Joint Research Centre

Similar documents
Joint Research Centre

Correction of test cycle tolerances: assessing the impact on CO 2 results. J. Pavlovic, A. Marotta, B. Ciuffo

The state-of-play of the NEDC/WLTP Correlation project

Progress at LAT. October 23, 2013 LABORATORY OF APPLIED THERMODYNAMICS

74th UNECE GRPE session

Approach for determining WLTPbased targets for the EU CO 2 Regulation for Light Duty Vehicles

European Parliament's Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety. Public Hearing Real-Driving Emissions Test

The European Commission s science and knowledge service. Joint Research Centre. VECTO - Overview VECTO Workshop Ispra, November, 2018

Simulation of Collective Load Data for Integrated Design and Testing of Vehicle Transmissions. Andreas Schmidt, Audi AG, May 22, 2014

Five Cool Things You Can Do With Powertrain Blockset The MathWorks, Inc. 1

TU Graz work related to PHEM and data collection

Vehicle simulation with cylinder deactivation

Validation of a simulation model for the assessment of CO 2 emissions of passenger cars under real-world conditions

Joint Research Centre

Addressing performance balancing in fuel economy driven vehicle programs

CO 2 Emissions from Heavy Duty Vehicles Overview of VECTO s inputs

DOC design & sizing using GT-SUITE European GT Conference Gauthier QUENEY 09/10/2017

VIRTUAL HYBRID ON THE ENGINE TEST BENCH SMART FRONTLOADING

Mobile Air Conditioning (MAC)

Correlation NEDC WLTP Proposed additional vehicles for testing

Real Driving Emissions and Test Cycle Data from 4 Modern European Vehicles

GT Conference 2017: Simulation Tool for Predictive Control Strategies for an ORC- System in Heavy Duty Vehicles

SIMULATION OF A SPARK IGNITION ENGINE WITH CYLINDERS DEACTIVATION

Predictive Control Strategies using Simulink

Modeling a Phlegmatized Diesel-Engine in a Hybrid Electric Vehicle Using a Transient Predictive Model Michael Auerbach, October 25th, 2010, Frankfurt

GRPE/HDH Engine-Base Emissions Regulation using HILS for Commercial Hybrid Vehicles JASIC

NOx reduction effect on CO 2. NOX Reductions are achievable without significant penalties in CO 2

MoBEO: Model based Engine Development and Calibration

Modeling and Simulate Automotive Powertrain Systems

Driving dynamics and hybrid combined in the torque vectoring

WLTC Validation test 1 ~ Progress report by JARI ~

UNECE WLTP Durability Task Force Status of experimental work at JRC

Identification of tyre lateral force characteristic from handling data and functional suspension model

AECC Clean Diesel Euro 6 Real Driving Emissions Project. AECC Technical Seminar on Real-Driving Emissions Brussels, 29 April 2015

Model-Based Design and Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation for Clean Vehicles Bo Chen, Ph.D.

76th UNECE GRPE session

Balancing operability and fuel efficiency in the truck and bus industry

Vehicle Simulation for Engine Calibration to Enhance RDE Performance

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Model (GEM) User Guide

Modelling of Diesel Vehicle Emissions under transient conditions

NEDC/WLTP correlation process

Using big data to relieve energy distribution stresses

OPTIMIZATION STUDIES OF ENGINE FRICTION EUROPEAN GT CONFERENCE FRANKFURT/MAIN, OCTOBER 8TH, 2018

Design and Calibration of the Jaguar XK Adaptive Cruise Control System. Tim Jagger MathWorks International Automotive Conference 2006

CHAPTER 4 : RESISTANCE TO PROGRESS OF A VEHICLE - MEASUREMENT METHOD ON THE ROAD - SIMULATION ON A CHASSIS DYNAMOMETER

Real Driving Emissions

The European Commission s science and knowledge service

Available online at ScienceDirect. Transportation Research Procedia 14 (2016 )

WLTP. Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class

EMISSION FACTORS FROM EMISSION MEASUREMENTS. VERSIT+ methodology Norbert Ligterink

