High Solids Anaerobic Biodegradation and Disintegration test of Undyed mink fur, Undyed fox fur, Dyed mink fur, Dyed fox fur and Fake fur

Similar documents
Dossier J Document CEMATE/2 - Page 2/9. Submitted by the requester and received at the laboratory on 16 May 2008.

MSW Pyrolysis integrated with Anaerobic Digestion

POTENTIAL OF BIOGAS GENERATION THROUGH CO-DIGESTION OF MSW, SEWAGE SLUDGE AND GLYCEROL

Improving the Quality and Production of Biogas from Swine Manure and Jatropha (Jatropha curcas) Seeds

BIOGAS PRODUCTION ENHANCEMENT BY USING GLYCERINE AS CO SUBSTRATE

India has a very huge potential of

BIODEGRADABILITY TESTING OF ONE PRODUCT

Excessive Waste. Some of the grease is used to supplement feed farms but majority of it ends up in landfills

ASTM D Determing Aerobic Biodegradation of Plastic Materials Under Controlled Composting Conditions. Work Order #:

Sludge Management EENV Overview of Sludge Treatment & Disposal

Instruction Manual EISMANN & STÖBE GBR EMISSIONS- UND UMWELTMESSTECHNIK. Test Set for Estimating the Foaming Potential of Substrates for Biogas Plants

Development and testing of a fully gravitational submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor (FG-SAnMBR) for wastewater treatment

Energy Densification via Hydrothermal Pretreatment (HTP) of Cellulosic Biomass

Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in Gasoline and Diesel Using the znose Edward J. Staples, Electronic Sensor Technology

Feedstocks: Characteristics, Pre-Treatments

Table 0.1 Summary Pollutant Discharge Test Results Engine Manufacturer. Number 24652

BF2RA. Low Temperature Ignition of Biomass Jenny Jones, Alan Williams, Abby Saddawi Ben Dooley, Eddie Mitchell, Joanna Werner, Steve Chilton

Formula Details. Product Features. In properly controlled landfills BIOflex PVC will vanish in 3 to 5 years

Anaerobic treatment of biodiesel production wastes

MONITORING AND RESEARCH DEPARTMENT

Stainless steels are. Cost-efficient materials for the global biofuels industries. Enßrgy & ßnvironmßnt. The economic benefits of stainless steels

Filter Blocking, Biofuels, Microbs

November 1, th IPEC - Iris Porat and Miguel Pelaez. Chemical Degradation of Polymer Used in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Produced Water

Advanced Technique for Si 1-x Ge x Characterization: Infrared Spectroscopic Ellipsometry

ASTM B117 Testing Quality Control

Next generation high-performance cationic dewatering flocculants. Kemira Superfloc XD series

Oil & Gas. From exploration to distribution. Week 3 V19 Refining Processes (Part 1) Jean-Luc Monsavoir. W3V19 - Refining Processes1 p.

Article: The Formation & Testing of Sludge in Bunker Fuels By Dr Sunil Kumar Laboratory Manager VPS Fujairah 15th January 2018

Technical Information Average Efficiency of the SMA Flexible Storage System

DEPLOYMENT STRATEGIES FOR CLEAN AND FUEL EFFICIENT VEHICLES: EFFECTIVENESS OF INFORMATION AND SENSITIZATION IN INFLUENCING PURCHASE BEHAVIOUR

Edexcel GCSE Chemistry. Topic 8: Fuels and Earth science. Fuels. Notes.

SOLID CONSTRUCTION PTFE STEP FACE GASKETS FOR IMPROVED SEALING PERFORMANCE IN MONDI PIPING

The bereal Project - Scientific Highlights

Natural Gas Engine Oil Considerations

NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEER Unit of Environmental Science and Technology

Testing of particulate emissions from positive ignition vehicles with direct fuel injection system. Technical Report

Small craft Reciprocating internal combustion engines exhaust emission measurement Testbed measurement of gaseous and particulate exhaust emissions

DGMK Field Study 2007/09. Diesel Fuels with FAME and Microbs. Margret Schmidt (Shell Global Solutions)

Quality Control in Mineral Exploration

RENEP CGLP. High-performance slideway oils for machine tools, with excellent demulsification properties. Description. Advantages

ProSimTechs PROCESS SIMULATION TECHNICS

ecolife MH (Ni-MH) battery for 10 years life in ELU

Monitoring the combustion process directly on the grate of Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators Jean-Pierre Schosger & Jiri Martinec

