High Risk Rural Roads Program Guideline
|
|
- Bryan Andrews
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 High Risk Rural Roads Program Guideline 3.1 High Risk Rural Roads Program (HRRRP) SFETE-LU introduced a new set-aside provision known as the High Risk Rural Roads Program (HRRRP), codified as 23 U.S.C. 148 (f) for reducing the frequency and severity of collisions on rural roads functionally classified as a rural major collector, rural minor collector and rural local roads by correcting or improving hazardous locations or features. The program is a component of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). 23 U.S.C. 148 (a)(1) defines a HRRR according to the following definition: any roadway functionally classified as a rural major or minor collector or rural local road. on which the crash rate for fatalities and incapacitating injuries exceeds the statewide average for those functional classes of roadway; or. that will likely have increases in traffic volume that are likely to create an crash rate for fatalities and incapacitating injuries that exceeds the statewide average for those functional classes of roadway. The Federal Highway dministration (FHW) established the amount of annual funds appointed to the HRRR Program. Virginia has annually appointed approximately $2.0 million and the funding allocated to each of the nine VDOT construction districts based on proportion of severe crashes in three years. For a project to be eligible for HRRRP funds, the project roadways must be functionally classified as a rural major collector, rural minor collector, or rural local roads with fatal and incapacitating injury crash rate above the statewide average for those functional classes of roadways. Projects may be selected on any public HRRRP-eligible roadway in Virginia to correct or improve hazardous road locations or features. HRRRP funds can only be used for construction and operational improvements on high risk rural roads and the planning, preliminary engineering, and Roadway Safety udits (RS) related to specific high risk rural road improvements (HSIP Final Rule 23 CFR part (c)(2), December 24, 2008). VDOT administers the HRRRP centrally with input and concurrence on recommended projects from regional traffic engineering staffs. Funding is allocated to each construction district based on the proportion of fatal and incapacitating 1 injuries (K+). Since VDOT maintains all rural roads (except for Federal Lands facilities), data is available to conduct comprehensive safety planning for the HRRR. 1 Virginia follows the KC Severity scale as K = death, = Visible signs of injury, = Visible but minor injury, C = o visible injury but complaint of pain injury
2 To develop project proposals, consultant services were used to conduct RSs at eligible locations identified by HSIP staff. Submitted proposals for HRRR funding must follow the requirements of HSIP project development. Engineering RS studies of proposed projects, which include the HSIP economic analysis (enefit/cost analysis), are submitted by regional staff for funding. 3.2 Data Description and Identification Procedures Three major elements as crash location, crash severity and vehicle exposure are needed to meet the HRRRP requirement for determining fatal and incapacitating injury (K+) crash rates on eligible locations Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) solidly stains detailed records on historical crash, roadway inventory and traffic information in the Highway Traffic Records Information System (HTRIS). The HTRIS is a comprehensive Oracle database and contains multiple subsystems and the subsystems store and access via base or derived relations. For establishing the HRRRP, three subsystems such as ccident (CC): a subsystem which contained crash, vehicle and human information derived from Police Crash Report (FR300), Roadway Inventory (RDI): a subsystem which contained attribute information of highway, roads and street network consisted of over 200,000 segments, and Traffic Monitoring System (TMS): a subsystem which contained travel, demographic, pavement condition, travel activity by vehicle type and continuous traffic data on all public roads. For identifying eligible locations which met the required FHW statutory, VDOT has developed systematic approaches which completely linking and rightly compiling and consolidating the three sub-systems (CC, RDI and TMS) to extract the major elements that needed. set of Structure Query Language (SQL), a standard programming language for retrieving Oracle database, were used to connect the sub-systems and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was then used to manage the data further to produce statistical test. Data manipulation procedures included screening of eligible locations and identification of safety improvement project locations from the screening are shown in Figure 3-1. Intersection and segment are separately conducted the procedures and specific guidance related to each step is outlined below;
