSA Notice of Proposed Rule-Making (NPRM)

Berkeley Unified School District Transportation Guide for Regular & Special Ed Students

THE ISSUE AND USE OF SECTION 10B PERMITS FOR ROAD PASSENGER TRANSPORT AND MINIBUS DRIVING IN NORTHERN IRELAND

Transit Vehicle (Trolley) Technology Review

INJURY PREVENTION POLICY ANALYSIS

HEAVY VEHICLE DRIVERS INVOLVED IN ROAD CRASHES IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA

HOLY SPIRIT RCSRD NO.4 BUS DRIVER S GUIDE

2018 NDE Pupil Transportation Reminders

Section Sixteen. Transportation

Successes and failures of road safety policy in Europe

SAFER TRUCKS & TRAILERS INCENTIVISING THE UPTAKE OF SAFETY TECHNOLOGIES

(a) "Motorist" shall refer to the driver of a motor vehicle.

Best practices for graduated driver licensing in Canada

Business Introduction

Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5.

Collect and analyze data on motorcycle crashes, injuries, and fatalities;

City of Palo Alto (ID # 6416) City Council Staff Report

Hours of Service. Accurate reference is on the Internet at:

Respecting the Rules Better Road Safety Enforcement in the European Union. ACEA s Response

Joint Legislative Program Evaluation Oversight Committee March 14, 2012

The Funding of Pupil Transportation In North Carolina March, 2001

Berkeley Unified School District Transportation Guide for Special Needs Students

Stronger road safety. in South Australia. Presented by Tamra Fedojuk Senior Statistician Road Safety Policy

RAC Work/Rest Rules Interpretation Document. Effective June 29, 2005

Land Transport Rule: Seatbelts and Seatbelt Anchorages 2002

FENEBUS POSITION PAPER ON REDUCING CO2 EMISSIONS FROM ROAD VEHICLES

POLICY MANUAL OPERATING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Response of the Road Haulage Association to Leeds City Council. Air Quality Public Consultation Feb 2018

VEHICLE FLEET MANAGEMENT AT THE IDAHO NATIONAL ENGINEERING AND ENVl RONMENTAL LABORATORY

OVERVIEW. TOYOTA LANDCRUISER LC200 WAGON 11/07 on build date BTC Upgrades Federal and State Compliance

PLAN FOR STUDENT TRANSPORTATION SAFETY TRAINING

Toronto Parking Authority Fleet Vehicle Replacement

ADR Compliance Crash Testing Explained

Information Bulletin. Fire Pump Battery Failures. Version 1.1 Approved for release August 2011

2015 IPWEA Queensland Conference Mackay. 14 th October 2015

Draft Agenda. Item Subject Responsible Time. 4. GAS INFORMATION SERVICES PROJECT IMO 10 min. 5. OPTIONS FOR GAS BULLETIN BOARD SYSTEM IMO 15 min

Which fuels do you use? 96% 34% 8% 5% 5% 1% 0.5% 2014 EQUIPMENT SURVEY

FURTHER TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR ENHANCING ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING

Appendix C SIP Creditable Incentive-Based Emission Reductions Moderate Area Plan for the 2012 PM2.5 Standard

I. Road Safety Targets and Indicators. II. Follow-up. III. Proposal. Note by the secretariat

Using Fleet Safety Programs to Impact Crash Frequency and Severity Session # S772

Vehicle Safety Risk Assessment Project Overview and Initial Results James Hurnall, Angus Draheim, Wayne Dale Queensland Transport

CMVSR 208 OCCUPANT RESTRAINT SYSTEMS IN FRONTAL IMPACT

SUMMARY OF THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT

GOVERNMENT STATUS REPORT OF JAPAN

RURAL ROAD MAINTENANCE PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Market Safety in ASEAN Region

Virginia Department of Education. A Regulatory View of Virginia Pupil Transportation

H 5456 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

CMVSR 208 OCCUPANT RESTRAINT SYSTEMS IN FRONTAL IMPACT

MODULE 6 Lower Anchors & Tethers for CHildren

COAST ACADEMIES MINIBUS POLICY. PRINCIPLES To provide guidance on how best to use the academy minibuses.

POLICY DOCUMENT FOR SCHOOL MINI BUS

Efficiency Standards for External Power Supplies

CICA HOIST SECTOR FAQs - RELEVANT STANDARDS / REGULATIONS. A. How do I find Australian Standards for cranes?

