AFFECTED SECTIONS OF MUTCD: Section 2C.36 Advance Traffic Control Signs Table 2C-4. Guidelines for Advance Placement of Warning Signs

Similar documents
NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

NCUTCD Proposal for Changes to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices

Sight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that

TURN AND CURVE SIGNS

Support: The Crossbuck (R15-1) sign assigns right-of-way to rail traffic at a highway-rail grade crossing.

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM

STOPPING SIGHT DISTANCE AS A MINIMUM CRITERION FOR APPROACH SPACING

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS

Section 2B.59 Weight Limit Signs - Interim Revisions

2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

2013 Changes to the 2011 MMUTCD, Part 6 September 2013

2003 EDITION. Illinois Supplement to the National Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Division of Highways

Emergency Signal Warrant Evaluation: A Case Study in Anchorage, Alaska

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL & INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM

Chapter III Geometric design of Highways. Tewodros N.

Traffic Engineering & Highway Safety Bulletin

Memorandum Federal Highway Administration

D-25 Speed Advisory System

Introduction. 3. The sample calculations used throughout this paper are based on a roadway posted at 35 mph.

Virginia Department of Education

SIGNING UPDATES MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD), 2009 EDITION. CLIFF REUER SDLTAP WESTERN SATELLITE (c)

60 70 Guidelines. Managing Speeds. Work Zones

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

South Carolina. It s serious. Deadly serious.

Recommendations for AASHTO Superelevation Design

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. June Dear Customer:

ALLEGAN COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION. Adopted by the Board of County Road Commissioners, December 28, Sign Policy

PART 8. TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR HIGHWAY-RAIL GRADE CROSSINGS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Anticipated Changes Based on 2009 Federal MUTCD

TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM

REVIEW OF THE DRAFT 2011 VA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL. December 14, 2010 David Rush VDOT WZS Program Manager

CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...

Created by: St. Louis County

W Type: Denotes functional type of sign (R = regulatory, W = warning, D = guide signs, and M = route markers)

Speed measurements were taken at the following three locations on October 13 and 14, 2016 (See Location Map in Exhibit 1):

Driveway Spacing and Traffic Operations

Maintaining Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity

Procedure Effective date Rescinds Vehicle Placement In or Near Moving Traffic 17 November January 2005

(Refer Slide Time: 00:01:10min)

Horizontal Sight Distance Considerations Freeway and Interchange Reconstruction

TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy

EMERGENCY ACCESS POLICY

Defensive Driving Policy

Low Speed Design Criteria for Residential Streets Andrew J. Ballard, P.E. and David M. Haldeman, E.I.T.

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering


Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

CEE 320. Fall Horizontal Alignment

Traffic Generation November 28, Mr. Todd Baker Baker Properties, LLC 953 Islington Street Suite 23D Portsmouth, NH 03801

Passing Sight Distance Design for Passenger Cars and Trucks

Access Management Standards

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

City of Lafayette Staff Report Circulation Commission

SECTION: 1503 Use of Lights & Sirens SUPERCEDES/RESCINDS: All Prior EFFECTIVE DATE:

1400 MISCELLANEOUS Traffic Engineering Manual

801-R-xxx LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER FOR WORK ZONE SAFETY. (Adopted xx-xx-17)

WORK ZONE SAFETY TOOLBOX

CHANGE LIST for MDOT Traffic and Safety Geometric Design Guides. May 23, 2017: The following update was made to the web site.

CITY OF POWAY MEMORANDUM

Commissioning Director for Environment. Officer Contact Details Lisa Wright; Summary

Section 6H.01 Typical Applications

Special GRRF Session on

Evaluation Considerations and Geometric Nuances of Reduced Conflict U-Turn Intersections (RCUTs)

TxDOT Guidelines for Acknowledgment Signing

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

A Gap-Based Approach to the Left Turn Signal Warrant. Jeremy R. Chapman, PhD, PE, PTOE Senior Traffic Engineer American Structurepoint, Inc.