3 FIGURE 3-1. Data Procedures for Identifying/Prioritizing HRRRP Sites Step 1 Roadway Inventory (RDI) Step 2 Intersection (HTRIS ode) Segment (HTRIS Link) Step 3 O SEEIG 1 Eligible configuration of approaches FC? SEEIG 1 Eligible FC on segment? O YES JOI Crash (CC) & Traffic (TMS) Data JOI YES Step 4 Calculate Statewide verage Fat. & Incap. Crash Rate Calculate Statewide verage Fat. & Incap. Crash Rate Step 5 O SEEIG 2 Fat. & Incap. > SW ve.? SEEIG 2 Fat. & Incap. > SW ve.? O YES YES Step 6 Candidate of HRRRP Intersections Candidate of HRRRP Segments Step 7 Safety Improvement Project Selection Safety Improvement Project Selection FC: Road Functional Classification SW: Statewide HRRRP: High Risk Rural Roads Program : Crash Rate Fat. & Incap.: Fatal and Incapacitating Injury Crash [Step 1] [Step 2] [Step 3] Extract Roadway Inventory (RDI) data from HTRIS Classify roadway network data for intersection and segments Screening eligible intersections and roadway segments functionally classified as a rural major or minor collector or rural local roads Intersections are consisted of a junction where more than two roads either meet or cross at grade. Therefore, intersections are practically consisted one or more than one road functional classes according to approach road characteristics. The defined only eligible roads as rural major or minor collector and rural locals are very straight to assort identifying segments but rather ambiguous for intersections. s a result, VDOT defined eligible HRRR
4 intersection by approach configurations. Only intersections which have at least one approach functional classified one of the three roads but must not have a single approach functionally classified as urban. Figure 3-2 shows example combinations of functional configurations on 4-Legs intersections. FIGURE 3-2. VDOT defined Eligible HRRR Intersection Configurations /C C /C /C /C (a) Type I - Eligible (b) Type II - Eligible (c) Type III - ot Eligible (d) Type IV - ot Eligible pproach : Rural Major Collecotr (FC=4), Rural Minor Collector (FC=5), Rural Local (FC=6) pproach : Rural Interstate (FC=1), Rural Principle rterial (FC=2), Rural Minor rterial (FC=3) pproach C: Urban Interstate (FC=), Urban Freeway and Expressway (FC=), Urban Principle rterial (FC=E) Urban Minor rterial (FC=H), Urban Collector (FC=I), Urban Local (FC=J) [Step 4] Calculate Statewide verage Fatal and Incapacitating Crash Rate after joining Crash (CC) and Traffic (TMS) data on the identified eligible HRRR intersections and segments Crash rates were calculated by counting only the fatal and incapacitating injury crashes (K+) at intersection and segments separately using the following crash rate calculation formulas. Homogeneous locations were classified by configuration and traffic control devices, and road functional classifications for intersections and segments respectively. Therefore, statewide average crash rate of intersections and segments in same homogeneous groups were measured and compared with individual locations at each group. i Crash 1,000,000 = Year 365 Enter DT i s Crash 100,000,000 = Year 365 Length Link DT s ij = k = 1 i or sj = k = 1 s In which, i or s = Intersection (i) or Segment (s) Crash Rate
5 ij or sj = verage Intersection (i) or Segment (s) Crash Rate in same homogeneous group j Crash = Fatal and Incapacitating Injury Crash Frequency Only Year = umber of Year DT i or s = verage nnual Daily Traffic (i = intersection and s = segment) = umber of Sites [Step 5] Flagging/identifying only intersections and segments which have fatal and incapacitating crash rate greater than statewide average in same categories of functional classification or geometric characteristics or features i ij or s sj In which, j or s = Intersection (i) or Segment (s) Crash Rate ij or sj = verage Intersection (i) or Segment (s) Crash Rate in same characteristic of homogeneous group j [Step 6] [Step 7] Final Candidate of intersections and segments which satisfying the required FHW statutory and eligible to use the HRRRP funds. Select the HRRRP intersection and segment project locations which provide maximum benefits from safety implementing using HRRRP funds 3.3 Project Selection [Step 7] and RS Review The identification procedures were conducted using three years ( ) of crash, roadway inventory and traffic data. From the identification procedures, approximate 12.4 % (5, 156) and 12.9% (5,552 miles) of intersections and segments were only satisfied the full FHW required statutory from the results(42, 352 and 43,123 miles of eligible intersection and segments) of roadway inventory (RDI) screening in [Step 3]. To maximize benefits from the limited HRRR funds, VDOT has focuses on identification of the most hazardous HRRR intersections and segments which have highly concentrated fatal and incapacitating injury crash and severities HRRR Intersection Project Location Three different thresholds, as shown in below, were used to screen and to identify HRRR intersection project locations:
6 1. Intersections which have fatal & incapacitating crashes >= 5, and fatal & incapacitating injured people >= 5 2. Intersections which have fatal & incapacitating crashes >= 5, and fatal & incapacitating crash percentage >= 40 % of total crashes 3. Intersections with no safety improvement during last 24 or planned for next 12 months 132 intersections were selected for the highest need of detailed assessment to determine possible treatments. VDOT allocated $400,000 for initiating HRRR program consultant lead Roadway Safety ssessments (RSs). Only 71 of the 132 intersections were identified for conducting crash and field RS reviews within the budget. The final 71 intersections were determined using four measures and a combined final rank (FR) method, as shown in below: 1. Fatal and Incapacitating Crash Frequency (CF) 2. Fatal and Incapacitating Crash Rate () 3. Fatal and Incapacitating Severity (People) Frequency (SF) 4. Fatal and Incapacitating Severity (People) Rate (SR) 5. Final Rank ( FR ) = Rank ( CF ) + Rank ( ) + Rank 4 ( SF ) + Rank ( SR ) Table 6-1 provides the distribution of the 71 intersections across Virginia. There are no intersections in orthern Virginia (OV) which is the most urbanized district in Virginia but over 70 percent of the intersections (51 intersections) are located the Salem, Lynchburg, Hampton Roads and Fredericksburg Districts. Table 3-1 Selected High Severe Crash HRRR Intersections District # of Intersections % 1 ristol Salem Lynchburg Richmond Hampton Roads Fredericksburg Culpeper Staunton OV TOTL
7 Roadway Safety ssessments were conducted at those 71 severe crash HRRR intersections. Three different terms of countermeasures for short, intermediate, and longterm have been recommended. Short-term recommendations are projects that can be completed in the immediate future at minimal expense with no right-of-way impacts, essentially maintenance treatments. Intermediate recommendations are those that require preliminary engineering, design, potential right-of-way acquisition and utilities work, and/or minor disturbance to operations. Long-term recommendations are the most expensive solutions that would require extensive design, right-of-way acquisition, utility relocation, and take much longer to plan, design, and reconstruct. lso, all the recommendations were categorized into maintenance, design and operation, and driving behaviors based on driving and crash patterns identified from traffic counts, collision diagrams and field review HRRR Segment Project Location VDOT has focused spending HRRRP funding on segments which have high Roadway Departure (RD) crashes. Segments which have high RD crash frequency were selected and prioritized from the 5,552 miles. There were 10,700 RD crashes which occurred at the 5,552 miles of segments during last 3 years ( ). s you shown in Figure 3-3, there was one spot which have 7 times of RD crashes between 2005 and 2007 but over 98 % of spots had been only one or two RD crashes. On the other words, RD crashes were occurred very randomly and dispersedly (1 spot/3091 ft) distributed. Figure 3-3 Spot Occurred Roadway Departure (RD) Crash Distribution # of RD Crash # of Spot For identifying high RD crash segments, VDOT has developed a search approach named as modified peak search sliding window. This approach fundamentally has same concept of general sliding window technique but multiple windows moved forward and backward inside of boundary which required must include a spot had user-defined RD crash
8 frequency. RD crash density were measured and compared inside of window boundaries as D1, D2 and D3 in Figure 3-4 (a). The identified/determined high RD density segments were combined with adjacent segments when the gap (L) between the identified two or more windows have less than 2500 ft (see Figure 3-4 (b)). s results, four different thresholds, as shown in below, were used to screen and to identify HRRRP segment project locations: 1. Segment must have at least one spot >= 3 RD crash/3year 2. Sliding window length (S) = 1200 ft 3. Consolidating gap (L) = 2500 ft 4. Intersections with no safety improvement during last 24 or planned for next 12 months Figure 3-4 Modified Peak Search Sliding Window D3 D1 D2 High RD Crash Spot Window (S ft) Sliding Windwow (a) Segment Determination L (ft) D i D i (b) Segment Consolidation Table 3-2 provides the distribution of identified about 30 miles of the most critical RD crash segments from the 5,552 miles eligible HRRR segments in statewide. The identified 30 miles of segments have over 30 times higher than statewide average of total and RD crash density respectively.
9 Table 3-2 Selected High RD Crash HRRR Segments District # of Routes Length(Mile) 1 ristol Salem Lynchburg Richmond Hampton Roads Fredericksburg Culpeper Staunton OV TOTL Roadway Safety ssessments (RSs) are currently processing at the 30 miles of high RD crash HRRR segments. RS field review will be conducted for each segment to identify safety issues related to roadway departure and specific strategies included 1. igger and/or brighter chevrons, 2. In-lane pavement markings, 3. Surface friction treatments on curves, 4. Edge line rumble strips. lso, same as intersection RS, three different terms of countermeasures for short-, intermediate-, and long-term will be recommended. 3.4 HRRR Program Implementation Progress HRRRP Funding Set-aside for HRRR projects has been $2 million each year since FY2006. With the 10 percent state match a total of $13.3 million is available for eligible projects. To date there has been no need to supplement the HRRR funds with other sources HRRRP Projects From the HRRR intersection RSs eight projects worth about $1.5 million were programmed in the FY2011 SYIP. dditional projects are pending more detailed engineering studies, such as traffic signal warrant studies, being conducted by VDOT staff. HRRR projects obligations for PE phases before June 2010 are shown in ppendix. ppendix lists the intersection improvement projects.
