MONTEREY BAY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DRAFT REPORT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "MONTEREY BAY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DRAFT REPORT"

Transcription

1 MONTEREY BAY OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FACILITY PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS DRAFT REPORT MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for Denise Duffy & Associates 947 Cass St. Suite 5 Monterey, CA April 16, 2015

2 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION Project Description Scope of Work Traffic Operation Evaluation Methodologies and Level of Service Standards Modeling of Right Turn on Red (RTOR) Criteria for Significant Project Impacts 4 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Existing Roadway Network Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Existing Transit Services Existing Traffic Data Existing Intersection Operations Existing Segment Operations 10 3 EXISTING PLUS PROJECTCONDITIONS Project Trip Generation and Distribution Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes Existing Plus Project Intersection Operations Existing Plus Project Segment Operations 13 4 CUMULATIVE WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS Approved and Proposed Projects Cumulative Network Modifications Cumulative Without Project Traffic Volumes Cumulative Without Project Intersection Operations Cumulative Without Project Segment Operations 15 5 CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Volume Forecasts Cumulative With Project Intersection Operations Cumulative Plus Project Segment Operations 17 6 ALTERNATIVE RELOCATION SITE REFERENCES List of References List of Contacts Report2.docx - i -

3 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis LIST OF EXHIBITS 1. Project Location 2. Project Site Plan 3. Existing Bicycle Network Monterey Bay Area 4A. Existing Condition AM Peak Hour Volumes 4B. Existing Condition PM Peak Hour Volumes 5A. Intersection Levels of Service 5B. Roadway Segment Levels of Service 6A. Project Trip Diversions AM Peak Hour Volumes 6B. Project Trip Diversions PM Peak Hour Volumes 7A. Existing Plus Project Condition AM Peak Hour Volumes 7B. Existing Plus Project Condition PM Peak Hour Volumes 8A. Approved Projects Trip Generation 8B. Cumulative Projects Trip Generation 9A. Cumulative Without Project Condition AM Peak Hour Volumes 9B. Cumulative Without Project Condition PM Peak Hour Volumes 10A. Cumulative Plus Project Condition AM Peak Hour Volumes 10B. Cumulative Plus Project Condition PM Peak Hour Volumes Report2.docx - ii -

4 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis LIST OF APPENDICES A1. Level of Service (LOS) Description Signalized Intersections A2. Level of Service (LOS) Description Unsignalized Intersections with Two-Way Stop Control (TWSC) B. Traffic Counts C. Intersection Level of Service Calculations Existing Conditions D. MST Administrative Employee Zip Codes E. Intersection Level of Service Calculation Existing Plus Project Conditions F. Intersection Level of Service Calculations Cumulative Without Project Conditions G. Intersection Level of Service Calculations Cumulative Plus Project Conditions Report2.docx - iii -

5 1 INTRODUCTION Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST) proposes the Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project, which includes a reconfiguration of its current facility on Ryan Ranch Road in Monterey, California. This is an efficiency upgrade project, reducing the amount of fuel needed to operate the MST bus fleet. Exhibit 1 depicts the location of the project site, while Exhibit 2 contains the proposed site plan. 1.1 Project Description The administrative and operations headquarters for MST is located on Ryan Ranch Road, near Canyon Del Rey Road (State Route 218, or SR 218) in Monterey, California. As a part of this project, MST is proposing to consolidate some of its current buses onto this site, relocating buses that currently are being housed at its Salinas operations site. The buses that are to be relocated are buses that currently service the greater Monterey Peninsula but are currently being stored in Salinas because there is currently no room to house them at the Ryan Ranch Road site. Modifications are proposed at the Ryan Ranch site, in order to store and maintain these relocated buses. One consequence of this bus relocation is that there will no longer be enough room on the Ryan Ranch Road site to accommodate the current administrative staff based there. This staff is therefore proposed to be relocated offsite, to an existing office building located either on Garden Road (off of Olmsted Road near the Monterey Regional Airport) or within the Ryan Ranch office park (off of Ragsdale Drive). 1.2 Scope of Work Based upon past experience analyzing the study area and consultation with the City of Monterey (the city in which this project is located), this study analyzes the traffic impacts of the proposed project on the surrounding roadway network. The study includes the operational evaluation of the following 14 intersections and qualitative evaluation of the following 11 roadway segments: Intersections 1. Josselyn Canyon Road / State Route 68 (SR 68); 2. Olmstead Road / SR 68; 3. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) Monterra Road / SR 68; 4. Ragsdale Drive / SR 68; 5. York Road / SR 68; 6. Boots Road Pasadera Drive / SR 68; 7. Laureles Grade / SR 68; 8. Corral De Tierra Road / SR 68; 9. San Benancio Road / SR 68; 10. Torero Drive / SR 68; 11. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) / Ryan Ranch Road; Report2.docx - 1 -

6 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis 12. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) / Del Rey Gardens Drive; 13. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) / General Jim Moore Boulevard; and 14. Canyon Del Rey Boulevard (SR 218) / Fremont Boulevard. Roadway Segments 1. SR 68, from SR 1 to Josselyn Canyon Road; 2. SR 68, from Josselyn Canyon Road to Olmstead Road; 3. SR 68, from Olmstead Road to Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) Monterra Road; 4. SR 68, from Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) to Ragsdale Drive; 5. SR 68, from Ragsdale Drive to York Road; 6. SR 68, from York Road to Boots Road Pasadera Drive; 7. SR 68, from Boots Road Pasadera Drive to Laureles Grade; 8. SR 68, from Laureles Grade to Corral De Tierra Road; 9. SR 68, from Corral De Tierra Road to San Benancio Road; 10. SR 68, from San Benancio Road to Torero Drive; and 11. SR 68 from Torero Drive to Portola Drive. Beyond the limits of the study area, the project trips disperse onto numerous local streets or onto regional facilities. The impact of trips that disperse on the local road network lessens as they move away from the project site. The local streets and intersections included in the analysis were identified as potentially having the greatest impact from the project. Weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic operations were analyzed for the following conditions. Existing Traffic Conditions Existing Plus Project Conditions Cumulative Without Project Conditions Cumulative Plus Project Conditions 1.3 Traffic Operation Evaluation Methodologies and Level of Service Standards Intersection and road segment traffic operations were evaluated based on the Level of Service (LOS) concept, and the LOS standard adopted by the jurisdiction within which the intersection or road segment is located. LOS is a quantitative description of an intersection and roadway s operation, ranging from LOS A to LOS F. Level of service A represents free flow un-congested traffic conditions. Level of service F represents highly congested traffic conditions with what is commonly considered unacceptable delay to vehicles on the road segments and at intersections. The intermediate levels of service represent incremental levels of congestion and delay between these two extremes. LOS descriptions for un-signalized intersections with one- and two-way stop control and signalized intersections are shown in Appendices A1 and A2. Intersection operations are based upon the average vehicular delay at the intersection. The average delay is then correlated to a level of service. For two-way stop controlled intersections, the vehicle Report2.docx - 2 -

