Appendix F. Capacity Analysis Worksheets No Build
|
|
|
- Aubrey Bailey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Appendix F Capacity Analysis Worksheets No Build 88
2 9: Rte 35 & Rte 58 WB Off & Rte 58 WB On 7/5/2014 Movement NBL2 NBL NBR SEL SER NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C Average Delay 2.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.7% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 NO Build 2015 AM 89
3 6: Rte 35 & Rte 58 EB On & Rte 58 EB Off 7/5/2014 Movement SBL2 SBL SBR NWL NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SB 1 SB 2 NE 1 SW 1 SW 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C Average Delay 2.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 35.7% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 NO Build 2015 AM 90
4 3: Rte 35 & Ridley/School 7/5/2014 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SE 1 SE 2 NW 1 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C A B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C B Average Delay 5.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.4% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 NO Build 2015 AM 91
5 9: Rte 35 & Rte 58 WB Off & Rte 58 WB On 7/5/2014 Movement NBL2 NBL NBR SEL SER NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 3.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 26.2% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 NO Build 2015 PM 92
6 6: Rte 35 & Rte 58 EB On & Rte 58 EB Off 7/5/2014 Movement SBL2 SBL SBR NWL NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SB 1 SB 2 NE 1 SW 1 SW 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 2.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.6% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 NO Build 2015 PM 93
7 3: Rte 35 & Ridley/School 7/5/2014 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SE 1 SE 2 NW 1 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B B Average Delay 4.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.2% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 NO Build 2015 PM 94
8 9: Rte 35 & Rte 58 WB Off & Rte 58 WB On 7/5/2014 Movement NBL2 NBL NBR SEL SER NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C Average Delay 3.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.9% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 NO Build 2021 AM 95
9 6: Rte 35 & Rte 58 EB On & Rte 58 EB Off 7/5/2014 Movement SBL2 SBL SBR NWL NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SB 1 SB 2 NE 1 SW 1 SW 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C Average Delay 2.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.4% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 NO Build 2021 AM 96
10 3: Rte 35 & Ridley/School 7/5/2014 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SE 1 SE 2 NW 1 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C A B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C B Average Delay 5.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.3% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 NO Build 2021 AM 97
11 9: Rte 35 & Rte 58 WB Off & Rte 58 WB On 7/5/2014 Movement NBL2 NBL NBR SEL SER NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 3.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 27.0% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 No Build 2021 PM 98
12 6: Rte 35 & Rte 58 EB On & Rte 58 EB Off 7/5/2014 Movement SBL2 SBL SBR NWL NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SB 1 SB 2 NE 1 SW 1 SW 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 2.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.4% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 No Build 2021 PM 99
13 3: Rte 35 & Ridley/School 7/5/2014 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SE 1 SE 2 NW 1 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B B Average Delay 4.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.3% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 No Build 2021 PM 100
14 Appendix G Capacity Analysis Worksheets Build 101
15 9: Rte 35 & Rte 58 WB Off & Rte 58 WB On 7/5/2014 Movement NBL2 NBL NBR SEL SER NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C Average Delay 3.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.3% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2015 AM 102
16 6: Rte 35 & Rte 58 EB On & Rte 58 EB Off 7/5/2014 Movement SBL2 SBL SBR NWL NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SB 1 SB 2 NE 1 SW 1 SW 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C Average Delay 2.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.4% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2015 AM 103
17 3: Rte 35 & Ridley/School 7/5/2014 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SE 1 SE 2 NW 1 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS F A C A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS F C Average Delay 19.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.2% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2015 AM 104
