Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware"

Transcription

1 American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware 2009

2 vii PREFACE Effective traffic barrier systems, end treatments, crash cushions, breakaway devices, truck-mounted attenuators, and other hardware are used to achieve the highest levels of highway safety. New systems are continually emerging to address safety problems, and traditional devices and practices for their use are being improved in response to an increased understanding of safety performance, a changing vehicle fleet, the emergence of new materials, and other factors. Full-scale crash testing has been and will continue to be the most common method of evaluating the impact performance of safety hardware. Because many agencies conduct such tests, there is a need for uniformity in the procedures and criteria used to evaluate traffic barriers and other roadside safety features. Procedures for full-scale vehicle crash testing of guardrails were first published in the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Highway Research Correlation Services Circular 482 in This one-page document specified vehicle mass, impact speed, and approach angle for the crash tests. In 1974, the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 153: Recommended Procedures for Vehicle Crash Testing of Highway Appurtenances was published to address questions that were not covered in Circular 482. This 16-page document provided a more complete set of testing procedures. Transportation Research Circular 191, published in 1978, addressed minor changes needed to address particular problem areas in NCHRP Report 153. In 1980, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 230: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Safety Appurtenances was published to broaden the scope of NCHRP Report 153. This 36-page document incorporated new procedures, updated the evaluation criteria, and brought the procedures up to date with available technology and practices. This document served as the primary reference for full-scale crash testing of highway safety appurtenances in the U.S. and in many other parts of the world. During the subsequent decade, the evolution of roadside safety concepts, technology, and practices necessitated an update to NCHRP Report 230. Reasons included significant changes in the vehicle fleet, the emergence of new barrier designs, increased interest in matching safety performance to levels of roadway utilization, and advances in computer simulation and other evaluation methods. The resulting document, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features, was published in The AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH), 2009, is an update to and supersedes NCHRP Report 350 for the purposes of evaluating new safety hardware devices. This publication marks the first time that AASHTO has officially adopted crash-testing procedures for use in assessing roadside hardware. Previous editions were published as research reports from TRB and NCHRP. In addition, it should be noted that MASH does not supersede any guidelines for the design of roadside safety hardware, which are contained within the AASHTO Roadside Design Guide.

3 viii Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware MASH was developed through NCHRP Project 22-14(02), Improvement of Procedures for the Safety-Performance Evaluation of Roadside Features, and contains revised criteria for impact performance evaluation of virtually all highway safety features. Updates to MASH include increases in the size of several test vehicles to better match the current vehicle fleet, changes to the number and impact conditions of the test matrices, and more objective, quantitative evaluation criteria. An implementation plan for MASH that was adopted jointly by AASHTO and FHWA states that all highway safety hardware accepted prior to the adoption of MASH using criteria contained in NCHRP Report 350 may remain in place and may continue to be manufactured and installed. In addition, highway safety hardware accepted using NCHRP Report 350 criteria is not required to be retested using MASH criteria. However, new highway safety hardware not previously evaluated must utilize MASH for testing and evaluation.

4 ix TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction PURPOSE AND SCOPE UNDERLYING PHILOSOPHY PERFORMANCE LIMITATIONS SAFETY FEATURES TEST LEVELS INTERNATIONAL HARMONIZATION ANALYTICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL TOOLS ORGANIZATION OF REPORT...7 Chapter 2 Test Matrices and Conditions GENERAL Impact Conditions Tolerances on Impact Conditions Safety Feature Orientation TEST MATRICES Longitudinal Barriers General Description of Tests Terminals and Crash Cushions General Description of Tests Other Terminals and Crash Cushion Systems Truck- and Trailer-Mounted Attenuators and Variable Message Sign and Arrow Board Trailers General Description of Tests Support Structures, Work-Zone Traffic Control Devices, Breakaway Utility Poles, and Longitudinal Channelizers General Description of Tests Roadside Geometric Features and Pavement Discontinuities IMPACT POINT FOR REDIRECTIVE DEVICES General Longitudinal Barriers Tests with 1100C and 2270P Vehicles Tests with 10000S, 36000V, and 36000T Vehicles Terminals and Redirective Crash Cushions Test Test Test Test SIDE IMPACT...54 Chapter 3 Test Installation GENERAL TESTING SITE SOIL Standard Soil Soil Strength Special Soils Embedment of Test Article Special Structures TEST ARTICLE General Installation Details...64

5 x Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Longitudinal Barriers Terminals and Crash Cushions Support Structures, Work-Zone Traffic Control Devices, and Breakaway Utility Poles Truck-Mounted and Trailer-Mounted Attenuators (TMAs) Test Installation Documentation Longitudinal Barriers and Longitudinal Channelizers Terminals and Crash Cushions Support Structures, Work-Zone Traffic Control Devices, and Breakaway Utility Poles Truck-Mounted and Trailer-Mounted Attenuators (TMAs) Test Installation Disposal...69 Chapter 4 Test Vehicle Specifications GENERAL TEST VEHICLE DESCRIPTIONS Production Vehicles Test Vehicle Mass Ballast Propulsion, Guidance, and Braking Vehicle Damage Surrogate Occupants Documentation Surrogate Test Vehicles Truck-Mounted and Trailer-Mounted Attenuator (TMA) Support Vehicle VEHICLE INSTRUMENTATION Instrumentation Specifications Accelerometer and Rate Gyro Placement and Data Reduction...88 Chapter 5 Evaluation Criteria GENERAL STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OCCUPANT RISK POST-IMPACT VEHICULAR TRAJECTORY GEOMETRIC FEATURES...98 Chapter 6 Test Documentation GENERAL REPORTING RECOMMENDATIONS General Information Report Contents Findings Presentation Formats Assessment ELECTRONIC DATA Chapter 7 In-Service Performance Evaluation PURPOSE OBJECTIVES IN-SERVICE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM New Feature Evaluation Continuous Monitoring DISCUSSIONS Appendix A Commentary CHAPTER ONE A1.2 UNDERLYING PHILOSOPHY CHAPTER TWO A2.1 GENERAL A2.1.1 Impact Conditions A2.1.2 Safety Feature Orientation A2.2.1 Longitudinal Barriers A2.2.2 Terminals and Crash Cushions...123

