SPCT Method. The SPCT Method - Testing of Dog Crates. Utskrivet dokument är ostyrt, dvs inte säkert gällande.

Similar documents
Side Impact and Ease of Use Comparison between ISOFIX and LATCH. CLEPA Presentation to GRSP, Informal Document GRSP Geneva, May 2004

Contact person Date Reference Page Mikael Videby P08110A 1 (6) SP Structural and Solid Mechanics

Will the MIM Safe Variocage fit in my vehicle?

SLED TEST PROCEDURE FOR ASSESSING KNEE IMPACT AREAS

Full Width Test ECE-R 94 Evaluation of test data Proposal for injury criteria Way forward

TRL s Child Seat Rating, (TCSR) Front Impact Testing Specification

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Chevrolet Malibu

Methodologies and Examples for Efficient Short and Long Duration Integrated Occupant-Vehicle Crash Simulation

Injury Risk and Seating Position for Fifth-Percentile Female Drivers Crash Tests with 1990 and 1992 Lincoln Town Cars. Michael R. Powell David S.

Finite Element Modeling and Analysis of Crash Safe Composite Lighting Columns, Contact-Impact Problem

Crash test facility simulates frontal, rear-end and side collision with acceleration pulses of up to 65 g and 85 km/h (53 mph)

WHEELCHAIR TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS W/c Tiedown and Occupant Restraint Systems-WTORS

Insert the title of your presentation here. Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Toyota Prius

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Scion xb

JRS Dynamic Rollover Test Toyota Camry

STUDY ON CAR-TO-CAR FRONTAL OFFSET IMPACT WITH VEHICLE COMPATIBILITY

Side impact protection in non-integral CRS First feedback on 440 mm. 52 nd Meeting of the UN Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

Digges 1 INJURIES TO RESTRAINED OCCUPANTS IN FAR-SIDE CRASHES. Kennerly Digges The Automotive Safety Research Institute Charlottesville, Virginia, USA

ISO INTERNATIONAL STANDARD. Wheelchair seating Part 4: Seating systems for use in motor vehicles

Integrated. Safety Handbook. Automotive. Ulrich Seiffert and Mark Gonter. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA INTERNATIONAL.

WP5 - Computational Mechanics B5 - Temporary Vertical Concrete Safety Barrier MAIN REPORT Volume 1 of 1

Analysis of a Frontal Impact of a Formula SAE Vehicle David Rising Jason Kane Nick Vernon Joseph Adkins Dr. Craig Hoff Dr. Janet Brelin-Fornari

Transport Canada. Child Occupant Protection Research. Considerations for Future Regulations. Suzanne Tylko Chief of Crashworthiness Research

Potential Use of Crash Test Data for Crashworthiness Research

JARI Research Activities for Traffic Safety

Proposal for the 09 series of amendments to Regulation No. 17

Occupant Restraint Systems in Frontal Impact

Economic and Social Council

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Folksam bicycle helmets for children test report 2017

Proposal for the 02 series of amendments to Phase 2 of Regulation No. 129 (Enhanced Child Restraint Systems)

FULL FRONTAL COLLISION SAFETY PERFORMANCE TEST PROCEDURE

The all-new Volvo S40

SEAT BELTS AND AIRBAGS. Mercedes-Benz

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.1/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.1/Amend.2

Research on Chest Injury Criteria

ADR Compliance Crash Testing Explained

Virginia Department of Transportation

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION. X-Tension DS. is suitable for all road types: Motorways, country roads, city streets for speed categories up to 110 km/h.

Simulation of Rollover crash events

Study on the Influence of Seat Adjustment on Occupant Head Injury Based on MADYMO

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN CAR COMPATIBILITY PHENOMENA

Evaluation of Event Data Recorder Based on Crash Tests

54 rd Meeting Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems Booster Seat Width Development. 27 th October2015

Attenuating Head Impact with Vehicular (Including Heavy Truck) Interiors

Convertible with unique safety features

FAAC International, Inc.

