NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons The University of Texas at Tyler
|
|
- Anastasia Flowers
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some cells appear to contain truncated text or misplaced line breaks. This is due to differences in Excel between on-screen display and what appears in print or PDF.
2 IPEDS:
3 About This Report The Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons report presents item-by-item student responses and statistical comparisons that allow you to examine patterns of similarity and difference between your students and those at your comparison group institutions. The report uses information from all randomly selected or census-administered students. The display below highlights important details in the report to keep in mind when interpreting your results. For more information please visit our website (nsse.indiana.edu) or contact a member of the NSSE team. 1. Class level: As reported by your institution. 2. Item numbers: Numbering corresponds to the survey facsimile included in your Institutional Report and available on the NSSE website and variable names: Survey items are in the same order and wording as they appear on the instrument. names are included for easy reference to your data file and codebook Values and response options: Values are used to calculate means. Response options are worded as they appear on the instrument. Count and column percentage (%): The Count column contains the number of students who selected the corresponding response option. The column percentage is the weighted percentage of students selecting the corresponding response option Note: Column percentages and statistics are weighted by institutionreported sex and enrollment status. Comparison group statistics are also weighted by institutional size. Counts are unweighted and cannot be used to replicate column percentages. For details visit: nsse.indiana.edu/html/weighting.cfm Statistical comparisons: Items with mean differences that are larger than would be expected by chance are noted with asterisks referring to three significance levels (*p <.05, **p <.01, ***p <.001). Significance levels indicate the probability that an observed difference is due to chance. Statistical significance does not guarantee the result is substantive or important. Large sample sizes tend to generate more statistically significant results even though the magnitude of mean differences may be inconsequential. Consult effect sizes (see #7) to judge the practical meaning of differences. Unless otherwise noted, statistical comparisons are two-tailed independent t -tests. Exceptions are items 11 a-f which are compared using a z -test. 7. size: size indicates practical significance. An effect size of.2 is often considered small,.5 moderate, and.8 large. A positive effect size indicates that your institution s mean was greater than that of the comparison group, thus showing a favorable result for your institution. A negative effect size indicates your institution lags behind the comparison group, suggesting that the student behavior or institutional practice represented by the item may warrant attention. sizes for independent t -tests use Cohen's d; z -tests use Cohen's h. Cohen's d is calculated by dividing the mean difference by the pooled standard deviation. Cohen's h is calculated by taking the difference in the proportion of students who responded Done or in progress after the proportion has been transformed using a non-linear (arcsine) transformation. See: Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition). New York: Psychology Press. 8. Key to symbols: Your students average was significantly higher (p <.05) with an effect size at least.3 in magnitude. Your students average was significantly higher (p <.05) with an effect size less than.3 in magnitude. Your students average was significantly lower (p <.05) with an effect size less than.3 in magnitude. Your students average was significantly lower (p <.05) with an effect size at least.3 in magnitude. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 3
4 Note: It is important to interpret the direction of differences relative to item wording and your institutional context. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 4
5 First-Year Students 1. During the current school year, about how often have you done the following? a. Asked questions or askquest 1 Never contributed to course 2 Sometimes , , , discussions in other ways Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean 3 Often , , *** * **.29 4 Very often Total , , , b. Prepared two or more drafts 1 Never drafts of a paper or 2 Sometimes , , assignment before turning it in 3 Often * ** Very often Total , , , c. Come to class without unpreparedr 1 Very often completing readings or (Reverse-coded 2 Often assignments version of 3 Sometimes , , , unprepared created by NSSE.) 4 Never Total , , , d. Attended an art exhibit, attendart 1 Never , , , play, or other arts 2 Sometimes , , performance (dance, music, etc.) 3 Often *** *** *** Very often Total , , , e. Asked another student CLaskhelp 1 Never to help you understand 2 Sometimes , , course material 3 Often , , * * Very often Total , , , f. Explained course CLexplain 1 Never material to one or more 2 Sometimes , , students Your first-year students compared with 3 Often , , * ** Very often Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 5
6 First-Year Students g. Prepared for exams by CLstudy 1 Never discussing or working 2 Sometimes , , through course material with other students Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean 3 Often , , * ** Very often Total , , , h. Worked with other CLproject 1 Never students on course 2 Sometimes , , projects or assignments 3 Often , , ** *.19 4 Very often Total , , , i. Given a course present 1 Never presentation 2 Sometimes , , During the current school year, about how often have you done the following? 3 Often *** Very often Total , , , a. Combined ideas from RIintegrate 1 Never different courses when 2 Sometimes , , , completing assignments 3 Often , , Very often Total , , , b. Connected your RIsocietal 1 Never learning to societal 2 Sometimes , , problems or issues 3 Often , , Very often Total , , , c. Included diverse RIdiverse 1 Never perspectives (political, 2 Sometimes , , religious, racial/ethnic, gender, etc.) in course discussions or assignments 3 Often , * Very often Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 6
7 First-Year Students Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean d. Examined the strengths RIownview 1 Never and weaknesses of 2 Sometimes , , your own views on a topic or issue 3 Often , , , Very often Total , , , e. Tried to better RIperspect 1 Never understand someone 2 Sometimes else's views by imagining how an issue 3 Often , , , looks from their 4 Very often perspective Total , , , f. Learned something that RInewview 1 Never changed the way you 2 Sometimes understand an issue or concept 3 Often , , , Very often Total , , , g. Connected ideas from RIconnect 1 Never your courses to your 2 Sometimes prior experiences and knowledge 3 Often , , , Very often During the current school year, about how often have you done the following? Total , , , a. Talked about career SFcareer 1 Never plans with a faculty 2 Sometimes , , member 3 Often Very often Total , , , b. Worked with a faculty SFotherwork 1 Never , , , member on activities 2 Sometimes other than coursework (committees, student 3 Often groups, etc.) 4 Very often Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 7
