United States Patent (19) Yao et al.

Similar documents
USOO5963O14A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,963,014 Chen (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 5, 1999

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/ A1

(12) United States Patent

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

USOO582O2OOA United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,820,200 Zubillaga et al. (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 13, 1998

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,220,819 B1

United States Patent (19) Muranishi

United States Patent (19) Kim et al.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,651,070 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,643,958 B1

United States Patent (19)

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2009/ A1

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

310/227, 228 Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Head, Johnson & Kachigian

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,168,973 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8, B2

United States Patent (19) Koitabashi

3 23S Sé. -Né 33% (12) United States Patent US 6,742,409 B2. Jun. 1, (45) Date of Patent: (10) Patent No.: 6B M 2 O. (51) Int. Cl...

IIIHIIII 5,509,863. United States Patent (19) Månsson et al. Apr. 23, Patent Number: 45) Date of Patent:

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,543,270 B2

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 6,152,637 Maughan (45) Date of Patent: Nov. 28, 2000

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2013/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,592,736 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,484,362 B1

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,205,840 B1

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 6,915,721 B2. Hsu et al. (45) Date of Patent: Jul. 12, 2005

United States Patent (19) Kitami et al.

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,588,825 B1

United States Patent (19) Hsu

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,641,228 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,429,647 B1

III. United States Patent (19) Hsu et al. 11 Patent Number: 5,330, Date of Patent: Jul. 19, electric power in addition to human force.

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1. Lee et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 9, 2006

United States Patent (19) Hormel et al.

Damper for brake noise reduction (brake drums)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,446,482 B1. Heskey et al. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 10, 2002

(12) United States Patent

Phillips (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 10, (54) TRIPLE CLUTCH MULTI-SPEED (58) Field of Classification Search

Earl Sch yang y Lee, 5,457,342 10/1995 Herbst, II /712

III III III. United States Patent 19 Justice. 11 Patent Number: position. The panels are under tension in their up position

United States Patent (19)

of a quadratic function f(x)=aox+box+co whose con

United States Patent (19) Maloof

(12) (10) Patent No.: US 6,994,308 B1. Wang et al. (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 7, 2006

USOO A United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,900,734 Munson (45) Date of Patent: May 4, 1999

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,695,581 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,668,685 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,603,232 B2. Van Dine et al. (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 5, 2003

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/ A1

(12) United States Patent

United States Patent (19)

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1

US 7, B2. Loughrin et al. Jan. 1, (45) Date of Patent: (10) Patent No.: and/or the driven component. (12) United States Patent (54) (75)

United States Patent (19) Smith

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2008/ A1

(12) United States Patent

(12) United States Patent

21 Appl. No.: 934,807 Abattery dispenser system with detachable dispensing units

NSN. 2%h, WD. United States Patent (19) Vranken 4,829,401. May 9, Patent Number: 45) Date of Patent: 54) ROTATING TRANSFORMER WITH FOIL

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.:

United States Patent 19 Schechter

United States Patent (19) Ochi et al.

Electric motor pump with magnetic coupling and thrust balancing means

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1. Cervantes et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jun. 7, 2007

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,758,066 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2012/ A1

(51) Int. Cl."... B62B 7700

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/ A1

USOO58065OOA United States Patent (19) 11 Patent Number: 5,806,500 Fargo et al. (45) Date of Patent: Sep. 15, 1998

3.s. isit. United States Patent (19) Momotet al. 2 Šg. 11 Patent Number: 4,709,634 (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 1, Zxx (54) (75) (73)

75 Inventors: William H. Robertson, Jr., Plantation; Primary Examiner-Peter S. Wong

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,378,207 B2

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,435,993 B1. Tada (45) Date of Patent: Aug. 20, 2002