March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming
COORDINATION WITH VDOT DISTRICTS TO DELIVER IMPLEMENTABLE IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS March 2, 2017 Integrating Transportation Planning, Project Development, and Project Programming PRESENTATION OUTLINE What
More informationUnderstanding and Identifying Crashes on Curves for Safety Improvement Potential in Illinois
Understanding and Identifying Crashes on Curves for Safety Improvement Potential in Illinois Priscilla Tobias, P.E. Mouyid Islam, Ph.D. Kim Kolody, P.E. Optional Agenda Image Title Background Workflow
More informationWet Accident Reduction Program (WARP) in Virginia. Bipad Saha, P.E. Pavement Design Engineer
Wet Accident Reduction Program (WARP) in Virginia Bipad Saha, P.E. Pavement Design Engineer Presentation Outline Introduction to WARP Background WARP Outline 2008 WARP Results Historical Data and Results
More informationHSIP FUNDING APPLICATION
HSIP FUNDING APPLICATION Lucas County - Sylvania Ave at Centennial Rd DATE 10/6/2011 Project Information: COUNTY Lucas County LOCATION TYPE Intersection PROJECT SERVICE LIFE 20 years SEGMENT INFORMATION
More informationEXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT
EXCEPTION TO STANDARDS REPORT PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND NEED The project is located in Section 6, Township 23 North, Range 9 East and Section 31 Township 24 North, Range 9 East, in the Town of Stockton,
More informationTRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM
TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM PROGRAM BASICS Mount Pleasant Transportation Department 100 Ann Edwards Lane Mt. Pleasant, SC 29465 Tel: 843-856-3080 www.tompsc.com The Town of Mount Pleasant has adopted a traffic
More informationPurpose and Need Report
Purpose and Need Report State Highway (SH) 29 From Southwestern Boulevard to SH 95 Williamson County, Texas (CSJ: 0337-02-045) Prepared by Blanton & Associates, Inc. Date: November, 2015 The environmental
More informationVDOT Unused Facilities
VDOT Unused Facilities Appropriation Act Item 457 K.1 (2010) Report to the Chairmen of House Appropriations and Senate Finance Committees Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond,
More information1. Traffic Count Balancing Methodology. 2. Design-Year No-Build & Build Traffic Growth and Balancing D-1
1. Traffic Count alancing Methodology 1. The raw 3-day data was consolidated and averaged to provide a single 24-hour average weekday daily traffic () count. Heavy vehicle percentages were also tabulated
More informationNational Road Safety Action Plan in China
Sixth SHRP 2 Safety Research Symposium National Road Safety Action Plan in China Dr. Yan Wang July 14, 2011 Washington DC, USA Outline 1 Initiative of Road Safety Action Plan 2 Phase I 3 For Next Phase?
More informationSUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE PAVEMENT PROJECTS 2015 TxAPA Annual Meeting September 23, 2015 Austin District Mike Arellano, P.E. Date
SUCCESSFUL PERFORMANCE PAVEMENT PROJECTS 2015 TxAPA Annual Meeting September 23, 2015 Austin District Mike Arellano, P.E. Date AUSTIN DISTRICT SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF HIGH- FRICTION MIXTURES Mike Arellano,
More informationSafety Assessment. Intersection of Route 29 (Seminole Trail) and Ashwood Blvd (Route 1670). Albemarle County
Safety Assessment for Intersection of Route 29 (Seminole Trail) and Ashwood Blvd (Route 1670). Albemarle County Prepared by: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Northwestern Regional Operations - Traffic
More information2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
Speed Hump Policy 1. GENERAL The purpose of this policy is to provide guidelines for the application of speed humps. A "speed hump" is a gradual rise and fall of pavement surface across the width of the
More informationChapter 4 COLLISION REDUCTION PROGRAM
Chapter 4 COLLISION REDUCTION PROGRAM Table of Contents 4.0 Background...4-3 4.1 Safety Improvement Projects SHOPP 201.010 Program...4-3 4.1.1 Spot Improvements..4-3 4.1.2 Wet Improvements...4-4 4.1.3
More informationEffectiveness of Median Cable Barriers and Rumble Strips
Effectiveness of Median Cable Barriers and Rumble Strips Chris Poole, Iowa Department of Transportation Peter Savolainen, Iowa State University Mid-Continent Transportation Research Symposium August 16,
More informationINNOVATIVE APPROACH IN ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND ROAD SAFETY IMPACT ASSESSMENT
INNOVATIVE APPROACH IN ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE SAFETY MANAGEMENT AND ROAD SAFETY IMPACT ASSESSMENT www.ptvgroup.com Timo Hoffmann, PTV Group TSTS Road Safety Seminar, Bangkok, 2014-10-17 CRASH PREDICTION Tomorrow
More informationCONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 III. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION PROCEDURE... 7 APPENDIX A... 9 APPENDIX B...