8 First-Year Students Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean c. Discussed course SFdiscuss 1 Never , , topics, ideas, or 2 Sometimes , , concepts with a faculty member outside of 3 Often class 4 Very often Total , , , d. Discussed your SFperform 1 Never academic performance 2 Sometimes , , with a faculty member 3 Often Very often Total , , , During the current school year, how much has your coursework emphasized the following? a. Memorizing course memorize 1 Very little material 2 Some Quite a bit , , , Very much Total , , , b. Applying facts, HOapply 1 Very little theories, or methods to 2 Some practical problems or new situations 3 Quite a bit , , , Very much Total , , , c. Analyzing an idea, HOanalyze 1 Very little experience, or line of 2 Some reasoning in depth by examining its parts 3 Quite a bit , , Very much Total , , , d. Evaluating a point of HOevaluate 1 Very little view, decision, or 2 Some information source 3 Quite a bit , , , Very much Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 8
9 First-Year Students Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean e. Forming a new idea or HOform 1 Very little understanding from 2 Some various pieces of information 3 Quite a bit , , , Very much During the current school year, to what extent have your instructors done the following? Total , , , a. Clearly explained ETgoals 1 Very little course goals and 2 Some requirements 3 Quite a bit , , , * ** *.23 4 Very much Total , , , b. Taught course sessions ETorganize 1 Very little in an organized way 2 Some Quite a bit , , Very much Total , , , c. Used examples or ETexample 1 Very little illustrations to explain 2 Some difficult points 3 Quite a bit , , Very much Total , , , d. Provided feedback on a ETdraftfb 1 Very little draft or work in 2 Some progress 3 Quite a bit , Very much Total , , , e. Provided prompt and ETfeedback 1 Very little detailed feedback on 2 Some , tests or completed assignments 3 Quite a bit , * Very much Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 9
10 First-Year Students 6. During the current school year, about how often have you done the following? Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean a. Reached conclusions QRconclude 1 Never based on your own 2 Sometimes , analysis of numerical information (numbers, 3 Often , graphs, statistics, etc.) 4 Very often Total , , , b. Used numerical QRproblem 1 Never information to examine 2 Sometimes , , a real-world problem or issue (unemployment, 3 Often climate change, public 4 Very often health, etc.) Total , , , c. Evaluated what others QRevaluate 1 Never have concluded from 2 Sometimes , , numerical information 3 Often * Very often Total , , , During the current school year, about how many papers, reports, or other writing tasks of the following lengths have you been assigned? (Include those not yet completed.) a. Up to 5 pages wrshortnum 0 None (Recoded version of wrshort created by NSSE. Values are estimated number of papers, reports, etc.) * More than Total , , , b. Between 6 and 10 wrmednum 0 None , , pages (Recoded version , of wrmed created by NSSE. Values are estimated number of papers, reports, etc.) ** *** * *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 10
11 First-Year Students 23 More than Total , , , Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 11
12 First-Year Students c. 11 pages or more wrlongnum 0 None , , , Estimated number of assigned pages of student writing. (Recoded version of wrlong created by NSSE. Values are estimated number of papers, reports, etc.) wrpages Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean *** *** *** More than (Continuous variable, recoded and summed by NSSE from wrshort, wrmed, and wrlong. Values are estimated pages of assigned writing.) Total , , , During the current school year, about how often have you had discussions with people from the following groups? a. People of a race or DDrace 1 Never ethnicity other than 2 Sometimes your own *** ** ** Often * Very often , Total , , , b. People from an DDeconomic 1 Never economic background 2 Sometimes other than your own 3 Often , * Very often Total , , , c. People with religious DDreligion 1 Never beliefs other than your 2 Sometimes own 3 Often Very often Total , , , d. People with political DDpolitical 1 Never views other than your 2 Sometimes own 3 Often *** * *.17 *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 12
13 First-Year Students Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean 4 Very often Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 13
14 First-Year Students 9. During the current school year, about how often have you done the following? Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean a. Identified key LSreading 1 Never information from 2 Sometimes reading assignments 3 Often , , Very often Total , , , b. Reviewed your notes LSnotes 1 Never after class 2 Sometimes Often * * Very often Total , , , c. Summarized what you LSsummary 1 Never learned in class or from 2 Sometimes course materials 3 Often , ** ** Very often Total , , , During the current school year, to what extent have your courses challenged you to do your best work? challenge 11. Which of the following have you done or do you plan to do before you graduate? f 1 Not at all Very much Total , , , a. Participate in an intern Have not decided internship, co-op, field (Means indicate Do not plan to do experience, student the percentage Plan to do , , , teaching, or clinical 7% 7% %.01 7%.00 who responded placement Done or in progress "Done or in *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 14
15 First-Year Students "Done nameor c in Values d Response options Count % Count % Count % Count % Mean progress.") Total , , , Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 15
16 First-Year Students b. Hold a formal leader Have not decided leadership role in a (Means indicate Do not plan to do student organization or the percentage group who responded Done or in progress "Done or in progress.") Total , , , Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean Plan to do , % 9%.11 12%.04 10%.10 c. Participate in a learning learncom Have not decided community or some (Means indicate Do not plan to do other formal program the percentage Plan to do where groups of 7% 11% % % -.12 who responded students take two or Done or in progress "Done or in more classes together progress.") Total , , , d. Participate in a study abroad Have not decided abroad program (Means indicate Do not plan to do the percentage Plan to do , , % 2% % % -.18 who responded "Done or in Done or in progress progress.") Total , , , e. Work with a faculty research Have not decided , member on a research (Means indicate Do not plan to do project the percentage Plan to do , % 5% % % -.21 who responded Done or in progress "Done or in progress.") Total , , , f. Complete a culminating capstone Have not decided senior experience (Means indicate Do not plan to do (capstone course, the percentage Plan to do , , senior project or thesis, 1% 2% % % -.13 who responded comprehensive exam, Done or in progress "Done or in portfolio, etc.) progress.") Total , , , About how many of your courses at this institution have included a community-based project (service-learning)? servcourse 1 None , , Some , Most * * -.22 *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 16
