CASE NO. 1D The Florida Department of Transportation appeals the trial court s non-final
|
|
- Rose Jacobs
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and JIM BOXOLD, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Florida Department of Transportation, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D Appellants, v. TROPICAL TRAILER LEASING, LLC, et al., Appellees. / Opinion filed November 6, An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Karen Gievers, Judge. Clinton L. Doud, Chief Counsel, Civil Litigation; Ryan Scott Bourgoin, Assistant General Counsel, Civil Litigation; George S. Reynolds, IV, and Marc A. Peoples, Assistant General Counsels, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, for Appellants. Diane G. DeWolf of Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; A. Rodgers Traynor, Jr. and Lawrence D. Silverman of Akerman LLP, Miami, for Appellees. B.L. THOMAS, C.J. The Florida Department of Transportation appeals the trial court s non-final order certifying two sub-classes in favor of Appellee, Tropical Trailer Leasing, LLC. The Department argues that the trial court abused its discretion on three
2 grounds: deciding the merits of Tropical Trailer s claim; certifying broader subclasses than requested by Tropical Trailer; and finding that Tropical Trailer proved the elements of rule 1.220, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. We disagree with the Department s assertion that the trial court decided the merits of Tropical Trailer s underlying claim, but we reverse the order and remand, because the trial court abused its discretion by expanding the class beyond that pled in Tropical Trailer s amended complaint. As we reverse on this issue, we do not reach the issue of whether Tropical Trailer proved the elements of rule 1.220, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Facts Tropical Trailer leases trailers to third parties. It filed suit to invalidate the Department s method of assessing tolls for towed trailers. Tolls were previously assessed against the vehicle pulling the trailer. Following the advent of cashless billing, SunPass transponders were installed on vehicles, and the Department began assessing tolls without requiring vehicle drivers to stop; but not all semitrucks had SunPass transponders installed. The Department later implemented the toll-by-plate billing system, using either front-plate cameras or rear-plate cameras to capture photographs of license plates to assess tolls. In Florida, license plates on semi-trucks are attached to its front bumper, and license plates on cars, trucks, and trailers are attached to the vehicle s rear bumper. 2
3 At some tolling locations, the Department has only installed rear-plate cameras, which assess a toll against the trailer owner, while at other tolling locations, the Department has installed both front and rear-plate cameras. In cases where a semitruck s front-license plate is hidden, or when a vehicle is towing a trailer and the vehicle s rear license plate is obscured, the toll is assessed against the trailer owner, rather than the vehicle owner, as the trailer s rear license plate remains visible. Tropical Trailer sued the Department for erroneously interpreting sections (21) and , Florida Statutes (2010), to authorize the Department to assess tolls against the trailer owner, instead of the owner of the vehicle towing the trailer. Tropical Trailer asserted that its trailers were not motor vehicles within the meaning of section (21), and that the Department should have charged the vehicle owner the toll pursuant to section , because the vehicle owner was the person who used the toll road. Tropical Trailer argued that while it may know who was driving the vehicle and thus could obtain reimbursement, many times leasing contracts preclude identifying the driver. Furthermore, Tropical Trailer asserted that it was spending its resources to collect tolls for the Department. Tropical Trailer also asserted that there were approximately forty other trailer-leasing companies subject to the same unauthorized billing procedures. 3
4 In its initial complaint, Tropical Trailer alleged it was suing on behalf of the following class: All owners of a trailer or semitrailer or chassis who within the four years preceding the filing of this lawsuit were charged a highway toll by [the Department] because the driver of the motorized vehicle towing the trailer or semitrailer or chassis failed to immediately pay the applicable toll. The Department moved to strike the class on the following grounds: This definition includes any person who within the preceding four years owned a trailer and used the Department s Toll-By-Plate payment system. The proposed class is not limited to persons similar to Tropical Trailer who lease trailers to customers that incur tolls through Toll-By-Plate. Instead, it seeks to include anyone who owned a trailer and incurred a toll through Toll-By-Plate within the preceding four years. As proposed, the class definition would include trailer owners who themselves used the toll road but did not immediately pay the applicable toll because they chose to pay through Toll-By- Plate. The inclusion of every trailer owner who received a Toll-By- Plate charge in the preceding four years is absurd and grossly overbroad. (Emphasis in original.) After the Department filed its motion to strike the class, Tropical Trailer amended its complaint, and alleged it was suing on behalf of a narrower class, consisting of approximately 40 trailer-leasing companies: All owners of a trailer or semitrailer or chassis who within the four years preceding the filing of this lawsuit were charged a highway toll by [the Department] because the driver of the motorized vehicle towing the trailer or semitrailer or chassis failed to immediately pay the applicable toll. Excluded from this definition would be 4
