VIADUCT LOCATION STUDY. October 19, 2009

Similar documents
STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report

US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting

San Rafael Transit Center. Update. Golden Gate Bridge, Highway & Transportation District Transportation Committee of the Board of Directors

METRO Light Rail Update

WELCOME PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE FOR US-64 FROM THE SH-18 INTERSECTION EAST 6.5 MILES JANUARY 10TH, 2017 PAWNEE CITY HALL, 5:30 PM

Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan

Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

IH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

Ravenswood Avenue Railroad Crossing Project City Council Meeting Study Session April 4, Ravenswood Avenue Railroad Crossing Project

Highway 23 New London Access & Safety Assessment. Public Open House #2 October 3, :00 to 7:00 PM

VIRGINIA RAILWAY EXPRESS MANASSAS PARK STATION PARKING EXPANSION. Site Evaluation & Recommendation. October 18, 2016

Over-Dimensional Vehicle Restriction Study for US 129 in TN

Open House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

South Lexington Transportation Study Lexington, Massachusetts

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

Extending TRACKS. Preliminary design plan review underway. Public comment and approval process in May & June. Municipal Consent Process

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Rocky Mount. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

appendix 4: Parking Management Study, Phase II

Purpose and Need Report

August 2, 2010 Public Meeting

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Citizens Committee for Facilities

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Harlem Avenue between 63 rd and 65 th

Introduction and Background Study Purpose

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

Welcome. Public Open House Schedule. Super 8 West Kelowna 1655 Westgate Rd, West Kelowna. West Kelowna. Wednesday, March 2, :00 p.m. 8:00 p.m.

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study

Exhibit A Sound Transit Board Resolution R Selecting the bicycle, pedestrian, and parking access improvements to be built for the Puyallup

COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS. for MILTON SQUARE

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

2017 MAX Program. Red & Blue Line Platform Extension. John Rhone Vice President, Capital Design & Construction June 22, 2017

LCPS Valley Service Center

Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions

Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report

Railroad Impact Study

Pace Bus Depot Location Analysis

METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options

Rolling Road (Route 638) Widening Project

RAILYARDS SUPPORT A VARIETY OF OPERATIONS INCLUDING: LOCOMOTIVES, ON-ROAD AND OFF-ROAD TRUCKS, CARGO-HANDLING EQUIPMENT, TRANSPORTATION

CROSSING RAIL PROJECT (P4) RAIL

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

This corridor section will carry commuter trains from Portland to Longview/Kelso, CHSR inter-city and inter-city express trains.

Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017

Railyard Alternatives & I-280 Boulevard Feasibility Study 1 RAILYARD ALTERNATIVES & I-280 BOULEVARD (RAB) FEASIBILITY STUDY

New Buck O Neil (U. S. 169) Crossing Benefit-Cost Analysis. Kansas City, Missouri

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS

NEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL #1 Open BLPC Meeting January 9, 2013

FRESNO COUNTY SUBSECTION OF THE CALIFORNIA HIGH- SPEED TRAIN (HST)

Welcome The City has undertaken a naming exercise for the existing and future LRT lines. The SE to West LRT, as the project has been called to date,

6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Safety Evaluation of Restricted Crossing U-Turn (RCUT or J-Turn) Projects in Louisiana

Preliminary 2014 Ontario Road Safety Annual Report Selected Statistics

Existing Conditions Belmont Circle Bourne, MA. Belmont Circle Improvements

Puyallup Station Access Improvements Project

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE

10/4/2016. October 6, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

City of Pacific Grove

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPLICATION MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOURTH STREET NEAR BEDFORD HIGHWAY SUBMITTED BY: LYDON LYNCH ARCHITECTS

Western ND Meeting. February 19, 2014 Grant Levi, NDDOT Director

Business Advisory Committee. July 7, 2015

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

Welcome. Green Line in Your Community

YELM HWY AND MERIDIAN RD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT CONTEXT

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

Wentzville Parkway South Phase 2 & 2A

Restoration of Historic Streetcar Services in Downtown Los Angeles

MBTA Key Bus Route. Community Meeting Route 1 - Boston

Middle Georgia Transportation Executive Committee. September 27, 2017

Committee Report. Transportation Committee. Business Item No

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

Memorandum. To: Sue Polka, City Engineer, City of Arden Hills. From: Sean Delmore, PE, PTOE. Date: June 21, 2017

Federal Way Link Extension

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

Access Management Standards

Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Central Park Drives Traffic Management Overview

Transcription:

VIADUCT LOCATION STUDY October 19, 2009

Background Information Traffic Study Alternative Evaluation Public Involvement Preferred Concept Next Steps

Evaluate alternatives for the location of a viaduct to serve central and eastern Waverly spanning U.S. Highway 6 and the BNSF Railway

N. 148 th St. N. 162nd St. N. 141st St. Waverly Rd. Oldfield St. Legend Bluff Road Study Area Waverly High School Waverly Middle School Waverly Intermediate School Waverly (Hamlow) Elem. School Amberly Road

North

Conduct Grade Separation Study A minimum exposure factor of 50,000 for a single crossing shall be required for identification as a potential location. (Exposure factor = # trains/day x # cars/day) A new grade separation project will require closing a minimum of two public at-grade crossings.