17 First-Year Students Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean 4 All Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 17
18 First-Year Students 13. Indicate the quality of your interactions with the following people at your institution. a. Students QIstudent 1 Poor Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean * * Excellent Not applicable Total , , , b. Academic advisors QIadvisor 1 Poor Excellent Not applicable Total , , , c. Faculty QIfaculty 1 Poor *** ** ** Excellent Not applicable Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 18
19 First-Year Students d. Student services staff QIstaff 1 Poor (career services, student activities, housing, etc.) Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean Excellent Not applicable Total , , , e. Other administrative QIadmin 1 Poor staff and offices (registrar, financial aid, etc.) How much does your institution emphasize the following? Excellent Not applicable Total , , , a. Spending significant empstudy 1 Very little amounts of time 2 Some studying and on academic work 3 Quite a bit , , Very much Total , , , b. Providing support to SEacademic 1 Very little help students succeed 2 Some academically 3 Quite a bit , , Very much Total , , , c. Using learning support SElearnsup 1 Very little services (tutoring 2 Some services, writing center, etc.) 3 Quite a bit *.23 4 Very much , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 19
20 First-Year Students Total , , , Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 20
21 First-Year Students d. Encouraging contact SEdiverse 1 Very little among students from 2 Some different backgrounds (social, racial/ethnic, religious, etc.) Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean 3 Quite a bit *** *** *** Very much Total , , , e. Providing opportunities SEsocial 1 Very little to be involved socially 2 Some Quite a bit , * Very much Total , , , f. Providing support for SEwellness 1 Very little your overall well-being 2 Some (recreation, health care, counseling, etc.) 3 Quite a bit Very much Total , , , g. Helping you manage SEnonacad 1 Very little your non-academic 2 Some responsibilities (work, family, etc.) 3 Quite a bit Very much Total , , , h. Attending campus SEactivities 1 Very little activities and events 2 Some (performing arts, athletic events, etc.) 3 Quite a bit Very much Total , , , i. Attending events that SEevents 1 Very little address important 2 Some social, economic, or political issues 3 Quite a bit ** ** ** Very much Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 21
22 First-Year Students 15. About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing the following? 33 More than 30 hrs Total , , , Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean a. Preparing for class tmprephrs 0 0 hrs (studying, reading, (Recoded version hrs writing, doing of tmprep created hrs homework or lab work, by NSSE. Values analyzing data, hrs are estimated rehearsing, and other hrs number of hours academic activities) per week.) hrs hrs b. Participating in cocurricular activities tmcocurrhrs 0 0 hrs , (Recoded version hrs (organizations, campus of tmcocurr hrs publications, student created by NSSE. government, fraternity hrs Values are or sorority, estimated number intercollegiate or of hours per intramural sports, etc.) week.) hrs * hrs hrs More than 30 hrs Total , , , c. Working for pay tmworkonhrs 0 0 hrs , , , on campus (Recoded version hrs of tmworkon hrs created by NSSE hrs Values are hrs estimated number of hours per hrs week.) hrs More than 30 hrs Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 22
23 First-Year Students d. Working for pay tmworkoffhrs 0 0 hrs , , , off campus (Recoded version hrs of tmworkoff hrs created by NSSE hrs Values are estimated number of hours per week.) Estimated number of hours working for pay tmworkhrs (Continuous variable created by NSSE) Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean hrs * hrs hrs More than 30 hrs Total , , , e. Doing community tmservicehrs 0 0 hrs , , , service or volunteer hrs work (Recoded version of tmservice created by NSSE. Values are estimated number of hours per week.) hrs hrs * hrs * ** hrs hrs More than 30 hrs Total , , , f. Relaxing and tmrelaxhrs 0 0 hrs socializing (time with (Recoded version hrs friends, video games, of tmrelax created hrs TV or videos, keeping by NSSE. Values up with friends online, hrs are estimated etc.) hrs number of hours per week.) hrs hrs More than 30 hrs Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 23
24 First-Year Students hrs hrs g. Providing care for tmcarehrs 0 0 hrs , , , dependents (children, hrs parents, etc.) (Recoded version of tmcare created by NSSE. Values are estimated number of hours per week.) Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean hrs ** ** hrs hrs More than 30 hrs Total , , , h. Commuting to campus tmcommutehrs 0 0 hrs , (driving, walking, etc.) (Recoded version hrs , of tmcommute hrs created by NSSE. Values are hrs estimated number of hours per week.) hrs *** *** hrs hrs More than 30 hrs Total , , , Of the time you spend preparing for class in a typical 7-day week, about how much is on assigned reading? reading 1 Very little Some About half ** *** Most Almost all Total , , , tmreadinghrs (Continuous variable created by NSSE. Calculated as a proportion of tmprephrs based on reading, where Very little=.10; Some=.25; About half=.50; Most=.75; Almost all=.90) *** *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 24
25 First-Year Students tmreadinghrscol 1 0 hrs (Collapsed version of tmreadinghrs created by NSSE.) More than zero, up to 5 hrs More than 5, up to 10 hrs More than 10, up to 15 hrs More than 15, up to 20 hrs More than 20, up to 25 hrs Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers , , , More than 25 hrs Total , , , How much has your experience at this institution contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal development in the following areas? a. Writing clearly and pgwrite 1 Very little effectively 2 Some Mean Mean Mean 3 Quite a bit , , Very much Total , , , b. Speaking clearly and pgspeak 1 Very little effectively 2 Some Quite a bit , Very much Total , , , c. Thinking critically and pgthink 1 Very little analytically 2 Some Quite a bit , , Very much Total , , , d. Analyzing numerical pganalyze 1 Very little and statistical 2 Some information 3 Quite a bit * *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 25
26 First-Year Students Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean 4 Very much Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 26
