ASEAN member state case study e.g. presentation of Thai Eco Label experience

Transcription

1 The ASEAN German Technical Cooperation Programme Cities, Environment and Transport Transport and Climate Change ASEAN member state case study e.g. presentation of Thai Eco Label experience Dr. Nuwong Chollacoop GIZ Project consultant/ Head of Renewable Energy Laboratory, National Metal and Materials Technology Center (MTEC) 28 March 2017 Implemented by 2 nd Forum of the ASEAN Fuel Economy Platform Pathumwan Princess Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand

2 2

3 Energy consumption in Thailand Implemented by

4 Vehicles/fuels mix in Thailand Implemented by

5 New/In-stock vehicles in Thailand New In-stock

6 04/04/60 Approved in Dec 2012 for implementation on 1 Jan

7 04/04/60 7

8 Methodology: weighted-average FE = h ( 100 ) = h = h Vehicle types New sale (Top 10 ranked vehicles) Weight-averaged FC (Lge/100km) O1 Eco car 187, ,519 87, O2 City car, subcompact : Sedan & 271, , , Hatchback O3 Compact car C-segment : Sedan 89,975 66,586 40, Hatchback Coupe Roadster O4 : D-segment full size sedan 34,363 19,343 16, O5 : mini-mpv and B-SUV 42,046 41,046 50, O6 : SUV 10,307 10,617 14, O7 : PPV 58,942 48,646 69, O8 : Single cab 75,024 51,325 50, O9 : Extra cab 278, , , O10 : 4 doors pickup 164, , , Sub-total vehicle (% share of total vehicle registration) 1,211,773 (93.25%) 844,119 (93.28%) 723,482 (90.88%) Total new vehicle registration 1,299, , ,089 Annual weight-averaged FC

9 Weighted-average FE/CO 2 by various parameters CO 2 -based excise tax approved in Dec 2012 for implementation on 1 Jan 2016

10 Weighted-average FE/CO 2 by fuel economy CO 2 -based excise tax approved in Dec 2012 for implementation on 1 Jan 2016

11 Effect of CO 2 -based excise tax by engine size CO 2 -based excise tax approved in Dec 2012 for implementation on 1 Jan 2016

12 Effect of CO 2 -based excise tax by vehicle weight CO 2 -based excise tax approved in Dec 2012 for implementation on 1 Jan 2016

13 Stakeholders interviews and workshops To understand each stakeholder s role and propose mutual interest Interviews Interview questions 1. Involvement with fuel economy standard? 2. Obstacles 3. Who can help? 4. Interested in foreign policies Workshop@OTP on 28 Mar 2016 Workshop@OTP on 11 Nov 2016

14 Stakeholder diagram by policy type BOI DEDE DLT ED EPPO OIE Board of Investment Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency Department of Land Transport The Excise Department Energy Policy and Planning Office Office of Industrial Economics ONEP and OTP PCD TAI TISI Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy Planning Office of Transport and Traffic Policy and Planning Pollution Control Department Thailand Automotive Institute Thai Industrial Standards Institute

15 Recommendations Proposed and concluded in Stakeholders workshop on 11 Nov 2016 Improve the mandatory fuel economy label. To show the fuel economy of the car under consideration in relation with the average fuel economy of all passenger cars of that year To allow the uninformed consumer to understand whether the car under consideration achieves a good, average or poor fuel economy. Revise the excise tax scheme for new cars. Introduce a continuous linear function to relate vehicle specific carbon emissions (in gco2 per km) to the level of excise tax (instead of using the current step function). Raise the incentive to buy more efficient vehicles by making the price increase for inefficient vehicles more progressive (i.e. increase the slope of the linear function), or even provide rebates for very efficient cars. Foster the uptake of plug-in hybrids and battery electric vehicles by excluding them from the excise tax. Consider the introduction of additional fiscal measure to stimulate use of fuel efficient vehicles. To further incentivize the uptake of efficient vehicles in the short term, focus on the use of additional fuel economy based (Lge per 100km) or carbon emission based (gco2 per km) fiscal measures instead of the rather complex task of introducing fuel economy standards, e.g. an annual, carbon emission based vehicle registration tax or the increase of the fuel tax.

16 Latest update from excise tax tightening! Proposal to Cabinet meeting this morning! CO 2 -based vehicle excise tax Push from PHEV/BEV initiative coupled with BOI package CO 2 < 100g/km Now 10% New 5% CO 2 ~ g/km Now 25% New 12.5% HEV/PHEV CO 2 ~ g/km Now 20% New 10% CO 2 > 200g/km Now 30% New 15% EV Now 10% New 2%

17 Thank you Report will be available at Contact:

18 FE Policy in ASEAN & Thailand

19 Labelling Thailand Singapore Vietnam Data is a prerequisite for emission/fuel economy based policy measures Information should be shown to consumers to guide their purchase decision FE labelling is compulsory in many countries/regions: Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, EU, Japan, Korea, New Zealand, Singapore, Thailand, United States, Vietnam

20 Weighted-average FE/CO 2 for MC Top 4 brand of MC New sale (Collected from DLT 2016) Weight-averaged FC (Lge/100km) Brand1 1,412,238 1,261,949 1,248, Brand2 322, , , Brand3 4,338 1,645 1, Brand4 3,712 19,125 12, Sub-total MC (% share of total new MC registration 1,742,409 (87.17%) 1,468,394 (86.43%) 1,445,224 (88.90%) Total new MC registration 1,998,934 1,698,984 1,625,742 Annual weight-averaged FC