5 owners of a trailer or semitrailer or chassis who also own the motorized vehicle which is towing their own trailer or semitrailer or chassis equipment at the time the toll is incurred. (Emphasis added.) The Department again moved to dismiss the amended complaint and moved to strike the new class definition. Responding to the Department s motion to dismiss, Tropical Trailer maintained that its action was on behalf of a class which includes the entire trailer leasing industry, and assured the trial court that [p]laintiffs certainly do not contend that they have no liability for any portion of the tolls which are payable to [the Department] by whomsoever chooses to use [the Department s] toll roads. During discovery, Tropical Trailer learned that the Department had assessed over 180,000 tolls against trailer owners using the toll-by-plate system; roughly half of these were assessed against commercial trailer owners, while the other half were assessed against personal trailer owners. After learning such information, Tropical Trailer filed a motion to certify four classes, proposing the following classes: Class A -- DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: All trailer owners whose trailer license tag was used by [the Department] between 10/14/10 and 6/30/12[ 1 ] to charge a toll in any amount. 1 Tropical Trailer argued that an amendment to section (21), Florida Statutes (2011), which became effective on July 1, 2012, redefined motor vehicle to include trailers. Ch , Laws of Fla.; see (21), Fla. Stat. (2012) (adopting meaning found in section (1)(a) for purposes of section , Florida Statutes). 5
6 Class B -- DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: All trailer owners whose trailer license tag was used by [the Department] between 10/14/10 and 6/30/12 to charge a toll which is greater than the toll chargeable for two axle vehicles. Class C -- DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: All trailer owners whose trailer license tag was used by [the Department] after 10/14/10 to charge a toll which is greater than the toll chargeable for three axle vehicles. Class D -- DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: All trailer owners whose license tag was used by [the Department] after 10/14/10 to charge a toll in any amount. Excluded from Class D would be all trailer owners who also own the motorized vehicle pulling the trailer at the time the toll is incurred. Before filing its motion for class certification, and in response to the Department s motion to strike its initial class as absurd and grossly overbroad, Tropical Trailer specifically limited its class definition to exclude trailer owners that also owned the vehicle pulling the trailer. In its amended motion for class certification, however, Tropical Trailer proposed Classes A, B, and C, which again included all trailer owners before the 2012 amendment, while its proposed Class D (starting after the 2012 amendment) still excluded those trailer owners who also own the motorized vehicle pulling the trailer at the time the toll is incurred. The proposed class definitions in its amended motion for class certification were based on Tropical Trailer s contention that any toll violation notice issued based upon the license plate of a trailer is improper, and indeed void ab initio. 6
7 In its order granting Tropical Trailer s motion, the trial court certified two sub-classes, even broader than requested: [T]he owners of all trailers towed on the turnpike for which [the Department] used the toll-by-plate method of toll imposition between October 6, 2010 and June 30, 2012, and the owners of all trailers towed on the turnpike for which [the Department] used the toll-by-plate method of toll imposition since July 1, Analysis The trial court s non-final order certifying a class is reviewed for abuse of discretion, because the determination that a case meets the requirements of a class action is a factual finding, which falls within the trial court s discretion. Sosa v. Safeway Premium Fin. Co., 73 So. 3d 91, 103 (Fla. 2011); Sacred Heart Health Sys., Inc. v. Humana Military Healthcare Servs., Inc., 601 F.3d 1159, 1169 (11th Cir. 2010) ( A... court abuses its discretion if it... follows improper procedures in making the determination.... (quoting Klay v. Humana, Inc., 382 F.3d 1241, 1251 (11th Cir. 2004)); Canal Ins. Co. v. Gibraltar Budget Plan, Inc., 41 So. 3d 375, 377 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (holding that a trial court acts within its discretion when it narrows a class); Stone v. Compuserve Interactive Servs., Inc., 804 So. 2d 383, 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (noting that trial courts have broad discretion in shaping the members of a class). 7