18 9: Rte 35 & Rte 58 WB Off & Rte 58 WB On 7/5/2014 Movement NBL2 NBL NBR SEL SER NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 4.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.4% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2015 PM 105
19 6: Rte 35 & Rte 58 EB On & Rte 58 EB Off 7/5/2014 Movement SBL2 SBL SBR NWL NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SB 1 SB 2 NE 1 SW 1 SW 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 1.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.4% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2015 PM 106
20 3: Rte 35 & Ridley/School 7/5/2014 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SE 1 SE 2 NW 1 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C A C A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C C Average Delay 11.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.8% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2015 PM 107
21 9: Rte 35 & Rte 58 WB Off & Rte 58 WB On 7/5/2014 Movement NBL2 NBL NBR SEL SER NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C Average Delay 4.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.4% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2021 AM 108
22 6: Rte 35 & Rte 58 EB On & Rte 58 EB Off 7/5/2014 Movement SBL2 SBL SBR NWL NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SB 1 SB 2 NE 1 SW 1 SW 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS D B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C Average Delay 2.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.1% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2021 AM 109
23 3: Rte 35 & Ridley/School 7/5/2014 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SE 1 SE 2 NW 1 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS F A D A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS F D Average Delay 25.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.7% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2021 AM 110
24 9: Rte 35 & Rte 58 WB Off & Rte 58 WB On 7/5/2014 Movement NBL2 NBL NBR SEL SER NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # NB 1 NB 2 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 4.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.9% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2021 PM 111
25 6: Rte 35 & Rte 58 EB On & Rte 58 EB Off 7/5/2014 Movement SBL2 SBL SBR NWL NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SB 1 SB 2 NE 1 SW 1 SW 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Average Delay 1.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 32.1% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2021 PM 112
26 3: Rte 35 & Ridley/School 7/5/2014 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) vc, conflicting volume vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # SE 1 SE 2 NW 1 NE 1 NE 2 SW 1 SW 2 SW 3 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS D A C A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C C Average Delay 11.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.9% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2021 PM 113
27 Appendix H Capacity Analysis Worksheets Ridley Mitigation Testing 114
28 3: Rte 35 & Ridley/School 7/5/2014 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Right Turn Channelized Volume (veh/h) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Approach Volume (veh/h) Crossing Volume (veh/h) High Capacity (veh/h) High v/c (veh/h) Low Capacity (veh/h) Low v/c (veh/h) Maximum v/c High 0.49 Maximum v/c Low 0.59 Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.7% ICU Level of Service A Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2015 AM - Testing Roundabout 115
29 HCM 2010 Signalized 3: Rte 35 & Ridley/School 7/5/2014 Movement SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR NEL NET NER SWL SWT SWR Volume (veh/h) Number Initial Q (Qb), veh Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) Parking Bus Adj Adj Sat Flow veh/h/ln Lanes Cap, veh/h Arrive On Green Sat Flow, veh/h Grp Volume(v), veh/h Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln Q Serve(g_s), s Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s Prop In Lane Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h V/C Ratio(X) Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h HCM Platoon Ratio Upstream Filter(I) Uniform Delay (d), s/veh Incr Delay (d2), s/veh Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh %ile Back of Q (50%), veh/ln Lane Grp Delay (d), s/veh Lane Grp LOS B B B B B B B F Approach Vol, veh/h Approach Delay, s/veh Approach LOS B B B F Timer Assigned Phs Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s Change Period (Y+Rc), s Max Green Setting (Gmax), s Max Q Clear Time (g_c+i1), s Green Ext Time (p_c), s HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 56.1 HCM 2010 LOS E Notes Ridley Rd C Store 7/5/2014 Build 2015 AM - Testing Signal 116