7 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis delay for side street traffic is analyzed. LOS for each side street movement is based on the distribution of gaps in the major street traffic stream and driver judgment in selecting gaps. Improvements may be warranted when a side street approach reaches LOS F for two-way stop controlled intersections. When using the HCM 2000 method for the analysis of signalized and allway stop controlled intersections, the overall intersection delay is used to determine LOS. The Synchro 8 software was used to evaluate the operations of the study intersections, using the Highway Capacity Manual methodologies. A saturation flow rate of 1,600 vehicles per lane per hour was used for the eastbound through and westbound through movements along SR 68 at the request of Caltrans District 5 staff. As the saturation flow rate cannot be adjusted in the Synchro software using the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual methodologies, the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual methodologies were used to analyze the study intersections. Operations of the study roadway segments along SR 68 under Existing and Cumulative Without Project conditions are cited from Ferrini Ranch Subdivision Traffic Impact Analysis, Higgins Associates, October 29, 2008 and The Resort at Del Rey Oaks Traffic Impact Analysis, Higgins Associates, June 6, The analysis contained within these reports was used to identify whether the project would represent a significant impact upon the operations of the study segments. The volume threshold planning methodology based on HCM 2000 was used in the evaluation of operating conditions on roadway and freeway segments. The study area covers the jurisdiction of multiple public agencies, including the Cities of Del Rey Oaks and Seaside, plus the County of Monterey. All of the study intersections are under the jurisdiction of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The overall Caltrans level of service standard is the transition from LOS C to LOS D, which is herein abbreviated as LOS C/D. Note that for un-signalized intersections, LOS E is considered the maximum acceptable level of service for the minor street approaches. Improvements may be warranted when the minor street approach operates at LOS F. 1.4 Modeling of Right Turn on Red (RTOR) All of the signalized study intersections allow right turns on red (RTOR), and these right turns can have an effect on the intersection LOS calculations. There are several options to model right turns on red with different traffic analysis software packages, but the only method prescribed by the HCM for modeling RTOR is to reduce the input volumes to account for vehicles turning right on red. Where an exclusive right turn lane movement runs concurrent with a protected left turn phase from the cross street, the HCM allows for the right turn volume to be reduced by the number of shadowed left turners. However, the length of the right turn lane affects the number of vehicles that are able to turn right on red. This is because a short right turn lane can result in right turning vehicles being trapped in the queue with vehicles in the through lane. Due to the already-congested conditions on SR 68, it was assumed that no vehicles would be able to turn Report2.docx - 3 -

8 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis right on red at the study intersections on SR 68 between Josselyn Canyon Road and San Benancio Road. 1.5 Criteria for Significant Project Impacts According to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it would cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. In accordance with CEQA, specific impact criteria have been applied to the study intersections and road segments to determine if the project specific increase in traffic is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. The relocated MST administration staff would be moved to an existing office building that was either previous analyzed via its own environmental review or possibly predates the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements of an environmental analysis. As the relocated staff would be administrative employees that would work around an office schedule (i.e. 8:00 AM 5:00 PM), the relocation of the MST administrative staff would be consistent with the previously approved uses within those buildings. Therefore, the staff relocation may not represent a new significant impact upon the area street system; however, to be conservative, it was assumed that the traffic from the relocated MST administrative staff was subject to an new impact evaluation. The study area falls within multiple jurisdictions as described in Section 1.3. The significance criteria for the relevant jurisdictions are listed below and have been applied to the analysis results. County of Monterey A significant impact at a signalized study intersection is defined to occur under the following conditions: A significant impact would occur if an intersection operating at LOS A, B, or C degrades to D, E or F. For intersections already operating at unacceptable levels D and E, a significant impact would occur if a project adds 0.01 or more during peak hours to the critical movement s volume-to-capacity ratio. If the intersection is already operating at LOS F, any increase (one vehicle) in the critical movement s volume-to-capacity ratio is considered significant. A significant impact at an un-signalized study intersection is defined to occur under the following conditions: A significant impact would occur if any traffic movement has LOS F or any traffic signal warrant is met. A significant impact on a study roadway segment is defined to occur under the following conditions: Report2.docx - 4 -

9 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis A significant impact would occur if a roadway segment operating at A through C degrades to a lower level of service of D, E or F, or if a segment already operating at level of service D or E degrades to E or F. If a segment is already operating at LOS F any increase during the peak hour (one vehicle) is considered significant. City of Seaside A significant impact at a signalized study intersection is defined to occur under the following conditions: A change from acceptable LOS (i.e. LOS A, B, or C) to an unacceptable LOS (i.e. LOS D, E, or F) will represent a significant impact. For intersections that remain at LOS D after the addition of project traffic, an increase in overall delay of over 2.0 seconds would represent a significant impact. For intersections operating at LOS E or LOS F, an increase in overall delay of over 1.0 seconds would represent a significant impact. City of Del Rey Oaks The City of Del Rey Oaks does not have an adopted significance criteria. Therefore, the following significance criteria will be used for study intersections within its jurisdiction: A change from acceptable LOS (A, B or C) to unacceptable LOS (D, E or F) will represent a significant impact. For intersections that remain at LOS D, E or F after the addition of project traffic, an increase in overall intersection traffic of over 2.0% will represent a significant impact Report2.docx - 5 -

10 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section describes the existing street network relevant to the proposed project and the existing operational traffic conditions. Existing operational deficiencies are identified and improvements are recommended. 2.1 Existing Roadway Network State Route 68 will provide regional access to the project site. Local access to the project will be via San Benancio Road, the Portola Drive interchange, and River Road. The study area stretches from the SR 1 / SR 68 intersection in the west to the SR 68 / Torero Drive intersection in the east. The study area also includes Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) between Fremont Boulevard and SR 68. A brief description of each of the roads in the study area follows: State Route 68 (SR 68) connects State Route 1 in Monterey and US 101 in Salinas. It is a 2-lane rural highway with a speed limit of 55 mph between SR 1 and just south of the Portola Drive interchange. SR 68 is a 4-lane freeway between the Portola Drive and Spreckels Boulevard interchanges. SR 68 is a 4-lane divided highway from the Spreckels Boulevard interchange to Blanco Road in the City of Salinas. Once inside the City of Salinas, SR 68 becomes an arterial along South Main Street and John Street. It serves as a commuter route between Salinas and the Monterey Peninsula, and functions as a scenic tourist route to the Monterey Peninsula. The speed limit on SR 68 is 55 miles per hour (mph). Canyon Del Rey Road (State Route 218, or SR 218) is a two-lane highway that connects State Route 68 and State Route 1. It provides access to Del Rey Oaks, Sand City and Seaside. While it is designated as Canyon Del Rey Road in Del Rey Oaks, the name changes to Canyon Del Rey Boulevard in Seaside. The SR 218 / SR 68 intersection is signal controlled. The speed limit on Canyon Del Rey Road is 45 mph. Josselyn Canyon Road is a two-lane road that provides access to low-density residential housing units as well as a church and a convalescent hospital. The speed limit on Josselyn Canyon Road is 25 mph. The Josselyn Canyon Road / SR 68 intersection is signal controlled. Olmsted Road is a two-lane road that provides access to the Monterey Peninsula Airport north of SR 68 and residential developments south of SR 68. The speed limit on Olmsted Road is unsigned, with the exception of a 25-mph school zone located about 1,200 feet south of SR 68. The Olmsted Road / SR 68 intersection is signal controlled. Ragsdale Drive is 4 lanes in the vicinity of the study area and provides access to the Ryan Ranch business park. The speed limit on Ragsdale Drive is 35 mph. The Ragsdale Drive / SR 68 intersection is signal controlled Report2.docx - 6 -

