Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008"

Transcription

1 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008 SUY Marko Vihervuori B: 6/2009

2

3 Publisher HELSINKI CITY TRANSPORT Planning Unit DESCRIPTION Date of publication (original ) Author(s) Marko Vihervuori Name of publication Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008 Abstract Helsinki City Transport constantly measures passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki with the help of questionnaires. In 2008 altogether 12,401 passengers were asked to evaluate different quality factors. Respondents gave public transport an overall mark of 4.03, which was a lower than the year before (4.13). The scale varies from 1 = poor to 5 = excellent. The mark went down with regard to the service in all modes of transport, except for VR commuter trains Tram passengers Bus passengers Metro passengers Commuter train passengers (VR) Total In tram traffi c satisfaction with available room and fl uency of travelling were better marked than earlier. Satisfaction with driver s information skills and driver s customer service went down, compared to the previous year. In bus traffi c passengers gave better marks for available room and driver s manner of driving. Satisfaction with driver s information skills and transfer conditions were lower than the year before. In metro traffi c, improvements were observed in available room, fl uency of travelling and station cleanliness. Satisfaction with vehicle tidiness and functioning of indication signs were lower than the year before. In commuter train service (operated by VR) satisfaction with public order and punctuality were better marked than earlier. Satisfaction with functioning of indication signs and station cleanliness went down, compared to the previous year. Key words Public transport, passengers satisfaction Other information Layout: Mirva Ilmoniemi, translation: Jarmo Kalanti Series number ISSN-number ISBN-number HKL series B: 6/ X Printing place and year Language Pages Appendices Helsinki 2009 English 21 4 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

4 2 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

5 Foreword This publication contains the results of the survey measuring passengers satisfaction in The averages of marks for quality factors have been calculated by line, by mode of public transport and, in the bus traffi c, by tender object and by operator. The results will be exploited to develop public transport, in staff schooling, and in the calculation of bonuses for tendered operators. The survey also contains valuable information on passenger profi les. The survey has been assisted by 4 6 students who have, on vehicles, distributed questionnaires to passengers, and collected them fi lled in. The fi eld work has been coordinated by research assistant Pirjo Pakonen. The results have been processed by system planner Esko Kokki. The report has been drawn up by head of traffi c research Marko Vihervuori. The report has been translated by Jarmo Kalanti and laid out by Mirva Ilmoniemi. Further enquiries can be posed to the undersigned at tel Helsinki, 14 August 2009 Marko Vihervuori Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

6 Contents Foreword 3 1. Introduction 6 2. Sample structure 7 3. Frequency of free riding 8 4. Passengers overall mark for public transport services in Helsinki in Passengers satisfaction with mode of public transport Satisfaction with operator and with public transport system Changes in different quality factors Passengers satisfaction with different operators Passengers marks by line-section and by line in bus service 19 Appendices Appendix 1 Passangers satisfaction by line in Appendix 2 Passangers satisfaction by tender object in Appendix 3 Passangers satisfaction by operator in Appendix 4 Questionnaire 30 4 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

7 Figures Figure 1. Passengers overall mark for public transport services in Helsinki Figure 2. Marks for operators, by mode of transport, semi-annually Figure 3. Marks for public transport system, by mode of transport, semi-annually Figure 4. Marks for different quality factors, by mode of transport, in 2007 and Figure 5: Marks for drivers performance in tram traffic, semi-annually Figure 6: Marks for drivers performance in bus traffic, semi-annually Figure 7: Marks for different factors of public transport system, in tram traffic, semi-annually Figure 8: Marks for different factors of public transport system, in bus traffic, semi-annually Figure 9: Marks for different factors of public transport system, in Metro traffic, semi-annually Figure 10: Marks for different factors of public transport system, in commuter train (VR) traffic, semi-annually Figure 11: Marks for bus drivers customer service, by operator, semi-annually Figure 12: Marks for bus drivers information skills, by operator, semi-annually Figure 13: Marks for bus drivers manner of driving, by operator, semi-annually Figure 14: Marks for vehicle tidiness in bus traffic, by operator, semi-annually Figure 15: Marks for travel comfort (indoor fittings) in bus traffic, by operator, semi-annually Figure 16: Marks for public order on vehicle in bus traffic, by operator, semi-annually Figure 17. Number of customer feedback to bus operators per million passengers, by operator, in Figure 18: Changes in marks for bus line-sections , in percentage terms. 19 Figure 19: Marks for operators of City Centre bus lines, in 2007 and Figure 20: Marks for public transport system in City Centre, in 2007 and Figure 21: Marks for operators of bus lines in North-Western Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 22: Marks for public transport system in North-Western Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 23: Marks for operators of bus lines in Northern Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 24: Marks for public transport system in Northern Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 25: Marks for operators of bus lines in North-Eastern Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 26: Marks for public transport system in North-Eastern Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 27: Marks for operators of bus lines in Eastern Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 28: Marks for public transport system in Eastern Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 29: Marks for operators of transverse bus lines, in 2007 and Figure 30. Marks for transverse public transport system, in 2007 ja Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

8 1. Introduction Helsinki City Transport has measured passengers satisfaction with transport services in Helsinki since Questionnaires have been fi lled in on all tram routes, on the Metro, and on bus lines with at least 1,600 daily passengers. As for commuter trains (operated by VR), the interviews have been carried out at the stations of Malmi, Malminkartano and Puistola. The objective is to get an opinion of approximately 11,000 passengers annually. The survey activity is going on throughout the year, except for the month of December. Passengers satisfaction is followed up with a quarterly output, and a report is published semi-annually. This report contains the results of the whole year The passengers have been interviewed from Monday to Thursday between 6 a.m. and 6 p.m., and on Friday between 6 a.m. and, at latest, 2 p.m. The number of chosen interviewees is determined by route quotas, and by morning peak, day time and evening peak-hours in relation to the distribution of passenger volumes. The objective is to get at least 100 opinions for each route annually. The most frequented lines have had larger samples. Passengers on neighbourhood bus lines were not interviewed. On bus, tram and Metro an assistant has distributed passengers, chosen by random, a map consisting of a questionnaire with pen and writing pad. The passengers have been asked to evaluate different quality factors on the respective line and to return the questionnaire map to the assistant when exiting. As for commuter trains, the assistant has interviewed passengers at stations. The assistant has completed every returned questionnaire with date, time and respective line number (or name of train station). Since the beginning of the year 2008 the scale of passengers satisfaction has varied from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). Earlier the scale varied from 4 (poor) to 10 (excellent). In this publication the data from the years has been converted into the new scale by using coeffi cients resulting from different questions and line numbers. The conversion is not linear because of different variance within the scales, it is, for instance, easier to give the mark 4 in a scale 1 5 than to give 9 in a scale The passengers may use the different scales with a different severity, so that time series on the marking of different factors are not always congruent. The survey also contains information on passenger profi le and such questions as what kind of tickets the passengers use, whether they could have taken the journey on their own car, and in which city or commune they live in. 6 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

9 2. Sample structure The passenger survey is not a sample in statistical terms, because the age distribution of and other background information on passengers is impossible to get in advance. It is not possible that the assistant starts with asking a passenger on his or her background and then refuses to continue with unsuitable interviewees. This kind of proceeding would irritate the passengers and delay the survey. To minimize a possible bias in the results, the assistants have been instructed to pick up the interviewees so randomly as possible with regard to their background (age, sex etc.). The passenger profi le of the respondents was as follows. Tram Bus Metro Train Total Respondents: 2,075 8,549 1, ,401 Gender: Male 31 % 28 % 32 % 28 % 29 % Female 69 % 72 % 68 % 72 % 71 % Age: % 8 % 5 % 5 % 7 % % 24 % 25 % 22 % 25 % % 27 % 33 % 29 % 28 % % 25 % 25 % 32 % 25 % % 17 % 11 % 12 % 16 % Ticket type: Travel card period 70 % 78 % 74 % 75 % 76 % Travel card value 18 % 14 % 16 % 15 % 15 % Single ticket 7 % 5 % 7 % 5 % 5 % Other 5 % 3 % 4 % 5 % 3 % City of residence: Helsinki 86 % 93 % 87 % 90 % 91 % Espoo, Kauniainen 5 % 2 % 3 % 1 % 3 % Vantaa 4 % 3 % 6 % 6 % 4 % Elsewhere in Uusimaa and Itä-Uusimaa 2 % 1 % 3 % 2 % 2 % Elsewhere in Finland 3 % 1 % 1 % 2 % 1 % Travelling on this route: At least 4 days a week 54 % 58 % 68 % 72 % 59 % 2 3 days a week 23 % 21 % 17 % 14 % 20 % One day a week 10 % 8 % 6 % 6 % 8 % Rarely 14 % 13 % 9 % 8 % 13 % Transfer of public vehicle: Journey with 2 transfers or more 7 % 13 % 14 % 8 % 12 % Journey with one transfer 40 % 42 % 48 % 47 % 42 % Journey without transfer 52 % 45 % 38 % 45 % 45 % Possibility to take the journey in one s own car: Possibility to take car 29 % 28 % 35 % 37 % 29 % No possibility 71 % 72 % 65 % 63 % 71 % Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

10 3. Frequency of free riding It is usual to ask a couple of variable questions not related to passengers satisfaction. In spring 2008 it was asked if the passenger had travelled without a ticket during the last 6 months. The same question was asked also in spring Travelling without a ticket was signifi cantly more common among travellers on rail transport than among travellers on bus. During the last six months had travelled without a ticket Respondent travelled on Spring 2008 Spring 2007 tram 17 % 21 % bus 10 % 10 % metro 20 % 16 % local train 13 % 22 % All passangers 12 % 13 % The mode of transport in the table refers to the actual mode the respondent used. The distribution does not tell how often or in which mode of transport the passengers have travelled without a ticket. Travelling without a ticket was intentional Respondent travelled on Spring 2008 Spring 2007 tram 34 % 54 % bus 32 % 46 % metro 30 % 29 % local train 43 % 36 % All passangers 33 % 45 % The share of those travelling without a ticket was a little lower and noticeably less intentional in spring 2008 than the previous year. This suggests that a more intense ticket control and the publicity on it have had positive effects. 8 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

11 4. Passengers overall mark for public transport services in Helsinki in 2008 Respondents gave public transport an overall mark of 4.03, which was signifi cantly lower than the year before, when it was The overall mark is the average of overall marks of each mode of public transport weighted by respective passenger amounts. The overall marks by the passengers on internal lines of Helsinki were worse for all modes of transport than in the previous year. The overall mark for the commuter train service was slightly better than the year before Of passengers on tram Of passengers on bus Of passengers on Metro Of passengers on train Of passengers on tram, bus and metro All passengers Tram Bus Metro Train K-04 S-04 K-05 S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07 S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 1. Passengers overall mark for public transport services in Helsinki There was little difference between the residents of Helsinki and other passengers with regard to the overall mark. The residents of Helsinki were, however, a little more satisfi ed with the Metro than others. Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

