Transportation Improvement Program
|
|
- John Woods
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION CITY OF FLAGSTAFF COCONINO COUNTY ARIZONA DOT Office: 100 West Birch Avenue Flagstaff, Arizona Mail: 211 West Aspen Avenue Flagstaff, Arizona Phone: (928) Fax: (928) Transportation Improvement Program Executive Board Approval June 24, 2009 Partners in Transportation Enhancing Our Community
2 This report produced with financial assistance from the Arizona Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration and the Federal Highway Administration.
3 Resolution Number of the Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization Executive Board Approving the Transportation Improvement Program WHEREAS, The Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization (FMPO) has the responsibility for conducting the area-wide continuing, comprehensive, and cooperative transportation system planning program and must maintain the regional transportation system plan and short range transportation improvement program on a current basis pursuant to Section 124 of Title 23, USC as Amended by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Act of 1991, the Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21 st Century of 1998, and the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act - a Legacy for Users Act of August 10, 2005; and WHEREAS, The FMPO s Transportation Improvement Program is a central program management tool for structuring metropolitan transportation programs and reflects the integrated nature of the regional transportation system; and WHEREAS, The FMPO reviews the arterial, transit, and bicycle improvement programs prepared by the member agencies for correlation as one regional Transportation Improvement Program, and advises the member jurisdictions of any conflicts, and prepares, as a coordinated composite of local programs, a regional Transportation Improvement Program for the FMPO area; and WHEREAS, The FMPO Technical Advisory Committee and Executive Board, consisting of local and state officials, are involved in a process to annually coordinate the preparation of a regional Transportation Improvement program and have reviewed and approved this Fiscal Year Transportation Improvement Program; and WHEREAS, The projects in this Transportation Improvement Program, including its 2009 Annual Element, are consistent with the Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization Regional Transportation Plan, adopted June 13, 2002; and WHEREAS, The FMPO HEREBY CERTIFIES that the metropolitan transportation planning process is being carried on in conformance with all applicable requirements of 23 U.S.C. 134, and as amended by the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, the Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21 st Century of 1998, the 1990 American with Disabilities Act; and the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments; and WHEREAS, The FMPO FURTHER CERTIFIES that the metropolitan planning program is being performed to satisfy the following federal regulations:
4
5 Table of Contents Resolution 09-01: Adopting the FY Transportation Improvement Program i Table of Contents iii Chapter I: Introduction General 3 Geographic Area 4 Statutory Requirements 5 Criteria for Inclusion of a Project in the TIP 5 Chapter II: ADOT Projects 8 Chapter III: Local projects: Federal Aid Funds 11 Chapter IV: Local projects: Non-Federal Aid Funds 14 Chapter V: Local Projects: Federal Transit Funds 16 Chapter VI: Local Projects: Safety and Enhancement Funds 19 Chapter VII: All Agencies: Pavement Preservation Projects 22 List of Figures FMPO Area Boundaries 4 FMPO Planning process 7 List of Tables Table 1. ADOT: Tentative 5-Year Highway Construction Program: FY Table 2. ADOT: FMPO proposed projects: FY Table 3. FMPO Surface Transportation Program (STP) projects FY Table 4. Non-Federal Aid Projects within the FMPO-area FY Table 5. FMPO Transit System Projects: FY Table 6. Safety projects within the FMPO-area: FY Table 7. Approved Enhancement Projects within the FMPO-area: FY Table 8. FMPO Area Pavement Preservations Projects All Agencies: FY List of Maps Map 1. ADOT: 5-Year Highway Construction Program Projects & FMPO Proposed Project 10 Map 2. FMPO Surface Transportation Projects 13 Map 3. Transit System Route Map and Capital Projects 18 Map 4. FMPO Area Enhancement Projects 21 Map 5. FMPO Area Pavement Preservation Projects (all agencies) 24
6
7 FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Transportation Improvement Program Chapter I Introduction
8 Chapter I. INTRODUCTION GENERAL FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM This Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) represents the project selection document for Federally-funded project. Project priorities are indicated by the year the project is programmed. For Federally-funded projects, the year programmed as indicated in the TIP refers to the state fiscal year ending June 30 th. This TIP is a multi-year, multi-agency listing of transportation improvements for the Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization s (FMPO) area covering a period of five years, 2010 through Included are projects on state routes which have recommended funding by the Arizona Department of Transportation for consideration by the Arizona State Transportation Board (Table 1) these projects are extracted from the state s draft 5-year plan; projects proposed for funding under the Federal Surface Transportation Program, Bridge, or Hazard Elimination System (Safety) programs; and other needed projects for which state funding is sought and/or local sources of revenue are identified. Last year s improvements are the Annual Listing of Projects. Table 2 in Chapter II presents projects proposed by FMPO members for potential inclusion in the Arizona State Highway System within the FMPO area. Chapter III lists other proposed local projects both federally and non-federally funded. Each of the projects proposed for implementation in this TIP are consistent with the FMPO Regional Transportation Plan, adopted June 13, 2002.
