08-09 Suspension Design Analysis
|
|
- Diana Palmer
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Jonathan Peyton Independent Design Study Suspension Design Analysis Summary: The chasiss of the car was redesigned to have a shorter wheelbase by two inches and a wider rear track by two and half inches that served as a more stable yet agile platform for further optimization. Stability gained by lowering toe variance in heave by over 40% (a slight gain was seen in toe variance at full steer in heave.) o The gain in toe at full steer is seen at the front wheel and is actually beneficial to getting the car to turn while manueving over bumps. The addition of toe out in the rear will help the car walk around turns without relying on sliding the car or drastically lifting the inside rear tire improving the stability of the car. Reduction is weight of the suspension system lowered the inertia of the moving components. o Fox Shox lower the weight by over 2 lbs. a corner while providing more advanced tuning and performance features than the previous coil shock. o J-Arm Rear end eliminates member that allows for lower A-Arm shock mount lowering the CG of the system. FEA analysis of outboard aluminum components lead to the lower of peak and average stress in the components o All components will see and increase in useful life before failure o Steering Arm geometry has been optimized to eliminate failures due to a preexisting stress riser in the past designs. o Lighter yet stronger components were designed thru iterative refinement Analysis of the systems geometry and components indicates that its dynamic performance has been improved in performance and the durabilty of components were improved by iterative redesign.
2 08-09 Mini Baja Suspension Design Objectives: Evaluate the performance of the past two years (06-07, 07-08) systems Understand gains made in past two years suspensions designs. Optimize suspension geometry with last year s dynamic analysis results as a guideline. Optimize components to save weight, improve dynamic characteristics of the car, and maintain simplistic streamlined design for ease of manufacture Suspension Design Strategy: Map the front end of the car in Optimum-K suspension analysis software to gain dynamic performance specifications of the past year s car. Optimize front end to outperform the previous design in relation to: Reduce toe variance in heave and at full steering input to achieve higher stability Gain more steering angle at inner wheel from the same steering input from the driver. Progress to fifteen degrees of wheel recession to prevent the car from landing nose down in jumps and deliver smoother ride characteristics. Obtain benefits to s rear end through conversation, testing and speculative mapping(full geometry lost due to poor file maintenance) Redesisn the rear end with a J - arm layout and obtain a system that duplicates the functionality of the past two year s rear end designs. Design a functional rear system with no rear toe link with variable toe out during compression to aide cornering. Results: Front Dynamics: Front Dynamics Dynamic Variable Toe in Heave Toe in Full Steer Camber in Heave Performance 1.7 Deg. Total Change 2.5 Deg. Total Change 15.9 Deg. Total Change Dynamic Variable Performance % Improvement Toe in Heave.99 Deg. Total Change 41% Reduction Toe in Full Steer 2.7 Deg. Total Change 8% Increase Camber in Heave 14.7 Deg. Total Change 8% Reduction All changes improve vehicle stability by optimizing to wheel dynamics Front Geometry Front Geometry Geometric Constraint Measure of Constraint Kingpin Inclination 6 deg Wheel Recession 12 deg Caster Angle 12 deg Scrub Radius Ackerman 24% Vertical wheel travel 12.5 Geometric Constraint Measure of Constraint Changes Kingpin Inclination 6 deg Same Wheel Recession 15 deg Increased* Caster Angle 15 deg Increased* Scrub Radius Increased** Ackerman 25% Increased** Vertical wheel travel 11.5 Decreased***
3 *The wheel recession angle was increased to improve stability over bumps and jumps the caster was changed to match wheel recession angle. ** The scrub radius and ackerman were increased to gain more steer with the same total rack displacement as the previous design. *** The vertical wheel travel suffered a decrease due to the Fox Shox having approximately one inch less of compressible length. Indicated above is the general layout to the and front geometries and basic dynamic performance to provide basis for quick comparison. The system saw the best documentation of data by the team and also proved one of the highest potentials for great performance seen in any RIT Baja Car. Hence the car served as a basis for comparison when designing this year s car. The car saw the greatest stability over even the roughest terrain due to the low variance in toe while turning or straight motion over its full vertical travel. The main reason for the gain in stability was the addition of wheel recession to the rear and adding two more degrees to the front wheel recession. Wheel recession allows the wheel to travel backwards and up in compression making the ride smoother while jumping and provides better landing for the car. The rear of the car used trailing arm that followed the overall wheel path of 15 degrees of wheel recession and proved to be very effective. This provided to the layout for the wheel recession for the design of this year s front and rear. Negatives to the car were that it required riding on a razors edge of control. To make the car effectively corner with speed made the driver ride the border of bicycling the car and low speed cornering demanded perfect turn in. If the driver missed the apex of a low speed corner the car pushed or lifted both inner tires. The car was known to be slightly slower but much more forgiving so a blend of these two cars personalities was the aim for this year s car. To begin to frame success the general dimensions of the car were modified in comparison to the car. The wheelbase shrunk from 60 to 58 to ease low speed tight radius cornering. To address the risk of bicycling the rear end was widened from a track width of 44 to After these dimensions were decided the finer details were optimized in Optimum-K. The Optimum-K suspension analysis software was a huge advantage as compared to ADAMS as it was much more user friendly and comprehensive at the same time. Below is listed the general dynamic characteristics of the rear of the car along with the geometric layout to the rear system Rear Dynamics: Rear Geometry Dynamic Variable Toe in Heave Camber in Heave Performance 3.7 Deg. Total Change 12.5 Deg. Total Change Geometric Constraint Measure of Constraint Kingpin Inclination 12 deg Wheel Recession Caster Angle 15 deg* 15 deg Vertical wheel travel 12 ** *The 15 deg wheel recession was based off creating a straightline path between the beginning and end of the path of the past years trailing arm. ** The previous years wheel travel was 13.5, the loss in wheel travel was due to the loss in compressible length in the Fox Shox as mentioned before.