11 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis York Road provides access to some single unit housing developments as well as the Laguna Seca and Ryan Ranch Business Parks and York School located to the north of SR 68. The speed limit on York Road is 25 mph. The SR 68 / York Road intersection is signal controlled. Pasadera Drive is a private road to the north off SR 68 and provides access to the Pasadera Country Club and its associated single unit housing development. The speed limit on Pasadera Drive is 25 mph. The SR 68 / Pasadera Drive intersection is signal controlled. Boots Road provides access to a small number of residential developments to the south of SR 68 and will in the future also provide access to the proposed Wang Subdivision development. The speed limit on Boots Road is 25 mph. The SR 68 / Boots Road intersection is signal controlled. Laureles Grade Road is a two-lane north/south county road that connects SR 68 with the Carmel Valley. The speed limit on Laureles Grade Road is 45 mph and it also provides access to several residential developments. The SR 68 / Laureles Grade Road intersection is signal controlled. Corral de Tierra Road is located to the west of San Benancio Road. It is a two-lane collector street with a speed limit of 35 mph. The SR 68 / Corral Del Tierra Road intersection is signal controlled. San Benancio Road is a two-lane collector street with a speed limit of 35 mph and it provides access to several residential developments. The SR 68 / San Benancio Road intersection is signal controlled. Torero Drive is a two-lane road that provides access to residential neighborhoods north of SR 68. The speed limit on Torero Drive is unsigned. The Torero Drive / SR 68 intersection is a T- intersection with a stop sign on Torero Drive. Fremont Boulevard is a four-lane north-south arterial extending from Highway 1 to Monterey. The posted speed limit on Fremont Boulevard within the City is 30 mph. The Fremont / Canyon Del Rey (SR 218) intersection is signal controlled. General Jim Moore Boulevard is a north-south arterial within Marina and Seaside, extending from CSU Monterey Bay to Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) in Del Rey Oaks. It provides access to the Presidio of Monterey Annex, business parks, government office buildings, and former Ford Ord lands. General Jim Moore Boulevard is two lanes wide within Del Rey Oaks, but widens to four lanes within Seaside (i.e. north of South Boundary Road). The speed limit on General Jim Moore Boulevard is 35 mph within Del Rey Oaks, but is 45 mph within Seaside. The General Jim Moore / Canyon Del Rey (SR 218) intersection is signal controlled. In addition to the major streets described above, other streets provide internal circulation for the study area. Major internal streets are Ryan Ranch Road and Del Rey Gardens Drive, both of which are east-west roadways. The Canyon Del Rey (SR 218) / Ryan Ranch intersection is signal controlled, while the Canyon Del Rey (SR 218) / Del Rey Gardens intersection is a T- intersections with a stop sign on Del Rey Gardens Drive Report2.docx - 7 -

12 2.2 Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis Pedestrian facilities generally include sidewalks, crosswalks and pedestrian signals. There is not a significant amount of foot-traffic in the vicinity of the proposed project and therefore sidewalks are not provided along SR 68 or in the vicinity of the proposed project. Crosswalks and pedestrian signal phasing are provided at the signalized study intersections. There are three basic types of bicycle facilities. Each type is described below: Bike path (Class I) - A completely separate right-of-way designed for the exclusive use of cyclists and pedestrians, with minimal crossings for motorists. Bike lane (Class II) - A lane on a regular roadway, separated from the motorized vehicle right-ofway by paint striping, designated for the exclusive or semi exclusive use of bicycles. Bike lanes allow one-way bike travel. Through travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians is prohibited, but crossing by pedestrians and motorists is permitted. Bike route (Class III) - Provides shared use of the roadway, designated by signs or permanent markings and shared with motorists. SR 68 is classified as a Caltrans Bike Route in the TAMC Monterey County 2011 Bike Map. The segment of SR 68 in the study area currently has paved shoulders of varying widths that accommodate bicycles. SR 68 is classified in the TAMC Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (December 2011) to be a Class II bike facility with bike lanes in the future. Bicycle Network Maps from the TAMC Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan are included in Exhibit Existing Transit Services Monterey-Salinas Transit (MST) provides fixed-route bus service in Monterey County and Peninsula cities. Lines 7, 8, 13, 56 and 82 provide service via SR 68 with stops at various locations along SR 68. Line 7 provides service between Monterey and Del Rey Oaks whereas Route 8 provides service between Ryan Ranch and Sand City. Route 13 serves Ryan Ranch and the Monterey Transit Plaza. Route 56 traverses between Salinas and Monterey with stops at the Ryan Ranch Business Park. Route 82 operates between Salinas and Fort Hunter Liggett and stops at the SR 68/Laureles Grade intersection. In addition to the above MST routes, the Del Rey Oaks Sand City/Monterey has stops along Canyon Del Rey Boulevard (SR 218). Lines 7 and 8 both stop at existing bus stops in each direction of Ryan Ranch Road at the entrance to the existing MST Ryan Ranch Road facility. Other nearby bus stops are located on Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) at Del Rey Gardens Drive and on SR 68 at Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) Report2.docx - 8 -

13 2.4 Existing Traffic Data Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis New AM and PM peak hour intersection counts were collected in January 2015 at the 14 study intersections listed below: 1. Josselyn Canyon Road / SR 68; 2. Olmstead Road / SR 68; 3. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) Monterra Road / SR 68; 4. Ragsdale Drive / SR 68; 5. York Road / SR 68; 6. Boots Road Pasadera Drive / SR 68; 7. Laureles Grade / SR 68; 8. Corral De Tierra Road / SR 68; 9. San Benancio Road / SR 68; 10. Torero Drive / SR 68; 11. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) / Ryan Ranch Road; 12. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) / Del Rey Gardens Drive; 13. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) / General Jim Moore Boulevard; and 14. Canyon Del Rey Boulevard (SR 218) / Fremont Boulevard. Appendix B contains the raw traffic counts, which were collected between 7:00 9:00 AM and 4:00 6:00 PM. From these counts, the peak hour of each individual intersection was identified for use in the operational analysis; these counts are included in Exhibits 4A and 4B. A review of historical count data along the SR 68 corridor indicates that traffic volumes have decreased only slightly at locations within the study area. Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) counts from Caltrans were compared for a few study segments within the study area from (see Appendix B). These indicate a similar trend in the traffic volumes. Therefore, no additional seasonality adjustments were applied to the counts collected in January within the study area. 2.5 Existing Intersection Operations Exhibit 5A summarizes the average delays and LOS for the study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours, while Appendix C contains the intersection level of service calculation sheets for the Existing Conditions analysis. Many of the study intersections currently operate below their respective level of service standards under Existing conditions. This includes the following intersections: 2. Olmstead Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS D; PM: LOS E); 8. Corral De Tierra Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS E; PM: LOS D); 9. San Benancio Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS E); 10. Torero Drive / SR 68 (AM: Overall LOS E, Side-Street LOS F; PM: Overall LOS A, Side-Street LOS F); and 11. Fremont Boulevard / Canyon Del Rey Boulevard (SR 218) (AM: LOS D; Report2.docx - 9 -

14 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis PM: LOS C). 2.6 Existing Segment Operations Exhibit 5B contains the segment levels of service from the Ferrini Ranch and The Resort at Del Rey Oaks traffic reports along the SR 68 corridor. All of the eleven study segments currently operate below their respective standards, although the freeway portion of Segment 11 (between Begin/End Freeway and Portola Drive) would operate at an acceptable LOS A Report2.docx

15 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis 3 EXISTING PLUS PROJECTCONDITIONS This section describes Existing Plus Project Conditions. Potential traffic related impacts associated with project development are discussed in this section. 3.1 Project Trip Generation and Distribution The Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project is an efficiency upgrade project. It consists of the relocation of buses from MST s Salinas maintenance facility to its Ryan Ranch Road facility, and the relocation of administrative staff from the Ryan Ranch Road and Salinas offices to a new off-site facility. Through the implementation of this project, MST anticipates a reduction in both the overall time traveling to and from their storage yard (i.e. deadhead driving) and the amount of fuel needed to operate its bus fleet. The methods for estimating the project trip generation and assigning them to the local road network are described in this section. Trip Generation The proposed project would not increase the number of staff employed with MST, nor would it add new buses to the MST fleet. Instead, the project is a reconfiguration of its current bus fleet and employment. The following are the specific changes being proposed: 1. Buses MST provides transit service throughout Monterey County. The primary concentrations of this service are Salinas and the greater Monterey Peninsula. Due to a lack of space at the Ryan Ranch Road facility, many buses that service the greater Monterey Peninsula are currently stored and maintained at the Salinas maintenance station. These buses are proposed to be relocated to the Ryan Ranch Road site, in order to reduce their deadhead driving). Note that the bus drivers that are driving those buses would also be relocated to the Ryan Ranch Road site. 2. Administrative Employees As a result of relocating buses from the Salinas maintenance station to the Ryan Ranch Road site, there will no longer be enough room on the Ryan Ranch site to accommodate all of the current administrative employees. As a result, all 29 of the administrative employees currently at the Ryan Ranch Road site are proposed to be relocated to a new offsite office location, likely either along Garden Road (near Olmsted Road and the Monterey Peninsula Airport public entrance) or within the Ryan Ranch Business Park (off of Ragsdale Drive). (Note that both locations, like the Ryan Ranch Road site, are located in the city of Monterey.) One additional administrative employee, who currently commutes from Santa Cruz County to a Salinas office, would also be relocated to the new offsite office. While the relocated buses (and bus drivers) would operate outside of the peak hours (in order to be available to service demand during the peak hours), the administrative employees work from 8 AM to 5 PM, Monday through Friday, and thus would be active during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Therefore, this analysis focuses on the potential impacts of these relocated staff. This analysis assumes that all administrative employees drive themselves to the Ryan Ranch Road Report2.docx

