ETCS Level 1 Deployment in Luxembourg

Transcription

1 ETCS Level 1 Deployment in Luxembourg UIC ERTMS CONFERENCE 2006 BUDAPEST François JAEGER Director CFL Member of the CFL board of Directors

2 ETCS LEVEL 1 DEPLOYMENT IN LUXEMBOURG SUMMARY 0 - LUXEMBOURG GENERAL INFORMATIONS 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE 3 - PILOT PHASE 4 - ROLLING STOCK 5 - ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS 6 - OPEN POINTS AND QUESTIONS 7 - CONCLUSIONS

3 0 - LUXEMBOURG General Information LUXEMBOURG Luxembourg Territory: 2586 km 2 Population: ~ Border countries: Belgium France Germany

4 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK TROISVIERGES Characteristics - CCSystems in Luxembourg / Neighbourhoods 270 km lines 95% electrified 70 % of the railway traffic is cross-border traction units needs several CCSystems Belgium: - Crocodile - TBL ETTELBRUCK Luxembourg: - MEMOR II+ - ETCS Level 1 Germany: - INDUSI / PZB - LZB WASSERBILLIG KLEINBETTINGEN LUXEMBURG France: - Crocodile - KVB / TVM PETANGE BETTEMBURG ESCH sur ALZETTE

5 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK CCSystem in Luxembourg - History 1973 CFL introduced crocodile system 1997 the implementation of MEMOR II+ (improvement of the crocodile system) 1999 CFL decided to introduce ETCS Level 1 on the complete Luxembourg railway network and to equip the whole rolling stock fleet 2002 a German supplier got the order to install ETCS Level 1 on the whole network, including Infill functionality based on Balise 2002 a French supplier got the order for the ETCS equipment of a pre-series of 10 engines Project supported by EU

6 1 - LUXEMBOURG NETWORK Technical migration for ETCS LEVEL 1 LEU MEMOR II+ Antenna EVC Balises No direct interface between LEU* and the Interlocking Signal information picked up by 2 current sensors for each lamp LEU also controls during migration MEMOR II+ Onboard ETCS EVC** controls the transitions between ETCS and MEMOR II+ (cut off in/out interface of MEMOR II+ system) * LEU Line-side Electronic Unit ** EVC European Vital Computer

7 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE ETCS Level 1 and estimated costs ETCS increases safety level on the network ETCS achieves interoperability between Luxembourg and neighbouring countries Same standard on the whole network Fully compatible with TSI Luxembourg takes a whole network approach (European wide a corridor approach, the Corridor C Antwerp -Basle/Lyon will accelerate ETCS development in the area and the RS onboard migra tion) Total estimated costs for the entire network: for the entire network: (1999)

8 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE Migration Migration duration : 5 years from 2003 Started with SRS* Version several change requests applied in first phase (pilot line) 9 phases are foreseen for ETCS deployment Deployment is line oriented All main signals (v>40km/h) and distant signals are also equipped with Infill functionality (Balises) Determination of the national values Several changes introduced in the national operational rules due to ETCS migration * SRS System Requirement Specification

9 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE National Values - Changes in National Operation Rules National Values Changes in National Operation Rules Variable Packet 3 National Values National Values NID_C 56 V_NVSHUNT V_NVSTFF V_NVONSIGHT V_NVUNFIT V_NVREL D_NVROLL Q_NVSRBKTRG Q_NVEMRRLS V_NVALLOWOVTRP V_NVSUPOVTRP D_NVOVTRP T_NVOVTRP D_NVPOTRP M_NVCONTACT T_NVCONTACT M_NVDERUN D_NVSTFF Q_NVDRIVER_ADHES 30km/h 40km/h 30km/h 100km/h 25km/h 2m 1 = Yes 0 = only at standstill 40km/h 40km/h 200m 150s 300m 10 = no reaction = unlimited 0 = No = unlimited 1 = Yes EXIGENCE FONCTIONNELLE ETCS ETCS ne contrôle pas les réductions de vitesse imposées par des conditions de freinage forfaitaire MESURE PRISE OU A PRENDRE PAR LE GI LUXEMBOURGEOIS (REGLE D EXPLOITATION OU ADAPTATION INFRASTRUCTURE) le GI luxembourgeois a pris tout un train de mesures pour supprimer ces réductions de vitesses: déterminer la vitesse maximale autorisée par les conditions de freinage en fonction de la vitesse-limite de la ligne, si cette vitesse est inférieure à la vitesse autorisée par la catégorie de circulation déterminer la vitesse maximale autorisée par les conditions de freinage en fonction des distances d implantation réelles des SFAv et des déclivités réelles, adapter la distance d implantation de certains SFAv à la distance d arrêt nécessaire augmentation des pourcentages de freinage forfaitaires minimaux de certaines catégories de trains : celui des MA 90 63%, celui des V %, celui des V % définition de nouveaux pourcentages de freinage minimaux pour les Hlp, les Hpv et les trains de locomotives nouvelle distance de protection des obstacles de 1500 m STATUT DE TRANS POSITION R R AT AT AT R

10 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE Lineside Electronic Unit and Eurobalise Line-side Electronic Unit Signal Electronic Unit Switch-able Balise

