1. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence - Page 5, line 12
|
|
- Nicholas Carr
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence - Page 5, line 12 C8-2 Preamble: The Evidence states: Transmission service is provided pursuant to a FERC Order 888-type tariff in British Columbia to ensure that BC Hydro's marketing subsidiary, Powerex, retains its FERC authorization to sell electricity in the United States at market-based rates, the fundamental purpose of which is to ensure that BC Hydro's ratepayers enjoy the maximum benefit of BC Hydro's generating and storage facilities Please confirm that Order 888-tariffs are to provide open and non-discriminatory access to transmission in BC. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain the purpose of the tariffs Please confirm that establishment of open access tariffs is to permit access to transmission by entities who may compete with BC Hydro or its affiliates. If such cannot be confirmed please explain Please confirm that establishment of open access tariffs may result in some loss of benefits to BC Hydro s ratepayers compared to a situation where no open access to BC s transmission network was provided and no entities had an opportunity to compete in BC with BC Hydro or its affiliates. If such cannot be confirmed please explain Please confirm that establishment of open access tariffs may result in some gains of trading benefits by BC Hydro s trading affiliate compared to a situation where no open access to transmission networks in other jurisdictions was provided and BC Hydro s affiliate had no opportunity to trade in those jurisdictions. If such cannot be confirmed please explain As FERC clarifies, corrects or modifies its Open Access tariff, please advise if the spirit and intent of the referenced statement would indicate that the clarifications, corrections and modifications should be adopted in B.C Please confirm that the open-access reciprocity inherent in the reference would be lost if B.C. elects to depart from the open access tariff or any clarifications, corrections or modifications of the tariff adopted in the U.S. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain. Page 1
2 2. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence - Page 5, line 16 Preamble: The Evidence states: Indeed, BCTC is obliged to provide services under a transmission tariff that maintains Powerex's U.S. market-based rate authorization Please indicate if, in BC Hydro s view, BCTC would be complying with its referenced obligation if BCTC elected to depart from a FERC endorsed open access tariff. Please provide reasons for BC Hydro s view Please indicate if, in BC Hydro s view, BCTC would be complying with its referenced obligation if BCTC elected to depart from clarifications, corrections and modifications of the Network Economy clauses such as the Idaho and MidAmerican dockets referred to on Page 16 of BC Hydro s evidence and the recent FERC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking dated May 19, 2006 which was attached to BCTC s response to AESO Please provide reasons for BC Hydro s view. Page 2
3 3. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence - Page 6, line 16 Preamble: The Evidence states: It was in part for the purpose of allowing such an allocation that the Transfer Pricing Agreement was created and entered into Please describe all purposes for which the Transfer Pricing Agreement ( TPA ) was created Please confirm that the TPA serves to separate transactions of BC Hydro, which are subject to regulatory oversight, from transactions of Powerex. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please describe how BC Hydro s transactions under the TPA, which are forecast to occur in an upcoming year, affect BC Hydro s forecast revenue requirement in the upcoming year Please describe how BC Hydro s transactions under the TPA affect BC Hydro s deferral accounts Please describe how Powerex s transactions under the TPA, which are forecast to occur in an upcoming year, affect BC Hydro s forecast revenue requirement in the upcoming year Please describe how Powerex s transactions under the TPA affect BC Hydro s deferral accounts. Page 3
4 4. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence - Page 6, line 6 Preamble: The Evidence states: From an operational perspective Powerex and certain of BC Hydro's generation staff work closely together with a view to maximizing, on an hour by hour basis, the value of BC Hydro's system storage and generating capability Please confirm that, if BC Hydro/Powerex determines that a Network Economy reservation is to be voluntarily relinquished which will cause BCTC to resell the relinquished capacity as Point-To-Point (PTP), that Powerex will be permitted to re-book the capacity as PTP and have an advantage in the competition for PTP services by having ahead-of-market knowledge of the pending relinquishment. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain In order to enable parties who, unlike Powerex, do not work closely together with BC Hydro s generation staff, to have an equal opportunity with Powerex to book non-firm PTP made available when a Network Economy reservation is voluntarily relinquished, would not some period of time (say 10 minutes) between: i. the posting of ATC changes due to Network Economy relinquishment; and ii. the ability to book non-firm PTP arising therefrom; be advisable or required to ensure open access to the ATC? If not, why not? Page 4
5 5. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence - Page 6, line 22 Preamble: The Evidence states: It is not necessary for the efficacy of the Transfer Pricing Agreement to distinguish those components of value on an hour-by-hour basis. Instead, it does what it is intended to do on an aggregate, end-of-year basis Please describe what, in this context, TPA is intended to do Please describe the methodology referred to as being done on an aggregate endof-year basis Please provide details of the aggregate end-of-year results for the last 2 years Please advise if aggregate, end-of-year transactions are the only use being made of the TPA. If there are other uses, please describe each use being made If the TPA has been amended to reflect transactions made on an aggregate endof-year basis, please provide the amendments. If the TPA has not been amended, please explain why not. Page 5
