Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) Thursday, August 18, 2011 Frank Quon, PE Lan Saadatnejadi, PE

Transcription

1 Metro s Highway Program Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) Thursday, August 18, 2011 Frank Quon, PE Lan Saadatnejadi, PE

2 Los Angeles County Sources: Metro 2009 Long Range Transportation Plan 2

3 Los Angeles County Diverse region with over 10 million residents in 89 local jurisdictions Daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT): 230 million Daily vehicle hours traveled: over 8 million hours Los Angeles area residents spend 70 hours each year stuck in traffic During the last decade, Metro added more than 100 route miles of major arterials and over 5,000 intersections have had signal timing equipment installed Measure R funding is increasing the investment in LA County's highway system by $7.8 billion Sources: Metro 2009 Long Range Transportation Plan 3

4 Los Angeles County Carpool (HOV) Lanes HOV facilities in Los Angeles County carry approximately 331,000 vehicles or 780,000 people per day Length in miles: 219 Lane Miles (both directions, each lane): 425 Metro fund programmed for HOV lanes since 1991: $2.7 billion Sources: 4

5 Metro Investments in Highway Elements FY2010 FY2040 Forecast Freeway (Carpool, Gap Closures, Interchanges): $10.6 billion Soundwall: $1.2 billion Freeway Service Patrol (FSP): $989 million ExpressLanes: $210 million Source: LRTP Financial Update April

6 Los Angeles County Subregions 6

7 Highway Projects 7

8 I-5 Widening and HOV Location: I-5 between the Los Angeles/Orange County Line and I-605 Project Description: Add one (1) general purpose lane and one (1) HOV lane in each direction, reconstruct 18 under/overcrossings, new ramps, median and shoulders to current highway design standards Funding: Project cost estimated at $1.62B Status: Six segments, four in design Lead Agency: Caltrans 8

9 I-5 Widening and HOV Continued 9

10 I-5 Widening and HOV Continued Segment 1 Alondra Construction: $ 65.5M Award: November 2011 Segment 2 Valley View Construction: $124.9M Award: March 2013 Segment 3 Shoemaker Construction: $131.7M Award: June 2012 Segment 4 Imperial Construction: $151M Award: June 2012 Segment 5 Florence Construction: $131.7M Award: March 2013 Carmenita Interchange Construction: $175.6M Award: August

11 I-710 Corridor Project EIR/EIS and/or Early Action Projects Location: I-710 from Ocean Blvd to SR-60 (18 miles) Project Description: Conduct EIR/EIS with five alternatives: Alternative 1 No Build Alternative 5A 10 General Purpose (GP) Lanes Alternative 6A 10 GP Lanes + Freight Corridor Alternative 6B 10 GP Lanes + Zero Emissions Freight Corridor Alternative 6C Tolled Freight Corridor 11

12 I-710 Corridor ProjectEIS/EIR Funding: Measure R - $590 million Potential P3 opportunity Schedule: DEIR/DEIS - February 2012 Final DEIR/DEIS - February 2013 Early Action Projects Continued 12

13 I-710 Corridor ProjectEIS/EIR Project Opportunities: Early Action Projects Continued RFP for North Utility Study issued on 6/22/11 RFP for Central Utility Study expected to be issued Aug 2011 Firestone Blvd S/B on-ramp reconfiguration Other soundwall, local interchange and arterial improvements 13

14 I-605 Corridor Hot Spot Interchanges Location: I-605 and transverse corridors within the Gateway Cities/Southeast portion of the County Project Description: Feasibility Study to further analyze improvement alternatives for identified hot spots, including: Freeway to Freeway Interchanges Arterials Local Ramps 14

15 I-605 Corridor Hot Spot Interchanges Continued Funding: Measure R provides $590 million Schedule: Feasibility Study will be completed in October 2012 Project Opportunities: Design and construction for individual hot spot projects 15

16 State Route 710 Gap Location: I-710 from Valley Blvd to State Route 134 / Interstate 210 Project Description: Conduct EIR/EIS of I-710 Gap between the cities of Alhambra and Pasadena Initial study area bordered by Routes 2, 10, 210 and 605 Funding: Measure R - $780 million Potential P3 opportunities 16