Vehicle Dynamics and Control

VEHICLE EMISSIONS. ITF-SEDEMA workshop in Mexico City Norbert Ligterink

Contribution to the RDE working group

EFFICIENZA E ANALISI TERMICA. Ing. Ivan Saltini Italy Country Manager

V-CAP TM A FEV VIRTUAL POWERTRAIN CALIBRATION PLATFORM

Fully Active vs. Reactive AWD coupling systems. How much performance is really needed? Thomas Linortner Manager, Systems Architecture

MODELING, VALIDATION AND ANALYSIS OF HMMWV XM1124 HYBRID POWERTRAIN

Early Stage Vehicle Concept Design with GT-SUITE

The research on gearshift control strategies of a plug-in parallel hybrid electric vehicle equipped with EMT

Modeling the Electrically Assisted Variable Speed (EAVS) Supercharger

PARALLEL HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLES: DESIGN AND CONTROL. Pierre Duysinx. LTAS Automotive Engineering University of Liege Academic Year

State of the art cooling system development for automotive applications

SPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?

Fuel consumption measurement in LDVs

Chip Simulation for Virtual ECUs

Test results of Validation test 1b and Cycle modifications

EGR Transient Simulation of a Turbocharged Diesel Engine using GT-Power

Development of Engine Clutch Control for Parallel Hybrid

Characterisation of real-world CO 2 variability and implications for future policy instruments

Emissions and Fuel Consumption Trade-offs of a Turbocharged Diesel Engine Equipped with Electrically Heated Catalyst

The Modell PHEM. Structure and Applicatons. Stefan Hausberger. (Passenger car & Heavy duty emission Model) JRC,

State-of-play of the project and possible way ahead

Transmitted by the expert from the European Commission (EC) Informal Document No. GRRF (62nd GRRF, September 2007, agenda item 3(i))

Consumption calculation of vehicles using OBD data. *CTL, Centre For Transport and Logistics, University of Rome La Sapienza

Cornering & Traction Test Rig MTS Flat-Trac IV CT plus

Real-world to Lab Robust measurement requirements for future vehicle powertrains

From Developing Credit Risk Models Using SAS Enterprise Miner and SAS/STAT. Full book available for purchase here.

WLTP Revision 1

Developing a Methodology for Certifying Heavy Duty Hybrids based on HILS

MORSE: MOdel-based Real-time Systems Engineering. Reducing physical testing in the calibration of diagnostic and driveabilty features

77 th GRPE, 6-8 June 2018 Agenda item 13, HD FE Harmonization. OICA HD-FE TF Y. Takenaka

Piaggio BV 350. Function, Form, Finish and Performance Wow!

CONVENTIONAL AND ELECTRICALLY HEATED DIESEL OXIDATION CATALYST MODELING IN GT-SUITE

GENERIC EPS MODEL Generic Modeling and Control of an Electromechanical Power Steering System for Virtual Prototypes

Full Vehicle Durability Prediction Using Co-simulation Between Implicit & Explicit Finite Element Solvers

LDV Real Driving Emissions: - Evaluation of PEMS results based on the Moving Averaging Window and a CO2 Severity Indicator

Technical support to the correlation of CO 2 emissions measured under NEDC and WLTP Ref: CLIMA.C.2/FRA/2012/0006

Hybrid Architectures for Automated Transmission Systems

WLTP-DTP WLTP Validation 2. Assessment Criteria

Contents. Preface... xiii Introduction... xv. Chapter 1: The Systems Approach to Control and Instrumentation... 1

Optimal Predictive Control for Connected HEV AMAA Brussels September 22 nd -23 rd 2016

Fault-tolerant Control System for EMB Equipped In-wheel Motor Vehicle

Evolution of Advanced Emissions Control System to meet NOx and Particulates Regulations

RDE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS & TOOLS

Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions

Greenhouse gas Emission Model (GEM) A Compliance Vehicle Model for Certification

AVL SERIES BATTERY BENCHMARKING. Getting from low level parameter to target orientation

EPA/NHTSA UPDATE ON PHASE II GHG AND FUEL EFFICIENCY RULES FOR MEDIUM AND HEAVY DUTY VEHICLES. Houshun Zhang U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Automotive Transmissions