CONSULTATION DOCUMENT

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Statutory Amendments Affecting Transportation of Agricultural Commodities and Farm Supplies

National Guidelines for Automated Vehicle Trials. RAC s Response to the National Transport Commission s Discussion Paper

Land Transport Rule Traction Engines [2008]

Queensland Code of Practice

Christian Theis 52 nd GRB, 6-8 September 2010, ASEP outline. Summary & Conclusion

DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE OF COMMERCIAL AFTERMARKET ROLL-BARS, ROLL-CAGES AND OTHER TYPES OF ROPS CODE LK9

External Hard Drive: A DFMA Redesign

The need for regulation of mobility scooters, also known as motorised wheelchairs Spinal Cord Injuries Australia Submission

d. Note: LPG conversions are acceptable providing the relevant Vehicle Declaration is completed by the HSVOC Registrar.

Table 1: Candidate global targets and indicators for review

Discussion Paper: Developing indicators for voluntary global performance targets for road safety risk factors and service delivery mechanisms

EL DORADO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATION

Transcription:

Feasibility Study for a Trial of Seat Belts on Contract School Buses Operating in Non Public Transport Areas of Western Australia Debra Swadling and Shannon Newman ARRB Transport Research Ltd. ARRB Transport Research Ltd was contracted by the Western Australian Department of Transport to conduct a feasibility study into the potential of conducting a trial of seat belts in contract school buses in non-public transport areas. The purpose of this review was not to determine any relevant safety issues, but to ascertain from a close examination of Australian Design Rules (ADRs), Australian Standards, the Australian Road Rules, the WA Road Traffic Act (1974) and the WA Road Traffic Code (1975), whether it is technically possible to conduct such a trial, and whether any issues exist among these documents which might have an impact on conducting a trial. In addition, the issue is further examined to determine the potential cost and capacity implications for the WA school bus fleet if the WA Government proceeds with legislation or a code of practice to initiate the use of seat belts in school buses. The purposes of any seat belt trial (if one is conducted) would be to:?? gauge the public reaction to having seat belts on buses;?? determine whether students will wear them if they are provided;?? determine the problems faced by drivers and other parties involved; and?? determine the impact on the capacity of buses. This report summarises developments in overseas jurisdictions relating to the fitment and legislative requirements associated with seatbelts in buses. It examines the current status in other States and Territories in Australia with regard to seat belts on school buses. The report also presents a discussion of vehicle design issues, as they relate to the vehicles used to transport children to and from school in Western Australia, identifying concerns and difficulties for consideration should a trial of seatbelts be developed for contract buses in this jurisdiction. Finally, cost and capacity implications for conducting a trial and for implementing seat belts on school buses are presented. Australian Design Rules Relevant to Seat Belts on School Buses Seven ADRs relate to the fitment of seat belts in motor vehicles (including buses). ADR 68/00 is most relevant to a trial of seat belts on school buses as this is the ADR in which each bus and its fitting requirements are specified. All contract school buses in Western Australia have, by specification, low back seats (less than 1.0 metres) and are therefore exempt from ADR 68/00. In addition, there are indications in all of the relevant ADRs which clearly show that school buses are not included in the definition of route service omnibuses, making them eligible to be fitted with seat belts, and therefore subject to these regulations if they are so fitted. ADR 68/00 This ADR applies to omnibuses over 3.5 tonnes (MD3, MD4 and ME) which seat more than 17 persons (including the driver and crew), and in which all seats have a reference height (seat back height) greater than 1.0 metre. That is, high-backed bus seats. None of the current WA school bus fleet meet this requirement. This is interpreted to mean that buses with low-back seats cannot be fitted with lap-sash seat belts. For lap-sash seat belts to be fitted to school buses in WA, the buses must first be modified to incorporate high-back seats. ADR 68/00 specifies that in these vehicles (with seat backs greater than 1.0 metre in height), all front and rear seating positions be equipped with seatbelts. The ADR indicates that Route Service Buses are exempt from the requirements prescribed. The ADR specifies the requirements for seat belts in buses including the strength of seats, seatanchorages, seatbelt anchorages and, child restraints anchorages, and the provisions for protecting occupants from impact with seat backs and accessories on seats and arm rests. The most relevant section of this ADR states that each seat is to be fitted with a Seatbelt Assembly (5.4.1).