12 5. Passengers satisfaction with mode of public transport 5.1 Satisfaction with operator and with public transport system Questions on different quality factors relate to the line on which the respondent was travelling. One part of the questions measures the operators performance and another part the public transport system in Helsinki. Time table punctuality is involved in both parts, because it refers to the system in tram and bus traffi c, and in Metro and VR commuter train service punctuality refers to operators. Factors measuring operator: - Drivers customer service - Drivers information skills - Drivers manner of driving - Time table punctuality - Vehicle tidiness - Travel comfort (indoor fi ttings) - Public order and security on vehicle Factors measuring public transport system: - Time table punctuality - Seat availability and room - Travel smoothness (speed) - Transfer conditions (from one vehicle into another) - Waiting conditions at stops Marks for operators Change Tram service Bus service Metro service Local train service Tram, bus and Metro together All together Marks for overall public transport system service Tram service Bus service Metro service Local train service Tram, bus and Metro together All together The marks for operators went down, compared to the previous year, by on tram routes and by on bus routes, and by on the Metro. The passengers satisfaction with commuter train operation improved by 0.16, so that it got the best mark since the introducing of the time series in The public transport system mark for tram service improved by 0.09, for bus by 0.04, for the Metro by 0.10 and for VR commuter train service by Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

13 Tram Bus Metro Train K-04 S-04 K-05 S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07 S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 2. Marks for operators, by mode of transport, semi-annually Tram Bus Metro Train K-04 S-04 K-05 S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07 S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 3. Marks for public transport system, by mode of transport, semi-annually Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

14 5.2 Changes in different quality factors Changes between 2007 and 2008 The most remarkable changes in the marks from the year 2007 to 2008 occurred in the following quality factors. Changes in all quality factors can be seen in fi gure 4. In tram service the most remarkably improved factors were seating room and travel smoothness. The most remarkable negative changes occurred with drivers information skills as well as with drivers customer service. One third of the deterioration of customer service results from a changed question of this factor. In bus service the most remarkable change was the improvement of seating room and of drivers manner of driving. The most remarkable negative changes occurred with drivers information skills and with transfer conditions TRAM SERVICE Drivers customer service Drivers information skills Drivers manner of driving Punctuality Vehicle tidiness Travel comfort (indoor fittings) Seat availability Timetable suitability Travel smoothness Transfer conditions Public order on vehicle Waiting conditions BUS SERVICE Drivers customer service Drivers information skills Drivers manner of driving Punctuality Vehicle tidiness Travel comfort (indoor fittings) Seat availability Timetable suitability Travel smoothness Transfer conditions Public order on vehicle Waiting conditions M ETRO SERVICE Drivers manner of driving Punctuality Vehicle tidiness Seat availability Timetable suitability In Metro service the best improvers were seating room, travel smoothness and station tidiness. The biggest falls compared to the previous year were registered in vehicle tidiness and functioning of information signals. In commuter train service (VR) public order and punctuality were remarkably better marked than in the previous year. Negative development was noticed in functioning of information signals and in station tidiness. Travel smoothness Order and safety on vehicle Station tidiness Functioning of information signals LOCAL TRAIN SERVICE Drivers manner of driving Punctuality Vehicle tidiness Seat availability Timetable suitability Travel smoothness Order and safety on vehicle Station tidiness Functioning of information signals Figure 4. Marks for different quality factors, by mode of transport, in 2007 and Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

15 Development between 2004 and 2008 Figures 5 10 show the development of different quality factors since the year 2004, semi-annually. In tram and bus service the development of drivers performance is depicted. By drivers performance is meant drivers customer service, information skills and manner of driving. The development of marks for different quality factors of the public transport system is depicted as well. The tram drivers performance has become worse especially with regard to information skills as well as to customer service, on the basis of the marks. A decreasing trend in terms of information skills can be noticed for some time, but in spring 2008 both marks fell remarkably, compared to earlier years. In tram service, a third of the deterioration in the mark results from a changed question of drivers customer service. Therefore, the time series is not quite congruent. The question about drivers information skills remained practically unchanged. In tram traffi c, the passengers have to deal with the driver only when buying a ticket or asking for information. This emphasizes the importance of being served, while in bus traffi c the passenger cannot avoid meeting the driver (except those boarding through the middle door with prams etc.). This explains also the fall of both marks in tram service, while in bus service such a fall is hardly noticeable. In tram service, as a part of public transport system, transfer conditions, waiting conditions, seating room and travel smoothness got better marks, but punctuality was weaker than before. In tram service the fl uctuation of marks has been rather strong during recent years. A clear trend has been noticeable only with regard to time table punctuality, with falling marks for a couple of years. In bus service transfer conditions deteriorated compared to the previous year and a falling trend of punctuality has been noticeable already for about four years. Other marks have remained rather stable. The marks for the Metro have remained high, except for punctuality, which was worse than the year before. The mark for station tidiness is signifi cantly lower than for other factors. However, this mark has slightly turned upwards. In VR commuter train service the marks have been lower compared to corresponding fi gures of the Metro. Annual fl uctuations have accompanied the train service, so that no clear trend can be seen Drivers customer service Drivers information skills Drivers manner of driving 3.0 K-04 S-04 K-05 S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07 S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 5: Marks for drivers performance in tram traffic, semi-annually Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

16 Drivers customer service Drivers information skills Drivers manner of driving 3.0 K-04 S-04 K-05 S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07 S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 6: Marks for drivers performance in bus traffic, semi-annually Punctuality Seat availability Travel smoothness Transfer conditions Waiting conditions 3.0 K-04 S-04 K-05S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 7: Marks for different factors of public transport system, in tram traffic, semi-annually Punctuality Seat availability Travel smoothness Transfer conditions Waiting conditions 3.0 K-04S-04 K-05S-05 K-06S-06 K-07S-07 K-08S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 8: Marks for different factors of public transport system, in bus traffic, semi-annually Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

17 Punctuality Seat availability Travel smoothness Station tidiness K-04 S-04 K-05S-05 K-06S-06 K-07 S-07K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 9: Marks for different factors of public transport system, in Metro traffic, semi-annually Punctuality Seat availability Travel smoothness Station tidiness K-04 S-04K-05S-05 K-06S-06 K-07S-07K-08S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 10: Marks for different factors of public transport system, in commuter train (VR) traffic, semi-annually Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

18 6. Passengers satisfaction with different operators In focus are bus operators Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy (HelB), Concordia Bus, Pohjolan kaupunkiliikenne (PKL) and Veolia Transport. Examined are the marks for the quality factors which the operators can contribute to. The average mark of each operator for each quality factor is the result of the mark of a single route weighed by its weekday boardings. The best mark for drivers customer service has mostly received the operator PKL. In 2008 the best mark received Veolia, which in a longer trend has been rather equal with HelB and Concordia. Drivers information skills have downright collapsed for all operators, compared to the previous year. The trend has been downwards already for a longer period, but, compared to autumn 2007, there is a signifi cant fall in the marks. The fall seems to even out for most of the operators, but only PKL has succeeded in turning the mark into a slight upwards direction. As for drivers manner of driving the lines operated by PKL were marked best. PKL has improved this mark for a couple of years. HelB and Concordia have been rather stable, Veolia has experienced more fl uctuations. The difference in marks between operators for vehicle tidiness has varied rather signifi cantly. Passengers have been most satisfi ed with the buses of PKL for years. The lowest mark received Concordia, HelB and Veolia were a little better marked. The best mark for travel comfort (indoor fi ttings) has received PKL already for years, Veolia went down most, and others went down less remarkably. Public order on vehicle got a grade around 4.5 for all operators, which is a very good mark. Veolia improved, others remained approximately on their previous levels HelB Concordia PKL Veolia K-05 S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07 S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 11: Marks for bus drivers customer service, by operator, semi-annually Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

19 HelB Concordia PKL Veolia K-05 S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07 S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 12: Marks for bus drivers information skills, by operator, semi-annually HelB Concordia PKL Veolia K-05 S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07 S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 13: Marks for bus drivers manner of driving, by operator, semi-annually HelB Concordia PKL Veolia K-05 S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07 S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 14: Marks for vehicle tidiness in bus traffic, by operator, semi-annually Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

20 HelB Concordia PKL Veolia K-05 S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07 S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 15: Marks for travel comfort (indoor fittings) in bus traffic, by operator, semi-annually HelB Concordia PKL Veolia K-05 S-05 K-06 S-06 K-07 S-07 K-08 S-08 Semi-annual period Figure 16: Marks for public order on vehicle in bus traffic, by operator, semi-annually Passengers satisfaction with public transport services is also monitored with the help of separate passenger feedbacks. The objective is to use them as complementary signals to passenger surveys. The majority of feedbacks are complaints on a service factor, such as time table, operation, staff behaviour, tariffs etc. The number of customer feedback to bus operators, per one million passengers, by month, during the period is shown below. Because feedback mostly concerns a single line, the operators are compared with each other, even if they have not always been able to have infl uence on the reason of a feedback. Number of passenger feedbacks 2008 HKL as operator Tram 1,400 Metro 500 Other feedback to HKL 5,200 HKL, in total 7,100 Bus operators 8,300 of which service lines 200 Other partners 100 Total 15,400 The survey results for an operator are mostly supported by the separate passenger feedback. 18 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

21 200 HelB Concordia Veolia PKL feedback / million passangers /2005 3/2005 5/2005 7/2005 Figure 17. Number of customer feedback to bus operators per million passengers, by operator, in Passengers marks by line-section and by line in bus service The bus routes are divided into sections on the basis of which part of the city they serve. A division into six sections of Helsinki is commonly used: City Centre bus lines, North-Western, Northern, North-Eastern, Eastern, and transverse bus lines. The operator s performance was best marked on transverse bus lines, with 3.73, and worst on Eastern bus lines, with The best mark, 4.22, for the public transport system was given to transverse bus service, and the worst mark, 4.12, for City Centre bus service. The general enforcement of 9/ /2005 1/2006 3/2006 5/2006 7/2006 9/ /2006 1/2007 3/2007 5/2007 7/2007 9/ /2007 1/2008 3/2008 5/2008 7/2008 9/ /2008 transverse public transport and the popularity of line 550 ( Jokeri ) may be visible in these marks, although the respondents are asked to evaluate only the line they are travelling on. The marks for both the operator and the public transport system decreased, compared to the year before. The marks for the transport system decreased clearly less than for the operator. The weakening of driver s information skills explains most of the decrease. Change City centre lines North-Western lines Northern lines North-Eastern lines Eastern lines Transverse lines Transport system Operator -6% -5% -4% -3% -2% -1% 0% Figure 18: Changes in marks for bus line-sections , in percentage terms. Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