6 xi A2.2.3 Truck-Mounted Attenuators (TMA) A2.2.4 Support Structures, Work-Zone Traffic Control Devices, Breakaway Utility Poles, and Longitudinal Channelizers A2.3 IMPACT POINT FOR REDIRECTIVE DEVICES A Tests with 1100C and 2270P Vehicles A Tests with 10000S, 36000V, and 36000T Vehicles CHAPTER THREE A3.2 TESTING SITE A3.3 SOIL A3.3.1 Standard Soil A3.3.2 Soil Strength A3.3.3 Special Soils A3.3.4 Embedment of Test Article A3.4 TEST ARTICLE A Longitudinal Barriers A Truck-Mounted Attenuators (TMA) CHAPTER FOUR A4.2 TEST VEHICLE DESCRIPTIONS A4.2.1 Production Vehicles A Test Vehicle Mass A Ballast A Vehicle Damage A Surrogate Occupants A4.2.2 Surrogate Test Vehicles A4.2.3 TMA Support Truck A4.3.1 Instrumentation Specifications A4.3.2 Acceleration and Rate Gyro Placement and Data Reduction CHAPTER FIVE A5.1 GENERAL A5.2 STRUCTUAL ADEQUACY A5.3 OCCUPANT RISK A5.4 POST-IMPACT VEHICULAR TRAJECTORY A5.5 GEOMETRIC FEATURES CHAPTER SIX A6.1 GENERAL REPORTING RECOMMENDATIONS CHAPTER SEVEN A7.1 PURPOSE Appendix B Soil Strength Performance Test B1 Purpose B2 Application B3 Instrumented Post B4 Post Placement B5 Dynamic Test B6 Assurance of Soil Performance Appendix C Electronic & PhotographicInstrumentation Specifications Appendix D Analytical and Experimental Tools D1 Useful Techniques D1.1 Structural Design D1.2 Static Tests D1.3 Computer Simulations D1.4 Laboratory Dynamic Tests D1.5 Gravitational Pendulum D1.6 Drop Mass/Dynamic Test Device D1.7 Scale Model D1.8 Bogie Test D2 Comparison of Techniques...209

7 xii Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Appendix E Measurement of Vehicle Deformation E1 Pre-Impact Measurements E2 Post-Impact Measurements E3 Photographic Documentation E4 Procedure for Measuring Exterior Crush Appendix F Determination of THIV, PHD, and ASI F1 Introduction F2 A Guide to the Measurement of the Theoretical Head Impact Velocity (THIV) and the Post-Impact Head Deceleration (PHD) F2.1 General F2.2 Theoretical Head Impact Velocity (THIV) F2.3 Post-Impact Head Deceleration (PHD) F2.4 Summary of Procedure to Compute THIV and PHD F3 A Guide to the Measurement of the Acceleration Severity Index (ASI) F3.1 Procedure F3.2 Summary Appendix G Occupant Risk Estimation for 1500A Vehicle G1. Introduction G2. Occupant Risk Values for 1500A Vehicle G2.1 Procedure Details Appendix H Test Vehicle Selection Procedures Glossary References and Bibliography...249

8 xiii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2-1. Impact Conditions for Longitudinal Barrier Tests...15 Figure 2-2. Impact Conditions for Terminal and Redirective Crash Cushion Tests...21 Figure 2-3. Impact Conditions for Non-Redirective Crash Cushion Tests...23 Figure 2-4. Impact Conditions for TMA...29 Figure 2-5. Impact Conditions for Support Structures, Work-Zone Traffic Control Devices, and Breakaway Utility Poles...34 Figure 2-6. Critical Impact Point for Test 10, Test Level Figure 2-7. Critical Impact Point for Test 10, Test Level Figure 2-8. Critical Impact Point for Test 10, Test Levels 3, 4, 5, and Figure 2-9. Critical Impact Point for Test 11, Test Level Figure Critical Impact Point for Test 11, Test Level Figure Critical impact point for Test 11, Test Levels 3, 4, 5, and Figure Critical Impact Point for Test 20, Test Level Figure Critical Impact Point for Test 20, Test Level Figure Critical Impact Point for Test 20, Test Levels 3, 4, 5, and Figure Critical Impact Point for Test 21, Test Level Figure Critical Impact Point for Test 21, Test Level Figure Critical Impact Point for Test 21, Test Levels 3, 4, 5, and Figure Critical Impact Point for Test 34 on Non-Gating Crash Cushions...53 Figure 3-1. Recommended Summary Sheet for Strong Soil Test Results...60 Figure 3-2. Example of Test Day Static Soil Strength Documentation...61 Figure C and 1500A Vehicle Parameters...80 Figure P Vehicle Parameters...81 Figure S Vehicle Parameters...82 Figure V Vehicle Parameters...83 Figure T Vehicle Parameters...84 Figure 4-6. Recommended Vehicle Coordinate System...88 Figure 5-1. Exit Box for Longitudinal Barriers...98 Figure 6-1. Recommended Format of Summary Sheet for Crash Test Results Figure 6-2. Example of Recommended Summary Sheet for Crash Test Results Figure 7-1. Flowchart of the In-Service Performance Evaluation Process (108) Figure A-1. Accelerometer Placement Figure B-1. Instrumented Post Figure B-2. Dynamic Test Configuration Figure B-3. Dynamic and Static Test Results for Standard Post Test Figure B-4. Static Soil Test Figure B-5. Test Day Static Load Test Compared to Standard Test Figure E-1. Pre-Impact Measurement Figure E-2. Placement of Swivel Laser Bracket Figure E-3. Measurement of Vertical Positions Figure E-4. Vehicle Deformation Spreadsheet Figure E-5. Reference Line Configuration Figure E-6. Field Length Measurement Figure E-7. Crush Depth Measurements Figure E-8. Crush Depth Measurements Figure F-1. Vehicle and Ground Reference Frames Figure F-2. Impact of the Theoretical Head on the Left Side...222

9 xiv Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1-1. Test Levels...6 TABLE 2-1. Vehicle Gross Static Mass Upper and Lower Limits...12 TABLE 2-2. Recommended Test Matrices for Longitudinal Barriers...14 TABLE 2-3. Recommended Test Matrices for Terminals and Crash Cushions...18 TABLE 2-4. Recommended Test Matrices for Truck- and Trailer-Mounted Attenuators...28 TABLE 2-5. Recommended Test Matrices for Support Structures, Work-Zone Traffic Control Devices, and Breakaway Utility Poles...33 TABLE 2-6. Critical Impact Point for Rigid Barrier Tests with 1100C and 2270P Vehicles...39 TABLE 2-7. Critical Impact Point for Heavy Vehicle Tests...52 TABLE 4-1. Recommended Properties of 1100C, 1500A, and 2270P Test Vehicles...75 TABLE 4-2. Recommended Properties of 10000S, 36000V, and 36000T Test Vehicles...76 TABLE 5-1. Safety Evaluation Guidelines...93 TABLE 6-1. Recommended Table of Contents for Crash Test Reports TABLE 6-2. Recommended Format for Reporting of Findings TABLE 6-3. Example of Recommended Assessment Summary Page for Individual Crash Tests TABLE 6-4. Example of Recommended Assessment Summary Page for Multiple Crash Tests TABLE A-1. Properties of Common Barrier Rail Elements TABLE A-2. Wood Post Properties TABLE A-3. Dynamic Yield Forces of Posts Embedded in Strong Soil TABLE D-1. Sources for Safety Feature Information TABLE D-2. Summary of Highway Safety Computer Programs TABLE D-3. Safety Feature Development Techniques TABLE H-1. Small Car Weights and Sales Volumes TABLE H-2. Light Truck Weights and Sales Volumes TABLE H-3. Center-of-Gravity Heights of Sport Utility Vehicles and Pickups TABLE H-4. Candidate Test Vehicle Dimensions...241