16 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis site; no employees walk, bicycle, take transit, or carpool; and that all employees arrive and depart within one hour. Therefore, trip generation for the project would be 30 trips during each peak hour (30 in, zero out during the AM peak hour and zero in, 30 out during the PM peak hour). Trip Distribution The project trip distribution was established based upon the locations where the administrative staff lives, i.e. their respective zip codes, which are identified in Appendix D. This information was applied to the study street network to determine the routes which the administrative staff currently use to access the Ryan Ranch Road site, as well as how they would divert to the offsite location. Exhibits 6A and 6B depict the net trip diversions that would occur with the shifting of the administrative staff to an offsite location. Note that it was assumed that the offsite location would be located along Garden Road, as this location has a greater potential to be a significant impact. 3.2 Existing Plus Project Traffic Volumes The project traffic diversions from the proposed project were added to the Existing Condition traffic volumes to achieve the Existing Plus Project traffic volumes contained in Exhibits 7A and 7B. 3.3 Existing Plus Project Intersection Operations Exhibit 5A summarizes the average delays and LOS for study intersections during the AM and PM peak hours under Existing Plus Project traffic conditions. The calculation sheets for these conditions can be found within Appendix E. The same intersections that would continue to operate deficiently under Existing Conditions would continue to operate deficiently under Existing Plus Project Conditions. The following study intersections would operate at unacceptable levels of service under Existing Plus Project Conditions: 2. Olmstead Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS D; PM: LOS E); 8. Corral De Tierra Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS E; PM: LOS D); 9. San Benancio Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS E); 10. Torero Drive / SR 68 (AM: Overall LOS E, Side-Street LOS F; PM: Overall LOS A, Side-Street LOS F); and 11. Fremont Boulevard / Canyon Del Rey Boulevard (SR 218) (AM: LOS D; PM: LOS C). However, as the study project would add no new trips to Intersections 8, 9, 10, and 11, the project would not represent a significant impact at these intersections. The project would represent a significant impact upon the operations of Intersection 2, Olmsted Road / SR 68. It is recommended that that MST implement a Transportation Demand Report2.docx

17 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis Management (TDM) program whose aim would be to reduce the vehicle trips of employees to the new administrative offices to a less that significant level. The Transportation Management Program would include site design and operation measures aimed at promoting alternative transportation modes as well as carpooling and van pooling. The measures included in the program could include the following: 1. Designation of an on-site transportation coordinator to direct the program. 2. Promote the use of flex-time work scheduling (e.g. varied work hours) and compressed work week programs for employees at the site. 3. Implementation of an off-site employee shuttle, in order to bus staff into and out of the new administrative offices. 4. Telecommute programs. 5. Rideshare matching. 6. Bicycle racks and bike lockers on-site. 7. Provide free or low-cost bus passes for employees, to encourage use of transit for their commute into and out of the office. 8. Preferential parking for vanpools and carpools. 9. Shared vehicles. With implementation of this program, the project would represent a less than significant impact upon the study intersections. 3.4 Existing Plus Project Segment Operations As noted earlier, Exhibit 5B contains the existing segment levels of service from the Ferrini Ranch and The Resort at Del Rey Oaks traffic studies along the SR 68 corridor. Although all of the eleven study segments would operate below their respective standards, the project would not add any new trips to Segments 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or 11, and thus would not impact those segments. Although the project would add additional trips to Segments 1 and 3 (i.e. SR 68 between SR 1 and Josselyn Canyon Road, and between Olmsted Road and Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218)), it would not represent a significant impact upon these segments, as it would not add enough traffic to change the level of service of this segment from Existing conditions, nor would it add any traffic in the direction that would operate at LOS F. The project would represent a significant impact upon Segment 2 (i.e. SR 68 between Josselyn Canyon Road and Olmsted Road). The aforementioned TDM program is recommended for implementation, which would reduce the project s impact upon the study segments to a less than significant level Report2.docx

18 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis 4 CUMULATIVE WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS This section describes Cumulative Without Project conditions, which represents conditions in approximately the Year Approved and Proposed Projects A number of other projects have been approved and proposed (i.e. cumulative ) within the study area that have not yet been constructed. The addition of their respective traffic to the study area was used to forecast future traffic conditions. A trip generation table for the approved projects that will most likely be implemented within the next 5 years is shown in Exhibit 8A, while the cumulative projects are shown in Exhibit 8B. The lists of approved and cumulative projects includes projects in the cities of Seaside, Sand City, and Monterey, as well as unincorporated areas of Monterey County. 4.2 Cumulative Network Modifications Two network modifications have been incorporated into the analysis, under both Cumulative Without Project and Cumulative Plus Project conditions. First, one of the approved projects proposes to add a fourth approach to the York Road / SR 68 intersection. Second, the recentlyapproved Ferrini Ranch project proposes to relocate and signalize the Torero Drive / SR 68 intersection. All network changes associated with these projects have been incorporated into the analysis, including new traffic lanes and signal modifications. 4.3 Cumulative Without Project Traffic Volumes The trips from the approved and pending projects were added to the Existing conditions volumes to create Cumulative Without Project volumes. These volumes are depicted within Exhibits 9A and 9B. 4.4 Cumulative Without Project Intersection Operations Exhibit 5A summarizes the average delays and LOS for the study intersections under Cumulative Without Project conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. The calculation sheets for these conditions can be found within Appendix F. Under Cumulative Without Project conditions, the following intersections operate below their respective level of service standard: 1. Josselyn Canyon Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); 2. Olmstead Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); 3. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) Monterra Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS D; PM: LOS D); 5. York Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); 6. Boots Road Pasadera Drive / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); Report2.docx

19 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis 7. Laureles Grade / SR 68 (AM: LOS E; PM: LOS F); 8. Corral De Tierra Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); 9. San Benancio Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); 10. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) / Del Rey Gardens Drive (AM: Overall LOS A, Side-Street LOS D; PM: Overall LOS C, Side-Street LOS F); and 11. Fremont Boulevard / Canyon Del Rey Boulevard (SR 218) (AM: LOS D; PM: LOS D). 4.5 Cumulative Without Project Segment Operations Exhibit 5B contains the Cumulative Without Project segment levels of service from the Ferrini Ranch and The Resort at Del Rey Oaks traffic studies along the SR 68 corridor. All eleven of the study segments would operate below their respective standards, although the freeway portion of Segment 11 (between Begin/End Freeway and Portola Drive) would operate at an acceptable LOS B Report2.docx

