1.3 OVERVIEW OF THE CORRIDOR
|
|
- Elinor Bradley
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 while the central option was a tunnel under DFW Airport. As of now, the northern access option appears to be favored. However, airport access options will continue to be studied and evaluated, and are not proposed to be part of this EIS. In October 2006, DART updated its 1995 Transit System Plan in accordance with the DART 2030 Transit System Plan. This plan reflects the latest year 2030 demographic projects from NCTCOG and identifies projects to be undertaken by DART through the year The LRT Line to Farmers Branch and Carrollton Final Environmental Impact Statement was completed in October The project received a Record of Decision (ROD) in February Final design has been completed on this 17.6 mile, double-tracked light rail extension from downtown Dallas to Carrollton. DART began construction in 2006 with operations scheduled to be phased in from 2009 through The Irving/DFW LRT Line begins north of Bachman Station on this line. 1.3 OVERVIEW OF THE CORRIDOR The transportation system in the Irving/DFW LRT Line Corridor includes a major international airport; several freeways; a tollway; a network of arterial roadways and local streets; a bus system operating daily on surface streets and freeways; a portion of a commuter rail line; two freight rail lines; and a people mover system serving the Las Colinas Urban Center. DFW International Airport, which is foreseen as the ultimate terminus of the Irving/DFW LRT Line, is one of the busiest airports in the world. According to information provided by the airport, DFW handles nearly 2,000 flights per day and serves 57 million passengers per year. The airline serves as a hub for Fort Worth-based American Airlines. The airport also has the newly-opened Skylink System automated people mover serving passengers and employees traveling between the six existing terminals. The bi-directional system has two stations at each terminal and operates during airport operating hours. A connection with this system is intended in the later phase of the LRT line. Several freeways interconnect within the project corridor. Texas Stadium serves as a focal point of the confluence of four freeways (SH 114, Loop 12, SH 183, and Spur 482). In addition, IH 35E crosses the eastern end of the alignment and SH 161 (the President George Bush Turnpike) crosses the western end of the alignment. The principal freeway in the area, SH 114 (John Carpenter Freeway), is part of a system of highways that radiates from the Dallas CBD freeway loop, and runs in a general northwest direction through the study area to the north edge of DFW Airport and rapidly-growing suburban communities such as Grapevine, Southlake, Coppell and Flower Mound. The proposed LRT line would parallel this freeway for much of its alignment. The busiest freeway within the project corridor is SH 183 (Airport Freeway), which connects north Dallas with north Fort Worth and provides access to the south entrance of DFW Airport. At the eastern end of the Irving/DFW LRT corridor, there are few arterial roadways due to the Elm Fork of the Trinity River. Towards the western end of the corridor there are more arterial roadways. A regular, grid street pattern does not exist within the corridor. The bus system currently includes two express, eight suburban circulator, one rail-feeder, and three cross-town routes in the corridor. Typically, express routes provide service to downtown Dallas, but one of the express routes is a cross-town route that provides east-west service on IH 635. The suburban circulator routes operate between transit centers in outer Dallas and in the suburbs; several of these routes serve Irving. Cross-town service into Dallas, Farmers Branch, and Carrollton is available, but cross-town service to other cities surrounding Irving does not exist as they are not DART member cities. The single rail feeder route feeds into the TRE. There is one transit center, the North Irving Transit Center, within the corridor which provides park-and-ride facilities and serves as a major bus transfer center. It is served by two express bus routes and five Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1-5
2 circulator bus routes on weekdays, and five different circulator bus routes during the weekend. DFW International Airport also operates a free terminal link van service. In addition to bus service, there is a commuter rail line operated by DART that travels just south of the corridor. The Trinity Railway Express (TRE) rail line links downtown Dallas and downtown Fort Worth. Located south of SH 183 on O Connor Road, the closest TRE station to the project corridor is the South Irving Station, which also contains a bus transfer center served by eight bus routes on weekdays. There are two active freight rail lines operating within the project corridor. One of these rail lines is now owned by DART and the other is owned by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF). Currently there are active freight operations on both of these rail lines. The primary rail line along the eastern edge of the corridor is the DART-owned UPRR line, along which construction of the new light rail line to Farmers Branch and Carrollton is proposed. The BNSF RR is a major north-south rail line that runs through the corridor. It runs through Irving and into Dallas and eventually Farmers Branch and Carrollton, where it intersects with the UPRR line. Within the Las Colinas Urban Center there is a 1.4-mile elevated people-mover system that connects several office buildings. The Las Colinas Area Personal Transit (APT) System, more commonly known as the Las Colinas people-mover, operates between 10:30 AM and 2:30 PM on weekdays and serves four stations in