Team Introduction Competition Background Current Situation Project Goals Stakeholders Use Scenario Customer Needs Engineering Requirements

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Team Introduction Competition Background Current Situation Project Goals Stakeholders Use Scenario Customer Needs Engineering Requirements"

Barnard Arnold
5 years ago
Views:

2 Team Introduction Competition Background Current Situation Project Goals Stakeholders Use Scenario Customer Needs Engineering Requirements Constraints Project Plan Risk Analysis Questions

Aeronautical Engineer Dominic Myren: Aeronautical

3 Christopher Jones - Aeronautical Engineer Matthew Zielinski - Aeronautical Engineer Ronald Manning - Aeronautical Engineer Dominic Myren: Aeronautical Engineer Project Manager Marc Protacio : Aeronautical Engineer Team Leader

for experienced teams Micro A new class focusing on small scale craft The goal is to build an aircraft to carry a

4 An event that challenges engineering students in the United States and internationally through the design, build, and test of an aircraft Three Classes: Regular The standard class we are interested in Advanced Extra challenge for experienced teams Micro A new class focusing on small scale craft The goal is to build an aircraft to carry a greater weight than others while following a set of restrictions and generating accurate engineering documentation

5 RIT Aero Design Club has been absent from the competition since 2008 Prior to 2008, RIT had been inconsistent in participating in the competition annually Lacking Experienced veterans to lead/guide the club Aeronautical engineering experience/knowledge Full commitment as students are on co-op for parts of the year Funding

6 Deliverables A functional finished aircraft designed and built to SAE Aero standards Comprehensive documentation of design, build, and testing methods and processes Jumpstart the Aero Club Build competence through sharing experience from the present Senior Design project Desired State: Aero Design club is able to compete in the SAE Aero Competition annually and be competitive

7 SAE Aero Organization Primary Customer RIT Aero Design Club MSD I Team Members Dr. Kolodziej Faculty Guide RIT Aerospace Engineering Faculty Potential Sponsors Rochester Institute of Technology

Pilot MSD Team Fly aircraft according to SAE Aero Regular Class Competition mission requirements Competition Use Scenaro Load aircraft with payload Thrust engine Deploy flaps and

8 Pilot MSD Team Fly aircraft according to SAE Aero Regular Class Competition mission requirements Competition Use Scenaro Load aircraft with payload Thrust engine Deploy flaps and rotate elevator (-) Climb to cruise altitude Trim aircraft: Use rudder, elevator and ailerons Eliminate engine thrust, deploy flaps, rotate elevator (-) Land aircraft Stop aircraft

9 Importance Key: 3=must have, 2=nice to have, 1=preference only

10 Importance Key: 9 = Critical 3 = Moderate 1 = Insignificant *Note: All engineering requirements derived from SAE Aero rules are deemed critical as failing to meet the target values will result in penalization or disqualification.

Risk Category Cause Effect L S I Method for Mitigation or Remediation 1 Inability to meet the design 1. Ask Aero Design Club about their current manufacturing capabilities.