SUMMARY CHANGES FOR NCHRP REPORT 350 GUIDELINES [NCHRP (02)] Keith A. Cota, Chairman Technical Committee on Roadside Safety June 14, 2007

SUMMARY CHANGES FOR NCHRP REPORT 350 GUIDELINES [NCHRP (02)] Keith A. Cota, Chairman Technical Committee on Roadside Safety June 14, 2007 SUMMARY CHANGES FOR NCHRP REPORT 350 GUIDELINES [NCHRP 22-14 (02)] Keith A. Cota, Chairman Technical Committee on Roadside Safety June 14, 2007 BACKGROUND Circular 482 (1962) First full scale crash test

More information

MASH 2016 Implementation: What, When and Why

MASH 2016 Implementation: What, When and Why MASH 2016 Implementation: What, When and Why Roger P. Bligh, Ph.D., P.E. Senior Research Engineer Texas A&M Transportation Institute June 7, 2016 2016 Traffic Safety Conference College Station, Texas Outline

More information

A MASH Compliant W-Beam Median Guardrail System

A MASH Compliant W-Beam Median Guardrail System 0 0 0 0 0 A MASH Compliant W-Beam Median Guardrail System By A. Y. Abu-Odeh, R. P. Bligh, W. Odell, A. Meza, and W. L. Menges Submitted: July 0, 0 Word Count:, + ( figures + tables=,000) =, words Authors:

More information

AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, AASHTO/FHWA Joint Implementation Plan Standing Committee on Highways September 24, 2015

AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, AASHTO/FHWA Joint Implementation Plan Standing Committee on Highways September 24, 2015 AASHTO Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, 2015 AASHTO/FHWA Joint Implementation Plan Standing Committee on Highways September 24, 2015 Full Scale MASH Crash Tests (NCHRP 22-14(02)) Conducted several

More information

Crash Testing Growth Common Roadside Hardware Systems Draft FHWA and AASHTO Requirements for Implementing MASH 2015

Crash Testing Growth Common Roadside Hardware Systems Draft FHWA and AASHTO Requirements for Implementing MASH 2015 64 th Annual Illinois Traffic Safety and Engineering Conference October 14, 2015 Crash Testing Growth Common Roadside Hardware Systems Draft FHWA and AASHTO Requirements for Implementing MASH 2015 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature

More information

June 5, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-178. Mr. Kevin K. Groeneweg Mobile Barriers LLC Genesee Trail Road Golden, CO Dear Mr.

June 5, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-178. Mr. Kevin K. Groeneweg Mobile Barriers LLC Genesee Trail Road Golden, CO Dear Mr. June 5, 2008 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590 In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-178 Mr. Kevin K. Groeneweg Mobile Barriers LLC 24918 Genesee Trail Road Golden, CO 80401 Dear Mr. Groeneweg: This

More information

Implementation of AASHTO s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016

Implementation of AASHTO s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016 Implementation of AASHTO s Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware (MASH) 2016 Update from the Technical Committee on Roadside Safety Keith Cota, New Hampshire DOT MASH 2016 Overview Background Ballot Results/Dates

More information

1962: HRCS Circular 482 one-page document, specified vehicle mass, impact speed, and approach angle for crash tests.

1962: HRCS Circular 482 one-page document, specified vehicle mass, impact speed, and approach angle for crash tests. 1 2 3 1962: HRCS Circular 482 one-page document, specified vehicle mass, impact speed, and approach angle for crash tests. 1973: NCHRP Report 153 16-page document, based on technical input from 70+ individuals

More information

VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS I. GENERAL A. The VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 (VULCAN TL-3) shall be a highly portable and crashworthy longitudinal barrier especially suited for use as a temporary barrier

More information

Product Specification. ABSORB 350 TM TL-2 Non-Redirective, Gating, Crash Cushion Applied to Quickchange Moveable Barrier

Product Specification. ABSORB 350 TM TL-2 Non-Redirective, Gating, Crash Cushion Applied to Quickchange Moveable Barrier TB 000612 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 9 Product Specification ABSORB 350 TM TL-2 Non-Redirective, Gating, Crash Cushion Applied to Quickchange Moveable Barrier I. General The ABSORB 350 TM TL-2 System is a Non-Redirective,

More information

Form DOT F (8-72) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Form DOT F (8-72) Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-02/4162-1 Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle EVALUATION OF TEXAS GRID-SLOT PORTABLE CONCRETE BARRIER

More information

VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS I. GENERAL A. The VULCAN BARRIER TL-3 (VULCAN TL-3) shall be a highly portable and crashworthy longitudinal barrier especially suited for use as a temporary barrier

More information

July 10, Refer to: HSA-10/CC-78A

July 10, Refer to: HSA-10/CC-78A July 10, 2003 Refer to: HSA-10/CC-78A Barry D. Stephens, P.E. Senior Vice President of Engineering ENERGY ABSORPTION Systems, Inc. 3617 Cincinnati Avenue Rocklin, California 95765 Dear Mr. Stephens: Your

More information

Universal TAU-IIR Redirective, Non-Gating, Crash Cushion

Universal TAU-IIR Redirective, Non-Gating, Crash Cushion TB 110927 Rev. 0 Page 1 of 5 Product Specification Universal TAU-IIR Redirective, Non-Gating, Crash Cushion I. General The Universal TAU-IIR system is a Redirective, Non-Gating Crash Cushion in accordance

More information

SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF WORK-ZONE DEVICES UNDER MASH TESTING

SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF WORK-ZONE DEVICES UNDER MASH TESTING SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF WORK-ZONE DEVICES UNDER MASH TESTING Schmidt, Faller, Lechtenberg, Sicking, Holloway Midwest Roadside Safety Facility Nebraska Transportation Center University of Nebraska-Lincoln

