Traffic Monitoring Report 2016
|
|
- Corey Paul
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Summary SUMMARY Cambridge 1. In, there were 206,750 motor vehicles entering and leaving Cambridge per 12-hour day (7am to 7pm). This represents an increase of 0.2% compared with Prior to 2014 the long-term trend over the past 17 years has been relatively flat, but there has been an increase of 8% over the past three years. 2. At 57,597 per 12-hour day, the number of motor vehicles crossing the River Cam bridges within Cambridge was 1% less than in 2015 and 12% less than 10 years ago. 3. There were over 3.13 million Park and Ride journeys in, representing a decrease of 1% compared with Other Urban Areas 4. The numbers of motor vehicles entering and leaving the nine market towns per 12-hour day in were: Huntingdon 76,834, Wisbech 64,934, St. Neots 55,908, St. Ives 51,246, Ely 46,263, March 35,389, Whittlesey 32,541, Ramsey 19,488 and Chatteris 19,688. Cycling 5. There was a 2% decrease in cycle trips in * compared with However, there has been significant growth of 59% from the average baseline. * data does not currently include data from the counties cycle ATCs as these are currently not operational. Figures will be updated when these issues have been resolved. Cambridgeshire Guided Busway 6. During there were just under 315,000 passenger journeys on the Cambridgeshire Guided Busway, representing an increase of 4% compared with
2 Contents CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 3 Purpose of the Traffic Monitoring Report Variability in Traffic Counts 2 Cambridge City 4 Introduction River Cam Screenline Radial Cordon Park and Ride 3 Town Monitoring 20 St. Neots Huntingdon St Ives Wisbech March Ely Chatteris Ramsey Whittlesey 4 Cycle Monitoring 38 5 The Busway 39 Appendix 1 - Definitions 41 Appendix 2 - Traffic Flows 43 Contact for Further Information 44 2
3 Introduction 1. INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Traffic Monitoring Report 1.1 The County Council, as Highway Authority, is responsible for all public roads within the county, except for the motorway and trunk road network, which is operated and maintained by Highways England. In order to fulfil its functions, the County Council requires up to date information on vehicle flows, flow composition, vehicle occupancy and overall trends. This information is used:- to identify and justify transport schemes; to assist in the priority ranking of schemes ; for strategic planning; for development control purposes; in road maintenance assessments; in road safety investigations; in the environmental assessment of schemes; for the monitoring of targets; to provide a database of information. 1.2 This report examines traffic and travel trends for both rural and urban roads within the county. Where appropriate, trends are compared with national statistics. Variability in Traffic Counts 1.3 Much of the information in this report is based on twelve-hour manual traffic counts. 1.4 Due to the random nature of traffic flow, even if counted under identical conditions the number of vehicles recorded in these samples will fluctuate. The associated uncertainty reduces (in percentage terms) as the number of vehicles increases. 1.5 More serious, and much harder to quantify, is potential systematic variation due to differing circumstances when counts are carried out. Three examples are:- Roadworks, accidents or other incidents causing vehicle diversions; Changes in travel mode due to weather; Unusual events (e.g. sport or entertainment events) causing untypical traffic patterns. 1.6 Care is taken to minimise the potential for systematic variation, but, inevitably, there is no guarantee that it is completely eliminated. 1.7 Because of random and possible systematic variation, caution is needed when interpreting observed changes in traffic from one year to the next. 3
4 Cambridge City 2. CAMBRIDGE CITY Introduction 2.1 Traffic flows have been monitored comprehensively in Cambridge since 1978 using two screenlines. 2.2 The first screenline runs along the River Cam, with vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists crossing all bridges in the city centre being counted in the Spring of each year. 2.3 The second screenline is a radial cordon, with vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists on every entry and exit route counted in the Autumn. Eight sites are also monitored to count cyclists and pedestrians on paths between the radial routes. River Cam Screenline 2.4 Vehicles and pedestrians crossing the River Cam urban screenline in April are shown in Table 2.1. The figures include cycle and pedestrian traffic on the City s River Cam cycle and pedestrian bridges. Table 2.1 Vehicles Crossing the River Cam - April Vehicle Type VEHICLES 12 Hour Flow Modal Split Motor Cycles % Cars & Taxis 46,597 37% Light Goods % Heavy Goods 994 1% Bus & Coach % All motor vehicles 57,597 45% Pedal cycles 33,264 26% Pedestrians 36,541 29% Total (All modes) 120, % 2.5 Traffic trends across the River Cam since 2012 are shown in Table
5 Cambridge City Table 2.2 Traffic Growth on the Urban River Cam Screenline INDEX (2006=100) Change Vehicle Type to Motorcycles % Cars % Light Goods Vehicles % Heavy Goods Vehicles % Bus & Coach % All motor vehicles % Pedal Cycles* % * Pedal cycle growth is based on 2-day average figures. 2.6 The number of motor vehicles observed crossing the River Cam last year was 1% less than in 2015 and 12% less than ten years ago. 2.7 The number of cyclists crossing the River Cam last year was 71% higher than ten years ago. 2.8 Figure 2.1 below shows total motor vehicles crossing the River Cam over the last ten years. Figure 2.1 Motor Vehicle Traffic Crossing River Cam 2.9 Figure 2.2 below shows flows by time of day. The morning and evening peaks are less pronounced than on the Cambridge radials (shown in Figure 2.4). 13