27 First-Year Students e. Acquiring job- or workrelated pgwork 1 Very little knowledge and 2 Some skills Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean 3 Quite a bit * * Very much Total , , , f. Working effectively pgothers 1 Very little with others 2 Some Quite a bit , , Very much Total , , , g. Developing or pgvalues 1 Very little clarifying a personal 2 Some code of values and ethics 3 Quite a bit Very much Total , , , h. Understanding people pgdiverse 1 Very little of other backgrounds 2 Some (economic, racial/ethnic, political, religious, nationality, etc.) 3 Quite a bit * ** ** Very much Total , , , i. Solving complex realworld pgprobsolve 1 Very little problems 2 Some Quite a bit * Very much Total , , , j. Being an informed and pgcitizen 1 Very little active citizen 2 Some Quite a bit Very much Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 27
28 First-Year Students 18. How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution? evalexp 1 Poor Fair Your first-year students compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean 3 Good , , , Excellent Total , , , If you could start over again, would you go to the same institution you are now attending? sameinst 20. Do you intend to return to this institution next year? f (Means indicate the percentage who responded "Yes." Comparison data are limited to NSSE 2018 participants.) 1 Definitely no Probably no Probably yes , , Definitely yes Total , , , returnexp No Yes , , % 86% *** % *** % *** -.44 Not sure Total , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 28
29 Seniors 1. During the current school year, about how often have you done the following? a. Asked questions or askquest 1 Never contributed to course 2 Sometimes , , , discussions in other ways Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean 3 Often , , , * *.11 4 Very often , , , Total , , , b. Prepared two or more drafts 1 Never , , drafts of a paper or 2 Sometimes , , , assignment before turning it in 3 Often , , , *** Very often , Total , , , c. Come to class without unpreparedr 1 Very often completing readings or 2 Often assignments (Reverse-coded version of unprepared created by NSSE.) 3 Sometimes , , , ** Never , , , Total , , , d. Attended an art exhibit, attendart 1 Never , , , play, or other arts 2 Sometimes , , , performance (dance, music, etc.) 3 Often * * Very often Total , , , e. Asked another student CLaskhelp 1 Never , to help you understand 2 Sometimes , , , course material 3 Often , , , *** Very often Total , , , f. Explained course CLexplain 1 Never material to one or more 2 Sometimes , , , students Your seniors compared with 3 Often , , , *** Very often , , Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 29
30 Seniors g. Prepared for exams by CLstudy 1 Never , discussing or working 2 Sometimes , , , through course material with other students Your seniors compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean 3 Often , , , *** ** ***.20 4 Very often , Total , , , h. Worked with other CLproject 1 Never , students on course 2 Sometimes , , , projects or assignments 3 Often , , , *** *.14 4 Very often , , , Total , , , i. Given a course present 1 Never , presentation 2 Sometimes , , , During the current school year, about how often have you done the following? 3 Often , , , ** *** Very often , , Total , , , a. Combined ideas from RIintegrate 1 Never different courses when 2 Sometimes , , , completing assignments 3 Often , , , ** * Very often , , , Total , , , b. Connected your RIsocietal 1 Never learning to societal 2 Sometimes , , , problems or issues 3 Often , , , *** Very often , , Total , , , c. Included diverse RIdiverse 1 Never , perspectives (political, 2 Sometimes , , , religious, racial/ethnic, gender, etc.) in course discussions or assignments 3 Often , , , *** Very often , , Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 30
31 Seniors Your seniors compared with Peers Peers Mean Mean Mean d. Examined the strengths RIownview 1 Never and weaknesses of 2 Sometimes , , , your own views on a topic or issue 3 Often , , , Very often , , Total , , , e. Tried to better RIperspect 1 Never understand someone 2 Sometimes , , , else's views by imagining how an issue looks from their perspective 3 Often , , , * Very often , , , Total , , , f. Learned something that RInewview 1 Never changed the way you 2 Sometimes , , , understand an issue or concept 3 Often , , , Very often , , , Total , , , g. Connected ideas from RIconnect 1 Never your courses to your 2 Sometimes , prior experiences and knowledge 3 Often , , , Very often , , , During the current school year, about how often have you done the following? Total , , , a. Talked about career SFcareer 1 Never , plans with a faculty 2 Sometimes , , , member 3 Often , , , *** *.14 4 Very often Total , , , b. Worked with a faculty SFotherwork 1 Never , , , member on activities 2 Sometimes , , , other than coursework (committees, student groups, etc.) 3 Often *** ** ***.26 4 Very often Total , , , *p<.05, **p<.01, ***p<.001 (2-tailed); Refer to p. 2 for key to triangle symbols. See the endnotes on the last page of this report. NSSE 2018 FREQUENCIES AND STATISTICAL COMPARISONS 31
NSSE 2017 U.S. Summary Frequencies
1. During the current school year, about how often have you done the following? a. Asked questions or askquest Never 187 2 495 4 310 4 348 3 529 3 98 3 191 2 413 4 572 3 188 3 3,702 3 contributed to course
More informationNSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of New Hampshire
NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Mansfield University of Pennsylvania
NSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of New Hampshire
NSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi
NSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Stetson University
NSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Western Carolina University
NSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Missouri State University
NSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2017 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of Central Oklahoma
NSSE 2015 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2013 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons IPEDS: 199999 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Interpreting Your Report The display below highlights details in the Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
More informationNSSE 2013 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons IPEDS: 217819 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Interpreting Your Report The display below highlights details in the Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
More informationNSSE 2013 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Auburn University at Montgomery IPEDS:
Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons IPEDS: 100830 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Interpreting Your Report The display below highlights details in the Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
More informationNSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons St. Olaf College
NSSE 2018 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons
NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2013 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Mansfield University of Pennsylvania IPEDS:
NSSE 2013 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons of Pennsylvania IPEDS: 213783 Interpreting Your Report The display below highlights details in the Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons report that
More informationNSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of San Francisco
NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez
NSSE Frequencies and Statistical s Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some cells appear
More informationNSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons The University of Texas at El Paso
Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some cells appear
More informationNSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons NSSEville State University
NSSE 2014 Frequencies and Statistical Comparisons Please note: The layout of this file is optimized for printing and PDF creation, not on-screen viewing. When the Excel version is viewed on screen, some
More informationNSSEville State University NSSE 2013 Major Field Report, Part II Comparisons to Other Institutions Crim J & Soc Wk
ersity NSSE 2013 Major Field Report, Part II Comparisons to Other Institutions Comparing your students majoring in the fields shown below to those in the same fields at your comparison group institutions
More informationNSSEville State University NSSE 2013 Major Field Report, Part II Comparisons to Other Institutions Comm
ersity NSSE 2013 Major Field Report, Part II Comparisons to Other Institutions Comparing your students majoring in the fields shown below to those in the same fields at your comparison group institutions
More informationNSSEville State University NSSE 2013 Major Field Report, Part II Comparisons to Other Institutions Bus
NSSE 2013 Major Field Report, Part II Comparisons to Other Institutions Comparing your students majoring in the fields shown below to those in the same fields at your comparison group institutions The
More informationNSSEville State University NSSE 2013 Major Field Report, Part II Comparisons to Other Institutions Engineering
ersity NSSE 2013 Major Field Report, Part II Comparisons to Other Institutions Comparing your students majoring in the fields shown below to those in the same fields at your comparison group institutions
More informationNSSEville State University NSSE 2014 Major Field Report, Part II Comparisons to Other Institutions Humanities
NSSE 2014 Major Field Report, Part II Comparisons to Other Institutions Comparing your students majoring in the fields shown below to those in the same fields at your comparison group institutions The
More informationNSSEville State University NSSE 2017 Major Field Report, Part I Within-Institution Comparisons
NSSE 2017 Major Field Report, Part I Within-Institution Comparisons Comparing your students' responses across groups of related majors within your institution Note: The Major Field Report was formatted
More information2009 Community College of Student Engagement (CCSSE) College Results: Frequency Distributions
2009 Community College of Student Engagement (CCSSE) College Results: Frequency Distributions Institutional Research & Effectiveness Frequency Distributions This report summarizes the observed frequencies
More informationInstitutional Research and Planning 440 Day Hall Ithaca, New York PULSE Survey
Institutional Research and Planning 440 Day Hall Ithaca, New York 14853 2009 PULSE Survey The Cornell PULSE (Perceptions of Undergraduate Life and Student Experiences) Survey asks currently enrolled undergraduate
More informationCity University of New York Faculty Survey of Student Experience (FSSE), Spring 2010
City University of New York Faculty Survey of Student Experience (FSSE), Spring 2010 CUNY administered the Faculty Survey of Student Experience (FSSE) in the Spring of 2010 at the 11 senior colleges, one
More informationBCSSE Institutional Report Frequency Distributions. Baccalaureate
BCSSE Institutional Report Frequency Distributions BCSSE Frequency Distributions Interpreting Frequency Results 1 3 5 6 2 4 7 8 1. Variables : The items from the BCSSE survey appear in the left column
More informationBCSSE Institutional Report Frequency Distributions. St. Olaf College
BCSSE Institutional Report Frequency Distributions BCSSE Frequency Distributions Interpreting Frequency Results 5 6 1 3 2 4 7 8 1. Variables : The items from the BCSSE survey appear in the left column
More informationCertificate in a vocational program
N 3,328 5,148 2,928 3,219 3,546 2,004 3,730 3,982 2,327 30,212 GOALS AND PLANS 2. What is your educational goal at this college? High school diploma or GED 1.9 1.3 2.2 1.4 2.2 2.2 1.9 2.0 1.7 1.8 Certificate
More informationUNITEC New Zealand. Respondent Characteristics Report December 2012
Respondent Characteristics Report December 2012 This report provides summary information on selected response, student and course characteristics. Results are provided for your institution and for three
More informationINTERNET ACCESS GOALS AND PLANS
i. Which do you consider to be your primary college* 2-year college Other 4-year Valley West Total 484 518 122 154 169 94 398 415 405 31 118 2,908 16.6 17.8 4.2 5.3 5.8 3.2 13.7 14.3 13.9 1.1 4.1 100.0
More informationUSC Aiken 2004 Freshman Orientation Survey Results Selected questions have been made parallel to those on the CIRP Freshman Survey
Note: In 2004, USC Aiken administered a custom survey at Freshman Orientation. Many questions are parallel to questions asked on the CIRP Freshman Survey. It is important to note that issues such as question
More informationCumulative Percent Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Frequency Table Fully Online Hybrid Online Partially Online H_10 Course Type Frequency 868 24.7 24.7 24.7 1735 49.3 49.3 74.0 832 23.6 23.6 97.6 84 2.4 2.4 100.0 H_13 Period Frequency 1162R 100.0 H_14
More informationAcademic Course Description
BEE305- ELECTRICAL MACHINES Academic Course Description BHARATH UNIVERSITY Faculty of Engineering and Technology Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering BEE305- ELECTRICAL MACHINES Third Semester,
More informationFALL 2007 MBA EXIT SURVEY (Sample size of 29: 15 responses from the San Marcos location and 14 responses from the RRHEC location)
FALL 2007 MBA EXIT SURVEY (Sample size of 29: 15 responses from the San Marcos location and 14 responses from the RRHEC location) EVALUATION OF MBA CURRICULUM Scale items: 1 = Very Satisfied 6 = Very Dissatisfied
More information2010 National Edition correlated to the. Creative Curriculum Teaching Strategies Gold
2010 National Edition correlated to the Creative Curriculum Teaching Strategies Gold 2015 Big Day for PreK is a proven-effective comprehensive early learning program that embraces children's natural curiosity
More informationMODULE 6 Lower Anchors & Tethers for CHildren
National Child Passenger Safety Certification Training Program MODULE 6 Lower Anchors & Tethers for CHildren Topic Module Agenda: 50 Minutes Suggested Timing 1. Introduction 2 2. Lower Anchors and Tether
More informationWho has trouble reporting prior day events?
