PASCO COUNTY 2014 MULTI-MODAL MOBILITY FEE UPDATE STUDY

Transcription

1 PASCO COUNTY 2014 MULTI-MODAL MOBILITY FEE UPDATE STUDY DRAFT REPORT October 15, 2014 Prepared for: 8731 Citizens Dr. New Port Richey, FL ph (727) Prepared by: W.E. Oliver, P.E., LLC

2 PASCO COUNTY MULTI-MODAL MOBILITY FEE STUDY Executive Summary... ES INTRODUCTION CHANGES TO CURRENT FEE VARIABLES Individual Land Use Trip Characteristics Trip Generation, Trip Length, and Percent New Trips Trip Length Adjustment by District Conversion of Vehicle-Trips to Person-Trips Reduced Travel Demand for TND/TOD Cost of Transportation Capacity Summary of Costs (Blended Cost Analysis) Capacity Addition Ratio Cross-District Travel Analysis Credit Calculations Gasoline Tax Credit (Equivalent) Transit Tax Credit Tax Increment Revenue Credit Facility Life Interest Rate Fuel Efficiency Effective Days per Year Capacity per Lane Mile Interstate/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor INCENTIVE FUNDING Gasoline Tax Revenues Penny for Pasco Sales Tax Revenues Property Tax Increment Revenues PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE Proposed Mobility Schedules Example Calculation Indexing October 2014 Page i Transportation Mobility

3 List of Figures Figure 1 - Districts and Planned Road Improvements... 2 List of Tables Table Proposed Changes to Travel Demand Parameters... 6 Table 2-2 Development of Trip Length Adjustments by District... 9 Table 2-3 Multi-Modal Transportation System Cost per Person-Mile of Capacity Table 2-4 Equivalent Pennies of Gas Tax Revenue Table 2-5 Estimated Capacity Added per Lane Mile Table 3-1 Incentive Budget Estimate Table 4-1 Urban Standard Schedule ( District A) Table 4-2 Urban Mixed-Use Trip Reduction Measures Schedule ( District A) Table 4-3 Urban Traditional Neighborhood Development Schedule ( District A) Table 4-4 Urban Transit-Oriented Development Schedule ( District A) Table 4-4 Harbors (West) Redevelopment District Schedule Table 4-5 Suburban Standard Schedule ( District B) Table 4-6 Suburban Mixed-Use Trip Reduction Measures Schedule ( District B) Table 4-7 Suburban Traditional Neighborhood Development Schedule ( District B) Table 4-8 Rural Standard Schedule ( District C) Table 4-9 Rural Mixed-Use Trip Reduction Measures Schedule ( District C) Table 4-10 Rural Traditional Neighborhood Development Schedule ( District C) Appendices APPENDIX A: Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database APPENDIX B: Travel Demand of MUTRM, TND, TOD, Mining Uses, and Residential Trip Rates by Size APPENDIX C: Cost Component Calculations APPENDIX D: Cross-District Travel Analysis APPENDIX E: Credit Component Calculations APPENDIX F: Incentive Revenue Estimates APPENDIX G: Condensed Schedules for Publication October 2014 Page ii Transportation Mobility

4 PASCO COUNTY 2014 MULTI-MODAL MOBILITY FEE UPDATE STUDY Executive Summary has updated its mobility fee study to respond to a changing economic and legislative environment. The prior fee was adopted in 2011, as a replacement to the County s prior transportation impact fee, when an economic recession was occurring, and legislation had been passed encouraging creative approaches to regulatory and land use policy to promote job creation and compact urban growth. Innovative features of the 2011 fee included: Creating a graduated fee schedule that provided lower fees in more dense urban areas and higher fees in rural areas, Providing incentives for job-creation, tourism, and compact urban growth land uses to locate in, and Providing flexibility in the application of the fee to transportation capital facilities for the four major modes of transportation private motor vehicles, transit, bicycles, and walking. Since 2011, the economic climate has pushed forward into recovery. Growth rates are increasing and costs of transportation facilities are increasing. In addition to the update required by the County s Mobility regulations to address current technical aspects of the fee, the County wished to continue the strategies implemented in 2011, maintain the same fee rates or lower, and expand the incentive program to fully incentivize employment- and tourism-serving land uses countywide, to create a new West/Harbors Redevelopment district, and to create a new class of incentivized development form, the Mixed-Use Trip Reduction Measures (MUTRM) development. Partial incentives continue to be provided for retail, recreational, institutional, and residential uses. Administrative procedures will ensure that the appropriate level of tax revenues are transferred to capital programs to annually round-out the fee incentives. The 2014 fee anticipates higher growth rates and the enactment of the full (five-cent) second local option gasoline tax to continue to achieve quality of service goals, and to continue and expand the incentives program previously implemented. The fee structure continues to recognize that the urban area will be served by congested roads and more dependence on public transit, the suburban area will be served by less-congested roads and less public transit, and the rural area by even lesscongested roads and very little public transit. Bicycle facilities and sidewalks are anticipated in all areas. In addition, the continued commitment of Penny for Pasco Sales Tax, the tax increment revenues from the Countywide Transportation District, and Multi-Modal Transportation Fund, was relied upon, to help fund increased transit operating costs with an expanded system and to incentivize specific job-creating land uses and other desired forms of development. October 2014 Page ES-1 Transportation Mobility

5 October 2014 Page ES-2 Transportation Mobility

6 PASCO COUNTY MULTI-MODAL MOBILITY FEE STUDY 1.0 INTRODUCTION 's history with transportation impact fees dates back to They are adopted to assist the County in providing adequate roads for expected growth. In July, 2011, the fee was modified to a Multi-Modal Mobility, to allow expenditures on all modes of transportation, to encourage economic development, and to encourage forms of development desired by the County. Per the enacting regulations, an update is required every three years at a minimum to reflect the most up to date conditions. In addition to updating technical aspects of the fee schedule, such as anticipated higher growth rates, changes in transportation revenue programs, and increased costs of providing transportation facilities and services, this 2014 update study expands upon several features of the 2011 fee, specifically: Expands the prior partial incentives for employment and tourism-supporting land uses to be full incentives county-wide, Addresses a new class of development, the Mixed-Use Trip Reduction Measure development (MUTRM), Adds the mining land use to the fee schedules. Such changes typically increase the magnitude of fees, but the County also desired to maintain the Standard fee rates as adopted in To achieve this, and maintain the quality of service goals on which the fee is based, additional revenues specifically the second local option gasoline tax was enacted by the Board of County Commissioners. The fee developed in this study will continue to fund transit, bicycle, and pedestrian capital facilities as well as roads, in keeping with a legislative emphasis on developing multi-modal transportation systems to provide mobility options to citizens of. The fee also supports the Comprehensive Plan designation of a geographically tiered (urban, suburban, and rural) growth management and mobility strategy. A part of the mobility fee strategy is the implementation of funding mechanisms that are consistent with the development densities and mobility strategies defined for each geographic area. In the urban area, a transit-oriented mobility plan has been adopted with a higher degree of roadway congestion. In the suburban and rural areas, correspondingly less transit and higher levels of roadway service are intended. Figure 1 illustrates the area boundaries and the currently adopted long-range transportation plan. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

7 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

8 This report is the technical support document to the regulations and documents the fee structure. schedules reflecting the above incentives are included in this report, as well as material supporting the specific parameters used in the fee calculations. The general equation used to compute the transportation impact fee for a given land use is: Net Mobility = Total Impact Cost Self-Credits Incentives The total impact cost is the product of the demand for travel placed on the transportation system times the unit cost of providing for that travel. The demand is expressed in units of person miles of transportation system capacity consumed. Rather than focusing on roads, bicycles, and pedestrians only, this multi-modal mobility fee integrates the capital costs of transit as well. The unit cost of building transportation system capacity is expressed in units of dollars per person-mile, and takes into consideration the level-of-service goal in each subarea of the County. Self-credits are an estimate of the revenues, generated by the new development itself, that are allocated to transportation system capacity expansion. Incentives are fee reductions to encourage certain forms and locations of development, funded by revenues generated by the pre-existing tax base. Thus, the fee represents an "up front" payment for a portion of the cost to provide or replace the transportation facilities consumed by a development. This report recommends changes to the input variables used in the County s current mobility fee schedule. Additional and/or new information available to the firm relevant to transportation impact and mobility fees was reviewed and used in the update. The general topics are as follows: Demand Component o Individual land use trip characteristics Cost Component o Multi-modal improvement costs o Multi-modal capacity cost Credit Component o Gasoline and sales tax distributions and allocations Other variables used in the mobility fee formula Incentives for favored land uses Development of fee schedules Example fee calculation These items are all discussed in subsequent sections of this document. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

9 Florida Statutes indicate that impact fees must be based on the most current data available. While this study was in progress, had also begun its 2014 update to its long range transportation plan (LRTP); however, that plan was not complete at the time this study was completed. Thus, unless otherwise noted, references to s LRTP refer to the adopted 2035 Cost-Affordable plan. 2.0 CHANGES TO CURRENT FEE VARIABLES There are 11 input components used in the current fee equation. Number of daily trips generated Length of those trips Proportion of travel that is new travel Cost per person- mile of capacity Capacity addition ratio Credits for revenues generated by development Facility life Interest rate Fuel efficiency Effective days per year Interstate/toll facility adjustment factor As necessary, modifications were made to the input components to reflect the current demand, cost, and revenue data obtained for this Update Study. A review of the input components and the proposed changes to them are presented in the following sections. 2.1 Individual Land Use Trip Characteristics Trip Generation, Trip Length, and Percent New Trips The amount of transportation system consumed by a land development activity is calculated using the following units of measure: Number of trips generated; Length of those trips; and Proportion of travel that is new travel, rather than travel that might have already been on the road system. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

10 For the purpose of this Update Study, the trip characteristic variables have been obtained primarily from two sources: (1) previous studies conducted throughout Florida, specifically the trip characteristics studies conducted previously in (Florida Studies Database) and (2) the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation reference report (9 th Edition, 2012). Changes between the proposed and current travel demand variables (i.e., trip generation rate, trip length, and percent new trips) are summarized in Table 2-1. Changes that resulted in increases in travel demand of more than one percent are identified for 22 of the 76 uses in the fee schedule, and decreases for 27 uses. The reasons for these changes are provided in Table 2-1. The reasons for these changes included: the availability of an updated ITE Trip Generation reference, the inclusion of additional field studies for trip lengths that have been undertaken since Pasco County s fees were last updated, and changes in Tindale-Oliver s mobility/impact fee study procedures. The trip characteristics used in the calculation of the mobility fee for each land use are included in the proposed fee schedules, presented later in this report. In addition, Tindale-Oliver s Florida Trip Characteristics Studies Database is included in Appendix A. This database provided trip length, percent capture of trips, and trip rate for some land uses. It should be noted that the adjustment factors applied to trip lengths (15 percent for residential and 5 percent for non-residential) applied in the 2002, 2007, and 2011 update studies (to account for differences between the trip lengths resulting from the studies included in the Florida Studies Database and the independent trip characteristics studies conducted by Tindale-Oliver in in 2002) were retained Trip Length Adjustment by District Since the fee is stratified into three geographic areas, the relative trip lengths for each of the three areas were investigated using the current Tampa Bay Regional (Transportation) Planning Model (TBRPM) version 7.2, and s LRTP. The model uses residential dwellings, industrial, commercial and service employment as its primary travel-forecasting variables. The lengths of trips generated by these forecasting variables, when located in 18 different locations throughout the County, were determined and the average of all of the trip lengths was tabulated. The upper portion of Table 2-2 summarizes the results of this modeling exercise, and indicates that trips in the rural area tend to be the longest, trips in the suburban area tend to be near average, and trips in the urban area the shortest for each of the variables. These findings were used to adjust the county-wide average trip lengths from the 2014 [should this say 2011?] mobility fee schedule and Tindale-Oliver s Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database to estimate appropriate trip lengths in each October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

11 ITE LUC Land Use Unit 2011 Trip Rate Table 2-1 Proposed Changes to Travel Demand Parameters from the 2011 Mobility Study Trip Rate % Change Trip Length 2014 Trip Length % Change 2011 % New Trips 2014 % New Trips % Change 2011 Gross VMT 2014 Gross VMT % Change Reason for Change Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than du % % 100% 100% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 5.3% due to an update to NHTS, ACS, and Census data used for tiering 80% of SHIP Definition 210 Less than 1,500 sf du % % 100% 100% 0.0% % TGR increased by 15.1% due to an update to NHTS, ACS, and Census data used for tiering 1,500 to 2,499 sf du % % 100% 100% 0.0% % TGR increased by 2.9% due to an update to NHTS, ACS, and Census data used for tiering 2,500 sf or larger du % % 100% 100% 0.0% % TGR increased by 9.5% due to an update to NHTS, ACS, and Census data used for tiering 220 Multi-Family "Low Income"; less than 80% of SHIP TGR decreased by 3.6% due to an update to NHTS, ACS, and Census data used for tiering. TL du % % 100% 100% 0.0% % definition decreased by 2.1% and PNT decreased by 2% due to an update to the FL Studies Database TGR increased by 0.2%, TL decreased by 2.1%, and PNT decreased by 2% due to an update to the ITE Multi-Family (Apartment) du % % 100% 100% 0.0% % 9th Edition and FL Studies Database blending analysis 231 Low-Rise Condominium (1 to 2 Stories) du % % 100% 100% 0.0% % TGR increased by 23.1% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition. TL decreased by 23% and PNT decreased by 22.9% due to an update to the FL Studies Database 232 High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du % % 100% 100% 0.0% % TL decreased by 23% and PNT decreased by 22.9% due to an update to the FL Studies Database 251 Age-Restricted Single Family du % % 100% 100% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 0.3% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition 252 Age-Restricted Multi-Family du % % 100% 100% 0.0% % TGR increased by 9.6% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition 310 Hotel room % % 66% 66% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 23.4% due to an update to the FL Studies Database 330 Resort Hotel room % % 83% 83% 0.0% % TGR increased by 14.3% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition 416 RV Park RV space % % 100% 100% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 27% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition. TL decreased by 8.7% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously applied a 15% TL adjustment) 420 Marina berth % % 90% 90% 0.0% % TL decreased by 8.7% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously applied a 15% TL adjustment) 430 Golf Course hole % % 90% 90% 0.0% % TL decreased by 8.7% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously applied a 15% TL adjustment) 431 Miniature Golf Course hole % % 90% 90% 0.0% % TL increased by 13.9% due to the use of LUC 210 as a proxy 495 Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf % % 90% 90% 0.0% % TGR increased by 47.8% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition 520 Elementary School (Private) student % % 80% 80% 0.0% % TL decreased by 4.4% due to an update to the model-based TL analysis 522 Middle School (Private) student % % 90% 90% 0.0% % TL decreased by 4.4% due to an update to the model-based TL analysis 530 High School (Private) student % % 90% 90% 0.0% % TL decreased by 4.4% due to an update to the model-based TL analysis 540 University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) TL decreased by 8.7% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously student % % 90% 90% 0.0% % (Private) applied a 15% TL adjustment) 550 University/Junior College (more than 7,500 TL decreased by 8.7% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously student % % 90% 90% 0.0% % students) (Private) applied a 15% TL adjustment) 565 Day Care student % % 73% 73% 0.0% % TGR increased by 44.6% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition (previously sourced "Previous Pasco Study) 566 Cemetery acre % % 95% 95% 0.0% % TL decreased by 8.7% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously applied a 15% TL adjustment) 610 Hospital 1,000 sf % % 77% 77% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 19.9% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition. TL decreased by 8.7% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously applied a 15% TL adjustment) 620 Nursing Home bed % % 89% 89% 0.0% % TGR increased by 11.3% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition 710 General Office 50,000 sf or less 1,000 sf % % 92% 92% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 1% due to an update to the ITE 9th Edition equation 710 General Office 50, ,000 sf 1,000 sf % % 92% 92% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 1.6% due to an update to the ITE 9th Edition equation 710 General Office 100, ,000 sf 1,000 sf % % 92% 92% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 2.2% due to an update to the ITE 9th Edition equation 710 General Office 200, ,000 sf 1,000 sf % % 92% 92% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 3.0% due to an update to the ITE 9th Edition equation 710 General Office greater than 400,000 sf 1,000 sf % % 92% 92% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 3.3% due to an update to the ITE 9th Edition equation 720 Medical Office 1,000 sf % % 89% 89% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 3.4% due to an update to the FL Studies Database 750 Office Park 1,000 sf % % 92% 89% -3.3% % TGR increased by 2.5% due to a blending analysis of ITE 9th and FL Studies. TL increased by 38.1% and PNT decreased by 3.3% due to the use of the FL Studies Database (previously used LUC 710 as a proxy) 760 Research & Development Center 1,000 sf % % 92% 89% -3.3% % TL increased by 4.5% and PNT decreased by 3.3% due to the use of LUC 770 (Business Park) as a proxy (previously used LUC 710 as a proxy) October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

12 ITE LUC Land Use Unit 2011 Trip Rate Table 2-1 (continued) Proposed Changes to Travel Demand Parameters from the 2011 Mobility Study Trip Rate % Change Trip Length 2014 Trip Length % Change 2011 % New Trips 2014 % New Trips % Change 2011 Gross VMT 2014 Gross VMT % Change Reason for Change 640 Veterinary Clinic 1,000 sf % % 70% 93% 32.9% % TGR increased by 22.3% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition. TL increased by 155.2% and PNT increased by 32.9% due to the use of LUC 630 (Clinic) as a proxy 820 Retail 50, ,000 sfgla 1,000 sfgla % % 67% 67% 0.0% % TL increased by 5.9% due to an update to the FL Curve analysis 820 Retail 200, ,000 sfgla 1,000 sfgla % % 73% 73% 0.0% % TL increased by 5.3% due to an update to the FL Curve analysis 820 Retail 400, ,000 sfgla 1,000 sfgla % % 76% 76% 0.0% % TL increased by 9.5% due to an update to the FL Curve analysis 820 Retail 600, ,000 sfgla 1,000 sfgla % % 79% 79% 0.0% % TL increased by 7.9% due to an update to the FL Curve analysis 820 Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla 1,000 sfgla % % 81% 81% 0.0% % TL increased by 5.7% due to an update to the FL Curve analysis 841 New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf % % 79% 79% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 5.4% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition 853 Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf % % 28% 28% 0.0% % TL increased by 5.3% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously did not apply a TL adjustment) 862 Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf % % 67% 67% 0.0% % TGR increased by 3.2% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition. TL increased by 5.9% due to an update to the FL Curve analysis 881 Pharmacy/Drug Store with and w/o Drive-Thru 1,000 sf % % 33% 32% -3.0% % TGR increased by 3.3% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition. PNT decreased by 3% due to an update to the FL Studies Database 932 High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf % % 71% 71% 0.0% % 934 Fast Food Rest. w/drive-thru 1,000 sf % % 58% 58% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 7.8% due to an update to the FL Studies Database. TL increased by 5% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously did not apply a TL adjustment) TGR decreased by 2.2% due to an update to the FL Studies Database. TL increased by 4.9% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously did not apply a TL adjustment) 942 Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf % % 72% 72% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 7.9% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition 947 Self-Service Car Wash bays % % 76% 68% -10.5% % TGr decreased by 59.3%, TL increased by 9%, and PNT decreased by 10.5% due to an update to the FL Studies Database n/a Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food 1,000 sf % % 32% 32% 0.0% % TL increased by 4.9% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously did not apply a TL adjustment) 130 Industrial Park 1,000 sf % % 92% 92% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 1.9% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition 151 Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf % % 92% 92% 0.0% % TGR increased by 14% due to a blending analysis of ITE 9th and FL Studies 152 High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf % % 92% 92% 0.0% % TGR decreased by 16.7% due to an update in ITE 9th Edition n/a Airport Hangar 1,000 sf % % 92% 92% 0.0% % TL increased by 5.0% due to the use of the 5% TL adjustment for non-residential uses (previously did not apply a TL adjustment) n/a Mining 1,000 cy n/a n/a n/a 97% This land use was not included in the 2011 Mobility Study October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

13 geographic subarea for which the fees are developed. Since the TBRPM (version 7.2) provides modeling capability for local and regional retail and service employees, the averages of the trip length factors were applied to the fee calculation. The computation of these averages and the values used are summarized in the lower portion of the Table Conversion of Vehicle-Trips to Person-Trips For application in a mixed transit and roadway mode, it was necessary to estimate travel in units of person-miles. No extensive source of person-trip travel generation by land use is available, such as is available for vehicle trips in the ITE Trip Generation reference. It is reasonable to assume that most of the trip generation rate studies in Trip Generation were undertaken in low-transit environments, so the person-trip generation characteristics for each land use in the fee schedule relied on the ITE vehicle-trip generation data. Vehicle-trips were converted to person-trips by applying a vehicle-trip to person-trip conversion factor of This value was derived from data from the TBRPM (version 7.2) Reduced Travel Demand for MUTRM, TND, and TOD is seeking to encourage development forms which minimize the need for travel. Developments meeting certain design criteria, diversity of land uses, density, and proximity to transit services accomplish this objective. Developments exhibiting certain design criteria can be qualified as Mixed-Use Trip Reduction Measures (MUTRM) development, Traditional Neighborhood Developments (TND), or Transit Oriented Developments (TOD). is developing criteria for the Land Development Code to qualify developments in these categories. Mobility fee rates that reflect the reduced travel generation are appropriate. The County has determined it will participate in partially funding, or incentivizing, the fees for MUTRM development, TND, and TOD s. In the urban and rural districts, the County has elected to incentivize 25 percent of the standard MUTRM fee for the district, 50 percent of TND development in the urban district, and 75 percent of fees charged to TOD development in the urban district. In the suburban district, fees for MUTRM development and TND were set to match those of the urban district. Information contained in the documentation from the URBan EMISsions (URBEMIS) 9.2 software program was used to develop an estimate of the reduction in travel from the standard travel levels associated with each of the alternative development forms. The reductions, more completely documented in Appendix B, are based on residential density, the mix of land uses, presence of localserving retail, presence and proximity to transit service, presence of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and density of the road network. These considerations have led to an estimate that MUTRM development generates percent, TND developments generate percent, and TOD October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

14 District Rural Suburban Urban Table 2-2: Development of Trip Length Adjustments by District Residential (100 du, 2.22ppu) Hotel (100 units) Industrial (100 empl.) Reg. Service (100 empl.) Reg. Commercial (100 empl.) Loc. Commercial (100 empl.) Avg Trip Number Avg Trip Number Avg Trip Number Avg Trip Number Avg Trip Number Avg Trip Number Probe TAZ Length of Trips VMT Length of Trips VMT Length of Trips VMT Length of Trips VMT Length of Trips VMT Length of Trips VMT , , , , ,621 11, ,050 13, , , , , ,686 9, ,079 11, , , , , ,663 9, ,062 12, , , , , ,645 10, ,072 12, , , , , ,662 14, ,058 17, , , , , ,647 14, ,027 16, , , , , ,645 19, ,100 24, , , , , ,673 14, ,112 18, , , , , ,657 13, ,071 16, , , , , ,670 14, ,092 18, , , , , ,645 14, ,053 17, , , , , ,673 12, ,084 14, , , , , ,632 11, ,087 15, , , , , ,701 10, ,076 12, , , , , ,678 13, ,078 16, , , , , ,658 21, ,097 26, , , , , ,646 21, ,084 27, , , , , ,670 13, ,061 16, Urban ,374 36, ,278 34, ,124 22, ,793 17, , , , , Suburban ,445 31, ,707 31, ,573 15, ,366 12, ,964 77, ,433 95, Rural ,146 24, ,143 25, ,032 12, , ,649 70, ,314 86, Ratios: Commercial Residential Lodging Industrial Office Regional Local Average Urban Suburban Rural October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

15 developments generate percent of the travel that their non-mutrm, non-tnd, or non-tod counterparts do. These reductions in travel demand are built in to the mobility fee schedules for the MUTRM, TND, and TOD land uses Travel Demand for Mining Land Use A new land use category was added in this fee update, mining. Trip generation information for mining activities is not included in the ITE Trip Generation reference, so parameters from mining permitting studies were drawn upon to develop trip generation, percent new trips, and trip length information. A discussion of how these parameters were developed is also provided in Appendix B. 2.2 Cost of Transportation Capacity The cost of providing transportation system capacity has increased since 2011, by approximately 13 percent. Road construction cost information from, other Florida Counties, and the Florida Department of Transportation (Florida DOT), were used to develop a unit cost for addition of a lane-mile of roadway capacity, including bike lanes and sidewalks. Appendix C provides the data and other support information utilized in these analyses to develop appropriate cost figures. The capital costs of providing capacity for transit were also estimated, based on costs of fleet vehicles, bus stops, park n ride facilities, and other physical features of the infrastructure needed to provide transit service provided in the October, 2013 Transit Development Plan. Since an impact fee only addresses the capital aspects of providing transportation, operating, maintenance, and administrative costs were excluded. The excluded operating costs can be substantial, however, and they are further addressed later in this report. Plans for transit service in the later stages of s 2035 Long-Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) include the development of bus rapid transit on potentially more costly per person-mile dedicated or managed transit-way lanes, and the introduction of commuter rail and re-structuring of transit routes to access that system. These more extensive types of service enhancements were not considered in this cost model, because they depend on the passage of a County-wide sales tax referendum in 2025 for funding. This potential revenue source is too far in the future, and its approval is not assured, so it was not relied upon for this fee study. However, this mobility fee structure does consider the expansion of non-premium transit services as proposed in the LRTP -- an expansion of service from approximately 4,300 bus-miles per day to 13,900 bus-miles per day. This increase comes about as a result of added routes, increasing the frequency of buses, and lengthening the hours of service provided by Public Transit. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

16 Bicycle and pedestrian facilities provide for relatively small quantities of travel short trip lengths and low volumes and there is little data on bicycle or pedestrian travel generation or trip lengths. Thus, travel demand for these modes by land use cannot be analyzed as readily as vehicular or transit travel can. Because of their relatively small role in the urban travel scheme, they do not have a significant effect on evaluating the costs of providing for mobility. However, bike and pedestrian facilities are important on a road for safety and mobility reasons, and they are a standard part of the urban street and rural roadway scene. Their costs are included in standard roadway cross-sections for which costs are estimated, and their costs are thereby included in the mobility fee. Their costs have been estimated at 3.64, 4.34, and 5.63 percent of the total roadway costs, for the urban, suburban, and rural fee districts, respectively. Bike and pedestrian facilities off of the major road network could be funded with mobility fees, provided the County is reasonably sure they will help to serve the travel demands for which developments are being assessed Summary of Costs (Blended Cost Analysis) Table 2-3 summarizes the combination of roadway and transit person-trip cost per person-mile of capacity to a single system person-trip capacity and combining the roadway and transit person-trip capacity. The combination considers the relative magnitude of transit system expansion and road system expansion planned, in terms of person-miles of capacity. Transit system expansion is relatively small compared to the road system expansion plans, but is largest in the urban area. Table 2-3 Multi-Modal Transportation System Cost per Person-Mile of Capacity (by District) [Table missing column labels for urban, suburban and rural] Road Network Capacity: Person-Miles Road Capacity Added: 8,803,059 9,834,096 3,929,336 Cost per Person-Mile: $ $ $ Total Road Cost: $2,845,579,474 $3,215,285,902 $1,200,929,375 Transit network capacity: Person-Miles Transit Capacity Added: 64,823 20,959 12,535 Cost per Person-Mile: $ $1, $1, Total Transit Cost: $63,955,006 26,037,391 15,816,585 Mixed Mode Capacity, Costs: Total Person-Miles of Capacity Added: 8,867,882 9,855,056 3,941,871 Total Cost: $2,909,534,480 $3,241,323,294 $1,216,745,960 Cost/PMC: $ $ $ October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

17 2.2.2 Capacity Addition Ratio The capacity addition ratio relates the number of person-miles of transportation system capacity that will be added per person-mile of travel growth that occurs. The assessable person-miles of travel generated by a land use, that travel within each of the three fee districts, are multiplied by the capacity addition ratio for that district to indicate the number of person-miles of capacity that are needed to provide mobility to that land use at the rate consistent with the goals of the adopted comprehensive plan. The capacity addition ratio can be greater or less than 1.00, but it cannot be set at a rate so high as to assess for a better quality of service than is currently provided -- unless other funds, generated by non-growth sources, are identified to also bring the current quality of service to that same level. Neither should it be set at a level that exceeds the quality of service that the County realistically expects to deliver in the future. Most current road impact fees are based on an assumption that capacity will be funded by growth at a rate of 1:1 relative to growth, where the 1.00 is based on the limit of acceptable roadway service, as established by the adopted level of service standard. In the absence of other funding to add capacity, continued addition of capacity at this rate will have the long-term result of average conditions at the limit of acceptable roadway service where roughly half the system operates at conditions worse than the adopted standard and half operates at conditions better than the adopted standard. In the absence of other funding, addition of capacity at a 1:1 rate does not accomplish the requirement of common level of service standards which require that no roads exceed the adopted standard, and that this condition be sustained into the future. In the urban fee district, the 2010 level of system use (person-miles of travel divided by person-miles of capacity) was estimated to be This is an average condition, and some specific locations in the transportation system currently operate at very low levels of congestion and some locations are very congested. The currently adopted LRTP indicates by 2035 (with expected travel growth and planned improvements) that the average level of system utilization in urban fee district will increase to This rate of increase reflects the addition of 0.8 person-miles of capacity per person-mile of growth in travel the rate at which the urban district fees are based. At this rate, a minimum level of service D [what about E, which is our adopted LOS for the urban area?] will not be able to be maintained on all roads. In the rural fee district, the County wishes to preserve the existing rural character. This intention is expressed in policies in both the Land Use and Transportation elements of the Comprehensive Plan, to wit: October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

18 POLICY TRA 2.3.4: RURAL RESIDENTIAL ROADS (CONSISTENT WITH POLICY FLU ) shall recognize the importance of rural-residential roads within the Northeast Pasco County Rural Area for the purposes of protecting rural character and shall ensure that these roadways sustain and maintain this character. For the purposes of this policy, "rural-residential roads" include Lake Iola Road, Happy Hill Road, Frazee Hill Road, Jessamine Road, Johnston Road, and Scharber Road. and POLICY TRA 2.3.5: RURAL ROAD SYSTEM (CONSISTENT WITH POLICY FLU ) The collector and arterial roadway system within the Northeast Rural Area predominantly consists of two (2) lane facilities. Specific collector, arterial, and rural-residential roads shall not be expected to require, nor are they planned to receive, capacity improvements over the twenty (20) year planning period, unless otherwise consistent with Chapter 7, Transportation Element, Table 7-2a, Corridor Preservation Table. When not inconsistent with State law or County ordinances and policies, the County shall discourage additional roadway expansions of these facilities beyond two (2) lanes. The 2010 level of system use (person-miles of travel divided by person-miles of capacity) in the rural fee district is estimated to be The LRTP indicates by 2035 that the level of system utilization in the rural fee district will increase to In an area where predominantly two and four-lane roads are expected to serve (and in the absence of other revenues dedicated to system capacity), adding capacity at a rate of 1.33 person-miles of capacity per person-mile of growth in travel (e.g. 1/0.75) should enable the system to trend toward an average of 75 percent full, allowing the adopted level of service D standard to be maintained. In the suburban fee district, in-between conditions are encountered. A suburban development pattern is desired where transit plays a role in mobility, albeit a lesser role than in the urban area. The County s goals are to maintain traditional level of service D standards, although with greater levels of congestion than in the rural area. In the suburban area the rate at which transportation system capacity must be built per unit of transportation growth will be less than in the rural area. In the suburban area, where a mixture of four and six-lane arterials would be in keeping with the suburban character (and in the absence of other revenues dedicated to system capacity), adding capacity at a rate of 1.25 person-miles of capacity per person-mile of growth in travel (e.g. 1/0.80) will allow the current average system utilization of 0.32 to trend toward maintaining an average system in the range of 80 percent full (between 75 and 83 percent full), and should enable adopted level of service D standards to be maintained Cross-District Travel October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

19 Traffic generated in each sub-area of the County does not remain exclusively in that sub-area. For example, some travel generated in the rural area travels into and through the suburban and/or urban areas en-route to its destination. It is appropriate in the calculation of the mobility fee to recognize, and adjust for, the different capacity costs and quality of service expectations when travel generated in one district crosses into other districts. To that end, an analysis of cross-district travel was undertaken and used to adjust the unit cost of travel applied to each land use. The percentage of travel from each fee district that made use of roads in each of the other districts was estimated using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) software and data from the TBRPM (version 7.2). The TBRPM application made use of the adopted 2035 Cost-Affordable Transportation Plan road network and socio-economic data forecasts for the 2040 Plan update study that was ongoing while this mobility fee study was in progress. Greater proportions of travel remained in the home district for land uses with shorter trip lengths, whereas greater proportions of travel were estimated in neighboring fee districts for land uses with longer trip lengths. Additional discussion of the GIS analysis is provided in Appendix D. An example of the application of the cross-district travel analysis to develop the unit cost for system capacity is provided below for a single-family home in the urban fee district: Per the fee schedule provided in Table 4-1, a single-family home in the urban fee district has a chargeable trip length of 6.53 miles. From the geographic analysis, as shown in Appendix D Table 4, percent of this travel remains in the urban fee district, percent travels in the suburban fee district, and 5.99 percent travels in the rural district. The capacity addition ratios for urban, suburban, and rural fee districts, as discussed in section 2.2.7, are 0.8, 1.25, and 1.33, respectively, and the unit cost per person-mile of travel, as shown in Table 2-8, are $328.10, $326.23, and $322.57, respectively. These values are combined as follows: Weighted cost/person-mile of capacity = Sum of (% travel in district * capacity addition ratio for district * cost per person-mile of capacity for district) Weighted $$/pmc = (0.6976*0.8* *1.25* *1.33*322.57) Weighted $$/pmc = $ Credit Calculations The credit calculations included a review of revenues from gasoline and sales taxes, and since this fee is multi-modal, transit revenues utilized for capital aspects of transit system expansion were considered. In addition, credit for tax increment financing was also considered. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

20 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

21 2.3.1 Gasoline Tax Credit (Equivalent) The present value of gasoline taxes generated by new development over a 25-year period is credited against the cost of the roadway system consumed by travel associated with the development. This is because travel from new development generates gasoline tax revenues, a portion of which is typically allocated to the expansion of the transportation system. In the 2011 Mobility, the credit calculation determined that 2.5 pennies from County-managed gas tax revenues were used for roadway capacity- adding improvements. However, in the fall of 2013, that revenue stream was redirected to improve roadway maintenance, resulting in the deferral of several improvements that had been scheduled in the transportation capital program. To reinstate those projects, and to help maintain the 2011 fee schedules, the County adopted all five cents of the second local option gasoline tax. The proceeds of that tax, all of which is dedicated toward transportation capital improvements, was incorporated into the fee calculations. A credit is also given in recognition of the Penny for Pasco sales tax revenues dedicated to transportation capacity expansion projects. This tax was reenacted in 2013, and beginning in 2015, 40 percent of the 45 percent of the proceeds that are allocated to the County (e.g. 18 percent of the total proceeds) was dedicated to transportation capital projects. This tax is allocated as an equivalent gasoline tax, the portion allocated to transportation capital generating the equivalent of 4.81 pennies per gallon. The Penny for Pasco Sales tax was re-enacted for an additional ten years (through 2024), but it was assumed for purposes of the mobility fee that this revenue source would be renewed for the duration of the 25-year planning period. In addition, state expenditures on state roads were reviewed and a credit for the capacity expansion portion was provided. The equivalent number of pennies allocated to fund state projects was determined using information for a 15-year period of the Florida DOT Work Program (2002 through2016). This information was used to develop a list of capacity-adding roadway projects similar to, but more extensive than, that previously utilized to determine the per-lane-mile costs of construction. The equivalency analysis is provided in Appendix E Table 2. In the work programs, we found improvements to Interstate 75, which constituted a sizeable and unusual inflow of capital funds to the work program. The full amount of these funds were not fully recognized because it is rare that improvements to the Interstate are funded. It has been since the late 1950 s and early 1960 s that the last funding of major lane addition improvements to I-75 were implemented, so these funds were assumed to occur over a 50-year period. This assumption resulted in an equivalent of 25.5 cents of gasoline tax per gallon a figure which is comparable to the 22.5 cents determined in the 2011 study. Table 2-4 summarizes the contribution of each component of the gasoline tax and equivalent credit. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

22 Revenue Table 2-4 Equivalent Pennies of Gas Tax Revenue Pennies per Gallon to Capital Data County 2nd LOGT $0.050 BoCC Action Penny for Pasco Sales Tax $0.048 Appendix Table E-5 State/Federal Gas Tax $0.244 Appendix Table E-2 Transit Capital Funding $0.011 Appendix Table C-8 Total: $ Transit Tax Credits Local, state, and federal revenue sources for transit capital expenditures were considered. Though capital funds for transit expansion are more readily available, funding transit operations is more of a challenge. Used in conjunction with local funding commitments, current federal policies typically provide 80 percent of funding for capital infrastructure; therefore, since future capital funds are expected to supplement transit operation and maintenance expenses, 80 percent of the nonroadway transit capital cost presented in Table 2-6 was converted to an equivalent gasoline tax credit of 1.1 pennies per gallon. Detailed calculations are provided in Appendix C Table Tax Increment Revenue Credit A credit for potential application of property tax to transportation system expansion was also incorporated into the mobility fee. The ordinance that establishes the tax increment revenue program to support the economic incentives and mobility fee program allows the use of the tax increment revenues generated to transportation system expansion after debt service, funding of specific land use fees (incentives), and transit and roadway operations and maintenance. Practically speaking, none of these funds are expected to be used for general capacity addition as they are expected to be completely obligated to fund fee incentives and to fund transit operations and roadway maintenance. Nonetheless, a credit of 25 years of revenue generated by a 0.25 mill assessment on the property value was given as a conservative measure in the event such expenditures did occur. The credit was estimated based on a typical tax value of land use per fee unit of development, based on a review of the 2010 tax roll tax value. For example, a recently constructed single-family home in October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

23 the suburban area of size 1,501 to 2,499 square feet was estimated to have a taxable value of $127,500. A tax credit for this use was estimated by assuming its value would appreciate by two percent per year, and that revenue generated by 0.25 mill of property tax on the appreciated value would be used for transportation system expansion. Appendix E Table 8 provides a summary of the property values estimated for each land use and the equations by which the credit was calculated. 2.4 Facility Life The facility life relates to the time period over which gasoline tax revenues might be bonded to pay for an improvement. The life used in the current fee is 25 years, which is typical of impact fees in many other communities; therefore, no change is recommended for this variable. 2.5 Interest Rate This is the discount rate at which tax revenues might be bonded. It is used to compute the present value of the gasoline taxes and other credits generated by new development. The previous update study used a rate of five (5) percent, but as a result of changing economic trends a rate of 3.3 percent was used in this update. This rate is consistent with guidance provided by the Florida DOT for developing long-range transportation plans. In addition, an outstanding bond (2002 Gas Tax Revenue Refinancing Bonds) confirmed that the County is currently borrowing at a rate of approximately five percent [why are we including this statement if we are using 3.3 percent?]. 2.6 Fuel Efficiency The fuel efficiency (i.e., the average miles traveled per gallon of fuel consumed) of the fleet of motor vehicles using the road system over the next 25 years is used to estimate the quantity of gasoline consumed by travel associated with a particular land use. In the 2011 Mobility, a fuel efficiency rate of 17.4 miles per gallon (mpg) was used. Per data provided by the Federal Highway Administration (Highway Statistics Table VM-1, 2012, provided in Appendix E Tables 5 and 6), the fleet fuel efficiency has improved since the 2011 study data was published, and the current fuel efficiency estimate is miles per gallon including Interstate travel. 2.7 Effective Days per Year An effective 365 days per year of operation was assumed for all land uses in the current fee. However, this will not be the case for all land uses since some uses operate only on weekdays (e.g., office buildings) and/or only seasonally (e.g., schools). The use of 365 days per year, therefore, provides a "conservative" element, ensuring that gasoline taxes are adequately credited against the fee. As a result, no changes to the effective days per year are proposed in this fee update. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

24 2.8 Capacity per Lane Mile An additional component of the mobility fee equation is the capacity added per lane mile of roadway constructed. Three different capacities per lane mile values were determined, one each for the urban, suburban, and rural districts, reflecting the character of roadway planned for construction in the County s LRTP, making use of generalized planning capacity tables released by the Florida DOT in December, Appendix C Table 7 provides the listing of projects and methodology used to calculate the daily capacity added per lane mile for roadways constructed in. The distribution of lane miles on County and State roadways being added in the 2035 LRTP Cost Affordable Plan was used to develop a weighted average capacity figure. Based on the analysis of county and state projects, averages of 9,389, 8,667, and 8,204 vehicle-miles of daily capacity per lane-mile of road, respectively, were estimated to be added to the roads serving urban, suburban, and rural travel. Table 2-5 provides a summary of this analysis. Table 2-5 Estimated Capacity Added per Lane Mile County & State Roadway Capital Expansion Projects in Lane- Miles Vehicle-Miles of Capacity Urban Suburban Rural Capacity Vehicle- Capacity Vehicle- Capacity per Lane- Weight Lane- Miles of per Lane- Weight Lane- Miles of per Lane- Mile in Mix Miles Capacity Mile in Mix Miles Capacity Mile Weight in Mix Interstate: ,700 21, % , % ,850 15, % Other State: ,332 9, % ,052 8, % n/a 0.00% County: ,162,004 8, % ,524,199 7, % ,043 7, % Weighted Mix: 9,389 veh/day/lane 8,667 veh/day/lane 8,204 veh/day/lane Note: Suburban freeway capacity per lane taken as same as urban, since there are no Interstates in "suburban" district, however suburban travel makes use of Interstate 75. The capacity values of this study are higher than those of the 2011, mostly in reflection of the 2013 Florida DOT Generalized Capacity table values running approximately 7 percent higher than those used in the 2011 fee. 2.9 Interstate/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor s mobility fee includes I-75 travel in its considerations. However, travel on the Suncoast Parkway, a toll facility, was excluded from the travel demand considerations, since drivers pay for that facility through the payment of tolls each time they pass through a toll gate. The quantity of travel generated by each fee district that makes use of the Suncoast Parkway was estimated using the selectzone traffic assignment procedures of the TBRPM (loaded with 2040 socio-economic data), which indicated that 1.0, 1.7, and 3.8 percent of the travel generated in the urban, suburban, and rural districts, respectively, make use of the Suncoast Parkway. These values are lower than estimated in the 2011 fee, likely as a result of growth forecasts that are more compacted in the urban and suburban fee districts. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

25 3.0 Revenues for Incentives For fairness to all development subject to an impact fee while also seeking to provide incentives for desired forms of development, revenues must be committed from non-growth sources to fund subsidies (in other words, pay for the incentive portions of fees that the developer does not pay). The County s Multi-Modal Tax Increment Ordinance (Chapter 2, Article VI, Division 3 of the Code) requires the subsidy be addressed on an annual basis, from County gasoline tax funds, Penny for Pasco sales tax funds, and/or revenue proceeds from the Multi-Modal Tax Increment district. In this analysis, the revenues generated by these three sources, from the existing population and business activities in, were estimated in order that a budget for incentives could be established to avoid failure to meet quality of service goals by over-incentivizing. 3.1 Penny for Pasco Sales Tax The Penny for Pasco sales tax was adopted to fund capital needs, including schools, transportation, and other needs. Starting in 2015, the portion of the County share (45 percent) of the Penny for Pasco Sales Tax allocated to transportation will increase to 40 percent, resulting in an estimated annual revenue to transportation in 2015 of $8.7 million. Considering inflation at percent per year, and inflation at 3.3 percent per year [word missing here? Why mention two different inflation rates?], the sales tax revenue generated by the existing are estimated to result in a $276.3 million (present value) contribution to the budget for potential subsidies. 3.2 Gasoline Tax Gasoline tax revenues from only the five-cent second local option gasoline tax will be allocated for transportation system capacity expansion. Each penny of gasoline tax currently generates approximately $1.7 million per year. 94 percent of that revenue, or approximately $1.6 million per year per penny, is returned to the control of. With improving fleet fuel efficiency, the amount of gasoline consumed per vehicle by the vehicle fleet using s roads is expected to decline. This feature, plus the effects of inflation, results in the value of gasoline taxes becoming weaker and weaker with each passing year. However, the revenue so garnered is not inconsequential, as this source of revenue will contribute an estimated $127 million (present value) to apply toward mobility fee subsidies over the 25-year planning horizon of the fee study. 3.3 Tax Increment Revenues The Board of County Commissioners is continuing to commit a portion of ad-valorem property tax revenues to the provision of transportation system capacity and operations. This commitment is described in Chapter 2, Article VI, Division 3 of the Code, the Multi-Modal Tax Increment Ordinance. The revenues to be dedicated to transportation purposes are established under a tax increment strategy. The tax increment strategy establishes a floor valuation of the property tax base, and as the value of the tax base increases, the tax increment (the difference between the taxable valuation in the current year minus the floor value) begins to generate revenue. A commitment of one-third of the millage rate, applied to the incremental increase in value, establishes the tax yield that will fund transportation. This revenue source was created to respond to October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

26 transportation maintenance, operations, and capital needs; however there is no requirement that any of these funds be spent on capital needs. Thus, portions of this revenue that are generated by new growth as well as the existing development are potentially available to fund incentives; however, this source of revenue is to be applied to incentives only if the gasoline tax and sales tax revenues are inadequate. To recognize the (remote) potential for some of the tax increment revenues to be used for capital needs, a small portion of these revenues generated by growth was viewed as a potential credit against the fee (see section 2.3.3). The remainder, all of the revenues generated by the existing development and the portions from growth not recognized as a self-credit, were estimated as revenues that could be used to fund other transportation purposes notably bond payments, transit operating costs, roadway maintenance, or mobility fee subsidies. An estimate of the tax increment revenues was based on discussions with s Office of Management and Budget, and review of historical tax valuations. The floor for the tax increment was re-adopted in 2012, when County property values were at a relatively low point. In 2013, initial revenues from the tax increment were realized, and increasing proceeds are expected as the value of the tax base appreciates and Save Our Homes tax limits are re-set through home sales. Additional details of the tax increment revenue projection are discussed in Appendix F, and this source of revenue has been estimated to contribute $405.9 million (present value) to the various transportation purposes over the 25-year planning horizon of the mobility fee. Tax increment revenues are back-end loaded meaning that lesser revenues will be generated in early years because the value of the tax base will appreciate, or grow, slowly. As the difference increases, the tax increment revenues will also increase. Depending on the rate of growth that actually occurs, the tax increment strategy might not keep pace with the need to fund the fee discounts; however to-date, gasoline taxes and Penny for Pasco revenues have been adequate to meet mobility fee subsidy needs. Table 3-1 summarizes the forecasts of the gasoline tax, Penny for Pasco Sales Tax, and Multi-Modal Tax Increment revenues as discussed above. The three sources combine to create a total present value amount of $718.1 million. From this amount, $142.1 million has been estimated as needed to help fund operating costs of the expanded transit system, and $155.1 has been budgeted for improved roadway maintenance needs, leaving $420.9 million for incentives, or other unforeseen needs. In the strategic planning phase of this study, all of the $420.9 million was estimated as needed to maintain the 2011 fee rates and modified incentives as discussed in the following section. The expected rate of growth is an important consideration in establishing the extent to which the above incentives budget can be used to provide incentives. The following paragraphs provide an illustration of this concept. The County s 2040 LRTP under development is based on a County-wide population growth rate of 2.29 percent per year through 2040 [shouldn t we say what BEBR rate this is?]. At this rate, an increase of 9.2 million person-miles of travel is estimated over the coming 25 years. If capacity is October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

