MEDICAL COUNCIL OF CANADA 1021 THOMAS SPRATT PLACE TRANSPORTATION BRIEF

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "MEDICAL COUNCIL OF CANADA 1021 THOMAS SPRATT PLACE TRANSPORTATION BRIEF"

Transcription

1 MEDICAL COUNCIL OF CANADA 121 THOMAS SPRATT PLACE TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 2, 24 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 November 214 Novatech File: Reference No. R)214)54

2

3 Documentation and Reporting Checklist Report Context (Section 1.) Description of the development (include all of the following that are known at the time of the application): Municipal address; Location relative to major elements of the existing transportation system (e.g., the site is located in the southwest quadrant of the intersection of Main Street/ First Street, 6 metres from the Maple Street Rapid Transit Station); Existing land uses or permitted use provisions in the Official Plan, Zoning By)law, etc.; Proposed land uses and relevant planning regulations to be used in the analysis; Proposed development size (building size, number of residential units, etc.) and location on site; Estimated date of occupancy; Planned phasing of development; Proposed number of parking spaces (not relevant for Registration of Plans of Subdivision); and Proposed access points and type of access (full turns, right)in/ right)out, turning restrictions, etc.). Study area; Time periods and phasing; and Horizon years (include reference to phased development). The TB must include a key plan that shows the general location of the development in relation to the surrounding area. The TB must also provide a draft site plan or development concept of a suitable scale that shows the general location of the development and the proposed access locations. If the proposed development/ redevelopment is to be constructed in phases, a description must be provided for each phase, identifying the proposed timing of implementation. Existing Conditions (Section 2.) Existing roads and ramps in the study area, including jurisdiction, classification, number of lanes, and posted speed limit; Existing intersections, indicating type of control, lane configurations, turning restrictions, and any other relevant data (e.g., extraordinary lane widths, grades, etc.); Existing access points to adjacent developments (both sides of all roads bordering the site); Existing transit system, including stations and stops; Existing on) and off)road bicycle facilities and pedestrian sidewalks and pathway networks; Existing system operations (V/C, LOS); and

4 Major trip generators/ attractors within the Study Area should be indicated. The TB report must include figures documenting the existing travel demands by mode. A photographic inventory of the transportation network elements in the vicinity of the proposed access points would be beneficial to staff in their review of the Consultant s report. Demand Forecasting (Section 3.) Trip generation forecasts Impact Analysis (Section 4.) Qualitative assessment of impacts on capacity; non)auto modes; on)site circulation; community Mitigation Measures and Site Design Characteristics (Section 5.78.) The TB must identify all mitigation measures required to offset network impacts from the development. The TB must also identify key site design features required to implement the Official Plan and Transportation Master Plan policies regarding site development. The TB must include all of the following, where they are required by the subject development: Location and timing of proposed changes to existing traffic controls at intersections (e.g., new traffic signals, Stop signs, etc.); Mitigation measures required to offset impacts on the surface and Rapid Transit networks; New or modified elements of the bicycle and pedestrian networks; Community impact mitigation measures; and Proposed TDM features or programs to support the site development.

5 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ANALYSIS METHODS ANALYSIS PARAMETERS EXISTING CONDITIONS ROADWAY FACILITIES STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS EXISTING PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE FACILITIES EXISTING TRANSIT FACILITIES EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING OTHER AREA DEVELOPMENTS TRIP GENERATION TRIP DISTRIBUTION Vehicular Trips Transit Trips INTERSECTION ANALYSIS EXISTING TRAFFIC TOTAL TRAFFIC PROVISIONS FOR NONAUTO MODES ONSITE DESIGN PROPOSED ACCESS ON"SITE PARKING GARBAGE COLLECTION AND LOADING COMMUNITY IMPACTS TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Novatech Page i

6 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place Figures Figure 1a Figure 1b Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Aerial Photo of Subject Site Key Plan Proposed Site Plan OC Transpo System Map Existing Traffic Volumes Other Area Development Traffic Site Generated Traffic Total Traffic Volumes Tables Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 Table 5 Table 6 Table 7 Table 8 ITE Trip Generation Person Trips Person Trips by Modal Share Top Origins/Destinations of Alta Vista District Trips Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Traffic Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Traffic (Mitigated) Intersection Capacity Analysis Total Traffic Intersection Capacity Analysis Total Traffic (Mitigated) Appendices Appendix A: Transit Maps Appendix B: Traffic Count and Signal Timing Data Appendix C: 2211 Thurston Drive Transportation Overview Excerpts Appendix D: 211 TRANS O!D Survey Report Excerpts Appendix E: Synchro Analysis Reports Appendix F: OTM Signal Justification Calculations Novatech Page ii

7 Transportation Brief Thomas Spratt Place INTRODUCTION This Transportation Brief (TB) has been prepared in support of a Site Plan Control (SPC) application for the proposed office development at 121 Thomas Spratt Place. The subject site forms part of the Ottawa Business Park and is located east of the Thomas Spratt Place cul)de)sac, as shown in Figure 1a. A key plan is also shown in Figure 1b. Figure 1a Aerial Photo of Subject Site The site has an area of hectares and is bordered by the Canadian National Railway (CNR) to the south, a hydro corridor and soccer fields to the north and industrial developments to the west and east. Under the City of Ottawa Zoning By)law, the subject site is zoned IL (Light Industrial) which permits the proposed use. The proposal includes two phases of development. Phase One consists of a 6,148 m2 (66,177 ft2) four)storey office building which will serve as the new head offices for the Medical Council of Canada. Phase One will include surfacing parking for 189 vehicles and the expected occupancy date is 215. Phase Two consists of a 2,12 m2 (22,82 ft2) building expansion with surface parking for an additional 27 vehicles, bringing the total on)site parking to 216 spaces. The timing of the Phase Two building expansion is unknown as Phase One is expected to accommodate the projected needs for a period of at least 1 years. The site plan for the proposed development is shown in Figure 2. Novatech Page 1

8

9

10 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place Access to the site will be provided by a new driveway connection to the Thomas Spratt Place cul) de)sac. 1.1 Analysis Methods The types of analysis undertaken to assess the transportation impacts of the proposed development are consistent with the requirements of the City of Ottawa Transportation Impact Assessment (TIA) Guidelines, published in 26. Intersection capacity analysis has been completed using the software package Synchro 8.. This software uses methodology from the Highway Capacity Manual 21 (HCM), published by the Transportation Research Board, to evaluate signalized and unsignalized intersections. Intersection operating conditions are commonly described in terms of a Level of Service (LOS). LOS is a qualitative measurement of speed, freedom to manoeuvre, interruptions, comfort and convenience. Letters are assigned to six levels, with LOS A representing optimal operating conditions and LOS F representing failing operating conditions. The City of Ottawa has adopted criteria that directly relate the LOS of a signalized intersection to a volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. Vehicle capacity is defined as the maximum number of vehicles that can pass a given point during a specified period under prevailing traffic conditions. The City s criteria are as follows: LOS v/c ratio A to.6 B.61 to.7 C.71 to.8 D.81 to.9 E.91 to 1. F >1. The LOS for an unsignalized intersection is based on average control delay and is defined for individual movements. Control delay includes initial deceleration, queue move)up time, stopped time and final acceleration. The HCM presents the following criteria relating the LOS for individual movements to average control delay: LOS Delay (sec/veh) A <1 B 1 to 15 C 15 to 25 D 25 to 35 E 35 to 5 F >5 Novatech Page 2

