Preliminary Design Review. California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017
|
|
|
- Virginia Howard
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Preliminary Design Review California State University, Long Beach USLI November 13th, 2017
2 System Overview
3 Launch Vehicle Dimensions Total Length 108in Airframe OD 6.17in. ID 6.00in. Couplers OD 5.998in. ID 5.775in. Motor Mount 75mm Centering Ring Thickness 0.2 in
4 Material Selection - Airframe, Nose Cone & Couplers Fiberglass Significantly stronger than blue tube Much cheaper than carbon fiber More environmentally resistant than blue tube Low thermal and electrical conductivity
5 Material Selection - Fins Carbon Fiber Highest yield strength Highest strength to weight Great environmental resistance Affordable for fins
6 Material Selection - Bulkheads & Centering Rings Aluminum Stronger than wood Inexpensive Easily manufactured Adds stability to coupler sections
7 Material Selection - Miscellaneous Avionics tray will be 3D printed using ABS material Epoxy for fin and centering ring attachment is Aeropoxy Light epoxy
8 Motor Selection 75mm Cesaroni 4263-L1350-CS Provides sufficient thrust to reach an apogee well over a mile
9 Stability From the tip of the nose cone Center of Gravity (CG)=68.73in Center of Pressure (CP)=85.05in Stability Margin=( )/6.17in=2.64 cal
10 Flight Simulations Total Mass-42.0lbs Velocity off rod -66.9ft/s Projected Apogee ft Thrust-to-weight ratio-7.21
11 Recovery System Altimeter Vendor Model Cost (1-5) Weight (1-5) Features (1-5) Integration (1-5) Total Eggtimer Eggtimer Quark PerfectFlite Stratologger CF MissileWor ks RCC MissileWor ks RCC3 Sport Adept AltS2-50k Altus Metrum Easy Mega
12 Recovery System (cont.) GPS Unit Comparison Vendor Model Cost (1-5) Weight (1-5) Dimensions (1-5) Integration (1-5) Total Transolve BeepX Eggtimer Eggfinder BigRedBe e BRB900 TX/RX Altus Metrum TeleMetrum Altus Metrum TeleMega
13 Recovery System (cont.) 13 Coupler Piece Primary and Backup Altimeters BRB900 GPS Tracker U-Bolt - 1,075 lb Maximum Capacity (Nylon Harness) Rotary Switch
14 Recovery System (cont.) Type of Parachute Parachute Size and Model Location Relative Descent Velocity (fps) Drogue Parachute 20" FC TARC Low and Mid Power Parachute Nose Cone + Payload Bay Aft End Main Parachute 84" FC Iris Ultra Standard Parachute Propulsion Bay Forward End 17.80
15 Recovery System (cont.) Wind Speed (mph) Wind Speed (fps) Drogue Drift (ft) Main Drift (ft) Total Drift (ft)
16 Recovery System (cont.) Kinetic Energy for Each Independent Section Upon Landing Section Weight (lb) Mass (slugs) Descent Velocity (ft/s) Kinetic Energy (lb-ft) Payload Bay Avionics Bay (After Event 2) Propulsion Bay
17 Recovery System (cont.)
18 Rover
19 Rover Overview Ground clearance Payload Space Distance Solar panel
20 Rover: Design Considerations Cylindrical Rover Stability, complexity, volume efficiency Triangular Able to deploy in multiple orientations. More possibilities of failure. Rectangular Wheg wheels Simple design
21 Rover: Design Choice Triangular Able to deploy from any orientation. Bogie system Gearbox
22 Rover: Design Choice Triangular Maximizes available space in rocket. Houses all electronics inside the body.
23 Rover Controls and Electronics Controller Arduino Nano Motorshield Sensors Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) Rangefinder Control Yaw Suppression Obstacle Avoidance
24 Rover Deployment Mechanism (RDM)
25 RDM Summary Purpose: Remotely deploy the rover from the internal structure of the launch vehicle. Design Choice: Single motor One threaded rod and two non-threaded rods Load is driven along threaded rod through a matching threaded nut
26 Mechanical/Hardware Rotary to linear system for load translation Motor attached to threaded rod Threaded nuts attached to the rover Bulkhead with threaded nut
27 Electronics/ Control Remotely activate the system 2.4GHz Digital Transmitter/Receiver Motor control Arduino Nano Microcontroller L298N H-Bridge 11.1 V LiPo Battery Provide motor feedback rotary encoder
28 RDM Schematics Rocket lands Remote rover deployment switch initiated The rover continues to translate, and pushes the nose cone away from the airframe. The rover falls off the rod and initializes the system. Electric motor spins the threaded rod in the loosening direction The nose cone translates along the rod and detaches.
