Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder July 2017
|
|
- Matthew Wade
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Appendix G: Rapid Transit Technology Backgrounder
2 This appendix provides additional details regarding Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail Transit technologies, with examples from other systems, including: Operating rights-of-way; Ridership attraction; Capital and operating costs; Land use and development; Service frequency; Technology conversion; and, Electric vehicles. Right-of-Way One key feature that differentiates rapid transit from conventional transit service is the right-of-way that the vehicles operate in. There are varying degrees of separation from general traffic that rapid transit vehicles can operate under: Exclusive right-of-way, where the complete separation of transit vehicles from automobiles, pedestrians and cyclists takes place. The aim is to minimize conflicts at intersections and along runningway segments, in order to maximize speed. This alignment allows for modes to travel at the highest speeds as they are not forced to operate at roadway speed limits. Examples of this include the majority of Ottawa s Transitway system, Calgary s C-Train LRT and most subway systems; Semi-exclusive right-of-way, where transit vehicles typically operate in dedicated lanes along existing roadways and where the number of atgrade intersections is limited. By reducing the number of at-grade intersections, vehicles can operate consistently at higher speeds (typically dictated by the speed limit of the road). These vehicles still cross major roadways at signalized intersections that utilize transit signal priority in order to reduce the delay the vehicle experiences. Examples of these types of alignments include York Region s VIVA rapidways, Toronto s St. Clair Streetcar, and many European LRT systems; and, Non-exclusive right-of-way, where transit vehicles operate in mixed traffic, similar to how the typical local bus operates today. However, transit signal priority can be implemented to improve operating speeds and limit delays G.2
3 at signalized intersections. Queue jump lanes, which allow buses exclusive access to the front of an intersection queue, can also be a strategy to improve operating speed without the need for an independent right-of-way. These types of alignments are common in downtown areas where foregoing speed due to space restrictions within a high activity centre is deemed acceptable. These alignments can experience significant delays that might otherwise be avoided in an exclusive or semi-exclusive system. Examples of this include Brampton s ZUM, and Toronto s King Street Streetcar service. Semi-exclusive right-of-way Non-exclusive right-of-way Most systems use a combination of these types of alignments depending on spatial constraints, traffic conditions and the selected technology. As the degree of grade separation increases, the vehicles are able to operate at a faster speed and with greater reliability. While all technologies can operate within all these alignments, recent projects have seen LRT operate exclusive and semiexclusive, streetcar in semi-exclusive and non-exclusive and BRT within all. While performance increases with the degree of exclusivity so does capital costs. To provide this degree of segregation, especially in a constrained urban environment, requires expensive investments such as bridges, tunnels, road widening or dedicated median lanes. G.3
4 Attracting Ridership The implementation of LRT and BRT has led to increased mobility and ridership in cities across the continent. Better speed, reliability and comfort all play a role in attracting new riders to use transit. Experience in other systems has shown that LRT systems attract more riders for a combination of reasons, including rider comfort and the permanence of the alignment. However, some riders can be discouraged as trips that could previously be completed by one bus, albeit in more time, may require an additional transfer to be made by LRT depending on how local routes are modified. Therefore, the design of transfer locations and transfer amenities is extremely important. BRT is also effective at attracting riders, however stronger branding of the service and infrastructure typically needs to occur to help differentiate the system from perceptions that residents have about conventional transit. The one significant advantage, aside from the significant cost savings compared to LRT, is that there is the option to operate routes that operate locally then use the BRT infrastructure to travel across town, providing a one-seat ride. G.4
5 Typical LRT and BRT passenger amenities include: Climate controlled waiting areas Wait time technology Way finding signage Accessible platforms G.5
6 Capital Costs There is a wide range of costs between the projects, with significant variation arising from the choice of alignment, the availability of right-of-way, the type of running structure/guideway, the scope of ancillary infrastructure (e.g. bus loops, park-and-ride lots) and the size of the rolling stock/fleet used in developing the system. In the United States, constructing a BRT line can vary from $10 million per kilometre to $40 million per km (USD) while the range for LRT is $40 million per kilometre to $80+ million per km (USD). In Canada, the LRT projects in Calgary and Waterloo that are or will be operating at-grade within roadway medians and along rail corridors, are costing towards the lower end of this range, while two projects in Edmonton which both include tunnel sections and multiple grade-separations- are at the higher end. In terms of Canadian BRT projects, York Region s vivanext and the Mississauga Transitway East are both costing between $20 million and $40 million per kilometre. Exhibit G.1 provides a summary of three rapid transit projects in Canada that are planned or currently under construction. Image of York Region s VIVA BRT infrastructure improvements. G.6