4 From the basic redesign to the wheel base and rear track width, the path is laid for a car that corners more sharply while providing greater stability. The quest for excellence continued with tuning in the geometry with Optimum-K to slightly lower camber changes and toe changes in the front. As for the rear it was decided that mild toe out in compression would be beneficial to help the rear end turn more efficiently in all turning scenarios. The benefits to toe out in compression were tested on with multiple inboard toe link points to connect to. The one problem was too much toe variance was seen in both compression and droop ranges causing the tires to slow the car in straight line motion over obstacles and greatly reducing stability. This testing with the 06-7 car made the team recognize the potential gains in cornering ability from the addition of toe out but had to wait for the next A-arm rear ended car as the car was planned to be an trailing arm car. It was decided that toe out while driving straight should not be over 5 degrees in compression but could be varied with flexible bushing at the lower upright connection. This way straight line stability could be kept while aiding in sharp cornering as additional toe out would be gained from busing flex cause by side loads on the wheel during cornering. The additional gains would be controlled by testing several grades of polyurethane to find the optimum toe gains that would not sacrifice speed over obstacles while moving straight or cause the car to corner too sharply. As can be seen by comparing the tables listing the dynamic characteristics of the two cars the dynamic properties were tuned in and only varied slightly though there were several geometric differences. The difference in wheel travel this year was a result of switching to a new shock that has an approximately one inch less in compressible length in comparison to the shocks we used on the car. The shocks this year are the Fox Float Evol and were chosen for multiple reasons. Firstly the Floats are at least 2.5 pounds lighter as compared to the PEP shocks used the year before. The Fox s also benefit from both low and high speed bound dampening adjustment, also as they are an air shock they a truly progressive in spring rate and have higher resolution in all tuning variables compared to the PEP s allowing for the optimum tuning to be obtained. The low speed bound dampening will be used to tune in cornering and jump face(lip) characteristics while the high speed compression tuning will address bumps. This way a plush ride can be achieved without sacrificing optimal roll stiffness. Also spring rates had to be changed by removing the shock and disassembling the spring stack and having then to compress the springs to set the proper preload. This was time consuming and at times dangerous. Now all tuning can be done with the shocks on the car by twisting knobs and adding or releasing air pressure from two filling locations. This aspect of these shocks will prove time saving and extremely useful during the race season. One difference in the steering this year is the longer scrub radius. This was slightly lengthened to give the driver slightly more feel in the steering. The scrub radius is now approximately 13% longer resulting in that much more force needed to be input by the driver at the wheel. It should return the car to a similar feel to the car that most drivers preferred over the car. The steering also saw an improvement is slightly more steer angle at the wheel with the same rack displacement as last year. The inside wheel sees an increase of a little over a degree to help cornering as it causes the wheel to nearly skid and assist the car in rotating about its center. On the outside wheel the increase is only a half of a degree but will also aide in helping the car in low speed cornering. The changes in steering still maintain the basic Ackerman geometry of having approximately ten degrees difference in steering angle between the inner and outer wheel at ride height. This is accomplised thru the steering arm geometry.
5 The last geometric change that will have an effect of on dynamics is the use of the J -arm layout for the rear to lower the CG of the system and allow for proper clearance of the CV shaft and all other drive line components that are nested in the rear of the car. The system is pictured to the left below and to the right of that is the front system that is a traditional A -arm system to show the differences. As seen in the screen shots the J -arm upper member removes one branch of the traditional arm and allows for the shock to be mounted off center. To adjust the shock being shifted forward the lower arm was design with a forward offset to shift the CG forward. The J -arm system is one of the most compact rear systems that the team has seen. The lower mount to the control arm from the upright will be bushed versus an adjustable rod end. This fast that only one rod end needs to be adjusted for set up lowers set up time more than any other rear A -arm design before. With performance and geometry understood of both the front and rear systems light will be shed on how the outboard components designed this year were optimize to extend life cycles while keeping moving mass down. For a mini baja car ruggedness and longevity of the car and its components are as important as how well it can perform dynamically. With several parts failing after shorter life cycles than expected a higher focus was put onto ensuring that the components be able to handle most anything thrown at them. Loading scenarios were replaced with more accurate ones as failed components shed light on what caused their failure. With the new loading scenarios the new front and rear uprights were analyzed with a loading scheme derived from the failure of last year s trailing arm. This loading scenario encompassed all offsets in both the front and rear from hubs, spindles and wheels to account any increase in forces from moments. Last year also saw failures in the steering arm, which had never before been analyzed. All components saw reduction in maximum stress and also increased stress distribution throughout the body greatly alleviating high stress pockets in the designs. Side by side comparisons of the stress plots are listed below with analysis of each component.
6 Front Upright analysis: The loading scenario for the front and rear uprights took half the vehicle weight and through the spindle/hub offset input 3g 4g and 5g loads in the longitudinal vertical and lateral planes. This resulted in a 1250lb-in moment from the longitudinal load, 1798lb-in from the vertical and a lateral of 6130 lb-in. Also a torque was applied from the brakes of 2040lb-in. Even with a five percent reduction in volume thus a five percent reduction in weight (as both uprights are produced from 7075-T6 Aluminum,) the upright still saw a much better overall stress distribution as seen above as most of the body is dark blue compared to the which is a bright blue. The max stress seen in the upright also dropped resulting in a higher factor of safety and approximately double the life cycles before failure. Last year saw no upright failure but obvious wear was apparent. The wear was noted at the upper rod end mount, this year s and last year s now run a sleeved mount. The sleeve is 4340 and has a top hat to distribute mounting forces. The max stress indicated on the stress plot of the upright was ignored as the stress one node or two over from it dropped severely and discussions with professors indicate that the stress rise is a combination of geometry and mesh shape. If more computing capability was available the mess would be refined in all areas with red and yellow and stress would lower due to correct mesh geometry. So a value for max stress was pulled from a node close to the max stress indicated. The stress used for life cycle calculations for the upright was 48 ksi versus 42.9 in the upright, this resulted in a 14% increase in factor of safety and 92% increase in life cycles to failure from 1.28 x 10^5 cycle to 2.46 x 10^5 life cycles to failure. With this analysis it is clear to see the improvement of this year s front upright.