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,899,031 B2

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2010/ A1

(12) United States Patent

Damper for Brake Noise Reduction

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,624,044 B2

III IIII. United States Patent 19 Guido. 11 Patent Number: 5,613,418 (45) Date of Patent: Mar 25, (75. Inventor: Heinz Guido, Duisburg, Germany

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,791,205 B2

(12) United States Patent

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2015/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2004/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/ A1

(12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2007/ A1

United States Patent (19)

(12) United States Patent

(12> Ulllted States Patent (16) Patent N6.= US 6,564,602 B2

(12) United States Patent

US 9, B2. Stamps et al. Jul. 11, (45) Date of Patent: (10) Patent No.: (12) United States Patent (54)

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,511,619 B2

Transcription:

United States Patent (19) Yao et al. 54 METHOD OF DESIGNING OPTIMAL BI AXIAL MAGNETIC GEARS AND SYSTEM OF THE SAME 75 Inventors: Yeong-Der Yao, Taipei; Chia-Ming Lee, Taipei Hsien; Shyh-Jier Wang, Hsinchu Hsien; Der-Ray Huang, Hsinchu, all of Taiwan 73 Assignee: Industrial Technology Research Institute, Hsinchu, Taiwan 21 Appl. No.: 08/994,644 22 Filed: Dec. 19, 1997 30 Foreign Application Priority Data Apr. 2, 1997 TW Taiwan... 86.104245 (51) Int. Cl."... G01M 1100 52 U.S. Cl.... 29/407.05; 29/407.09; 74/DIG. 4 58 Field of Search... 29/407.05, 407.09, 29/407.1, 893,893.37; 74/412 R, DIG. 4 56) References Cited 2,548,373 3,085.407 U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 4/1951 Hurvitz... 74/DIG. 4 4/1963 Tomlinson... 74/DIG. 4 US006047456A 11 Patent Number: 6,047,456 (45) Date of Patent: Apr. 11, 2000 3,730,488 5/1973 Gardner, Jr.... 259/67 3,936,683 2/1976 Walker. 4,196,639 4/1980 Spodig... 74/210 4,232,535 11/1980 Caldwell.... 64/28 M 4,850,821 7/1989 Sakai... 417/420 5,013,949 5/1991 Mabe, Jr.... 310/83 5,204,572 4/1993 Ferreira. 5,569,967 10/1996 Rode... 310/103 Primary Examiner David P. Bryant Assistant Examiner Essama Omgba Attorney, Agent, Or Firm-Finnegan, HenderSon, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, L.L.P. 57 ABSTRACT A method for designing an optimal bi-axial type of magnetic gear System that uses magnetic coupling for transmitting torque in order to be free from the defects caused by using a conventional mechanical gear System. A non-coaxial rather than a conventional coaxial type of magnetic gear design is considered for this invention. For the non-coaxial magnetic gear System, the Size of torque will depend on the number of poles magnetized out of the Strong magnetic material around the magnetic gear. Therefore, the optimum number of mag netized poles must be carefully Selected for a set of Specified conditions Such that the largest torque can be obtained. An optimal magnetic gear System can be produced by the method in this invention. 11 Claims, 5 Drawing Sheets

U.S. Patent Apr. 11, 2000 Sheet 1 of 5 6,047.456 FIG. 1

U.S. Patent Apr. 11, 2000 Sheet 2 of 5 6,047.456 EFFECT OF WARYING THICKNESS OF MAGNETIC CONDUCTING MATERALLAYER EXTERNAL RING RADIUS R=100 mm GEAR DISTANCE d=2 mm - A - Y=0mm MAX=58 -- Y=2mm MAX52 -G-Y-6mm MAX-46 MAX=42 O 20 40 60 80 100 NUMBER OF MAGNETIZED POLES FIG 2

U.S. Patent Apr. 11, 2000 Sheet 3 of 5 6,047.456 EFFECT OF WARYING EXTERNAL RING RADIUS OF MAGNETIC GEAR GEAR DISTANCE d=2 mm THICKNESS OF MAGNETIC Y=0 mm CONDUCTING MATERIALLAYER -e- R-200 mm MAX-88 -A R=100 mm MAX=52 A- Rs.20 mm MAX-16 O 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 NUMBER OF MAGNETIZED POLES FIG. 3