WP5 - Computational Mechanics B1 (ESP-N2) Barrier Steel N2 MAIN REPORT Volume 2 of 2

DESIGN FOR CRASHWORTHINESS

Wheelchair Transportation Principles I: Biomechanics of Injury

REVIEW OF POTENTIAL TEST PROCEDURES FOR FMVSS NO. 208

Saab 9-3 4D M03-, Saab 9-3 5D M06-, Saab 9-5 5D

Certificate of testing

Small Overlap Frontal Crashworthiness Evaluation Rating Protocol (Version II)

Accident Reconstruction & Vehicle Data Recovery Systems and Uses

Pre impact Braking Influence on the Standard Seat belted and Motorized Seat belted Occupants in Frontal Collisions based on Anthropometric Test Dummy

Proposal for the 02 series of amendments to Phase 2 of Regulation No. 129 (Enhanced Child Restraint Systems)

GTR Rev.1. Note:

Potential Effects of Deceleration Pulse Variations on Injury Measures Computed in Aircraft Seat HIC Analysis Testing

THUMS User Community

ANALYTICAL EVALUATION OF AN ADVANCED INTEGRATED SAFETY SEAT DESIGN IN FRONTAL, REAR, SIDE, AND ROLLOVER CRASHES

EEVC Report to EC DG Enterprise Regarding the Revision of the Frontal and Side Impact Directives January 2000

ADVANCED RESTRAINT SY S STEM (ARS) Y Stephen Summers St NHTSA Ve NHTSA V hi hhicle S Saf t e y t R Resear R h c 1

e-cfr Data is current as of October 31, 2012

Study concerning the loads over driver's chests in car crashes with cars of the same or different generation

White Paper. Compartmentalization and the Motorcoach

Economic and Social Council

Comparison of HVE simulations to NHTSA full-frontal barrier testing: an analysis of 3D and 2D stiffness coefficients in SIMON and EDSMAC4

REPORT NUMBER: 214P-MGA SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 214 DYNAMIC SIDE IMPACT PROTECTION RIGID POLE

TEST REPORT MEDICAL VEHICLES AND THEIR EQUIPMENT TABLE FOR AMBULANCE STRETCHER

The Center for Auto Safety

Sledtest Configuration: Resna WC-4:2012 Vol.19 ISO Customer-No.: - Test no.: U0819SF032 Vehicle: Kimba Neo with MPS Seat Date:

HEAD AND NECK INJURY POTENTIAL IN INVERTED IMPACT TESTS

Evaluation of sealing performance of metal. CRIEPI (Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry)

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

VOLKSWAGEN. Volkswagen Safety Features

Using the Abaqus BioRID-II Dummy to support the development of a Front Seat Structure during rear low speed crashes - Whiplash

This document is a preview generated by EVS

Motorcoach Roof Crush/Rollover Testing. Discussion Paper. March 2009

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards

E/ECE/324/Rev.1/Add.16/Rev.5 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.1/Add.16/Rev.5

Stakeholder Meeting: FMVSS Considerations for Automated Driving Systems

Universal TAU-IIR Redirective, Non-Gating, Crash Cushion

CLIENT PROJECT REPORT

Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware

Crashworthiness Evaluation Offset Barrier Crash Test Protocol (Version III) June 1996

Vehicle Safety Research in TGGS

Correct driving posture

E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.2/Amend.2 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.128/Rev.2/Amend.2

Vehicle LATCH Hardware Evaluation Protocol (Version II) November 2015

Progress of NCAP. Total (42 vehicles) : 31 Passenger cars, 9 RV, 2 Buses. Some of the popular cars sold in Korea. Brake test RV(6) Frontal impact

REPORT NUMBER: 301-CAL SAFETY COMPLIANCE TESTING FOR FMVSS 301 FUEL SYSTEM INTEGRITY REAR IMPACT FORD MOTOR COMPANY 2009 FORD F150 2-DOOR PICKUP

Electrolyte Spillage and Electrical Shock Protection

FIMCAR. Frontal Impact Assessment Approach FIMCAR. frontal impact and compatibility assessment research

Correlation of Occupant Evaluation Index on Vehicle-occupant-guardrail Impact System Guo-sheng ZHANG, Hong-li LIU and Zhi-sheng DONG

Lighter and Safer Cars by Design

Transcription:

Kvalitetsdokument Författare, enhet Mikael Videby Bygg och Mekanik Hållfasthet och konstruktion Utgåva 1 (7) Godkännare 2 The Testing of Dog Crates Application Area... 2 References... 2 1 Test Sample Selection... 2 2 Test Sample... 2 3 Testing... 2 3.1 Frontal Crash Test... 3 3.1.1 Measuring of the Sample Objects... 3 3.1.2 Prepare / Connection of Equipment... 3 3.1.3 Tuning of Speed and Deceleration Pulse... 3 3.1.4 Placing the Test Sample... 3 3.1.5 Photography and Documentation Prior to the Test... 3 3.1.6 Testing and Evaluation... 3 3.1.7 Photography and Documentation of Damage to the Test Sample and Vehicle... 3 3.1.8 Evaluation of the Criteria... 3 3.2 The Testing of a Rear End Collision... 4 3.2.1 Measuring of the Sample Object... 4 3.2.2 Preparation / Connection of Equipment... 4 3.2.3 Tuning of Speed and Deceleration Pulse... 4 3.2.4 Positioning the dummy and test sample... 4 3.2.5 Adjustments of the intrusion barrier... 4 3.2.6 Photography and Documentation Prior to the Test... 4 3.2.7 Testing and Evaluation... 4 3.2.8 Photography and documentation of damage to the test objects and vehicle interior 4 3.2.9 Evaluation of the Criteria... 5 3.3 Drop Test in order to Simulate a Roll Over Shock... 5 3.3.1 Measuring of the sample object... 5 3.3.2 Preparation and Connection of Equipment... 5 3.3.3 Suspension of the test sample in the release mechanism... 5 3.3.4 Measuring of the vertical drop and the adjustment of appropriate angles... 5 3.3.5 Photography and Documentation Prior to the Test... 6 3.3.6 Testing and Evaluation... 6 3.3.7 Photography and documentation of the damages to the test objects... 6 3.3.8 Evaluation of Criteria... 6 4 Calculating Criteria... 6 5 Measurement Uncertainties... 7 6 Reporting... 7 Utskrivet dokument är ostyrt, dvs inte säkert gällande.

2 (7) Application Area The SPCT method refers to testing of pet crates for safety of pets and passengers in a collision with a car. It provides instructions how pet crate safety can be tested as there is no applicable standard. The rear seat strength in a frontal collision is normally tested according to United Nations regulations no. 17 (ECE R17) with wooden blocks. The same frontal impact test is carried out with the dog crate as one of the three stages of the SPCT method. Studies of statistics regarding the number of families with both dogs and children in Sweden have shown that an increasing number of rearend collisions with a dog crate in the cargo area will occur as the use of dog crates continue to grow. (Ny metod för analys av hundburars påverkan på bilars säkerhet, Anders Flogård, MIM Construction AB, 2008 0222). A test of the crate performance and ability to not transfer energy into the back seat in a rear end collision is one of the test elements. The robustness of the crate is also taken into account in the testing methodology to prevent injuries to animals and passengers in all types of collision directions. References [1] ECER17 APPROVAL OF VEHICLES WITH Rev.2, Appendix 9, REGARD TO THE SEATS, THEIR 6 nov. 2009 ANCHORAGES AND ANY HEAD RESTRAINTS [2] ECER44 APPROVAL OF RESTRAINING DEVICES Rev.2, Annex 7 Appendix 2, FOR CHILD OCCUPANTS OF VEHICLES 14 feb. 2011 1 Test Sample Selection Test samples are collected by the manufacturer (Customer). 2 Test Sample Drawings of the test sample shall be submitted along with the test sample. The maximum permissible load for the test sample shall be stated such as 45 kg or 2x35 kg. Fasteners and mounting instructions for the vehicle must accompany the test sample. 3 Testing The testing consists of three parts. A frontal impact test in a car body with the crate located in the cargo area, a barrier collision against the crate and the body simulating a rear end collision and a drop test against a corner of the crate in order to test the robustness of the crate in all types of crash direction.

3 (7) 3.1 Frontal Crash Test The elements included in the frontal crash test is as follows: Measuring of the sample objects Tuning of speed and deceleration pulse Photography and documentation prior to the test Testing and evaluation Photography and documentation of damage to the test objects and vehicle interior Evaluation of the criteria 3.1.1 Measuring of the Sample Objects The test sample is being checked for compliance by submitted drawings. 3.1.2 Prepare / Connection of Equipment Make sure all equipment is calibrated. Check views and operation of highspeed cameras. 3.1.3 Tuning of Speed and Deceleration Pulse The rear part of a prepared Volvo V70N body is mounted on the crash sled. The rear seat backs mounted in the body must have a 60/40 split and have an aluminum frame (20012004). The backs are positioned in the comfort mode. The speed of the sled and the deceleration pulse simulates a front collision taken from the ECE R17 [2]. 3.1.4 Placing the Test Sample The dog crate should be placed in the luggage compartment in accordance to the manufacturer's instructions (Figure 1, Appendix 1). If the test object consists of a separate area it requires a 45 kg payload and if the test object consisting of two separate areas it requires two payloads of 35 kg each. If permissible load is reduced by the manufacturer that same load should be used during testing. 3.1.5 Photography and Documentation Prior to the Test The positioning of the test sample is photographed and documented. 3.1.6 Testing and Evaluation The crash test is performed by accelerating the crash sled with the body to a speed of 4850 km / h and then slow down the unit by means of a hard braking of 2028 g simulating the crash. Deceleration is measured by an accelerometer mounted on the crash sled. Deceleration graph is analyzed after the test. 3.1.7 Photography and Documentation of Damage to the Test Sample and Vehicle Damage to the test sample, the boot floor and seat backs are photographed and documented after the test. 3.1.8 Evaluation of the Criteria The criteria for the frontal crash test is based on the following: Risk of falling out of the test sample during and after the crash? Sharp edges after the crash. Can the dog be severely damaged by resulting sharp edges if the car rolls over several times? Can the test sample be opened and evacuated after the test without the need of tools and/or excessive force. Does the test object have an evacuation hatch. A hatch that can be used if the regular door can t be opened or accessed after an accident.