7 Steering Arm Analysis: The loading scenario for the steering arm was derived from a combined longitudinal and lateral load were causing the failures. A loading scenario was created by analyzing the and achieving a loading scenario that resulted in a factor of safety of approximately.5. This loading scenario was 750 lb longitudinal and 750 lateral being applied at the rod end mount holes(where the pink arrows indicate above). The steering arm was never before analyzed but became a point of concern as several failed last year. These parts are made from billet blocks and hence waste a lot of material to machine them. This correlates to a long machine time and increased tooling demand. To reduce the time to produce spares these parts were greatly improved this year. The peak stress seen in last year s model came from a fillet not being continued a long a face leaving a sharp edge. This combined with leaving the edge between the two mating faces to the upright unradiused lead to two stress multipliers in close proximity to each other. The steering arms would rip themselves apart near where the arrow indicates the max stress. This area was focused on this year during the design process. With increasing thickness of the side mounting tabs, continuing radii and adding a fillet to the edge between the two mating faces to the upright, a 47% reduction in stress was seen.
8 Rear Upright Analysis: The challenge of designing this year s upright was packaging it into an optimal geometry that would handle the increased forces of a bushed lower mount from the increased distance between the mounting tabs. After clearances were checked from the lower control arm at full droop and the wheel in a outboard assembly, optimization of geometry began with radiusing and increasing tab thickness at the lower mount tabs. After several iterations an optimal design was produced and compared to the life span of last year trailing arm which saw premature fatigue failure. When compared to the trailing arm the rear upright is 193% better in terms of factor of safety with the trailing arm reaching only.9 and the new upright hitting a factor of safety of This resulting is a drastic increase in cycles to failure from 82,400 to 7,190,000. References: All files for models and FEA are located of the Mini Baja PDM vault All prework and design strategy is stored in the Suspension Design Book All Optimum-K work is saved on the Baja server in the Suspension folder Additional information is available in the attached appendix.
9 Suspension Definitions: Camber: Measure of angle of the wheel s tilt vertically towards or away from the vehicle s center. Negative camber indicate that the wheel s top is tilted towards the center of the car and positive camber is when the top of the wheel is further away from the center of the car then the bottom of the wheel. Toe: It is the relationship between the front and rear of the wheel as compared to the center of the vehicle. Toe out or negative toe is when the front of the wheel is pointed away from the center of the car. Toe in or positive toe is when the front of the wheel is closer to the center of the car than the rear of the wheel. Caster: Relationship between the upper and lower suspension mounts at the wheel upright in respect to the side view of the car. Kingpin: Measure of the angle between the upper and lower outer A- Arm mounts at the wheel in relation to the center of the car. This angle is measured from the front view of the car and usually the upper mount is closer to the center of the car in comparison to the lower mount. Wheel recession: Measure of the angle created between the horizontal and the control arm s rotational axis. This angle is measure from creating a line from the inboard mounts and measuring the angle between that line and the ground(level horizon), this angle can be measured from the side view of the car. In a car equipped with wheel recession the wheel does not simply travel vertical through its wheel travel it also moves horizontally towards the rear of the car aiding in stability over bumps and landing. Heave: Motion of the vehicle up and down. Down is negative and up is positive. This motion is analyzed to measure dynamics of the suspension in compression(neg. heave) and droop(pos. heave.) Steer angle: Same measure as toe but specifically from steering input versus toe that is created from wheel motion in vertical travel. Ackerman Steering: Steering geometry that allows for a larger steering angle at the inner tire compared the outside wheel to address smaller turning radius at the inner wheel. Scrub Radius: Distance between the centerline of the wheel and the kingpin angle extended to the ground.
10 Front Appendix: Camber Variance In Heave Camber (deg) Camber at Wheel Camber at Wheel Heave(in) Details Details Front Right Camber(deg) Heave Min Min Max 8.08 Max 6.75 Range Deg Heave Camber at Rest 0 Min -5.5 Max Max 7 Min Delta
11 Front Toe Variance in Heave Toe (deg) Heave (in) Toe Varience Toe Varience Details Details Front Toe Right(deg) Heave Min Min Max Max 6.75 Range Toe at Rest 0 Heave Max Min -5.5 Min Max 7 Delta 1.717
12 Toe Variance at Full Steer in Heave Toe (deg) Toe at Outside Tire Toe at Inside Tire Toe at Outside Tire Toe at Inside Tire Heave(in) Details Front Left Toe (deg) Front Right Toe (deg) Heave(in) (Outside Tire) (Inside Tire) Min Min Min Max Max Max 6.75 Delta Delta Details Outside Tire (deg) Inside Tire (deg) Heave(in) Full Steer at Ride Height Min -5.5 Steer Max Max 7 Steer Min Delta Max-Min
13 Rear Appendix: Rear Camber Variance in Heave 5 Deg Heave Camber at Rest 0 Min Max 3.71 Max 4.75 Min Delta 12.6 Camber (deg) Camber at Wheel -10 Heave (in) Rear Toe Variance in Heave 2 1 Toe at Rest (deg) 0 Heave Max Min Min Max 4.75 Delta 3.7 Toe (deg) Toe at Wheel -2-3 Heave (in)
SAE Mini BAJA: Suspension and Steering
SAE Mini BAJA: Suspension and Steering By Zane Cross, Kyle Egan, Nick Garry, Trevor Hochhaus Team 11 Progress Report Submitted towards partial fulfillment of the requirements for Mechanical Engineering
More informationROLL CENTER You can adjust the front and rear roll centers of the XB8 by changing the mounting locations of various components.