7 Image of Missisauga s Miway BRT improvements. Exhibit G.1 System Cost Comparison SYSTEM LENGTH COST COST/KM Calgary (LRT) South Line Extension 3.5 km $ 180 Million $ 51.4 Million Waterloo (LRT) 19 km $ 818 Million $ 43 Million Edmonton (LRT) Metro Line 3.3 km $ 665 Million $ 200 Million York Region Rapidways (BRT) 34.2 km $ 1.4 Billion $ 41 Million Mississauga Transitway (BRT) 18 km $ 259 Million $ 14 Million To analyse the cost variability from system to system, the capital costs can be categorized into three parts: The Runningway Depending on the degree of grade separation, the exclusivity of the right-of-way, and the type of guideway, the cost of the runningway infrastructure can have a wide range of variability. For example, a system with completely exclusive right-of-way will carry a much higher cost burden than a lite system that operates in mixed traffic within an existing road right-of-way. The Rolling Stock As system size and service frequency increase, the number of vehicles in operation also increase to maintain service. The choice of vehicle can also be the source of considerable cost variability from one G.7
8 system to the next. High cost vehicles may be more energy efficient, provide a more comfortable riding experience, and be more user friendly, while having higher passenger capacities compared to lower end vehicles. Operating and Maintenance Facility - With the introduction of new vehicles to a transit system, comes the need for a new operating and maintenance facility that is built to service them. In the case of LRT, an operating and maintenance facility needs to be connected to the rail network. Considering that every additional track kilometre adds extensive cost to a system, the strategic placement of the facility needs to be carefully considered while considering land use implications and distance from the route. Operating Costs Operating cost can vary significantly from system to system depending on fleet size, service frequency, and vehicle technologies. The breakdown of operating cost variability from system to system can be broken down into three categories: Energy Costs - As network size and service frequency increase, so to do vehicle operating hours. The types of vehicles that are running also affect the variable energy costs of a system. LRT vehicles get all their power from electric induction and have lower energy costs per vehicle km than buses that run on hybrid diesel/electric motors. Labour Labour costs vary depending on the amount of vehicle hours and driver wages. Operating and Maintenance Maintenance varies between LRT and BRT systems. LRT systems have greater costs associated with track and vehicle maintenance. As passenger demand increases, and service frequency and vehicle-hours increase, the lower variable costs of LRT become more apparent and LRT can be more justified. Under conditions of lower passenger demand, and lower vehicle hours, BRT is favourable. For comparison purposes, operating costs by revenue vehicle-hour were retrieved from the US National Transit Database for LRT and bus (conventional and BRT combined) vehicles and is shown in Exhibit G.2. Comparable Canadian data was not available at the time of writing. G.8
9 Exhibit G.2 LRT and Bus Operating Costs per One Revenue Vehicle-Hour Experience from these systems indicates that the cost to operate one LRT vehicle or one BRT vehicle for one hour varies significantly, but that BRT is generally less expensive. Because of this, cost-effective use of light rail requires high passenger demand to become viable. While LRT can be a more attractive option for choice riders, ensuring that the technology matches the demand will help to ensure the long-term financial sustainability of the system. Land Use and Development Both BRT and LRT have the ability to shape land along the nodes and corridors that they service, with the impact on development dependent on a combination of the specific site, the land use policies in place, and the vehicle technology. By directing residential and employment intensification along a rapid transit corridor, a municipality will grow the ridership base for the corridor and achieve other development objectives, such as encouraging mixed-use, walkable communities. While LRT is perceived as being a more permanent infrastructure investment, which provides extra security for developers to invest, a full BRT system with major investment into the running way and station design can also be viewed as permanent infrastructure. G.9
10 Example of intensification along a LRT corridor. The City of Vancouver has been a leader in using rapid transit as a catalyst for development by encouraging development near rapid transit stations, especially large trip attractors, likes grocery stores, fitness facilities and pharmacies. This has resulted in a decline in the average trip length for retail-based trips as the day-to-day needs of residents can be met within their local community. Depending on the station location, park-and-ride lots can reduce the development potential of a station-area as the land closest to the station is instead allocated to parking lots. This prevents new development from taking advantage of being in close proximity to the rapid transit station and causes the surrounding area to become an unattractive area to pedestrians. However, parkand-ride lots have a role to play and should be used at locations with minimal development potential (e.g. under hydro corridors, areas with constrained lot sizes, or brownfield lots that are not economic to remediate in the short-term). Service Frequency LRT vehicles have larger capacities compared to buses, requiring fewer vehicles to accommodate passenger demand. This in turn impacts the headway (i.e. time between vehicle) required to meet the peak demands along a rapid transit corridor. A headway that is too long will reduce the ability to attract new riders while a headway that is very short can be challenging to reliably maintain. G.10