More information

February 8, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/CC-104

February 8, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/CC-104 February 8, 2008 200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590 In Reply Refer To: HSSD/CC-04 Barry D. Stephens, P.E. Sr. Vice President Engineering Energy Absorption Systems, Inc. 367 Cincinnati Avenue

More information

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE THE TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE THE TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843 NCHRP REPORT 350 ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING ROADSIDE SAFETY HARDWARE by C. Eugene Buth, P.E. Senior Research Engineer Wanda L. Menges Associate Research Specialist and Sandra K. Schoeneman Research Associate

More information

MASH TEST 3-37 OF THE TxDOT 31-INCH W-BEAM DOWNSTREAM ANCHOR TERMINAL

MASH TEST 3-37 OF THE TxDOT 31-INCH W-BEAM DOWNSTREAM ANCHOR TERMINAL TTI: 9-1002 MASH TEST 3-37 OF THE TxDOT 31-INCH W-BEAM DOWNSTREAM ANCHOR TERMINAL ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Crash testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground 3100 SH 47, Building

More information

CRASH TEST AND EVALUATION OF 3-FT MOUNTING HEIGHT SIGN SUPPORT SYSTEM

CRASH TEST AND EVALUATION OF 3-FT MOUNTING HEIGHT SIGN SUPPORT SYSTEM TTI: 9-1002-15 CRASH TEST AND EVALUATION OF 3-FT MOUNTING HEIGHT SIGN SUPPORT SYSTEM ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Crash testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground 3100 SH 47, Building

More information

Correlation of Occupant Evaluation Index on Vehicle-occupant-guardrail Impact System Guo-sheng ZHANG, Hong-li LIU and Zhi-sheng DONG

Correlation of Occupant Evaluation Index on Vehicle-occupant-guardrail Impact System Guo-sheng ZHANG, Hong-li LIU and Zhi-sheng DONG 07 nd International Conference on Computer, Mechatronics and Electronic Engineering (CMEE 07) ISBN: 978--60595-53- Correlation of Occupant Evaluation Index on Vehicle-occupant-guardrail Impact System Guo-sheng

More information

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS Evaluation of small car - RM_R1 - prepared by Politecnico di Milano Volume 1 of 1 January 2006 Doc. No.: ROBUST-5-002/TR-2004-0039

More information

Evaluation and Design of ODOT s Type 5 Guardrail with Tubular Backup

Evaluation and Design of ODOT s Type 5 Guardrail with Tubular Backup Evaluation and Design of ODOT s Type 5 Guardrail with Tubular Backup Draft Final Report Chuck A. Plaxico, Ph.D. James C. Kennedy, Jr., Ph.D. Charles R. Miele, P.E. for the Ohio Department of Transportation

More information

Integrated. Safety Handbook. Automotive. Ulrich Seiffert and Mark Gonter. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA INTERNATIONAL.

Integrated. Safety Handbook. Automotive. Ulrich Seiffert and Mark Gonter. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA INTERNATIONAL. Integrated Automotive Safety Handbook Ulrich Seiffert and Mark Gonter INTERNATIONAL. Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA Table of Contents Preface ix Chapter 1 The Need to Increase Road Safety 1 1.1 Introduction

More information

Evaluation of Barriers for Very High Speed Roadways

Evaluation of Barriers for Very High Speed Roadways TTI: 0-6071 Evaluation of Barriers for Very High Speed Roadways ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Crash testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground 3100 SH 47, Building 7091 Bryan, TX 77807

More information

NCHRP Report 350 Crash Testing and Evaluation of the S-Square Mailbox System

NCHRP Report 350 Crash Testing and Evaluation of the S-Square Mailbox System TTI: 0-5210 NCHRP Report 350 Crash Testing and Evaluation of the S-Square Mailbox System ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Crash testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground 3100 SH 47, Building

More information

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-07/0-5527-1 4. Title and Subtitle DEVELOPMENT OF A LOW-PROFILE TO F-SHAPE TRANSITION BARRIER SEGMENT 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. Technical Report Documentation

More information

Advances in Simulating Corrugated Beam Barriers under Vehicular Impact

Advances in Simulating Corrugated Beam Barriers under Vehicular Impact 13 th International LS-DYNA Users Conference Session: Automotive Advances in Simulating Corrugated Beam Barriers under Vehicular Impact Akram Abu-Odeh Texas A&M Transportation Institute Abstract W-beam

More information

COMPARISON OF THE IMPACT PERFORMANCE OF THE G4(1W) AND G4(2W) GUARDRAIL SYSTEMS UNDER NCHRP REPORT 350 TEST 3-11 CONDITIONS

COMPARISON OF THE IMPACT PERFORMANCE OF THE G4(1W) AND G4(2W) GUARDRAIL SYSTEMS UNDER NCHRP REPORT 350 TEST 3-11 CONDITIONS Paper No. 00-0525 COMPARISON OF THE IMPACT PERFORMANCE OF THE G4(1W) AND G4(2W) GUARDRAIL SYSTEMS UNDER NCHRP REPORT 350 TEST 3-11 CONDITIONS by Chuck A. Plaxico Associate Research Engineer Worcester Polytechnic

More information

WP5 - Computational Mechanics B5 - Temporary Vertical Concrete Safety Barrier MAIN REPORT Volume 1 of 1

WP5 - Computational Mechanics B5 - Temporary Vertical Concrete Safety Barrier MAIN REPORT Volume 1 of 1 ROBUST PROJECT TRL Limited WP5 - Computational Mechanics B5 - Temporary Vertical Concrete Safety Barrier MAIN REPORT Volume 1 of 1 December 2005 Doc. No.: ROBUST-5-010c Rev. 0. (Logo here) Main Report

More information

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual

DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO. (15-01) MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. MANUAL: Road Design English Manual DISTRIBUTION: Electronic Recipients List MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPED BY: Design Standards Unit ISSUED BY: Office of Project Management and Technical Support TRANSMITTAL LETTER NO.