6 6. Reference BC Hydro Evidence Page 8, line 15 Preamble: The Evidence states: Moreover, both the Idaho and Mid-American cases BCTC relies on make it clear that it is the effect of Network Economy's priority while simultaneously exporting that is the concern Please confirm that in regard to the Idaho case, the following statement at Page 3 of FERC Docket IN indicates that improper use of native load priority is of concern whether or not there is simultaneous exports: It is axiomatic that the native load priority cannot be used to complete sales that are not necessary to serve native load. Transmission providers must take point-to-point service for their own off-system sales, which results in comparable treatment for both transmission provider and network customers Please confirm that in regard to the MidAmerican case, the following reference is made at Page 11 of FERC Docket PA indicates that improper use of native load priority is of concern whether or not there is simultaneous exports: First, it is fundamental that transmission customers are prohibited from using the native load priority to complete sales that are not necessary to serve native load Please confirm that in FERC s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (Docket Nos. RM and RM dated May 19, 2006) at paragraph 428 indicates that proper use of native load priority is its focus whether or not there is simultaneous exports: While we reiterate that secondary network service may be used only to serve a network customer s designated network load, we do not intend to discourage market participants from identifying opportunities to profitably purchase for resale. We simply intend to ensure that all market participants compete on a comparable basis and use Point-topoint service to complete all segments of a purchase for resale offsystem If any of the above cannot be confirmed, please explain why. Page 6
7 7. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence, page 13, lines Preamble: The Evidence suggests the following reporting: non-firm schedules that were interrupted by a reduction in transmission capacity; non-firm schedules that were interrupted by higher priority PTP schedules; non-firm schedules that were interrupted by higher priority Network Economy schedules; non-firm schedules that were interrupted by higher priority Network Economy reservations; Network Economy schedules that were interrupted by a reduction in transmission capacity; and Network Economy schedules that were interrupted by higher priority PTP schedules Please confirm that BC Hydro s suggestions only focus on interrupted schedules of PTP service and do not include interrupted reservations of PTP service. If such cannot be confirmed please explain Please explain why BC Hydro s proposal does not include interrupted reservations of PTP services as well. Page 7
8 8. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence, page 13, line 20 Preamble: The Evidence states: Even with the overstated allocation of curtailments due to Network Economy reservations as a result of the previously mentioned flaws in BCTC s reporting, the data shows minimal interruptions to non-firm PTP reservations attributed to Network Economy reservations or schedules. For example, the data produced by BCTC for March 2006 to May 2006 show that there were curtailments of non-firm PTP reservations (Alberta to B.C.) attributed to Network Economy in only 45 of 2,208 hours. In only 3 of those hours were there any unused Network Economy reservations. In the same period for the U.S. to B.C. direction, in only 56 of 2,208 hours were PTP curtailments attributed to Network Economy, and in only 19 of those hours were there any unused Network Economy reservations Please advise of the source of the data for April and May since the referenced Information Responses by BCTC to BC Hydro only contains data for March Please provide BC Hydro s data and calculations which were made to determine the results referenced Please provide average Mid-C prices by week for the period referenced Please provide average export capacity from Alberta by week for the period Please provide BC Hydro s expectation of export activity from Alberta to Mid-C during any period with Mid-C prices and Alberta export capacity as they were in the referenced period Please confirm that the reference indicates a 99.9% hourly utilization for the AB to BC path ((2208-3)/2208 = 99.9%) and a 99.1% hourly utilization for the U.S. to B.C. direction (( )/2208 = 99.1%). If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please provide percentage utilization for the two utilization measures proposed to be used by BCTC as utilization targets, at Page 16 of BCTC s Application Assuming BCTC s utilization target concept is adopted, what would be a reasonable target level in BC Hydro s opinion. Please explain the reasons for the level. Page 8
9 9. Reference 1: BC Hydro Evidence, page 14, lines Reference 2: BCTC Response to AESO Preamble: The Evidence in reference 1 states: BC Hydro believes that the proposed capacity test, described at paragraphs 48 to 54 of BCTC's application and in response to the Commission's IR 1.7.1, usefully serves the objective of ensuring, as BCTC states, "that energy delivered pursuant to Network Economy service is for delivery to Network Loads, rather than to third party sales". Thus, BC Hydro believes that application of the capacity test would ensure compliance with section 28.6 of BCTC's OATT (set out in full at paragraph 3 of BCTC's application). The capacity test as proposed by BCTC in its application is one of the portfolio of measures that BC Hydro proposes in section 4 below. Specifically BC Hydro believes that the proposed capacity test addresses entirely the "generation capacity" component of what BC Hydro believes ought to be the goal of the new tariff provisions. That is, the proposed capacity test would act to ensure that BC Hydro can not use the relative priority of Network Economy service to preferentially create generation capacity (that would not otherwise have been available) to facilitate a simultaneous export on the non-import tie. BCTC s response in reference 2 states The principle of the capacity test is that Network Customer may not use Network Economy at the same time it is making third party sales, unless it has adequate generation capacity to support exports independently of imports delivered using Network Economy Does BC Hydro agree with the principle as stated by BCTC? If not, why not? 9.2. Please confirm that one significant difference between the test BC Hydro supports and the revised test as outlined in BCTC s response to AESO is the consideration of simultaneous exports on the intertie being used for Network Economy imports (Intertie 2). If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please confirm that the revised test (per AESO.BCTC-1.9.1) would require BC Hydro to have generating capacity to support exports on Intertie 2 whereas the test supported by BC Hydro would not. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please provide BC Hydro s reasons for proposing that there be no requirement for the Network Customer to have adequate generation capacity to support exports on Intertie 2 independently of imports delivered using Network Economy. Page 9
10 10. Reference: BCTC Response to AESO Revised Tariff Supplement BCTC 1 Section 4(b). Preamble: The reference regarding the revised Capacity Test states: Total Reserve Requirements means Contingency Reserve Requirements plus total spinning and nonspinning reserves for external Balancing Authorities; Please confirm that a difference between the Capacity Tests supported by BC Hydro at Page 14 of BC Hydro s evidence and the revised capacity test in the reference above is the consideration of reserve requirements which are over and above the Contingency Reserve Requirement. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please confirm that sales of operating reserves to external jurisdictions would be an example of a reserve for an external Balancing Authority. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please provide BC Hydro s reasons for proposing that there be no requirement for the Network Customer to have adequate generation capacity to support reserves for external Balancing Authorities independently of imports delivered using Network Economy. Page 10