27 built at an overall county average rate of October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

28 Year 2nd LOGT Table 3-1 Incentive Budget Estimate P4P Sales Tax Tax Increment Total 2015 $7,986,489 $8,673,460 $3,010,812 $19,670, $7,915,181 $8,821,799 $4,703,916 $21,440, $7,843,872 $8,972,756 $6,434,653 $23,251, $7,772,564 $9,126,330 $8,203,024 $25,101, $7,701,256 $9,282,522 $10,009,027 $26,992, $7,629,947 $9,441,332 $11,852,664 $28,923, $7,558,639 $9,602,759 $13,733,935 $30,895, $7,487,335 $9,766,805 $15,652,838 $32,906, $7,416,027 $9,933,468 $17,609,375 $34,958, $7,344,718 $10,103,621 $19,603,545 $37,051, $7,273,410 $10,276,392 $21,635,348 $39,185, $7,202,101 $10,451,781 $23,704,784 $41,358, $7,130,793 $10,630,660 $25,811,854 $43,573, $7,059,485 $10,812,157 $27,956,557 $45,828, $6,988,176 $10,997,145 $30,138,894 $48,124, $6,916,868 $11,185,622 $32,358,863 $50,461, $6,845,559 $11,376,718 $34,616,466 $52,838, $6,774,256 $11,571,303 $36,911,702 $55,257, $6,702,947 $11,769,379 $39,244,571 $57,716, $6,631,639 $11,970,946 $41,615,074 $60,217, $6,560,331 $12,176,002 $44,023,210 $62,759, $6,489,022 $12,384,549 $46,468,979 $65,342, $6,417,714 $12,596,587 $48,952,381 $67,966, $6,346,405 $12,812,114 $51,473,417 $70,631, $6,275,097 $13,031,132 $54,032,086 $73,338, $6,203,789 $13,253,640 $56,628,388 $76,085,817 Present Value: $127,495,201 $184,680,618 $422,741,707 $734,917,526 Less Transit Operating Allocation: $142,117,435 Less Roadway Maintenance Allocation: $155,100,000 Less Tax Increment "Self-Credit": $16,839,567 Available for Incentives: $420,860,524 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

29 1:1, then the cost of that capacity (at $326/person-mile) would be $3.0 billion, and the $420.9 million could address 14 percent of that need. If, on the other hand, a slower growth rate occurs, say 1.5 percent per year, then only 5.5 million person-miles of capacity would be needed, costing $1.8 billion, and the $420.9 million could address 23 percent of the needed capacity allowing for deeper incentives. Because the fee-reduction considerations discussed above are sensitive to the growth rate, it will be important for the County to monitor the rate of growth and adjust the fee from time to time to ensure revenues keep pace with the needs of growth. This can be accomplished as a part of the monitoring of fee collections and the required three year updates of the mobility fee. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

30 4.0 PROPOSED MOBILITY FEE SCHEDULES This section discusses the proposed transportation mobility fee schedules for. As indicated previously in this report, the County approached the fee structure wishing to accomplish the following objectives: Expand the zero-fee incentives for employment- and tourism-attractive uses (office, industrial, and lodging) from just the urban district to a county-wide incentive, Provide a zero-fee incentive to redevelopment in the Harbors (West) district, Add a new class of incentivized development form the MUTRM class, Consider recent decisions to shift transportation funds from capital to maintenance purposes, Consider updated, higher growth rates and construction costs over the 25-year planning horizon for the fee, Continue to deliver the desired quality of transportation service, and Maintain current fee rates. In light of increasing growth rates, increased construction costs, and input from the development community that certain forms of development were proving to be less attractive than previously thought, it was not possible to accomplish all of these objectives. With the adoption of the second local option gasoline tax, the first six objectives were accomplished in the proposed fee schedules that are presented below; however it was necessary to reduce the extent to which the TND and TOD development is incentivized, as follows: s for urban and rural MUTRM land uses were established at 75 percent of their corresponding standard land uses, s for urban and rural TND were established at half the rates of the corresponding urban and rural standard fee rates, s for urban TOD were established at 25 percent of the rates of the corresponding urban standard fee rates, s for suburban TND and MUTRM development were set to match those of the urban fee district. The resulting fees are higher than their respective 2011 rates, but that was intended, because incentives for all TND uses county-wide were reduced. s for TND and TOD uses were previously established as 25 percent of the corresponding standard fee rates and zero, respectively, in the fee adopted in In addition, a new land use, mining, has been added to the fee schedule, and the extent of incentives for the mini-warehouse land use was reduced, as the County felt this use was more characteristic of retail businesses, rather than being a significant employment-generating land use. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

31 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

32 4.1 Proposed Mobility Schedules The proposed fee schedules are provided in Tables 4-1 through 4-11, in the following order: Urban Standard Urban MUTRM Urban TND Urban TOD Urban Harbors/West Redevelopment Suburban Standard Suburban MUTRM Suburban TND Rural Standard Rural MUTRM Rural TND These tables present an expanded version, providing the values and intermediate computations of various aspects of the fees, the extent to which incentives have lowered the fees, and disaggregation of the fee into the Interstate/SIS, Transit, and Bike/Pedestrian components. Condensed versions of the tables indicating the fee rates to be paid only, more suitable for inclusion in an adoption ordinance or public dissemination, are provided in Appendix G. Each table lists the major land use categories and the proposed mobility fees for the individual land uses contained in each of the major categories. For each land use, the tables present the travel demand component variables (trip rate, trip length, and percent new trips), the total impact cost, the annual gas tax and tax increment credits and present value of the credits, the net mobility fee, the amount by which each fee value might be discounted, the current (2011) mobility fee and the percent difference between the proposed mobility fee and the current fee. It should be noted that the Net Mobility s contained in these tables represent the transportation mobility fee per unit of land use that would be charged in. The methodology used herein to calculate these fees has been developed to satisfy the proportionality concept of the dual rational nexus test. As a result, development is charged based upon the proportion of person-miles of travel (demand) it is expected to generate on the transportation system. In these fee schedules, 839 specific fee rates have been calculated, for 77 different land uses in 11 geographic or urban form categories. Of these: October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

33 307 fees arise from new development form categories or land uses not in the 2011 fee schedules (MUTRM,Harbors/ West Redevelopment, and mining), 267 fees are higher due to reduced incentives or re-classification of the use (incentives were reduced for TND and TOD, and mini-warehouses were moved from the industrial to retail class), 40 fees are lower due to expanding the zero-fee incentive for employment/ tourism uses county-wide, 16 fees are lower due to revised/updated travel characteristics, and 225 of 228 original standard fees are either lower or remain unchanged. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

34 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RESIDENTIAL: Table 4-1 Urban Mobility Schedule ( District A) Standard Rates Revenue period: 25 P4P Equivalent Pennies: 4.8 Include carrying cost?: No TOD Deduction: 0.00% Discount Rate: 3.30% 2nd LOFT County pennies to capacity: 5.0 Include Interstates?: Yes TND Deduction: 0.00% Fuel efficiency: Existing State pennies to capacity: 25.6 MUTRM Deduction: 0.00% Days/yr: 365 Tax Inc Fin Millage Rate to capacity: % Factor to convert VMT to PMT: 1.37 Existing County pennies to capital: 0 Toll.fwy discount: 1.7% Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than 80% SHIP 210.1P Definition (2) du 4.10 A 7.61 C % V $307 $5,541 $ $ $1, $1,702 $ $3,737 11% $422 $3,315 $4,025 $3,163 $2,992 $171 $8 $144 $3,315 0% 210.2P to 1,500 s.f. du 6.25 A 7.61 C % V $307 $8,447 $ $ $1, $2,595 $ $5,750 27% $1,577 $4,173 $6,189 $3,982 $3,769 $213 $10 $181 $4,173 0% 210.3P ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du 7.81 A 7.61 C % V $307 $10,555 $ $ $2, $3,243 $ $7,173 19% $1,338 $5,835 $7,722 $5,568 $5,270 $298 $14 $253 $5,835 0% 210.4P ,500 s.f. and greater du 9.20 A 7.61 C % V $307 $12,434 $ $ $2, $3,820 $ $8,253 23% $1,924 $6,329 $8,900 $6,039 $5,708 $331 $15 $275 $6,329 0% 210.5P "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family (2) du 3.46 A 5.87 C % V $305 $3,581 $ $ $ $1,131 $76.49 $2,373 10% $231 $2,141 $2,559 $2,042 $1,933 $109 $6 $93 $2,141 0% Multi-Family Apartments du 6.60 B 5.87 C % V $305 $6,830 $ $ $1, $2,158 $76.49 $4,595 14% $624 $3,971 $4,950 $3,789 $3,590 $199 $10 $172 $3,971 0% Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du 6.40 B 5.87 J % V $305 $6,623 $ $ $1, $2,093 $76.49 $4,454 10% $445 $4,009 $4,798 $3,825 $3,623 $202 $10 $174 $4,009 0% High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du 4.18 B 5.87 J % V $305 $4,326 $ $ $ $1,367 $76.49 $2,882 0% $0 $2,882 $3,107 $2,750 $2,604 $146 $7 $125 $3,213-10% Mobile Home Park du 4.17 C 5.29 C % V $304 $3,877 $ $ $ $1,241 $44.80 $2,591 15% $384 $2,207 $2,793 $2,105 $1,995 $110 $6 $96 $2,207 0% Age Restricted Single Family (3) du 3.12 D 6.23 C % V $305 $3,427 $ $ $ $1,077 $ $2,248 14% $324 $1,924 $2,426 $1,835 $1,736 $99 $5 $84 $1,924 0% Age Restricted Multi-Family (3) du 2.97 D 3.77 C % V $301 $1,945 $92.51 $88.99 $ $655 $55.73 $1,234 20% $249 $984 $1,335 $938 $889 $49 $3 $43 $984 0% Congregate Care Facility (Attached) (3) du 2.25 D 3.54 C % C $301 $996 $47.79 $45.98 $ $338 $36.06 $621 12% $74 $547 $673 $521 $494 $27 $2 $24 $547 0% LODGING: Hotel room 6.36 D 7.20 C % C $306 $5,056 $ $ $1, $1,573 $60.10 $3, % $3,422 $0 $3,685 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Motel room 5.63 B 4.99 C % C $303 $3,586 $ $ $ $1,166 $30.05 $2, % $2,390 $0 $2,577 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Resort Hotel room 5.83 D 7.02 C % C $306 $5,683 $ $ $1, $1,772 $60.10 $3, % $3,851 $0 $4,146 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a RECREATION: General Recreation acre 2.28 B 5.37 K % K $303 $1,827 $83.18 $80.02 $ $589 $ $1,130 43% $485 $646 $1,225 $616 $581 $35 $2 $28 $646 0% RV Park RV space 1.62 B 4.83 L % L $302 $1,292 $59.75 $57.48 $ $423 $10.71 $858 15% $129 $730 $925 $696 $660 $36 $2 $32 $730 0% Marina berth 2.96 B 6.95 M % K $306 $3,097 $ $ $ $967 $81.95 $2,049 39% $798 $1,251 $2,210 $1,194 $1,129 $65 $3 $54 $1,251 0% Golf Course hole B 6.95 M % K $306 $37,399 $1, $1, $8, $11,672 $ $25,590 40% $10,140 $15,451 $27,534 $14,743 $13,970 $773 $37 $671 $15,451 0% Miniature Golf Course hole 3.30 B 6.95 M % K $306 $3,453 $ $ $ $1,078 $48.08 $2,327 52% $1,207 $1,120 $2,507 $1,068 $1,012 $56 $3 $49 $1,120 0% Bowling Alley 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % K $303 $26,902 $1, $1, $6, $8,669 $34.97 $18,198 44% $8,051 $10,147 $19,596 $9,682 $9,185 $497 $24 $441 $10,147 0% Movie Theater screen E 2.33 C % C $294 $35,164 $1, $1, $9, $13,257 $ $21,742 41% $8,898 $12,844 $23,570 $12,255 $11,685 $570 $31 $558 $12,844 0% Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % W $303 $11,828 $ $ $2, $3,811 $ $7,907 44% $3,484 $4,423 $8,521 $4,220 $4,000 $220 $11 $192 $4,423 0% Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf B 7.06 K % K $306 $35,950 $1, $1, $8, $11,205 $ $24,635 63% $15,491 $9,145 $26,503 $8,726 $8,268 $458 $22 $397 $9,145 0% INSTITUTIONS: Elementary School student 1.29 B 4.52 O % K $303 $919 $41.85 $40.26 $ $296 $22.13 $600 26% $159 $441 $648 $420 $398 $22 $2 $19 $441 0% Middle School student 1.62 B 4.52 O % K $303 $1,298 $59.12 $56.87 $ $419 $22.13 $857 27% $229 $628 $925 $599 $568 $31 $2 $27 $628 0% High School student 1.71 B 4.52 O % K $303 $1,370 $62.40 $60.03 $ $442 $22.13 $906 27% $242 $664 $978 $633 $600 $33 $2 $29 $664 0% University/Jr College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 F 6.95 M % K $307 $2,499 $ $ $ $766 $22.13 $1,710 25% $427 $1,283 $1,840 $1,223 $1,158 $65 $4 $56 $1,283 0% University/Jr College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student 1.50 F 6.95 M % K $307 $1,874 $81.14 $78.06 $ $575 $22.13 $1,277 25% $319 $959 $1,375 $914 $865 $49 $3 $42 $959 0% Church 1,000 sf 9.11 B 4.10 K % K $302 $6,597 $ $ $1, $2,158 $ $4,305 30% $1,283 $3,022 $4,648 $2,883 $2,732 $151 $8 $131 $3,022 0% Day Care student 3.03 H 2.13 C % C $297 $909 $47.14 $45.35 $ $334 $ $346 21% $74 $271 $393 $258 $238 $20 $1 $12 $271 0% Cemetery acre 4.73 B 6.95 M % H $307 $6,238 $ $ $1, $1,913 $13.77 $4,311 25% $1,083 $3,228 $4,636 $3,080 $2,918 $162 $8 $140 $3,228 0% Hospital 1,000 sf B 6.95 M % K $307 $14,131 $ $ $3, $4,333 $ $9,596 6% $569 $9,027 $10,330 $8,613 $8,150 $463 $22 $392 $9,027 0% Nursing Home bed 2.76 D 2.72 C % C $299 $1,298 $64.02 $61.59 $ $453 $5.83 $839 37% $307 $532 $906 $507 $482 $25 $2 $23 $532 0% OFFICE: General Office 50,000 sf or less (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $15,297 $ $ $3, $4,818 $ $10, % $10,357 $0 $11,151 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.1P General Office 50, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $12,958 $ $ $2, $4,082 $58.27 $8, % $8,818 $0 $9,491 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.2P General Office 100, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $10,974 $ $ $2, $3,457 $58.27 $7, % $7,459 $0 $8,029 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.3P General Office 200, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf 9.41 G 5.41 C % C $305 $9,286 $ $ $2, $2,925 $58.27 $6, % $6,303 $0 $6,786 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.4P General Office greater than 400,000 sf (5) 1,000 sf 8.54 G 5.41 C % C $305 $8,428 $ $ $1, $2,655 $58.27 $5, % $5,715 $0 $6,153 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf 7.98 B 5.41 N % N $305 $7,875 $ $ $1, $2,481 $58.27 $5, % $5,336 $0 $5,745 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Medical Office 1,000 sf D 5.83 C % C $306 $35,817 $1, $1, $8, $11,181 $58.27 $24, % $24,577 $0 $26,439 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Office Park 1,000 sf D 7.47 C % Q $308 $15,569 $ $ $3, $4,741 $58.27 $10, % $10,769 $0 $11,578 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Research and Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 B 5.65 Q % Q $305 $8,086 $ $ $1, $2,538 $58.27 $5, % $5,490 $0 $5,910 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 770.P 640 Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf B 5.36 P % P $305 $39,654 $1, $1, $9, $12,501 $58.27 $27, % $27,094 $0 $29,155 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Incentive Before % Incentive $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Share /SIS Share (Excl Int) Transit Share Bike/Ped Share 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 Net Mobility October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

35 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RETAIL: Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Table 4-1 (continued) Urban Mobility Schedule ( District A) Standard Rates Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf B 1.96 R % R $294 $9,969 $ $ $2, $3,821 $ $6,038 40% $2,391 $3,647 $6,556 $3,480 $3,319 $161 $9 $158 $3,647 0% Retail 50,000 sfgla or less (4) 1,000 sfgla G 1.96 S % S $294 $16,824 $ $ $4, $6,448 $ $10,266 39% $4,017 $6,249 $11,140 $5,963 $5,688 $275 $15 $271 $6,249 0% 820.1P Retail 50, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.52 S % S $297 $16,077 $ $ $4, $5,804 $ $10,163 44% $4,522 $5,641 $10,999 $5,382 $5,122 $260 $14 $245 $5,641 0% 820.2P Retail 200, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.77 S % S $297 $15,106 $ $ $3, $5,364 $ $9,577 44% $4,178 $5,400 $10,362 $5,152 $4,898 $254 $13 $235 $5,400 0% 820.3P Retail 400, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.01 S % S $299 $14,932 $ $ $3, $5,195 $ $9,572 47% $4,484 $5,088 $10,348 $4,855 $4,613 $242 $12 $221 $5,088 0% 820.4P Retail 600, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.26 S % S $299 $15,202 $ $ $3, $5,226 $ $9,812 46% $4,521 $5,291 $10,602 $5,048 $4,795 $253 $13 $230 $5,291 0% 820.5P Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla (5) 1,000 sfgla G 3.51 S % S $301 $15,605 $ $ $3, $5,279 $ $10,162 45% $4,578 $5,584 $10,973 $5,327 $5,057 $270 $14 $243 $5,584 0% Specialty Retail 1,000 sf D 3.54 C % C $301 $27,220 $1, $1, $6, $9,198 $ $17,913 42% $7,476 $10,437 $19,328 $9,959 $9,459 $500 $25 $453 $10,437 0% New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf D 4.83 C % C $303 $19,674 $ $ $4, $6,351 $51.67 $13,271 39% $5,187 $8,084 $14,293 $7,714 $7,317 $397 $19 $351 $8,084 0% Tire Store 1,000 sf B 3.80 T % T $301 $12,313 $ $ $2, $4,122 $ $8,082 41% $3,353 $4,729 $8,722 $4,512 $4,282 $230 $12 $205 $4,729 0% Supermarket 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $294 $22,348 $1, $1, $6, $8,374 $50.07 $13,924 40% $5,556 $8,368 $15,085 $7,985 $7,613 $372 $20 $363 $8,368 0% Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf D 1.59 C % C $290 $60,286 $3, $3, $17, $24,632 $22.25 $35,632 43% $15,296 $20,336 $38,764 $19,405 $18,574 $831 $48 $883 $20,336 0% Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf B 2.52 U % U $297 $9,276 $ $ $2, $3,349 $ $5,817 46% $2,687 $3,130 $6,299 $2,986 $2,841 $145 $8 $136 $3,130 0% Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $294 $11,854 $ $ $3, $4,442 $ $7,303 40% $2,914 $4,388 $7,919 $4,186 $3,989 $197 $11 $191 $4,388 0% Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 B 6.39 C % C $306 $3,216 $ $ $ $1,003 $ $2,104 43% $899 $1,204 $2,271 $1,149 $1,086 $63 $3 $52 $1,204 0% Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf D 2.58 C % C $297 $33,796 $1, $1, $8, $12,150 $ $21,436 41% $8,706 $12,730 $23,192 $12,147 $11,559 $588 $30 $553 $12,730 0% Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.30 C % C $299 $41,658 $2, $1, $10, $14,295 $ $27,228 41% $11,217 $16,011 $29,393 $15,278 $14,519 $759 $38 $695 $16,011 0% High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.33 C % C $299 $49,611 $2, $2, $12, $17,002 $ $32,474 39% $12,816 $19,658 $35,052 $18,757 $17,825 $932 $47 $854 $19,658 0% Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf D 2.15 C % C $294 $112,835 $5, $5, $30, $42,401 $ $70,202 42% $29,252 $40,950 $76,065 $39,075 $37,260 $1,815 $97 $1,778 $40,950 0% Quick Lube bays B 3.80 T % T $301 $19,805 $ $ $4, $6,630 $35.51 $13,140 42% $5,462 $7,677 $14,169 $7,325 $6,956 $369 $19 $333 $7,677 0% Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf D 3.80 T % T $301 $15,561 $ $ $3, $5,209 $67.10 $10,285 37% $3,755 $6,530 $11,094 $6,230 $5,915 $315 $16 $284 $6,530 0% Gasoline Station fuel pos B 2.00 C % C $294 $13,730 $ $ $3, $5,239 $1.85 $8,489 40% $3,379 $5,110 $9,202 $4,875 $4,652 $223 $13 $222 $5,110 0% Self-Service Car Wash bays D 2.29 C % C $297 $12,228 $ $ $3, $4,496 $35.51 $7,697 0% $0 $7,697 $8,333 $7,344 $6,997 $347 $19 $334 $11,402-32% 913.P 913 Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf C 2.78 C % C $297 $156,535 $7, $7, $40, $55,556 $22.25 $100,957 44% $44,167 $56,790 $109,091 $54,190 $51,570 $2,620 $134 $2,466 $56,790 0% Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 2.15 B 3.26 K % N $299 $1,160 $56.33 $54.19 $ $399 $53.23 $708 42% $297 $411 $769 $392 $371 $21 $1 $18 $0 100% INDUSTRIAL: General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 B 5.41 N % N $305 $6,821 $ $ $1, $2,150 $38.42 $4, % $4,633 $0 $4,987 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf 1.50 B 5.41 N % N $305 $1,468 $65.34 $62.86 $ $463 $38.42 $ % $967 $0 $1,043 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Industrial Park 1,000 sf 6.83 B 5.41 N % N $305 $6,684 $ $ $1, $2,107 $38.42 $4, % $4,539 $0 $4,886 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 B 5.41 N % N $305 $3,739 $ $ $ $1,179 $38.42 $2, % $2,522 $0 $2,716 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Warehouse 1,000 sf 3.56 B 5.41 N % N $305 $3,484 $ $ $ $1,098 $53.23 $2, % $2,333 $0 $2,514 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 B 6.95 M % N $307 $2,128 $92.18 $88.68 $ $653 $53.23 $1, % $1,422 $0 $1,532 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 160.P 153 Airport Hangar 1,000 sf 3.56 H 5.41 N % N $305 $3,484 $ $ $ $1,098 $38.42 $2, % $2,347 $0 $2,528 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a OTHER: 199.P n/a Mining 1,000 cy 0.01 I I % I $311 $57 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0 $0.48 $57 0% $0 $57 $60 $54 $36 $18 $1 $2 n/a n/a Notes: 1) This value is the total value of transportation system consumed, less credits for revenues committed to transportation system expansion that are generated by the use itself. This value includes Interstate costs and "carrying costs", but not toll road costs. It does consider the proportion of trip length, varying system costs, and transportation system performance goals that vary by fee district. 2) Specific calculations for the "low income" category can be seen in Appendix B of the 2014 Mobility Update Study. 3) The statistical relationship between the trip generation rate for the age restricted single family, age restricted multi-family, and congregate care facility was used to interpolate the trip length. 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the office and retail size categories used the end-point of the range due to the nature of the ITE equation to be conservative for smaller developments. 5) The trip generation rate used for the office and retail open-ended size categories used the size 200,000 s.f. larger than the beginning of the size range, as the size ranges increase in 200,000 s.f. increments. 6) s of trip rate, percent new trips, and trip length are as follows: (A) FL Studies (NHTS, AHS, Census) (I) Independent Study (Collier County) (Q) Same as LUC 770 (Business Park) (B) ITE 9 th Edition (J) Same as LUC 220 (R) Same as LUC 820 (<50k) (C) Florida Studies Database (K) Florida Schedules (S) Florida Curve (D) Blend of TIE 9 th & FL Studies (L) Same as LUC 240 (T) Same as LUC 942 (Auto Care Center) (E) Blend of ITE 6 th & FL Studies (M) Same as LUC 210 (U) Same as LUC 820 (50k-200k) (F) ITE Regression Analysis (N) Same as LUC 710 (V) n/a (G) ITE 9 th Equation (O) Model-Based Trip Length (W) Same as LUC 492 (Health Club) (H) Previous Pasco Mobility Study (P) Same as LUC 630 (Clinic) Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Incentive Before % Incentive $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Share /SIS Share (Excl Int) Transit Share Bike/Ped Share 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 Net Mobility October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

36 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RESIDENTIAL: Table 4-2 Urban Mobility Schedule ( District A) MUTRM Rates Revenue period: 25 P4P Equivalent Pennies: 4.8 Include carrying cost?: No TOD Deduction: 0.00% Discount Rate: 3.30% 2nd LOFT County pennies to capacity: 5 Include Interstates?: Yes TND Deduction: 0.00% Fuel efficiency: Existing State pennies to capacity: 25.6 MUTRM Deduction: 8.02% Days/yr: 365 Tax Inc Fin Millage Rate to capacity: % Factor to convert VMT to PMT: 1.37 Existing County pennies to capital: 0 Toll.fwy discount: 1.7% Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than 80% SHIP 210.1P Definition (2) du 4.10 A 7.61 C % V $307 $5,097 $ $ $1, $1,566 $ $3,429 28% $944 $2,486 $3,694 $2,372 $2,244 $128 $6 $ P to 1,500 s.f. du 6.25 A 7.61 C % V $307 $7,769 $ $ $1, $2,387 $ $5,281 41% $2,151 $3,130 $5,685 $2,986 $2,826 $160 $8 $ P ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du 7.81 A 7.61 C % V $307 $9,709 $ $ $2, $2,983 $ $6,587 34% $2,211 $4,376 $7,091 $4,175 $3,951 $224 $11 $ P ,500 s.f. and greater du 9.20 A 7.61 C % V $307 $11,437 $ $ $2, $3,513 $ $7,563 37% $2,815 $4,747 $8,157 $4,529 $4,280 $249 $12 $ P "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family (2) du 3.46 A 5.87 C % V $305 $3,293 $ $ $ $1,041 $76.49 $2,176 26% $570 $1,606 $2,347 $1,532 $1,450 $82 $4 $ Multi-Family Apartments du 6.60 B 5.87 C % V $305 $6,282 $ $ $1, $1,985 $76.49 $4,220 29% $1,243 $2,978 $4,547 $2,842 $2,692 $150 $7 $ Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du 6.40 B 5.87 J % V $305 $6,092 $ $ $1, $1,925 $76.49 $4,090 26% $1,084 $3,007 $4,407 $2,868 $2,716 $152 $8 $ High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du 4.18 B 5.87 J % V $305 $3,979 $ $ $ $1,257 $76.49 $2,645 18% $483 $2,162 $2,852 $2,062 $1,952 $110 $6 $ Mobile Home Park du 4.17 C 5.29 C % V $304 $3,566 $ $ $ $1,142 $44.80 $2,380 30% $725 $1,655 $2,565 $1,579 $1,496 $83 $4 $ Age Restricted Single Family (3) du 3.12 D 6.23 C % V $305 $3,152 $ $ $ $991 $ $2,059 30% $617 $1,443 $2,223 $1,376 $1,301 $75 $4 $ Age Restricted Multi-Family (3) du 2.97 D 3.77 C % V $301 $1,789 $85.09 $81.86 $ $603 $55.73 $1,130 35% $392 $738 $1,223 $704 $668 $36 $2 $ Congregate Care Facility (Attached) (3) du 2.25 D 3.54 C % C $301 $916 $43.96 $42.29 $ $311 $36.06 $569 28% $159 $410 $616 $391 $370 $21 $1 $ LODGING: Hotel room 6.36 D 7.20 C % C $306 $4,651 $ $ $1, $1,447 $60.10 $3, % $3,143 $0 $3,385 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Motel room 5.63 B 4.99 C % C $303 $3,298 $ $ $ $1,072 $30.05 $2, % $2,196 $0 $2,368 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Resort Hotel room 5.83 D 7.02 C % C $306 $5,227 $ $ $1, $1,630 $60.10 $3, % $3,537 $0 $3,809 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - RECREATION: General Recreation acre 2.28 B 5.37 K % K $303 $1,680 $76.51 $73.60 $ $542 $ $1,031 53% $546 $485 $1,119 $462 $436 $26 $2 $ RV Park RV space 1.62 B 4.83 L % L $302 $1,188 $54.95 $52.87 $ $389 $10.71 $789 31% $241 $548 $850 $522 $495 $27 $2 $ Marina berth 2.96 B 6.95 M % K $306 $2,849 $ $ $ $889 $81.95 $1,878 50% $940 $938 $2,026 $894 $845 $49 $3 $ Golf Course hole B 6.95 M % K $306 $34,399 $1, $1, $7, $10,736 $ $23,527 51% $11,939 $11,588 $25,315 $11,057 $10,477 $580 $28 $ Miniature Golf Course hole 3.30 B 6.95 M % K $306 $3,176 $ $ $ $991 $48.08 $2,137 61% $1,297 $840 $2,302 $802 $759 $43 $2 $ Bowling Alley 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % K $303 $24,745 $1, $1, $5, $7,974 $34.97 $16,736 55% $9,125 $7,610 $18,021 $7,262 $6,889 $373 $18 $ Movie Theater screen E 2.33 C % C $294 $32,344 $1, $1, $8, $12,194 $ $19,986 52% $10,353 $9,633 $21,666 $9,192 $8,764 $428 $23 $ Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % W $303 $10,879 $ $ $2, $3,506 $ $7,264 54% $3,947 $3,317 $7,829 $3,165 $3,000 $165 $8 $ Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf B 7.06 K % K $306 $33,067 $1, $1, $7, $10,307 $ $22,651 70% $15,792 $6,859 $24,369 $6,544 $6,201 $343 $17 $ INSTITUTIONS: Elementary School student 1.29 B 4.52 O % K $303 $845 $38.49 $37.03 $ $273 $22.13 $551 40% $219 $331 $594 $316 $299 $17 $1 $ Middle School student 1.62 B 4.52 O % K $303 $1,194 $54.38 $52.31 $ $385 $22.13 $787 40% $316 $471 $849 $449 $425 $24 $2 $ High School student 1.71 B 4.52 O % K $303 $1,261 $57.40 $55.22 $ $407 $22.13 $832 40% $334 $498 $897 $474 $449 $25 $2 $ University/Jr College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 F 6.95 M % K $307 $2,298 $99.51 $95.73 $ $705 $22.13 $1,571 39% $610 $962 $1,691 $917 $868 $49 $3 $ University/Jr College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student 1.50 F 6.95 M % K $307 $1,724 $74.64 $71.80 $ $529 $22.13 $1,173 39% $454 $719 $1,263 $686 $649 $37 $2 $ Church 1,000 sf 9.11 B 4.10 K % K $302 $6,068 $ $ $1, $1,985 $ $3,949 43% $1,682 $2,267 $4,264 $2,163 $2,049 $114 $6 $ Day Care student 3.03 H 2.13 C % C $297 $836 $43.36 $41.71 $ $307 $ $299 32% $96 $203 $343 $193 $177 $16 $1 $ Cemetery acre 4.73 B 6.95 M % H $307 $5,738 $ $ $1, $1,759 $13.77 $3,965 39% $1,544 $2,421 $4,263 $2,310 $2,188 $122 $6 $ Hospital 1,000 sf B 6.95 M % K $307 $12,998 $ $ $2, $3,986 $ $8,810 23% $2,040 $6,770 $9,486 $6,460 $6,112 $348 $16 $ Nursing Home bed 2.76 D 2.72 C % C $299 $1,194 $58.88 $56.65 $ $417 $5.83 $771 48% $372 $399 $833 $381 $362 $19 $1 $ OFFICE: General Office 50,000 sf or less (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $14,070 $ $ $3, $4,432 $ $9, % $9,516 $0 $10,247 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 50, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $11,918 $ $ $2, $3,754 $58.27 $8, % $8,106 $0 $8,725 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 100, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $10,094 $ $ $2, $3,180 $58.27 $6, % $6,856 $0 $7,381 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 200, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf 9.41 G 5.41 C % C $305 $8,542 $ $ $1, $2,691 $58.27 $5, % $5,793 $0 $6,237 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office greater than 400,000 sf (5) 1,000 sf 8.54 G 5.41 C % C $305 $7,752 $ $ $1, $2,442 $58.27 $5, % $5,252 $0 $5,655 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf 7.98 B 5.41 N % N $305 $7,244 $ $ $1, $2,282 $58.27 $4, % $4,904 $0 $5,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Medical Office 1,000 sf D 5.83 C % C $306 $32,944 $1, $1, $7, $10,284 $58.27 $22, % $22,602 $0 $24,314 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Office Park 1,000 sf D 7.47 C % Q $308 $14,320 $ $ $3, $4,361 $58.27 $9, % $9,901 $0 $10,645 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Research and Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 B 5.65 Q % Q $305 $7,438 $ $ $1, $2,334 $58.27 $5, % $5,045 $0 $5,432 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P 640 Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf B 5.36 P % P $305 $36,474 $1, $1, $8, $11,499 $58.27 $24, % $24,917 $0 $26,812 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Incentive Before % Incentive $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Share /SIS Share (Excl Int) Transit Share Bike/Ped Share 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 Net Mobility October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

37 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RETAIL: Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Table 4-2 (continued) Urban Mobility Schedule ( District A) MUTRM Rates Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf B 1.96 R % R $294 $9,169 $ $ $2, $3,515 $ $5,545 51% $2,810 $2,735 $6,022 $2,609 $2,488 $121 $7 $ Retail 50,000 sfgla or less (4) 1,000 sfgla G 1.96 S % S $294 $15,474 $ $ $4, $5,931 $ $9,434 50% $4,747 $4,687 $10,238 $4,471 $4,265 $206 $12 $ P Retail 50, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.52 S % S $297 $14,787 $ $ $3, $5,339 $ $9,339 55% $5,108 $4,231 $10,108 $4,037 $3,842 $195 $10 $ P Retail 200, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.77 S % S $297 $13,894 $ $ $3, $4,934 $ $8,796 54% $4,746 $4,050 $9,518 $3,864 $3,674 $190 $10 $ P Retail 400, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.01 S % S $299 $13,734 $ $ $3, $4,779 $ $8,791 57% $4,976 $3,816 $9,505 $3,641 $3,459 $182 $9 $ P Retail 600, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.26 S % S $299 $13,983 $ $ $3, $4,807 $ $9,012 56% $5,044 $3,968 $9,739 $3,786 $3,596 $190 $10 $ P Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla (5) 1,000 sfgla G 3.51 S % S $301 $14,353 $ $ $3, $4,856 $ $9,334 55% $5,146 $4,188 $10,079 $3,996 $3,793 $203 $10 $ Specialty Retail 1,000 sf D 3.54 C % C $301 $25,037 $1, $1, $6, $8,460 $ $16,468 52% $8,640 $7,828 $17,769 $7,469 $7,094 $375 $19 $ New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf D 4.83 C % C $303 $18,096 $ $ $4, $5,842 $51.67 $12,202 50% $6,139 $6,063 $13,143 $5,785 $5,488 $297 $15 $ Tire Store 1,000 sf B 3.80 T % T $301 $11,326 $ $ $2, $3,791 $ $7,425 52% $3,879 $3,547 $8,014 $3,384 $3,211 $173 $9 $ Supermarket 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $294 $20,556 $1, $1, $5, $7,702 $50.07 $12,803 51% $6,527 $6,276 $13,871 $5,988 $5,709 $279 $15 $ Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf D 1.59 C % C $290 $55,451 $3, $3, $16, $22,657 $22.25 $32,772 53% $17,520 $15,252 $35,654 $14,554 $13,931 $623 $36 $ Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf B 2.52 U % U $297 $8,532 $ $ $2, $3,080 $ $5,342 56% $2,994 $2,348 $5,785 $2,240 $2,131 $109 $6 $ Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $294 $10,903 $ $ $2, $4,086 $ $6,708 51% $3,417 $3,291 $7,275 $3,140 $2,992 $148 $8 $ Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 B 6.39 C % C $306 $2,958 $ $ $ $922 $ $1,926 53% $1,024 $903 $2,080 $861 $813 $48 $3 $ Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf D 2.58 C % C $297 $31,085 $1, $1, $8, $11,176 $ $19,700 52% $10,152 $9,548 $21,315 $9,110 $8,669 $441 $23 $ Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.30 C % C $299 $38,317 $1, $1, $9, $13,149 $ $25,034 52% $13,026 $12,008 $27,025 $11,458 $10,889 $569 $29 $ High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.33 C % C $299 $45,632 $2, $2, $11, $15,638 $ $29,859 51% $15,115 $14,744 $32,230 $14,069 $13,370 $699 $35 $ Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf D 2.15 C % C $294 $103,786 $5, $5, $28, $39,001 $ $64,553 52% $33,840 $30,713 $69,946 $29,306 $27,945 $1,361 $73 $1, Quick Lube bays B 3.80 T % T $301 $18,216 $ $ $4, $6,098 $35.51 $12,083 52% $6,325 $5,758 $13,029 $5,494 $5,217 $277 $14 $ Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf D 3.80 T % T $301 $14,313 $ $ $3, $4,791 $67.10 $9,455 48% $4,557 $4,898 $10,199 $4,673 $4,437 $236 $12 $ Gasoline Station fuel pos B 2.00 C % C $294 $12,629 $ $ $3, $4,819 $1.85 $7,808 51% $3,975 $3,833 $8,464 $3,657 $3,490 $167 $10 $ Self-Service Car Wash bays D 2.29 C % C $297 $11,248 $ $ $2, $4,135 $35.51 $7,077 18% $1,304 $5,773 $7,662 $5,508 $5,247 $261 $14 $ P 913 Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf C 2.78 C % C $297 $143,981 $7, $6, $36, $51,101 $22.25 $92,858 54% $50,265 $42,593 $100,340 $40,642 $38,677 $1,965 $101 $1, Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 2.15 B 3.26 K % N $299 $1,067 $51.81 $49.84 $ $367 $53.23 $647 52% $340 $308 $703 $294 $278 $16 $1 $ INDUSTRIAL: General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 B 5.41 N % N $305 $6,274 $ $ $1, $1,978 $38.42 $4, % $4,258 $0 $4,584 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf 1.50 B 5.41 N % N $305 $1,350 $60.10 $57.82 $ $426 $38.42 $ % $886 $0 $956 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Industrial Park 1,000 sf 6.83 B 5.41 N % N $305 $6,148 $ $ $1, $1,938 $38.42 $4, % $4,172 $0 $4,491 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 B 5.41 N % N $305 $3,439 $ $ $ $1,084 $38.42 $2, % $2,316 $0 $2,495 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Warehouse 1,000 sf 3.56 B 5.41 N % N $305 $3,205 $ $ $ $1,010 $53.23 $2, % $2,141 $0 $2,308 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 B 6.95 M % N $307 $1,957 $84.79 $81.57 $ $600 $53.23 $1, % $1,303 $0 $1,405 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P 153 Airport Hangar 1,000 sf 3.56 H 5.41 N % N $305 $3,205 $ $ $ $1,010 $38.42 $2, % $2,156 $0 $2,323 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - Notes: 1) This value is the total value of transportation system consumed, less credits for revenues committed to transportation system expansion that are generated by the use itself. This value includes Interstate costs and "carrying costs", but not toll road costs. It does consider the proportion of trip length, varying system costs, and transportation system performance goals that vary by fee district. 2) Specific calculations for the "low income" category can be seen in Appendix B of the 2014 Mobility Update Study. 3) The statistical relationship between the trip generation rate for the age restricted single family, age restricted multi-family, and congregate care facility was used to interpolate the trip length. 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the office and retail size categories used the end-point of the range due to the nature of the ITE equation to be conservative for smaller developments. 5) The trip generation rate used for the office and retail open-ended size categories used the size 200,000 s.f. larger than the beginning of the size range, as the size ranges increase in 200,000 s.f. increments. 6) s of trip rate, percent new trips, and trip length are as follows: (A) FL Studies (NHTS, AHS, Census) (I) Independent Study (Collier County) (Q) Same as LUC 770 (Business Park) (B) ITE 9 th Edition (J) Same as LUC 220 (R) Same as LUC 820 (<50k) (C) Florida Studies Database (K) Florida Schedules (S) Florida Curve (D) Blend of TIE 9 th & FL Studies (L) Same as LUC 240 (T) Same as LUC 942 (Auto Care Center) (E) Blend of ITE 6 th & FL Studies (M) Same as LUC 210 (U) Same as LUC 820 (50k-200k) (F) ITE Regression Analysis (N) Same as LUC 710 (V) n/a (G) ITE 9 th Equation (O) Model-Based Trip Length (W) Same as LUC 492 (Health Club) (H) Previous Pasco Mobility Study (P) Same as LUC 630 (Clinic) Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Incentive Before % Incentive $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Share /SIS Share (Excl Int) Transit Share Bike/Ped Share 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 Net Mobility October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

38 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RESIDENTIAL: Table 4-3 Urban Mobility Schedule ( District A) TND Rates Revenue period: 25 P4P Equivalent Pennies: 4.8 Include carrying cost?: No TOD Deduction: 0.00% Discount Rate: 3.30% 2nd LOFT County pennies to capacity: 5 Include Interstates?: Yes TND Deduction: 11.36% Fuel efficiency: Existing State pennies to capacity: 25.6 MUTRM Deduction: 0.00% Days/yr: 365 Tax Inc Fin Millage Rate to capacity: % Factor to convert VMT to PMT: 1.37 Existing County pennies to capital: 0 Toll.fwy discount: 1.7% Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than 80% SHIP 210.1P Definition (2) du 4.10 A 7.61 C % V $307 $4,912 $ $ $1, $1,509 $ $3,301 50% $1,643 $1,658 $3,556 $1,582 $1,496 $86 $4 $72 $ % 210.2P to 1,500 s.f. du 6.25 A 7.61 C % V $307 $7,487 $ $ $1, $2,300 $ $5,086 59% $2,999 $2,087 $5,475 $1,991 $1,884 $107 $5 $91 $1, % 210.3P ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du 7.81 A 7.61 C % V $307 $9,356 $ $ $2, $2,874 $ $6,343 54% $3,425 $2,918 $6,829 $2,784 $2,634 $150 $7 $127 $1, % 210.4P ,500 s.f. and greater du 9.20 A 7.61 C % V $307 $11,021 $ $ $2, $3,386 $ $7,275 56% $4,110 $3,165 $7,848 $3,020 $2,854 $166 $8 $137 $1, % 210.5P "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family (2) du 3.46 A 5.87 C % V $305 $3,174 $ $ $ $1,003 $76.49 $2,094 49% $1,024 $1,071 $2,259 $1,021 $966 $55 $3 $47 $ % Multi-Family Apartments du 6.60 B 5.87 C % V $305 $6,054 $ $ $1, $1,913 $76.49 $4,064 51% $2,078 $1,986 $4,379 $1,895 $1,795 $100 $5 $86 $ % Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du 6.40 B 5.87 J % V $305 $5,871 $ $ $1, $1,855 $76.49 $3,939 49% $1,934 $2,005 $4,244 $1,913 $1,812 $101 $5 $87 $1, % High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du 4.18 B 5.87 J % V $305 $3,834 $ $ $ $1,212 $76.49 $2,546 43% $1,105 $1,441 $2,745 $1,374 $1,301 $73 $4 $63 $803 79% Mobile Home Park du 4.17 C 5.29 C % V $304 $3,437 $ $ $ $1,100 $44.80 $2,292 52% $1,188 $1,104 $2,470 $1,053 $997 $56 $3 $48 $ % Age Restricted Single Family (3) du 3.12 D 6.23 C % V $305 $3,037 $ $ $ $955 $ $1,981 51% $1,019 $962 $2,139 $917 $867 $50 $3 $42 $ % Age Restricted Multi-Family (3) du 2.97 D 3.77 C % V $301 $1,724 $82.00 $78.88 $ $581 $55.73 $1,087 55% $595 $492 $1,177 $469 $444 $25 $2 $21 $ % Congregate Care Facility (Attached) (3) du 2.25 D 3.54 C % C $301 $883 $42.36 $40.75 $ $300 $36.06 $547 50% $273 $274 $593 $261 $247 $14 $1 $12 $ % LODGING: Hotel room 6.36 D 7.20 C % C $306 $4,482 $ $ $1, $1,395 $60.10 $3, % $3,027 $0 $3,260 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Motel room 5.63 B 4.99 C % C $303 $3,179 $ $ $ $1,033 $30.05 $2, % $2,115 $0 $2,281 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Resort Hotel room 5.83 D 7.02 C % C $306 $5,037 $ $ $1, $1,571 $60.10 $3, % $3,406 $0 $3,668 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a RECREATION: General Recreation acre 2.28 B 5.37 K % K $303 $1,619 $73.73 $70.93 $ $522 $ $990 67% $667 $323 $1,074 $308 $290 $18 $1 $14 $ % RV Park RV space 1.62 B 4.83 L % L $302 $1,145 $52.96 $50.95 $ $375 $10.71 $759 52% $394 $365 $819 $348 $330 $18 $1 $16 $183 99% Marina berth 2.96 B 6.95 M % K $306 $2,746 $ $ $ $857 $81.95 $1,807 65% $1,180 $626 $1,949 $597 $565 $32 $2 $27 $ % Golf Course hole B 6.95 M % K $306 $33,150 $1, $1, $7, $10,346 $ $22,668 66% $14,942 $7,726 $24,390 $7,371 $6,984 $387 $19 $336 $3,881 99% Miniature Golf Course hole 3.30 B 6.95 M % K $306 $3,061 $ $ $ $955 $48.08 $2,058 73% $1,498 $560 $2,217 $534 $505 $29 $2 $24 $281 99% Bowling Alley 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % K $303 $23,846 $1, $1, $5, $7,684 $34.97 $16,127 69% $11,053 $5,074 $17,366 $4,842 $4,593 $249 $12 $220 $2,549 99% Movie Theater screen E 2.33 C % C $294 $31,169 $1, $1, $8, $11,751 $ $19,254 67% $12,832 $6,422 $20,874 $6,127 $5,842 $285 $16 $279 $3,225 99% Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % W $303 $10,484 $ $ $2, $3,378 $ $6,996 68% $4,784 $2,212 $7,541 $2,110 $2,000 $110 $6 $96 $1,110 99% Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf B 7.06 K % K $306 $31,866 $1, $1, $7, $9,933 $ $21,824 79% $17,251 $4,573 $23,480 $4,363 $4,135 $228 $11 $199 $2,296 99% INSTITUTIONS: Elementary School student 1.29 B 4.52 O % K $303 $815 $37.09 $35.68 $ $263 $22.13 $530 58% $308 $221 $572 $210 $199 $11 $1 $10 $ % Middle School student 1.62 B 4.52 O % K $303 $1,151 $52.40 $50.41 $ $371 $22.13 $758 59% $444 $314 $817 $299 $283 $16 $1 $14 $ % High School student 1.71 B 4.52 O % K $303 $1,215 $55.32 $53.21 $ $392 $22.13 $801 59% $469 $332 $864 $317 $301 $16 $1 $14 $ % University/Jr College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 F 6.95 M % K $307 $2,215 $95.90 $92.26 $ $679 $22.13 $1,514 58% $871 $642 $1,629 $612 $580 $32 $2 $28 $ % University/Jr College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student 1.50 F 6.95 M % K $307 $1,661 $71.93 $69.19 $ $509 $22.13 $1,130 58% $650 $480 $1,216 $457 $433 $24 $2 $21 $ % Church 1,000 sf 9.11 B 4.10 K % K $302 $5,847 $ $ $1, $1,913 $ $3,801 60% $2,290 $1,511 $4,105 $1,441 $1,365 $76 $4 $66 $ % Day Care student 3.03 H 2.13 C % C $297 $806 $41.79 $40.20 $ $296 $ $280 52% $145 $136 $322 $129 $118 $11 $1 $6 $64 113% Cemetery acre 4.73 B 6.95 M % H $307 $5,529 $ $ $1, $1,695 $13.77 $3,820 58% $2,206 $1,614 $4,107 $1,540 $1,458 $82 $4 $70 $ % Hospital 1,000 sf B 6.95 M % K $307 $12,526 $ $ $2, $3,841 $ $8,483 47% $3,969 $4,514 $9,134 $4,307 $4,075 $232 $11 $196 $2, % Nursing Home bed 2.76 D 2.72 C % C $299 $1,150 $56.75 $54.59 $ $402 $5.83 $743 64% $477 $266 $803 $253 $240 $13 $1 $12 $ % OFFICE: General Office 50,000 sf or less (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $13,559 $ $ $3, $4,271 $ $9, % $9,166 $0 $9,871 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.1P General Office 50, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $11,486 $ $ $2, $3,618 $58.27 $7, % $7,809 $0 $8,406 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.2P General Office 100, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $9,727 $ $ $2, $3,064 $58.27 $6, % $6,605 $0 $7,110 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.3P General Office 200, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf 9.41 G 5.41 C % C $305 $8,232 $ $ $1, $2,593 $58.27 $5, % $5,580 $0 $6,008 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.4P General Office greater than 400,000 sf (5) 1,000 sf 8.54 G 5.41 C % C $305 $7,470 $ $ $1, $2,353 $58.27 $5, % $5,059 $0 $5,447 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf 7.98 B 5.41 N % N $305 $6,981 $ $ $1, $2,199 $58.27 $4, % $4,723 $0 $5,086 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Medical Office 1,000 sf D 5.83 C % C $306 $31,748 $1, $1, $7, $9,911 $58.27 $21, % $21,779 $0 $23,429 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Office Park 1,000 sf D 7.47 C % Q $308 $13,800 $ $ $3, $4,203 $58.27 $9, % $9,539 $0 $10,256 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Research and Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 B 5.65 Q % Q $305 $7,167 $ $ $1, $2,249 $58.27 $4, % $4,860 $0 $5,232 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 770.P 640 Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf B 5.36 P % P $305 $35,149 $1, $1, $8, $11,081 $58.27 $24, % $24,010 $0 $25,836 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 Net Mobility October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