9 GEOGRAPHIC AREA Figure 1 illustrates boundaries for the Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization. The area stretches from the unincorporated areas of Kachina Village and Mountainaire in the south to the San Francisco Peaks in the north and the unincorporated areas of Winona to the east and Bellemont to the west. Figure 1. FMPO Boundaries
10 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS Under federal guidelines, the TIP is a staged, multi-year (4-5) program of transportation projects which is consistent with and implements the FMPO Regional Transportation Plan. The TIP must be prepared in such detail as to identify projects (or groupings of projects of similar types), to assign these projects to appropriate staging periods, and to identify costs and funding sources. Further, it must be revised as least biannually and be endorsed by the FMPO. The purpose of the TIP is to synthesize the short-range plans and programs of all local agencies to insure coordination, to schedule projects of area-wide significance which are recommended in the Regional Transportation Plan, and to provide system s level overview of the proposed improvements for the entire area. Further, the TIP is a central program management tool for structuring metropolitan transportation programs and reflects the integrated nature of the regional transportation system. The TIP must be approved by the FMPO Executive Board and the Governor of Arizona or his/her designee. Following such approvals, the TIP shall be included in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) prepared by the Arizona Department of Transportation. FMPO S TIP is a product of the regional transportation planning process that is carried on cooperatively by FMPO with the City of Flagstaff, Coconino County and ADOT. Working together, these agencies plan and sponsor projects that carry out the policies and recommendations of the regional plan. This process is detailed in Figure 2. CRITERIA FOR INCLUSION OF A PROJECT IN THE TIP The FMPO has created an application form and process the scoring for which is summarized below: Roadway Projects: Criteria: REGIONAL PLAN SUPPORT Possible Points: 20 Criteria: ROADWAY SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT Possible Points: 25 Criteria: COST EFFECTIVENESS Possible Points: 15 Criteria: BONUS POINTS Possible Points: 10 Transit Projects: Criteria: COMPLIANCE WITH SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN Possible Points: 20 Criteria: EXISTING AND/OR FUTURE RIDERSHIP ON ROUTE Possible Points: 20 Criteria: SAFETY AND SECURITY Possible Points: 20 Criteria: INTERMODALISM/MULTIMODALISM Possible Points: 10 Criteria: REGIONAL PLAN SUPPORT Possible Points: 10 Criteria: BONUS POINTS Possible Points: 10
11 Pedestrian/Bicycle Projects: Criteria: SAFETY Possible Points: 25 Criteria: REGIONAL PLAN SUPPORT Possible Points: 20 Criteria: PEDESTRIAN/BIKEWAY SYSTEM ENHANCEMENT Possible Points: 25 Criteria: EFFECTIVENESS/COST EFFECTIVENESS Possible Points: 20 Criteria: BONUS POINTS Possible Points: 10 This process is employed when the number of projects proposed for the use of federal funds exceeds the ability to work through a consensus process.
12 Figure 2. FMPO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS FMPO TRANSPORTATION POLICY FRAMEWORK Goals, Objectives, Policies State Policy FMPO TRANSPORTATION PLANNING State Transportation Planning System Performance Pavement, Bridges, Transit, Safety, Congestion, Freight Movement, Traffic Monitoring System Performance Public Input Public Input Transportation Plan Long Range Forecasting Analyses, and Identification of Travel Needs Short Range Analyses of Operational Needs FMPO Transportation Plan State Transportation Plan Annual Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Update and Refine Update and Refine
13 FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Transportation Improvement Program Chapter II ADOT projects in the FMPO area
14 Table 1. Arizona Department of Transportation: Tentative 5-Year Highway Construction Program Fiscal Years as of 6/4/09 mpo_cog tip_fy project_sponsor project_name project_location work_type_equipment_etc Length federal_functional_class lanes_before lanes_after funding_type fmpo 2010 ADOT US 66 Steve's Blvd Turn Lanes Add right turn Steve's 0.1 Principal Arterial 2 2 HURF 75,000 fmpo 2013 ADOT 89A Airport TI Construct intersection improvement 0.1 Urban Minor Arterial 2 2 STP 6,250,000 fmpo 2009 ADOT I-40 Walnut Canyon, WB Reprofile Vertical Curves 3.8 Rural Interstate 2 2 ARRA 12,000,000 18,427,000 federal_funds Table 2. Arizona Department of Transportation: FMPO proposed projects Fiscal Years Updated 6/4/09 PROJECTS IN THIS TABLE ARE LISTED FOR ILLUSTRATIVE REASONS ONLY - THEY ARE NOT PROGRAMMED mpo_cog tip_fy project_sponsor project_name project_location work_type_equipment_etc Length lanes_before federal_functional_class lanes_after federal_aid_type fmpo 2014 ADOT I-40 Lone Tree TI, mile post construct new traffic interchange 1.5 Interstate 2 2 STP 25,000,000 25,000,000 Note: This project has been submitted to Congress for consideration in the next highway bill federal_funds
15
16 FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Transportation Improvement Program Chapter III Local Projects: Federal Aid Funds
17
18 Table 3. FY FMPO Surface Transportation Program (STP) projects Update: 6/24/09 mpo_cog tip_fy project_sponsor project_name project_location work_type_equipment_etc Length federal_functional_class lanes_before lanes_after federal_aid_type federal_funds fmpo 2009 Flagstaff Lake Mary AZ FH 3 (Lake Mary Rd) (1) Widening - shoulders Urban Minor 4.4 Arterial 2 2 STP $ 226,678 1,600,000 13,900,000 fmpo 2010 ADOT Turn lane E. Route 66/Steves (WB) Bus pull-outs, const. Other Principal 0.1 Arterial STP $ 260,680 75, ,680 Milton Rd Design - Congestion Relief - Riordan to Other Principal fmpo 2010 Flagstaff Milton I Phase I (3) Arterial STP $ 340,017 18,859 12% of $15M fmpo 2010 NAIPTA Mt. Links - BRT Downtown & NAU Design 4.7 System STP-flex $ 260, ,000 Milton Rd Design - Congestion Relief - Riordan to Other Principal fmpo 2011 Flagstaff Milton II Phase II Arterial STP $ 436,129 24,190 Rio de Flag Bridges fmpo 2012 Flagstaff Rio bridges (4) bridge improvements Urban Collector 2 2 HPP $ 3,000,000 W. Route Rio Bridge Construction (share) Other Principal fmpo 2012 Flagstaff 66 bridge de Flag (2) (3) 0.2 Arterial STP $ 183,881 10,199 fmpo 2012 Flagstaff Milton III Milton Rd Design - Phase III Congestion Relief - Riordan to 180 Other Principal 0.86 Arterial STP $ 459, ,497 fmpo 2013 Flagstaff Milton IV Milton Rd Design - Phase IV Congestion Relief - Riordan to 180 Other Principal 0.86 Arterial STP $ 835, ,317 local_match Total Project Cost fmpo 2014 Flagstaff Beulah Beulah Blvd extension Road Design - Complete Urban Collector 0.4 (prop.) STP $ 662,954 36, ,000 fmpo 2014 Flagstaff Lone Tree T.I. T.I. Design Support Road Design - Share Urban 0.4 Interstate STP $ 508,265 25,372 20,000,000 (1) Total project cost estimated at $13,900,000, additional funding programmed through City of Flagstaff, Coconino County, and federal forest highways program (2) Total project cost estimated at $2,000,000, additional funding aniticpated from ADOT bridge program (3) Total project cost estimated at $15,000,000 - capital funding not programmed at this time (4) Total project cost estimated at $54,000,000 for the complete flood control project (5) Assumed 4% per year cost of inflation from FY 2009.