8 Rule 1.220(c)(2)(D)(ii), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, provides that [a]ny pleading... shall contain... a definition of the alleged class.... Rule 1.220(d)(1) provides that after hearing the court shall enter an order determining whether the claim... is maintainable on behalf of a class on the application of any party or on the court s initiative. In Florida, the movant bears the burden of proving the elements of rule 1.220, and the trial court must conduct a rigorous analysis before determining whether to certify a class. Fla. Health Sciences Ctr., Inc. v. Elsenheimer, 952 So. 2d 575, 581 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Rule was modeled after Rule 23, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and decisions interpreting Rule 23, while not binding, are persuasive authority in Florida courts. Rollins, Inc. v. Butland, 951 So. 2d 860, 879 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). And federal district courts have held that trial courts abuse their discretion when they certify a class that is broader than the class defined in the complaint. See Johnson v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co. Group, LLC, 285 F.R.D. 573, 577 n.2 (E.D. Ca. 2012) (declining to use expanded class definition proposed in motion for class certification, and resorting to class definition in complaint); Clarke v. Baptist Mem l Healthcare Corp., 264 F.R.D. 375, 381 (W.D. Tenn. 2009) (requiring plaintiffs to file an amended complaint to expand the proposed class definition); Fisher v. Ciba Specialty Chem. Corp., 238 F.R.D. 273, 300 (S.D. Ala. 2006) ( Having selected and litigated the class definition of their choice, plaintiffs must 8
9 live with that choice. ); Heastie v. Cmty. Bank of Greater Peoria, 125 F.R.D. 669, 672 n.10 (N.D. Ill. 1989) (certifying class as originally proposed in the plaintiff s complaint, and noting that it may seek to change the definition through an amended complaint); see generally Retired Chicago Police Ass n v. City of Chicago, 7 F.3d 584, 595 (7th Cir. 1993) (affirming trial court s denial of class certification, because motion attempted to redefine and significantly expand the scope of the class defined in the [plaintiff s] complaint ). These cases are distinguishable from Farrar v. Mobil Oil Corporation, where landowners sued Mobil Oil for breach of contract. 43 Kan. App. 2d 871, (Kan. Ct. App. 2010). Three years into the litigation, [t]hese claims were expanded to add members who suffered a different type of injury than those in the original class. Id. at 874 (emphasis added). The Kansas appellate court affirmed the trial court s decision to certify such expanded class, noting that [a] class may be altered, expanded, subdivided or abandoned as a case develops. Id. at 889. Farrar is distinguishable, because there the plaintiffs claims were expanded, meaning the complaint was amended, as opposed to moving to certify a more expansive class. Here, we do not hold that a class may not be expanded once a definition has been proposed in a complaint. We simply adhere to the rule that the proper 9
10 procedural method to expand a class is by moving to amend the complaint, and then moving to certify the newly defined class. When Tropical Trailer filed its initial complaint, the Department moved to strike the class as overly broad, because it included any trailer owner (including those trailer owners that also owned the vehicle towing the trailer). Tropical Trailer amended its complaint to specifically exclude trailer owners that also owned the vehicle towing the trailer, and the amended complaint also alleged the class included at least forty of Tropical Trailer s competitors. However, in its motion for class certification, Tropical Trailer proposed Classes A-C which included all trailer owners regardless of whether they also owned the vehicle pulling the trailer, arguing that even trailer owners who owned the vehicle towing the trailer suffered the injury of being assessed a toll based on the rear-plate video billing method. Apparently based on this new argument, the trial court certified a sub-class of all trailer owners, including those trailer owners excluded from the class definition in the amended complaint those that owned the vehicle pulling the trailer. Based on such a definition, Tropical Trailer alleged in its motion for class certification that the class grew exponentially from approximately 40 members to over 180,000 members. The massive expansion went far beyond the alleged class definition Tropical Trailer pled in its amended complaint, to which it was bound. 10
11 See Reid v. Bradshaw, 302 So. 2d 180, 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974) (noting [t]he pleader is bound by his own allegations in the complaint. ). Expanding a class beyond what was pled in the complaint unfairly surprised the Department, because it was not on notice to defend against such a broad class definition. See generally Phillip Morris USA, Inc. v. Scott, 131 S. Ct. 1, 3-4 (2010) (Scalia, J., in chambers) (quoting Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 66 (1972), and noting that due process guarantees an opportunity to present every available defense. ). Further, the procedural requirements are in place to ensure and protect the parties right to due process. See generally Ernie Haire Ford, Inc. v. Gilley, 903 So. 2d 956, 959 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (reversing a trial court s class certification where no motion for class certification was filed, on the grounds that it violated the defendant s due-process right to be heard on the issue). We hold that Tropical Trailer improperly sought to expand the scope of the class through its motion for class certification and, instead, should have further moved to amend its complaint. Fla. R. Civ. P (d)(1). Further, the trial court abused its discretion by expanding the scope of the class beyond the class definition proposed in the amended complaint. REVERSED and REMANDED. LEWIS and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR. 11
Aamco Transmissions v. James Dunlap
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-1-2016 Aamco Transmissions v. James Dunlap Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv CC.