22 In the following are fi gured the marks for operators of each line-section, by line, in 2007 and Only the lines are shown of which there are observations in both periods of comparison B 15,A B 15,A 16 Line Line V 21V ,A 55,A Mark Mark Figure 19: Marks for operators of City Centre bus lines, in 2007 and Figure 20: Marks for public transport system in City Centre, in 2007 and Line Line Mark Mark Figure 21: Marks for operators of bus lines in North- Western Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 22: Marks for public transport system in North-Western Helsinki, in 2007 and Line 64 65A Line 64 65A A 66A Mark Mark Figure 23: Marks for operators of bus lines in Northern Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 24: Marks for public transport system in Northern Helsinki, in 2007 and Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

23 68,X 68,X T 70T 70V 70V V 71V Line Line A 75A 76A,B 76A,B A 77A Mark Mark Figure 25: Marks for operators of bus lines in North- Eastern Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 26: Marks for public transport system in North-Eastern Helsinki, in 2007 and ,B 81,B Line ,V 94A 94B Line ,V 94A 94B ,V ,V Mark Mark Figure 27: Marks for operators of bus lines in Eastern Helsinki, in 2007 and Figure 28: Marks for public transport system in Eastern Helsinki, in 2007 and A 52A 52V 52V Line ,B Line ,B Mark Mark Figure 29: Marks for operators of transverse bus lines, in 2007 and Figure 30. Marks for transverse public transport system, in 2007 ja Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

24 APPENDICES 22 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

25 Appendix 1 Passangers satisfaction by line in 2008 HKL Planning unit EK PASSENGERS' SATISFACTION BY LINE IN 2008 Line 1. Drivers' 2. Drivers' 3. Drivers' 4. Punctuality 5. Vehicle 6. Travel 8. Seat 9. Timetable 10. Travel 11. Transfer 12. Order, 13. Waiting 14.Inform. 17. Station 18. Functioning Total service information skills way of driving tidiness comfort availability suitability smoothness conditions safety conditions availibility tidiness of information Operator System Tram Boardings N 1,A ,01 3,88 3,94 3,68 3,65 3,75 4,40 4,35 4,07 4,15 3,99 3,77 4,08 3,85 4,06 3B,T ,84 3,89 3,79 3,54 3,36 3,71 4,11 4,46 4,06 4,19 3,90 3,73 4,22 3,72 4,03 4,T ,85 3,89 3,81 3,97 3,70 3,80 3,74 4,55 4,23 4,21 4,23 3,93 4,24 3,81 4, ,89 3,96 3,88 3,89 3,72 3,90 3,99 4,63 4,07 4,27 3,90 3,72 4,32 3,87 4,10 7A,B ,87 3,94 3,90 3,58 3,62 3,75 4,06 4,51 4,16 4,13 4,07 3,73 4,20 3,82 4, ,86 3,86 3,90 3,76 3,73 3,98 4,25 4,58 4,24 4,21 3,86 3,81 4,30 3,87 4, ,75 3,73 3,62 3,70 3,92 4,04 4,42 4,52 4,26 4,26 4,04 3,81 4,13 3,81 4, ,96 3,90 3,89 4,08 3,68 3,81 4,02 4,63 4,24 4,29 4,21 3,87 4,18 3,85 4,19 Tram total ,88 3,90 3,85 3,78 3,62 3,80 4,05 4,54 4,16 4,21 4,04 3,80 4,22 3,81 4,10 Bus ,77 3,74 3,61 3,72 3,78 3,67 4,01 4,46 3,84 4,17 4,50 3,77 4,35 3,71 4,10 14B ,77 3,71 3,67 3,85 3,85 3,78 4,30 4,59 4,16 4,17 4,44 3,75 4,34 3,76 4,20 15,A ,87 3,66 3,71 3,89 3,95 3,89 4,58 4,45 4,38 4,36 4,29 3,79 4,30 3,82 4, ,77 3,38 3,56 3,31 3,84 3,83 4,76 4,47 4,05 4,10 4,53 3,50 4,24 3,68 4, ,99 3,64 3,70 3,57 4,07 3,90 4,67 4,46 3,99 4,10 4,62 3,46 4,17 3,86 4, ,81 3,78 3,68 3,38 3,95 3,96 4,34 4,41 3,71 4,04 4,59 3,88 4,34 3,84 4, ,80 3,76 3,47 3,48 3,76 3,85 4,40 4,42 3,91 4,09 4,56 3,86 4,29 3,73 4,13 21V ,62 3,45 3,37 3,58 3,58 3,44 4,50 4,50 3,93 4,05 4,63 3,86 4,12 3,49 4, ,84 3,80 3,67 3,57 3,63 3,65 4,77 4,57 4,08 4,13 4,63 3,48 4,28 3,72 4, ,83 3,67 3,64 3,13 3,69 3,67 4,35 4,36 3,94 4,11 4,41 3,53 4,28 3,70 4, ,71 3,64 3,60 3,53 3,60 3,57 4,35 4,40 3,83 3,91 4,61 3,71 4,32 3,62 4, ,91 3,64 3,63 3,97 3,96 4,00 4,49 4,50 4,16 4,17 4,51 3,98 4,24 3,83 4, ,88 3,65 3,69 3,97 3,72 3,71 4,56 4,58 4,12 4,20 4,57 3,75 4,36 3,73 4, ,84 3,65 3,56 3,58 3,64 3,71 4,60 4,51 4,05 4,15 4,42 3,87 4,22 3,68 4, ,69 3,32 3,52 3,69 3,68 3,71 4,44 4,48 3,91 4,14 4,48 3,76 4,31 3,58 4, ,72 3,46 3,67 3,84 3,86 3,88 4,39 4,45 3,96 4,27 4,42 3,72 4,41 3,72 4, ,81 3,46 3,70 3,59 3,70 3,59 4,56 4,54 4,22 4,20 4,70 3,62 4,38 3,65 4, ,77 3,76 3,66 3,67 4,06 3,91 4,59 4,63 4,08 4,23 4,69 3,79 4,34 3,83 4, ,86 3,64 3,79 3,71 3,75 3,64 4,76 4,46 4,03 4,06 4,59 3,85 4,26 3,74 4, ,80 3,55 3,65 3,18 3,74 3,65 4,75 4,47 3,97 4,00 4,53 3,98 4,35 3,68 4,15 52A ,88 3,35 3,69 3,87 3,38 3,23 4,83 4,58 4,46 3,88 4,59 3,52 4,33 3,51 4,26 52V ,83 3,71 3,83 3,77 3,96 3,56 4,77 4,44 4,35 4,26 4,74 3,86 4,24 3,78 4, ,12 4,19 4,01 4,24 4,19 4,19 4,98 4,82 4,58 4,33 4,82 4,02 4,43 4,14 4, ,75 3,59 3,64 3,81 3,64 3,61 4,47 4,45 4,22 4,00 4,56 3,72 4,31 3,65 4,19 55,A ,87 3,67 3,68 3,56 3,98 4,01 4,38 4,46 3,98 4,20 4,49 3,84 4,24 3,84 4, ,83 3,74 3,74 3,86 3,86 3,73 4,85 4,52 4,15 4,00 4,65 3,90 4,41 3,78 4,29 58,B ,93 3,62 3,72 3,90 4,08 3,99 4,21 4,50 4,03 4,17 4,63 3,73 4,36 3,87 4, ,92 3,65 3,85 4,08 4,15 4,06 4,58 4,65 4,38 4,32 4,76 3,76 4,40 3,93 4, ,63 3,40 3,62 3,68 3,68 3,44 4,64 4,29 4,04 4,02 4,35 3,72 4,21 3,55 4, ,76 3,54 3,72 3,70 3,83 3,76 4,51 4,51 4,08 4,28 4,57 4,06 4,31 3,72 4, ,99 3,80 3,89 4,09 4,07 4,02 4,66 4,47 4,16 4,16 4,50 4,07 4,35 3,95 4,31 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