InnoBYG small scale demonstration tests - Part 2

CASE STUDY 1612C FUEL ECONOMY TESTING

IFO 380 HEAVY FUEL OIL Vessel using Xbee Natural Fuel Additive

# of tests Condition g/mile ± g/mile ± g/mile ± (miles/gal) ± Impact of Diesel Extreme on emissions and fuel economy USDS results:

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIGESTIBILITY OF CRUDE GLYCEROL IN ANAEROBIC DIGESTION OF COW DUNG AND MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE

REMOTE SENSING MEASUREMENTS OF ON-ROAD HEAVY-DUTY DIESEL NO X AND PM EMISSIONS E-56

CASE STUDY 1612B FUEL ECONOMY TESTING

(i) Place a cross in the box next to a pair of greenhouse gases.

Onboard Plasmatron Generation of Hydrogen Rich Gas for Diesel Engine Exhaust Aftertreatment and Other Applications.

Obtaining ASTM D6400- D6868 Approval

White Paper. Improving Accuracy and Precision in Crude Oil Boiling Point Distribution Analysis. Introduction. Background Information

Effective Oxidation Catalysts for Water Treatment and Colour Removal

Power Performance and Exhaust Gas Analyses of Palm Oil and Used Cooking Oil Methyl Ester as Fuel for Diesel Engine

Regional Feedstock Partnership 2010 Switchgrass Report

CEN and CENELEC Position Paper on the European Commission s proposal for a Directive on the deployment of alternative fuels October 2013

Joost van Bennekom 1, Daan Assink, Robbie Venderbosch, Erik Heeres

A 3-Part Fuel Mixture is the Solution

Regulatory Impacts of Biogas-fired Internal Combustion Engines

Bio Methane based Chemicals

PRODUCTION QUALITY OF ADVANCED LABS FULFILLING THE ZERO FAILURE APPROACH AABC EUROPE 2017 CHEMISTRY & MATERIALS FOR LEAD-BASED BATTERIES

DaimlerChrysler Alternative Particulate Measurement page 1/8

International Journal of Scientific Research and Engineering Development- Volume 2 Issue 1, Jan-Feb 2019

Determination Of Fire Effluents From Products On Railway Vehicles

Olson-EcoLogic Engine Testing Laboratories, LLC

Setting the Standard in Oil Filtration Keep It Clean! & Keep It Green!

The Analysis of Biodiesel for Inorganic Contaminants, including Sulfur, by ICP-OES

Emission measurement equipment was from both Volvo and Veolia was installed in the test buses.

BLAST CAPACITY ASSESSMENT AND TESTING A-60 OFFSHORE FIRE DOOR

Q1. The table shows how much carbon dioxide is produced when you transfer the same amount of energy by burning coal, gas and oil.

ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF METHYLAL AS HCFC REPLACEMENT IN PU FOAMS

Synthesis of Optimal Batch Distillation Sequences

Overview about research project Energy handling capability

FLAT BIO END CAP TEST REPORT

PATENTED TECHNOLOGY» PROVEN RESULTS» PAYBACK

Combustion and Boiler Performance Assessment of Kardia Power Plant

A NEXT GENERATION LANDFILL AND BIOGAS LUBRICANT FOR TODAY S DEMANDING HIGH BMEP ENGINES. John Palazzotto Chevron Oronite Company, LLC

TASK ORDER NO. 7 CO-DIGESTION OF BIOSOLIDS AND FOOD WASTES BENCH-SCALE PILOT STUDY. Prepared by:

I. Ježek et al. Correspondence to: I. Ježek and G. Močnik

High-performance slideway oils for machine tools, with excellent demulsification properties

TECHNICAL BULLETIN Coolant Types and their Purpose Issue: April 2015

Level and Flow Measurement. Sludge Finder 2

CAT CG170. Series Gas Generator Sets

ENERGY STORAGE SOLUTIONS FOR IMPROVING THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC TRANSPORT VEHICLES

INCREASING THE ELECTRIC MOTORS EFFICIENCY IN INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS

Chemical indicators and test devices Benchmarking sterilisation processes.