11 11. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence, page 14, lines and page 15, lines 1-2 Preamble: The Evidence states: Rather than excluding generation units that in BCTC s view are not usually run to serve domestic load, the calculations of Excess Generation Capacity should include all generating units that are dispatchable by BC Hydro and are included in reserve calculations within the delivery hour X, regardless of their usual configuration Please list generation capacity that BC Hydro is proposing to include in Excess Generation Capacity calculations which would not be included in the capacity calculations proposed by BCTC Please provide a table with the Capacity Test calculations proposed by BC Hydro and show on the table BC Hydro s understanding of the calculations proposed by BCTC. Please explain the differences. Page 11
12 12. References: BC Hydro Evidence, page 15, line 13. Preamble: The Evidence states: BC Hydro fundamentally disagrees with the need for the proposed utilization test Please confirm that both firm PTP customers and non-firm PTP customers are charged the full tariff amount for PTP reservations regardless of utilization. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please confirm there is no incremental monetary charge to the Network Customer for either use or non-use of Network Economy reservations. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please confirm that unused firm PTP and non-firm PTP reservations are reposted for use by others. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain. Page 12
13 13. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence Page 16, line 1 Preamble: The Evidence states: There is, for example, no evidence from BCTC on the extent to which a 95% utilization target is something that BC Hydro can in fact control, given that its energy imports are subject to curtailments and interruptions in control areas outside of British Columbia and over which it has no control Please provide a listing of curtailments or interruptions of BC Hydro s imports as referenced, including MW amounts and time of interruption, over the most recent 12 month period. Page 13
14 14. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence Page 17, line 4. Preamble: The Evidence states: In particular, what the proposed economic test does is consider that certain BC Hydro imports that are allocated to the "trade account" under the Transfer Pricing Agreement (for reasons that have nothing to do with the day-to-day and hour-by-hour operational generation decisions of BC Hydro) are deemed not to be serving domestic load, despite BCTC's admission that they are in fact doing just that Please elaborate on such a decision to allocate BC Hydro imports to the trade account including: (i) why such a trade transaction would not be undertaken by Powerex; (ii) the timing of such a decision; and (iii) reasons why Please provide details including volumes, durations and dates of all trade account transactions by BC Hydro over the last 24 months. Page 14
15 15. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence Page 18, line 22. Preamble: The Evidence states: However, in the absence of simultaneous net exports, there can not be any doubt that when BC Hydro imports energy it is used to serve load - there simply is no other place for it to go. While it is true that serving load with imported energy allows BC Hydro to generate less, and therefore have more water available for either domestic or export purposes at a later time, it is simply not true that the import is "supporting a third party transaction". When such an import is made there is no corresponding export customer, export price or export transaction linked or identified with that import Please advise if Powerex arranges import transactions on the expectation that export opportunities are expected to subsequently develop? If not, why not? Please confirm that the TPA provides Powerex with an opportunity to effectively store energy imported in one period until Powerex exports the energy in another period. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain why the TPA does not provide the opportunity. Page 15
16 16. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence Page 19, line 12. Preamble: The Evidence states: Thus, a Powerex purchase in the U.S. at a price less than the Threshold Purchase Price could not lawfully be imported by BC Hydro under Network Economy service, while a Powerex purchase in the U.S. at a price greater than the Threshold Purchase Price could lawfully be imported by BC Hydro under Network Economy service (see BCTC's responses to BC Hydro's IRs and 1.2.1, respectively) Please provide details of the number of occurrences in the past 24 months, including amounts and prices, that Powerex purchased energy in the US for BC Hydro at prices less than the Threshold Purchase Price but greater than the Transfer Price Please provide details of the number of occurrences in the past 24 months, including amounts and prices, that Powerex purchased energy in the U.S. for BC Hydro at prices greater than the Threshold Purchase Price Please confirm that if Powerex purchased energy in the US for BC Hydro at prices less than the Threshold Purchase Price and less than the Transfer Price, BCTC s proposed Economic Test would permit use of Network Economy. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please provide a record of the Threshold Purchase Price and any volume limitations to purchases as specified by BC Hydro under the TPA over the past 24 months. Page 16
17 17. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence, page 21, line 12. Preamble: The Evidence states: Given that compliance with the economic test and the utilization test are not within BC Hydro s control and that Powerex s competitors are certain to benefit BC Hydro expects that it will sharply limit its use of Network Economy service if BCTC s proposal is accepted Please describe the nature and details of the types of transactions that BC Hydro is referring to when it states: BC Hydro expects it will sharply limit its use of Network Economy service. Page 17
18 18. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence Page 21, Line 18. Preamble: The Evidence states: Powerex will not engage in transactions where its margin is less than its incremental PTP charges; Please confirm that such would be the intention of all other entities using open access in B.C. If confirmation can not be given, please explain. Page 18