U.S. Patent Apr. 11, 2000 Sheet 4 of 5 6,047,456 EFFECT OF WARYING MAGNETIC GEAR DISTANCE EXTERNAL RING RADIUS R-100 mm THICKNESS OF MAGNETIC CONDUCTING MATERIAL LAYER -A- d=2mm MAX=58 -- d=4mm MAX-48 -- d=6mm MAX=40 -e- d=8mm MAX=32 -- d=10mm MAX=24 -e- d=12mm MAX=22 3 m NUMBER OF MAGNETIZED POLES FIG. 4

U.S. Patent Apr. 11, 2000 Sheet 5 of 5 6,047.456 t

1 METHOD OF DESIGNING OPTIMAL B AXIAL MAGNETIC GEARS AND SYSTEM OF THE SAME BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of Invention The present invention relates to a non-axial type of magnetic coupling transmission System. More particularly, the present invention relates to an optimization method for a bi-axial magnetic gear System. 2. Description of Related Art Gravitational force, electric force and magnetic force are three natural forces that can act at a distance. Through recent advances in the Science field, not only has more knowledge been gained about the above physical phenomena, but also use of their characteristic properties has been applied in beneficial technical applications. Considering the use of magnetic forces, related technologies Such as magnetic levitation and magnetic bearings are growing. Many prac tical applications for the magnetic forces are known includ ing magnetically levitated trains, hydrodynamically oper ated machines, and So on. Conventional mechanical gears that are normally used in machines also have a magnetic counterpart in the magnetic gears. (refer to U.S. Pat. No. 3,936,683). There are a number of advantages in using magnetic gears over the conventional mechanical gears. For example, mechanical gears can generate much vibration and noise during operation, whereas magnetic gears Significantly reduce Such vibration and noise. Furthermore, the rotating gears need lubrication and inspection for wear and tear from time to time. Therefore, if the gears can operate in a non-contact fashion, all those problems caused by friction, wear, Vibration and noise disappear. Moreover, Such non contact gears are almost maintenance-free. A magnetic gear System has at least the following advan tages over the conventional mechanical gear System, namely: 1. Non-contact operation: can eliminate problems due to friction and wear, thus resulting in a longer life, easy maintenance, and great reduction of noise and vibra tion. 2. Operation in Special environments: no lubrication is needed; therefore, it can be used in a vacuum, a dust free chamber or an environment filled with uncommon gases. 3. Potential for future development: with advances in electrical and mechanical engineering technologies, the range of applications for magnetic gear System is unlimitedly increasing. Principally, magnetic gears operate through the interac tion of magnetic field Set up between two magnetic gears, and torque is transmitted by their mutual attraction and repulsion due to a magnetic coupling. Most conventional magnetic gear Systems are designed for the coaxial type, because large torque can be transmitted. (e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,204,572 Shows coaxial magnetic rings for load transmission.) An attempt has also been made to replace one of the magnetic rings with an electromagnet in order to attain a higher magnetic coupling. Because the magnetic coupling is achieved by the action of an electromagnet, problems, Such as winding Space and control current, must also be considered. Therefore, this type of magnetic gear design becomes rather complicated. Nevertheless, Since the torque transmitted through a coaxial magnetic