Train Data Vehicle Data Accident History Nearby Development Adjacent RR crossings Sight Distance School Locations/Bus Routes Hospital Locations Fire Station Locations Project Location Cost-Benefit Analysis Pedestrian Traffic Right-of-Way/Relocation Impact on Community Local Support & Funding Railroad Support & Funding

Existing Traffic Pedestrians Operations Safety Train Volumes Exposure Factors Alternatives / Impacts Future Growth Scenarios Development Impacts Schools & Bus Routes Emergency Vehicles

Data Collection Counts Field Review Analysis Operations Crash History Exposure Factors Trains vs. Vehicles Traffic Modeling Current Land Use Travel Patterns

Crossing Location Crash Data 141st Street and BNSF Crossing 2 Train / Vehicle Crashes: PDO 148th Street and BNSF Crossing 1 Train / Vehicle Crash: PDO 162nd Street and BNSF Crossing 3 Train / Vehicle Crashes: 1 PDO, 1 injury, 1 fatality Intersection Crash Data Intersection Angle Rear-End Same Sideswipe Opposite Other Total US 6 & Amberly Rd 12 1 2 0 3 18 US 6 & N 141st St 5 2 1 1 1 10 US 6 & N 148th St 3 2 2 0 5 12 US 6 & N 140th St 5 4 1 0 0 10

120 Yearly train counts through Waverly, NE (2009-2034 growth, using 2008 as base and increasing 2.43% per year) 110 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Average day 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Peak day 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034

Exposure Factor Calculations Exposure Factor Calculations - Exposure Factor of 50,000 Warrants a Viaduct - Existing Factor is More Than 5 Times Greater

Average Train Delay at Crossings = 2:45

Ability to eliminate crossing hazard and improve safety Cost Connectivity to existing/future roadway network Impact to private property, including access Public support Ability to accommodate truck and farm machinery traffic Environmental impacts Utility impacts Benefits (how much traffic is served)

N. 162nd St. N. 141st St. Jamestown St. Heywood St.

Concept #1: Viaduct at 148 th Street (Alternate 1) Estimated construction cost: $ 8.2 Million Grade-separated pedestrian crossing at 141 st Street: $2.3 Million Projected traffic: 4,400 vehicles per day Reasons for Consideration Relative close proximity to downtown Reduces area required for right-of-way acquisition Accommodates largest volume of traffic, including truck traffic Sidewalk/trail along this alignment would best accommodate future residential development and present school locations Continuity to existing road network Disadvantages Impacts to Millard Lumber employee parking Impacts to agricultural property Lengthy access/frontage roads required

Concept #2: Viaduct at 148 th Street (Alternate 2) Estimated construction cost: $8.4 Million Grade-separated pedestrian crossing at 141st Street: $2.3 Million Projected traffic: 4,400 vehicles per day Reasons for Consideration Relative close proximity to downtown Reduces area required for right-of-way acquisition Accommodates largest volume of traffic, including truck traffic Sidewalk/trail along this alignment would best accommodate future residential development and present school locations Continuity to existing road network More direct connection to US-6 Disadvantages Impacts to future development west of 148th Street Impacts to agricultural property Impacts to commercial property

Concept #3A: Viaduct at 148 th Street (Alternate 3A) Estimated construction cost: $7.7 Million Grade-separated pedestrian crossing at 141 st Street: $2.3 Million Projected traffic: 4,300 vehicles per day Reasons for Consideration Relative close proximity to downtown Reduces area required for right-of-way acquisition Accommodates largest volume of traffic, including truck traffic Sidewalk/trail along this alignment would best accommodate future residential development and present school locations Existing 148 th Street is maintained as the primary alignment including connection to Highway 6 Continuity to existing road network Disadvantages Impacts to future development west of 148 th Street Impacts to agricultural property