11 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place In this assessment, movements at signalized and unsignalized intersections have been evaluated in terms of the LOS as defined in the foregoing tables. Mitigation measures in the form of additional lane capacity and/or signal adjustments have been identified for movements with LOS F. The methodologies used to analyze the transportation impacts of the proposed development are described as follows: An operational evaluation of the site access and study area intersections under the existing and total traffic conditions (i.e. existing traffic plus development traffic) for the weekday AM and PM peak hours, An assessment of provisions for non)auto travel modes, including integration with local transit service, and connections with the local pedestrian and bicycle networks, A review of the proposed on)site design in terms of access, parking facilities, and loading/garbage service requirements, and An evaluation of conformance with Transportation Demand Management (TDM) principles 1.2 Analysis Parameters The study area for this report was confirmed with City staff, and includes the following intersections: Conroy Road / Thurston Drive; St. Laurent Boulevard / Thurston Drive; Thurston Drive / Thomas Spratt Place. The selected time periods for analysis include the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Based on the nature of the proposed development, these time periods are considered to represent the worst case combination of site)generated traffic and adjacent street traffic. 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Roadway Facilities Conroy Road is a two way arterial roadway that runs on a north)south alignment between Walkley Road and Bank Street. In the vicinity of the subject site, Conroy Road has a four)lane divided urban cross section. Conroy Road is designated as an urban truck route and has a posted speed limit of 6 km/hr within the study area. St. Laurent Boulevard is a two way collector roadway that runs on a north)south and east)west alignment between Walkley Road and Conroy Road. In the vicinity of the subject site, St. Laurent Boulevard has a two)lane undivided urban cross section and a regulatory speed limit of 5kph under the Ontario Highway Traffic Act. Thurston Drive is a two way local roadway that runs on a north)south and east)west alignment between St. Laurent Boulevard and Conroy Road. Thomas Spratt Place is a two way local roadway that runs on an east)west alignment and terminates in a cul)de)sac approximately 12m east of Thurston Drive. Thurston Drive and Thomas Spratt Place have two)lane undivided urban Novatech Page 3

12 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place cross sections with 11m road widths and regulatory speed limits of 5kph under the Ontario Highway Traffic Act. 2.2 Study Area Intersections The study area intersections are described as follows: Conroy Road / Thurston Drive Conroy Road and Thurston Drive form a tee intersection that operates under traffic signal control; An access to the snow disposal facility at 31 Conroy forms the fourth (westerly) leg of the intersection; Dedicated left turn lanes are provided on all approaches; and A channelized right turn lane is provided on the northbound approach. Thurston Drive / St. Laurent Boulevard Thurston Drive and St. Laurent Boulevard form a tee intersection that operates under all) way stop control; An access to a private distribution company at 232 St. Laurent Boulevard forms the fourth (northerly) leg of the intersection; All legs consist of a single approach lane. Thurston Drive / Thomas Spratt Place Thomas Spratt Place and Thurston Drive form a tee intersection with stop control on Thomas Spratt Place; All legs consist of a single approach lane. 2.3 Existing Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities Existing pedestrian facilities within the study area are described as follows: Concrete sidewalk is provided along the east side of Conroy Road; An asphalt multi)use pathway (MUP) is provided on the west side of Conroy Road; Concrete sidewalk is provided on the north/west side of St. Laurent Boulevard; Concrete sidewalk is provided on the north/west side of Thurston Drive; and A pathway is provided along the north side of the hydro corridor/soccer fields north of the subject site. Existing cycling facilities within the study area include dedicated bike lanes along Conroy Road, in addition to the asphalt MUP provided along the west side. 2.4 Existing Transit Facilities A portion of the 214 OC Transpo system map for the study area is included in Appendix A. Novatech Page 4

13 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place This report describes all existing transit facilities within a five minute walk of the subject site, which equates to a distance of approximately 4m. Bus stops #439 and #435 are located in the southeast and northeast corner of the St. Laurent Boulevard/Thurston Drive intersection at a walking distance of approximately 43m and 45m from the subject site respectively. These stops provide service to the regular route 114; travelling between Hurdman and Greenboro Stations on 1 to 15 minute headways during weekday rush hours. The location of the aforementioned bus stops in relation to the subject site is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3: OC Transpo Bus Stop Locations 2.6 Existing Traffic Volumes An eight hour traffic count was conducted by the City of Ottawa at the signalized intersection of Conroy Road/Thurston Drive on Monday June 27th, 211. Novatech commissioned the City of Ottawa to complete an eight hour count at the unsignalized intersection of St. Laurent Boulevard/Thurston drive on January 15, 214 for the purpose of this report. Peak hour summary sheets for the above traffic counts are included in Appendix B. Peak hour traffic volumes at the Thurston Drive/Thomas Spratt Place intersection were approximated using the adjacent counts and estimated site traffic for the existing uses with vehicular access along Thomas Spratt Place. The existing weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 4. Novatech Page 5

14

15 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3. TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING 3.1 Other Area Developments It was confirmed with City staff that traffic generated by the proposed office development at 2211 Thurston Drive should be incorporated into the total traffic conditions. A Transportation Overview for the proposed office development at 2211 Thurston Drive was submitted by Delcan on February 9 th, 212. Relevant excerpts of the aforementioned Transportation Overview are included in Appendix C. Trips generated by the proposed office development at 2211 Thurston Drive are shown in Figure Trip Generation Trips generated by the proposed two phases of development have been estimated using peak hour rates identified in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9 th Edition for the Corporate Headquarters land use. The estimated weekday AM and PM peak hour trips are outlined in Table 1 below. Table 1: ITE Trip Generation Land Use Code GFA AM Peak (vph 1 ) PM Peak (vph) In Out Total In Out Total Phase 1 Corporate Headquarters Phase 2 Corporate Headquarters 1. vph = Vehicles per Hour ,177 ft ,997 ft The trip generation surveys compiled in the ITE Trip Generation Manual only record vehicle trips, and the sites surveyed are typically located in suburban locations in the United States where non) auto modes of transportation typically have a modal share of 1% or less. Where multiple modes of transportation are readily available, it is considered good practice to express projected trip generation volumes in terms of person trips, instead of vehicle trips. To convert ITE vehicle trip rates to person trip rates, two adjustment factors have been applied: Vehicle occupancy factor: 1.29 (taken from the 211 TRANS O)D Survey Report) Non)auto usage factor: 1.1 (non)auto trips not counted in ITE surveys, assumed 1%) Combining the two factors gives an overall vehicle trip to person trip adjustment factor of approximately This factor was applied to the vehicle trips projected by the ITE rates to estimate the number of person trips generated by the site in the AM and PM peak hours. The estimated peak hour person trips are shown in the following table for each development phase. Novatech Page 6

16

17 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place Table 2: Person Trips Land Use Code GFA AM Peak (pph 1 ) PM Peak (pph) In Out Total In Out Total Phase 1 Corporate Headquarters Phase 2 Corporate Headquarters 1. pph = persons per hour ,177 ft ,997 ft The number of car trips that the site will generate has been estimated by categorizing the person trips by modal share. The auto)driver trip shares are based on observed percentages in the 211 Trans O!D Survey Report that are specific to the region referred to as the Alta Vista District. An auto modal share of 65% is assumed for trips generated by the proposed office space based on all observed trips within the Alta Vista District, including those with an origin or destination beyond that area. A full breakdown of the projected number of trips by modal share is shown in the following table. Table 3: Person Trips by Modal Share Travel Mode Phase 1 Modal Share AM Peak PM Peak In Out Total In Out Total Person Trips Auto Driver 65% Auto Passenger 1% Transit 15% Non)Auto 1% Phase 2 Person Trips Auto Driver 65% Auto Passenger 1% Transit 15% Non)Auto 1% Novatech Page 7

18 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3.3 Trip Distribution Vehicular Trips The projected distribution of vehicular trips generated by the proposed development has been derived with appropriate consideration given to several key factors, including: the size and nature of the proposed development; existing traffic patterns; the location of the site access with respect to the adjacent roadway system; and the principles of logical trip routing. The assumed distribution of vehicular trips generated during the weekday AM and PM peak hours is summarized as follows: 35% to/from the east via St. Laurent Boulevard; 5% to/from the west via St. Laurent Boulevard; 1% to/from the north via Conroy Road; and 5% to/from the south via Conroy Road. The projected peak hour vehicle trip volumes generated by the proposed development at full build) out of the two phases are shown in Figure 6. The projected total traffic volumes are shown in Figure Transit Trips The distribution of transit trips to and from the proposed development has been derived from the data presented in Tables 6)2 and 6)3 of the 211 TRANS O!D Survey Report. Tables 6)2 and 6)3 are included in this report as Appendix D. The top origins/destinations for all arriving and departing trips generated within the Alta Vista District are summarized in the following table. Table 4: Top Origins/Destinations of Alta Vista District Trips PM Peak AM Peak % Trips Destination of Origin of Arrivals Departures % Trips Alta Vista 27% Alta Vista 31% Hunt Club 13% Hunt Club 11% Orleans 1% Orleans 1% Ottawa Inner Area 7% Ottawa Inner Area 8% Merivale 6% Merivale 6% Based on the data presented in Table 4, the top origins and destinations for all trips generated by the Alta Vista District are the Alta Vista District itself, the Hunt Club District, the Orleans District, the Ottawa Inner District and the Merivale District. Novatech Page 8