17 State Route 710 Gap Continued Schedule: Target Board approval of EIR/EIS award Sept DEIS/DEIR Target Fall 2013 Final EIS/EIR Target Fall 2014 Project Status: EIS/EIR RFP issued on 6/2/11 Proposals received on 7/18/11 Community outreach and public involvement RFP issued 6/28/11 Proposals due 8/12/11 17

18 I-5 Corridor Projects Courtesy of Caltrans District 7 18

19 Segment Project Segment Design Status 1 SR-134 to Magnolia Blvd. 2 Magnolia Blvd. to Buena Vista St. (Empire & Burbank) 3 Buena Vista St. to SR-170 Current Schedule R/W Status Begin Construction End Construction 100% 100% Oct Dec % 20% Oct Apr % 100% Oct Dec SR-170 to SR % 100% May 2010 Dec SR-118 to SR % 100% June 2009 Nov I-5/SR-14 Direct HOV Connector 7 SR-14 to Pico Canyon Rd. Truck Lanes 8 SR-14 to Parker Rd. HOV/Truck Lanes 100% 100% May 2008 June % 100% Dec Aug % 0% Oct March 2017 Courtesy of Caltrans District 7 19

20 Funding Sources 20 Courtesy of Caltrans District 7

21 I-10 HOV Lanes Seg. Limits Dsgn ROW Beg. Const. End Const. 1 I-605 to Puente Avenue 100% 100% Oct Nov Puente Ave. to Citrus Ave. 90% 60% Feb Nov Citrus Ave. to SR-57 70% 15% Jan Nov

22 Funding Sources STPL-R 31% Local 0.2% TCRP 5% STIP 30% CMIA 5% CMAQ 29% Courtesy of Caltrans District 7 22

23 SR-138 Capacity Enhancements 23

24 SR-138 Capacity Enhancements Seg. Limits Dsgn ROW Beg. Const th to East of Ave. T 96 th St to 106 th St Longview to 146 th St Twin Bridge Construction *No Measure R funds assigned to these segments. C O M P L E T E D C O M P L E T E D C O M P L E T E D C O M P L E T E D End. Const. 1 Avenue T to 60 th St. E. Feb Jul Jan Jul T-8 to 77 th St. East TBD TBD TBD TBD 4 W. of 77 th St. to 77 th St. E. TBD TBD TBD TBD 5 Littlerock, 77 th St. to 87 th St. 100% 100% Nov Apr th St. E. to 96 th St. E. TBD TBD TBD TBD th St. to 126 th St. E. TBD TBD TBD TBD th St. to Longview Feb Jul Jan Jul Llano, 165 th St. to 190 th St. 100% Nov Nov Sep Llano, 185 th St. to Junct. 18 Feb Jul Jan Jul th St. to 89 th St. E. TBD TBD TBD TBD 24

25 High Desert Corridor (HDC) SR-14 (LA) to SR-18 (SB) 63 miles Freeway / Expressway / Toll Potential P3 Env. Doc. Mid

26 Soundwall Program 26

27 Soundwalls Pkg Location Dsgn ROW Beg. Const. End. Const. 1 Los Angeles SR-170 C O M P L E T E D 2 3 Arcadia I-210 Azusa & Glendora I-210 C O M P L E T E D C O M P L E T E D 4 Arcadia & Monrovia I % 100% 10/ / Los Angeles I % 100% 10/2011 3/ Long Beach I % 100% 10/2011 9/ Burbank & Los Angeles SR % 100% 10/2011 3/ Whittier & LA Co. I % 100% 10/2011 9/ Pasadena & Arcadia I-210 (3 of 4 locations) 100% 100% TBD TBD 11 Los Angeles I-405 & SR /2011 TBD TBD TBD 27

28 Arroyo Verdugo Operational Improvements ($170 M) 28

29 Arroyo Verdugo Summary Table Burbank (6) $5.0 $3.0 $1.0 $1.3 $10.3 La Cañada Flintridge (1) Prior Cities FY12 FY13 FY14 Years $0.3 Total Board Approved (in millions) $0.6 $3.2 $0.5 $4.6 Glendale (15) $10.5 $4.8 $1.9 $2.3 $19.5 Totals $15.8 $8.4 $6.1 $4.1 $