39 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RETAIL: Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Table 4-3 (continued) Urban Mobility Schedule ( District A) TND Rates Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Notes: 1) This value is the total value of transportation system consumed, less credits for revenues committed to transportation system expansion that are generated by the use itself. This value includes Interstate costs and "carrying costs", but not toll road costs. It does consider the proportion of trip length, varying system costs, and transportation system performance goals that vary by fee district. 2) Specific calculations for the "low income" category can be seen in Appendix B of the 2014 Mobility Update Study. 3) The statistical relationship between the trip generation rate for the age restricted single family, age restricted multi-family, and congregate care facility was used to interpolate the trip length. 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the office and retail size categories used the end-point of the range due to the nature of the ITE equation to be conservative for smaller developments. 5) The trip generation rate used for the office and retail open-ended size categories used the size 200,000 s.f. larger than the beginning of the size range, as the size ranges increase in 200,000 s.f. increments. 6) s of trip rate, percent new trips, and trip length are as follows: (A) FL Studies (NHTS, AHS, Census) (I) Independent Study (Collier County) (Q) Same as LUC 770 (Business Park) (B) ITE 9 th Edition (J) Same as LUC 220 (R) Same as LUC 820 (<50k) (C) Florida Studies Database (K) Florida Schedules (S) Florida Curve (D) Blend of TIE 9 th & FL Studies (L) Same as LUC 240 (T) Same as LUC 942 (Auto Care Center) (E) Blend of ITE 6 th & FL Studies (M) Same as LUC 210 (U) Same as LUC 820 (50k-200k) (F) ITE Regression Analysis (N) Same as LUC 710 (V) n/a (G) ITE 9 th Equation (O) Model-Based Trip Length (W) Same as LUC 492 (Health Club) (H) Previous Pasco Mobility Study (P) Same as LUC 630 (Clinic) Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf B 1.96 R % R $294 $8,836 $ $ $2, $3,387 $ $5,340 66% $3,516 $1,824 $5,799 $1,740 $1,659 $81 $5 $79 $ % Retail 50,000 sfgla or less (4) 1,000 sfgla G 1.96 S % S $294 $14,912 $ $ $4, $5,716 $ $9,087 66% $5,962 $3,125 $9,862 $2,981 $2,843 $138 $8 $136 $1, % 820.1P Retail 50, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.52 S % S $297 $14,251 $ $ $3, $5,145 $ $8,996 69% $6,175 $2,821 $9,737 $2,691 $2,561 $130 $7 $123 $1, % 820.2P Retail 200, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.77 S % S $297 $13,390 $ $ $3, $4,755 $ $8,471 68% $5,771 $2,700 $9,167 $2,576 $2,449 $127 $7 $117 $1, % 820.3P Retail 400, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.01 S % S $299 $13,235 $ $ $3, $4,605 $ $8,466 70% $5,922 $2,544 $9,154 $2,428 $2,307 $121 $6 $110 $1, % 820.4P Retail 600, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.26 S % S $299 $13,475 $ $ $3, $4,632 $ $8,679 70% $6,033 $2,646 $9,379 $2,524 $2,397 $127 $7 $115 $1, % 820.5P Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla (5) 1,000 sfgla G 3.51 S % S $301 $13,832 $ $ $3, $4,679 $ $8,989 69% $6,196 $2,792 $9,707 $2,664 $2,529 $135 $7 $121 $1, % Specialty Retail 1,000 sf D 3.54 C % C $301 $24,128 $1, $1, $5, $8,153 $ $15,866 67% $10,647 $5,219 $17,120 $4,979 $4,729 $250 $13 $227 $2, % New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf D 4.83 C % C $303 $17,439 $ $ $4, $5,630 $51.67 $11,757 66% $7,716 $4,042 $12,664 $3,856 $3,657 $199 $10 $176 $2, % Tire Store 1,000 sf B 3.80 T % T $301 $10,915 $ $ $2, $3,654 $ $7,152 67% $4,787 $2,365 $7,719 $2,256 $2,141 $115 $6 $103 $1, % Supermarket 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $294 $19,809 $1, $1, $5, $7,423 $50.07 $12,336 66% $8,153 $4,184 $13,366 $3,992 $3,806 $186 $10 $182 $2, % Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf D 1.59 C % C $290 $53,438 $3, $2, $15, $21,834 $22.25 $31,582 68% $21,413 $10,168 $34,358 $9,702 $9,287 $415 $24 $442 $5, % Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf B 2.52 U % U $297 $8,222 $ $ $2, $2,968 $ $5,144 70% $3,579 $1,565 $5,571 $1,493 $1,420 $73 $4 $68 $ % Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $294 $10,507 $ $ $2, $3,937 $ $6,461 66% $4,267 $2,194 $7,007 $2,093 $1,994 $99 $6 $95 $1, % Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 B 6.39 C % C $306 $2,851 $ $ $ $889 $ $1,853 67% $1,250 $602 $2,001 $574 $543 $31 $2 $26 $ % Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf D 2.58 C % C $297 $29,957 $1, $1, $7, $10,770 $ $18,977 66% $12,611 $6,365 $20,533 $6,074 $5,780 $294 $15 $276 $3, % Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.30 C % C $299 $36,926 $1, $1, $9, $12,671 $ $24,120 67% $16,114 $8,006 $26,038 $7,639 $7,259 $380 $19 $348 $4, % High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.33 C % C $299 $43,975 $2, $2, $10, $15,071 $ $28,770 66% $18,941 $9,829 $31,055 $9,378 $8,912 $466 $24 $427 $4, % Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf D 2.15 C % C $294 $100,017 $5, $5, $27, $37,584 $ $62,200 67% $41,725 $20,475 $67,398 $19,537 $18,629 $908 $49 $889 $10, % Quick Lube bays B 3.80 T % T $301 $17,555 $ $ $4, $5,876 $35.51 $11,643 67% $7,804 $3,839 $12,555 $3,662 $3,478 $184 $10 $167 $1, % Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf D 3.80 T % T $301 $13,794 $ $ $3, $4,617 $67.10 $9,109 64% $5,845 $3,265 $9,826 $3,115 $2,957 $158 $8 $142 $1, % Gasoline Station fuel pos B 2.00 C % C $294 $12,170 $ $ $3, $4,644 $1.85 $7,524 66% $4,969 $2,555 $8,157 $2,437 $2,325 $112 $7 $111 $1, % Self-Service Car Wash bays D 2.29 C % C $297 $10,839 $ $ $2, $3,985 $35.51 $6,819 44% $2,970 $3,849 $7,382 $3,672 $3,498 $174 $10 $167 $2,854 35% 913.P 913 Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf C 2.78 C % C $297 $138,753 $6, $6, $35, $49,245 $22.25 $89,485 68% $61,091 $28,395 $96,695 $27,095 $25,785 $1,310 $67 $1,233 $14, % Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 2.15 B 3.26 K % N $299 $1,029 $49.93 $48.03 $ $354 $53.23 $622 67% $416 $206 $675 $196 $185 $11 $1 $9 $0 n/a INDUSTRIAL: General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 B 5.41 N % N $305 $6,047 $ $ $1, $1,906 $38.42 $4, % $4,102 $0 $4,416 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf 1.50 B 5.41 N % N $305 $1,301 $57.92 $55.72 $ $410 $38.42 $ % $853 $0 $920 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Industrial Park 1,000 sf 6.83 B 5.41 N % N $305 $5,925 $ $ $1, $1,868 $38.42 $4, % $4,019 $0 $4,327 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 B 5.41 N % N $305 $3,314 $ $ $ $1,045 $38.42 $2, % $2,231 $0 $2,403 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Warehouse 1,000 sf 3.56 B 5.41 N % N $305 $3,088 $ $ $ $974 $53.23 $2, % $2,062 $0 $2,222 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 B 6.95 M % N $307 $1,886 $81.71 $78.61 $ $579 $53.23 $1, % $1,254 $0 $1,352 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 160.P 153 Airport Hangar 1,000 sf 3.56 H 5.41 N % N $305 $3,088 $ $ $ $974 $38.42 $2, % $2,076 $0 $2,237 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 Net Mobility October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

40 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RESIDENTIAL: Table 4-4 Urban Mobility Schedule ( District A) TOD Rates Revenue period: 25 P4P Equivalent Pennies: 4.8 Include carrying cost?: No TOD Deduction: 20.46% Discount Rate: 3.30% 2nd LOFT County pennies to capacity: 5 Include Interstates?: Yes TND Deduction: 0.00% Fuel efficiency: Existing State pennies to capacity: 25.6 MUTRM Deduction: 0.00% Days/yr: 365 Tax Inc Fin Millage Rate to capacity: % Factor to convert VMT to PMT: 1.37 Existing County pennies to capital: 0 Toll.fwy discount: 1.7% Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than 80% SHIP 210.1P Definition (2) du 4.10 A 7.61 C % V $307 $4,407 $ $ $ $1,354 $ $2,952 72% $2,123 $829 $3,181 $791 $748 $43 $2 $36 $0 100% 210.2P to 1,500 s.f. du 6.25 A 7.61 C % V $307 $6,719 $ $ $1, $2,064 $ $4,553 77% $3,510 $1,043 $4,902 $995 $942 $53 $3 $45 $0 100% 210.3P ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du 7.81 A 7.61 C % V $307 $8,396 $ $ $1, $2,579 $ $5,677 74% $4,218 $1,459 $6,113 $1,392 $1,317 $75 $4 $63 $0 100% 210.4P ,500 s.f. and greater du 9.20 A 7.61 C % V $307 $9,890 $ $ $2, $3,038 $ $6,491 76% $4,909 $1,582 $7,005 $1,509 $1,425 $84 $4 $69 $0 100% 210.5P "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family (2) du 3.46 A 5.87 C % V $305 $2,848 $ $ $ $900 $76.49 $1,872 71% $1,337 $535 $2,019 $510 $482 $28 $2 $23 $0 100% Multi-Family Apartments du 6.60 B 5.87 C % V $305 $5,433 $ $ $1, $1,717 $76.49 $3,639 73% $2,647 $993 $3,922 $947 $896 $51 $3 $43 $0 100% Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du 6.40 B 5.87 J % V $305 $5,268 $ $ $1, $1,665 $76.49 $3,527 72% $2,525 $1,002 $3,800 $955 $904 $51 $3 $44 $0 100% High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du 4.18 B 5.87 J % V $305 $3,441 $ $ $ $1,087 $76.49 $2,277 68% $1,556 $721 $2,456 $688 $651 $37 $2 $31 $0 100% Mobile Home Park du 4.17 C 5.29 C % V $304 $3,084 $ $ $ $987 $44.80 $2,052 73% $1,500 $552 $2,212 $526 $498 $28 $2 $24 $0 100% Age Restricted Single Family (3) du 3.12 D 6.23 C % V $305 $2,726 $ $ $ $857 $ $1,767 73% $1,286 $481 $1,909 $458 $433 $25 $2 $21 $0 100% Age Restricted Multi-Family (3) du 2.97 D 3.77 C % V $301 $1,547 $73.58 $70.79 $ $521 $55.73 $970 75% $724 $246 $1,050 $234 $222 $12 $1 $11 $0 100% Congregate Care Facility (Attached) (3) du 2.25 D 3.54 C % C $301 $792 $38.02 $36.57 $ $269 $36.06 $487 72% $350 $137 $528 $130 $123 $7 $1 $6 $0 100% LODGING: Hotel room 6.36 D 7.20 C % C $306 $4,022 $ $ $ $1,252 $60.10 $2, % $2,710 $0 $2,919 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Motel room 5.63 B 4.99 C % C $303 $2,852 $ $ $ $927 $30.05 $1, % $1,895 $0 $2,043 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Resort Hotel room 5.83 D 7.02 C % C $306 $4,520 $ $ $1, $1,410 $60.10 $3, % $3,050 $0 $3,285 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a RECREATION: General Recreation acre 2.28 B 5.37 K % K $303 $1,453 $66.16 $63.65 $ $469 $ $877 82% $715 $162 $953 $154 $145 $9 $1 $7 $0 100% RV Park RV space 1.62 B 4.83 L % L $302 $1,028 $47.52 $45.72 $ $337 $10.71 $680 73% $498 $183 $734 $174 $165 $9 $1 $8 $0 100% Marina berth 2.96 B 6.95 M % K $306 $2,464 $ $ $ $769 $81.95 $1,613 81% $1,300 $313 $1,741 $298 $281 $17 $1 $14 $0 100% Golf Course hole B 6.95 M % K $306 $29,747 $1, $1, $6, $9,284 $ $20,327 81% $16,464 $3,863 $21,872 $3,685 $3,491 $194 $10 $168 $0 100% Miniature Golf Course hole 3.30 B 6.95 M % K $306 $2,747 $ $ $ $857 $48.08 $1,841 85% $1,561 $280 $1,984 $267 $253 $14 $1 $12 $0 100% Bowling Alley 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % K $303 $21,398 $ $ $4, $6,896 $34.97 $14,467 82% $11,931 $2,537 $15,579 $2,421 $2,296 $125 $6 $110 $0 100% Movie Theater screen E 2.33 C % C $294 $27,969 $1, $1, $7, $10,545 $ $17,260 81% $14,049 $3,211 $18,714 $3,064 $2,921 $143 $8 $139 $0 100% Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % W $303 $9,408 $ $ $2, $3,032 $ $6,267 82% $5,160 $1,106 $6,756 $1,055 $1,000 $55 $3 $48 $0 100% Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf B 7.06 K % K $306 $28,595 $1, $1, $6, $8,913 $ $19,572 88% $17,287 $2,286 $21,058 $2,181 $2,066 $115 $6 $99 $0 100% INSTITUTIONS: Elementary School student 1.29 B 4.52 O % K $303 $731 $33.28 $32.02 $ $236 $22.13 $473 77% $363 $110 $511 $104 $98 $6 $1 $5 $0 100% Middle School student 1.62 B 4.52 O % K $303 $1,033 $47.02 $45.24 $ $333 $22.13 $678 77% $521 $157 $731 $149 $141 $8 $1 $7 $0 100% High School student 1.71 B 4.52 O % K $303 $1,090 $49.64 $47.75 $ $352 $22.13 $716 77% $551 $166 $773 $158 $149 $9 $1 $7 $0 100% University/Jr College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 F 6.95 M % K $307 $1,988 $86.06 $82.79 $ $609 $22.13 $1,356 76% $1,035 $321 $1,459 $306 $290 $16 $1 $14 $0 100% University/Jr College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student 1.50 F 6.95 M % K $307 $1,491 $64.54 $62.09 $ $457 $22.13 $1,011 76% $772 $240 $1,089 $229 $217 $12 $1 $10 $0 100% Church 1,000 sf 9.11 B 4.10 K % K $302 $5,247 $ $ $1, $1,717 $ $3,397 78% $2,641 $756 $3,670 $721 $682 $39 $2 $33 $0 100% Day Care student 3.03 H 2.13 C % C $297 $723 $37.50 $36.07 $ $266 $ $228 70% $160 $68 $265 $64 $58 $6 $1 $3 $0 100% Cemetery acre 4.73 B 6.95 M % H $307 $4,962 $ $ $1, $1,521 $13.77 $3,426 76% $2,620 $807 $3,684 $770 $729 $41 $2 $35 $0 100% Hospital 1,000 sf B 6.95 M % K $307 $11,240 $ $ $2, $3,447 $ $7,591 70% $5,334 $2,257 $8,175 $2,153 $2,037 $116 $6 $98 $0 100% Nursing Home bed 2.76 D 2.72 C % C $299 $1,032 $50.92 $48.99 $ $361 $5.83 $666 80% $533 $133 $720 $126 $119 $7 $1 $6 $0 100% OFFICE: General Office 50,000 sf or less (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $12,167 $ $ $2, $3,833 $ $8, % $8,213 $0 $8,845 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.1P General Office 50, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $10,306 $ $ $2, $3,247 $58.27 $7, % $7,002 $0 $7,537 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.2P General Office 100, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $8,729 $ $ $1, $2,750 $58.27 $5, % $5,921 $0 $6,374 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.3P General Office 200, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf 9.41 G 5.41 C % C $305 $7,386 $ $ $1, $2,327 $58.27 $5, % $5,001 $0 $5,385 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 710.4P General Office greater than 400,000 sf (5) 1,000 sf 8.54 G 5.41 C % C $305 $6,704 $ $ $1, $2,112 $58.27 $4, % $4,534 $0 $4,882 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf 7.98 B 5.41 N % N $305 $6,264 $ $ $1, $1,973 $58.27 $4, % $4,233 $0 $4,558 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Medical Office 1,000 sf D 5.83 C % C $306 $28,489 $1, $1, $6, $8,893 $58.27 $19, % $19,537 $0 $21,017 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Office Park 1,000 sf D 7.47 C % Q $308 $12,383 $ $ $2, $3,771 $58.27 $8, % $8,554 $0 $9,198 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Research and Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 B 5.65 Q % Q $305 $6,432 $ $ $1, $2,018 $58.27 $4, % $4,355 $0 $4,689 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 770.P 640 Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf B 5.36 P % P $305 $31,541 $1, $1, $7, $9,943 $58.27 $21, % $21,539 $0 $23,178 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 Net Mobility October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

41 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RETAIL: Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Table 4-4 (continued) Urban Mobility Schedule ( District A) TOD Rates Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Notes: 1) This value is the total value of transportation system consumed, less credits for revenues committed to transportation system expansion that are generated by the use itself. This value includes Interstate costs and "carrying costs", but not toll road costs. It does consider the proportion of trip length, varying system costs, and transportation system performance goals that vary by fee district. 2) Specific calculations for the "low income" category can be seen in Appendix B of the 2014 Mobility Update Study. 3) The statistical relationship between the trip generation rate for the age restricted single family, age restricted multi-family, and congregate care facility was used to interpolate the trip length. 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the office and retail size categories used the end-point of the range due to the nature of the ITE equation to be conservative for smaller developments. 5) The trip generation rate used for the office and retail open-ended size categories used the size 200,000 s.f. larger than the beginning of the size range, as the size ranges increase in 200,000 s.f. increments. 6) s of trip rate, percent new trips, and trip length are as follows: (A) FL Studies (NHTS, AHS, Census) (I) Independent Study (Collier County) (Q) Same as LUC 770 (Business Park) (B) ITE 9 th Edition (J) Same as LUC 220 (R) Same as LUC 820 (<50k) (C) Florida Studies Database (K) Florida Schedules (S) Florida Curve (D) Blend of TIE 9 th & FL Studies (L) Same as LUC 240 (T) Same as LUC 942 (Auto Care Center) (E) Blend of ITE 6 th & FL Studies (M) Same as LUC 210 (U) Same as LUC 820 (50k-200k) (F) ITE Regression Analysis (N) Same as LUC 710 (V) n/a (G) ITE 9 th Equation (O) Model-Based Trip Length (W) Same as LUC 492 (Health Club) (H) Previous Pasco Mobility Study (P) Same as LUC 630 (Clinic) Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf B 1.96 R % R $294 $7,929 $ $ $2, $3,039 $ $4,781 81% $3,868 $912 $5,193 $869 $829 $40 $3 $40 $0 100% Retail 50,000 sfgla or less (4) 1,000 sfgla G 1.96 S % S $294 $13,381 $ $ $3, $5,129 $ $8,143 81% $6,581 $1,562 $8,838 $1,490 $1,421 $69 $4 $68 $0 100% 820.1P Retail 50, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.52 S % S $297 $12,788 $ $ $3, $4,617 $ $8,061 83% $6,652 $1,410 $8,726 $1,345 $1,280 $65 $4 $61 $0 100% 820.2P Retail 200, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.77 S % S $297 $12,015 $ $ $3, $4,267 $ $7,584 82% $6,234 $1,350 $8,209 $1,287 $1,223 $64 $4 $59 $0 100% 820.3P Retail 400, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.01 S % S $299 $11,877 $ $ $2, $4,132 $ $7,580 83% $6,308 $1,272 $8,197 $1,214 $1,154 $60 $3 $55 $0 100% 820.4P Retail 600, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.26 S % S $299 $12,092 $ $ $3, $4,157 $ $7,771 83% $6,448 $1,323 $8,399 $1,262 $1,198 $64 $4 $57 $0 100% 820.5P Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla (5) 1,000 sfgla G 3.51 S % S $301 $12,412 $ $ $3, $4,199 $ $8,049 83% $6,653 $1,396 $8,694 $1,331 $1,263 $68 $4 $61 $0 100% Specialty Retail 1,000 sf D 3.54 C % C $301 $21,651 $1, $ $5, $7,316 $ $14,226 82% $11,617 $2,609 $15,351 $2,489 $2,364 $125 $7 $113 $0 100% New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf D 4.83 C % C $303 $15,648 $ $ $3, $5,052 $51.67 $10,545 81% $8,524 $2,021 $11,358 $1,928 $1,829 $99 $5 $88 $0 100% Tire Store 1,000 sf B 3.80 T % T $301 $9,794 $ $ $2, $3,279 $ $6,406 82% $5,224 $1,182 $6,915 $1,128 $1,070 $58 $3 $51 $0 100% Supermarket 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $294 $17,776 $ $ $4, $6,661 $50.07 $11,065 81% $8,973 $2,092 $11,988 $1,996 $1,903 $93 $5 $91 $0 100% Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf D 1.59 C % C $290 $47,952 $2, $2, $14, $19,593 $22.25 $28,337 82% $23,253 $5,084 $30,829 $4,851 $4,644 $207 $12 $221 $0 100% Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf B 2.52 U % U $297 $7,378 $ $ $1, $2,664 $ $4,605 83% $3,822 $783 $4,988 $747 $711 $36 $2 $34 $0 100% Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $294 $9,428 $ $ $2, $3,533 $ $5,786 81% $4,689 $1,097 $6,276 $1,046 $996 $50 $3 $48 $0 100% Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 B 6.39 C % C $306 $2,558 $ $ $ $798 $ $1,651 82% $1,350 $301 $1,784 $287 $271 $16 $1 $13 $0 100% Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf D 2.58 C % C $297 $26,881 $1, $1, $6, $9,664 $ $17,007 81% $13,824 $3,183 $18,404 $3,037 $2,890 $147 $8 $138 $0 100% Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.30 C % C $299 $33,135 $1, $1, $8, $11,370 $ $21,630 81% $17,627 $4,003 $23,351 $3,819 $3,629 $190 $10 $174 $0 100% High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.33 C % C $299 $39,461 $1, $1, $9, $13,523 $ $25,802 81% $20,887 $4,915 $27,853 $4,690 $4,457 $233 $12 $213 $0 100% Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf D 2.15 C % C $294 $89,749 $4, $4, $24, $33,726 $ $55,791 82% $45,553 $10,238 $60,455 $9,768 $9,314 $454 $25 $445 $0 100% Quick Lube bays B 3.80 T % T $301 $15,753 $ $ $3, $5,273 $35.51 $10,444 82% $8,525 $1,919 $11,262 $1,831 $1,739 $92 $5 $83 $0 100% Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf D 3.80 T % T $301 $12,378 $ $ $2, $4,143 $67.10 $8,167 80% $6,534 $1,633 $8,810 $1,558 $1,479 $79 $4 $71 $0 100% Gasoline Station fuel pos B 2.00 C % C $294 $10,921 $ $ $3, $4,167 $1.85 $6,752 81% $5,474 $1,278 $7,319 $1,218 $1,162 $56 $4 $56 $0 100% Self-Service Car Wash bays D 2.29 C % C $297 $9,726 $ $ $2, $3,576 $35.51 $6,115 69% $4,191 $1,924 $6,621 $1,835 $1,748 $87 $5 $84 $0 100% 913.P 913 Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf C 2.78 C % C $297 $124,508 $6, $6, $31, $44,190 $22.25 $80,296 82% $66,099 $14,198 $86,766 $13,547 $12,892 $655 $34 $617 $0 100% Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 2.15 B 3.26 K % N $299 $923 $44.80 $43.10 $ $317 $53.23 $552 81% $450 $103 $600 $98 $92 $6 $1 $4 $0 100% INDUSTRIAL: General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 B 5.41 N % N $305 $5,426 $ $ $1, $1,710 $38.42 $3, % $3,677 $0 $3,959 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf 1.50 B 5.41 N % N $305 $1,168 $51.97 $50.00 $ $368 $38.42 $ % $761 $0 $822 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Industrial Park 1,000 sf 6.83 B 5.41 N % N $305 $5,317 $ $ $1, $1,676 $38.42 $3, % $3,602 $0 $3,879 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 B 5.41 N % N $305 $2,974 $ $ $ $937 $38.42 $1, % $1,998 $0 $2,152 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a Warehouse 1,000 sf 3.56 B 5.41 N % N $305 $2,771 $ $ $ $874 $53.23 $1, % $1,844 $0 $1,988 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 B 6.95 M % N $307 $1,692 $73.32 $70.54 $ $519 $53.23 $1, % $1,120 $0 $1,208 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 160.P 153 Airport Hangar 1,000 sf 3.56 H 5.41 N % N $305 $2,771 $ $ $ $874 $38.42 $1, % $1,859 $0 $2,003 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 n/a 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 Net Mobility October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

42 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RESIDENTIAL: Table 4-5 Urban Mobility Schedule ( District A) West Market Redevelopment Rates Revenue period: 25 P4P Equivalent Pennies: 4.8 Include carrying cost?: No TOD Deduction: 0.00% Discount Rate: 3.30% 2nd LOFT County pennies to capacity: 5 Include Interstates?: Yes TND Deduction: 0.00% Fuel efficiency: Existing State pennies to capacity: 25.6 MUTRM Deduction: 0.00% Days/yr: 365 Tax Inc Fin Millage Rate to capacity: % Factor to convert VMT to PMT: 1.37 Existing County pennies to capital: 0 Toll.fwy discount: 1.7% Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than 80% SHIP 210.1P Definition (2) du 4.10 A 7.61 C % V $307 $5,541 $ $ $1, $1,702 $ $3, % $3,737 $0 $4,025 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P to 1,500 s.f. du 6.25 A 7.61 C % V $307 $8,447 $ $ $1, $2,595 $ $5, % $5,750 $0 $6,189 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du 7.81 A 7.61 C % V $307 $10,555 $ $ $2, $3,243 $ $7, % $7,173 $0 $7,722 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P ,500 s.f. and greater du 9.20 A 7.61 C % V $307 $12,434 $ $ $2, $3,820 $ $8, % $8,253 $0 $8,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family (2) du 3.46 A 5.87 C % V $305 $3,581 $ $ $ $1,131 $76.49 $2, % $2,373 $0 $2,559 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Multi-Family Apartments du 6.60 B 5.87 C % V $305 $6,830 $ $ $1, $2,158 $76.49 $4, % $4,595 $0 $4,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du 6.40 B 5.87 J % V $305 $6,623 $ $ $1, $2,093 $76.49 $4, % $4,454 $0 $4,798 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du 4.18 B 5.87 J % V $305 $4,326 $ $ $ $1,367 $76.49 $2, % $2,882 $0 $3,107 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Mobile Home Park du 4.17 C 5.29 C % V $304 $3,877 $ $ $ $1,241 $44.80 $2, % $2,591 $0 $2,793 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Age Restricted Single Family (3) du 3.12 D 6.23 C % V $305 $3,427 $ $ $ $1,077 $ $2, % $2,248 $0 $2,426 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Age Restricted Multi-Family (3) du 2.97 D 3.77 C % V $301 $1,945 $92.51 $88.99 $ $655 $55.73 $1, % $1,234 $0 $1,335 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Congregate Care Facility (Attached) (3) du 2.25 D 3.54 C % C $301 $996 $47.79 $45.98 $ $338 $36.06 $ % $621 $0 $673 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - LODGING: Hotel room 6.36 D 7.20 C % C $306 $5,056 $ $ $1, $1,573 $60.10 $3, % $3,422 $0 $3,685 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Motel room 5.63 B 4.99 C % C $303 $3,586 $ $ $ $1,166 $30.05 $2, % $2,390 $0 $2,577 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Resort Hotel room 5.83 D 7.02 C % C $306 $5,683 $ $ $1, $1,772 $60.10 $3, % $3,851 $0 $4,146 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - RECREATION: General Recreation acre 2.28 B 5.37 K % K $303 $1,827 $83.18 $80.02 $ $589 $ $1, % $1,130 $0 $1,225 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ RV Park RV space 1.62 B 4.83 L % L $302 $1,292 $59.75 $57.48 $ $423 $10.71 $ % $858 $0 $925 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Marina berth 2.96 B 6.95 M % K $306 $3,097 $ $ $ $967 $81.95 $2, % $2,049 $0 $2,210 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Golf Course hole B 6.95 M % K $306 $37,399 $1, $1, $8, $11,672 $ $25, % $25,590 $0 $27,534 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Miniature Golf Course hole 3.30 B 6.95 M % K $306 $3,453 $ $ $ $1,078 $48.08 $2, % $2,327 $0 $2,507 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Bowling Alley 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % K $303 $26,902 $1, $1, $6, $8,669 $34.97 $18, % $18,198 $0 $19,596 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Movie Theater screen E 2.33 C % C $294 $35,164 $1, $1, $9, $13,257 $ $21, % $21,742 $0 $23,570 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % W $303 $11,828 $ $ $2, $3,811 $ $7, % $7,907 $0 $8,521 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf B 7.06 K % K $306 $35,950 $1, $1, $8, $11,205 $ $24, % $24,635 $0 $26,503 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - INSTITUTIONS: Elementary School student 1.29 B 4.52 O % K $303 $919 $41.85 $40.26 $ $296 $22.13 $ % $600 $0 $648 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Middle School student 1.62 B 4.52 O % K $303 $1,298 $59.12 $56.87 $ $419 $22.13 $ % $857 $0 $925 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ High School student 1.71 B 4.52 O % K $303 $1,370 $62.40 $60.03 $ $442 $22.13 $ % $906 $0 $978 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ University/Jr College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 F 6.95 M % K $307 $2,499 $ $ $ $766 $22.13 $1, % $1,710 $0 $1,840 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ University/Jr College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student 1.50 F 6.95 M % K $307 $1,874 $81.14 $78.06 $ $575 $22.13 $1, % $1,277 $0 $1,375 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Church 1,000 sf 9.11 B 4.10 K % K $302 $6,597 $ $ $1, $2,158 $ $4, % $4,305 $0 $4,648 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Day Care student 3.03 H 2.13 C % C $297 $909 $47.14 $45.35 $ $334 $ $ % $346 $0 $393 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Cemetery acre 4.73 B 6.95 M % H $307 $6,238 $ $ $1, $1,913 $13.77 $4, % $4,311 $0 $4,636 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Hospital 1,000 sf B 6.95 M % K $307 $14,131 $ $ $3, $4,333 $ $9, % $9,596 $0 $10,330 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Nursing Home bed 2.76 D 2.72 C % C $299 $1,298 $64.02 $61.59 $ $453 $5.83 $ % $839 $0 $906 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - OFFICE: General Office 50,000 sf or less (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $15,297 $ $ $3, $4,818 $ $10, % $10,357 $0 $11,151 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 50, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $12,958 $ $ $2, $4,082 $58.27 $8, % $8,818 $0 $9,491 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 100, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $305 $10,974 $ $ $2, $3,457 $58.27 $7, % $7,459 $0 $8,029 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 200, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf 9.41 G 5.41 C % C $305 $9,286 $ $ $2, $2,925 $58.27 $6, % $6,303 $0 $6,786 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office greater than 400,000 sf (5) 1,000 sf 8.54 G 5.41 C % C $305 $8,428 $ $ $1, $2,655 $58.27 $5, % $5,715 $0 $6,153 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf 7.98 B 5.41 N % N $305 $7,875 $ $ $1, $2,481 $58.27 $5, % $5,336 $0 $5,745 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Medical Office 1,000 sf D 5.83 C % C $306 $35,817 $1, $1, $8, $11,181 $58.27 $24, % $24,577 $0 $26,439 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Office Park 1,000 sf D 7.47 C % Q $308 $15,569 $ $ $3, $4,741 $58.27 $10, % $10,769 $0 $11,578 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Research and Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 B 5.65 Q % Q $305 $8,086 $ $ $1, $2,538 $58.27 $5, % $5,490 $0 $5,910 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P 640 Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf B 5.36 P % P $305 $39,654 $1, $1, $9, $12,501 $58.27 $27, % $27,094 $0 $29,155 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 Net Mobility October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

43 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RETAIL: Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Table 4-5 (continued) Urban Mobility Schedule ( District A) West Market Redevelopment Rates Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Notes: 1) This value is the total value of transportation system consumed, less credits for revenues committed to transportation system expansion that are generated by the use itself. This value includes Interstate costs and "carrying costs", but not toll road costs. It does consider the proportion of trip length, varying system costs, and transportation system performance goals that vary by fee district. 2) Specific calculations for the "low income" category can be seen in Appendix B of the 2014 Mobility Update Study. 3) The statistical relationship between the trip generation rate for the age restricted single family, age restricted multi-family, and congregate care facility was used to interpolate the trip length. 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the office and retail size categories used the end-point of the range due to the nature of the ITE equation to be conservative for smaller developments. 5) The trip generation rate used for the office and retail open-ended size categories used the size 200,000 s.f. larger than the beginning of the size range, as the size ranges increase in 200,000 s.f. increments. 6) s of trip rate, percent new trips, and trip length are as follows: (A) FL Studies (NHTS, AHS, Census) (I) Independent Study (Collier County) (Q) Same as LUC 770 (Business Park) (B) ITE 9 th Edition (J) Same as LUC 220 (R) Same as LUC 820 (<50k) (C) Florida Studies Database (K) Florida Schedules (S) Florida Curve (D) Blend of TIE 9 th & FL Studies (L) Same as LUC 240 (T) Same as LUC 942 (Auto Care Center) (E) Blend of ITE 6 th & FL Studies (M) Same as LUC 210 (U) Same as LUC 820 (50k-200k) (F) ITE Regression Analysis (N) Same as LUC 710 (V) n/a (G) ITE 9 th Equation (O) Model-Based Trip Length (W) Same as LUC 492 (Health Club) (H) Previous Pasco Mobility Study (P) Same as LUC 630 (Clinic) Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf B 1.96 R % R $294 $9,969 $ $ $2, $3,821 $ $6, % $6,038 $0 $6,556 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Retail 50,000 sfgla or less (4) 1,000 sfgla G 1.96 S % S $294 $16,824 $ $ $4, $6,448 $ $10, % $10,266 $0 $11,140 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P Retail 50, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.52 S % S $297 $16,077 $ $ $4, $5,804 $ $10, % $10,163 $0 $10,999 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P Retail 200, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.77 S % S $297 $15,106 $ $ $3, $5,364 $ $9, % $9,577 $0 $10,362 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P Retail 400, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.01 S % S $299 $14,932 $ $ $3, $5,195 $ $9, % $9,572 $0 $10,348 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P Retail 600, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.26 S % S $299 $15,202 $ $ $3, $5,226 $ $9, % $9,812 $0 $10,602 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla (5) 1,000 sfgla G 3.51 S % S $301 $15,605 $ $ $3, $5,279 $ $10, % $10,162 $0 $10,973 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Specialty Retail 1,000 sf D 3.54 C % C $301 $27,220 $1, $1, $6, $9,198 $ $17, % $17,913 $0 $19,328 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf D 4.83 C % C $303 $19,674 $ $ $4, $6,351 $51.67 $13, % $13,271 $0 $14,293 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Tire Store 1,000 sf B 3.80 T % T $301 $12,313 $ $ $2, $4,122 $ $8, % $8,082 $0 $8,722 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Supermarket 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $294 $22,348 $1, $1, $6, $8,374 $50.07 $13, % $13,924 $0 $15,085 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf D 1.59 C % C $290 $60,286 $3, $3, $17, $24,632 $22.25 $35, % $35,632 $0 $38,764 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf B 2.52 U % U $297 $9,276 $ $ $2, $3,349 $ $5, % $5,817 $0 $6,299 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $294 $11,854 $ $ $3, $4,442 $ $7, % $7,303 $0 $7,919 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 B 6.39 C % C $306 $3,216 $ $ $ $1,003 $ $2, % $2,104 $0 $2,271 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf D 2.58 C % C $297 $33,796 $1, $1, $8, $12,150 $ $21, % $21,436 $0 $23,192 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.30 C % C $299 $41,658 $2, $1, $10, $14,295 $ $27, % $27,228 $0 $29,393 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.33 C % C $299 $49,611 $2, $2, $12, $17,002 $ $32, % $32,474 $0 $35,052 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf D 2.15 C % C $294 $112,835 $5, $5, $30, $42,401 $ $70, % $70,202 $0 $76,065 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Quick Lube bays B 3.80 T % T $301 $19,805 $ $ $4, $6,630 $35.51 $13, % $13,140 $0 $14,169 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf D 3.80 T % T $301 $15,561 $ $ $3, $5,209 $67.10 $10, % $10,285 $0 $11,094 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Gasoline Station fuel pos B 2.00 C % C $294 $13,730 $ $ $3, $5,239 $1.85 $8, % $8,489 $0 $9,202 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Self-Service Car Wash bays D 2.29 C % C $297 $12,228 $ $ $3, $4,496 $35.51 $7, % $7,697 $0 $8,333 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P 913 Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf C 2.78 C % C $297 $156,535 $7, $7, $40, $55,556 $22.25 $100, % $100,957 $0 $109,091 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 2.15 B 3.26 K % N $299 $1,160 $56.33 $54.19 $ $399 $53.23 $ % $708 $0 $769 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - INDUSTRIAL: General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 B 5.41 N % N $305 $6,821 $ $ $1, $2,150 $38.42 $4, % $4,633 $0 $4,987 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf 1.50 B 5.41 N % N $305 $1,468 $65.34 $62.86 $ $463 $38.42 $ % $967 $0 $1,043 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Industrial Park 1,000 sf 6.83 B 5.41 N % N $305 $6,684 $ $ $1, $2,107 $38.42 $4, % $4,539 $0 $4,886 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 B 5.41 N % N $305 $3,739 $ $ $ $1,179 $38.42 $2, % $2,522 $0 $2,716 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Warehouse 1,000 sf 3.56 B 5.41 N % N $305 $3,484 $ $ $ $1,098 $53.23 $2, % $2,333 $0 $2,514 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 B 6.95 M % N $307 $2,128 $92.18 $88.68 $ $653 $53.23 $1, % $1,422 $0 $1,532 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P 153 Airport Hangar 1,000 sf 3.56 H 5.41 N % N $305 $3,484 $ $ $ $1,098 $38.42 $2, % $2,347 $0 $2,528 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 Net Mobility October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