19
20 FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Transportation Improvement Program Chapter IV Local Projects: Non-federal Aid Funds
21 Table 4. FY : Non-Federal Aid Projects within the FMPO-area on Federal Aid Eligible roads Update 6/4/09 mpo_cog tip_fy project_sponsor project_name project_location work_type_equipment_etc Length federal_functional_class lanes_before lanes_after local fund source fmpo 2009 Flagstaff Huntington Drive Improvements Enterprise to Bronco reconstruction Urban 0.75 Collector 2 2 Transpo 4,500,000 Urban fmpo Flagstaff Beulah Blvd. Extension Forest Meadows to Yale right-of-way purchase 0.35 Collector 2 2 Transpo 1,995,480 fmpo Flagstaff Downtown Rail Crossing Modifications Beaver and San Francisco Streets quiet zone installations Urban 0.1 Collector 2 2 Transpo 860,000 fmpo 2009 Flagstaff Lake Mary Rd/FH 3 JWP to City Limits utility relocate and shoulder widening Urban Minor 4.3 Arterial 2 2 Transpo 1,445,000 Urban Industrial Drive/Fanning Eagle Mountain to reconstruction and Collector fmpo Flagstaff Wash Huntington drainage 0.25 (prop) 2 2 Transpo 2,785,000 Urban fmpo 2009 Flagstaff West/Sixth Intersection West/Sixth roundabout construction 0.2 Collector 2 2 Transpo 740,000 Industrial Drive-Fanning Fanning to Eagle Urban Collector fmpo 2009 Flagstaff to Eagle Mtn Drive Mountain construction 0.3 (prop) 2 2 Transpo 1,750,000 fmpo 2011 Flagstaff Country Club/Oakmont intersection safety improvements Urban 0.2 Collector 2 2 Transpo 775,000 fmpo Flagstaff West Arrowhead Improvements Route 66 to West, Arrowhead to Dortha reconstruction, edge improvements Urban 1.15 Collector 2 2 Transpo 7,400,000 local funds fmpo 2009 Coconino Lake Mary Rd Guardrail replacement south of City limits Guardrail replacement Urban Minor na Arterial 2 2 HURF 300,000 fmpo 2010 Coconino Cosnino Road full limits grade change and reconstruction Rural 2.1 Collector 2 2 Roads 1,800,000 fmpo 2011 Coconino Stardust Trail Yancy to Rio Rancho new construction Rural 0.8 Collector 0 2 Roads 1,750,000 26,100,480
22 FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Transportation Improvement Program Chapter V Local Projects: Federal Transit Funds
23
24 Table 5. FY : Transit Projects within the FMPO-area Update 6/4/09 Fiscal Agency Year ALI Code Location Project Description Fund Type Local Cost Federal Cost Total Cost In Progress Projects NAIPTA A.00 Region Vehicle Rehab and Maintenance 5307 $ 24,400 $ 97,600 $ 122,000 NAIPTA Flagstaff Passenger Shelters, Signs, and Poles 5309 $ 4,540 $ 18,157 $ 22,697 NAIPTA Flagstaff Passenger Shelters, Signs, and Poles 5307 ARRA $ 67,303 $ 67,303 NAIPTA Flagstaff Design & Engineering Mountain Links - Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 5307 ARRA $ - $ 170,000 $ 170,000 NAIPTA Flagstaff Passenger Shelter - Downtown Transfer Center 5307 $ 33,000 $ 120,000 $ 153,000 NAIPTA Flagstaff Building Construction - Maintenance and Admin Bldg, Kaspar Dr 5307 $ 298,963 $ 1,195,851 $ 1,494,814 NAIPTA Flagstaff Building Construction - Maintenance and Admin Bldg 5309 $ 381,037 $ 1,524,149 $ 1,905,186 TOTAL ALL CATEGORIES-2009 $ 336,503 $ 1,571,311 $ 1,907,814 Future Projects NAIPTA Region Operating Assistance, including Project Management 5307 $ 3,475,402 $ 904,974 $ 4,380,376 NAIPTA Flagstaff 1 Hybrid Electric Bus (expansion of fleet, increase frequency) 5307 ARRA $ 540,000 $ 540,000 NAIPTA A.00 Region Vehicle Rehab and Maintenance 5307 ARRA $ 25,200 $ 319,084 $ 344,284 NAIPTA Flagstaff Passenger Shelter - Mall Transfer Center 5307 ARRA $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 NAIPTA Flagstaff Passenger Shelters, Signs, and Poles 5307 ARRA $ 44,569 $ 178,274 $ 222,843 NAIPTA Flagstaff Design & Engineerng Mountain Links - BRT 5307 STP $ 17,312 $ 230,000 $ 247,312 TOTAL ALL CATEGORIES-2010 $ 3,562,483 $ 2,372,332 $ 5,934,815 NAIPTA Region Operating Assistance, including Project Management 5307 $ 4,751,127 $ 904,974 $ 5,656,101 NAIPTA A.00 Region Vehicle Rehab and Maintenance 5307 $ 25,960 $ 103,840 $ 129,800 NAIPTA Region 1 Para-Transit Van (Replacement) 5307 $ 13,049 $ 52,195 $ 65,244 NAIPTA Flagstaff Passenger Shelters, Signs, and Poles 5309 $ 7,750 $ 31,000 $ 38,750 TOTAL ALL CATEGORIES-2011 $ 4,797,886 $ 1,092,009 $ 5,889,895 NAIPTA Region Operating Assistance, including Project Management 5307 $ 4,941,471 $ 904,974 $ 5,846,445 NAIPTA Region 1 Para-Transit Van (Replacement) 5307 $ 13,375 $ 53,500 $ 66,875 NAIPTA Flagstaff Passenger Shelters, Signs, and Poles 5307 $ 5,000 $ 20,000 $ 25,000 TOTAL ALL CATEGORIES-2012 $ 4,959,846 $ 978,474 $ 5,938,320 NAIPTA Region Operating Assistance, including Project Management 5307 $ 5,139,475 $ 904,974 $ 6,044,449 NAIPTA A.00 Region Vehicle Rehab and Maintenance 5307 $ 27,600 $ 110,400 $ 138,000 NAIPTA Region 1 Para-Transit Van (Replacement) 5307 $ 13,709 $ 54,838 $ 68,547 NAIPTA Flagstaff Passenger Shelters, Signs, and Poles 5307 $ 5,000 $ 20,000 $ 25,000 TOTAL ALL CATEGORIES-2013 $ 5,185,784 $ 1,090,212 $ 6,275,996 NAIPTA Region Operating Assistance, including Project Management 5307 $ 5,139,475 $ 904,974 $ 6,044,449 NAIPTA Region 2 Para-Transit Van (Replacement) 5307 $ 28,104 $ 112,417 $ 140,521 NAIPTA Region Passenger Shelters, Signs, and Poles 5307 $ 60,000 $ 240,000 $ 300,000 NAIPTA Flagstaff Design and Construction of BRT Route/Corridor 5309 $ 943,000 $ 3,772,000 $ 4,715,000 NAIPTA Flagstaff 4 Hybrid Electric Bus (expansion of fleet, implementation of BRT) 5309 $ 432,000 $ 1,728,000 $ 2,160,000 NAIPTA Flagstaff 6 Hybrid Electric Bus (replacement of expired fleet)) 5307 ARRA TIGGER $ - $ 3,240,540 $ 3,240,540 NAIPTA Flagstaff 4 Hybrid Electric Buses (replacement of expired fleet) 5309 $ 472,984 $ 1,891,936 $ 2,364,920 NAIPTA Flagstaff Building Construction - Phase 2 of Admin Facility 5309 $ 1,200,000 $ 4,800,000 $ 6,000,000 TOTAL ALL CATEGORIES-2014 $ 8,275,563 $ 16,689,867 $ 24,965,430