More information

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS

ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS ROBUST PROJECT Norwegian Public Roads Administration / Force Technology Norway AS Volume 1 of 1 April 2005 Doc. No.: ROBUST-05-009/TR-2005-0012 - Rev. 0 286-2-1-no-en Main Report Report title: Simulation

More information

WP5 - Computational Mechanics B1 (ESP-N2) Barrier Steel N2 MAIN REPORT Volume 2 of 2

WP5 - Computational Mechanics B1 (ESP-N2) Barrier Steel N2 MAIN REPORT Volume 2 of 2 ROBUST PROJECT TRL Limited WP5 - Computational Mechanics B1 (ESP-N2) Barrier Steel N2 Volume 2 of 2 November 2005 Doc. No.: ROBUST 5-014b Rev. 1. (Logo here) Main Report Report title: WP5 - Computational

More information

Assessing Options for Improving Roadside Barrier Crashworthiness

Assessing Options for Improving Roadside Barrier Crashworthiness 13 th International LS-DYNA Users Conference Session: Simulation Assessing Options for Improving Roadside Barrier Crashworthiness D. Marzougui, C.D. Kan, and K.S. Opiela Center for Collision Safety and

More information

CRASH TEST AND EVALUATION OF TEMPORARY WOOD SIGN SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR LARGE GUIDE SIGNS

CRASH TEST AND EVALUATION OF TEMPORARY WOOD SIGN SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR LARGE GUIDE SIGNS TTI: 9-1002-15 CRASH TEST AND EVALUATION OF TEMPORARY WOOD SIGN SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR LARGE GUIDE SIGNS ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Crash testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground 3100

More information

Improving Roadside Safety by Computer Simulation

Improving Roadside Safety by Computer Simulation A2A04:Committee on Roadside Safety Features Chairman: John F. Carney, III, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Improving Roadside Safety by Computer Simulation DEAN L. SICKING, University of Nebraska, Lincoln

More information

MASH Test 3-11 on the T131RC Bridge Rail

MASH Test 3-11 on the T131RC Bridge Rail TTI: 9-1002-12 MASH Test 3-11 on the T131RC Bridge Rail ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Crash testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground 3100 SH 47, Building 7091 Bryan, TX 77807 Test

More information

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION. X-Tension DS. is suitable for all road types: Motorways, country roads, city streets for speed categories up to 110 km/h.

PRODUCT DESCRIPTION. X-Tension DS. is suitable for all road types: Motorways, country roads, city streets for speed categories up to 110 km/h. INDEX Introduction 2 Product Description 3 Installation 6 Specifications 7 Crash Tests Table 8 Reusability 9 FAQ 10 Annexes 14 Drawings 15 Pictures 16 Crash Tests Results 18 Approvals 23 INTRODUCTION Improving

More information

MASH TEST 3-11 OF THE TxDOT T222 BRIDGE RAIL

MASH TEST 3-11 OF THE TxDOT T222 BRIDGE RAIL TTI: 9-1002-12 MASH TEST 3-11 OF THE TxDOT T222 BRIDGE RAIL ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Crash testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground 3100 SH 47, Building 7091 Bryan, TX 77807 Test

More information

MASH TEST 3-10 ON 31-INCH W-BEAM GUARDRAIL WITH STANDARD OFFSET BLOCKS

MASH TEST 3-10 ON 31-INCH W-BEAM GUARDRAIL WITH STANDARD OFFSET BLOCKS TTI: 9-1002 MASH TEST 3-10 ON 31-INCH W-BEAM GUARDRAIL WITH STANDARD OFFSET BLOCKS ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Crash testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground 3100 SH 47, Building

More information

Virginia Department of Transportation

Virginia Department of Transportation TEST REPORT FOR: Virginia Department of Transportation SKT SP 350 50 (15.24 m) System PREPARED FOR: Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 E. Broad St. Richmond, VA 23219 TEST REPORT NUMBER: REPORT

More information

STI Project: Barrier Systems, Inc. RTS-QMB Longitudinal Barrier. Page 38 of 40 QBOR1. Appendix F (Continued) Figure F-3

STI Project: Barrier Systems, Inc. RTS-QMB Longitudinal Barrier. Page 38 of 40 QBOR1. Appendix F (Continued) Figure F-3 Barrier Systems, Inc. RTS-QMB Longitudinal Barrier STI Project: QBOR1 Page 38 of 40 Appendix F (Continued) Figure F-3 t=.500sec 115 meters overall 37.1 Impact Severity (kj).. 141.6 Angle (deg).. 25 Speed

More information

Technical Report Documentation Page Form DOT F (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized

Technical Report Documentation Page Form DOT F (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-05/0-4162-3 4. Title and Subtitle 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DEVELOPMENT OF LOW-DEFLECTION PRECAST CONCRETE ARRIER 5. Report Date January 2005 Technical

More information

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-04/9-8132-1 4. Title and Subtitle TESTING AND EVALUATION OF THE FLORIDA JERSEY SAFETY SHAPED BRIDGE RAIL 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 5. Report Date February

More information

VERIFICATION & VALIDATION REPORT of MGS Barrier Impact with 1100C Vehicle Using Toyota Yaris Coarse FE Model

VERIFICATION & VALIDATION REPORT of MGS Barrier Impact with 1100C Vehicle Using Toyota Yaris Coarse FE Model VERIFICATION & VALIDATION REPORT of MGS Barrier Impact with 1100C Vehicle Using Toyota Yaris Coarse FE Model CCSA VALIDATION/VERIFICATION REPORT Page 1 of 4 Project: CCSA Longitudinal Barriers on Curved,

More information

NCHRP Report 350 Test 4-12 of the Modified Thrie Beam Guardrail

NCHRP Report 350 Test 4-12 of the Modified Thrie Beam Guardrail NCHRP Report 350 Test 4-12 of the Modified Thrie Beam Guardrail PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-RD-99-065 DECEMBER 1999 Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown

More information

November 16, 1998 Refer to: HNG-14. Mr. David Allardyce Mechanical Engineer B&B Electromatic Main Street Norwood, Louisiana 70761

November 16, 1998 Refer to: HNG-14. Mr. David Allardyce Mechanical Engineer B&B Electromatic Main Street Norwood, Louisiana 70761 November 16, 1998 Refer to: HNG-14 Mr. David Allardyce Mechanical Engineer B&B Electromatic 14113 Main Street Norwood, Louisiana 70761 Dear Mr. Allardyce: In your August 31 letter, you presented some preliminary

More information

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-09/

Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-09/ 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-09/0-6071-1 4. Title and Subtitle ANALYSIS OF ROADSIDE SAFETY DEVICES FOR USE ON VERY HIGH-SPEED ROADWAYS Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's

More information

CRITICAL FLARE RATES FOR W-BEAM GUARDRAIL DETERMINING MAXIMUM CAPACITY USING COMPUTER SIMULATION NCHRP 17-20(3)

CRITICAL FLARE RATES FOR W-BEAM GUARDRAIL DETERMINING MAXIMUM CAPACITY USING COMPUTER SIMULATION NCHRP 17-20(3) CRITICAL FLARE RATES FOR W-BEAM GUARDRAIL DETERMINING MAXIMUM CAPACITY USING COMPUTER SIMULATION NCHRP 17-2(3) Submitted by Beau D. Kuipers, B.S.M.E., E.I.T. Graduate Research Assistant Ronald K. Faller,

More information

July 17, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176A

July 17, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176A July 17, 2008 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590 In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176A Mr. John Addy Hill & Smith Springvale Business and Industrial Park Bliston, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, UK,

More information

Contents INTRODUCTION...