Performance of Batteries in Grid Connected Energy Storage Systems. June 2018

EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL

Performance Testing of Composite Bearing Materials for Large Hydraulic Cylinders

Feedstock Diversification through Innovation Ken Williams November 3, 2015

HIGH-RELIABILITY POUCH CELL CONNECTION AND COST ASPECTS OF A ROBUST BMS SOLUTION

Thermal Exploitation of Wastes in Lignite Combustion Facilities

Schedule of Accreditation issued by United Kingdom Accreditation Service 2 Pine Trees, Chertsey Lane, Staines-upon-Thames, TW18 3HR, UK

ELECTRICAL 48 V MAIN COOLANT PUMP TO REDUCE CO 2 EMISSIONS

Critical Solution Temperatures for Ten Different Non-CFC Refrigerants with Fourteen Different Lubricants

Mandate to CEN on the revision of EN 590 to increase the concentration of FAME and FAEE to 10% v/v

Tool for evaluation of operating economy and ecology in ship concept design

NEW: CG132B TAKE ADVANTAGE OF DIGITAL ASSISTANCE

Transcription:

FINAL REPORT MNI-1 High Solids Anaerobic Biodegradation and Disintegration test of Undyed mink fur, Undyed fox fur, Dyed mink fur, Dyed fox fur and Fake fur Author: Lies Debeer Sponsor: Fur Europe Avenue des Arts 3-4-5 1210 Brussel BELGIUM OWS nv Dok-Noord 5, 9000 Gent, Belgium Tel: +32 9 233 02 04 Fax: +32 9 233 28 25 1/19 mail@ows.be www.ows.be

Table of contents 1 Identification of the test... 3 2 Introduction... 4 2.1 Principle of test method... 4 2.2 Standard followed... 4 3 Results biodegradation tests (MNI-1/1 and MNI-1/3)... 5 3.1 Test set up... 5 3.2 Analyses of inoculum, reference and test items... 5 3.3 Biogas production... 6 3.4 Biodegradation percentages... 7 4 Results disintegration test... 12 4.1 Test set up... 12 4.2 Analyses of inoculum... 12 4.3 Disintegration... 12 5 Summary and conclusions... 19 RA.MNI-1.Rev00 2/19

1 Identification of the test Project number MNI-1/1 MNI-1/2 MNI-1/3 High solids anaerobic biodegradation test of Undyed fox fur, Undyed mink fur, Dyed fox fur and Dyed mink fur High solids anaerobic disintegration test of Undyed fox fur, Undyed mink fur, Dyed fox fur, Dyed mink fur and Fake fur High solids anaerobic biodegradation test of Fake fur Conditions The test was performed under screening conditions Sponsor Fur Europe Avenue des Arts 3-4-5 1210 Brussel BELGIUM Sponsor contact Mette Lykke Nielsen Phone: +32 471 42 02 01 Mette.lykke.nielsen@fureurope.eu Testing facility OWS nv Phone: +32 9 233 02 04 Dok-Noord 5 Fax: +32 9 233 28 25 9000 Gent bruno.dewilde@ows.be BELGIUM lies.debeer@ows.be Test items Undyed mink fur Undyed fox fur Dyed mink fur Dyed fox fur Fake fur Reference item Cellulose Test duration 30 days RA.MNI-1.Rev00 3/19

2 Introduction 2.1 Principle of test method The biodegradability of products in a sanitary landfill or in a solid state anaerobic digestion system is determined through high-rate dry anaerobic batch fermentation. This method simulates and accelerates the biodegradation process that takes place in a landfill because it is a stationary (no mixing) and dry fermentation under optimal conditions. The incubation temperature was 37 C ± 2 C. A small amount of test item is added to a large amount of highly active inoculum that has been stabilised prior to the start of the digestion period. Optimal conditions with regard to ph, nutrients, volatile fatty acids, etc. are provided and the mixture is left to ferment batch-wise. Likewise biodegradation is not influenced by other factors than those inherent to the test item itself. During the anaerobic biodegradation of organic materials, a mixture of gases, principally methane and carbon dioxide, are the final decomposition products while some of the organic material will be assimilated for cell growth. The volume of the biogas produced is measured and the amount of CH 4 and CO 2 produced per weight unit of test item is calculated. If the carbon content of the test item is known the percentage of biodegradation can be calculated as the percentage of solid carbon of the test item that has been converted to gaseous, mineral C. To evaluate the disintegration of a product in a sanitary landfill or in a solid state anaerobic digestion system, recognisable pieces of test item are added to a large amount of highly active inoculum and left to ferment batch-wise. At regular intervals (e.g. weekly) a piece of test item is removed from a test reactor and physical changes in the test item are abserved. 2.2 Standard followed The test was performed according to the following standard: ISO 15985 Plastics Determination of the ultimate anaerobic biodegradation and disintegration under high-solids anaerobic-digestion conditions - Method by analysis of released biogas (2014) ASTM D5511 Standard Test Method for Determining Anaerobic Biodegradation of Plastic Materials Under High-Solids Anaerobic-Digestion Conditions (2018). RA.MNI-1.Rev00 4/19

