BARTON COUNTY GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP PREPARED BY THE KANSAS NE 120 RD NE 100 RD NE 80 RD NE 70 RD NE 50 RD NE 60 RD T18S T19S. County Ellsworth County

Similar documents
s Contact the Area Construction Engineer at for RAP sample location. Page 2 of 10

Page 1 of KA

59-2 KA Page 1 of 16

KDOT PROJECT # 106 KA

KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EDITION 2007

2 Min. Min. Edge of. Edgeline See Note 3 PLAN VIEW. See Note 3. This distance may vary

MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION PLANS FOR PROPOSED STATE HIGHWAY DESIGN DESIGNATION INDEX OF SHEETS LENGTH OF PROJECT SHEET NUMBER

Section 6H.01 Typical Applications

SECTIO N 610 PAVEMENT SMO O THNESS

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

Plan Check Policies and Guidelines

1400 MISCELLANEOUS Traffic Engineering Manual

DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT 200' TYPICAL SPACING (YELLOW DELINEATORS) END OF MERGE LANE TAPER DELINEATOR REFERENCE POINT

IH 35 FEASIBILITY STUDY

This corridor section will carry commuter trains from Portland to Longview/Kelso, CHSR inter-city and inter-city express trains.

East Kings Highway and Roberts Avenue Speed Hump Analysis

STATE ND PROJECT NO. CP 0883 (14) & CP 1152 (14) SHEET NO. TOTAL SHEETS 9 31 SIGN NUMBER SIGN SIZE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT REQUIRED UNITS PER AMOUNT UNITS

EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT

Alberta Transportation Rumble Strips - C-TEP Lunch and Learn

Kentucky Highway District 6

CATEGORY 500 PAVING SECTION 535 PAVEMENT SURFACE PROFILE

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (IRI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

Lee County DOT Traffic Section Design Standard for Sign Installation

DIVISION V SURFACINGS AND PAVEMENTS

CLAY COUNTY MISSOURI HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PLANS FOR PROPOSED STATE HIGHWAY NOT TO SCALE LENGTH OF PROJECT

800 Access Control, R/W Use Permits and Drive Design

La Paz County Public Works Standards Volume I

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. TRB Straight to Recording for All. Rumble Strips/Stripes: Practices and Challenges

THE CITY OF MARION HISTORIC DOWNTOWN STREETSCAPE PLAN DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE

April 27, FHWA/FTA Approval of an Amendment to the Kansas STIP to include WAMPO s April 14, 2009 TIP Amendment 6

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

Site DNL Calculator. Guidelines:

Corridor Sketch Summary

WICHITA AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION

Work Zone Safety & New Interstate Resurfacing Provision

Session 123 Rumble Stripes: Opportunity to Improve Safety and Retroreflectivity

Brigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction

Temporary Traffic Control Plans

Support: The Crossbuck (R15-1) sign assigns right-of-way to rail traffic at a highway-rail grade crossing.

MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SPECIAL PROVISION FOR PAVEMENT RIDE QUALITY (MEAN ROUGHNESS INDEX ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA)

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

Maintaining Pavement Marking Retroreflectivity

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

PN /21/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

AASHTO Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets

2003 EDITION. Illinois Supplement to the National Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Division of Highways

Safety Audits in Iowa

Public Information Packet FY Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)

FIGURE 15. MANUAL RUT DEPTH

Western ND Meeting. February 19, 2014 Grant Levi, NDDOT Director

Pre-Grant Meeting Township Safety Signs Grant Program

Section 2B.59 Weight Limit Signs - Interim Revisions

Table Standardized Naming Convention for ERD Files

MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN

RE: S.P (T.H. 210) in Crow Wing County Located on T.H. 210 from Brainerd (R.P ) to Ironton (R.P )

High-production installation Rumble strip milling attachment W 60

Pre-Grant Meeting Township Safety Signs Grant Program

Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Candidate Project List for Public Review

SN01 STANDARD NOTES CITY OF SAMMAMISH 2018 FLASHING YELLOW ARROW SIGNALS PROJECT NO. DATE BY APPR REVISION COSA0023 KING COUNTY WASHINGTON

.MAINTENANCE. Strategic Initiative Four:

CEDAR COUNTY ACCESS POLICY FOR SUBDIVISION, DRIVEWAY, AND FIELD ACCESS

SECTION 602 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT SMOOTHNESS

Rural Planning. Highway Projects - CULLMAN COUNTY

TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION INSTRUCTIONAL & INFORMATIONAL MEMORANDUM

High Tension Cable Barrier

PN 420-7/18/ SURFACE SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR PAVEMENTS

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO INSTALL A DRIVEWAY ON A COUNTY TRUNK HIGHWAY

BY-ELECTION SIGN GUIDELINES

Intersection Design: Switch Point

Control of Pavement Smoothness in Kansas

City of Grand Forks Staff Report

DESCRIPTION This work consists of measuring the smoothness of the final concrete or bituminous surface.

Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment

Plainfield, Indiana Speed Limit Study

This corridor section will carry commuter trains from Wilsonville to Portland and Portland to Longview/Kelso.

MnDOT s Experience with IRI Specifications

Speed Limit and Safety Nexus Studies for Automated Enforcement Locations in the District of Columbia 3rd Street Tunnel at Massachusetts Avenue Exit

ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY AND OPERATIONS DIVISION CONTRACTS AND SPECIFICATIONS SECTION TABULATION OF BIDS

FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS Based on the 2012 edition of the International Fire Code

CHANGE LIST for MDOT Traffic and Safety Geometric Design Guides. May 23, 2017: The following update was made to the web site.

INFORMATION BULLETIN / PUBLIC - ZONING CODE REFERENCE NO.: L.A.M.C A5 Effective: DOCUMENT NO.: P/ZC Revised:

Ch. 157 ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS CHAPTER 157. ESTABLISHED SOUND LEVELS

Appendix 3 Traffic Technical Memorandum

2016 PSRC REGIONAL & KING COUNTYWIDE EASTSIDE FUNDING AWARDS. Eastside Transportation Partnership September 9, 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS NEVADA STANDARD SIGNS MANUAL 2006

Regulatory Signs in Nomenclature Order

Speed Evaluation Saw Mill Drive

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. June Dear Customer:

DESIGN STANDARDS SECTION DS 3 STREETS

Subarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.

Fire Department Access & Water Supply

JCE4600 Fundamentals of Traffic Engineering

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

2017 Jefferson County Outreach Jefferson County Maintenance. Matthew Burkett ~ Jefferson County Maintenance Manager

2013 Changes to the 2011 MMUTCD, Part 6 September 2013

Letter of Transmittal

WELCOME PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE FOR US-64 FROM THE SH-18 INTERSECTION EAST 6.5 MILES JANUARY 10TH, 2017 PAWNEE CITY HALL, 5:30 PM

DRIVEWAY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES

Tulsa Transportation Management Area. Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program

Transcription:

TS TS NW 0 RD! Stickney! Millard!!!!! NE 00 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD! NW 0 AVE NW 0 AVE NW 0 AVE NW 0 AVE NW 00 AVE NW 0 AVE NW 0 AVE NW 0 AVE NW 0 AVE NW 0 AVE NW 0 AVE NW 0 AVE NW 0 AVE N SUSANK RD NE 0 AVE NE 0 AVE NE 0 AVE NE 0 AVE NE 0 AVE NE 0 AVE NE 0 AVE NE 0 AVE NE 0 AVE NE 00 AVE NE 0 AVE NE 0 AVE NE 0 AVE NE 0 AVE NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 00 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 00 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD NW 0 RD W BARTON COUNTY RD SW 0 RD SW 0 RD SW 0 RD SW 0 RD SW 0 RD SW 0 RD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Albert 0 0 0 0 0 Pawnee Rock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Beaver 0 0 0 0 0 Cheyenne Bottoms - KA 0-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 00 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD NE 0 RD E BARTON COUNTY RD SE 0 RD SE 0 RD SE 0 RD SE 0 RD reek RS RS RS 0 RS 0 RS TS T0S 0' 0' 0' - 0' C Beaver Goo secr ee k Coal Cre ek Lan don C Galatia reek Cow Creek Creek Sellens De ception Creek K&O Olmitz Boo t C reek Bl ood Creek K&O reek lnutcr. C Cheyenn e Little Wa Dry Walnut Creek K&O K&O A rkans as River Antelope Creek Dundee Heizer Boyd Susank Hoisington Dent Spur Great Bend Redwing Dartmouth Odin Ellinwood Hitschmann Claflin Farhman Clarendon Fourth Standard Parallel South RS RS RS RS RS RS 0 RS RS RS RS SW 0 AVE SW AVE SW 00 AVE SW 0 AVE SW 0 AVE SW AVE SW 0 AVE SW 0 AVE SW AVE SW 0 AVE SW 0 AVE SW 0 AVE S WASHINGTON AVE SE 0 AVE SE 0 AVE SE 0 AVE SE 0 AVE SE AVE SE 0 AVE SE 0 AVE SE 0 AVE SE 00 AVE SE 0 AVE SE 0 AVE SE 0 AVE SE 0 AVE SW 0 AVE RS 0 RS 0-00' RS SW 0 AVE SW 0 AVE SE 0 AVE SE 0 AVE RS RS RS 0 RS RS 0 RS RS RS RS RS RS - 0' RS RS RS RS RS RS 0 RS 0 RS - 0' Russell County TS TS 0' TS TS Pawnee County Rush County 0' 0' RS Rice County Ellsworth County RW RW RW R0W RW RW RW RW RW RW RW RW TS TS TS TS TS TS TS TS TS TS TS T0S T0S County Pawnee County Stafford T0S TS RW TS HIGHWAY MARKERS BOUNDARIES 0 Interstate Numbered Highway County Boundary State Boundary Kansas Turnpike Authority Military Fort Boundary 0 U.S. Numbered Highway Indian Reservation or Half-Breed Land 0 State Numbered Highway Section Line HIGHWAY CLASSIFICATIONS Park or Wildlife Area Interstate Incorporated City Limit Kansas Turnpike (KTA) Urban Area Controlled Access US Route - Divided CITIES OR TOWNS US Route - Undivided State Capitol State Route - Divided County Seat State Route - Undivided Populated Place ROAD CLASSIFICATIONS! Locale RS Route - Paved RS Route - Unpaved DRAINAGE Minor Road - Paved River or Major Drainage Minor Road - Gravel Lake or Reservoir Minor Road - Soil MAP SYMBOLS ROAD SYSTEM DESIGNATION RS Rural Secondary System Roundabout Interchange ST RD County Road System State System Bridge End of Designated System Railroad s GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP BARTON COUNTY KANSAS PREPARED BY THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING IN COOPERATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Miles 0 MARCH 0 KDOT makes no warranties, guarantees, or representations for the accuracy of this information and assumes no liability for errors or omissions. RW RW RW R0W - 0' RW RW - 0' RW RW RW RW - 0' RW - 00' Page of

- KA 0-0 shall transition Page of

Page of - KA 0-0

- KA 0-0 Page of

Page of - KA 0-0

Ú City limit or Urban boundary No Centerline rumble strips Centerline rumble strips City connecting link or Urbanized (Unincorporated city) TYPICAL CITY CONNECTING LINK OR URBANIZED AREA Centerline rumble strips ì Major HighwayÜ ì Major HighwayÜ Ú Minor Highway or County Road Ú City limit or Urban boundary GENERAL NOTES Construction of centerline rumble strips in asphalt pavement is paid under the bid item "Rumble Strips (Milled) (Centerline)". All work and materials required to construct the strips in accordance to these details and Special Provisions are included in this item. See typical sections for other surfacing details. Do not construct rumble strip on bridges or concrete bridge approaches. No variation in spacing between depressions will be permitted. Either rumble strip shape is acceptable with no mixing of shapes on a project unless approved by the engineer. For Shoulder Rumble Strip details see Standard drawing RD0. ì Major HighwayÜ ì Major HighwayÜ TYPICAL RURAL INTERSECTION WITH BYPASS LANES No Centerline rumble strips Centerline rumble strips ì Major HighwayÜ ì Major HighwayÜ TYPICAL RURAL INTERSECTION WITH LEFT TURN LANES Centerline rumble strips Page of KDOT Graphics Certified Ú Minor Highway or County Road Centerline rumble strips No Centerline rumble strips Centerline rumble strips - KA 0-0 OF --0 Revised notes S.W.K. J.O.B. --0 Rem ì rumble strips thru sdrd. S.W.K. J.O.B. NO. DATE REVISIONS BY APP'D RD0 KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MILLED RUMBLE STRIPS FHWA APPROVAL -- (CENTERLINE) DESIGNED DETAILED QUANTITIES DESIGN CK. DETAIL CK. QUAN.CK. KDOT Graphics Certified 0-0-0 APP'D. James O. Brewer TRACED Bowser TRACE CK. King