26 65A ,75 3,75 3,58 3,17 3,75 3,74 4,20 4,43 3,83 4,25 4,63 3,80 4,31 3,71 4,08 65B ,62 3,47 3,38 3,31 3,80 3,87 4,60 4,38 3,80 4,11 4,46 3,96 4,28 3,63 4,11 65X ,55 3,45 3,40 3,72 3,70 3,48 4,47 4,14 3,98 3,86 4,63 3,90 4,26 3,52 4,12 66A ,49 3,38 3,28 3,35 3,49 3,42 4,13 4,38 3,69 4,29 4,47 3,60 4,14 3,41 4,01 66B ,69 3,53 3,57 3,77 3,71 3,74 4,56 4,49 4,00 4,13 4,58 4,06 4,28 3,65 4, ,66 3,38 3,55 3,93 3,67 3,59 4,17 4,48 3,94 4,12 4,38 3,79 4,29 3,57 4,14 68, X ,85 3,53 3,64 3,87 3,84 3,82 4,70 4,45 4,08 4,07 4,57 3,93 4,53 3,74 4, ,78 3,59 3,65 3,59 3,79 3,80 4,61 4,56 4,00 4,02 4,45 3,83 4,26 3,72 4,17 70T ,85 3,66 3,66 3,48 3,68 3,70 4,57 4,40 3,88 3,95 4,53 3,94 4,32 3,71 4,13 70V ,71 3,49 3,54 3,62 3,66 3,45 4,25 4,50 3,99 4,09 4,51 3,89 4,38 3,57 4, ,70 3,63 3,60 3,90 3,82 3,74 4,36 4,52 4,16 4,23 4,41 3,99 4,45 3,70 4,25 71V ,78 3,64 3,52 4,04 3,62 3,56 4,55 4,53 4,17 3,88 4,61 3,73 4,40 3,62 4, ,81 3,68 3,61 3,39 3,59 3,59 4,28 4,43 4,02 4,02 4,46 3,79 4,20 3,66 4, ,65 3,31 3,43 3,54 3,42 3,44 4,40 4,31 3,96 3,99 4,33 3,72 4,36 3,45 4, ,70 3,56 3,55 3,72 3,63 3,60 4,48 4,24 3,91 3,98 4,44 3,60 4,40 3,61 4, ,67 3,75 3,54 3,69 3,77 3,72 4,47 4,48 4,00 3,93 4,45 3,75 4,17 3,69 4,12 75A ,65 3,53 3,72 3,90 3,78 3,74 4,80 4,38 4,43 4,08 4,49 3,67 4,21 3,68 4,25 76A,B ,80 3,50 3,58 4,03 3,65 3,65 4,76 4,43 4,38 3,81 4,49 3,74 4,20 3,64 4, ,81 3,59 3,66 3,75 3,64 3,71 4,44 4,40 4,27 4,09 4,24 3,98 4,23 3,68 4,18 77A ,84 3,67 3,70 3,77 3,52 3,63 4,60 4,36 4,28 4,07 4,32 3,57 4,13 3,67 4, ,61 3,45 3,50 3,71 3,52 3,57 4,65 4,52 4,21 4,14 4,31 3,71 4,20 3,53 4, ,79 3,63 3,61 3,78 3,53 3,60 4,44 4,51 4,16 4,13 4,30 3,72 4,41 3,63 4, ,66 3,68 3,62 3,77 3,66 3,77 4,41 4,39 4,28 4,18 4,33 3,73 4,18 3,68 4,16 81,B ,81 3,61 3,51 3,98 3,55 3,61 4,72 4,54 4,46 4,31 4,40 3,66 4,28 3,62 4, ,69 3,58 3,46 3,73 3,57 3,61 4,47 4,52 4,36 4,26 4,17 3,80 4,25 3,58 4, ,14 3,60 4,04 4,18 4,34 4,19 4,84 4,36 4,46 4,17 4,56 3,83 4,27 4,06 4, ,77 3,42 3,51 4,00 3,53 3,55 4,28 4,40 4,10 4,13 4,17 3,79 4,21 3,56 4, ,59 3,33 3,59 3,78 3,68 3,70 4,36 4,20 4,10 4,11 4,42 3,83 4,26 3,58 4, ,64 3,59 3,70 3,79 3,58 3,42 4,48 4,42 4,35 4,25 4,40 3,87 4,34 3,59 4, ,69 3,53 3,54 4,03 3,79 3,77 4,64 4,45 4,41 4,26 4,62 3,80 4,21 3,66 4, ,73 3,56 3,52 4,16 3,67 3,78 4,73 4,59 4,60 4,24 4,53 3,82 4,20 3,65 4, ,79 3,64 3,83 4,02 3,73 3,92 4,77 4,56 4,50 4,06 4,43 3,87 4,20 3,78 4, ,68 3,47 3,50 3,64 3,47 3,61 4,40 4,27 4,32 4,10 4,22 3,56 4,15 3,55 4,08 94,V ,72 3,52 3,66 3,70 3,39 3,54 4,40 4,38 4,20 3,97 4,31 3,71 4,16 3,57 4,10 94A ,63 3,47 3,58 3,84 3,67 3,56 4,69 4,48 4,41 4,09 4,25 4,03 4,10 3,58 4,24 94B ,67 3,39 3,56 4,00 3,77 3,68 4,71 4,38 4,50 3,94 4,27 3,46 4,06 3,61 4, ,87 3,63 3,61 3,54 3,48 3,58 4,30 4,26 4,15 4,02 4,25 3,54 4,12 3,63 4, ,76 3,46 3,51 3,97 3,46 3,62 4,35 4,24 4,33 3,98 4,17 3,74 4,14 3,56 4,12 97,V ,67 3,36 3,60 3,83 3,53 3,53 4,60 4,28 4,16 4,14 4,17 3,65 4,27 3,54 4, ,76 3,63 3,59 3,97 3,53 3,65 4,60 4,37 4,25 4,09 4,29 3,80 4,25 3,63 4,20 Bus total ,76 3,59 3,60 3,68 3,72 3,70 4,46 4,44 4,07 4,11 4,46 3,79 4,28 3,67 4,16 Metro ,37 4,45 3,43 4,29 4,55 4,63 3,91 4,12 3,46 4,09 4,09 4,16 Local train ,28 3,83 3,39 3,78 4,41 4,44 4,09 4,35 3,01 3,94 3,86 4,01 T, B, M ,81 3,71 3,89 3,92 3,61 3,74 4,29 4,50 4,25 4,15 4,19 3,79 4,22 3,83 4,14 HKL (T, M) ,10 4,10 3,52 4,17 4,54 4,39 3,98 4,17 3,94 4,13 Total ,81 3,71 3,90 3,92 3,60 3,74 4,28 4,50 4,26 4,15 4,18 3,79 4,22 3,83 4,14 24 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

27 Appendix 2 Passangers satisfaction by tender object in 2008 HKL Planning unit EK PASSENGERS' SATISFACTION BY TENDER OBJECT IN Drivers' 2. Drivers' 3. Drivers' 4. Punctuality 5. Vehicle 6. Travel 8. Seat 9. Timetable 10. Travel 11. Transfer 12. Order, 13. Waiting 14. Information Total Object Line Boardings N service information skway of driving tidiness comfort availability suitability smoothness conditions safety conditions availibility Operator System ,86 3,64 3,79 3,71 3,75 3,64 4,76 4,46 4,03 4,06 4,59 3,85 4,26 3,74 4, ,80 3,55 3,65 3,18 3,74 3,65 4,75 4,47 3,97 4,00 4,53 3,98 4,35 3,68 4,15 52A ,88 3,35 3,69 3,87 3,38 3,23 4,83 4,58 4,46 3,88 4,59 3,52 4,33 3,51 4,26 52V ,83 3,71 3,83 3,77 3,96 3,56 4,77 4,44 4,35 4,26 4,74 3,86 4,24 3,78 4,30 Total 3,84 3,58 3,73 3,53 3,72 3,59 4,76 4,48 4,08 4,03 4,58 3,86 4,30 3,69 4, ,83 3,74 3,74 3,86 3,86 3,73 4,85 4,52 4,15 4,00 4,65 3,90 4,41 3,78 4, ,79 3,63 3,61 3,78 3,53 3,60 4,44 4,51 4,16 4,13 4,30 3,72 4,41 3,63 4,18 Total 3,80 3,67 3,66 3,81 3,65 3,65 4,59 4,51 4,16 4,08 4,43 3,79 4,41 3,69 4, ,77 3,74 3,61 3,72 3,78 3,67 4,01 4,46 3,84 4,17 4,50 3,77 4,35 3,71 4,10 14B ,77 3,71 3,67 3,85 3,85 3,78 4,30 4,59 4,16 4,17 4,44 3,75 4,34 3,76 4,20 Total 3,77 3,73 3,62 3,75 3,80 3,69 4,08 4,49 3,91 4,17 4,49 3,77 4,35 3,72 4, V ,62 3,45 3,37 3,58 3,58 3,44 4,50 4,50 3,93 4,05 4,63 3,86 4,12 3,49 4,15 65A ,75 3,75 3,58 3,17 3,75 3,74 4,20 4,43 3,83 4,25 4,63 3,80 4,31 3,71 4,08 65B ,62 3,47 3,38 3,31 3,80 3,87 4,60 4,38 3,80 4,11 4,46 3,96 4,28 3,63 4,11 65X ,55 3,45 3,40 3,72 3,70 3,48 4,47 4,14 3,98 3,86 4,63 3,90 4,26 3,52 4,12 66A ,49 3,38 3,28 3,35 3,49 3,42 4,13 4,38 3,69 4,29 4,47 3,60 4,14 3,41 4,01 66B ,69 3,53 3,57 3,77 3,71 3,74 4,56 4,49 4,00 4,13 4,58 4,06 4,28 3,65 4,23 Total 3,62 3,54 3,43 3,39 3,66 3,60 4,32 4,38 3,84 4,16 4,57 3,81 4,23 3,57 4, ,61 3,45 3,50 3,71 3,52 3,57 4,65 4,52 4,21 4,14 4,31 3,71 4,20 3,53 4, ,79 3,64 3,83 4,02 3,73 3,92 4,77 4,56 4,50 4,06 4,43 3,87 4,20 3,78 4, ,76 3,46 3,51 3,97 3,46 3,62 4,35 4,24 4,33 3,98 4,17 3,74 4,14 3,56 4, ,76 3,63 3,59 3,97 3,53 3,65 4,60 4,37 4,25 4,09 4,29 3,80 4,25 3,63 4,20 Total 3,71 3,51 3,57 3,89 3,54 3,66 4,56 4,41 4,31 4,06 4,28 3,76 4,18 3,60 4, ,83 3,67 3,64 3,13 3,69 3,67 4,35 4,36 3,94 4,11 4,41 3,53 4,28 3,70 4,01 Total 3,83 3,67 3,64 3,13 3,69 3,67 4,35 4,36 3,94 4,11 4,41 3,53 4,28 3,70 4, ,66 3,38 3,55 3,93 3,67 3,59 4,17 4,48 3,94 4,12 4,38 3,79 4,29 3,57 4,14 Total 3,66 3,38 3,55 3,93 3,67 3,59 4,17 4,48 3,94 4,12 4,38 3,79 4,29 3,57 4, T ,85 3,66 3,66 3,48 3,68 3,70 4,57 4,40 3,88 3,95 4,53 3,94 4,32 3,71 4,13 70V ,71 3,49 3,54 3,62 3,66 3,45 4,25 4,50 3,99 4,09 4,51 3,89 4,38 3,57 4,15 Total 3,79 3,59 3,61 3,54 3,67 3,60 4,44 4,44 3,92 4,01 4,52 3,92 4,34 3,65 4, ,81 3,68 3,61 3,39 3,59 3,59 4,28 4,43 4,02 4,02 4,46 3,79 4,20 3,66 4,07 Total 3,81 3,68 3,61 3,39 3,59 3,59 4,28 4,43 4,02 4,02 4,46 3,79 4,20 3,66 4, ,84 3,80 3,67 3,57 3,63 3,65 4,77 4,57 4,08 4,13 4,63 3,48 4,28 3,72 4,19 Total 3,84 3,80 3,67 3,57 3,63 3,65 4,77 4,57 4,08 4,13 4,63 3,48 4,28 3,72 4,19 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