Case: 18-10448 Date Filed: 07/10/2018 Page: 1 of 6 [DO NOT PUBLISH] THOMAS HUTCHINSON, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 18-10448 Non-Argument
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D02-75
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2003 DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D02-75 DAWNA MEGAN-NEAVE, Appellee. Opinion
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 112,523 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, STACY A. GENSLER, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 112,523 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. STACY A. GENSLER, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Sedgwick District
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 115,277. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, NICHOLAS W. FISHER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 115,277 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. NICHOLAS W. FISHER, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT A prior municipal court conviction for driving under the influence
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICKEY LEE DILTS, RAY RIOS, and DONNY DUSHAJ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. PENSKE LOGISTICS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 115,278. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DAVID SHELDON MEARS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 115,278 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DAVID SHELDON MEARS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT A prior municipal court conviction for driving under the influence
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Citizens Utility Board v. Illinois Commerce Comm n, 2016 IL App (1st) 152936 Appellate Court Caption THE CITIZENS UTILITY BOARD and ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 49 Filed: 11/02/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:192
Case: 1:14-cv-03385 Document #: 49 Filed: 11/02/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:192 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
More informationKongsberg Automotive Holding v. Teleflex Inc
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-2-2014 Kongsberg Automotive Holding v. Teleflex Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 13-2309
More informationUSAACE & Fort Rucker Preventative Law Program. Alabama Lemon Law
USAACE & Fort Rucker Preventative Law Program Alabama Lemon Law THIS PAMPHLET contains basic information on this particular legal topic for your general information. If you have specific questions, contact
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GMOSER S SEPTIC SERVICE, LLC, and WHITNEY BLAKESLEE, and Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants- Appellees, FOR PUBLICATION February 19, 2013 9:00 a.m. MICHIGAN SEPTIC TANK ASSOCIATION,
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,886 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,886 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. STACEY LYNN STODDARD, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Riley District
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ANTHONY NEWTON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-2927 ) CATERPILLAR
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:14-cv IN RE: Petrobras Securities Litigation. Document 259.
PlainSite Legal Document New York Southern District Court Case No. 1:14-cv-09662 IN RE: Petrobras Securities Litigation Document 259 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation
More informationFILED 2017 Mar-23 PM 12:37 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA
Case 4:17-cv-00450-KOB Document 1 Filed 03/23/17 Page 1 of 13 FILED 2017 Mar-23 PM 12:37 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA THE HEIL CO., Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 112,828 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, JUSTIN D. STANLEY, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 112,828 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. JUSTIN D. STANLEY, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Johnson District Court;
More informationAPPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Racine County: CHARLES H. CONSTANTINE, Judge. Reversed.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 21, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear
More informationSYNOPSIS OF PROPOSED GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RULES CHAPTER TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES AND TAXI SERVICES
SYNOPSIS OF PROPOSED GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY RULES CHAPTER 570-35 TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES AND TAXI SERVICES Purpose: The rules provide for the registration and regulation of transportation
More informationGeorgia Department of Revenue Policy Bulletin - MVD HB 170 Transportation Funding Act of 2015
Georgia Department of Revenue Policy Bulletin - MVD - 2015-01 HB 170 Transportation Funding Act of 2015 1) Purpose: Effective Date: July 1, 2015. 2) Authority: O.C.G.A. 40-2-11, 40-2-86.1, 40-2-151, 40-2-151.1,
More informationMAINE LEMON LAW SUMMARY
MAINE LEMON LAW SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TIME PERIOD FOR FILING CLAIMS ELIGIBLE VEHICLE Earlier of (1) three years from original delivery to the consumer, or (2) the term of the express warranties. Any
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit IN RE: 55 BRAKE LLC, Appellant 2014-1554 Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO IA TANFIELD ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2011-IA-00682 TANFIELD ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, INC. APPELLANT VS. PEGGY ANN THORNTON, as Widow of GREGORY THORNTON, DECEASED APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Jerry Paquette, Petitioner, v. Case No.