30 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 600 MINOR STREET HIGHER- VOLUME APPROACH - VPH OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE 150* 100* MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note: 150 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Rte 35 and Ridley Major = 593 Minor = 147 Not Warranted 1 Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 40 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES MINOR STREET HIGHER- VOLUME APPROACH - VPH OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE 1 LANE & 1 LANE 100* 75* MAJOR STREET TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) *Note: 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 75 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. 117
31 Appendix I Turn Lane Worksheets 118
32 Rte 35 Right-in / Right-out Access Build F-73 PM 2 3 AM 5 4 NO TURN LANES OR TAPERS REQUIRED Appropriate Radius required at all Intersections and Entrances (Commercial or Private). LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adjustment for Right Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, PHV right turns > 40, and PHV total < 300. Adjusted right turns = PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note: An average of 11% for K x D will suffice. FIGURE 3-26 GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) 119
33 Ridley Rd Access Build F PM AM 4 5 NO TURN LANES OR TAPERS REQUIRED Appropriate Radius required at all Intersections and Entrances (Commercial or Private). LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adjustment for Right Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, PHV right turns > 40, and PHV total < 300. Adjusted right turns = PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note: An average of 11% for K x D will suffice. FIGURE 3-26 GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) 120
34 Ridley Road Access Build F-52 Warrants for Left Turn Storage Lanes on Two-Lane Highways Advancing volume and opposing volumes (VPH), speed and percent left turns are used to determine whether a left turn storage lane is warranted on two-lane highways. The warrants in table below are taken from the 2011 AASHTO Green Book, Page 9-132, Table They were derived from Highway Research Report No. 211, Figures 2 through 19, for required storage length determinations. The No. 211 study was undertaken to provide consistent volume warrants for left-turn storage lanes at unsignalized intersections. WARRANTS FOR LEFT TURN LANES ON TWO-LANE HIGHWAYS VPH OPPOSING VOLUME ADVANCING VOLUME 5% 10% 20% 30% LEFT TURNS LEFT TURNS LEFT TURNS LEFT TURNS 40-MPH DESIGN SPEED* MPH DESIGN SPEED* MPH DESIGN SPEED* TABLE 3-1 * Source: Adapted from 2011 AASHTO Green Book, Page 9-132, Table 9-23 * USE DESIGN SPEED IF AVAILABLE, IF NOT USE LEGAL SPEED LIMIT. * Rev. 1/13 Example: Two-lane highway with 40-MPH operating speed AM PM - Opposing Vol % Left Turns Advancing Vol Not Met Not Met Opposing Volume (VPH) Advancing Volume (VPH) Left-Turn Volume (VPH) - 44 or 10% of Advancing Volume With opposing volume (VPH) of 600 and 10% of advancing volume (VPH) making left turns, and advancing volume (VPH) of 305 or more will warrant a left-turn lane. When the Average Running Speed on an existing facility is available, the corresponding Design Speed may be obtained from IIM LD
35 Route 35 and Ridley Road1 Build 2021 F-73 NO TURN LANES OR TAPERS REQUIRED PM AM 2 Appropriate Radius required at all Intersections and Entrances (Commercial or Private). LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adjustment for Right Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, PHV right turns > 40, and PHV total < 300. Adjusted right turns = PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note: An average of 11% for K x D will suffice. FIGURE 3-26 GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) 122
36 Mike Johnson From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Beth Lewis Friday, October 10, :10 PM Mike Johnson FW: Meherrin and Ridley Road image001.jpg Mike, Here is an amended comment regarding traffic around the middle and high schools. Regardless, the TIA assumed all traffic used the Meherrin Road entrance, so if only a car or two uses 58, the traffic on Meherrin is reduced below what the study accounted for. Thanks, Beth Beth Lewis, AICP Community Development Deputy Director Franklin Southampton Community Development Department 207 West Second Avenue Franklin, VA From: Drewery, Gene H. [drewerygh@shso.org] Sent: Friday, October 10, :03 PM To: bphillips@southamptoncounty.org Cc: Beth Lewis Subject: Meherrin and Ridley Road Mr. Phillips, I looked back for two years and found only one accident at or near the intersection. Per our phone conversation, I found the following; Students use both the Meherrin Road (Hwy 35) and Southampton Pkwy( Hwy 58) driveways to the schools in the morning and afternoon. My earlier response had stated different and I stand corrected. The School Resource Officer controls the civilian traffic in the parking lot to ensure a smooth flow for the buses to enter and exit. The Sheriff s office has voluntarily provided only in the afternoon traffic control for several years for the buses only. The afternoon traffic control was initiated by Capt. J. A. Wyche several years ago on his own and not requested by the School Board. Major G.H. Drewery Chief Deputy PIO/Fire Investigator Office (757) Fax (757) ORI VA [fbina] 256th Session 123