19 19. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence Page 22, Line 18. Preamble: The Evidence states BC Hydro is proposing: a tariff prohibition on the use by Powerex or BC Hydro of any transmission capacity on the export tie (Intertie 1) made available as a result of an interruption or curtailment of a third party's wheelthrough schedule arising as a result of BC Hydro's use of Network Economy on the import tie (Intertie 2); Please confirm that BC Hydro s proposed limitation on the Network Customer s use of export capacity as referenced is related to situations where a PTP customer has successfully acquired a PTP reservation and implemented an energy schedule for the reservation. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please confirm that BC Hydro s proposed limitation on use of export capacity by the Network Customer will in many cases leave the export capacity unused as PTP customers will be unable to use the export capacity when Network Economy imports use all available import capacity. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please confirm that BC Hydro s proposal would not create any limitation on the Network Customer if a PTP customer had successfully acquired a PTP reservation but had not implemented an energy schedule at the time the Network Customer used the Network Economy priority to reserve Network Economy and bump the PTP reservation. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please confirm that BC Hydro may reserve Network Economy ahead of the delivery period (hours ahead, days ahead or longer). If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please confirm that under BC Hydro s proposal, BC Hydro would be permitted to make a Network Economy reservation for any purpose, including completing known or anticipated trade transactions. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please confirm that BC Hydro s proposal would not create any limitation on the Network Customer if Network Economy reservations filled the available import transmission capacity, such that PTP customers either refrained from placing reservations for PTP services or had reservations denied due to lack of available capacity. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain. Page 19
20 20. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence, page 23, lines Preamble: The Evidence states: BC Hydro proposes that BCTC curtails all unutilized Network Economy reservations at the end of the preschedule window prior to performing curtailments in the preschedule window. After the end of the preschedule curtailment process, Network Economy transmission capacity would then be immediately re-offered for purchase Please confirm that BC Hydro s scheduling proposal means that at 16:59:59 of the pre-schedule day, all Network Economy reservations, including hourly pre-schedule reservations for the next day that do not have energy schedules will be released for resale. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Please provide examples illustrating curtailments of unutilized Monthly, Weekly, Daily and Hourly (preschedule) Network Economy Reservations as proposed by BC Hydro. Page 20
21 21. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence, page 23, lines Preamble: The Evidence states: BC Hydro believes that implementation of this proposal would eliminate the need entirely for artificial utilization targets because unused Network Economy reservations would no longer displace third party users of the system Please provide numerical examples which illustrate BC Hydro s scheduling proposals and also illustrate BC Hydro s understanding of BCTC s scheduling proposals. Page 21
22 22. Reference: BC Hydro Evidence, page 24, lines Preamble: The Evidence states: At paragraph 26 of its application BCTC states that such a proposal "would be an inefficient use of the transmission system, and could lead to higher energy prices in Alberta". In response BC Hydro says that efficiency of use, while an appropriate second order objective, should not be allowed to justify a transfer of the benefits of low cost imports between Alberta and British Columbia Presuming conditions are such that transmission users are seeking access to transmission, please confirm that BC Hydro agrees that leaving transmission capacity unused does not represent an efficient outcome. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Presuming conditions are such that transmission users are seeking access to transmission, please confirm that BC Hydro agrees that leaving transmission capacity unused is contrary to open access to transmission. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain Presuming conditions are such that transmission users are seeking access to transmission, please confirm that if other jurisdictions using the Order 888 Tariffs permitted such inefficiencies, transmission capacity into BC could be left unused and ratepayers in BC would be adversely affected. If such cannot be confirmed, please explain. Page 22
BC Hydro OATT - Balancing Area Transmission Service Workshop. January 20, 2014
T BC Hydro OATT - Balancing Area Transmission Service Workshop January 20, 2014 1 AGENDA Topic Time Speaker Welcome and Introduction 09:00 09:15 Gord Doyle Background 09:15 10:00 Martin Huang Enforcement
More informationCHAPTER 25. SUBSTANTIVE RULES APPLICABLE TO ELECTRIC SERVICE PROVIDERS.
25.211. Interconnection of On-Site Distributed Generation (DG). (a) (b) (c) Application. Unless the context indicates otherwise, this section and 25.212 of this title (relating to Technical Requirements
More informationDocket No. ER June 2018 Informational Report Energy Imbalance Market Transition Period Report Idaho Power Company
California Independent System Operator Corporation August 21, 2018 The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 Re: California
More informationMerger of the generator interconnection processes of Valley Electric and the ISO;
California Independent System Operator Corporation Memorandum To: ISO Board of Governors From: Karen Edson Vice President, Policy & Client Services Date: August 18, 2011 Re: Decision on Valley Electric
More informationThe Rollover Request customer accepts a reservation term for the rollover at least as long as that offered by any competing customer.
XX.X xx.xx ROLLOVER RIGHTS FOR LONG TERM FIRM SERVICE Overview Pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Tariff, long term firm transmission service customers (Network Integration Transmission Service ( NITS ) customers
More informationPOSTING OF TRANSMISSION SERVICE OFFERINGS
POSTING OF TRANSISSION SERVICE OFFERINGS In this Section: Overview Valid Path Name and Point of Receipt/Point of elivery (POR/PO) Pricing Posting of TTC and ATC 1.0 OVERVIEW BC Hydro s Open Access Transmission
More informationKANSAS CITY POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY P.S.C. MO. No. 7 Fourth Revised Sheet No. 39 Canceling P.S.C. MO. No. 7 Third Revised Sheet No.
P.S.C. MO. No. 7 Fourth Revised Sheet No. 39 Canceling P.S.C. MO. No. 7 Third Revised Sheet No. 39 PURPOSE: The purpose of the Solar Subscription Pilot Rider (Program) is to provide a limited number of
More informationPOSTING OF TRANSMISSION SERVICE OFFERINGS
POSTING OF TRANSISSION SERVICE OFFERINGS In this Section: Overview Valid Path Name and Point of Receipt/Point of elivery (POR/PO) Pricing Posting of TTC and ATC 1.0 OVERVIEW BC Hydro s Open Access Transmission
More informationROLLOVER RIGHTS OF LONG TERM FIRM TRANSMISSION SERVICE
ROLLOVER RIGHTS OF LONG TERM FIRM TRANSMISSION SERVICE In this Section: Overview Evaluation of Initial Requests Rollover Request Competing Request Competing Examples 1.0 OVERVIEW Pursuant to Section 2.2
More informationFrequently Asked Questions New Tagging Requirements
Frequently Asked Questions New Tagging Requirements Q: Are there new E-tagging requirements related to the new fifteen minute market FERC Order No. 764 fifteen minute scheduling implemented on May 1, 2014?