6 Cambridge City Figure 2.2 River Cam Screenline flows by Time of Day 14
7 Cambridge City Figure
8 Cambridge City Cambridge Radial Cordon 2.10 Table 2.3 records the numbers of vehicles crossing the Cambridge radial cordon. Table 2.3 includes 4,559 pedal cyclists and 2,496 pedestrians on paths between the radial routes. Table 2.3 Vehicles Crossing the Cambridge Radial Cordon - October VEHICLES Vehicle Type 12 Hr Flow Modal Split Motor Cycles 2,185 1% Cars & Taxis 174,473 78% Light Goods 21,760 10% Heavy Goods 5,925 3% Bus & Coach 2,407 1% All motor vehicles 206,750 92% Pedal cycles 13,023 6% Pedestrians 4,169 2% Total (All modes) 223, % 2.11 Changes in traffic on the City s radial routes are recorded in Table 2.4 and Figure In, there were 206,750 motor vehicles entering and leaving Cambridge per 12-hour day (7am to 7pm). This represents a small increase of 0.2% compared with Prior to 2014 the long-term trend over the previous 17 years was relatively flat, but there has been an increase of 8% over the past three years. Table 2.4 Traffic Growth on the Cambridge Radial Cordon INDEX (2006=100) Change Vehicle Type to Motorcycles % Cars % Light Goods Vehicles % Heavy Goods Vehicles % Bus & Coach % All motor vehicles % Pedal cycles % 2.13 There was an increase of 12% in cyclists crossing the cordon in compared to 2015, and overall growth of 96% over the past ten years. 16
9 Cambridge City Figure 2.4 Motor vehicles entering and leaving Cambridge 2.14 Figure 2.5 shows flows by time of day. The morning and evening peaks are more pronounced than on the River Cam Screenline Figure 2.5 Cambridge radial traffic by time of day 17
10 Cambridge City Figure
11 Cambridge City Park and Ride 2.15 Passenger journey numbers are shown in Figure 2.7 and Table There were over 3.13 million Park and Ride passenger journeys in, a decrease of 1% from Table 2.5 Annual Journey Figures Site Total (All Sites) 3,671,108 3,692,472 3,523,505 3,183,708 3,138,548 Figure 2.7 Park and Ride Passenger Journeys 19
12 Town Monitoring 3. TOWN MONITORING Introduction 3.1 The market town monitoring programme was extended in 2004 to include three more towns: Chatteris, Ramsey and Whittlesey. 3.2 For each town there is an outer cordon. The total number of vehicles crossing the cordon provides an estimate of traffic entering and leaving the town. St. Neots 3.3 The locations of the monitoring points are shown in Figure 3.1 and the results are summarised in Tables 3.1 and Just under 56,000 motor vehicles, over 900 pedal cycles and just under 3,000 pedestrians enter and leave St. Neots between 7.00 am and 7.00 pm each day (two-way flows). Table 3.1 Vehicles Entering & Leaving St. Neots Vehicle Type Vehicles VEHICLE INDEX Hour Flow Modal Split Motor Cycles % Cars & Taxis ,747 80% Light Goods ,216 10% Heavy Goods % Bus & Coach % All Motor Vehicles ,908 94% Pedal cycles % Pedestrians ,900 5% Total (All modes) , % 11
13 Town Monitoring Figure
14 Town Monitoring Huntingdon 3.5 The locations of the monitoring points are shown in Figure 3.2 and the results are summarised in Table Just under 77,000 motor vehicles, over 1300 pedal cycles and over 2,100 pedestrians enter and leave Huntingdon between 7.00 am and 7.00 pm each day (two-way flows). Table 3.2 Vehicles Entering & Leaving Huntingdon Vehicles Vehicle Type VEHICLE INDEX Hour Flow Modal Split Motor Cycles % Cars & Taxis % Light Goods % Heavy Goods % Bus & Coach % All Motor Vehicles % Pedal cycles % Pedestrians % Total (All modes) % 13
15 Town Monitoring Figure
16 Town Monitoring St. Ives 3.7 The locations of the outer cordon monitoring points are shown in Figure 3.3 and the results are summarised in Table Over 51,200 motor vehicles, 1,200 pedal cycles and 1,700 pedestrians enter and leave St. Ives between 7.00 am and 7.00 pm each day (twoway flows). Table 3.3 Vehicles Entering & Leaving St. Ives Vehicles Vehicle Type VEHICLE INDEX Hour Flow Modal Split Motor Cycles % Cars & Taxis % Light Goods % Heavy Goods % Bus & Coach % All Motor Vehicles % Pedal cycles % Pedestrians % Total (All modes) % 15
17 Town Monitoring Figure
18 Town Monitoring Wisbech 3.9 The locations of the outer cordon monitoring points are shown in Figure 3.4 and the results are summarised in Table Just under 65,000 motor vehicles, 300 pedal cycles and over 700 pedestrians enter and leave Wisbech between 7.00 am and 7.00 pm each day (two-way flows). Table 3.4 Vehicles Entering & Leaving Wisbech Vehicles Vehicle Type VEHICLE INDEX Hour Flow Modal Split Motor Cycles % Cars & Taxis % Light Goods % Heavy Goods % Bus & Coach % All Motor Vehicles % Pedal cycles % Pedestrians % Total (All modes) % 17
19 Town Monitoring Figure
20 Town Monitoring March 3.11 The locations of the monitoring points are shown in Figure 3.5 and the results are summarised in Table Over 35,000 motor vehicles, 550 pedal cycles and just over 900 pedestrians enter and leave March each day (two-way flows). Table 3.5 Vehicles Entering & Leaving March Vehicles Vehicle Type VEHICLE INDEX Hour Flow Modal Split Motor Cycles % Cars & Taxis % Light Goods % Heavy Goods % Bus & Coach % All Motor Vehicles % Pedal cycles % Pedestrians % Total (All modes) % 19
21 Town Monitoring Figure