Your XRAY XB8 luxury nitro buggy is a top competition, precision racing machine that features multiple adjustments that allow you to set up for any track condition. The XB8 includes innovative set-up features
More informationKinematic Analysis of Roll Motion for a Strut/SLA Suspension System Yung Chang Chen, Po Yi Tsai, I An Lai
Kinematic Analysis of Roll Motion for a Strut/SLA Suspension System Yung Chang Chen, Po Yi Tsai, I An Lai Abstract The roll center is one of the key parameters for designing a suspension. Several driving
More informationDynamic Analysis of Double Wishbone and Double Wishbone with S Link + Toe Link
RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS Dynamic Analysis of Double Wishbone and Double Wishbone with S Link + Toe Link Rajkumar Kewat, Anil Kumar Kundu,Kuldeep Kumar,Rohit Lather, Mohit Tomar RJIT, B.S.F ACADEMY
More informationSAE Mini BAJA: Suspension and Steering
SAE Mini BAJA: Suspension and Steering By Zane Cross, Kyle Egan, Nick Garry, Trevor Hochhaus Team 11 Project Progress Submitted towards partial fulfillment of the requirements for Mechanical Engineering
More informationGlobal West Suspension 655 South Lincoln Ave San Bernardino Ca Phone Fax Web address globalwest.
Global West Suspension 655 South Lincoln Ave San Bernardino Ca. 92408 Phone 877-470-2975 Fax 909-890-0703 Web address globalwest.net Mustang coilover instruction sheets for 64-66 Kit includes the following
More informationDesign and Analysis of suspension system components
Design and Analysis of suspension system components Manohar Gade 1, Rayees Shaikh 2, Deepak Bijamwar 3, Shubham Jambale 4, Vikram Kulkarni 5 1 Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, D Y Patil college
More informationDesigning and Hard Point Optimization of Suspension System of a Three-Wheel Hybrid Vehicle
ISSN (O): 2393-8609 International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Designing and Hard Point Optimization of Suspension System of a Three-Wheel Hybrid Vehicle Gomish Chawla B.Tech Automotive
More informationBasic Wheel Alignment Techniques
Basic Wheel Alignment Techniques MASTERING THE BASICS: Modern steering and suspension systems are great examples of solid geometry at work. Wheel alignment integrates all the factors of steering and suspension
More informationA double-wishbone type suspension is used in the front. A multi-link type suspension is used in the rear. Tread* mm (in.) 1560 (61.
CHASSIS SUSPENSION AND AXLE CH-69 SUSPENSION AND AXLE SUSPENSION 1. General A double-wishbone type suspension is used in the front. A multi-link type suspension is used in the rear. 08D0CH111Z Specifications
More informationiracing.com Williams-Toyota FW31 Quick Car Setup Guide
iracing.com Williams-Toyota FW31 Quick Car Setup Guide In this guide we will briefly explain a number of key setup parameters which are distinct to the FW31 and which are new to iracing vehicles. We hope
More informationDesign of Suspension and Steering system for an All-Terrain Vehicle and their Interdependence
Design of Suspension and Steering system for an All-Terrain Vehicle and their Interdependence Saurabh Wanganekar 1, Chinmay Sapkale 2, Priyanka Chothe 3, Reshma Rohakale 4,Samadhan Bhosale 5 1 Student,Department
More informationUniversity of Wisconsin-Platteville Formula SAE Design Report
2012-2013 University of Wisconsin-Platteville Formula SAE Design Report Introduction The 2012-2013 University of Wisconsin-Platteville Formula SAE Team is competing in Formula SAE, Nebraska, for the second
More informationSUMMARY OF STANDARD K&C TESTS AND REPORTED RESULTS
Description of K&C Tests SUMMARY OF STANDARD K&C TESTS AND REPORTED RESULTS The Morse Measurements K&C test facility is the first of its kind to be independently operated and made publicly available in
More informationTorque steer effects resulting from tyre aligning torque Effect of kinematics and elastokinematics
P refa c e Tyres of suspension and drive 1.1 General characteristics of wheel suspensions 1.2 Independent wheel suspensions- general 1.2.1 Requirements 1.2.2 Double wishbone suspensions 1.2.3 McPherson
More informationWheel Alignment Fundamentals
CHAPTER 67 Wheel Alignment Fundamentals OBJECTIVES Upon completion of this chapter, you should be able to: Describe each wheel alignment angle. Tell which alignment angles cause wear or pull. KEY TERMS
More informationSuspension Analyzer Full Vehicle Version
Suspension Analyzer Full Vehicle Version Overview of Features The Full Vehicle version of Suspension Analyzer has several enhancements over the standard version, the most significant is analyzing various
More informationRED RAVEN, THE LINKED-BOGIE PROTOTYPE. Ara Mekhtarian, Joseph Horvath, C.T. Lin. Department of Mechanical Engineering,
RED RAVEN, THE LINKED-BOGIE PROTOTYPE Ara Mekhtarian, Joseph Horvath, C.T. Lin Department of Mechanical Engineering, California State University, Northridge California, USA Abstract RedRAVEN is a pioneered
More informationDesign and Integration of Suspension, Brake and Steering Systems for a Formula SAE Race Car
Design and Integration of Suspension, Brake and Steering Systems for a Formula SAE Race Car Mark Holveck 01, Rodolphe Poussot 00, Harris Yong 00 Final Report May 5, 2000 MAE 340/440 Advisor: Prof. S. Bogdonoff
More informationFundamentals of Steering Systems ME5670
Fundamentals of Steering Systems ME5670 Class timing Monday: 14:30 Hrs 16:00 Hrs Thursday: 16:30 Hrs 17:30 Hrs Lecture 3 Thomas Gillespie, Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics, SAE, 1992. http://www.me.utexas.edu/~longoria/vsdc/clog.html
More informationDesign of Formula SAE Suspension
SAE TECHNICAL PAPER SERIES 2002-01-3310 Design of Formula SAE Suspension Badih A. Jawad and Jason Baumann Lawrence Technological University Reprinted From: Proceedings of the 2002 SAE Motorsports Engineering