20 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis 5 CUMULATIVE PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section describes the analysis and results for the Cumulative Plus Project condition, which includes projected traffic from the approved projects, proposed projects, and the study project. 5.1 Cumulative Plus Project Traffic Volume Forecasts Trip diversions from the study project were added to Cumulative Without Project volumes to create Cumulative Plus Project volumes. These volumes are depicted within Exhibits 10A and 10B. 5.2 Cumulative With Project Intersection Operations Exhibit 5A summarizes the average delays and LOS for study intersections under Cumulative Plus Project conditions during the AM and PM peak hours. The calculation sheets for these conditions can be found within Appendix G. Note that Cumulative Plus Project conditions assumes the same network modifications as under Cumulative Without Project conditions. Under Cumulative Plus Project conditions, the following intersections continue to operate below their respective level of service standard: 1. Josselyn Canyon Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); 2. Olmstead Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); 3. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) Monterra Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS D; PM: LOS D); 5. York Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); 6. Boots Road Pasadera Drive / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); 7. Laureles Grade / SR 68 (AM: LOS E; PM: LOS F); 8. Corral De Tierra Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); 9. San Benancio Road / SR 68 (AM: LOS F; PM: LOS F); 10. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) / Del Rey Gardens Drive (AM: Overall LOS A, Side-Street LOS D; PM: Overall LOS B, Side-Street LOS F); and 11. Fremont Boulevard / Canyon Del Rey Boulevard (SR 218) (AM: LOS D; PM: LOS D). However, as the study project would add no new trips to Intersections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11, the project would not represent a significant impact at these intersections. The project would also not represent a significant impact upon Intersection 3 (i.e. Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218) Monterra Road / SR 68), because the volume-to-capacity ratio at the intersection would not change. The project would represent a significant impact upon Intersections 1 and 2 (i.e. Josselyn Canyon / SR 68 and Olmsted / SR 68). It is recommended that MST implement the aforementioned TDM program. With implementation of this TDM program, the project would represent a less than significant impact upon the study intersections Report2.docx

21 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis 5.3 Cumulative Plus Project Segment Operations As noted earlier, Exhibit 5B contains the existing segment levels of service from the Ferrini Ranch and The Resort at Del Rey Oaks traffic reports along the SR 68 corridor. Although all of the eleven study segments would operate below their respective standards, the project would not add any new trips to Segments 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or 11, and thus would not impact those segments. The project would represent a significant impact upon Segments 1, 2 and 3, (i.e. SR 68 between SR 1 and Canyon Del Rey Road (SR 218). The aforementioned TDM program is recommended for implementation, which would reduce the project s impact upon the study segments to a less than significant level Report2.docx

22 Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis 6 ALTERNATIVE RELOCATION SITE Although this analysis assumed that the administrative staff would be relocated to an office along Garden Road, it is also possible that they may be relocated to an office within the Ryan Ranch business park. In that case, the potential project impacts would be slightly different than identified elsewhere in this report. A qualitative assessment of project impacts upon the study street system has been performed for this alternative office site, based upon the analysis contained within this report. As there would still be no added project traffic east of Ragsdale Drive, the project (with the Ryan Ranch business park office) would still not represent an impact upon Intersections 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, and 14, and would also not impacts Segments 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11. As for Intersection 4 (i.e. Ragsdale / SR 68), this intersection would operate acceptably under Existing Plus Project and Cumulative Plus Project, and thus the added project trips (from the administrative staff relocation to the Ryan Ranch business park) would also not represent a significant impact. The project (with the Ryan Ranch business park office) would also not represent an impact upon Intersection 12 (i.e. Canyon Del Rey (SR 218) / Del Rey Gardens), because it would add an estimated one net trip to the intersection, which is well below the 2% volume increase threshold. The project (with the Ryan Ranch business park office) would represent a significant impact upon Segment 4 (i.e. SR 68 between SR 218 and Ragsdale) and Intersection 3 (i.e. Canyon Del Rey (SR 218) Monterra Road / SR 68). The aforementioned TDM program is again recommended for implementation, which would reduce the project s impact upon the study intersections and segments to a less than significant level Report2.docx

23 7. REFERENCES 7.1 List of References Monterey Bay Operations and Maintenance Facility Project Traffic Impact Analysis 1. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Traffic Census ( February Higgins Associates, Ferrini Ranch Subdivision Traffic Impact Analysis, October 29, Higgins Associates, The Resort at Del Rey Oaks Traffic Impact Analysis, June 6, List of Contacts 1. Erin Harwayne, Denise Duffy & Associates, Monterey, California Report2.docx

24 N Project Site Map Source: Google Maps, 2015 Hatch Mott MacDonald Exhibits1.xls LocationMap EXHIBIT 1 Project Location Map

25 Source: AECOM and Whitson Engineers, February 2, 2015 Hatch Mott MacDonald Exhibits1.xls Site Plan EXHIBIT 2 Project Site Plan

26 Hatch Mott MacDonald Source: Alta Planning+Design Exhibits1.xls Bike Map EXHIBIT 3 Existing Bicycle Network Monterey Bay Area

27 14 N.T.S XX = INTERSECTION NUMBER VOLUMES COLLECTED ON JANUARY 13, 2015 EXHIBIT 4A EXISTING CONDITION AM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES

28 14 N.T.S XX = INTERSECTION NUMBER VOLUMES COLLECTED ON JANUARY 13, 2015 EXHIBIT 4B EXISTING CONDITION PM PEAK HOUR VOLUMES

29 Existing Existing Lane Intersection LOS Existing Conditions Existing + Project Cumulative Without Project Conditions Conditions Cumulative Plus Project Conditions N-S E-W Configuration Control Standard AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Street Street Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) 1 Josselyn Highway 68 NB 1-L, 1-R Signal C/D 25.6 C 18.6 B 25.9 C 19.1 B 89.5 F F 90.4 F F Canyon EB 1-T, 1-R Road WB 1-L, 1-T 2 Olmsted Highway 68 NB 1-L/T/R Signal C/D 49.9 D 67.1 E 49.8 D 70.0 E F F F F Road SB 1-L/T, 1-R EB 1-L, 1-T, 1-R WB 1-L, 1-T, 1-R 3 Canyon Highway 68 NB 1-L, 1-T/R Signal C/D 18.5 B 19.6 B 18.7 B 19.5 B 37.0 D 39.2 D 37.3 D 38.9 D Del Rey SB 2-L, 1-T, 1-R Road EB 1-L, 1-T, 1-T/R (Hwy. 218) WB 1-L, 2-T, 1-R 4 Ragsdale Highway 68 SB 2-R Signal C/D 17.5 B 20.0 B 17.5 B 20.0 B 23.0 C 29.8 C 23.0 C 29.8 C Drive EB 1-L, 2-T WB 1-T, 1-T/R 5 York Highway 68 SB 1-L, 1-R Signal C/D 26.8 C 34.6 C 26.8 C 34.6 C F F F F Road EB 1-L, 1-T WB 1-T, 1-R 6 Boots Rd. - Highway 68 NB 1-L, 1-T/R Signal C/D 18.9 B 22.2 C 18.9 B 22.2 C F F F F Pasadera SB 1-L/T, 1-R Drive EB 1-L, 1-T, 1-R WB 1-L, 1-T, 1-R 7 Laureles Highway 68 NB 1-L, 1-R Signal C 18.4 B 20.5 C 18.4 B 20.5 C 63.9 E 87.0 F 63.9 E 87.0 F Grade EB 1-T, 1-R WB 2-L, 1-T 8 Corral Highway 68 NB 1-L, 1-R Signal C 58.7 E 50.9 D 58.7 E 50.9 D F F F F De Tierra SB 1-L/T, 1-R Road EB 1-L, 1-T, 1-R WB 1-L, 1-T/R 9 San Benancio Highway 68 NB 1-L/T, 1-R Signal C F 57.0 E F 57.0 E F F F F Road SB 1-L/T, 1-R EB 1-L, 1-T, 1-R WB 2-L, 1-T/R 10 Torero Highway 68 SB 1-L, 1-R Stop Sign (Overall) C/D 38.6 E 2.5 A 38.6 D 2.5 A 24.8 C 17.0 B 24.8 C 17.0 B Drive EB 1-L, 1-T (Worst Approach) (SB) F F F F WB 1-T, 1-R 11 Canyon Ryan NB 1-T, 1-R Signal C/D 4.7 A 10.0 A 4.5 A 8.7 A 5.1 A 10.9 B 4.9 A 9.2 A Del Rey Ranch SB 1-L, 1-T Road Road WB 1-L, 1-R (Hwy. 218) HATCH MOTT MACDONALD LOS1.xlsx - LOS Exhibit 5A Intersection Levels of Service 1 of 2