area office buildings. DFW International Airport operates the Skylink secure-side, elevated people-mover between existing terminals. The bi-directional system has two stations at each terminal and runs during normal airport operating hours. Existing transportation services and facilities are illustrated in Figure 1-2. The proposed Northwest LRT Line to Irving/DFW is included in the third phase of expansion to DART s LRT system. The initial phase included the 20-mile LRT Starter System that was opened in The second phase included the extensions along the North Central LRT Line to Richardson and Plano that were completed in late 2003, and the Northeast Line to Garland that was completed in late The third phase of LRT development includes the Northwest Corridor to Farmers Branch and Carrollton and the Southeast Corridor, which are in final design, as well as the Northwest LRT Line to Irving/DFW. Planned and programmed LRT improvements are shown in Figure 1-3. The Northwest Corridor LRT Line to Irving/DFW branches off of the LRT Line to Farmers Branch and Carrollton at Bachman Station, and parallels several highways, including Spur 482 and State Highway 114, as it makes its way through Irving and to DFW Airport. The corridor is linked at the south end via the Farmers Branch/Carrollton line to the Dallas Central Business District with 120,000 jobs, and a variety of employment, education, health, entertainment and residential areas. Major Activity Centers along the corridor include Texas Stadium, The University of Dallas, Las Colinas, North Lake College and DFW Airport. In addition to these Major Activity Centers there is a variety of residential, industrial and commercial uses along the proposed alignment. Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1-6
3 N MACARTHUR BLVD MOCKINGBIRD LN WEB CHAPEL RD Legend!( " # Bus Routes!( " MIDWAY RD Dallas Love Field LOVERS LN INWOOD RD DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY CEDAR SPRINGS RD VALLEY VIEW LN Trinity Railway Express Station INTERNATIONAL PKY Farmers Branch North Irving Transit Center Existing Railroads Existing DFW Skylink Existing Las Colinas APT!(" DFW International Airport TRINITY RAILWAY EXPRESS ESTERS RD!(" VALLEY VIEW LN UV 161 Cabell Dr CARBON RD NORTHGATE DR ROCHELLE RD BELT LINE RD PRESIDENT GEORGE BUSH TPKE WALNUT HILL LN IRVING BLVD STORY RD UV 114 Irving JOHN CARPENTER FWY HIDD E AIRPORT FWY MACARTHUR BLVD EN RIDG E DR N O' CONNOR RD!( " BNSF RR ROYAL LN RIVERSIDE DR # ROCHELLE BLVD &-348 LUNA RD CALIFORNIA CROSSING RD JOHN CARPENTER FWY UV 183 TOM BRANIFF DR Dallas NORTHWEST HWY ") 12 35E STOREY LN GRAUWYLER RD Elm Fork Trinity River REGAL ROW UPRR - LRT Line to Farmers Branch and Carrollton (under final design) &-482 HARRY HINES BLVD ") 12 BROO NORTHHAVEN RD WALNUT HILL LN DENTON DR KHOLLOW LE A D 35E Harry Hines Blvd Sh orecrest UV 354 MARSH LN IRVING BLVD Source: Parsons, 2005; DART 2005 Figure 1-2 NW Corridor LRT Line to Irving/DFW 0 4,000 8,000 16,000 Environmental Impact Statement Feet Existing Transportation Services and Facilities
4
5 1.3.1 Population and Employment The Dallas/Ft. Worth region is growing at a tremendous pace, placing significant demands on the transportation system. Population in the region is forecast to grow by almost 80% between 2000 and Employment in the region is forecast to grow by almost 72% in this same time period. Growth within the area within one-half mile of the proposed LRT alignment will be strong as well, especially in terms of employment. In 2000, employment in the vicinity of the proposed alignment outnumbered population by over 41,600 jobs. In 2025, the surplus of jobs over population in this same area is expected to grow to more than 87,200. When the area is expanded to include the entire Las Colinas and DFW Airport areas, the surplus of jobs over population in 2030 jumps to 272,300. Current population and employment and forecast growth are shown in Table 1-1. TABLE 1-1 FORECAST POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH Population Employment Area % Difference % Difference DFW Region 2 5,067,400 9,107, % 3,158,200 5,416, % Dallas County 2,232,476 2,817, % 1,745,100 2,529, % City of Dallas 1,202,592 1,404, % 1,038,314 1,390, % City of Irving 196, , % 165, , % DFW Airport Area 4,962 4, % 48,785 85, % Las Colinas Area 25,066 38, % 77, , % Irving/DFW Alignment 3 16,473 21, % 58, , % 1 NCTCOG estimate adjusted from 2000 Census count; does not include group quarters 2 Ten-county region as defined by NCTCOG 3 Defined as the geographic area within one-half mile of the proposed LRT alignment and based on NCTCOG Traffic Survey Zone data Source: NCTCOG 2030 Demographic Forecast, Travel Patterns and Congestion The primary flow of traffic within the corridor is north and south along the major arterials within Irving (Belt Line Road, MacArthur Boulevard, and O Connor Boulevard), and northwest and southeast along the central freeway of the corridor, SH 114, as well as Spur 348 (Northwest Highway). SH 114 and Spur 348 exhibit traditional commuter traffic patterns in that most traffic is traveling southeast towards Dallas during the AM peak, and most is traveling northwest away from Dallas during the PM peak. However, the Las Colinas Urban Center is a center of employment within the corridor which causes some reverse commuting on SH 114 between Las Colinas and Dallas. Finally, SH 161 (the President George Bush Turnpike) provides a cross-town route, which is an alternative to the more heavily traveled IH 35E when traveling from IH 635 to SH 183 or the south DFW Airport entrance. Traffic volumes in the Dallas urbanized area are considered some of the highest in Texas. The project corridor is bounded on the east by IH 35E, which carries an average of 226,000 vehicles per day north