Options for Scenario Five Mileage Fee (DMV Collection)

Similar documents
The Oregon Mileage Fee Concept and Road User Fee Pilot Program

Oregon s Mileage Fee Concept and Road User Fee Pilot Program

2010 Symposium on Mileage-Based User Fees: Moving Forward MOVING TO A VMT-FEE SYSTEM: TRANSITION CONSIDERATIONS. U n i v ersi ty o f Minnesota

New Vision for Vehicle Road Usage Charges in Oregon

WASHINGTON STATE ROAD USAGE CHARGE ASSESSMENT

Are Direct User Fees the Key? Oregon s Per-Mile Road Usage Charge Program

State Tolling Authority adopts all state Highway and bridge tolls sets fares for Washington State Ferries

Oregon s Road Usage Charge Program

WASHINGTON STATE ROAD USAGE CHARGE ASSESSMENT. Reema Griffith Executive Director Washington State Transportation Commission

Utah Road Usage Charge Program

The Status of Transportation Funding, Road Charge and Vehicle Miles Traveled in California

Washington State Road Usage Charge Assessment

Philip Schaffner & Jason Junge Minnesota Department of Transportation

VEHICLE TOLLING & MANAGEMENT. By: Julian Holtzman, Dan Moser, and Whitney Schroeder

Georgia Department of Revenue Policy Bulletin - MVD HB 170 Transportation Funding Act of 2015

Electric Vehicles and State Funds

Oregon s Road Usage Charge Program

2018 CLEAN AIR GRANTS ON-ROAD VEHICLE PROGRAM

Future Funding The sustainability of current transport revenue tools model and report November 2014

GAS TAX GETTING OUT OF GAS? WASHINGTON STATE ROAD USAGE CHARGE Pilot Project. Paul Parker Deputy Director Washington State Transportation Commission

mileage fees primer vmt fees are in your future

Area-Wide Road Pricing Research in Minnesota

Clean Taxicab Initiative Code Amendment to Provide an Extended Age Limit for Low Emission Taxicabs

The Future is Bright! So how do we get there? Council of State Governments West Annual Meeting August 18, 2017

Commuter Vanpool Program Scope of Work

Emergency Vehicle Application Package

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

Department of Legislative Services

Section 02: Vehicle Registration and Licensing. Minnesota Trucking Regulations

Mileage Fees. What has been done? What is happening now? What do you need to know?

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 1008

Collection of Mercury Switches and Mercury Switch Assemblies from Vehicles

Minnesota Mileage-Based User Fee Test Results. Ray Starr Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Minnesota Department of Transportation

Colorado Legislative Council Staff Fiscal Note STATE REVISED FISCAL IMPACT (replaces fiscal note dated March 21, 2013)

Joey Nunn Corporate Government Manager, Southeast US Ken Germano Director of Fleet Management, SC Bryan Jolliff Finance Manager, SC

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

Vehicle and Equipment Services (4760P)

Red Light Camera Frequently Asked Questions

MOTION NO. M Purchase of Thirty-two Double Deck Buses for Increased Passenger Capacity, Bus Replacement and Service Expansion

Your Driving Costs. How much are you really paying to drive? Behind the Numbers

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

Section 02: Vehicle Registration and Licensing. Minnesota Trucking Regulations

SEPULVEDA PASS CORRIDOR

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 2704 SUMMARY

HydroGenerations PROGRAM HANDBOOK

VOUCHER INCENTIVE PROGRAM Application Package

VOUCHER INCENTIVE PROGRAM Application Package

This notice provides rules claimants must follow to make a one-time claim for

Fueling Savings: Higher Fuel Economy Standards Result In Big Savings for Consumers

Oregon Withholding Tax Tables

Page 1 of 10. Motor Pool Policies & Procedures

Innovative, Sustainable Funding Options for State DOTs

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED SEPTEMBER 12, 2016

Joint Legislative Program Evaluation Oversight Committee March 14, 2012

Andrew Lee, House Fiscal 1 of 12 4/1/ :36 PM

2. General Information on Recharge Centers

Agenda AARTO Overview AARTO Process AARTO Implementation e-toll Overview e-toll Process e-toll Discount Structure e-toll Implementation Closure and qu