29 Airbrake Summary Main Goal: Ensure that the rocket achieves target apogee by correcting upward drift velocity after engine cutout. Mechanics: airbrake flaps are deployed by use of a linear actuator. Control: triggering the actuation of the flaps to maintain target velocity.
30 Airbrake mechanics A linear actuator with a 2 stroke will be used to deploy the flaps from the rocket. The actuator will pull up causing the linkage arms to straighten, deploying the flaps. 4 flaps are used to maximize drag without compromising the structural integrity of the rocket.
31 Air Brake Control Electronics 2 Stroke electric linear actuator Arduino Nano microcontroller Sensors Pitot Tube Airspeed Sensor BMP280 Barometer 6 DOF IMU Control Correct for error in velocity Modeling of system to determine timing, duration, and deflection of flaps Closed versus open-loop system
32 Significant Failure Mode - Launch Vehicle Tail Fins shear off during flight Fins are not properly secured to airframe Rocket takes unpredictable flight path Ensure adhesive used is strong enough to handle force of flight. Check adhesive for cracks before launch. Fins not properly aligned Fins not assembled correctly Rocket spins uncontrollably Follow proper procedure when assembling fins Motor centering ring fails Adhesive not properly applied to centring ring Motor launch through the rocket Construction procedures are followed for applying adhesive
33 Significant Failure Mode - Recovery Parachute does not deploy Parachute gets tangled around rocket Rocket will fall to ground at high velocity Parachute will be integrated in a was to reduce risk of getting tangled Parachute has rip Parachute gets ripped while deploying Rocket descend to quick and get damaged upon impact Team members will be careful during packaging of parachute Altimeter failure Faultily altimeter Parachute will not deploy Use two altimeter for redundancy
34 Significant Failure Mode - Airbrakes Structural damage to airbrake system during launch Material of airbrake not strong enough Airbrakes will not deploy or become damaged Verify through testing that airbrake can handle force of flight Airbrakes do not deploy at desired altitude Programming failure Rocket will not make desired altitude Test airbrakes programming during subscale launch Airbrake flaps fly off during flight Flaps made not to handle force of launch Rocket become unstable Verify through testing flaps can handle force of flight
35 Significant Failure Mode - Rover Rover damaged during landing Impact of landing more than expected Rover becomes inoperable Make sure rover is secure in place before launch and test to ensure it can handle force of landing Rover damaged during flight Rover not secure in place Rover becomes damaged and inoperable Ensure rover is secure put in the rocket Rover gets stuck on rock Rover not capable of handling terrain Rover gets stuck and unable to make distance requirement Design rover to handle all terrains and verify that through testing
36 Significant Failure Mode - RDM RDM does not deploy when activated Programing failure Rover will not deploy Verify that programing will act as desired through testing RDM deploys during flight Electronic failure Nose cone opens up during flight Ensure electronics work properly through testing RDM becomes damaged during flight RDM materials cannot handle force of launch RDM damaged and rover will not deploy Choose strong material that can handle the force of flight
37 Testing Wind tunnel Test drag force and drag coefficient of airbrake flaps Drop testing Test strength of components to ensure they can handle forces of flight and landing Programing and Electronic testing Test all programs and electronics to ensure that they act in the way that they are supposed to Shock and Impact testing Test all components of launch vehicle to ensure that they can handle the shock of the flight and the impact of landing
38 Project Plan
39 Timeline Subscale Launch in November, Full scale built by February, Full scale launch in March
40 Airbrake Timeline
41 Educational Engagement Event Date Estimated Attendees Girls Day at the Beach (1) 3/ Aerospace Rocket Symposium 9/7/ Girls Day at the Beach (2) 9/ Introduction to Engineering Presentations 11/ MAES Latinos in Engineering Bottle Rocketry 4/ High School Engineering Presentation 12/ TOTAL 1160
42 Budget-Expenses Subteam Projected Expenses RDM $ Rover $ Avionics $ Recovery $ Launch Vehicle $2,295 Airbrake $ Business $8,670 Total $13,870.91
43 Budget-Income Source Income College of Engineering $4,200 AIAA - CSULB $1,500 Fundraisers $1,500 ASI Travel Grant $7,000 Sponserships Total $600 $14,800
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW. University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry
CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW University of South Florida Society of Aeronautics and Rocketry 2017-2018 AGENDA 1. Launch Vehicle 2. Recovery 3. Testing 4. Subscale Vehicle 5. Payload 6. Educational Outreach 7.