More information2.0 Reference: None. Explain the cost/benefit of the privatization for BC Hydro and for the BC Hydro customer. RESPONSE:
Information Request No...0 Dated: 2 March 2004.0 Reference: None..0 Please explain the rationale for the restructuring and privatization. What were the costs for the restructuring and privatization? What
More informationMaharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Renewable Purchase Obligation, Its. Regulations, 2016 STATEMENT OF REASONS
MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400 005 Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@mercindia.org.in Website: www.mercindia.org.in
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Electric Storage Participation in ) Markets Operated by Regional ) Docket Nos. RM16-23; AD16-20 Transmission Organizations and )
More informationDecision on Merced Irrigation District Transition Agreement
California Independent System Operator Corporation Memorandum To: ISO Board of Governors From: Karen Edson, Vice President Policy & Client Services Date: March 13, 2013 Re: Decision on Merced Irrigation
More informationFERC NOPR on Integrating Renewable Energy Resources into the Transmission Grid
FERC NOPR on Integrating Renewable Energy Resources into the Transmission Grid Presented by: February 17, 2011 Floyd L. Norton, IV (202) 739-5620 fnorton@morganlewis.com Joseph C. Hall (202) 739-5236 jchall@morganlewis.com
More informationDepartment of Market Quality and Renewable Integration November 2016
Energy Imbalance Market March 23 June 3, 216 Available Balancing Capacity Report November 1, 216 California ISO Department of Market Quality and Renewable Integration California ISO i TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationPatrick Wruck Commission Secretary
Patrick Wruck Commission Secretary Commission.Secretary@bcuc.com bcuc.com Suite 410, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6Z 2N3 P: 604.660.4700 TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 June 15, 2018 Sent via
More informationBEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. The following Commissioners participated in the disposition of this matter:
BEFORE THE FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION In re: Fuel and purchased power cost recovery clause with generating performance incentive factor. ORDER NO. PSC-17-0219-PCO-EI ISSUED: June 13, 2017 The following
More informationPortland General Electric Company Fourteenth Revision of Sheet No P.U.C. Oregon No. E-18 Canceling Thirteenth Revision of Sheet No.
Portland General Electric Company Fourteenth Revision of Sheet No. 75-1 P.U.C. Oregon No. E-18 Canceling Thirteenth Revision of Sheet No. 75-1 AVAILABLE In all territory served by the Company. APPLICABLE
More informationAttention: Ms. Laurel Ross, Acting Commission Secretary and Director
Diane Roy Director, Regulatory Services Gas Regulatory Affairs Correspondence Email: gas.regulatory.affairs@fortisbc.com Electric Regulatory Affairs Correspondence Email: electricity.regulatory.affairs@fortisbc.com
More informationConsolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
PSC NO: 11 Electricity Leaf: 1 Initial Superseding Economic Development Delivery Service No. 2 Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Schedule For Economic Development Delivery Service Subsequent
More informationNEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AN ORDER OF THE BOARD NO. P.U. 17(2017)
NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF PUBLIC UTILITIES AN ORDER OF THE BOARD NO. P.U. (0) 0 0 IN THE MATTER OF the Electrical Power Control Act,, SNL, Chapter E-. (the EPCA ) and the Public
More informationGrid Energy Storage: Policies
Grid Energy Storage: Policies John Martin, P. Eng. Senior Tariff and Special Projects Advisor Alberta Electric System Operator (AESO) IEEE Northern Canada Section PES/IAS Chapter Seminar, 21 Nov 2017,
More informationBC Hydro writes in compliance with Exhibit A-4 to provide its Final Submission in respect of the Application (Exhibit B-1).
Ken Duke Solicitor & Counsel Phone: 604-623-3623 Fax: 604-623-3606 bchydroregulatorygroup@bchydro.com April 30, 2014 Sixth Floor 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC V6Z 2N3 Dear Ms. Hamilton: RE: (BCUC) British
More informationJanuary 24, Re: Small Refiner Exemptions. Dear Administrator Pruitt:
January 24, 2018 The Honorable Scott Pruitt Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., 1101A Washington, DC 20460 Re: Small Refiner Exemptions Dear Administrator
More informationbest to you all Gail Carbiener Page 1 of 5
Please accept this attachment as my up dated response to the B2H DEIS. If this is not acceptable, please let me know. Nice meeting last Monday in Boardman. 300316 best to you all Gail Carbiener 2 Page
More informationAttention: Mr. Patrick Wruck, Commission Secretary and Manager, Regulatory Support
Diane Roy Vice President, Regulatory Affairs Gas Regulatory Affairs Correspondence Email: gas.regulatory.affairs@fortisbc.com Electric Regulatory Affairs Correspondence Email: electricity.regulatory.affairs@fortisbc.com
More informationPUBLIC Law, Chapter 539 LD 1535, item 1, 124th Maine State Legislature An Act To Create a Smart Grid Policy in the State
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Emergency preamble. Whereas, acts
More informationUniversity of Alberta
Decision 2012-355 Electric Distribution System December 21, 2012 The Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 2012-355: Electric Distribution System Application No. 1608052 Proceeding ID No. 1668 December
More informationDocket No EI Date: May 22, 2014
Docket No. 140032-EI Big Bend Units 1 through 4 are pulverized coal steam units that currently use distillate oil 2 for start-ups and for flame stabilization. The Company seeks to use natural gas in place
More informationPage 1 of 5. 1 The Code Administrator will provide the paper reference following submission to National Grid.