28 1. Drivers' 2. Drivers' 3. Drivers' 4. Punctuality 5. Vehicle 6. Travel 8. Seat 9. Timetable 10. Travel 11. Transfer 12. Order, 13. Waiting 14. Information Total Object Line Boardings N service information skway of driving tidiness comfort availability suitability smoothness conditions safety conditions availibility Operator System ,63 3,40 3,62 3,68 3,68 3,44 4,64 4,29 4,04 4,02 4,35 3,72 4,21 3,55 4,12 Total 3,63 3,40 3,62 3,68 3,68 3,44 4,64 4,29 4,04 4,02 4,35 3,72 4,21 3,55 4, ,99 3,64 3,70 3,57 4,07 3,90 4,67 4,46 3,99 4,10 4,62 3,46 4,17 3,86 4,13 Total 3,99 3,64 3,70 3,57 4,07 3,90 4,67 4,46 3,99 4,10 4,62 3,46 4,17 3,86 4, ,77 3,76 3,66 3,67 4,06 3,91 4,59 4,63 4,08 4,23 4,69 3,79 4,34 3,83 4,25 58,B ,93 3,62 3,72 3,90 4,08 3,99 4,21 4,50 4,03 4,17 4,63 3,73 4,36 3,87 4, ,92 3,65 3,85 4,08 4,15 4,06 4,58 4,65 4,38 4,32 4,76 3,76 4,40 3,93 4,37 Total 3,89 3,66 3,73 3,87 4,09 3,98 4,37 4,56 4,10 4,21 4,67 3,75 4,36 3,87 4, ,99 3,80 3,89 4,09 4,07 4,02 4,66 4,47 4,16 4,16 4,50 4,07 4,35 3,95 4,31 Total 3,99 3,80 3,89 4,09 4,07 4,02 4,66 4,47 4,16 4,16 4,50 4,07 4,35 3,95 4, ,77 3,42 3,51 4,00 3,53 3,55 4,28 4,40 4,10 4,13 4,17 3,79 4,21 3,56 4, ,59 3,33 3,59 3,78 3,68 3,70 4,36 4,20 4,10 4,11 4,42 3,83 4,26 3,58 4, ,64 3,59 3,70 3,79 3,58 3,42 4,48 4,42 4,35 4,25 4,40 3,87 4,34 3,59 4, ,69 3,53 3,54 4,03 3,79 3,77 4,64 4,45 4,41 4,26 4,62 3,80 4,21 3,66 4, ,73 3,56 3,52 4,16 3,67 3,78 4,73 4,59 4,60 4,24 4,53 3,82 4,20 3,65 4,36 Total 3,67 3,47 3,59 3,89 3,63 3,60 4,44 4,37 4,25 4,18 4,39 3,83 4,26 3,59 4, ,A ,87 3,66 3,71 3,89 3,95 3,89 4,58 4,45 4,38 4,36 4,29 3,79 4,30 3,82 4,26 Total 3,87 3,66 3,71 3,89 3,95 3,89 4,58 4,45 4,38 4,36 4,29 3,79 4,30 3,82 4, ,80 3,76 3,47 3,48 3,76 3,85 4,40 4,42 3,91 4,09 4,56 3,86 4,29 3,73 4, ,84 3,65 3,56 3,58 3,64 3,71 4,60 4,51 4,05 4,15 4,42 3,87 4,22 3,68 4,18 Total 3,81 3,72 3,50 3,52 3,72 3,80 4,47 4,45 3,96 4,11 4,51 3,86 4,26 3,71 4, ,71 3,64 3,60 3,53 3,60 3,57 4,35 4,40 3,83 3,91 4,61 3,71 4,32 3,62 4, ,72 3,46 3,67 3,84 3,86 3,88 4,39 4,45 3,96 4,27 4,42 3,72 4,41 3,72 4,18 Total 3,71 3,58 3,62 3,63 3,69 3,67 4,36 4,42 3,87 4,03 4,55 3,71 4,35 3,66 4, ,91 3,64 3,63 3,97 3,96 4,00 4,49 4,50 4,16 4,17 4,51 3,98 4,24 3,83 4,25 Total 3,91 3,64 3,63 3,97 3,96 4,00 4,49 4,50 4,16 4,17 4,51 3,98 4,24 3,83 4, ,65 3,31 3,43 3,54 3,42 3,44 4,40 4,31 3,96 3,99 4,33 3,72 4,36 3,45 4,08 Total 3,65 3,31 3,43 3,54 3,42 3,44 4,40 4,31 3,96 3,99 4,33 3,72 4,36 3,45 4, ,70 3,56 3,55 3,72 3,63 3,60 4,48 4,24 3,91 3,98 4,44 3,60 4,40 3,61 4,10 Total 3,70 3,56 3,55 3,72 3,63 3,60 4,48 4,24 3,91 3,98 4,44 3,60 4,40 3,61 4, A ,65 3,53 3,72 3,90 3,78 3,74 4,80 4,38 4,43 4,08 4,49 3,67 4,21 3,68 4,25 76A,B ,80 3,50 3,58 4,03 3,65 3,65 4,76 4,43 4,38 3,81 4,49 3,74 4,20 3,64 4,23 77A ,84 3,67 3,70 3,77 3,52 3,63 4,60 4,36 4,28 4,07 4,32 3,57 4,13 3,67 4,14 Total 3,80 3,58 3,66 3,89 3,61 3,65 4,69 4,39 4,34 3,97 4,41 3,65 4,17 3,66 4, ,66 3,68 3,62 3,77 3,66 3,77 4,41 4,39 4,28 4,18 4,33 3,73 4,18 3,68 4,16 81,B ,81 3,61 3,51 3,98 3,55 3,61 4,72 4,54 4,46 4,31 4,40 3,66 4,28 3,62 4, ,69 3,58 3,46 3,73 3,57 3,61 4,47 4,52 4,36 4,26 4,17 3,80 4,25 3,58 4,20 Total 3,71 3,62 3,53 3,81 3,60 3,67 4,52 4,48 4,36 4,24 4,29 3,74 4,23 3,63 4,21 26 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in 2008

29 1. Drivers' 2. Drivers' 3. Drivers' 4. Punctuality 5. Vehicle 6. Travel 8. Seat 9. Timetable 10. Travel 11. Transfer 12. Order, 13. Waiting 14. Information Total Object Line Boardings N service information skway of driving tidiness comfort availability suitability smoothness conditions safety conditions availibility Operator System ,12 4,19 4,01 4,24 4,19 4,19 4,98 4,82 4,58 4,33 4,82 4,02 4,43 4,14 4,53 Total 4,12 4,19 4,01 4,24 4,19 4,19 4,98 4,82 4,58 4,33 4,82 4,02 4,43 4,14 4, ,75 3,59 3,64 3,81 3,64 3,61 4,47 4,45 4,22 4,00 4,56 3,72 4,31 3,65 4,19 Total 3,75 3,59 3,64 3,81 3,64 3,61 4,47 4,45 4,22 4,00 4,56 3,72 4,31 3,65 4, ,88 3,65 3,69 3,97 3,72 3,71 4,56 4,58 4,12 4,20 4,57 3,75 4,36 3,73 4, ,69 3,32 3,52 3,69 3,68 3,71 4,44 4,48 3,91 4,14 4,48 3,76 4,31 3,58 4, ,81 3,46 3,70 3,59 3,70 3,59 4,56 4,54 4,22 4,20 4,70 3,62 4,38 3,65 4,23 Total 3,77 3,45 3,60 3,78 3,70 3,70 4,49 4,52 4,01 4,17 4,53 3,74 4,33 3,64 4, ,78 3,59 3,65 3,59 3,79 3,80 4,61 4,56 4,00 4,02 4,45 3,83 4,26 3,72 4,17 Total 3,78 3,59 3,65 3,59 3,79 3,80 4,61 4,56 4,00 4,02 4,45 3,83 4,26 3,72 4, ,67 3,75 3,54 3,69 3,77 3,72 4,47 4,48 4,00 3,93 4,45 3,75 4,17 3,69 4, ,81 3,59 3,66 3,75 3,64 3,71 4,44 4,40 4,27 4,09 4,24 3,98 4,23 3,68 4,18 Total 3,73 3,68 3,59 3,72 3,71 3,72 4,46 4,44 4,12 4,00 4,36 3,85 4,20 3,69 4, ,77 3,38 3,56 3,31 3,84 3,83 4,76 4,47 4,05 4,10 4,53 3,50 4,24 3,68 4,12 Total 3,77 3,38 3,56 3,31 3,84 3,83 4,76 4,47 4,05 4,10 4,53 3,50 4,24 3,68 4, ,A ,87 3,67 3,68 3,56 3,98 4,01 4,38 4,46 3,98 4,20 4,49 3,84 4,24 3,84 4,14 Total 3,87 3,67 3,68 3,56 3,98 4,01 4,38 4,46 3,98 4,20 4,49 3,84 4,24 3,84 4, ,81 3,78 3,68 3,38 3,95 3,96 4,34 4,41 3,71 4,04 4,59 3,88 4,34 3,84 4,09 Total 3,81 3,78 3,68 3,38 3,95 3,96 4,34 4,41 3,71 4,04 4,59 3,88 4,34 3,84 4, ,14 3,60 4,04 4,18 4,34 4,19 4,84 4,36 4,46 4,17 4,56 3,83 4,27 4,06 4,33 Total 4,14 3,60 4,04 4,18 4,34 4,19 4,84 4,36 4,46 4,17 4,56 3,83 4,27 4,06 4, ,68 3,47 3,50 3,64 3,47 3,61 4,40 4,27 4,32 4,10 4,22 3,56 4,15 3,55 4,08 94,V ,72 3,52 3,66 3,70 3,39 3,54 4,40 4,38 4,20 3,97 4,31 3,71 4,16 3,57 4,10 94A ,63 3,47 3,58 3,84 3,67 3,56 4,69 4,48 4,41 4,09 4,25 4,03 4,10 3,58 4,24 94B ,67 3,39 3,56 4,00 3,77 3,68 4,71 4,38 4,50 3,94 4,27 3,46 4,06 3,61 4, ,87 3,63 3,61 3,54 3,48 3,58 4,30 4,26 4,15 4,02 4,25 3,54 4,12 3,63 4,02 97,V ,67 3,36 3,60 3,83 3,53 3,53 4,60 4,28 4,16 4,14 4,17 3,65 4,27 3,54 4,14 Total 3,70 3,47 3,59 3,76 3,54 3,58 4,51 4,35 4,29 4,04 4,25 3,67 4,14 3,58 4, ,76 3,54 3,72 3,70 3,83 3,76 4,51 4,51 4,08 4,28 4,57 4,06 4,31 3,72 4,25 Total 3,76 3,54 3,72 3,70 3,83 3,76 4,51 4,51 4,08 4,28 4,57 4,06 4,31 3,72 4, ,X ,85 3,53 3,64 3,87 3,84 3,82 4,70 4,45 4,08 4,07 4,57 3,93 4,53 3,74 4, ,70 3,63 3,60 3,90 3,82 3,74 4,36 4,52 4,16 4,23 4,41 3,99 4,45 3,70 4,25 71V ,78 3,64 3,52 4,04 3,62 3,56 4,55 4,53 4,17 3,88 4,61 3,73 4,40 3,62 4,24 Total 3,75 3,60 3,61 3,90 3,81 3,75 4,48 4,50 4,14 4,16 4,47 3,95 4,47 3,70 4,26 Passengers satisfaction with public transport services in Helsinki in