Driving Under the Influence House Sub. for SB 6

VOUCHER INCENTIVE PROGRAM. Application Package

Collection of Mercury Switches and Mercury Switch Assemblies from Vehicles

6 Things to Consider when Selecting a Weigh Station Bypass System

2017 Colorado Phase 2 Regulatory Rate Review Frequently asked questions

DMV Certified Dealer Education since gotplates. Copyright TriStar Motors LLC

MAINE LEMON LAW SUMMARY

MassDOT Highway ROW Solar PV Energy Program. Hongyan (Lily) Oliver Massachusetts Department of Transportation Office of Transportation Planning

Revenue Estimating Conference Revenues to State Transportation Trust Fund Forecast. August 3, 2018

NAT GAS Acts S 1408 vs. HR 1835 Side by Side

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

OPTION I. Pay the Fine

Minnesota Highway Cost Allocation Study

ROAD CHARGE AND THE FUTURE OF TRANSPORTATION. Jim Madaffer Commissioner California Transportation Commission September 30, 2015

Bella Vista Bypass Benefit Cost Analysis

Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. House Bill 3157

Road Tolls and Road Pricing Innovative Methods to Charge for the Use of Road Systems

Heber Light & Power Electric Service Rule No. 14 NET METERING SERVICE

MEMORANDUM. PH-1c 09/22/16. Agenda Item: Meeting Date: Financial: City Commission TO: THROUGH: Douglas Hutchens, Interim City Manag9

Paid Parking at Park & Ride Lots: Framing the Issues. Capital Programs Committee May 2014

Page Number Schedule Rate Class Description 1 R

BOROUGH OF FOX CHAPEL 2018 BUDGET GENERAL FUND

2013 Capital Budget Capital Improvement Program

Plug-In Electric Vehicle (PEV) High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lane Exemption

Parking Management Strategies

The USDOT Congestion Pricing Program: A New Era for Congestion Management

DMV/STUDY STREAMLINING IFTA AND IRP PROCESSES DMV STUDY STREAMLINING IFTA AND IRP PROCESSES

TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE RULES. This transmittal memorandum contains changes to Department of Revenue Rules.

Benefit Cost Analysis

220 CMR : RATES FOR THE TOWING OF MOTOR VEHICLES

Village of Lombard Automated Red Light Enforcement Program. OPTION I. Pay the Fine

The Evans Network of Companies. Northeast Drayage Workshop Boston, MA October 13, 2010

State Zero-Emission Vehicle Programs Memorandum of Understanding

Transportation Funding Overview

The Vehicle Sticker Proposal March 5, Chicago s City Sticker Model. The purpose of this report:

Parking Utility Function: Public Works & Transportation

CITY OF HAMILTON BY-LAW NO

Treasure Island Mobility Management Program

Department of Motor Vehicles. Vehicle Registration Withholding Program

MEMORANDUM. Proposed Town of Chapel Hill Green Fleets Policy

TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER EL PASO

Policy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.

Transcription:

Options for Scenario Five Mileage Fee (DMV Collection) Mileage data is uploaded to Department of Motor Vehicles locations for fee calculation and payment as a condition of registering passenger vehicles. User receives credit for gas tax paid. a. Data Collection and Fee Retrieval Staff Conception Paid at DMV Locations (Actual VMT with Estimated Gas Tax Credit). The mileage fee would be paid at DMV locations by application of the fee rate to actual VMT data collected at the DMV locations. DMV would forward fees to Highway Fund. b. Data Collection Technology Task Force Preference Electronic Odometer (either GPS or Odometer Tag). The task force prefers a policy that encourages or mandates installation of technology that facilitates electronic collection of VMT data for purposes of straight application of a fee amount per mile. In this respect, the task force chose an electronic odometer in the form of either a simple Global Positioning System (GPS) or an Odometer Tag, depending upon cost and the interoperability of these technologies with other elements of the preferred mileage fee system. (Note: This option is research dependent.) c. Data Upload Technology Staff Conception Radio Frequency Upload at DMV Station. Vehicle VMT data would be uploaded to DMV locations from an electronic odometer (either GPS or Odometer Tag) via radio frequency. (Note: This option is research dependent.) d. Phasing Into Current Oregon Road Finance System (Credit for Gas Tax Paid by Mileage Fee Payers). Staff Recommendation Credit for Estimated Gas Taxes Paid. Passenger vehicle owners who pay a mileage fee would receive a credit for estimated gas taxes paid for the same period. The credit for estimated gas tax paid would be determined as a function of the vehicle miles traveled for the period, the gas tax rate and the EPA fuel efficiency rating for the vehicle. The amount of the credit would be S - 1

limited to the amount of the mileage fee assessed. [Alert: Raises New Revenue] This option has two sub-options (a) First Sub-Option - Credit Offsets Mileage fee. Passenger vehicle owners would only be obligated to pay the amount of the mileage fee in excess of the credit for estimated gas taxes paid. (b) Second Sub-Option - Credit Reimbursement. The amount of the credit for estimated gas taxes paid would be reimbursed to the taxpayer in the form of a check to avoid double taxation. First Alternative Option - Gas Taxes Refunded as Income Tax Credit. Passenger vehicle owners who pay a mileage fee would receive a credit for estimated gas taxes paid for the same period. These taxpayers would receive a credit for gas tax payments against income taxes owed. The credit for estimated gas tax paid would be determined as a function of the vehicle miles traveled for the period, the gas tax rate and the EPA fuel efficiency rating for the vehicle. The amount of the credit would be limited to the amount of mileage fee assessed. The Highway fund would reimburse the state general by the amount of the total credits for estimated gas tax paid. [Alert: Raises New Revenue] Second Alternative Option Credit for Estimated Gas Taxes Paid Against Registration Fee (Increase Flat Registration Fee). Passenger vehicle owners who pay a mileage fee would receive a credit for estimated gas taxes paid for the same period. This would involve an increase in the passenger vehicle registration fee rate and a reduction in gas tax rate sufficient to accommodate the credit for gas tax payments against a flat registration fee. The credit for estimated gas tax paid would be determined as a function of the vehicle miles traveled for the period, the gas tax rate and the EPA fuel efficiency rating for the vehicle. The amount of the credit would be limited to the amount of the mileage fee assessed. Changes in registration fee and gas tax rates would be staged over two years to avoid cash flow shortfalls in the Highway Fund. [Alert: Raises New Revenue] e. Enforcement Staff Conception Non-renewal of Vehicle Registration. DMV would refuse to renew vehicle registration for non-payment of mileage fee. Enforcement system would require no change from status quo. S - 2

f. Retrofitting/ Phase-In Application Task Force Preference Phase In of GPS Acquisition (Newly Purchased Vehicles)/ No Retrofitting. Mileage fee would be phased in for vehicles containing a simple GPS form of electronic odometer and associated data transmission technology. GPS and data collection technology would be required for newly purchased vehicles only. Owners of older vehicles would be allowed to participate by voluntarily retrofitting the necessary technology. OR Task Force Preference Phase In of Odometer Tag (Retrofitting). All Oregon passenger vehicles would be required to be equipped with the Odometer Tag form of electronic odometer and associated data transmission technology. Odometer Tag and associated data transmission technology would be required for newly purchased vehicles. State would pay the cost of retrofitting older vehicles over a multi-year time period. First Alternative Option Phase In of GPS Acquisition (Initially Registered Vehicles)/ No Retrofitting. Mileage fee phased in for vehicles containing a simple GPS form of electronic odometer and associated data transmission technology. GPS and data collection technology would be required for passenger vehicles initially registering after effective date of law. Owners of other vehicles would be allowed to participate by voluntarily retrofitting the necessary technology. Second Alternative Option Phase In of GPS/ No Retrofitting. Same as staff recommendation or the first alternative option except that a complex GPS form of electronic odometer would be mandated, including a charge for telematic services (currently estimated at $20 per month). Owners of other vehicles would be allowed to participate by voluntarily retrofitting the necessary technology and agreeing to the charge for telematic services. Third Alternative Option Retrofitting All Passenger Vehicles. Mileage fee would apply to all passenger vehicles in Oregon. All Oregon passenger vehicles would be required to be equipped with a simple GPS form of electronic odometer and associated data transmission technology. State would pay the cost of retrofitting older vehicles. S - 3