More informationDesign and optimization of Double wishbone suspension system for ATVs
Design and optimization of Double wishbone suspension system for ATVs Shantanu Garud 1, Pritam Nagare 2, Rohit Kusalkar 3, Vijaysingh Gadhave 4, Ajinkya Sawant 5 1,2,3,4Dept of Mechanical Engineering,
More informationWhy do cars need Alignment
Why do cars need Alignment The main purpose of wheel alignment is to make the tires roll without Scuffing, slipping, or dragging under all operating conditions. Caster Camber Toe Steering axis inclination
More information2012 Dalhousie University Formula SAE Design Report
Dalhousie University Car #47 - Formula SAE Michigan fsae@dal.ca Introduction 2012 Dalhousie University Formula SAE Design Report The 2012 Dalhousie University Formula SAE Team is competing in Formula SAE,
More informationCane Creek Double Barrel Instructions
Cane Creek Double Barrel Instructions Congratulations on your purchase of the Cane Creek Double Barrel rear shock. Developed in partnership with Öhlins Racing, the Double Barrel brings revolutionary suspension
More information2. MEASURE VEHICLE HEIGHT. (b) Measure the vehicle height. Measurement points: C: Ground clearance of front wheel center
ADJUSTMENT If the wheel alignment has been adjusted, and if suspension or underbody components have been removed/installed or replaced, be sure to perform the following initialization procedure in order
More informationGENERAL INFORMATION. Wheel Alignment Theory & Operation
Fig. 1: Checking Steering Linkage GENERAL INFORMATION Wheel Alignment Theory & Operation ADJUSTMENTS NOTE: This article is intended for general information purposes only. This information may not apply
More informationWheel Alignment And Diagnostic Angles (STE04)
Module 1 Wheel Alignments Wheel Alignment And Diagnostic Angles (STE04) Wheel Alignments o Conditions Requiring An Alignment o Conditions Requiring An Alignment (cont d) o Why We Do Checks And Alignments
More informationMultilink IRS Setup & Assembly Manual
Art Morrison Enterprises Multilink IRS Setup & Assembly Manual 8/13/2018 Rev 6 Contents Introduction... 3 Toe Link Eccentric... 3 Powdercoating... 3 IRS Assembly Steps... 4 1. Backing plates/knuckles/hubs...
More informationSPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?
SPMM 5000 OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000? The Suspension Parameter Measuring Machine (SPMM) is designed to measure the quasi-static suspension characteristics that are important
More informationHow to Set the Alignment on Ford Mustangs
How to Set the Alignment on 1967-1973 Ford Mustangs Let's Get This Straight - Mustang Monthly Magazine Christopher Campbell Technical Editor March 25, 2015 Frontend alignment is one of the most basic adjustments
More informationWheel Alignment Defined
Wheel Alignment Defined While it's often referred to simply as an "alignment" or "wheel alignment," it's really complex suspension angles that are being measured and a variety of suspension components
More informationPart # GM F Body Complete CoilOver System
350 S. St. Charles St. Jasper, In. 47546 Ph. 812.482.2932 Fax 812.634.6632 www.ridetech.com Part # 11170109 70-81 GM F Body Complete CoilOver System Front Components: 1 11173509 Front Fixed Valving CoilOvers
More informationUS Patent You will find many features that set our Caster/Camber Plates apart from the rest.
3430 Sacramento Dr., Unit D San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Telephone: 805/544-8748 Fax: 805/544-8645 www.maximummotorsports.com US Patent 6485223 Read all instructions before beginning work. Following instructions
More informationPart # GM A Body Complete SA CoilOver System
Part # 11240210 68-72 GM A Body Complete SA CoilOver System Front Components: 1 11243510 Front Single-adjustable CoilOvers 1 11222899 Front Lower StrongArms 1 11223699 Front Upper StrongArms 1 11009300
More informationME 455 Lecture Ideas, Fall 2010
ME 455 Lecture Ideas, Fall 2010 COURSE INTRODUCTION Course goal, design a vehicle (SAE Baja and Formula) Half lecture half project work Group and individual work, integrated Design - optimal solution subject
More informationSPMM OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000?
SPMM 5000 OUTLINE SPECIFICATION - SP20016 issue 2 WHAT IS THE SPMM 5000? The Suspension Parameter Measuring Machine (SPMM) is designed to measure the quasi-static suspension characteristics that are important
More informationSIX-BAR STEERING MECHANISM
SIX-BAR STEERING MECHANISM Shrey Lende 1 1 UG Student, Department of Mech, G.H Raisoni College of Engineering, Nagpur, RTMN University ABSTRACT In this paper a steering system is designed for a Low weight
More informationASME Human Powered Vehicle
ASME Human Powered Vehicle By Yousef Alanzi, Evan Bunce, Cody Chenoweth, Haley Flenner, Brent Ives, and Connor Newcomer Team 14 Mid-Point Review Document Submitted towards partial fulfillment of the requirements
More information7333 INSTRUCTIONS FOR MILD STEEL A-ARM AVENGER CHASSIS MUSTANG
#917333 Page 1 of 5 7333 INSTRUCTIONS FOR MILD STEEL A-ARM AVENGER CHASSIS 1994-2004 MUSTANG ITEM QTY PART NO/SIZE TUBE CODE DESCRIPTION 1 1 4080 Main hoop 2 1 pr 4180 Cage side (driver & passenger side)
More informationCONTENTS. All texts and images contained within this set-up book are copyright by XRAY. All rights reserved. XRAY
CONTENTS Setting up the XRAY T3 3 Downstops 6 Ride Height 8 Droop 10 Track Width 12 Steering Throw Symmetry 13 Camber 14 Caster 16 Bump Steer 17 Ackermann 17 Toe 18 Tweak 20 Roll Center 24 Chassis Flex
More informationSTEERING SYSTEM Introduction
STEERING SYSTEM Introduction The steering makes it possible to change direction. The steering must be reliable and safe; there must not be too much play in the steering. It must be possible to steer accurately.