25 Map 3.Mountain Line Projects Mall Transfer Center NAIPTA Administrative Center Downtown Transfer Center Mountain Links Transit Way/BRT
26 FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Transportation Improvement Program Chapter VI Local Projects: Safety & Enhancement Projects
27
28 Table 6. Safety Projects with the FMPO -area: FY Updated 6/4/09 Project Sponsor none Project Location Project Description Federal no projects at this time Fund Source Required Local Other TOTAL Table 7. Approved Enhancement Projects within the FMPO-area: FY Update: 6/04/09 fmpo fmpo mpo_cog tip_fy 2009 Flagstaff 2010 Flagstaff project_sponsor project_name project_location work_type_equipment_etc Length federal_aid_type federal_funds Multi-use trail on west side, Railhead to Snowflake US 89 trail construction 1.27 Enhance $ 500,000 $ 481,720 Multi-use trail on north side from Country Club to Mall Way old Route 66 trail construction 0.5 Enhance $ 466,570 $ 100,000 local_match fmpo 2013 Flagstaff Walnut Street Railroad Underpass BNSF RR trail construction 0.5 Enhance $ 500,000 $ 760,408 Trail work from Rio de Flag to San fmpo 2010 Flagstaff Francisco Street B40 trail construction 0.25 ARRA-TE $ 500,000 $ 250,000 fmpo 2010 Flagstaff S. Beaver & S. San Francisco Southside streetscape/landscaping 0.5 Enhance $ 500,000 $ 2,028,000 fmpo 2011 Flagstaff Woodlands Village Landscaping Woodlands Village Bvd streetscape/landscaping 0.25 Enhance $ 500,000 $ 200,000
29
30 FLAGSTAFF METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Transportation Improvement Program Chapter VII All Agencies: Pavement Preservation Projects
31
32 Table 8. Pavement Preservation Projects within the FMPO Area: Fiscal Years as of 6/4/09 mpo_cog tip_fy project_sponsor project_name project_location work_type_equipment_etc Length federal_functional_class lanes_before lanes_after federal_aid_type federal_funds local_match fmpo 2009 ADOT US-89 Townsend- Fernwod Pavement preservation Rural Principal 6 Other 4 4 ARRA-STP 8,000,000 fmpo 2009 Coconino W. Rte 66 Pavement preservation Minor Arterial 2 2 ARRA-STP 916, ,000 fmpo Flagstaff system Pavement preservation Local to Minor varies Arterial 12,000,000 fmpo 2012 Coconino Lake Mary Rd -Phase I Pavement recycle Major Collector 1,462,323 fmpo 2013 Coconino Lake Mary Rd -Phase II Pavement recycle Major Collector 1,200,000 fmpo 2014 Coconino Townsend- Winona Pavement recycle Minor Arterial 1,200, ,987,323
33
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Candidate Project List for Public Review
2011-2014 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Candidate List for Public Review Table 1 Annual Listing Of Federal Aid Obligation For Federal Fiscal Year 2010 North Dakota s Number Transit 410083 Transit
More information5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS
5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS When the METRO Green Line LRT begins operating in mid-2014, a strong emphasis will be placed on providing frequent connecting bus service with Green Line trains. Bus hours
More informationTulsa Transportation Management Area. Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program
Tulsa Transportation Management Area Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program FFY 2022 Application Information Sponsor Location Description STP Request Other Funds Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha
More informationBasic Project Information
FY 2015-16 PROJECT DESCRIPTION FORM (7B) Submitting Agency: Fairfax County Basic Project Information Project Title: South Van Dorn Street and Franconia Road Interchange 7B Project Type (check one): Roadway
More informationPublic Information Packet FY Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Public Information Packet FY - Fargo-Moorhead Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Comment Form Annual Element TIP Projects - TIP Projects Year - Metropolitan Transportation Improvement
More informationUnified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report
Unified Corridor Investment Study DRAFT Step 2 Scenario Analysis Report REVISIONS 1. Table 39: New Public Investments for Operation and Maintenance Costs 2. Appendix A-10: Passenger Rail Service - Operations
More informationDixie Transportation Planning Office
A project must be given a yes rating on items 1 & 2 in order to be prioritized. Sponsor: St. George City Project: Pioneer Parkway Type: Road Widening and Reconstruction Rev. 9/17/2010 Dixie Transportation
More informationCEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update
CEDAR AVENUE TRANSITWAY Implementation Plan Update EECUTIVE SUMMARY DECEMBER 2015 Executive Summary In 2013, the Twin Cities metropolitan area s first bus rapid transit (BRT) line, the METRO Red Line,
More informationExecutive Summary. Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009.
Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Study Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis October 13, 2009 Background As the Treasure Valley continues to grow, high-quality transportation connections
More informationOverview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region
Overview of Transit Funding and Planning in the PACTS Region Presentation to PACTS Transit Committee and Federal Transit Administration Representatives February 8, 2018 Transit Agencies Agency Communities
More informationRocky Mount. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation
2020 Transportation Plan Developed by the Transportation Planning Division of the Virginia Department of Transportation in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
More informationProposed FY Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1
Proposed FY 2019-2023 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) March 5, 2018 Capital Planning Committee 1 The Capital Improvement Program is: A fiscally constrained, 5-year program of capital projects An implementation
More informationEUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT
EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON EAST WEST PILOT BRT LANE TRANSIT DISTRICT (BRIEF) Table of Contents EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD, OREGON (USA)... 1 COUNTY CONTEXT AND SYSTEM DESCRIPTION... 1 SYSTEM OVERVIEW... 1 PLANNING
More information2016 PSRC REGIONAL & KING COUNTYWIDE EASTSIDE FUNDING AWARDS. Eastside Transportation Partnership September 9, 2016
2016 PSRC REGIONAL & KING COUNTYWIDE EASTSIDE FUNDING AWARDS Eastside Transportation Partnership September 9, 2016 1 2 PSRC 2016 Project Selection Process 2018-2020 Estimated FHWA Funds Available: (Summary)
More informationHighway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County. Executive Summary
Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County Executive Summary October 2014 Highway 18 BNSF Railroad Overpass Feasibility Study Craighead County Executive Summary October 2014 Prepared
More informationKendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study
Florida Department of Transportation District Six Kendall Drive Premium Transit PD&E Study Project Kick-Off Meeting SR 94/Kendall Drive/SW 88 Street Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study What
More informationDevelop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional
Project Overview TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS WHAT ARE THE PROJECT GOALS? Transportation transportation hub. Develop ground transportation improvements to make the Airport a multi-modal regional Land Use
More informationA Presentation to: Project Advisory Group Meeting #10
A Presentation to: Project Advisory Group Meeting #10 October 21, 2015 Agenda Introductions Action Items From Last PAG Meeting (August 26, 2015) Recent Agency Involvement Update on Refined Alternative
More informationBuilding our future, together. Steering Committee Presentation for the Comprehensive Plan Update April 23, 2013
Building our future, together Steering Committee Presentation for the Comprehensive Plan Update April 23, 2013 Vision In 2030, the City of Tyler will be nationally known for its commitment to community,
More informationRecommended Transportation. Capital Improvement Program
Recommended 2018-2022 Transportation Capital Improvement Program 1 Overview 2017 Review 2018-2022 Considerations 2018-2022 Recommended CIP 2 Limited Resources are Directed to the Highest Priority Number
More informationWaco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study
Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study Chris Evilia, Director of Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Allen Hunter, General Manager Waco Transit System Jimi Mitchell, Project Manager AECOM
More informationTransportation. Background. Transportation Planning Goals. Level of Service Analysis 5-1
Transportation portion of the city s stormwater utility, and state road and fuel taxes. Background The transportation needs of the City of Lacey and its planning areas are met by a growing multimodal network
More informationChapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis. Chapter 8. Plan Scenarios. LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle
Chapter 7: Travel Demand Analysis Chapter 8 Plan Scenarios LaSalle Community Center. Image Credit: Town of LaSalle 164 Chapter 8: Plan Scenarios Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act (MAP
More informationArizona-Sonora Border Master Plan. Plan Maestro para la Frontera Arizona-Sonora
Arizona-Sonora Border Master Plan Plan Maestro para la Frontera Arizona-Sonora Project Objectives Develop and implement a plan for identifying, prioritizing, and promoting land port of entry (LPOE), multi-modal
More informationMPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017
MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017 RECOMMENDED ACTION: 2 nd TAC Meeting with Kimley-Horn/WSB in Updating the Street/Highway Element of 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Matter
More informationParking Management Element
Parking Management Element The State Transportation Planning Rule, adopted in 1991, requires that the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) area implement, through its member jurisdictions, a parking
More informationPublic Information Workshop
Public Information Workshop Charlotte County-Punta Gorda MPO - Meeting Rooms A and B March 29, 2018 Welcome to the Public Information Workshop for Harborview Road Project Development and Environment (PD&E)
More informationMETRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options
METRO Orange Line BRT American Boulevard Station Options Bloomington City Council Work Session November 18, 2013 Christina Morrison BRT/Small Starts Project Office Coordinating Planning and Design AMERICAN
More informationAPPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY]
APPENDIX I: [FIXED-GUIDEWAY TRANSIT FEASIBILITY] Jackson/Teton Integrated Transportation Plan 2015 Appendix I. Fixed-Guideway Transit Feasibility Jackson/Teton County Integrated Transportation Plan v2
More informationMetro Transit Update. Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office. John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner
Metro Transit Update Christina Morrison, Senior Planner Metro Transit BRT/Small Starts Project Office John Dillery, Senior Transit Planner Metro Transit Service Development May 16, 2013 1 Transit Planning
More informationBROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY
BROWARD BOULEVARD CORRIDOR TRANSIT STUDY FM # 42802411201 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY July 2012 GOBROWARD Broward Boulevard Corridor Transit Study FM # 42802411201 Executive Summary Prepared For: Ms. Khalilah Ffrench,
More informationPoint A Point B Point C Point D. Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017
Fulton County Board of Commissioners and Mayors Meeting December 14, 2017 Master Plan Overview Phase 1 Community Vision and Existing Transit Conditions Phase 2 Scenario Development Phase 3 Transit Master
More informationLeadership NC. November 8, 2018
v Leadership NC November 8, 2018 Planning for our region s growth The Triangle is one of the fastestgrowing regions in the nation. More than 2 million people are already part of the equation, and the
