ISO Road traffic safety (RTS) management systems - Requirements with guidance for use

Transcription

1 ISO Road traffic safety (RTS) management systems - Requirements with guidance for use

2 The road transport system is an open and complex system Infrastructure Vehicles Road Transportation of goods and passengers Road users during the execution of their duties Corporations and organizations Regulatory framework Monitoring Etc.. This is where ISO comes in!

3 Traffic safety background facts The global traffic safety situation is a human catastrophe, with more than 1.3 million fatalities each year. 2030, injuries generated within the road transport system will be the 5th most common reason for loss of health (projected by WHO). Traffic injuries are the largest cause of mortality in the age group (10%) (source: The Lancet). Lack of systematic work and commitment among organizations that affect the safety of the road transport system.

4 The vision behind ISO Elimination of death and serious injury in the road transport system is the overarching goal. A voluntary and complimentary tool to legislation, addressing all organizations interacting with road traffic and driven by the needs of interested parties, including market forces. An approach to utilize and disseminate best practice. Knowledge transfer from Traffic safety experts to the intended user community of the standard.

5 On the road to ISO Road Traffic Safety (RTS) management systems Work item approved by ISO ballot among ISO member countries January ISO Project Committee, ISO/PC 241, established by ISO Technical management board February 2008 Secretariat allocated to Swedish Standards Institute (SIS). Chairman of ISO/PC 241 Claes Tingvall, Director Road Safety, SRA Swedish Road Administration. Secretary Peter Hartzell (SIS). ISO to be published middle of ISO 39001

6 An ISO management system standard is a voluntary tool for organizations to work systematically with specific issues (Environment, Quality, Food safety, Road Traffic Safety etc.). is often based on the concept of continual improvement PDCA cycle and process approach. does not specify any specific technical solution or minimum requirements and is flexible and adaptable to the needs and resources of each specific organization

7 Success factors adressed Follow the success story of ISO 9001 (Quality management systems) and ISO (Environmental management systems) in the area of Road traffic safety. Facilitate the implementation by harmonization to existing and well-known ISO management system standards. Holistic approach addressed through stakeholder identification, consultation and coordination. Strengthen the efforts on Road Traffic Safety by addressing the relation to OH&S (occupational health and safety) and CSR (corporate social responsibility).

8 Members of ISO/PC 241 Participating members Argentina Armenia Australia Barbados Canada China Colombia Finland Germany Italy Japan Jordan Korea Malaysia Nigeria Philippines South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom Observing members Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus Czech Republic France Israel Netherlands New Zealand Norway Singapore Thailand Liaison organizations ISO/TC 22, Road Vehicles ISO/TC 211, Geographic information/geomatics Global Road Safety Forum (GRSF) Global Road Safety Partnership (GRSP) World Health Organization (WHO) World Bank (WB) The International Transport Forum (ITF/OECD) International Association of Oil & Gas producers (OGP) UN Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) European Transport Safety Council (ETSC) The International Road Federation (IRF)

9 Global participation 32 member countries = 14% :

10 ISO PC 241 Organization Chart CAG Chairs Advisory Group ISO/PC 241 Chair: Claes Tingvall, Sweden Secretary: Peter Hartzell, Sweden TG1 Introduction, Scope, Normative references, Terms and definitions TG2 Top management Responsibilities TG3 Requirements, Annex A Editing Committee Convenor: Jeong Whon Yu, Korea Secretary: Martin Conrads, Germany Convenor: Martin Small, Australia Secretary: TBA Project Editor: Linley Crackel, Australia

11 Task group sessions Reaching consensus on key topics Handling of national comments of current drafts

12 1st ISO PC/241 meeting in Stockholm June nd ISO PC/241 meeting in Malaysia February 2009

13 3rd ISO PC/241 meeting in Ottawa September th ISO PC/241 meeting in Beijing March 2010

14 Overall structure and unique elements of ISO draft standard Organizational context related to RTS Incident investigation Top management responsibilities and commitment RTS performance factors

15 The architecture of ISO The overall structure and content aligned with ISO MSS - in compliance with N005 and ISO Guide 72. (Compare with EMAS and OHSAS 18001) - following the HLS (High Level Structure) of JTCG (ISO:s Joint Technical Coordination Group) Top management responsibilities and commitment - concept adopted from ISO 9000 Organizational context related to RTS - adopted from ISO/TMB/JTCG Joint vision RTS performance factors - reflects common experience and knowledge in the field of road traffic safety Incident investigation - partly adopted from OHSAS harmonization between the ISO world and Traffic Safety expertise

16 Progress in ISO PC RTS management systems 1st meeting in Stockholm June nd meeting in Malaysia February rd meeting in Ottawa September th meeting in Beijing March th meeting in Berlin November 2010 Comments on CD 2 to be handled in Berlin Sub-groups are established to develop the content of the standard Target date for publication: April 2012

17 Progress in ISO PC RTS management systems CD2 ISO includes: JTCG work of HLS High Level Structure for MSS (Management System Standards) Clause structure and titles Terms and Definitions Identical text Final decision regarding application of JTCG work in ISO is not yet made. Focus on ISO unique parts (clause 6 RTS Road Traffic Safety Performance Factors)

18 Progress in ISO PC RTS management systems Ballot results CD2 ISO votes cast 3 comments submitted (liaisons) 3 votes not cast 6 Yes 5 Yes with comments 4 No (26.7%) 2 Abstain Effect: PC 241 decides (at Berlin meeting in Nov 2010) to move to CD3 or DIS. Comment: At DIS/FDIS there must be less than 25% No-votes to pass.

19 Progress in ISO PC RTS management systems Future work: PC 241 meeting in Berlin Nov 1-5th 2010 Follow up the progress of JTCG work Decide on level of application of JTCG work Next step: CD3 or DIS

20 ISO/PC 241 Thank you for your attention! For more information about this project please contact: PC 241 Secretariat at SIS, Sweden Anette Eriksson, Peter Hartzell,