4 (7) 3.2 The Testing of a Rear End Collision The elements included in the rear end collision test is as follows: Measuring of the sample object Preparation / connection of equipment Tuning of speed and deceleration pulse Placement of dummy and test sample Adjustments of the intrusion barrier Photography and documentation prior to the test Testing and evaluation Photography and documentation of damage to the test objects and vehicle interior Evaluation of the criteria 3.2.1 Measuring of the Sample Object The test sample is being checked for compliance by submitted drawings. 3.2.2 Preparation / Connection of Equipment Make sure all equipment is calibrated. Check that the correct measurement range is set for dummy accelerometers. Check views and function of highspeed cameras. 3.2.3 Tuning of Speed and Deceleration Pulse The rear part of a prepared Volvo V70N body is mounted on the crash sled. The rear seat backs mounted in the body must have a 60/40 split and have an aluminum frame (20012004). The backs are positioned in the comfort mode. The speed of the sled and the deceleration pulse simulates a rear end collision taken from the ECE R44 [2]. 3.2.4 Positioning the dummy and test sample A Hybrid III 50 percentile crash test dummy is placed in the left rear seat (position 4 in accordance with ISO encoding). The Dummy shall be equipped with a threeaxial accelerometer in the head and a single axial accelerometer at the height of the upper thoracic vertebrae, T1 (Figure 4, Appendix 1). The dog crate should be placed in the luggage compartment in accordance to the manufacturer's instructions (Figure 1, Appendix 1). If the test object consists of a separate area it requires a 45 kg payload and if the test object consisting of two separate areas it requires two payloads of 35 kg each. If permissible load is reduced by the manufacturer that same load should be used. 3.2.5 Adjustments of the intrusion barrier The intrusion barrier is adjusted so that a minimum of clearance against cargo area floor is achieved. The deformation of the test object shall begin at about 100 mm of travel after the crash sled deceleration start (Figure 3, Appendix 1). 3.2.6 Photography and Documentation Prior to the Test The positioning of the crash test dummy and the test object is photographed and documented. 3.2.7 Testing and Evaluation The crash test is performed by accelerating the crash sled with the body to a speed of 3032 km / h and then slow down the unit by means of a braking of 1421 g. Deceleration is measured by an accelerometer mounted on the crash sled. Deceleration graph is analyzed after the test. 3.2.8 Photography and documentation of damage to the test objects and vehicle interior Damage to the test sample, cargo area floor and seat backs are photographed and documented. The upholstery on the seat backs must be removed prior to shooting.

5 (7) 3.2.9 Evaluation of the Criteria The criteria for tests of rear end collisions are given by: Head 3 ms acceleration and HIC 36. Acceleration data from the three axial accelerometer in the dummy head should be filtered using a CFC 1000 filter. The HIC 36 and the maximum acceleration during the main 3 milliseconds, multiple peaks, is calculated. T1 acceleration. The acceleration of the dummy upper thoracic vertebra is filtered using CFC 180 and the highest value is noted. Horizontal deformation of the seat back. The deformation of the seat back measured over the entire seat back flat part, with a reference steel scale or similar positioned towards the top and bottom of the seat back (Figure 5 and 6, Appendix 1). Penetration depth of the seat back. Isolated holes or deformations from penetrating parts are measured in depth compared to the back flat part (Figure 7, Appendix 1). Risk of falling out of the test object during and after the crash? Sharp edges after the test. Can the dog be severely injured by resulting sharp edges if the car rolls over several times? Can the test sample be opened and evacuated after the test without the need of tools and/or excessive force. Does the test object have an evacuation hatch. An hatch that can be used if the regular door can t be opened or accessed after an accident. 3.3 Drop Test in order to Simulate a Roll Over Shock The elements included in the drop test: Measuring of the sample object Preparation / connection of equipment Suspension of the test sample in the release mechanism Measuring of vertical drop and the adjustment of appropriate angle Photography and documentation prior to the test Testing and evaluation Photography and documentation of damage to the test objects and vehicle interior Evaluation of the criteria 3.3.1 Measuring of the sample object The test sample is being checked for compliance by submitted drawings. 3.3.2 Preparation and Connection of Equipment Make sure all equipment is calibrated. If the test should be recorded with a digital video recorder, check the view and the operation of the camera. 3.3.3 Suspension of the test sample in the release mechanism A release mechanism that is not likely to affect the subject is being positioned above a rigid fall plate. The test sample is attached with straps to the release mechanism (Figure 8, Appendix 1). 3.3.4 Measuring of the vertical drop and the adjustment of appropriate angles The test object's weakest corner shall be exposed to the drop test and this point is to be generated by an engineering assessment. The test object's position is adjusted with straps and rotated around the vehicle's intended longitudinal axis 45 and then rotates around the vehicle transverse axis 15 (Figure 8, Appendix 1). The drop height for the subject's lowest point is adjusted to 70 cm above the rigid fall plate.