More informationCustomer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Information Item III-E May 13, 2010 Bus Fleet Plan
Customer Services, Operations, and Safety Committee Board Information Item III-E May 13, 2010 Bus Fleet Plan Page 72 of 96 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary
More informationCity of Grand Forks Staff Report
City of Grand Forks Staff Report Service/Safety Committee December 15, 2015 City Council December 21, 2015 Agenda Item: Amendment No. 1 to Engineering Services Agreement with CPS for City Project No. 7143,
More informationOpen House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition
Welcome Meetings 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. - Open House Why is Highway 212 Project Important? Important Arterial Route Local Support Highway 212
More informationRight-of-Way Obstruction Permit Fee Structure Minneapolis Department of Public Works May 10, 2001
Right-of-Way Obstruction Permit Fee Structure Minneapolis Department of Public Works May 10, 2001 Revised April 5, 2005 Revised January 27, 2006 Prepared by: Steve Collin, Engineer 2.5 Revised by Douglas
More informationBINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY
BINGHAMTON METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION STUDY ANNUAL LISTING OF FEDERAL AID PROJECT OBLIGATIONS FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR Federal regulations require an annual listing of transportation projects, including investments
More informationAPPENDIX H. Transportation Impact Study
APPENDIX H Transportation Impact Study BUENA VISTA LAGOON ENHANCEMENT PROJECT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: San Diego Association of Governments Prepared by: VRPA Technologies, Inc. 9520 Padgett
More informationSFY Call for Projects MPO Staff Recommendation All Projects Submitted for Funding Funds Available: $57,075,000
SFY 2022-2023 Call for Projects MPO Staff Recommendation All Projects Submitted for Funding Funds Available: $57,075,000 DES NUM LPA PROJECT TITLE TYPE TOTAL SCORE FUND TYPE SFY FEDERAL COST LOCAL COST
More informationChapter 7: Corridor Visions
Chapter 7: Corridor Visions (see also Appendix 7 for Details) January 24, 2008 NOTE: This document has been prepared using Federal funding from the United States Department of Transportation. The United
More informationCommittee Report. Transportation Committee. Business Item No
Committee Report Business Item No. 2015-280 Transportation Committee For the Metropolitan Council meeting of December 9, 2015 Subject: METRO Blue Line Extension (Bottineau Light Rail Transit) Revised Scope
More informationSubarea Study. Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project. Final Version 1. Washington County.
Subarea Study Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) Corridor Management and Safety Improvement Project Final Version 1 Washington County June 12, 214 SRF No. 138141 Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Forecast Methodology
More informationTRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS
Approved: Effective: August 22, 2017 Review: June 21, 2017 Office: Traffic Engineering and Operations Topic No.: 750-010-011-e Department of Transportation PURPOSE TRAFFIC REGULATION APPROVAL PROCESS To
More informationDIXIE TIP CONCEPT REPORT APPLICATION FY 2015 (Due November 6, 2013) PROJECT INFORMATION
DIXIE TIP CONCEPT REPORT APPLICATION FY 2015 (Due November 6, 2013) PROJECT INFORMATION 1) TITLE: Old Hwy 91 (Swiss Village, Santa Clara to 200 East, Ivins) 2) DESCRIPTION: This joint Ivins/Santa Clara
More informationWestern ND Meeting. February 19, 2014 Grant Levi, NDDOT Director
Western ND Meeting February 19, 2014 Grant Levi, NDDOT Director 1 Traffic Trends in North Dakota 2 Truck Traffic 2008 3 Truck Traffic 2012 4 Average Daily Traffic 5 ND Vehicle Miles Traveled Statewide
More information4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS
4 COSTS AND OPERATIONS 4.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes the estimated capital and operations and maintenance (O&M) costs for the Modal and High-Speed Train (HST) Alternatives evaluated in this
More informationSnelling Bus Rapid Transit. May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1
Snelling Bus Rapid Transit May 13, 2013 Technical Advisory Committee Meeting #1 1 Today s meeting TAC Introductions Project Overview Arterial BRT Concept Background Snelling Corridor Plan, Funding & Schedule
More informationBrigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction
Brigham City 1200 West Box Elder Creek Bridge - Widening Project Type Reconstruction 550 North to 650 North $ 1,750,000 $ 1,582,113 To widen an existing bridge on 1200 West over Box Elder Creek that will
More informationLACEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 09, 2015
LACEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 09, 2015 SUBJECT: 2016-2021 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan and Mitigation List RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution approving the proposed 2016-2021 Six- Year Transportation
More informationALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SCOPING BROCHURE
I-10 WEST ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS/ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SCOPING BROCHURE INTRODUCTION Cricket Pavilion Study Description, Project Background The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and METRO are
More informationChapter 7. Transportation Capital Improvement Projects. Chapter 7
Chapter 7 Transportation Capital Improvement Projects Chapter 7 81 Chapter 7 Transportation Capital Improvement Projects Local Transportation Sales Tax Programs For over three decades, Santa Clara County
More information6/6/2018. June 7, Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION
June 7, 2018 Item #1 CITIZENS PARTICIPATION 1 Item #2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Item #3 TRAC GOALS, FRAMEWORK & AGENDA REVIEW 2 COMMITTEE GOALS Learn about Southern Nevada s mobility challenges, new developments
More informationMarch 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming
COORDINATION WITH VDOT DISTRICTS TO DELIVER IMPLEMENTABLE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming PRESENTATION OUTLINE What
More informationCITY OF TORRANCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE
CITY OF TORRANCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2017 1 DISCUSSION TOPICS Update of Infrastructure Action Plan (IAP) o Sidewalk and Roadway projects
More informationSTH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report
#233087 v3 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Report Washington County Public Works Committee Meeting September 28, 2016 1 STH 60 Northern Reliever Route Feasibility Study Hartford Area Development
More informationMETRO Light Rail Update
American Society of Highway Engineers METRO Light Rail Update Brian Buchanan Director, Design and Construction October 13, 2009 1 High Capacity Transit System 2 20-Mile Light Rail Line 3 Operations Operations
More informationINDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Planning the transportation future for the Indianapolis region MEMORANDUM
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Planning the transportation future for the Indianapolis region MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Indianapolis Regional Transportation Council Policy Committee Anna M.