Grid Code Review Panel Issue Assessment Proforma Operational Metering for Embedded Small Power Stations PP 11/35 1 A Panel Paper by John Lucas (ELEXON) & Steve Curtis (NGET) Summary Currently it is unclear
More informationKey DRAFT OPERATING CODE 2 LEGAL TEXT
Key DRAFT OPERATING CODE 2 LEGAL TEXT 1) Blue Text From Grid Code 2) Black Text Changes / Additional words 3) Orange/ Brown text From RfG 4) Purple From HVDC Code 5) Green From DCC (not used in this document)
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
10.1.2019 L 8 I/1 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS REGULATION (EU) 2019/26 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 8 January 2019 complementing Union type-approval legislation with regard to
More informationKERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION. NOTIFICATION Dated, Thiruvananthapuram 6 th August,2007
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION NOTIFICATION No.1/1/KSERC-2006/ Dated, Thiruvananthapuram 6 th August,2007 KSERC (Supply of Power from Captive Generating Plants to Distribution Licensees)
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX B4 1667206 [ ](2014) XXX DRAFT 30.04.2014 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX supplementing Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council
More informationHB 2471: Municipal Electric Utility Formation in Oregon
HB 2471: Municipal Electric Utility Formation in Oregon Oregon municipal utilities provide safe and reliable service to their customers often at a lower cost than investor owned utilities. Examples of
More informationHB 2471: Municipal Electric Utility Formation in Oregon
HB 2471: Municipal Electric Utility Formation in Oregon Oregon municipal utilities provide safe and reliable service to their customers often at a lower cost than investor owned utilities. Examples of
More informationMENARD ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE POLICY MANUAL. SECTION IV Operating Rules for Cooperative Members
49.1 INTERCONNECTION OF AND SERVICE TO QUALIFYING FACILITIES UNDER Objective To provide for the interconnection of and service to a Qualifying Facility in keeping with the provisions of the Public Utility
More informationEASTERN ILLINI ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE REGULATION NO. 26A
EASTERN ILLINI ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE REGULATION NO. 26A SUBJECT: Interconnection of and Service to Qualifying Facilities under Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) OBJECTIVE: To provide, through
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Essential Reliability Services and the ) Evolving Bulk-Power System ) Docket No. RM16-6-000 Primary Frequency Response ) COMMENTS
More informationECOMP.3.A EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 December 2018 (OR. en) 2018/0220 (COD) PE-CONS 67/18 ENT 229 MI 914 ENV 837 AGRI 596 PREP-BXT 58 CODEC 2164
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 12 December 2018 (OR. en) 2018/0220 (COD) PE-CONS 67/18 T 229 MI 914 V 837 AGRI 596 PREP-BXT 58 CODEC 2164 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE 07-097 PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Petition for Adjustment of Stranded Cost Recovery Charge Order Following Hearing O R D E R N O. 24,872
More informationFebruary 8, Southwest Power Pool, Inc. Revisions to SPP Open Access Transmission Tariff to add Schedule 12 Docket No.
February 8, 2005 VIA HAND DELIVERY The Honorable Magalie R. Salas Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Re: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. Revisions to
More informationA member-consumer with a QF facility shall not participate in the Cooperative s electric heat rate program.
Electric Tariff _2nd Revised Sheet No. 72 Filed with Iowa Utilities Board Cancels _1st Sheet No. _72 Cooperative is a member of Central Iowa Power Cooperative (CIPCO), a generation and transmission cooperative
More informationThe Commonwealth of Massachusetts
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES D.P.U. 16-64-H November 6, 2017 Investigation of the Department of Public Utilities, on its own Motion, Commencing a Rulemaking pursuant
More informationTopic Small Projects (< 100 kw) Large Projects (>100 kw)
New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Docket No. DE 16-576 Development of New Alternative Net Metering Tariffs and/or Other Regulatory Mechanisms and Tariffs for Customer-Generators Joint Settlement
More informationReactive Power Requirements and Financial Compensation. Addendum to Draft Final Proposal
Reactive Power Requirements and Financial Compensation July 21, 2016 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 3 2. Changes to Proposal... 4 3. Plan for Stakeholder Engagement... 4 4.... 4 6. Next Steps...
More informationGuideline for Parallel Grid Exit Point Connection 28/10/2010
Guideline for Parallel Grid Exit Point Connection 28/10/2010 Guideline for Parallel Grid Exit Point Connection Page 2 of 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PURPOSE... 3 1.1 Pupose of the document... 3 2 BACKGROUND
More informationSouthern California Edison Rule 21 Storage Charging Interconnection Load Process Guide. Version 1.1
Southern California Edison Rule 21 Storage Charging Interconnection Load Process Guide Version 1.1 October 21, 2016 1 Table of Contents: A. Application Processing Pages 3-4 B. Operational Modes Associated
More informationThe Commonwealth of Massachusetts
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES D.P.U. 12-81-A January 18, 2013 Investigation by the Department of Public Utilities on its own Motion Commencing a Rulemaking pursuant to
More informationSTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE LIBERTY UTILITIES (GRANITE STATE ELECTRIC) CORP. d/b/a LIBERTY UTILITIES
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION DE 17-058 LIBERTY UTILITIES (GRANITE STATE ELECTRIC) CORP. d/b/a LIBERTY UTILITIES Request for Approval of Energy Supply Solicitation and Resulting Rates
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS
XXV. NET METERING A. Applicability and Availability 1. The terms Net Metering Service, Demand Charge-based Time-of- Use Tariff, Net Metering Customer, Customer, Time-of-Use Customer, Time-of-Use Tier,
More informationANNEX MOTOR VEHICLES AND MOTOR VEHICLES' PARTS. Article 1. General Provisions
ANNEX MOTOR VEHICLES AND MOTOR VEHICLES' PARTS Article 1 General Provisions 1. This Annex shall apply to motor vehicles in UNECE vehicle regulations' category M1 as well as parts and equipment regulated
More informationMMP Investigation of Arthur Kill 2 and 3
MMP Investigation of Arthur Kill 2 and 3 Requestor Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Facility Name Arthur Kill 2 and 3 Date of Request January 27, 2003 Type of Facility NG Generator Topic of
More informationSHORE POWER RATE BC HYDRO 333 DUNSMUIR STREET VANCOUVER, BC
SHORE POWER RATE BC HYDRO 333 DUNSMUIR STREET VANCOUVER, BC 28 January, 2015 INTRODUCTION OUTLINE 1. Introduction 2. Background and Context Shore power Need for a Shore Power Rate: Port requests Initiatives
More informationJoint Operating Procedures for First Nations Consultation on Energy Resource Activities
Joint Operating Procedures for First Nations Consultation on Energy Resource Activities October 31, 2018 Contents Revision History... iv Definitions of Key Terms... v 1 Background... 1 2 Roles and Responsibilities...
