Phoenix Lander Implications on in situ resource utilization for robotic exploration of Mars

Similar documents

ReachMars 2024 A Candidate Large-Scale Technology Demonstration Mission as a Precursor to Human Mars Exploration

Curiosity lands on Mars

THE HISTORY OF MARS EXPLORATION

Name: Space Exploration PBL

From MARS To MOON. V. Giorgio Director of Italian Programs. Sorrento, October, All rights reserved, 2007, Thales Alenia Space

Lunette: A Global Network of Small Lunar Landers

Massachusetts Space Grant Consortium

On Orbit Refueling: Supporting a Robust Cislunar Space Economy

Exploration Architecture Update

Light-Lift Rocket II

CHANGING ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING PARADIGMS FOR HUMAN MARS LANDER

Long-Range Rovers for Mars Exploration and Sample Return

Lunar Architecture and LRO

FEDERAL SPACE AGENCY OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION LAVOCHKIN ASSOCIATION PROGRAM OF THE MOON EXPLORATION BY AUTOMATIC SPACE COMPLEXES

Brief overview of lunar surface environment Examples of rover types and designs Steering systems Static and dynamic stability

Martin J. L. Turner. Expedition Mars. Published in association with. Chichester, UK

Suitability of reusability for a Lunar re-supply system

Landing Targets and Technical Subjects for SELENE-2

Analysis of Power Storage Media for the Exploration of the Moon

lights on, down 2 ½ 40 feet, down 2 ½ Kickin up some dust 30 feet, 2 ½ down faint shadow

NEXT Exploration Science and Technology Mission. Relevance for Lunar Exploration

Next Steps in Human Exploration: Cislunar Systems and Architectures

WHAT WE WILL DISCUSS IN THIS VIDEO

Lunar Science and Infrastructure with the Future Lunar Lander

Mars Surface Mobility Proposal

Lunar Missions by Year - All Countries. Mission count dropped as we transitioned from politically driven missions to science driven missions

The European Lunar Lander Mission

LUNAR DAYLIGHT EXPLORATION Cost Constrained Human and Robotic Exploration Brand Norman Griffin 1 A.M., ASCE

Lunar Cargo Capability with VASIMR Propulsion

Challenges of Designing the MarsNEXT Network

Human Exploration of the Lunar Surface

Lunar Surface Access from Earth-Moon L1/L2 A novel lander design and study of alternative solutions

Moon Exploration Lunar Polar Sample Return ESA Thematic information day BELSPO, 3 July 2012

Two Related Primary Challenges for Successful Renewed Lunar Exploration

LUNAR INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH BASE. Yuzhnoye SDO proprietary

TOWARDS A HEAVY LAUNCHER - PROPULSION SOLUTIONS - A. Souchier - C. Rothmund Snecma Moteurs, Direction Grosse Propulsion à Liquides

Venus Entry Options Venus Upper Atmosphere Investigations Science and Technical Interchange Meeting (STIM)

Building an Economical and Sustainable Lunar Infrastructure To Enable Lunar Science and Space Commerce

Silicon-Germanium Integrated Electronics for Extreme Environments Applied to the Design of a Lunar Hopper

Future NASA Power Technologies for Space and Aero Propulsion Applications. Presented to. Workshop on Reforming Electrical Energy Systems Curriculum

Transportation Copyright Council for Economic Education

NASA Glenn Research Center Intelligent Power System Control Development for Deep Space Exploration

OMOTENASHI. (Outstanding MOon exploration TEchnologies demonstrated by NAno Semi-Hard Impactor)

Solar Electric Propulsion Benefits for NASA and On-Orbit Satellite Servicing

Adrestia. A mission for humanity, designed in Delft. Challenge the future

Deployment and Drop Test for Inflatable Aeroshell for Atmospheric Entry Capsule with using Large Scientific Balloon

MARTIAN HABITAT DESIGN

High Power Solar Electric Propulsion for Human Space Exploration Architectures

European Lunar Lander: System Engineering Approach

An Overview of CSA s s Space Robotics Activities

Station for Exploratory Analysis and Research Center for Humanity (SEARCH)

On the feasibility of a fast track return to Mars

Lunar Robotics. Dr. Rob Ambrose, NASA JSC December Dr. Robert O. Ambrose

BIMODAL NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKET (BNTR) PROPULSION FOR FUTURE HUMAN MARS EXPLORATION MISSIONS

BIMODAL NUCLEAR THERMAL ROCKET (BNTR) PROPULSION FOR FUTURE HUMAN MARS EXPLORATION MISSIONS

Subsonic Parachutes for Future Mars Missions

Deployment and Flight Test of Inflatable Membrane Aeroshell using Large Scientific Balloon

Spinning-in of Terrestrial Microsystems and Technologies to Space Robotics: Results and Roadmaps