3 Results biodegradation tests (MNI-1/1 and MNI-1/3) 3.1 Test set up A set of 18 equal vessels with a total volume of 2.5 l each was used. Each reactor was filled with 1000 g of inoculum and 15 g of reference or test item (except for the control reactors). The test items were cut into 2 cm by 2 cm pieces before adding them to the reactors, the cellulose was added as a microcrystalline powder. The reactors were kept at 37 C 2 C in an incubator. The test set-up is given in Table 1. Table 1. Test set up of the high solids anaerobic biodegradation test RN Test code Test series Inoculum (g) Item (g) 1 MNI-1/1 Control 994.5-2 MNI-1/1 Cellulose 993.1 14.9 3 MNI-1/1 Undyed mink fur 1046.0 14.9 4 MNI-1/1 Undyed fox fur 996.1 15.6 5 MNI-1/1 Dyed mink fur 997.0 15.0 6 MNI-1/1 Dyed fox fur 996.8 14.8 7 MNI-1/1 Control 994.8-8 MNI-1/1 Cellulose 992.9 14.9 9 MNI-1/1 Undyed mink fur 997.4 14.9 10 MNI-1/1 Undyed fox fur 997.2 16.0 11 MNI-1/1 Dyed mink fur 998.1 15.0 12 MNI-1/1 Dyed fox fur 997.8 15.1 13 MNI-1/3 Control 997.7-14 MNI-1/3 Cellulose 995.0 14.9 15 MNI-1/3 Fake fur 994.8 15.1 16 MNI-1/3 Control 998.4-17 MNI-1/3 Cellulose 994.8 14.9 18 MNI-1/3 Fake fur 995.0 15.0 3.2 Analyses of inoculum, reference and test items The inoculum was taken from a digester that has been operated during several months on the organic fraction of household waste. Before use, the inoculum was left to stabilize during 7 days. This post-fermentation was needed to reduce the biogas production rate. The characteristics of the inoculum are given in Table 2. It is recommended that the ph is between 7.5 and 8.5, the NH 4 + -N content between 0.5 and 2.0 g/kg and the volatile fatty acids content < 1 g/kg. The quality of the inoculum was good as all of the recommendations were fulfilled for both tests. The reference and test item were analysed for total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS) and total organic carbon content (TOC). The results are given in Table 3. Table 2. Characteristics of the inoculum Characteristics Inoculum MNI-1/1 Inoculum MNI-1/3 Total solids (TS, %) 20.1 21.6 Volatile solids (VS, % on TS) 65.5 64.3 Ash content (% on TS) 34.5 35.7 ph 8.1 8.1 Volatile fatty acids (VFA, g/kg) 0.17 b.r. NH + 4 -N (g/kg) 1.52 1.14 b.r. = below reporting limit; reporting limit: VFA = 0.14 g/kg RA.MNI-1.Rev00 5/19

