Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

Similar documents
Traffic Accident Statistics

1999 Missouri State Highway System. Missouri Department of Transportation - Transportation Management Systems

Crash Contributing Factors 2016

Crash Contributing Factors 2015

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

Collision Analysis Safety Tables

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

Unit 1 - Driving, Mobility and Laws. Chapter 1 - Driving and Mobility

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

REAL-TIME ELECTRONIC SPEED FEEDBACK DISPLAYS EVALUATION:

Over-Dimensional Vehicle Restriction Study for US 129 in TN

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

Understanding and Identifying Crashes on Curves for Safety Improvement Potential in Illinois

ACCIDENT REVIEW FORM

TITLE 16. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 27. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

Plainfield, Indiana Speed Limit Study

2016 Kansas Traffic Crash Facts. Definitions

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. South Fork Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 30N44

Crashes by Unit Contributing Factor

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

Conventional Approach

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

Slow Down! Why speed is important in realizing your Vision Zero goals and how to achieve the speeds you need

Qualitative Assessment US 1 at Old Dixie Highway 1

DRIVER CONTRIBUTING CIRCUMSTANCES

Created by: St. Louis County

Major Contributing Factors

Transportation accomplishments

Table of Contents. Procedures for Locally Establishing Speed Limits. Chapter 30

VEHICLE NO.1- Your Vehicle. Began From. License Plate # (Street, Highway, Mile Marker, Terminal or Other Landmark) Near At VEHICLE NO.2.

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

Denise Marshall Northumberland County

Safety Assessment. Intersection of Route 29 (Seminole Trail) and Ashwood Blvd (Route 1670). Albemarle County

USE RESTRICTED 23 USC 409

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

Alcohol Related Accidents in Mahoning County:

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

a. A written request for speed humps must be submitted by residents living along the applicable street(s) to the Public Works Department.

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE 630/650 SOUTH STREET RETAIL DEVELOPMENT WRENTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Regional Safety Study

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 3rd Street Tunnel at Massachusetts Avenue Exit

Roadway Contributing Factors in Traffic Crashes

Speed Evaluation Saw Mill Drive

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

NCDOT Report on Improving Safety on Secondary Roads

Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment

Traffic Generation November 28, Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

USE RESTRICTED 23 USC 409

APPENDIX A Basis of Design and Design Criteria Memorandum

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description C Planned Suitland Parkway Westbound at Stanton Road Southeast

INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

Engineering Report: Shasta-Trinity National Forest. Shasta McCloud Management Unit. Analysis of. National Forest System Road 37N79

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

Pole Mounted Speed Display Pilot Program Study. January, 2016

Instruction Page for Page 2 of the Accident Report. Discard this sheet after use.

TABLE OF CONTENTS CRASHES.. VI TRENDS. VII

CAR 10-1 TRAFFIC CALMING CAR 10-1 OPR: Engineering 06/06

MULTILANE HIGHWAYS. Highway Capacity Manual 2000 CHAPTER 21 CONTENTS

TRAFFIC IMPACT DATA. Dillons #98 On-Site Relocation

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Geometric Design Elements to Reduce Wrong-Way (WW) Entry at Freeway Interchanges Hugo Zhou, Ph.D., P.E.

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

Traffic Engineering Study

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

Technical Feasibility Report

City of Pacific Grove

1400 MISCELLANEOUS Traffic Engineering Manual

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

USE RESTRICTED 23 USC 409

Course Syllabus. Time Requirements. Course Timeline. Grading Policy. Contact Information Online classroom Instructor: Kyle Boots

Transverse Pavement Markings for Speed Control and Accident Reduction

Study Area and Location District PSA Ward ANC Phase Description A Proposed Monroe Street Northeast Eastbound at Rhode Island Avenue

1200 ZONES AND STUDIES Traffic Engineering Manual

VIADUCT LOCATION STUDY. October 19, 2009

Act 229 Evaluation Report

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida

Traffic Feasibility Study

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

STATE OF NEVADA TRAFFIC ACCIDENT REPORT SCENE INFORMATION SHEET Revised 1/14/04

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

SpeedGuard Radar Speed Reporting System

2016 Community Report Los Alamos County

CHAMPLAIN PARKWAY GRADE CROSSING DIAGNOSTIC MATRIX

2015 Community Report White Rock

Evaluation of Cedar Rapids Automated Traffic Enforcement Report - Primary Highway System