Page of KDOT Graphics Certified ShoulderÜ ì ProjectÜ TYPICAL MINOR SIDEROAD OR ENTRANCE Centerline Rumble Strips Edge of travel wayü Traffic ÙCenterline Rumble Strips of Undivided Highway Traffic Edge of travel wayû TYPICAL INSTALLATION " " " PLAN DETAILS OF DEPRESSION " " " --0 Revised notes S.W.K. J.O.B. --0 Rem ì rumble strips thru sdrd. S.W.K. J.O.B. NO. RD0 DATE REVISIONS BY APP'D KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MILLED RUMBLE STRIPS FHWA APPROVAL -- (CENTERLINE) DESIGNED DETAILED QUANTITIES DESIGN CK. DETAIL CK. QUAN.CK. APP'D. James O. Brewer TRACED Bowser TRACE CK. King KDOT Graphics Certified 0-0-0 " ELEVATION B A A B B A A PLAN B DETAILS OF DEPRESSION (Alternate Shape) "to " depth " " SECTION B-B (ALT. SHAPE) "to " depth SECTION A-A (Typical for both shapes) ÚTop of pavement ÚTop of pavement SECTION B-B " - KA 0-0 OF ALT. RUMBLE STRIP SHAPE "to " depth "Radius "Radius "to " depth End of Rad. Úì Sideroad or Paved Entrance End of Rad.

00 00 " SOLID WHITE EDGELINE " SOLID YELLOW LINE " DOTTED WHITE EXTENSION LINE " SOLID WHITE EDGELINE D/ " BROKEN WHITE LANE LINE " WHITE LANE DROP LINE NOTE: DOTTED EXTENSION LINE TAPER LENGTH POSTED SPEED * FOR POSTED SPEEDS ABOVE 0 MPH W - D TYPICAL MARKING FOR AUXILIARY PASSING LANE " BROKEN WHITE LANE LINE " SOLID YELLOW LINE SHOULDER LINE " SOLID WHITE EDGE LINE TYPICAL SPACING FOR DOTTED EXTENSION LINES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. " SOLID WHITE EDGE LINE SHOULDER LINE " BROKEN WHITE LANE LINE " BROKEN YELLOW LINE TWO-WAY LEFT TURN DETAIL FOR FIVE LANE ROADWAY TYPICAL SPACING FOR LANE DROP. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS. " SOLID YELLOW LINE SHOULDER LINE " SOLID WHITE EDGE LINE " SOLID WHITE EDGE LINE TYPICAL SPACING FOR BROKEN LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS SHOULDER LINE " BROKEN YELLOW LINE TWO-WAY LEFT TURN DETAIL FOR THREE LANE ROADWAY " " SPACING (FT) 0 X SPEED (MPH) TWO-WAY LEFT TURN ARROW SPACING DETAIL " TYPICAL SPACING FOR NO PASSING LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS - KA 0-0 NOTE: IF ARROWS ARE USED SPACE THE ARROWS AS SHOWN IN THE SPACING DETAIL. Page of Pg of // Added Dotted Extension and Lane Drop Lines B.A.H. B.D.G. /0/0 Removed Aux. Passing Lane Dotted Ext. Line J.F.F. B.D.G. //0 New FHWA Approval Date J.F.F. B.D.G. NO. DATE REVISIONS BY APP D KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TYPICAL PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS FOR UNDIVIDED ROADWAYS TE0 FHWA APPROVAL //0 APP D Brian D. Gower DESIGNED J.F.F. DETAILED J.F.F. QUANTITIES TRACED DESIGN CK. B.D.G. DETAIL CK. B.D.G. QUAN. CK. TRACE CK.

