Volume 2 Appendix Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. June 18, 2018

Transcription

1 Volume 2 Appendix 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard Dallas, Texas June 18, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project # Registered Firm F-928

2 Maple Avenue Drive 1 Fairmount Street Gillespie Street Cedar Springs Road North Not To Scale Drive 2 Drive 3 Brown Street Enid Street Drive 4 Drive 5 Sale Street Mansion Drive Turtle Creek Boulevard (10%) (10%) 10% (10%) (10%) 10% (10%) (10%) (15%) 10% 10% 10% 10% 15% (10%) EXHIBIT A1 Drive 1 Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment: 3000 Turtle Creek Boulevard 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard - Dallas, TX 10% (10%) (10%) LEGEND: X% (Y%) 10% 10% X% = Percentage of Inbound Site-Generated Traffic (Y%) = Percentage of Outbound Site-Generated Traffic Drive 2 Drive 3 *NOTE: Drive 2 combines both the central office driveway and the adjacent condominium driveway for a conservative analysis.

3 Maple Avenue (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) Drive 4 Drive 5 Sale Street 0 (0) 0 (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) Drive 1 Fairmount Street Gillespie Street Cedar Springs Road North Not To Scale Enid Street Drive 2 Drive 3 Mansion Drive Brown Street Turtle Creek Boulevard (21) (0) (0) (21) (0) (0) (4) 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) 3 (21) (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) 3 (21) (0) (0) (4) 3 (21) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (21) 0 (0) 5 (32) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) (4) (4) 23 (4) 23 (4) (0) (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) (6) 0 0 (0) (0) 0 (0) 3 (21) 0 (0) 23 (4) EXHIBIT A2 Site-Generated Traffic Volumes: 3000 Turtle Creek Boulevard 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard - Dallas, TX Drive (0) (0) 0 (0) (0) (0) 0 (0) 3 (21) 3 (21) LEGEND: 0 (0) 0 (0) X (Y) 23 (4) 23 (4) X = Weekday AM Peak Hour Turning Movements Y = Weekday PM Peak Hour Turning Movements Volumes may not sum from point to point due to rounding and presence of smaller driveways not included in analysis. Drive 2 Drive 3 *NOTE: Drive 2 combines both the central office driveway and the adjacent condominium driveway for a conservative analysis.

4 City Comments to March 23, 2018 TIA and KHA Responses kimley-horn.com Noel Road, Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 700, Dallas, TX

5 CITY OF DALLAS TRANSPORTATION REVIEW COMMENTS Traffic Engineer: Scot Johnson, P.E. (Kimley-Horn) Project Name: 2727 Turtle Creek Blvd Received: 3/22/2017 Reviewed By: David Nevarez, P.E., PTOE Zoning Case: Z (CY) Reviewed On: 4/20/2018 Sustainable Development and Construction Engineering Division received a Traffic Impact Analysis for the above-referenced project. The following comments are provided to Current Planning as comments for consideration based on a technical review of the analysis, findings and recommendations. A. General Comments 1. TIA presents a summary of trip generation comparisons between the proposed development and alternative as-of-right scenarios: 1) 850 MF DU, approx. 930 ksf of office, and 400 ksf of office to represent a theoretical full use of the existing building structures. Analysis shows that the proposed development will generate less than (or relatively similar trips to) the theoretical scenarios with the exception of a full MF development. The 850-MF scenario would still generate more outbound traffic during the morning peak hour than the proposed development. B. Request for Comments from Applicant 2. The office building element, located in the northernmost parcel (with direct access to Gillespie and Enid/Fairmount) will generate approximately 75-80% of the total traffic volumes during the morning and afternoon peak hours of adjacent street traffic. Yet, the analysis only assigns 45% to the two driveways toward Gillespie and Enid. Given the geographical location and projected downgrading in level-of-service at intersections on Turtle Creek Blvd, staff anticipates a higher trip generation will concentrate on residential streets (i.e. Enid, Gillespie) until they reach their corresponding capacity. 3. Study of Enid at Brown shows site generated traffic but does not take into account any background traffic already generated by adjacent residential properties. Staff requests comments on proposed driveway geometry without significantly disrupting existing traffic operations. 4. Staff requests comments on anticipated traffic operations of proposed hotel meeting space (if any). 5. The projected average control delay for the WBR approach at Maple and Turtle Creek increases from 65 (LOS E) to 83 seconds/vehicle (LOS F) at horizon background during the morning study peak period. Developer, however, proposes no mitigation for the anticipated development impact. C. Site Plan Evaluation Review 6. TIA also omits background traffic in the capacity analysis of all site driveways on Turtle Creek. 7. TIA includes only three driveways on Turtle Creek Blvd. However, the proposed development plan for 2727 Turtle Creek shows five driveways: Study Drive 1 (hotel), Study Drive 2 (access to office garage), Study Drive 3 (access to both residential and office garage), in addition to a fourth driveway (between Drive 1 and 2) with access to residential parking garage and a fifth driveway (between Drive 2 and 3) with access to residential lobby. Engineering recommends the consolidation of some driveways by means of shared access agreements to reduce conflict points on Turtle Creek Blvd. D. Summary of Findings & Recommendations 8. Traffic study recommends improvements to the intersection of Turtle Creek Blvd at Fairmount to accommodate two-lane approach for all directions with shared-through lanes. This recommendation is a viable option but should not be a condition to this development or the City of Dallas. The City of Dallas Transportation Department will reevaluate traffic operations at project buildout. Page 1 of 2