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

2014 Community Report Portales

2014 Community Report Luna County

Current Corridor Characteristics. MN 62 Corridor Performance

Transcription:

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report This report documents the engineering and traffic investigation required by Vermont Statutes Annotated Title 23, Chapter 13 1007 for a municipal legislative body to establish a safe and reasonable speed limit for their local traffic ordinance. Municipality: Town of Ferrisburgh, Addison County, Vermont Road Name (Town Highway ): Old Hollow Rd. (TH 1 / FAS 0198) Study Location Description/ Length: From Mt. Philo Rd. to 400 East of Four Winds Rd. / About 0.6 Miles Long ATR Set up Location: Old Hollow Rd. 0.2 Mile West of Four Winds Rd. (GMPC Pole # 81) Recommended Speed Limit: Present Posted Speed Limit: 30 mph 35 mph Evaluation By: Daryl Benoit, Transportation Planner Final Report Document Date: 25 Oct 2013 (Updated 14 May 2014) 1. 85th Percentile Speed (mph): 41 mph : Eastbound / 41 mph : Westbound 2. 10 mph Pace Speed (mph): 32 41 mph : Eastbound / 62.7% in Pace : 31 40 mph : Westbound / 60.3% in Pace : 3. Average (Mean) Speed (mph): 35 mph : Eastbound / 35 mph : Westbound 4. Speed Limit Range: 31 38 mph 5. Test Car speed (mph): 30 mph 6. Safe speed at curves and intersections: N/A 7. Safety problem related to speed: VTrans Crash Listings document 3 crashes with 2 injuries from 2008 2012 on FAS 0198 between Milemarkers 0.31 & 0.89 (see attached report). 8. Average Annual Daily Traffic (vehicles per day): 1400 AADT / 90 Truck AADT (Sep 2013 count) 9. Class of Roadway: State Class III Town Highway Functional Class (07) Rural Major Collector 10. (a) Road Surface: Asphalt (b) Road Width: 22 0 (11 0 lanes) 11. (b) Shoulder Surface: Grass (b) Shoulder Width: 3 0 Eastbound lane / 3 0 Westbound lane 12. Parking: None 13. Pedestrians/Bicycles: Formal Bicycle Route 14. Adjacent Land Use: Residential, Commercial Investigation Summary: The recommended maximum speed limit of 30 mph is safe and reasonable for both directions due to the roadway geometrics and the residential nature of abutting land use. The 30 mph recommendation is lower than the 85th percentile speed, which is generally preferred in setting speed limits. However, taking into consideration other factors, such as; driveway access density, narrow setbacks of abutting roadside development (see Figure 2), shared pedestrian & vehicle use of the roadway, and crash history, the establishment of a 30 mph speed limit is reasonable. 1 Addison County Regional Planning Commission 802.388.3141 14 Seminary Street 802.388.0038 Middlbury, Vermont 05753 www.acrpc.org

Figures 1 & 2 below are views of the Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR) set up during Sep 2013. 2 Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

Figure 3 indicates the location of ATR set up as well as the approximate milemarker positions within the study area delineating the locations of the 2008 2012 crashes listed at the beginning of this report, and on the VTrans crash summary report (see attached). It should be noted that a traffic calming study of the Old Hollow neighborhood was initiated in 2013 to recommend strategies to lower the traffic speed on Old Hollow Rd. A copy of the report may be viewed at the following link: http://acrpc.org/transportation/ 3 Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