More informationRegulatory Treatment Of Recoating Costs
Regulatory Treatment Of Recoating Costs Prepared for the INGAA Foundation, Inc., by: Brown, Williams, Scarbrough & Quinn, Inc. 815 Connecticut Ave., N.W. Suite 750 Washington, DC 20006 F-9302 Copyright
More informationFITCHBURG GAS AND ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY NET METERING SCHEDULE NM
Sheet 1 FITCHBURG GAS AND ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY SCHEDULE NM Applicability The following tariff provisions shall be applicable to a Host Customer, as defined herein, that requests net metering services
More informationSubmission on the Electricity ( Disconnections and Low Fixed Charges) Amendment Bill
Submission on the Electricity ( Disconnections and Low Fixed Charges) Amendment Bill Submission : TrustPower supports the Amendments relating to Disconnections. TrustPower does not support the Amendments
More informationBIENNIAL REPORT REGARDING FUEL AND FUEL-RELATED CHARGE ADJUSTMENT PROCEEDINGS FOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES. REQUIRED PURSUANT TO G.S
BIENNIAL REPORT REGARDING FUEL AND FUEL-RELATED CHARGE ADJUSTMENT PROCEEDINGS FOR ELECTRIC UTILITIES REQUIRED PURSUANT TO G.S. 62-133.2(g) DATE DUE: JULY 1, 2013 SUBMITTED: JUNE 28, 2013 RECEIVED BY THE
More informationA Guide to the medium General Service. BC Hydro Last Updated: February 24, 2012
A Guide to the medium General Service Conservation Rate BC Hydro Last Updated: February 24, 2012 Executive summary The way Medium General Service (MGS) accounts pay for electricity is changing. MGS is
More informationD.P.U A Appendix B 220 CMR: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES
220 CMR 18.00: NET METERING Section 18.01: Purpose and Scope 18.02: Definitions 18.03: Net Metering Services 18.04: Calculation of Net Metering Credits 18.05: Allocation of Net Metering Credits 18.06:
More informationAddressing ambiguity in how electricity industry legislation applies to secondary networks
In Confidence Office of the Minister of Energy and Resources Chair, Cabinet Business Committee Addressing ambiguity in how electricity industry legislation applies to secondary networks Proposal 1 This
More informationOverview of Electricity Trade Agreement between Québec and Ontario. May 10, 2017 For Information Purposes Only
Overview of Electricity Trade Agreement between Québec and Ontario May 10, 2017 For Information Purposes Only Purpose To provide an overview of the electricity trade agreement between the Independent Electricity
More informationFebruary 10, The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426
California Independent System Operator Corporation February 10, 2016 The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 Re: California
More information18/10/2018. Mr Peter Adams General Manager, Wholesale Markets Australian Energy Regulator. By
ABN 70 250 995 390 180 Thomas Street, Sydney PO Box A1000 Sydney South NSW 1235 Australia T (02) 9284 3000 F (02) 9284 3456 18/10/2018 Mr Peter Adams General Manager, Wholesale Markets Australian Energy
More informationSAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. These responses and objections are made without prejudice to, and are not a waiver of, SDG&E and SoCalGas right to rely on other facts or documents in these proceedings. 2. By
More informationVermont Public Power Supply Authority 2018 Tier 3 Annual Plan
Vermont Public Power Supply Authority 2018 Tier 3 Annual Plan Vermont s Renewable Energy Standard ( RES ) enacted through Act 56 in 2015 requires electric distribution utilities to generate fossil fuel
More informationGENERAL INFORMATION 15. MARKET SUPPLY CHARGE ("MSC")
P.S.C. NO. 3 ELECTRICITY LEAF: 214 ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC. REVISION: 3 INITIAL EFFECTIVE DATE: November 1, 2015 SUPERSEDING REVISION: 1 Issued in compliance with Order in Case 14-E-0493 dated
More informationCase No. 109 of Coram. Shri Azeez M. Khan, Member Shri Deepak Lad, Member. Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd.
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400005 Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@merc.gov.in Website:
More informationGC108: EU Code: Emergency & Restoration: Black start testing requirement
Stage 01: Modification Proposal Grid Code GC108: EU Code: Emergency & Restoration: Black start testing requirement Purpose of Modification: This modification seeks to align the GB Grid Code with the European
More informationHow to incentivise the efficient deployment of electric vehicles
Going electric How to incentivise the efficient deployment of electric vehicles Ofgem has recently unveiled its new strategy for regulating the future energy system. One of its objectives is to ensure
More informationThis Distribution Charter explains how PLS distributes collective licensing
Distribution Charter 1 This Distribution Charter explains how PLS distributes collective licensing revenues. 1. Introduction 1.1 Collective licensing for published materials was introduced in the UK in
More informationOverview of S.L Competitive Energy Solutions for North Carolina
Overview of S.L. 2017-192 Competitive Energy Solutions for North Carolina JENNIFER MCGINNIS CHRIS SAUNDERS STAFF AT TORNEYS, LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS DIVISION 1 Overview Product of extensive stakeholder process
More informationCONSULTATION DOCUMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 31.5.2017 C(2017) 3815 final CONSULTATION DOCUMENT First phase consultation of the Social Partners under Article 154 of TFEU on a possible revision of the Road Transport Working
More informationNovember 27, Mr. Joel H. Peck, Clerk State Corporation Commission c/o Document Control Center P.O. Box 2118 Richmond, VA
Mr. Joel H. Peck, Clerk State Corporation Commission c/o Document Control Center P.O. Box 2118 Richmond, VA 23218-2118 RE: Public Comments of the Retail Energy Supply Association Application of Virginia
More informationENERGY STRATEGY FOR YUKON. Independent Power Production Policy
ENERGY STRATEGY FOR YUKON Independent Power Production Policy May 20, 2014 Page 2 of 11 BACKGROUND The Government of Yukon released the Energy Strategy for Yukon in January 2009. The strategy sets out
More informationRICanada Comments on the British Columbia Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Renewable and Low Carbon Fuel Requirements) Act and the Renewable and Low Carbon
RICanada Comments on the British Columbia Greenhouse Gas Reduction (Renewable and Low Carbon Fuel Requirements) Act and the Renewable and Low Carbon Fuel Requirements Regulation 2018-01-05 ATTN: Michael
More informationMarch 14, Please contact the undersigned directly with any questions or concerns regarding the foregoing.