What action is expected to take place in the foreseeable future in ADRs with regard to seat belts on school buses? The Australian Transport Safety Bureau has reported to the project team that no plans are in place for any National Legislation or Regulation relating to fitment of seat belts on school buses. The ATSB is, however, currently undertaking a study of seat belts in buses. The issue is expected to be mandated on a State-by-State basis, with individual jurisdictions enacting their own legislation as and when they see fit. The summary of Australian jurisdictions presented in Section 6.4 of this report provides information that is available at the present time relating to this question. Identification of any gaps or contradictions within ADRs and between ADRs and other legislation There are some discrepancies both within and between some Australian Design Rules regarding seat belts and seat belt anchorages. These are described in full in the body of the report (see Section 5.1 and 5.2). Implications for a trial of seat belts on school buses from ADRs Several implications for conducting a trial have been identified. These include: 1 All buses to be used in a trial must have high-back seats, or seats with a reference height of at least 1.0 metre in order to be fitted with seat belts. 2 Lap-only belts cannot be used on buses of any size. 3 The number of anchorage points required on buses with varying floor structures must be clarified prior to any trial of seat belts on school buses. 4 There are two potential options for fitting seat belts to school buses: either retro-fit current buses with appropriate equipment, or purchase new vehicles which meet all ADR requirements. If current fleet buses are used in a trial, they would need to be retro-fitted to meet ADR 68/00 (Occupant Protection in Omnibuses) standards. This retro-fitting, unfortunately, cannot be carried out on some of the buses in the current contract school bus fleet, including all Toyota vehicles, and any vehicles which seat less than 12 persons. An alternative would be for Transport WA to purchase new vehicles which are fully ADR 68/00 compliant to be used specifically for the trial. 5 The retro-fitting might include (depending on bus type) structural changes or modifications to the following sections of the bus: a The bus floor must be strengthened and fitted with appropriate anchorage fittings for withstanding the required forces for relevant crash test requirements to be met; b The bus seats must all be replaced with high-back seats as low-back seats cannot be fitted with lap/sash seat belts and are not ADR 68/00 compliant; c The side walls and/or pillars of the buses must be reinforced to withstand the anchorage points required for the lap/sash belts required; and d The anchorage points for the seats will need to be modified to account for additional anchorage points necessary to accommodate seat belt fittings. 6 The three-for-two seating system currently in place would not be applicable if buses are fitted with seat belts. That is, each seat could only hold as many passengers as there are seat belts provided for. Gaps in the WA Road Traffic Code and Act The WA Road Traffic Act 1974 does not contain any legislation or regulation pertinent to seat belts. The Australian Road Rules (which may or may not be adopted by the WA government) show the age at which an individual becomes responsible for their own seat belt usage as 16 years. In the WA Road Traffic Code (1975), the age of responsibility in motor vehicles (which does not include buses) is 14. The main difficulty with the issue of responsibility for wearing seat belts (which is only addressed in the WA Road Traffic Code 1975 and the Australian Road Rules) is the fact that neither legislation provides for the responsibility of ensuring compliance with seat belt usage in omnibuses of any size or type (with the exception that the driver of an omnibus must ensure he or she wears their own device). Implications from the WA Road Traffic Code 1975 for a trial of seat belts in school buses Options to ensure students wear seat belts on school buses include:?? Legislation to assign responsibility; and