22 Town Monitoring Ely 3.13 The locations of the outer cordon monitoring points are shown in Figure 3.6 and the results are summarised in Table Over 46,200 motor vehicles, 800 pedal cycles and over 2,100 pedestrians enter and leave Ely between 7.00 am and 7.00 pm each day (two-way flows). Table 3.6 Vehicles Entering & Leaving Ely Vehicles Vehicle Type VEHICLE INDEX Hour Flow Modal Split Motor Cycles % Cars & Taxis % Light Goods % Heavy Goods % Bus & Coach % All Motor Vehicles % Pedal cycles % Pedestrians % Total (All modes) % 21
23 Town Monitoring Figure
24 Town Monitoring Chatteris 3.15 The locations of the outer cordon monitoring points are shown in Figure 3.7 and the results are summarised in Table Just under 20,000 motor vehicles, 36 pedal cycles and 267 pedestrians enter and leave Chatteris between 7.00 am and 7.00 pm each day (two-way flows). Table 3.7 Vehicles Entering & Leaving Chatteris Vehicles Vehicle Type VEHICLE INDEX Hour Flow Modal Split Motor Cycles % Cars & Taxis % Light Goods % Heavy Goods % Bus & Coach % All Motor Vehicles % Pedal cycles % Pedestrians % Total (All modes) % 23
25 Town Monitoring Figure
26 Town Monitoring Ramsey 3.17 The locations of the outer cordon monitoring points are shown in Figure 3.8 and the results are summarised in Table Just under 19,500 motor vehicles, 55 pedal cycles and 117 pedestrians enter and leave Ramsey between 7.00 am and 7.00 pm each day (two-way flows). Table 3.8 Vehicles Entering & Leaving Ramsey Vehicles Vehicle Type VEHICLE INDEX Hour Flow Modal Split Motor Cycles % Cars & Taxis % Light Goods % Heavy Goods % Bus & Coach % All Motor Vehicles % Pedal cycles % Pedestrians % Total (All modes) % 25
27 Town Monitoring Figure
28 Town Monitoring Whittlesey 3.19 The locations of the outer cordon and inner screenline monitoring points are shown in Figure 3.9 and the results are summarised in Tables About 32,500 motor vehicles, 330 pedal cycles and just under 400 pedestrians enter and leave Whittlesey between 7.00 am and 7.00 pm each day (two-way flows). Table 3.9 Vehicles Entering and Leaving Whittlesey Vehicles Vehicle Type VEHICLE INDEX Hour Flow Modal Split Motor Cycles % Cars & Taxis % Light Goods % Heavy Goods % Bus & Coach % All Motor Vehicles % Pedal cycles % Pedestrians % Total (All modes) % 27
29 Town Monitoring Figure
30 Cycle Monitoring 4. CYCLE MONITORING 4.1 The numbers of cyclists using particular routes over the past ten years is shown in Table 3 in Appendix 2. Growth in Cycling 4.2 Cycling growth is measured by the overall increase across a number of automatic and manual count points located throughout Cambridgeshire, giving a large, robust sample. 4.3 There was a 2% decrease in cycle trips in * compared with Overall growth from the average baseline is 59%, which is better than the Council's target of 33.6%. * data does not currently include data from the counties cycle ATCs as these are currently not operational. Figures will be updated when these issues have been resolved. 4.4 The River Cam bridge surveys undertaken in March are a major component of the index Table 4.1 Cambridgeshire Cycle Flows at Selected Locations Increase from Year 2005 average baseline % % % % 59% Journey to Work by Pedal Cycle 4.5 Data from the 2011 national census shows that 30% of journeys to work by Cambridge residents are by pedal cycle. For Cambridgeshire as a whole the figure is 9.7%, which is much higher than the average 3% for England. 4.6 The latest available data from the Department for Transport s walking and cycling statistics, published in June 2015, shows that, in the 12 months ending March 2014, 22% of adults in Cambridgeshire cycled at least once a week. The corresponding figure for Cambridge is 48.1%, which is the highest in the country: Proportion of residents who do any walking or cycling (at local authority level) (CW010) - Statistical data sets - GOV.UK 29
31 The Busway 5. THE BUSWAY Introduction 5.1 The Busway opened on 7 th August This chapter contains some data about use of the Busway, including numbers of bus passengers, cyclists and pedestrians. Passenger Journeys 5.2 During there were just under 315,000 bus passenger journeys on the Busway. This is an increase of 4% compared with The busway usage trend is shown in Figure 5.1 below Figure 5.1 Guided Busway Passenger Journeys 12-month Rolling Total Cyclists and Pedestrians Using the Busway Maintenance Track 5.3 Table 5.1 below shows numbers of cyclists and pedestrians using the maintenance track beside the Busway per 12-hour day (between 7am and 7pm). Table 5.1 Cyclists and pedestrians using the maintenance track St. Ives Park Under A14, Trumpington and Ride Site Impington Cyclists Pedestrians Cyclists using the maintenance track contributed to a 12% increase in cycling across the Cambridge radial cordon in the autumn of 30
32 The Busway compared with autumn. There were 13,023 cycle journeys (twoway) across the cordon per day between 7am and 7pm. 31
33 Definitions APPENDIX 1 DEFINITIONS General Traffic Flow The number of motor vehicles in a given period of time, expressed as a two-way total. 12 hour flow Traffic flow in the period between 7 am and 7 pm. This is the usual period observed for manual traffic surveys. 16 hour flow Traffic flow in the period 6 am to 10 pm 18 hour flow Traffic flow in the period 6 am to midnight; traffic surveys over this period are used for environmental and traffic noise studies. 24 hour flow Traffic flow over the entire 24-hour period. 12 hour AAWF Annual Average Weekday Flow (Monday to Thursday inclusive) throughout the year. This is usually based on counts carried out during the Spring and Autumn months. 16 hour AAWF The Annual Average Weekday Flow (Monday to Friday inclusive) throughout the year. 24 hour AAWF The Annual Average Weekday Flow (Monday to Friday inclusive), throughout the year. AADT ATC MCC Screenline Annual Average Daily Traffic is the average flow on an average day, i.e. Sunday to Saturday inclusive, throughout the year and is expressed as a 24-hour flow. Automatic Traffic Counters are battery powered wire loop detectors operating from permanent loops cut into the road. The loops create a magnetic field, which is disturbed when a vehicle passes over it. Manual Classified Count is a traffic count undertaken by manual observation, recorded and classified by vehicle type and time period. An imaginary line drawn across a transport corridor (often following a physical barrier such as a river or a railway line) used to determine net flows between the areas on either side. Note: It is generally accepted that the 24 hour Annual Average Daily Traffic flow is the same as (or very similar to) the 16 hour Annual Average Weekday Flow. 32