Vol. 10, Issue 1, 2017 Who has trouble reporting prior day events? Tim Triplett 1, Rob Santos 2, Brian Tefft 3 Survey Practice 10.29115/SP-2017-0003 Jan 01, 2017 Tags: missing data, recall data, measurement
More informationCluster Knowledge and Skills for Business, Management and Administration Finance Marketing, Sales and Service Aligned with American Careers Business
for Business, Management and Administration Finance Marketing, Sales and Service Aligned with American Careers Business About American Careers Correlations The following correlations are provided to demonstrate
More informationFAMU Completers Satisfaction Survey Results 2010
FAMU Completers Satisfaction Survey Results 2010 Non-Member record_type Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent 35 100.0 100.0 100.0 Race: Frequency Percent Percent Cumulative Percent Black 30 85.7
More informationAGRIBUSINESS. Academic Programs. Undergraduate Programs BS Agricultural Business. AGB Courses. Agribusiness
Agribusiness 1 AGRIBUSINESS Agriculture Bldg. (10), Room 210 Phone: 805.756.5000; Fax: 805.756.5040 https://agb.calpoly.edu Department Chair: Cyrus Ramezani Academic Programs Program name Agricultural
More informationScholastic s Early Childhood Program Correlated to the Minnesota Pre-K Standards
Scholastic s Early Childhood Program 5/2/07 Page 1 DOMAIN I: EMOTIONAL AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT 2. 3. 4. 5. Demonstrate increasing competency in recognizing and describing own emotions
More informationPolitics Philosophy Economics Undergraduate Degree Plan Curriculum Map New Plan Proposal: Appendix C
Politics Philosophy Economics Undergraduate Degree Plan Curriculum Map 2016 New Plan Proposal: Appendix C Politics Sub-Plan Learning Outcomes Philosophy Sub-Plan Economics Sub-Plan Politics Sub-Plan (POPE)
More informationAGRIBUSINESS (AGB) AGB Courses. Agribusiness (AGB) 1
Agribusiness (AGB) 1 AGRIBUSINESS (AGB) AGB Courses AGB 101. Introduction to Agribusiness. 4 units Prerequisite: AGB major and freshman standing. Orientation to the agribusiness sector of agriculture.
More informationGains in Written Communication Among Learning Habits Students: A Report on an Initial Assessment Exercise
Gains in Written Communication Among Learning Habits Students: A Report on an Initial Assessment Exercise The following pages provide a brief overview of an assessment exercise focusing on a small set
More informationInquiry-Based Physics in Middle School. David E. Meltzer
Inquiry-Based Physics in Middle School David E. Meltzer Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College Arizona State University Mesa, Arizona U.S.A. Supported in part by a grant from Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College
More information9.3 Tests About a Population Mean (Day 1)
Bellwork In a recent year, 73% of first year college students responding to a national survey identified being very well off financially as an important personal goal. A state university finds that 132
More informationRiders Helping Riders: An Alcohol Peer Intervention Program for Motorcyclists
Riders Helping Riders: An Alcohol Peer Intervention Program for Motorcyclists A. Scott McKnight and Les R. Becker Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation Robert L. Hohn National Highway Traffic Safety
More informationBachelor of Arts in Economics - Business Specialization (Fall 2016) Student
Bachelor of Arts in Economics - Business Specialization (Fall 2016) Student Student ID# Anticipated Graduation Term Advisor Minimum GPA 2.00 Today's Date 2016-2017 Undergraduate Catalog Requirements System
More informationHARLEY-DAVIDSON. Motorcycle Technician Training & Professional Development Program
HARLEY-DAVIDSON Motorcycle Technician Training & Professional Development Program 274 North Industrial Drive, Frontenac, KS 66763 (620) 231-3819 fortscott.edu Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Technician Training
More informationAcademic Course Description
BME 503 FLUID POWER SYSTEMS Academic Course Description BHARATH UNIVERSITY Faculty of Engineering and Technology Department of Mechanical Engineering BME 503 FLUID POWER SYSTEMS Fifth Semester, 2015-16
More informationA2 units showing 90% conversion points (cp) January 2013 series
A2 units showing 90% conversion points (cp) January 2013 series GCE Accounting F013/01 Company Accounts and Interpretation (A2) Raw 80 75 71 64 57 50 44 0 F014/01 Management Accounting (A2) Raw 120 112
More informationFrequency Table. UDSAT Satisfaction with UD. Cumulative. 1 Very Dissatisfied. Valid. 2 Dissatisfied. 3 Satisfied. 4 Very Satisfied. Total.