Table 3. Total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS) and total organic carbon (TOC) content of the reference and test items Test item TS (%) VS (% on TS) TOC (%) Cellulose 97.0 100.0 42.7 Undyed mink fur 89.6 96.9 44.6 Undyed fox fur 91.9 94.9 44.8 Dyed mink fur 89.8 95.5 42.1 Dyed fox fur 91.5 98.8 44.9 Fake fur 99.2 98.9 64.0 3.3 Biogas production The averages and standard deviations of the final gas readings, after 30 days, in Nl (normalized litre. i.e. litre converted to standard conditions of temperature and pressure) are summarized in Table 4. The background activity of the inoculum was clearly lower compared to the reference reactors for both MNI-1/1 and MNI-1/3. This shows that the inoculum was stabilized sufficiently during the post-fermentation period. The low background activity improved the accuracy of the tests. Table 4. Average and standard deviation of the final gas production (Nl) after 30 days Test code Test series Biogas production (Nl) Average Standard deviation MNI-1/1 Control 6.8 0.3 MNI-1/1 Cellulose 17.0 0.4 MNI-1/1 Undyed mink fur 10.2 0.6 MNI-1/1 Undyed fox fur 8.6 0.7 MNI-1/1 Dyed mink fur 9.0 0.1 MNI-1/1 Dyed fox fur 7.6 0.2 MNI-1/3 Control 7.1 0.1 MNI-1/3 Cellulose 17.1 0.2 MNI-1/3 Fake fur 7.1 0.0 Table 5 shows the biogas composition after 30 days of testing. The gas compositions were within a normal range for all reactors. The composition of the biogas has no influence on the biodegradation percentage, but gives an idea on the fermentation process. A high CO 2 concentration and a low CH 4 content could indicate a bad fermentation. As can be seen from Table 5 this was certainly not the case for the test items. Table 5. Average biogas composition (%) at the end of the test of the different test series Test code Test series CO 2 content (%) CH 4 content (%) MNI-1/1 Control 40.1 59.9 MNI-1/1 Cellulose 46.6 53.4 MNI-1/1 Undyed mink fur 39.3 60.7 MNI-1/1 Undyed fox fur 39.3 60.7 MNI-1/1 Dyed mink fur 39.6 60.4 MNI-1/1 Dyed fox fur 39.1 60.9 MNI-1/3 Control 40.4 59.6 MNI-1/3 Cellulose 47.3 52.7 MNI-1/3 Fake fur 39.5 60.5 RA.MNI-1.Rev00 6/19

3.4 Biodegradation percentages Table 6 shows the biodegradation percentages of reference and test items after 30 days. They are calculated as the amount of carbon in the sample that was converted to carbon in the biogas (methane and carbon dioxide). Test series Table 6. Biodegradation percentages at the end of the test (30 days) Average C input (g) Average C gaseous (g) Biodegradation (%) AVG SD REL Cellulose* 6.4 5.4 85.7 2.0 100.0 Undyed mink fur 6.6 1.7 25.8 2.7 30.2 Undyed fox fur 7.1 1.0 13.6 4.9 15.9 Dyed mink fur 6.3 1.2 18.3 0.4 21.3 Dyed fox fur 6.7 0.4 6.6 2.0 7.7 Fake fur 9.6 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.4 With AVG = average, SD = standard deviation, REL = relative biodegradation. * Average of MNI-1/1 and MNI-1/3 The values in Table 6 do not include the amount of carbon which was originally present in the test or reference item and which in the course of the digestion has been converted to biomass carbon. Some of the carbon that is biodegraded is indeed used for the building of new bacterial biomass. For anaerobic digestion the biomass yield factor is between 10% and 30%. This means that for 1 g of carbon consumed, between 10% and 30% is used for new cell biomass while 70% to 90% is converted to gaseous, mineral carbon under the form of CH 4 or CO 2. Figure 1 shows the evolution of the average biodegradation percentages of the reference and test items. Figure 2 to Figure 7 show the evolution of the biodegradation percentage of all the replicates of cellulose (4 replicates 2 for MNI-1/1 and 2 for MNI-1/3) and the test items. The test is considered valid if after 15 days (according to ISO 15985) the biodegradation percentage of the reference item is more than 70% and if the standard deviation of the biodegradation percentage of the reference item is less than 20% at the end of the test. After a lag phase of about one day, biodegradation of cellulose started at a high rate in both MNI- 1/1 and MNI-1/3. After about 6 days, a biodegradation percentage of already 79.7% was reached. Then biodegradation slowed down to reach a plateau. The final biodegradation (after 30 days) was 85.7% ± 2.0%, meaning that all requirements for a valid test were fulfilled. Biodegradation of the Undyed mink fur, Undyed fox fur, Dyed mink fur and Dyed fox fur started immediately. The undyed mink fur shows the highest biodegradation (25.8%), followed by the dyed mink fur (18.3%), the undyed fox fur (13.6%) and the dyed fox fur (6.6%). Biodegradation reached a plateau for all test items. This means that these test items are partially biodegradable under mesophilic, high solids anaerobic conditions. Biodegradation of the fake fur never started. At the end of the test a biodegradation percentage of 0.3% ± 0.1% was measured. The slightly positive result is considered due to natural variations in the biogas production of the inoculum. This means that the fake fur is not biodegradable under mesophilic, high solids anaerobic conditions. To put de biodegradation of the (real) fur samples into perspective it is interesting to know the average biodegradation percentage of some natural products. This data is included in Table 7. RA.MNI-1.Rev00 7/19