19

20

21 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place For the purposes of this analysis, all site)generated transit trips are assumed to use regular route 114. The projected passenger loadings are summarized as follows: AM Peak Hour 28 people (26 alighting, 2 boarding) at Stop #439 on St. Laurent Boulevard PM Peak Hour 29 people (3 alighting, 26 boarding) at Stop #439 on St. Laurent Boulevard Based on the projected transit trip volumes associated with the proposed development, no capacity problems are anticipated at the adjacent curbside bus stops. 4. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS 4.1 Existing Traffic Intersection capacity analysis has been completed for the existing traffic conditions. The analysis is based on the existing roadway lane configurations and traffic signal timing plans obtained from the Public Works & Services Department. Traffic count and signal timing plans are included in this report as Appendix B. The results of the analysis are summarized in the following table for the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Detailed reports are included in Appendix E. Table 5: Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Traffic Intersection max. v/c or Delay AM Peak LOS Movement max. v/c or Delay PM Peak LOS Movement Conroy Road / Thurston Drive 1.66 B NBT 1.1 F WBL Thurston Drive / Thomas Spratt Place 13s B WBL/R 13s B WBL/R St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive 44s E WBT/L 58s F WBT/L 1. Signalized Intersection The westbound left and southbound through movements at the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive intersection are currently operating with a v/c ratio of 1.1 and 1.6, corresponding to a LOS F during the PM peak hour. The westbound through/left turn movement at the St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersection is currently operating with a delay of 44s, corresponding to a LOS E during the AM peak hour. The westbound through/left turn movement is also operating with a delay of 58s, corresponding to a LOS F during the PM peak hour. Novatech Page 9

22 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place It should be noted that the failing operations at the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive and St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersections are a result of the existing traffic patterns within the study area, and are not driven by the proposed development at 121 Thomas Spratt Place. Mitigation Measures To mitigate the failing operations at the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive intersection, Novatech recommend widening Thurston Drive at Conroy Road to accommodate westbound dual left turn lanes. Methodology outlined in Book 12 of the Ontario Traffic Manual (OTM) was used to determine whether traffic signal control is currently justified at the St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersection. A review of the Justification 4 Minimum Four)Hour Vehicle Volume criteria suggest that traffic signal control is warranted at this intersection based on the existing traffic volumes. A copy of the traffic signal justification calculations is included in Appendix F. Novatech recommend the provision of traffic signal control at the St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersection to mitigate the existing failing conditions. Table 6 shows the projected operation of the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive and St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersection under existing traffic conditions assuming the aforementioned mitigation measures in place. Table 6: Intersection Capacity Analysis Existing Traffic (Mitigated) Intersection AM Peak PM Peak max. v/c LOS Movement max. v/c LOS Movement Conroy Road / Thurston Drive 1.67 B NBT.84 D SBT/R St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive 1.79 C WBT/L.78 C NBL/R 1. Signalized intersection With the aforementioned mitigation measures in place all movements at the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive and St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersections are anticipated to operate under acceptable conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. 4.2 Total Traffic Intersection capacity analysis has been completed for the projected total traffic volumes, which are the sum total of the existing traffic, other area development traffic and the traffic likely to be generated the proposed development at full build)out. The following analysis shows the projected intersection operations at the study area intersections if the mitigation measures identified in Section 4.1 are not provided prior to the build)out of the subject site. The results of the analysis are summarized in the following table for the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Detailed reports are included in Appendix E. Novatech Page 1

23 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place Table 7: Intersection Capacity Analysis Total Traffic Intersection max. v/c or Delay AM Peak LOS Movement max. v/c or Delay PM Peak LOS Movement Conroy Road / Thurston Drive 1.68 B NBT 1.28 F WBL Thurston Drive / Thomas Spratt Place 15s C WBL/R 17s C WBL/R St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive 7s F WBT/L 79s F WBT/L 1. Signalized intersection The v/c ratio associated with the westbound left movement at the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive intersection is anticipated to increase to 1.28 during the PM peak hour if no mitigation measures are applied. The delay associated with the westbound through/left turn movement at the St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersection is anticipated to increase to 7s and 79s during the weekday AM and PM peak hours respectively if no mitigation measures are applied. It should be noted that the failing operations at the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive and St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersections are a result of the existing traffic patterns within the study area, and are not driven by the proposed development at 121 Thomas Spratt Place. Table 8 shows the projected operation of the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive and St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersections under total traffic conditions assuming the mitigation measures identified in Section 4.1 are in place. Table 8: Intersection Capacity Analysis Total Traffic (Mitigated) Intersection AM Peak PM Peak max. v/c LOS Movement max. v/c LOS Movement Conroy Road / Thurston Drive 1.68 B NBT.87 D WBL St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive 1.8 C WBT/L.82 D NBL/R 1. Signalized intersection With the mitigation measures identified in Section 4.1 in place, all movements at the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive and St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersections are anticipated to operate under acceptable conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours. 5. PROVISIONS FOR NON7AUTO MODES Sidewalk connections will be provided at the drop)off area/main building entrance. The end islands of the parking lot drive aisles and the a 2.6m pedestrian walkway between the central parking aisles will be painted with a hatch to provide improved pedestrian refuge. Novatech Page 11

24 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place A 6m easement will be provided on the southerly property limit of the subject site for a future pathway connection between Thomas Spratt Place and Ages Drive. Bicycle parking will be provided in accordance with the minimum requirements outlined in the City of Ottawa Zoning By)law (ZBL) and will be located near the northerly and easterly building entrance. Bicycle parking requirements are outlined in Section 6.. The subject site is located at a walking distance of approximately 5m from the OC Transpo bus stop #439 at the southeast corner of the St. Laurent Boulevard/Thurston Drive intersection. This stop provides service to OC Transpo regular route ON7SITE DESIGN This section of the report provides a review of the on)site design in terms of vehicular access, on) site parking and on)site loading facilities. 6.1 Proposed Access A new access is proposed along the Thomas Spratt Place cul)de)sac. The curb)to)curb width of the new access is 8.7m at the property line. The access is located approximately 3m from the northerly property limit and 5m from the southerly easement for the future walkway connection to Thomas Spratt Place. The location and spacing of the proposed access driveway along Thomas Spratt Place is compliant with the City of Ottawa s Private Approach By!law. A 3.5m wide drop)off area is proposed at the main building entrance. 6.2 On7Site Parking The subject site is located in Area C of Schedule 1 to the ZBL. Minimum vehicular parking space requirements for the proposed development are identified as follows: Office 2.4 per 1m 2 of GFA Based on the foregoing, the ZBL identifies a minimum requirement of 148 parking spaces for Phase One of the proposed development. A total of 189 parking spaces are proposed, which satisfies the minimum requirement of the ZBL. A total of 12 visitor parking spaces, including two spaces for the physically disabled, will be provided near the main building entrance. The remaining 176 parking spaces will be located at the rear of the building, including three additional spaces for the physically disabled. A control gate will be provided at the access to the parking lot. A total of 148 parking spaces are required for Phase One; the Phase Two expansion requires an additional 51 spaces, summing to a requirement to provide a total of 199 spaces. A total of 189 parking spaces are provided for Phase One; the Phase Two expansion provides an additional 27 spaces, yielding a total of 216 on)site parking spaces. The total parking provided for the Phase Two expansion satisfies the minimum requirement of the ZBL. Novatech Page 12