34 Definitions Vehicle Classifications Motor Cycles Motor cycles, mopeds, scooters and motor cycle combinations. Cars LGV HGV Buses All Vehicles Cars, taxis, estate cars, light goods vans with side windows to the rear of the driver s seat, three wheeled cars and motor invalid carriages. Light Goods Vehicles are goods vehicles up to 3.5 tonnes gross vehicle weight. This category includes all transit style vans, and small pickup vans. Heavy Goods Vehicles are goods vehicles over 3.5 tonnes gross vehicle weight. This category includes both rigid and articulated vehicles. All buses and coaches, including works buses. All motor vehicles. Route Classifications Motorways Trunk Roads Primary Roads National routes with restricted access, which are operated and maintained by Highways England. National routes that are operated and maintained by Highways England. Important through routes of regional significance, including all trunk roads and a number of strategic routes for which the County Council is the Highway Authority. Distributor Roads County roads which link major settlements with primary routes. Access Roads Principal Roads Rural Roads Urban Roads All other county roads. All non trunk A class roads. Those with a speed limit of more than 40 mph. Those with a speed limit of 40 mph or less 33
35 Traffic Flow Summaries APPENDIX 2 TRAFFIC FLOWS Table 1: River Cam Screenline - 12 Hour Flows Road No Location Total Motor Vehicles A1134 Elizabeth Way 26,634 22,340 24,657 22,633 24,545 C292 Victoria Avenue 13,344 10,901 11,364 11,434 11,158 C290 Bridge Street 2,467 2,180 2,207 1,786 1,800 C294 Silver Street 3,422 3,742 2,866 3,132 4,357 A1134 Fen Causeway 20,481 19,517 18,231 19,154 15,736 TOTAL 66,348 58,679 59,325 58,139 57,597 Location Table 2: Cambridge Radials - 12 Hour Flows Total Motor Vehicles Histon Road 21,342 20,313 22,374 24,189 23,633 Milton Road 25,487 24,698 26,560 27,082 26,971 Horningsea Road 15,402 12,683 14,408 14,737 14,714 Newmarket Road 20,160 20,125 20,553 21,800 21,027 High St Teversham 3,181 2,925 3,109 3,216 3,210 Fulborn Road 9,839 9,088 9,185 9,518 9,774 Wort sc way (adj) 1,121 1,021 1,140 1,153 1,052 Lime Kiln Rd (adj) 7,465 6,523 5,897 6,509 5,063 Babraham Road 12,439 12,799 12,949 13,102 14,086 Granhams Road 3,439 3,260 3,074 3,283 3,369 Shelford Road 8,631 10,151 10,548 10,175 10,145 Hauxton Road 18,208 25,667 26,216 27,850 28,040 Coton Road 3,610 3,083 3,277 3,187 3,251 Barton Road 10,566 10,289 11,683 12,464 11,956 Madingley Road 14,162 13,692 14,332 13,976 15,309 Huntingdon Road 10,388 9,470 9,852 9,346 9,006 Girton Road 4,505 4,572 4,823 4,494 4,628 Guided Busway Total 189, , , , ,750 34
36 Traffic Flow Summaries Table 3: Cambridge Cycle Route Monitoring 12 Hour Flows Location Newnham 1,533 1,755 2,295 2,356 1,900 Comberton Toft Dry Drayton Oakington Milton ,074 1, Fulbourn Teversham Coldham s Lane Carter Cycle Bridge A1301 through Gt. Shelford 1,285 1,455 1,962 2,126 1,417 2,738 2,759 3,320 3,378 3, , Hills Road 2,566 2,366 3,121 3, Long Road ,035 1, Jubilee Way ,273 1, Cambridge Road, Sawston Swaffham Bulbeck - Prior A1303 Quy to Bottisham Total 12,604 12,934 16,883 18,224 10,541 Further information can be obtained from: Business Intelligence Team OCT1224, Second Floor Octagon Castle Hill, Cambridge CB3 0AP Business.Intelligence@cambridgeshire.gov.uk 35
Traffic Monitoring Report 2017
Summary SUMMARY Cambridge 1. In, there were 203,329 motor vehicles entering and leaving Cambridge per 12-hour day (7am to 7pm). This is a decrease of 2% compared with 2016. 2. The number of motor vehicles
More informationTRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT HARVINGTON PT1 (CREST HILL)
TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT HARVINGTON PT1 ( HILL) October 20-24th 2014 Conducted voluntarily by the residents of Harvington Village. This report has been prepared in light of the planning application W14/01788/OU
More informationPost Opening Project Evaluation. M6 Toll
M6 Toll Five Post Years Opening After Study: Project Summary Evaluation Report Post Opening Project Evaluation M6 Toll Five Years After Study Summary Report October 2009 Document History JOB NUMBER: 5081587/905
More informationBUS SERVICES IN CHAMBERLAYNE ROAD NW10
INTRODUCTION BUS SERVICES IN CHAMBERLAYNE ROAD NW10 1 LONDON BUSES 1. This note reviews the issues in Chamberlayne Road, Kensal Rise. It covers the range of bus routes in the area, their characteristics
More informationRTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT
2011-2015 RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary... 3 Crash Types... 4 Time and Day of Crashes... 7 Crash Factors... 9 Fatalities... 10 Driver s Behavior... 11 Crash Locations... 15 Non-Motorized
More informationM6 TOLL TRAFFIC MONITORING STUDY