More information2030 Multimodal Transportation Study
2030 Multimodal Transportation Study City of Jacksonville Planning and Development Department Prepared by Ghyabi & Associates April 29,2010 Introduction Presentation Components 1. Study Basis 2. Study
More informationVAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT
VAN NESS AVENUE BUS RAPID TRANSIT Peter Gabancho Project Manager III Capital Programs & Construction SFMTA Shari Tavafrashti Principal Engineer SFCTA 1 Project Purpose and Need Improve transit reliability,
More informationCharacterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment
Department of Public Works Inyo County, California Characterization of Combined Use of County Road Segment Segment Name: _Lone Pine No. 1_ Purpose: Which of the following does the combined-use segment
More informationUS 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing. February 16, 2017
US 29 Bus Rapid Transit Planning Board Briefing February 16, 2017 Project Goals Improve the quality of transit service Improve mobility opportunities and choices Enhance quality of life Support master
More informationDecember 12, Dear Secretary Foxx:
Chair Pete White City Councilmember Vice-Chair Jay Adams Mustang Mayor Secretary/Treasurer Matt Dukes Midwest City Mayor association of central oklahoma governments Executive Director John G. Johnson December
More informationColorado Association of Ski Towns August 26, 2016
Colorado Association of Ski Towns August 26, 2016 1 Presentation RFTA Overview Long Range Forecast Integrated Transportation System Plan Questions Roaring Fork Transportation Authority (RFTA) RFTA Overview
More information2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street
IV.J TRANSPORTATION 1. INTRODUCTION This section presents an overview of the existing traffic and circulation system in and surrounding the project site. This section also discusses the potential impacts
More informationMajor Widening/New Roadway
Revised Evaluation s Major Widening/New Roadway This page provides a summary of any revisions made to the draft scores presented at the October th Attributable Funds Committee meeting. The information
More informationCity of Lake Oswego Transportation System Plan Update PLAN AND POLICY REVIEW, PART 1
City of Lake Oswego Transportation System Plan Update PLAN AND POLICY REVIEW, PART 1 Date: March 7, 2012 Project #: 11187 To: Cc: From: Project: Subject: Project Management Team Transportation System Plan
More informationCall for Projects Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Emissions Formulas Technical Advisory Committee
Call for Projects Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Emissions Formulas Technical Advisory Committee July 18, 2018 Formula Coordination DRCOG under review, considering FHWA toolkit RAQC Argonne
More informationThe range of alternatives has been reviewed with the RTAC Subgroup and the preliminary analysis is proceeding on the following HCT alternatives:
Attachment 2 Boise Treasure Valley Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis August 14, 2009 Introduction The Treasure Valley High Capacity Transit Priority Corridor Phase 1 Alternatives Analysis is being prepared
More informationImproving Accessibility of Regional Bus Stops and Pathways
Customer Service and Operations Committee Board Information Item III-A March 13, 2014 Improving Accessibility of Regional Bus Stops and Pathways Page 3 of 17 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
More informationPORTS-TO-PLAINS. Corridor Planning. Ports-to-Plains Stakeholder Meeting
PORTS-TO-PLAINS Corridor Planning Stakeholder Workshop - Agenda 1 Purpose of Stakeholder Workshops 3 2 Rural Transportation System Overview 4 3 Ports-to-Plains 8 4 5 6 7 I-27 Expansion Key Considerations
More informationBusiness Advisory Committee. July 7, 2015
Business Advisory Committee July 7, 2015 1 Today s Topics Outreach Update TI #1 and 2: Target Field Station Connection to I-94: Recommendation 85 th Station Configuration 93 rd Station Configuration DEIS
More informationAlternatives Analysis Findings Report
6.0 This chapter presents estimates of the potential capital, operations and maintenance costs associated with the alternatives carried forward for detailed evaluation. The methodology used to develop
More informationALAMEDA CORRIDOR. A A Project of National Significance. TRB Summer Conference MTS as a Component of the Nation s Transportation System June 25, 2002
ALAMEDA CORRIDOR A A Project of National Significance TRB Summer Conference MTS as a Component of the Nation s Transportation System June 25, 2002 Top U.S. Container Ports (2001) LOS ANGELES 5.18 LONG
More informationCommunity Advisory Committee. October 5, 2015
Community Advisory Committee October 5, 2015 1 Today s Topics Hennepin County Community Works Update Project Ridership Estimates Technical Issue #4:Golden Valley Rd and Plymouth Ave Stations Technical
More informationPublic Meeting. City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development
Public Meeting City of Chicago Department of Transportation & Department of Housing and Economic Development Funded by Regional Transportation Authority September 12, 2011 In partnership with Presentation
More informationTable 8-1: Service Frequencies for All Short-List Alternatives by Day of Week and Time of Day Frequency Day of Week Time of Day Time Period
8. Operating Plans The following Section presents the operating plans for the Short-List Alternatives. The modern streetcar operating plans are presented for Alternatives 2 and 3, followed by bus rapid
More information4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES
4.0 TIER 2 ALTERNATIVES The Tier 2 Alternatives represent the highest performing Tier 1 Alternatives. The purpose of the Tier 2 Screening was to identify the LPA utilizing a more robust list of evaluation
More informationUpdate on Bus Stop Enhancements
Customer Service and Operations Committee Board Information Item III-A February 2, 2012 Update on Bus Stop Enhancements Page 3 of 15 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information