MARS-OZ: A Design for a Simulated Mars Base in the Arkaroola Region

Ares V: Supporting Space Exploration from LEO to Beyond

Martian In Situ Investigations

Travel: Detailed Flight Plan

Case Study: ParaShield

INTERNATIONAL LUNAR NETWORK ANCHOR NODES AND ROBOTIC LUNAR LANDER PROJECT UPDATE

IAC-07- A3.I.A.19 A VALUE PROPOSITION FOR LUNAR ARCHITECTURES UTILIZING PROPELLANT RE-SUPPLY CAPABILITIES

Historical Perspectives: Evolution of Recent Mars EDL Systems Development. 6th International Planetary Probe Workshop June 2008 Erisa K Hines

ENERGIA 1. IDENTIFICATION. 1.1 Name. 1.2 Classification Family : K Series : K-1/SL-17 Version : 4 strap-ons

THE FALCON I LAUNCH VEHICLE Making Access to Space More Affordable, Reliable and Pleasant

Planetary Surface Transportation and Site Development

A combined Exobiology and Geophysics Mission to Mars

A New Facility for Lander Touchdown and Rover Mobility Testing at DLR

Transportation Options for SSP

NASA s Choice to Resupply the Space Station

Initial Concept Review Team Alpha ALUM Rover (Astronaut Lunar Utility Mobile Rover) Friday, October 30, GMT

Good afternoon. We're going to be talking today about frontiers of imagination in space exploration

Europa Lander Mission Overview and Update

Mars 2018 Mission Status and Sample Acquisition Issues

ACCESS TO MARS: (Part 1) EARTH TO MARS TRANSIT - LOGISTICS ALTERNATIVES John K. Strickland, Jr.

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A LUNAR IN-SITU RESOURCE UTILIZATION (ISRU) PROPELLANT SERVICES MARKET:

A LEO Propellant Depot System Concept for Outgoing Exploration

Rocketry, the student way

H-IIA Launch Vehicle Upgrade Development

Development of a Low Cost Suborbital Rocket for Small Satellite Testing and In-Space Experiments

SABRE FOR HYPERSONIC & SPACE ACCESS PLATFORMS

Extending NASA s Exploration Systems Architecture towards Longterm Crewed Moon and Mars Operations

THE MARS EXPLORATION ROVERS: HITTING THE ROAD ON MARS. Nagin Cox

Airships: A New Horizon for Science April 30 May 3, Worldwide Aeros Corp. Montebello, California. Presented by:

AEROSPACE TEST OPERATIONS

LOW DENSITY SUPERSONIC DECELERATOR. Kolby Javinar Department of Electrical Engineering University of Hawai i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI ABSTRACT

Blue Origin Achievements and plans for the future

LOW DENSITY SUPERSONIC DECELERATOR. Jacob J. Matutino Department of Computer Science University of Hawai i at Mānoa Honolulu, HI ABSTRACT

DESIGN, APPLICATIONS AND COMMERCIALIZATION OF FUEL CELL POWERED AIRCRAFT

Suborbital Flight Opportunities for Cubesat-Class Experiments Aboard NLV Test Flights

Europa Lander. Mission Concept Update 3/29/2017

DYNAMIC SIMULATION OF MARS-03 ENTRY, DESCENT AND LANDING SYSTEM

Fly Me To The Moon On An SLS Block II

3 DESIGN. 3.1 Chassis and Locomotion

This is Ground Control... Professor Derek Long Department of Informatics King s College London

High Performance Green Propulsion (HPGP): A Flight-Proven Capability and Cost Game-Changer for Small and Secondary Satellites Aaron Dinardi

Transcription:

Phoenix Landing Site May 2008 Phoenix Lander Implications on in situ resource utilization for robotic exploration of Mars LEAG-ICEUM-SRR (2008) Cape Canaveral, FL Robert L. Ash October 29, 2008 Aerospace Engineering Dept. Old Dominion University

VALLES MARINERIS (68.219 N, 234.251 E) PHOENIX Lander JUNE 19, 2008 OLYMPUS MONS (22.5 N, 312.0 E) Viking I Lander 230 o E (July 20, 1976)

PHOENIX LANDER North Pole Ice (Late Summer) October 11, 2008 Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter Image just after local dust storm passed over Phoenix Lander

Phoenix Trench Marks 6-15-08 Same Trench Marks 6-19-08 First, you see them. Then, they re gone!

