US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations. Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS

Similar documents
TARDEC Technology Integration

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Track & Suspension Overview Mr. Jason Alef & Mr. Geoff Bossio 11 Aug 2011

Robot Drive Motor Characterization Test Plan

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Non-primary Power Systems Overview Kevin Centeck and Darin Kowalski 10 Aug 2011

Automatic Air Collision Avoidance System. Auto-ACAS. Mark A. Skoog Dryden Flight Research Center - NASA. AutoACAS. Dryden Flight Research Center

AFRL-RX-TY-TM

TARDEC Robotics. Dr. Greg Hudas UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Command (TARDEC) Overview

FTTS Utility Vehicle UV2 Concept Review FTTS UV2 Support Variant

UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release. GVPM Energy Storage Overview Mr. David Skalny & Dr. Laurence Toomey 10 August 2011

Helicopter Dynamic Components Project. Presented at: HCAT Meeting January 2006

GM-TARDEC Autonomous Safety Collaboration Meeting

Evaluation of SpectroVisc Q3000 for Viscosity Determination

Feeding the Fleet. GreenGov Washington D.C. October 31, 2011

UNCLASSIFIED: DIST A. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. ARMY GREATEST INVENTIONS CY 2009 PROGRAM MRAP Overhead Wire Mitigation (OWM) Kit

Energy Storage Requirements & Challenges For Ground Vehicles

UNCLASSIFIED: Distribution A. Approved for Public Release TACOM Case # 21906, 26 May Vehicle Electronics and Architecture

Presented by Mr. Greg Kilchenstein OSD, Maintenance. 29August 2012

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 3

LESSONS LEARNED WHILE MEASURING FUEL SYSTEM DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE MARK HEATON AIR FORCE FLIGHT TEST CENTER EDWARDS AFB, CA 10 MAY 2011

EXPLORATORY DISCUSSIONS - PRE DECISIONAL

FINAL REPORT FOR THE C-130 RAMP TEST #3 OF A HYDREMA MINE CLEARING VEHICLE

US ARMY POWER OVERVIEW

U.S. Army/CERDEC's Portable Fuel Cell Evaluation and Field Testing 2011 Fuel Cell Seminar & Expo Orlando, FL 31 Oct 2011

Servicing Hawker Vehicle Batteries with Standard Battery Charging and Test Equipment

Alternative Fuels: FT SPK and HRJ for Military Use

Energy Storage Commonality Military vs. Commercial Trucks

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Vehicle Systems Engineering and Integration Activities - Phase 4

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

TARDEC --- TECHNICAL REPORT ---

REMOTE MINE AREA CLEARANCE EQUIPMENT (MACE) C-130 LOAD CELL TEST DATA

TARDEC OVERVIEW. Tank Automotive Research, Development and Engineering Center. APTAC Spring Conference Detroit 27 March, 2007

Monolithically Integrated Micro Flapping Vehicles

Open & Evolutive UAV Architecture

INTELLIGENT ENERGY MANAGEMENT IN A TWO POWER-BUS VEHICLE SYSTEM. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

TARDEC Hybrid Electric Program Last Decade

DSCC Annual Tire Conference CATL UPDATE. March 24, 2011 UNCLASSIFIED: Dist A. Approved for public release

Cadmium Repair Alternatives on High-Strength Steel January 25, 2006 Hilton San Diego Resort 1775 East Mission Bay Drive San Diego, CA 92109

Evaluation of Digital Refractometers for Field Determination of FSII Concentration in JP-5 Fuel

Transparent Armor Cost Benefit Study

An Advanced Fuel Filter

EVALUATING VOLTAGE REGULATION COMPLIANCE OF MIL-PRF-GCS600A(ARMY) FOR VEHICLE ON-BOARD GENERATORS AND ASSESSING OVERALL VEHICLE BUS COMPLIANCE

Joint Light Tactical Vehicle Power Requirements

Navy Coalescence Test on Petroleum F-76 Fuel with Infineum R655 Lubricity Improver at 300 ppm

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Predator B: The Multi-Role UAV

High efficiency variable speed versatile power air conditioning system for military vehicles

2011 NDIA GROUND VEHICLE SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY SYMPOSIUM POWER AND MOBILITY (P&M) MINI-SYMPOSIUM AUGUST 9-11 DEARBORN, MICHIGAN

SIO Shipyard Representative Bi-Weekly Progress Report

Application of Airbag Technology for Vehicle Protection

Power Distribution System for a Small Unmanned Rotorcraft

Navy Coalescence Test on Camelina HRJ5 Fuel

Up-Coming Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions Regulations For Mobile Sources. Parminder Khabra RDECOM-TARDEC TACOM LCMC March 22, 2006 JSEM

Does V50 Depend on Armor Mass?