6 9. Analysis of roadway capacity for Turtle Creek Blvd assumes left turn lanes; staff concurs that although projected traffic will exceed theoretical capacity of a two-lane, undivided roadway, the existing width of Turtle Creek allows for through traffic to bypass turning vehicles without impacting traffic operations or on-street parking. At this point, there is no plan of any re-striping mitigations or restricting on-street parking on Turtle Creek Blvd. 10. Study does not evaluate actual traffic operations of Gillespie at Turtle Creek, located within close proximity of the intersection at Cedar Springs. These intersections (combined) currently operate at failing levels-of-service. The proposed development will only exacerbate these conditions without proposing any mitigations. END OF REVIEW Page 2 of 2

7 MEMORANDUM To: From: Prescott Realty Group Scot A. Johnson, P.E., PTOE Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: April 30, 2018 Subject: Response to Transportation Review Comments Z (CY) 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard The following are responses to the April 20, 2018 transportation review comments by the City of Dallas. Each comment needing a response is reproduced in italics and then the response is listed. Comment: 2. The office building element, located in the northernmost parcel (with direct access to Gillespie and Enid/Fairmount) will generate approximately 75-80% of the total traffic volumes during the morning and afternoon peak hours of adjacent street traffic. Yet, the analysis only assigns 45% to the two driveways toward Gillespie and Enid. Given the geographical location and projected downgrading in level-of-service at intersections on Turtle Creek Blvd, staff anticipates a higher trip generation will concentrate on residential streets (i.e. Enid, Gillespie) until they reach their corresponding capacity. Response: The office proportions of the site-generated traffic are 66% in the AM peak hour and 59% in the PM peak hour. The trip distribution assumed in the analysis is appropriate considering the relative attractiveness of Turtle Creek Boulevard and the major driveway direct from Turtle Creek Boulevard to the office parking area. The office traffic can reach the office garage from any of the main approach directions. Comment: 3. Study of Enid at Brown shows site generated traffic but does not take into account any background traffic already generated by adjacent residential properties. Staff requests comments on proposed driveway geometry without significantly disrupting existing traffic operations. Response: The 2025 Background and 2025 Background Plus Site traffic volumes at Enid street at Brown Street are shown in the updated Exhibit 8 and Exhibit 10 attached. The intersection would be set up in several ways: 1. In the existing configuration with the public streets forming an uncontrolled curve, and the driveway stopping when it approaches the public street. 2. A more formal T-intersection where southbound Brown Street is stop-controlled, and Enid Street and Drive 4 do not stop. 3. A 3-way Stop-controlled intersection, which would be preferred for consistency, traffic calming, and pedestrian friendliness and safety. Each of the potential configurations operates with favorable conditions on all approaches. The 3-way stop is the preferred alternative. kimley-horn.com Noel Road, Two Galleria Suite 700, Dallas, TX

8 Page 2 Comment: 4. Staff requests comments on anticipated traffic operations of proposed hotel meeting space (if any). Response: The amount of hotel meeting space is unremarkable for the size of the hotel (around 13,000 SF, or much less than 10% of the overall building area), so any trip generation is contained within the hotel s projection. Meeting space is specifically noted as a supporting facility or accessory use within the Hotel land use data in the ITE Trip Generation Manual. Vehicles will approach and depart in the same manner as hotel guests. As shown in the below hotel drop-off drawing by HKS, the hotel dropoff has large areas set aside for valet operations, which will accommodate any peak traffic flows due to events. There are two inbound lanes for car stacking in addition to the bypass lane, and a long outbound staging lane plus the outbound bypass lane. kimley-horn.com Merit Drive, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX

9 Page 3 Comment: 5. The projected average control delay for the WBR approach at Maple and Turtle Creek increases from 65 (LOS E) to 83 seconds/vehicle (LOS F) at horizon background during the morning study peak period. Developer, however, proposes no mitigation for the anticipated development impact. Response: The site is adding only 24 westbound right-turning vehicles in the AM peak hour, to a background volume of 446 right-turning vehicles in the 2025 AM peak hour. The site-generated traffic is making up only 5% of the combined right-turn traffic volume. The existing signal timing at the intersection of Maple Avenue and turtle Creek Boulevard was not modified in the future scenarios of the original report, as it continued to operate at excellent levels of service with the background traffic and the addition of the site-generated traffic. Under that timing plan, the Turtle Creek Boulevard approaches are given only 19 seconds out of each 60-second signal cycle, which is quite short considering the large volume of existing westbound right-turning traffic. A signal timing adjustment of only 2 seconds towards the Turtle Creek Boulevard (21 seconds green/yellow/all-red, 39 seconds for Maple Avenue) would result in a westbound right-turn delay of 61.5 seconds (LOS E), effectively removing any impact from the site traffic. The table below shows the approach and overall operating conditions using the signal timing tweak. The westbound approach has been improved to better conditions than in the 2025 background scenario, and the overall intersection remains favorable. INTERSECTION Maple Turtle Creek Boulevard APPROACH 2025 Background Traffic AM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) LOS 2025 Background plus Site Traffic AM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) LOS 2025 Background plus Site traffic With Signal Mod AM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) EB 6.5 A 6.5 A 5.9 A WB 59.7 E 73.5 E 55.2 E NB 6.8 A 6.9 A 8.2 A SB 9.9 A 12.8 B 15.5 B Overall 21.6 C 26.4 C 23.0 C LOS kimley-horn.com Merit Drive, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX

10 Page 4 Comment: 6. TIA also omits background traffic in the capacity analysis of all site driveways on Turtle Creek. Response: The background traffic is updated to show correctly in the attached updated Exhibit 8 and Exhibit 10. The following table excerpt shows the driveway operating conditions with all background traffic included. All driveways continue to operate with minimal delays to the public streets (LOS A for inbound movements) and LOS C or better conditions for outbound movements. INTERSECTION APPROACH 2020 Background plus Site Traffic 2025 Background plus Site Traffic 2020 Background plus Site Traffic 2025 Background plus Site Traffic Drive Turtle Creek Boulevard Drive Turtle Creek Boulevard Drive Turtle Creek Boulevard Brown Drive 4 / Enid Street AM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) LOS AM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) LOS PM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) LOS PM Peak Hour DELAY (SEC/VEH) EBL 8.6 A 8.6 A 8.4 A 8.4 A SB* 14.8 B 15.2 C 18.2 C 19.2 C EBL 8.6 A 8.7 A 8.3 A 8.4 A SB* 14.9 B 15.3 C 18.1 C 19.0 C EBL 8.7 A 8.7 A 8.2 A 8.3 A SB* 13.7 B 14.0 B 15.0 C 15.5 C EB* 7.8 A 7.8 A 7.7 A 7.7 A WB* 7.3 A 7.3 A 7.4 A 7.4 A EB* 7.3 A 7.3 A 7.1 A 7.1 A LOS Comment: 7. TIA includes only three driveways on Turtle Creek Blvd. However, the proposed development plan for 2727 Turtle Creek shows five driveways: Study Drive 1 (hotel), Study Drive 2 (access to office garage), Study Drive 3 (access to both residential and office garage), in addition to a fourth driveway (between Drive 1 and 2) with access to residential parking garage and a fifth driveway (between Drive 2 and 3) with access to residential lobby. Engineering recommends the consolidation of some driveways by means of shared access agreements to reduce conflict points on Turtle Creek Blvd. Response: Some driveways were combined for analysis purposes to ensure a conservative analysis of intersection operations, where the higher combined volumes result in increased delays. The TIA noted that Drive 2 was the combination of the central office driveway and the adjacent condo residential driveway. Drive 3 was the combination of the two multifamily residential driveways which are at opposite ends of the multifamily building porte-cochere. Even with the combined volumes, all the driveways operate at favorable levels of service with minimal delays and queuing. All the proposed driveways will meet the City of Dallas minimum driveway spacing standards. kimley-horn.com Merit Drive, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX

11 Page 5 Comment: 8. Traffic study recommends improvements to the intersection of Turtle Creek Blvd at Fairmount to accommodate two-lane approach for all directions with shared-through lanes. This recommendation is a viable option but should not be a condition to this development or the City of Dallas. The City of Dallas Transportation Department will reevaluate traffic operations at project buildout. Response: Noted. Comment: 9. Analysis of roadway capacity for Turtle Creek Blvd assumes left turn lanes; staff concurs that although projected traffic will exceed theoretical capacity of a two-lane, undivided roadway, the existing width of Turtle Creek allows for through traffic to bypass turning vehicles without impacting traffic operations or on-street parking. At this point, there is no plan of any re-striping mitigations or restricting on-street parking on Turtle Creek Blvd. Response: Additionally, parking is already prohibited on the north side of Turtle Creek Boulevard in the site vicinity. Comment: 10. Study does not evaluate actual traffic operations of Gillespie at Turtle Creek, located within close proximity of the intersection at Cedar Springs. These intersections (combined) currently operate at failing levels-of-service. The proposed development will only exacerbate these conditions without proposing any mitigations. Response: The analysis included the unsignalized intersection of Turtle Creek Boulevard at Gillespie Street, which operates favorably in all time periods when considered by itself. The southbound leftturn or through movement is blocked in some PM peak hour cycles by the eastbound left-turning queue extending back from the signal at Cedar Springs Road and Turtle Creek Boulevard, if the eastbound vehicles do not respect the Gillespie intersection by leaving gaps. Unfortunately there is no way to quantify this impact with the standard analysis tools. At its present location so close to Cedar Springs Road, there is no meaningful mitigation available for the Gillespie intersection. A Do Not Block sign is already installed for the eastbound traffic. Adjustment of the signal timing at Turtle Creek Boulevard and Cedar Springs Road has the potential for improving the eastbound operations to reduce the number of times the eastbound left-turning queue would extend back to Gillespie Street. Currently the Turtle Creek Boulevard approaches are given only 31 seconds out of each 120-second cycle in the PM peak hour. Increasing the proportion of the signal cycle available to Turtle Creek Boulevard would reduce the eastbound queue lengths. Considering the Cedar Springs Road coordinated signal timing, the intersection with Turtle Creek Boulevard has more time dedicated to the Cedar Springs Road approaches than do the adjacent signals at Carlisle Street or Bowen Street. This would indicate that some of the signal cycle can be redistributed to the Turtle Creek Boulevard approach without negatively affecting the Cedar Springs Road coordinated phase or green band. END Attachments: Updated Exhibit Background Plus Site-Generated Traffic Volumes Updated Exhibit Background Plus Site-Generated Traffic Volumes kimley-horn.com Merit Drive, Suite 1000, Dallas, TX

12 Maple Avenue (6) (373) (30) 43 (53) (33) (10) 8 (19) (19) (68) (16) 42 (19) 66 (37) 24 (57) 11 (8) Drive 4 Drive 5 Sale Street 28 (49) 17 (46) (29) 16 (40) (175) (48) 17 (23) (10) (87) (6) Drive 1 Fairmount Street Gillespie Street Cedar Springs Road North Not To Scale Enid Street Drive 2 Drive 3 Mansion Drive Brown Street Turtle Creek Boulevard (287) (113) (55) (24) (13) (685) (349) 4 (7) (60) (241) (116) 311 (271) (4) (12) 19 (8) (57) (11) (44) 479 (329) (172) (495) (38) 4 (27) 65 (86) 16 (43) 491 (385) 0 (1) 7 (34) 1 (13) 49 (28) 8 (0) 30 (19) 141 (451) 3 (11) (337) (541) 165 (451) 27 (4) (5) (2) (538) (74) 23 (66) (39) (83) (32) 16 (71) 56 (144) (83) (903) (6) (38) (38) 41 (19) 429 (417) EXHIBIT Background Plus Site-Generated Traffic Volumes 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard - Dallas, TX 41 (19) 261 (484) Drive (38) (38) 41 (19) (38) (19) 20 (10) 453 (398) 478 (379) LEGEND: 41 (19) 41 (19) X (Y) 236 (503) 212 (522) X = Weekday AM Peak Hour Turning Movements Y = Weekday PM Peak Hour Turning Movements Volumes may not sum from point to point due to rounding and presence of smaller driveways not included in analysis. Drive 2 Drive 3 *NOTE: Drive 2 combines both the central office driveway and the adjacent condominium driveway for a conservative analysis.