Contents INTRODUCTION... INTRODUCTION... xiii CHAPTER 1. FROM THE SYSTEM TO THE SOFTWARE... 1 1.1. Introduction... 1 1.2. Command/control system... 2 1.3. System... 6 1.4. Software application... 8 1.4.1. What is software?...

More information

MASH TEST 3-21 ON TL-3 THRIE BEAM TRANSITION WITHOUT CURB

MASH TEST 3-21 ON TL-3 THRIE BEAM TRANSITION WITHOUT CURB TTI: 9-1002-12 MASH TEST 3-21 ON TL-3 THRIE BEAM TRANSITION WITHOUT CURB ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Crash testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground 3100 SH 47, Building 7091 Bryan,

More information

Appendix D. Figure D-1. ENCLOSURE 1 (4 Pages) SafeGuard TM Gate System

Appendix D. Figure D-1. ENCLOSURE 1 (4 Pages) SafeGuard TM Gate System Appendix D Figure D-1 SafeGuard TM Gate System ENCLOSURE 1 (4 Pages) Appendix D (Continued) Figure D-4 SafeGuard TM Gate System Appendix D (Continued) Figure D-9 SafeGuardTM Gate System Page D-9 Figure

More information

MASH TEST 3-11 OF THE TxDOT SINGLE SLOPE BRIDGE RAIL (TYPE SSTR) ON PAN-FORMED BRIDGE DECK

MASH TEST 3-11 OF THE TxDOT SINGLE SLOPE BRIDGE RAIL (TYPE SSTR) ON PAN-FORMED BRIDGE DECK TTI: 9-1002 MASH TEST 3-11 OF THE TxDOT SINGLE SLOPE BRIDGE RAIL (TYPE SSTR) ON PAN-FORMED BRIDGE DECK ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Crash testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground

More information

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-03/0-4138-3 4. Title and Subtitle PERFORMANCE OF THE TXDOT T202 (MOD) BRIDGE RAIL REINFORCED WITH FIBER REINFORCED POLYMER BARS

More information

Plastic Safety Systems

Plastic Safety Systems Plastic Safety Systems CrashGard Sand Barrel System Manual On the Roadway for Safety Version 4.4 11/12 Download full-line PSS Product Catalog. General Information Manual Contents: This manual provides

More information

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas

Texas Transportation Institute The Texas A&M University System College Station, Texas 1. Report No. FHWA/TX-05/9-8132-P7 4. Title and Subtitle TL-4 CRASH TESTING OF THE F411 BRIDGE RAIL 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 5. Report Date October 2004 Technical Report Documentation

More information

Guide Rail Safety Symposium

Guide Rail Safety Symposium Ministry of Transportation Guide Rail Safety Symposium MTO Provincial Roadside Safety Update Mark C. Ayton, P. Eng. Senior Engineer, Highway Design MTO Highway Standards Branch MTO Provincial Roadside

More information

Impact analysis of a vertical flared back bridge rail-to-guardrail transition structure using simulation

Impact analysis of a vertical flared back bridge rail-to-guardrail transition structure using simulation Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 41 (2005) 371 396 www.elsevier.com/locate/finel Impact analysis of a vertical flared back bridge rail-to-guardrail transition structure using simulation Ali O. Atahan,

More information

SMART CUSHION INNOVATIONS

SMART CUSHION INNOVATIONS SMART CUSHION The World s Only Speed-Dependent Crash Attenuators SMART CUSHION INNOVATIONS MASH AND NCHRP 350 APPROVED The only attenuator that is tested to MASH and NCHRP 350 Marketed and Distributed

More information

OPTIMIZATION OF THRIE BEAM TERMINAL END SHOE CONNECTION

OPTIMIZATION OF THRIE BEAM TERMINAL END SHOE CONNECTION TTI: 9-1002-15 OPTIMIZATION OF THRIE BEAM TERMINAL END SHOE CONNECTION ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Pendulum testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground 3100 SH 47, Building 7091 Bryan,

More information

Median Barriers in North Carolina

Median Barriers in North Carolina Median Barriers in North Carolina AASHTO Subcommittee on Design - 2006 June 13-16, 2006 Jay A. Bennett North Carolina DOT State Roadway Design Engineer Brian Murphy, PE Traffic Safety Engineer Safety Evaluation

More information

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM GENERAL SUBJECT: SPEED LIMITS, ADVISORY SPEEDS, SIGNS SPECIFIC SUBJECT: Pole Mounted Speed Display Signs: Requirements DIRECTED

More information

Analysis of Existing Work-Zone Sign Supports Using Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Safety Performance Criteria

Analysis of Existing Work-Zone Sign Supports Using Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware Safety Performance Criteria University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Civil Engineering Faculty Publications Civil Engineering 2011 Analysis of Existing Work-Zone Sign Supports Using Manual

More information

CrashGard. Sand Barrel System Product Guide

CrashGard. Sand Barrel System Product Guide Product Guide General Information PSS CrashGard is a non-redirective, gating sand barrel, or crash cushion. Sand barrels are designed to protect fixed objects, whether permanent or temporary. Sand barrels

More information

DEVELOPMENT OF A MASH TL-3 MEDIAN BARRIER GATE

DEVELOPMENT OF A MASH TL-3 MEDIAN BARRIER GATE TTI: 9-1002 DEVELOPMENT OF A MASH TL-3 MEDIAN BARRIER GATE ISO 17025 Laboratory Testing Certificate # 2821.01 Crash testing performed at: TTI Proving Ground 3100 SH 47, Building 7091 Bryan, TX 77807 Research/Test

More information

Development and Validation of a Finite Element Model of an Energy-absorbing Guardrail End Terminal

Development and Validation of a Finite Element Model of an Energy-absorbing Guardrail End Terminal Development and Validation of a Finite Element Model of an Energy-absorbing Guardrail End Terminal Yunzhu Meng 1, Costin Untaroiu 1 1 Department of Biomedical Engineering and Virginia Tech, Blacksburg,

More information

(Item 1) PSS - Type III barricade with a lightweight light attachment, and with a variation in the panel spacing;