44 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RESIDENTIAL: Table 4-6 Suburban Mobility Schedule ( District B) Standard Rates Revenue period: 25 P4P Equivalent Pennies: 4.8 Include carrying cost?: No TOD Deduction: 0.00% Discount Rate: 3.30% 2nd LOFT County pennies to capacity: 5 Include Interstates?: Yes TND Deduction: 0.00% Fuel efficiency: Existing State pennies to capacity: 25.6 MUTRM Deduction: 0.00% Days/yr: 365 Tax Inc Fin Millage Rate to capacity: % Factor to convert VMT to PMT: 1.37 Existing County pennies to capital: 0 Toll.fwy discount: 1.0% Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than 80% SHIP 210.1P Definition (2) du 4.10 A 7.61 C % V $356 $7,030 $ $ $1, $1,842 $86.32 $5,102 4% $218 $4,884 $5,467 $4,660 $4,341 $319 $12 $212 $4,884 0% 210.2P to 1,500 s.f. du 6.25 A 7.61 C % V $356 $10,717 $ $ $2, $2,808 $86.32 $7,822 21% $1,682 $6,141 $8,379 $5,859 $5,460 $399 $15 $267 $6,141 0% 210.3P ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du 7.81 A 7.61 C % V $356 $13,392 $ $ $2, $3,509 $ $9,743 12% $1,173 $8,570 $10,439 $8,177 $7,619 $558 $21 $372 $8,570 0% 210.4P ,500 s.f. and greater du 9.20 A 7.61 C % V $356 $15,775 $ $ $2, $4,134 $ $11,259 17% $1,947 $9,312 $12,078 $8,886 $8,268 $618 $22 $404 $9,312 0% 210.5P "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family (2) du 3.46 A 5.87 C % V $358 $4,602 $ $ $ $1,223 $71.03 $3,308 4% $148 $3,160 $3,547 $3,015 $2,808 $207 $8 $137 $3,160 0% Multi-Family Apartments du 6.60 B 5.87 C % V $358 $8,777 $ $ $1, $2,332 $71.03 $6,374 8% $529 $5,845 $6,830 $5,577 $5,199 $378 $14 $254 $5,845 0% Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du 6.40 B 5.87 J % V $358 $8,512 $ $ $1, $2,262 $71.03 $6,179 5% $289 $5,890 $6,621 $5,620 $5,239 $381 $14 $256 $5,890 0% High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du 4.18 B 5.87 J % V $358 $5,559 $ $ $1, $1,477 $71.03 $4,011 0% $0 $4,011 $4,300 $3,827 $3,566 $261 $10 $174 $4,724-15% Mobile Home Park du 4.17 C 5.29 C % V $358 $5,006 $ $ $ $1,340 $40.43 $3,626 10% $369 $3,257 $3,886 $3,108 $2,898 $210 $8 $141 $3,257 0% Age Restricted Single Family (3) du 3.12 D 6.23 C % V $357 $4,397 $ $ $ $1,164 $86.32 $3,146 9% $295 $2,851 $3,375 $2,720 $2,533 $187 $7 $124 $2,851 0% Age Restricted Multi-Family (3) du 2.97 D 3.77 C % V $360 $2,552 $99.61 $95.82 $ $705 $43.71 $1,802 18% $330 $1,472 $1,935 $1,404 $1,309 $95 $4 $64 $1,472 0% Congregate Care Facility (Attached) (3) du 2.25 D 3.54 C % C $361 $1,310 $51.43 $49.47 $ $364 $28.41 $917 10% $96 $821 $986 $783 $730 $53 $2 $36 $821 0% LODGING: Hotel room 6.36 D 7.20 C % C $356 $7,255 $ $ $1, $1,900 $49.17 $5, % $5,305 $0 $5,682 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Motel room 5.63 B 4.99 C % C $358 $5,230 $ $ $1, $1,399 $24.59 $3, % $3,806 $0 $4,078 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Resort Hotel room 5.83 D 7.02 C % C $356 $8,164 $ $ $1, $2,139 $49.17 $5, % $5,975 $0 $6,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % RECREATION: General Recreation acre 2.28 B 5.37 K % K $358 $2,660 $ $96.20 $ $708 $38.55 $1,913 54% $1,025 $888 $2,051 $846 $788 $58 $3 $39 $888 0% RV Park RV space 1.62 B 4.83 L % L $358 $1,892 $71.69 $68.96 $ $508 $3.86 $1,380 30% $420 $960 $1,479 $915 $853 $62 $3 $42 $960 0% Marina berth 2.96 B 6.95 M % K $356 $4,450 $ $ $ $1,167 $81.95 $3,201 49% $1,560 $1,641 $3,432 $1,566 $1,458 $108 $4 $71 $1,641 0% Golf Course hole B 6.95 M % K $356 $53,727 $1, $1, $10, $14,088 $ $39,502 49% $19,346 $20,155 $42,293 $19,232 $17,935 $1,297 $48 $875 $20,155 0% Miniature Golf Course hole 3.30 B 6.95 M % K $356 $4,961 $ $ $ $1,301 $36.06 $3,624 59% $2,149 $1,475 $3,882 $1,407 $1,311 $96 $4 $64 $1,475 0% Bowling Alley 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % K $358 $39,169 $1, $1, $7, $10,423 $30.98 $28,714 54% $15,425 $13,289 $30,750 $12,680 $11,830 $850 $32 $577 $13,289 0% Movie Theater screen E 2.33 C % C $363 $53,556 $2, $2, $11, $15,620 $ $37,812 54% $20,549 $17,263 $40,595 $16,472 $15,390 $1,082 $41 $750 $17,263 0% Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % W $358 $17,221 $ $ $3, $4,583 $81.95 $12,556 54% $6,740 $5,816 $13,451 $5,549 $5,175 $374 $14 $253 $5,816 0% Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf B 7.06 K % K $356 $51,583 $1, $1, $9, $13,528 $81.95 $37,972 69% $26,019 $11,953 $40,653 $11,405 $10,637 $768 $29 $519 $11,953 0% INSTITUTIONS: Elementary School student 1.29 B 4.52 O % K $359 $1,046 $40.13 $38.61 $ $284 $22.13 $740 0% $0 $740 $794 $706 $657 $49 $2 $32 $741 0% Middle School student 1.62 B 4.52 O % K $359 $1,478 $56.70 $54.55 $ $402 $22.13 $1,054 0% $0 $1,054 $1,131 $1,005 $937 $68 $3 $46 $1,054 0% High School student 1.71 B 4.52 O % K $359 $1,560 $59.85 $57.58 $ $424 $22.13 $1,114 0% $1 $1,113 $1,195 $1,062 $990 $72 $3 $48 $1,113 0% University/Jr College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 F 6.95 M % K $356 $2,787 $ $99.66 $ $734 $22.13 $2,031 0% $0 $2,031 $2,176 $1,938 $1,806 $132 $5 $88 $2,132-5% University/Jr College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student 1.50 F 6.95 M % K $356 $2,090 $77.70 $74.75 $ $550 $22.13 $1,518 0% $0 $1,518 $1,626 $1,448 $1,349 $99 $4 $66 $1,595-5% Church 1,000 sf 9.11 B 4.10 K % K $360 $7,554 $ $ $1, $2,071 $54.76 $5,428 5% $276 $5,152 $5,821 $4,915 $4,584 $331 $13 $224 $5,152 0% Day Care student 3.03 H 2.13 C % C $365 $1,073 $45.41 $43.69 $ $322 $ $522 0% $0 $522 $578 $497 $451 $46 $2 $23 $533-2% Cemetery acre 4.73 B 6.95 M % H $356 $6,956 $ $ $1, $1,832 $10.93 $5,114 0% $0 $5,114 $5,475 $4,879 $4,550 $329 $13 $222 $5,356-5% Hospital 1,000 sf B 6.95 M % K $356 $15,759 $ $ $2, $4,149 $ $11,407 0% $0 $11,407 $12,226 $10,885 $10,141 $744 $27 $495 $15,015-24% Nursing Home bed 2.76 D 2.72 C % C $362 $1,510 $61.57 $59.23 $ $436 $7.27 $1,066 15% $160 $906 $1,145 $864 $807 $57 $3 $39 $906 0% OFFICE: General Office 50,000 sf or less (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $358 $17,265 $ $ $3, $4,618 $72.66 $12, % $12,574 $0 $13,471 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % 710.1P General Office 50, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $358 $14,625 $ $ $2, $3,912 $72.66 $10, % $10,640 $0 $11,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % 710.2P General Office 100, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $358 $12,386 $ $ $2, $3,313 $72.66 $9, % $9,000 $0 $9,644 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 710.3P General Office 200, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf 9.41 G 5.41 C % C $358 $10,481 $ $ $2, $2,804 $72.66 $7, % $7,605 $0 $8,150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 710.4P General Office greater than 400,000 sf (5) 1,000 sf 8.54 G 5.41 C % C $358 $9,512 $ $ $1, $2,544 $72.66 $6, % $6,895 $0 $7,390 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf 7.98 B 5.41 N % N $358 $8,889 $ $ $1, $2,377 $72.66 $6, % $6,438 $0 $6,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Medical Office 1,000 sf D 5.83 C % C $358 $40,248 $1, $1, $7, $10,713 $72.66 $29, % $29,462 $0 $31,553 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2, % Office Park 1,000 sf D 7.47 C % Q $356 $17,304 $ $ $3, $4,539 $72.66 $12, % $12,692 $0 $13,591 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Research and Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 B 5.65 Q % Q $358 $9,111 $ $ $1, $2,432 $72.66 $6, % $6,607 $0 $7,080 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 770.P 640 Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf B 5.36 P % P $358 $44,756 $1, $1, $8, $11,981 $72.66 $32, % $32,702 $0 $35,028 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

45 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RETAIL: Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Table 4-6 (continued) Suburban Mobility Schedule ( District B) Standard Rates Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Notes: 1) This value is the total value of transportation system consumed, less credits for revenues committed to transportation system expansion that are generated by the use itself. This value includes Interstate costs and "carrying costs", but not toll road costs. It does consider the proportion of trip length, varying system costs, and transportation system performance goals that vary by fee district. 2) Specific calculations for the "low income" category can be seen in Appendix B of the 2014 Mobility Update Study. 3) The statistical relationship between the trip generation rate for the age restricted single family, age restricted multi-family, and congregate care facility was used to interpolate the trip length. 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the office and retail size categories used the end-point of the range due to the nature of the ITE equation to be conservative for smaller developments. 5) The trip generation rate used for the office and retail open-ended size categories used the size 200,000 s.f. larger than the beginning of the size range, as the size ranges increase in 200,000 s.f. increments. 6) s of trip rate, percent new trips, and trip length are as follows: (A) FL Studies (NHTS, AHS, Census) (I) Independent Study (Collier County) (Q) Same as LUC 770 (Business Park) (B) ITE 9 th Edition (J) Same as LUC 220 (R) Same as LUC 820 (<50k) (C) Florida Studies Database (K) Florida Schedules (S) Florida Curve (D) Blend of TIE 9 th & FL Studies (L) Same as LUC 240 (T) Same as LUC 942 (Auto Care Center) (E) Blend of ITE 6 th & FL Studies (M) Same as LUC 210 (U) Same as LUC 820 (50k-200k) (F) ITE Regression Analysis (N) Same as LUC 710 (V) n/a (G) ITE 9 th Equation (O) Model-Based Trip Length (W) Same as LUC 492 (Health Club) (H) Previous Pasco Mobility Study (P) Same as LUC 630 (Clinic) Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf B 1.96 R % R $365 $12,447 $ $ $2, $3,821 $81.95 $8,544 46% $3,943 $4,602 $9,191 $4,391 $4,105 $286 $11 $200 $4,602 0% Retail 50,000 sfgla or less (4) 1,000 sfgla G 1.96 S % S $365 $21,007 $ $ $4, $6,448 $81.95 $14,476 46% $6,655 $7,822 $15,568 $7,463 $6,979 $484 $19 $340 $7,822 0% 820.1P Retail 50, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.52 S % S $363 $19,799 $ $ $4, $5,804 $81.95 $13,913 49% $6,862 $7,051 $14,941 $6,728 $6,286 $442 $17 $306 $7,051 0% 820.2P Retail 200, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.77 S % S $363 $18,603 $ $ $3, $5,364 $ $13,116 49% $6,422 $6,694 $14,082 $6,387 $5,963 $424 $16 $291 $6,694 0% 820.3P Retail 400, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.01 S % S $362 $18,196 $ $ $3, $5,195 $ $12,878 51% $6,559 $6,319 $13,823 $6,030 $5,629 $401 $15 $274 $6,319 0% 820.4P Retail 600, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.26 S % S $362 $18,525 $ $ $3, $5,226 $ $13,177 50% $6,623 $6,554 $14,139 $6,253 $5,836 $417 $16 $285 $6,554 0% 820.5P Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla (5) 1,000 sfgla G 3.51 S % S $361 $18,855 $ $ $3, $5,279 $ $13,454 49% $6,593 $6,860 $14,433 $6,545 $6,108 $437 $17 $298 $6,860 0% Specialty Retail 1,000 sf D 3.54 C % C $361 $32,891 $1, $1, $6, $9,198 $81.95 $23,611 46% $10,871 $12,740 $25,320 $12,157 $11,350 $807 $30 $553 $12,740 0% New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf D 4.83 C % C $359 $23,461 $ $ $4, $6,351 $34.44 $17,075 43% $7,321 $9,754 $18,294 $9,307 $8,685 $622 $23 $424 $9,754 0% Tire Store 1,000 sf B 3.80 T % T $361 $14,879 $ $ $2, $4,122 $81.95 $10,675 46% $4,914 $5,760 $11,448 $5,496 $5,129 $367 $14 $250 $5,760 0% Supermarket 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $365 $27,905 $1, $1, $6, $8,374 $55.69 $19,475 46% $9,036 $10,439 $20,925 $9,961 $9,312 $649 $25 $453 $10,439 0% Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf D 1.59 C % C $367 $76,796 $3, $3, $17, $24,632 $23.73 $52,140 54% $28,115 $24,024 $56,130 $22,924 $21,466 $1,458 $57 $1,043 $24,024 0% Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf B 2.52 U % U $363 $11,423 $ $ $2, $3,349 $81.95 $7,992 51% $4,063 $3,929 $8,586 $3,748 $3,500 $248 $10 $171 $3,929 0% Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $365 $14,801 $ $ $3, $4,442 $81.95 $10,278 46% $4,772 $5,506 $11,047 $5,254 $4,910 $344 $13 $239 $5,506 0% Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 B 6.39 C % C $357 $3,781 $ $ $ $1,003 $81.95 $2,696 45% $1,221 $1,475 $2,892 $1,407 $1,309 $98 $4 $64 $1,475 0% Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf D 2.58 C % C $363 $41,620 $1, $1, $8, $12,150 $ $29,277 51% $14,893 $14,384 $31,440 $13,725 $12,821 $904 $34 $625 $14,384 0% Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.30 C % C $362 $50,766 $2, $1, $10, $14,295 $44.94 $36,426 46% $16,840 $19,586 $39,063 $18,688 $17,452 $1,236 $47 $851 $19,586 0% High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.33 C % C $362 $60,457 $2, $2, $12, $17,002 $44.94 $43,410 45% $19,356 $24,054 $46,552 $22,952 $21,433 $1,519 $57 $1,045 $24,054 0% Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf D 2.15 C % C $365 $140,893 $5, $5, $30, $42,401 $ $98,273 52% $51,560 $46,712 $105,594 $44,573 $41,675 $2,898 $110 $2,029 $46,712 0% Quick Lube bays B 3.80 T % T $361 $23,930 $ $ $4, $6,630 $26.63 $17,274 46% $7,968 $9,306 $18,518 $8,880 $8,290 $590 $22 $404 $9,306 0% Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf D 3.80 T % T $361 $18,803 $ $ $3, $5,209 $33.23 $13,561 41% $5,627 $7,934 $14,538 $7,570 $7,066 $504 $19 $345 $7,934 0% Gasoline Station fuel pos B 2.00 C % C $365 $17,144 $ $ $3, $5,239 $1.97 $11,903 51% $6,075 $5,828 $12,794 $5,561 $5,202 $359 $14 $253 $5,828 0% Self-Service Car Wash bays D 2.29 C % C $363 $15,059 $ $ $3, $4,496 $26.63 $10,537 0% $0 $10,537 $11,320 $10,054 $9,399 $655 $25 $458 $14,244-26% 913.P 913 Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf C 2.78 C % C $363 $192,776 $7, $7, $40, $55,556 $23.73 $137,196 53% $73,267 $63,929 $147,213 $61,002 $56,995 $4,007 $151 $2,776 $63,929 0% Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 2.15 B 3.26 K % N $362 $1,414 $56.33 $54.19 $ $399 $27.98 $987 46% $454 $533 $1,061 $508 $474 $34 $2 $23 $ % INDUSTRIAL: General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 B 5.41 N % N $358 $7,851 $ $ $1, $2,101 $33.41 $5, % $5,717 $0 $6,125 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf 1.50 B 5.41 N % N $358 $1,690 $63.85 $61.42 $ $452 $33.41 $1, % $1,204 $0 $1,292 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Industrial Park 1,000 sf 6.83 B 5.41 N % N $358 $7,694 $ $ $1, $2,059 $33.41 $5, % $5,601 $0 $6,001 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 B 5.41 N % N $358 $4,303 $ $ $ $1,152 $33.41 $3, % $3,118 $0 $3,342 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Warehouse 1,000 sf 3.56 B 5.41 N % N $358 $4,010 $ $ $ $1,073 $27.98 $2, % $2,909 $0 $3,117 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 B 6.95 M % N $356 $2,424 $90.03 $86.61 $ $638 $27.98 $1, % $1,758 $0 $1,884 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 160.P 153 Airport Hangar 1,000 sf 3.56 H 5.41 N % N $358 $4,010 $ $ $ $1,073 $33.41 $2, % $2,904 $0 $3,112 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % OTHER: n/a n/a Mining 1,000 cy 0.01 I I % I $354 $64 $0.14 $1.17 $14.73 $16 $0.48 $47 0% $0 $47 $51 $44 $42 $2 $1 $2 n/a n/a 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

46 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RESIDENTIAL: Table 4-7 Suburban Mobility Schedule ( District B) MUTRM Rates Revenue period: 25 P4P Equivalent Pennies: 4.8 Include carrying cost?: No TOD Deduction: 0.00% Discount Rate: 3.30% 2nd LOFT County pennies to capacity: 5 Include Interstates?: Yes TND Deduction: 0.00% Fuel efficiency: Existing State pennies to capacity: 25.6 MUTRM Deduction: 8.02% Days/yr: 365 Tax Inc Fin Millage Rate to capacity: % Factor to convert VMT to PMT: 1.37 Existing County pennies to capital: 0 Toll.fwy discount: 1.0% Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than 80% SHIP 210.1P Definition (2) du 4.10 A 7.61 C % V $356 $6,466 $ $ $1, $1,695 $86.32 $4,686 47% $2,199 $2,486 $5,022 $2,372 $2,210 $162 $6 $ P to 1,500 s.f. du 6.25 A 7.61 C % V $356 $9,857 $ $ $1, $2,583 $86.32 $7,188 56% $4,058 $3,130 $7,700 $2,986 $2,783 $203 $8 $ P ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du 7.81 A 7.61 C % V $356 $12,318 $ $ $2, $3,228 $ $8,950 51% $4,575 $4,376 $9,591 $4,175 $3,890 $285 $11 $ P ,500 s.f. and greater du 9.20 A 7.61 C % V $356 $14,510 $ $ $2, $3,803 $ $10,325 54% $5,578 $4,747 $11,079 $4,529 $4,213 $316 $12 $ P "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family (2) du 3.46 A 5.87 C % V $358 $4,232 $ $ $ $1,125 $71.03 $3,037 47% $1,431 $1,606 $3,257 $1,532 $1,427 $105 $4 $ Multi-Family Apartments du 6.60 B 5.87 C % V $358 $8,074 $ $ $1, $2,145 $71.03 $5,857 49% $2,879 $2,978 $6,277 $2,842 $2,649 $193 $7 $ Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du 6.40 B 5.87 J % V $358 $7,829 $ $ $1, $2,080 $71.03 $5,678 47% $2,670 $3,007 $6,084 $2,868 $2,674 $194 $8 $ High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du 4.18 B 5.87 J % V $358 $5,113 $ $ $ $1,359 $71.03 $3,684 41% $1,521 $2,162 $3,949 $2,062 $1,921 $141 $6 $ Mobile Home Park du 4.17 C 5.29 C % V $358 $4,605 $ $ $ $1,233 $40.43 $3,332 50% $1,677 $1,655 $3,571 $1,579 $1,472 $107 $4 $ Age Restricted Single Family (3) du 3.12 D 6.23 C % V $357 $4,044 $ $ $ $1,071 $86.32 $2,887 50% $1,444 $1,443 $3,097 $1,376 $1,281 $95 $4 $ Age Restricted Multi-Family (3) du 2.97 D 3.77 C % V $360 $2,347 $91.62 $88.14 $ $649 $43.71 $1,654 55% $916 $738 $1,776 $704 $656 $48 $2 $ Congregate Care Facility (Attached) (3) du 2.25 D 3.54 C % C $361 $1,205 $47.30 $45.51 $ $335 $28.41 $842 51% $432 $410 $904 $391 $364 $27 $1 $ LODGING: Hotel room 6.36 D 7.20 C % C $356 $6,673 $ $ $1, $1,748 $49.17 $4, % $4,876 $0 $5,223 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Motel room 5.63 B 4.99 C % C $358 $4,811 $ $ $ $1,287 $24.59 $3, % $3,499 $0 $3,749 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Resort Hotel room 5.83 D 7.02 C % C $356 $7,509 $ $ $1, $1,968 $49.17 $5, % $5,492 $0 $5,882 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - RECREATION: General Recreation acre 2.28 B 5.37 K % K $358 $2,446 $91.98 $88.49 $ $651 $38.55 $1,756 72% $1,271 $485 $1,883 $462 $431 $31 $2 $ RV Park RV space 1.62 B 4.83 L % L $358 $1,740 $65.94 $63.43 $ $467 $3.86 $1,269 57% $721 $548 $1,360 $522 $487 $35 $2 $ Marina berth 2.96 B 6.95 M % K $356 $4,093 $ $ $ $1,073 $81.95 $2,938 68% $1,999 $938 $3,150 $894 $832 $62 $3 $ Golf Course hole B 6.95 M % K $356 $49,418 $1, $1, $9, $12,958 $ $36,323 68% $24,734 $11,588 $38,891 $11,057 $10,311 $746 $28 $ Miniature Golf Course hole 3.30 B 6.95 M % K $356 $4,563 $ $ $ $1,197 $36.06 $3,330 75% $2,491 $840 $3,567 $802 $747 $55 $2 $ Bowling Alley 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % K $358 $36,027 $1, $1, $6, $9,587 $30.98 $26,409 71% $18,799 $7,610 $28,281 $7,262 $6,775 $487 $18 $ Movie Theater screen E 2.33 C % C $363 $49,261 $2, $1, $10, $14,368 $ $34,770 72% $25,137 $9,633 $37,330 $9,192 $8,588 $604 $23 $ Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % W $358 $15,839 $ $ $3, $4,215 $81.95 $11,542 71% $8,226 $3,317 $12,365 $3,165 $2,951 $214 $8 $ Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf B 7.06 K % K $356 $47,446 $1, $1, $8, $12,443 $81.95 $34,920 80% $28,061 $6,859 $37,386 $6,544 $6,103 $441 $17 $ INSTITUTIONS: Elementary School student 1.29 B 4.52 O % K $359 $962 $36.92 $35.51 $ $261 $22.13 $678 51% $347 $331 $728 $316 $295 $21 $1 $ Middle School student 1.62 B 4.52 O % K $359 $1,359 $52.15 $50.17 $ $369 $22.13 $968 51% $497 $471 $1,038 $449 $418 $31 $2 $ High School student 1.71 B 4.52 O % K $359 $1,435 $55.05 $52.96 $ $390 $22.13 $1,023 51% $525 $498 $1,097 $474 $441 $33 $2 $ University/Jr College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 F 6.95 M % K $356 $2,563 $95.29 $91.67 $ $675 $22.13 $1,866 48% $904 $962 $1,999 $917 $855 $62 $3 $ University/Jr College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student 1.50 F 6.95 M % K $356 $1,922 $71.47 $68.75 $ $506 $22.13 $1,394 48% $675 $719 $1,494 $686 $639 $47 $2 $ Church 1,000 sf 9.11 B 4.10 K % K $360 $6,948 $ $ $1, $1,905 $54.76 $4,988 55% $2,721 $2,267 $5,349 $2,163 $2,017 $146 $6 $ Day Care student 3.03 H 2.13 C % C $365 $987 $41.77 $40.18 $ $296 $ $462 56% $259 $203 $513 $193 $174 $19 $1 $ Cemetery acre 4.73 B 6.95 M % H $356 $6,398 $ $ $1, $1,685 $10.93 $4,703 49% $2,282 $2,421 $5,035 $2,310 $2,154 $156 $6 $ Hospital 1,000 sf B 6.95 M % K $356 $14,495 $ $ $2, $3,816 $ $10,476 35% $3,706 $6,770 $11,229 $6,460 $6,018 $442 $16 $ Nursing Home bed 2.76 D 2.72 C % C $362 $1,388 $56.63 $54.48 $ $401 $7.27 $980 59% $581 $399 $1,052 $381 $356 $25 $1 $ OFFICE: General Office 50,000 sf or less (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $358 $15,880 $ $ $3, $4,248 $72.66 $11, % $11,560 $0 $12,385 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 50, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $358 $13,452 $ $ $2, $3,598 $72.66 $9, % $9,781 $0 $10,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 100, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $358 $11,393 $ $ $2, $3,047 $72.66 $8, % $8,273 $0 $8,865 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 200, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf 9.41 G 5.41 C % C $358 $9,641 $ $ $1, $2,579 $72.66 $6, % $6,989 $0 $7,490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office greater than 400,000 sf (5) 1,000 sf 8.54 G 5.41 C % C $358 $8,749 $ $ $1, $2,340 $72.66 $6, % $6,337 $0 $6,791 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf 7.98 B 5.41 N % N $358 $8,176 $ $ $1, $2,187 $72.66 $5, % $5,916 $0 $6,341 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Medical Office 1,000 sf D 5.83 C % C $358 $37,020 $1, $1, $7, $9,854 $72.66 $27, % $27,093 $0 $29,017 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Office Park 1,000 sf D 7.47 C % Q $356 $15,916 $ $ $3, $4,175 $72.66 $11, % $11,668 $0 $12,495 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Research and Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 B 5.65 Q % Q $358 $8,380 $ $ $1, $2,237 $72.66 $6, % $6,071 $0 $6,506 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P 640 Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf B 5.36 P % P $358 $41,167 $1, $1, $7, $11,020 $72.66 $30, % $30,074 $0 $32,213 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

47 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RETAIL: Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Table 4-7 (continued) Suburban Mobility Schedule ( District B) MUTRM Rates Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Notes: 1) This value is the total value of transportation system consumed, less credits for revenues committed to transportation system expansion that are generated by the use itself. This value includes Interstate costs and "carrying costs", but not toll road costs. It does consider the proportion of trip length, varying system costs, and transportation system performance goals that vary by fee district. 2) Specific calculations for the "low income" category can be seen in Appendix B of the 2014 Mobility Update Study. 3) The statistical relationship between the trip generation rate for the age restricted single family, age restricted multi-family, and congregate care facility was used to interpolate the trip length. 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the office and retail size categories used the end-point of the range due to the nature of the ITE equation to be conservative for smaller developments. 5) The trip generation rate used for the office and retail open-ended size categories used the size 200,000 s.f. larger than the beginning of the size range, as the size ranges increase in 200,000 s.f. increments. 6) s of trip rate, percent new trips, and trip length are as follows: (A) FL Studies (NHTS, AHS, Census) (I) Independent Study (Collier County) (Q) Same as LUC 770 (Business Park) (B) ITE 9 th Edition (J) Same as LUC 220 (R) Same as LUC 820 (<50k) (C) Florida Studies Database (K) Florida Schedules (S) Florida Curve (D) Blend of TIE 9 th & FL Studies (L) Same as LUC 240 (T) Same as LUC 942 (Auto Care Center) (E) Blend of ITE 6 th & FL Studies (M) Same as LUC 210 (U) Same as LUC 820 (50k-200k) (F) ITE Regression Analysis (N) Same as LUC 710 (V) n/a (G) ITE 9 th Equation (O) Model-Based Trip Length (W) Same as LUC 492 (Health Club) (H) Previous Pasco Mobility Study (P) Same as LUC 630 (Clinic) Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf B 1.96 R % R $365 $11,449 $ $ $2, $3,515 $81.95 $7,853 65% $5,117 $2,735 $8,448 $2,609 $2,439 $170 $7 $ Retail 50,000 sfgla or less (4) 1,000 sfgla G 1.96 S % S $365 $19,322 $ $ $4, $5,931 $81.95 $13,309 65% $8,622 $4,687 $14,313 $4,471 $4,181 $290 $12 $ P Retail 50, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.52 S % S $363 $18,211 $ $ $3, $5,339 $81.95 $12,790 67% $8,559 $4,231 $13,736 $4,037 $3,772 $265 $10 $ P Retail 200, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.77 S % S $363 $17,111 $ $ $3, $4,934 $ $12,054 66% $8,004 $4,050 $12,943 $3,864 $3,608 $256 $10 $ P Retail 400, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.01 S % S $362 $16,737 $ $ $3, $4,779 $ $11,835 68% $8,019 $3,816 $12,705 $3,641 $3,398 $243 $9 $ P Retail 600, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.26 S % S $362 $17,040 $ $ $3, $4,807 $ $12,110 67% $8,142 $3,968 $12,995 $3,786 $3,533 $253 $10 $ P Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla (5) 1,000 sfgla G 3.51 S % S $361 $17,343 $ $ $3, $4,856 $ $12,365 66% $8,177 $4,188 $13,266 $3,996 $3,729 $267 $10 $ Specialty Retail 1,000 sf D 3.54 C % C $361 $30,253 $1, $1, $6, $8,460 $81.95 $21,711 64% $13,883 $7,828 $23,283 $7,469 $6,972 $497 $19 $ New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf D 4.83 C % C $359 $21,579 $ $ $4, $5,842 $34.44 $15,703 61% $9,640 $6,063 $16,824 $5,785 $5,398 $387 $15 $ Tire Store 1,000 sf B 3.80 T % T $361 $13,685 $ $ $2, $3,791 $81.95 $9,812 64% $6,265 $3,547 $10,523 $3,384 $3,157 $227 $9 $ Supermarket 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $365 $25,667 $1, $1, $5, $7,702 $55.69 $17,909 65% $11,633 $6,276 $19,243 $5,988 $5,598 $390 $15 $ Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf D 1.59 C % C $367 $70,637 $3, $3, $16, $22,657 $23.73 $47,956 68% $32,704 $15,252 $51,627 $14,554 $13,628 $926 $36 $ Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf B 2.52 U % U $363 $10,507 $ $ $2, $3,080 $81.95 $7,345 68% $4,997 $2,348 $7,891 $2,240 $2,092 $148 $6 $ Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $365 $13,614 $ $ $2, $4,086 $81.95 $9,447 65% $6,156 $3,291 $10,154 $3,140 $2,934 $206 $8 $ Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 B 6.39 C % C $357 $3,477 $ $ $ $922 $81.95 $2,473 63% $1,570 $903 $2,654 $861 $801 $60 $3 $ Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf D 2.58 C % C $363 $38,282 $1, $1, $8, $11,176 $ $26,914 65% $17,366 $9,548 $28,903 $9,110 $8,510 $600 $23 $ Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.30 C % C $362 $46,694 $1, $1, $9, $13,149 $44.94 $33,501 64% $21,492 $12,008 $35,927 $11,458 $10,700 $758 $29 $ High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.33 C % C $362 $55,609 $2, $2, $11, $15,638 $44.94 $39,925 63% $25,181 $14,744 $42,815 $14,069 $13,138 $931 $35 $ Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf D 2.15 C % C $365 $129,593 $5, $5, $28, $39,001 $ $90,374 66% $59,661 $30,713 $97,108 $29,306 $27,400 $1,906 $73 $1, Quick Lube bays B 3.80 T % T $361 $22,011 $ $ $4, $6,098 $26.63 $15,887 64% $10,128 $5,758 $17,030 $5,494 $5,129 $365 $14 $ Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf D 3.80 T % T $361 $17,295 $ $ $3, $4,791 $33.23 $12,471 61% $7,573 $4,898 $13,369 $4,673 $4,362 $311 $12 $ Gasoline Station fuel pos B 2.00 C % C $365 $15,769 $ $ $3, $4,819 $1.97 $10,948 65% $7,115 $3,833 $11,767 $3,657 $3,421 $236 $10 $ Self-Service Car Wash bays D 2.29 C % C $363 $13,852 $ $ $2, $4,135 $26.63 $9,690 40% $3,917 $5,773 $10,410 $5,508 $5,149 $359 $14 $ P 913 Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf C 2.78 C % C $363 $177,315 $7, $6, $36, $51,101 $23.73 $126,191 66% $83,598 $42,593 $135,405 $40,642 $37,972 $2,670 $101 $1, Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 2.15 B 3.26 K % N $362 $1,301 $51.81 $49.84 $ $367 $27.98 $906 66% $598 $308 $973 $294 $274 $20 $1 $ INDUSTRIAL: General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 B 5.41 N % N $358 $7,222 $ $ $1, $1,933 $33.41 $5, % $5,256 $0 $5,631 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf 1.50 B 5.41 N % N $358 $1,554 $58.73 $56.50 $ $416 $33.41 $1, % $1,105 $0 $1,186 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Industrial Park 1,000 sf 6.83 B 5.41 N % N $358 $7,077 $ $ $1, $1,894 $33.41 $5, % $5,149 $0 $5,517 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 B 5.41 N % N $358 $3,958 $ $ $ $1,059 $33.41 $2, % $2,865 $0 $3,071 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Warehouse 1,000 sf 3.56 B 5.41 N % N $358 $3,689 $ $ $ $987 $27.98 $2, % $2,673 $0 $2,865 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 B 6.95 M % N $356 $2,230 $82.81 $79.67 $ $586 $27.98 $1, % $1,615 $0 $1,731 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P 153 Airport Hangar 1,000 sf 3.56 H 5.41 N % N $358 $3,689 $ $ $ $987 $33.41 $2, % $2,668 $0 $2,860 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

48 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RESIDENTIAL: Table 4-8 Suburban Mobility Schedule ( District B) TND Rates Revenue period: 25 P4P Equivalent Pennies: 4.8 Include carrying cost?: No TOD Deduction: 0.00% Discount Rate: 3.30% 2nd LOFT County pennies to capacity: 5 Include Interstates?: Yes TND Deduction: 11.36% Fuel efficiency: Existing State pennies to capacity: 25.6 MUTRM Deduction: 0.00% Days/yr: 365 Tax Inc Fin Millage Rate to capacity: % Factor to convert VMT to PMT: 1.37 Existing County pennies to capital: 0 Toll.fwy discount: 1.0% Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than 80% SHIP 210.1P Definition (2) du 4.10 A 7.61 C % V $356 $6,232 $ $ $1, $1,633 $86.32 $4,512 63% $2,855 $1,658 $4,836 $1,582 $1,473 $109 $4 $72 $1,221 36% 210.2P to 1,500 s.f. du 6.25 A 7.61 C % V $356 $9,499 $ $ $1, $2,489 $86.32 $6,924 70% $4,837 $2,087 $7,417 $1,991 $1,855 $136 $5 $91 $1,536 36% 210.3P ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du 7.81 A 7.61 C % V $356 $11,871 $ $ $2, $3,111 $ $8,620 66% $5,703 $2,918 $9,237 $2,784 $2,593 $191 $7 $127 $2,143 36% 210.4P ,500 s.f. and greater du 9.20 A 7.61 C % V $356 $13,983 $ $ $2, $3,664 $ $9,936 68% $6,772 $3,165 $10,663 $3,020 $2,809 $211 $8 $137 $2,323 36% 210.5P "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family (2) du 3.46 A 5.87 C % V $358 $4,079 $ $ $ $1,084 $71.03 $2,924 63% $1,853 $1,071 $3,136 $1,021 $951 $70 $3 $47 $790 36% Multi-Family Apartments du 6.60 B 5.87 C % V $358 $7,780 $ $ $1, $2,067 $71.03 $5,642 65% $3,656 $1,986 $6,046 $1,895 $1,766 $129 $5 $86 $1,463 36% Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du 6.40 B 5.87 J % V $358 $7,545 $ $ $1, $2,005 $71.03 $5,469 63% $3,463 $2,005 $5,861 $1,913 $1,784 $129 $5 $87 $1,474 36% High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du 4.18 B 5.87 J % V $358 $4,928 $ $ $ $1,309 $71.03 $3,547 59% $2,106 $1,441 $3,803 $1,374 $1,280 $94 $4 $63 $1,182 22% Mobile Home Park du 4.17 C 5.29 C % V $358 $4,438 $ $ $ $1,188 $40.43 $3,209 66% $2,106 $1,104 $3,440 $1,053 $981 $72 $3 $48 $815 35% Age Restricted Single Family (3) du 3.12 D 6.23 C % V $357 $3,898 $ $ $ $1,032 $86.32 $2,779 65% $1,817 $962 $2,982 $917 $854 $63 $3 $42 $712 35% Age Restricted Multi-Family (3) du 2.97 D 3.77 C % V $360 $2,262 $88.29 $84.94 $ $625 $43.71 $1,593 69% $1,101 $492 $1,710 $469 $437 $32 $2 $21 $368 34% Congregate Care Facility (Attached) (3) du 2.25 D 3.54 C % C $361 $1,161 $45.59 $43.85 $ $323 $28.41 $810 66% $536 $274 $870 $261 $243 $18 $1 $12 $205 34% LODGING: Hotel room 6.36 D 7.20 C % C $356 $6,431 $ $ $1, $1,684 $49.17 $4, % $4,697 $0 $5,031 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Motel room 5.63 B 4.99 C % C $358 $4,636 $ $ $ $1,240 $24.59 $3, % $3,371 $0 $3,612 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Resort Hotel room 5.83 D 7.02 C % C $356 $7,236 $ $ $1, $1,896 $49.17 $5, % $5,291 $0 $5,667 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $81-100% RECREATION: General Recreation acre 2.28 B 5.37 K % K $358 $2,357 $88.64 $85.27 $ $628 $38.55 $1,691 81% $1,368 $323 $1,814 $308 $287 $21 $1 $14 $222 45% RV Park RV space 1.62 B 4.83 L % L $358 $1,677 $63.54 $61.13 $ $450 $3.86 $1,223 70% $858 $365 $1,310 $348 $325 $23 $1 $16 $240 52% Marina berth 2.96 B 6.95 M % K $356 $3,944 $ $ $ $1,034 $81.95 $2,828 78% $2,202 $626 $3,033 $597 $556 $41 $2 $27 $410 53% Golf Course hole B 6.95 M % K $356 $47,623 $1, $1, $9, $12,488 $ $34,999 78% $27,273 $7,726 $37,473 $7,371 $6,874 $497 $19 $336 $5,041 53% Miniature Golf Course hole 3.30 B 6.95 M % K $356 $4,397 $ $ $ $1,153 $36.06 $3,208 83% $2,648 $560 $3,437 $534 $497 $37 $2 $24 $369 52% Bowling Alley 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % K $358 $34,719 $1, $1, $6, $9,239 $30.98 $25,449 80% $20,375 $5,074 $27,253 $4,842 $4,518 $324 $12 $220 $3,324 53% Movie Theater screen E 2.33 C % C $363 $47,472 $1, $1, $10, $13,846 $ $33,503 81% $27,081 $6,422 $35,970 $6,127 $5,725 $402 $16 $279 $4,318 49% Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % W $358 $15,264 $ $ $2, $4,062 $81.95 $11,120 80% $8,908 $2,212 $11,913 $2,110 $1,967 $143 $6 $96 $1,454 52% Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf B 7.06 K % K $356 $45,723 $1, $1, $8, $11,991 $81.95 $33,649 86% $29,076 $4,573 $36,025 $4,363 $4,069 $294 $11 $199 $2,990 53% INSTITUTIONS: Elementary School student 1.29 B 4.52 O % K $359 $927 $35.58 $34.22 $ $252 $22.13 $653 66% $432 $221 $701 $210 $196 $14 $1 $10 $185 19% Middle School student 1.62 B 4.52 O % K $359 $1,310 $50.26 $48.35 $ $356 $22.13 $932 66% $618 $314 $1,000 $299 $278 $21 $1 $14 $263 19% High School student 1.71 B 4.52 O % K $359 $1,383 $53.05 $51.04 $ $376 $22.13 $985 66% $653 $332 $1,057 $317 $295 $22 $1 $14 $278 19% University/Jr College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 F 6.95 M % K $356 $2,470 $91.83 $88.34 $ $650 $22.13 $1,798 64% $1,156 $642 $1,926 $612 $570 $42 $2 $28 $533 20% University/Jr College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student 1.50 F 6.95 M % K $356 $1,853 $68.87 $66.26 $ $488 $22.13 $1,343 64% $862 $480 $1,439 $457 $426 $31 $2 $21 $399 20% Church 1,000 sf 9.11 B 4.10 K % K $360 $6,696 $ $ $1, $1,836 $54.76 $4,805 69% $3,294 $1,511 $5,153 $1,441 $1,344 $97 $4 $66 $1,288 17% Day Care student 3.03 H 2.13 C % C $365 $951 $40.25 $38.73 $ $285 $ $437 69% $301 $136 $486 $129 $116 $13 $1 $6 $128 6% Cemetery acre 4.73 B 6.95 M % H $356 $6,166 $ $ $1, $1,624 $10.93 $4,532 64% $2,918 $1,614 $4,852 $1,540 $1,436 $104 $4 $70 $1,340 20% Hospital 1,000 sf B 6.95 M % K $356 $13,968 $ $ $2, $3,678 $ $10,088 55% $5,574 $4,514 $10,814 $4,307 $4,012 $295 $11 $196 $3,753 20% Nursing Home bed 2.76 D 2.72 C % C $362 $1,338 $54.57 $52.50 $ $386 $7.27 $944 72% $678 $266 $1,014 $253 $236 $17 $1 $12 $227 17% OFFICE: General Office 50,000 sf or less (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $358 $15,304 $ $ $2, $4,093 $72.66 $11, % $11,138 $0 $11,933 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 710.1P General Office 50, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $358 $12,964 $ $ $2, $3,467 $72.66 $9, % $9,423 $0 $10,097 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 710.2P General Office 100, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $358 $10,979 $ $ $2, $2,937 $72.66 $7, % $7,970 $0 $8,540 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 710.3P General Office 200, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf 9.41 G 5.41 C % C $358 $9,291 $ $ $1, $2,485 $72.66 $6, % $6,733 $0 $7,216 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 710.4P General Office greater than 400,000 sf (5) 1,000 sf 8.54 G 5.41 C % C $358 $8,432 $ $ $1, $2,255 $72.66 $6, % $6,104 $0 $6,542 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf 7.98 B 5.41 N % N $358 $7,879 $ $ $1, $2,107 $72.66 $5, % $5,699 $0 $6,108 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Medical Office 1,000 sf D 5.83 C % C $358 $35,675 $1, $1, $6, $9,496 $72.66 $26, % $26,107 $0 $27,961 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Office Park 1,000 sf D 7.47 C % Q $356 $15,338 $ $ $2, $4,023 $72.66 $11, % $11,242 $0 $12,039 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Research and Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 B 5.65 Q % Q $358 $8,076 $ $ $1, $2,155 $72.66 $5, % $5,848 $0 $6,267 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 770.P 640 Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf B 5.36 P % P $358 $39,672 $1, $1, $7, $10,620 $72.66 $28, % $28,979 $0 $31,040 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

49 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RETAIL: Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Table 4-8 (continued) Suburban Mobility Schedule ( District B) TND Rates Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Notes: 1) This value is the total value of transportation system consumed, less credits for revenues committed to transportation system expansion that are generated by the use itself. This value includes Interstate costs and "carrying costs", but not toll road costs. It does consider the proportion of trip length, varying system costs, and transportation system performance goals that vary by fee district. 2) Specific calculations for the "low income" category can be seen in Appendix B of the 2014 Mobility Update Study. 3) The statistical relationship between the trip generation rate for the age restricted single family, age restricted multi-family, and congregate care facility was used to interpolate the trip length. 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the office and retail size categories used the end-point of the range due to the nature of the ITE equation to be conservative for smaller developments. 5) The trip generation rate used for the office and retail open-ended size categories used the size 200,000 s.f. larger than the beginning of the size range, as the size ranges increase in 200,000 s.f. increments. 6) s of trip rate, percent new trips, and trip length are as follows: (A) FL Studies (NHTS, AHS, Census) (I) Independent Study (Collier County) (Q) Same as LUC 770 (Business Park) (B) ITE 9 th Edition (J) Same as LUC 220 (R) Same as LUC 820 (<50k) (C) Florida Studies Database (K) Florida Schedules (S) Florida Curve (D) Blend of TIE 9 th & FL Studies (L) Same as LUC 240 (T) Same as LUC 942 (Auto Care Center) (E) Blend of ITE 6 th & FL Studies (M) Same as LUC 210 (U) Same as LUC 820 (50k-200k) (F) ITE Regression Analysis (N) Same as LUC 710 (V) n/a (G) ITE 9 th Equation (O) Model-Based Trip Length (W) Same as LUC 492 (Health Club) (H) Previous Pasco Mobility Study (P) Same as LUC 630 (Clinic) Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Increment Self-Credit Before Incentive Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf B 1.96 R % R $365 $11,033 $ $ $2, $3,387 $81.95 $7,564 76% $5,741 $1,824 $8,138 $1,740 $1,626 $114 $5 $79 $1,150 59% Retail 50,000 sfgla or less (4) 1,000 sfgla G 1.96 S % S $365 $18,621 $ $ $4, $5,716 $81.95 $12,823 76% $9,697 $3,125 $13,790 $2,981 $2,788 $193 $8 $136 $1,957 60% 820.1P Retail 50, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.52 S % S $363 $17,550 $ $ $3, $5,145 $81.95 $12,323 77% $9,502 $2,821 $13,235 $2,691 $2,514 $177 $7 $123 $1,763 60% 820.2P Retail 200, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.77 S % S $363 $16,490 $ $ $3, $4,755 $ $11,612 77% $8,911 $2,700 $12,469 $2,576 $2,406 $170 $7 $117 $1,674 61% 820.3P Retail 400, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.01 S % S $362 $16,129 $ $ $3, $4,605 $ $11,401 78% $8,857 $2,544 $12,239 $2,428 $2,267 $161 $6 $110 $1,579 61% 820.4P Retail 600, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.26 S % S $362 $16,421 $ $ $3, $4,632 $ $11,666 77% $9,020 $2,646 $12,519 $2,524 $2,355 $169 $7 $115 $1,638 62% 820.5P Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla (5) 1,000 sfgla G 3.51 S % S $361 $16,713 $ $ $3, $4,679 $ $11,911 77% $9,119 $2,792 $12,780 $2,664 $2,486 $178 $7 $121 $1,715 63% Specialty Retail 1,000 sf D 3.54 C % C $361 $29,155 $1, $1, $5, $8,153 $81.95 $20,920 75% $15,701 $5,219 $22,435 $4,979 $4,648 $331 $13 $227 $3,186 64% New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf D 4.83 C % C $359 $20,796 $ $ $4, $5,630 $34.44 $15,132 73% $11,090 $4,042 $16,212 $3,856 $3,598 $258 $10 $176 $2,440 66% Tire Store 1,000 sf B 3.80 T % T $361 $13,188 $ $ $2, $3,654 $81.95 $9,453 75% $7,087 $2,365 $10,138 $2,256 $2,105 $151 $6 $103 $1,440 64% Supermarket 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $365 $24,735 $1, $1, $5, $7,423 $55.69 $17,257 76% $13,073 $4,184 $18,542 $3,992 $3,732 $260 $10 $182 $2,611 60% Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf D 1.59 C % C $367 $68,072 $3, $2, $15, $21,834 $23.73 $46,214 78% $36,046 $10,168 $49,751 $9,702 $9,085 $617 $24 $442 $6,010 69% Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf B 2.52 U % U $363 $10,125 $ $ $2, $2,968 $81.95 $7,075 78% $5,510 $1,565 $7,601 $1,493 $1,394 $99 $4 $68 $982 59% Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $365 $13,120 $ $ $2, $3,937 $81.95 $9,101 76% $6,906 $2,194 $9,782 $2,093 $1,956 $137 $6 $95 $1,377 59% Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 B 6.39 C % C $357 $3,351 $ $ $ $889 $81.95 $2,380 75% $1,778 $602 $2,554 $574 $534 $40 $2 $26 $368 64% Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf D 2.58 C % C $363 $36,892 $1, $1, $7, $10,770 $ $25,930 75% $19,564 $6,365 $27,847 $6,074 $5,674 $400 $15 $276 $3,596 77% Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.30 C % C $362 $44,999 $1, $1, $9, $12,671 $44.94 $32,282 75% $24,276 $8,006 $34,621 $7,639 $7,134 $505 $19 $348 $4,900 63% High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.33 C % C $362 $53,589 $2, $2, $10, $15,071 $44.94 $38,474 74% $28,645 $9,829 $41,258 $9,378 $8,758 $620 $24 $427 $6,018 63% Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf D 2.15 C % C $365 $124,887 $5, $5, $27, $37,584 $ $87,084 76% $66,609 $20,475 $93,574 $19,537 $18,267 $1,270 $49 $889 $11,684 75% Quick Lube bays B 3.80 T % T $361 $21,212 $ $ $4, $5,876 $26.63 $15,309 75% $11,469 $3,839 $16,411 $3,662 $3,419 $243 $10 $167 $2,328 65% Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf D 3.80 T % T $361 $16,667 $ $ $3, $4,617 $33.23 $12,017 73% $8,752 $3,265 $12,883 $3,115 $2,908 $207 $8 $142 $1,985 64% Gasoline Station fuel pos B 2.00 C % C $365 $15,196 $ $ $3, $4,644 $1.97 $10,550 76% $7,995 $2,555 $11,340 $2,437 $2,279 $158 $7 $111 $1,458 75% Self-Service Car Wash bays D 2.29 C % C $363 $13,349 $ $ $2, $3,985 $26.63 $9,337 59% $5,488 $3,849 $10,031 $3,672 $3,432 $240 $10 $167 $3,563 8% 913.P 913 Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf C 2.78 C % C $363 $170,877 $6, $6, $35, $49,245 $23.73 $121,608 77% $93,212 $28,395 $130,487 $27,095 $25,316 $1,779 $67 $1,233 $15,994 78% Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 2.15 B 3.26 K % N $362 $1,253 $49.93 $48.03 $ $354 $27.98 $872 76% $666 $206 $937 $196 $182 $14 $1 $9 $52 296% INDUSTRIAL: General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 B 5.41 N % N $358 $6,959 $ $ $1, $1,862 $33.41 $5, % $5,064 $0 $5,425 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf 1.50 B 5.41 N % N $358 $1,498 $56.60 $54.45 $ $401 $33.41 $1, % $1,063 $0 $1,141 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $53-100% Industrial Park 1,000 sf 6.83 B 5.41 N % N $358 $6,820 $ $ $1, $1,825 $33.41 $4, % $4,961 $0 $5,315 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 B 5.41 N % N $358 $3,814 $ $ $ $1,021 $33.41 $2, % $2,760 $0 $2,958 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Warehouse 1,000 sf 3.56 B 5.41 N % N $358 $3,555 $ $ $ $951 $27.98 $2, % $2,575 $0 $2,760 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 B 6.95 M % N $356 $2,149 $79.81 $76.77 $ $565 $27.98 $1, % $1,555 $0 $1,667 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $66-100% 160.P 153 Airport Hangar 1,000 sf 3.56 H 5.41 N % N $358 $3,555 $ $ $ $951 $33.41 $2, % $2,570 $0 $2,755 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