NOTE: ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE BROKEN AT CROSS ROADS. FOR HIGHWAY JUNCTIONS THE NO PASSING ZONE WILL EXTEND 000 FROM INTERSECTION. " BROKEN YELLOW LINE " SOLID WHITE LANE LINE " SOLID YELLOW LINE " WHITE EDGE LINE " WHITE EDGE LINE 00 00 " WHITE EDGE LINE " SOLID WHITE LANE LINE " SOLID YELLOW LINE " BROKEN YELLOW LINE " WHITE EDGE LINE TYPICAL ROAD JUNCTION MARKINGS WITH BYPASS LANES " BROKEN WHITE LANE LINE SHOULDER LINE " SOLID WHITE EDGE LINE " SOLID YELLOW DOUBLE LINE " SOLID WHITE EDGE LINE SHOULDER LINE " BROKEN WHITE LANE LINE TYPICAL MARKINGS FOR FOUR LANE ROADWAY " SOLID WHITE EDGE LINE W- " BROKEN YELLOW LINE " SOLID YELLOW NO PASSING LINE SHOULDER LINE " SOLID WHITE EDGE LINE TYPICAL TWO LANE MARKINGS NOTE: LONGITUDINAL PAVEMENT MARKING LINES SHALL BE OFFSET A MINIMUM OF " FROM LONGITUDINAL PAVEMENT JOINTS. NOTE: ON NON I, US, AND K ROUTES, " EDGE LINES MAY BE INSTALLED. " EDGE LINES ARE NOT REQUIRED ON NON I, US, AND K ROUTES. Page of Pg of - KA 0-0 // Added Dotted Extension and Lane Drop Lines B.A.H. B.D.G. /0/0 Removed Aux. Passing Lane Dotted Ext. Line J.F.F. B.D.G. //0 New FHWA Approval Date J.F.F. B.D.G. NO. DATE REVISIONS BY APP D KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TYPICAL PAVEMENT MARKING DETAILS FOR UNDIVIDED ROADWAYS TE0 FHWA APPROVAL //0 APP D Brian D. Gower DESIGNED J.F.F. DETAILED J.F.F. QUANTITIES TRACED DESIGN CK. B.D.G. DETAIL CK. B.D.G. QUAN. CK. TRACE CK.

TYPICAL SIGNING AND MARKING FOR RIGHT LANE MUST TURN RIGHT " BROKEN YELLOW LINE SIDE ROAD MIN FOR MPH AND ABOVE USING THE SAME SPACING 0 " SOLID WHITE LINE 0 " SOLID YELLOW LINE " BROKEN WHITE LANE DROP LINE RIGHTLANE TYPICAL CROSSWALKS TYPE I: CROSSWALK LINES SHALL BE " SOLID WHITE LINES. THEY SHALL BE SPACED A MINIMUM OF APART FROM INSIDE EDGE TO INSIDE EDGE. TYPE II: THESE LINES SHOULD BE SOLID WHITE " WIDE PLACED PARALLEL TO THE DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW. THE LINE PLACEMENT IS DETERMINED BY LANE LINE,CENTER LINE, AND WHEEL PATH IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE TRAFFIC WEAR. THE CROSSWALK WIDTH SHOULD BE NOT LESS THAN. THE TRANSVERSE CROSSWALK LINES MAY BE ADDED. MUST TURN RIGHT R- THE LANE DROP MARKINGS LENGTH IS A MINIMUM OF 00 AND A MAXIMUM OF 0 PRIOR TO THE "SOLID WHITE LINE WHEN REQUIRED, STOP LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF FROM CROSSWALKS. MIN. TYPE II TYPE I - KA 0-0 Pg of MIN. // Updated Chart B and Lane Drop Lines B.A.H. B.D.G. 0/0/0 RR Xing Symbol Changed from " to " T.L.H. B.D.G. /0/0 Added " Solid Yellow Double Line to RRxing J.F.F. B.D.G. NO. DATE REVISIONS BY APP D KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TYPICAL MISCELLANEOUS MIN. Page 0 of PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEET TE0 FHWA APPROVAL //00 APP D Brian D. Gower DESIGNED J.F.F. DETAILED J.F.F. QUANTITIES TRACED DESIGN CK. B.D.G. DETAIL CK. B.D.G. QUAN. CK. TRACE CK.