SLIP CONTROL AT SMALL SLIP VALUES FOR ROAD VEHICLE BRAKE SYSTEMS

Transcription:

Joint Research Centre the European Commission's in-house science service Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation The CO 2 MPAS tool G. Fontaras, V. Arcidiacono, V. Valverde, K. Anagnostopoulos, S. Tsiakmakis, B. Ciuffo, J. Pavlovic, D. Komnos Ispra, 17/11/2016

Approach Phasing-in During the WLTP phasing-in, WLTP measurements will be correlated into NEDC values using CO 2 MPAS (CO 2 Model for PAssenger and commercial vehicles Simulation), developed by JRC. WLTP-based vehicle Type- Approval CO 2 MPAS meta-model NEDCequivalent CO 2 emissions NEDC-based OEM performance

CO 2 MPAS data flow overview Data Entry Veh. characteristics WLTP Bag CO 2 WLTP time series Processing Sub models calibration NEDC simulation Reporting Simulated time-series Summary Report Dice report

Key features Comprises of 2 main calculation modules Power RPM module Simple longitudinal dynamics (WLTP-GTR) Engine power and RPM calc d @ 1hz Inclusion of Mech or Elec. loads where needed Generic start-stop logic A/T and CVT RPM prediction model Alternator logic calibrated over WLTP FC module Calculation of FC Indicative instantaneous approach Based on an extended Willans model Semi-physical empirical cold start model Calibration - Optimization based on WLTP results Specific engine technologies included +Parallel work for HEV control module and optimization Accurate calculation of average / instantaneous power demand Very good accuracy when compared with results obtained from the Cruise simulations by LAT and Real test data from 40 vehicles

Power demand @ the wheel Electric power demand Gearshifting / Engine RPM pred. Logic Losses Differential Currents Alternator Losses TC / Clutch Electrical System Logic Currents Battery Losses GB Engine RPM Model WLTP measurements (Bag CO2 & Timeseries signals) Engine Torque Losses Engine Temperature model Total Engine Power Demand Model Cycle, Road loads & Vehicle Characteristics FCM Optimization WLTP CO 2 (Initial estimate) WLTP CO 2 (Calibrated) Fuel Consumption Model 5 Cycle Prediction

CO 2 MPAS sub-models CO 2 MPAS includes the following sub-models: Automatic Transmission model (gear shifting) Clutch / Torque converter model score Engine cold start speed model Engine speed model Start stop model Alternator model Engine coolant temperature model Engine fuel consumption (CO 2 ) model 6

CO 2 MPAS self assessment of internal models Mean absolute error (quantities with units) Calibration coefficient for unit-less quantities

Automatic Transmission model (gear-shifting 1/2) There are 2 official options enabled in the A/T model: Corrected Mean Velocity (CMV) creates a map of gear upshifts and down-speeds as a function of vehicle speed. GearShift Power-Velocity (GSPV) creates a map of gear upshifts as a function of vehicle speed & the power at the gearbox CO 2 MPAS automatically selects the option that better reproduces gear shifting over WLTP Two sets of gear-shift maps are calculated, hot and cold conditions In engineering mode the DT option can be also enabled Power (kw) GSPV example Velocity (km/h)

Automatic Transmission model (gear-shifting 2/2) Final step: Matrix Velocity Limits (MVL) correction model corrects gear-shifting over quasi-steady state conditions () Engine speed [RPM] Engine speed [RPM] 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Time [s] Engine speed [RPM] Engine speed [RPM] 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 800 900 1000 1100 1200 Time [s] output.prediction.nedc_h.ts/engine_speeds_out output.prediction.nedc_h.ts/target.engine_speeds_out output.prediction.nedc_h.ts/engine_speeds_out output.prediction.nedc_h.ts/target.engine_speeds_out 9

Automatic Transmission model (gear-shifting 2/2) For CVTs a gradient boost regressor is used to predict Engine RPM as a function of vehicle speed, acceleration and power at the gearbox Engine speed [RPM] 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 output.prediction.nedc_h.ts/engine_speeds_out output.prediction.nedc_h.ts/target.engine_speeds_out CVT ratio 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 Ratio WLTP Ratio NEDC 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Time [s] 0 0 50 100 150 Vehicle Speed (km/h) 10