ITASCA COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC SIGN POLICY

Speed Zoning. District Traffic Engineer ISHC, Seymour, Indiana

Lee County DOT Traffic Section Design Standard for Sign Installation

TRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS

TITLE 16. TRANSPORTATION CHAPTER 27. TRAFFIC REGULATIONS AND TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES

SECTION 12 - CONSTRUCTION AREA TRAFFIC CONTROL TABLE OF CONTENTS

CITY CLERK. Warrants for All-Way Stop Sign Control and 40 km/h Maximum Speed Limits

Evaluation of Request to Establish 15 MPH Speed Limits on Streets around Schools

Work Zone Safety Best Practices Traffic Engineering & Safety Conference October 18, Dean Mentjes Federal Highway Administration

2.3. Priority Responses recognized by the Derby Fire Department will be as follows:

INVESTIGATION OF THE MOTORCYCLIST/Car Driver COLLISION. RECONSTRUCTION REPORT July 31, 2010

Temporary Traffic Control Plans

DATE: August 13, 2013 AGENDA ITEM # 8. City Council. Cedric Novenario, Transportation Manager RECOMMENDATION:

Work Zone Safety. Mike Marr Industrial Safety Consultant Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation Division of Safety & Hygiene

2018 NDACE CONFERENCE

Advance Warning System with Advance Detection

Work Zone Worker Protection

Plainfield, Indiana Speed Limit Study

INSTALLATION OF A CONVEX MIRROR FOR A PRIVATE DRIVEWAY OR STREET

Figure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd

800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design

Crash Reconstruction Crash Report and assessment Road Safety Reviews Road Safety Assessment Case Studies/Evaluation

DESIGN SPEED CHOICES FOR CANADIAN TWO-LANE RURAL HIGHWAYS. Dr. John F. Morrall, P.Eng. President Canadian Highways Institute Ltd.

STATE OF OHIO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATION 808 DIGITAL SPEED LIMIT (DSL) SIGN ASSEMBLY.

Evaluation and Installation Guidelines for Advance Warning Signal Systems in Utah

Driver Assessment Companion Document

Additional $200 Speeding Fine Signs

Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION...1

Brownwood Portable Traffic Signals and AFADs Evaluation. Carl Johnson, P.E., TxDOT Brownwood District Melisa Finley, P.E., TTI

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999

POLICY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND POSTING OF SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY AND TOWNSHIP HIGHWAYS WITHIN MCHENRY COUNTY, ILLINOIS

Fire Apparatus Access Roads in Marysville

Transcription:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 RWSTC June 2012 RW # 3 TOPIC: Advance Traffic Control Signs TECHNICAL COMMITTEE: Regulatory & Warning Signs Technical Committee STATUS/DATE OF ACTION: TC Drafts: 11/24/2011, 11/30/11, 12/01/11,5/14/12, 5/15/12 TC Approval: 01/18/2012 Transmitted to Sponsors: Spring 20120 RWSTC approval following sponsors: 6/20/12 Council Approval: 6-22-12 ORIGIN OF REQUEST: Pline/Heydel & Ranck AFFECTED SECTIONS OF MUTCD: Section 2C.36 Advance Traffic Control Signs Table 2C-4. Guidelines for Advance Placement of Warning Signs SUMMARY: The existing MUTCD provisions for Advance Traffic Control Signs refers to Table 2C-4 Guidelines for Advance Placement of Warning Signs as a reference to determine sufficient distance to permit a road user to respond to the control device at the intersection. The road user needs to see the STOP or YIELD sign in sufficient time to bring their vehicle to a stop at the intersection. This reference can lead to an improper determination of adequate visibility distance for a road user to decelerate to a stop condition. This road user requirement is reflected in the AASHTO Guidelines for Stopping Sight Distance.. RESEARCH: The AASHTO Stopping Sight Distance is based on 2.5 seconds perception/reaction time exceeding the 90 th percentile of all drivers. The vehicle stopping distance is documented in NCHRP 400 as providing a comfortable deceleration rate and adequate for wet pavements. DISCUSSION It is necessary that a road user observe the STOP or YIELD at the intersection, react, and decelerate to a stop condition. The AASHTO Stopping Sight Distance criteria is based on a 2.5 sec PRT and a deceleration rate of 11.2 ft/sec 2 for the various design