g. Privacy Protections Task Force Preference Design Limitation. State would be required to build into the data collection system a design limitation that prevents state from accessing a GPS device to locate passenger vehicles in real time or to determine detailed travel history of vehicle other than to upload summary data. AND Task Force Preference Legal Prohibition. A civil and/or criminal law statute would prohibit anyone connected with a state agency from using accessing a GPS device to locate passenger vehicles in real time or to determine detailed travel history of vehicle other than to upload summary data. OR Task Force Preference No Privacy Protections Needed. No Privacy Protections Necessary for using Odometer Tag in data collection. h. Non-resident Fee Payments Task Force Preference Defer Resolution of Non-Resident Road Taxes. Wait to resolve non-resident tax issues until after mileage fee is fully phased-in and gas tax is fully phased out. Interstate compact is likely to resolve taxation issues pertaining to interstate travel before gas tax is fully phased out. AND Task Force Preference Continue the Gas Tax. Continue gas tax indefinitely. Second Alternative Option Tolling for Non-Residents. Design tolling method for non-residents entering state as a proxy for mileage fee and implement this method after gas tax is fully phased out. i. Rate Adjustment Overlays Task Force Preference Congestion Pricing Only Overlay. The mileage fee rate would only be adjusted for congestion pricing (See Targeted Revenue Options). Staff Recommendation Congestion Pricing and Fuel Efficiency Overlays (Surcharge on Less Fuel Efficient Vehicles). The mileage fee rate would be adjusted for congestion pricing (See Targeted Revenue Options) and fuel efficiency. The rate adjustment for fuel efficiency would be calculated as a flat mileage fee rate combined with a low mileage vehicle surcharge that reflects the additional amount the S - 4

vehicle operator would have paid under the gas tax. [Alert: Raises new revenue.] Second Alternative Option - Congestion Pricing and Fuel Efficiency Overlays (Graduated Rate for Fuel Efficiency). The mileage fee rate would be adjusted for congestion pricing (See Targeted Revenue Options) and fuel efficiency. The rate adjustment for fuel efficiency would be calculated as a graduated mileage fee rate based on fuel efficiency above and below the statewide fleet average for any given year. The rate reduction shall not exceed _x_ percent for fuel efficient vehicles. The rate increase shall not exceed _x_ percent for non-fuel efficient vehicles. [Alert: Raises new revenue.] Third Alternative Option Fuel Efficiency Only Overlay. The mileage fee rate would only be adjusted for fuel efficiency either in the manner described in the staff recommendation or the first alternative option. [Alert: Raises new revenue.] Fourth Alternative Option No Rate Adjustment Overlays. The mileage fee rate would be flat. j. Setting Rate Including Administrative Cost Recovery Task Force Preference Revenue Neutrality Plus Cost Recovery. The mileage fee rate would be based on three factors. One, a rate of 1.22 cents per mile (e.g. based on the 24 cents gas tax divided by the 2002 passenger vehicle fleet average of 19.7 miles per gallon). Two, an amount per mile for the cost recovery of fee collection overhead. Three, an amount per mile for the cost recovery of amortized capital expenditures related to implementation of the new fee system. Alternative Option Additional Revenue. An additional revenue factor would be added to the staff recommendation to provide new revenue for road system improvements, including a rate adjustment for inflation. S - 5