37 JDW Development of Virginia LLC c/o David Williams 736 Forest Mills Road Chesapeake, VA Christian and Hazel Moore Moore Road Paul and Marguerite Leathers Greenhead Road Wilbert and Mahala Williams Greenhead Road Dennis Butler Midway Drive Helen Simmons 406 Hunterdale Road Franklin, VA Wilbert Williams and Eunice Wilson Greenhead Road Brenda Tennessee Ridley Road Courtland VA Natalie Coggsdale LW Crowder Meherrin Road Maynard Boykins Jr etals P.O. Box 412 Timothy and Kimberly Nixon Ridley Road William Chambliss Ivor Road Branch Banking & Trust Co. P.O. Box Forest Hills Road Wilson, NC Paul Leathers etals Ridley Road Frances Stanton TR B Keith Stanton c/o Evelyn Miller 4 Mill Creek Terrace Hampton, VA Kenneth Barnes Ridley Road Patricia and Inez Faltz Ridley Road Joseph and Gladys Pettiford TR 1608 N. Howard Street Alexandria, VA Mary Irby Ridley Road Kenneth and Shelby Bradshaw Ridley Road William Barham etals c/o Brenda Myers 54 Cheswold Blvd, Apt 516 Newark, DE Teresa Reichert 12 Seaview Avenue Northport, NY Vera Dawson and Helen Parker Ridley Road Dianne Williams life estate c/o Cheryl Roberts Hanging Tree Road Meredith and Nancy Turner Ridley Road Lillie Murphy Ridley Road Fitzgerald Barnes 7307 Courthouse Road Louisa, VA Daniel and Annetta Moore Moore Road Evelyn Musser etals Churchill Drive Ronald Williams Sr. P.O. Box
38 Southampton County School Board P.O. Box 96 Courtland, VA
39 126
Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA
Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA (St. Tammany Parish Mandeville, LA) Prepared For The Pittman Companies Michael N Pittman, MD 328 East Boston St Covington, LA 70433
JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
JOHNSON RANCH RAPID CITY, SOUTH DAKOTA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: KTM Design Solutions 528 Kansas City Street, Suite 1 Rapid City, SD 57701 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 6300 South Syracuse
MEMORANDUM. Saint Edward Ballfields Traffic and Parking Analysis (Updated)
MEMORANDUM Date: May 26, 2016 To: From: Subject: Debbie Bent and Kris Overleese, City of Kenmore Kendra Breiland and Sarah Keenan, Fehr & Peers Saint Edward Ballfields Traffic and Parking Analysis (Updated)
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Merrimack Valley Metropolitan Planning Organization FROM: James Terlizzi, P.E., Transportation Planning Engineer DATE: March 6, 2017 SUBJECT: Further analysis of the recommendations
SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation
SR 104/Paradise Bay-Shine Road Intersection Safety Improvements Intersection Control Evaluation Background and Project Needs SR 104 is functionally classified as a rural-principal arterial. It is a limited
Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis January 4, 2019 Prepared by City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation Active Transportation Division Winnetka Ave Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009
6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (veh/h) 116 20 8 405 137 56 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.67 0.67 0.89 0.89 Hourly flow
MEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC
MEMORANDUM Date: November 4, 2013 To: From: Subject: Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis As requested, Fehr & Peers is providing clarification
FORT MYERS CITY COUNCIL OSCAR M. CORBIN, JR. CITY HALL, 2200 SECOND STREET FORT MYERS, FLORIDA
Agenda City Council Special Mee ng March 18, 2019 1:00 PM Historic Preserva on Commission Appeal - Virginia Avenue/ McGregor Boulevard Roundabout MAYOR Randall P. Henderson, Jr. Ward 1 Teresa Watkins Brown
1 st Street Intersection Study
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 1 st Street Intersection Study Prepared for: City of Independence In Cooperation With: Iowa Department of Transportation & Iowa Department of Public Safety Governor
APPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets
APPENDICES APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets Lanes, Volumes, Timings NO BUILD 2016 PM 8: 10th St & Thain Rd 10/05/2016 Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA. Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR RESIDENCE INN PROJECT Davis, CA Prepared For: JACKSON PROPERTIES 155 Cadillac Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. 3853 Taylor Road,
Lakeside Terrace Development
Lakeside Terrace Development City of Barrie, County of Simcoe Traffic Brief for: Type of Document: Final Report Project Number: JDE 1617 Date Submitted: April 29 th, 216 4/29/16 John Northcote, P.Eng.