6 (7) If the test object consists of a separate area it requires a 45 kg payload and if the test object consisting of two separate areas it requires two payloads of 35 kg each. If permissible load is reduced by the manufacturer that same load should be used. 3.3.5 Photography and Documentation Prior to the Test The positioning of the test sample is photographed and documented. 3.3.6 Testing and Evaluation The test object is released with the help of the release mechanism into the fall plate. The fall velocity is calculated to be around 3.7 m / s at the impact with the floor. The test can be recorded with a digital video recorder upon request to facilitate further analysis. 3.3.7 Photography and documentation of the damages to the test objects Damage to the test sample is photographed and documented. 3.3.8 Evaluation of Criteria The criteria for the simulation of the rollover shock based on the following: Risk of falling out of the test sample during and after the crash? Sharp edges after the crash. Can the dog be severely damaged by resulting sharp edges if the car rolls over several times? Can the test sample be opened and evacuated after the test without the need of tools and/or violence. Does the test object have an evacuation hatch. A hatch that can be used if the regular door can t be opened or accessed after an accident. 4 Calculating Criteria The overall test results from the three test phases are added together to form green, yellow or red results in Table 1 below. Description of the criteria contained in Chapter 3.1.8, 3.2.9 and 3.3.8 above. Tabell 1 Test Criteria The risk of falling out of the test sample during and after the test All test Sharp edges after the test elements Test sample openable and evacuation able after the test without tools / violence Accessible evacuation hatch Head 3 ms acc HIC 36 Rear T1acc End Collision Horizontal deformation of seat back Depth of penetration into seat back Green Yellow Red No Yes No Yes Yes No Yes No < 70 g 7080 g > 80 g < 400 400500 > 500 < 70 g 7080 g > 80 g < 50 mm > 50 mm < 15 mm > 15 mm In order to get a Green result when tested it is required that the entire column "Green" is observed. If the test object has no evacuation hatch the result may never be green. If any of the criteria is yellow (and no red), the complete test result is Yellow. If any of the criteria is red, the complete test result is Red.

5 7 (7) Measurement Uncertainties SP works consistently with relative measurement uncertainties, ie. uncertainties are given in percent of displayed or estimated value. To facilitate the reporting process, we specify to the maximum extent possible the same measurement uncertainty for different tests. To achieve this, all instruments is checked for their detailed contributions to the overall measurement uncertainty. Measurement uncertainty for the frontal crash test and rear end collision test will be determined according to the derivation of the measurement uncertainty of crash testing, and dimensional analysis (length). Measurement uncertainty for the drop test is determined according to the derivation of the uncertainty of the test case. 6 Reporting A report completed in accordance with SP's general writing rules shall also include: A summary of test result Graphs showing the acceleration of the head and neck Deformations measured in the backrests and photographs of these A description of the cage condition after each of the three test phases Graph showing the corridors of the acceleration pulse to ECE R44 and ECE R17 Result matrix with maximum reference values Measurement of uncertainty and how it is calculated An overall drawing from drawing documentation for the test sample

1 (4) Appendix 1 Figure 1, Set up Frontal Crash Test Bild 2, Set up Rear End Collision

2 (4) Appendix 1 Figure 3, The crash barrier position when the crash bars starts deforming (braking) Figure 4, Location of the T1 accelerometer in the dummy

3 (4) Appendix 1 Figure 5, Measuring the horizontal deformation of the seat back Figure 6, Measuring the horizontal deformation of the seat back

4 (4) Appendix 1 Figure 7, Penetration holes after the rear end test Figure 8, Angle adjustment of the test objects before the drop test