30 Las Virgenes-Malibu Operational Improvements ($175 M) 34

31 Las Virgenes-Malibu Summary Table Westlake Village(3) Prior Cities FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 Years $11.6 Total Board Approved (in millions) $1.5 $13.1 Agoura Hills (6) $6.6 $4.0 $5.0 $8.0 $11.0 $6.0 $40.6 Calabasas (7) $5.1 $7.0 $9.0 $1.0 $2.0 $24.1 Malibu (3) $1.8 $2.0 $10.2 $14.0 Totals $23.3 $12.5 $14.0 $10.8 $13.0 $18.2 $

32 South Bay Subregion ($906 M) 40

33 Summary Table Cities FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16 Total Board Approved (in millions) CALTRANS (8) $8.0 $12.0 $4.0 $24.0 CARSON (1) $1.2 $1.2 COUNTY (1) $0.5 $0.5 $1.0 $24.9 $26.9 EL SEGUNDO (3) $2.5 $0.2 $1.8 $4.4 GARDENA (3) $0.5 $0.4 $7.2 $8.2 HAWTHORNE (3) $2.1 $0.6 $4.2 $6.9 HERMOSA BEACH (2) $0.2 $1.0 $1.2 INGLEWOOD (1) $0.3 $3.2 $3.5 LAWNDALE (2) $0.1 $0.5 $1.4 $2.0 LOMITA (2) $0.1 $0.8 $0.9 MANHATTAN BEACH (5) $0.2 $4.6 $7.0 $1.5 $13.3 REDONDO BEACH (7) $2.4 $0.8 $0.5 $4.6 $8.3 TORRANCE (6) $4.5 $11.0 $9.8 $18.0 $43.3 Totals $21.4 $35.8 $33.7 $50.7 $2.5 $

34 2011 Call for Projects Preliminary Project Funding Strategy 55

35 Overview Programs federal, state and local funds over three-year period (FY 15, 16 and 17) Competitive process cities, county and JPAs (under sponsorship of city or county) eligible to apply Funds awarded to projects based on regional significance, need/mobility benefit, local match, cost effectiveness and sustainability 56

36 Preliminary Funding Strategy 180 applications submitted, 64 recommended for funding Projects assigned a minimum score of 70 points eligible for funding qualifying line For several modes, qualifying projects beyond Boardapproved modal marks RSTI, Bike, Ped & TEA modes Fund those with dollars expected from uncontested projects in the 2011 Deobligations process 57

37 Preliminary Funding Strategy Continued Goods Movement mode recommendations below modal mark Surplus reallocated to Call Reserve Fund TAC may recommend additional projects for funding from Call Reserve Fund 58

38 Recommended Changes to Preliminary Modal Category Funding Marks Modal Category Approved Modal Mark (1) Amount Recommended Difference Regional Surface Transportation Improvements $19,788,000 $20,215,691 $427,691 Goods Movement Improvements $17,850,000 $17,320,744 -$529,256 Transit Capital $14,210,000 $14,210,000 $0 Transportation Enhancements $2,484,000 $2,685,835 $201,835 Signal Synchronization & Bus Speed Improvements $22,542,000 $22,542,000 $0 Bikeway Improvements $15,614,000 $15,913,630 $299,630 Pedestrian Improvements $7,979,000 $8,229,016 $250,016 Transportation Demand Management $3,774,000 $3,774,000 $0 Reserve $2,856,000 $3,385,256 $529,256 (3) TOTAL FUNDING MARK $107,097,000 (2) $108,276,172 $1,179,172 (4) (1) Approved by Board of Directors in March 2011 (2) Total funding mark includes the preliminary fund estimate of $102 million plus $5 million for FY 14-15, deobligated from 2010 Countywide Call for Projects Deobligation Process (3) Surplus funds transferred from Goods Movement Improvements mode (4) Preliminary estimated deobligated funds of $1.18 million from the 2011 Deobligations will supplement the funding marks 59

39 Next Steps Released preliminary funding recommendations July 2011 TAC Appeals August 9, 2011 Metro Board considers approval of 2011 Call for Projects at the September 22, 2011Board Meeting 60

40 Questions & Answers Questions & Answers CONTACT INFORMATION Lan Saadatnejadi (213) Frank Quon (213)