Speed Hump Program CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... 2 II. SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION POLICY... 3 1. GENERAL... 3 2. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS... 3 A. PETITION... 3 B. OPERATIONAL AND GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF
More informationOpen House. Highway212. Meetings. Corridor Access Management, Safety & Phasing Plan. 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition
Welcome Meetings 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. - Southwest Corridor Transportation Coalition 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. - Open House Why is Highway 212 Project Important? Important Arterial Route Local Support Highway 212
More informationOverview. Prioritization of Safety Strategies Development of the Minnesota Sinusoidal Rumble Strip Implementation and Public Relations Considerations
Victor Lund, PE, Traffic Engineer St. Louis County, Minnesota October 11, 2018 Overview Prioritization of Safety Strategies Development of the Minnesota Sinusoidal Rumble Strip Implementation and Public
More informationAdditional $200 Speeding Fine Signs
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Agenda Date: June 18, 2007 Action Required: Presenter: Staff Contacts: Title: Adopt Ordinance Jeanie Alexander, P.E. Jeanie Alexander Additional $200
More information2030 Multimodal Transportation Study
2030 Multimodal Transportation Study City of Jacksonville Planning and Development Department Prepared by Ghyabi & Associates April 29,2010 Introduction Presentation Components 1. Study Basis 2. Study
More informationMissouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017
Missouri Seat Belt Usage Survey for 2017 Conducted for the Highway Safety & Traffic Division of the Missouri Department of Transportation by The Missouri Safety Center University of Central Missouri Final
More informationTask Force Meeting January 15, 2009
Task Force Meeting January 15, 2009 Study Update August 14 th Task Force Meeting Update on Traffic Projections and Financial Feasibility Study presented by Kane County and WSA staff The presentation summarized
More informationTransportation accomplishments
1 1 Welcome Transportation accomplishments Federal Funding State Funding Challenges Future Projects 2 Transportation Project: The NDDOT had a record construction season in 2011. Completed $595.6 million
More informationRTE. 1 at RTE. 637 & RTE. 639
INTERSECTION SAFETY STUDY Prepared for: Virginia Department of Transportation Central Region Operations Traffic Engineering (UPC #81378, TO 12-092) DAVENPORT Project Number: 13-368 / /2014 RTE. 1 at RTE.
More informationFigure 1 Map of intersection of SR 44 (Ravenna Rd) and Butternut Rd
Abbreviated Study District: 12 County: Geauga Route: SR 44 Section: 1.58 GEA 44 1.58 213 HSP # 47 (Rural Intersection) Prepared April 23, 215 By Bryan Emery Existing Conditions This study contains the
More informationINTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION
INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION Trunk Highway 22 and CSAH 21 (E Hill Street/Shanaska Creek Road) Kasota, Le Sueur County, Minnesota November 2018 Trunk Highway 22 and Le Sueur CSAH 21 (E Hill Street/Shanaska
More informationPOLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION. Effective Date: July 10, 2013
CITY OF MORENO VALLEY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING DIVISION Administration Policy #A-14A POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SPEED HUMP INSTALLATION Effective Date: July 10, 2013 Approved
More informationTulsa Transportation Management Area. Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program
Tulsa Transportation Management Area Urbanized Area Surface Transportation Program FFY 2022 Application Information Sponsor Location Description STP Request Other Funds Broken Arrow Elm Place: Kenosha
More informationMetropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report
Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report Metro District Office of Operations and Maintenance Regional Transportation Management Center May 2014 Table of Contents PURPOSE AND NEED... 1 INTRODUCTION...