Biodegradation (%) Table 7. Average biodegradation percentage of natural products Product Average biodegradation (%) Craft paper (bleached and lignin removed) 66 Newspaper 30 Cardboard 44 Grass (mostly roadside) 50 Straw (from wheat) 36 Leaves (oak, poplar, willow) 31 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Test duration (days) Ref Undyed Mink Fur Undyed Fox Fur Dyed Mink Fur Dyed Fox Fur Fake Fur Figure 1. Evolution of the average biodegradation percentage of reference item and test items RA.MNI-1.Rev00 8/19

Biodegradation (%) Biodegradation (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Test duration (days) RN 2 RN 8 RN 14 RN 17 Figure 2. Evolution of the biodegradation percentage of the replicates of cellulose 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Test duration (days) RN 3 RN 9 Figure 3. Evolution of the biodegradation percentage of the replicates of Undyed mink fur RA.MNI-1.Rev00 9/19

Biodegradation (%) Biodegradation (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Test duration (days) RN 4 RN 10 Figure 4. Evolution of the biodegradation percentage of the replicates of Undyed fox fur 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Test duration (days) RN 5 RN 11 Figure 5. Evolution of the biodegradation percentage of the replicates of Dyed mink fur RA.MNI-1.Rev00 10/19

Biodegradation (%) Biodegradation (%) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Test duration (days) RN 6 RN 12 Figure 6. Evolution of the biodegradation percentage of the replicates of Dyed fox fur 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0-10 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Test duration (days) RN 15 RN 18 Figure 7. Evolution of the biodegradation percentage of the replicates of Fake fur RA.MNI-1.Rev00 11/19

4 Results disintegration test (MNI-1/2) 4.1 Test set up A series of 10 equal reactors with a volume of 2.5 l was used. The reactors were carefully filled with 1000 g of inoculum and 5 cm by 5 cm pieces of test items Undyed mink fur, Undyed fox fur, Dyed mink fur, Dyed fox fur and Fake fur. It was seen to that the pieces of test item are completely covered in inoculum. Each reactor contained 6 pieces of test item. The test was performed in duplicate at 37 C 2 C. Every week, a piece of test item was removed from the test reactors to assess the disintegration. The removed pieces were cleaned up as much as possible, photos were taken and visual observations were noted. 4.2 Analyses of inoculum The same inoculum as MNI-1/2 was used for this test. The characteristics of the inoculum are given in Table 2. The quality of the inoculum was good as all of the recommendations were fulfilled. 4.3 Disintegration In Table 8 to Table 12 a photo and the observations can be found for each test item and every test week. In general, it was observed that the Undyed mink fur, Undyed fox fur, Dyed mink fur and Dyed fox fur partially disintegrated: the skin fell apart and disappeared but the hairs remained. The fake fur did not show any disintegration, only discolouration. Table 8. Visual representation of the disintegration of the undyed mink fur Undyed mink fur at start Undyed mink fur after 7 days Skin has become weak and lost strength. The piece fell apart easily. Hairs were clearly visible and seemed intact. RA.MNI-1.Rev00 12/19

Undyed mink fur after 14 days The pieces were falling apart completely. Some skin was still left, but all strength was gone. Hairs detached very easily. Undyed mink fur after 21 days The pieces were falling apart completely. Some skin was still left, but all strength was gone. Hairs detached very easily. Undyed mink fur at end (30 days) The pieces were falling apart completely. Some skin was still left, but all strength was gone. Hairs detached very easily. Table 9. Visual representation of the disintegration of the undyed fox fur Undyed fox fur at start (Blue background used to obtain better photo hairs were difficult to distinguish on white background) RA.MNI-1.Rev00 13/19

Undyed fox fur after 7 days Skin had become weak and lost strength. It was difficult to remove the digestate from the piece without causing the piece to fall apart. Hairs were clearly visible and seemed intact. Undyed fox fur after 14 days The skin was almost completely gone. Due to the longer hair (compared to mink), the pieces still hold together better, possibly due to digestate gluing them together. Undyed fox fur after 21 days The skin was almost completely gone. Due to the longer hair (compared to mink), the pieces still hold together better, possibly due to digestate gluing them together. Undyed fox fur at end (30 days) The pieces were falling apart, some skin was still left, but all strength was gone. Hairs detach very easily. Due to the longer hair (compared to mink), the pieces still hold together better, possibly due to digestate gluing them together. RA.MNI-1.Rev00 14/19