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering
Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands
Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia
Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia S IGNAL W ARRANT A NALYSIS For the Intersection of: Sugarloaf Parkway / Richards Middle School Driveway / Sugarland Crossing Main Site Driveway Prepared for:
L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:
L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES
RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS
RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS Proposed Gas Station 40 Arthur Street (Highway 26), Town of the Blue Mountains (Thornbury), County of Grey, Ontario AUGUST 2013 August 27, 2013 MR. REG RUSSWURM
BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM
BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Prepared for: City and County of Denver Prepared by: Contact: Brian Bern, P.E., PTOE 303.572.0200 On Behalf of: Lowry Redevelopment Authority
Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario
April 18 th, 2017 Mr. Kevin Yemm Vice President, Land Development Richraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa, Ontario (Tel: 613.739.7111 / e-mail: keviny@richcraft.com) Re:
Traffic Impact Analysis
Traffic Impact Analysis Congregate Care Facility Billerica, Massachusetts Prepared For: Hawthorn Development, LLC 35 Kettle Court Salem, OR 973 Prepared By: Sebago Technics, Inc. 75 John Roberts Road,
Appendix E: Emission Reduction Calculations
Derr Road and Home Road Conversion Feasibility Study Springfield, OH Appendix E: Emission Reduction Calculations Derr Road and Home Road Conversion Feasibility Study Springfield, OH Emission Reduction
DIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
DIVISION STREET PLAT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction...3 2. Project Description...3 3. Existing Conditions...3 4. Forecast Traffic Demand and Analysis...12 5. Conclusions and
HONDA DEALERSHIP LAKE ELSINORE, CALIFORNIA. Prepared by:
LOS ANGELES 21 S. Figueroa St, Suite 24 Los Angeles, CA 912 213.337.368 Fax :213.337.3679 ONTARIO 4141 E. Inland Empire Blvd, Suite 25 Ontario, CA 91764 99.481.575 Fax :99.481.5757 SAN DIEGO 6 B St, Suite
Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY Boston Post Road Realignment and Roundabout Design Report
March 6, 2015 Ryan Coyne, PE City Engineer City of Rye 1051 Boston Post Road Rye, NY 10580 RE: JMC Project 14108 Boston Post Road Roundabout Boston Post Road and Parsons Street City of Rye, NY Dear Ryan:
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Upper Broadway Road Diet Summary of Findings
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Summary of Findings Date: June 17, 2014 Project #: 17121.15 To: Si Lau, P.E.; City of Oakland, CA From: Erin Ferguson, P.E.; Aaron Elias, P.E.; Daphne Dethier; and Mark Bowman, P.E.;
ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RAYMOND VINEYARDS WINERY USE PERMIT MODIFICATION #P11-00156 AUGUST 5, 2014 PREPARED BY: OMNI-MEANS,
APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE
APPENDIX A LEVEL OF SERVICE CONCEPTS, ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES,STANDARDS OF SIGNIFICANCE Roadway Segment Level of Service Definitions LOS V/C Congestion/Delay Traffic Description (Used for surface streets,
Village of Richmond Transportation Brief
Village of Richmond Transportation Brief GENIVAR Project Number 111-18482-00 June 21 st, 2011 www.genivar.com GENIVAR 15 Fitzgerald Road, Suite 100 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA K2H 9G1 Telephone: 613-829-2800
886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study
McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited March 2013 886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 (905) 882-4100 www.hdrinc.com
JMC. November 7, Chairman John P. Ewasutyn and Members of the Planning Board Town of Newburgh Town Hall 308 Gardnertown Road Newburgh, NY 12550
JMC JOHN MEYER CONSULTING, PC Site Planning n Civil Engineering n Landscape Architecture Land Surveying n Transportation Engineering n Environmental Studies n Permitting n Construction Services November
APPENDIX G. Traffic Data
APPENDIX G Traffic Data HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Duanesburg Road & I-88 Ramps 10/7/2004 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl)
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study Crawford, Bunte, Brammeier May 1, 2009 MEMORANDUM Date: April 24, 2009 To: From: Subject:
Traffic Analysis For Approved Uses within the St. Lucie West DRI Aldi Port St. Lucie, FL Prepared for: Bohler Engineering, LLC 1000 Corporate Drive Suite 250 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334 Prepared by: 10795
LEMON FLATS SECOND ACCESS
LEMON FLATS SECOND ACCESS RECONNAISSANCE STUDY SEPTEMBER 2007 APPENDIX A Synchro Analysis Worksheets HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2005 - Background 3: Anka Street & Lemon Flats Second
MMM Group Limited. Communities. Transportation. Buildings. Infrastructure