More informationPRESEASON CHASSIS SETUP TIPS
PRESEASON CHASSIS SETUP TIPS A Setup To-Do List to Get You Started By Bob Bolles, Circle Track Magazine When we recently set up our Project Modified for our first race, we followed a simple list of to-do
More informationDesign, Modelling & Analysis of Double Wishbone Suspension System
Design, Modelling & Analysis of Double Wishbone Suspension System 1 Nikita Gawai, 2 Deepak Yadav, 3 Shweta Chavan, 4 Apoorva Lele, 5 Shreyash Dalvi Thakur College of Engineering & Technology, Kandivali
More informationKINEMATICS OF REAR SUSPENSION SYSTEM FOR A BAJA ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE.
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET) Volume 8, Issue 8, August 2017, pp. 164 171, Article ID: IJMET_08_08_019 Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?jtype=ijmet&vtype=8&itype=8
More information2. Remove front wheels.
Read all instructions before beginning work. Following instructions in the proper sequence will ensure the best and easiest installation. Thank you for purchasing Maximum Motorsports Caster/Camber Plates.
More informationSolar Car Suspension Design Considerations for achieving an efficient and stable vehicle
Innovators Educational Foundation Solar Car Suspension Design Considerations for achieving an efficient and stable vehicle Solar Car Conference, February 1-3, 2019 Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville,
More information2004 SUSPENSION. Wheel Alignment - Corvette. Caster Cross +/ / Fastener Tightening Specifications Specification Application
2004 SUSPENSION Wheel Alignment - Corvette SPECIFICATIONS WHEEL ALIGNMENT SPECIFICATIONS Wheel Alignment Specifications Camber Cross Caster Cross Suspension Camber Tolerance Caster Tolerance FE1 & FE3
More informationAppendix X New Features in v2.4 B
Appendix X New Features in v2.4 B Version 2.4B adds several features, which we have grouped into these categories: New Suspension Types or Options The program now allows for solid front axles and for several
More informationInstallation Procedure GR40 S197 SLA Front Suspension System (Does not include Aluminum Spindle and Hub Instructions)
Installation Procedure GR40 S197 SLA Front Suspension System (Does not include Aluminum Spindle and Hub Instructions) Please take the time and read these instructions first! The GR40 S197 system is designed
More information3.0 Tuning Tips. To Shut Off the Engine: Use the included pipe plug or simply bump the flywheel with a wrench or plastic handled tool.
TM 8IGHT 3.0 Tuning Tips Before you start making changes on your 8IGHT 3.0 Off-Road Racing buggy, you need to make a few decisions. First of all, tires, and how they are setup, have a tremendous impact
More informationCHASSIS DYNAMICS TABLE OF CONTENTS A. DRIVER / CREW CHIEF COMMUNICATION I. CREW CHIEF COMMUNICATION RESPONSIBILITIES
CHASSIS DYNAMICS TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Driver / Crew Chief Communication... 1 B. Breaking Down the Corner... 3 C. Making the Most of the Corner Breakdown Feedback... 4 D. Common Feedback Traps... 4 E. Adjustment
More informationSTAGE 1 COIL-OVER SUSPENSION KIT INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS PART NUMBER R APPLICATION: E90/E92 335i (not xi)
STAGE 1 COIL-OVER SUSPENSION KIT INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS PART NUMBER R190-9111 APPLICATION: 2007-11 E90/E92 335i (not xi) Congratulations for being selective enough to use a Dinan Engineering Coil-Over
More information7260 INSTRUCTIONS FOR ELIMINATOR II STRUT FRONT, 4-LINK REAR, MILD STEEL, FULL SIZE, SERIES CHASSIS
#917260 Page 1 of 6 7260 INSTRUCTIONS FOR ELIMINATOR II STRUT FRONT, 4-LINK REAR, MILD STEEL, FULL SIZE, SERIES CHASSIS ITEM QTY SIZE/PART NO. TUBE CODE DESCRIPTION 1 2 4139 Cage Side 2 2 4250 Forward
More informationPart # GM A Body Complete CoilOver System
350 S. St. Charles St. Jasper, In. 47546 Ph. 812.482.2932 Fax 812.634.6632 www.ridetech.com Part # 11230109 64-67 GM A Body Complete CoilOver System Front Components: 1 11233509 Front Non-adjustable CoilOvers
More informationSAE Mini Baja: Suspension and Steering
SAE Mini Baja: Suspension and Steering Project Proposal Zane Cross, Kyle Egan, Nick Garry, Trevor Hochhaus NAU December 3, 2014 Overview 2 Problem Definition and Project Plan Concept Generation Design
More information1 Summary PROPORTIONAL RESPONSE TECHNICAL SUMMARY. Contents
HABIT WHITE PAPER PROPORTIONAL RESPONSE TECHNICAL SUMMARY Contents 1 Summary 1 2 Suspension for Mountain Bikes 2 3 Proportional Response 10 4 Experimental Validation of Suspension Response 12 5 Size Specific
More informationINSTALLATION GUIDE TCP COLVF-07
READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS COMPLETELY AND THOROUGHLY UNDERSTAND THEM BEFORE DOING ANYTHING. CALL TOTAL CONTROL PRODUCTS TECH SUPPORT (916) 388-0288 IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE. INSTALLATION GUIDE TCP COLVF-07 Front
More informationSAE Mini Baja. Final Presentation. Benjamin Bastidos, Jeramie Goodwin, Eric Lockwood Anthony McClinton, Caizhi Ming, Ruoheng Pan May 2, 2014
SAE Mini Baja Final Presentation Benjamin Bastidos, Jeramie Goodwin, Eric Lockwood Anthony McClinton, Caizhi Ming, Ruoheng Pan May 2, 2014 Overview Project Introduction Need Statement Frame Design and
More informationInternational Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 8, Issue 10, October-2017 ISSN
309 Design and Analysis of Suspension System for a Formula Style Car Anshul Kunwar 1, Mohit Nagpal 2, Geetanjali Raghav 3 1 Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, DIT University, Dehradun-248009
More informationSTAGE 1 COIL-OVER SUSPENSION KIT INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS PART NUMBER D APPLICATION: F10 M5 (EDC only) F06 M6 GC (EDC only)
STAGE 1 COIL-OVER SUSPENSION KIT INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS PART NUMBER D190-1011 APPLICATION: 2013-15 F10 M5 (EDC only) 2013-15 F06 M6 GC (EDC only) Congratulations for being selective enough to use a
More informationSTAGE 1 COIL-OVER SUSPENSION KIT INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS PART NUMBER R APPLICATION: M3 (E90, E92, E93; non-edc only)
STAGE 1 COIL-OVER SUSPENSION KIT INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS PART NUMBER R190-9134 APPLICATION: 2007-12 M3 (E90, E92, E93; non-edc only) Congratulations for being selective enough to use a Dinan Engineering
More informationTypical mounting of a dial indicator for a radial check. Moog Automotive, Inc.