11 Technology Conversions BRT Conversion & Phasing A number of cities have successfully built BRT systems that upgrade the infrastructure over time. These systems typically begin with a BRT-lite route along a corridor that typically operates in mixed-traffic with some priority measures (e.g. transit-signal priority, queue jumps). As ridership and congestion grow, and new funds become available, the infrastructure along these routes can be upgraded to meet the local needs. York Region Transit s VIVA Rapid Transit system has used this approach since September 2005, when its first route launched. Since then, over 13 km of rapidways have been or are under construction. When the current phase is built out in 2021, the bus rapidways will stretch over 44 km across the Region, however large portions on the peripherals will continue to operate in mixed-traffic. The vivanext plan eventually envisions upgrading busier segments of the rapidways to LRT as demand and funding warrant. BRT to LRT Conversion Conversion from BRT to LRT is the long-term plan of many rapid transit systems, including VIVA and Zum. A number of new BRT systems, including York Region, have incorporated design elements with this in mind in order to be strategic with their funding. There are numerous advantages to deploying BRT services as a precursor to LRT including: Important BRT infrastructure elements, such as transit signal priority and passenger information displays can represent sunk infrastructure costs that benefit a LRT project; Improvements to pedestrian and cycling infrastructure to access BRT stations will support future LRT stations; and, Stations can be designed to be retrofitted or move (depending on BRT and LRT alignment), representing a reusable asset for an LRT system. As of 2015, only two North American examples exist of BRT to LRT upgrades. The first was completed in 2007, and saw Seattle s Downtown Transit Tunnel which was converted to support a mix of BRT and LRT after 15 years as a busonly tunnel. The tunnel initially incorporated a number of geometric elements G.11
12 within its design in order to accommodate the LRT catenary and stations required minimal retrofits to accommodate level-boarding onto LRT. A notable Canadian example is the Ottawa Confederation Line where 10km of the Central Transitway is currently being converted from BRT to LRT. The line, which is scheduled to open in 2018, will replace original sections dating back to The LRT line will take advantage of original design provisions such as vertical clearance provision, geometric elements and structural loadings on existing structures that were planned to accommodate light rail vehicles. Ottawa Confederation Line LRT Conversion Rendering. While only two BRT to LRT conversions have taken place, both Ottawa and Seattle demonstrated that a BRT system is an effective first step to building the necessary ridership foundation for LRT. While both conversions have or are causing significant service disruptions, they will ultimately provide a long-term benefit for their communities. It is important to note that the conversion from BRT to LRT should only be considered for systems that have been in place for a significant time period (at least 25 years), and where an upgrade is warranted after an additional detailed evaluation process. Continuous service disruptions and high costs to simply upgrade the existing rapid transit can be greeted by significant political resistance and public criticism. G.12
13 Electric Bus Market Scan The following table summarizes a scan of current electric bus options available on the market, including vehicle features, powertrain, dimensions, seating, warranty and costs. A summary of the advantages and disadvantages of each vehicle is provided at the bottom of the table. G.13
14 G.14
15
2.1 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Expand regional rapid transit networks STRATEGIC DIRECTION
TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION TRANSIT VISION 2040 defines a future in which public transit maximizes its contribution to quality of life with benefits that support a vibrant and equitable society,
More informationCITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6
2016 2019 CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6 STRATEGIC AREA OF FOCUS: SUB-PRIORITY: STRATEGY: INITIATIVE: INITIATIVE LEAD(S): BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE CITY
More informationV03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT
V03 APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August 2016 Green Line LRT 2 Presentation Outline Past Present Future 3 16/03/2016 RouteAhead Update 4 4 16/03/2016 RouteAhead Update 5 5 16/03/2016 6 6
More information2.4 TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION. Support the revitalization of urban cores STRATEGIC DIRECTION
TRANSIT VISION 2040 FROM VISION TO ACTION TRANSIT VISION 2040 defines a future in which public transit maximizes its contribution to quality of life with benefits that support a vibrant and equitable society,
More informationSTRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES AND POLICY COMMITTEE MAY 5, 2016 Shift Rapid Transit Initiative Largest infrastructure project in the city s history. Rapid Transit initiative will transform London s public transit
More informationService Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:
Over the past decade, much attention has been placed on the development of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems. These systems provide rail-like service, but with buses, and are typically less expensive to
More informationWhat IS BRT, Really? Not BRT and RNY
What IS BRT, Really? 2007 Winter TexITE Meeting Presented by Jeff Arndt, TTI Not BRT and RNY 1 What is Bus Rapid Transit? A flexible, rubber-tired from of rapid transit that combines stations, vehicles,
More informationSERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES
VTA TRANSIT SUSTAINABILITY POLICY: APPENDIX A SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted February 2007 COMMUNITYBUS LOCALBUS EXPRESSBUS BUSRAPIDTRANSIT LIGHTRAILTRANSIT STATIONAREAS S A N T A C L A R A Valley Transportation
More informationConverting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada. John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada
Converting BRT to LRT in the Nation s Capital Ottawa, Canada John Manconi City of Ottawa Ottawa, Canada 1 The Challenge *Mackenzie King Bridge Ottawa, AM peak period 2 The Challenge Ottawa s population
More informationTORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.
Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: October 24, 2012 SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN RAPID TRANSIT EXPANSION STUDY (DRTES) PHASE 1 STRATEGIC PLAN ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS
More informationPreliminary Definition of Alternatives. 3.0 Preliminary Definition of Alternatives
3.0 What preliminary alternatives are being evaluated? The alternatives for the East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor project that were considered for screening include the No Build Alternative, Transportation
More informationEUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT
EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT (BRIEF) Table of Contents EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON (USA)... 1 COUNTY CONTEXT AND SYSTEM DESCRIPTION... 1 SYSTEM OVERVIEW... 1 PLANNING
More informationYonge Subway Extension Breakfast Meeting
Yonge Subway Extension Breakfast Meeting May 12, 2011 1 breakfast meeting overview 1. Welcome 2. Rapid Transit overview Yonge Subway Funding Call to action 3. Commentary 4. Open discussion 5. Closing remarks
More informationHalifax Commuter Rail: A Fresh Concept
Building Owners & Managers Association (BOMA) Nova Scotia PO Box 1597, Halifax NS B3J 2Y3 902-425-3717 info@bomanovascotia.com bomanovascotia.com Halifax Commuter Rail: A Fresh Concept The Green Interconnected
More informationAPPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]
APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY] Jackson/Teton Integrated Transportation Plan 2015 Appendix I. Fixed-Guideway Transit Feasibility Jackson/Teton County Integrated Transportation Plan v2
More informationGreen Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017
Green Line LRT: Beltline Segment Update April 19, 2017 Quick Facts On April 11, 2017, City Council approved Administration s recommendation for the Green Line to be underground in the Beltline from 2 Street
More informationGO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan
GO Transit s deliverable: the 2020 Service Plan GO Transit s 2020 Service Plan describes GO s commitment to customers, existing and new, to provide a dramatically expanded interregional transit option
More informationThe City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007
The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007 Presentation Outline Transportation Statistics Transportation Building Blocks Toronto s Official Plan Transportation and City Building Vision Projects
More informationPublic Meeting. June 15, :30 7:30 p.m.
Public Meeting June 15, 2017 5:30 7:30 p.m. Welcome 2015 Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study 2015 Naval Station Norfolk Transit Extension Study 2017 Norfolk Westside Transit Study HRT and the
More informationAn Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics. Date April 30, 2009
An Overview of Rapid Transit Typical Characteristics Date April 30, 2009 Land Use and Transportation Is there a link? Streetcar Suburbs were the result of land developers creating streetcar lines in order
More information5 RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PLAN PRINCIPLES, METROLINX BUSINESS CASE, AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE
5 RAPID TRANSIT NETWORK PLAN PRINCIPLES, METROLINX BUSINESS CASE, AND ALTERNATIVE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ANALYSIS UPDATE The Rapid Transit Public/Private Partnership Steering Committee recommends the
More informationExecutive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1
Executive Summary Introduction The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project is a vital public transit infrastructure investment that would provide a transit connection to the existing Metro Gold Line
More informationYonge-Eglinton. Mobility Hub Profile. September 19, 2012 YONGE- EGLINTON
September 19, 2012 PEEL YORK HALTON DURHAM HAMILTON TORONTO YONGE- EGLINTON MOBILITY HUBS: places of connectivity between regional and rapid transit services, where different modes of transportation come
More informationAttachment 5. High Speed Transit Planning Study REPORT SUMMARY. Prepared by: City of Edmonton Transportation Planning Branch. Stantec Consulting Ltd.