Gearbox Losses (1/2) A generic torque loss model is used in CO 2 MPAS T out [Nm] = GB10 RPM in + GB01 T in + GB00 Where GB00 = -0.0034 * T max + GB10 = -0.0034/2000 * T max + GB01 = 0.975 80 0.965 40 0.3 80 0.7 40 0.1/2000 80 0.25/2000 40 All quantities refer to the input shaft (engine side) of the gearbox Linear interpolation between cold and hot T out according to GB temperature calculated by CO 2 MPAS 11

Gearbox Losses (2/2) 12

Clutch / Torque converter model CO 2 MPAS by default calibrates a clutch model (generic or DTC) unless a TC is declared as present on the vehicle: In both cases an RPM-slip model as a function of acceleration is fitted based on experimental data Efficiency model (predefined non calibrated): Clutch: linear TC efficiency as a function of RPM ratio TC: a non-linear efficiency as a function of RPM ratio For TCs a lock up velocity (48km/h) is used 13

Engine cold start speed model The ECSSM increases idling RPMs during the cold start phase An optimizer is used to calculate the unit less RPM idle [%] function during cold start RPM is a linear function o f engine temperature capped at a certain value which is also estimated by the optimizer Additional Idle RPM 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Examples 0 20 40 60 80 100 Engine temperature C

Engine speed model The ESM calculates the exact RPM/Velocity ratios over the specific test Gear ratios (or default RPM/V ratios) and information on tyre dimensions provided by the user are used as starting values An optimizer calculates the optimal dynamic radius of the tire based on the dyno velocity and engine RPM data measured over the WLTP 15

Start stop model The SS model defines where the engine should be switched off for SS equipped vehicles CO 2 MPAS uses a classifier in order to associate engine switch off events to vehicle deceleration and velocity. SS functionality is initiated based on the user provided input on engine SS initiation time 2 on_engine on_engine 1 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 16

Alternator model Comprises of 2 parts: Logic part (when the alternator operates and how) Electric part (what current is supplied by the alternator) Logic part identifies different phases (idling, regenerative braking, battery charging, battery depletion) and under what conditions those occur result: alternator status Electric part identifies the current per each phase based on other parameters (eg RPM, Battery SOC, deceleration) A gradient boost regressor is used for predicting the currents based on alt. status, acceleration, power at g/box, SOC at t-1, and initialization time 17

Alternator logic and current prediction -180-160 -140-120 -100-80 -60-40 -20 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 1 26 51 76 101 126 151 176 201 226 251 276 301 326 351 376 401 426 451 476 501 526 551 576 601 626 651 676 701 726 751 776 801 826 851 876 901 926 951 976 1001 1026 1051 1076 1101 1126 1151 1176 Current [A] Status [-] Time alternator_statuses alternator_currents

Alternator logic and current prediction - windows

Engine coolant temperature model CO 2 MPAS uses a regressor to predict engine temperature (T) evolution T i is function of T i-1, RPM, acceleration and the power at the gearbox The regressor is calibrated based on WLTP recorded time series using Gradient Boost algorithm (ransac algorithm used for inlier and outlier detection) 20

Engine fuel consumption (CO 2 ) model Extended Willans Model approach: Fitting of a specific non-linear Willans model BMEP=(a+b cm+c c m2 ) FuMEP+(a2 FuMEP 2 )+l 0 +l 2 cm 2 Where: BMEP: brake mean effective pressure cm: mean piston speed FuMEP: fuel mean effective pressure a, b, c, a2, l0, l2 are the parameters that are being fitted