(Item 1) PSS - Type III barricade with a lightweight light attachment, and with a variation in the panel spacing; Refer to: HSA-10/WZ-102 Mr. Chuck Bailey Plastic Safety Systems, Inc. 2444 Baldwin Road Cleveland, OH 44104 Dear Mr. Bailey: Thank you for your letter of February 19, 2002, requesting Federal Highway Administration

More information

Working Paper. Development and Validation of a Pick-Up Truck Suspension Finite Element Model for Use in Crash Simulation

Working Paper. Development and Validation of a Pick-Up Truck Suspension Finite Element Model for Use in Crash Simulation Working Paper NCAC 2003-W-003 October 2003 Development and Validation of a Pick-Up Truck Suspension Finite Element Model for Use in Crash Simulation Dhafer Marzougui Cing-Dao (Steve) Kan Matthias Zink

More information

BarrierGate. General Specifications. Manual Operations General Specifications

BarrierGate. General Specifications. Manual Operations General Specifications BarrierGate General Specifications Manual Operations General Specifications BarrierGate GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS I. GENERAL A. The BarrierGate system (the gate) shall be designed and manufactured by Energy

More information

Australian/New Zealand Standard

Australian/New Zealand Standard AS/NZS 3845:1999 Australian/New Zealand Standard Road safety barrier systems AS/NZS 3845:1999 This Joint Australian/New Zealand Standard was prepared by Joint Technical Committee CE/33, Road Safety Barrier

More information

GUARDRAIL TESTING MODIFIED ECCENTRIC LOADER TERMINAL (MELT) AT NCHRP 350 TL-2. Dean C. Alberson, Wanda L. Menges, and Rebecca R.

GUARDRAIL TESTING MODIFIED ECCENTRIC LOADER TERMINAL (MELT) AT NCHRP 350 TL-2. Dean C. Alberson, Wanda L. Menges, and Rebecca R. GUARDRAIL TESTING MODIFIED ECCENTRIC LOADER TERMINAL (MELT) AT NCHRP 350 TL-2 Dean C. Alberson, Wanda L. Menges, and Rebecca R. Haug Prepared for The New England Transportation Consortium July 2002 NETCR

More information

Analysis. Techniques for. Racecar Data. Acquisition, Second Edition. By Jorge Segers INTERNATIONAL, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA

Analysis. Techniques for. Racecar Data. Acquisition, Second Edition. By Jorge Segers INTERNATIONAL, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA Analysis Techniques for Racecar Data Acquisition, Second Edition By Jorge Segers INTERNATIONAL, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA Preface to the Second Edition xiii Preface to the First Edition xv Acknowledgments

More information

MASH08 TEST 3-11 OF THE ROCKINGHAM PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER

MASH08 TEST 3-11 OF THE ROCKINGHAM PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER Proving Ground Report No. 400001-RPC4 Report Date: July 2009 MASH08 TEST 3-11 OF THE ROCKINGHAM PRECAST CONCRETE BARRIER by C. Eugene Buth, P.E. Research Engineer William F. Williams, P.E. Assistant Research

More information

Safe-Stop TMA (Truck Mounted Attenuator) GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS

Safe-Stop TMA (Truck Mounted Attenuator) GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS Safe-Stop TMA (Truck Mounted Attenuator) GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS I. GENERAL A. All Safe-Stop Truck Mounted Attenuators (Safe-Stop TMA) shall be designed and manufactured by Energy Absorption Systems, Incorporated,

More information

Midwest Guardrail System Without Blockouts

Midwest Guardrail System Without Blockouts Duplication for publication or sale is strictly prohibited without prior written permission of the Transportation Research Board Paper No. 13-0418 Midwest Guardrail System Without Blockouts by John D.

More information

DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSITION BETWEEN FREE-STANDING AND REDUCED-DEFLECTION PORTABLE CONCRETE BARRIERS PHASE I

DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSITION BETWEEN FREE-STANDING AND REDUCED-DEFLECTION PORTABLE CONCRETE BARRIERS PHASE I Research Project Number TPF-5(193) Supplement #78 DEVELOPMENT OF A TRANSITION BETWEEN FREE-STANDING AND REDUCED-DEFLECTION PORTABLE CONCRETE BARRIERS PHASE I Submitted by Mojdeh Asadollahi Pajouh, Ph.D.

More information

CRASH TESTING OF RSA/K&C ANTI-RAM FOUNDATION BOLLARD PAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIPLOMATIC SECURITY SD-STD-02.

CRASH TESTING OF RSA/K&C ANTI-RAM FOUNDATION BOLLARD PAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIPLOMATIC SECURITY SD-STD-02. CRASH TESTING OF RSA/K&C ANTI-RAM FOUNDATION BOLLARD PAD IN ACCORDANCE WITH U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE DIPLOMATIC SECURITY SD-STD-02.01 REVISION A Prepared for RSA Protective Technologies, LLC FINAL REPORT

More information

Finite Element Modeling and Analysis of Crash Safe Composite Lighting Columns, Contact-Impact Problem

Finite Element Modeling and Analysis of Crash Safe Composite Lighting Columns, Contact-Impact Problem 9 th International LS-DYNA Users Conference Impact Analysis (3) Finite Element Modeling and Analysis of Crash Safe Composite Lighting Columns, Contact-Impact Problem Alexey Borovkov, Oleg Klyavin and Alexander

More information

safedirection.com.au Ref: PM 017/02

safedirection.com.au Ref: PM 017/02 DISTRIBUTOR 0 Product Manual Ref: PM 017/02 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction... 3 2.0 The... 3 3.0 How the Functions... 4 4.0 Crash Test Performance... 4 5.0 Characteristics of Terminals... 5 5.1 Gating

More information

June 27, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176

June 27, In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176 June 27, 2008 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 20590 In Reply Refer To: HSSD/B-176 Mr. John Addy Hill & Smith Springvale Business and Industrial Park Bliston, Wolverhampton, West Midlands, UK,

More information

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles

An Introduction to Automated Vehicles An Introduction to Automated Vehicles Grant Zammit Operations Team Manager Office of Technical Services - Resource Center Federal Highway Administration at the Purdue Road School - Purdue University West

More information

Roadside Safety MASH

Roadside Safety MASH Ministry of Transportation MEA 2016 ANNUAL WORKSHOP AND GENERAL MEETING Roadside Safety MASH MTO Design & Contract Standards Office Highway Standards Branch November 24, 2016 Roadside Safety - MASH Highway

More information

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH 2003 Anti-Ram Bollards Prepared for: RSA Protective Technologies, LLC 1573 Mimosa Court Upland, CA 91784 Test

More information

Evaluating The Relevancy Of Current Crash Test Guidelines For Roadside Safety Barriers On High Speed Roads