MMM Group Limited Traffic Study CASA MIA Community Care Facility Vancouver, BC Communities Transportation Buildings Infrastructure February 2013 5011001-033 STANDARD LIMITATIONS This report was prepared
Appendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants
Appendix I: The Project Traffic Impact Study report by TJKM Transportation Consultants TJKM Transportation Consultants Draft Report Traffic Impact Study for the Residential Development at 4659 Proctor
Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA
Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Camp Parkway Commerce Center is a proposed distribution and industrial center to be
Traffic Impact Analysis Update
Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017
Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,
KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266
KUM & GO #300 PECOS STREET & 88 TH AVENUE THORNTON, COLORADO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REVISION 1 PREPARED FOR KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266 JANUARY 23, 2014 OA PROJECT NO. 013-1721
SUBJECT: EMERALD NECKLACE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PHASE 1 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT SUMMARY OF FINDINGS. May 9, 2016
May 9, 2016 Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos ECORP CONSULTING, INC. 215 North 5 th Street Redlands, CA 92374 SUBJECT: EMERALD NECKLACE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN PHASE 1 TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT Dear Mr. Jesus "Freddie" Olmos:
CastleGlenn Consultants Inc.
CastleGlenn Consultants Inc. Engineers, Project Managers & Planners March 11 th, 2013 Domenic Idone, P. Eng Planning Manager R.W. Tomlinson Ltd. 5597 Power Road Ottawa, Ontario K1G 3N4 Dear Mr. Idone:
MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA
MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 Prepared for: Golden Eagle Multi-Family Properties, LLC 6201 Oak Canyon Rd., Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92618 Prepared
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Prescott Plaza Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX 1.1: APPROVED TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPING AGREEMENT TIA Report.docx
Prescott Plaza Traffic Impact Analysis APPENDIX 1.1: APPROVED TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPING AGREEMENT 11897-05 TIA Report.docx Prescott Plaza Traffic Impact Analysis This page is intentionally left blank 11897-05
(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals
February 14th, 2014 BY E-MAIL: wally.dubyk@ottawa.ca City of Ottawa Planning and Growth Management Branch 110 Laurier Ave. W., 4 th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Attention: Wally Dubyk, C.E.T (A) Project
Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents
Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 15001714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 4 III. 2015 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS...
STANDARD LIMITATIONS
STANDARD LIMITATIONS This report was prepared by MMM Group (MMM) for the account of Spire Construction Inc. (the Client). The disclosure of any information contained in this report is the sole responsibility
Barrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief
Barrhaven Honda Dealership Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 September, 2015 File: 115136 Ref: R-2015-152
Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 9821 425.339.8266 Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish January 218 GTC #17-37
Critical Movement* Delay (sec/veh) Critical Movement* LOS 8 a.m. 9 a.m. B 25.2 C. 3 p.m. 4 p.m. B 17.3 B
Memorandum DATE: AUGUST 1, 2013 TO: PAUL TILTON, P.E., SANDWICH DPW DIRECTOR/TOWN ENGINEER FROM: LEV MALAKHOFF, SR. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER RE: ROUTE 130/QUAKER MEETINGHOUSE ROAD INTERSECTION Paul: Per
APPENDICES. No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016)
APPENDICES Appendix T No Cumulative Impact Project Alternative Traffic Analysis Memorandum (May 2016) 661 Bear Valley Parkway EIR March 2017 APPENDICES This page intentionally left blank 661 Bear Valley
One Harbor Point Residential
Residential Gig Harbor, WA Transportation Impact Analysis January 23, 2017 Prepared for: Neil Walter Company PO Box 2181 Tacoma, WA 98401 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest 11400 SE
June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903
LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 545 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Suite 210 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 633-2868 FAX (719) 633-5430 E-mail: lsc@lsctrans.com Website: http://www.lsctrans.com June 21,
Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida
Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida Summary Report June 2008 Prepared by: 12909 N 56 th Street # 201 Tampa, FL 33617 Ph: (813) 988-3180 Fax: (813) 343-6854 Morgan Road
April Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief
April 26 Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief prepared for: The Salvation Army 2 Overlea Blvd.