25 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place The ZBL identifies a minimum requirement of one bicycle parking space per 25m 2 of GFA for office land uses. A minimum of 25 bicycle parking spaces are required for Phase One of the proposed development. Bicycle parking spaces will be provided in accordance with the minimum requirement and located near the northerly and easterly building entrances, as shown on the site plan. 6.3 Garbage Collection and Loading Garbage collection and loading will take place along the north side of the building. Two loading spaces are to be provided with a total width of 8.8m. Delivery vehicles are expected to consist of single)unit, courier type trucks and will be accommodated on)site at the proposed loading area. 7. COMMUNITY IMPACTS The subject site is one of the last remaining vacant parcels of land to be developed in the Ottawa Business Park. The business park has direct access from two adjacent arterials including Walkley Road and Conroy Road. Infiltration of site)generated traffic onto local neighborhood roadways is not anticipated. The proposed on)site parking is expected to meet the demand of the new use. Parking infiltration onto the adjacent area roadways is not anticipated. 8. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT The City of Ottawa has developed a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategy as part of its efforts to reduce automobile dependency. TDM measures can reduce transportation infrastructure requirements by encouraging people to change their travel mode, timing or destination. The following design elements and programs will help promote sustainable transportation at the proposed new head offices for the Medical Council of Canada: Passenger pick)up and drop)off areas Bicycle parking Flexible work hours/work from home programs Additional measures that could be considered include: Preferential carpool parking Transit payroll deduction program (PRESTO smartcard) Novatech Page 13

26 Transportation Brief 121 Thomas Spratt Place 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results of the foregoing analysis, the main conclusions and recommendations of this report are as follows: Based on the projected transit trip volumes associated with the proposed development, no capacity problems are anticipated at the adjacent curbside bus stops. The westbound left and southbound through movements at the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive intersection are currently operating with a LOS F during the PM peak hour. To mitigate the failing conditions at the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive intersection, Novatech recommend widening Thurston Drive at Conroy Road to accommodate westbound dual left turn lanes. The westbound through/left turn movement at the St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersection is currently operating with a LOS F during the PM peak hour. Novatech recommend the provision of traffic signal control at the St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersection to mitigate the existing failing conditions. With the aforementioned mitigation measures in place all movements at the Conroy Road / Thurston Drive and St. Laurent Blvd / Thurston Drive intersections are anticipated to operate under acceptable conditions during the weekday AM and PM peak hours under the total traffic condition. The location and spacing of the proposed access driveway along Thomas Spratt Place is compliant with the City of Ottawa s Private Approach By!law. The proposed on)site vehicle and bicycle parking satisfy the minimum requirements of the ZBL. Infiltration of site)generated traffic onto local neighborhood roadways is not anticipated. Parking infiltration onto the adjacent area roadways is not anticipated. The following design elements and programs will help promote sustainable transportation at the proposed new head offices for the Medical Council of Canada: o Passenger pick)up and drop)off areas o Bicycle parking o Flexible work hours/work from home programs It is recommended that the application for site plan control be approved from a transportation perspective. Novatech Page 14

27

28 APPENDIX A Transit Maps

29 SUBJECT SITE

30

31 APPENDIX B Traffic Count and Signal Timing Data

32

33 City of Ottawa 11 Laurier Ave West Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1P 1J Count Name: THURSTON AND ST LAURENT JAN 15/14 Site Code: Start Date: 1/15/214 Page No: 5 Eastbound St. [W] Total In Out T R 2 2 P U Peak Hour Data 1/15/214 7:45 AM Ending At 1/15/214 8:45 AM Car Truck Pedal Bike (Road) Ped T L U P Out In Total Westbound St. [E] U L R P Out In Total Northbound St. [S] Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (7:45 AM)

34 City of Ottawa 11 Laurier Ave West Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1P 1J Count Name: THURSTON AND ST LAURENT JAN 15/14 Site Code: Start Date: 1/15/214 Page No: 9 Eastbound St. [W] Total In Out T P U R Peak Hour Data 1/15/214 4: PM Ending At 1/15/214 5: PM Car Truck Pedal Bike (Road) Ped T L U P Out In Total Westbound St. [E] U L R P Out In Total Northbound St. [S] Turning Movement Peak Hour Data Plot (4: PM)

35 Traffic Signal Timing City of Ottawa, Public Works Department Traffic Operations Intersection: Controller: Author: Main: Conroy Side: Thurston MS32 TSD: 5955 Michael Carneiro Date: 8#Jan#14 Existing Timing Plans Plan Ped Minimum Time AM Peak Off Peak PM Peak Night Standby Walk DW A+R Cycle FREE Offset X X NB Thru SB Thru EB Thru WB Thru SBLT 11 # # # # # # Phasing Sequence * Plan: 1 * * Plan: 2,3,4 & 9 * NOTE: For Plan 9, if the pedestrian signal is actuated, it will time 37.9 seconds for side street. Otherwise 36.9 seconds is the maximum split available. Schedule Weekday Saturday Sunday Time Plan Time Plan Time Plan :15 4 : 4 :15 4 6:3 1 6:3 2 6:3 2 9:3 2 22: 4 21: 4 15: 3 18:3 2 21:3 9 Notes : Time for each direction includes amber and all red intervals : Start of first phase should be used as reference point for offset Asterix (*): Indicates actuated phase (fp): Fully Protected Left Turn Pedestrian signal Cost is $26.25 ($25 + GST)

36 APPENDIX C 2211 Thurston Drive Transportation Overview Excerpts

37 P a g e 7 Figure 4: New Office Vehicle Trips Figure 5: Redistributed Existing Office Vehicle Trips

38 APPENDIX D 211 TRANS OD Survey Report Excerpts

39 14 Table 6-2: AM Peak Period Person-Trips All Modes, All Purposes (26 districts) District Name O/D Total Ottawa Centre 1 3,47 1, ,57 Ottawa Inner Area 5 9,42 17,18 1,96 1,45 4, ,26 1, , ,11 Ottawa East 1 3,4 3,67 7,28 2,11 2, , ,53 Beacon Hill 12 1,88 1,38 1,75 5,17 1, ,71 Alta Vista 14 4,18 4,97 1,94 2,69 16,22 1,98 3,1 1, , ,28 Hunt Club 18 3,32 3, ,99 8,55 3, ,28 Merivale 2 4,71 4, , ,98 4,96 2, , ,31 Ottawa West 24 4,27 3, , ,34 8,28 1, ,8 Bayshore/Cedarview 26 3,51 2, , ,71 4,87 14, , ,23 Orleans 3 7,33 4,8 2,84 4,18 5, ,94 1,46 1,21 29,9 1, , ,39 Rural East , ,54 Rural Southeast ,55 1, , ,74 South Gloucester / Leitrim ,97 1, , ,5 South Nepean 425 3,82 2, , ,31 1,83 3, , , ,52 Rural Southwest ,28 1, ,74 Kanata - Stittsville 5 4,56 3, , ,41 2,2 5, ,13 3,36 1, ,7 Rural West ,25 4, ,36 Île de Hull , ,33 Hull Périphérie 625 2,64 1, ,58 1, , ,44 Plateau 65 1,8 1, ,36 3,55 2, ,36 Aylmer 7 2,66 1, ,63 2, , ,94 Rural Northwest , , ,25 Pointe Gatineau 8 2,79 1, ,64 4, ,4 2, ,29 Gatineau Est 82 1, ,9 2, ,86 11, ,6 Rural Northeast , ,17 2,21 3,24 1, ,79 Masson-Angers ,15 3 6, ,95 External Total 71,22 62,1 23,1 21,1 59,33 19,62 49,61 32,91 35,23 38,37 2,66 6,12 6,73 23,37 8,1 46,6 6,22 26,43 32,5 4,34 13,48 5,31 25,58 19, 5,41 9,3 5,34 658,18 Values may not add due to rounding. 211 TRANS O-D Survey Report R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. January 213