` M6 TOLL TRAFFIC MONITORING STUDY Traffic Impact Study Report POST OPENING PROJECT EVALUATION M6 TOLL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REPORT JOB NUMBER: 4416515.1525.600 DOCUMENT REF: M6 Toll Traffic Impact Study
More informationSubmission to Greater Cambridge City Deal
What Transport for Cambridge? 2 1 Submission to Greater Cambridge City Deal By Professor Marcial Echenique OBE ScD RIBA RTPI and Jonathan Barker Introduction Cambridge Futures was founded in 1997 as a
More informationPedestrians Road Safety
Pedestrians Road Safety Overview Over the period 1996-2009, 5,323 people have been killed on Irish road. Out of this 22% (1162) were pedestrians. Additional 3863 pedestrians were seriously injured in the
More informationMichigan. Traffic. Profile
June 2014 Revised 5/11/15 Michigan 2013 Traffic Crash Profile Reporting Criteria Please pay particular attention to the wording when interpreting the three levels of data gathered for this report. Crash
More information2016 Community Report New Mexico
216 Produced for the Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 581 by the University of, Geospatial and Population Studies, Traffic Research Unit Distributed
More informationTRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS
Jiangxi Ji an Sustainable Urban Transport Project (RRP PRC 45022) TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTS A. Introduction 1. The purpose of the travel demand forecasts is to assess the impact of the project components
More information2014 Community Report Portales
4 Portales Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More informationONE YEAR ON: THE IMPACTS OF THE LONDON CONGESTION CHARGING SCHEME ON VEHICLE EMISSIONS
ONE YEAR ON: THE IMPACTS OF THE LONDON CONGESTION CHARGING SCHEME ON VEHICLE EMISSIONS Sean D Beevers and David C Carslaw Environmental Research Group, King s College London, 4 th Floor, Franklin Wilkins
More information2014 Community Report Luna County
4 Luna County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More informationMichigan. Traffic. Profile
June 2014 Revised 5/11/15 Michigan 2013 Traffic Crash Profile Reporting Criteria Please pay particular attention to the wording when interpreting the three levels of data gathered for this report. Crash
More information2015 Community Report White Rock
5 White Rock Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More informationProvisional Review of Fatal Collisions. January to December 31 st 2017
Provisional Review of Fatal Collisions January to December 31 st 17 2 nd January 18 Review of 17 fatal collision statistics as of 31st December 17 Overview This report summarises the main trends in road
More information2016 Community Report Los Alamos County
6 Los Alamos County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2016 Community Report Portales
6 Portales Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2014 Community Report Las Vegas
4 Las Vegas Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2014 Community Report Truth or Consequences
4 Truth or Consequences Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2014 Community Report Tularosa
4 Tularosa Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 8 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2015 Community Report Grants
5 Grants Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2016 Community Report Torrance County
6 Torrance County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2015 Community Report Torrance County
5 Torrance County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2016 Community Report De Baca County
6 De Baca County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2014 Community Report Aztec
Aztec Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies, Traffic
More information2015 Community Report Las Vegas
5 Las Vegas Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2015 Community Report Tularosa
5 Tularosa Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2016 Community Report Santa Fe County
26 Santa Fe County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2014 Community Report Los Lunas
4 Los Lunas Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2015 Community Report Chaparral
5 Chaparral Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2016 Community Report San Juan County
26 San Juan County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2015 Community Report San Juan County
25 San Juan County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2016 Community Report Aztec
Aztec Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies, Traffic
More information2015 Community Report Aztec
25 Aztec Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2015 Community Report Doña Ana County
25 Doña Ana County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2015 Community Report Los Lunas
25 Los Lunas Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More informationAppendix J Traffic Impact Study
MRI May 2012 Appendix J Traffic Impact Study Level 2 Traffic Assessment Limited Impact Review Appendix J [This page was left blank intentionally.] www.sgm-inc.com Figure 1. Site Driveway and Trail Crossing
More informationAppendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability
(http://mobility.tamu.edu/mmp) Office of Operations, Federal Highway Administration Appendix SAN San Diego, California 2003 Annual Report on Freeway Mobility and Reliability This report is a supplement
More informationMissouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017
Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017 Conducted for the Highway Safety & Traffic Division of the Missouri Department of Transportation by The Missouri Safety Center University of Central Missouri Final
