Alfred & Plantagenet Multi-Residential Cart Recycling Program CIF Project Number # Final Report October 1, 2016

Similar documents
CIF # City of Barrie. Large Curbside Containers. Final Report. Final Project Report, September City of Barrie. CIF Project # 801.

2014 Efficiency of Automated Collection and Performance of Compressed Natural Gas Vehicles CIF Project No

The Next Collection Contract

Curbside Collection Pilot Single-Use Dry Cell Batteries

BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS

Purpose of Presentation

RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE RFP DRAFT

That an annual one-week curbside battery collection program BE REFERRED to the 2019 budget process for consideration.

Executive Summary. Solid Waste Management Program Analysis and Recommendations for Silver City, New Mexico

Guelph Automated Waste Cart Collection System Curbside Collection Performance and Monitoring Report Quarterly Report No.

Alternate Fuel Collection Vehicles. Prepared By: The Emerald Group. On behalf of the Continuous Improvement Fund Project No. 217

Residential Curbside Recycling

Final Report Community Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant (CWRAR) 2015 City of Asheville, NC

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF WHITBY. MUNICIPAL BUILDING Rossland Road East. Whitby, Ontario

2016 Waste and Recycling Program Frequently Asked Questions

Too Good to Throw Away Implementation Strategy

9/1/2011. Trash to Treasure Catherine Chertudi Boise Idaho Public Works September Boise City. Population 206,000 69,300 Households.

RESIDENTIAL WASTE HAULING ASSESSMENT SERVICES. January 10, 2011 Presentation to Arvada City Council

STAFF REPORT. Consideration of Request Submitted by Athens Services for Rate Adjustment SUMMARY

London Borough of Bexley

Taking Innovation on the Road: Increasing Efficiency in Nova Scotia's Beverage Container System. Oct. 16, 2014

City Transfer Stations: Loading Services and Fees

New Trash & Recycling Services. TD HOA Board Meeting April 28, 2018 Erica Mertens Recycling Program Manager

Illegal Dumping at Tribal Churches and Longhouses

The Town of Oliver is implementing a cart program for the same reasons as the industry service providers as well as a few other reasons including:

Solid Waste Management

WASTE & RECYCLING SERVICES

RESIDENTIAL WASTE HAULING: Arvada s Existing System & Early Research. September 8, 2010 Presentation to Arvada Citizens Task Force

REPORT Meeting Date: February 7,2013 Waste Management Committee

Environment and Infrastructure Services

Alternatives to an Open Competitive Commercial Collection Program Presented by Robert Craggs RAM/SWANA Conference

Automated Cart Recycling: A Study of Municipal Collection and Operations in Ontario. CIF Project 888. V2 Updated June 2016

New Franchise Agreement: Recyclables, Organics, and Waste. Town of Truckee Town Council Meeting July 25, 2017

Total Production by Month (Acre Feet)

Background METRO WASTE AUTHORITY WE KNOW WHERE IT SHOULD GO

Questions and Answers to Request for Proposal

CIF Town of Cochrane. Curbside Recycling Implementation. Final Report. Final Project Report August 14, 2015.

1 YORK REGION TRANSIT EXTENSION OF EXISTING DIAL-A-RIDE PILOT PROJECT AND STOCK TRANSPORTATION SCHOOL BUS CONTRACTS

Refuse collection East Riding of Yorkshire

Used Tires Program. Processor / Recycled Products Manufacturer Operational Webinar. August 20, 2009, 9:00AM.

Utility Rates October 1, 2018

The Case for. Business. investment. in Public Transportation

Implementation of a 3 Bin System Charles Sullivan & Nicki Ledger

Performance and Cost Data. residential refuse collection

Generator Levy & Commercial Hauler Licensing

Green Power Feasibility Study Econet Lesotho

Garden waste charging: implementation and impact mitigation measures

NIXA CITY RESIDENTS Residential Solid Waste and Recycle Removal Guide 2017

Urban Construction Initiative Certification Program Update

Thomas Alston Director of Business and Policy Development. Presented By N. Scottsdale Rd, Suite 410 Scottsdale Arizona 85257

RESOLUTION NO. RD:MJV:KML 07/27/2017

STRATEGIC CAPITAL PANEL REPLACEMENT OF REFUSE COLLECTION FLEET

Item No Halifax Regional Council June 21, 2016

Information Meeting Transfer Station Options. September 30, 2014

Car Sharing at a. with great results.