TRANSIENT MAGNETIC FLUX DENSITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS ON A FUSELAGE-LIKE TEST SETUP AND INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFECTS OF APERTURES

Evaluation of Single Common Powertrain Lubricant (SCPL) Candidates for Fuel Consumption Benefits in Military Equipment

HIGH REPETITION RATE CHARGING A MARX TYPE GENERATOR *

F100 ENGINE NACELLE FIRE FIGHTING TEST MOCKUP DRAWINGS

Fuel Efficient ground vehicle Demonstrator (FED) Vision

Multilevel Vehicle Design: Fuel Economy, Mobility and Safety Considerations, Part B

Predator Program Office

Hydro-Piezoelectricity: A Renewable Energy Source For Autonomous Underwater Vehicles

BALANCE OF PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS FOR SURVIVABILITY AND MOBILITY IN THE DEMONSTRATOR FOR NOVEL DESIGN (DFND) VEHICLE CONCEPTS

NDCEE National Defense Center for Energy and Environment

Center for Ground Vehicle Development and Integration

Dual Use Ground Vehicle Condition-Based Maintenance Project B

Robust Fault Diagnosis in Electric Drives Using Machine Learning

Development of Man Portable Auxiliary Power Unit using Advanced Large Format Lithium-Ion Cells

Portable Fluid Analyzer

DESULFURIZATION OF LOGISTIC FUELS FOR FUEL CELL APUs

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

INLINE MONITORING OF FREE WATER AND PARTICULATE CONTAMINATION OF JET A FUEL

Power Technology Branch Army Power Division US Army RDECOM CERDEC C2D Fort Belvoir, Virginia

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards VHG Labs Inc. Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100 and D12-XXX Series Standards

Additives to Increase Fuel Heat Sink Capacity

U.S. Army s Ground Vehicle Energy Storage R&D Programs & Goals

Membrane Wing Aerodynamics for µav Applications

IMPACT OF FRICTION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES ON FUEL ECONOMY FOR GROUND VEHICLES G. R. Fenske, R. A. Erck, O. O. Ajayi, A. Masoner, and A. S.

NoFoam Unit Installation, Evaluation and Operations Manual

Blast Pendulum Testing of Milliken Tegris Panels

Joint Oil Analysis Program Spectrometer Standards SCP Science (Conostan) Qualification Report For D19-0, D3-100, and D12-XXX Series Standards

Program Overview. Chris Mocnik Robotic Vehicle Control Architecture for FCS ATO Manager U.S. Army RDECOM TARDEC

Hybrid Components: Motors and Power Electronics

ITC-Germany Visit. Chuck Coutteau, Associate Director Ground Vehicle Power and Mobility Overview 10 November 2011

GVSET Power & Energy Preview Mr. Chuck Coutteau Associate Director (Acting) Ground Vehicle Power & Mobility 19 August 2009

Quarterly Progress Report

Endurance Testing of Redesigned Tab Spring for MI-RAMS System

Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices

DEVELOPMENT OF COMPACT VARIABLE- VOLTAGE, BI-DIRECTIONAL 100KW DC-DC CONVERTER

Impact of 200 ppm HiTEC 4898C Lubricity Improver Additive (LIA) on F-76 Fuel Coalescence

Report No. D November 24, Live Fire Testing of Light Tactical Wheeled Vehicles was Effective for the Portions Completed

Developing a Methodology for the Evaluation of Hybrid Vehicle Thermal Management Systems

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Methylene Chloride Alternative HAP-Free Chemical Paint Strippers at Anniston Army Depot

2012 E2S2 CARB s New Mobile Equipment Regulations

The Characterization of Spinal Compression in Various-Sized Human and Manikin Subjects During +Gz Impact

Linear Algebraic Modeling of Power Flow in the HMPT500-3 Transmission

ANALYSIS OF NON-TACTICAL VEHICLE UTILIZATION AT FORT CARSON COLORADO

An MRAP manufactured by Navistar International. Nearly 8,000 have been produced. (david_axe / flickr)