California Independent System Operator Corporation The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 March 14, 2017 Re: California
More informationProposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service
Proposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service Requested Action: The Trustees are being requested to approve a resolution adopting modifications to the Long Island Power Authority
More informationThe Gambia National Forum on
The Gambia National Forum on Renewable Energy Regulation Kairaba Hotel, The Gambia January 31 February 1, 2012 Tariff and Price Regulation of Renewables Deborah Erwin Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
More informationRATE ORDER 2015 UNIFORM ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION RATES January 08, 2015
Ontario Energy Board Commission de l énergie de l Ontario IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c.15 (Schedule B); AND IN THE MATTER OF a motion by the Ontario Energy Board to
More informationApplication of claw-back
Application of claw-back A report for Vector Dr. Tom Hird Daniel Young June 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. How to determine the claw-back amount 2 2.1. Allowance for lower amount of claw-back
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION The Nevada Hydro Company, Inc. Docket No. EL18-131-000 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY'S COMMENTS AND PROTEST TO THE NEVADA HYDRO
More informationGC108: EU Code: Emergency & Restoration: Black start testing requirement
Stage 01: Modification Proposal Grid Code GC108: EU Code: Emergency & Restoration: Black start testing requirement Purpose of Modification: This modification seeks to align the GB Grid Code with the European
More informationGRID CONSTRAINT: OPTIONS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
GRID CONSTRAINT: OPTIONS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2 What s the Problem? Constrained grid is an issue that impacts many new renewables developments. A quick look at the distribution heat maps published by
More informationElectrovaya Provides Business Update
News for Immediate Release Electrovaya Provides Business Update Toronto, Ontario November 8, 2016 Electrovaya Inc. (TSX: EFL) (OTCQX:EFLVF) is providing the following update on business developments previously
More informationJEA Distributed Generation Policy Effective April 1, 2018
Summary This JEA Distributed Generation Policy is intended to facilitate generation from customer-owned renewable and non-renewable energy generation systems interconnecting to the JEA electric grid. The
More informationAvailable at:
Fred James Chief Regulatory Officer Phone: 604-623-4046 Fax: 604-623-4407 bchydroregulatorygroup@bchydro.com March 20, 2017 Mr. Patrick Wruck Commission Secretary and Manager Regulatory Support British
More informationCity of, Kansas Electric Department. Net Metering Policy & Procedures for Customer-Owned Renewable Energy Resources
Ordinance No. Exhibit A ----------------------------------------- City of, Kansas Electric Department Net Metering Policy & Procedures for Customer-Owned Renewable Energy Resources -------------------------------------
More informationFebruary 13, Docket No. ER ; ER Response to Request for Additional Information
California Independent System Operator Corporation The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 Re: California Independent System
More informationProposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service
Proposal Concerning Modifications to LIPA s Tariff for Electric Service Requested Action: LIPA Staff proposes revisions to the Tariff for Electric Service under Service Classification No. 11 ( SC-11 ),
More informationOctober 17, Please contact the undersigned directly with any questions or concerns regarding the foregoing.
California Independent System Operator Corporation The Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, NE Washington, DC 20426 October 17, 2017 Re: California
More informationThank you for your time and attention to this matter. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the filing.
Mary L. Cottrell, Secretary March 27, 2009 Page 1 Stacey M. Donnelly Counsel September 23, 2009 Mark D. Marini, Secretary Department of Public Utilities One South Station Boston, MA 02110 Re: D.P.U. 09-03
More informationDTE Electric Company One Energy Plaza, 1208WCB Detroit, MI January 13, 2017
One Energy Plaza, 1208WCB Detroit, MI 48226-1279 Estella R. Branson (313) 235-6985 estella.branson@dteenergy.com January 13, 2017 Ms. Mary Jo Kunkle Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission
More informationSTATE LOAD DISPATCH CENTRES (SLDC)
ACTIVITIES OF SLDC STATE LOAD DISPATCH CENTRES (SLDC) **The State Load Despatch Centre:- As per section 33 of Electricity Act - 2003 (Central Act 36 of 2003), SLDC performs powers as defined below:- SLDC
More information(2) Scope. 220 CMR applies to all Distribution Companies subject to the jurisdiction of the Department.
D.P.U. 11-10-A 220 CMR 18.00: NET METERING Section 18.01: Purpose and Scope 18.02: Definitions 18.03: Net Metering Services 18.04: Calculation of Net Metering Credits 18.05: Allocation of Net Metering
More informationFinal Report. Solar feed in tariff for regional Queensland for
Final Report Solar feed in tariff for regional Queensland for 2014 15 May 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Terms of reference 1 1.2 Background 1 1.3 About this review 2 1.4
More informationSERVICE CLASSIFICATION NO. 7. Also optional for: This option is not available to Service Classification No. 2 customers, effective December 3, 2002.
Page 1 of 60 PSC No: 120 - Electricity Leaf No. 211 New York State Electric and Gas Corporation Revision: 1 Initial Effective Date: September 26, 2010 Superseding Revision: 0 Issued in compliance with
More informationENERGY MANAGEMENT 4/22/2014. What are your approximate yearly energy costs? (Electricity, natural gas, etc.)
MICHIGAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ENERGY MANAGEMENT Webinar Electricity - Natural Gas April 23, 2014 10:00 A.M. - 11:00 A.M. EDT Presented by John M. Studebaker, Ph.D. www.studebakerenergy.net JStudebaker 4/23/14
More information