More informationCase bem Doc 854 Filed 10/15/18 Entered 10/15/18 17:13:18 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 53
Document Page 1 of 53 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION IN RE: BEAULIEU GROUP, LLC, et al., Debtors. ) ) ) ) ) ) CHAPTER 11 Jointly Administered Under
More informationDriving Under the Influence House Sub. for SB 6
House Sub. for SB 6 amends various administrative and criminal statutes related to driving under the influence (DUI). The bill addresses professional licensing consequences for DUI, permits saliva testing,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: JOHN T. WILSON Anderson, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: GREGORY F. ZOELLER Attorney General of Indiana JODI KATHRYN STEIN Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit SNAP-ON INCORPORATED, Appellant v. MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPORATION, METCO BATTERY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit PLAS-PAK INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant, v. SULZER MIXPAC AG, Appellee. 2014-1447 Appeal from the United States
More informationSTANDARDS OF THE IDAHO LEMON LAW
STANDARDS OF THE IDAHO LEMON LAW The following is a brief explanation of most relevant provisions of the lemon law. The complete text of the lemon law can be found at Code section 48-901 et seq. VEHICLES
More informationCase 1:99-mc Document 458 Filed 06/05/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 458 Filed 06/05/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 29297 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PPS DATA, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, v. Plaintiff,
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA Before The Public Utilities Commission. Beverly Jones Heydinger Chair Dr. David C. Boyd Commissioner Nancy Lange
STATE OF MINNESOTA Before The Public Utilities Commission Beverly Jones Heydinger Chair Dr. David C. Boyd Commissioner Nancy Lange Commissioner Dan Lipschultz Commissioner Betsy Wergin Commissioner PUBLIC
More informationRULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY. Chapter Non-Consensual Towing
Table of Contents RULES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Chapter 570-36 Non-Consensual Towing 570-36-.01 Definitions 570-36-.02 Procedures 570-36-.03 Fees Charged for Nonconsensual Towing 570-36-.04
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Generac Power Systems Inc v. Kohler Co et al Doc. 147 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN GENERAC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., v. Plaintiff, Case No. 11-CV-1120-JPS KOHLER COMPANY and TOTAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c; ARCAP 28(c; Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT OF
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-11-2012 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
More informationAs Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No
132nd General Assembly Regular Session S. B. No. 194 2017-2018 Senator Terhar Cosponsor: Senator Wilson A B I L L To amend sections 4505.101, 4513.601, and 4513.611 of the Revised Code to require only
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) Salt River Project Agricultural ) Improvement and Sacramento ) Municipal Utility District ) ) Docket No. EL01-37-000 v. ) ) California
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JILL M. DENMAN JEREMY K. NIX Matheny, Michael, Hahn & Denman LLP Huntington, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana GRANT H. CARLTON
More informationNEW HAMPSHIRE LEMON LAW SUMMARY
NEW HAMPSHIRE LEMON LAW SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TIME PERIOD FOR FILING CLAIMS ELIGIBLE VEHICLE One year following expiration of the express warranty term. If purchased or leased in New Hampshire: (1)
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Clayton Colwell vs. Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E), Complainant, Defendant. Case No. 08-10-012 (Filed October 17, 2008) ANSWER
More informationBOARD POLICIES. DIVISION XI Campus Police POLICY NUMBER [1] DATE Adopted 1980 Edited 1982 Revised 9/92, 3/00, 12/02, 10/13
11.04.00 [1] 11.04.00 PARKING AND VEHICLE CODES PARKING AND MOTOR VEHICLE POLICY INDEX CHAPTER I General Section 1-100 Purpose 1-200 Applicability 1-300 General Policy 1-400 Severability CHAPTER II Article
More informationVillage of Schiller Park Automated Red Light Enforcement Program
Red-Light Cameras are located at: Mannheim Rd & Irving Park Rd (Northbound) Lawrence Ave & River Rd (Southbound/Eastbound) River Rd & Irving Park Rd (Eastbound) Frequently Asked Questions: Village of Schiller
More informationTITLE 15 MOTOR VEHICLES, TRAFFIC AND PARKING 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS
15-1 CHAPTER 1. MISCELLANEOUS. 2. SPEED LIMITS. 3. PARKING. 4. ENFORCEMENT. TITLE 15 MOTOR VEHICLES, TRAFFIC AND PARKING 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS 15-101. Compliance with financial responsibility law required.
More informationOFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FLORIDA NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FLORIDA NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD QUARTERLY CASE SUMMARIES October 2012 - December 2012 (4th Quarter) NONCONFORMITY 681.102(15), F.S.. (2012) George v. Hyundai
More informationFebruary 13, Docket No. ER ; ER Response to Request for Additional Information
California Independent System Operator Corporation The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 Re: California Independent System
More informationP.L. 2007, c.348 Approved January 13, 2008
P.L. 2007, c.348 Approved January 13, 2008 INTRODUCED JUNE 11, 2007 ASSEMBLY, No. 4314 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE Sponsored by: Assemblyman JOHN S. WISNIEWSKI District 19 (Middlesex) Assemblyman
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GEORGE A. FERGISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED February 1, 2007 v No. 271488 Ottawa Circuit Court STONEBRIDGE LIFE INS COMPANY, LC No. 06-054495-CK Defendant-Appellee.
More informationINTRODUCTION TO THE CODES
INTRODUCTION TO THE CODES Transportation Code and More Texas Municipal Courts Education Center OBJECTIVES By the end of this class, Participants will be able to: Identify Types and Sources of Law Identify
More informationSleeper v. Lilley et al. Media Statement (from sworn testimony) Lawsuits must be based on factual evidence. The jury in this case heard very
! 1 Sleeper v. Lilley et al. Media Statement (from sworn testimony) Lawsuits must be based on factual evidence. The jury in this case heard very emotional testimony from Mr. and Mrs. Sleeper ( Sleepers
More informationPRE-HEARING DECISION ON A MOTION
BETWEEN: MAGDY SHEHATA Applicant and ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA Insurer PRE-HEARING DECISION ON A MOTION Before: Heard: Appearances: David Leitch May 2, 2003, at the offices of the Financial
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 119,015 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. CITY OF ATCHISON, KANSAS, Appellee,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 119,015 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CITY OF ATCHISON, KANSAS, Appellee, v. ERNIE CARTER, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Reversed. Appeal from Atchison
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION The Nevada Hydro Company, Inc. Docket No. EL18-131-000 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S COMMENTS AND PROTEST TO THE NEVADA HYDRO
More informationOhio Legislative Service Commission
Ohio Legislative Service Commission Bill Analysis Amanda M. Ferguson Sub. H.B. 341 131st General Assembly (As Reported by H. State Government) Reps. Young and Sweeney, Becker, Boose, Hall, Retherford,
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION. Beverly Jones Heydinger
STATE OF MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Beverly Jones Heydinger Nancy Lange Dan Lipschultz Matt Schuerger John Tuma Chair Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner May 25, 2016 RE: Compliance
More informationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS POLICY 28. REGULATION OF PARKING AND TRAFFIC West Virginia University and Its Regional Campuses
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY BOARD OF GOVERNORS POLICY 28 REGULATION OF PARKING AND TRAFFIC West Virginia University and Its Regional Campuses Section 1: General 1.1 Scope. Rule regarding the regulation of
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA CITY OF SANDY SPRINGS, GEORGIA ) ) Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION ) FILE NO.: v. ) ) CITY OF ATLANTA, GEORGIA ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT AND PETITION
More informationVillage of Lombard Automated Red Light Enforcement Program. OPTION I. Pay the Fine
Frequently Asked Questions: Village of Lombard Automated Red Light Enforcement Program What do I do if I receive a Notice of Violation? How much is the fine? The fine is $100.00 for each violation. How
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PATSY SONDREAL and JAMES SONDREAL, Plaintiffs-Appellees, UNPUBLISHED March 15, 2005 v No. 250956 Genesee Circuit Court BISHOP INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LC No. 02-074334-NO
More informationBefore the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) REPLY COMMENTS OF CTIA THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION
Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Amendment of Parts 1, 2, 22, 24, 27, 90 and 95 of the Commission s Rules to Improve Wireless Coverage Through the Use
More informationCHAPTER 7. TOURING PRIVILEGES
39:7-TP1. Touring privileges CHAPTER 7. TOURING PRIVILEGES a. A nonresident owner of a motor vehicle properly registered in the nonresident s home jurisdiction, which conspicuously displays that registration
More informationOFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FLORIDA NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FLORIDA NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD QUARTERLY CASE SUMMARIES April 2003 - June 2003 ( 2nd Quarter) JURISDICTION: Motor Vehicle 681.102(15), F.S. Morris v. Ford Motor