Auburn University. Project Wall-Eagle FRR
Auburn University Project Wall-Eagle FRR Rocket Design Rocket Model Mass Estimates Booster Section Mass(lb.) Estimated Upper Section Mass(lb.) Actual Component Mass(lb.) Estimated Mass(lb.) Actual Component
NASA USLI PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW. University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team
NASA USLI 2012-13 PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW University of California, Davis SpaceED Rockets Team OUTLINE School Information Launch Vehicle Summary Motor Selection Mission Performance and Predictions Structures
NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS. PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel
NASA SL - NU FRONTIERS PDR presentation to the NASA Student Launch Review Panel 1 Agenda Launch Vehicle Overview Nose Cone Section Payload Section Lower Avionic Bay Section Booster Section Motor Selection
UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation. Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access
UC Berkeley Space Technologies and Rocketry Preliminary Design Review Presentation Access Control: CalSTAR Public Access Agenda Airframe Propulsion Payload Recovery Safety Outreach Project Plan Airframe
GIT LIT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER 13TH, 2017
GIT LIT 07-08 NASA STUDENT LAUNCH PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW NOVEMBER TH, 07 AGENDA. Team Overview (5 Min). Educational Outreach ( Min). Safety ( Min) 4. Project Budget ( Min) 5. Launch Vehicle (0 min)
Project NOVA
Project NOVA 2017-2018 Our Mission Design a Rocket Capable of: Apogee of 5280 ft Deploying an autonomous Rover Vehicle REILLY B. Vehicle Dimensions Total Length of 108 inches Inner Diameter of 6 inches
Flight Readiness Review
Flight Readiness Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2017-2018 Illinois Space Society 1 Overview Illinois Space Society 2 Launch Vehicle Summary Javier Brown Illinois
Auburn University Student Launch. PDR Presentation November 16, 2015
Auburn University Student Launch PDR Presentation November 16, 2015 Project Aquila Vehicle Dimensions Total Length of 69.125 inches Inner Diameter of 5 inches Outer Diameter of 5.25 inches Estimated mass
Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review. University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch March 30, 2016
Illinois Space Society Flight Readiness Review University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2015-2016 March 30, 2016 Team Managers Project Manager: Ian Charter Structures and Recovery Manager:
Critical Design Review
Critical Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign NASA Student Launch 2017-2018 Illinois Space Society 1 Overview Illinois Space Society 2 Launch Vehicle Summary Javier Brown Illinois Space
FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS
FLIGHT READINESS REVIEW TEAM OPTICS LAUNCH VEHICLE AND PAYLOAD DESIGN AND DIMENSIONS Vehicle Diameter 4 Upper Airframe Length 40 Lower Airframe Length 46 Coupler Band Length 1.5 Coupler Length 12 Nose
CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION
CRITICAL DESIGN PRESENTATION UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA LAUNCH SOCIETY BILL BROWN, BEECHER FAUST, ROCKWELL GARRIDO, CARSON SCHAFF, MICHAEL WIESNETH, MATTHEW WOJCIECHOWSKI ADVISOR: CARLOS MONTALVO MENTOR:
Presentation Outline. # Title
FRR Presentation 1 Presentation Outline # Title 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Team Introduction Mission Summary Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Upper Body Section Elliptical
Jordan High School Rocketry Team. A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device
Jordan High School Rocketry Team A Roll Stabilized Video Platform and Inflatable Location Device Mission Success Criteria No damage done to any person or property. The recovery system deploys as expected.