50 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RESIDENTIAL: Table 4-9 Rural Mobility Schedule ( District C) Standard Rates Revenue period: 25 P4P Equivalent Pennies: 4.8 Include carrying cost?: No TOD Deduction: 0.00% Discount Rate: 3.30% 2nd LOFT County pennies to capacity: 5 Include Interstates?: Yes TND Deduction: 0.00% Fuel efficiency: Existing State pennies to capacity: 25.6 MUTRM Deduction: 0.00% Days/yr: 365 Tax Inc Fin Millage Rate to capacity: % Factor to convert VMT to PMT: 1.37 Existing County pennies to capital: 0 Toll.fwy discount: 3.8% Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length for revenue (mi) % New Trips % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Before Increment Incentive Self-Credit Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than 80% SHIP 210.1P Definition (2) du 4.10 A 7.61 C % V $364 $9,050 $ $ $1, $2,351 $68.84 $6,630 16% $1,037 $5,593 $7,101 $5,336 $4,995 $341 $14 $243 $5,593 0% 210.2P to 1,500 s.f. du 6.25 A 7.61 C % V $364 $13,796 $ $ $2, $3,584 $68.84 $10,143 31% $3,117 $7,026 $10,860 $6,704 $6,278 $426 $17 $305 $7,026 0% 210.3P ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du 7.81 A 7.61 C % V $364 $17,239 $ $ $3, $4,478 $ $12,635 22% $2,836 $9,800 $13,531 $9,350 $8,753 $597 $24 $426 $9,800 0% 210.4P ,500 s.f. and greater du 9.20 A 7.61 C % V $364 $20,308 $ $ $3, $5,275 $ $14,720 27% $3,997 $10,723 $15,775 $10,231 $9,571 $660 $26 $466 $10,723 0% 210.5P "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family (2) du 3.46 A 5.87 C % V $366 $5,920 $ $ $1, $1,554 $0.00 $4,366 17% $738 $3,629 $4,674 $3,462 $3,244 $218 $9 $158 $3,629 0% Multi-Family Apartments du 6.60 B 5.87 C % V $366 $11,292 $ $ $2, $2,964 $0.00 $8,329 20% $1,635 $6,694 $8,915 $6,387 $5,984 $403 $16 $291 $6,694 0% Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du 6.40 B 5.87 J % V $366 $10,950 $ $ $2, $2,874 $54.63 $8,022 16% $1,286 $6,736 $8,591 $6,427 $6,020 $407 $16 $293 $6,736 0% High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du 4.18 B 5.87 J % V $366 $7,152 $ $ $1, $1,877 $54.63 $5,220 0% $0 $5,220 $5,592 $4,980 $4,663 $317 $13 $227 $5,407-3% Mobile Home Park du 4.17 C 5.29 C % V $367 $6,453 $ $ $1, $1,700 $38.24 $4,715 21% $984 $3,731 $5,050 $3,560 $3,334 $226 $9 $162 $3,731 0% Age Restricted Single Family (3) du 3.12 D 6.23 C % V $365 $5,657 $ $ $1, $1,481 $68.84 $4,107 20% $827 $3,280 $4,401 $3,130 $2,930 $200 $8 $142 $3,280 0% Age Restricted Multi-Family (3) du 2.97 D 3.77 C % V $370 $3,302 $ $ $ $888 $29.50 $2,385 27% $635 $1,750 $2,556 $1,669 $1,563 $106 $5 $76 $1,750 0% Congregate Care Facility (Attached) (3) du 2.25 D 3.54 C % C $371 $1,698 $64.63 $62.17 $ $458 $19.67 $1,220 20% $242 $978 $1,309 $933 $874 $59 $3 $42 $978 0% LODGING: Hotel room 6.36 D 7.20 C % C $364 $8,652 $ $ $1, $2,254 $43.71 $6, % $6,355 $0 $6,804 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % Motel room 5.63 B 4.99 C % C $368 $6,253 $ $ $1, $1,652 $21.85 $4, % $4,579 $0 $4,904 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Resort Hotel room 5.83 D 7.02 C % C $365 $9,735 $ $ $1, $2,537 $43.71 $7, % $7,155 $0 $7,661 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % RECREATION: General Recreation acre 2.28 B 5.37 K % K $367 $3,178 $ $ $ $837 $22.76 $2,318 55% $1,271 $1,047 $2,483 $999 $936 $63 $3 $45 $1,047 0% RV Park RV space 1.62 B 4.83 L % L $368 $2,262 $84.61 $81.39 $ $599 $2.28 $1,660 32% $536 $1,124 $1,778 $1,072 $1,005 $67 $3 $49 $1,124 0% Marina berth 2.96 B 6.95 M % K $365 $5,306 $ $ $1, $1,383 $81.95 $3,841 50% $1,921 $1,920 $4,117 $1,832 $1,714 $118 $5 $83 $1,920 0% Golf Course hole B 6.95 M % K $365 $64,070 $2, $2, $12, $16,703 $81.95 $47,285 50% $23,743 $23,542 $50,614 $22,464 $21,045 $1,419 $56 $1,022 $23,542 0% Miniature Golf Course hole 3.30 B 6.95 M % K $365 $5,916 $ $ $1, $1,542 $28.85 $4,345 60% $2,617 $1,728 $4,652 $1,648 $1,543 $105 $5 $75 $1,728 0% Bowling Alley 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % K $367 $46,806 $1, $1, $8, $12,321 $24.04 $34,461 55% $18,914 $15,547 $36,893 $14,835 $13,901 $934 $37 $675 $15,547 0% Movie Theater screen E 2.33 C % C $378 $65,017 $2, $2, $13, $18,177 $ $46,730 54% $25,276 $21,454 $50,108 $20,471 $19,202 $1,269 $51 $932 $21,454 0% Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % W $367 $20,578 $ $ $3, $5,417 $73.21 $15,088 55% $8,277 $6,811 $16,157 $6,499 $6,089 $410 $16 $296 $6,811 0% Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf B 7.06 K % K $365 $61,587 $2, $2, $11, $16,041 $73.21 $45,473 69% $31,517 $13,956 $48,673 $13,317 $12,475 $842 $33 $606 $13,956 0% INSTITUTIONS: Elementary School student 1.29 B 4.52 O % K $369 $1,262 $47.64 $45.83 $ $337 $22.13 $903 2% $18 $885 $969 $844 $789 $55 $3 $38 $885 0% Middle School student 1.62 B 4.52 O % K $369 $1,784 $67.31 $64.75 $ $477 $22.13 $1,285 2% $28 $1,257 $1,377 $1,199 $1,123 $76 $3 $55 $1,257 0% High School student 1.71 B 4.52 O % K $369 $1,883 $71.05 $68.35 $ $503 $22.13 $1,357 2% $29 $1,328 $1,455 $1,266 $1,185 $81 $4 $58 $1,328 0% University/Jr College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 F 6.95 M % K $365 $3,352 $ $ $ $876 $22.13 $2,454 0% $0 $2,454 $2,628 $2,341 $2,192 $149 $6 $107 $2,531-3% University/Jr College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student 1.50 F 6.95 M % K $365 $2,514 $92.80 $89.28 $ $657 $22.13 $1,835 0% $0 $1,835 $1,965 $1,750 $1,638 $112 $5 $80 $1,894-3% Church 1,000 sf 9.11 B 4.10 K % K $370 $9,127 $ $ $1, $2,454 $38.51 $6,634 6% $367 $6,267 $7,109 $5,980 $5,604 $376 $15 $272 $6,267 0% Day Care student 3.03 H 2.13 C % C $382 $1,323 $53.00 $50.98 $ $375 $ $718 0% $1 $717 $787 $684 $628 $56 $2 $31 $717 0% Cemetery acre 4.73 B 6.95 M % H $365 $8,368 $ $ $1, $2,188 $8.20 $6,173 0% $0 $6,173 $6,607 $5,890 $5,518 $372 $15 $268 $6,355-3% Hospital 1,000 sf B 6.95 M % K $365 $18,957 $ $ $3, $4,956 $ $13,800 0% $0 $13,800 $14,785 $13,168 $12,326 $842 $33 $599 $17,832-23% Nursing Home bed 2.76 D 2.72 C % C $375 $1,841 $72.32 $69.57 $ $512 $6.17 $1,322 15% $199 $1,123 $1,418 $1,071 $1,005 $66 $3 $49 $1,123 0% OFFICE: General Office 50,000 sf or less (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $367 $20,777 $ $ $3, $5,497 $61.70 $15, % $15,218 $0 $16,298 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2, % 710.1P General Office 50, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $367 $17,600 $ $ $3, $4,657 $61.70 $12, % $12,882 $0 $13,796 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2, % 710.2P General Office 100, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $367 $14,906 $ $ $2, $3,944 $61.70 $10, % $10,900 $0 $11,675 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % 710.3P General Office 200, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf 9.41 G 5.41 C % C $367 $12,614 $ $ $2, $3,337 $61.70 $9, % $9,215 $0 $9,870 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % 710.4P General Office greater than 400,000 sf (5) 1,000 sf 8.54 G 5.41 C % C $367 $11,448 $ $ $2, $3,029 $61.70 $8, % $8,357 $0 $8,952 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf 7.98 B 5.41 N % N $367 $10,697 $ $ $2, $2,830 $61.70 $7, % $7,805 $0 $8,361 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % Medical Office 1,000 sf D 5.83 C % C $367 $48,519 $1, $1, $9, $12,766 $61.70 $35, % $35,691 $0 $38,212 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5, % Office Park 1,000 sf D 7.47 C % Q $365 $20,817 $ $ $3, $5,426 $61.70 $15, % $15,329 $0 $16,411 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % Research and Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 B 5.65 Q % Q $367 $10,983 $ $ $2, $2,897 $61.70 $8, % $8,025 $0 $8,596 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % 770.P 640 Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf B 5.36 P % P $368 $53,983 $2, $1, $10, $14,261 $61.70 $39, % $39,660 $0 $42,465 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

51 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RETAIL: Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Table 4-9 (continued) Rural Mobility Schedule ( District C) Standard Rates Trip length for revenue (mi) % New Trips % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Notes: 1) This value is the total value of transportation system consumed, less credits for revenues committed to transportation system expansion that are generated by the use itself. This value includes Interstate costs and "carrying costs", but not toll road costs. It does consider the proportion of trip length, varying system costs, and transportation system performance goals that vary by fee district. 2) Specific calculations for the "low income" category can be seen in Appendix B of the 2014 Mobility Update Study. 3) The statistical relationship between the trip generation rate for the age restricted single family, age restricted multi-family, and congregate care facility was used to interpolate the trip length. 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the office and retail size categories used the end-point of the range due to the nature of the ITE equation to be conservative for smaller developments. 5) The trip generation rate used for the office and retail open-ended size categories used the size 200,000 s.f. larger than the beginning of the size range, as the size ranges increase in 200,000 s.f. increments. 6) s of trip rate, percent new trips, and trip length are as follows: (A) FL Studies (NHTS, AHS, Census) (I) Independent Study (Collier County) (Q) Same as LUC 770 (Business Park) (B) ITE 9 th Edition (J) Same as LUC 220 (R) Same as LUC 820 (<50k) (C) Florida Studies Database (K) Florida Schedules (S) Florida Curve (D) Blend of TIE 9 th & FL Studies (L) Same as LUC 240 (T) Same as LUC 942 (Auto Care Center) (E) Blend of ITE 6 th & FL Studies (M) Same as LUC 210 (U) Same as LUC 820 (50k-200k) (F) ITE Regression Analysis (N) Same as LUC 710 (V) n/a (G) ITE 9 th Equation (O) Model-Based Trip Length (W) Same as LUC 492 (Health Club) (H) Previous Pasco Mobility Study (P) Same as LUC 630 (Clinic) Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Before Increment Incentive Self-Credit Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf B 1.96 R % R $382 $17,195 $ $ $3, $4,878 $73.21 $12,243 53% $6,431 $5,812 $13,136 $5,546 $5,202 $344 $14 $252 $5,812 0% Retail 50,000 sfgla or less (4) 1,000 sfgla G 1.96 S % S $382 $29,019 $1, $1, $5, $8,233 $73.21 $20,712 52% $10,854 $9,858 $22,220 $9,406 $8,825 $581 $24 $428 $9,858 0% 820.1P Retail 50, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.52 S % S $375 $26,963 $1, $1, $5, $7,494 $73.21 $19,396 55% $10,583 $8,813 $20,797 $8,409 $7,886 $523 $21 $383 $8,813 0% 820.2P Retail 200, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.77 S % S $375 $25,335 $ $ $5, $6,952 $ $18,273 55% $10,066 $8,207 $19,589 $7,831 $7,341 $490 $20 $356 $8,207 0% 820.3P Retail 400, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.01 S % S $373 $24,720 $ $ $4, $6,754 $ $17,856 57% $10,107 $7,750 $19,141 $7,394 $6,930 $464 $19 $337 $7,750 0% 820.4P Retail 600, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.26 S % S $373 $25,167 $ $ $4, $6,813 $ $18,245 56% $10,250 $7,995 $19,553 $7,629 $7,150 $479 $19 $347 $7,995 0% 820.5P Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla (5) 1,000 sfgla G 3.51 S % S $371 $25,570 $ $ $4, $6,899 $ $18,561 55% $10,233 $8,328 $19,890 $7,946 $7,446 $500 $20 $362 $8,328 0% Specialty Retail 1,000 sf D 3.54 C % C $371 $44,603 $1, $1, $8, $12,023 $73.21 $32,507 53% $17,067 $15,440 $34,824 $14,732 $13,809 $923 $37 $671 $15,440 0% New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf D 4.83 C % C $368 $31,656 $1, $1, $6, $8,376 $46.48 $23,234 51% $11,750 $11,484 $24,879 $10,958 $10,268 $690 $27 $499 $11,484 0% Tire Store 1,000 sf B 3.80 T % T $370 $20,099 $ $ $3, $5,400 $73.21 $14,626 53% $7,698 $6,928 $15,671 $6,610 $6,194 $416 $17 $301 $6,928 0% Supermarket 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $378 $38,129 $1, $1, $7, $10,745 $0.00 $27,384 52% $14,302 $13,082 $29,365 $12,483 $11,713 $770 $31 $568 $13,082 0% Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf D 1.59 C % C $389 $88,387 $3, $3, $19, $26,793 $25.22 $61,569 57% $35,168 $26,401 $66,162 $25,191 $23,673 $1,518 $63 $1,147 $26,401 0% Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf B 2.52 U % U $375 $15,557 $ $ $3, $4,324 $73.21 $11,160 56% $6,242 $4,917 $11,968 $4,691 $4,399 $292 $12 $214 $4,917 0% Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $378 $20,224 $ $ $4, $5,699 $73.21 $14,452 52% $7,555 $6,897 $15,503 $6,580 $6,172 $408 $17 $300 $6,897 0% Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 B 6.39 C % C $365 $5,090 $ $ $ $1,331 $73.21 $3,686 53% $1,945 $1,742 $3,951 $1,661 $1,554 $107 $5 $76 $1,742 0% Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf D 2.58 C % C $378 $47,138 $1, $1, $9, $13,334 $ $33,659 54% $18,077 $15,582 $36,109 $14,868 $13,948 $920 $37 $677 $15,582 0% Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.30 C % C $373 $68,967 $2, $2, $13, $18,643 $46.29 $50,278 53% $26,543 $23,735 $53,861 $22,648 $21,232 $1,416 $56 $1,031 $23,735 0% High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.33 C % C $371 $81,745 $3, $3, $16, $22,180 $46.29 $59,518 51% $30,242 $29,276 $63,766 $27,936 $26,192 $1,744 $69 $1,271 $29,276 0% Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf D 2.15 C % C $382 $160,583 $6, $6, $33, $46,391 $ $114,028 55% $63,051 $50,978 $122,372 $48,644 $45,661 $2,983 $120 $2,214 $50,978 0% Quick Lube bays B 3.80 T % T $373 $26,902 $1, $ $5, $7,315 $23.79 $19,564 43% $8,385 $11,179 $20,962 $10,667 $10,001 $666 $27 $485 $11,179 0% Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf D 3.80 T % T $370 $25,401 $ $ $4, $6,824 $68.65 $18,508 49% $8,991 $9,517 $19,828 $9,081 $8,510 $571 $23 $413 $9,517 0% Gasoline Station fuel pos B 2.00 C % C $382 $19,540 $ $ $4, $5,725 $2.09 $13,813 54% $7,455 $6,358 $14,828 $6,067 $5,697 $370 $15 $276 $6,358 0% Self-Service Car Wash bays D 2.29 C % C $382 $17,243 $ $ $3, $4,924 $23.79 $12,295 0% $0 $12,295 $13,191 $11,732 $11,010 $722 $29 $534 $17,824-31% 913.P 913 Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf C 2.78 C % C $378 $218,333 $8, $8, $44, $61,040 $25.22 $157,268 56% $88,136 $69,131 $168,613 $65,966 $61,886 $4,080 $163 $3,002 $69,131 0% Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 2.15 B 3.26 K % N $373 $1,921 $73.43 $70.64 $ $520 $47.93 $1,353 53% $717 $636 $1,453 $606 $567 $39 $2 $28 $429 48% INDUSTRIAL: General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 B 5.41 N % N $367 $9,310 $ $ $1, $2,464 $18.07 $6, % $6,828 $0 $7,311 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2, % General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf 1.50 B 5.41 N % N $367 $2,003 $74.87 $72.03 $ $530 $18.07 $1, % $1,455 $0 $1,559 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Industrial Park 1,000 sf 6.83 B 5.41 N % N $367 $9,123 $ $ $1, $2,414 $18.07 $6, % $6,690 $0 $7,164 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 B 5.41 N % N $367 $5,102 $ $ $ $1,350 $18.07 $3, % $3,734 $0 $3,999 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % Warehouse 1,000 sf 3.56 B 5.41 N % N $367 $4,755 $ $ $ $1,258 $47.93 $3, % $3,449 $0 $3,696 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 B 6.95 M % N $365 $2,868 $ $ $ $750 $47.93 $2, % $2,070 $0 $2,219 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 160.P 153 Airport Hangar 1,000 sf 3.56 H 5.41 N % N $367 $4,755 $ $ $ $1,258 $18.07 $3, % $3,478 $0 $3,726 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % OTHER: n/a n/a Mining 1,000 cy 0.01 I I % I $363 $76 $0.17 $1.38 $17.43 $19 $0.48 $56 0% $0 $56 $60 $53 $51 $2 $1 $2 n/a n/a 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

52 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RESIDENTIAL: Table 4-10 Rural Mobility Schedule ( District C) MUTRM Rates Revenue period: 25 P4P Equivalent Pennies: 4.8 Include carrying cost?: No TOD Deduction: 0.00% Discount Rate: 3.30% 2nd LOFT County pennies to capacity: 5 Include Interstates?: Yes TND Deduction: 0.00% Fuel efficiency: Existing State pennies to capacity: 25.6 MUTRM Deduction: 8.02% Days/yr: 365 Tax Inc Fin Millage Rate to capacity: % Factor to convert VMT to PMT: 1.37 Existing County pennies to capital: 0 Toll.fwy discount: 3.8% Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Before Increment Incentive Self-Credit Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than 80% SHIP 210.1P Definition (2) du 4.10 A 7.61 C % V $364 $8,324 $ $ $1, $2,162 $68.84 $6,093 31% $1,898 $4,195 $6,526 $4,003 $3,748 $255 $10 $ P to 1,500 s.f. du 6.25 A 7.61 C % V $364 $12,689 $ $ $2, $3,296 $68.84 $9,324 43% $4,054 $5,270 $9,984 $5,028 $4,708 $320 $13 $ P ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du 7.81 A 7.61 C % V $364 $15,857 $ $ $2, $4,119 $ $11,612 37% $4,262 $7,350 $12,436 $7,013 $6,566 $447 $18 $ P ,500 s.f. and greater du 9.20 A 7.61 C % V $364 $18,679 $ $ $3, $4,852 $ $13,514 40% $5,472 $8,042 $14,485 $7,674 $7,178 $496 $19 $ P "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family (2) du 3.46 A 5.87 C % V $366 $5,445 $ $ $1, $1,429 $0.00 $4,016 32% $1,294 $2,722 $4,299 $2,597 $2,434 $163 $7 $ Multi-Family Apartments du 6.60 B 5.87 C % V $366 $10,387 $ $ $1, $2,726 $0.00 $7,661 34% $2,640 $5,021 $8,200 $4,791 $4,490 $301 $12 $ Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du 6.40 B 5.87 J % V $366 $10,072 $ $ $1, $2,643 $54.63 $7,374 31% $2,322 $5,052 $7,897 $4,821 $4,516 $305 $12 $ High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du 4.18 B 5.87 J % V $366 $6,578 $ $ $1, $1,727 $54.63 $4,797 18% $882 $3,915 $5,139 $3,735 $3,498 $237 $10 $ Mobile Home Park du 4.17 C 5.29 C % V $367 $5,936 $ $ $1, $1,563 $38.24 $4,334 35% $1,536 $2,798 $4,642 $2,669 $2,499 $170 $7 $ Age Restricted Single Family (3) du 3.12 D 6.23 C % V $365 $5,204 $ $ $ $1,363 $68.84 $3,772 35% $1,313 $2,460 $4,043 $2,347 $2,196 $151 $6 $ Age Restricted Multi-Family (3) du 2.97 D 3.77 C % V $370 $3,037 $ $ $ $817 $29.50 $2,191 40% $878 $1,313 $2,349 $1,252 $1,173 $79 $4 $ Congregate Care Facility (Attached) (3) du 2.25 D 3.54 C % C $371 $1,562 $59.45 $57.19 $ $421 $19.67 $1,121 34% $387 $734 $1,202 $700 $656 $44 $2 $ LODGING: Hotel room 6.36 D 7.20 C % C $364 $7,958 $ $ $1, $2,073 $43.71 $5, % $5,841 $0 $6,255 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Motel room 5.63 B 4.99 C % C $368 $5,752 $ $ $1, $1,520 $21.85 $4, % $4,210 $0 $4,509 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Resort Hotel room 5.83 D 7.02 C % C $365 $8,955 $ $ $1, $2,333 $43.71 $6, % $6,578 $0 $7,043 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - - RECREATION: General Recreation acre 2.28 B 5.37 K % K $367 $2,923 $ $ $ $770 $22.76 $2,131 63% $1,346 $785 $2,282 $749 $701 $48 $2 $ RV Park RV space 1.62 B 4.83 L % L $368 $2,080 $77.82 $74.87 $ $551 $2.28 $1,527 45% $684 $843 $1,635 $804 $753 $51 $2 $ Marina berth 2.96 B 6.95 M % K $365 $4,881 $ $ $ $1,272 $81.95 $3,526 59% $2,087 $1,440 $3,780 $1,373 $1,284 $89 $4 $ Golf Course hole B 6.95 M % K $365 $58,931 $2, $2, $11, $15,363 $81.95 $43,486 59% $25,829 $17,657 $46,548 $16,848 $15,784 $1,064 $42 $ Miniature Golf Course hole 3.30 B 6.95 M % K $365 $5,441 $ $ $1, $1,419 $28.85 $3,994 68% $2,698 $1,296 $4,277 $1,236 $1,157 $79 $4 $ Bowling Alley 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % K $367 $43,052 $1, $1, $8, $11,333 $24.04 $31,695 63% $20,035 $11,660 $33,932 $11,126 $10,425 $701 $28 $ Movie Theater screen E 2.33 C % C $378 $59,803 $2, $2, $12, $16,720 $ $42,973 63% $26,882 $16,091 $46,081 $15,354 $14,402 $952 $38 $ Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % W $367 $18,928 $ $ $3, $4,983 $73.21 $13,872 63% $8,764 $5,108 $14,856 $4,874 $4,566 $308 $12 $ Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf B 7.06 K % K $365 $56,648 $2, $2, $10, $14,755 $73.21 $41,820 75% $31,353 $10,467 $44,763 $9,987 $9,356 $631 $25 $ INSTITUTIONS: Elementary School student 1.29 B 4.52 O % K $369 $1,161 $43.82 $42.16 $ $310 $22.13 $829 20% $165 $664 $889 $633 $592 $41 $2 $ Middle School student 1.62 B 4.52 O % K $369 $1,641 $61.91 $59.56 $ $438 $22.13 $1,180 20% $237 $943 $1,265 $899 $842 $57 $3 $ High School student 1.71 B 4.52 O % K $369 $1,732 $65.35 $62.87 $ $463 $22.13 $1,247 20% $250 $996 $1,337 $950 $890 $60 $3 $ University/Jr College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 F 6.95 M % K $365 $3,083 $ $ $ $806 $22.13 $2,255 18% $414 $1,841 $2,415 $1,756 $1,644 $112 $5 $ University/Jr College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student 1.50 F 6.95 M % K $365 $2,313 $85.36 $82.12 $ $605 $22.13 $1,686 18% $310 $1,376 $1,806 $1,312 $1,228 $84 $4 $ Church 1,000 sf 9.11 B 4.10 K % K $370 $8,395 $ $ $1, $2,257 $38.51 $6,099 23% $1,399 $4,700 $6,535 $4,484 $4,202 $282 $12 $ Day Care student 3.03 H 2.13 C % C $382 $1,217 $48.75 $46.89 $ $345 $ $642 16% $104 $538 $705 $513 $470 $43 $2 $ Cemetery acre 4.73 B 6.95 M % H $365 $7,697 $ $ $1, $2,012 $8.20 $5,677 18% $1,047 $4,630 $6,077 $4,418 $4,139 $279 $11 $ Hospital 1,000 sf B 6.95 M % K $365 $17,437 $ $ $3, $4,558 $ $12,677 18% $2,327 $10,350 $13,583 $9,876 $9,243 $633 $25 $ Nursing Home bed 2.76 D 2.72 C % C $375 $1,693 $66.52 $63.99 $ $471 $6.17 $1,216 31% $373 $842 $1,304 $803 $753 $50 $2 $ OFFICE: General Office 50,000 sf or less (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $367 $19,111 $ $ $3, $5,056 $61.70 $13, % $13,993 $0 $14,986 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 50, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $367 $16,189 $ $ $3, $4,283 $61.70 $11, % $11,844 $0 $12,685 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 100, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $367 $13,711 $ $ $2, $3,628 $61.70 $10, % $10,021 $0 $10,734 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office 200, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf 9.41 G 5.41 C % C $367 $11,602 $ $ $2, $3,070 $61.70 $8, % $8,471 $0 $9,074 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P General Office greater than 400,000 sf (5) 1,000 sf 8.54 G 5.41 C % C $367 $10,530 $ $ $2, $2,786 $61.70 $7, % $7,682 $0 $8,229 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf 7.98 B 5.41 N % N $367 $9,839 $ $ $1, $2,603 $61.70 $7, % $7,174 $0 $7,685 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Medical Office 1,000 sf D 5.83 C % C $367 $44,628 $1, $1, $8, $11,743 $61.70 $32, % $32,823 $0 $35,142 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Office Park 1,000 sf D 7.47 C % Q $365 $19,147 $ $ $3, $4,991 $61.70 $14, % $14,095 $0 $15,090 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Research and Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 B 5.65 Q % Q $367 $10,102 $ $ $1, $2,664 $61.70 $7, % $7,376 $0 $7,901 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P 640 Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf B 5.36 P % P $368 $49,654 $1, $1, $9, $13,117 $61.70 $36, % $36,475 $0 $39,055 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

53 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RETAIL: Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Table 4-10 (continued) Rural Mobility Schedule ( District C) MUTRM Rates Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Notes: 1) This value is the total value of transportation system consumed, less credits for revenues committed to transportation system expansion that are generated by the use itself. This value includes Interstate costs and "carrying costs", but not toll road costs. It does consider the proportion of trip length, varying system costs, and transportation system performance goals that vary by fee district. 2) Specific calculations for the "low income" category can be seen in Appendix B of the 2014 Mobility Update Study. 3) The statistical relationship between the trip generation rate for the age restricted single family, age restricted multi-family, and congregate care facility was used to interpolate the trip length. 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the office and retail size categories used the end-point of the range due to the nature of the ITE equation to be conservative for smaller developments. 5) The trip generation rate used for the office and retail open-ended size categories used the size 200,000 s.f. larger than the beginning of the size range, as the size ranges increase in 200,000 s.f. increments. 6) s of trip rate, percent new trips, and trip length are as follows: (A) FL Studies (NHTS, AHS, Census) (I) Independent Study (Collier County) (Q) Same as LUC 770 (Business Park) (B) ITE 9 th Edition (J) Same as LUC 220 (R) Same as LUC 820 (<50k) (C) Florida Studies Database (K) Florida Schedules (S) Florida Curve (D) Blend of TIE 9 th & FL Studies (L) Same as LUC 240 (T) Same as LUC 942 (Auto Care Center) (E) Blend of ITE 6 th & FL Studies (M) Same as LUC 210 (U) Same as LUC 820 (50k-200k) (F) ITE Regression Analysis (N) Same as LUC 710 (V) n/a (G) ITE 9 th Equation (O) Model-Based Trip Length (W) Same as LUC 492 (Health Club) (H) Previous Pasco Mobility Study (P) Same as LUC 630 (Clinic) Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Before Increment Incentive Self-Credit Incentive % $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf B 1.96 R % R $382 $15,816 $ $ $3, $4,487 $73.21 $11,255 61% $6,896 $4,359 $12,077 $4,159 $3,902 $257 $11 $ Retail 50,000 sfgla or less (4) 1,000 sfgla G 1.96 S % S $382 $26,691 $1, $1, $5, $7,573 $73.21 $19,045 61% $11,652 $7,394 $20,432 $7,055 $6,618 $437 $18 $ P Retail 50, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.52 S % S $375 $24,801 $ $ $4, $6,893 $73.21 $17,835 63% $11,224 $6,610 $19,123 $6,307 $5,915 $392 $16 $ P Retail 200, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.77 S % S $375 $23,303 $ $ $4, $6,394 $ $16,798 63% $10,644 $6,155 $18,009 $5,873 $5,505 $368 $15 $ P Retail 400, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.01 S % S $373 $22,737 $ $ $4, $6,212 $ $16,415 65% $10,603 $5,813 $17,597 $5,547 $5,199 $348 $14 $ P Retail 600, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.26 S % S $373 $23,149 $ $ $4, $6,266 $ $16,773 64% $10,777 $5,996 $17,976 $5,721 $5,361 $360 $15 $ P Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla (5) 1,000 sfgla G 3.51 S % S $371 $23,519 $ $ $4, $6,345 $ $17,064 63% $10,818 $6,246 $18,286 $5,960 $5,585 $375 $15 $ Specialty Retail 1,000 sf D 3.54 C % C $371 $41,026 $1, $1, $7, $11,059 $73.21 $29,894 61% $18,314 $11,580 $32,025 $11,049 $10,357 $692 $28 $ New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf D 4.83 C % C $368 $29,117 $1, $1, $5, $7,704 $46.48 $21,367 60% $12,754 $8,613 $22,880 $8,218 $7,701 $517 $21 $ Tire Store 1,000 sf B 3.80 T % T $370 $18,487 $ $ $3, $4,967 $73.21 $13,447 61% $8,251 $5,196 $14,408 $4,957 $4,645 $312 $13 $ Supermarket 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $378 $35,071 $1, $1, $7, $9,883 $0.00 $25,188 61% $15,376 $9,812 $27,010 $9,362 $8,784 $578 $24 $ Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf D 1.59 C % C $389 $81,298 $3, $3, $17, $24,644 $25.22 $56,629 65% $36,828 $19,801 $60,853 $18,894 $17,755 $1,139 $47 $ Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf B 2.52 U % U $375 $14,309 $ $ $2, $3,977 $73.21 $10,259 64% $6,571 $3,688 $11,002 $3,519 $3,299 $220 $9 $ Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $378 $18,602 $ $ $3, $5,242 $73.21 $13,287 61% $8,114 $5,173 $14,253 $4,935 $4,629 $306 $13 $ Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 B 6.39 C % C $365 $4,682 $ $ $ $1,224 $73.21 $3,385 61% $2,078 $1,307 $3,628 $1,246 $1,166 $80 $4 $ Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf D 2.58 C % C $378 $43,358 $1, $1, $8, $12,265 $ $30,948 62% $19,261 $11,687 $33,201 $11,151 $10,461 $690 $28 $ Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.30 C % C $373 $63,436 $2, $2, $12, $17,148 $46.29 $46,242 62% $28,440 $17,801 $49,538 $16,986 $15,924 $1,062 $42 $ High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.33 C % C $371 $75,189 $2, $2, $14, $20,401 $46.29 $54,741 60% $32,784 $21,957 $58,648 $20,951 $19,643 $1,308 $52 $ Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf D 2.15 C % C $382 $147,704 $6, $5, $30, $42,670 $ $104,870 64% $66,636 $38,234 $112,545 $36,484 $34,247 $2,237 $90 $1, Quick Lube bays B 3.80 T % T $373 $24,745 $ $ $4, $6,728 $23.79 $17,993 53% $9,609 $8,384 $19,279 $8,000 $7,500 $500 $20 $ Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf D 3.80 T % T $370 $23,364 $ $ $4, $6,277 $68.65 $17,018 58% $9,880 $7,138 $18,232 $6,811 $6,384 $427 $17 $ Gasoline Station fuel pos B 2.00 C % C $382 $17,973 $ $ $3, $5,266 $2.09 $12,705 62% $7,936 $4,769 $13,639 $4,550 $4,273 $277 $12 $ Self-Service Car Wash bays D 2.29 C % C $382 $15,860 $ $ $3, $4,529 $23.79 $11,307 18% $2,086 $9,221 $12,132 $8,799 $8,257 $542 $22 $ P 913 Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf C 2.78 C % C $378 $200,823 $7, $7, $40, $56,145 $25.22 $144,653 64% $92,805 $51,848 $155,088 $49,474 $46,414 $3,060 $122 $2, Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 2.15 B 3.26 K % N $373 $1,767 $67.54 $64.97 $ $478 $47.93 $1,241 62% $774 $467 $1,333 $445 $416 $29 $2 $ INDUSTRIAL: General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 B 5.41 N % N $367 $8,563 $ $ $1, $2,266 $18.07 $6, % $6,279 $0 $6,724 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf 1.50 B 5.41 N % N $367 $1,843 $68.87 $66.25 $ $488 $18.07 $1, % $1,337 $0 $1,433 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Industrial Park 1,000 sf 6.83 B 5.41 N % N $367 $8,391 $ $ $1, $2,221 $18.07 $6, % $6,152 $0 $6,588 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 B 5.41 N % N $367 $4,693 $ $ $ $1,242 $18.07 $3, % $3,433 $0 $3,677 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Warehouse 1,000 sf 3.56 B 5.41 N % N $367 $4,374 $ $ $ $1,158 $47.93 $3, % $3,168 $0 $3,395 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 B 6.95 M % N $365 $2,638 $97.40 $93.70 $ $690 $47.93 $1, % $1,900 $0 $2,037 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ P 153 Airport Hangar 1,000 sf 3.56 H 5.41 N % N $367 $4,374 $ $ $ $1,158 $18.07 $3, % $3,198 $0 $3,425 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

54 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RESIDENTIAL: Table 4-11 Rural Mobility Schedule ( District C) TND Rates Revenue period: 25 P4P Equivalent Pennies: 4.8 Include carrying cost?: No TOD Deduction: 0.00% Discount Rate: 3.30% 2nd LOFT County pennies to capacity: 5 Include Interstates?: Yes TND Deduction: 11.36% Fuel efficiency: Existing State pennies to capacity: 25.6 MUTRM Deduction: 0.00% Days/yr: 365 Tax Inc Fin Millage Rate to capacity: % Factor to convert VMT to PMT: 1.37 Existing County pennies to capital: 0 Toll.fwy discount: 3.8% Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Before Increment Incentive Incentive % Self-Credit $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less than 80% SHIP 210.1P Definition (2) du 4.10 A 7.61 C % V $364 $8,022 $ $ $1, $2,084 $68.84 $5,869 52% $3,072 $2,797 $6,286 $2,669 $2,499 $170 $7 $121 $1, % 210.2P to 1,500 s.f. du 6.25 A 7.61 C % V $364 $12,229 $ $ $2, $3,177 $68.84 $8,983 61% $5,471 $3,513 $9,619 $3,351 $3,137 $214 $9 $153 $1, % 210.3P ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du 7.81 A 7.61 C % V $364 $15,281 $ $ $2, $3,970 $ $11,186 56% $6,286 $4,900 $11,980 $4,675 $4,377 $298 $12 $213 $2, % 210.4P ,500 s.f. and greater du 9.20 A 7.61 C % V $364 $18,001 $ $ $3, $4,676 $ $13,012 59% $7,650 $5,362 $13,947 $5,116 $4,786 $330 $13 $233 $2, % 210.5P "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family (2) du 3.46 A 5.87 C % V $366 $5,247 $ $ $ $1,377 $0.00 $3,870 53% $2,056 $1,815 $4,143 $1,731 $1,622 $109 $5 $79 $ % Multi-Family Apartments du 6.60 B 5.87 C % V $366 $10,010 $ $ $1, $2,627 $0.00 $7,383 55% $4,035 $3,347 $7,903 $3,194 $2,993 $201 $8 $145 $1, % Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du 6.40 B 5.87 J % V $366 $9,706 $ $ $1, $2,548 $54.63 $7,104 53% $3,736 $3,368 $7,609 $3,214 $3,010 $204 $8 $146 $1, % High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du 4.18 B 5.87 J % V $366 $6,339 $ $ $1, $1,664 $54.63 $4,621 44% $2,011 $2,610 $4,950 $2,490 $2,331 $159 $7 $113 $1,352 93% Mobile Home Park du 4.17 C 5.29 C % V $367 $5,720 $ $ $1, $1,507 $38.24 $4,175 55% $2,309 $1,866 $4,472 $1,780 $1,667 $113 $5 $81 $ % Age Restricted Single Family (3) du 3.12 D 6.23 C % V $365 $5,015 $ $ $ $1,313 $68.84 $3,633 55% $1,993 $1,640 $3,893 $1,565 $1,465 $100 $4 $71 $ % Age Restricted Multi-Family (3) du 2.97 D 3.77 C % V $370 $2,927 $ $ $ $787 $29.50 $2,110 59% $1,235 $875 $2,262 $834 $781 $53 $3 $38 $ % Congregate Care Facility (Attached) (3) du 2.25 D 3.54 C % C $371 $1,505 $57.29 $55.11 $ $406 $19.67 $1,079 55% $591 $489 $1,158 $466 $436 $30 $2 $21 $ % LODGING: Hotel room 6.36 D 7.20 C % C $364 $7,669 $ $ $1, $1,998 $43.71 $5, % $5,628 $0 $6,026 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Motel room 5.63 B 4.99 C % C $368 $5,543 $ $ $1, $1,465 $21.85 $4, % $4,056 $0 $4,344 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Resort Hotel room 5.83 D 7.02 C % C $365 $8,629 $ $ $1, $2,248 $43.71 $6, % $6,337 $0 $6,786 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % RECREATION: General Recreation acre 2.28 B 5.37 K % K $367 $2,817 $ $ $ $742 $22.76 $2,052 74% $1,528 $524 $2,199 $499 $467 $32 $2 $23 $ % RV Park RV space 1.62 B 4.83 L % L $368 $2,005 $75.00 $72.15 $ $531 $2.28 $1,472 62% $909 $562 $1,576 $536 $502 $34 $2 $24 $ % Marina berth 2.96 B 6.95 M % K $365 $4,703 $ $ $ $1,226 $81.95 $3,395 72% $2,435 $960 $3,640 $915 $856 $59 $3 $42 $ % Golf Course hole B 6.95 M % K $365 $56,791 $2, $2, $10, $14,805 $81.95 $41,904 72% $30,133 $11,771 $44,855 $11,232 $10,522 $710 $28 $511 $5, % Miniature Golf Course hole 3.30 B 6.95 M % K $365 $5,244 $ $ $ $1,367 $28.85 $3,848 78% $2,984 $864 $4,120 $823 $770 $53 $3 $38 $ % Bowling Alley 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % K $367 $41,489 $1, $1, $7, $10,922 $24.04 $30,543 75% $22,769 $7,774 $32,699 $7,417 $6,950 $467 $19 $338 $3, % Movie Theater screen E 2.33 C % C $378 $57,631 $2, $2, $11, $16,112 $ $41,409 74% $30,682 $10,727 $44,404 $10,235 $9,600 $635 $26 $466 $5, % Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf B 5.41 N % W $367 $18,241 $ $ $3, $4,802 $73.21 $13,366 75% $9,960 $3,406 $14,314 $3,249 $3,043 $206 $9 $148 $1, % Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf B 7.06 K % K $365 $54,591 $2, $1, $10, $14,219 $73.21 $40,299 83% $33,320 $6,978 $43,135 $6,658 $6,237 $421 $17 $303 $3, % INSTITUTIONS: Elementary School student 1.29 B 4.52 O % K $369 $1,119 $42.23 $40.63 $ $299 $22.13 $798 44% $355 $443 $856 $422 $395 $27 $2 $19 $ % Middle School student 1.62 B 4.52 O % K $369 $1,581 $59.66 $57.40 $ $423 $22.13 $1,136 45% $507 $629 $1,218 $600 $562 $38 $2 $27 $ % High School student 1.71 B 4.52 O % K $369 $1,669 $62.98 $60.58 $ $446 $22.13 $1,201 45% $537 $664 $1,287 $633 $593 $40 $2 $29 $ % University/Jr College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student 2.00 F 6.95 M % K $365 $2,971 $ $ $ $777 $22.13 $2,173 44% $946 $1,227 $2,327 $1,171 $1,096 $75 $3 $53 $633 94% University/Jr College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student 1.50 F 6.95 M % K $365 $2,229 $82.26 $79.13 $ $583 $22.13 $1,624 43% $706 $918 $1,740 $875 $819 $56 $3 $40 $474 94% Church 1,000 sf 9.11 B 4.10 K % K $370 $8,090 $ $ $1, $2,175 $38.51 $5,876 47% $2,742 $3,134 $6,297 $2,990 $2,802 $188 $8 $136 $1, % Day Care student 3.03 H 2.13 C % C $382 $1,172 $46.98 $45.19 $ $333 $ $610 41% $252 $359 $671 $342 $313 $29 $1 $16 $ % Cemetery acre 4.73 B 6.95 M % H $365 $7,418 $ $ $1, $1,939 $8.20 $5,470 44% $2,383 $3,087 $5,856 $2,945 $2,759 $186 $8 $134 $1,590 94% Hospital 1,000 sf B 6.95 M % K $365 $16,804 $ $ $3, $4,393 $ $12,209 43% $5,309 $6,900 $13,082 $6,583 $6,161 $422 $17 $300 $4,458 55% Nursing Home bed 2.76 D 2.72 C % C $375 $1,632 $64.11 $61.67 $ $454 $6.17 $1,171 52% $610 $562 $1,256 $536 $502 $34 $2 $24 $ % OFFICE: General Office 50,000 sf or less (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $367 $18,417 $ $ $3, $4,873 $61.70 $13, % $13,482 $0 $14,439 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 710.1P General Office 50, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $367 $15,601 $ $ $2, $4,128 $61.70 $11, % $11,412 $0 $12,222 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 710.2P General Office 100, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf G 5.41 C % C $367 $13,213 $ $ $2, $3,496 $61.70 $9, % $9,655 $0 $10,342 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 710.3P General Office 200, ,000 sf (4) 1,000 sf 9.41 G 5.41 C % C $367 $11,181 $ $ $2, $2,958 $61.70 $8, % $8,161 $0 $8,742 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 710.4P General Office greater than 400,000 sf (5) 1,000 sf 8.54 G 5.41 C % C $367 $10,147 $ $ $1, $2,685 $61.70 $7, % $7,401 $0 $7,928 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf 7.98 B 5.41 N % N $367 $9,482 $ $ $1, $2,509 $61.70 $6, % $6,911 $0 $7,404 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Medical Office 1,000 sf D 5.83 C % C $367 $43,007 $1, $1, $8, $11,316 $61.70 $31, % $31,629 $0 $33,864 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1, % Office Park 1,000 sf D 7.47 C % Q $365 $18,452 $ $ $3, $4,809 $61.70 $13, % $13,581 $0 $14,540 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Research and Development Center 1,000 sf 8.11 B 5.65 Q % Q $367 $9,736 $ $ $1, $2,567 $61.70 $7, % $7,106 $0 $7,612 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 770.P 640 Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf B 5.36 P % P $368 $47,851 $1, $1, $9, $12,641 $61.70 $35, % $35,148 $0 $37,634 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