More informationBedford Town Centre Transport Modelling. Local Model Validation Report (LMVR) Final Draft
Bedford Town Centre Transport Modelling Local Model Validation Report (LMVR) Final Draft Bedford Town Centre Transport Modelling Local Model Validation Report (LMVR) JMP Consultants Limited Abacus House
More informationClean Harbors Canada, Inc.
Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Proposed Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference Transportation Assessment St. Clair Township, Ontario September 2009 itrans Consulting Inc. 260
More information2.1 Outline of Person Trip Survey
Trip Characteristics 2.1 Outline of Person Trip Survey 2.1.1 Outline of the Survey The Person Trip survey was carried out from 2006 to 2007 as a part of the Istanbul Transportation Master Plan undertaken
More informationWhere are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities?
Where are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities? Umesh Shankar Mathematical Analysis Division (NPO-121) Office of Traffic Records and Analysis National Center for Statistics and Analysis National
More informationTravel Time Savings Memorandum
04-05-2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Background 3 Methodology 3 Inputs and Calculation 3 Assumptions 4 Light Rail Transit (LRT) Travel Times 5 Auto Travel Times 5 Bus Travel Times 6 Findings 7 Generalized Cost
More informationTraffic Accident Statistics
2000 Missouri State Highway System Traffic Accident Statistics Missouri State Highway System Traffic Accident Statistics Table of Contents Subject Chapter 1: Statewide Traffic Accident Statistics, Introduction
More informationA9 Data Monitoring and Analysis Report. March Content. 1. Executive Summary and Key Findings. 2. Overview. 3. Purpose
A9 Data Monitoring and Analysis Report March 2018 Content 1. Executive Summary and Key Findings 2. Overview 3. Purpose 4. Baseline Data Sources and Methodology 5. Casualty Analysis 6. Vehicle Speed Data
More informationTrip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley
Trip Generation and Parking Study New Californian Apartments, Berkeley Institute of Transportation Engineers University of California, Berkeley Student Chapter Spring 2012 Background The ITE Student Chapter
More informationMichigan/Grand River Avenue Transportation Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 PROJECTED CARBON DIOXIDE (CO 2 ) EMISSIONS Michigan / Grand River Avenue TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #18 From: URS Consultant Team To: CATA Project Staff and Technical Committee Topic:
More information2015 LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT
LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT CAPITAL and METRO LINES Project Team: ETS Transit Data Management Transportation Planning Strategic Monitoring and Analysis April, 2016 LRT STATION
More informationMichigan State Police (MSP) Post 21 - Metro North
October 2017 2016 Reporting Criteria Please pay particular attention to the wording when interpreting the three levels of data gathered for this report. Crash The Crash Level analyzes data related to crash
More information6. Strategic Screenlines
6. Strategic Screenlines Introduction 6.1 Previous sections in this report have presented changes in traffic flows at individual count locations. Some of these count locations have also been grouped into
More informationWIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT
WIM #41 CSAH 14, MP 14.9 CROOKSTON, MINNESOTA APRIL 2014 MONTHLY REPORT In order to understand the vehicle classes and groupings, the MnDOT Vehicle Classification Scheme and the Vehicle Classification
More informationTechnical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections What s New for 2015
Technical Memorandum Analysis Procedures and Mobility Performance Measures 100 Most Congested Texas Road Sections Prepared by Texas A&M Transportation Institute August 2015 This memo documents the analysis
More informationPedestrians Road Safety
Pedestrians Road Safety Overview According to the World Health Organization, the World Bank, the FIA Foundation for the Automobile and Society and the Global Road Safety Partnership collaborative report
More informationExcessive speed as a contributory factor to personal injury road accidents
Excessive speed as a contributory factor to personal injury road accidents Jonathan Mosedale and Andrew Purdy, Transport Statistics: Road Safety, Department for Transport Summary This report analyses contributory
More information2016 Congestion Report
2016 Congestion Report Metropolitan Freeway System May 2017 2016 Congestion Report 1 Table of Contents Purpose and Need...3 Introduction...3 Methodology...4 2016 Results...5 Explanation of Percentage Miles
More informationA Cost-Benefit Analysis of Heavy Vehicle Underrun Protection
A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Heavy Vehicle Underrun Protection Narelle Haworth 1 ; Mark Symmons 1 (Presenter) 1 Monash University Accident Research Centre Biography Mark Symmons is a Research Fellow at Monash
More informationTraffic Counts
www.trafficcounts.co.nz www.trafficcounts.co.nz Quality Assurance Information Prepared for: Job Number: Prepared by: Reviewed by: Abley Limited 0000 Shane Ingley, Transportation Engineer Courtney Groundwater,
More informationCTfastrak Expansion. Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016
CTfastrak Expansion Stakeholder Meeting #4 Manchester Town Hall June 3, 2016 Today s Agenda Phase I Update 2016 Service Plan Implementation Schedule & Cost Update Phase II Services Timeline Market Analysis