of the corridor. In addition, the project corridor is just south of IH 635 (LBJ Freeway) which, when it travels through north Dallas, carries the highest volumes of traffic in the Dallas urbanized area with approximately 300,000 vehicles per day. The busiest freeway in the project corridor is SH 183 which carries an average of 177,000 vehicles per day near Texas Stadium. SH 114 carries an average of 86,000 to 100,000 vehicles per day, and SH 161 carries an average of 35,000 to 47,000 vehicles per day. Traffic volumes on most of the arterial roadways in the study corridor are also high, with some carrying over 30,000 vehicles per day. Along many of these major arterial roadways, high traffic volumes contribute to congestion delays. The high volume-tocapacity ratios on many of these arterials result in unacceptable traffic operating conditions as defined by local and national standards. Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1-9
6 Historically, traffic volumes on Dallas freeways have increased five to ten percent per year between 1995 and Growth slowed in the first years of this decade due to a general economic recession, but is expected to increase again through the year Within the project corridor, traffic volumes on the mature freeways (IH 35E, Loop 12, and Spur 482) are projected to grow at about one percent per year, while traffic volumes on SH 114 are projected to grow at about four percent per year. With the connection of SH 161 to the main portion of President George Bush Turnpike being opened in late 2005, traffic on this section of the turnpike will increase rapidly in the next few years. The traffic volume statistics for the major roadways serving the corridor are listed in Table 1-2. These statistics include the existing traffic volumes, existing levels of service, projected 2030 traffic volumes, and their projected 2030 levels of service. The level of service is a measure of the relative delay and congestion experienced on a roadway, with level of service A being the best, and anything worse than level of service D being unacceptable. TABLE 1-2 EXISTING AND PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1 Roadway Location Freeways ADT 2 LOS 3 ADT 2 LOS 3 %Change IH 35E (Stemmons Freeway) South of Spur E 170 E Spur 482 (Storey Lane) East of IH 35E 54 C 72 C Loop 12 (Walton Walker Freeway) North of SH E 194 F SH 114 (John Carpenter Freeway) North of Spur D E South of Spur E F SH 161 (Pres. George Bush Tpke.) Valley View to Beltline 47 4 B F Arterials Riverside Drive Teleport to O Connor 6 B 11 B O Connor to Spur C 27 D O Connor Boulevard West of Riverside 25 D 13 B Spur 348 (Northwest Highway) Loop 12 to Luna Road 36 E 54 F O Connor to SH E 38 F Hidden Ridge Dr. West of SH B 18 C Walnut Hill Lane SH 114 to MacArthur 15 B 18 C East of Belt Line Rd. 22 C 27 D Belt Line Road South of Valley View 32 E 41 F Along major roadways paralleling and crossing the proposed LRT alignment 2 ADT = Average Daily Traffic volume (in thousands). All freeway traffic counts were collected in 2003, all arterial traffic counts were collected in 2003 or LOS = Level of Service, a measure of traffic flow and delay. LOS A is free flow/no delays, LOS F is congested/long delays. Level of Service determined by NCTCOG. 4 Includes traffic on main lanes and frontage roads Source: Parsons Transportation Group, NCTCOG Existing Transit Conditions The Irving/DFW LRT corridor is served by a network of 14 bus routes. The bus routes traveling through the study corridor have a total average ridership of more than 220,000 passengers each month, almost 91 percent of which use the system on weekdays. These routes account for about seven percent of DART s total system-wide bus ridership. The two highest ridership routes are actually suburb-to-suburb services which travel between the North Irving Transit Center and the City of Garland. Several types of transit use occur within the corridor. Some transit users drive to a park-and-ride lot and board a bus bound for downtown Dallas, a cross-town destination, or destinations within the corridor. Other transit users walk to bus stops near their homes and board the bus bound for their place of employment. Depending on their destination, some of these latter transit users may use the transit center to transfer from one bus route to another in order to reach their final destination. Finally, some transit users use the commuter rail that travels just south of the corridor. These users Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1-10
7 are primarily long-haul commuters who drive to the park-and-ride lot in south Irving and ride the train into downtown Dallas or downtown Fort Worth. The first type of transit user described above is usually a resident of the northwestern suburbs of Dallas who would rather drive just part of the way towards their employment destination and use the transit system for the remainder of it. These transit users are likely using the system to reach employment centers in and around downtown Dallas. As residential development increases within the corridor and to the northwest and as employment opportunities increase in and around downtown Dallas, more and more long-haul commuters will likely choose the park-and-ride option rather than driving in the increasing traffic congestion that will likely occur on highways leading into Dallas. The second type of transit user described above is usually a transit-dependent person who does not have access to an automobile. DART s transit system enables these people to work at employment centers all over the Dallas area that would normally be accessible only to someone with an automobile. This allows transit-dependent people living in the corridor to work outside the corridor, and vice versa. Considering the large