Concept #3B: Viaduct at 148 th Street (Alternate 3B) Estimated construction cost: $10.0 Million Grade-separated pedestrian crossing at 141 st Street: $2.3 Million Projected traffic: 4,300 vehicles per day Reasons for Consideration Relative close proximity to downtown Access to downtown Reduces area required for right-of-way acquisition Accommodates largest volume of traffic, including truck traffic Sidewalk/trail along this alignment would best accommodate future residential development and present school locations Existing 148 th Street is maintained as the primary alignment including connection to Highway 6 Continuity to existing road network Disadvantages Impacts to future commercial development Impacts to commercial property Impacts to agricultural property

Concept #4: Viaduct at 152nd Street (Eliminated) Estimated construction cost: $7.4 Million Grade-separated pedestrian crossing at 141 st Street: $2.3 Million Projected traffic: 2,900 vehicles per day Reasons for Elimination Distance from central Waverly: Increased vehicle travel distance/times Too remote to provide pedestrian access across BNSF Railway and U.S. Highway 6 Increased emergency response times Lower traffic utilization No direct access to downtown Property impacts Reasons for Initial Consideration Provided an alternate viaduct location to 148th Street Viaduct constructed near eastern edge of future land use plan

Concept #5: Viaduct at 162 nd Street (Eliminated) Estimated construction cost: $5.0 Million Grade-separated pedestrian crossing at 141 st Street: $2.3 Million Projected traffic: 300 vehicles per day Reasons for Elimination Distance from central Waverly: Increased vehicle travel distance/times Too remote to provide pedestrian access across BNSF Railway and U.S. Highway 6 Increased emergency response times Lowest traffic utilization No direct access to downtown Reasons for Initial Consideration Lower construction cost Fewer property impacts Better accommodate future growth in far eastern reaches of future city limits

Concept #6: Viaduct at 141 st Street (Eliminated) Estimated construction cost: $7.0 Million Grade-separated pedestrian crossing at 148th Street: $2.3 Million Projected traffic: 5,800 vehicles per day Reasons for Elimination Property impacts: Home relocations Residential and commercial driveway and access closures/reconfiguration Retaining wall in close proximity to homes Intersecting street closures necessary Increased traffic volumes on residential streets Difficult turning movements for viaduct truck traffic Does not accommodate farm machinery Reasons for Initial Consideration Provides direct access to north and south of U.S. Highway 6 near center of Waverly Along same alignment as existing 141st Street

Concept #7: Underpass at 141 st Street (Eliminated) Estimated construction cost: Not Calculated For This Concept Grade-separated pedestrian crossing at 148th Street: $2.3 M Projected traffic: 5,800 vehicles per day Reasons for Elimination Property impacts: Residential and commercial driveway and access closures/reconfiguration Retaining wall in close proximity to homes Increased traffic volumes on residential streets Difficult turning movements for viaduct truck traffic Does not meet Nebraska Minimum Design Standards- steep grades Does not accommodate farm machinery Long term maintenance and operational costs Reasons for Initial Consideration Provides direct access to north and south of U.S. Highway 6 near center of Waverly Along same alignment as existing 141st Street

Public Meetings (2) June 24, 2008 September 9, 2008 One-on-one / stakeholder meetings (9)

Public Meeting #1 36 comments received 20 residents 13 business owners 3 unknown 7 support 19 oppose 4 support & oppose 6 undecided

Reasons for supporting the project Safety concerns with existing crossings Existing vehicle delays at crossings Existing train horn noise Reasons for opposing the project Concern for closing 141 st Street crossing Division of town Loss of business Increased travel times/distances

Public Meeting #2 Comments Received Concern for closing 141 st Street crossing Increased travel times Impacts to businesses Any new structure must accommodate farm machinery Any new structure must accommodate pedestrians Provide direct access to U.S. Hwy 6 Provide direct access to downtown Waverly Noise

Hybrid of Concepts 2 & 4 Most direct connection to Hwy 6 Most direct connection to downtown Decreased travel times Best responds to public comments

ITEM Viaduct/Roadway Construction COST 148 th Street Viaduct 141 st Pedestrian Overpass $9,150,000 $2,300,000 Utilities $200,600 $0 Right-of-Way $266,000 $50,000 Design Engineering & Environmental Review $1,153,990 $282,000 Construction Engineering $961,660 $235,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST $11,732,250 $2,867,000 Combined: $14,599,250 Federal 80% Railroad 5% State (TMT) 10% Local 5%

Public Comment Council vote on approving report recommendations If/when moved to design/construction NDOR Study Review/Approval Preliminary Design Environmental Documentation and Federal Approval Funding Approval Right-of-Way Acquisitions Final Design Construction