Transcription:

US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations By Major Robert Kent, USAF, MC, SFS 1

Report Documentation Page Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. 1. REPORT DATE MAY 2010 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE US Army Non - Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Findings and Recommendations 5a. CONTRACT NUMBER 5b. GRANT NUMBER 5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER 6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER 5e. TASK NUMBER 5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) Air Force Research Laboratory,Human Effectiveness Directorate,Wright Patterson AFB,OH,45433 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR S ACRONYM(S) 12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. 13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 14. ABSTRACT 15. SUBJECT TERMS 11. SPONSOR/MONITOR S REPORT NUMBER(S) 16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT a. REPORT unclassified b. ABSTRACT unclassified c. THIS PAGE unclassified 18. NUMBER OF PAGES 51 19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Statement of Accountability This brief represents the position of the researcher. It does not represent the position of any other organization including the United States Air Force or the Department of Defense. Cleared for public release by ASC Public Affairs. Disposition Date: 3 May 2007 Document Number: AFRL-WS 07-1099 2

Background This study describes all 207 U.S. Army Class A-B Rotary Wing Mishaps ascribed to Non - Human Factors (NHF) from FY 85 to 05 This data is based on a study of data archived in the mishap files of the USA Combat Readiness Center at Fort Rucker, Alabama This data is the third part of a study that will include all rotary wing aircraft in the DoD The first part USAF Helicopter Mishap Data was publicly released on 18 Sep 2006 The second part USA Human Factor Helicopter Mishap Data was publicly released on 29 Mar 2007 3

Method Obtained all U.S. Army Rotary Wing Aircraft Class A & B Mishaps ascribed to Non - Human Factors from FY 85 to FY 05 inclusive from the U.S. Army Combat Readiness Center Reviewed all 207 mishap reports Created a data base for initial analysis Major injuries resulted in approximately four weeks or more of lost duty time or permanent disability Minor injuries resulted in approximately less than four weeks of lost duty time 4

Definitions Aircraft were placed in 7 groups for the analysis AH-1 AH-1E/F/G/S FAH-1S, JPAH-1S UH-1 UH-1H/V JUH-1H H-6 AH-6C/G/J MH-6B/E/H/J OH-6A H-47 CH-47C/D MH-47D/E OH-58 OH-58A/C/D/DI/DR H-60 EH-60A MH-60A/K/L UH-60A/L AH-64 AH-64A/D 5

Overview Definitions Mishap Characterization Phase of Flight Data Fatality & Injury Data Summary & Recommendations 6

Definitions Non-Human Factor Definition: Any mishap where the proximal cause was not due to a human factor in accordance with the Department of Defense Human Factors Analysis and Classification System Generally speaking: mechanical failures and weather Weather cases are those where severe weather was encountered but was not forecast 7

Non-Human Factor Mishap Character 8

% of Inventory, FY 85 05, Involved in Class A or B NHF Mishaps 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 % Involved UH-1 (34) AH-1 (19) H-6 (14) H-47 (20) OH-58 (49) H-60 (33) AH-64 (38) N = 207 9

NHF Mishaps by MDS AH-64 (38) UH-1 (34) H-60 (33) AH-1 (19) H-6 (14) N = 207 OH-58 (49) H-47 (20) 10

NHF Mishap Rates/100KHrs by MDS 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 UH-1 (34) AH-1 (19) H-6 (14) CH-47 (20) OH-58 (49) H-60 (33) AH-64 (38) 0.5 0 11

Non-Human Factor Mishap Character Phase of Flight 12

NHF Mishap by Phase of Flight FY 85-05 61% T/O Cruise Hover/Taxi Landing Ground N = 207 13

NHF Fatalities & Injuries by Phase of Flight Ground Landing Hover & Taxi Take-off Uninjured Minor Major Fatal Cruise 0 100 200 300 400 500 14

NHF Fatalities & Injuries by Phase of Flight - Overview Ground Landing Hover & Taxi Take-off Minor Major Fatal Cruise 0 100 200 300 15

All NHF Mishaps Malfunction Categories 15 17 18 29 78 Engine Failure WX Fuel System Tail Rotor Airframe 82% Flight Controls Fire Electrical Main Rotor Transmission Weapons FOD Hydraulics N = 207 16