55 Pasco County Land Use Code ITE LUC RETAIL: Land Use Unit Trip Rate (veh trips) TGR (6) Standard Trip Length TL (6) Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor Chargeable Trip length (mi) Table 4-11 (continued) Rural Mobility Schedule ( District C) TND Rates Trip length % New for revenue Trips (mi) % NT (6) Gross assessable pmt/day Weighted Capacity Needed Addition PMC Ratio Needed PMC After Fwy/Toll/ Weighted TOD/TND/ Cost/PMC MUTRM Deduct Notes: 1) This value is the total value of transportation system consumed, less credits for revenues committed to transportation system expansion that are generated by the use itself. This value includes Interstate costs and "carrying costs", but not toll road costs. It does consider the proportion of trip length, varying system costs, and transportation system performance goals that vary by fee district. 2) Specific calculations for the "low income" category can be seen in Appendix B of the 2014 Mobility Update Study. 3) The statistical relationship between the trip generation rate for the age restricted single family, age restricted multi-family, and congregate care facility was used to interpolate the trip length. 4) The trip generation rate recommended for the office and retail size categories used the end-point of the range due to the nature of the ITE equation to be conservative for smaller developments. 5) The trip generation rate used for the office and retail open-ended size categories used the size 200,000 s.f. larger than the beginning of the size range, as the size ranges increase in 200,000 s.f. increments. 6) s of trip rate, percent new trips, and trip length are as follows: (A) FL Studies (NHTS, AHS, Census) (I) Independent Study (Collier County) (Q) Same as LUC 770 (Business Park) (B) ITE 9 th Edition (J) Same as LUC 220 (R) Same as LUC 820 (<50k) (C) Florida Studies Database (K) Florida Schedules (S) Florida Curve (D) Blend of TIE 9 th & FL Studies (L) Same as LUC 240 (T) Same as LUC 942 (Auto Care Center) (E) Blend of ITE 6 th & FL Studies (M) Same as LUC 210 (U) Same as LUC 820 (50k-200k) (F) ITE Regression Analysis (N) Same as LUC 710 (V) n/a (G) ITE 9 th Equation (O) Model-Based Trip Length (W) Same as LUC 492 (Health Club) (H) Previous Pasco Mobility Study (P) Same as LUC 630 (Clinic) Total Impact Cost PV County Gas Tax Credit ($$/yr): PV P4P Equivalent Credit PV Federal/ State Gas Tax Revenue Credit ($$/yr) PV Sub- Total Countywide selfcredits: PV Tax Before Increment Incentive Incentive % Self-Credit $$ Allocated for Incentive Net Mobility Full (1) Road Share (Incl Int) Road Interstate Transit Bike/Ped Share /SIS Share Share Share (Excl Int) Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf B 1.96 R % R $382 $15,241 $ $ $3, $4,324 $73.21 $10,844 73% $7,938 $2,906 $11,636 $2,773 $2,601 $172 $7 $126 $1, % Retail 50,000 sfgla or less (4) 1,000 sfgla G 1.96 S % S $382 $25,722 $1, $ $5, $7,298 $73.21 $18,351 73% $13,422 $4,929 $19,688 $4,703 $4,412 $291 $12 $214 $2, % 820.1P Retail 50, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.52 S % S $375 $23,900 $ $ $4, $6,643 $73.21 $17,184 74% $12,777 $4,407 $18,426 $4,205 $3,943 $262 $11 $191 $2, % 820.2P Retail 200, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 2.77 S % S $375 $22,457 $ $ $4, $6,162 $ $16,184 75% $12,081 $4,104 $17,351 $3,916 $3,670 $246 $10 $178 $2, % 820.3P Retail 400, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.01 S % S $373 $21,912 $ $ $4, $5,987 $ $15,815 75% $11,940 $3,875 $16,954 $3,697 $3,465 $232 $10 $168 $1, % 820.4P Retail 600, ,000 sfgla (4) 1,000 sfgla G 3.26 S % S $373 $22,308 $ $ $4, $6,039 $ $16,160 75% $12,162 $3,998 $17,319 $3,814 $3,575 $239 $10 $174 $1, % 820.5P Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla (5) 1,000 sfgla G 3.51 S % S $371 $22,665 $ $ $4, $6,115 $ $16,440 75% $12,276 $4,164 $17,618 $3,973 $3,723 $250 $10 $181 $2, % Specialty Retail 1,000 sf D 3.54 C % C $371 $39,536 $1, $1, $7, $10,657 $73.21 $28,806 73% $21,086 $7,720 $30,860 $7,366 $6,904 $462 $19 $335 $3, % New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf D 4.83 C % C $368 $28,060 $1, $1, $5, $7,424 $46.48 $20,589 72% $14,847 $5,742 $22,047 $5,479 $5,134 $345 $14 $249 $2, % Tire Store 1,000 sf B 3.80 T % T $370 $17,816 $ $ $3, $4,787 $73.21 $12,956 73% $9,493 $3,464 $13,882 $3,305 $3,097 $208 $9 $150 $1, % Supermarket 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $378 $33,797 $1, $1, $6, $9,524 $0.00 $24,273 73% $17,732 $6,541 $26,030 $6,241 $5,856 $385 $16 $284 $3, % Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf D 1.59 C % C $389 $78,346 $3, $3, $17, $23,749 $25.22 $54,572 76% $41,370 $13,201 $58,643 $12,596 $11,837 $759 $32 $573 $6, % Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf B 2.52 U % U $375 $13,789 $ $ $2, $3,833 $73.21 $9,884 75% $7,425 $2,459 $10,600 $2,346 $2,199 $147 $6 $107 $1, % Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf D 2.18 C % C $378 $17,927 $ $ $3, $5,052 $73.21 $12,802 73% $9,353 $3,449 $13,733 $3,290 $3,086 $204 $9 $150 $1, % Furniture Store 1,000 sf 5.06 B 6.39 C % C $365 $4,512 $ $ $ $1,179 $73.21 $3,259 73% $2,388 $871 $3,494 $830 $777 $53 $3 $38 $ % Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf D 2.58 C % C $378 $41,783 $1, $1, $8, $11,820 $ $29,819 74% $22,028 $7,791 $31,990 $7,434 $6,974 $460 $19 $338 $3, % Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.30 C % C $373 $61,132 $2, $2, $11, $16,525 $46.29 $44,561 73% $32,693 $11,868 $47,737 $11,325 $10,617 $708 $28 $515 $5, % High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf D 3.33 C % C $371 $72,458 $2, $2, $14, $19,660 $46.29 $52,752 72% $38,114 $14,638 $56,517 $13,967 $13,095 $872 $35 $636 $7, % Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf D 2.15 C % C $382 $142,341 $5, $5, $29, $41,121 $ $101,056 75% $75,567 $25,489 $108,452 $24,322 $22,831 $1,491 $60 $1,107 $12, % Quick Lube bays B 3.80 T % T $373 $23,846 $ $ $4, $6,484 $23.79 $17,339 68% $11,749 $5,590 $18,578 $5,333 $5,000 $333 $14 $243 $2, % Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf D 3.80 T % T $370 $22,516 $ $ $4, $6,049 $68.65 $16,398 71% $11,639 $4,759 $17,568 $4,540 $4,254 $286 $12 $207 $2, % Gasoline Station fuel pos B 2.00 C % C $382 $17,320 $ $ $3, $5,074 $2.09 $12,244 74% $9,065 $3,179 $13,144 $3,033 $2,848 $185 $8 $138 $1, % Self-Service Car Wash bays D 2.29 C % C $382 $15,284 $ $ $3, $4,365 $23.79 $10,896 44% $4,748 $6,148 $11,690 $5,866 $5,505 $361 $15 $267 $4,456 38% 913.P 913 Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf C 2.78 C % C $378 $193,530 $7, $7, $39, $54,106 $25.22 $139,399 75% $104,833 $34,566 $149,455 $32,983 $30,943 $2,040 $82 $1,501 $17, % Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf 2.15 B 3.26 K % N $373 $1,703 $65.09 $62.62 $ $461 $47.93 $1,194 73% $876 $318 $1,283 $303 $283 $20 $1 $14 $ % INDUSTRIAL: General Light Industrial 1,000 sf 6.97 B 5.41 N % N $367 $8,252 $ $ $1, $2,184 $18.07 $6, % $6,050 $0 $6,479 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf 1.50 B 5.41 N % N $367 $1,776 $66.37 $63.84 $ $470 $18.07 $1, % $1,288 $0 $1,380 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Industrial Park 1,000 sf 6.83 B 5.41 N % N $367 $8,086 $ $ $1, $2,140 $18.07 $5, % $5,928 $0 $6,348 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Manufacturing 1,000 sf 3.82 B 5.41 N % N $367 $4,523 $ $ $ $1,197 $18.07 $3, % $3,308 $0 $3,543 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % Warehouse 1,000 sf 3.56 B 5.41 N % N $367 $4,215 $ $ $ $1,115 $47.93 $3, % $3,051 $0 $3,270 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf 1.68 B 6.95 M % N $365 $2,542 $93.86 $90.30 $ $665 $47.93 $1, % $1,830 $0 $1,962 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 160.P 153 Airport Hangar 1,000 sf 3.56 H 5.41 N % N $367 $4,215 $ $ $ $1,115 $18.07 $3, % $3,081 $0 $3,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ % 2011 Mobility Percent change from 2011 to 2014 October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

56 4.2 Example Calculation It is useful to provide example calculations for the mobility fee for one of the land use categories. In the following examples, the net mobility fee is calculated for the Single-Family Residential detached land use category (ITE LUC 210) using information from the proposed urban mobility fee schedule, and an example of the Total Impact Cost is also provided. For each land use category of the fee schedules, the same equations are used to calculate the net mobility fee: Net Mobility = Total Impact Cost Gas Tax, P4P Tax, and Tax Increment Credit-Incentive Where: Total Impact Cost = ((Trip Rate Chargeable Trip Length % New Trips) (1-MUTRM,TOD, or TND deduction) Factor to convert VMT to PMT / 2) (1 Toll or Freeway deduction) (Weighted Cost per Person-Mile of capacity) Gas Tax and P4P Tax Credit = Present Value of (Annual Gas Tax and Equivalent P4P Credit), at 3.3% interest rate and 25-year facility life, computed as: [(((Trip Rate Trip Length for Revenue % New Trips) / 2) (1-MUTRM, TND, or TOD reduction) Effective Days per Year $/Gallon to Capital) / Fuel Efficiency] where is the factor to convert 25 years of revenue to present value at 5 percent interest rate. Tax Increment Credit = Present Value ([estimated tax value per unit of development in year i floor value of unit of development] 0.25 / $1,000) at 3.3 percent for i = 1 to 25 years Discount = is a reduction in the mobility fee, the magnitude of which was established by Board of County Commissioners direction. Generally, land uses which generate employment were given greater discounts to promote job-creating land uses in. Each of the inputs has been discussed previously in this document; however, for purposes of this example, brief definitions for each are provided below, along with the actual inputs for the Single- Family Residential Detached, 1,501 to 2,499 s.f. category, in the Urban District. Trip Rate = the average daily trip generation rate, in vehicle-trips/day (7.81). % New Trips = adjustment factor to account for trips that are already on the roadway (100%). October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

57 Market Area Trip Length Adjustment Factor = a factor which adjusts the county-wide average trip length, and therefore person-miles of travel, to reflect the geographic sub-area of the county, or fee district, in which the new development is located (0.858). Chargeable Trip Length = the average trip length on arterial and collector roads for which the new development is assessed, in miles (6.53). This value includes toll road travel, which is deducted below. Trip Length for Revenue = trip length representing travel on all roads where the vehicle engine is running and burning gasoline and generating gas tax revenues. This occurs on all roads including freeways, toll roads, and local roads. A distance of 0.5 mile was added to the Chargeable Trip Length of each land use category to account for local street travel, and the Interstate/Toll road deduction applied to the Chargeable Trip Length is not applied to the Trip Length for Revenue. ( = 7.03). Factor to convert VMT to PMT = 1.37 person-trips per vehicle trip. 2 = the total daily miles of travel generated by a particular category (i.e., rate * length * % new trips) is divided by two to prevent the double-counting of travel generated by any given land use, since every trip is generated by a land use at each end of the trip. Deduct Toll/Fwy/MUTRM/TND/TOD Share = reduced travel demand to account for travel occurring on interstate highways and/or toll facilities (1.7 percent in this case for travel on the Suncoast Parkway only, as no deduction is made for Interstate highway travel), and reduced travel demand for development following MUTRM, TND, or TOD development standards of s Land Development Regulations. (0% deduction in this case, since this example is for the Standard fee rate). Weighted Cost per Person-Mile of Capacity = unit cost to construct one person-mile of transportation system capacity, in $/person-mile ($307.69). An example of the calculation of this value is provided in section Present Value = calculation of the present value of a uniform series of cash flows, gas tax payments or tax increment credits in this case, given an interest rate, i, and a number of periods, n; for 3.3% interest and a 25-year facility life, the uniform series present worth factor is Effective Days per Year = 365 days $/Gallon to Capital = the amount of State and County gas tax revenue and equivalent pennies of sales tax revenue per gallon of fuel that is used for capital improvements, in $/gallon ($0.353) Fuel Efficiency = average fuel efficiency of vehicles, in vehicle-miles/gallon (18.43) October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

58 Using these inputs, the following net mobility fee is calculated for the 1,501 to 2,499 s.f. Single-Family Residential Detached land use in the urban district. Note that the exact dollar amounts may vary slightly from the values reported in Table 3-1 due to the spreadsheet carrying additional decimal places in its computations. Total Impact Cost = (( (1-0.00)) 1.37 / 2) ( ) ($307.69) = $10,565 Present Value Sub-Total of Gas Tax and Equivalent Self-Credits = [((( ) (1-0.00) / 2) 365 $0.353) / 18.43] = $3,233 Present Value Tax Increment Self-Credit = sum of ($127, ((1+0.02) n -1) ( ) n /$1,000) for n = 1 to 25-year period = $139 $$ Allocated for Buy-Down Discount= $1,358 (18.9 percent of fee before buy-down) Net Mobility = $10,565 - $3,233 - $139 - $1,358 = $5,835 The Full represents the full potential cost of providing transportation system capacity, and is used by as an upper limit to proportionate share assessments. It s computation is similar to the standard mobility fee, except that an additional element of cost, the time value of Year Phase Proportion of Cost Adjusted for Time 6 Design $3.49 $ Design $3.49 $ ROW $5.81 $ ROW $11.63 $ ROW $11.63 $ Const/CEI $31.98 $ Const/CEI/Open $31.98 $31.98 Total: $ $ Carrying Cost Factor: funds used to fund design, right-of-way acquisition, and some elements of construction in advance of the funded capacity becoming available to the public is added, and no incentives. The carrying cost computation is summarized in the table to the left, indicating the carrying costs of a hypothetical $100 improvement project over a 6-year period. A carrying cost of 5.2 percent of the total cost is indicated, based on a 3.3 percent per year interest rate. In addition, the discretionary buy-down is not applied. All other self-credits, such as gasoline tax credits and the tax increment credit, remain applicable. Thus, the calculation, borrowing from the previous example, is: Full = Gross Impact Cost * Carrying Cost Present Value Sub-Total of County-wide Self- Credits, or Present Value Sub-Total of County-wide Self-Credits Tax Increment Credit Full = $10,565 * (1.052) - $3,232 - $139 - $0 = $7,743 The Interstate share of the mobility fee was determined by calculating the difference between the mobility fees calculated in the normal method as described above and the fee calculated by deleting October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

59 the portion of travel on I-75 and the portion of gasoline tax credits that are associated with planned Interstate improvements. These values and computations are as follows, with the numbers that change denoted in bold: Total Impact Cost = (( (1-0.00)) 1.37 / 2) ( ) ($307.70) = $9,859 Gas Tax Credit, or Present Value Sub-Total of County-wide Self-Credits = [((( ) (1-0.00) / 2) 365 $0.316) / 18.43] = $2,894 n -1) (1-0.05) n /$1,000) for n = 1 to 25- year period = $139 $$ Allocated for Buy-Down = $1,288 (18.88% of fee before buy-down) if I-75 is excluded = $9,859 - $2,894 - $139 - $1,288 = $5,538 Thus, the effect of I-75 on the mobility fee, or the Interstate Share, is ($5,835 - $5,538 =) $ Indexing Currently, annually reviews its transportation impact fees to adjust them to respond to cost trends. With this update to its fee structure, the County is reserving the right to adjust mobility fees at any time, with full fee program reviews to be undertaken no less frequently than every three years. s will not be automatically indexed, and Board of County Commissioner action will be required to alter the fees. October 2014 Page Mobility Update Study

60 Appendix A Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database

61 Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database The Florida Studies Trip Characteristics Database includes over 200 studies on 40 different residential and non-residential land uses collected over the last 25 years. Data from these studies include trip generation, trip length, and percent new trips for each land use. This information has been used in the development of impact fees and the creation of land use plan category trip characteristics for communities throughout Florida and the U.S. Tindale-Oliver estimates trip generation rates for all land uses in a multi-modal mobility fee schedule using data from studies in the Florida Studies Database and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation reference report (9 th edition). In instances, when both ITE Trip Generation reference report (9 th edition) and Florida Studies trip generation rate (TGR) data are available for a particular land use, the data is typically blended together to increase the sample size and provide a more valid estimate of the average number of trips generated per unit of development. If no Florida Studies data is available, only TGR data from the ITE reference report is used in the fee calculation. The trip generation rate for each respective land use is calculated using machine counts that record daily traffic into and out of the site studied. The traffic count hoses are set at entrances to residential subdivisions for the residential land uses and at all access points for non-residential land uses. The trip length information is obtained through origin-destination surveys that ask respondents where they came from prior to arriving at the site and where they intended to go after leaving the site. The results of these surveys were used to estimate average trip length by land use. The percent new trips variable is based on assigning each trip collected through the origin-destination survey process a trip type (primary, secondary, diverted, and captured). The percent new trip variable is then calculated as 1 minus the percentage of trips that are captured. Tindale-Oliver has published an article entitled, Measuring Travel Characteristics for Transportation Impact s, ITE Journal, April 1991 on the data collecting methodology for trip characteristics studies. October 2014 Page A-1 Transportation Mobility

62 Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # Interviews Mini-Warehouse (ITE LUC 151) # Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Total Size Average Trip Length: n/a ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: n/a Blended total 1,235.3 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: - Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 1.53 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.50 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.15 VMT Single-Family Detached Housing (ITE LUC 210) Total # # Trip Length Percent New Location Size / Units Date Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length VMT Interviews Interviews Trips Gwinnett Co, GA - 12/13-18/ N/A Street Smarts Gwinnett Co, GA - 12/13-18/ N/A Street Smarts Sarasota Co, FL 76 Jun N/A Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 79 Jun N/A Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 135 Jun N/A Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 152 Jun N/A Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 193 Jun N/A Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 97 Jun N/A Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 282 Jun N/A Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 393 Jun N/A Sarasota County Hernando Co, FL 76 May a-6p 4.85 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 128 May a-6p 6.03 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 232 May a-6p 5.04 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 301 May a-6p 3.28 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 135 Oct a-5p 7.90 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 142 Oct a-5p 4.10 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 150 Oct a-5p N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 215 Oct a-5p 4.60 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 257 Oct a-5p 7.40 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 345 Oct a-5p 6.60 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 368 Oct a-5p 5.70 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 383 Oct a-5p 5.00 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 441 Oct a-5p 4.70 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 1,169 Oct a-5p 8.00 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL 90 Dec a-6p N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL 400 Dec a-6p 6.40 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 49 Apr a-6p N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 52 Apr a-6p 7.60 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 126 Apr a-6p 8.30 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 55 Apr a-6p 8.12 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 60 Apr a-6p 8.75 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 70 Apr a-6p 6.03 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 74 Apr a-6p 5.95 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 189 Apr a-6p 8.99 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 102 Apr a-6p 5.10 N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 105 Apr a-6p 7.22 N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 124 Apr a-6p 7.29 N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 132 Apr a-6p 7.00 N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 133 Apr a-6p 4.92 N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Citrus Co, FL 111 Oct a-6p 7.70 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Citrus Co, FL 231 Oct a-6p 4.82 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Citrus Co, FL 306 Oct a-6p 3.94 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Citrus Co, FL 364 Oct a-6p 9.14 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Citrus Co, FL 374 Oct a-6p 6.88 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 42 Dec N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 51 Dec N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 59 Dec N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 90 Dec N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 239 Dec N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 232 Apr a-6p 8.16 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 95 Apr a-6p 5.88 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 90 Apr a-6p 5.86 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 58 Apr a-6p 8.39 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL 74 Mar a-6p 3.05 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL 97 Mar a-6p N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL 315 Mar-08 1, a-6p 6.55 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL 42 Mar a-6p N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size 10, ,130 Average Trip Length: 6.79 Weighted Average Trip Length: 6.62 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 7.61 Note: Georgia studies are not included in summary statistics. Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 7.81 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 9.52 October 2014 Page A-2 Transportation Mobility

63 Location Size / Units Date Multi-Family/Apartment and Residential Condo/Townhouse (ITE LUC 220/230) Total # Interviews # Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Sarasota Co, FL 212 Jun N/A Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 243 Jun N/A - Sarasota County Marion Co, FL 214 Apr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 240 Apr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 288 Apr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 480 Apr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 500 Apr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Lake Co, FL 250 Dec N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 157 Dec N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 169 Dec N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 226 Dec N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 312 Apr N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 176 Apr N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 31 May a-6p 4.98 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 128 May a-6p 5.18 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 229 Apr a-6p - N/A - Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 248 Apr a-6p 3.53 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size 4,103 Average Trip Length: 4.84 Total Size (TL) 3,631 Weighted Average Trip Length: 5.10 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 5.87 LUC 220: Multi-Family Total Size 3, Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 6.31 ITE 18, ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 6.65 Blended total 21,947 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 6.60 LUC 230 Studies are highlighted LUC 230: Condo/Townhouse Total Size Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 4.97 ITE 10, ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.81 Blended total 10,660 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.76 VMT Mobile Home Park (ITE LUC 240) Location Size / Units Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Marion Co, FL 67 Jul hrs N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 82 Jul hr N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 137 Jul hr N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Sarasota Co, FL 996 Jun N/A Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 235 Jun N/A Sarasota County Marion Co, FL 188 Apr hr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 227 Apr hr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 297 Apr hr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Hernando Co, FL 1,892 May a-6p 4.13 N/A Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size 4, ,303 Average Trip Length: 4.84 Weighted Average Trip Length: 4.60 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 5.29 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 4.17 Location Size / Units Date Retirement Community/Age-Restricted Single Family (ITE LUC 251) Total # Interviews # Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Lakeland, FL 67 3/28-4/2/ am-4pm 2.44 N/A 8.54 Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 778 Apr hr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 877 Apr hr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 1,054 Apr hr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 3,076 Apr hr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 3,625 Apr hr N/A Kimley-Horn & Associates Total Size 9, Average Trip Length: 4.80 ITE 6,240 8 Weighted Average Trip Length: 5.42 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 6.23 Blended total 15,717 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.75 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 3.68 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 3.12 VMT Senior Adult Housing/Age-Restricted Multi-Family (ITE LUC 252) Total # # Trip Length Percent New Location Size / Units Date Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length VMT Interviews Interviews Trips Sun City Center, FL 208 Oct hr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 3.28 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 3.28 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 3.77 Blended total 438 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.46 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 3.44 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.97 October 2014 Page A-3 Transportation Mobility

64 Location Size / Units Date Total # Interviews Congregate Care Facility (ITE LUC 253) # Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Pinellas Park, FL 72 Aug am-5pm Tindale-Oliver & Associates Palm Harbor, FL 200 Oct am-5pm Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 2.80 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 3.08 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 3.54 Blended total 660 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 3.50 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.02 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.25 VMT Location Size (Rooms) Date Total # Interviews # Trip Length Interviews Hotel (ITE LUC 310) Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Pinellas Co, FL 174 Aug a/3-7p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 114 Oct p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL 1, Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL 1, Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL 1, Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Total Size 6, Average Trip Length: 6.25 ITE 4, Weighted Average Trip Length: 6.26 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 7.20 Blended total 11,704 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 66.3 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.12 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 8.17 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 6.36 VMT Motel (ITE LUC 320) Location Size (Rooms) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Pinellas Co, FL 48 Oct a-2p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 54 Oct p-7p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 120 Oct p-7p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 3.93 ITE 2, Weighted Average Trip Length: 4.34 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 4.99 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 76.6 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.63 Resort Hotel (ITE LUC 330) Location Size (Rooms) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Pinellas Co, FL 207 Sep a-7p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 390 Sep a-7p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 5.30 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 6.10 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: ,101 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 83.3 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.10 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.83 October 2014 Page A-4 Transportation Mobility

65 Movie Theater with Matinee (ITE LUC 444) Location Size (Screens) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Pinellas Co, FL 8 Oct p-8p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 12 Sep p-8p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 2.30 ITE 10 estimated Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.22 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 87.8 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate (6th): Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Health Club (ITE LUC 492) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Tampa, FL - Mar Kimley-Horn & Associates Total Size 33 Average Trip Length: n/a ITE 15 1 Percent New Trip Average: 94.0 Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # Interviews Day Care Center (ITE LUC 565) # Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Pinellas Co, FL 5.6 Aug a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 10.0 Sep a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Tampa, FL - Mar Kimley-Horn & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 2.20 Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.03 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 2.13 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 73.2 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per student: 4.38 VMT Nursing Home (ITE LUC 620) Location Size (Beds) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Lakeland, FL 120 Mar a-4p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 2.59 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.59 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 2.72 Blended total 834 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 89.0 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.86 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.74 Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 2.76 Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # Interviews # Trip Length Interviews Clinic (ITE LUC 630) Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Largo, FL Aug a-430p Tindale-Oliver & Associates St. Petersburg, FL - Oct a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 4.60 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 5.10 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 93.0 VMT General Office Building (ITE LUC 710) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Sarasota Co, FL 14.3 Jun Sarasota County Gwinnett Co, GA 98.0 Dec Street Smarts Gwinnett Co, GA Dec Street Smarts Pinellas Co, FL Oct a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates St. Petersburg, FL Sep a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 6.46 ITE 15, Weighted Average Trip Length: 5.15 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 5.41 October 2014 Page A-5 Transportation Mobility

66 Medical-Dental Office Building (ITE LUC 720) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Tampa, FL - Mar Kimley-Horn & Associates Palm Harbor, FL 14.6 Oct a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates St. Petersburg, FL - Nov a-4p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 58.4 May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 28.0 May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 11.0 Oct a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 28.0 Oct a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Charlotte Co, FL 30.4 Oct a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Citrus Co, FL 38.9 Oct p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Citrus Co, FL 10.0 Nov p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Citrus Co, FL 5.3 Dec p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Total Size Average Trip Length: 5.07 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 5.55 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 5.83 Blended total Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 88.9 Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Office Park (ITE LUC 750) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Sarasota Co, FL 30 Jun Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 36 Jun Sarasota County Sarasota Co, FL 45 Jun Sarasota County Total Size Average Trip Length: 7.40 ITE 4, Weighted Average Trip Length: 7.11 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 7.47 Blended total 5,055.0 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: - Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Business Park (ITE LUC 770) Total # # Trip Length Percent New Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length VMT Interviews Interviews Trips Collier Co, FL 14.1 May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL 66.0 May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 4.90 ITE 6, Weighted Average Trip Length: 5.38 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 5.65 Blended total 6,579.2 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 88.8 October 2014 Page A-6 Transportation Mobility

67 Percent New Trips Trip Length (Miles) Retail (ITE LUC 820) Trip Length Curve Square Footage Retail (ITE LUC 820) Percent New Trips Curve 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Square Footage October 2014 Page A-7 Transportation Mobility

68 Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # Interviews Specialty Retail Center (ITE LUC 826) # Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Orlando, FL 56.5 Jan varied LCE, Inc. Collier Co, FL 12.0 May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL 12.0 May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 3.16 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 3.37 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 3.54 Blended total Weighted Percent New Trip Average: Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: VMT New Car Sales (ITE LUC 841) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT St.Petersburg, FL 43.0 Oct a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Clearwater, FL 43.0 Oct a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Total Size Average Trip Length: 4.60 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 4.60 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 4.83 Blended total 1,029.7 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 78.5 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # Interviews Supermarket (ITE LUC 850) # Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Palm Harbor, FL 62.0 Aug a-4p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 2.08 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.08 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 2.18 Blended total Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 56.0 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: VMT Service Station w/convenience Market (ITE LUC 853) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Tampa, FL - Mar Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 1.1 Jun hr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 2.1 Jun hr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 4.4 Jun hrs Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug Tindale-Oliver & Associates Tampa, FL /13-15/ hr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Ellenton, FL /20-22/ hr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Tampa, FL /10-12/ hr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 2.5 Apr hr Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 2.5 Apr hr Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 3.0 Apr hr Kimley-Horn & Associates Total Size ,148 Average Trip Length: 1.44 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 1.51 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 1.59 Blended Total 55.1 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: October 2014 Page A-8 Transportation Mobility

69 Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Pharmacy/Drugstore w/drive-thru (ITE LUC 880 & 881) Total # Interviews # Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Pasco Co, FL 11.1 Apr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 12.0 Apr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 15.1 Apr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size ,542 Average Trip Length: 2.07 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.08 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 2.18 Blended total Weighted Percent New Trip Average: Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate (LUC 880 / 881): / Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: VMT Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # Interviews Furniture Store (ITE LUC 890) # Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Largo, FL /28-30/ Tindale-Oliver & Associates Tampa, FL 16.9 Jul Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 6.01 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 6.09 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 6.39 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 54.2 Average Trip Generation Rate: - ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: 5.06 VMT Drive-In Bank (ITE LUC 912) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Tampa, FL - Mar Kimley-Horn & Associates Tampa, FL - Mar Kimley-Horn & Associates Clearwater, FL 0.4 Aug a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Largo, FL 2.0 Sep Tindale-Oliver & Associates Seminole, FL 4.5 Oct Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 2.3 Jun hr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 3.1 Jun hr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 2.5 Jul hrs Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug hr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 5.4 May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 2.4 Apr hr Kimley-Horn & Associates Marion Co, FL 2.7 May hr Kimley-Horn & Associates Total Size ,407 Average Trip Length: 2.38 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.46 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 2.58 Blended total 46.2 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # Interviews Quality Restaurant (ITE LUC 931) # Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Tampa, FL - Mar Kimley-Horn & Associates St. Petersburg, FL 7.5 Oct a-2p/4-8p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Clearwater, FL 8.0 Oct a-2p/5-9p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 2.80 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 3.14 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 3.30 Blended total Weighted Percent New Trip Average: Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: VMT October 2014 Page A-9 Transportation Mobility

70 High-Turnover Restaurant (ITE LUC 932) Total # # Trip Length Percent New Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length VMT Interviews Interviews Trips Hernando Co, FL 6.2 May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 8.2 May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates St. Petersburg, FL 5.0 Oct p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Kenneth City, FL 5.2 Oct p-730p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 5.2 Apr a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 5.8 Apr a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Orange Co, FL Orange County Total Size ,102 Average Trip Length: 3.07 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 3.17 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 3.33 Blended total Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 70.8 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Fast Food Restaurant w/drive Thru (ITE LUC 934) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Tampa, FL - Mar Kimley-Horn & Associates Tampa, FL - Mar Kimley-Horn & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 2.20 Aug a-2p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pinellas Co, FL 4.30 Oct day Tindale-Oliver & Associates Tarpon Springs, FL - Oct a-7p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 1.60 Jun hrs Tindale-Oliver & Associates Marion Co, FL 4.00 Jun hrs Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL - Aug Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 5.43 May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Hernando Co, FL 3.13 May a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 2.20 Apr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 3.20 Apr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lake Co, FL 3.80 Apr Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 2.66 Apr a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 2.96 Apr a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Pasco Co, FL 4.42 Apr a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Orange Co, FL Orange County Total Size ,463 Average Trip Length: 2.11 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.05 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 2.15 Blended total Weighted Percent New Trip Average: Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # Interviews Automobile Care Center (ITE LUC 942) # Trip Length Interviews Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Percent New Trips Jacksonville, FL 2.3 2/3-4/ a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Jacksonville, FL 2.3 2/3-4/ a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Jacksonville, FL 2.4 2/3-4/ a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Lakeland, FL 5.2 Mar a-4p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Largo, FL 5.5 Sep a-5p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Orange Co, FL 25.0 Nov p LCE, Inc. Lakeland, FL - Mar a-4p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 2.74 ITE Weighted Average Trip Length: 3.62 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 3.80 Blended total Weighted Percent New Trip Average: Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: VMT October 2014 Page A-10 Transportation Mobility

71 Gasoline/Service Station (ITE LUC 944) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Largo, FL 0.6 Nov am-5pm Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier County, FL - Aug Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 1.46 ITE (vfp) Weighted Average Trip Length: 1.90 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 2.00 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 23.0 ITE Average Trip Generation Rate - per fuel position: Self-Service Car Wash (ITE LUC 947) Location Size (Bays) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Largo, FL 10 Nov am-5pm Tindale-Oliver & Associates Clearwater, FL - Nov am-5pm Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier, FL 11 Dec Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier, FL 8 Jan Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 1.94 Total Size (TGR) 19 2 Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.18 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 2.29 ITE 5 1 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 67.7 Blended total 24 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Blend of FL Studies and ITE Average Trip Generation Rate: Gasoline/Fast Food/Convenience Store (ITE LUC - ) Location Size (1,000 sf) Date Total # # Trip Length Percent New Trip Gen Rate Time Period Trip Length Interviews Interviews Trips VMT Volusia Co, FL Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL 2.4 Nov a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Indian River Co, FL 2.5 Mar a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Indian River Co, FL 3.0 Mar a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Indian River Co, FL 3.1 Mar a-6p , Tindale-Oliver & Associates Collier Co, FL 3.3 Nov a-6p Tindale-Oliver & Associates Total Size Average Trip Length: 2.70 Weighted Average Trip Length: 2.65 Pasco Adjusted Trip Length: 2.78 Weighted Percent New Trip Average: 32.1 Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate: October 2014 Page A-11 Transportation Mobility

72 Appendix B Travel Demand of Transit-Oriented, Traditional Neighborhood, and Mixed-Use Trip Reduction Measures Developments

73 Appendix B Travel Demand of Transit-Oriented, Traditional Neighborhood, and Mixed-Use Trip Reduction Measures Developments This appendix provides support for estimating the travel demand component of several land uses for which either no field studies are available, or for which additional stratification is desired that is not provided in the ITE Trip Generation reference or the Trip Characteristics database. The land uses specifically addressed herein include: Stratification of single-family residential units by size Mixed-Use Trip Reduction Measures development (MUTRM), Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND), and Transit-Oriented Development (TOD), and Mining operations. Single Family Residential Trip Generation Rate Tiering As part of this study, an update to the tiering of the assessed impact fee for the single family residential (detached) land use, to ensure equity by size of home, is included. To facilitate this, an analysis was completed on the comparative relationship between housing size and household travel behavior. This analysis utilized data from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) and the 2011 American Housing Survey (AHS) to examine overall trip-making characteristics of households in the United States. Table B-1 presents the existing trip characteristics being utilized in the current adopted impact fee schedule for the single family (detached) land use. The 2009 NHTS database was used to assess average annual household vehicle miles of travel (VMT) for various annual household income levels, including low-income. In addition, the 2011 AHS database was used to compare median annual family/household incomes with housing unit size. It is important to recognize that the use of the income variable in each of these databases is completed simply to provide a convenient linking mechanism between household VMT from the NHTS and housing unit size from the AHS. Table B-1 Calculated Single Family Trip Characteristics Calculated Values Assessable Trip Rate Excluding Tiering Trip Length Daily VMT Ratio to Mean Single Family (Detached) : FL Studies for LUC 210, shown in Appendix A October 2014 Page B-1 Transportation Mobility

74 The results of the NHTS and AHS analyses are included in Tables B-2 through B-4. First, the data shown in Table B-2 indicates that the average income in the U.S. for families/households living in the three housing size tiers. As shown, the average income for housing units between 1,500 and 2,499 square feet in size ($62,563) is slightly lower than the overall average income for the U.S. ($62,831). Next, a fourth tier, less than 1,500 sq. ft. and low-income was also addressed. Data for this tier was developed by utilizing the SHIP definitions for low-income households (i.e., under 80% of the area county median income), as shown in Table D-3. Since the overall median income level for the County is $57,400, the SHIP low income designation applies to households with an annual median household income of less than $45,900. Table B-3 SHIP Low-Income Designation SHIP Definitions Median Income ---> $57,400 Low Income ---> $45,900 : 2011 American Household Survey The next step involved the use of the NHTS database to assess average annual household vehicle miles of travel (VMT) for the annual household income levels that were identified for the four tiers using the AHS and SHIP data. For example, as shown in Table B-4, households in the less-than- 1,500-sf tier have a median annual household income of approximately $42,156. Therefore, the NHTS data were used to estimate the annual VMT per household for those households with a median annual income of $42,156. This analysis resulted in an annual VMT per household of 19,241 miles, which translates to a daily VMT of miles. In the case of the less-than-1,500-sf-and-lowincome tier, since the 80 percent SHIP low-income definition results in a potential range of annual household incomes of up to approximately $45,900, a median annual household income of $22,950 was used for purposes of assessing average annual household VMT. The NHTS-specific analysis is documented in Table B-4 for all four tiers. Table B-2 Annual Income by Housing Size 2011 AHS Average Income Annual Data by Housing Size Income (1) Less than 1,500 sf $42,156 1,500 to 2,499 sf $62,563 2,500 sf or more $79,443 Average of All Houses $62,831 : 2011 American Household Survey October 2014 Page B-2 Transportation Mobility

75 Table B-4 NHTS VMT Annual VMT by Income Category 2009 NHTS Travel Data by Annual Ratio to Normalized Days Daily VMT Annual HH Income VMT/HH Mean to Median of $22,950 12, Median of $42,156 19, Total (All Homes) 24, Median of $62,563 24, Median of $79,443 28, : 2009 National Household Travel Survey Database, Federal Highway Administration To calculate a corresponding trip rate for the tiers it was necessary to rely on comparative ratios. As an example, consider the $42,156 annual income category. First, it was determined that the average annual household VMT for this income level is 19,241 miles. This figure was then compared to the overall average annual VMT per household in the U.S. and normalized to the average of the $62,563 (24,069 miles) category to derive a ratio of Next, the normalized ratio was applied to the daily VMT for the average single family housing unit size (Less than 1,500 sf) to generate a daily VMT of for the new tier, as shown in Table B-5. This daily VMT figure was then divided by the proposed assessable trip length of 7.61 miles to obtain a typical trip rate of 6.25 trips per day. Table B-5 Trip Generation Rate by Single Family Land Use Tier Assessable Daily Ratio to Estimation of Trip Rate by Tier Trip Rate (1) Trip Length (2) VMT (3) Mean (4) Single Family (Detached) Less than 1,500 sf & Low Income Less than 1,500 sf ,500 to 2,499 sf ,500 sf or larger (1) Daily VMT (Item 3) divided by assessable trip length (Item 2) for each tiered single family land use category (2) : Table B-1 (3) Ratio to the mean (Item 4) divided by the total daily VMT for the 1,500 to 2,499 sf tier for each tiered sf single family land use category (4) : Table B-4 Multi-Family Residential Trip Generation Rate Tiering Similar to the single family residential land use, a low-income tier was developed for the multifamily residential land use in. Due to a lack of available data to determine a link between housing unit size, income, and travel behavior for multi-family properties, the tiering analysis was based on the single family relationships previously discussed. October 2014 Page B-3 Transportation Mobility

76 Table B-6 illustrates the ratio of VMT per household for median and low income tiers, similar to the analysis presented in Table B-4. As shown, the ratio of the low income multi-family home to the average multi-family home is This ratio is then applied to the daily VMT of miles for the currently proposed multi-family category to generate a daily VMT of for the new low income category, as shown in Table B-7. This daily VMT figure is then divided by the recommended trip length of 5.87 miles to obtain a typical trip rate of 3.46 trips per day. 1 Table B-6 NHTS VMT Annual VMT by Income Category (Multi-Family Analysis) 2009 NHTS Travel Data by Annual Ratio to Normalized Days Daily VMT Annual HH Income VMT/HH Mean to Median of $22,950 12, Total (All Homes) 24, Median of $62,563 24, : 2009 National Household Travel Survey Database, Federal Highway Administration Table B-7 Trip Generation Rate by Multi-Family Land Use Tier Estimation of Trip Rate by Assessable Daily Ratio to Trip Rate (1) Tier Trip Length (2) VMT (3) Mean (4) Multi-Family (Apartment) Multi-Family & Low Income Multi-Family (1) Daily VMT (Item 3) divided by assessable trip length (Item 2) for each tiered single family land use category (2) : FL Studies for LUC 220, shown in Appendix A (3) Ratio to the mean (Item 4) divided by the total daily VMT for the multi-family tier for each the multi-family & low income land use (4) : Table B-6 Mixed-Use Trip Reduction Measures, Transit Oriented Development, and Traditional Neighborhood Development Vehicle Mile of Travel Reductions This section describes potential reductions experience in vehicle mile of travel (VMT) that can be experienced as a result of developing communities according to mixed-use trip reduction measures (MUTRM), transit oriented development (TOD) and traditional neighborhood development (TND) principles and guidelines. The methodology applied to estimate VMT reductions followed the guidelines implemented in URBEMIS 9.2 software. This software package was designed to estimate air emissions from land use development projects and, to be able to estimate emissions, VMT needs to be estimated. URBEMIS 9.2 is based on the guidance and funding supplied by several California air districts: 1 Recommended trip length is assumed to remain constant at 5.87 miles since the NHTS data show that average trip length characteristics are relatively uniform across the annual household income levels; only average daily trip rates are significantly different. October 2014 Page B-4 Transportation Mobility

77 Bay Area Air Pollution Control District; Feather River Air Quality Management District; Imperial County Air Pollution Control District; Mendocino County Air Pollution Control District; Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District; Placer County Air Quality Management District; Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District; San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District; San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District; Santa Barbara Air Pollution Control District; South Coast Air Quality Management District; and Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management District. Of all the variables used by the software to estimate VMT, only the ones applicable to the Pasco County MUTRM, TOD, and TND development characteristics were evaluated. These development characteristics are the following: Residential Development Density Mix of Land Uses Local-Serving Retail Transit Use Bikes and Pedestrians As part of its Land Development Code (LDC), has adopted MUTRM development standards. In addition, has adopted in its Comprehensive Plan eight different TOD Transit Stations typologies and it has developed a TND ordinance. To evaluate reduction in VMT to be observed in these developments when compared to non-mutrm, non-tod, and non-tnd developments, typical requirements included in the County s regulations were used. In addition to the MUTRM form of development, the eight TOD station typologies are: Regional Commercial Regional Professional Service Regional Mixed Use Community Commercial Community Professional Service Community Mixed Use-New Town/Villages Community Business Commerce Park Neighborhood Even though all of the station types include a mix of land uses and will be served by transit, the land use mix requirements vary from station-type to station-type. TND VMT reductions were assumed to be similar to TOD Neighborhood station less the VMT reduction expected due to the presence of transit use. October 2014 Page B-5 Transportation Mobility

78 It is the County s desire to have only one VMT reduction factor to be applied to all the transit stations; therefore, VMT reductions expected to be observed at each of the eight TOD station-types were computed and averaged. Residential Development Density Even though URBEMIS 9.2 uses an elasticity formula to estimate residential trip generation reductions as a result of residential development density, s Mobility Schedule includes different residential land uses based on density. Therefore, reductions in VMT as a result of density increases are already taken into consideration in the VMT by land use computation Mix of Land Uses A procedure adapted from Criterion and Fehr & Peers, 2001 is used: Trip reduction = (1-(ABS(1.5*h-e)/(1.5*h+e))-0.25)/0.25*0.03 Where: h = study area households (or housing units) e = study area employment This formula assumes an ideal housing balance of 1.5 jobs per household, based on Messenger & Ewing (1996), and a baseline diversity of The maximum possible reduction using this formula is 9%. The application of this formula resulted in the VMT reductions summarized in Table B-8. Table B-8. Residential and Non-Residential VMT Reduction as a result of Mix of Land Uses Development Type Area Residents [per acre] Employees [per acre] VMT Reduction MUTRM % TOD Regional Commercial % Regional Professional Service % Regional Mixed Use % Community Commercial % Community Professional Service % Community Mixed Use-New Town/Villages % Community Business Commerce Park % Neighborhood % TND % Local Serving Retail The presence of local serving retail is expected to provide additional VMT generation reductions. URBEMIS recommends an additional 2% VMT reduction due to local-serving retail. Table B-9 summarizes the VMT reductions applied to reflect the presence of local serving retail. October 2014 Page B-6 Transportation Mobility

79 Table B-9. Residential and Non-Residential VMT Reduction as a result of Local Serving Retail MUTRM 2.00% TOD Regional Commercial 2.00% Regional Professional Service 2.00% Regional Mixed Use 2.00% Community Commercial 2.00% Community Professional Service 2.00% Community Mixed Use-New Town/Villages 2.00% Community Business Commerce Park 2.00% Neighborhood 2.00% TND 2.00% Transit Use Transit use reductions are based on two variables, transit use and the presence of facilities that allow for non-motorized access to transit (pedestrian/bicycle friendliness score). The transit use component is based on default transit service index scores assigned to different transit modes and frequencies. Based on planned transit services to be provided at each station, the transit use component was estimated. The second component of the transit use reduction was based on the pedestrian/bike score explained in the next section. The formula applied to estimate this reduction is the following: Where: t = transit service index Trip reduction = t * t * ped/bike score * As can be seen in the formula, a maximum of 15 percent reduction in VMT can be accomplished by transit use. No reductions due to the presence of transit use were applied to MUTRM and/or TND development. Table B-10 summarizes the VMT reductions obtained as a result of applying this methodology. Bike and Pedestrian Facilities Reductions in VMT to account for the presence of bike and pedestrian facilities take into consideration the following two factors: Street connectivity, with traditional ( grid ) street networks as opposed to the loops, lollipops and cul-de-sacs of recent subdivisions Development Type VMT Reduction Human-scale streetscapes with adequate pedestrian amenities, access to shopping and other amenities, and higher densities (Lund et. al., 2004) October 2014 Page B-7 Transportation Mobility

80 Table B-10. Residential and Non-Residential VMT Reduction as a result of Transit Use Development Type Transit Use VMT Redution Ped/Bike Total MUTRM 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% TOD Regional Commercial 2.93% 4.24% 7.17% Regional Professional Service 2.63% 4.24% 6.87% Regional Mixed Use 3.08% 5.48% 8.56% Community Commercial 2.93% 6.97% 9.90% Community Professional Service 2.48% 6.97% 9.45% Community Mixed Use-New Town/Villages 1.28% 6.97% 8.25% Community Business Commerce Park 2.48% 6.97% 9.45% Neighborhood 1.43% 6.97% 8.40% TND 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% URBEMIS 9.2 recommends the use of network density plus sidewalk completeness and bicycle network completeness to keep data requirements to a minimum. The pedestrian/bicycle factor is calculated as follows: Ped/bike factor = (network density + sidewalk completeness + bike lane completeness) / 3 Where: Network density = intersections per square mile / 1300 (or 1.0, whichever is less) Table B-11 summarizes the VMT reductions obtained as a result of applying this methodology. Table B-11. Residential and Non-Residential VMT Reduction as a result of shift to Bikes and Pedestrians Development Type VMT Reduction MUTRM 4.08% TOD Regional Commercial 5.09% Regional Professional Service 5.09% Regional Mixed Use 6.58% Community Commercial 8.36% Community Professional Service 8.36% Community Mixed Use-New Town/Villages 8.36% Community Business Commerce Park 8.36% Neighborhood 8.36% TND 8.36% October 2014 Page B-8 Transportation Mobility