gear System is provided by mutual inter 6,047,456 15 25 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 2 actions involving all the magnets in the two magnetic rings, a large torque can be transmitted by the coaxial magnetic System. In a non-coaxial gear System, only a few of the neighboring magnets are involved in the mutual interactions, hence weakening the resulting torque. However, due to directional restrictions of a coaxial type of magnetic gear transmission System, non-coaxial type of magnetic gear transmission System cannot be completely replaced with the coaxial type. Furthermore, the recent advances in the mate rial research have produced a number of powerful magnets, Such as a strong magnetic compound known as neodymium iron boron (NdFeB). Therefore, non-coaxial magnetic gear Systems have practical value. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, the present invention is directed to provide a bi-axial type of magnetic gear System using Strong mag netic material, and a method of finding the optimum number of magnetized poles in a magnetic gear to give the largest possible torque by varying the controlling parameters that affect the Size of the torque. Subsequently, the optimal design is applied to the fabrication of a magnetic gear System. To achieve these and other advantages and in accordance with the purpose of the invention, as embodied and broadly described herein, the invention provides a method for designing an optimal bi-axial type of magnetic gear System, comprising the Steps of providing a non-coaxial magnetic gear System that includes at least two magnetic gears having a hard magnetic material; then, Setting a distance between the magnetic gears and a ratio of an external ring radius of the magnetic gear over the thickness of a hard magnetic material layer, next, casting a magnetic conducting material layer on an internal perimeter of the magnetic gears, thereafter, drawing a Series of magnetized pole number Versus torque curves each having a peak value by varying the thickness of the magnetic conducting material layer; then, optimizing the magnetic gears to obtain the optimal torque by magnetizing the optimal number of magnetic poles on the magnetic gear; and varying a distance between the magnetic gears and a ratio of the external ring radius over the thickness of the hard magnetic material layer Separately, and then repeating the procedures from casting the magnetic conducting material layer to optimizing the magnetic gears to obtain optimal torque as described above. In another aspect, a bi-axial type of magnetic gear System comprises at least two transmission Shafts each Supported by a bearing enclosed within a base plate. At least two magnetic gears having a hard magnetic material Slide into one of the transmission shafts for transmitting torque, and each mag netic gear includes a magnetic ring and a magnetic conduct ing material layer. The magnetic conducting material layer is formed by casting magnetic conducting material into the internal perimeter of the magnetic ring, and is located Spatially between the magnetic ring and the transmission shaft. The magnetic ring is constructed by casting hard magnetic material and then magnetized with an optimum number of magnetic poles to obtain the optimal torque according to an analysis of the factors affecting the torque. It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary, and are intended to provide further explanation of the invention as claimed. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated

3 in and constitute a part of this Specification. The drawings illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, Serve to explain the principles of the inven tion. In the drawings, FIG. 1 is a front view of an bi-axial type of magnetic gear System showing the measurements of various parameters, FIG. 2 is a graph with a Series of torque versus number of thickness of a magnetic conducting material layer under the conditions of t=3 mm, R=100 mm, d=2 mm for a bi-axial magnetic gear System; FIG. 3 is a graph with a series of torque versus number of radius of the external ring of a magnetic gear under the conditions of t=3 mm, Y=0 mm, d=2 mm for a bi-axial magnetic gear System; FIG. 4 is a graph with a Series of torque versus number of gear distance between the magnetic gear under the condi tions of t=3 mm, Y=0 mm, R=100 mm for a bi-axial magnetic gear System; and FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the bi-axial magnetic gear System designed according to the optimization method of this invention. DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Wherever possible, the same reference numbers are used in the draw ings and the description to refer to the same or like parts. FIG. 1 is a frontal view of a bi-axial type of magnetic gear System depicting various parameter dimensions. AS shown in FIG. 1, the parameters that determine the magnitude of torque T in a bi-axial magnetic gear System, in general, include the gear distance d between magnetic gears 10, thickness t of a magnetic material layer 12, thickness Y of a magnetic conducting material layer 14, the number M of magnetized poles (the total number of N and Spoles in a magnetic gear as shown in FIG. 1), an external ring radius R of the magnetic material layer 12 and an internal ring radius r of the magnetic material layer 12. In a System with two magnetic gears 10, each having the Same ratio R/t of external ring radius over the thickness of the magnetic conducting material layer 14, the same thick ness Y of magnetic conducting material layer 14, and the Same number M of magnetized poles. In other words, the torque transmitted between the two gears 10 is defined by the functional relation, T=f(d, Y, M, R/t). FIG. 2 is a graph with a Series of torque versus number of thickness Y of the magnetic conducting material layer 14 under the conditions of t=3 mm, R=100 mm, d=2 mm, that is, T=f(Y, M), for bi-axial magnetic gear System under these conditions. As shown in FIG. 2, for whatever thickness the magnetic conducting material layer 14 may be, a maximum torque per number of magnetized poles may be found for each of the respective curve (T-M curve). Therefore, a magnetic gear System having an optimal torque can be obtained by Selecting the optimal number of magnetized poles. Results from the research show that the optimal number of magnetized pole is preferably found within 20% of the peak torque in each of the T-M curves. Furthermore, the thicknessy of the magnetic conducting material layer 14 6,047,456 15 25 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 4 will also affect the magnitude of the torque. FIG. 2 reveals that as the thickness Y increases, the maximum torque Significantly increases. However, further increases in the thickness Y have a diminishing increase in the maximum torque. Next, using, a similar method as described above, the effects of varying the ratio of the external ring radius R over the thickness t of the magnetic material layer 12 and varying the distance d between the magnetic gears 10, on the value of torque T is investigated as follows: 1. When d and Y=const, T=f(R/t, M). FIG. 3 is a graph with a series of torque versus number of external ring radius R of a magnetic gear under the condi tions of t=3 mm, Y=0 mm, d=2 mm for a bi-axial magnetic gear System. Similarly, a maximum torque is always found in the T-M curve for each value of external ring radius R of the magnetic gear 10. Therefore, for each Selected external ring radius R, a specific number of magnetized poles M that corresponds to a maximum torque T can be found. 2. When R/t and Y=const, T=f(d, M). FIG. 4 is a graph with a Series of torque versus number of gear distance d between the magnetic gear under the con ditions of t=3 mm, Y=0 mm, R=100 mm for a bi-axial magnetic gear System. Similarly, a maximum torque is always found in the T-M curve for each distance of separa tion d between two magnetic gears 10. Therefore, for each distance of Separation d, a specific number of magnetized poles M that corresponds to a maximum torque T can be found. AS a conclusion, the above method can be extended to cover the conditions of having a different external ring radius R and a different number of magnetized poles M for a bi-axial magnetic gear System. Research indicates that when the ratio of thickness Y of the magnetic conducting material layer over the thickness t of the magnetic material layer 12 is controlled within certain limits, preferably between 0.5<Y/t-2.5, an optimized design for torque versus number of magnetized poles can be obtained. FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a bi-axial magnetic gear System designed according to the optimization method of this invention. The magnetic gear system 50 includes two magnetic gears 52 and two transmission shafts 53 along two different axes 54 and 56. Each magnetic gear 52 slides into its respective transmission shaft and torque is transmitted through rotation. Each magnetic gear 52 comprises a mag netic conducting material layer 58 and a magnetic ring 60. The magnetic conducting material layer 58 can be formed, for example, by casting Soft magnetic material with a high magnetic conductance coefficient, Such as pure iron, around an internal perimeter 59 of the magnetic ring 60, such that the magnetic conducting material layer 58 is located between the magnetic ring 60 and the transmission Shaft. The magnetic ring 60 is constructed from a hard magnetic material, for example, a magnetic compound known as neodymium iron boron (NdFeB). The hard magnetic mate rial in the magnetic ring 60 is then magnetized into an even number of magnetic poles 62 optimized for torque through a factor analysis as previously discussed. Four magnetic poles 62 are shown in FIG. 5 as an example. The factors included in the analysis are, for example, the ratio of the external ring radius R of the magnetic gears 52 over the thickness Y of the magnetic ring 60, thickness t of the magnetic conducting material layer 58 and distance d between the magnetic gears 52. In addition, the two trans mission shafts are each Supported by a bearing (not shown