NHF Cruise Mishaps Malfunction Categories 6 6 9 11 20 54 Engine Failure WX Fuel Systems Tail Rotor Flight Controls Fire Electrical Transmission Airframe Main Rotor Weapons Hydraulics FOD 84% N = 126 17

NHF Cruise Mishaps Fatalities & Injuries 139 185 Uninjured Minor Major Fatal N = 437 29 84 18

NHF Cruise Fatalities & Injuries by Malfunction Category Engine Failure WX Electrical Flight Controls Tail Rotor Main Rotor Fuel Systems Airframe Fire Weapons Minor Major Fatal N = 437 Hydraulics Transmission 0 30 60 90 120 19

NHF Landing Mishaps Malfunction Categories Engine Failure WX 54% 3 2 7 Tail Rotor Fuel Systems / Starvation Main Rotor Flight Controls 4 6 FOD N = 24 20

NHF Landing Mishaps Fatalities & Injuries 8 21 35 Uninjured Minor Major Fatal N = 99 35 21

NHF Landing Fatalities & Injuries by Malfunction Category Fuel System Tail Rotor WX Main Rotor Minor Major Fatal Engine Failure N = 64 FOD 0 5 10 15 20 22

NHF Hover/Taxi Mishaps Malfunction Categories 2 2 2 2 6 8 Engine Airframe Tail Rotor Electrical Fire Flight Controls Fuel Hydraulics Transmission Weapons WX 4 N = 30 23

NHF Hover/Taxi Mishaps Fatalities & Injuries 16 5 5 N = 93 Uninjured Minor Major Fatal 67 24

NHF Hover/Taxi Fatalities & Injuries by Malfunction Category Airframe Tail Rotor Engine WX Fuel Flight Controls Weapons Minor Major Fatal N = 26 Hydraulics 0 5 10 25

NHF Take-Off Mishaps Malfunction Categories 1 Engine Flight Controls 2 Fuel Systems WX N = 13 2 8 26

NHF Take-Off Mishaps Injuries 2 No Fatalities Uninjured Minor 17 Major 32 N = 51 27

NHF Take-Off Fatalities & Injuries by Malfunction Category Engine Failure Fuel Systems Minor Major N = 19 Flight Controls 0 5 10 15 28

NHF Ground Mishaps Malfunction Categories Airframe Flight Controls Fire 5 Engine Failure FOD Main Rotor Transmission 3 WX N = 14 29

NHF Ground Mishap Fatalities & Injuries 3 1 Uninjured Minor Fatal N = 45 41 30

Non-Human Factor Deaths & Injuries 31

NHF Fatality Rates/100KHrs by MDS 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 UH-1 AH-1 H-6 CH-47 OH-58 H-60 AH-64 0.5 0 32

NHF Fatality Rates/100K Hours Adjusted for average personnel on board 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 UH-1 AH-1 H-6 CH-47 OH-58 H-60 AH-64 0.1 0 33

NHF Mishap Protection Factor 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 UH-1 AH-1 H-6 H-47 OH-58 H-60 AH-64 0 34

NHF Injury Rates/100K Hours by MDS 1.6 1.4 1.2 Minor Major 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 UH-1 AH-1 H-6 H-47 OH-58 H-60 AH-64 35

NHF Injury Rates/100K Hours Adjusted for average personnel on board 0.7 0.6 0.5 Minor Major 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 UH-1 AH-1 H-6 H-47 OH-58 H-60 AH-64 36

NHF Fatalities & Major Injuries by MDS 125 100 75 Fatal Major 50 25 0 UH-1 AH-1 H-6 H-47 OH-58 H-60 AH-64 37

NHF Fatality & Injury Rates by MDS/100K Hours 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 UH-1 AH-1 H-6 H-47 OH-58 H-60 AH-64 Fatal Major 38

NHF Fatality & Injury Rates by MDS/100K Hours - Adjusted 0.6 0.5 0.4 Fatal Major 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 UH-1 AH-1 H-6 H-47 OH-58 H-60 AH-64 39

Percent Survivable Mishaps 100% 80% 60% Uncategorized 40% 20% Non-Survivable Partially Survivable Survivable 0% AH-1 UH-1 H-6 H-47 OH-58 H-60 AH-64 40

Percent Injuries in Survivable Mishaps 100% 80% 60% 40% Uninjured Minor Major Fatal 20% 0% AH-1 UH-1 H-6 H-47 OH-58 H-60 AH-64 41