40 141 Table 6-3: PM Peak Period Person-Trips All Modes, All Purposes (26 districts) District Name O/D Total Ottawa Centre 1 5,59 9,89 3,23 1,39 3,86 2,96 4,26 3,82 3,41 6, , , ,43 1,53 2, ,94 1,54 1, ,58 Ottawa Inner Area 5 3,48 25,5 4,52 1,19 5,7 2,8 4,75 2,63 3,24 4, , , , , ,2 Ottawa East ,32 11,35 2,23 2,55 1, , ,37 Beacon Hill ,25 2,42 6,49 1, , ,17 Alta Vista 14 1,19 4,9 3,65 1,81 19,66 6,86 3,61 1,89 1,82 6, ,56 1,76 2, , ,41 Hunt Club , ,4 9,87 1, , , ,36 Merivale 2 1,8 3,76 1, ,99 3,23 17,86 4,78 6,64 1, , , ,28 Ottawa West , , ,5 14,22 4,58 1, , , ,93 Bayshore/Cedarview , ,1 63 4,85 3,34 16,26 1, , , ,8 Orleans ,24 1,27 1,48 2, ,7 1, ,7 Rural East , ,98 Rural Southeast , ,67 South Gloucester / Leitrim , ,87 South Nepean , , ,43 1, ,58 Rural Southwest ,4 1, ,64 Kanata - Stittsville , ,84 1,1 3, ,5 1,41 37,47 3, ,59 Rural West ,66 3, ,16 Île de Hull , , ,59 4,4 2,19 2, ,63 1,93 1, ,72 Hull Périphérie ,51 12,7 3,44 2,5 1,41 4, 2,52 1,69 1, ,51 Plateau ,49 3, ,55 Aylmer , , ,69 Rural Northwest , ,47 Pointe Gatineau ,67 5 1, ,82 5,33 2,69 1, ,36 Gatineau Est ,21 1,3 1, ,56 Rural Northeast , ,68 Masson-Angers ,3 6,97-1,5 External ,42 Total 16,75 61,64 31,58 18,13 47,74 32,44 49,41 35,84 45,45 68,86 4,92 12,35 1,81 42,6 12,1 67,16 11,5 7,14 3,3 15,32 25,21 9,62 36,24 26,15 15,8 12,78 3,36 749,49 Values may not add due to rounding. 211 TRANS O-D Survey Report R.A. Malatest & Associates Ltd. January 213

41 APPENDIX E Synchro Analysis Reports

42 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Existing AM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 18% 33% 25% 2% % 5% 9% 4% 2% 3% 5% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m).... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m) Detector 1 Position(m) Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m) Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).... Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 38.% 38.% 38.% 38.% 51.% 51.% 51.% 11.% 62.% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 1

43 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Existing AM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead LeadCLag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None CCMin CCMin CCMin None CCMin Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS C D A B A B A Approach Delay Approach LOS C C B A Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 1 Actuated Cycle Length: 1 Offset: 84 (84%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 9 Control Type: ActuatedCCoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:.66 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.2% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 2

44 2: Thurston Drive & Thomas Spratt Place Existing AM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left 3 2 Volume Right 2 29 csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (m).3..4 Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 3

45 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Existing AM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B E C Intersection Summary Delay 29.7 Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 4

46 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Existing PM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 18% 33% 25% 2% % 5% 9% 4% 2% 3% 5% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m).... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m) Detector 1 Position(m) Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m) Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).... Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 4.% 4.% 4.% 4.% 6.% 6.% 6.% 6.% 6.% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 5

47 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Existing PM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag LeadCLag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None CCMin CCMin CCMin CCMin CCMin Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS C F A B A B E Approach Delay Approach LOS C F B E Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 95 Actuated Cycle Length: 95 Offset: 94 (99%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 12 Control Type: ActuatedCCoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.1 Intersection Signal Delay: 54.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: D ICU Level of Service E Splits and Phases: 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 6

48 2: Thurston Drive & Thomas Spratt Place Existing PM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left 29 2 Volume Right 2 3 csh Volume to Capacity.1.2. Queue Length 95th (m) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 7

49 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Existing PM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C F C Intersection Summary Delay 36.9 Level of Service E Intersection Capacity Utilization 8.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 8

50 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Existing AM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 18% 33% 25% 2% % 5% 9% 4% 2% 3% 5% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m).... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m) Detector 1 Position(m) Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m) Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).... Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 1.% 38.% 11.% 39.% 4.% 4.% 4.% 11.% 51.% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 9

51 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Existing AM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead LeadCLag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None CCMin CCMin CCMin None CCMin Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D C D A B A B A Approach Delay Approach LOS D C B A Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 1 Actuated Cycle Length: 1 Offset: 84 (84%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 15 Control Type: ActuatedCCoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:.67 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.4% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 1

52 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Existing AM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 3 Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 4% 4% 6% 22% 3% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m)... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m).... Detector 1 Position(m).... Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s).... Detector 1 Queue (s).... Detector 1 Delay (s).... Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m).6.6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).. Turn Type NA Perm NA NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 6.% 6.% 6.% 4.% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s)... Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 11

53 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Existing AM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag LeadCLag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Min None None Min Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 6 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay... Total Delay LOS A B A Approach Delay Approach LOS A B A Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 7 Actuated Cycle Length: 45.5 Natural Cycle: 7 Control Type: ActuatedCUncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:.79 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.2% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service E Splits and Phases: 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 12

54 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Existing PM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 18% 33% 25% 2% % 5% 9% 4% 2% 3% 5% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m).... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m) Detector 1 Position(m) Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m) Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).... Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 18.9% 4.% 18.9% 4.% 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 13

55 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Existing PM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag LeadCLag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None CCMin CCMin CCMin CCMin CCMin Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D D A A A B B Approach Delay Approach LOS D A B Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 95 Actuated Cycle Length: 95 Offset: 94 (99%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 15 Control Type: ActuatedCCoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:.84 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.1% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service D Splits and Phases: 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 14

56 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Existing PM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 29% 3% 4% 6% 4% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m)... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m).... Detector 1 Position(m).... Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s).... Detector 1 Queue (s).... Detector 1 Delay (s).... Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m).6.6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).. Turn Type NA Perm NA NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 68.9% 68.9% 68.9% 31.1% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s)... Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 15

57 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Existing PM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag LeadCLag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Max None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay... Total Delay LOS A B B Approach Delay Approach LOS A B B Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 9 Actuated Cycle Length: 77.8 Natural Cycle: 9 Control Type: ActuatedCUncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:.78 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.7% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service E Splits and Phases: 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 16

58 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Total AM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 18% 33% 25% 2% % 5% 9% 4% 2% 3% 5% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m).... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m) Detector 1 Position(m) Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m) Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).... Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 38.% 38.% 38.% 38.% 51.% 51.% 51.% 11.% 62.% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 17

59 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Total AM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead LeadCLag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None CCMin CCMin CCMin None CCMin Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS C D A B A B A Approach Delay Approach LOS C C B A Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 1 Actuated Cycle Length: 1 Offset: 84 (84%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 9 Control Type: ActuatedCCoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 7.9% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 18

60 2: Thurston Drive & Thomas Spratt Place Total AM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left 9 7 Volume Right 5 14 csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (m) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 19

61 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Total AM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B F C Intersection Summary Delay 42.9 Level of Service E Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 2

62 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Total PM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 18% 33% 25% 2% % 5% 9% 4% 2% 3% 5% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m).... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m) Detector 1 Position(m) Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m) Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).... Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 4.% 4.% 4.% 4.% 6.% 6.% 6.% 6.% 6.% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 21

63 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Total PM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag LeadCLag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None CCMin CCMin CCMin CCMin CCMin Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS C F A B A B E Approach Delay Approach LOS C F B E Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 95 Actuated Cycle Length: 95 Offset: 94 (99%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 13 Control Type: ActuatedCCoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.28 Intersection Signal Delay: 65.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: E ICU Level of Service E Splits and Phases: 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 22

64 2: Thurston Drive & Thomas Spratt Place Total PM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade % % % Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (m) Walking Speed (m/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (m) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left 13 8 Volume Right 7 11 csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (m) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 4.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 23

65 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Total PM 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C F C Intersection Summary Delay 47.6 Level of Service E Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 24

66

67 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Total AM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 18% 33% 25% 2% % 5% 9% 4% 2% 3% 5% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m).... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m) Detector 1 Position(m) Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m) Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).... Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 1.% 38.% 11.% 39.% 4.% 4.% 4.% 11.% 51.% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 25

68 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Total AM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lag Lead LeadCLag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None CCMin CCMin CCMin None CCMin Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D C D A B A B A Approach Delay Approach LOS D C B A Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 1 Actuated Cycle Length: 1 Offset: 84 (84%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 15 Control Type: ActuatedCCoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:.68 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 7.4% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 26

69 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Total AM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 2 3 Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 4% 4% 6% 22% 3% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m)... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m).... Detector 1 Position(m).... Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s).... Detector 1 Queue (s).... Detector 1 Delay (s).... Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m).6.6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).. Turn Type NA Perm NA NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 6.% 6.% 6.% 4.% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s)... Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 27

70 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Total AM Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag LeadCLag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Min None None Min Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 6 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay... Total Delay LOS A B B Approach Delay Approach LOS A B B Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 7 Actuated Cycle Length: 52.8 Natural Cycle: 8 Control Type: ActuatedCUncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:.8 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service E Splits and Phases: 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, Novatech Page 28

