S a f e r c a r s f o r A S E A N r e g i o n A A S F / I M P A C T, B A N G K O K

Transcription

1 S a f e r c a r s f o r A S E A N r e g i o n ASEAN NCAP - Children in the car - How safe they are? A A S F / I M P A C T, B A N G K O K

2 Agenda 1. Magnitude of the problem 2. Child safety Concept in Vehicle 3. ASEAN NCAP Test, Assessment and Results 4. Case Study

3 Agenda 1: Magnitude of the problem

4 Statistic in Malaysia Traffic fatalities by vehicle type involving children aged 0-14 years-old Truck 5% Traffic non-fatalities by vehicle type involving children aged 0-14 years-old Truck 3% Pedestrian 26% Car 26% Pedestrian 25% Car 23% Bicycle 6% Motorcycle 37% Bicycle 9% Motorcycle 40% 4

5 Statistic in Malaysia 2008 Fatal Serious Slight Damage Only Total 0-3 years old years old years old Total Fatal Serious Slight Damage Only Total 0-3 years old years old years old Total Fatal Serious Slight Damage Only Total 0-3 years old years old years old Total

6 RTA among Children in Malaysia 6

7 Agenda 2: ASEAN NCAP Test, Assessment and Results

8 Crash Configuration P3 50 th percentile Hibrid III P th percentile Hibrid III

9 Child Safety Rating System SCORE (Points) Percentage (%) Rating

10 Assessment Method Requirements Dynamic Assessment Pre requisites - no partial or full ejection of child dummy out of CRS / CRS must not be partially or wholly unrestrained by any of the vehicle interfaces CRS Based Assessment CRS marking CRS to Vehicle Interface Vehicle Based Assessment Use of CRS on the Front Seat Provision of three-points seat belts (Passengers) Gabarit assessment (outboard Rear) Gabarit assessment (other passenger seats) ISOFIX Integrated CRS - 8 points - 4 points 5 points - 1 points 1 points - 1 points - 3 points - 2 points Score Total

11 Result Compilation Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase Nissan Teana 87.7% Toyota Prius % Mazda % Honda CRV 85.9% Toyota Altis 78.0% Proton IRIS 82.0% Honda City % Honda Civic % Suzuki Swift % VW Polo 84.5% Chev. Sonic 77.7 % Isuzu Dmax % Perodua Axia 71.0% Honda City 83.0% Ford Fiesta % Subaru XV 67.0% Kia Picanto 73.3% Perodua MyVi 53.5 % Proton Saga % Nissan Almera 52.0 % Peugeot % Prot. Preve 67.1 % Honda Jazz 71.0% Ch. Colorado 63.1 % TATA Vista 53.0% Nissan March % Perodua Alza 46.0 % Mit. Pajero 40.0 % Toyota Vios % Hyundai i % Mit. Mirage 43.0 % Toy. Avanza 38.0% Daihatsu Xenia 33.0 % ISOFIX + Top Tehter ISOFIX + Seat Belt Seat Belt Kia Picanto 28.5 %

12 Agenda 3: Child Safety concept in Vehicle

13 Safety Chain Safety Harness 5 point Seat belt Adult Seat Belt ISO Fix Top Tether LATCH 13

14 Type of Attachment ISOFIX LATCH Top Tether LATCH ISOFIX

15 ISOFIX

16 Top Tether

17 Seat Belt

18 Agenda 3: Case Study

19 Crash test Configuration Crash Test on the same vehicle with the different attachment between seat and child seat Dummy Vehicle A Vehicle B 3 years old ISOFIX and Top Tether Adult Seat Belt 1.5 years old ISOFIX Adult Seat Belt 19

20 Crash Pulse comparison Same energy absorption (crash pulse) same structure 20

21 Result Comparisons Different results 21

22 3 Years Old with ISOFIX and Top Tether 22

23 3 Years Old with Adult Seat Belt 23

24 1.5 Years Old with ISOFIX and Top Tether 24

25 1.5 Years Old with Adult Seat Belt 25

26 Making cars safer in ASEAN region T h a n k y o u f o r y o u r a t t e n t i o n h t t p : / / w w w. a s e a n c a p. o r g 26

27 Copyright Statement This work is the intellectual property of ASEAN NCAP. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of ASEAN NCAP. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from ASEAN NCAP. 27