Evaluating The Relevancy Of Current Crash Test Guidelines For Roadside Safety Barriers On High Speed Roads Evaluating The Relevancy Of Current Crash Test Guidelines For Roadside Safety Barriers On High Speed Roads Connie Xavier Dominique Lord Chiara Dobrovolny Roger Bligh TRB 1 st International Roadside Safety

More information

METAL BEAM GUARDFENCE TRANSITION AND END TREATMENT IDENTIFICATION GUIDE

METAL BEAM GUARDFENCE TRANSITION AND END TREATMENT IDENTIFICATION GUIDE 2016 TxDOT Design Division METAL BEAM GUARDFENCE TRANSITION AND END TREATMENT IDENTIFICATION GUIDE A guide to help TxDOT employees identify metal beam guardfence transitions and end treatments for the

More information

Illinois Safety Program IDOT District ATSSA Workshop

Illinois Safety Program IDOT District ATSSA Workshop Illinois Safety Program IDOT District ATSSA Workshop Roadway Departure & MASH DRAFT IDOT Facilitator: Dave Piper ATSSA Facilitator: Jim Thonn 1 Illinois Emphasis Area Priority Pyramid 2 Fatalities and

More information

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE MODIFIED G4(1S) GUARDRAIL UPDATE TO NCHRP 350 TEST NO WITH 28" C.G. HEIGHT (2214WB-2)

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE MODIFIED G4(1S) GUARDRAIL UPDATE TO NCHRP 350 TEST NO WITH 28 C.G. HEIGHT (2214WB-2) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE MODIFIED G4(1S) GUARDRAIL UPDATE TO NCHRP 350 TEST NO. 3-11 WITH 28" C.G. HEIGHT (2214WB-2) Submitted by Karla A. Polivka, M.S.M.E., E.I.T. Research Associate Engineer Dean

More information

DESIGN OF A SURROGATE VEHICLE TO TEST LOW SPEED PROTECTIVE DEVICES. A Thesis MICHAEL W. LISK

DESIGN OF A SURROGATE VEHICLE TO TEST LOW SPEED PROTECTIVE DEVICES. A Thesis MICHAEL W. LISK DESIGN OF A SURROGATE VEHICLE TO TEST LOW SPEED PROTECTIVE DEVICES A Thesis by MICHAEL W. LISK Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment

More information

REVIEW OF THE DRAFT 2011 VA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL. December 14, 2010 David Rush VDOT WZS Program Manager

REVIEW OF THE DRAFT 2011 VA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL. December 14, 2010 David Rush VDOT WZS Program Manager REVIEW OF THE DRAFT 2011 VA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL December 14, 2010 David Rush VDOT WZS Program Manager Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Released in December 2009 States have until

More information

PN SoftStop. Revision A June End Terminal. Product Description Assembly Manual

PN SoftStop. Revision A June End Terminal. Product Description Assembly Manual PN 620237 SoftStop End Terminal Product Description Assembly Manual SoftStop End Terminal Product Description Assembly Manual 2525 Stemmons Freeway Dallas, Texas 75207 Important: This Manual is to be used

More information

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE THE TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE THE TEXAS A & M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843 NCHRP REPORT 350 TEST 3-11 OF THE STEEL-BACKED TIMBER GUARDRAIL by D. Lance Bullard, Jr., P.E. Associate Research Engineer Wanda L. Menges Associate Research Specialist and Sandra K. Schoeneman Research

More information

Development of a Finite Element Model of a Motorcycle

Development of a Finite Element Model of a Motorcycle Development of a Finite Element Model of a Motorcycle N. Schulz, C. Silvestri Dobrovolny and S. Hurlebaus Texas A&M Transportation Institute Abstract Over the past years, extensive research efforts have

More information

Lee County DOT Traffic Section Design Standard for Sign Installation

Lee County DOT Traffic Section Design Standard for Sign Installation Lee County DOT Traffic Section Design Standard for Sign Installation Traffic Section Table Of Contents Section Title 1. Sign Panel Material 2. Sign Shape 3. Posts 4. Fasteners 5. Retro reflectivity and

More information

Vehicle Dynamics and Control

Vehicle Dynamics and Control Rajesh Rajamani Vehicle Dynamics and Control Springer Contents Dedication Preface Acknowledgments v ix xxv 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Driver Assistance Systems 2 1.2 Active Stabiüty Control Systems 2 1.3 RideQuality

More information

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards

CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH Anti-Ram Bollards CRASH TEST REPORT FOR PERIMETER BARRIERS AND GATES TESTED TO SD-STD-02.01, REVISION A, MARCH 2003 Anti-Ram Bollards Prepared for: RSA Protective Technologies, LLC 1573 Mimosa Court Upland, CA 91784 Test

More information

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier

ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier ArmorGuard Barrier Portable Longitudinal Barrier Installation & Maintenance Manual AGB I&M 082409 Page 1 of 12 ArmorGuard Barrier Table of contents Preface... 2 Applications and System Characteristics

More information

CrashGard. Sand Barrel System Product Guide

CrashGard. Sand Barrel System Product Guide Product Guide General Information PSS CrashGard is a non-redirective, gating sand barrel, or crash cushion. Sand barrels are designed to protect fixed objects, whether permanent or temporary. Sand barrels

More information

PRODUCT & INSTALLATION MANUAL RICOCHET SAFETY BARRIER SYSTEM TL2 MASH 1

PRODUCT & INSTALLATION MANUAL RICOCHET SAFETY BARRIER SYSTEM TL2 MASH 1 PRODUCT & INSTALLATION MANUAL RICOCHET SAFETY BARRIER SYSTEM TL2 MASH 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION... 1 PRODUCT... 2 SPECIFICATIONS... 4 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS... 7 SAFETY INFORMATION... 11 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS...

More information

Crash Performance of Strong-Post W-Beam Guardrail with Missing Blockouts Carolyn E. Hampton and Hampton C. Gabler

Crash Performance of Strong-Post W-Beam Guardrail with Missing Blockouts Carolyn E. Hampton and Hampton C. Gabler Crash Performance of Strong-Post W-Beam Guardrail with Missing Blockouts Carolyn E. Hampton and Hampton C. Gabler Virginia Tech Center for Injury Biomechanics, Blacksburg VA 24061 Abstract Missing blockouts

More information

Development of a Heavy Containment Level Bridge Rail for Istanbul

Development of a Heavy Containment Level Bridge Rail for Istanbul Original Article Abstract The international highways within the city limits of Istanbul are used to transit more than 15 million trucks and other heavy good vehicles per year. According to the statistics,

More information