13 (6) (391) (31) 44 (54) (35) (10) 8 (19) (19) (71) (17) 42 (19) 69 (37) 24 (57) 12 (9) Drive 4 Drive 5 Sale Street 29 (52) 17 (47) (29) 16 (40) (183) (50) 18 (23) (10) (91) (6) Maple Avenue Drive 1 Fairmount Street Gillespie Street Cedar Springs Road North Not To Scale Drive 2 Drive 3 Brown Street Enid Street Mansion Drive Turtle Creek Boulevard (298) (118) (58) (24) (14) (720) (365) 4 (8) (62) (253) (122) 325 (280) (4) (13) 19 (9) (60) (12) (45) 498 (342) (180) (520) (40) 4 (27) 68 (89) 17 (44) 511 (401) 0 (1) 7 (34) 1 (14) 50 (28) 9 (0) 31 (19) 147 (471) 3 (12) (352) (564) 170 (469) 27 (4) (5) (2) (565) (76) 24 (69) (41) (88) (33) 17 (75) 58 (148) (85) (949) (6) (38) (38) 41 (19) 449 (434) EXHIBIT Background Plus Site-Generated Traffic Volumes 2727 Turtle Creek Boulevard - Dallas, TX 41 (19) 269 (507) Drive (38) (38) 41 (19) (38) (19) 20 (10) 473 (415) 498 (396) LEGEND: 41 (19) 41 (19) X (Y) 244 (526) 220 (545) X = Weekday AM Peak Hour Turning Movements Y = Weekday PM Peak Hour Turning Movements Volumes may not sum from point to point due to rounding and presence of smaller driveways not included in analysis. Drive 2 Drive 3 *NOTE: Drive 2 combines both the central office driveway and the adjacent condominium driveway for a conservative analysis.

14 Traffic Counts and Historical Data Maple Avenue Record Year Link Start Link End Source 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 14, Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 15, % Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 13, % Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 15, % Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 14, % Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 15, % Turtle Creek Boulevard Average Growth : 1.7% Record Year Link Start Link End Source 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate Fairmount Street Park Bridge Court COD 6, Park Bridge Court Mansion Driveway KHA 6,316 - Fairmount Street Average Growth : 0.2% Record Year Link Start Link End Source 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 3, Turtle Creek Boulevard Kitrell Street TxDOT 4,809 - Brown Street Record Year Link Start Link End Source Average Growth : 5.4% 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate Enid Street Hood Street KHA Enid Street Record Year Link Start Link End Source 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate Fairmount Street Brown Street KHA Gillespie Street Record Year Link Start Link End Source 24-Hour Volume Annual Growth Rate Welborn Street Oak Lawn Avenue TxDOT 1, Welborn Street Oak Lawn Avenue TxDOT 1, % Sale Street Turtle Creek Boulevard KHA % Average Growth : -5.1% kimley-horn.com Noel Road, Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 700, Dallas, TX

15 NB Brown Street South of Hood Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0: /9/2017 1: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : TOTAL: 300 The A.M. peak hour from 8:30 to 9:30 is 14 The P.M. peak hour from 18:30 to 19:30 is VOLUME TIME

16 SB Brown Street South of Hood Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0: /9/2017 1: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : TOTAL: 353 The A.M. peak hour from 8:00 to 9:00 is 33 The P.M. peak hour from 17:45 to 18:45 is VOLUME TIME

17 NB Gillespie Street South of Sale Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0: /9/2017 1: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : TOTAL: 283 The A.M. peak hour from 8:00 to 9:00 is 60 The P.M. peak hour from 23:00 to 0:00 is VOLUME TIME

18 SB Gillespie Street South of Sale Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0: /9/2017 1: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : TOTAL: 331 The A.M. peak hour from 8:00 to 9:00 is 90 The P.M. peak hour from 23:00 to 0:00 is VOLUME TIME

19 EB Enid Street east of Fairmount Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0: /15/2017 1: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : TOTAL: 479 The A.M. peak hour from 8:00 to 9:00 is 31 The P.M. peak hour from 17:15 to 18:15 is VOLUME TIME

20 WB Enid Street east of Fairmount Street TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0: /15/2017 1: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : TOTAL: 438 The A.M. peak hour from 8:15 to 9:15 is 62 The P.M. peak hour from 16:15 to 17:15 is VOLUME TIME

21 EB Turtle Creek Boulevard West of Mansion TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0: /9/2017 1: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : TOTAL: 2951 The A.M. peak hour from 8:15 to 9:15 is 176 The P.M. peak hour from 16:45 to 17:45 is VOLUME TIME