Attachment 5 High Speed Transit Planning Study Prepared by: City of Edmonton Transportation Planning Branch Stantec Consulting Ltd. Transportation Management & Design, Inc. with Lea Consulting Ltd. [135-35130]
More informationLocation Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan
Valley Line West LRT Concept Plan Recommended Amendments Lewis Farms LRT Terminus Site Location Concept Plan Amendment Recommendation Approved 2011 Concept Plan Lewis Farms LRT terminus site, 87 Avenue/West
More informationBus Rapid Transit. Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL
Bus Rapid Transit Jennifer Flynn and Cheryl Thole Senior Research Associates Commuter Choice Workshop January 2012 Tampa, FL What is Bus Rapid Transit? BRT is an enhanced bus system that operates on bus
More informationDowntown Transit Connector. Making Transit Work for Rhode Island
Downtown Transit Connector Making Transit Work for Rhode Island 3.17.17 Project Evolution Transit 2020 (Stakeholders identify need for better transit) Providence Core Connector Study (Streetcar project
More informationWest Broadway Transit Study. Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015
West Broadway Transit Study Community Advisory Committee September 17, 2015 Introductions Community Engagement Summer Outreach Fall Outreach Technical Analysis Process Update Alternatives Review Economic
More informationGreen Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions
Green Line LRT: Beltline Recommendation Frequently Asked Questions June 2017 Quick Facts Administration has evaluated several alignment options that would connect the Green Line in the Beltline to Victoria
More informationKey Transfer Stations - Technical Memo
DOCUMENT 5 October 2008 Key - Technical Memo 1.0 INTRODUCTION In May 2008 Council approved a Primary Rapid Transit Network which includes both Light Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) corridors.
More informationThe Engineering Department recommends Council receive this report for information.
CORPORATE REPORT NO: R161 COUNCIL DATE: July 23, 2018 REGULAR COUNCIL TO: Mayor & Council DATE: July 19, 2018 FROM: General Manager, Engineering FILE: 8740-01 SUBJECT: Surrey Long-Range Rapid Transit Vision
More informationBUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) MISSISSAUGA SEGMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
APPENDIX 1 CITY OF MISSISSAUGA BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) MISSISSAUGA SEGMENT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Executive Summary McCORMICK RANKIN May 2003 Introduction This executive summary highlights the findings and
More informationDriving change. Investing in the Future of London s Mobility
Driving change. Investing in the Future of London s Mobility Transit suits today s pace of life. With ridership in London forecast to grow by 50% over the next 10 years, the current transit system will
More informationAppendix A-L Public Information Centre 3 Materials
Appendix A-L Public Information Centre 3 Materials RAPID TRANSIT CORRIDORS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY NOTICE OF PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE #3 The City of London is entering a new chapter in its history
More informationCONNECTING THE REGION
CONNECTING THE REGION GERRY CHAPUT VICE PRESIDENT, RAPID TRANSIT, METROLINX VALUE ANALYSIS CANADA SUMMIT KEYNOTE OCTOBER 16, 2017 Metrolinx was created in 2006 by the Province of Ontario to improve the
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 2018 What is the More MARTA Atlanta program? The More MARTA Atlanta program is a collaborative partnership between MARTA and the City of Atlanta to develop and implement a program
More information5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS
5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS When the METRO Green Line LRT begins operating in mid-2014, a strong emphasis will be placed on providing frequent connecting bus service with Green Line trains. Bus hours
More informationCalgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit
Calgary Transit and the Calgary Transportation Plan Chris Jordan, M.Sc., P.Eng. Coordinator, Strategic Transit Planning, Calgary Transit 1. Plan It Calgary the new Municipal Development Plan and Calgary
More informationChapter 4 : THEME 2. Transportation
Chapter 4 : THEME 2 Strengthen connections to keep the Central Area easy to reach and get around 55 Figure 4.2.1 Promote region-wide transit investments. Metra commuter rail provides service to the east,
More informationCEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update
CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update EECUTIVE SUMMARY DECEMBER 2015 Executive Summary In 2013, the Twin Cities metropolitan area s first bus rapid transit (BRT) line, the METRO Red Line,
More informationFINAL. Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update. Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link. Prepared for: Sound Transit
Sound Transit Long-Range Plan Update Issue Paper S.1: Tacoma Link Integration with Central Link Prepared for: Sound Transit Prepared by: Quade & Douglas, Inc. FINAL March 2005 Foreword This issue paper
More informationThe ION Story. November 2015
The ION Story November 2015 Planning For The Future The Region of Waterloo has been planning for rapid transit for more than a decade ION will: Limit urban sprawl; ease traffic congestion Protect environmentally-sensitive
More informationThree ULTra Case Studies examples of the performance of the system in three different environments