?? Making the wearing of seat belts a condition of travel. Australian Standards relevant to Seat Belts in School Buses Ten Australian Standards were identified which apply to seat belts, their design, assembly and the performance testing of individual components. The most relevant of these is AS 2596:1995 Seat Belt Assemblies for Motor Vehicles. AS 2596:1995 Seat belt assemblies for motor vehicles This standard was developed to provide minimum performance requirements for seat belts in order to promote the provision of a high level of protection for persons travelling in motor vehicles. It specifies the requirements for seatbelts assemblies and part assemblies, intended for use with adults and larger children, or in conjunction with approved child restraints. This standard specifies that the belt or restraint system applied must be designed so that, when it is correctly installed and properly used by a vehicle occupant, satisfactory operation can be assured and the risk of bodily injury in the event of an accident is reduced. While the standards apply to seatbelts in general, there is no specific mention regarding the application of these standards to seatbelts on either buses in general or school buses in particular. However, if seat belts are fitted to school buses, they will be required to meet AS2596:1995 standards. Summary of Gaps in all Legislation, Standards, ADRs and Regulations While the most serious of the gaps and discrepancies in ADRs, the Australian Road Rules, the Australian Standards, and the WA Road Traffic Code have been illustrated above or further in the body of this report, it should be noted that there are numerous additional potential problems associated with the fitment of seat belts to school buses. Current Developments Pertaining to Fitment of Seat Belts in School Buses International information on the current status with regard to seat belts on school buses was an additional objective of this project. Specific information was obtained from the United States of America, Canada and the United Kingdom. Summaries of the findings for these jurisdictions are presented in the Table below. Jurisdiction Seatbelt Fitment Seatbelt Use Required Not required United States School buses: - less than 4.5 tonnes. Canada United Kingdom Small Buses: - less than 4.5 tonnes - not school buses Minibuses - carrying 9-16 people Coaches: - carrying more than 16 people; - GVM more than 7.5t; & maximum speed of more than 60mph Large school buses: - 4.5 tonnes or more. NB: other safety standards apply Large Buses: - 4.5 tonnes or more Coaches: if - GVM 7.5t or less; or maximum speed of less than 60mph Voluntary compliance. No policy to mandate seatbelt use. Mandated Persons 14 years or older must wear a seatbelts where vehicles, including buses, are equipped with seatbelts. Bus driver is responsible for ensuing passengers under 14 years of age wear a seatbelt, where fitted.

Australia Omnibuses: (ADR 68/00) over 3.5 tonnes (MD3, MD4 and ME) that have: - more than 17 seats; & - seatback reference height more than 1.0 m Omnibuses: (ADR 4/03) - up to 3.5 tonnes (MD1 and MD2) Comparison to the Australian Situation School Buses Mandated Persons 16 years or older must wear a seatbelts where vehicles, including buses, are equipped with them. In buses with 12 seats or less, the bus driver is responsible for ensuing passengers under 16 years of age wear a seatbelt, where fitted. State-by-State regulations and the differences between them are shown in two Tables on pages 20 and 21 of this report. No Australian State or Territory currently has in place legislation or regulations which require seat belts to be fitted to school buses, but some States are examining the issue and discussing potential trials. Capacity Implications of Fitting Seat belts to School Buses The Table below shows the number of buses in the current fleet for which additional services would have to be provided if seat belts were introduced (using four-seater rows see later section which describes five-row seats being manufactured with seat belts). Number of School Buses the routes of which would require additional vehicles to service passengers at existing carriage rates if seat belts were fitted Vehicle Category/ Type Number of Vehicles in Current Fleet Number of Vehicles Carrying 70% or Above Adult Seated Capacity Toyota 346 103 MD4 29 8 ME 434 434 TOTAL 809 545 The full capacity implications are difficult to estimate, and are dependent upon which seating arrangement is chosen for new buses. The above figures relate to the existing bus fleet only. Cost calculations (below) are calculated based on a 90%-10% split of MD4 and ME buses respectively. That is, it is estimated that 90% of the additional vehicle requirements could be catered for using a smaller MD4 vehicle, while 10% may require the larger ME category buses. Cost Implications of Fitting Seat Belts to School Buses As stated above, there are two potential options for fitting seat belts to school buses: retro-fit existing vehicles (where possible); or replace current buses with new vehicles. The cost implications for both retro-fitting vehicles and for replacing vehicles are shown here. If a bus is to be modified to fit seat belts (where possible), what is the cost (estimated figure) for a small and large vehicle? The costs to modify the existing MD4 class buses, based on quotes obtained from numerous providers of such services shows an average cost of $23,000 per bus. For the ME class vehicles, the cost of retrofitting each bus to meet ADR 68/00 would be approximately $35,000 per vehicle. These costs include modifications to walls, floors, replacement of seats and fitting of seat belts and all required anchorages. The total cost for the current school bus fleet (based on figures above) for retro-fitting would therefore be approximately $25 million.