More information2010 Motorcycle Risk Study Update
2010 Motorcycle Risk Study Update Introduction This report provides an update to the Motorcycle Risk Study from AI.16 of the 2005 Rate Application. The original study was in response to Public Utilities
More informationNational Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area
National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area Presentation to the Transportation Research Board s National Household Travel Survey Conference: Data for Understanding
More informationAlberta Speeding Convictions and Collisions Involving Unsafe Speed
Alberta Speeding Convictions and Collisions Involving Unsafe Speed 2004-2008 Overview This document was prepared under the Alberta Traffic Safety Plan, Strategic Research Plan for 2008-2010, with the objective
More informationMichigan State Police (MSP) Post 21 - Metro North
June 2018 Revised 8/3/2018 2017 Reporting Criteria Please pay particular attention to the wording when interpreting the three levels of data gathered for this report. Crash The Crash Level analyzes data
More informationTraffic Safety Network Huron Valley
June 2018 Revised 8/3/2018 2017 Reporting Criteria Please pay particular attention to the wording when interpreting the three levels of data gathered for this report. Crash The Crash Level analyzes data
More informationProject : A Prepared by: Jack Wellings / Andrew Hughes. Client: Wembdon Parish Council Approved by: Philip Weatherhead
Technical Note 01 Project: Wembdon Neighbourhood Plan Office: Wellington Project : A108388 Prepared by: Jack Wellings / Andrew Hughes Client: Wembdon Parish Council Approved by: Philip Weatherhead Date:
More informationCongestion Charging in London
Central London Congestion Charging Scheme Congestion Charging in London Steve Kearns Transport for London First a qualification! Former Mayor Ken Livingstone (2000 2008) New Mayor Boris Johnson (3 May
More informationWashtenaw County Traffic Crash Data & Year Trends. Reporting Criteria
June 2018 Revised 8/3/2018 2017 Reporting Criteria Please pay particular attention to the wording when interpreting the three levels of data gathered for this report. Crash The Crash Level analyzes data
More informationMetropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report
Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report Metro District Office of Operations and Maintenance Regional Transportation Management Center May 2014 Table of Contents PURPOSE AND NEED... 1 INTRODUCTION...
More informationWashtenaw County Traffic Crash Data & Year Trends. Reporting Criteria
June 2017 Revised 10/3/17 2016 Reporting Criteria Please pay particular attention to the wording when interpreting the three levels of data gathered for this report. Crash The Crash Level analyzes data
More informationU N I V E R S I T Y O F B R I T I S H C O L U M B I A. Fall 2008 Transportation Status Report
U N I V E R S I T Y O F B R I T I S H C O L U M B I A Fall 2008 Transportation Status Report 6 February 2009 U N I V E R S I T Y O F B R I T I S H C O L U M B I A Fall 2008 Transportation Status Report
More informationEngineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering
The University College of Applied Sciences UCAS Engineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering (BENG 4326) Instructors: Dr. Y. R. Sarraj Chapter 4 Traffic Engineering Studies Reference: Traffic
More information1999 Missouri State Highway System. Missouri Department of Transportation - Transportation Management Systems
1999 Missouri State Highway System Traffic Accident Statistics - Transportation Management Systems Missouri State Highway System Traffic Accident Statistics Table of Contents Subject Chapter 1: Statewide
More informationExpansion Projects Description
Expansion Projects Description The Turnpike expansion program was authorized by the Florida Legislature in 1990 to meet the State s backlog of needed highway facilities. The Legislature set environmental
More informationSouthern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017
Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017 The Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission (the RPC ) has been monitoring traffic at 19 locations throughout the southern
More informationCITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Supports Item No. 1 T&T Committee Agenda May 13, 2008 CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Report Date: April 29, 2008 Author: Don Klimchuk Phone No.: 604.873.7345 RTS No.: 07283 VanRIMS No.: 13-1400-10
More informationPerformance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms
Performance Measure Summary - Charlotte NC-SC There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance
More informationPerformance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms
Performance Measure Summary - Louisville-Jefferson County KY-IN There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There
More informationA9 Data Monitoring and Analysis Report. January Content. 1. Executive Summary. 2. Overview. 3. Purpose. 4. Baseline Data Sources
A9 Data Monitoring and Analysis Report January 2018 Content 1. Executive Summary 2. Overview 3. Purpose 4. Baseline Data Sources 5. Casualty Analysis 6. Vehicle Speed Data 7. Incident Frequency & Impact
More information1 TO 2 2 TO 3 3 TO 4 11 TO TO 1
STATION: New York State Department of Transportation Traffic Count Hourly Report Page of ROUTE #: NY ROAD NAME: FROM: RT : END / OLAP COUNTY: Onondaga : Eastbound FACR GROUP: REC. SERIAL #: AP FUNC. CLASS:
More informationWIM #37 was operational for the entire month of September Volume was computed using all monthly data.