Three ULTra Case Studies examples of the performance of the system in three different environments airport application: London Heathrow : linking business and staff car parks through the access tunnel
More informationTHE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE
THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE 2 LRT for Everyone LRT FOR EVERYONE Light rail is about more than transit; it s about transforming Edmonton. As the city grows, so do its transportation needs. LRT is an
More informationRecommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network
Recommended Vision for the Downtown Rapid Transit Network April 2008 Presentation Overview Context Transit options Assessment of options Recommended network Building the network 2 1 Rapid Our Vision Reliable
More informationClick to edit Master title style
Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates SERVICE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES September 22, 2015 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW & WORK TO DATE 1. Extensive stakeholder involvement Throughout 2. System and market assessment
More informationPublic Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development
Public Meeting City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development Funded by Regional Transportation Authority September 12, 2011 In partnership with Presentation
More informationBrian Pessaro, AICP National Bus Rapid Transit Institute
Brian Pessaro, AICP National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Source: WCVB TV, Boston BRT is an enhanced bus system that operates on bus lanes or other transitways in order to combine the flexibility of buses
More informationMidtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Key Issues Memo
Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Key Issues Memo 1/4/2013 Prepared by the SRF Consulting Group Team for Table of Contents Introduction... 1 1. Markets... 1 External Markets... 1 Intra-Corridor Travel...
More informationMETRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options
METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options Bloomington City Council Work Session November 18, 2013 Christina Morrison BRT/Small Starts Project Office Coordinating Planning and Design AMERICAN
More informationStrategic Plan
2005-2015 Strategic Plan SUMMARY OF THE REVISED PLAN IN 2011 A decade focused on developing mass transit in the Outaouais A updated vision of mass transit in the region The STO is embracing the future
More informationCITY of GUELPH Transit Growth Strategy and Plan, Mobility Services Review. ECO Committee
CITY of GUELPH Transit Growth Strategy and Plan, Mobility Services Review ECO Committee July 19, 2010 1 Study Purpose Vision and growth strategy for Guelph Transit, ensuring broad consultation Operational
More informationBRT: What is it & Where Does it Fit? Sam Zimmerman
BRT: What is it & Where Does it Fit? Sam Zimmerman 1 BRT: Bus Rapid Transit Flexible, permanently integrated, high performance system with a quality image and a strong ID Package of components appropriate
More informationMississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project
Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit Preliminary Design Project PUBLIC INFORMATION CENTRE OCTOBER 2008 WELCOME The Mississauga Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project Thank you for attending this Public Information Centre.
More informationFACT SHEET. US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies. Alternative Description/Overview
FACT SHEET US 192 Alternatives Analysis Modal Technologies Bus Alternative Description/Overview Bus systems typically operate in mixed traffic and have minimal station infrastructure. Bus service typically
More informationBi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis
Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis Prepared for: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Planning and Project Development May 2005 Prepared by: in conjunction
More informationBROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY
BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY FM # 42802411201 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2012 GOBROWARD Broward Boulevard Corridor Transit Study FM # 42802411201 Executive Summary Prepared For: Ms. Khalilah Ffrench,
More informationWhat is the Connector?
What is the Connector? The Connector is a plan for a high-capacity transit system from northeast to south Ann Arbor, connecting major destinations including downtown, commercial, and residential areas,
More informationREPORT CARD FOR CALIFORNIA S INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT CALIFORNIA S TRANSIT FACILITIES
TRANSIT GRADE: C- WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT TRANSIT FACILITIES California needs robust, flexible and reliable transit systems to reduce peak congestion on our highways, provide options for citizens who
More informationGTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1
GTA West Corridor Planning and EA Study Stage 1 Draft Development Strategy Presentation to Peel Goods Movement Task Force April 8 2011 Study Areas 2 Unique Approach Unprecedented two-stage EA process:
More informationSeoul. (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%)
Seoul (Area=605, 10mill. 23.5%) Capital Region (Area=11,730, 25mill. 49.4%) . Major changes of recent decades in Korea Korea s Pathways at a glance 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s Economic Development
More informationExecutive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.
Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009 Background As the Treasure Valley continues to grow, high-quality transportation connections
More informationExecutive Summary. Phase 2 Evaluation Report. Introduction
, Executive Summary Executive Summary Introduction TransLink and the Province of British Columbia sponsored a multi-phase study to evaluate alternatives for rapid transit service in the Broadway corridor
More informationTravel Time Savings Memorandum
04-05-2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Background 3 Methodology 3 Inputs and Calculation 3 Assumptions 4 Light Rail Transit (LRT) Travel Times 5 Auto Travel Times 5 Bus Travel Times 6 Findings 7 Generalized Cost
More information7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES
7 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES 7.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter presents the comparative analysis of the four Level 2 build alternatives along with a discussion of the relative performance of the
More informationWELCOME TO OUR PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT)
WELCOME TO OUR PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT) Preliminary Planning for a Transit Project Assessment November 23 rd, 24 th, 25 th, 26 th & December 2 nd, 8 th, 10 th 2009
More informationPEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP. Current Status & Next Steps
PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP Current Status & Next Steps PEACHTREE CORRIDOR PARTNERSHIP Why Peachtree? Why Now? I. THE CONTEXT High Level View of Phasing Discussion Potential Ridership Segment 3 Ease
More informationForm Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan
Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: August 30, 2006 SUBJECT: Scarborough Rt Strategic Plan RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Commission: 1. Endorse
More informationPolicy Note. Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost.
Policy Note Vanpools in the Puget Sound Region The case for expanding vanpool programs to move the most people for the least cost Recommendations 1. Saturate vanpool market before expanding other intercity
More informationOpportunities for Improved Bus Service on Finch Avenue 27 April 2011
Opportunities for Improved Bus Service on Finch Avenue 27 April 2011 Background The inclusion of Finch Avenue as one of the higher-priority applications of light rail transit (LRT) service embodied in
More informationMississauga Transit 2009 Budget
Mississauga Transit 2009 Budget Budget Committee Presentation December 2, 2008 Revenue Ridership Forecasted 2008 Total Rides Including transfers 11% growth in the last 24 months Transit Service Area Business
More informationUS 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017
US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing February 16, 2017 Project Goals Improve the quality of transit service Improve mobility opportunities and choices Enhance quality of life Support master
More informationHOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit
HOT Lanes: Congestion Relief and Better Transit Robert W. Poole, Jr. Director of Transportation Studies Reason Foundation www.reason.org/transportation Basic Thesis: Current Transportation Plans Need Rethinking
More information4. Transportation Plan
The sizes of the most suitable sites are indicated in Table 4.3.6.2. Table 4.3.6.2: Site Sizes and Potential Development Area Potential Development Site Site Size (m 2 ) Area m 2 (3 Floors) D1 29,000 87,000
More informationAttachment 5 Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update
Eglinton West LRT Planning and Technical Update 1. Introduction In July 2016, City Council approved an Eglinton West LRT with between 8 and 12 stops between Mount Dennis and Renforth Gateway, and up to
More informationMidtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Initial Screening Analysis
Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Initial Screening Analysis 7/24/2013 Prepared by the SRF Consulting Group Team for Table of Contents Purpose... 1 Initial Screening Analysis Methodology... 1 Screening...
More informationLight rail, Is New Zealand Ready for Light Rail? What is Needed in Terms of Patronage, Density and Urban Form.
Light rail, Is New Zealand Ready for Light Rail? What is Needed in Terms of Patronage, Density and Urban Form. THE PROBLEM LIGHT RAIL THE SOLUTION? INTRODUCTION Light rail transit (LRT) provides the opportunity
More informationWe Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network:
We Want Your Input! Review the design alternatives and tell us what s important to you in the design of these areas of the approved BRT Network: Richmond North of Oxford Street Richmond Row Dundas Street
More informationMEDIA RELEASE. June 16, 2008 For Immediate Release
MEDIA RELEASE June 16, 2008 For Immediate Release Recommendations to Keep Trolleys Released Alternative Proposal for Trolleys Ensures City s Sustainability The Edmonton Trolley Coalition, a non-profit
More informationMr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology
Mr. Vince Mauceri General Manager Transportation Operations and Technology METROLINX OVERVIEW AND MANDATE Established in 2006 to address the significant transportation challenges in the Greater Toronto
More information10-Year Vision Update. Vancouver City Council May 2, 2017
1 10-Year Vision Update Vancouver City Council May 2, 2017 The 10-year Vision is our Regional Blueprint for Multimodal Transportation Investments Welcome 1 million more people and 500,000 more jobs in
More informationPresentation A Blue Slides 1-5.
Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 1 Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 2 Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 3 Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 4 Presentation A Blue Slides 1-5. 5 Transit Service right. service
More informationScarborough Transit Planning
Scarborough Transit Planning April 23, 2016 Transportation Planning Section City Planning Division Overview 1. Developing Toronto s Transit Network Plan 2. Scarborough Transit Planning 1. Minutes of last
More informationACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010
ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Planning Innovations in Practice Session 6B Tuesday November 23, 2010 Presentation Outline Context t of Mississauga i City Centre Implementing Paid Parking and TDM
More informationCharlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Region Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration Legislative Committee on Urban Growth and Infrastructure Carolyn Flowers CEO Charlotte Area Transit System March 23, 2010 Charlotte Region
More informationWELCOME. Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops
WELCOME Transit Options Amherst - Buffalo Public Workshops Sponsored by Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Greater Buffalo Niagara Regional Transportation Council Where do you live? Where do you
More informationKendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study
Florida Department of Transportation District Six Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study What
More informationVictoria Regional Rapid Transit Project
Camosun College Highlands View Royal Saanich Victoria General Hospital Trans Canada Hwy. Island Hwy. Langford C.F.B. E&N Royal Roads University Esquimalt D.N.D. D.N.D. Colwood Victoria Victoria Regional
More informationPAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation
PAWG Meeting #3a Tier 1 Evaluation August 2, 2017 LYNX Central Station Open Area 1 Modes Screening 2 Trunk vs Feeder Trunk Modes High peak capacity Direct routes Feeder Modes Routing may be flexible Serve
More informationNeeds and Community Characteristics
Needs and Community Characteristics Anticipate Population and Job Growth in the City Strongest density of population and jobs in Ann Arbor are within the Study Area Population expected to grow 8.4% by
More informationWelcome. Green Line in Your Community
Welcome Green Line in Your Community Today's session will provide you with information about Administration's recommendation for connecting the Green Line in the Beltline to Victoria Park and Inglewood/Ramsay
More informationTransLink/MoTI SURREY RAPID TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PHASE 2 EVALUATION
TransLink/MoTI SURREY RAPID TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS PHASE 2 EVALUATION FINAL EVALUATION REPORT, AUGUST, 2012 In association with Hatch Mott Macdonald, Golder Associates, A. Steadman, and Coriolis
More informationIstanbul METROBUS BRT. Adapted from Presentations by World Resources Institute/EMBARQ s Sibel Koyluoglu and Dario Hidalgo
Istanbul METROBUS BRT Adapted from Presentations by World Resources Institute/EMBARQ s Sibel Koyluoglu and Dario Hidalgo Historic Istanbul Modern Istanbul Istanbul Among World s most historic and rapidly
More informationWelcome. The purpose of today s session is to:
Welcome The purpose of today s session is to: Update you on what we ve heard from the community Share the preferred Rapid Transit network solution Present the draft Rapid Transit Master Plan Representatives
More informationMETROLINX REGIONAL TRANSIT NETWORK
METROLINX REGIONAL TRANSIT NETWORK Background Paper to the Draft 2041 Regional Transportation Plan by IBI Group 2017 Draft Report Transportation Planning and Policy Work in Support of the Regional Transportation
More informationRapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality
City of Charlotte Rapid Transit and Land-Use Integration a Reality Transportation Oversight Committee Carolyn Flowers CEO Charlotte Area Transit System April 29, 2010 Charlotte Region Statistics Mecklenburg
More informationTier 2 Screening and Selection522. of the Short List Alternatives KISSIMMEE CORRIDOR. Downtown CRA. US 192 Alternatives Analysis
LAKE COUNTY ORANGE COUNTY Ticket and Transportation Center Walt Disney / Reedy Creek Improvement District CR 535 John Young Parkway 441 17 92 Florida s Turnpike VE 92 mee Hall JOHN YOUNG PKY 192 OAK ST
More informationTORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.
Revised: March/13 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: August 19, 2014 OPPORTUNITIES TO IMPROVE TRANSIT SERVICE IN TORONTO ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the
More informationKendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study
Florida Department of Transportation District Six Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study From
More informationMidtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014
Midtown Corridor Alternatives Analysis Policy Advisory Committee Meeting February 12, 2014 Today s Agenda Introductions Outreach efforts and survey results Other updates since last meeting Evaluation results
More information