Presentation Outline. # Title # Title
CDR Presentation 1 Presentation Outline # Title # Title 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Team Introduction Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Upper Body Section Payload
NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013. University of Minnesota: USLI CDR 1
NASA - USLI Presentation 1/23/2013 2013 USLI CDR 1 Final design Key features Final motor choice Flight profile Stability Mass Drift Parachute Kinetic Energy Staged recovery Payload Integration Interface
NASA SL Critical Design Review
NASA SL Critical Design Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1 LAUNCH VEHICLE 2 Vehicle Summary Launch Vehicle Dimensions Fairing Diameter: 6 in. Body Tube Diameter: 4 in. Mass at lift off: 43.8
Preliminary Design Review. Cyclone Student Launch Initiative
Preliminary Design Review Cyclone Student Launch Initiative Overview Team Overview Mission Statement Vehicle Overview Avionics Overview Safety Overview Payload Overview Requirements Compliance Plan Team
Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES
Georgia Tech NASA Critical Design Review Teleconference Presented By: Georgia Tech Team ARES 1 Agenda 1. Team Overview (1 Min) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Changes Since Proposal (1 Min) Educational Outreach (1 Min)
NASA SL Flight Readiness Review
NASA SL Flight Readiness Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1 LAUNCH VEHICLE 2 Vehicle Overview Vehicle Dimensions Diameter: 6 fairing/4 aft Length: 106 inches Wet Mass: 41.1 lbs. Center of Pressure:
University Student Launch Initiative
University Student Launch Initiative HARDING UNIVERSITY Flight Readiness Review March 31, 2008 Launch Vehicle Summary Size: 97.7 (2.5 meters long), 3.1 diameter Motor: Contrail Rockets 54mm J-234 Recovery
AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH. Project Nova. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL Post Launch Assessment Review
AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH Project Nova 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL 36849 Post Launch Assessment Review April 19, 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents...2 List of Tables...3 Section 1: Launch Vehicle
Overview. Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management
MIT ROCKET TEAM Overview Mission Overview Payload and Subsystems Rocket and Subsystems Management Purpose and Mission Statement Our Mission: Use a rocket to rapidly deploy a UAV capable of completing search
PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW
PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW 1 1 Team Structure - Team Leader: Michael Blackwood NAR #101098L2 Certified - Safety Officer: Jay Nagy - Team Mentor: Art Upton NAR #26255L3 Certified - NAR Section: Jackson Model
Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review
Team Air Mail Preliminary Design Review 2014-2015 Space Grant Midwest High-Power Rocket Competition UAH Space Hardware Club Huntsville, AL Top: Will Hill, Davis Hunter, Beth Dutour, Bradley Henderson,
NUMAV. AIAA at Northeastern University
NUMAV AIAA at Northeastern University Team Officials Andrew Buggee, President, Northeastern AIAA chapter Dr. Andrew Goldstone, Faculty Advisor John Hume, Safety Officer Rob DeHate, Team Mentor Team Roster
Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review
2012-2013 Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Critical Design Review Table of Contents, Tables, and Figures I.0 CDR Report Summary... 1 I.1 Team Summary... 1 I.2 Launch Vehicle Summary... 1 I.2a
PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW
PROJECT AQUILA 211 ENGINEERING DRIVE AUBURN, AL 36849 POST LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW APRIL 29, 2016 Motor Specifications The team originally planned to use an Aerotech L-1520T motor and attempted four full
Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review
Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Critical Design Review High-Powered Rocketry Team 911 Oval Drive Raleigh NC, 27695 January 13, 2017 Table of Contents Table of Figures:... 8 Table of Appendices:...
Table of Content 1) General Information ) Summary of PDR Report ) Changes Made Since Proposal ) Safety... 8
Table of Content 1) General Information... 3 1.1 Student Leader... 3 1.2 Safety Officer... 3 1.3 Team Structure... 3 1.4 NAR/TRA Sections... 4 2) Summary of PDR Report... 5 2.1 Team Summary... 5 2.2 Launch
Flight Readiness Review March 16, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768
Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2018 Agenda California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Agenda 1.0 Changes made Since CDR 2.0 Launch Vehicle Criteria 3.0 Mission
Notre Dame Rocketry Team. Flight Readiness Review March 8, :00 PM CST
Notre Dame Rocketry Team Flight Readiness Review March 8, 2018 2:00 PM CST Contents Overview Vehicle Design Recovery Subsystem Experimental Payloads Deployable Rover Payload Air Braking System Safety and
NASA s Student Launch Initiative :
NASA s Student Launch Initiative : Critical Design Review Payload: Fragile Material Protection 1 Agenda 1. Design Overview 2. Payload 3. Recovery 4. 5. I. Sub-Scale Predictions II. Sub-Scale Test III.
Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review
Tacho Lycos 2017 NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review High-Powered Rocketry Team 911 Oval Drive Raleigh NC, 27695 March 6, 2017 Table of Contents Table of Figures... 9 Table of Appendices... 11
NASA Student Launch College and University. Preliminary Design Review
2017-2018 NASA Student Launch College and University Preliminary Design Review Institution: United States Naval Academy Mailing Address: Aerospace Engineering Department United States Naval Academy ATTN:
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY POST-LAUNCH ASSESSMENT REVIEW NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY USLI TEAM APRIL 27TH 2018 Table of Contents 1. Summary 2 1.1 Team Summary 2 1.2 Launch Summary 2 2. Launch Vehicle Assessment
Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight. Roll Induction and Counter Roll NASA University Student Launch.
Flight Readiness Review Addendum: Full-Scale Re-Flight Roll Induction and Counter Roll 2016-2017 NASA University Student Launch 27 March 2017 Propulsion Research Center, 301 Sparkman Dr. NW, Huntsville
University Student Launch Initiative
University Student Launch Initiative HARDING UNIVERSITY Critical Design Review February 4, 2008 The Team Dr. Edmond Wilson Brett Keller Team Official Project Leader, Safety Officer Professor of Chemistry
Critical Design Review Report
Critical Design Review Report I) Summary of PDR report Team Name: The Rocket Men Mailing Address: Spring Grove Area High School 1490 Roth s Church Road Spring Grove, PA 17362 Mentor: Tom Aument NAR Number
Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum
Statement of Work Requirements Verification Table - Addendum Vehicle Requirements Requirement Success Criteria Verification 1.1 No specific design requirement exists for the altitude. The altitude is a
Post Launch Assessment Review
AIAA Orange County Section Student Launch Initiative 2011-2012 Post Launch Assessment Review Rocket Deployment of a Bendable Wing Micro-UAV for Data Collection Submitted by: AIAA Orange County Section
USLI Critical Design Report
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2011 2012 USLI Critical Design Report University Of Minnesota Team Artemis 1/23/2012 Critical Design Report by University of Minnesota Team Artemis for 2011-2012 NASA
Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S.
Wichita State Launch Project K.I.S.S. Benjamin Russell Jublain Wohler Mohamed Moustafa Tarun Bandemagala Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Introduction Vehicle Overview Mission Predictions Payload Design Requirement
The University of Toledo
The University of Toledo Project Kronos Preliminary Design Review 11/03/2017 University of Toledo UT Rocketry Club 2801 W Bancroft St. MS 105 Toledo, OH 43606 Contents 1 Summary of Proposal... 6 1.1 Team
Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati
Rocketry Projects Conducted at the University of Cincinnati 2009-2010 Grant Schaffner, Ph.D. (Advisor) Rob Charvat (Student) 17 September 2010 1 Spacecraft Design Course Objectives Students gain experience
AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II. 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL CDR
AUBURN UNIVERSITY STUDENT LAUNCH PROJECT NOVA II 211 Davis Hall AUBURN, AL 36849 CDR January 10, 2019 Contents List of Tables...7 List of Figures...9 1 CDR Report Summary...12 1.1 Payload Deployable Rover...12
NASA Student Launch W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA Artemis. Deployable Rover. November 3rd, Preliminary Design Review
2017 2018 NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Review 1000 W. Foothill Blvd. Glendora, CA 91741 Artemis Deployable Rover November 3rd, 2017 Table of Contents General Information... 9 1. School Information...