Table UDSAT Satisfaction with UD 1 Very Dissatisfied 12 1.2 1.2 1.2 2 Dissatisfied 33 3.2 3.3 4.5 3 Satisfied 565 55.1 56.2 60.7 4 Very Satisfied 395 38.5 39.3 1005 98.0 21 2.0 UDREC Likely to recommend
More information2013 PLS Alumni/ae Survey: Overall Evaluation of the Program
2013 PLS Alumni/ae Survey: Overall Evaluation of the Program Summary In the spring 2013, the Program of Liberal Studies conducted its first comprehensive survey of alumni/ae in several decades. The department
More informationCapstone Design Project: Developing the Smart Arm Chair for Handicapped People
Capstone Design Project: Developing the Smart Arm Chair for Handicapped People Kwang Sun Kim 1, Jun Young Kim 2, Kyung Min Jang 3 and Kang Wo Joo 4 1 School of Mechatronics Engineering, Korea University
More informationNEW CAR TIPS. Teaching Guidelines
NEW CAR TIPS Teaching Guidelines Subject: Algebra Topics: Patterns and Functions Grades: 7-12 Concepts: Independent and dependent variables Slope Direct variation (optional) Knowledge and Skills: Can relate
More informationSchool Transportation Assessment
Grade: K-12 Version 1 April 2015 School Transportation Assessment SCHOOL BUS Evaluate the carbon emissions from daily transportation related to your school and identify strategies for more sustainable
More informationNebraska Teen Driving Experiences Survey Four-Year Trend Report
Nebraska Teen Driving Experiences Survey Four-Year Trend Report 2014-2015, 2015-2016, and 2017-2018 School Years April 2018 Division of Public Health Injury Prevention Program Table of Contents Executive
More informationAuto Service Technician
Auto Service Technician Organization Washburn Institute of Technology Program Number 47.0604 Instructional Level Certificate Target Population Grades 11 & 12 Post-secondary Description The Auto Service
More informationScholastic Big Day for PreK. Arkansas Early Childhood Education Framework for Three & Four Year Old Children 2011
Scholastic Big Day for PreK Correlated to the Arkansas Early Childhood Education Framework for Three & Four Year Old Children 2011 TM & Scholastic Inc. All rights reserved. SCHOLASTIC, Big Day for PreK,
More informationHARLEY-DAVIDSON. Motorcycle Technician Training & Professional Development Program
HARLEY-DAVIDSON Motorcycle Technician Training & Professional Development Program 274 N. Industrial Drive Frontenac, KS 66763 (FSCC LOGO) (620) 231-3819 www.fortscott.edu HARLEY-DAVIDSON & Fort Scott Community
More informationYour web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and. the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore
Your web browser (Safari 7) is out of date. For more security, comfort and Activitydevelop the best experience on this site: Update your browser Ignore Circuits with Friends What is a circuit, and what
More informationSafety and Preventitive Cautions for Teenage Drivers
Safety and Preventitive Cautions for Teenage Drivers 1. Review the basic safety rules of driving 2. Learn and comprehend the safety issues involved in driving 3. Understand what factors affect safe driving
More informationScholastic s Early Childhood Program correlated to the Kentucky Primary English/Language Arts Standards
Primary English/Language Arts Reading (1.2) Arts and Humanities (2.24, 2.25) Students develop abilities to apply appropriate reading strategies to make sense of a variety of print and nonprint texts (literary,
More informationUniversity Of California, Berkeley Department of Mechanical Engineering. ME 131 Vehicle Dynamics & Control (4 units)
CATALOG DESCRIPTION University Of California, Berkeley Department of Mechanical Engineering ME 131 Vehicle Dynamics & Control (4 units) Undergraduate Elective Syllabus Physical understanding of automotive
More informationGraduate Two Year-At-A-Glance
Graduate 20-20 Two Year-At-A-Glance Name ES SU SP-1 ES SU ACC 7000 Accounting Theory Online - - - - OL - ACC 7100 Advanced Financial Accounting Reporting Online - - - - - OL ACC 7200 Advanced Income Taxation
More informationEngineering Diploma Resource Guide ST280 ETP Hydraulics (Engineering)
Engineering Diploma Resource Guide ST80 ETP Hydraulics (Engineering) Introduction Hydraulic systems are a fundamental aspect of engineering. Utilised across a variety of sectors including aviation, construction,
More informationFourth Grade. Multiplication Review. Slide 1 / 146 Slide 2 / 146. Slide 3 / 146. Slide 4 / 146. Slide 5 / 146. Slide 6 / 146
Slide 1 / 146 Slide 2 / 146 Fourth Grade Multiplication and Division Relationship 2015-11-23 www.njctl.org Multiplication Review Slide 3 / 146 Table of Contents Properties of Multiplication Factors Prime
More informationA Correlation of. Scott Foresman. Reading Street. Common Core. to the. Arkansas English Language Arts Standards Grade 3
A Correlation of Scott Foresman Reading Street Common Core 2013 to the To the INTRODUCTION This document demonstrates how Scott Foresman Reading Street Common Core, 2013 meets the. Correlation page references
More information2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the NSCAS Summative ELA and Mathematics Assessments based on MAP Growth Scores
2018 Linking Study: Predicting Performance on the NSCAS Summative ELA and Mathematics Assessments based on MAP Growth Scores November 2018 Revised December 19, 2018 NWEA Psychometric Solutions 2018 NWEA.