Glossary: 10 mph Pace Speed (or "Pace Speed"): The 10 mph range in which the highest percentage of vehicles are traveling, 85th Percentile Speed: The maximum speed at which 85% of all vehicles are travelling. Annual Average Daily Traffic: A statistical indicator for roadway counts (i.e. traffic volume), known as the 'Annual Average Daily Traffic', or AADT, has been developed to represent the average amount of vehicular traffic in both directions of travel, passing on a given point of road, over a 24 hour period, on a typical day (i.e. seasonally adjusted) of a specified year. ATR (Automatic Traffic Recorder): A pneumatic triggered device utilizing rubber tubes installed upon a roadway to record vehicle counts, classifications, and speed data. ATRs are the tool used to capture Total Vehicle volume (used to calculate AADT), truck & bus data, 85th percentile speed, 10 MPH pace speed, Average speed data, et al. Average Speed: The statistic used to describe the typical (average or mean) value for a group of values that is calculated by dividing the sum of the observed values by the number of observed values. Class of Roadway: State and Federal classification of roadways used to identify the functional purpose and funding levels. More detailed information is available at: http://acrpc.org/road class/ FAS (Federal Aid System): identifying number for roads designated upon the Federal Aid System. Line of Sight (i.e. Sight Distance, Sight Line): The length of unobstructed visibility upon a roadway. Sufficient line of sight allows for enough driver reaction time and vehicle movement to avoid potential collisions. Milemarker (MM): A milemarker (i.e. milepost) is a reflective green paddle sign placed alongside highways indicating total mileage from an original control point. For Interstates, the zero milemarker originates at the southernmost, or the westernmost end of the route. However, for other types of routes, the location of the zero milemarker is placed at each municipal boundary. The Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) manages their milemarkers from South to North, or West to East, depending on the direction of travel of a particular route. Speed Limit Range: The lowest number of 10 mph Pace Speed divided by a higher number. This higher number is the lower value of either; A. The 85 th percentile speed, or B. The highest value of the 10 mph Pace Speed. This higher number is then subtracted from 3. Stopping Sight Distance (SSD): The minimum distance a driver can see ahead in tandem with how long it takes for her/him to stop the vehicle. According to the AASHTO Green Book, this distance is comprised of two components; 1. Perception Reaction Time, which covers the distance a vehicle travels from the moment the driver sees an object necessitating a stop, to the instant the brakes are applied, and 2. Braking Distance, which is the distance a vehicle travels during the braking maneuver. Test Car Speed: A qualitative measure determined by the person conducting the speed limit engineering study by driving the road for a few passes and using their "gut" to determine what "feels" to be a reasonable speed. Traffic Calming: The use of educational programs, enforcement, and engineering to change the behavior of drivers, reduce crash/injury rates, and increase safety. Vermont State Standards (VSS): Formally known as the Vermont State Standard for the Design of Transportation Construction, Reconstruction and Rehabilitation on Freeways, Roads and Streets, VSS were developed during the mid 1990 s to standardize the physical design parameters and guidelines of Vermont bridges and roadways. VSS was initially created for two purposes: 1. To provide clear technical direction to the designers of transportation projects in Vermont, and; 2. To achieve roadway and bridge designs which provide access, mobility and safety for users, and which are also sensitive to the social and environmental context of Vermont. These standards are purportedly under review to be updated in 2015. 4 Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

Appendices: 1. Crash Report Summary: 2008 2012 2. Automatic Traffic Recorder (ATR) reports and data may be downloaded from: http://acrpc.org/trandata/ 5 Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