Preliminary Design Review November 15, Agenda. California State Polytechnic University, Pomona W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768
Preliminary Design Review November 15, 2017 Agenda California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W. Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Agenda 1.0 General Information 2.0 Launch Vehicle System Overview
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Illinois Space Society Student Launch 2017-2018 Preliminary Design Review November 3, 2017 Illinois Space Society 104 S. Wright Street Room 18C Urbana, Illinois
Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt
Tripoli Rocketry Association Level 3 Certification Attempt Kevin O Classen 1101 Dutton Brook Road Goshen, VT 05733 (802) 247-4205 kevin@back2bed.com Doctor Fill Doctor Fill General Specifications Airframe:
University of Notre Dame
University of Notre Dame 2016-2017 Notre Dame Rocketry Team Critical Design Review NASA Student Launch Competition Roll Control and Fragile Object Protection Payloads Submitted January 13, 2017 365 Fitzpatrick
USLI Flight Readiness Review
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2011 2012 USLI Flight Readiness Review University Of Minnesota Team Artemis 3/26/2012 Flight Readiness Report prepared by University of Minnesota Team Artemis for 2011-2012
Student Launch. Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken
University of Evansville Student Launch Enclosed: Preliminary Design Review Submitted by: 2016 2017 Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken Submission Date: November 04, 2016 Payload: Fragile Material Protection
Pegasus II. Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation. Brian Wheeler
Pegasus II Tripoli Level 3 Project Documentation Brian Wheeler Contents: A. Design Overview B. Booster Construction C. Electronics Bay (Mechanical) Construction D. Nose Cone Construction E. Recovery System
Florida A & M University. Flight Readiness Review. 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review
Florida A & M University Flight Readiness Review 11/19/2010 Preliminary Design Review 1 Overview Team Summary ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ Vehicle Criteria ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~
Critical Design Review
Critical Design Review 1/27/2017 NASA Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 1/27/2017 California State Polytechnic University,
Preliminary Design Review
Preliminary Design Review November 16, 2016 11/2016 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 1 Agenda 1.0 General Information
Rocket Design. Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick. February 2010
Rocket Design Tripoli Minnesota Gary Stroick February 2010 Purpose Focus is on designing aerodynamically stable rockets not drag optimization nor construction techniques! Copyright 2010 by Gary Stroick
Critical Design Review
AIAA Orange County Section Student Launch Initiative 2011-2012 Critical Design Review Rocket Deployment of a Bendable Wing Micro-UAV for Data Collection Submitted by: AIAA Orange County Section NASA Student
Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review
Northwest Indian College Space Center USLI Post Launch Assessment Review 2012-2013 Table of Contents I. Team Summary... 1 Team Name: Northwest Indian College RPGs... 1 II. Launch Vehicle Summary... 1
Tuskegee University Rocketry Club
Tuskegee University Rocketry Club National Aeronautics and Space Administration Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review Atmospheric Measurement and Aerodynamic Analysis TURC 2015-2016 NASA
Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix
Presentation 3 Vehicle Systems - Phoenix 1 Outline Structures Nosecone Body tubes Bulkheads Fins Tailcone Recovery System Layout Testing Propulsion Ox Tank Plumbing Injector Chamber Nozzle Testing Hydrostatic
First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016
First Nations Launch Rocket Competition 2016 Competition Date April 21-22, 2016 Carthage College Kenosha, WI April 23, 2016 Richard Bong Recreational Park Kansasville, WI Meet the Team Wisconsin Space
Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014
Illinois Space Society University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Student Launch 2014-2015 Maxi-MAV Preliminary Design Review November 5, 2014 Illinois Space Society 104 S. Wright Street Room 321D Urbana,
NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS)
2016-2017 NASA USLI Flight Readiness Review (FRR) Rensselaer Rocket Society (RRS) Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute 110 8th St Troy, NY 12180 Project Name: Andromeda Task 3.3: Roll Induction and Counter
Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017
Cal Poly Pomona Rocketry NASA Student Launch Competition 2016-2017 POST LAUNCH ASSESMENT REVIEW April 24, 2017 California State Polytechnic University, Pomona 3801 W Temple Ave, Pomona, CA 91768 Department
CNY Rocket Team Challenge. Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge
CNY Rocket Team Challenge Basics of Using RockSim 9 to Predict Altitude for the Central New York Rocket Team Challenge RockSim 9 Basics 2 Table of Contents A. Introduction.p. 3 B. Designing Your Rocket.p.