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION Sabal Pine Condominiums, Inc., Petitioner,
More informationFEDERAL EXCISE TAXES (F.E.T.) CALCULATIONS
FEDERAL EXCISE TAXES (F.E.T.) CALCULATIONS Foreword: Trailers are normally designed to transport a particular type of cargo and, as a result of that design, are assigned a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR)
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Fulton County Superior Court ***EFILED***TV Date: 2/13/2018 2:47 PM Cathelene Robinson, Clerk IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FULTON COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA CLIFFORD K. BRAMBLE, JR., and KIRK PARKS, Plaintiffs,
More informationOPTION I. Pay the Fine
Frequently Asked Questions: Village of Lynwood Automated Red Light Enforcement Program What do I do if I receive a Notice of Violation? How much is the fine? The fine is $100.00 for each violation. How
More informationSTATUTORY AND ADMINSTRATIVE RULES GOVERNING THE BREATH ALCOHOL IGNITION DEVICE (BAIID) FOR MONITORED DEVICE DRIVING PERMITS
STATUTORY AND ADMINSTRATIVE RULES GOVERNING THE BREATH ALCOHOL IGNITION DEVICE (BAIID) FOR MONITORED DEVICE DRIVING PERMITS Larry A. Davis The Davis Law Group, P.C. 191 Waukegan Road Ste. 350 Northfield,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) 07 C Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
Case 1:07-cv-06227 Document 19 Filed 01/16/2008 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GARELLI WONG & ASSOCIATES, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) 07 C
More informationCAUSE NO RUBICON GLOBAL, LLC IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF. v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Counter-Defendant 125th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CAUSE NO. 2017-52435 RUBICON GLOBAL, LLC IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Counter-Claimant v. HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS WASTE CONNECTIONS OF TEXAS, LLC Counter-Defendant 125th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTER-CLAIMANT S ORIGINAL
More informationPetitioner, CASE NO.: CA O WRIT NO.: 06-44
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA GREGORY HARR, v. Petitioner, CASE NO.: 2006 - CA - 004539-O WRIT NO.: 06-44 STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY
More informationTown of Centreville Automated Speed Enforcement Program
Frequently Asked Questions: Town of Centreville Automated Speed Enforcement Program What is Automated Speed Enforcement In October 2009 the State of Maryland authorized the use of Automated Speed Monitoring
More informationOFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FLORIDA NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FLORIDA NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD QUARTERLY CASE SUMMARIES April 1999 - June 1999 (2nd Quarter) JURISDICTION: Consumer 681.102(4), F.S. Boucher v. Ford Motor Company,
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court People ex rel. Hartrich v. 2010 Harley-Davidson, 2016 IL App (5th) 150035 Appellate Court Caption THE PEOPLE ex rel. MATTHEW HARTRICH, State s Attorney of Crawford
More informationDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Hours of Service; Electronic Logging Devices; Limited 90-Day Waiver; Truck Renting and Leasing Association, Inc.
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/19/2018 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2018-00843, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [4910-EX-P]
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1997 SESSION S.L SENATE BILL 260
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1997 SESSION S.L. 1997-29 SENATE BILL 260 AN ACT TO MODIFY THE PENALTY SCHEDULE FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE VEHICLE EMISSION INSPECTION PROGRAM, TO CLARIFY THE PROCEDURE FOR
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Order Instituting Rulemaking Concerning Energy Efficiency Rolling Portfolios, Policies, Programs, Evaluation, and Related Issues. R.13-11-005
More informationMaryland Lemon Law Statute. For Free Maryland Lemon Law Help Click Here
Maryland Lemon Law Statute For Free Maryland Lemon Law Help Click Here Sections 14-1501 14-1504 of the Commercial Law Articles 14-1501. Definitions In general. -- In this subtitle the following words have
More informationOFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FLORIDA NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FLORIDA NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD QUARTERLY CASE SUMMARIES April 2004 - June 2004 ( 2nd Quarter) JURISDICTION: Prior Resort to a State-certified, Manufacturer-sponsored
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
10.1.2019 L 8 I/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS REGULATION (EU) 2019/26 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 8 January 2019 complementing Union type-approval legislation with regard to
More informationTyson W. Voyles vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-7-2014 Tyson W. Voyles vs. Safety
More informationmew Doc 2578 Filed 02/16/18 Entered 02/16/18 12:17:29 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In Re: : : Bankruptcy No. 17-10751-mew WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY LLC, : et al. : Chapter 11 : Debtors 1 : (Jointly Administered)