Army Rotary Wing Non-Human Factor Mishap Fatalities & Injuries Head Chest Spine Lower Ext Major (n=44) Fatal (n=164) Abdomen Pelvis Upper Ext Burns Drown 0 50 100 150 42

Pilot Fatality and Injury Location PILOT Injuries n=409 Fatal Major Minor Total Head 60 14 39 113 (27.6%) Chest 60 5 13 78 (19.1%) Abdomen 43 2 3 48 (11.7%) Pelvis 36 1 5 42 (10.3%) Upper Ext 35 8 23 66 (16.1%) Lower Ext 41 14 47 102 (24.9%) Spine 45 17 35 97 (23.7%) Pilot injuries were most often to the head, lower extremity, and spine in NHF mishaps 43

Pilot Fatality and Injury Location PILOTS Fatal Non-Fatal Percent Fatal (N = 409) (N=69) (N=340) Head 60 (87.0%) 53 53.1% Chest 60 (87.0%) 18 76.9% Abdomen 43 (62.3%) 5 89.6% Pelvis 36 (52.2%) 6 85.7% Upper Ext. 35 (50.7%) 31 53.0% Lower Ext. 41 (59.4%) 61 40.2% Spine 45 (65.2%) 52 46.4% Percent of pilots with a given injury location who died 44

Non-Pilot Injury Location Non-PILOT Injuries n=315 Fatal Major Minor Total Head 63 11 17 91 (28.9%) Chest 62 8 5 75 (23.8%) Abdomen 43 2 0 45 (14.3%) Pelvis 45 5 5 55 (17.5%) Upper Ext 37 4 13 54 (17.1%) Lower Ext 46 10 20 76 (24.1%) Spine 50 4 19 73 (23.2%) Non-Pilot injuries were most often to the head, lower extremity, chest, and spine in NHF mishaps 45

Non-pilot Fatality and Injury Patterns, by Location Crew & PAX Fatal (N=95) Non-Fatal (N=220) Percent Fatal Head 63 (66.3%) 28 69.2% Chest 62 (65.3%) 13 82.7% Abdomen 43 (45.3%) 2 95.6% Pelvis 45 (47.4%) 10 81.8% Upper Ext. 37 (38.9%) 17 68.5% Lower Ext. 46 (48.4%) 30 60.5% Spine 50 (52.6%) 23 68.5% 46

Paired Pilot vs. Passenger & Crew U.S. Army Rotary Wing Non-Human Factor Mishap Fatalities & Injuries MISHAPS N = 207 PILOTS N = 409 # % PAX & CREW N = 315 # % Δ% NOT INJURED 218 53.3 132 41.9-11.4 RR =.77 (p<.0011) MINOR INJURY 99 24.2 67 21.3-2.9 RR =.89 (p<.388) MAJOR INJURY 23 5.6 21 6.7 +1.04 RR = 1.2 (P<.538) +13.3 FATAL 69 16.9 95 30.2 RR = 1.75 (P<.00006) 47

Emergency Locator Transmitters U.S. Army Rotary Wing Non-Human Factor Mishaps MISHAPS N = 207 No ELT Installed or ELT not armed Fatal Mishap N = 49 # % 8 25.6 Non-Fatal Mishap N = 158 # % 4 3.2 ELT Installed 41 74.4 154 96.8 48

Summary & Recommendations 49

Summary NHF mishaps affect all MDS approximately equally Most NHF mishaps, injuries, and fatalities occur during cruise flight (High V 2 ) Most NHF cruise mishaps are due to engine failure or weather Engine failure is common to all phases of flight but is uniquely NOT the greatest problem with regards to injury during landing Head injury is associated with the greatest risk of fatality Non-pilot crew members and passengers have greater frequencies of more severe injuries than pilots Lack of an installed and armed ELT is highly associated with fatal mishaps 50

Safety Technology Recommendations Require all personnel aboard helicopters to wear helmets at all times Provide real time, satellite datalink weather to all helicopter pilots Improve crashworthiness, flail and Gz protection of nonpilot seating to mitigate disproportionately high injury and death rates compared to pilots Improve the ability of rear compartment crew to remain in crashworthy seating below ETL Eliminate the need to use harnesses in place of crashworthy seating Emergency Locator Transmitters should be installed and armed on all aircraft Design emergency procedures to minimize V 2 51