Rover Delivery NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review. Charger Rocket Works.
Rover Delivery 2017-2018 NASA University Student Launch Initiative Post-Launch Assessment Review Charger Rocket Works April 27 th, 2018 Propulsion Research Center 1030 John Wright Drive NW, Huntsville,
Critical Design Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)
Critical Design Review Report 2014-2015 NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME) Florida International University Engineering Center College
LEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD. Dan Schwartz
LEVEL 3 BUILD YELLOW BIRD Dan Schwartz This entire rocket is built using the same techniques I use for my nose cones, a central airframe tube for compression strength and rings of high compression styrofoam
NASA SL Preliminary Design Review
NASA SL Preliminary Design Review University of Alabama in Huntsville 1 Mission Summary Design, fabricate, test and fly a rocket and payload to 1 mile in altitude Deploy a rover upon landing to autonomously
University of North Dakota Department of Physics Frozen Fury Rocketry Team
University of North Dakota Department of Physics Frozen Fury Rocketry Team NASA Student Launch Initiative Flight Readiness Review - Report Submitted by: The University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rocketry
Student Launch. Enclosed: Proposal. Submitted by: Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken. Submission Date: September 30, 2016
University of Evansville Student Launch Enclosed: Proposal Submitted by: 2016 2017 Rocket Team Project Lead: David Eilken Submission Date: September 30, 2016 Payload: Fragile Material Protection Submitted
The University of Toledo
The University of Toledo Project Cairo Preliminary Design Review 10/08/2016 University of Toledo UT Rocketry Club 2801 W Bancroft St. MS 105 Toledo, OH 43606 Contents 1 Summary of Preliminary Design Review...
AKRONAUTS. P o s t - L a u n c h A ss e s m e n t R e v i e w. The University of Akron College of Engineering. Akron, OH 44325
AKRONAUTS Rocket Design Team Project P o s t - L a u n c h A ss e s m e n t R e v i e w The University of Akron College of Engineering 302 E Buchtel Ave Akron, OH 44325 NASA Student Launch Initiative April
SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle
SpaceLoft XL Sub-Orbital Launch Vehicle The SpaceLoft XL is UP Aerospace s workhorse space launch vehicle -- ideal for significant-size payloads and multiple, simultaneous-customer operations. SpaceLoft
ISS Space Grant Team Exocoetidae
ISS Space Grant Team Exocoetidae Illinois Space Society University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana March 9, 2018 Faculty Advisor: Diane Jeffers (dejeffer@illinois.edu, 217-898-5888) Team Lead: Shivani
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES 2012 2013 University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics 3/18/2013 2012-2013 University of Minnesota
Cornell Rocketry Team. NASA Student Launch Competition CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM
2015-2016 CORNELL ROCKETRY TEAM Presentation Centennial Challenge MAV Participant NASA Student Launch Competition LAUNCH VEHICLE GENERAL DIMENSIONS Airframe Tubing: OD = 3.98 in ID = 3.9 in Couplers: OD
Flight Readiness Review Report NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME)
Flight Readiness Review Report 2014-2015 NASA Student Launch Florida International University American Society of Mechanical Engineers (FIU-ASME) Florida International University Engineering Center College
Turbo-Rocket. A brand new class of hybrid rocket. Rene Nardi and Eduardo Mautone
Turbo-Rocket R A brand new class of hybrid rocket Rene Nardi and Eduardo Mautone 53 rd AIAA/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference July 10 12, 2017 - Atlanta, Georgia Rumo ao Espaço R - UFC Team 2 Background
York College of Pennsylvania NASA Student Launch Preliminary Design Report
York College of Pennsylvania NASA Student Launch 2017-2018 Preliminary Design Report The Aurora Project 441 Country Club Road York, PA 17403 1 General Information Contact Information: Campus Leader: YCP
By: Georgia Institute of Technology Team Autonomous Rocket Equipment System (A.R.E.S.) Georgia Institute of Technology North Avenue NW Atlanta GA,
By: Georgia Institute of Technology Team Autonomous Rocket Equipment System (A.R.E.S.) Georgia Institute of Technology North Avenue NW Atlanta GA, 30332 Project Name: Hermes MAXI-MAV Competition Friday,
Modified shock-cord mount and cables (cables are shown pushed into motor mount here)
Building the Ariel Builder: Ray Wilkinson This is Ray Wilkinson's own rocket, but will mostly reside at UH, and will be used for display purposes as well as being flown. It's built from a kit made by PML
CYCLONE STUDENT LAUNCH INITIATIVE
NSL PROPOSAL September 19, 2018 CYCLONE STUDENT LAUNCH INITIATIVE 2018-19 Iowa State University 537 Bissell Rd. 1200 Howe Hall Ames, IA 50011 Table of Contents Table of Contents... 2 Table of Figures...