More informationCHAPTER 403. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL TRANSPORTATION
Ch. 403 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 67 403.1 CHAPTER 403. HAZARDOUS MATERIAL TRANSPORTATION Sec. 403.1. General information and requirements. 403.2. Definitions. 403.3. [Reserved]. 403.4. Adoption of portions
More informationLegal Opinion Regarding Operation of Motorized Scooters on Florida Roads, Sidewalks, Sidewalk Areas, and Bicycle Paths
CAO 2018-024 To: Edward Hudak, Chief of Police for the City of Coral Gables From: Miriam Soler Ramos, City Attorney for the City of Coral Gables U ~ RE: Legal Opinion Regarding Operation of Motorized Scooters
More informationTHE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO. PRINTER'S NO. 00 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL No. Session of 01 INTRODUCED BY BROWNE, RAFFERTY, WHITE, RESCHENTHALER, TARTAGLIONE, SCAVELLO, COSTA, YUDICHAK, BREWSTER,
More informationJune 9, The County Board of Arlington, Virginia. Ron Carlee, County Manager
June 9, 2003 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The County Board of Arlington, Virginia Ron Carlee, County Manager Amendments to the Arlington County Code 14.2-34 to limit parking of commercial vehicles, motor homes,
More informationDepartment of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session SB 401 Senate Bill 401 Judicial Proceedings FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Revised (Senator Pugh, et al.) Environmental Matters Motor Vehicles
More information2210 South Union Avenue 470 East Market Street Alliance, Ohio Alliance, Ohio 44601
[Cite as State v. Schneller, 2013-Ohio-2976.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellant -vs- ANDREW A. SCHNELLER Defendant-Appellee JUDGES: Hon. W.
More informationCase 1:11-cv MSK-MEH Document 289 Filed 01/15/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15
Case 1:11-cv-02560-MSK-MEH Document 289 Filed 01/15/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 15 Civil Action No. 11-cv-02560-MSK-MEH IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia
More informationAn appeal from an order of the Department of Insurance.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ALLSTATE FLORIDIAN INSURANCE COMPANY; ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY; ALLSTATE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY;
More informationECOMP.3.A EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2018 (OR. en) 2018/0220 (COD) PE-CONS 67/18 ENT 229 MI 914 ENV 837 AGRI 596 PREP-BXT 58 CODEC 2164
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 12 December 2018 (OR. en) 2018/0220 (COD) PE-CONS 67/18 T 229 MI 914 V 837 AGRI 596 PREP-BXT 58 CODEC 2164 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS
More informationToyota Motor North America, Inc. Grant of Petition for Temporary Exemption from an Electrical Safety Requirement of FMVSS No. 305
This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 01/02/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2014-30749, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National
More informationCOMPUTING COUNTY OFFICIAL SALARIES FOR
COMPUTING COUNTY OFFICIAL SALARIES FOR 2018 ACCG 191 Peachtree Street, N.E. Suite 700 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 (404) 522-5022 www.accg.org ACCG OFFERS REFERENCE MATERIAL AS A GENERAL SERVICE TO COUNTY OFFICIALS
More informationOFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FLORIDA NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FLORIDA NEW MOTOR VEHICLE ARBITRATION BOARD QUARTERLY CASE SUMMARIES July 2015 - September 2015 (3rd Quarter) JURISDICTION: Consumer 681.102(4) F.S. Gerald v. Volkswagen/Audi
More informationSAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
Agenda Item No: 5.a Meeting Date: November 20, 2017 Department: Public Works SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Prepared by: Bill Guerin, Director of Public Works TOPIC: IMPLEMENTATION OF PARKING TIME
More informationNo. 52,415-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered November 8, 2018. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 52,415-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * JOSEPH
More informationAMENDMENT RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERDALE TOWNHOMES ASSOCIATION, INC. REGARDING POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR VEHICLE PARKING
AMENDMENT RESOLUTION OF THE RIVERDALE TOWNHOMES ASSOCIATION, INC. REGARDING POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR VEHICLE PARKING SUBJECT: PURPOSE: AUTHORITY: Amendment of the policy and procedure for the parking of
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : :
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA THOMAS J. COLLINS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING, Appellant NO. 2946 C.D. 1998 SUBMITTED April 16, 1999
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-01687 Document 1 Filed 08/18/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Civil Action No. Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) HARLEY-DAVIDSON,
More information