Engine fuel consumption (CO 2 ) model Fuel Consumption (Fc) Calculation Function &' ) & ) * & &' ) & ) * * 4 * + 1 +,-./0, 23 & * ) * 4"#$!"#$ %, where: 2 * Cold start factor ) 5/6%2 78/980 :;00<.;)? => #@A BCA 56 4"#$ $ % * 78/980 DEF0. G 178/980 H-;-I9,J ) K LMNOMP QRPPS TRU? VW!XA XY @/ % Z[7D, D- 78/980 H-;-I9,J )K LMNOMP QRPPS 5TRU6 VW1? * Z\0] ^EF0. _0-,98/ `-]\0 a? N The following are considered as knowns from the measurement / other COMPAS modules (in order to understand issues and improve the stability of the FC module): Engine Speed, Temperature, Engine Power The constant parameters are calculated by optimization of the above equation against WLTP CO 2 measured data

Engine fuel consumption (CO 2 ) model Extended Willans Model is calibrated using WLTP CO 2 results An initial estimate is made based on generic values (categorized per engine and aspiration type) The model perturbates until the initial and final estimate of the CO 2 time series converge A final optimization is done in order to reduce the error in the WLTP bag value prediction. Specific technologies are currently considered using the Extended Willans approach For Petrol engines: Variable valve actuation, Lean combustion, Aspiration type, Cylinder deactivation (limited validation), External EGR (limited validation) For Diesel engines: External EGR, Cylinder deactivation (limited 23 validatipn), Selective catalytic reduction (limited validation)

Optimization path Initial guess Rescaling Optimization 24

Summary 25

Correlation and CO 2 MPAS Process flow chart TA Report WLTP Test Data Input CO 2 MPAS GUI TA data NEDC DV TA Doc. DF & VF Yes - Engine data. update Initial Engine - CO 2 model setup Engine - CO 2 model calibration / Instantaneous samples WLTP CO 2 Improv ing? No Engine - CO 2 model trimming / WLTP bag values Generic Values Selection Sub models calibration (Eng. Temp., RPM, G/box, Clutch-TC, Power) Final Engine -Vehicle model setup WLTP (prediction) & NEDC Test simulation WLTP & NEDC sim. data Reports (Summary, Dice) No Accept DV, Add Hash in TA doc Physical NEDC Test NEDC to be tested? Dice report emailed to Timestamp Server Yes Yes NEDC TA No CO 2DV CO 2 Hb*[Dc: > 0.96

Correlation and CO 2 MPAS Process flow chart TA Report WLTP Test Data Input CO 2 MPAS GUI TA data NEDC DV TA Doc. DF & VF Yes - Engine data. update Initial Engine - CO 2 model setup Engine - CO 2 model calibration / Instantaneous samples WLTP CO 2 Improv ing? No Engine - CO 2 model trimming / WLTP bag values Generic Values Selection Sub models calibration (Eng. Temp., RPM, G/box, Clutch-TC, Power) Final Engine -Vehicle model setup WLTP (prediction) & NEDC Test simulation WLTP & NEDC sim. data Reports (Summary, Dice) No Accept DV, Add Hash in TA doc Physical NEDC Test NEDC to be tested? Dice report emailed to Timestamp Server Yes CO 2 CO 2 MPAS <1.04 CO 2 DV NEDC TA Yes No

Correlation and CO 2 MPAS Process flow chart TA Report WLTP Test Data Input CO 2 MPAS GUI TA data NEDC DV TA Doc. DF & VF Yes - Engine data. update Initial Engine - CO 2 model setup Engine - CO 2 model calibration / Instantaneous samples WLTP CO 2 Improv ing? No Engine - CO 2 model trimming / WLTP bag values Generic Values Selection Sub models calibration (Eng. Temp., RPM, G/box, Clutch-TC, Power) Final Engine -Vehicle model setup WLTP (prediction) & NEDC Test simulation WLTP & NEDC sim. data Reports (Summary, Dice) No Accept DV, Add Hash in TA doc Physical NEDC Test NEDC to be tested? Dice report emailed to Timestamp Server Yes Yes NEDC TA No CO 2DV CO 2 Hb*[Dc: > 0.96

Stay in touch JRC Science Hub: www.ec.europa.eu/jrc https://co2mpas.io co2mpas@jrc.ec.europa.eu Twitter: @EU_ScienceHub LinkedIn: european-commission-joint-research-centre YouTube: JRC Audiovisuals Vimeo: Science@EC