81 Total VMT Reductions After obtaining the reductions due to the presence of each individual characteristic, the reduction percentages were added and the total VMT reduction factor was obtained. This is documented in Table B-12. For TOD, the average VMT reduction to be applied to this type of development was computed, as also reflected in Table B-12. In addition, and as noted above, reductions to be applied to TND were assumed to be similar to TOD Neighborhood station, less the 8.40 percent VMT reduction expected due to the presence of transit service. Development Type Table B-12. Total VMT Reduction Percentage Mix of Uses Local Serving Retail VMT Reduction Transit Use Bike and Pedestrian MUTRM 1.94% 2.00% 0.00% 4.08% 8.02% TOD Regional Commercial 2.14% 2.00% 7.17% 5.09% 16.40% Regional Professional Service 2.14% 2.00% 6.87% 5.09% 16.10% Regional Mixed Use 1.17% 2.00% 8.56% 6.58% 18.31% Community Commercial 5.26% 2.00% 9.90% 8.36% 25.52% Community Professional Service 1.41% 2.00% 9.45% 8.36% 21.22% Community Mixed Use-New Town/Villages 6.00% 2.00% 8.25% 8.36% 24.61% Community Business Commerce Park 1.97% 2.00% 9.45% 8.36% 21.78% Neighborhood 1.00% 2.00% 8.40% 8.36% 19.76% TOD Average 20.46% TND 1.00% 2.00% 0.00% 8.36% 11.36% Total Mining Land Use Trip characteristics variables for the Mining land use were developed based on the 2009 Collier County Mine Land Use Study, conducted by Tindale-Oliver & Associates (TOA). This study reviewed three mining sites in Collier County for trip length and percent new trips, and several additional analyses that were conducted for trip generation purposes for mining and excavation permits in southwest Florida. Trip Generation Rate To determine the trip generation rate associated with mining operations, TOA considered several variables, including the size of the mine (in acres), depth of excavation (in feet), volume of mine (in cubic yards), anticipated duration of mine (in years), truck hauling capacity per load, days of hauling per week, and a truck-to-passenger car equivalency factor. With these variables in mind, the following material was reviewed: October 2014 Page B-9 Transportation Mobility

82 Lee County Truck Impact Evaluation Report (David Douglas and Associates, July 2008), which was used as the basis for the calculation of the mine land use transportation impact fee in Lee County; Four mining traffic impact statements, including: o Gardiner Earth Mine Hendry County o Hogan Island Mine Collier County o SR 846 Land Trust Mine Collier County o Good Grove Mine Manatee County Permitting Information for the existing mines in Collier County Annual reports from the three existing mines in Collier County In addition, TOA interviewed the operators of the three mines where trip characteristics surveys were conducted to obtain additional information. Based on this review, it became apparent that trip activity to and from mines is very volatile and depends heavily on demand for material extracted. In addition, the amount of material leaving a mine is limited by the loading rates and truck weighing rates across the scales, measured in trucks per minute. Information provided by the representatives of the three mines where the trip characteristics studies were conducted indicated that these mines have the capability to load 18, 40 and 50 trucks per hour, which results in an average loading capacity of 36 trucks per hour, or 1.7 minutes per truck, with a range of 1.2 minutes to 3.3 minutes per truck. To develop an average daily trip generation rate for mining operations, the following assumptions for a typical mine were made: 40-year life span 8-hour work days 6-day work weeks These assumptions resulted in an average loading time of 3 minutes per truck for the largest of the three mines surveyed (with a capacity of approximately 33.6 million cubic yards of material). For the smaller mines, the same assumptions resulted in an average loading time of 6.5 minutes (for the mine with a capacity of 15 million cubic yards), and 12 minutes (mine with a capacity of 7.8 million cubic yards). As presented, these loading times are well within the capabilities of each mine, and the assumptions result in more conservative results as the mine capacity decreases. Many of the traffic impact statements distributed an anticipated mining volume over an estimated duration of mining activities. This method is reasonable for determining level of service impacts for local network improvements. As explained above, for this impact fee analysis the time period or life of the mine is assumed to be 40 years to develop the needed trip generation rate that goes into the impact fee calculation. October 2014 Page B-10 Transportation Mobility

83 The total 40 year annualized trip rate is trips per 1,000 cubic yards (including an equivalent truck to car factor of 2.0) for trucks. While some agencies have applied a more conservative factor of 1.0, an equivalency factor of 2.0 is identified in the Highway Capacity Manual for heavily loaded trucks to reflect their effect on roadway capacity consumption. Based on mining and excavation permitting analyses submitted to, the trip generation from light vehicles (employees, etc.) was found to be approximately 11.5% of the total daily trip generation. The trip generation rate used for gas tax credit calculation does not use the conversion to cars factor since the fuel efficiency factor for gas tax calculations is already adjusted for trucks (6.4 mpg). As such, the necessary figure for this calculation is the number of trucks, and not the equivalent number of cars. Trip Length The first variable obtained from the trip characteristics study is trip length. To calculate the weighted average trip length from the data collected in Collier County, the average trip length for each site is weighted by the number of assessable trip ends obtained from the surveys collected at the study site. Looking at these surveys, the mine land use trip lengths ranged from 8.07 miles to miles. The resulting weighted average trip length for the mine land use is miles. Percent New Trips The percentage of new trips computed from the survey data collected. The weighted average percent new trips was obtained by weighting the percent new trips of each site by the number of surveys used. For each site, the percent new trips is calculated by first classifying all trips as either a captured trip, primary trip, diverted trip, or secondary trip. The percentage of the combined primary, diverted, and secondary trips of the total trips classified is the percent new trips. This methodology for classifying trips was published by Bill Oliver in the ITE article Measuring Travel Characteristics for Transportation Impact s, in April, The results indicated that the percent new trips to the mine land use ranged from 90 percent to 100 percent. The resulting weighted average percent new trips is 97 percent for the mine land use. Fuel Efficiency The fuel efficiency level is used to calculate the gas tax credit component of the transportation impact fee. The fuel efficiency figure used calculated a combined fuel efficiency for cars and trucks (11.5% at mpg and 88.5% at 6.40 mpg), and resulted in a weighted mix of 7.78 miles per gallon. This rate October 2014 Page B-11 Transportation Mobility

84 was applied to the state gasoline tax, but not the second local option gasoline tax, since that tax is not levied on diesel fuel. October 2014 Page B-12 Transportation Mobility

85 Appendix C Cost Component Calculations

86 This appendix examines the detailed calculations for the roadway facility, bicycle/pedestrian facility, and transit facility costs. Roadway Facility Costs This section examines the unit construction costs associated with interstate, other state, and non-state roadway facilities in. The costs are discussed in four phases: design, construction engineering/inspection (CEI) right-of-way (ROW), and construction costs. Design/CEI State Roads: The design cost for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. Based on a review of recent transportation impact fee studies completed throughout Florida and FDOT Long Range Estimates (LRE), a design factor of 10 percent of construction costs was used to calculate the design cost for state roads. Similar to design, the CEI cost for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. Based on a review of recent transportation impact fee studies completed throughout Florida and FDOT Long Range Estimates (LRE), a CEI factor of 10 percent of construction costs was used to calculate the CEI cost for state roads. Non-State Roads: The design cost for non-state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. The design factor was based on a review of recently completed local capacity expansion improvements and transportation impact fee studies completed throughout Florida. As shown in Table C-2, the design-to-construction factor for five recent improvements ranged from 3.2 percent to 23.0 percent, with a weighted average of 11.2%. The local average was slightly higher than the average of 10 percent used in recent impact fee studies throughout Florida (see Table C-3). Based on a review of this data, a conservative design factor of 10 percent of construction costs was used in the mobility fee calculation. Similar to design, the CEI cost for non-state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. Based on discussions with staff, CEI is usually estimated at approximately 3.0 percent of the construction cost for a roadway improvement. A review of recent transportation impact fee studies completed throughout Florida showed that recent impact fee studies have October 2014 Page C-1 Transportation Mobility

87 estimated CEI at 10 percent of construction costs, on average. Based on a review of this data, a CEI factor of 5.0 percent of construction costs was used in the mobility fee calculation. Tables C-1 and C-2 provides additional detail for the recent impact fee studies that were reviewed for state and non-state roadways, respectively. Table C-1 Design and CEI Cost Factors from Recent Impact Studies; State Roads Year Study Design - State Roads CEI - State Roads Design Constr. % CEI Constr. % 2006 Collier $349,643 $3,385,978 10% $349,643 $3,385,978 10% 2006 Citrus $400,432 $2,860,227 14% $400,432 $2,860,227 14% 2006 Highlands $347,326 $2,480,900 14% $347,326 $2,480,900 14% 2006 Marion $154,643 $1,430,919 11% $154,643 $1,430,919 11% 2007 Pasco $427,112 $3,050,799 14% $427,112 $3,050,799 14% 2007 Lake $318,412 $3,184,125 10% $318,412 $3,184,125 10% 2007 Volusia $309,526 $3,095,258 10% $309,526 $3,095,258 10% 200 Hernando $343,200 $3,432,000 10% $343,200 $3,432,000 10% 2008 Leon $372,130 $3,383,000 11% $372,130 $3,383,000 11% 2008 Sumter $238,000 $2,380,000 10% $238,000 $2,380,000 10% 2009 Collier $320,000 $3,200,000 10% $320,000 $3,200,000 10% 2009 Polk $217,000 $2,170,000 10% $217,000 $2,170,000 10% 2009 City of Tampa $420,000 $3,500,000 12% $420,000 $3,500,000 12% 2010 Collier Ph. II $241,800 $2,418,000 10% $241,800 $2,418,000 10% 2011 City of North Port $200,000 $2,000,000 10% $200,000 $2,000,000 10% 2012 Osceola $313,258 $2,847,800 11% $313,258 $2,847,800 11% 2012 City of Orlando $319,000 $2,900,000 11% $319,000 $2,900,000 11% 2012 City of Sarasota $286,000 $2,600,000 11% $286,000 $2,600,000 11% 2013 Hernando $222,640 $2,024,000 11% $222,640 $2,024,000 11% 2013 Charlotte $240,000 $2,400,000 10% $240,000 $2,400,000 10% Average $302,006 $2,737,150 11% $302,006 $2,737,150 11% : Recent impact fee studies conducted throughout Florida Table C-2 Design Cost Factors from Recent Local Projects; Non-State Roads CIP # Description From To Feature Design : Engineering Services Construction (includes AAR) Design/ Construction 3268 Bell Lake Rd Alpine Rd East Collier Pkwy 0 to 2 Lanes $20,000 $630, % 3412 Collier Pkwy, Ph. II Hale Rd North Parkway Blvd 0 to 2 Lanes $932,995 $4,054, % 4298 CR 54 / SR 54 W of I-75 Curley Rd (CR 577) 2 to 6 Lanes $2,967,980 $19,806, % 5071 Clinton Ave East, Ph. I 1,000 ft W of Ft King Hwy US to 4 Lanes $543,600 $5,652, % 1502 Ridge Rd Broad St Moon Lake Rd 2 to 4 Lanes $826,274 $17,172, % Total $5,290,849 $47,315, % October 2014 Page C-2 Transportation Mobility

88 Table C-3 Design and CEI Cost Factors from Recent Impact Studies; Non-State Roads Year Study Design - Non-State Roads CEI - Non-State Roads Design Constr. % CEI Constr. % 2006 Collier $323,639 $2,558,546 13% $323,639 $2,558,546 13% 2006 Citrus $361,774 $2,584,099 14% $361,774 $2,584,099 14% 2006 Highlands $235,030 $1,678,785 14% $235,030 $1,678,785 14% 2006 Marion $185,333 $1,941,244 10% $185,333 $1,941,244 10% 2007 Pasco $246,324 $3,079,051 8% $246,324 $3,079,051 8% 2007 Lake $232,882 $2,911,021 8% $232,882 $2,911,021 8% 2007 Flagler $174,000 $1,740,000 10% $174,000 $1,740,000 10% 2007 Volusia $291,696 $2,651,778 11% $291,696 $2,651,778 11% 2008 Hernando $230,000 $2,300,000 10% $230,000 $2,300,000 10% 2008 Leon $212,800 $2,660,000 8% $212,800 $2,660,000 8% 2008 Sumter $178,960 $2,237,000 8% $178,960 $2,237,000 8% 2009 Collier $217,000 $3,100,000 7% $217,000 $3,100,000 7% 2009 Polk $95,400 $1,590,000 6% $95,400 $1,590,000 6% 2009 City of Tampa $308,000 $2,800,000 11% $308,000 $2,800,000 11% 2010 Collier Ph. II $119,560 $1,708,000 7% $119,560 $1,708,000 7% 2011 Orange Ph. I $288,000 $2,400,000 12% $288,000 $2,400,000 12% 2011 City of North Port $240,000 $2,400,000 10% $240,000 $2,400,000 10% 2012 Osceola $371,196 $2,651,400 14% $371,196 $2,651,400 14% 2012 Orange Ph. II $264,000 $2,400,000 11% $264,000 $2,400,000 11% 2012 City of Orlando $288,000 $2,400,000 12% $288,000 $2,400,000 12% 2012 City of Sarasota $240,000 $2,400,000 10% $240,000 $2,400,000 10% 2013 Hernando $198,000 $1,980,000 10% $198,000 $1,980,000 10% 2013 Charlotte $220,000 $2,200,000 10% $220,000 $2,200,000 10% Average $240,069 $2,363,953 10% $240,069 $2,363,953 10% : Recent impact fee studies conducted throughout Florida Right-of-Way State Roads: The right-of-way cost for state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. Based on a review of recent transportation impact fee studies completed throughout Florida and discussions with FDOT staff, a ROW factor of 50 percent of construction costs was used to calculate the ROW cost for state roads. Table C-4 presents the recent studies that were reviewed which ranged from 20 percent to 74 percent of construction, with a weighted average of 46 percent. FDOT staff noted that ROW costs vary greatly by project and that costs can sometimes equal or exceed the cost of construction. For mobility fee purposes, the conservative estimate of 50 percent was used for ROW acquisition costs in the Urban area. ROW costs for the other areas (suburban and rural) are based on the ROW cost ratio from historical acquisition data (as shown in Table C-7). October 2014 Page C-3 Transportation Mobility

89 Non-State Roads: The right-of-way cost for non-state roads was estimated as a percentage of the construction cost per lane mile. Based on a review of recently completed local improvements and recent transportation impact fee studies completed throughout Florida, a ROW factor of 50 percent of construction costs was used to calculate the ROW cost for non-state roads. Table C-5 presents the local projects reviewed, which ranged from 10 percent to 351 percent in terms of ROW-to-construction factors. Removing the low and high outliers, the local data returns a 66 percent ROW factor. Table C-6 presents the recent studies that were also reviewed which ranged from 21 percent to 94 percent of construction, with a weighted average of 43 percent. For mobility fee purposes, the conservative estimate of 50 percent was used for ROW acquisition costs in the Urban area. ROW costs for the other areas (suburban and rural) are based on the ROW cost ratio from historical acquisition data (as shown in Table C-7). Table C-4 Right-of-Way Cost Factors from Recent Impact Studies; State Roads Year Study Right-of-Way - State Roads ROW Constr. % 2005 Polk $1,795,013 $2,418,993 74% 2006 Collier $1,751,790 $3,385,978 52% 2006 Citrus $949,979 $2,860,227 33% 2006 Highlands $507,500 $2,480,900 20% 2006 Marion $868,908 $1,430,919 61% 2007 Pasco $1,560,714 $3,050,799 51% 2007 Lake $1,462,133 $3,184,125 46% 2007 Volusia $954,543 $3,095,258 31% 2008 Hernando $2,080,000 $3,432,000 61% 2008 Leon $1,363,000 $3,383,000 40% 2008 Sumter $1,400,000 $2,380,000 59% 2009 Collier $1,300,000 $3,200,000 41% 2009 Polk $550,000 $2,170,000 25% 2009 City of Tampa $2,500,000 $3,500,000 71% 2010 Collier, Ph. II $901,000 $2,418,000 37% 2012 Osceola $1,167,598 $2,847,800 41% 2012 City of Orlando $1,305,000 $2,900,000 45% 2013 Hernando $890,560 $2,024,000 44% 2013 Charlotte $1,128,000 $2,400,000 47% Average Min Max : Recent impact fee studies conducted throughout Florida $1,286,091 $2,766,421 46% 20% 74% October 2014 Page C-4 Transportation Mobility

90 Table C-5 Right-of-Way Cost Factors from Recent Local Projects; Non-State Roads CIP # Description From To Feature Construction Right-of- ROW/ (includes Way Construction AAR) 3268 Bell Lake Rd Alpine Rd East Collier Pkwy 0 to 2 Lanes $197,475 $630, % 3412 Collier Pkwy, Ph. II Hale Rd North Parkway Blvd 0 to 2 Lanes $2,816,784 $4,054, % 4298 CR 54 / SR 54 W of I-75 Curley Rd (CR 577) 2 to 6 Lanes $69,467,723 $19,806, % 5071 Clinton Ave East, Ph. I 1,000 ft W of Ft King Hwy US to 4 Lanes $3,774,682 $5,652, % 1502 Ridge Rd Broad St Moon Lake Rd 2 to 4 Lanes $1,700,000 $17,172, % Total $77,956,664 $47,315, % Total (excluding CR 54) $8,488,941 $27,509, % Total (excluding CR 54 and Ridge Rd) $6,788,941 $10,337, % : Engineering Services October 2014 Page C-5 Transportation Mobility

91 Table C-6 Right-of-Way Cost Factors from Recent Impact Studies; State Roads Year Study Right-of-Way - Non-State Roads ROW Constr. % 2005 Polk $1,459,817 $1,790,646 82% 2006 Collier $1,751,790 $2,558,546 68% 2006 Citrus $784,599 $2,584,099 30% 2006 Highlands $468,853 $1,678,785 28% 2006 Marion $1,005,123 $1,941,244 52% 2007 Pasco $814,517 $3,079,051 26% 2007 Lake $599,185 $2,911,021 21% 2007 Flagler $460,000 $1,740,000 26% 2007 Volusia $858,109 $2,651,778 32% 2008 Hernando $650,000 $2,300,000 28% 2008 Leon $1,120,000 $2,660,000 42% 2008 Sumter $802,000 $2,237,000 36% 2009 Collier $1,300,000 $3,100,000 42% 2009 Polk $1,491,000 $1,590,000 94% 2009 City of Tampa $1,500,000 $2,800,000 54% 2010 Collier, Ph. II $901,000 $1,708,000 53% 2011 Orange, Ph. I $1,080,000 $2,400,000 45% 2012 Osceola $1,087,074 $2,651,400 41% 2012 Orange, Ph. II $1,080,000 $2,400,000 45% 2012 City of Orlando $1,080,000 $2,400,000 45% 2013 Hernando $811,800 $1,980,000 41% 2013 Charlotte $1,034,000 $2,200,000 47% Average Min Max : Recent impact fee studies conducted throughout Florida $1,006,312 $2,334,617 43% 21% 94% As previously mentioned, the ROW cost factors established above apply only to projects in the Urban fee area. To develop ROW factors for the Suburban and Rural fee areas, the ratio of historical ROW acquisitions from these three areas was reviewed. As shown in Table C-7, Suburban ROW costs are approximately 75 percent of the costs in the Urban fee area, and Rural ROW costs are approximately 60% of the costs in the Urban fee area. Based on this analysis, and the fact that ROW costs in the Urban area were calculated at 50% of the construction costs, a ROW cost of 38% was used for the suburban area (50% * 75% = 38%) and a ROW cost of 60% was used for the Rural fee area (50% * 60% = 30%). October 2014 Page C-6 Transportation Mobility

92 Project Number CIP Project Number Mobility District : 2011 Mobility Study Description From To Table C-7 Right-of-Way Costs for Completed Local Projects Segment Design Class Suburban Moon Lake Rd Decubellis SR 52 Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 4 Lanes $13,165,420 $724, Suburban Clinton W. Curley E. Pasadena Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $9,380,000 $1,019, Urban SR 54 SR 581 CR 577 Urban Add Lanes & Reconstruct 4 to 6 Lanes $6,842,000 $331, Suburban Ridge Rd Broad St Moon Lake Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 4 Lanes $6,573,350 $553, Suburban Curley Rd N. Overpass N. Clinton Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 4 Lanes $5,582,270 $372, Rural CR 578 (N Cty Line) East Rd Shady Hills Rd Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 4 Lanes $5,447,200 $469, Suburban Collier Pkwy N. Pkwy Ehren Cutoff Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $5,440,000 $1,147, Suburban Clinton W. of FT King E. US 301 Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 4 Lanes $5,282,000 $1,056, Urban Z-hills SR 54 E. of Handcart Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $4,446,000 $2,179, Urban CR 54 SR 56 Magnolia Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 4 Lanes $14,645,400 $1,126, Urban Old Pasco Rd Overpass SR 52 Urban Add Lanes & Reconstruct 2 to 4 Lanes $4,405,200 $629, Urban Chancey Fox Ridge Morris Bridge Rd Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $4,085,090 $1,021, Urban CR 54 (2) Magnolia Boulevard SR 581 Urban Add Lanes & Reconstruct 2 to 4 Lanes $4,004,017 $901, Suburban Old Pasco Rd (Ph II) Quail Hollow Overpass Urban Add Lanes & Reconstruct 2 to 4 Lanes $3,048,165 $302, Suburban Collier Pkwy Hale Rd Parkway Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $3,129,760 $864, Urban Gunn Hwy Hills Co Line SR 54 Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $2,919,000 $973, Suburban Curley Rd N. SR 54 N. Overpass Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 4 Lanes $2,427,600 $173, Urban Little Rd Trinity SR 54 Urban Add Lanes & Reconstruct 4 to 6 Lanes $2,400,000 $600, Urban Old Pasco Rd 800' N. of SR 54 Quail Hollow Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 4 Lanes $1,988,220 $456, Suburban Ridge Rd Ext Suncoast SR 41 Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $1,620,000 $216, Urban Lake Patience W of Mitchell US 41 Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $1,537,090 $374, Suburban Kossik Rd Ft King Greenslope Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $981,836 $564, Urban Little Rd CR 54 Dusty Ln Urban Add Lanes & Reconstruct 4 to 6 Lanes $750,000 $150, Suburban East Rd Denton N. County Line Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $596,000 $903, Rural Christian Powerline US 301 Rural New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $542,148 $271, Rural Power Line Rd Lock St Frazee Hill Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $542,148 $271, Suburban Zephyrhills W. of Dean Dairy US 301 Urban Add Lanes & Reconstruct 2 to 4 Lanes $400,000 $66, Suburban Decubellis Starkey Town Center Rd Urban Add Lanes & Reconstruct 2 to 4 Lanes $386,760 $82, Suburban Zephyrhills Handcart Dean Dairy Urban New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $300,000 $93, Rural Frazee Hill Rd 14th US 301 Rural New Lane Construction 0 to 2 Lanes $114,048 $380,160 Feature Length Lanes Added Total Lane Miles ROW Cost ROW Cost per Lane Mile Proposed Cost per Lane Mile Relationship Total (Rural): $6,645,544 $417,959 $415, % 60% Total (Suburban): $58,313,161 $505,051 $500, % 75% Total (Urban): $48,022,017 $670,886 $670, % 100% Use October 2014 Page C-7 Transportation Mobility

93 Construction Interstate Roads: The construction cost per lane mile for interstate improvements was based on recent costs from local improvements. These improvements (along SR 52, SR 54, SR 56, County Line Rd, and Overpass Rd) include the cost for lane expansion (4 to 6 lanes) and any planned overpass structures. For purposes of the mobility fee update, the average cost per lane mile was adjusted by 80 percent, resulting in a construction cost of approximately $10.58 million per lane mile. State Roads: The construction cost per lane mile for state roads was estimated based on a review of recently-bid improvements throughout Florida. A review of bid data for the past six years identified 53 improvements from 27 different counties, including one improvement in (US 41 from Tower Rd to Ridge Rd). As shown in Table C-8, these improvements account for over 300 new lane miles of roadway with a weighted average cost of $2.6 million. When shifting the focus to only projects located in FDOT District 7, the weighted average construction cost per lane mile remains at $2.6 million (70 lane miles of improvements), while the single improvement is at $2.2 million per lane mile. In addition to local bids, the District 7 Long Range Estimates (LRE) was also reviewed. As shown in Table C-9, the cost per lane mile for urban design (curb & gutter) arterials is $3.2 million per lane mile, on average. For purposes of this update study, a construction cost of $2.6 million per lane mile was used in the mobility fee calculation. Non-State Roads: The construction cost per lane mile for non-state roads was estimated based on a review of recent local improvements as well as recently-bid capacity expansion improvements throughout Florida. A review of local improvements identified five new road construction/capacity expansion improvements in. As shown in Table C-10, these projects added approximately 27 lane miles of roadway at a cost of $1.7 million per lane mile. To increase the sample size, recently bid improvements throughout Florida were also reviewed. As shown in Table C-11, the Florida bid data for the past six years identified 57 improvements from 15 different counties. These improvements account for approximately 275 new lane miles of roadway with a weighted average cost of $2.1 million. For purposes of this analysis, the local project set was combined with the statewide project set to develop a weighted average cost per lane mile for non-state roadways. The resulting construction cost of $2.1 million per lane mile was used in the mobility fee calculation. October 2014 Page C-8 Transportation Mobility

94 Table C-8 Construction Costs for Recent Bids throughout Florida; State Roads County District Description From To Year Status Feature Design Length Walton 3 SR 83 (US 331) SR 30 (US 98) S. end of Choctaw Bridge 2008 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $11,649,363 $2,800,328 Hillsborough 7 US 301 (SR 43) S. of Balm Rd N. of Gibsonton Rd 2008 Bid 2 to 6 Urban $55,702,777 $2,309,402 Indian River 4 SR 5 (US 1) S. of Oslo Rd S. of Indian River Bend 2008 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $14,953,562 $4,398,106 Indian River 4 SR 60/Osceola Blvd W. of 82 Ave 66th Ave/CR Bid 4 to 6 Urban $18,496,793 $4,301,580 Orange 5 SR 50 Good Homes Rd Pine Hills Rd 2008 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $35,929,914 $4,949,024 Leon 3 SR 10 (Mahan Drive) Dempsey Mayo Rd Walden Rd 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $18,083,510 $2,916,695 Indian River 4 SR 60 (Osceola Blvd) W. of I-95 W. of 82nd Ave/CR Bid 4 to 6 Urban $7,366,557 $1,199,765 Sarasota 1 US 301 Wood St Myrtle Ave 2009 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $18,372,050 $3,533,087 Sarasota 1 US 301 Myrtle Ave Desoto Rd 2009 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $8,293,271 $4,146,636 Pasco 7 US 41 (SR 45) Tower Rd Ridge Rd 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $12,685,027 $2,233,279 Lee 1 SR 739 US 41 (S. of Alico) Six Mile Cypress Pkwy 2009 Bid 0 to 6 Urban $20,663,929 $1,243,317 Manatee 1 US 301 Erie Rd CR Bid 4 to 6 Urban $21,040,000 $2,565,854 Marion 5 SR 35 (US 301) Sumter County Line 529' S. of CR Bid 2 to 4 Urban $3,596,000 $1,284,286 Miami-Dade 6 Perimeter Rd NW 72 Avenue NW 57 Avenue 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $6,383,286 $2,127,762 Polk 1 US 27 N. of CR 546 S. of SR Bid 2 to 4 Urban $4,100,069 $1,314,125 Santa Rosa 3 SR 281 (Avalon Blvd) N. of CSX R/R Bridge S. of Commerce Rd 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $5,621,006 $2,867,860 Santa Rosa 3 SR 281 (Avalon Blvd) Gulf Rd SR 10 (US 90) 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $9,150,583 $2,570,388 St. Lucie 4 SR 70 MP MP Bid 2 to 4 Urban $12,426,020 $1,425,002 Sumter 5 SR 35 (US 301) N. of CR 204 Marion County Line 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $3,856,688 $1,277,049 Washington 3 SR 79 N. Environmental Rd Strickland Rd 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $8,877,323 $2,580,617 Lake 5 SR 50 E. of Grand Hwy W. of Hancock Rd 2010 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $4,689,633 $1,803,705 Polk 1 SR 559 Extension SR 655 (Recker Hwy) Derby Ave 2010 Bid 0 to 2 Urban $2,751,592 $1,993,907 Santa Rosa 3 SR 281 (Avalon Blvd) SR 8 (I-10) S. of Moor's Lodge 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $5,378,226 $3,163,662 Santa Rosa 3 SR 281 (Avalon Blvd) S. of Moor's Lodge N. of CSX R/R Bridge 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $7,145,212 $2,413,923 Lee 1 US 41 Corkscrew Rd San Carlos Blvd 2010 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $12,822,677 $1,431,102 Polk 1 US 98 S. of Manor Dr N. of CR 540A 2010 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $11,092,909 $1,670,619 St. Lucie 4 SR 70 Okeechobee County Line MP Bid 2 to 4 Urban $18,782,630 $1,599,883 Polk 1 US 98 (Bartow Hwy) Brooks St Edgewood Dr 2011 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $4,341,917 $3,015,220 Hillsborough 7 CR 39/Alexander St N. of I-4 N. of Knights Griffin 2011 Bid 0 to 4 Urban $14,782,862 $1,158,532 Pinellas 7 SR 688 (Ulmerton Rd) E. of 119th St W. of Seminole Bypass 2011 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $16,908,929 $5,636,310 Polk 1 SR 60 (Van Fleet) W. of US 98/Broadway W. of US 17 (SR 555) 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $9,540,473 $5,546,787 Lake 5 SR 500 (US 441) Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Lake Ella Rd 2011 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $16,278,889 $2,504,444 Hillsborough 7 SR 574 (MLK Blvd) W. of Highview Rd E. of Parsons Ave 2011 Bid 3 to 5 Urban $7,147,510 $3,927,203 Collier 1 SR 84 (Davis Blvd) E. of Santa Barbara Blvd W. of Radio Rd 2012 Bid 2 to 6 Urban $10,956,198 $1,547,486 Volusia 5 SR 415 Seminole Co. Line Reed Ellis Rd 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $18,718,637 $4,132,149 Volusia 5 SR 415 Reed Ellis Rd 0.3 miles N. of Acorn Lake 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $18,388,845 $1,815,286 Pinellas 7 US 19 (SR 55) N. of CR 576/Sunset Pnt S. of Countryside Blvd 2012 Bid 6 to 10 Urban $17,196,050 $2,442,621 Miami-Dade 6 SR 823/NW 57th Ave W. 23rd St W. 46th St 2012 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $14,081,161 $4,757,149 Hernando 7 SR 50 (Cortez Blvd) US 19 (SR 55) W. of CR 587/Mariner Blvd 2012 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $39,444,222 $3,276,098 Orange 5 SR 50 E. of West Oaks Mall W. of Good Homes Rd 2012 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $8,694,472 $9,660,524 Clay 2 SR 23 Oakleaf Plantation Pkwy Old Jennings 2012 Bid 0 to 2 Urban $13,231,111 $2,106,865 Hendry 1 SR 80 Birchwood Pkwy Dalton Lane 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $12,855,092 $1,285,509 Hendry 1 SR 80 CR 833 US Bid 2 to 4 Urban $8,117,039 $1,399,489 Lee 1 SR 739 Winkler Ave Hanson St 2012 Bid 0 to 6 Urban $14,025,932 $1,744,519 Seminole 5 SR 434 I-4 Rangeline Rd 2012 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $10,111,333 $2,808,704 Palm Beach 4 SR 710/Beeline Hwy W. of Congress Ave W. of Australian Ave 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $12,189,533 $7,255,674 Polk 1 US 27 N. of Ritchie Rd S. of Barry Rd 2012 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $14,242,918 $2,225,456 Polk 1 US 98 (SR 35/SR 700) N. of CR 540A SR Bid 4 to 6 Urban $18,004,051 $2,609,283 Brevard 5 SR 5 (US 1) N. of Pine St N. of Cidco Rd 2012 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $29,360,536 $3,822,986 Brevard 5 SR 507 (Babcock St) Melbourne Ave Ave 2013 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $5,167,891 $6,459,864 Hillsborough 7 SR 41 (US 301) S. of Tampa Bypass Canal N. of Fowler Ave 2013 Bid 2 to 4 Sub-Urb $15,758,965 $4,365,364 Lee 1 US 41 Business Littleton Rd SR Bid 2 to 4 Urban $8,488,393 $3,450,566 Orange 5 SR 50 (Colonial Dr) E. of CR 425 (Dean Rd) E. of Old Cheney Hwy 2013 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $66,201,688 $6,633,436 Total $784,145,254 $2,579,171 : FDOT recently-bid projects by transportation district, available at Lanes Added Lane Miles Added Construction Cost Construction Cost per Lane Mile October 2014 Page C-9 Transportation Mobility

95 Table C-9 Florida Department of Transportation District 7 Long Range Estimates; State Roads Roadway Scope Total Construction Construction MOT Mobilization Subtotal Contingency Construction Cost per Lane Cost (25%) Cost Mile Rural Arterial New Construction (2-Lane Roadway) $3,351,896 $335,190 $368,709 $4,055,795 $1,013,949 $5,069,744 $2,534,872 New Construction (4-Lane Roadway) $5,449,902 $544,990 $599,489 $6,594,381 $1,648,595 $8,242,976 $2,060,744 New Construction (6-Lane Roadway) $6,945,143 $694,514 $763,966 $8,403,623 $2,100,906 $10,504,529 $1,750,755 Add Lanes (2 to 4 Lanes) $3,895,621 $389,562 $428,518 $4,713,701 $1,178,425 $5,892,126 $2,946,063 Add Lanes (4 to 6 Lanes) $4,364,817 $436,482 $480,130 $5,281,429 $1,320,357 $6,601,786 $3,300,893 Add Lanes (4 to 8 Lanes) $5,855,972 $585,597 $644,157 $7,085,726 $1,771,432 $8,857,158 $2,214,290 Add Lanes (6 to 8 Lanes) $5,489,564 $548,956 $603,852 $6,642,372 $1,660,593 $8,302,965 $4,151,483 Average - Rural Arterial $2,708,443 Urban Arterial New Construction (2-Lane Roadway) $4,840,624 $484,062 $532,469 $5,857,155 $1,464,289 $7,321,444 $3,660,722 New Construction (4-Lane Roadway) $6,832,753 $683,275 $751,603 $8,267,631 $2,066,908 $10,334,539 $2,583,635 New Construction (6-Lane Roadway) $8,353,372 $835,337 $918,871 $10,107,580 $2,526,895 $12,634,475 $2,105,746 Add Lanes (2 to 4 Lanes) $4,477,530 $447,753 $492,528 $5,417,811 $1,354,453 $6,772,264 $3,386,132 Add Lanes (4 to 6 Lanes) $5,002,273 $500,227 $550,250 $6,052,750 $1,513,188 $7,565,938 $3,782,969 Add Lanes (4 to 8 Lanes) $6,581,386 $658,139 $723,953 $7,963,478 $1,990,870 $9,954,348 $2,488,587 Add Lanes (6 to 8 Lanes) $5,969,158 $596,916 $656,607 $7,222,681 $1,805,670 $9,028,351 $4,514,176 Average - Urban Arterial $3,217,424 : Florida Department of Transportation, Office of Policy Planning. Revised June 2014 October 2014 Page C-10 Transportation Mobility

96 Table C-10 Construction Costs for Completed Local Projects; Non-State Roads CIP # Description From To Feature Length Lane Construction Construction Lanes Miles (includes Cost per Lane Added Added AAR) Mile 3268 Bell Lake Rd Alpine Rd East Collier Pkwy 0 to 2 Lanes $630,846 $525, Collier Pkwy, Ph. II Hale Rd North Parkway Blvd 0 to 2 Lanes $4,054,279 $1,119, CR 54 / SR 54 W of I-75 Curley Rd (CR 577) 2 to 6 Lanes $19,806,189 $1,439, Clinton Ave East, Ph. I 1,000 ft W of Ft King Hwy US to 4 Lanes $5,652,207 $2,078, Ridge Rd Broad St Moon Lake Rd 2 to 4 Lanes $17,172,219 $2,890,946 Total $47,315,740 $1,736,995 : Engineering Services October 2014 Page C-11 Transportation Mobility

97 : Tindale-Oliver Costs database; Information provided by each respective County Table C-11 Construction Costs for Recent Bids throughout Florida; Non-State Roads County District Description From To Year Status Feature Design Length Collier 1 Santa Barbara Blvd Extension Rattlesnake Hammock Rd Davis Blvd 2008 Bid 0 to 6 Urban $12,035,894 $1,002,991 Polk 1 Silver Connector Rd E.F. Griffin Rd US Bid 0 to 2 Urban $1,560,483 $2,364,368 Polk 1 County Line Rd Ewell Ave Pipkin Rd 2008 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $3,993,892 $1,664,122 Volusia 5 Debary Ave Deltona Blvd Providence Blvd 2008 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $7,405,914 $2,012,477 Volusia 5 S. Williamson Blvd (Ph. II) S. of Sabal Creek Blvd N. of Moody Bridge 2008 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $11,109,225 $2,908,174 Lake 5 CR 466 (Segment A) US 301 CR Bid 2 to 4 Urban $4,062,660 $2,031,330 Hillsborough 7 40th St River Pines Apts Humphrey St 2008 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $5,154,862 $2,713,085 Hillsborough 7 Race Track Rd (Ph. I) Douglas Rd Linebaugh Ave 2008 Bid 2 to 6 Urban $10,099,911 $2,499,978 Osceola 5 John Young Pkwy Carroll Orange Co. Line 2008 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $3,230,000 $1,900,000 Orange 5 CR 535 (Segments C and E) Ficquette Rd Butler Ridge Dr 2008 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $3,693,616 $1,678,916 Orange 5 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Ocoee Apopka Rd SR Bid 2 to 4 Urban $2,803,484 $3,504,355 Orange 5 Destination Pkwy International Dr Tradeshow Blvd 2008 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $3,017,443 $2,124,960 Lee 1 Gladiolus Dr (Ph. I) A&W Bulb Rd Winkler Rd 2008 Bid 2 to 4/6 Urban / $13,971,509 $2,568,292 Lee 1 Gladiolus Dr (Ph. II) Pine Ridge Rd A&W Bulb Rd 2008 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $6,748,642 $3,308,158 Charlotte 1 Toledo-Blade Corridor North Port US Bid 2 to 4 Sub-Urb $3,174,852 $1,322,855 Orange 5 Clarcona-Ocoee Rd Hiawassee Rd Clark 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $10,182,738 $2,036,548 Orange 5 Woodbury Rd S. of SR 50 Challenger Pkwy 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $4,088,942 $3,145,340 Orange 5 Sand Lake Rd President's Dr FL Mall 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $6,020,755 $3,010,378 Orange 5 Taft-Vineland Road Extension Central Florida Pkwy John Young Pkwy 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $4,462,535 $3,187,525 Osceola 5 Narcoossee Rd US 192 Orange Co. Line 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $47,360,000 $3,200,000 Osceola 5 Osceola Pkwy (Ph. I) FL Turnpike Buenaventura Blvd 2009 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $5,966,000 $1,900,000 Osceola 5 Poinciana Blvd (Ph. II) Crescent Lakes US 17/ Bid 2 to 4 Urban $16,000,000 $3,200,000 Osceola 5 Old Lake Wilson Rd (Ph. I) Livingston Rd Sinclair Rd 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $14,720,000 $3,200,000 Hillsborough 7 Bruce B. Downs Palm Springs Blvd Pebble Beach Blvd 2009 Bid 4 to 8 Urban $40,575,305 $1,408,865 Hillsborough 7 Race Track Rd (Ph. IV) Douglas Rd Hillsborough Ave 2009 Bid 2 to 6 Urban $4,397,412 $1,963,130 Sarasota 1 Fruitville Rd (Ph. I) Tatum Rd Debrecen Rd 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $4,355,796 $3,024,858 Sarasota 1 Fruitville Rd (Ph. II) Coburn Rd Tatum Rd 2009 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $8,557,904 $3,395,994 Lee 1 Colonial Blvd (CR 884) I-75 SR Bid 4 to 6 Urban $14,576,393 $2,699,332 Indian River 4 College Lane Rd Extension IRSC 66th Ave 2009 Bid 0 to 2 Urban $1,700,000 $1,700,000 Indian River 4 16th St 66th Ave 74th Ave 2009 Bid 0 to 2 Urban $3,109,321 $1,224,142 Orange 5 Alafaya Tr Avalon Park Blvd Mark Twain Blvd 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $18,918,599 $2,469,791 Hillsborough 7 Boyette Rd (Ph. III) McMullen Rd Bell Shoals Rd 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $23,184,354 $4,458,530 Broward 4 Bailey Rd NW 64th Ave / SW 81st Ave SR 7 (US 441) 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $6,330,297 $1,582,574 Collier 1 Oil Well Rd (Segment 2) Immokalee Rd E. of Everglades Blvd 2010 Bid 2 to 4/6 Urban / $16,759,586 $1,534,761 Collier 1 Oil Well Rd (Segment 4A) W. of Oil Well Grade Rd W. of Camp Keais Rd 2010 Bid 2 to 6 Urban $17,919,244 $949,113 Lee 1 Six Mile Cypress Pkwy Daniels Pkwy S. of Winkler Rd Ext Bid 2 to 4 Urban $6,711,242 $1,085,961 Charlotte 1 Piper Rd Henry St Jones Loop Rd 2010 Bid 2 to 4 Sub-Urb $8,627,803 $2,054,239 Indian River 4 53rd St Kings Hwy Lateral H Canal 2010 Bid 0 to 4 Urban $7,000,000 $857,843 Indian River 4 53rd St Lateral H Canal Indian River Blvd 2010 Bid 0 to 4 Urban $7,605,993 $3,802,997 Sarasota 1 North Cattlemen Rd Richardson Rd Desoto Rd 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $12,153,584 $2,383,056 Lee 1 Daniels Pkwy Chamberlin Pkwy Gateway Blvd 2011 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $2,906,553 $708,915 Orange 5 Rouse Rd SR 50 Corporate Blvd 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $29,380,249 $5,650,048 Orange 5 CR 535 Seg. A Magnolia Park Ct SR Bid 2 to 4 Urban $8,390,570 $3,062,252 Osceola 5 Goodman Rd Tri-County Sand Mine Rd 2011 Bid 0 to 2 Urban $7,060,000 $1,000,000 Pinellas 1 Bryan Dairy Rd Starkey Rd (CR 1) 72nd St 2011 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $10,327,383 $3,512,715 Hernando 7 Elgin Blvd Mariner Blvd East 3900' 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $2,684,566 $1,813,896 Hernando 7 Sunshine Grove Rd SR 50 Ken Austin Pkwy 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $4,646,801 $1,106,381 Palm Beach 4 SR 806 (Atlantic Ave) W. of Lyons Rd Starkey Rd 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $5,307,643 $3,317,277 Palm Beach 4 Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd SR 80 N. of Sycamore Dr 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $9,733,669 $1,131,822 Charlotte 1 Burnt Store Rd (Ph. I) US 41 Notre Dame Blvd 2011 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $13,512,394 $2,815,082 Indian River 4 Oslo Rd (Ph. III) 43rd Ave 58th Ave 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $3,812,202 $1,657,479 Indian River 4 66th Ave SR 60 49th St 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $20,773,389 $3,405,474 Palm Beach 4 Seminole Pratt Whitney Rd M Canal S. of Orange Blvd 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $3,646,523 $1,402,509 Polk 1 Kathleen Rd (CR35A) (Ph. II) Galloway Rd Duff Rd 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $16,784,760 $2,797,460 Polk 1 Bartow Northern Connector (Ph. I) US 98 US 17/ Bid 0 to 4 Urban $11,110,205 $1,388,776 Volusia 5 Tymber Creek Rd SR 40 Peruvian Ln 2012 Bid 2 to 4 Urban $5,276,057 $3,517,371 Collier 1 Collier Blvd (CR 951) Golden Gate Blvd Green Blvd 2013 Bid 4 to 6 Urban $21,392,039 $3,903,657 Total $580,091,194 $2,111,880 Lanes Added Lane Miles Added Construction Cost Construction Cost per Lane Mile October 2014 Page C-12 Transportation Mobility

98 The construction cost figures previously discussed reflect the cost per lane mile for adding an urban-designed (curb & gutter) roadway. In addition to planned curb & gutter improvements, has planned rural-designed (open drainage) improvements. The construction cost for open drainage improvements were developed based on the ratio of urban to rural costs from the FDOT Long Range Estimates. As shown in Table C-12, rural designed roadways are approximately 84 percent of urban designed roadways. Table C-12 Urban/Rural Section Design Adjustment Factor Improvement Construction Cost per Lane Mile Rural / Rural Design Urban Design Urban 0-2 Lanes $2,534,872 $3,660,722 69% 0-4 Lanes $2,060,744 $2,583,635 80% 0-6 Lanes $1,750,755 $2,105,746 83% 2-4 Lanes $2,946,063 $3,386,132 87% 4-6 Lanes $3,300,893 $3,782,969 87% 4-8 Lanes $2,214,290 $2,488,587 89% 6-8 Lanes $4,151,483 $4,514,176 92% Average $2,708,443 $3,217,424 84% : Florida Department of Transportation, Office of Policy Planning. Revised June 2014 Based on this information, the estimated costs per lane-mile for a State rural (open drainage) section of $2,158,000 and for a County rural section of $1,743,000 were established. The next step in arriving at a road cost per lane-mile is to establish a blend of urban and rural section improvements in each fee district. Based on a review of the MPO LRTP road projects with County staff, the percentages of closed-drainage section and open-drainage section project mileage presented in Table C-13, below, were judged as reasonable. In consideration of the project cost information for roadway capacity-adding projects discussed above, the estimated total average cost per lane mile for State roads ranged from $3.93 to $4.34 million, and for County roads from $2.58 to $3.41 million. Finally, the costs per lane-mile for Interstate highways, and State and County roads are combined in each district in the bottom section of Table C-13 to arrive at a single cost per lane-mile of capacity for each of the fee districts. This number is later divided by the capacity per lane (developed in section xx below) to arrive at a cost per vehicle-mile, then multiplying by 1.37 persons per vehicle trip from the TBRPM planning model. The at-grade arterials are combined in proportion to their mix in the adopted LRTP, and the Interstate costs are incorporated based on October 10, 2014 C-13 Transportation Mobility