More informationThe Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future
The Eastern Connector Study November, 2007 planning for the future In late 2006, Albemarle County and the City of Charlottesville jointly initiated the Eastern Connector Corridor Study. The Project Team
More informationWentzville Parkway South Phase 2 & 2A
Wentzville Parkway South Phase 2 & 2A Sponsor Wentzville Project No. RB18-000034 Project Type New Road TOTAL FUNDING Phase 2 Total County Sponsor Federal $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 Phase 2A Total
More informationNorth Shore Alternatives Analysis. May 2012
North Shore Alternatives Analysis May 2012 Agenda Study Process and Progress to Date Short List Alternatives Screening Traffic Analysis Conceptual Engineering Ridership Forecasts Refinement of Service
More informationCAPITAL FUND 9510 STREET & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS
9510 STREET & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2019-2023 9510 STREET & SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS - 01 STREET AND SIDEWALK MAINTENANCE PROGRAM $1,250,000 $0 $1,250,000
More informationThe Georgia CMAQ Program. Practice Makes Perfect
The Georgia CMAQ Program Practice Makes Perfect Outline Georgia s Air Quality Georgia s CMAQ Process Prioritized Projects Project Mix Georgia and Air Quality Out of the 6 pollutants measured by EPA, Georgia
More informationFeasibility Study. Community Meeting March, North-South Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
Feasibility Study Community Meeting March, 2017 1 Agenda 1. Welcome / Introductions 2. Background / Meeting Purpose 3. Progress to Date Options Evaluated Capital/Operating Costs Ridership 4. Financial
More informationOperating & Maintenance Cost Results Report
Operating & Maintenance Cost Results Report Prepared for: Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority Prepared by: Connetics Transportation Group Under Contract To: Kimley-Horn and Associates FINAL June
More informationChapter 9 Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR
Chapter 9 Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative and Alternatives for Evaluation in Draft SEIS/SEIR 9.0 RECOMMENDED LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE AND ALTERNATIVES FOR EVALUATION IN DRAFT SEIS/SEIR
More informationValley Metro Overview. ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014
Valley Metro Overview ITE/IMSA Spring Conference March 6, 2014 Valley Metro Who Are We? Operate Regional Transit Services Valley Metro and Phoenix are region s primary service providers Light Rail and
More informationBalancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City
Balancing the Transportation Needs of a Growing City FY 2019 and FY 2020 Capital Budget SFMTA Board Meeting Ed Reiskin, Director of Transportation April 3, 2018 1 FY 2019-23 Capital Improvement Program
More informationClearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study
Clearlake Road (State Road 501) Project Development & Environment (PD&E) Study FROM MICHIGAN AVENUE TO INDUSTRY ROAD BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Financial Project ID No: 433605-1-22-01 Federal Aid Project
More informationExecutive Summary. Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ES-1
Executive Summary Introduction The Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 Project is a vital public transit infrastructure investment that would provide a transit connection to the existing Metro Gold Line
More informationReport by Planning, Development & Real Estate Committee (B) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary
Report by Planning, Development & Real Estate Committee (B) 06-26-08 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information Summary Action Information MEAD Number: 100027 Resolution: Yes
More informationApril 27, FHWA/FTA Approval of an Amendment to the Kansas STIP to include WAMPO s April 14, 2009 TIP Amendment 6
U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Federal Highway Administration 901 Locust Street, Suite 404 6111 SW 29 th Street, Suite 100 Kansas City, MO 64106 Topeka, KS 66614-4271
More informationReston Transportation Strategy July 9, 2018
Reston Transportation Strategy July 9, 2018 Background: On February 11, 2014, the Board of Supervisors adopted the Reston Phase I Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the core areas of Reston between Sunset
More informationRedefining Mobility. Randy Iwasaki. Executive Director Contra Costa Transportation Authority January 18, 2018
Redefining Mobility Randy Iwasaki Executive Director Contra Costa Transportation Authority January 18, 2018 Who We Are CCTA is a public agency formed by voters in 1988 to manage the county s transportation
More informationDraft Results and Open House
Waco Rapid Transit Corridor (RTC) Feasibility Study Draft Results and Open House Chris Evilia, Director of Waco Metropolitan Planning Organization Allen Hunter, General Manager Waco Transit System Jimi
More informationPARTIAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FFY
PARTIAL PROGRAM OF PROJECTS FFY 2016-17 The proposed Partial Program of Projects for FFY 2016-17 is attached. The proposed Partial Program of Projects was introduced at the SCTA Board at its meeting on
More informationKey Project Elements Status Report
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Key Project Elements Status Report presented to the Corridor Advisory Committee August 18, 2016 Background Motion 22.1 elements are grouped into
More informationMETRONext. Vision & Moving Forward Plans. Board Workshop. December 11, DRAFT For Preliminary Discussion Only
METRONext Vision & Moving Forward Plans Board Workshop December 11, 2018 Disclaimer This presentation is being provided solely for discussion purposes by the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit
More informationITEM 13 - NOTICE May 20, 2009
ITEM 13 - NOTICE May 20, 2009 Notice of Proposed Amendment to the 2009 CLRP and FY 2010-2015 TIP to include the Closure of the I-395 Southbound Exit Ramp to 3rd Street NW, the Reconfiguration of the Southbound
More information