More informationECONOMICS-ECON (ECON)
Economics-ECON (ECON) 1 ECONOMICS-ECON (ECON) Courses ECON 101 Economics of Social Issues (GT-SS1) Credits: Economic analysis of poverty, crime, education, and other social issues. Basics of micro, macro,
More informationGRADUATED LICENSING. KITCHEN TABLE DISCUSSION GUIDE Have your say on Your PLates reforms
YOUR GRADUATED LICENSING KITCHEN TABLE DISCUSSION GUIDE Have your say on Your PLates reforms Justice and Community Safety Directorate April - May 2018 INTRODUCTION Thank you for your interest in how we
More informationEmployee Compensation 2014 Band 60, ,999.99
Employee Compensation 2014 60,000.00-74,999.99 Accessibility Counsellor (1) Administrator Officer (1) Advisor (2) Analyst (5) Application Architect (1) Archivist 1 (1) Assistant Dean, Arts (1) Assistant
More informationBusy Ant Maths and the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence Foundation Level - Primary 1
Busy Ant Maths and the Scottish Curriculum for Excellence Foundation Level - Primary 1 Number, money and measure Estimation and rounding Number and number processes Fractions, decimal fractions and percentages
More informationSenior Statewide Survey Results Wave 2
Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project Principal Investigator: Marta Tienda, Princeton University Co-Investigator: Teresa Sullivan, University of Texas at Austin Senior Statewide Survey Results Wave
More informationFourth Grade. Slide 1 / 146. Slide 2 / 146. Slide 3 / 146. Multiplication and Division Relationship. Table of Contents. Multiplication Review
Slide 1 / 146 Slide 2 / 146 Fourth Grade Multiplication and Division Relationship 2015-11-23 www.njctl.org Table of Contents Slide 3 / 146 Click on a topic to go to that section. Multiplication Review
More informationStatistics and Quantitative Analysis U4320. Segment 8 Prof. Sharyn O Halloran
Statistics and Quantitative Analysis U4320 Segment 8 Prof. Sharyn O Halloran I. Introduction A. Overview 1. Ways to describe, summarize and display data. 2.Summary statements: Mean Standard deviation Variance
More informationEconomics Major: Business Economics (Last Revised 03/2019)
Economics Major: Business Economics (Last Revised 03/2019) Required Business Core (39 hours) ECON 1041 Principles of Macroeconomics 3 hrs. ECON 1051 Principles of Microeconomics (ECON 1041) 3 hrs. ECON
More information2016 Annual Statistical Report on the HiSET Exam
2016 Annual Statistical Report on the HiSET Exam hiset.ets.org Table of Contents About HiSET About ETS...1 About ITP...1 Test Content...1 Overview The HiSET Tests...2 Scoring the HiSET Tests...2 Explanation
More informationHoughton Mifflin MATHEMATICS. Level 1 correlated to Chicago Academic Standards and Framework Grade 1
State Goal 6: Demonstrate and apply a knowledge and sense of numbers, including basic arithmetic operations, number patterns, ratios and proportions. CAS A. Relate counting, grouping, and place-value concepts
More informationConduct on-road training for motorcycle riders
Page 1 of 5 Conduct on-road training for motorcycle riders Level 5 Credits 10 Purpose This unit standard is for licensed motorcycle riding instructors who wish to conduct on-road motorcycle training. People
More informationClinical Laboratory Science Program Annual Assessment Report
Clinical Laboratory Science Program Annual Assessment Report 2009-2010 I. Introduction The Clinical Laboratory Science Program (CLS) serves all admitted OIT CLS degree students, who are each required to
More informationSolarMiles SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY: ELECTRIC VEHICLES SOLAR PV - SMART CHARGING CAR SHARING
Assignment IWP Energy Transition September 2018 SolarMiles SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY: ELECTRIC VEHICLES SOLAR PV - SMART CHARGING CAR SHARING Brief description of the problem SolarMiles is about charging electric
More informationCourse Syllabus
John D. Rockefeller Truck Driver Training Program Course Syllabus 2013-14 INSTRUCTOR: John Barber, Tim Egyud CLASSROOM: JDRCC DOOR 6 OFFICE HRS: 7:00-2:00 M-F OFFICE PH: 304-564-3337 extension 118 MOBILE
More informationInstructionally Relevant Alternate Assessments for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities
Instructionally Relevant Alternate Assessments for Students with Significant Cognitive Disabilities Neal Kingston, Karen Erickson, and Meagan Karvonen Background History of AA-AAS as separate from instruction
More informationELEC 585/462 MOTOR DRIVE DYNAMICS COURSE OUTLINE & ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES SEPT- DEC / FALL 2013 CRN 11254/11246
ELEC 585/462 MOTOR DRIVE DYNAMICS COURSE OUTLINE & ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES SEPT- DEC / FALL 2013 CRN 11254/11246 Instructor: Office Hours: Dr. S. Nandi Days: Any time by appointment Phone: 721-8679 Location:
More informationA REPORT ON THE STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS of the Highlands Ability Battery CD
A REPORT ON THE STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS of the Highlands Ability Battery CD Prepared by F. Jay Breyer Jonathan Katz Michael Duran November 21, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Data Determination
More informationSurvey Report Informatica PowerCenter Express. Right-Sized Data Integration for the Smaller Project
Survey Report Informatica PowerCenter Express Right-Sized Data Integration for the Smaller Project 1 Introduction The business department, smaller organization, and independent developer have been severely
More information2015 Faculty Survey of Assessment Culture
2015 Faculty Survey of Assessment Culture Nationwide Report 852 Respondents out of 3,292 invited participated = 25.9% response rate from 39 institutions Scale: Strongly =6; =5; =4; =3; =2; =1. Empty response
More informationAUTO 140A: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
AUTO 140A: Vehicle Maintenance 1 AUTO 140A: VEHICLE MAINTENANCE Discipline AUTO - Automotive Technology Course Number 140A Course Title Vehicle Maintenance Catalog Course Description Intended for the incumbent
More informationLinking the Kansas KAP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *
Linking the Kansas KAP Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests * *As of June 2017 Measures of Academic Progress (MAP ) is known as MAP Growth. February 2016 Introduction Northwest Evaluation Association (NWEA
More informationSolar Kit Lesson #13 Solarize a Toy
UCSD TIES adapted from NYSERDA Energy Smart www.schoolpowernaturally.org Solar Kit Lesson #13 Solarize a Toy TEACHER INFORMATION LEARNING OUTCOME After designing and constructing solar electric power sources
More information