11 TROISVIERGES 2 - INFRASTRUCTURE State of play BÜRDEN ETTELBRUCK COLMAR-US BISSEN SCHIEREN DIEKIRCH COLMARBERG CRUCHTEN Phase 1 completed (Pilot phase) ETTELBRUCK MERSCH Phase 2 completed WASSERBILLIG LINTGEN HEISDORF LORENTZWEILER KLEINBETTINGEN LUXEMBURG DOMMELDANGE WALFERDANGE SANDWEILER PETANGE ESCH / ALZETTE BETTEMBURG Phases 3 and 4 CENTS-HAMM

12 3 - PILOT PHASE SUMM UP of the pilot line ~50 km line equipped with ETCS level 1 10 traction units equipped with ETCS level 1 ETCS Version several change requests corresponding to subset 108 All problems solved on an international level, no national solution (UNISIG Group) First tests with CFL D-railcar: December 2003 Commercial service: March 2005 Commercial train kilometres: ~ km

13 3 - PILOT PHASE Rolling stock - First migration phase achieved Pilot phase started in 2004 with 10 engines 3 D-Railcar CFL 2100 (same as SNCF X73500) Equipped with ETCS: 12/ /2004 Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor Cost per engine: ,- 4 EMU CFL 2000 (same as SNCF Z11500) Equipped with ETCS: 09/ /2004 Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor (needs two equipments per EMU due to the length of the EMU) Cost per engine: , E-Locos CFL 3000 (same as SNCB T13) Equipped with ETCS: 05/ /2005 Use: Freight / passengers trains cross-border and on corridor Cost per engine: ,- Total costs for the 10 engines: ,

14 3 - PILOT PHASE Main goals achieved Test components on - Infrastructure - Rolling Stock Test of the system ETCS level 1 Validation of the system Reduction of maintenance costs Improved safety High reliability level No major train delays Project supported by EU

15 4 - ROLLING STOCK Onboard Migration EMU CFL 2000 (same as SNCF Z11500) CCS-system: MEMOR II+ Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor* Cost per engine: ~ ,- 12 EMU CFL 2200 (same as SNCF Z 24500) CCS-system: MEMOR II+, KVB Use: Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor* 16 E-Locos CFL 3000 (same as SNCB T13) CCS-system: MEMOR II+, KVB, TBL Use: Freight / passengers trains cross-border and on corridor* 18 Control trailer CFL DABpbdzfa A14 CCS-system: MEMOR II+, PZB (same as DB AG DBpbzfa 766) Passenger trains cross-border and on corridor* 20 E-Locos CFL 4000 (same as DB AG 185) CCS-system: MEMOR II+, KVB, PZB Use: Passenger / freight trains cross-border and on corridor* * corridor C Antwerp - Basle/Lyon

16 4 - ROLLING STOCK Onboard Migration Roll-out phase will start when: - equipment prices are acceptable! - and financing is secured! (Railway Undertaking and MS + EU Funds)

17 4 - ROLLING STOCK Onboard Migration Equipment of the Electric Multiple Unit 2000 Speed Sensor EVC European Vital Computer DM I Driver Machine Interface Radar Accelerometer Antenna

18 5 - ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS (1/2) + ~100 km (double/single track) equipped with ETCS + 10 traction units equipped with ETCS + No major problem to equip (INFRA + RS) + ETCS version several change requests corresponding to subset No national solution implemented + Changing operation rules to introduce ETCS + Commercial service from March 2005 (no major train delays due to the introduction of ETCS) + Commercial train kilometres: ~ km + Increased safety level (MEMOR II+)

19 5 - ACHIEVEMENTS AND LESSONS (2/2) + No relevant failures (INFRA + RS) + No interoperability problems between INFRA + RS (two different suppliers) + No interferences with actual system Memor II+ + End of MEMOR II+ by Multiple Units need two equipments (additional costs) - Problems with homologation of ETCS RS on other networks (costs and time) - ETCS equipment for RS increases costs currently (costs of prototype and series) - Combined ETCS/National System are not helpful for Interoperability

20 6 - OPEN POINTS and QUESTIONS (1/2) Cross acceptance! Re-examination of the rolling stock authorisation for the modified engines in the bordering countries (long lasting process and high additional co sts) Braking curves not unified! Transition between the different CCSystems! (No specific STM available in the worst case standing transition) 70% of the trains in Luxembourg are cross-border, traction units need several CCSystems! Several data recorders within one engine to pass border (JRU, ATESS, DSK)!

21 6 - OPEN POINTS and QUESTIONS (2/2) Compatibility problems between ETCS balises and KVB on board equipment! State of play of the RS migration of other RUs operating in the area? Retrofitting ETCS on RS is actually a high invest for CFL and other "ETCS RUs"! State of play of MS and EU funding? Funding prototype (fix costs) and series? All traction units should qualify for EU funds? (Locomotives, multiple units, control trailers,...)

22 7 - MAIN CONCLUSIONS ETCS: in Luxembourg is aligned on the EU policies migration phase for Luxembourg INFRA assured migration phase on RS is challenging (high costs, cross acceptance and different migration strategies of other RUs) on the Corridor C Antwerp- Basle/ Lyon will certainly accelerate the migration in the area (INFRA +RS) is expensive on INFRA and particularly on RS side needs MS and EU funds for INFRA and RS insures interoperability and is an important project for Luxembourg and Europe