Page: 1181 Vermont Agency of Transportation Date: 08/07/2013 General Yearly Summaries - Crash Listing: State Highways and All Federal Aid Highway Systems From 01/01/08 To 12/31/12 General Yearly Summaries Information * Reporting Agency/ Town Mile Marker Date MM/DD/YY Time Weather Contributing Circumstances Direction Of Collision Of Injuries Of Fatalities Of Untimely Deaths Direction Road Group Route: FAS 0197 Continued... Monkton 4.15 05/16/2008 09:30 Clear No improper driving Single Vehicle Crash 1 0 0 MC (FAS) 1159 VT0040100/2008-1123 Monkton UNK 01/18/2008 08:16 Snow No improper driving Other - Explain in Narrative 0 0 0 N MC (FAS) Route: FAS 0198 2339 0495 2762 0094 2291 3385 1296 3424 VTVSP0600/12C20 2683 0222 2427 VTVSP0600/12C20 3671 3502 Route: FAS 0199 VT0010100/08BR0 1478 VT0010100/12BR0 1126 VT0010100/09BR0 0418 2153 VT0010100/11BR0 0892 VTVSP0600/10C20 0438 3466 3147 0140 VTVSP0600/10C20 3667 3209 Ferrisburgh 0.01 08/26/2008 16:18 Clear Failure to keep in proper lane Single Vehicle Crash 1 0 0 E MC (FAS) Ferrisburgh 0.06 03/02/2009 14:15 Snow No improper driving, Failed to yield right of way, Driving too fast for conditions No Turns, Thru moves only, Broadside ^< 0 0 0 E MC (FAS) Ferrisburgh 0.31 10/03/2011 13:59 Rain Driving too fast for conditions, Disregarded Single Vehicle Crash 1 0 0 S MC (FAS) traffic signs, signals, road markings Ferrisburgh 0.32 01/12/2011 08:37 Snow Driving too fast for conditions, Disregarded Right Turn and Thru, Same Direction 1 0 0 S MC (FAS) traffic signs, signals, road markings, No Sideswipe/Angle Crash ^^-- improper driving Ferrisburgh 0.89 08/29/2009 23:50 Rain Driving too fast for conditions, Failure to Single Vehicle Crash 0 0 0 E MC (FAS) keep in proper lane Ferrisburgh 1.62 12/28/2009 11:56 Snow Driving too fast for conditions Single Vehicle Crash 0 0 0 W MC (FAS) Monkton 2.74 05/25/2011 18:20 Clear Made an improper turn, No improper driving Left Turn and Thru, Broadside v<-- 0 0 0 MC (FAS) Monkton 2.78 12/31/2009 12:34 Snow No improper driving, Driving too fast for Opp Direction Sideswipe 0 0 0 N MC (FAS) conditions Monkton 3.59 09/01/2012 11:26 Clear Failure to keep in proper lane Single Vehicle Crash 0 0 0 MC (FAS) Monkton 3.86 01/29/2008 14:22 Sleet, Hail (Freezing Failure to keep in proper lane Single Vehicle Crash 1 0 0 MC (FAS) Rain or Drizzle) Monkton 3.88 09/10/2009 14:13 Cloudy Failure to keep in proper lane, Distracted Single Vehicle Crash 0 0 0 N MC (FAS) Monkton 4.08 11/26/2012 18:02 Clear Failure to keep in proper lane, No improper Opp Direction Sideswipe 0 0 0 N MC (FAS) driving Monkton 4.45 12/19/2011 09:50 Cloudy Failure to keep in proper lane Single Vehicle Crash 1 0 0 W MC (FAS) Bristol 0.03 11/08/2008 19:20 Rain Driving too fast for conditions, Operating defective equipment, No improper driving Rear End 1 0 0 N MC (FAS) Bristol 0.05 11/24/2012 17:51 Clear Exceeded authorized speed limit, Single Vehicle Crash 0 1 0 MC (FAS) Inattention Bristol 0.22 04/14/2009 19:24 Clear Distracted, No improper driving Rear End 0 0 0 N MC (FAS) Bristol 0.74 08/09/2008 15:56 Cloudy No improper driving, Failed to yield right of way No Turns, Thru moves only, Broadside ^< 2 0 0 MC (FAS) Bristol 0.74 09/27/2011 21:39 Cloudy Technology Related Distraction, Single Vehicle Crash 0 0 0 E MC (FAS) Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings Bristol 0.75 02/22/2010 22:32 Cloudy Failure to keep in proper lane, Fatigued, Single Vehicle Crash 0 0 0 N MC (FAS) asleep Bristol 1.03 12/23/2008 06:37 Cloudy Failed to yield right of way, Followed too Rear End 1 0 0 N MC (FAS) closely Bristol 1.41 11/15/2011 14:50 Cloudy Failure to keep in proper lane, Fatigued, Single Vehicle Crash 1 0 0 MC (FAS) asleep Bristol 1.5 01/17/2009 04:30 Clear Failure to keep in proper lane, Driving too Single Vehicle Crash 0 0 0 S MC (FAS) fast for conditions Bristol 1.51 12/21/2010 05:41 Cloudy Driving too fast for conditions Single Vehicle Crash 1 0 0 N MC (FAS) Bristol 1.66 12/08/2009 12:33 Cloudy Failure to keep in proper lane Single Vehicle Crash 0 0 0 MC (FAS) *Crash occurred prior to the last Highway Improvement Project. This data should not be used in a crash analysis. UNK indicates the Mile Marker is Unknown.