Session 1: Implementing SDG 7 and Achieving Target 7.1 CAMBODIA CHHE LIDIN

Compressed Natural Gas Snow Plows

CITY OF HAYWARD. Schedule of RATES Effective June 1, 2018 through February 28, 2019 Annual Rate Adjustment

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLABLES BYLAW NO , 2011

Chapter 740, Street Vending One Year Review

Batteries dead? Recycle instead!

Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project

Analysis of Waste & Recyclable Materials Collection Arrangements. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Presented by Jeff Schneider

Utility Rates April 1, 2019

Sanitation Services Proposed FY11 Budget. Council Briefing

SUBJECT: Russell Hill Subway Train Accident Of August 11, 1995 Due Diligence Checklist Update

FAQ. Do I have a choice for a service provider?

1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call and Introductions. 3. Meeting Open to the Public. 4. New Business

P.O BOX 429, NUKU ALOFA, Tel: (676) Fax: (676)

Foothill Transit Battery Electric Bus Performance Results

Multi-Family Recycling

Elko County Enhanced 911 Advisory Committee Five-Year Master Plan (v.1.3.1) March 9, 2017

Introduction Overview The Landfill... 2 Benefits... 3

CITY OF BELVEDERE RESOLUTION NO

2017 Solid Waste Rates & Fees

Aim: Integration of Road Infrastructure of Georgia with European Standards and effective satisfaction of the Road User needs. Annual Report 2013

Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County 1997 Residential Generation Study

September 2016 Water Production & Consumption Data

1. The Tillamook County Solid Waste Advisory Committee recommended the amount of the submitted rate increases be approved.

EXHIBIT 2A RESIDENTIAL SERVICES

April 2010 April 2010 Presented by Alan Eirls

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

5 RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PLAN PRINCIPLES, METROLINX BUSINESS CASE, AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE

FINAL REPORT TO SHEFFIELD BUS PARTNERSHIP OPERATIONS GROUP FROM: WORK PACKAGE 5 PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK & UPDATE DATE OF MEETING: 19 OCTOBER 2012

Office of Transportation Bureau of Traffic Management Downtown Parking Meter District Rate Report

Bus Stop Optimization Study

An Overview FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. Curbside Cart Collection & Recycling Program

Director of Finance & Administrative Services

PDR Energy Baseline Alternative. Proposal for Discussion October 27, 2015

Chief Operating Officer. Nigel Bell, Energy Resource Manager

Business Information Session August 8, Harmonized Sales Tax (HST)

CITY OF ARVADA, COLORADO MUNICIPAL SOLID WASET BENCHMARKING - SUMMARY TABLE

Corridor Management Committee. March 7, 2012

Automated Trash and Recycling Collection System

To: Honorable Public Utilities Board Submitted by: /s/ Rebecca Irwin AGM Customer Resources

Overview WHAT IS PAYT? Global Warming & Garbage??? 6. Changing the Way New Mexico Values Trash. New Mexico Waste Characterization

Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan

Funding Scenario Descriptions & Performance

O-Train Confederation Line Stage 1

Transcription:

Alfred & Plantagenet Multi-Residential Cart Recycling Program CIF Project Number #545.3 Final Report October 1, 2016 Prepared for: Waste Diversion Ontario Continuous Improvement Fund Office Barrie, Ontario

Acknowledgement This Project has been delivered with the assistance of Waste Diversion Ontario s Continuous Improvement Fund, a fund financed by Ontario municipalities and stewards of Blue Box waste in Ontario. Notwithstanding this support, the views expressed are the views of the author(s), and Waste Diversion Ontario and Stewardship Ontario accept no responsibility for these views. 2016 Waste Diversion Ontario and Stewardship Ontario All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, recorded or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photographic, sound, magnetic or other, without advance written permission from the owner.

Table of Contents Executive Summary... i 1 Background... 1 1.1 Community Profile... 1 1.2 Waste Management System... 1 1.3 Current Waste Management Performance... 2 1.4 Program Challenges... 2 2 Approach... 3 2.1 Implementation... 3 2.1.1 Complete Site visits forms & update the MR Database... 3 2.1.2 Evaluate systems needs and budget... 3 2.1.3 Purchase containers and distribute P&E materials... 3 2.1.4 Delivery of recycling containers... 3 2.2 Monitoring and Measurement Methodology... 4 2.2.1 MR blue box recycling tonnes... 4 2.2.2 Monitoring cart fullness... 4 2.2.3 Communicating with contractors... 4 3 Project Results and Analysis... 5 3.1 Project Results... 5 3.2 Analysis of Results... 5 3.3 Lessons Learned... 5 4 Project Budget... 6 5 Conclusions... 6 List of Figures Figure 1: Map of Township of Alfred & Plantagenet... 1 Figure 2: New recycling carts collected by contractor... 2 Figure 3: Material collected in MR Cart program... 4 Figure 4: Tonnes of blue box materials collected from MR... 5 List of Tables Table 1: Project budget vs actual... 6