More informationTRAFFIC DEPARTMENT 404 EAST WASHINGTON BROWNSVILLE, TEXAS City of Brownsville Speed Hump Installation Policy
A. GENERAL Speed humps are an effective and appropriate device for safely reducing vehicle speeds on certain types of streets when installed accordance with the provisions of this policy. In order for
More informationDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW OF SAFETY PROGRAMS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW OF SAFETY PROGRAMS SAFETY PROGRAMS Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) Commercial Vehicle Safety Federal Highway Administration (FHWA ) Highway Safety
More informationEngineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering
The University College of Applied Sciences UCAS Engineering Dept. Highways & Transportation Engineering (BENG 4326) Instructors: Dr. Y. R. Sarraj Chapter 4 Traffic Engineering Studies Reference: Traffic
More information2016 Congestion Report
2016 Congestion Report Metropolitan Freeway System May 2017 2016 Congestion Report 1 Table of Contents Purpose and Need...3 Introduction...3 Methodology...4 2016 Results...5 Explanation of Percentage Miles
More informationNew Buck O Neil (U. S. 169) Crossing Benefit-Cost Analysis. Kansas City, Missouri
New Buck O Neil (U. S. 169) Crossing Benefit-Cost Analysis Kansas City, Missouri New Buck O Neil (U. S. 169) Crossing Benefit-Cost Analysis prepared for Kansas City, Missouri prepared by Burns & McDonnell
More informationSpeed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report
Speed Limit Study: Traffic Engineering Report This report documents the engineering and traffic investigation required by Vermont Statutes Annotated Title 23, Chapter 13 1007 for a municipal legislative
More informationODOT Transportation Safety. It All Starts With Crash Data
ODOT Transportation Safety Programs It All Starts With Crash Data Robin Ness, Mgr. Crash Analysis & Reporting Unit Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) 17 th Annual Northwest Tribal Symposium Red
More informationCULPEPER DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION UPDATE / FALL 2017
CULPEPER DISTRICT TRANSPORTATION UPDATE / FALL 17 From the District Engineer: In 17, the Culpeper District successfully delivered several large projects that have been years in the making. In Culpeper
More information2015 Community Report White Rock
5 White Rock Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2016 Community Report Los Alamos County
6 Los Alamos County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More informationAnnual Report on Initiatives for Outsourcing, Privatization and Downsizing within VDOT
Annual Report on Initiatives for Outsourcing, Privatization and Downsizing within VDOT HB 5063 (Special Session I, 2006) Report to the General Assembly of Virginia Virginia Department of Transportation
More information2014 Community Report Portales
4 Portales Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More informationBackground. Request for Decision. Pedestrian Lighting Standards for Road Right-of-ways. Recommendation. Presented: Monday, Mar 17, 2014
Presented To: Operations Committee Request for Decision Pedestrian Lighting Standards for Road Right-of-ways Presented: Monday, Mar 17, 2014 Report Date Thursday, Mar 06, 2014 Type: Presentations Recommendation
More information2016 Community Report Portales
6 Portales Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2016 Community Report Torrance County
6 Torrance County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2015 Community Report Torrance County
5 Torrance County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2014 Community Report Luna County
4 Luna County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2015 Community Report Grants
5 Grants Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2016 Community Report De Baca County
6 De Baca County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More informationThe Highway Safety Manual: Will you use your new safety powers for good or evil? April 4, 2011
The Highway Safety Manual: Will you use your new safety powers for good or evil? April 4, 2011 Introductions Russell Brownlee, M.A. Sc., FITE, P. Eng. Specialize in road user and rail safety Transportation
More informationThe major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown on Figure 1-1 and described below:
3.5 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 3.5.1 Existing Conditions 3.5.1.1 Street Network DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT The major roadways in the study area are State Route 166 and State Route 33, which are shown
More information2015 Community Report Las Vegas
5 Las Vegas Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More informationTable of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...
Crosshaven Drive Corridor Study City of Vestavia Hills, Alabama Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 3 PROJECT STUDY AREA... 3 Figure 1 Vicinity Map Study Area... 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS... 5 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...