22 WB Turtle Creek Boulevard West of Mansion TIME 0:00 0:15 0:30 0:45 TOTAL Date Began: 0: /9/2017 1: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : TOTAL: 3365 The A.M. peak hour from 7:45 to 8:45 is 371 The P.M. peak hour from 17:00 to 18:00 is VOLUME TIME

23 1. Turtle Creek Blvd at Cedar Spring s Road - TMC Wed Nov 15, 2017 Full Length (7AM-9AM, 4:30PM-6:30PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: , Location: , , Site Code: 1 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Drive way Ce dar Springs Road Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int :00AM :15AM :30AM :45AM Hourly Total :00AM :15AM :30AM :45AM Hourly Total :30PM :45PM Hourly Total :00PM :15PM :30PM :45PM Hourly Total :00PM :15PM Hourly Total Total % Approac h 27.8% 69.8% 0.4% 2.1% % 42.1% 23.7% 0% % 87.7% 11.9% 0% % 0.8% 82.3% 0% % Total 12.4% 31.2% 0.2% 0.9% 4 4.7% - 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0% 0.6% - 0.1% 33.4% 4.5% 0% 38.1% - 2.8% 0.1% 13.7% 0% 16.6% - - Lights % Lights 98.7% 99.6% 100% 100% 99.4 % - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 100% 99.5% 100% 100% 99.6% % 100% 98.9% 0% 98.9% % Artic ulate d Truc ks % Artic ulate d Truc ks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.5% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% - 0% Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks % Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks 1.3% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.6% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0.5% 0% 0% 0.4 % - 0.5% 0% 1.1% 0% 1.0% - 0.6% Pe de strians % Pe de strians % % % % - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 1 of 6

24 1. Turtle Creek Blvd at Cedar Spring s Road - TMC Wed Nov 15, 2017 AM Peak (8AM - 9AM) All Classes (Lig hts, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Sing le-unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: , Location: , , Site Code: 1 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Drive way Ce dar Springs Road Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int :00AM :15AM :30AM :45AM Total % Approac h 29.1% 70.7% 0.2% 0% % 20.0% 40.0% 0% % 75.7% 23.1% 0% % 2.7% 76.5% 0% % Total 18.2% 44.1% 0.1% 0% 62.4 % - 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0% 0.3% - 0.3% 21.9% 6.7% 0% 28.9% - 1.8% 0.2% 6.5% 0% 8.5% - - PHF Lights % Lights 98.4% 99.7% 100% 0% 99.4 % - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 100% 99.2% 100% 0% 99.4 % - 100% 100% 98.2% 0% 98.7% % Artic ulate d Truc ks % Artic ulate d Truc ks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks % Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks 1.6% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.6% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0.8% 0% 0% 0.6% - 0% 0% 1.8% 0% 1.3% - 0.7% Pe de strians % Pe de strians % % % - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 6

25 1. Turtle Creek Blvd at Cedar Spring s Road - TMC Wed Nov 15, 2017 PM Peak (5:15PM - 6:15PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lig hts, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Sing le-unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: , Location: , , Site Code: 1 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Drive way Ce dar Springs Road Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int :15PM :30PM :45PM :00PM Total % Approac h 21.3% 73.6% 0.2% 4.9% % 54.5% 18.2% 0% - - 0% 94.4% 5.5% 0.1% % 0% 82.0% 0% % Total 6.8% 23.3% 0% 1.6% 31.7% - 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0% 0.5% - 0% 42.6% 2.5% 0% 4 5.1% - 4.1% 0% 18.6% 0% 22.7% - - PHF Lights % Lights 99.3% 100% 100% 100% 99.8% - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 0% 99.8% 100% 100% 99.8% % 0% 99.7% 0% 99.6% % Artic ulate d Truc ks % Artic ulate d Truc ks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks % Buse s and Single -Unit Truc ks 0.7% 0% 0% 0% 0.2% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0.2% - 1.2% 0% 0.3% 0% 0.4 % - 0.2% Pe de strians % Pe de strians % % % - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 6