Executive Summary This is a final report accounting the implementation of the Township of Alfred and Plantagenet s cart recycling program for the multi-residential (MR) community. Funding and technical support was provided to the Township by the Continuous Improvement Fund in completing this project work. In past years, the MR program in the Township has been a mixed bag of collection containers (some blue boxes, some carts, and some other containers) and participation / diversion varied widely between buildings. In 2015, the Township introduced a cart service program for the MR sector based on the best practice fundamentals for collection container capacity. The Township also created a MR database to keep track of buildings, contact person(s), on site capacity, and other key program information. In total 50 recycling carts and more than 600 reusable bags were purchased through the CIF s Cooperative Container Procurement Program and distributed to MR residents by Township staff in the fall of 2015. To support the program launch, the Township distributed P&E materials to MR buildings promoting the recycling program and providing notice to residents of the cart program launch. The program launch has been a resounding success. In comparing the first 8 months of 2015 versus 2016, the number of blue box recycling tonnes captured from the MR program has increased more than 20%. This is projected to divert an additional 23 tonnes of material from landfill annually. The Township and residents are very pleased with the success of the MR cart program and are continuously looking to improve blue box performance and diversion of our recycling programs. For further information about this project, please contact: Monique Bastien Deputy Clerk Township of Alfred and Plantagenet O: 613 673-4797, ext. 225 e: MBastien@alfred-plantagenet.com i

1 Background 1.1 Community profile Nestled in the heart of Eastern Ontario, the Township of Alfred and Plantagenet is home to approximately 8,000 residents settled in the seven essentially Francophone villages including Alfred, Curran, Lefaivre, Pendleton, Plantagenet, Treadwell and Wendover. The Township is advantageously located between two major urban centres; Ottawa, 45 minutes to the west and Montreal 75 minutes to the east. The US border at Cornwall Ontario is only 45 minutes to the south. Figure 1: Map of Township of Alfred & Plantagenet (outlined in red) 1.2 Waste management system The municipality of Alfred and Plantagenet provides residents with multi-stream recycling through weekly curbside collections. Population Permanent 8019 Households (single family) 4319 Blue Box Tonnage (2015 Datacall submission) 714 MT Municipal Grouping Small Rural Blue Box Program net cost (2015 Datacall submission) $304,604 Annual P&E Budget $3,000 October 11, 2016 Page 1

The municipality targets all materials accepted through the Blue Box program, including polystyrene. The municipality collects these materials through a single stream recycling program. As of 2015, collection is completed by Cool Containers and Rental; based on a set fee for the contract year. Materials are trucked to Recycle Action at 1301 Spence Avenue in Hawkesbury, Ontario; processing costs are at a per tonne rate. 1.3 Current waste management performance In the past few years leading up to this project work, the Township has effectively rebranded our recycling program through investments in promotion and education. CIF project #604.4 and #604.12 provided funding and resources in establishing the Township s communication plan for blue box recycling and targeting plastics packaging. A portion of the funding received under #604.12 was allocated to producing the P&E materials used in this project work. The multi-residential (MR) sector in the Township is home to approximately 600 households. The buildings represent a wide variety of families. These range from very high income to social assistance living arrangements. The recycling rates of buildings in the Township vary widely also, but in 2015 approximately 86 tonnes of blue box materials was diverted through the MR recycling program; resulting in an average recycling rate of approximately 138 kilograms per MR household unit. 1.4 Program challenges The MR households had previously been provided with a mixed bag of collection containers depending on the building. With the new program roll out in the fall of 2015, MR households now have a uniform cart program collecting blue box materials in the same single stream method as the curbside (single family) program. Figure 2: New recycling carts collected by contractor October 11, 2016 Page 2