Tram Passenger Survey. Autumn 2013 Report

Tram Passenger Survey. Autumn 2013 Report Tram Passenger Survey Autumn 2013 Report Contents 1 Foreword 3 2 Key findings 4 3 Research objective and methodology 8 4 Journey satisfaction 10 5 Tram usage 36 6 Passenger and journey details 42 7 Appendices

More information

Bus Passenger Survey spring Centro authority area, and National Express (NX) routes within Centro

Bus Passenger Survey spring Centro authority area, and National Express (NX) routes within Centro spring 01 results for: Centro authority area, and National Express (NX) routes within Centro July 01 Contact: Murray Leader, Research Team, Passenger Focus nd Floor, 1 Drummond Gate, Pimlico, London, SW1V

More information

Survey on passengers satisfaction with rail services. Analytical report. Flash Eurobarometer 326 The Gallup Organization

Survey on passengers satisfaction with rail services. Analytical report. Flash Eurobarometer 326 The Gallup Organization Flash Eurobarometer 326 The Gallup Organization Flash Eurobarometer European Commission Survey on passengers satisfaction with rail services Analytical report Fieldwork: March 2011 Publication: June 2011

More information

Bus Passenger Survey autumn 2013 results Merseytravel (Merseyside PTE area)

Bus Passenger Survey autumn 2013 results Merseytravel (Merseyside PTE area) Bus Passenger Survey autumn Merseytravel (Merseyside PTE area) Contact: Murray Leader, Research Team, Passenger Focus Fleetbank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX Tel: 0300 123 0843 Email: murray.leader@passengerfocus.org.uk

More information

Customer Charter Audit Quarter

Customer Charter Audit Quarter Customer Charter Audit Quarter 3 2017 Introduction The Bus Éireann Customer Charter Audit is conducted quarterly to establish if the company s performance levels reach the requirements outlined in its

More information

Post Opening Project Evaluation. M6 Toll

Post Opening Project Evaluation. M6 Toll M6 Toll Five Post Years Opening After Study: Project Summary Evaluation Report Post Opening Project Evaluation M6 Toll Five Years After Study Summary Report October 2009 Document History JOB NUMBER: 5081587/905

More information

Tram Passenger Survey

Tram Passenger Survey Tram Passenger Survey Autumn 2014 Contents 1 Foreword 3 2 Key findings 4 3 Research objective and methodology 8 4 Journey satisfaction 10 5 Tram usage 36 6 Passenger and journey details 42 7 Appendices

More information

Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement

Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement Peace River October 17, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement: The Panel recognizes that although significant stakeholder engagement initiatives have occurred, these efforts were

More information

Alcohol interlocks in Finland. 22 April 2015, Lisbon

Alcohol interlocks in Finland. 22 April 2015, Lisbon ETSC Safe & Sober Alcohol interlocks and the fight against drink-driving Alcohol interlocks in Finland 22 April 2015, Lisbon Marita Löytty, Special Adviser Responsible traffic. A joint effort. Content

More information

IMPACT OF THE BUS LOCATION SYSTEM ON BUS USAGE. - Morioka City -

IMPACT OF THE BUS LOCATION SYSTEM ON BUS USAGE. - Morioka City - IMPACT OF THE BUS LOCATION SYSTEM ON BUS USAGE - Morioka City - Yoshitaka Motoda, Professor, Iwate Prefectural University, 152-52 Sugo Takizawa, Iwate, Japan 020-0193 Phone: +81-19-694-2732, Fax: +81-19-694-2701

More information

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway

More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway Author(s): Liva Vågane Oslo 2009, 57 pages Norwegian language Summary: More persons in the cars? Status and potential for change in car occupancy rates in Norway Results from national travel surveys in

More information

GfK. Growth from Knowledge

GfK. Growth from Knowledge GfK. Growth from Knowledge Passenger Focus Bus Passenger Customer Satisfaction Survey Fieldwork Quality Report Quarter 3 2010 437957 / August 2010 v1 Prepared for: Prepared by: Contacts: Passenger Focus

More information

Passenger seat belt use in Durham Region

Passenger seat belt use in Durham Region Facts on Passenger seat belt use in Durham Region June 2017 Highlights In 2013/2014, 85 per cent of Durham Region residents 12 and older always wore their seat belt when riding as a passenger in a car,

More information

MIT ICAT M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n

MIT ICAT M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Standard Flow Abstractions as Mechanisms for Reducing ATC Complexity Jonathan Histon May 11, 2004 Introduction Research

More information

Public transport in Warsaw - step by step

Public transport in Warsaw - step by step Public transport in Warsaw - step by step This brief guide for passengers outlines the basic rules related with the functioning of and using the Warsaw public transport. These rules described herein are

More information

This is an easy to read report.

This is an easy to read report. This is an easy to read report. It is about changing the bus services in Dublin. 1 What is Bus Connects? The National Transport Authority looks after public transport services across Dublin. The Authority

More information

Impact of Copenhagen s

Impact of Copenhagen s Impact of Copenhagen s Parking Strategy Copenhagen s parking strategy Strategy background From the 1950s, a marked increase was seen in car traffic, and streets and squares in the centre of Copenhagen

More information

IS THE URBAN RAIL SYSTEM SUFFICIENTLY UTILISED IN SOME PARTS OF BELGRADE?

IS THE URBAN RAIL SYSTEM SUFFICIENTLY UTILISED IN SOME PARTS OF BELGRADE? IS THE URBAN RAIL SYSTEM SUFFICIENTLY UTILISED IN SOME PARTS OF BELGRADE? Mirjana Bugarinović 1*, Nikola Ristić 2*, Aleksandar Petković 1 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Transport and traffic Engineering,

More information

2015 LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT

2015 LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT LRT STATION ACTIVITY & PASSENGER FLOW SUMMARY REPORT CAPITAL and METRO LINES Project Team: ETS Transit Data Management Transportation Planning Strategic Monitoring and Analysis April, 2016 LRT STATION

More information

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia

DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 40 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia DRIVER SPEED COMPLIANCE WITHIN SCHOOL ZONES AND EFFECTS OF 4 PAINTED SPEED LIMIT ON DRIVER SPEED BEHAVIOURS Tony Radalj Main Roads Western Australia ABSTRACT Two speed surveys were conducted on nineteen

More information

19 May 2015, Luxembourg

19 May 2015, Luxembourg Implementation and evaluation of the alcohol interlock programme in Finland 19 May 2015, Luxembourg Marita Löytty, Special Adviser Responsible traffic. A joint effort. Content 1. Finland: facts and number

More information

The Experience of Vienna City

The Experience of Vienna City Examples from key cities and public transport operators: The Experience of Vienna City DI Isabella Kossina, MBA Wiener Stadtwerke, Vienna, Austria Wiener Stadtwerke Sustainability Report 2008 and Sustainability

More information

PUBLICATION NEW TRENDS IN ELEVATORING SOLUTIONS FOR MEDIUM TO MEDIUM-HIGH BUILDINGS TO IMPROVE FLEXIBILITY

PUBLICATION NEW TRENDS IN ELEVATORING SOLUTIONS FOR MEDIUM TO MEDIUM-HIGH BUILDINGS TO IMPROVE FLEXIBILITY PUBLICATION NEW TRENDS IN ELEVATORING SOLUTIONS FOR MEDIUM TO MEDIUM-HIGH BUILDINGS TO IMPROVE FLEXIBILITY Johannes de Jong E-mail: johannes.de.jong@kone.com Marja-Liisa Siikonen E-mail: marja-liisa.siikonen@kone.com

More information

TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT HARVINGTON PT1 (CREST HILL)

TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT HARVINGTON PT1 (CREST HILL) TRAFFIC SURVEY REPORT HARVINGTON PT1 ( HILL) October 20-24th 2014 Conducted voluntarily by the residents of Harvington Village. This report has been prepared in light of the planning application W14/01788/OU

More information

Who has trouble reporting prior day events?

Who has trouble reporting prior day events? Vol. 10, Issue 1, 2017 Who has trouble reporting prior day events? Tim Triplett 1, Rob Santos 2, Brian Tefft 3 Survey Practice 10.29115/SP-2017-0003 Jan 01, 2017 Tags: missing data, recall data, measurement

More information

SPARTA Ridership Satisfaction Study

SPARTA Ridership Satisfaction Study SPARTA Ridership Satisfaction Study Presented by the Students of CRP 814 Gowtham Cherukumalli, Sam Keith, Kelsey Lantz, Nabarjun Vashisth, & Nelson Yaksic Vera With Guidance from Dr. Eric A. Morris INTRODUCTION

More information

Comparing the Quality of Service of Bus Companies Operating in two Cities in Brazil

Comparing the Quality of Service of Bus Companies Operating in two Cities in Brazil Comparing the Quality of Service of Bus Companies Operating in two Cities in Brazil D. I. De Souza, D. Kipper, G. P. Azevedo Abstract The main objective of this work is to compare the quality of service

More information

GODURHAM PROGRESS REPORT

GODURHAM PROGRESS REPORT GODURHAM PROGRESS REPORT OVERVIEW OPERATIONS & PERFORMANCE With the service enhancements, total revenue hours increased In 2016, GoDurham connected 5.9 million passengers to jobs, education and health

More information

How BRT can develop the bus mode in Dublin Paddy Doherty, Chief Executive, Dublin Bus

How BRT can develop the bus mode in Dublin Paddy Doherty, Chief Executive, Dublin Bus How BRT can develop the bus mode in Dublin Paddy Doherty, Chief Executive, Dublin Bus Background Dublin Bus operates the public service obligation network in the Greater Dublin Area Also operates some

More information

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO.

TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. Revised: March/13 TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION REPORT NO. MEETING DATE: March 26, 2014 SUBJECT: COMMUNITY BUS SERVICES ACTION ITEM RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Board not approve any routing

More information

2.1 Outline of Person Trip Survey

2.1 Outline of Person Trip Survey Trip Characteristics 2.1 Outline of Person Trip Survey 2.1.1 Outline of the Survey The Person Trip survey was carried out from 2006 to 2007 as a part of the Istanbul Transportation Master Plan undertaken

More information

American Driving Survey,

American Driving Survey, RESEARCH BRIEF American Driving Survey, 2015 2016 This Research Brief provides highlights from the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety s 2016 American Driving Survey, which quantifies the daily driving patterns

More information

Driver survey: Republic of Ireland 2017

Driver survey: Republic of Ireland 2017 Driver survey: Republic of Ireland 2017 Contents 1. Why Ireland? 2. What is the Irish driver survey? 3. How can I access the Irish driver survey? 2 1. GiPA coverage throughout the world GiPA operates in

More information

Act 229 Evaluation Report

Act 229 Evaluation Report R22-1 W21-19 W21-20 Act 229 Evaluation Report Prepared for Prepared by Table of Contents 1. Documentation Page 3 2. Executive Summary 4 2.1. Purpose 4 2.2. Evaluation Results 4 3. Background 4 4. Approach

More information

2015 LRT PASSENGER COUNT. CAPITAL and METRO LINES

2015 LRT PASSENGER COUNT. CAPITAL and METRO LINES 2015 LRT PASSENGER COUNT CAPITAL and METRO LINES Project Team: ETS Transit Data Management Transportation Planning Strategic Monitoring and Analysis April, 2016 2015 LRT PASSENGER COUNT Edmonton Transit

More information

2018 AER Social Research Report

2018 AER Social Research Report 2018 AER Social Research Report Executive Summary June 2018 2018 AER Social Research Report Executive Summary June 2018 Published by Alberta Energy Regulator Suite 1000, 250 5 Street SW Calgary, Alberta

More information

ANALYSIS OF THE ACCIDENT SCENARIO OF POWERED TWO- WHEELERS ON THE BASIS OF REAL-WORLD ACCIDENTS

ANALYSIS OF THE ACCIDENT SCENARIO OF POWERED TWO- WHEELERS ON THE BASIS OF REAL-WORLD ACCIDENTS ANALYSIS OF THE ACCIDENT SCENARIO OF POWERED TWO- WHEELERS ON THE BASIS OF REAL-WORLD ACCIDENTS Author: Dipl.-Ing. H. Liers Verkehrsunfallforschung an der TU Dresden GmbH Zellescher Weg 24 01217 Dresden

More information

Evaluation of the interlock programme for DUI offenders in Finland

Evaluation of the interlock programme for DUI offenders in Finland Special Adviser, Marita Löytty, Finnish Transport Safety Agency (Trafi) Abstract Background Finland started a trial with alcohol interlocks for DUI offenders in 2005. The positive experiences of the three-year

More information

TRANSPORT SA EVALUATION OF COMPETENCY-BASED DRIVER TRAINING & ASSESSMENT IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA

TRANSPORT SA EVALUATION OF COMPETENCY-BASED DRIVER TRAINING & ASSESSMENT IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA TRANSPORT SA \ \ EVALUATION OF COMPETENCY-BASED \ DRIVER TRAINING & ASSESSMENT IN SOUTH AUSTRALIA TRANSPORT SA DOCUMENT INFORMATION REPORT NUMBER: 212001 DATE: February 2001 PAGES: 61 ISBN: 0 7590 0066

More information

Passenger Promise and Rights: National Express Bus

Passenger Promise and Rights: National Express Bus 51 Bordesley Green Birmingham B9 4BZ Passenger Promise and Rights: National Express Bus 1. Introduction This document incorporates both our promise to you and a statement of your rights under the EU Passenger

More information

Abstract. 1. Introduction. 1.1 object. Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress

Abstract. 1. Introduction. 1.1 object. Road safety data: collection and analysis for target setting and monitoring performances and progress Road Traffic Accident Involvement Rate by Accident and Violation Records: New Methodology for Driver Education Based on Integrated Road Traffic Accident Database Yasushi Nishida National Research Institute

More information

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Agency Information Collection Activities; Approval of a New Information

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. Agency Information Collection Activities; Approval of a New Information This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 03/21/2017 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2017-05523, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION [4910-EX-P]

More information

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito

Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1266 205 Public Transportation Problems and Solutions in the Historical Center of Quito JACOB GREENSTEIN, Lours BERGER, AND AMIRAM STRULOV Quito, the capital of Ecuador,

More information

Driver Speed Compliance in Western Australia. Tony Radalj and Brian Kidd Main Roads Western Australia

Driver Speed Compliance in Western Australia. Tony Radalj and Brian Kidd Main Roads Western Australia Driver Speed Compliance in Western Australia Abstract Tony Radalj and Brian Kidd Main Roads Western Australia A state-wide speed survey was conducted over the period March to June 2 to measure driver speed

More information

Wolverhampton City Centre Metro Extension

Wolverhampton City Centre Metro Extension Wolverhampton City Centre Metro Extension Public Consultation 2013 Please tell us what you think by 31st May 2013 centro.org.uk 1 We would like to hear your views on the proposed Midland Metro extension

More information

WHITE PAPER. Preventing Collisions and Reducing Fleet Costs While Using the Zendrive Dashboard

WHITE PAPER. Preventing Collisions and Reducing Fleet Costs While Using the Zendrive Dashboard WHITE PAPER Preventing Collisions and Reducing Fleet Costs While Using the Zendrive Dashboard August 2017 Introduction The term accident, even in a collision sense, often has the connotation of being an

More information

Helsinki Region Transport

Helsinki Region Transport Helsinki Region Transport Helsinki Region Commuter Trains Tendering Project Presentation agenda Commuter train services Current contract and operating situation Past performance statistics Proposed tendering

More information

DOWNTOWN PARKING STUDY AND STRATEGIC PLAN

DOWNTOWN PARKING STUDY AND STRATEGIC PLAN INTRODUCTION This report includes a summary of several key components of the Rapid City Downtown Parking Study and Strategic Plan, including: Current Conditions Analysis (Inventory and Occupancy and Length

More information

Suggestions toward quality improvement in public transportation service in Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil

Suggestions toward quality improvement in public transportation service in Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil Urban Transport XVI 115 Suggestions toward quality improvement in public transportation service in Rio Branco, Acre, Brazil D. I. De Souza 1,2, D. Kipper 1 & P. Duarte 1 1 Civil Engineering Department,

More information

Written Exam Public Transport + Answers

Written Exam Public Transport + Answers Faculty of Engineering Technology Written Exam Public Transport + Written Exam Public Transport (195421200-1A) Teacher van Zuilekom Course code 195421200 Date and time 7-11-2011, 8:45-12:15 Location OH116

More information

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS

5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS 5. OPPORTUNITIES AND NEXT STEPS When the METRO Green Line LRT begins operating in mid-2014, a strong emphasis will be placed on providing frequent connecting bus service with Green Line trains. Bus hours

More information

School Transportation Assessment

School Transportation Assessment Grade: K-12 Version 1 April 2015 School Transportation Assessment SCHOOL BUS Evaluate the carbon emissions from daily transportation related to your school and identify strategies for more sustainable

More information

Glasgow Subway Passenger Survey

Glasgow Subway Passenger Survey Glasgow Subway Passenger Survey Autumn 2017 results April 2018 Contents Overview Context to the survey 3 Summary of 2017 findings 6 The findings Experience and opinions of the journey 14 Waiting at the

More information

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION Reference Number: TR 50-18 Location:, Brooklyn Bus Hub - Brooklyn Proposal: Information: To provide new bus stops to create a Bus hub location on Cleveland Street, Brooklyn, as part of Wellington s new

More information

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County

Abstract. Executive Summary. Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County Emily Rogers Jean Wang ORF 467 Final Report-Middlesex County Abstract The purpose of this investigation is to model the demand for an ataxi system in Middlesex County. Given transportation statistics for

More information

FINAL REPORT TO SHEFFIELD BUS PARTNERSHIP OPERATIONS GROUP FROM: WORK PACKAGE 5 PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK & UPDATE DATE OF MEETING: 19 OCTOBER 2012

FINAL REPORT TO SHEFFIELD BUS PARTNERSHIP OPERATIONS GROUP FROM: WORK PACKAGE 5 PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK & UPDATE DATE OF MEETING: 19 OCTOBER 2012 Sheffield Bus Partnership FINAL REPORT TO SHEFFIELD BUS PARTNERSHIP OPERATIONS GROUP FROM: WORK PACKAGE 5 SUBJECT: PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK & UPDATE DATE OF MEETING: 19 OCTOBER 2012 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Overall

More information

From a marketplace for mobility towards Mobility as a Service in Rotterdam (Nl)

From a marketplace for mobility towards Mobility as a Service in Rotterdam (Nl) From a marketplace for mobility towards Mobility as a Service in Rotterdam (Nl) Martijn van de Leur - De Verkeersonderneming 27-11-17 1 Content 1. From a Marketplace for Mobility towards MaaS 2. What does

More information

Bus Passenger Survey

Bus Passenger Survey Bus Passenger Survey March 2013 Contents 1 Foreword 3 2 Area key findings 4 3 4 Area results Introduction Former metropolitan county authorities Transport authority area groups Local transport authority

More information

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY. Conducted from November 1 to 10, 2017 and answered by 4,101 of the Electric Circuit s 17,644 members.

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY. Conducted from November 1 to 10, 2017 and answered by 4,101 of the Electric Circuit s 17,644 members. 2017 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Conducted from November 1 to 10, 2017 and answered by 4,101 of the Electric Circuit s 17,644 members. 1 HIGHLIGHTS The majority of respondents said they were satisfied

More information

About Half View Tim s image as positive, overall

About Half View Tim s image as positive, overall FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE About Half View Tim s image as positive, overall But about two-fifths say they visit less than they used to Toronto, April 23 rd In a random sampling of public opinion taken by The

More information

CHANGE IN DRIVERS PARKING PREFERENCE AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF STRENGTHENED PARKING REGULATIONS

CHANGE IN DRIVERS PARKING PREFERENCE AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF STRENGTHENED PARKING REGULATIONS CHANGE IN DRIVERS PARKING PREFERENCE AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF STRENGTHENED PARKING REGULATIONS Kazuyuki TAKADA, Tokyo Denki University, takada@g.dendai.ac.jp Norio TAJIMA, Tokyo Denki University, 09rmk19@dendai.ac.jp

More information

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION: 2016

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION: 2016 SWT-2016-8 MAY 2016 MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION: 2016 BRANDON SCHOETTLE MICHAEL SIVAK SUSTAINABLE WORLDWIDE TRANSPORTATION MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS

More information

EVALUATING THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF BATTERY OPERATED AUTO RICKSHAW IN KHULNA CITY

EVALUATING THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF BATTERY OPERATED AUTO RICKSHAW IN KHULNA CITY Proceedings of the 4 th International Conference on Civil Engineering for Sustainable Development (ICCESD 2018), 9~11 February 2018, KUET, Khulna, Bangladesh (ISBN-978-984-34-3502-6) EVALUATING THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC

More information

Example of a successful campaign in the Liszki District near Kraków

Example of a successful campaign in the Liszki District near Kraków Example of a successful campaign in the Liszki District near Kraków Webinar: SmartMove - Active mobility consultancy in eight European rural regions, 25th January 2016 Katarzyna Nosal, Cracow University

More information

ROAD SAFETY MONITOR 2014: KNOWLEDGE OF VEHICLE SAFETY FEATURES IN CANADA. The knowledge source for safe driving

ROAD SAFETY MONITOR 2014: KNOWLEDGE OF VEHICLE SAFETY FEATURES IN CANADA. The knowledge source for safe driving T R A F F I C I N J U R Y R E S E A R C H F O U N D A T I O N ROAD SAFETY MONITOR 2014: KNOWLEDGE OF VEHICLE SAFETY FEATURES IN CANADA The knowledge source for safe driving TRAFFIC INJURY RESEARCH FOUNDATION

More information

2015 Carbon footprint JTP. Date of issue: 14 th March 2016

2015 Carbon footprint JTP. Date of issue: 14 th March 2016 2015 Carbon footprint JTP Prepared by: Helen Troup Reviewed by: Sarah McCusker Date of issue: 14 th March 2016 Executive summary Carbon Smart 2 Executive summary JTP have seen significant reduction in

More information

Seat Belt Survey. Q1. When travelling in a car, do you wear your seat belt all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, or never?