S in the Fig.) and the bearing is in turn enclosed within an aluminum base plate (also not shown in the Fig.). Although spur (gears are shown in the above illustration of how to optimize the magnetic gear System according to the preferred embodiment of this invention, the shape of gears are by no means restricted to the above. Other forms of gears Such as bevel gears, worm gears or helical gears should be included within the scope of this invention. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the Structure of the present invention without departing from the Scope or Spirit of the invention. In view of the foregoing, it is intended that the present invention cover modifications and variations of this invention provided they fall within the scope of the following claims and their equivalents. What is claimed is: 1. A method for designing an optimal bi-axial type of magnetic gears System, comprising the Steps of: (a) providing a non-coaxial magnetic gears System includ ing at least two magnetic gears having a hard magnetic material; (b) setting a distance between the magnetic gears and a ratio of an external ring radius of the magnetic gear over a thickness of the hard magnetic material layer of the magnetic gears, (c) finding a peak value of a torque versus a number of magnetized pole curve for the hard magnetic material used; (d) optimizing the magnetic gears System to obtain an optimal torque by magnetizing an optimal number of magnetic poles on the magnetic gears; and (e) varying the distance between the magnetic gears and the ratio of the external ring radius over the thickness of the hard magnetic material layer Separately, and then repeating the procedures as described in Steps (c) to (e). 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the magnetic gears are Spur gears, bevel gears, Worm gears or helical gears. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the hard magnetic material includes a neodymium iron boron compound. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the optimal number of magnetic poles is found within 20% from the peak value of the torque Versus the number of magnetized pole curves. 6,047,456 15 25 35 40 6 5. A method for designing an optimal bi-axial type of magnetic gears System, comprising the Steps of (a) providing a non-coaxial magnetic gears System includ ing at least two magnetic gears having a hard magnetic material; (b) setting a distance between the magnetic gears and a ratio of an external ring radius of the magnetic gears Over a thickness of a hard magnetic material layer of the magnetic gears, (c) casing a magnetic conducting material layer around an internal perimeter of the magnetic gears, (d) drawing a series of torque versus a number of mag netized pole curves, each having a peak value, by varying the thickness of the magnetic conducting mate rial layer; (e) optimizing the magnetic gears to obtain an optimal torque by magnetizing an optimal number of magnetic poles on the magnetic gears, and (f) varying the distance between the magnetic gears and the ratio of the external ring radius over the thickness of the hard magnetic material layer Separately, and then repeating the procedures as described in Steps (c) to (e). 6. The method of claim 5, wherein the magnetic gears are Spur gears, bevel gears, Worm gears or helical gears. 7. The method of claim 5, wherein the hard magnetic material includes a neodymium iron boron compound. 8. The method of claim 5, wherein a ratio of the thickness of the conducting material layer over the thickness of hard magnetic material layer is controlled within the range of 0.5 and 2.5. 9. The method of claim 5, wherein the conducting mag netic material is a Soft magnetic material with a high magnetic conductance coefficient. 10. The method of claim 9, wherein the soft magnetic material includes pure iron. 11. The method of claim 5, wherein the optimal number of magnetized poles is found within 20% from the peak value of the torque versus the number of magnetized pole CUWCS.

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION PATENT NO.: 6,047456 DATED: April 11, 2000 INVENTOR(S): Yeong-Der Yao, Chia-Ming Lee, Shyh-Jier Wang, Der-Ray Huang It is certified that an error appears in the above-identified patent and that said Letters Patent is hereby corrected as shown below: In Claim 1, col. 5, line 27, "curve" should read-curves--. Signed and Sealed this Twentieth Day of March, 2001 Zaaé, f-34 NICHOLAS P. GOOIC Attesting Officer Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office