14 Risk Category Cause Effect L S I Method for Mitigation or Remediation 1 Inability to meet the design 1. Ask Aero Design Club about their current manufacturing capabilities. tolerances and specified size Manufacturing Disqualification Intentionally design aircraft dimensions less than the upper size limit given by the rules. limits 3. Make tolerances relatively large. 2 3 Not enough initial funding Resource MSD Budget Structures may fail Safety Aerodynamics loads in flight 4 Aircraft may not fly Poor design 5 Aircraft may not take-off within required distance Inability to acquire required lift in time Inability to fully build aircraft Damaged Aircraft Inability to perform competition objective Inability to perform competition objective Research supplies that may not be of the highest quality but will still perform the required job. 2. Try to ask for more funding and justify the additional money with valid reasons. 3. If strength of materials is of concern, research less costly materials with the same properties needed. 4. Ensure that manufacturing is done carefully so as to avoid needing to purchase more materials when mistakes are made. 1. Perform extensive mechanics of solids analysis, both theoretical and with finite element analysis software in conjunction with computational fluid dynamics software. 2. Add an adequate factor of safety when choosing materials based on strength. 3. Fabricate spare aircraft parts/assemblies. 1. Perform extensive aerodynamics and flight dynamics analysis, both theoretical and with flight simulation and computational fluid dynamics software. 2. Perform wind tunneling testing to compare/contrast pressure distributions obtained through CFD. 1. Ensure Wing is sized to provide initial adequate lift using theoretical calculations and include a sizing factor of safety. Ensure elevator is adequately sized to provide adequate pitching moment using theoretical calculations and a sizing factor of safety. 2. Ensure elevator deflection angle range is adequate using theoretical calculations and an angle range factor of safety. 3. Ensure flaps are adequately sized to provide additional lift assist using theoretical calculations and a sizing factor of safety. 4. Ensure flap deflection angle range is adequate using theoretical calculations and an angle range factor of safety. 5. Ensure engine provides adequate thrust to get aircraft to the required initial velocity by testing the thrust capability of the engine on a test stand. Owner (Team leader assumes partial ownership of all risks) Ron Chris Dom Dom/Ron Matt Aircraft may not land within the required distance 7 Aircraft may not be able to carry a competitive payload 8 Aircraft may not be designed and built within the required time frame Inability to decelerate aircraft while trimmed and having proper attitude. Poor design Manufacturing Inability to perform competition objective Fail to impress stakeholders Inability to compete/ showcase aircraft 9 Bad flight conditions Rsource Poor weather Poor aircraft performance Poor controllability of aircraft during flight Electronics may fail 12 Engine may not be able to provide adequate thrust Safety Resource Safety Resource Design is too stable Bad connections, poor equipment, unfamiliarity with electronics integration, battery failure and/or fire Poor maneuverability and possibily safety hazard Need for electronics repair or replacement, safety hazard Poor engine choice Inability to obtain or under-performing required velocity engine Have discussion with pilot to discuss required landing velocity and ensure that he/or she plans to obtain that requirement when approaching the land. 2. Make sure elevator and flaps are adequately sized and have adequate angular range, as discussed previously when taking-off, to trim aircraft during landing. 3. Make sure rudder is adequately sized and has sufficient angular deflection capability to remove any sideslip angle, using theoretical calculations and applying a factor of safety. 1. Research previous winning aircrafts and the payloads that they were able to carry. 2. Design the aircraft to carry more than that payload, and include a factor of safety in the lifting capability. 3. Test aircraft to ensure the designed payload weight is carried prior to competition. 1. Develop Gantt scheduling chart and follow it strictly. 2. Include a scheduling factor of safety (allocate extra time for tasks) to account for problems experienced and mistakes made in the process. Matt Dom/Ron Test aircraft in a variety of weather scenarios to give pilot experience flying with poor flight conditions. Chris 1. Properly size control surfaces using theoretical calculations and a sizing factor of safety. 2. Ensure control surface deflection angle range is adequate using theoretical calculations and an angle range factor of safety. 3. Allow pilot adequate time to test the aircraft so that he or she is comfortable flying it. Chris 4. Make sure control surfaces do not have excessive slop Purchase spare electronic components. 2. Inspect/test electronics prior to flight. 3. Consult with Aero Design Club about electronics integration 4. Follow electrical component safety procedures Refer to previous SAE Aero design reports 1. Calculate required thrust using theoretical calculations and ensure that a thrust factor of safety is implemented. 2. Test the thrust capability of the engine on a test stand. Chris Matt Matt 13 Lack of aeronautical engineering knowledge amongst team members Resource RIT curriculum Difficulties in design process, inability to meet deadlines Consult with textbooks regarding aeronautical engineering theory as well as aircraft design methods. 2. Refer to previous SAE Aero design reports to learn about design methods used. 3. Assemble team members that are in the Aero option. Dom 14 Lack of aircraft manufacturing knowledge amongst team Resource members RIT curriculum Difficulties in design process, inability to meet deadlines Consult with aero club for manufacturing help. 2. Consult with previous SAE Aero technical report for manufacturing guidelines and hints. Ron

15 Comments Concerns Complaints

Lateral Directional Flight Considerations

Lateral Directional Flight Considerations This section discusses the lateral-directional control requirements for various flight conditions including cross-wind landings, asymmetric thrust, turning flight,