Inspect / Service / Test / Replace To find out if the ball joint is loose beyond manufacturer's specifications, use an accurate measuring device. Most load carrying ball joints have a wear limit of 0.060"
More information1 Bordnersville Rd. Jonestown, Pa Phone Fax On The Web at
Serial #2023 and up Updated 12/14/17 Manufactured By: 1 Bordnersville Rd. Jonestown, Pa 17038 Phone 717-865-3119 Fax 717-865-0904 E-mail lazerchassis@comcast.net On The Web at www.lazerchassis.com Dear
More informationSimulation and Optimization of MPV Suspension System Based on ADAMS
11 th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimisation 07 th -12 th, June 2015, Sydney Australia Simulation and Optimization of MPV Suspension System Based on ADAMS Dongchen Qin 1, Junjie
More informationMAIN SHAFT SUPPORT FOR WIND TURBINE WITH A FIXED AND FLOATING BEARING CONFIGURATION
Technical Paper MAIN SHAFT SUPPORT FOR WIND TURBINE WITH A FIXED AND FLOATING BEARING CONFIGURATION Tapered Double Inner Row Bearing Vs. Spherical Roller Bearing On The Fixed Position Laurentiu Ionescu,
More informationFSAE SUSPENSION SYSTEM
EML 4905 Senior Design Project A B.S. THESIS PREPARED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING FSAE SUSPENSION SYSTEM Michael Benitez Yussimil
More informationWhat s in the Box? AMT Motorsport C5/C6 Corvette Steel Frame Camber Kit User s Guide
AMT Motorsport C5/C6 Corvette Steel Frame Camber Kit User s Guide Thank you for purchasing the AMT Motorsport Camber Kit. We believe this is the most versatile camber kit available on the market, but with
More informationLifting Mechanisms. Example 1: Two Stage Lift
Lifting Mechanisms The primary scoring method for the 2018 game is to deposit fuel cubes into scoring zones. A manipulator fixed to your robot can deliver fuel cubes into ground level scoring zones, but
More informationA7741 Truggy Wheel, Yellow
STEP H-01 Tire Mounting BAG H 1 2 A7780B XTT Tire, Blue Truggy Foam Insert Only sold with Tires A7741 Truggy Wheel, Yellow STEP H-02 Tire Gluing The Tires need to be glued to the wheels. This can be done
More informationTRADE OF HEAVY VEHICLE MECHANIC
TRADE OF HEAVY VEHICLE MECHANIC PHASE 2 Module 8 Steering and Suspension Systems UNIT: 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Learning Outcome... 1 1.1 Key Learning Points... 1 2.0 Health and Safety... 3 3.0 The Function
More informationSTUDY OF ROLL CENTER SAURABH SINGH *, SAGAR SAHU ** ABSTRACT
STUDY OF ROLL CENTER SAURABH SINGH *, SAGAR SAHU ** *, ** Mechanical engineering, NIT B ABSTRACT As our solar car aims to bring new green technology to cope up with the greatest challenge of modern era
More informationDOUBLE WISHBONE SUSPENSION SYSTEM
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET) Volume 8, Issue 5, May 2017, pp. 249 264 Article ID: IJMET_08_05_027 Available online at http:// http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?jtype=ijmet&vtype=8&itype=5
More informationPart # GM F Body CoilOver System
350 S. St. Charles St. Jasper, In. 47546 Ph. 812.482.2932 Fax 812.634.6632 www.ridetech.com Part # 11160201 67-69 GM F Body CoilOver System Front Components: 1 11163510 Front HQ Series CoilOvers 1 11162899
More informationNose 1. Nose 2 Nose 3. Nose 4 Nose 5. Nose 6 Nose 7
Nose 1 Nose 2 Nose 3 Nose 4 Nose 5 Nose 6 Nose 7 Nose 1 - Existing design C L value = 0.044 C D value = -0.053 The existing design shows a high pressure region under the nose giving a lift value. A shock
More informationChevy Nova Pro-Touring Front Suspension Installation Instructions
1962-1967 Chevy Nova Pro-Touring Front Suspension Installation Instructions 1-800-984-6259 www.totalcostinvolved.com 1 Pro-Touring Clip A-Arm Assembly Sway Bar Assembly Fender Panel Kit 8 7/16-20 * 1 ¼
More informationIJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 5, Issue 03, 2017 ISSN (online):
IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development Vol. 5, Issue 03, 2017 ISSN (online): 2321-0613 Design and Analysis of Suspension Component of F1 Prototype Ajay Kumar 1 Rahul Rajput
More informationChrysler A-Body Tubular A-Arms Installation Instructions A-ARM INSTALLATION
1967-1976 Dodge Demon 1112 67-72 Chrysler A-Body Tubular A-Arms Installation Instructions Thank you for your purchase of this Hotchkis Performance product. Your A-Arm set was designed with the performance
More informationTech Tip: Trackside Tire Data
Using Tire Data On Track Tires are complex and vitally important parts of a race car. The way that they behave depends on a number of parameters, and also on the interaction between these parameters. To
More informationSignature redacted. Signature redacted- - JUL LIBRARIES
Design and Analysis of the Front Suspension Geometry and Steering System for a Solar Electric Vehicle by Bruce Arensen Submitted to the Department of Mechanical Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the
More informationPart # GM G Body Air Suspension System
350 S. St. Charles St. Jasper, In. 47546 Ph. 812.482.2932 Fax 812.634.6632 www.ridetech.com Part # 11320298 78-88 GM G Body Air Suspension System Front Components: 1 11323001 HQ Series Front Shockwaves
More informationChapter 10 Parametric Studies
Chapter 10 Parametric Studies 10.1. Introduction The emergence of the next-generation high-capacity commercial transports [51 and 52] provides an excellent opportunity to demonstrate the capability of