" RAILROAD CROSSING MARKING " BROKEN WHITE LANE LINE " SYMBOL " BROKEN YELLOW LINE 00 " APPROX. " SOLID YELLOW LINE " SOLID YELLOW DOUBLE LINE... VARIES " SOLID WHITE LINE.. 0 0 0 DISTANCE D FROM CHART A " WHITE EDGE LINE W 0- R R A THREE-LANE ROADWAY SHOULD BE MARKED WITH A CENTERLINE FOR TWO-LANE APPROACH OPERATION ON THE APPROACH TO A CROSSING. ON MULTI-LANE ROADS THE TRANSVERSE BANDS SHOULD EXTEND ACROSS ALL APPROACH LANES, AND INDIVIDUAL R X R SYMBOLS SHOULD BE USED IN EACH APPROACH LANE. REFER TO STANDARD ALPHABET FOR HIGHWAY SIGNS AND MARKINGS FOR R X R SYMBOLS DETAILS. CHART "A" DISTANCE SPEED D MPH (feet) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 (X) PLACEMENT LOCATION IS DEPENDENT ON SITE CONDITIONS AND OTHER SIGNING TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE ADVANCE WARNING TO THE DRIVER *STOP LINE FROM NEAR EDGE OF GATE OR CANTILEVER, IF PRESENT. 0 0 NOTE: ON NON I, US, AND K ROUTES, " EDGE LINES MAY BE INSTALLED. " EDGE LINES ARE NOT REQUIRED ON NON I, US, AND K ROUTES. 0 0 (X) (X) (X) ALL DISTANCES ARE MINIMUM. " DOUBLE YELLOW LINE TYPICAL APPROACH TAPER DETAIL X ( FROM CHART B) MINIMUM " A " YELLOW DIAGONAL LINE L 0 B " SOLID WHITE LANE LINE " " WHITE STOP LINE " THE APPROACH TAPER LENGTH FROM POINT A TO POINT B IS TO BE DETERMINED USING CHART C. VALUES FOR L WERE CALCULATED USING THE EQUATIONS BELOW AND INCREASED TO THE NEXT HIGHER MPH INCREMENT. - SPEEDS < MPH L= W*S 0 - SPEEDS = MPH L= W*S IF ARROWS ARE USED AND UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED THE SPACE BETWEEN LINES SHOULD BE AT LEAST FOUR TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE CHARACTERS FOR LOW SPEED ROADS BUT NOT MORE THAN TEN TIMES THE HEIGHT OF THE CHARACTERS, UNDER ANY CONDITIONS. FOR SPEEDS LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 0 MPH, R=0. FOR SPEEDS GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO MPH, R=00. Page of Pg of CHART "B" CHART "C" APPROACH APPROACH SPEED X SPEED L 0 MPH 0 0 MPH 0 MPH MPH 0 MPH 0 0 MPH 0 MPH MPH 0 MPH 0 0 MPH 0 MPH MPH 0 0 MPH 0 0 MPH 00 MPH MPH 0 0 MPH 0 0 MPH 0 MPH MPH 0 0 MPH 0 0 MPH 0 - KA 0-0 // Updated Chart B and Lane Drop Lines B.A.H. B.D.G. 0/0/0 RR Xing Symbol Changed from " to " T.L.H. B.D.G. /0/0 Added " Solid Yellow Double Line to RRxing J.F.F. B.D.G. NO. DATE REVISIONS BY APP D KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TYPICAL MISCELLANEOUS PAVEMENT MARKING DETAIL SHEET TE0 FHWA APPROVAL //00 APP D Brian D. Gower DESIGNED J.F.F. DETAILED J.F.F. QUANTITIES TRACED DESIGN CK. B.D.G. DETAIL CK. B.D.G. QUAN. CK. TRACE CK.

Page of - KA 0-0

Page of - KA 0-0

Page of - KA 0-0

Page of - KA 0-0