amount of employment within the study corridor, DART s transit system is very important to the economic vitality of the corridor. It provides job opportunities for people from all areas and demographics, and it provides employers with a wider range of the labor pool. As employment opportunities increase within the corridor and transitdependent residential development increases, the transit system will become even more important to employers and employees alike. The third type of transit user often prefers the speed and reliability of a train over other forms of transportation. The implementation of a light rail will provide increased opportunities for this type of transit user. 1.4 NEED FOR ACTION Current and projected travel patterns, levels of roadway congestion, growth in population and employment in the region and in the corridor require that the proposed project be built in order to address the need for transportation improvements. The need for transportation improvements is illustrated by the following: The Dallas-Fort Worth region is currently (as of April 2005) designated as a Serious nonattainment area for 1-Hour Ozone and a Moderate non-attainment area for 8-Hour Ozone by the Environmental Protection Agency; The entire study area falls within a region identified for the year 2030 as an area of severe peak-period congestion by the Mobility 2025 Plan (Amended April 2005) produced by the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG); Existing and planned roadway improvements are insufficient to meet the demand within this corridor; Travel time delay and congestion levels in the corridor are increasing; and A significant amount of employment and population growth is forecast for the corridor Specific Transportation Needs in the Corridor The SH 114 corridor, bounded by IH 35 E (Stemmons Freeway) on the east and The George Bush Turnpike (SH 161) on the west, is an important and growing employment center featuring highdensity, mixed-use developments like Las Colinas and major educational facilities such as The Draft Environmental Impact Statement 1-11
4.0 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
4.0 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS This chapter describes the anticipated transportation impacts of the No-Build and LRT Alternative. The evaluation is based upon the anticipated travel demand, transportation
More informationTABLE 4-4 DAILY LRT ALTERNATIVE STATION PASSENGER VOLUMES IN 2030
Station Volumes and Boardings/Alightings The stations proposed for the LRT Alternative were selected due to their proximity to population and employment centers, major existing transportation facilities,
More informationExecutive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1
Executive Summary Introduction The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project is a vital public transit infrastructure investment that would provide a transit connection to the existing Metro Gold Line
More informationStation Evaluation Summary
Station Evaluation Summary Preferred Site Location 10/1/00 Loop 1 Station Points 70 Key Issues: Potential Master Plan Development suggests a strong economic development potential for the larger property
More informationProposed Program of Interrelated Projects
DALLAS AREA RAPID TRANSIT Proposed Program of Interrelated Projects Federal Transit Administration Capital Investment Program Summer 204 INTRODUCTION The current federal transportation bill, Moving Ahead
More informationBi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis
Bi-County Transitway/ Bethesda Station Access Demand Analysis Prepared for: Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Office of Planning and Project Development May 2005 Prepared by: in conjunction
More informationSpeaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS
Making the Case for Transit: the Transit Competitiveness Index Title William E. Walter, GISP Speaker Information Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS Understanding Conditions in Each Travel Market
More informationUS 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting March 14, 2013 Introductions ODOT FHWA SAIC Meeting Purpose Present need for bypass Provide responses to 10/04/11 public meeting comments
More informationTXDOT PLANNING CONFERENCE. Quincy D. Allen, P.E. Houston District Engineer June 16, 2016
TXDOT PLANNING CONFERENCE Quincy D. Allen, P.E. Houston District Engineer June 16, 2016 Welcome to Houston Show video...http://youtu.be/knchpl8sdfu Population Growth in Texas Texas added 1.3 million people
More informationClick to edit Master title style
Nelson/Nygaard Consulting Associates SERVICE IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES September 22, 2015 1 PROJECT OVERVIEW & WORK TO DATE 1. Extensive stakeholder involvement Throughout 2. System and market assessment
More informationNORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP)
NORTH HOUSTON HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (NHHIP) Project Overview Briefing Packet March 2017 PROJECT OVERVIEW Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Project divided into 3 Segments Segment 1: Beltway 8
More informationTravel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG
Travel Demand Modeling at NCTCOG Arash Mirzaei North Central Texas Council Of Governments for Southern Methodist University The ASCE Student Chapter October 24, 2005 Contents NCTCOG DFW Regional Model
More informationNorth Central Texas Council of Governments 209
16. Regional Rail and Bus Transit Systems INTRODUCTION The Regional Rail and Bus Transit Systems chapter of Mobility 2030: The Metropolitan Transportation Plan for the Dallas-Fort Worth Area includes information
More information2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS
2 EXISTING ROUTE STRUCTURE AND SERVICE LEVELS In the Study Area, as in most of the Metro Transit network, there are two distinct route structures. The base service structure operates all day and the peak
More informationDFW HSR Station Plans People Movers Hyperloop
DFW HSR Station Plans People Movers Hyperloop Transit-Oriented Development Task Force Meeting May 1, 2018 Automated Transportation Systems (People Movers) Traditional People Movers Fixed, Closed Guideways
More informationPHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)
PHILADELPHIA SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL) October 2003 The Philadelphia commuter rail service area consists of 5.1 million people, spread over 1,800 square miles at an average population
More informationGreen Line Long-Term Investments
Enhancements Short-term improvements to keep Austin moving. Investments Long-term projects to support our future. Mobility Hubs MetroRapid MetroRail MetroExpress Connectors Circulators Project Connect
More informationI-820 (East) Project Description. Fort Worth District. Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange
I-820 (East) Project Description Fort Worth District Reconstruct Southern I-820/SH 121 Interchange I-820 from approximately 2,000 feet north of Pipeline Road/Glenview Drive to approximately 3,200 feet
More informationEUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT
EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT (BRIEF) Table of Contents EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON (USA)... 1 COUNTY CONTEXT AND SYSTEM DESCRIPTION... 1 SYSTEM OVERVIEW... 1 PLANNING
More informationTAP PHASE 3.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TAP PHASE 3.2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction In 2002 the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) launched the Thoroughfare Assessment Program (TAP), the goal of which has been to reduce vehicular
More informationSouth Dallas-Waxahachie Corridor Strategy Meeting. June 2, 2009
South Dallas-Waxahachie Corridor Strategy Meeting June 2, 2009 Project Mission Provide additional transportation choices connecting major activity centers in Dallas County and Ellis County by efficiently
More information5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS
5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS When the METRO Green Line LRT begins operating in mid-2014, a strong emphasis will be placed on providing frequent connecting bus service with Green Line trains. Bus hours
More informationAlpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study
Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1
More informationMetroExpress Improvements
Improvements Enhancements Short-term improvements to keep Austin moving. Investments Long-term projects to support our future. Mobility Hubs MetroRapid MetroRail Commuters Connectors Circulators Project
More informationDART Capital Program Update
DART Capital Program Update CMAA North Texas April 30, 2015 David Ehrlicher Assistant Vice President, Program Delivery Overview of DART System Multimodal System: 120 + bus routes 90 miles of Light Rail
More informationNICTI Alternatives Analysis
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Development of Detailed Alternatives Report Prepared for: Northern Illinois Commuter Transportation Initiative City of Rockford, Illinois Prepared by: 222 South Riverside Plaza, Suite
More information2016 Congestion Report
2016 Congestion Report Metropolitan Freeway System May 2017 2016 Congestion Report 1 Table of Contents Purpose and Need...3 Introduction...3 Methodology...4 2016 Results...5 Explanation of Percentage Miles
More informationNew Jersey Turnpike Authority Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program
New Jersey Turnpike Authority Interchange 6 to 9 Widening Program Tuesday, September 18, 2007 Public Hearings: Time: 5:00 PM - 8:00 PM Wednesday, September 19, 2007 Senior Center 3 Municipal Drive Bordentown,
More informationTAP PHASE 3.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TAP PHASE 3.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction In 2002 the North Central Texas Council of Governments (NCTCOG) launched the Thoroughfare Assessment Program (TAP), the goal of which has been to reduce vehicular
More informationMetropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report
Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report Metro District Office of Operations and Maintenance Regional Transportation Management Center May 2014 Table of Contents PURPOSE AND NEED... 1 INTRODUCTION...
More informationChallenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007
EAST-WEST CORRIDOR Challenges in a Post-Katrina Environment East-West Corridor Project Overview February, 2007 Presentation Agenda Project Overview / Purpose and Need Highway Component Transit Component
More informationProposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10
I 35 ROADWAY Proposed Project I 35 Improvements from SH 195 to I 10 The existing I 35 facility from State Highway 195 (SH 195) north of Georgetown to Interstate 10 (I 10) in San Antonio varies from four
More informationEscondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT
Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for Phelps Program Management 420 Sixth Avenue, Greeley, CO 80632 Prepared by 5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite
More informationHelp shape your community investment in Wake Transit. Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary
Help shape your community investment in Wake Transit Fiscal Year 2019 Draft Work Plan Summary Wake County, growth and transit The Triangle is one of the fastest-growing regions in the nation. Wake County
More informationWhat is the Connector?