VALLES MARINERIS NASA Langley Research Center pioneered robotic exploration of planetary surfaces Viking 1976 OLYMPUS MONS Viking I Lander Site JULY 20, 1976 First-ever image taken from the surface of another planet. 1977 Commodore Pet 2001 PC (4K Memory) 230 o E

Scientific Results of Viking ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION Average Surface Pressure: 5.6 mb (Earth altitude of 115,000 ft.) (VL-1 @ 7.8 mb; VL-2 @ 8.7 mb) Density @ 200 K, 6.8 mb: 0.018 kg/m 3 (Earth altitude of 45 km or 148,000 ft.) More than one Mars year of weather data (P, T and wind) at 22.5 o N and 48.0 o N. Nominal Diurnal Surface Temperature Variation: 50 K (90 o F Temperature Swing) Gas Proportion CO 2 0.9532 N 2 0.027 Ar 0.016 O 2 0.0013 CO 0.0007 H 2 O Ne Kr Xe O 3 300 ppm* 2.5 ppm 0.3 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.03 ppm* Molecular Weight: 43.36 *The atmosphere is humid, but H 2 O is variable and in ppm!

The CASE for MARS METHANE (CH 4 ) Comparison of Rocket Propellant Performance for Different Fuel Molecules* Molecule Nominal Temp. Combined Specific Gravity Specific Impulse Normalized Refrig. FoM Hydrogen 20 K 0.324 426 sec. 3.609 CO Carbon monoxide CH 4 Methane C 3 H 8 Propane C 4 H 10 Butane CH 3 OH Methanol 82 0.887 259 1.056 111 0.812 342 1.000 231 0.940 328 0.705 274 0.852 315 0.567 338 0.963 312 0.533 *Ash, Dowler and Varsi, 1978. LOX, stored at 90.18 K is the oxidizer for all fuels. Methanol can be produced from H 2 O and CO 2, but propane and butane are too difficult.

Post Viking Mission Mars Scorecard Mission Mars Observer (1992) Mars Pathfinder (1997) Mars Global Surveyor (1997) Nozomi/Planet B (1998) Mars Climate Orbiter (1999) Status Failed Mission Successful Mission Great Success (continuing) Trajectory Problems/Lost Crashed at Mars Mars Polar Lander/Deep Space 2 (1999) Lost at Mars Phoenix 2008 Mars Odyssey (2001) Mars Express Orbiter (2003) Mars Express Beagle Surface Probe (2003) Mars Airplane I (2003) Phobos and Deimos Sample Return (2003) Mars Sample Return (2003) Mars Exploration Rovers and Landers (2004) Mars Sample Return (2005) Netlanders (2005) Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (2006) Mars Sample Return (2007) Phoenix Lander (2008) Mars Sample Return (2009) Successful (still in orbit) Successful (continuing) Lost Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Great Success (continuing) Cancelled Cancelled Great Success (continuing) Cancelled Successful (ongoing) Postponed Oct. 29, 2008 2:50 PM Paper Number 4030

VALLES MARINERIS Phoenix Lander Site Mars Lander Locations 32 years after Viking I. PATHFINDER OLYMPUS MONS VIKING LANDER I 230 o E (Southern Winter)

Mars Lander Locations 32 years later (continued) VIKING II LANDER ROVER OPPORTUNITY SYRTIS MAJOR ROVER SPIRIT 70 o E (Southern Winter)

How do we explore Mars surface, one lander at a time? PATHFINDER OLYMPUS MONS VIKING LANDER I Optimistic Rover Range (100 km) VALLES MARINERIS 1000 km Mars has nearly the same land area as Earth.

Follow the Water Significant WATER HOW CAN WE ADJUST OUR MISSIONS IN RESPONSE TO NEW DATA --IN LESS THAN 7 TO 10 YEARS? Lower-Limit of Water Mass Fraction on Mars Mars Odyssey Spacecraft data Geotimes, April 2002 PHOENIX (LOOKING FOR WATER IS A FOCUS NOT AN END!)

Robotic Mars Base Candidate Locations Areas where known water mass fraction exceeds 5% (mid lattitude). Phoenix Lander? Viking Lander II Alba Patera Sinus Meridiani Arabia Antipode Arabia

Though subjective, Mars orbital and landing mission success rates are less than 50%--much less if cancelled missions are included.

THE Moon Mars & Beyond TIME PROBLEM A PERSPECTIVE Twenty five years (starting in 1960) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 US Presidents between 1960 and 1985. JFK LBJ RMN GRF JC RR NASA Administrators Webb Paine Fletcher Frosch Beggs Apollo Program Vietnam War Reagan Bush I Clinton Bush II McBama International Space Station 1984-2009 Sustaining a 25 to 30 year plan is difficult especially with a 7-year mission lead time.