30 Existing Existing Lane Intersection LOS Existing Conditions Existing + Project Cumulative Without Project Conditions Conditions Cumulative Plus Project Conditions N-S E-W Configuration Control Standard AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Street Street Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) (sec) 12 Canyon Del Rey NB 1-L, 1-T Stop Sign (Overall) C/D 1.4 A 1.0 A 1.4 A 1.0 A 2.3 A 20.3 C 2.3 A 19.4 B Del Rey Gardens SB 1-T, 1-R (Worst Approach) (EB) 23.9 C 25.8 D 23.6 C 24.9 C 30.0 D F 29.5 D F Road Drive EB 1-L, 1-R (Hwy. 218) 13 General Canyon SB 1-L, 1-R Signal C/D 19.7 B 18.0 B 19.7 B 17.8 B 20.7 C 15.5 B 20.5 C 15.3 B Jim Moore Del Rey EB 1-L, 1-T Boulevard Road WB 1-T, 1-R (Hwy. 218) Mitigation 14 Fremont Canyon NB 1-L, 2-T, 1-R Signal C/D 32.3 C 32.6 C 32.2 C 32.6 C 49.7 D 37.3 D 49.3 D 37.3 D Boulevard Del Rey SB 1-L, 2-T, 1-R Boulevard EB 1-L, 1-T, 1-T/R (Hwy. 218) WB 1-L, 1-T, 1-T/R Mitigation NOTES: 1. L, T, R = Left, Through, Right. 2. NB, SB, EB, WB = Northbound, Southbound, Eastbound, Westbound. 3. Analysis performed using 2000 Highway Capacity Manual methodologies. 4. Level of service standard for the Cities of Del Rey Oaks and Seaside is LOS C. Level of service standard for the City of Monterey is LOS D. Level of service standard for Caltrans is the transition between LOS C and LOS D. 5. Intersections in bold represent significant impacts. HATCH MOTT MACDONALD LOS1.xlsx - LOS Exhibit 5A Intersection Levels of Service 2 of 2

31 Road Segment Type Direction LOS Std. AM Peak Hr Existing Conditions PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hr Cumulative Conditions PM Peak Hr Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume Speed LOS Volume Speed LOS 1 Highway 68 Between Highway 1 & Josselyn Canyon Rd. 2-Lane Rural Highway Two-Way C/D 2,142 E 1,984 E 3,456 F 3,444 F AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Volume Speed LOS Volume Speed LOS AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Volume Speed LOS Volume Speed LOS 2 Highway 68 Between Josselyn Canyon Rd. and Olmsted Rd. 2-Lane Arterial EB C/D 1, F E 1, F 1, F WB F 1, E 1, F 2, F 3 Highway 68 Between Olmsted Rd. and Highway Lane Arterial EB C/D 1, E D 1, E 1, E WB 1, E 1, F 1, F 2, F 4 Highway 68 Between Highway 218 and Ragsdale Dr. 4-Lane Expressway EB C/D 1, E 1, E 2, E 1, E WB 1, E 1, D 1, F 2, F 5 Highway 68 Between Ragsdale Dr. and York Rd. 2-Lane Arterial EB C/D D D 1, E 1, F WB 1, C 1, D 1, E 1, E 6 Highway 68 Between York Rd. and Boots Rd.-Pasadera Dr. 2-Lane Arterial EB C/D E 1, F 1, E 1, F WB 1, E 1, C 2, F 1, E 7 Highway 68 Between Boots Rd.-Pasadera Dr. and Laureles Grade Rd. 2-Lane Arterial EB C/D E 1, F 1, E 1, F WB 1, E 1, E 2, F 1, F 8 Highway 68 Between Laureles Grade Rd. and Corral de Tierra Rd. 2-Lane Arterial EB C/D D 1, F 1, F 1, F WB 1, E 1, B 2, F 1, E 9 Highway 68 Between Corral de Tierra Rd. and San Benancio Rd. 2-Lane Arterial EB C/D 1, E 1, F 1, F 2, F WB 1, E 1, E 1, F 1, F AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume Speed LOS Volume Speed LOS 10 Highway 68 Between San Benancio Rd. and Torero Dr. 2-Lane Rural Highway Two-Way C/D 2,351 E 2,549 F 3,623 F 3,921 F 11a Highway 68 Between Torero Dr. and Begin/End Freeway 2-Lane Rural Highway Two-Way C/D 1,982 E 2,489 E 3,205 F 3,853 F AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr AM Peak Hr PM Peak Hr Volume Density LOS Volume Density LOS Volume Density LOS Volume Density LOS 11b Highway 68 Between Begin/End Freeway and Portola Dr. 4-Lane Freeway EB C/D 1, A 1, A 1, B 1, B WB A 1, A 1, B 1, B Hatch Mott MacDonald Data Sources: Ferrini Ranch Subdivision Traffic Impact Analysis, Higgins Associates, October 29, 2008 and The Resort at Del Rey Oaks Traffic Impact Analysis, Higgins Associates, June 6, Note: Segments in bold represent significant impacts LOS1.xlsx - Seg LOS EXHIBIT 5B Roadway Segment Levels of Service

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 4.14.1 Summary Table 4.14-1 summarizes the identified environmental impacts, proposed mitigation measures, and residual impacts of the proposed project with regard to

More information

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 1. Introduction... 4 2. Project Description... 4 3. Background Information... 4 4. Study Scope...

More information

MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA

MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RESEARCH INSTITUTE (MBARI) MASTER PLAN UPDATE MOSS LANDING, CALIFORNIA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Administrative Draft Report Prepared For Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Moss

More information

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis Rim of the World Unified School District Reconfiguration Prepared for: Rim of the World School District 27315 North Bay Road, Blue Jay, CA 92317 Prepared by: 400 Oceangate,

More information

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis Memorandum Date: February 7, 07 To: From: Subject: John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis Introduction Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

More information

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 2018 Highway & Bridge Project PIN 6754.12 Route 13 Connector Road Chemung County February 2018 Appendix

More information

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...

More information

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:

The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below: 3.5 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.1.1 Street Network DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown

More information

Traffic Engineering Study

Traffic Engineering Study Traffic Engineering Study Bellaire Boulevard Prepared For: International Management District Technical Services, Inc. Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3580 November 2009 Executive Summary has been requested

More information

D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA. Prepared For:

D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA. Prepared For: D R A F T TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR DARK HORSE GOLF RESORT EXPANSION Nevada County, CA Prepared For: ASIAN PACIFIC GROUP 18000 Van Karman Avenue, Suite 500 Irvine, CA 92612 Prepared By: KD Anderson &

More information

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways. 4.2 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This section presents the key assumptions, methods, and results of analysis for the transportation and circulation impacts of the proposed project. This section is based on

More information

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for: TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY 2014 Prepared for: Hartford Companies 1218 W. Ash Street Suite A Windsor, Co 80550 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive

More information

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report APPENDIX E Traffic Analysis Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK EAGLE RIVER TRAFFIC MITIGATION PHASE I OLD GLENN HIGHWAY/EAGLE RIVER ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Eagle River, Alaska

More information

Section 5.8 Transportation and Traffic

Section 5.8 Transportation and Traffic Section 5.8 Transportation and Traffic 5.8 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC Generous This Section is based on the Topgolf Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (RK Engineering Group, Inc., October 31, 2016);

More information

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis

PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM DATE: September 10, 2014 PROJECT 5861.03 NO: PROJECT: Wilkinson Road Corridor Improvement Traffic Management Planning Project SUBJECT: Traffic Analysis TO: Steve Holroyd - District

More information

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Barrhaven Fellowship CRC 3058 Jockvale Road Ottawa, ON K2J 2W7 December 7, 2016 116-649 Report_1.doc D. J.