SEPTEMBER 2016 WIM Site Location WIM #37 is located on I-94 near Otsego in Wright county. The WIM is located only on the westbound (WB) side of I-94, meaning that all data mentioned in this report pertains
More informationMethodological tool Baseline emissions for modal shift measures in urban passenger transport
CLEAN DEVELOPMENT MECHANISM TOOL18 Methodological tool Baseline emissions for modal shift measures in urban passenger transport TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION... 3 2. SCOPE, APPLICABILITY, AND
More informationAct 229 Evaluation Report
R22-1 W21-19 W21-20 Act 229 Evaluation Report Prepared for Prepared by Table of Contents 1. Documentation Page 3 2. Executive Summary 4 2.1. Purpose 4 2.2. Evaluation Results 4 3. Background 4 4. Approach
More informationTraffic Safety Basic Facts 2010 Seasonality
Although the annual number of people who died in road traffic accidents in Europe has fallen over many years, the distribution of the annual number by month has scarcely changed. Traffic Safety Basic Facts
More informationPort Wallace Development: Safety and Traffic Concerns. April 12, 2018
Port Wallace Development: Safety and Traffic Concerns April 12, 2018 Highway 107 at the Quarry: 2017 Traffic Figures November 21, 2017 Staff Recommendation: Traffic and Infrastructure In May 2017, the
More informationRELEASED UNDER THE OFFICIAL INFORMATION ACT 1982
Subject MINISTERIAL BRIEFING NOTE Rapid Transit in Auckland Date 1 November 2017 Briefing number BRI-1133 Contact(s) for telephone discussion (if required) Name Position Direct line Cell phone 1 st contact
More informationITSMR Research Note. Motorcyclists and Impaired Driving ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION KEY FINDINGS. September 2013
September 2013 KEY FINDINGS F&PI CRASHES INVOLVING IMPAIRED MOTORCYCLISTS 27% of the fatal MC crashes over the five year period, 2008-2012, were alcohol-related. 48% of the alcohol-related F&PI MC crashes
More informationDesignation of a Community Safety Zone in Honey Harbour in the Township of Georgian Bay
TO: FROM: Chair and Members Engineering and Public Works Committee Mark Misko, C.E.T. Manager, Roads Maintenance and Construction DATE: March 23, 2016 SUBJECT: REPORT NO: Designation of a Community Safety
More informationSouth Gloucestershire Challenge Fund and Cycle Ambition Fund
South Gloucestershire Challenge Fund and Cycle Ambition Fund The Challenge Fund A4174 scheme is coordinated and delivered by South Gloucestershire Council who were awarded 14 million pounds from the Department
More information5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS
5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS When the METRO Green Line LRT begins operating in mid-2014, a strong emphasis will be placed on providing frequent connecting bus service with Green Line trains. Bus hours
More informationPublic Meeting: Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) TNC (Transportation Network Company) Lot on S. Eads Street
Public Meeting: Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (MWAA) TNC (Transportation Network Company) Lot on S. Eads Street Department of Environmental Services, Transportation Division Sept. 27, 2018
More informationKandy Transport Improvement Project (KTIP) Ministry of Defense & Urban Development
Under Strategic Cities Development Project (SCDP) Kandy Transport Improvement Project (KTIP) Ministry of Defense & Urban Development Amal S. Kumarage May 2014 P: 217,678 V: 34,317 P: 8,310 V: 4,051 Map
More informationThe City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007
The City of Toronto s Transportation Strategy July 2007 Presentation Outline Transportation Statistics Transportation Building Blocks Toronto s Official Plan Transportation and City Building Vision Projects
More informationProject Appraisal Guidelines for National Roads Unit National Parameters Values Sheet
Project Appraisal Guidelines for National Roads Unit 6.11 - National Parameters Values Sheet TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IRELAND (TII) PUBLICATIONS About TII Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) is responsible
More information20 January Road Safety in Provisional results. Manuelle SALATHÉ Head of the French Road Safety Observatory (ONISR)
20 January 2014 Road Safety in 2013 Provisional results Manuelle SALATHÉ Head of the French Road Safety Observatory (ONISR) 1 Table of contents 1. Provisional results in 2013 2. Long trends 3. 10-year
More informationPerformance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance
More informationPerformance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms
Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance
More informationTRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury
TRANSIT FEASIBILITY STUDY Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury Open House Presentation January 19, 2012 Study Objectives Quantify the need for transit service in BWG Determine transit service priorities based
More informationCollision Analysis Safety Tables
Crash Severity Geography of Geography of Time and Date of Crash Conditions Features Features.. Queries Selected: Town(Hartford), Date(Year:All or //05 to 9/7/06), Severity(All), Route Class(Interstate),
More information