40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 speeds representing the recommended minimum design guidelines for a comfortable stop. If the STOP or YIELD at the intersection is not visible at this distance in advance of the intersection then the road user would not have adequate time to react to the intersection traffic control and bring the vehicle to a stop. It would also be appropriate to install the Advance Traffic Control Sign (Stop Ahead or Yield Ahead) at this point of stopping sight distance to provide the road user notice of the stop condition so they can begin the deceleration to a stop. It is recognized that the Stop Ahead or Yield Ahead symbol sign has several hundred feet of legibility distance which when added to the AASHTO Stopping Sight Distance provides an additional warning distance for the road user and an opportunity to either react or decelerate at a slower rate than the minimum criteria. It is recommended that Table 2C-4 Guidelines for the Advance Placement of Warning Signs be revised to place the AASHTO Stopping Sight Distance minimum design guidelines in the 0 column or STOP condition for the various speeds. The basis for posting the Advance Traffic Control signs further in advance of the intersection are as follows; 1. It provides more advance notice of the critical intersection stop condition and a factor of safety for the driver to use more PRT or decelerate slower. 2. At 35 mph or less, Table 2C-4 assumes a sign legibility distance of 180 feet placing the Advance Traffic Control sign at 100 feet from the intersection. If that legibility distance does not exist then the motorist does not have adequate warning for stopping at the intersection. 3. Moving the Advance Traffic Control signs out away from the intersection is representative of Figure 2A-4 and 2A-5 (Note, Figure 2A-5 is currently being considered by the Council ) providing more space on the intersection approach for lane control and guide signing. The existing visibility criteria for a traffic control signal is based on continuous view of at least two signal faces for the distance specified in Table 4D-2 below assuming a queue of 2 vehicles (50 feet), PRT = 3.0 seconds, deceleration @ 11.2 ft/sec 2 and design speed vs. assumed speed based on Mokkapati, Naveen and H. G. Hawkins. Jr. Guidelines for Minimum Signal Sight Distance, Transportation Research Record 2020, TRB, Washington D.C., pages 40-46, 2007 ; MUTCD Table 4D-2. Minimum Sight AASHTO Table 3-1 Distances for Signal Visibility Stopping Sight Distance 85 th %ile Speed Minimum Sight Distance Design Speed Design Distance 20 mph 175 feet 20 mph 115 feet 25 mph 215 feet 25 mph 155 feet 30 mph 270 feet 30 mph 200 feet 35 mph 325 feet 35 mph 250 feet 40 mph 390 feet 40 mph 305 feet 45 mph 460 feet 45 mph 360 feet 50 mph 540 feet 50 mph 425 feet 55 mph 625 feet 55 mph 495 feet 60 mph 715 feet 60 mph 570 feet Section 4D.12(04) Guidance: provides, The two primary signal faces as a minimum on each approach should be continuously visible to traffic approaching the traffic control

86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 signal, from a point at least the minimum sight distance provided in Table 4D-2 in advance of and measured to the stop line. It should be noted that this is a Guidance provision while Section 2C.36 makes the visibility criteria for a traffic signal specified in Table 4D-2 a Standard provision. It is appropriate to modify the existing Standard, Section 2C.36(01), Lines 118 & 119, to a Guidance provision to make Section 2C.36 and 4D.12 consistent. However, Section 4D.12 places the Traffic Signal Ahead Warning sign in conformance with Section 2C.36 that references Table 2C-4. Making the change in Table 2C-4 would also locate the Signal Ahead Warning sign the same distance as recommended for the Stop Ahead or Yield Ahead signs. Other Sections of the MUTCD that refer to the application of Stop Ahead and Yield Ahead Warning signs are as follows; Figure 2A-4B Relative Location of Regulatory, Warning and Guide Signs on Intersection Approaches. Section 2B.10(01). STOP Sign or YIELD Sign Placement Section 4D.12(07) Visibility, Aiming and Shielding of Signal Faces Section 5C.04(01)(02) Stop Ahead and Yield Ahead Signs Section 5F.04(02) STOP and YIELD Signs Section 8B.05(01) Use of STOP or YIELD Signs without Crossbuck Signs at Highway-LRT Grade Crossings. Section 8B.06(03) Grade Crossing Advance Warning Signs In each Section, the cross reference is to Section 2C.36 for the need and placement of the Stop Ahead and Yield Ahead sign. Therefore, revision of these Sections is not necessary. RECOMMENDED MUTCD PROVISIONS/ REVISIONS: Note: Proposed changes to the MUTCD are shown in Underlined Red and removed text are shown in strike through red. Section 2C.36 Advance Traffic Control Signs (W3-1, W3-2, W3-3, W3-4) Standard: 01 The Advance Traffic Control symbol signs (see Figure 2C-6) include the Stop Ahead (W3-1), Yield Ahead (W3-2), and Signal Ahead (W3-3) signs. These signs shall be installed on an approach to a primary traffic control device that is not visible for a sufficient distance to permit the road user to respond to the device (see Table 2C-4). Support: 02 Figure 2A-4 and 2A-5 shows the typical placement of an Advance Traffic Control sign. 03 Permanent obstructions causing the limited visibility might include roadway alignment or structures. Intermittent obstructions might include foliage or parked vehicles. Guidance: The visibility criteria for a traffic control signal should be based on having a continuous view of at least two signal faces for the distance specified in Table 4D-2. 04 Where intermittent obstructions occur, engineering judgment should determine the treatment to be implemented. Option:

135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 05 An Advance Traffic Control sign may be used for additional emphasis of the primary traffic control device, even when the visibility distance to the device is satisfactory. 06 An advance street name plaque (see Section 2C.58) may be installed above or below an Advance Traffic Control sign. 07 A warning beacon may be used with an Advance Traffic Control sign. 08 A BE PREPARED TO STOP (W3-4) sign (see Figure 2C-6) may be used to warn of stopped traffic caused by a traffic control signal or in advance of a section of roadway that regularly experiences traffic congestion. Standard: 09 When a BE PREPARED TO STOP sign is used in advance of a traffic control signal, it shall be used in addition to a Signal Ahead sign and shall be placed downstream from the Signal Ahead (W3-3) sign. Option: 10 The BE PREPARED TO STOP sign may be supplemented with a warning beacon (see Section 4L.03). Guidance: 11 When the warning beacon is interconnected with a traffic control signal or queue detection system, the BE PREPARED TO STOP sign should be supplemented with a WHEN FLASHING (W16-13P) plaque (see Figure 2C-12). Support: 12 Section 2C.40 contains information regarding the use of a NO MERGE AREA (W4-5P) supplemental plaque in conjunction with a Yield Ahead sign. Table 2C-4. Guidelines for Advance Placement of Warning Signs Make the following revisions to the Table; Posted or 85th- Percentile Speed Advance Placement Distance1 Condition B: Deceleration to the listed advisory speed (mph) for the condition Current 03 Recommended 03 20 mph 100 ft6 115 ft 25 mph 100 ft6 155 ft 30 mph 100 ft6 200 ft 35 mph 100 ft6 250 ft 40 mph 125 ft 305 ft 45 mph 175 ft 360 ft 50 mph 250 ft 425 ft 55 mph 325 ft 495 ft 60 mph 400 ft 570 ft 65 mph 475 ft 645 ft 70 mph 550 ft 730 ft 75 mph 650 ft 820 ft 1 The distances are adjusted for a sign legibility distance of 180 feet for Condition A. The distances for Condition B have been adjusted for a sign legibility distance of 250 feet, which is appropriate for an alignment warning symbol sign. For Conditions A and B, warning signs with less than 6-inch legend or more than four words, a minimum of 100 feet should be added to the advance placement distance to provide adequate legibility of the warning sign. 2 Typical conditions are locations where the road user must use extra time to adjust speed and change lanes in heavy traffic because of a complex driving situation. Typical signs are Merge and Right Lane Ends. The distances are determined by providing the driver a PRT of 14.0 to 14.5 seconds for vehicle maneuvers (2005 AASHTO Policy, Exhibit 3-3, Decision Sight Distance, Avoidance Maneuver E) minus the legibility distance of 180 feet for the appropriate sign. 3 Typical condition is the warning of a potential stop situation. Typical signs are Stop Ahead, Yield Ahead, Signal Ahead, and Intersection Warning signs.the distances are based on the 2011 AASHTO Policy, Table 3-1, Stopping Sight Distance, providing a PRT of 2.5 seconds, a deceleration rate of 11.2 feet/second2, minus the sign legibility distance of 180 feet. 4 Typical conditions are locations where the road user must decrease speed to maneuver through the warned condition. Typical signs are Turn, Curve,Reverse Turn, or Reverse Curve. The distance is determined by providing a 2.5 second PRT, a vehicle deceleration rate of 10 feet/second2, minus the sign legibility distance of 250 feet. 5 No suggested distances are provided for these speeds, as the placement location is dependent on site conditions and other signing. An alignment warning sign may be placed anywhere from the point of curvature up to 100 feet in advance of the curve. However, the alignment warning sign should be installed in advance of the curve and at least 100 feet from any other signs. 6 The minimum advance placement distance is listed as 100 feet to provide adequate spacing between signs. RWSTC 6-20-12 For: 18 Vote:

199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 Against: 1 Abstentions: 1 Council Vote: For: Unanimous Against: Abstentions: : C:NCUTCD/June 2012/RW # 3 Stop ahead signs Table 2C-4 Placement of advance signs 6-22-12 APPROVED BY COUNCIL