Living off the land. MOON MARS ISRU: Optional In Situ Resource Utilization. ISRU: Essential

Breaking the Serial Mars Mission Exploration Paradigm Establish a fixed robotic operations base. Orbital Elements High bandwidth communication on Mars and with Earth Precision navigation at Mars Fixed Base Elements Adequate electrical power WATER WATER WATER WATER Reusable Unpiloted Vehicle System suite to traverse great distances, bringing dispersed samples to a central robotic science laboratory

Dust Devil Tracks (From Orbit) Solar Array Area (Scale) Case for Nuclear Paper Number 4030 Power Oct. 29, 2008 2:50 PM Remove seasonal solar constraint Relax base latitude constraint Remove diurnal energy storage req. Enhance ISRU Dust Devil Rover Spirit image at Gusev Crater

Space Nuclear Power for the Moon and Mars Continuous Multi-kW e Avoids Energy Storage Can be protected from Mars Dust Devil wind loads Dust storms Russian reactors have flown LANL developing 10 kw system Payloads greater than 10,000 kg needed.

Viking Entry, Descent & Landing limited to 1000 kg because of -Parachute size -Time to deploy Mars Advanced EDL systems Braun et al Georgia Tech 20,000 kg Landed Mass Precision Landing 2 km above Mars Ref. Requires programmatic Commitment.

Notional Demonstration Payload Item Methane-oxygen Production Plant Methane and LOX cryocoolers Cryogenic Storage tanks 3 kw e Electric Power Generator Regolith manipulation and water ice extraction tools Water distillation and feedstock preparation unit Feedstock collection and delivery vehicle Mars Surface Science Analytical Laboratory Communications Systems Base excavation rovers (2) Exploration rovers (3) Ballistic launch and recovery sample collection systems (4) Inflatable hydrogen-filled aerosonde balloon units (50) with inflation/launch system Heavy-lift hydrogen balloon systems for transporting exploration rovers (3) Two airplanes with associated launch and recovery system (2) Repair shop and supplies Mass/Power Allowance 250 kg/2,100 W e 20 kg/550 W e 200 kg/50 W e 400 kg/3,000 W e 200 kg/50 W e (2 kw e peak) 20 kg/100 W e 100 kg/1 kw e peak 850 kg/110 W e 20 kg/500 W e peak 100 kg/500 W e (x 2) 150 kg/150 W e (x 3) 50 kg/50 W e (x 4) 55 kg/100 W e 100 kg/100 W e (x 3) 150 kg/100 W e (x 2) 1000 kg/2 kw e peak 5,000 kg

ISRU Transportation Options VIKING LANDER II ROVER OPPORTUNITY SYRTIS MAJOR Mars base Propellant Feedstock Nominal I Sp Comments Compressed CO 2 Mars Atmosphere 0.5 km/sec Simple Systems, use anywhere. Compressed gas tools are attractive. ROVER SPIRIT CO O 2 Mars Atmosphere 2.5 km/sec RF glow discharge anywhere ( dirty CO). Electrochemical O 2 production. CH 4 O 2 Atmosphere + water 3.35 km/sec Base node for water. Sabatier + electrolysis. Allow boil-off at desitnation. H 2 O 2 Water ice 4.18 km/sec Compressed gas send ice from base for return trip; solar-powered electrolysis limited propellant mass

Supercritical CO 2 Rocket Propellant Storage Tank Relief Valve Assembly Control Valve Nozzle Sensor Module 1 Tank Coupling Sensor Module 1

Mars 20,000 kg Entry, Descent and Landing Precision Landing Demonstrator (suite of robotic exploration systems and laboratory equipment).

Permafrost-like polygonal surface: Phoenix Lander (Southeast) Consider dry lake landing site Find the ice!

Biosphere II didn t work. We will need food at Mars. Radiation is problematic too. Can we explore Mars using robots most of the time, sending humans only when needed? We built an outpost on the South Pole. ISRU materials air, water, ice Use Robotic Systems Evolve toward human outpost

We know how to use dry lake landing sites! High-speed (95 m/s) X-15 landing at Rogers Dry Lake, CA 1961

CONCLUSIONS Robotic Mars Exploration capabilities have increased by orders of magnitude in 30 years. Water ice can be a feedstock for a fixed ISRU base following the water. Nuclear power and precision heavy EDL are required at Mars (Lunar and Mars systems can be similar). ISRU at a fixed Mars base can enable surface exploration missions to be outfitted and executed from Mars rather than sent to Mars, greatly accelerating the rate of discovery.

Please Recycle! Paper Number 4030 Oct. 29, 2008 2:50 PM

Living off the Land Attribute Earth Moon Propulsion Wind COMBUSTION! None Mars Wind? Food Hunt & gather None None Water Plentiful Polar Craters? Frozen Oxygen (Atm. Press.) Air (1.01 bar) Rocks (10-13 bar) Processed (6x10-3 bar) Gravity 1 g 1/6 g 3/8 g Communication delay Travel Time (One-Way) Instantaneous 1.28 sec. 5 to 20 min. Already there! 4 days 100+ days Mean, Min and Max Surface Temps. (K) 288, 184-331 (24 hr day) 250, 126-373 213, 160-280 (655.7 hr day) (24.623 hr day) Lunar vacuum and Mars ambient conditions are lethal.