26 2. Turtle Creek Blvd at Gillespie St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 Full Leng th (7AM-9AM, 4:30PM-6:30PM) All Classes (Lig hts, Buses and Sing le-unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: , Location: , , Site Code: 2 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int :00AM :15AM :30AM :45AM Hourly Total :00AM :15AM :30AM :45AM Hourly Total :30PM :45PM Hourly Total :00PM :15PM :30PM :45PM Hourly Total :00PM :15PM Hourly Total T otal % Approac h 43.5% 28.8% 27.7% 0% % 85.4% 0.2% 0.1% - - 0% 0% 0% 0% % 76.7% 8.8% 0.1% % Total 4.8% 3.2% 3.1% 0% 11.1% - 6.9% 41.3% 0.1% 0% 4 8.3% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 5.8% 31.1% 3.6% 0% 4 0.5% - - Lights % Lights 96.1% 97.6% 98.8% 0% 97.3% % 99.4% 100% 100% 99.1% - 0% 0% 0% 0% % 99.4% 97.9% 100% 99.3% % Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks % Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks 3.9% 2.4% 1.2% 0% 2.7% - 2.7% 0.6% 0% 0% 0.9% - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 0% 0.6% 2.1% 0% 0.7% - 1.0% Pe de strians % Pe de strians % - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 1 of 6

27 2. Turtle Creek Blvd at Gillespie St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 AM Peak (8AM - 9AM) All Classes (Lig hts, Buses and Sing le-unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: , Location: , , Site Code: 2 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int :00AM :15AM :30AM :45AM Total % Approac h 20.0% 55.0% 25.0% 0% % 85.4% 0% 0% - - 0% 0% 0% 0% % 68.8% 19.4% 0.7% % T otal 1.9% 5.2% 2.4% 0% 9.5% - 9.8% 57.8% 0% 0% 67.6% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 2.5% 15.7% 4.4% 0.2% 22.9% - - PHF Lights % Lights 91.7% 100% 100% 0% 98.3% % 99.7% 0% 0% 99.5% - 0% 0% 0% 0% % 100% 100% 100% 100% % Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks % Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks 8.3% 0% 0% 0% 1.7% - 1.6% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.5% - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.5% Pe de strians % Pe de strians % - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 6

28 2. Turtle Creek Blvd at Gillespie St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 PM Peak (5:15PM - 6:15PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lig hts, Buses and Sing le-unit Trucks, Pedestrians) All Movements ID: , Location: , , Site Code: 2 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Gille spie Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Time R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int :15PM :30PM :45PM :00PM Total % Approac h 61.1% 12.2% 26.7% 0% % 84.8% 0% 0.3% - - 0% 0% 0% 0% % 79.7% 4.2% 0% % Total 6.7% 1.3% 2.9% 0% 11.0% - 5.4% 30.9% 0% 0.1% 36.4 % - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 8.5% 41.9% 2.2% 0% 52.6% - - PHF Lights % Lights 96.4% 100% 100% 0% 97.8% % 99.6% 0% 100% 99.3% - 0% 0% 0% 0% % 100% 100% 0% 100% % Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks % Buse s and S ingle -Unit Truc ks 3.6% 0% 0% 0% 2.2% - 2.3% 0.4% 0% 0% 0.7% - 0% 0% 0% 0% - - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.5% Pe de strians % Pe de strians * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 6

29 3. Turtle Creek Blvd at Fairmount St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 Full Length (7AM-9AM, 4:30PM-6:30PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: , Location: , , Site Code: 3 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Tim e R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int :00AM :15AM :30AM :45AM Hourly Total :00AM :15AM :30AM :45AM Hourly Total :30PM :45PM Hourly Total :00PM :15PM :30PM :45PM Hourly Total :00PM :15PM Hourly Total Total % Approac h 11.7% 64.5% 23.8% 0% % 70.8% 4.6% 0% % 43.4% 44.3% 0% % 76.8% 7.2% 0% % Total 3.3% 18.3% 6.8% 0% 28.3% - 7.4% 21.3% 1.4% 0% 30.0% - 2.3% 8.0% 8.1% 0% 18.4 % - 3.7% 17.9% 1.7% 0% 23.2% - - Lights % Lights 99.2% 99.7% 99.2% 0% 99.5% % 99.0% 98.1% 0% 98.8% - 100% 99.7% 100% 0% 99.9% - 100% 99.3% 98.4% 0% 99.3% % Articulated Trucks % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0.1% - 0% 0.2% 0% 0% 0.2% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit T ruc ks % Buses and Single - Unit Trucks 0.8% 0.1% 0.8% 0% 0.4 % - 1.8% 0.7% 1.9% 0% 1.0% - 0% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.1% - 0% 0.7% 1.6% 0% 0.7% - 0.6% Pe de strians % Pe de strians % % % % - Bicycle s on Crosswalk % Bicycle s on Crosswalk % % % % - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 1 of 6