What is the Connector? The Connector is a plan for a high-capacity transit system from northeast to south Ann Arbor, connecting major destinations including downtown, commercial, and residential areas,
More informationRail~Volution 2005 Hal Ryan Johnson, AICP, Bus Rapid Transit Project Manager Utah Transit Authority September 7, 2005
Rail~Volution 2005 Hal Ryan Johnson, AICP, Bus Rapid Transit Project Manager Utah Transit Authority September 7, 2005 Public Transit District Utah Transit Authority Linear Geographic Area - 130 miles by
More informationNEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL)
NEW YORK SUBURBAN RAIL SUMMARY (COMMUTER RAIL, REGIONAL RAIL) October 2003 New York: The New York commuter rail service area consists of 20.3 million people, spread over 4,700 square miles at an average
More informationLeadership NC. November 8, 2018
v Leadership NC November 8, 2018 Planning for our region s growth The Triangle is one of the fastestgrowing regions in the nation. More than 2 million people are already part of the equation, and the
More informationis being pushed by the locomotive, which reduces the number of seats in that car.
Commuter rail is passenger rail service that is designed to transport large volumes of passengers over long distances in a fast and comfortable manner. The primary market for commuter rail service is usually
More informationTravel Forecasting Methodology
Travel Forecasting Methodology Introduction This technical memorandum documents the travel demand forecasting methodology used for the SH7 BRT Study. This memorandum includes discussion of the following:
More informationValley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014
Valley Metro Overview ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014 Valley Metro Who Are We? Operate Regional Transit Services Valley Metro and Phoenix are region s primary service providers Light Rail and
More informationDART Priorities Overview
City of Dallas Transportation and Trinity River Project Committee DART Priorities Overview Gary C. Thomas President/Executive Director August 10, 2015 City of Dallas Transportation & Trinity River Committee
More informationTroost Corridor Transit Study
Troost Corridor Transit Study May 23, 2007 Kansas City Area Transportation Authority Agenda Welcome Troost Corridor Planning Study Public participation What is MAX? Survey of Troost Riders Proposed Transit
More informationParking Management Element
Parking Management Element The State Transportation Planning Rule, adopted in 1991, requires that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) area implement, through its member jurisdictions, a parking
More informationITEM 9 Information October 19, Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment
ITEM 9 Information October 19, 2016 Briefing on the Performance Analysis of the Draft 2016 CLRP Amendment Staff Recommendation: Issues: Background: Receive briefing None The board will be briefed on a
More informationDevelop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional
Project Overview TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WHAT ARE THE PROJECT GOALS? Transportation transportation hub. Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional Land Use
More informationSTH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report
#233087 v3 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report Washington County Public Works Committee Meeting September 28, 2016 1 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Hartford Area Development
More informationMETRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options
METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options Bloomington City Council Work Session November 18, 2013 Christina Morrison BRT/Small Starts Project Office Coordinating Planning and Design AMERICAN
More informationPublic Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development
Public Meeting City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development Funded by Regional Transportation Authority September 12, 2011 In partnership with Presentation
More informationV03. APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August Green Line LRT
V03 APTA Multimodal Operations Planning Workshop August 2016 Green Line LRT 2 Presentation Outline Past Present Future 3 16/03/2016 RouteAhead Update 4 4 16/03/2016 RouteAhead Update 5 5 16/03/2016 6 6
More informationSubmission to Greater Cambridge City Deal
What Transport for Cambridge? 2 1 Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal By Professor Marcial Echenique OBE ScD RIBA RTPI and Jonathan Barker Introduction Cambridge Futures was founded in 1997 as a
More informationCITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6
2016 2019 CITY OF LONDON STRATEGIC MULTI-YEAR BUDGET ADDITIONAL INVESTMENTS BUSINESS CASE # 6 STRATEGIC AREA OF FOCUS: SUB-PRIORITY: STRATEGY: INITIATIVE: INITIATIVE LEAD(S): BUILDING A SUSTAINABLE CITY
More informationUTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis. Board Workshop January 6, 2018
UTA Transportation Equity Study and Staff Analysis Board Workshop January 6, 2018 1 Executive Summary UTA ranks DART 6 th out of top 20 Transit Agencies in the country for ridership. UTA Study confirms
More informationTHE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE
THE WAY WE MOVE LRT FOR EVERYONE 2 LRT for Everyone LRT FOR EVERYONE Light rail is about more than transit; it s about transforming Edmonton. As the city grows, so do its transportation needs. LRT is an
More informationMadison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans
Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study Proposed BRT Operations Plans This paper presents a description of the proposed BRT operations plan for use in the Madison BRT Transit Corridor Study. The objective is
More informationLetter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a
Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island Page 1 No comments n/a Page 2 Response to comment EL652 1 Section 4.5.3 of the Final EIS presents the range of potential impacts of the project. This project also lists
More informationD2 - CBD Second Alignment
D2 - CBD Second Alignment Joint Meeting of DART Board of Directors/City of Dallas Transportation and Trinity River Project Council Committee 28 October 2013 Steve Salin, AICP Vice President, Rail Planning
More informationKenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM)
Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee (KRM) Commuter Rail #147925 November 6, 2009 1 Guidance of KRM Commuter Rail Studies Intergovernmental Partnership Technical Steering Committee Temporary and Limited Authority
More informationPurpose and Need Report
Purpose and Need Report State Highway (SH) 29 From Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 Williamson County, Texas (CSJ: 0337-02-045) Prepared by Blanton & Associates, Inc. Date: November, 2015 The environmental
More informationREGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SETTING
CIRCULATION ELEMENT WHITE PAPER NO. 1 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SETTING INTRODUCTION According to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), by 2030 the six- County region will be home to
More informationBackground Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study
Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study Questions Overview of Existing Service Q. Why is the study being conducted? A. The 29 Lines provide an important connection between Annandale and
More informationTarrant County Projected Population Growth
Based on the information provided in the preceding chapters, it is apparent that there are a number of issues that must be addressed as The T works to develop an excellent transit system for Fort Worth
More information3.1 Introduction Transportation Elements and Study Area Meeting the Need for the Project
Chapter 3 Transportation Environment and Consequences 3. Introduction This chapter summarizes the characteristics of the transportation system in the East Link Project vicinity and discusses potential
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 2018 What is the More MARTA Atlanta program? The More MARTA Atlanta program is a collaborative partnership between MARTA and the City of Atlanta to develop and implement a program
More informationSERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES
VTA TRANSIT SUSTAINABILITY POLICY: APPENDIX A SERVICE DESIGN GUIDELINES Adopted February 2007 COMMUNITYBUS LOCALBUS EXPRESSBUS BUSRAPIDTRANSIT LIGHTRAILTRANSIT STATIONAREAS S A N T A C L A R A Valley Transportation
More informationRTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis
RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis Overall Model and Scenario Assumptions The Puget Sound Regional Council s (PSRC) regional travel demand model was used to forecast travel
More informationPROPOSAL OF HIGH CAPACITY URBANAUT PUGET SOUND REGIONAL MONORAIL MASTERPLAN WASHINGTON STATE, USA
PROPOSAL OF HIGH CAPACITY URBANAUT PUGET SOUND REGIONAL MONORAIL MASTERPLAN WASHINGTON STATE, USA Not to be copied in part without reference to author Urbanaut Company Inc. Monorail Tel: 425 434-6570 Fax:
More informationProject Scoping Report Appendix B Project Web Site. APPENDIX B Project Web Site
Project Scoping Report Appendix B Project Web Site APPENDIX B Project Web Site WESTSIDE EXTENSION TRANSIT CORRIDOR STUDY February 4, 2008 News and Info of 1 http://metro.net/projects_programs/westside/news_info.htm#topofpage
More information4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES
4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES The Tier 2 Alternatives represent the highest performing Tier 1 Alternatives. The purpose of the Tier 2 Screening was to identify the LPA utilizing a more robust list of evaluation
More informationWest Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor. Informational Briefing Gateway Cities Service Council April 13, 2017
West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Informational Briefing Gateway Cities Service Council April 13, 2017 Project Study Area 98 square miles 20 individual cities plus unincorporated LA County 1.2 million
More informationEast San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor. TAC Briefing December 4, 2013
East San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor TAC Briefing December 4, 2013 Overview Measure R Project Long Range Transportation Plan Reserves $170.1 Million 2018 Revenue Operations Date Coordination with
More informationTHE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES. Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner
THE WILSHIRE CORRIDOR: RAIL AND ITS ALTERNATIVES Prepared By: Jacki Murdock Transportation and Environmental Planner December 13 th, 2012 Overview Characteristics of Wilshire Boulevard Overview of the
More informationOpen House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition
Welcome Meetings 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. - Open House Why is Highway 212 Project Important? Important Arterial Route Local Support Highway 212
More informationWAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018
WAKE TRANSIT PLAN Summer 2018 Planning for growth WAKE COUNTY s population already exceeds ONE MILLION and grows by more than 60 people a day. That s 23,000 people a year or basically another Morrisville.
More informationCLRP. Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP. Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION TRANSPORTATION PLANNING BOARD Item 12 CLRP Financially Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan For the National Capital Region 2014 Performance Analysis of The Draft 2014 CLRP
More informationRocky Mount. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation
2020 Transportation Plan Developed by the Transportation Planning Division of the Virginia Department of Transportation in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
More informationFigure 2-14: Existing Bus Routing at Irwindale Station
494 W oothill Blvd 69 N Irwindale Ave 185 Irwindale E 1st St 3 6 feet igure 2-14: Existing Bus Routing at Irwindale 39 Proposed Bus Route 494 W oothill Blvd Proposed Discontinued Bus Route Proposed New
More information2 VALUE PROPOSITION VALUE PROPOSITION DEVELOPMENT
2 VALUE PROPOSITION The purpose of the Value Proposition is to define a number of metrics or interesting facts that clearly demonstrate the value of the existing Xpress system to external audiences including
More informationTORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.