2 Approach In transitioning the MR sector to the cart program, there were a number of implementation steps involved as described in the following section. 2.1 Implementation 2.1.1 Site visits & the MR database Site visits were completed on collection days, before pickup, in the fall of 2015. These visits included establishing building contact (superintendents, building manager, etc) and completing baseline measuring and monitoring activities (i.e. how many carts were on site, etc.). This information was used to update the Township s existing excel MR database. 2.1.2 Evaluate systems needs and budget In determining the number of 95 gallon carts needed for the program, the updated MR database was used to identify the number of carts that were currently located at buildings around the Township. Then, the best practice number of carts was calculated for each address based on the ratio of 1 cart for every 7 units at an address. The best practice number of carts identified was then increased by 1 cart for each address to ensure adequate recycling container capacity was available to residents. In total 54 carts were estimated to be required for the program. Concurrently, the number of superintendent s handbooks required for the program had to be determined and was estimated by counting the number of MR buildings receiving service 24. 2.1.3 Purchase containers and distribute P&E materials Carts and reusable bags were purchased through the CIF s Cooperative Container Procurement Program which provides municipalities and first nations groups with economies of scale fixed prices for the purchase of carts, blue boxes, and reusable bags. The Township purchased 50, 95 gallon blue recycling, carts and 1,000 reusable bags for the MR program. In anticipation of launching the new cart program, the Township designed, printed and distributed P&E materials to MR residents and superintendents. The main messages of the materials included the following: o o o Carts are coming Proper sorting Participate in Blue Box recycling The materials were delivered to residents prior to cart delivery. 2.1.4 Delivery of recycling containers Carts and reusable bags were received from the suppliers and distributed to residents September 10, 2015 by municipal staff. October 11, 2016 Page 3

2.2 Monitoring and measurement methodology In monitoring the impacts of this project, the Township monitored the number of blue box tonnes collected through the MR recycling program, the fullness of carts placed out for collection at MR buildings, and communicated with the collection and processing contractors to ensure that residue rates remained in check with the new program. 2.2.1 MR blue box recycling tonnes The amount of blue box material collected from MR buildings was monitored during the first 8 months of 2015 vs the first 8 months of 2016. The collection contractor collects material from MR buildings on a separate route from the curbside program which allows for this separation, identification, and measuring of MR materials. 2.2.2 Monitoring cart fullness In updating the Townships MR database, the number of carts and their respective fullness on collection day was recorded. These metrics will be compared post implementation. 2.2.3 Communicating with contractors In communicating with the collection and processing contractors, the Township is attempting to ascertain anecdotal information regarding the performance of the program. The Township will be examining the impact of the additional container capacity on the amount of material recycled and the residue of the recycling stream (garbage/organics ending up in the recycling containers). Figure 3: Material collected in MR Cart program October 11, 2016 Page 4

Monthly tonnes #545.3 Alfred & Plantagenet Large Curbside Containers 3 Project results and analysis 3.1 Project results Figure 3, below presents the monthly tonnes of blue box recycling materials collected from the Township s MR households over the first 8 months of 2015 versus 2016. Over the 8 month period, the amount of material increased approximately 12.4 tonnes or 22% from 2015 to 2016. The projected annual blue box recycling is estimated at 109 tonnes or an increase of 23 tonnes from 2015. 12 10 Tonnage comparison 8 6 4 2015 2016 2 0 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Figure 4: Tonnes of blue box materials collected from MR The Township has been in regular communication with the collection and processing contractors and is pleased to note that there has not been an increase in the amount of residue (contamination) in the MR blue box recycling program. 3.2 Analysis of results The implementation of the cart program has been a success. Providing carts to MR building in the Township s service area has provided a uniform level of service to residents. The increasing amount of blue box recycling materials being collected by the MR program is impressive. This is all material that is not entering our landfill, but rather is being recycled. This is a great result for the Township. 3.3 Lessons learned The Township struggled with ongoing monitoring of the MR program. In the future, the Township plans to regularly update the MR database list of buildings and contact person(s). The ongoing performance monitoring of buildings (cart fullness) will not be continued. October 11, 2016 Page 5

4 Project budget The budget for this project versus the actual costs are presented in the table below. The actual project costs come in under budget approximately $1,600. Table 1: Project budget vs actual Item Description Units Budget Actual Carts 360 Litres recycling carts 50 $ 5,000.00 $ 3,772.50 Reusable bags Reusable recycling bags 1000 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,120.75 Container distribution Staff to complete cart/bag/p&e distribution $ 1,000.00 $ 860.00 P&E materials Promotion and Education materials $ 500.00 $ - total $ 7,500.00 $ 5,753.25 Primarily, the costs of recycling carts were lower than anticipated in part due to the cheaper per cart costs of purchasing carts through the CIF cooperative tender. 5 Conclusions The implementation of the Township s MR cart program has been a success. Residents are happy with the uniform level of service that is provided to the MR program and the amount of recycling collected has risen dramatically since the program was launched. As a small community, the ongoing measuring and monitoring of the program suggested by best practices has proven too arduous for us. The Township plans on keeping the MR database regularly up to date, but will not likely be monitoring building specific performance in the future. The Township does intend to continuously promote the recycling program to all residents through our blue box communications planning. October 11, 2016 Page 6