30 3. Turtle Creek Blvd at Fairmount St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 AM Peak (8AM - 9AM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: , Location: , , Site Code: 3 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Tim e R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int :00AM :15AM :30AM :45AM T otal % Approach 17.7% 68.6% 13.6% 0% % 75.7% 2.3% 0% % 35.9% 52.3% 0% % 61.2% 21.7% 0% % Total 4.2% 16.4% 3.3% 0% 23.8% - 8.5% 29.0% 0.9% 0% 38.4 % - 2.8% 8.6% 12.5% 0% 23.8% - 2.4% 8.6% 3.0% 0% 14.0% - - PHF Lights % Lights 100% 98.7% 100% 0% 99.1% % 99.3% 100% 0% 98.9% - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 100% 98.7% 100% 0% 99.2% % Articulated Trucks % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.7% 0% 0% 0.5% - 0% 0.4% 0% 0% 0.3% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.2% Buses and Single -Unit T ruc ks % Buses and Single - Unit T ruc ks 0% 0.7% 0% 0% 0.5% - 2.6% 0.4% 0% 0% 0.8% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 1.3% 0% 0% 0.8% - 0.5% Pe de strians % Pe de strians % % - Bicycle s on Crosswalk % Bicycle s on Crosswalk % % - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 6

31 3. Turtle Creek Blvd at Fairmount St - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 PM Peak (5PM - 6PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: , Location: , , Site Code: 3 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Fairmount Stre e t Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Tim e R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int :00PM :15PM :30PM :45PM Total % Approac h 10.6% 62.1% 27.3% 0% % 59.7% 8.1% 0% % 57.9% 27.1% 0% % 77.9% 4.6% 0% % Total 3.4% 20.1% 8.8% 0% 32.3% - 7.8% 14.5% 2.0% 0% 24.3% - 1.8% 6.9% 3.3% 0% 12.0% - 5.5% 24.5% 1.5% 0% 31.4 % - - PHF Lights % Lights 97.5% 100% 100% 0% 99.7% % 98.2% 100% 0% 98.6% - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% - 100% 99.7% 100% 0% 99.7% % Articulated Trucks % Articulated Trucks 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0.6% 0% 0% 0.4 % - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit T ruc ks % Buses and Single - Unit T ruc ks 2.5% 0% 0% 0% 0.3% - 1.1% 1.2% 0% 0% 1.1% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0% 0.3% 0% 0% 0.3% - 0.4% Pe de strians % Pe de strians % % - Bicycle s on Crosswalk % Bicycle s on Crosswalk % % - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 6

32 4. Turtle Creek Blvd at Maple Ave - TMC Thu Nov 9, 2017 Full Length (7AM-9AM, 4:30PM-6:30PM) All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single-Unit Trucks, Pedestrians, Bicycles on Crosswalk) All Movements ID: , Location: , , Site Code: 4 Provided by: C. J. Hensch & Associates Inc Sycamore Ave., Pasadena, TX, 77503, US Le g Maple Ave nue Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Maple Ave nue Turtle Cre e k Boule vard Dire ction Southbound We stbound Northbound Eastbound Tim e R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* R T L U App Pe d* Int :00AM :15AM :30AM :45AM Hourly Total :00AM :15AM :30AM :45AM Hourly Total :30PM :45PM Hourly Total :00PM :15PM :30PM :45PM Hourly Total :00PM :15PM Hourly Total Total % Approac h 1.0% 76.2% 22.8% 0% % 1.5% 11.7% 0% % 92.3% 0.7% 0% % 27.3% 45.5% 0% % Total 0.5% 34.3% 10.3% 0% 4 5.0% % 0.3% 2.1% 0% 18.3% - 2.5% 32.9% 0.2% 0% 35.7% - 0.3% 0.3% 0.4% 0% 1.0% - - Lights % Lights 100% 98.8% 99.4% 100% 98.9% % 100% 99.3% 0% 99.4 % % 99.0% 100% 0% 99.0% - 100% 100% 100% 0% 100% % Articulated Trucks % Articulated Trucks 0% 0.1% 0.1% 0% 0.1% - 0.1% 0% 0% 0% 0.1% - 0% 0.1% 0% 0% 0.1% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.1% Buses and Single -Unit T ruc ks % Buses and Single - Unit T ruc ks 0% 1.1% 0.4% 0% 1.0% - 0.5% 0% 0.7% 0% 0.6% - 1.1% 0.9% 0% 0% 0.9% - 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% - 0.9% Pe de strians % Pe de strians % % % % - Bicycle s on Crosswalk % Bicycle s on Crosswalk % % % % - * Pedestrians and Bicycles on Crosswalk. L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 1 of 6