71 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Existing PM Peak Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 18% 33% 25% 2% % 5% 9% 4% 2% 3% 5% 13% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m).... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m) Detector 1 Position(m) Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m) Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).... Turn Type Prot Prot NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 18.9% 4.% 18.9% 4.% 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% 41.1% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, NECL Page 29

72 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Existing PM Peak Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag LeadCLag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None CCMin CCMin CCMin CCMin CCMin Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D D A A A B B Approach Delay Approach LOS D A B Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 95 Actuated Cycle Length: 95 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 15 Control Type: ActuatedCCoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:.87 Intersection Signal Delay: 2.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.1% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service E Splits and Phases: 4: Conroy Road & Thurston Drive Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, NECL Page 3

73 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Existing PM Peak Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (m) Storage Lanes 1 Taper Length (m) Lane Util. Factor Ped Bike Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (k/h) Link Distance (m) Travel Time (s) Confl. Peds. (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 6% 29% 3% 4% 6% 4% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(m) Link Offset(m)... Crosswalk Width(m) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (k/h) Number of Detectors Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left Leading Detector (m) Trailing Detector (m).... Detector 1 Position(m).... Detector 1 Size(m) Detector 1 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s).... Detector 1 Queue (s).... Detector 1 Delay (s).... Detector 2 Position(m) Detector 2 Size(m).6.6 Detector 2 Type Cl+Ex Cl+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s).. Turn Type NA Perm NA NA Protected Phases Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 68.9% 68.9% 68.9% 31.1% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) AllCRed Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s)... Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, NECL Page 31

74 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Existing PM Peak Mitigated 121 Thomas Spratt Place 3/11/214 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag LeadCLag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Max None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay... Total Delay LOS A B B Approach Delay Approach LOS A B B Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 9 Actuated Cycle Length: 78.8 Natural Cycle: 9 Control Type: ActuatedCUncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio:.82 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 9.3% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: B ICU Level of Service E Splits and Phases: 1: Thurston Drive & St. Laurent Boulevard Synchro 8 Report Brad Byvelds, NECL Page 32

75 APPENDIX F OTM Signal Justification Calculations

76

77

78

Barrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief

Barrhaven Honda Dealership. Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON. Transportation Brief Barrhaven Honda Dealership Dealership Drive, Ottawa, ON Transportation Brief Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 September, 2015 File: 115136 Ref: R-2015-152

More information

Provide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes;

Provide an overview of the development proposal including projected site traffic volumes; December 19, 2013 File: 163600935 Attention: Troy Elliott Carl Elliott Limited 15-1831 Robertson Road PO Box 11117 Nepean, Ontario K1H 7T8 Dear Mr. Elliott, Reference: 2235 and 2265 Robertson Road Transportation

More information

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study

886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited March 2013 886 March Road McDonald's Transportation Study Submitted by: HDR Corporation 100 York Boulevard, Suite 300 Richmond Hill, ON L4B 1J8 (905) 882-4100 www.hdrinc.com

More information

Traffic Analysis For Approved Uses within the St. Lucie West DRI Aldi Port St. Lucie, FL Prepared for: Bohler Engineering, LLC 1000 Corporate Drive Suite 250 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33334 Prepared by: 10795

More information

April Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief

April Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 102 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief April 26 Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief Salvation Army Barrhaven Church 2 Bill Leathem Drive Transportation Brief prepared for: The Salvation Army 2 Overlea Blvd.

More information

LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW

LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW LOST LAKE CORRIDOR REVIEW Prepared for: Prepared by: Broadview Developments Inc. c/o Westbrook Consulting Watt Consulting Group Our File: 2064.B01 Date: October 31, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...

More information

Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview

Re: Residential Development - Ogilvie/Cummings Transportation Overview 1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com March 28, 2012 OUR REF: TO3088TOY Barry J. Hobin & Architects 63 Pamilla Street Ottawa, ON K1S 3K7

More information

Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership

Re: Cyrville Road Car Dealership 1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com February 25, 2013 OUR REF: TO3098TOE Mark Motors of Ottawa 611 Montreal Road Ottawa, ON K1K 0T8 Attention:

More information

Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc Hazeldean Road. Transportation Impact Study. Ottawa, Ontario. Project ID

Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc Hazeldean Road. Transportation Impact Study. Ottawa, Ontario. Project ID Wellings Communities Holding Inc and Extendicare (Canada) Inc. 5731 Hazeldean Road Transportation Impact Study Ottawa, Ontario Project ID 160401195 Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. March 2016 WELLINGS

More information

Village of Richmond Transportation Brief

Village of Richmond Transportation Brief Village of Richmond Transportation Brief GENIVAR Project Number 111-18482-00 June 21 st, 2011 www.genivar.com GENIVAR 15 Fitzgerald Road, Suite 100 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA K2H 9G1 Telephone: 613-829-2800

More information

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for: L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES

More information

Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use

Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use Paisley & Whitelaw - Paisley Park OPA / ZBA for Mixed Density Residential Use Transportation Impact Study City of Guelph Prepared for: Armel Corporation August 2018 Table of Contents 1 Introduction...

More information

(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals

(A) Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals February 14th, 2014 BY E-MAIL: wally.dubyk@ottawa.ca City of Ottawa Planning and Growth Management Branch 110 Laurier Ave. W., 4 th Floor, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1J1 Attention: Wally Dubyk, C.E.T (A) Project

More information

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO:

MEMO. McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION. File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February 1, 2010 COPIES: OUR FILE: SUBJECT: TO: McCORMICK RANKIN CORPORATION 2655 North Sheridan Way Mississauga, Ontario, L5K 2P8 Tel: (905)823-8500 Fax: (905) 823-8503 E-mail: mrc@mrc.ca Website: www.mrc.ca MEMO TO: File FROM: Keyur Shah DATE: February

More information

267 O Connor Street Residential Development

267 O Connor Street Residential Development M a y 2014 267 O Connor Street Residential Development Transportation Brief Google 2014 Bing 2014 Prepared for: MASTERCRAFT STARWOOD Prepared by: Study 267 O'Connor Type Street May 2014 Study Residential

More information

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009

HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009 6: Brian Street & LC 111 5/26/2009 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Volume (veh/h) 116 20 8 405 137 56 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.67 0.67 0.89 0.89 Hourly flow

More information

Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet)

Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet) Market Street Road Diet Wilmington, NC 2016 Final Technical Report US 17 Corridor Study Update (Market Street Road Diet) Wilmington, NC Parsons Brinckerhoff January 2016 FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT US 17 Corridor

More information

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 2190986ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 October 6, 2010 110-502 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny

More information

MEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC

MEMORANDUM. Date: November 4, Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company. Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis WC MEMORANDUM Date: November 4, 2013 To: From: Subject: Cheryl Burrell, Pebble Beach Company Rob Rees, P.E. Inclusionary Housing Transportation Analysis As requested, Fehr & Peers is providing clarification

More information

Wellington Street West

Wellington Street West Transportation Brief prepared for: 185 Davenport Road Suite 300 Toronto, ON M5R 1J1 prepared by: 1223 Michael Street Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 November 5, 2013 TO3131TOH Transportation Brief November

More information

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study

Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri. Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study Traffic Impact Study Proposed Commercial Development Ballwin, Missouri Technical Memorandum for Traffic Impact Study Crawford, Bunte, Brammeier May 1, 2009 MEMORANDUM Date: April 24, 2009 To: From: Subject:

More information

Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis

Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 9821 425.339.8266 Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish January 218 GTC #17-37

More information

APPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets

APPENDICES. APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets APPENDICES APPENDIX D Synchro Level of Service Output Sheets Lanes, Volumes, Timings NO BUILD 2016 PM 8: 10th St & Thain Rd 10/05/2016 Lane Group NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR

More information

Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents

Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: A Table of Contents Traffic Impact Study Hudson Street Parking Garage MC Project No.: 15001714A Table of Contents Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS... 4 III. 2015 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS...