More information

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for Phelps Program Management 420 Sixth Avenue, Greeley, CO 80632 Prepared by 5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study addresses the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Shopko redevelopment located in Sugarhouse, Utah. The Shopko redevelopment project is located between 1300 East and

More information

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Invecta Development (Ottawa) Corporation 758 Shanks Height Milton, ON L9T 7P7 May

More information

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily

Table Existing Traffic Conditions for Arterial Segments along Construction Access Route. Daily 5.8 TRAFFIC, ACCESS, AND CIRCULATION This section describes existing traffic conditions in the project area; summarizes applicable regulations; and analyzes the potential traffic, access, and circulation

More information

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Proposed Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference Transportation Assessment St. Clair Township, Ontario September 2009 itrans Consulting Inc. 260

More information

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205

More information

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street IV.J TRANSPORTATION 1. INTRODUCTION This section presents an overview of the existing traffic and circulation system in and surrounding the project site. This section also discusses the potential impacts

More information

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios:

Quantitative analyses of weekday a.m. and p.m. commuter hour conditions have been conducted for the following five scenarios: 6.1 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 6.1.1 INTRODUCTION This section of the EIR presents the results of TJKM s traffic impact analysis of the proposed Greenbriar Development. The analysis includes consideration

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA Prepared For: McDonald s USA, LLC Pacific Sierra Region 2999 Oak Road, Suite 900 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Prepared By:

More information

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By: TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Sacramento, CA Prepared For: MBK Homes Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road, Suite G Loomis, California 95650 (916) 660-1555

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Submitted by April 9, 2009 Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona,

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 24 UPDATED

More information

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited. RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited June 16, 2016 116-638 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting

More information

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014. King County Metro Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis Downtown Southend Transit Study May 2014 Parametrix Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Methodology... 1 Study Area...

More information

MADERAS HOTEL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Transportation Planner III & Jorge Cuyuch Transportation Engineer I

MADERAS HOTEL TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS. LLG Ref Transportation Planner III & Jorge Cuyuch Transportation Engineer I TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS MADERAS HOTEL Poway, California June 21, 2016 LLG Ref. 3-16-2602 Prepared by: Amelia Giacalone Transportation Planner III & Jorge Cuyuch Transportation Engineer I Under the

More information

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 2190986ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 October 6, 2010 110-502 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny

More information

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Camp Parkway Commerce Center is a proposed distribution and industrial center to be

More information

Appendix M. Traffic Impact Analysis Report

Appendix M. Traffic Impact Analysis Report Appendix M Traffic Impact Analysis Report California Flats Solar Project Traffic Impact Analysis Report August 5, 213 Contents Executive Summary... 1 1. Introduction... 4 2. Existing Conditions... 12 3.

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT Vallejo, CA Prepared For: ELITE DRIVE-INS, INC. 2190 Meridian Park Blvd, Suite G Concord, CA 94520 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road,

More information

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RAYMOND VINEYARDS WINERY USE PERMIT MODIFICATION #P11-00156 AUGUST 5, 2014 PREPARED BY: OMNI-MEANS,

More information

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project July 25, 218 ROMF Transportation Impact Analysis Version

More information

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California

Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California Shirk Road at State Route 198 Interchange Analysis Tulare County, California DRAFT REPORT Prepared By Tulare County Association of Governments (TCAG) April 2013 Table of Contents Introduction:... 3 Project

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Emerald Isle Commercial Development Prepared by SEPI Engineering & Construction Prepared for Ark Consulting Group, PLLC March 2016 I. Executive Summary A. Site Location The Emerald

More information

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS BERKELEY DOWNTOWN AREA PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: City of Berkeley Prepared by: REVISED JANUARY 9, 2009 Berkeley Downtown Area Plan Program EIR Traffic

More information

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Transportation & Traffic Engineering Transportation & Traffic Engineering 1) Project Description This report presents a summary of findings for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) performed by A+ Engineering, Inc. for the Hill Country Family

More information

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1 Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West

More information

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639

RTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639 INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY Prepared for: Virginia Department of Transportation Central Region Operations Traffic Engineering (UPC #81378, TO 12-092) DAVENPORT Project Number: 13-368 / /2014 RTE. 1 at RTE.

More information

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Warrenville, Illinois Prepared For: Prepared By: April 11, 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Existing Conditions... 4 Site Location...

More information

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Study Plainfield, Illinois August 2018 Prepared for: Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Existing Conditions

More information

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017 Movin Out June 2017 1.0 Introduction The proposed Movin Out development is a mixed use development in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of West Broadway and Fayette Avenue in the City of Madison.

More information

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND Prepared for: Department of Public Works Anne Arundel County Prepared by: URS Corporation 4 North Park Drive, Suite 3 Hunt Valley,

More information

Appendix G Traffic and Parking Report

Appendix G Traffic and Parking Report Appendix G Traffic and Parking Report TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary... v 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Study Area... 3 2.0 Project Description... 4 2.1 Site Location... 4 2.2 Existing Project

More information

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT CITY OF BUENA PARK Prepared by Project No. 14139 000 April 17 th, 2015 DKS Associates Jeffrey Heald, P.E. Rohit Itadkar, T.E. 2677 North Main

More information

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS for the South Novato Transit Hub Study Prepared by: January 11, 2010 DKS Associates With Wilbur Smith Associates IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS Chapter 1: Introduction 1. INTRODUCTION The strategic

More information

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017

Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017 Southern Windsor County 2016 Traffic Count Program Summary April 2017 The Southern Windsor County Regional Planning Commission (the RPC ) has been monitoring traffic at 19 locations throughout the southern

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR YUBA CROSSINGS MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT Yuba City, CA Prepared For: Yuba Crossings LLC 1825 Del Paso Blvd Sacramento, CA 95815 Prepared By: KDAnderson & Associates, Inc. 3853 Taylor

More information

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for: L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES

More information

Appendix Q Traffic Study

Appendix Q Traffic Study Appendices Appendix Q Traffic Study Crummer Site Subdivision Draft EIR City of Malibu Appendices This page intentionally left blank. The Planning Center April 2013 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Photo z here

More information

APPENDIX G TRAFFIC STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX G TRAFFIC STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM APPENDIX G TRAFFIC STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Jerry Flores - AECOM Brian A. Marchetti, AICP September 9, 5 DRAFT Traffic Study LABOE Channel 5 Studio Relocation

More information

3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY

3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY 3.15 SAFETY AND SECURITY Introduction This section describes the environmental setting and potential effects of the alternatives analyzed in this EIR with regard to safety and security in the SantaClara-Alum

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SAFARI HIGHLANDS RANCH, California November 11, 2016 LLG Ref. 3-14-2334 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Project proposes the development of 550 luxury residential dwelling units, public trails,

More information

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study Final Report (Revised) March 2011 Submitted to: Groupe Lépine Ottawa Project No. 09-1613 Submitted by: Groupe Lépine

More information

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DETAILED SUMMARY OF FINAL APPLICATIONS

MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DETAILED SUMMARY OF FINAL APPLICATIONS MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DETAILED SUMMARY OF FINAL APPLICATIONS AB 2766 Grant Program for FY 2009-2010 August 19, 2009 10detailedsumm6 R Page 1 For Multiple Counties 10-03 AMBAG: Regional

More information

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange

INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange INTERCHANGE OPERTIONS STUDY Interstate 77 / Wallings Road Interchange City of Broadview Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio Prepared For: City of Broadview Heights Department of Engineering 9543 Broadview Road

More information

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study

APPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study APPENDIX H Transportation Impact Study BUENA VISTA LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: San Diego Association of Governments Prepared by: VRPA Technologies, Inc. 9520 Padgett

More information

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS... Crosshaven Drive Corridor Study City of Vestavia Hills, Alabama Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA... 3 Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE. Executive Summary... xii TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary... xii 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Study Area... 2 1.2 Traffic Impact Analysis Scenarios... 4 1.3 Study Area - City of Orange... 4 2.0 Project Description