Table 10. Visual representation of the disintegration of the dyed mink fur Dyed mink fur at start Dyed mink fur after 7 days Skin had become weak and lost strength. It was difficult to remove the digestate from the piece without causing the piece to fall apart. Hairs were clearly visible and seemed intact. Dyed mink fur after 14 days The pieces were falling apart completely. Some skin seems to remain (very hard to distinguish from the black digestate), but all strength was gone. Hairs detached very easily. Dyed mink fur after 21 days The pieces were falling apart completely, some skin seems to remain (very hard to distinguish from the black digestate), but all strength was gone. Hairs detached very easily. RA.MNI-1.Rev00 15/19

Dyed mink fur at end (30 days) The pieces were falling apart completely, some skin seems to remain (very hard to distinguish from the black digestate), but all strength was gone. Hairs detached very easily. Table 11. Visual representation of the disintegration of the dyed fox fur Dyed fox fur at start Dyed fox fur after 7 days Skin has become weak and lost strength. It was difficult to remove the digestate from the piece without causing the piece to fall apart. Hairs were clearly visible and seemed intact. Dyed fox fur after 14 days The skin was almost completely gone. Due to the longer hair (compared to mink), the pieces still hold together better, possibly due to digestate gluing them together. RA.MNI-1.Rev00 16/19

Dyed fox fur after 21 days The skin was almost completely gone. Due to the longer hair (compared to mink), the pieces still hold together better, possibly due to digestate gluing them together. Dyed fox fur at end (30 days) The skin was almost completely gone and the sample falls to pieces. Due to the longer hair (compared to mink), the pieces still hold together better, possibly due to digestate gluing them together. Table 12. Visual representation of the disintegration of the fake fur Fake fur at start Fake fur after 7 days The sample looked intact, only discoloration due to the digestate was observed. RA.MNI-1.Rev00 17/19

Fake fur after 14 days The sample looked intact, only discoloration due to the digestate was observed. Fake fur after 21 days The sample looked intact, only discoloration due to the digestate was observed. Fake fur at end (30 days) The sample looked intact, only discoloration due to the digestate was observed. RA.MNI-1.Rev00 18/19

5 Summary and conclusions The biodegradation at 37 C ± 2 C (mesophilic conditions) of test items Undyed mink fur, Undyed fox fur, Dyed mink fur, Dyed fox fur and Fake fur was tested together with cellulose as reference item in a high solids anaerobic digestion test, according to ISO 15985. The test was performed in duplicate and lasted 30 days. The biodegradation percentage is based on the net biogas production and carbon content of the test item. Furthermore, the disintegration of the test items was evaluated. According to ISO 15985 the test is considered valid if a) the degree of biodegradation of the reference material is >70% after 15 days, and b) the deviation of the percentage of biodegradation for the reference item in the different vessels is less than 20% at the end of the test. After 15 days the biodegradation of cellulose was 84.1%. The final biodegradation (after 30 days) was 85.7% ± 2.0%, meaning that all requirements for a valid test were fulfilled. Biodegradation of the Undyed mink fur, Undyed fox fur, Dyed mink fur and Dyed fox fur started immediately. The undyed mink fur shows the highest biodegradation so far (25.8%), followed by the dyed mink fur (18.3%), the undyed fox fur (13.6%) and the dyed fox fur (6.6%). Biodegradation reached a plateau for all test items. This means that these test items are partially biodegradable under mesophilic, high solids anaerobic conditions within 30 days. Biodegradation of the fake fur never started. At the end of the test a biodegradation percentage of 0.3% ± 0.1% was measured. The slightly positive result is considered due to natural variations in the biogas production of the inoculum. This means that the fake fur is not biodegradable under mesophilic, high solids anaerobic conditions. In the disintegration test, it was observed that the Undyed mink fur, Undyed fox fur, Dyed mink fur and Dyed fox fur partially disintegrated: the skin fell apart and disappeared but the hairs remained. The fake fur did not show any disintegration, only discolouration. Gent, May 25th, 2018 Lies Debeer Study Director RA.MNI-1.Rev00 Bruno De Wilde Lab Manager 19/19