Form Revised: February 2005 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: October 24, 2012 SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN RAPID TRANSIT EXPANSION STUDY (DRTES) PHASE 1 STRATEGIC PLAN ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATIONS
More informationChapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle
Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis Chapter 8 Plan Scenarios LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle 164 Chapter 8: Plan Scenarios Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP
More informationIH 45 (GULF FWY) IH 10 (Katy Fwy) to IH 610 S (South Loop) 2010 Rank: Rank: 12
Mobility Investment Priorities Project Houston IH 45 IH 45 (GULF FWY) IH 10 (Katy Fwy) to IH 610 S (South Loop) Current Conditions From IH 10 to IH 610 south, IH 45 is a 6- to 9-lane facility with three
More informationThe major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:
3.5 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.1.1 Street Network DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown
More informationANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS
ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS Introduction The Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) initiated a feasibility study in the fall of 2012 to evaluate the need for transit service expansion
More informationChicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor
Chicago Milwaukee Intercity Passenger Rail Corridor Past, Present, and Future Arun Rao, Passenger Rail Manager Wisconsin Department of Transportation Elliot Ramos, Passenger Rail Engineer Illinois Department
More informationTRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS
Jiangxi Ji an Sustainable Urban Transport Project (RRP PRC 45022) TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS A. Introduction 1. The purpose of the travel demand forecasts is to assess the impact of the project components
More informationStation Evaluation. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project Spring 2012
Station Evaluation Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project Spring 2012 Key Ingredients for Station Development Platform Designs UNC Hospitals Station The UNC Hospitals Station Option D would be the westerly
More informationMetro Green Line to LAX Alternatives Analysis. March 2012
Metro Green Line to LAX Alternatives Analysis 1 2 The Crenshaw/LAX Project Foundation for Metro Green Line to LAX 8.5 mile extension Metro Exposition Line (Crenshaw Exposition) to Metro Green Line (Aviation/LAX
More informationSUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES SCOPING OF ALTERNATIVES GATEWAY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS AT PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES SCOPING OF ALTERNATIVES GATEWAY CORRIDOR ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS A second series of four public open houses was held for the Gateway Corridor Alternatives Analysis
More informationQUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT I O N S TAT I O N
QUALITY OF LIFE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REPORT UN I O N S TAT I O N T R AV E L by TR A I N Published September 2017 2015 PROGRESS MAP This document reports FasTracks progress through 2015 BACKGROUND RTD The
More informationPUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS FM 664 / OVILLA ROAD WIDENING & IMPROVEMENTS FM 664 / OVILLA ROAD CONNECTS US 287 WITH I-45 (SOURCE: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. 2016 FM 664 / OVILLA ROAD WIDENING
More informationNortheast Corridor Alternatives Analysis. Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study
Northeast Corridor Alternatives Analysis Public Involvement Round 2 Input on Alternatives for Further Study Feb. 7-9, 2012 Agenda Review project background Progress summary Recommended alternatives for
More informationExecutive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.
Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009 Background As the Treasure Valley continues to grow, high-quality transportation connections
More informationMountainland Association of Governments SPRINGVILLE-SPANISH FORK AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY APRIL 2012
Mountainland Association of Governments SPRINGVILLE-SPANISH FORK AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY APRIL 2012 PLANNING FOR OUR FUTURE Planners with the Mountainland Association of Governments (MAG) have evaluated
More informationComprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS
Comprehensive Regional Goods Movement Plan and Implementation Strategy Goods Movement in the 2012 RTP/SCS Annie Nam Southern California Association of Governments September 24, 2012 The Goods Movement
More informationDallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Cotton Belt Regional Rail Project
Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) Cotton Belt Regional Rail Project Kick-Off Meeting - Richardson and Plano Community Stakeholders Richardson Civic Center March 28, 2019 0 How to Stay Informed Visit www.dart.org/cottonbelt
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY
APPENDIX 1 DEVELOPMENT OF RIDERSHIP FORECASTS FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT STUDY INTRODUCTION: This Appendix presents a general description of the analysis method used in forecasting
More informationHighway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary
Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County Executive Summary October 2014 Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County Executive Summary October 2014 Prepared
More information1.0 Introduction 1.0 Introduction
1.0 Introduction 1.0 Introduction DART RAIL TO ROWLETT Connecting Communities 1.0 INTRODUCTION DART s Northeast Corridor Major Investment Study (MIS) 1995 identified cost-effective solutions to meet the
More informationSherman Oaks Community Traffic Plan
Sherman Oaks is a community that is geographically bound by the Santa Monica mountains on its southern boundary, and the ever-expanding San Fernando Valley on its western, northern, and eastern boundaries.
More informationAlternatives Analysis Findings Report
6.0 This chapter presents estimates of the potential capital, operations and maintenance costs associated with the alternatives carried forward for detailed evaluation. The methodology used to develop
More information