99 Table C-13 Estimated Unit Cost for Roadway Projects in Construction Cost/Ln-mi: Urban Section Rural Section Interstate: $10,580,229 $10,580,229 Other State: $2,600,000 $2,158,000 Non-State: $2,100,000 $1,743,000 Urban Suburban Rural Interstate Ln-Mi: Cost: $210,546,550 $0 $170,341,681 Total Cost/Ln-Mi: $10,580,229 n/a $10,580,229 State % C&G: 90% 75% 10% State Ln-Mi C&G: State Ln-Mi Open: Cost C&G: $141,804,000 $122,148,000 $0 Cost Open: $13,077,480 $33,794,280 $0 State Const Cost/Ln-Mi: $2,555,800 $2,489,500 $0 Design/CEI ROW as % of Const 50% 38% 30% ROW/Ln-Mi: $1,277,900 $946,010 $0 Total Cost/Ln-Mi: $4,344,860 $3,933,410 $0 County % C&G 90% 75% 10% County Ln-Mi C&G: County Ln-Mi Open: Cost C&G: $508,032,000 $335,632,500 $6,006,000 Cost Open: $46,851,840 $92,858,325 $44,864,820 County Const Cost/Ln-Mi: $2,064,300 $2,010,750 $1,778,700 Design/CEI ROW as % of Const 50% 38% 30% ROW/Ln-Mi: $1,032,150 $764,085 $533,610 Total Cost/Ln-Mi: $3,406,095 $3,076,448 $2,579,115 Weighted Non-Interstate $/LnMi: $3,578,800 $3,271,124 $2,579,115 District % vmt on Interstate: 8.27% 8.36% 10.70% Incl I-75, weighted on usage: $4,157,819 $3,882,165 $3,435,234 Capacities per lane: Interstate: 21,704 21,704 15,734 Other State: 9,314 8,606 Non-State: 8,045 7,146 7,302 Weighted Capacities per lane: Non-Interstate: 8,278 7,478 7,302 Including I-75: 9,389 8,667 8,204 Cost per vehicle and person-mile: Cost per vehicle-mile: $ $ $ Cost per person-mile: $ $ $ October 10, 2014 C-14 Transportation Mobility

100 their proportion of usage by each fee district, since some fee districts (notably the suburban district) does not include any interstate facilities, whereas travel generated in the suburban district consumes Interstate capacity in the urban and rural districts. Roadway Capacity Vehicular capacity per lane-mile of construction was based on the improvements planned in the MPO s 2035 Cost-Affordable Long-Range Transportation Plan (see Table C-14). The number of lanes added and lengths of improvements were multiplied to develop lane-miles of improvement. In addition, the service volumes for existing roads and improved roads were assigned from the Generalized Annual Average Daily Volumes for Florida s Urbanized Areas (generalized service volume) tables published by the Florida DOT (December, 2013). The change in service volumes were multiplied by the length of each road improvement to develop the total vehicle-miles of service volume delivered by each improvement. The vehicle-miles of service volume were divided by the lane-miles of improvement for Interstate, Other State, and County road improvements in each impact fee district to estimate service capacities per lane for each category of road in each fee district. October 10, 2014 C-15 Transportation Mobility

101 Table C LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Capacity per Lane Mile Calculation October 10, 2014 C-16 Transportation Mobility

102 Table C-14 (continued) 2035 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Capacity per Lane Mile Calculation October 10, 2014 C-17 Transportation Mobility

103 Table C-14 (continued) 2035 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Capacity per Lane Mile Calculation October 10, 2014 C-18 Transportation Mobility

104 Transit Capital Cost per Person-Mile of Travel A model for transit service and cost was developed to establish both the capital cost per person-mile of capacity and the system operating cost for revenue budget planning purposes. This model considered planned changes to the quality of transit service provided in terms of system coverage, hours of service, and headways from s 2035 LRTP. The LRTP proposes a more than three-fold increase in service by 2035, expanding route coverage, lengthening the service hours during the day, and reducing headways to half their current levels. Table C-15 summarizes the current service and planned service. The proposed increases in capacity and service have an associated capital cost of $105.8 million, of which $65.5 million is the value of road system consumed. The increase in personmiles of capacity is 98,318, yielding a county-wide capital cost per person-mile of capacity of $1,076. The calculations are based on the planning parameters provided in Table C-16. Components of the capital cost considered included: Vehicles Needed and Fleet Margin, Bus Stops Park-n-Ride lots Cost of road network used by transit vehicles Transit capital costs were computed as the cost of capital features needed to expand the transit system, as follows: Transit Capital Cost = Vehicle Cost + Bus Stops Cost + Park n Ride Lots Cost + Road Capacity Cost where the bus cost is based on the number of buses needed during peak hours, including a 20 percent fleet margin, three bus stops per mile (one of ten with a shelter), and park n ride lots as identified in the transit service plan proposed in the County s TDP. The value of road capacity consumed by the transit service was computed as the vehicle-miles of travel by the bus fleet, weighted by the dwell-time at three bus stops per mile, multiplied by the cost per vehicle-mile of roadway capacity and capacity utilization factor. The load factor is a measure of the extent to which transit capacity is utilized. Under current conditions, the load factor in is only approximately nine percent, which means that only nine percent of the total daily capacity of the transit system is used. This is a result of low ridership throughout the day. A lower load factor results in a higher cost per person-mile of transit capacity because there are fewer bus riders across which to distribute the costs. Since transit service is intended to serve as an alternative to more heavily congested roads in the future, the assumption of a load factor that reflects current conditions would not be realistic. A higher load factor of 0.30 was October 10, 2014 C-19 Transportation Mobility

105 Table C-15 Summary of Planned Transit Service Changes and Cost Estimate 2013 Service Urban Suburban Rural Total County Road Miles in District: % Roads Covered: 87.1% 52.5% 0% 57.7% Miles of Coverage: Operating days/year: Speed: Cycles/day: Minimum Headway (mins): Park n Ride Lots: Total Route-miles: Route coverage (mi): Buses needed: Vehicle-miles/day: ,267 Vehicle-hours/day: Road Capital Cost: $17,814,557 $9,643,747 $0 27,458,304 Bus Stop Capital Cost: $4,437,296 $1,942,706 $0 6,380,002 Person-Miles of Capacity: 32,749 10, ,523 Transit Capital Cost: $28,731,853 $14,421,453 $0 $43,153,306 Fixed Route Operating Cost: $3,385,569 $1,113,897 $0 $4,499,466 Paratransit Multiplier: Annual Transit Operating Cost: $5,024,184 $1,653,023 $0 $6,677,208 Local Share of Captial Cost: $28,731,853 $14,421,453 $0 $43,153,306 Future Service: 2035 Transit Plan, 2035 MPO CA LRTP, extrapolated to 2040 Horizon Year Road-Miles in District: % Major Roads Covered: 117.3% 53.5% 48.9% 83.2% Miles of Coverage: Operating days/year: Speed (mph): Cycles/day: Minimum Headway (mins): Park n Ride Lots: Total Route-miles: Route coverage (mi): Buses needed: Vehicle-miles/day: 9,566 3,111 1,229 13,906 Vehicle-hours/day: Road Capital Cost: 53,077,267 28,403,206 11,458,001 92,938,474 Bus Stop Capital Cost: 7,717,591 2,639,971 1,118,584 11,476,146 Person-Miles of Capacity: 97,572 31,734 12, ,841 Transit Capital Cost: $92,686,859 $40,458,844 $15,816,585 $148,962,288 Fixed Route Operating Cost: $10,091,276 $3,282,067 $1,296,422 $14,669,766 Paratransit Multiplier: Annual Transit Operating Cost $13,855,323 $4,506,279 $1,779,988 $20,141,589 Local Share of Captial Cost: $92,686,859 $40,458,844 $15,816,585 $148,962,288 Change: Increase in miles of coverage: Increase in Cycles per day: Reduction in Minimum Headway (minutes): Park 'n' Ride Lots: Road Capital Cost: $35,262,710 $18,759,459 $11,458,001 $65,480,171 Bus Stop Capital Cost: $3,280,295 $697,265 $1,118,584 $5,096,143 Increase in Fleet Size: Increase in Bus-Miles per Day: 6,355 2,055 1,229 9,639 Increase in Person-Miles of Capacity: 64,823 20,959 12,535 98,318 Transit Capital Cost: $63,955,006 $26,037,391 $15,816,585 $105,808,982 Annual Transit Operating Cost: $8,831,138 $2,853,255 $1,779,988 $13,464,382 Capital Cost per Person-Mile of Capacity: $987 $1,242 $1,262 $1,076 Non-Road Capital Cost: $40,328,811 Federal/State Share (% ): 80% Federal/State Share ($): $32,263,049 Present value of 25 years of one penny of gas tax: $29,651,898 Equivalent pennies of gas tax: 1.1 October 10, 2014 C-20 Transportation Mobility

106 used for this study, reflecting the intended, improved future service, particularly on routes where travel demands are high and the roads are most heavily congested. Table C-16: Transit Planning Parameters QOS Load Factor: 0.3 Fleet margin: 1.2 Seats / bus: 34 Bus Stops/Mile: 3 % Cadillac Stops: 10% Seconds per stop: 14.4 Transfer Station: $1,200,000 Park n Ride Facility: $100,667 Cost/Basic Stop: $750 Cost/Enhanced Stop: $24,116 Cost/Bus: $405,000 Daily ridership/pk hr ridership: 10 Local Share of Capital: 100% Operating Cost/veh-hr: $63.83 October 10, 2014 C-21 Transportation Mobility

107 Appendix D Cross-District Travel Analysis

108 Appendix D Cross-District Travel Analysis It is appropriate to recognize that travel generated in one district does not always stay within that district. If travel from a development extends into an adjacent district, it is appropriate to recognize the capacity costs and quality of service standard of the adjacent district in the fee charged to that development. Short trips are less likely to use the transportation systems in neighboring fee districts, but longer trips are likely to make more use of the transportation system in adjacent districts. This appendix documents development of estimates of travel in the home and adjacent districts as a function of development trip length. These estimates are incorporated into the computation of the cost of a person-mile of travel, weighted to consider the different system costs and quality of service/capacity addition ratio established for each fee district. was divided into three regions, or fee districts -- urban, suburban, and rural. The urban region is generally located in the west and south parts of the county. The suburban region is generally located in the central and east parts of the county. The rural region is generally located in the north part of the county. This analysis was undertaken using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) buffer-zone analysis tools, and person-trip generation by traffic analysis zone. The Tampa Bay Regional Planning Model 7.0 (TBRPM) was run for the base 2007 scenario and the future 2035 scenario. The number of net new person trips generated between these two scenarios was assigned to the corresponding traffic analysis zones (TAZs), as represented in a GIS shapefile. The acreage of each TAZ was determined and then the number of net new person trips per acre for each TAZ was calculated. The TAZs were then assigned to their mobility fee district: urban, suburban, or rural. TAZs that overlapped regions were split and the trips within the TAZ were proportionally allocated to the split portions based on their respective areas. The analysis built estimates of the amount of travel in the home and adjacent fee districts using average trip lengths from 0.5 to 8.0 miles, in half-mile increments. Two buffer zones were created for each incremental trip length one zone was defined by being far enough away from adjacent zones that no trips were likely to leave the home district, and the second zone was close enough to the fee district boundary that it was likely that some travel would leave the home zone. Based on a review of the trip length distributions for the various trip purposes found in the TBRPM, the approximate buffer distance was determined based on 2.5 times the average trip length for trip lengths less than or equal to 3 miles and 2.0 times the average trip length for trip lengths greater than 3 miles. These distances were adequate to address 90 to 95 percent of the destinations for trips generated by a land use. The boundary for each region that borders another region within was buffered for each of the sixteen trip length buffers, as described above, three separate times (once for each region). Each region was therefore divided into two sub-regions; the portion of the region that was outside of the buffer, sub-region A, and the portion of the region that fell within the buffer, October 10, 2014 D-1 Transportation Mobility

109 sub-region B, as shown in Figure D-1. A portion of sub-region B also extended into the adjacent regions. The acreage for each portion of TAZ within each buffer was determined. The number of person trips per acre was then multiplied by the acreage within each portion of TAZ. The total person trips within each portion of each TAZ within each buffer, each sub-region, and each region were totaled. This allowed the table to be populated where as the buffer distance increases, the number of person trips in sub-region A decreases while at the same time the number of person trips in sub-region B (both in the same and in adjacent regions) increases. Therefore, as the average trip length increases, represented by the buffer distance, the number of person trips within its vicinity, whether in the same region or an adjacent region will increase. These analyses provided an estimate of the number of trips generated by a land use that might be destined to an adjacent fee district, or remain in the home fee district. The results are indicated in Tables D-1 through D-3. The next step was to then determine, for trips travelling into the adjacent fee districts, what proportion of the trip length made use of transportation system in the home district as opposed to those in the adjacent district. These proportions were manually estimated by reviewing maps, the district boundaries, and existing and planned roadway facilities. The final estimates were then smoothed to eliminate sudden changes in proportions. The final cross-district travel estimates by trip length are provided in Table D-4. October 10, 2014 D-2 Transportation Mobility

110 Figure D-1 October 10, 2014 D-3 Transportation Mobility

111 Example of Trip Proportioning Buffer-Zone October 10, 2014 D-4 Transportation Mobility

112 Table D-1 Estimate of Cross-District Travel for Urban District Avg Trip Length Buffer Zone Area A Trips % A trips to Urban % TL in Urban Area B Trips % Area B trips to Urban %Area B trips to Suburban % B to Suburban TL in Urban % B to Suburban TL in Suburban % B to Suburban TL in Rural % Area B trips to Rural % B to Rural TL in Urban % B to Rur TL in Suburban , % 100% 941,946 71% 26% 50% 50% 0% 3% 33% 33% 33% 91.8% 7.6% 0.5% , % 100% 1,315,803 65% 33% 50% 50% 0% 3% 33% 33% 33% 86.3% 13.1% 0.7% , % 100% 1,673,969 60% 37% 50% 50% 0% 3% 33% 33% 33% 80.3% 18.8% 1.0% , % 100% 1,714,496 58% 39% 50% 50% 0% 4% 0% 50% 50% 77.4% 20.8% 1.8% , % 100% 1,718,726 56% 40% 50% 50% 0% 4% 0% 50% 50% 75.9% 21.9% 2.2% , % 100% 1,726,156 54% 41% 50% 50% 0% 5% 0% 50% 50% 74.9% 22.6% 2.5% , % 100% 1,729,732 54% 41% 50% 50% 0% 5% 0% 50% 50% 74.6% 22.8% 2.6% , % 100% 1,734,090 54% 40% 50% 50% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 74.1% 23.0% 2.9% , % 100% 1,737,207 54% 41% 50% 50% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 73.9% 23.2% 2.9% , % 100% 1,738,327 53% 41% 50% 50% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 73.8% 23.3% 2.9% , % 100% 1,738,327 53% 41% 50% 50% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 73.8% 23.3% 3.0% , % 100% 1,738,594 53% 41% 50% 50% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 73.7% 23.3% 3.0% % 100% 1,740,636 53% 41% 50% 50% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 73.7% 23.3% 3.0% % 100% 1,740,636 53% 41% 0% 100% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 53.4% 43.6% 3.0% % 100% 1,740,636 53% 41% 0% 100% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 53.4% 43.6% 3.0% % 100% 1,740,636 53% 41% 0% 100% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 53.4% 43.6% 3.0% % 100% 1,740,636 53% 41% 0% 100% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 53.4% 43.6% 3.0% % 100% 1,740,636 53% 41% 0% 100% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 53.4% 43.6% 3.0% % 100% 1,740,636 53% 41% 0% 100% 0% 6% 0% 50% 50% 53.4% 43.6% 3.0% % B to Rural TL in Rural %TL in Urban %TL in Suburban % TL in Rural Table D-2 Estimate of Cross-District Travel for Suburban District Avg Trip Length Buffer Zone Area A Trips % A trips to Suburban % TL in Suburban Area B Trips % Area B trips to Suburban %Area B trips to Urban % B to Urban TL in Urban % B to Urban TL in Suburban % B to Urban TL in Rural % Area B trips to Rural % B to Rural TL in Urban % B to Rural TL in Suburban % B to Rural TL in Rural %TL in Urban %TL in Suburban % TL in Rural , % 100% 639,359 55% 39% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 18.6% 79.6% 1.8% , % 100% 1,086,425 51% 44% 100% 0% 0% 5% 0% 40% 60% 35.7% 61.8% 2.5% , % 100% 1,305,366 53% 42% 100% 0% 0% 5% 0% 40% 60% 41.3% 55.8% 2.9% , % 100% 1,318,877 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 5% 0% 40% 60% 41.1% 55.7% 3.3% , % 100% 1,322,929 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.9% 55.5% 3.6% , % 100% 1,324,414 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.8% 55.6% 3.6% % 100% 1,325,169 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.7% 3.6% % 100% 1,325,724 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.7% 3.6% % 100% 1,326,027 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.7% 3.6% % 100% 1,326,042 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.7% 3.6% % 100% 1,326,042 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.7% 3.6% % 100% 1,326,042 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.7% 3.6% % 100% 1,326,042 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.8% 3.6% % 100% 1,326,042 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.8% 3.6% % 100% 1,326,042 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.8% 3.6% % 100% 1,326,042 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.8% 3.6% % 100% 1,326,042 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.8% 3.6% % 100% 1,326,042 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.8% 3.6% % 100% 1,326,042 53% 41% 100% 0% 0% 6% 0% 40% 60% 40.7% 55.8% 3.6% Table D-3 Estimate of Cross-District Travel for Rural District Avg Trip Length Buffer Zone Area A Trips % A trips to Rural % TL in Rural Area B Trips % Area B trips to Rural %Area B trips to Urban % B to Urban TL in Urban % B to Urban TL in Suburban % B to Urban TL in Rural % Area B trips to Suburban % B to Suburban TL in Urban % B to Suburban TL in Suburban % B to Suburban TL in Rural %TL in Urban %TL in Suburban % TL in Rural , % 100% 122,836 22% 20% 50% 0% 50% 59% 2% 49% 49% 6.9% 18.2% 75.0% , % 100% 141,174 17% 18% 50% 0% 50% 65% 0% 50% 50% 6.6% 23.3% 70.1% , % 100% 162,135 14% 15% 41% 41% 19% 71% 0% 50% 50% 5.1% 34.5% 60.4% , % 100% 180,519 13% 16% 42% 42% 15% 71% 0% 50% 50% 6.2% 39.0% 54.8% % 100% 195,108 12% 18% 44% 44% 13% 70% 0% 50% 50% 8.1% 43.0% 48.9% % 100% 195,136 9% 31% 45% 45% 10% 60% 0% 50% 50% 13.9% 43.8% 42.3% % 100% 195,136 9% 34% 45% 45% 9% 57% 0% 50% 50% 15.3% 44.0% 40.7% % 100% 195,136 8% 36% 46% 46% 9% 55% 0% 50% 50% 16.6% 44.2% 39.3% % 100% 195,136 8% 42% 46% 46% 8% 51% 0% 50% 50% 19.1% 44.4% 36.5% % 100% 195,136 6% 51% 46% 46% 8% 43% 0% 50% 50% 23.4% 44.9% 31.7% % 100% 195,136 6% 53% 47% 47% 7% 41% 0% 50% 50% 24.8% 45.2% 30.0% % 100% 195,136 6% 53% 47% 47% 6% 41% 0% 50% 50% 24.9% 45.3% 29.8% % 100% 195,136 6% 53% 47% 47% 6% 41% 0% 50% 50% 25.1% 45.5% 29.5% % 100% 195,136 6% 53% 47% 47% 5% 41% 0% 50% 50% 25.2% 45.6% 29.2% % 100% 195,136 6% 53% 47% 47% 5% 41% 0% 50% 50% 25.3% 45.7% 29.0% % 100% 195,136 6% 53% 47% 47% 5% 41% 0% 50% 50% 25.3% 45.7% 29.0% % 100% 195,136 6% 53% 47% 47% 5% 41% 0% 50% 50% 25.3% 45.7% 29.0% % 100% 195,136 6% 53% 47% 47% 5% 41% 0% 50% 50% 25.3% 45.7% 29.0% % 100% 195,136 6% 53% 47% 47% 5% 41% 0% 50% 50% 25.3% 45.7% 29.0% October 10, 2014 D-5 Transportation Mobility

113 Table D-4 Percent of Travel in Home and Adjacent Districts by Development Average Trip Length Average Trip "Urban" Home District "Suburban" Home District "Rural" Home District Length (Miles) Urban Suburban Rural Urban Suburban Rural Urban Suburban Rural % 5.00% 2.00% 23.20% 73.00% 3.80% 6.00% 14.00% 80.00% % 10.07% 3.85% 27.01% 67.86% 5.13% 9.00% 20.00% 71.00% % 13.90% 4.77% 29.72% 64.42% 5.86% 11.36% 23.64% 65.00% % 16.14% 5.19% 31.31% 62.49% 6.20% 14.87% 26.55% 58.58% % 17.73% 5.43% 32.43% 61.16% 6.41% 19.10% 28.61% 52.29% % 18.97% 5.59% 33.30% 60.14% 6.56% 21.91% 30.21% 47.88% % 19.98% 5.70% 34.02% 59.32% 6.66% 23.93% 31.52% 44.55% % 20.83% 5.78% 34.62% 58.64% 6.74% 25.46% 32.62% 41.92% % 21.57% 5.84% 35.14% 58.06% 6.80% 26.65% 33.58% 39.77% % 22.22% 5.89% 35.60% 57.55% 6.85% 27.62% 34.42% 37.96% % 22.80% 5.93% 36.01% 57.09% 6.89% 28.41% 35.18% 36.41% % 23.33% 5.95% 36.39% 56.69% 6.93% 29.07% 35.86% 35.07% % 23.81% 5.97% 36.73% 56.32% 6.95% 29.63% 36.49% 33.88% % 24.25% 5.99% 37.04% 55.98% 6.98% 30.11% 37.06% 32.83% % 24.66% 6.00% 37.33% 55.67% 7.00% 30.53% 37.59% 31.88% % 25.04% 6.01% 37.60% 55.38% 7.02% 30.89% 38.09% 31.02% % 25.40% 6.02% 37.85% 55.12% 7.03% 31.21% 38.55% 30.24% % 25.73% 6.03% 38.09% 54.87% 7.04% 31.49% 38.98% 29.53% % 26.05% 6.03% 38.31% 54.63% 7.06% 31.74% 39.39% 28.87% % 26.35% 6.03% 38.52% 54.41% 7.07% 31.96% 39.78% 28.26% Notes: *An average trip length of 6.53 miles in the Urban home district was used in the example in section Cross-District Travel Analysis October 10, 2014 D-6 Transportation Mobility

114 Appendix E Credit Component Calculations

115 APPENDIX E: Credit Component Calculations This appendix presents the revenue estimates for the credit component. Currently, in addition to the capital funding from State and Federal fuel tax revenues, s transportation system is financially supported by several local funding sources. Of these, County fuel taxes are listed below, along with a few pertinent characteristics of each. 1. Constitutional Fuel Tax (2 /gallon) Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. Collected in accordance with Article XII, Section 9 (c) of the Florida Constitution. The State allocated 80 percent of this tax to Counties after first withholding amounts pledged for debt service on bonds issued pursuant to provisions of the State Constitution for road and bridge purposes. The 20 percent surplus can be used to support the road construction program within the county. 2. County Fuel Tax (1 /gallon) Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. Primary purpose of these funds is to help reduce a County s reliance on ad valorem taxes. Proceeds are to be used for transportation-related expenses, including the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes. Authorized uses include acquisition of rights-of-way; the construction, reconstruction, operation, maintenance, and repair of transportation facilities, roads, bridges, bicycle paths, and pedestrian pathways; or the reduction of bond indebtedness incurred for transportation purposes st Local Option Tax (6 /gallon) Tax applies to every net gallon of motor and diesel fuel sold within a county. Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. To accommodate statewide equalization, all six cents are automatically levied on diesel fuel in every county, regardless of whether a County is levying the tax on motor fuel at all or at the maximum rate. Proceeds are distributed to a county and its municipalities according to a mutually agreed upon distribution scheme, or by using a formula contained in the Florida Statutes. currently levies this tax, and applies it for non-capital (e.g. operations and maintenance) purposes. October 10, 2014 E-1 Transportation Mobility

116 4. 2 nd Local Option Tax (5 /gallon) Tax applies to every net gallon of gasoline sold within a county. Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the capital improvements element of an adopted Local Government Comprehensive Plan. Proceeds are distributed to a county and its municipalities according to a mutually agreed upon distribution scheme, or by using a formula contained in the Florida Statutes. In September, 2014, the Board of County Commissioners voted to begin collecting all five pennies of the 2 nd Local Option Fuel Tax, starting on January 1, Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax (1 /gallon) Tax is on every net gallon of motor fuel sold within a county. Proceeds may be used to fund transportation expenditures. To accommodate statewide equalization, this tax is automatically levied on diesel fuel in every county, regardless of whether a County is levying the tax on motor fuel at all. Counties are not required to share the proceeds of this tax with their municipalities. Each year, the Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (LCIR) produces the Local Government Financial Information Handbook, which details the estimated local government revenues for the upcoming fiscal year. Included in this document are the estimated distributions of the various fuel tax revenues for each county in the state. The data represent projected fuel tax distributions to for the upcoming fiscal year. In the table, the fuel tax revenue data are used to calculate the value per penny (per gallon of fuel) that should be used to estimate the equivalent pennies of other revenue sources. Table E-1 shows the distribution per penny for each of the fuel levies to, and then the calculation of the weighted average for the value of a penny of fuel tax. The weighting procedure takes into account the differing amount of revenues generated for the various types of gas tax revenues, and portions allocated to the municipalities. The weighted average figure of approximately $1.772 million estimates the annual revenue that one penny of gas tax generates for. October 10, 2014 E-2 Transportation Mobility

117 Table E-1 Estimated Fuel Tax Distribution Allocated to Capital Programs for the Board of County Commissioners, FY (1) Tax Amount of Levy Total Distribution Per per Gallon Distribution Penny Constitutional Fuel Tax $0.02 $3,906,148 $1,953,074 County Fuel Tax $0.01 $1,721,756 $1,721,756 1st Local Option (1-6 cents) $0.06 $10,265,766 $1,710,961 2nd Local Option (1-5 cents) $0.00 $0 - Ninth-Cent Fuel Tax $0.01 $1,825,833 $1,825,833 Total $0.10 $17,719,503 Weighted Average $1,771,950 (1) : Florida Legislative Committee on Intergovernmental relations, (2) The weighted average distribution per penny is calculated by taking the sum of the total distribution and dividing that value by the sum of the total levies per gallon (multiplied by 100). Gas Tax Credit A revenue credit for the annual gas tax equivalent expenditures on roadway capacity expansion projects in is presented below. The two components of the credit are as follows: County gas tax equivalent pennies State gas tax expenditures County Gas Tax Equivalent Pennies As shown in Table E-1, currently collects 10 pennies of gas tax, including the constitutional, county, 1 st local option, and ninth cent fuel taxes. While historically approximately 25 percent of the gas tax collections have been allocated to roadway capacity expansion improvements, these funds have recently been shifted to fund a higher level of roadway maintenance. The Board of County Commissioners voted to levy all five pennies of the second local option gasoline tax for capital purposes, so new development will be credited for five pennies of County gas tax expenditures. State Gas Tax Expenditures In the calculation of the equivalent pennies of gas tax from the State, expenditures on roadway capacity expansion spanning a 15-year period (from FY 2005 to FY 2019) were October 10, 2014 E-3 Transportation Mobility

118 reviewed. For calculation purposes, the 15-year period was broken into three increments; two historical (FY and FY ) and one future (FY ). Information on historical and future projects funding was obtained from the FDOT Work Programs. A 15-year funding period was used to develop a State credit for non-interstate roadway capacity expansion projects. But, since Interstate improvements are funded on a relatively infrequent basis, and Interstate 75 in is currently being improved to add general-purpose through lanes (the first major capacity addition improvements since I-75 was built), assumption of the interstate funding over only a 15- year period would overstate the capital funding. Thus, interstate improvement funding was distributed over a 50-year horizon, resulting in a State/Federal gas tax equivalent of $24.5 pennies per gallon. This approach results in a stable credit, and the value compares favorably with the 22.5 pennies per gallon used in the 2011 mobility fee schedule. Table E-2 documents this calculation, and the specific projects that were used in the equivalent penny calculations are summarized in Tables E-3. Table E-2 Equivalent Penny Calculation for State Portion Cost of Interstate Projects (2) Cost of Non- Interstate Projects (2) Equivalent Pennies (4) FDOT ( ) (1) $16,488,870 $285,446,787 $0.328 FDOT ( ) $239,229,455 $155,601,961 $0.257 FDOT ( ) $74,243,942 $109,938,860 $0.149 Total $329,962,267 $550,987,608 $0.245 (1) : FDOT District 7 Gaming Reports (2) : Tables E-3 (3) Value of one penny of gasoline tax to = $1,771,950 (4) Equivalent pennies calculated as ((Total Interstate/50 yrs + Total Non- Interstate/15yrs)}/($1,771,950*100) October 10, 2014 E-4 Transportation Mobility

119 Table E-3 FDOT FY Work Program Expansion Projects October 10, 2014 E-5 Transportation Mobility

120 Table E-3 (continued) FDOT FY Work Program Expansion Projects October 10, 2014 E-6 Transportation Mobility

121 Sales Tax Credit In addition to the gas tax credit, collects a one cent Penny for Pasco sales tax. The revenue generated from this tax is used to finance specific transportation capacity expansion needs throughout the County. In 2013, this tax was re-adopted and extended through percent of the BoCC s 45 percent share is allocated for transportation capital purposes. This study assumed the sales tax would continue in effect and fund transportation needs through In 2014, the sales tax generated $49.4 million, with $8.5 million allocated to transportation. At $1,771,950 per year per penny of gasoline tax, the sales tax converts to 4.81pennies of gasoline tax per gallon for mobility fee purposes. Transit Capital Credit Based on an 80 percent Federal matching ratio and estimated transit capital costs, an equivalent gasoline tax of 0.11 pennies was estimated. The transit cost estimates and conversion of the anticipated revenues to an equivalent gasoline tax credit is discussed in Appendix C. Tax Increment Self-Credit The Board of County Commissioners established a tax increment finance district on the entire unincorporated county to fund transportation needs. These funds would first be applied to meet bonds, then to fund the buy-down of mobility fees, then to fund transit operations, and then to be applied to transportation capital needs. In the event the first three purposes do not utilize the entire tax increment revenue source and some portion of tax increment revenues are allocated to transportation capital needs, a credit would be due to new development. From a practical perspective, no allocation of tax increment revenues to transportation capital is expected other than as a buy-down of mobility fees. However, as a conservative measure, some credit was issued, amounting to an equivalent 0.25 mills over a 25-year life of the development. Tax increment revenues are based on the increase in taxable value of property over time. In the year established, no revenue is generated, but as the tax base appreciates, the value of the proceeds is based on the increase in property value. Thus, this revenue source does not produce large amounts of income in its early years, but the future revenues can be substantial as property values rise. October 10, 2014 E-7 Transportation Mobility

122 To estimate the magnitude of this credit for individual land uses, the taxable value of the various land use categories of the impact fee were researched in s property tax records, current as of October, 2010, and the results are indicated in Table E-4. The table also provides the calculation of the present value of 25 years of the 0.25 millage rate applied to the taxable property value, at a 3.3 percent per year discount rate. In this analysis, an assumption that property values would appreciate by two percent per year was incorporated based on guidance of s Office of Management and Budget. The equation by which the value of the credit was computed is: Tax Increment Credit = (Property value 0.25 ((1+0.02) n -1) ( ) n /$1,000) for n = 1 to 25-year period Fuel Efficiency for Credit Calculations To recognize credits for motor fuel taxes, it is necessary to convert vehicle-miles of travel to gallons of fuel consumed. For this purpose, information published by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration was used. Table E-5 presents the FHWA fuel efficiency information, and Table E-6 summarizes the calculation of the 18.4 miles per gallon fuel efficiency applied in this study. October 10, 2014 E-8 Transportation Mobility

123 Table E-4 Tax Increment Credit Analysis Land Use Code Land Use Unit Tax Value/ Unit Urban Area Suburban Area Rural Area Present Value Credit (1) Tax Value/ Unit Present Value Credit (1) Tax Value/ Unit Present Value Credit (1) RESIDENTIAL Less than 1,500 s.f. & Annual Hh Income less tha 80% SHIP Definition du $93,000 $ $79,000 $86.32 $63,000 $ to 1,500 s.f. du $93,000 $ $79,000 $86.32 $63,000 $ ,501 to 2,499 s.f. du $127,500 $ $127,500 $ $115,000 $ ,500 s.f. and greater du $330,000 $ $350,000 $ $286,000 $ "Low Income" SHIP defined Multi-Family du $70,000 $76.49 $65,000 $71.03 $50,000 $ Multi-Family Apartments du $70,000 $76.49 $65,000 $71.03 $50,000 $ Low-Rise Condominium/Townhouse (1 to 2 stories) du $70,000 $76.49 $65,000 $71.03 $50,000 $ High-Rise Condominium (3 or more stories) du $70,000 $76.49 $65,000 $71.03 $50,000 $ Mobile Home Park du $41,000 $44.80 $37,000 $40.43 $35,000 $ Age Restricted Single Family du $93,000 $ $79,000 $86.32 $63,000 $ Age Restricted Multi-Family du $51,000 $55.73 $40,000 $43.71 $27,000 $ Congregate Care Facility (Attached) du $33,000 $36.06 $26,000 $28.41 $18,000 $19.67 LODGING: 310 Hotel room $55,000 $60.10 $45,000 $49.17 $40,000 $ Motel room $27,500 $30.05 $22,500 $24.59 $20,000 $ Resort Hotel room $55,000 $60.10 $45,000 $49.17 $40,000 $43.71 RECREATION: 412 General Recreation acre $98,013 $ $35,284 $38.55 $20,831 $ RV Park site $9,801 $10.71 $3,528 $3.86 $2,083 $ Marina berth $75,000 $81.95 $75,000 $81.95 $75,000 $ Golf Course hole $125,000 $ $125,000 $ $75,000 $ Miniature Golf Course hole $44,000 $48.08 $33,000 $36.06 $26,400 $ Bowling Alley 1,000 sf $32,000 $34.97 $28,350 $30.98 $22,000 $ Movie Theater screen $150,000 $ $112,500 $ $100,500 $ Racquet Club/Health Club/Spa/Dance Studio 1,000 sf $100,000 $ $75,000 $81.95 $67,000 $ Community Center/Gymnasium 1,000 sf $100,000 $ $75,000 $81.95 $67,000 $73.21 INSTITUTIONS: 520 Elementary School student $20,250 $22.13 $20,250 $22.13 $20,250 $ Middle School student $20,250 $22.13 $20,250 $22.13 $20,250 $ High School student $20,250 $22.13 $20,250 $22.13 $20,250 $ University/Junior College (7,500 or fewer students) (Private) student $20,250 $22.13 $20,250 $22.13 $20,250 $ University/Junior College (more than 7,500 students) (Private) student $20,250 $22.13 $20,250 $22.13 $20,250 $ Church 1,000 sf $122,010 $ $50,110 $54.76 $35,240 $ Day Care student $210,000 $ $210,000 $ $210,000 $ Cemetery acre $12,600 $13.77 $10,000 $10.93 $7,500 $ Hospital 1,000 sf $185,000 $ $185,000 $ $185,000 $ Nursing Home bed $5,333 $5.83 $6,650 $7.27 $5,647 $6.17 October 10, 2014 E-1 Transportation Mobility

124 Table E-4 (continued) Tax Increment Credit Analysis Land Use Code Land Use Unit OFFICE: Tax Value/ Unit Urban Area Suburban Area Rural Area Present Value Credit (1) Tax Value/ Unit Present Value Credit (1) Tax Value/ Unit Present Value Credit (1) General Office 50,000 sf or less 1,000 sf $111,300 $ $66,500 $72.66 $56,470 $ General Office 50, ,000 sf 1,000 sf $53,330 $58.27 $66,500 $72.66 $56,470 $ General Office 100, ,000 sf 1,000 sf $53,330 $58.27 $66,500 $72.66 $56,470 $ General Office 200, ,000 sf 1,000 sf $53,330 $58.27 $66,500 $72.66 $56,470 $ General Office greater than 400,000 sf 1,000 sf $53,330 $58.27 $66,500 $72.66 $56,470 $ Corporate Headquarters Building 1,000 sf $53,330 $58.27 $66,500 $72.66 $56,470 $ Medical Office 1,000 sf $53,330 $58.27 $66,500 $72.66 $56,470 $ Office Park 1,000 sf $53,330 $58.27 $66,500 $72.66 $56,470 $ Research and Development Center 1,000 sf $53,330 $58.27 $66,500 $72.66 $56,470 $ Veterinarian Clinic 1,000 sf $53,330 $58.27 $66,500 $72.66 $56,470 $61.70 RETAIL: 814 Specialty Retail 1,000 sf $100,000 $ $75,000 $81.95 $67,000 $ Hardware/Paint 1,000 sf $100,000 $ $75,000 $81.95 $67,000 $ Retail 50,000 sfgla or less 1,000 sfgla $100,000 $ $75,000 $81.95 $67,000 $ Retail 50, ,000 sfgla 1,000 sfgla $100,000 $ $75,000 $81.95 $67,000 $ Retail 200, ,000 sfgla 1,000 sfgla $150,000 $ $112,500 $ $100,500 $ Retail 400, ,000 sfgla 1,000 sfgla $150,000 $ $112,500 $ $100,500 $ Retail 600, ,000 sfgla 1,000 sfgla $150,000 $ $112,500 $ $100,500 $ Retail greater than 800,000 sfgla 1,000 sfgla $150,000 $ $112,500 $ $100,500 $ New/Used Auto Sales 1,000 sf $47,290 $51.67 $31,520 $34.44 $42,540 $ Tire Store 1,000 sf $100,000 $ $75,000 $81.95 $67,000 $ Supermarket 1,000 sf $45,820 $50.07 $50,970 $55.69 $0 $ Convenience Store w/gas Pumps 1,000 sf $20,360 $22.25 $21,720 $23.73 $23,080 $ Home Improvement Superstore 1,000 sf $100,000 $ $75,000 $81.95 $67,000 $ Pharmacy/Drug Store with and without Drive-Thru 1,000 sf $100,000 $ $75,000 $81.95 $67,000 $ Furniture Store 1,000 sf $100,000 $ $75,000 $81.95 $67,000 $ Bank/Savings w/drive-in 1,000 sf $192,200 $ $176,310 $ $132,233 $ Quality Restaurant 1,000 sf $123,610 $ $41,130 $44.94 $42,360 $ High-Turnover Restaurant 1,000 sf $123,610 $ $41,130 $44.94 $42,360 $ Fast Food Restaurant w/drive-thru 1,000 sf $212,500 $ $200,000 $ $150,000 $ Quick Lube bays $32,500 $35.51 $24,375 $26.63 $21,775 $ Auto Repair or Body Shop 1,000 sf $61,410 $67.10 $30,410 $33.23 $62,830 $ Gasoline Station fuel pos. $1,690 $1.85 $1,803 $1.97 $1,916 $ Self-Service Car Wash bays $32,500 $35.51 $24,375 $26.63 $21,775 $ Convenience/Gasoline/Fast Food Store 1,000 sf $20,360 $22.25 $21,720 $23.73 $23,080 $ Mini-Warehouse 1,000 sf $48,710 $53.23 $25,610 $27.98 $43,860 $47.93 INDUSTRIAL: 110 General Light Industrial 1,000 sf $35,160 $38.42 $30,580 $33.41 $16,540 $ General Heavy Industrial 1,000 sf $35,160 $38.42 $30,580 $33.41 $16,540 $ Industrial Park 1,000 sf $35,160 $38.42 $30,580 $33.41 $16,540 $ Manufacturing 1,000 sf $35,160 $38.42 $30,580 $33.41 $16,540 $ Warehouse 1,000 sf $48,710 $53.23 $25,610 $27.98 $43,860 $ High-Cube Warehouse 1,000 sf $48,710 $53.23 $25,610 $27.98 $43,860 $ Airport Hangar 1,000 sf $35,160 $38.42 $30,580 $33.41 $16,540 $ Mining 1,000 cu yd $440 $0.48 $440 $0.48 $440 $0.48 Note: 1. See text for description and formula. October 10, 2014 E-2 Transportation Mobility

125 Table E-5 October 10, 2014 E-3 Transportation Mobility

126 ANNUAL VEHICLE DISTANCE TRAVELED IN MILES AND RELATED DATA (1) BY HIGHWAY CATEGORY AND VEHICLE TYPE Published January 2014 TABLE VM-1 SUBTOTALS YEAR ITEM LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES SHORT WB (2) MOTOR- CYCLES BUSES LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES LONG WB (2) SINGLE-UNIT COMBINATION TRUCKS (3) TRUCKS ALL LIGHT VEHICLES (2) SINGLE-UNIT 2-AXLE 6-TIRE OR MORE AND COMBINATION TRUCKS ALL MOTOR VEHICLES Motor-Vehicle Travel: (millions of vehicle-miles) 2012 Interstate Rural 141,090 1,279 1,674 43,889 9,249 48, ,979 57, , Other Arterial Rural 231,314 2,880 2,036 88,842 17,194 29, ,156 46, , Other Rural 226,777 3,358 2,031 94,356 17,961 14, ,133 32, , All Rural 599,181 7,516 5, ,086 44,403 92, , , , Interstate Urban 345,091 2,815 2,359 84,130 14,539 35, ,220 50, , Other Urban 1,119,085 10,967 6, ,872 46,018 35,047 1,408,957 81,065 1,507, All Urban 1,464,176 13,782 9, ,001 60,557 70,662 1,838, ,219 1,992, Total Rural and Urban (5) 2,063,357 21,298 14, , , ,358 2,664, ,318 2,968, Number of motor vehicles 183,171,882 8,454, ,509 50,588,676 8,190,286 2,469, ,760,558 10,659, ,639,386 registered (2) 2012 Average miles traveled 11,265 2,519 19,299 11,882 12,815 66,161 11,398 25,172 11,705 per vehicle 2012 Person-miles of travel (4) 2,866,797 22, , , , ,358 3,669, ,318 4,273,876 (millions) 2012 Fuel consumed 88,541, ,115 2,059,305 35,093,224 14,286,505 27,925, ,634,677 42,212, ,395,187 (thousand gallons) 2012 Average fuel consumption per , ,744 11, , vehicle (gallons) 2012 Average miles traveled per gallon of fuel consumed (1) The FHWA estimates national trends by using State reported Highway Performance and Monitoring System (HPMS) data, fuel consumption data (MF-21 and MF-27), vehicle registration data (MV-1, MV-9, and MV-10), other data such as the R.L. Polk vehicle data, and a host of modeling techniques. Starting with the 2009 VM-1, an enhanced methodology was used to provide timely indicators on both travel and travel behavior changes. (2) Light Duty Vehicles Short WB - passenger cars, light trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles with a wheelbase (WM) equal to or less than 121 inches. Light Duty Vehicles Long WB - large passenger cars, vans, pickup trucks, and sport/utility vehicles with wheelbases (WB) larger than 121 inches. All Light Duty Vehicles - passenger cars, light trucks, vans and sport utility vehicles regardless of (3) Single-Unit - single frame trucks that have 2-Axles and at least 6 tires or a gross vehicle weight rating exceeding 10,000 lbs. (4) Vehicle occupancy is estimated by the FHWA from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS); For single unit truck and heavy trucks, 1 motor vehicle mile travelled = 1 person-mile traveled. (5) VMT data are based on the latest HPMS data available; it may not match previous published results. ANNUAL VEHICLE DISTANCE TRAVELED IN MILES AND RELATED DATA - October 10, 2014 E-4 Transportation Mobility

127 2012 (1) Table E-6 October 10, 2014 E-5 Transportation Mobility

128 Average Motor Vehicle Fuel Efficiency - Excluding Interstate Travel Travel Vehicle Miles of Travel Percent VMT mpg Other Arterial Rural 320,156,000,000 46,883,000, ,039,000,000 87% 13% Other Rural 321,133,000,000 32,277,000, ,410,000,000 91% 9% Other Urban 1,408,957,000,000 81,065,000,000 1,490,022,000,000 95% 5% Total 2,050,246,000, ,225,000,000 2,210,471,000,000 93% 7% Fuel Consumed Total Mileage and Fuel 21.6 mpg 6.4 mpg 2,210,471 miles (millions) Other Arterial Rural 14,822,037,037 7,325,468,750 22,147,505, ,954 gallons (millions) Other Rural 14,867,268,519 5,043,281,250 19,910,549, mpg Other Urban 65,229,490,741 12,666,406,250 77,895,896,991 Total 94,918,796,297 25,035,156, ,953,952,547 : U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Highway Statistics 2012, Section V, Table VM-1 Annual Vehicle Distance Traveled in Miles and Related Data by Highway Category and Vehicle Type Computation of Average Motor Vehicle Fleet Efficiency October 10, 2014 E-6 Transportation Mobility

129 October 10, 2014 E-1 Transportation Mobility

130 Appendix F Tax Increment Revenue Estimate October 10, 2014 E-2 Transportation Mobility

131 Appendix F Tax Increment Proceeds Year County-wide Valuation (Excl CRA's) Gross Proceeds Increment from (2012 "Floor") Tax Commitment to Transportation (97% of 33.33%) Floor set in 2012 as: 2012 $15,761,360,963 $115,753, $16,332,186,066 $119,945,208 $4,192,197 $1,355, $17,029,415,742 $125,065,732 $9,312,721 $3,010, $17,742,495,305 $130,302,660 $14,549,649 $4,703, $18,471,424,756 $135,655,991 $19,902,980 $6,434, $19,216,204,094 $141,125,724 $25,372,713 $8,203, $19,976,833,319 $146,711,862 $30,958,851 $10,009, $20,753,312,431 $152,414,402 $36,661,391 $11,852, $21,545,641,431 $158,233,345 $42,480,334 $13,733, $22,353,820,318 $164,168,692 $48,415,681 $15,652, $23,177,849,092 $170,220,442 $54,467,430 $17,609, $24,017,727,754 $176,388,594 $60,635,583 $19,603, $24,873,456,303 $182,673,150 $66,920,139 $21,635, $25,745,034,739 $189,074,110 $73,321,099 $23,704, $26,632,463,063 $195,591,472 $79,838,461 $25,811, $27,535,741,274 $202,225,237 $86,472,226 $27,956, $28,454,869,372 $208,975,406 $93,222,395 $30,138, $29,389,847,357 $215,841,978 $100,088,967 $32,358, $30,340,675,230 $222,824,953 $107,071,942 $34,616, $31,307,352,990 $229,924,331 $114,171,320 $36,911, $32,289,880,637 $237,140,112 $121,387,101 $39,244, $33,288,258,172 $244,472,297 $128,719,286 $41,615, $34,302,485,594 $251,920,884 $136,167,873 $44,023, $35,332,562,903 $259,485,875 $143,732,864 $46,468, $36,378,490,100 $267,167,269 $151,414,258 $48,952, $37,440,267,184 $274,965,066 $159,212,055 $51,473, $38,517,894,155 $282,879,266 $167,126,255 $54,032, $39,611,371,014 $290,909,870 $175,156,859 $56,628,388 Present Value of Tax Increment ( ): $422,741,707 Less Self-Credit $$$: $16,839,567 TIF Revenue for buy-down: $405,902,140 October 10, 2014 F-1 Transportation Mobility

132 Appendix G Condensed Schedules for Publication

133 October 2014 Page G-1 Transportation Mobility

134 October 2014 Page G-2 Transportation Mobility