More information

5.9 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

5.9 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC 5.9 TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This section evaluates transportation- and traffic-related impacts that have the potential to result from the construction and operation of the Project. Information and analysis

More information

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis Appendix E NJ TRANSIT Pennsauken Junction Transit Center and Park & Ride RiverLINE and Atlantic City Line Pennsauken Township, Camden County, New Jersey TRAFFIC DATA Background Traffic Information for

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE. PANORAMA PD Shasta County, California. Prepared For: Enplan 3179 Bechelli Lane, Suite 100 Redding, CA 96002

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE. PANORAMA PD Shasta County, California. Prepared For: Enplan 3179 Bechelli Lane, Suite 100 Redding, CA 96002 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THE PANORAMA PD Shasta County, California Prepared For: Enplan 3179 Bechelli Lane, Suite 100 Redding, CA 96002 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates, Inc. 3853 Taylor Road,

More information

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017 Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,

More information

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS NAPA FLEA MARKET COUNTY OF NAPA Prepared for: Tom Harding Napa-Vallejo Flea Market 33 Kelly Road American Canyon, CA 9453 Prepared by: 166 Olympic Boulevard, Suite 21 Walnut Creek,

More information

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To Kumar Neppalli Traffic Engineering Manager Town of Chapel Hill From Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. Cc HNTB Project File: 38435 Subject Obey Creek TIS 2022

More information

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY

BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY FM # 42802411201 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2012 GOBROWARD Broward Boulevard Corridor Transit Study FM # 42802411201 Executive Summary Prepared For: Ms. Khalilah Ffrench,

More information

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS

V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive Extension FINAL Feasibility Study Page 9 V. DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPTS Throughout the study process several alternative alignments were developed and eliminated. Initial discussion

More information

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional

Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional Project Overview TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WHAT ARE THE PROJECT GOALS? Transportation transportation hub. Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional Land Use

More information

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1. DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava July 9, 2015 115-620 Overview_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation

More information

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT

Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT Delcan Corporation Transit City Etobicoke - Finch West LRT APPENDIX D Microsimulation Traffic Modeling Report March 2010 March 2010 Appendix D CONTENTS 1.0 STUDY CONTEXT... 2 Figure 1 Study Limits... 2

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY. Escondido, California June 25, LLG Ref Transportation Engineer II

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY. Escondido, California June 25, LLG Ref Transportation Engineer II TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS WESTMINSTER SEMINARY Escondido, California June 25, 2015 LLG Ref. 3-15-2420 Prepared by: Pedram Massoudi Transportation Engineer II Under the Supervision of: John Boarman, P.E.

More information

APPENDIX J LAKE WOHLFORD DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (DAM REPLACEMENT) Lake Wohlford Dam Replacement Project EIR

APPENDIX J LAKE WOHLFORD DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (DAM REPLACEMENT) Lake Wohlford Dam Replacement Project EIR APPENDIX J LAKE WOHLFORD DAM REPLACEMENT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (DAM REPLACEMENT) Replacement Project EIR Appendices TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS LAKE WOHLFORD DAM Escondido, California December 19,

More information

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

Traffic Impact Analysis Update Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS

More information

Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project

Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project July 2004 Prepared for: The City of Berkeley 1031-1925 F EHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS 3685 Mt. Diablo Blvd. #301 Lafayette, CA 94549 925-284-3200 Fax:

More information

3.3 TRANSPORTATION, TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION, AND PARKING

3.3 TRANSPORTATION, TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION, AND PARKING 3.3 Transportation, Traffic, Circulation, and Parking January 2013 3.3 TRANSPORTATION, TRAFFIC, CIRCULATION, AND PARKING This section describes the transportation network in the vicinity of the VA Transfer

More information

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT

DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DRAFT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY CASTILIAN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Prepared for: Submitted by: 299 Lava Ridge Ct. Suite 2 Roseville, CA. 95661 June 212 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 Project Location

More information

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

MEMO VIA  . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To: MEMO To: Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers VIA EMAIL From: Michael J. Labadie, PE Julie M. Kroll, PE, PTOE Brandon Hayes, PE, P.Eng. Fleis & VandenBrink Date: January 5, 2017 Re: Proposed

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION Chapel Hill, North Carolina FINAL REPORT Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill, NC Prepared by: Architects-Engineers-Planners, Inc. December 2010

More information

Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation

Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation Appendix H: Construction Impacts H-2 Transportation \ AECOM 71 W. 23 rd Street New York, NY 10010 www.aecom.com 212 366 6200 tel 212 366 6214 fax Memorandum To CC Subject Robert Conway Donald Tone Construction

More information

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT DRAFT TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT WEST HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2013 PREPARED FOR BEVERLY BOULEVARD ASSOCIATION PREPARED BY DRAFT TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899

More information

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study

Appendix J Traffic Impact Study MRI May 2012 Appendix J Traffic Impact Study Level 2 Traffic Assessment Limited Impact Review Appendix J [This page was left blank intentionally.] www.sgm-inc.com Figure 1. Site Driveway and Trail Crossing

More information

3.4 TRANSPORTATION. Introduction. Existing Conditions. Existing Roadway Network

3.4 TRANSPORTATION. Introduction. Existing Conditions. Existing Roadway Network 3.4 TRANSPORTATION Introduction This section of the EIR summarizes the effects on existing and future (2035) transportation and circulation system resulting from vehicle trips associated with the Project.

More information

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT for Sunrise Elementary School Replacement PREPARED FOR: Puyallup School District PREPARED BY: 6544 NE 61 st Street, Seattle, WA 98115 ph: (26) 523-3939 fx: (26) 523-4949

More information

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D

MEMORANDUM. Figure 1. Roundabout Interchange under Alternative D MEMORANDUM Date: To: Liz Diamond, Dokken Engineering From: Subject: Dave Stanek, Fehr & Peers Western Placerville Interchanges 2045 Analysis RS08-2639 Fehr & Peers has completed a transportation analysis

More information

Los Angeles Mission College Facilities Master Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report 3.13 TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC

Los Angeles Mission College Facilities Master Plan Draft Program Environmental Impact Report 3.13 TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC 3.13 TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC As a result of the analysis undertaken in the Initial Study for the Los Angeles Mission College Facilities Master Plan, the (LACCD) determined that the proposed project may

More information

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

Section 5.0 Traffic Information Section 5.0 Traffic Information 10.0 TRANSPORTATION MDM Transportation Consultants, Inc. (MDM) has prepared an evaluation of transportation impacts for the proposed evaluation for the expansion of the

More information

Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement

Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Traffic Study PHA Transportation Consultants 12-05-359 October 2012 Diablo Vista Pumping Plant Replacement Traffic Study For EBMUD October 2012 PHA Transportation

More information

Section 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

Section 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Section 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 5.2 TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION/PARKING This section evaluates potential traffic-related and parking impacts associated with the proposed project. The following discussion

More information

1650 South Delaware Street

1650 South Delaware Street 65 South Delaware Street Final Transportation Impact Analysis Prepared for: City of San Mateo June 8, 28 Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. Hexagon Office: 4 North Second Street, Suite 4 San Jose,

More information

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for Galloway & Company

More information

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County

City of Marina. Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: Transportation Agency for Monterey County Regional Roundabout Study Utilizing Caltrans Intersection Control Evaluation Section 4: City of Marina Study Intersections: RESERVATION ROAD AT BEACH ROAD RESERVATION ROAD AT DEFOREST ROAD CARDOZA AVENUE

More information

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. Volume 1 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas June 18, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064523000 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis 2727 Dallas, Texas Prepared

More information

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015 5500 New Albany Road Columbus, Ohio 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Fax: 614.775.4800 Toll Free: 1-888-775-EMHT emht.com 2015-1008 MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES September 2, 2015 Engineers

More information

IV. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND

IV. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND IV. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND 1. REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT IS/MND This section presents corrections and clarifications that have been made to the text of the Draft IS/MND. These changes include revisions

More information