Seat Belt Survey. Q1. When travelling in a car, do you wear your seat belt all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, or never? N F O C F g r o u p Seat Belt Survey Q1. When travelling in a car, do you wear your seat belt all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, or never? The majority of Canadians (85%) wear their seat

More information

Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) Manchester Metrolink

Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) Manchester Metrolink Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) Manchester Metrolink Rosie Giles Tel: 000 0 Email: Rosie.Giles@transportfocus.org.uk Insight Team, Transport Focus, Fleetbank House, - Salisbury Square, London, ECY JX 0 results

More information

Pricing Strategies for Public Transport. Neil Douglas Douglas Economics

Pricing Strategies for Public Transport. Neil Douglas Douglas Economics Pricing Strategies for Public Transport Neil Douglas Douglas Economics Start Oct 2011 Scope Feb 2012 Review June 2012 Mkt Res Plan Sept 2012 Pilot Results Nov 2012 Main Surveys Dec 2012 May 2013 Final

More information

Travel to Work Survey 2018

Travel to Work Survey 2018 Travel to Work Survey 2018 The four local councils, Bath & North East Somerset Council, Bristol City Council, North Somerset Council, and South Gloucestershire Council carry out this survey annually. The

More information

Metro trains for the future: what our passengers have said

Metro trains for the future: what our passengers have said Metro trains for the future: what our passengers have said A: Executive summary 1 Nexus is developing plans to buy a new fleet of Metrocars to replace the current fleet, which are nearing the end of their

More information

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area

National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area National Household Travel Survey Add-On Use in the Des Moines, Iowa, Metropolitan Area Presentation to the Transportation Research Board s National Household Travel Survey Conference: Data for Understanding

More information

CALGARY TRANSIT 2013 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY DECEMBER HarGroup. M anagement Consultants

CALGARY TRANSIT 2013 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY DECEMBER HarGroup. M anagement Consultants CALGARY TRANSIT 2013 CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY DECEMBER 2013 HarGroup M anagement Consultants Table of Contents Executive Summary... i 1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1 1.1 Survey Methodology... 1 1.2 Factors

More information

HANDBOOK Bussing Information

HANDBOOK Bussing Information HANDBOOK 2016-2017 Bussing Information Dulwich College Shanghai Bussing DCS buses are all equipped with seatbelts and supervised by locally employed Bus Monitors. Our Bus Monitors are all provided with

More information

The Streamlined Public Transit Commute.

The Streamlined Public Transit Commute. The Streamlined Public Transit Commute. Background Statement As the total U.S. population grows and disperses, traffic congestion begins to affect cities where it once was not a major problem. As the second-fastest

More information

CUSTOMER CHARTER NSW. this IS HoW we roll CUSTOMER CHARTER. transitsystems.com.au

CUSTOMER CHARTER NSW. this IS HoW we roll CUSTOMER CHARTER. transitsystems.com.au this IS HoW we roll CUSTOMER CHARTER transitsystems.com.au we help cities stay on the move 03. about Us 1500 PLUS EMPLOYEES IN NSW 800 PLUS VEHICLES At Transit Systems NSW we operate a modern fleet of

More information

Public attitudes to road safety

Public attitudes to road safety Public attitudes to road safety Highlights of the survey Prepared by the Research & Statistics section of the Land Transport Safety Authority. 3 4 Fieldwork conducted for the LTSA by National Research

More information

Bus Passenger Survey spring 2013 results

Bus Passenger Survey spring 2013 results Go-Ahead bus companies in England outside of London Bus Passenger Survey spring 2013 results Contact: Murray Leader, Research Team, Passenger Focus Fleetbank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8JX

More information

Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) Midland Metro

Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) Midland Metro Tram Passenger Survey (TPS) Midland Metro Rosie Giles Tel: 8 Email: Rosie.Giles@transportfocus.org.uk results March 8 Insight Team, Transport Focus, Fleetbank House, - Salisbury Square, London, ECY 8JX

More information

CO 2 Emissions: A Campus Comparison

CO 2 Emissions: A Campus Comparison Journal of Service Learning in Conservation Biology 3:4-8 Rachel Peacher CO 2 Emissions: A Campus Comparison Abstract Global warming, little cash inflow, and over-crowded parking lots are three problems

More information

2017 FLEET BAROMETER. Belgium

2017 FLEET BAROMETER. Belgium 1 2017 FLEET BAROMETER Belgium 2 Table of content I CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FLEET p.17 II FINANCING p.35 III TELEMATICS p.47 IV PERSPECTIVES IN TERMS OF MOBILITY p.52 V INFORMATION SOURCES p.63 Perimeter

More information

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT

RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT 2011-2015 RTCSNV CRASH ANALYSIS REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary... 3 Crash Types... 4 Time and Day of Crashes... 7 Crash Factors... 9 Fatalities... 10 Driver s Behavior... 11 Crash Locations... 15 Non-Motorized

More information

Metro-North Report on Metrics and Fare Evasion

Metro-North Report on Metrics and Fare Evasion Metro-North Report on Metrics and Fare Evasion Performance Metrics Service Performance Improvement Metrics Service Metric OTP SHORT TRAINS SWITCH/SIGNAL DELAYS Change from 2018 2019 Goal YTD Target YTD

More information

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION

MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION UMTRI-2015-22 JULY 2015 MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION BRANDON SCHOETTLE MICHAEL SIVAK MOTORISTS' PREFERENCES FOR DIFFERENT LEVELS OF VEHICLE AUTOMATION Brandon Schoettle

More information

Alberta Speeding Convictions and Collisions Involving Unsafe Speed

Alberta Speeding Convictions and Collisions Involving Unsafe Speed Alberta Speeding Convictions and Collisions Involving Unsafe Speed 2004-2008 Overview This document was prepared under the Alberta Traffic Safety Plan, Strategic Research Plan for 2008-2010, with the objective

More information

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary

Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary Denver Car Share Program 2017 Program Summary Prepared for: Prepared by: Project Manager: Malinda Reese, PE Apex Design Reference No. P170271, Task Order #3 January 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...

More information

What role for cars in tomorrow s world?

What role for cars in tomorrow s world? What role for cars in tomorrow s world? OPINION SURVEY JUNE 2017 There is no desire more natural the desire of knowledge OPINION SURVEY ON CARS AND THEIR USES The Montaigne Institute has organised an

More information

Real-time Bus Tracking using CrowdSourcing

Real-time Bus Tracking using CrowdSourcing Real-time Bus Tracking using CrowdSourcing R & D Project Report Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Technology by Deepali Mittal 153050016 under the guidance

More information

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION

PROPOSED TRAFFIC RESOLUTION Reference Number: TR 52-18 Location: Frobisher Street and Severn Street - Island Bay Proposal: Information: To provide two new bus stop locations on Frobisher Street, and change the time restriction on

More information

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image:

Service Quality: Higher Ridership: Very Affordable: Image: Over the past decade, much attention has been placed on the development of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems. These systems provide rail-like service, but with buses, and are typically less expensive to

More information

Rider Transit ADA Paratransit How to Ride Guide

Rider Transit ADA Paratransit How to Ride Guide Rider Transit ADA Paratransit How to Ride Guide ADA Paratransit Program Policies and Procedures for Passengers & Staff A partnership of Concord Kannapolis Area Transit Mobility for all Transportation is

More information

Consumer Attitude Survey

Consumer Attitude Survey Consumer Attitude Survey Spring 2018 Consumer Attitude Survey Spring 2018 2 Consumer Attitude Survey Spring 2018 Contents Introduction.. 4 Regional breakdown...... 5 Consumer views General perceptions..

More information

Appendix A: Additional Respondent Information

Appendix A: Additional Respondent Information Appendix A: Additional Respondent Information Employment Status Which of the following best describes your working status? Full-time for an employer Self-employed/home-based business Part-time for an employer

More information

Which fuels do you use? 96% 34% 8% 5% 5% 1% 0.5% 2014 EQUIPMENT SURVEY

Which fuels do you use? 96% 34% 8% 5% 5% 1% 0.5% 2014 EQUIPMENT SURVEY 2014 EQUIPMENT SURVEY Diesel Still Dominates SBF s Equipment Survey finds that 96% of operations run some or all of their buses on diesel, while propane is the mostly widely used alternative fuel. Our

More information

3 consecutive 2-month summer campaigns

3 consecutive 2-month summer campaigns Background NZ Police typically operate with a 10km/h speed enforcement threshold which is publicised. Other jurisdictions already commenced operating with reduced or zero thresholds (e.g. Australia (VIC,

More information

Introduction and Background Study Purpose

Introduction and Background Study Purpose Introduction and Background The Brent Spence Bridge on I-71/75 across the Ohio River is arguably the single most important piece of transportation infrastructure the Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana (OKI) region.

More information

Service and Operations Planning for Ottawa s New Light Rail Line Pat Scrimgeour

Service and Operations Planning for Ottawa s New Light Rail Line Pat Scrimgeour Service and Operations Planning for Ottawa s New Light Rail Line Pat Scrimgeour Manager, Transit Service Planning and Reporting OC Transpo Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa Light Rail Project 12.5 km, 13 stations

More information

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study

Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study Background Information about the Metrobus 29 Lines Study Questions Overview of Existing Service Q. Why is the study being conducted? A. The 29 Lines provide an important connection between Annandale and

More information

2016 De Montfort University Travel Survey

2016 De Montfort University Travel Survey 2016 De Montfort University Travel Survey 2016 Travel Survey Responses Executive summary Overall 698 staff and 1286 students responded to the survey and provided usable data; this compares with 433 staff

More information

Key Findings General Public and Traffic Police Surveys

Key Findings General Public and Traffic Police Surveys General Public and Traffic Police Surveys Tanzania Population: 50 million Demographics: 64% of population under 24 Dar es Salaam population growth: 4.39% (3rd fastest in Africa, 9th fastest globally) Surveys

More information