If buses need to be replaced, what are the costs of purchasing new vehicles fitted with seat belts? If the replacement option is chosen, then Transport WA would be faced with an increase in the cost of servicing capital relative to the price of the new buses. The rates for depreciation and return on investment would not change, but obviously the dollar amount this represents would increase (due to increased costs for vehicles). Costs obtained for this project indicate that the replacement of the MD4 vehicles would cost approximately $145,000 each, while ME category vehicles would cost about $190,000 each. The approximate total charges (exclusive of GST and on-road costs) therefore, would be approximately $140 million. Details of these costs are shown in Section 8.1.3 of this report. Using the above figures for new buses, the capital cost to Transport for a new fleet would translate to approximately $140 million over a ten to fifteen year period. Neither this cost nor the figure above for retro-fitting includes the additional costs due to capacity implications resulting from the introduction of seat belts on school buses. These costs are discussed in a later section. How do these costs translate to the whole fleet? The following sections show break-downs of the costs for both retro-fitting seat belts on existing school buses and also costs to replace the entire existing WA Contract School Bus fleet with buses which are fully ADR68/00 compliant. What is the cost due to reduced seating capacity? The above information relating to capacity implications from fitting seat belts to school buses is used to estimate the costs for these impacts. The actual cost calculations can only be conducted at today s costs, and it must be noted that future increases in vehicle costs cannot be estimated at this time. According to information received from Transport WA, approximately 550 of the current 809 services will have their seating capacity impacted from the introduction of seat belts. As stated above, about 90% of these could be catered to with the addition of a smaller (MD4) category vehicle, while the remaining 10% would require a larger (ME category) vehicle to cater for the reduced seating capacity. This means 495 services would require extra smaller buses, while the remaining 55 would need to be serviced with a larger ME bus. Under Transport WA s current practice for capital cost payments, this translates into a cost of approximately $34 million per annum. The length of a trial of seat belts on school buses required to produce reliable results A trial in which the evaluation of a number of non-safety-related criteria could be conducted in a period which includes one school year during which data is collected, and approximately three to four months in addition for pre-trial development and post-trial evaluation. This does not include the time required to fit buses with the seat belt assemblies required for the purposes of the trial, and also does not include the time that would be needed to develop, adopt or establish, and legislate (where necessary) any rules or regulations relating to the responsibility of wearing seat belts during the trial on the buses which are fitted with seat belts. Further details of such a trial are discussed in the Conclusions Section of this report. Conclusions Relating to the Currently Proposed Trial of Seat Belts in Contract School Buses It would be possible to conduct a trial of seat belts on school buses to provide information on factors which would be of interest and relevant to any eventual implementation of their use in school buses. The nature of the project could include the development of education programs for participating drivers, schools and students; determining compliance rates; evaluating comfort ratings provided by passengers of different age groups; and general acceptability of the seat belts by the users. Various types of signage to be used inside the vehicles to ensure passengers are aware of their (relative) responsibilities for wearing the provided seat belts could also be tested for effectiveness. These factors have all been shown in research to be important to the ultimate success of any imp lementation of seat belts in school buses. The necessary data to be gathered from a trial such as that outlined briefly above could be conducted over a period of one school year. Additional time will be required to design the study and to fit the buses with seat belts in the pre-trial period, and a further eight weeks or so to evaluate the data and prepare the report would be required at the conclusion of the data gathering stage. Results would be

gathered through survey, interview and focus group discussions with school representatives, students on the buses fitted with seat belts, students (and their parents) on buses not included in the trial (to ascertain level of interest or demand among passengers for seat belts), and bus drivers. The results of such a study would provide the Government with a good indicator of the potential for any successful implementation of seat belts in school buses in Western Australia. REFERENCES ADR 68/00 Federal Office of Road Safety. (1997). Occupant protection in buses. Australian Design Rule 68/00. Includes Determination 2 of 1998. (Federal Office of Road Safety: Canberra) AUSTRALIAN ROAD RULES (2000). Australian Bureau of Road Safety, Canberra, ACT. Federal Office of Road Safety. (1997). Seatbelts. Australian Design Rule 4/03. Includes Determination 2 of 1998. (Federal Office of Road Safety: Canberra) S2596:1995 Seat belt assemblies for motor vehicles. Standards Australia. Homebush, NSW. WA ROAD TRAFFIC ACT (1975). http://www.austlii.edu.au WA ROAD TRAFFIC CODE (1974). http://www.austlii.edu.au