More information2015 Community Report Tularosa
5 Tularosa Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2016 Community Report Santa Fe County
26 Santa Fe County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2014 Community Report Las Vegas
4 Las Vegas Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2014 Community Report Truth or Consequences
4 Truth or Consequences Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2014 Community Report Tularosa
4 Tularosa Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 8 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2016 Community Report San Juan County
26 San Juan County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2015 Community Report San Juan County
25 San Juan County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2015 Community Report Doña Ana County
25 Doña Ana County Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population
More information2015 Community Report Chaparral
5 Chaparral Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2016 Community Report Aztec
Aztec Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies, Traffic
More information2015 Community Report Aztec
25 Aztec Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More informationApproved Revenue Sharing Projects for De-Allocation "Attachment A"
Approved Revenue Sharing s for De-Allocation "Attachment A" # Bristol Abingdon (Town of) U000-40-R69 05675 Sidewalk (new construction) $355,50.00 04-5 Russell County Abingdon (Town of) summary: Saltville
More informationFlorida Strategic Highway Safety Planning Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Update and Performance Overview
Session 1 Florida Strategic Highway Safety Planning Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Update and Performance Overview Joe Santos, PE, FDOT, State Safety Office October, 23, 2013 Florida Statistics
More information2014 Community Report Aztec
Aztec Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies, Traffic
More information1200 ZONES AND STUDIES Traffic Engineering Manual
TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 12 - ZONES AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING STUDIES 1200 GENERAL... 12-5 1201 TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONES... 12-5 1202 SCHOOL ZONES... 12-5 1203 SPEED ZONES... 12-5 1203-1 General... 12-5 1203-2
More information2015 Community Report Los Lunas
25 Los Lunas Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More information2014 Community Report Los Lunas
4 Los Lunas Produced for the New Mexico Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 58 by the University of New Mexico, Geospatial and Population Studies,
More informationAusRAP assessment of Peak Downs Highway 2013
AusRAP assessment of Peak Downs Highway 2013 SUMMARY The Royal Automobile Club of Queensland (RACQ) commissioned an AusRAP assessment of Peak Downs Highway based on the irap protocol. The purpose is to
More informationSPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS
SPEED CUSHION POLICY AND INSTALLATION PROCEDURES FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS CITY OF GRAND PRAIRIE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT SPEED CUSHION INSTALLATION POLICY A. GENERAL Speed cushions are an effective
More informationCOUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS. Policy 817 i
Table of Contents COUNTY ROAD SPEED LIMITS Policy 817.1 PURPOSE... 2.2 APPLICABILITY... 2.3 DEFINITIONS... 2.4 STATE ENABLING LEGISLATION... 3.5 SPEED LIMITS ON COUNTY ROADS (CCC 11.04)... 3.6 ESTABLISHING
More informationAct 229 Evaluation Report
R22-1 W21-19 W21-20 Act 229 Evaluation Report Prepared for Prepared by Table of Contents 1. Documentation Page 3 2. Executive Summary 4 2.1. Purpose 4 2.2. Evaluation Results 4 3. Background 4 4. Approach
More informationState Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT
State Highway 32 East TIGER Discretionary Grant Application APPENDIX C - BENEFIT COST ANALYSIS REPORT April 2016 I. COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS A Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) was conducted in conformance
More informationAlberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999
&+$37(5Ã)Ã Alberta Infrastructure HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE AUGUST 1999 &+$37(5) 52$'6,'()$&,/,7,(6 7$%/(2)&217(176 Section Subject Page Number Page Date F.1 VEHICLE INSPECTION STATIONS... F-3 April
More information2016 Community Report New Mexico
216 Produced for the Department of Transportation, Traffic Safety Division, Traffic Records Bureau, Under Contract 581 by the University of, Geospatial and Population Studies, Traffic Research Unit Distributed
More informationKANSAS Occupant Protection Observational Survey Supplementary Analyses Summer Study
KANSAS Occupant Protection Observational Survey Supplementary Analyses 2018 Summer Study Submitted To: Kansas Department of Transportation Bureau of Transportation Safety and Technology Prepared by: DCCCA
More informationSight Distance. A fundamental principle of good design is that
Session 9 Jack Broz, PE, HR Green May 5-7, 2010 Sight Distance A fundamental principle of good design is that the alignment and cross section should provide adequate sight lines for drivers operating their
More informationNortheast Pavement Preservation Partnership Burlington, Vermont. Rhode Island DOT
Northeast Pavement Preservation Partnership Burlington, Vermont Rhode Island DOT April 8, 2014 SHRP2 R26 (Preservation of High-Traffic Volume Roadways) and MAP-21 Impacts to RIDOT Pavement Management David
More informationRocky Mount. Transportation Plan. Transportation Planning Division. Virginia Department of Transportation
2020 Transportation Plan Developed by the Transportation Planning Division of the Virginia Department of Transportation in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration
More informationConventional Approach
Session 6 Jack Broz, PE, HR Green May 5-7, 2010 Conventional Approach Classification required by Federal law General Categories: Arterial Collector Local 6-1 Functional Classifications Changing Road Classification
More informationRichmond Area MPO Regional Priority Transportation Projects
Regional Priority Transportation Projects September 27, 2007 HANOVER GOOCHLAND ASHLAND POWHATAN RICHMOND HENRICO NEW KENT CHESTERFIELD CHARLES CITY 9211 Forest Hill Avenue, Suite 200 Richmond, Virginia
More informationREVIEW OF THE DRAFT 2011 VA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL. December 14, 2010 David Rush VDOT WZS Program Manager
REVIEW OF THE DRAFT 2011 VA WORK AREA PROTECTION MANUAL December 14, 2010 David Rush VDOT WZS Program Manager Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) Released in December 2009 States have until
More informationCHARACTERIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRUCK LOAD SPECTRA FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE PAVEMENT DESIGN PRACTICES IN LOUISIANA
CHARACTERIZATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRUCK LOAD SPECTRA FOR CURRENT AND FUTURE PAVEMENT DESIGN PRACTICES IN LOUISIANA LSU Research Team Sherif Ishak Hak-Chul Shin Bharath K Sridhar OUTLINE BACKGROUND AND
More informationRTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT
2011-2015 RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary... 3 Crash Types... 4 Time and Day of Crashes... 7 Crash Factors... 9 Fatalities... 10 Driver s Behavior... 11 Crash Locations... 15 Non-Motorized
More informationMPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017
MPO Staff Report Technical Advisory Committee: July 12, 2017 RECOMMENDED ACTION: 2 nd TAC Meeting with Kimley-Horn/WSB in Updating the Street/Highway Element of 2045 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. Matter
More informationBella Vista Bypass Benefit Cost Analysis
Bella Vista Benefit Cost Analysis The Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) was performed in accordance with the ARRA guidance provided in the Federal Register. These benefits and costs were quantified in accordance
More informationGuardrail/Bridgerail Recommendations for Very Low Volume Local Roads in Kansas
Guardrail/Bridgerail Recommendations for Very Low Volume Local Roads in Kansas MINK Conference September 20, 2017 Ronald J. Seitz, P.E. and Tod Salfrank The Problem The Local Road System in Kansas is Very
More informationMEMORANDUM. Proposed Town of Chapel Hill Green Fleets Policy
AGENDA #4k MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Town Council W. Calvin Horton, Town Manager Proposed Town of Chapel Hill Green Fleets Policy DATE: June 15, 2005 The attached resolution would adopt the
More informationCENTRAL VIRGINIA LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN. Appendix F
Data Collection Traffic turning movement data were obtained from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) Southwestern Region Lynchburg District Traffic Engineering Section. However, 12-hour traffic
More informationTOWARD SAFE AND RELIABLE ROADWAYS. Jill Ryan, MPH Eagle County Commissioner
TOWARD SAFE AND RELIABLE ROADWAYS Jill Ryan, MPH Eagle County Commissioner Where Does CDOT Money Go? FY2012 (in CDOT millions) Expenditures $1,104,588,163* $684.3 [63%] MAINTAIN What We Have 15% 14% 5%
More informationCITY OF TORRANCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE
CITY OF TORRANCE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE UPDATE TUESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2017 1 DISCUSSION TOPICS Update of Infrastructure Action Plan (IAP) o Sidewalk and Roadway projects
More informationCITY CLERK. Warrants for All-Way Stop Sign Control and 40 km/h Maximum Speed Limits
CITY CLERK Clause embodied in Report No. 9 of the, as adopted by the Council of the City of Toronto at its Special Meeting held on July 30, 31 and August 1, 2002. 10 Warrants for All-Way Stop Sign Control
More informationCrash Reconstruction Crash Report and assessment Road Safety Reviews Road Safety Assessment Case Studies/Evaluation
Road Assessments Crash Reconstruction Crash Report and assessment Road Safety Reviews Road Safety Assessment Case Studies/Evaluation Crash Reconstruction Illinois State Police Illinois Crash Report Assessment
More informationWhere are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities?
Where are the Increases in Motorcycle Rider Fatalities? Umesh Shankar Mathematical Analysis Division (NPO-121) Office of Traffic Records and Analysis National Center for Statistics and Analysis National
More informationUS 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting
US 81 Bypass of Chickasha Environmental Assessment Public Meeting March 14, 2013 Introductions ODOT FHWA SAIC Meeting Purpose Present need for bypass Provide responses to 10/04/11 public meeting comments
More informationPerformance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms
Performance Measure Summary - Large Area Sum There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance
More informationPerformance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum. Performance Measures and Definition of Terms
Performance Measure Summary - Medium Area Sum There are several inventory and performance measures listed in the pages of this Urban Area Report for the years from 1982 to 2014. There is no single performance
More informationHIGHWAY SAFETY RESEARCH GROUP. Safety Analysis Tools Used for Coalitions and Districtwide Safety Investment Plans
Safety Analysis Tools Used for Coalitions and Districtwide Safety Investment Plans 3 Levels of Analysis SHSP Dashboards LOSS Dashboard GIS Tool SHSP Dashboards Strategic Highway Safety Plan The vision
More information