More information

Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois

Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois Proposed Office Building Traffic Impact Study 1714-1720 Chicago Avenue Evanston, Illinois Prepared For: HOLABIRD & ROOT, LLC Prepared by: Eriksson Engineering Associates, Ltd. 145 Commerce Drive, Ste A,

More information

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1

Table 1 - Land Use Comparisons - Proposed King s Wharf Development. Retail (SF) Office (SF) 354 6,000 10, Land Uses 1 Ref. No. 171-6694 Phase 2 November 23, 217 Mr. David Quilichini, Vice President Fares & Co. Developments Inc. 31 Place Keelson Sales Centre DARTMOUTH NS B2Y C1 Sent Via Email to David@faresinc.com RE:

More information

Lakeside Terrace Development

Lakeside Terrace Development Lakeside Terrace Development City of Barrie, County of Simcoe Traffic Brief for: Type of Document: Final Report Project Number: JDE 1617 Date Submitted: April 29 th, 216 4/29/16 John Northcote, P.Eng.

More information

JRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3

JRL consulting. March Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3 March 2015 Prepared for Hartland Developments Limited 1993 Hammonds Plains Road Hammonds Plains, NS B4B 1P3 JRL consulting JRL consulting TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION... 2 1.1 BACKGROUND... 2 2 EXISTING

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 2014 UPDATED

More information

Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017

Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017 Salvini Consulting Inc. 459 Deer Ridge Drive Kitchener, ON N2P 0A7 519-591-0426 November 8, 2017 Revised December 20, 2017 Laurie Wills, PEng Deputy Director of Public Works Town of Cobourg 740 Division

More information

STANDARD LIMITATIONS

STANDARD LIMITATIONS STANDARD LIMITATIONS This report was prepared by MMM Group (MMM) for the account of Spire Construction Inc. (the Client). The disclosure of any information contained in this report is the sole responsibility

More information

RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS

RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS RESPONSE TO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY COMMENTS Proposed Gas Station 40 Arthur Street (Highway 26), Town of the Blue Mountains (Thornbury), County of Grey, Ontario AUGUST 2013 August 27, 2013 MR. REG RUSSWURM

More information

Traffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers

Traffic Impact Study. Eastern Springs. A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY. April Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers Traffic Impact Study For Eastern Springs A Proposed Development in Manorville, NY April 2018 Haas Group Inc Transportation Planners and Engineers Table of Contents 1) Executive Summary... 2 2) Study Purpose...

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village

Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village Traffic Impact Analysis Farmington Center Village Route 4 (Farmington Avenue) Farmington, Connecticut Prepared for: The Town of Farmington, CT Prepared By: BL Companies Meriden, Connecticut December 2016

More information

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZINFANDEL LANE / SILVERADO TRAIL INTERSECTION TRAFFIC ANALYSIS UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RAYMOND VINEYARDS WINERY USE PERMIT MODIFICATION #P11-00156 AUGUST 5, 2014 PREPARED BY: OMNI-MEANS,

More information

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017 Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,

More information

1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief

1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief 1140 Wellington Street West Transportation Brief October 2013 Study 1140 Wellington Type Street West October 2013 Study Transportation Name Brief February 2011 TB Check List TIS / TB/ CTS Check List prepared

More information

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia

Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia Sugarland Crossing Gwinnett County, Georgia S IGNAL W ARRANT A NALYSIS For the Intersection of: Sugarloaf Parkway / Richards Middle School Driveway / Sugarland Crossing Main Site Driveway Prepared for:

More information

Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida

Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida Traffic Impact Study Morgan Road Commerce Park Pasco County, Florida Summary Report June 2008 Prepared by: 12909 N 56 th Street # 201 Tampa, FL 33617 Ph: (813) 988-3180 Fax: (813) 343-6854 Morgan Road

More information

MMM Group Limited. Communities. Transportation. Buildings. Infrastructure

MMM Group Limited. Communities. Transportation. Buildings. Infrastructure MMM Group Limited Traffic Study CASA MIA Community Care Facility Vancouver, BC Communities Transportation Buildings Infrastructure February 2013 5011001-033 STANDARD LIMITATIONS This report was prepared

More information

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Barrhaven Fellowship CRC 3058 Jockvale Road Ottawa, ON K2J 2W7 December 7, 2016 116-649 Report_1.doc D. J.

More information

Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality

Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality Rockingham Ridge Plaza Commercial Development Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Study Final Draft Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T

More information

MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA

MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA MURRIETA APARTMENTS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF MURRIETA, CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 20, 2012 Prepared for: Golden Eagle Multi-Family Properties, LLC 6201 Oak Canyon Rd., Suite 250 Irvine, CA 92618 Prepared

More information

CastleGlenn Consultants Inc.

CastleGlenn Consultants Inc. CastleGlenn Consultants Inc. Engineers, Project Managers & Planners March 11 th, 2013 Domenic Idone, P. Eng Planning Manager R.W. Tomlinson Ltd. 5597 Power Road Ottawa, Ontario K1G 3N4 Dear Mr. Idone:

More information

Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th

Ref. No Task 3. April 28, Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th Ref. No. 151-00564 Task 3 April 28, 2015 Mr. Cesar Saleh, P. Eng. VP Planning and Design W.M. Fares Group th 3480 Joseph Howe Drive, 5 Floor HALIFAX NS B3L 4H7 Sent via Email to ceasr.saleh@wmfares.com

More information

June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903

June 21, Mr. Jeff Mark The Landhuis Company 212 North Wahsatch Avenue, Suite 301. Colorado Springs, CO 80903 LSC TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. 545 East Pikes Peak Avenue, Suite 210 Colorado Springs, CO 80903 (719) 633-2868 FAX (719) 633-5430 E-mail: lsc@lsctrans.com Website: http://www.lsctrans.com June 21,

More information

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario April 18 th, 2017 Mr. Kevin Yemm Vice President, Land Development Richraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa, Ontario (Tel: 613.739.7111 / e-mail: keviny@richcraft.com) Re:

More information

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...

More information

MEMORANDUM November 19, 2012

MEMORANDUM November 19, 2012 COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS CENTRAL NAUGATUCK VALLEY 60 NORTH MAIN ST 3RD Floor WATERBURY, CT 06702-1403 (203)757-0535 Web Site: www.cogcnv.org E-Mail: cogcnv@cogcnv.org November 19, 2012 MEMORANDUM 111912

More information

One Harbor Point Residential

One Harbor Point Residential Residential Gig Harbor, WA Transportation Impact Analysis January 23, 2017 Prepared for: Neil Walter Company PO Box 2181 Tacoma, WA 98401 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest 11400 SE

More information

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI

LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES. Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI LATSON INTERCHANGE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC STUDIES Genoa Township, Livingston County, MI DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY FOR I-96 AT LATSON RD INTERCHANGE Livingston County CS 47065 JN 101622C Submitted to: Michigan Department

More information

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited.

RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited. RICHMOND OAKS HEALTH CENTRE 6265 PERTH STREET OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Guycoki (Eastern) Limited June 16, 2016 116-638 Brief_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting

More information

1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace

1012 & 1024 McGarry Terrace December 217 112 & 124 McGarry Terrace Transportation Impact Study 112 & 124 McGarry Terrace Transportation Impact Study prepared for: Lépine Corporation 32 March Road Kanata, ON K2K 2E3 prepared by: 1223

More information

ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ARVADA TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Prepared for: Arvada Urban Renewal Authority 5601 Olde Wadsworth Boulevard, Suite 210 Arvada, Colorado 80002 (720) 898-7062 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt

More information

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Upper Broadway Road Diet Summary of Findings

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Upper Broadway Road Diet Summary of Findings TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Summary of Findings Date: June 17, 2014 Project #: 17121.15 To: Si Lau, P.E.; City of Oakland, CA From: Erin Ferguson, P.E.; Aaron Elias, P.E.; Daphne Dethier; and Mark Bowman, P.E.;

More information

10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis

10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98201 425.339.8266 10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish September 2018

More information

KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266

KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266 KUM & GO #300 PECOS STREET & 88 TH AVENUE THORNTON, COLORADO TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY REVISION 1 PREPARED FOR KUM & GO 6400 WESTOWN PARKWAY WEST DES MOINES, IOWA 50266 JANUARY 23, 2014 OA PROJECT NO. 013-1721

More information

700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1. Submitted by:

700 Hunt Club Road. Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1. Submitted by: 700 Hunt Club Road Transportation Impact Study - Addendum #1 Submitted by: 14 June 2013 1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com 14 June 2013

More information

Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit Application Transportation Assessment

Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit Application Transportation Assessment MEMORANDUM Date: June 22, 2018 Project #: 21562 To: Colin McArthur, AICP From: Project: Subject: Zachary Bugg, PhD, Diego Arguea, PE, and Phill Worth University of Oregon North Campus Conditional Use Permit

More information

Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA

Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA Addendum to Traffic Impact Analysis for Port Marigny Site Mandeville, LA (St. Tammany Parish Mandeville, LA) Prepared For The Pittman Companies Michael N Pittman, MD 328 East Boston St Covington, LA 70433

More information

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study Final Report (Revised) March 2011 Submitted to: Groupe Lépine Ottawa Project No. 09-1613 Submitted by: Groupe Lépine

More information

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM for ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT US 460 Bypass Interchange and Southgate Drive Relocation State Project No.: 0460-150-204, P101, R201, C501, B601; UPC 99425

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

Traffic Impact Analysis Update Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS

More information

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Invecta Development (Ottawa) Corporation 758 Shanks Height Milton, ON L9T 7P7 May

More information

C. iv) Analysis/Results

C. iv) Analysis/Results The Pettengill Road project is located outside the borders of the model in an external zone. As a result, inserting all Pettengill Road trip generation assumptions into the NRPC model and running a new

More information

Minto Mahogany Stage 2

Minto Mahogany Stage 2 Minto Mahogany Stage 2 Transportation Impact Study prepared for: Minto Developments Inc 200-180 Kent Street Ottawa, ON K1P 0B6 prepared by: 1223 Michael Street Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1J 7T2 June 27, 2017

More information

Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis

Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 8 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98 45.9.8 Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish February 8 GTC #7-87 Sweetwater Landing Traffic

More information

CitiGate Retail Development

CitiGate Retail Development CitiGate Retail Development Transportation Impact Study prepared for: Trinity Development Group Inc. Sun Life Financial Centre, East Tower 3250 Bloor Street West, Suite 1000 Toronto, ON M8X 2X9 prepared

More information

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1.

DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava. July 9, Overview_1. DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY 1627 MAXIME STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW Prepared for: Subhas Bhargava July 9, 2015 115-620 Overview_1.doc D. J. Halpenny & Associates Ltd. Consulting Transportation

More information

BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM

BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM BUCKLEY ANNEX REDEVELOPMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ADDENDUM Prepared for: City and County of Denver Prepared by: Contact: Brian Bern, P.E., PTOE 303.572.0200 On Behalf of: Lowry Redevelopment Authority

More information

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report As part of the City s Transportation Master Plan, this report reviews the technical feasibility of the proposed conversion of the current

More information

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1

More information

Half Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment. Full Report. March 15, Prepared for: Mattamy Homes.

Half Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment. Full Report. March 15, Prepared for: Mattamy Homes. Half Moon Bay North Apartment Block Transportation Impact Assessment Full Report March 15, 2018 Prepared for: Mattamy Homes Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Ltd. Table of Contents 1.0 SCREENING... 1 1.1

More information

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive. Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc.

TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS. Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive. Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc. TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS Wawa US 441 and Morningside Drive Prepared for: Brightwork Real Estate, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1 Project Description... 1 Estimated Daily Project Traffic... 3 Estimated

More information

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1 Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West

More information

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Warrenville, Illinois Prepared For: Prepared By: April 11, 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Existing Conditions... 4 Site Location...

More information

APPENDIX G. Traffic Data

APPENDIX G. Traffic Data APPENDIX G Traffic Data HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Duanesburg Road & I-88 Ramps 10/7/2004 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Ideal Flow (vphpl)

More information

Appendix B: Traffic Reports

Appendix B: Traffic Reports Appendix B: Traffic Reports 407 TRANSITWAY - KENNEDY ROAD TO BROCK ROAD MINISTRY OF TRANSPORTATION - CENTRAL REGION Report Markham Road Station Traffic Study Prepared for Ministry of Transportation, Ontario

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Emerald Isle Commercial Development Prepared by SEPI Engineering & Construction Prepared for Ark Consulting Group, PLLC March 2016 I. Executive Summary A. Site Location The Emerald

More information

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for Galloway & Company

More information

830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality

830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality 830 Main Street Halifax Regional Municipality Traffic Impact Statement Final Report Prepared by: GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 www.griffininc.ca Prepared

More information

Mobilia Centre Merivale Road and 530/540 West Hunt Club Road Transportation Overview and Parking Study

Mobilia Centre Merivale Road and 530/540 West Hunt Club Road Transportation Overview and Parking Study Final Report Mobilia Centre - 1872 Merivale Road and 530/540 West Hunt Club Road Transportation Overview and Parking Study Prepared for CPD Developments by IBI Group August 13, 2014 IBI GROUP FINAL REPORT

More information

Date: December 20, Project #:

Date: December 20, Project #: To: Craig Rottenberg Long s Jewelers 60A South Avenue Burlington, MA 01803 From: Patrick Dunford, P.E. Senior Project Manager Date: December 20, 2018 Project #: 14416.00 Re: Burlington Mall Proposed Long

More information

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...3 II. Project Description...3 III. Existing Conditions...3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions...8 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...14

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas February 15, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064524900 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis

More information

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering

Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering Aldridge Transportation Consultants, LLC Advanced Transportation Planning and Traffic Engineering John M.W. Aldridge, PE, PTOE, AICP 1082 Chimney Rock Road Colorado Registered Professional Engineer Highlands

More information

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills

Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Oakbrook Village Plaza City of Laguna Hills Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared by: HDR Engineering 3230 El Camino Real, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92602 October 2012 Revision 3 D-1 Oakbrook Village Plaza Laguna

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Submitted by April 9, 2009 Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona,

More information

Parking/Traffic Assessment Study

Parking/Traffic Assessment Study Brock Road Industrial Mall 985 Brock Road South City of Pickering Parking/Traffic Assessment Study Prepared by: Tranplan Associates, Toronto Toronto 416-670-2005 Sudbury 705-522-0272 Peterborough 705-874-3638

More information

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017 Movin Out June 2017 1.0 Introduction The proposed Movin Out development is a mixed use development in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of West Broadway and Fayette Avenue in the City of Madison.

More information

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND Prepared for: Department of Public Works Anne Arundel County Prepared by: URS Corporation 4 North Park Drive, Suite 3 Hunt Valley,

More information

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Study Plainfield, Illinois August 2018 Prepared for: Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Existing Conditions

More information

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 320 Kirkland,

More information

Traffic Engineering Study

Traffic Engineering Study Traffic Engineering Study Bellaire Boulevard Prepared For: International Management District Technical Services, Inc. Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3580 November 2009 Executive Summary has been requested

More information

Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2. Prepared By:

Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2. Prepared By: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE TTC MCNICOLL BUS GARAGE CITY OF TORONTO Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2 Prepared By: Canada Inc. 4th Floor, 3 Leek Crescent

More information

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 2018 Highway & Bridge Project PIN 6754.12 Route 13 Connector Road Chemung County February 2018 Appendix

More information

Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis

Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis Winnetka Avenue Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis January 4, 2019 Prepared by City of Los Angeles Department of Transportation Active Transportation Division Winnetka Ave Bike Lanes Traffic Impact Analysis

More information

RE: Taggart Retail Site Plan: Kanata West Proposal for Traffic Impact Study: Addendum #2

RE: Taggart Retail Site Plan: Kanata West Proposal for Traffic Impact Study: Addendum #2 1223 Michael Street, Suite 100, Ottawa, Ontario K1J 7T2 Tel: 613.738.4160 Fax: 613.739.7105 www.delcan.com July 9, 2014 OUR REF: TO3073TOK00 BY EMAIL: jparkes@taggart.ca/aturner@taggart.ca Taggart Commercial

More information

TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN AND TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE RESORT CENTRE ASP

TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN AND TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE RESORT CENTRE ASP TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN AND TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THREE SISTERS MOUNTAIN VILLAGE RESORT CENTRE ASP OCTOBER 2016 STANDARD LIMITATIONS This report was prepared by MMM Group Limited, a WSP

More information

Intersection LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive N B 16.1 B 17.5

Intersection LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive N B 16.1 B 17.5 Intersection No- LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive N B 16.1 B 17.5 Ü Intersection No- LOS Delay (Sec) LOS Delay (Sec.) US 3/ Hawthorne Drive S C 32.6 D 43.0 Intersection No- LOS Delay

More information