Post Launch Assessment Review
Post Launch Assessment Review University of South Alabama Launch Society Conner Denton, John Faulk, Nghia Huynh, Kent Lino, Phillip Ruschmyer, Andrew Tindell Department of Mechanical Engineering 150 Jaguar
Michigan Aeronautical Science Association
Michigan Aeronautical Science Association Established August 2003 Organizational Document December 29, 2003 Version 3 Authors: Jeffrey D. Lydecker: jlydec@umich.edu Matthew H. McKeown: mckeownm@umich.edu
How Does a Rocket Engine Work?
Propulsion How Does a Rocket Engine Work? Solid Rocket Engines Propellant is a mixture of fuel and oxidizer in a solid grain form. Pros: Stable Simple, fewer failure points. Reliable output. Cons: Burns
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY NASA USLI PROPOSAL. Tacho Lycos. Submitted by: North Carolina State University High Powered Rocket Club
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY NASA USLI PROPOSAL Submitted by: North Carolina State University High Powered Rocket Club 22 November 2013 This document is in response to the NASA USLI request for proposals
Innovating the future of disaster relief
Innovating the future of disaster relief American Helicopter Society International 33rd Annual Student Design Competition Graduate Student Team Submission VEHICLE OVERVIEW FOUR VIEW DRAWING INTERNAL COMPONENTS
THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON
THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON College of Engineering 302 E Buchtel Ave Akron, OH 44325 September 20, 2017 NASA Student Launch Initiative Table of Contents 1. Adult Educators and Advisors... 4 2. Team Officials...
Critical Design Review
Harding University University Student Launch Initiative Team Critical Design Review January 29, 2007 The Flying Bison Sarah Christensen Project Leader Dr. Ed Wilson Faculty Supervisor Dr. James Mackey
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics 16.00 Introduction to Aerospace and Design Problem Set #4 Issued: February 28, 2002 Due: March 19, 2002 ROCKET PERFORMANCE
HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick
Complex Rocket Design Considerations HPR Staging & Air Starting By Gary Stroick 1. Tripoli Safety Code 2. Technical Considerations 3. Clusters/Air Starts 4. Staging 5. Summary 2 1. Complex High Power Rocket.
Information Pack for Mid Power Rockets
Information Pack for Mid Power Rockets www.qldrocketry.com Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. Terminology... 3 3. Rocket Flight Phases... 4 4. Igniters... 5 5. Motors... 6 5.1 Key Components...
NWIC Space Center s 2017 First Nations Launch Achievements
NWIC Space Center s 2017 First Nations Launch Achievements On April 18, 2017, we were on two airplanes to Milwaukee, Wisconsin by 6:30 am for a long flight. There were 12 students, 3 mentors, 2 toddlers
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA FROZEN FURY CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW REPORT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH 2015
1 UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA FROZEN FURY CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW REPORT NASA STUDENT LAUNCH 2015 2 Table of Contents Summary Team Summary Launch Vehicle Summary AGSE/Payload Summary Changes Made Since PDR
Y. Lemmens, T. Benoit, J. de Boer, T. Olbrechts LMS, A Siemens Business. Real-time Mechanism and System Simulation To Support Flight Simulators
Y. Lemmens, T. Benoit, J. de Boer, T. Olbrechts LMS, A Siemens Business Real-time Mechanism and System Simulation To Support Flight Simulators Smarter decisions, better products. Contents Introduction
This Week. Next Week 4/7/15
E80 Spring 2015 This Week! Transfer breadboard circuit to PC board.! Verify everything still works.! Get data logger working.! Pass off consists of: " Power PC board with data logger & start logging. "