Dartmouth, NS B3B 1X7 Tel: WSP. Canada Inc.
Traffic Impact Study: Proposed Residential Development Herring Cove Road Halifax, NS Presented to: FH Construction Ltd. 1 Spectacle Lake Drive Dartmouth, NS B3B 1X7 Tel: 902 835 9955 Fax: 902 835 1645
Interstate 80 Corridor Study
Interstate 80 Corridor Study Final Technical Memorandum 5: Traffic Volumes, Accident Locations and Operational Deficiencies West Verdi (SR 425) Interchange to West McCarran Boulevard (SR 651) and East
TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis
Appendix E NJ TRANSIT Pennsauken Junction Transit Center and Park & Ride RiverLINE and Atlantic City Line Pennsauken Township, Camden County, New Jersey TRAFFIC DATA Background Traffic Information for
LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI
LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY FOR I-96 AT LATSON RD INTERCHANGE Livingston County CS 47065 JN 101622C Submitted to: Michigan Department
MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1
MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 2190986ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 October 6, 2010 110-502 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive. Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc.
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Project Description... 1 Estimated Daily Project Traffic... 3 Estimated
D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...3 II. Project Description...3 III. Existing Conditions...3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions...8 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...14
INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange
INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange City of Broadview Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Broadview Heights Department of Engineering 9543 Broadview Road
DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.
DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava July 9, 2015 115-620 Overview_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation
Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development
Traffic Impact Study Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development Marbledale Road Tuckahoe, NY PREPARED FOR BILLWIN DEVELOPMENT AFFILIATES, LLC 365 WHITE PLAINS ROAD EASTCHESTER, NY. 10709 PREPARED BY Engineering
Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois
Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study 1714-1720 Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois Prepared For: HOLABIRD & ROOT, LLC Prepared by: Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd. 145 Commerce Drive, Ste A,
267 O Connor Street Residential Development
M a y 2014 267 O Connor Street Residential Development Transportation Brief Google 2014 Bing 2014 Prepared for: MASTERCRAFT STARWOOD Prepared by: Study 267 O'Connor Type Street May 2014 Study Residential
MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:
McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February
MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:
MEMO To: Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers VIA EMAIL From: Michael J. Labadie, PE Julie M. Kroll, PE, PTOE Brandon Hayes, PE, P.Eng. Fleis & VandenBrink Date: January 5, 2017 Re: Proposed
Proposed Pit Development
July 5, 2017 via email: sam@greenwoodconst.ca CCTA File 114239 Sam Greenwood Greenwood Aggregates 205467 County Road 109 Amaranth, ON L9W 0V1 Re: Proposed Violet Hill Gravel Pit, Town of Mono Traffic Review
JRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3
March 2015 Prepared for Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3 JRL consulting JRL consulting TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 BACKGROUND... 2 2 EXISTING
Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California
Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California DRAFT REPORT Prepared By Tulare County Association of Governments (TCAG) April 2013 Table of Contents Introduction:... 3 Project
770 SOMERSET STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Downtown North York by PFHLai / CC-BY-3. September 217 77 SOMERSET STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Transportation Impact Assessment 77 Somerset Street Residential Development Transportation Impact Assessment
Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 8 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98 45.9.8 Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish February 8 GTC #7-87 Sweetwater Landing Traffic
Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis
Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 320 Kirkland,
LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW
LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW Prepared for: Prepared by: Broadview Developments Inc. c/o Westbrook Consulting Watt Consulting Group Our File: 2064.B01 Date: October 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639
INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY Prepared for: Virginia Department of Transportation Central Region Operations Traffic Engineering (UPC #81378, TO 12-092) DAVENPORT Project Number: 13-368 / /2014 RTE. 1 at RTE.
Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1
Ref. No. 171-6694 Phase 2 November 23, 217 Mr. David Quilichini, Vice President Fares & Co. Developments Inc. 31 Place Keelson Sales Centre DARTMOUTH NS B2Y C1 Sent Via Email to David@faresinc.com RE:
Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit Application Transportation Assessment
MEMORANDUM Date: June 22, 2018 Project #: 21562 To: Colin McArthur, AICP From: Project: Subject: Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit
County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study
County State Aid Highway 30 (Diffley Road) and Dodd Road Intersection Study City of Eagan, Dakota County, Minnesota Date: March 2012 Project No. 14957.000 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101
10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis
Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98201 425.339.8266 10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish September 2018
BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:
BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Barrhaven Fellowship CRC 3058 Jockvale Road Ottawa, ON K2J 2W7 December 7, 2016 116-649 Report_1.doc D. J.
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)
Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205
Wellington Street West
Transportation Brief prepared for: 185 Davenport Road Suite 300 Toronto, ON M5R 1J1 prepared by: 1223 Michael Street Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 November 5, 2013 TO3131TOH Transportation Brief November
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 2014 UPDATED
TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS
TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS NAPA FLEA MARKET COUNTY OF NAPA Prepared for: Tom Harding Napa-Vallejo Flea Market 33 Kelly Road American Canyon, CA 9453 Prepared by: 166 Olympic Boulevard, Suite 21 Walnut Creek,
700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1. Submitted by:
700 Hunt Club Road Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1 Submitted by: 14 June 2013 1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com 14 June 2013
LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS
LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...
April 7, Mr. Blake Shutler Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435
Compass Homes Development LLC Summit Homes Construction, LLC PO Box 6539 Dillon, CO 80435 Re: Trip Generation Comparison West Hills Townhomes Keystone, Colorado FHU Reference No. 116388-01 Dear Mr. Shutler:
MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah DATE: October 26, 2009 COPIES: OUR FILE: TO: FROM: Jack Thompson
McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (95)823-85 Fax: (95) 823-853 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: FROM: File Mark VanderSluis, Keyur Shah
Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1
Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West
830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality
830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Statement Final Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 www.griffininc.ca Prepared
Memorandum. Megan Costa, SOCPA Sam Gordon, Town of DeWitt Jeanie Gleisner, CNYRPDB Meghan Vitale DATE: April 20, 2017
TO: FROM: Megan Costa, SOCPA Sam Gordon, Town of DeWitt Jeanie Gleisner, CNYRPDB Meghan Vitale DATE: April 20, 2017 RE: Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council 100 Clinton Square 126 N. Salina Street,
Date: December 20, Project #:
To: Craig Rottenberg Long s Jewelers 60A South Avenue Burlington, MA 01803 From: Patrick Dunford, P.E. Senior Project Manager Date: December 20, 2018 Project #: 14416.00 Re: Burlington Mall Proposed Long
Traffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers
Traffic Impact Study For Eastern Springs A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY April 2018 Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers Table of Contents 1) Executive Summary... 2 2) Study Purpose...
Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills
Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared by: HDR Engineering 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 October 2012 Revision 3 D-1 Oakbrook Village Plaza Laguna
VOA Vista Drive Residential housing Development TIA Project #13915 TABLE OF CONTENTS
VOA Vista Drive Residential housing Development TIA Project #13915 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 2 Project Background... 2 Conditions... 2 Findings... 3 Recommendations... 4 Introduction... 6
1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief
1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief October 2013 Study 1140 Wellington Type Street West October 2013 Study Transportation Name Brief February 2011 TB Check List TIS / TB/ CTS Check List prepared