More informationStreet-Lynx By. Reilly MotorSports, Inc. Installation Manual
Street-Lynx By Reilly MotorSports, Inc. Installation Manual 1 1- Begin by removing your original rear suspension disconnect your brake lines, E-brake cables, and remove the driveshaft. To prevent fire
More informationThe University of Akron 2015 SAE Zips Baja Off- Road Racing Team 2015 Suspension System Design
The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Honors Research Projects The Dr. Gary B. and Pamela S. Williams Honors College Spring 2015 The University of Akron 2015 SAE Zips Baja Off- Road Racing Team 2015
More informationSuspension systems and components
Suspension systems and components 2of 42 Objectives To provide good ride and handling performance vertical compliance providing chassis isolation ensuring that the wheels follow the road profile very little
More informationExternal Hard Drive: A DFMA Redesign
University of New Mexico External Hard Drive: A DFMA Redesign ME586: Design for Manufacturability Solomon Ezeiruaku 4-23-2013 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following document serves to illustrate the effects
More informationVEHICLE DYNAMICS. A factsheet on Volvo Cars Scalable Product Architecture chassis technology
VEHICLE DYNAMICS A factsheet on Volvo Cars Scalable Product Architecture chassis technology VEHICLE DYNAMICS Contents Driving Confidence 3 Chassis Simulation 4 - Connecting objective testing to human experience
More informationSUSPENSION 2-1 SUSPENSION TABLE OF CONTENTS
XJ SUSPENSION 2-1 SUSPENSION TABLE OF CONTENTS page ALIGNMENT... 1 FRONT SUSPENSION... 7 page REAR SUSPENSION... 16 ALIGNMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS page AND WHEEL ALIGNMENT...1 DIAGNOSIS AND TESTING SUSPENSION
More informationSome observations concerning the Jowett Javelin/Jupiter front suspension:
From Philip Dingle: Some observations concerning the Jowett Javelin/Jupiter front suspension: The document Technical Information for the Javelin issued by the Jowett Car Club in 2001 provides a lot of
More informationDesign Methodology of Steering System for All-Terrain Vehicles
Design Methodology of Steering System for All-Terrain Vehicles Dr. V.K. Saini*, Prof. Sunil Kumar Amit Kumar Shakya #1, Harshit Mishra #2 *Head of Dep t of Mechanical Engineering, IMS Engineering College,
More informationGR40 SLA Installation and Set Up Instructions.
GR40 SLA Installation and Set Up Instructions. Read these instructions completely before beginning. These instructions are written for experienced installer/technicians with a strong idea as to how a chassis
More informationKaydon white paper. The importance of properly mounting thin section bearings. an SKF Group brand. by Rob Roos, Senior Product Engineer
The importance of properly mounting thin section by Rob Roos, Senior Product Engineer an SKF Group brand Figure 1 Radial Load Reversing Thrust Overturning Moment Thin section ball have a much thinner cross-section
More informationNEW DESIGN AND DEVELELOPMENT OF ESKIG MOTORCYCLE
NEW DESIGN AND DEVELELOPMENT OF ESKIG MOTORCYCLE Eskinder Girma PG Student Department of Automobile Engineering, M.I.T Campus, Anna University, Chennai-44, India. Email: eskindergrm@gmail.com Mobile no:7299391869
More informationSkid against Curb simulation using Abaqus/Explicit
Visit the SIMULIA Resource Center for more customer examples. Skid against Curb simulation using Abaqus/Explicit Dipl.-Ing. A. Lepold (FORD), Dipl.-Ing. T. Kroschwald (TECOSIM) Abstract: Skid a full vehicle
More informationDIAGNOSIS AND TESTING
DIAGNOSIS AND TESTING SUSPENSION AND STEERING SYSTEM 2007 SUSPENSION Suspension - Nitro CONDITION POSSIBLE CAUSES CORRECTION FRONT END NOISE 1. Loose or worn wheel bearings. 1. Replace wheel bearings.
More informationThe DR-Z70 is designed for use by children and off road use only do not use on public roads. Single rider only weight limit 40 kg (88 lbs.).
2016 Suzuki DR-Z70 The time has come to get your little ones on the dirt! The Suzuki DR-Z70 brings ease and convenience to young riders getting started on two wheels. With an automatic clutch, 3-speed
More informationUniversity of Alberta Design Report
University of Alberta Design Report INTRODUCTION The University of Alberta has been a competitor in the Formula SAE competition since 1999. Those years of experience have provided the team with many lessons
More informationRHINO SUSPENSION SYSTEM INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
PARTS INCLUDED: 2 FRONT UPPER A-ARMS 2 FRONT LOWER A-ARMS 2 UNI-BALL JOINTS 2 UNI-BALL JOINT STUDS 2 UNI-BALL JOINT CAPS 2 RETAINING RINGS 1 FRONT SHOCK ASSEM. 2 DELRON STEERING STOPS 2 SHOCK MOUNT SPACERS
More informationSix Keys to a Successful Rack and Pinion Conversion
CLICK for More Info Online Rack and Pinion Steering Conversions for Early Mustangs and Classic Fords Also available in right-hand-drive configuration. US Patents: 6,457,375 & D440,240 Six Keys to a Successful
More informationSTAGE 1 COIL-OVER SUSPENSION KIT INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS PART NUMBER D APPLICATION: 2016 M2 (F87 without EDC)
STAGE 1 COIL-OVER SUSPENSION KIT INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS PART NUMBER D190-8701 APPLICATION: 2016 M2 (F87 without EDC) Congratulations for being selective enough to use a Dinan Coil-Over Suspension Kit.
More information