ICAPCD RULE APPENDIX C

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "ICAPCD RULE APPENDIX C"

Sheryl Baldwin
5 years ago
Views:

2 There is not a federal policy that establishes maximum cost effectiveness values for NOx RACT. The San Joaquin Valley APCD uses a BARCT threshold of $9, (California Air Resources Board (CARB), Report to the Legislature, Implications of Future Oxides of Nitrogen Controls from Seasonal Sources in the San Joaquin Valley, January 2002, Table 9, Comparison of BARCT Cost Effectiveness Thresholds). Therefore, for the purpose of this evaluation, the ICAPCD will use a RACT cost effectiveness value of $8,000- $10,000/ton of NOx. The cost of control equipment is highly dependent on the size of the unit and the type of control selected. According to the APCD survey, the majority of the boilers that will be impacted by Rule are in the range of MMBtu/hour. Therefore, the cost effectiveness evaluation was conducted for several size boilers ranging from 50 to 200 MMBtu/hour and capacity factors ranging from 10% to 75%. To estimate cost effectiveness, ICAPCD staff obtained capital cost estimates of a low NOx burner with flue gas recirculation system from Jeff Welton and Pete Santner, R.F. MacDonald Company. According to Pete Santner ( message on December 3, 2009), boilers with capacity MMBtu/hr would need to be retrofit with a combination of low-nox burner and flue gas recirculation system in order to reduce NOx emissions to a minimum of 30 ppmv for gaseous fuel-fired units. The total initial cost (capital cost and installation) for a low NOx burner and flue gas recirculation system for boilers 50 to 200 MMBtu/hr ranges from $401,000 to $732,000. The average cost effectiveness ranges from approximately $6,470 to $48,580 per ton of NOx reduced. The high end of the cost effectiveness range is due to low annual heat input of boilers. This evaluation indicates that it is cost effective to retrofit boilers to low-nox burner and flue gas recirculation but only for those units operating under an annual capacity factor above 30%. Therefore, Rule will establish an alternative NOx emission limit of 70 ppmv for those existing emission units with an annual capacity factor of 30% or less. The annual capacity factor is the ratio of the amount of fuel burned by an emission unit in a calendar year to the amount it could have burned if it had operated all year around; in other words, it represents 30% of the potential annual fuel consumption for the emission unit. The ICAPCD staff conducted a survey of the permit database to identify the number of boilers which will need to be retrofitted to comply with the new RACT requirements. Approximately 13 units rated 50 million Btu per hour or greater are operated at three of Imperial County s major source facilities and will be affected by the requirements of Rule The ICAPCD survey indicates that one of the boilers (Unit 4) operated by Imperial Irrigation District at the El Centro Generating Facility and three of the natural gas boilers operated by Spreckels Sugar Company would be out of compliance with the 30 ppmv emission limit with current NOx control technology. Unit 4 is currently equipped with Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) and Spreckels Sugar Company has indicated that its natural gas boilers will be retrofitted with Flue Gas Recirculation technology. However, this type of NOx control technology would not be able to reduce NOx emissions to the 30 ppmv limit. Therefore, a 70 ppmv NOx limit would be feasible to achieve with the current and proposed technology for these units. The ICAPCD staff evaluated cost effectiveness for retrofitting the Spreckels Sugar boilers and the El Centro 2 February 23, 2010

3 Generating Facility Unit 4 boiler to meet the 30 ppmv limit, a detailed cost effectiveness evaluation for these boilers is included in Section II.b of this report. This evaluation indicates that due to the seasonal nature of operation of the Spreckels Sugar natural gas boilers and El Centro Generating Unit 4 boiler, the cost for retrofitting these boilers is higher than the recommended cost effectiveness threshold. Therefore, these emission units will be restricted to 70 ppmv NOx and maximum annual capacity factor of 30%. It is important to point out that any new boilers will need to comply with BACT requirements; therefore, these units will be required to install more efficient technology to reduce NOx emission, hence the capital and operational cost will be higher. II. COST EFFECTIVENSS A Low NOx with Flue Gas Recirculation System The cost of retrofitting units to comply with the proposed rule varies with the size of the unit and the type of controls used. ICAPCD staff analyzed the cost effectiveness of Rule based on installing and operating of low-nox burner system and flue gas recirculation because this is the control technology that will most likely be used by local industry to comply with this rule. The cost effectiveness evaluation was conducted for several sizes of units ranging from 50 to 200 MMBru/hour. The potential NOx emission reductions were evaluated using the following assumptions: Baseline emissions are lb/mmbtu 3% O2) Controlled emissions are lb/mmbtu 3% O2) Operating schedule 24 hour/day; 365 days/year 0.10, 0.25, 0.30, 0.50 and 0.75 capacity factors Table 1 provides a summary of NOx emissions reductions for boilers at different capacity factors. Table 1 Potential NOx Emissions Reductions MMBtu/hr Capacity Factor Uncontrolled Emissions Tons/yr Controlled Emissions Tons/yr NOx Reductions Tons/year February 23, 2010

4 To estimate cost effectiveness, ICAPCD staff obtained capital cost estimates of a low NOx burner with flue gas recirculation system from Jeff Welton and Pete Santner, R.F. MacDonald Company. In addition, to estimate cost for installation and operation of the boilers, ICAPCD staff used information provided by the CARB, Report to the Legislature, Implications of Future Oxides of Nitrogen Controls from Seasonal Sources in the San Joaquin Valley, January The method for calculating cost effectiveness on CARB s evaluation assumes a 10% interest rate and useful life for the control equipment of 10 years. Table 2 provides a summary of cost to control NOx emissions for different boiler capacities. Table 2 Cost of NOx Control for Boilers Boiler Capacity, MMBtu/hr NOx emission limit, ppm Capital cost, $ 336K 475K 525K 600K Installation cost, $ 65K 96K 108K 132K Total initial cost, $ 401K 571K 633K 732K Capital cost amortization factor 1 Annual repair and 5K 10K 15K 20K maintenance cost, $ Annual operation cost, $ Annual source test cost, $ 4K 4K 4K 4K Total annual cost, $ 74.7K 108.3K 124.9K 148.2K Table 3 indicates the cost effectiveness for boilers at various capacity factors that are subject to the lb/mmbtu or 30 ppm standard. Table 3 Cost Effectiveness for Boilers 50 to 200 MMBtu/hour Capacity Factor (%) (MMBtu/hr) K 27.98K 22.57K 13.96K 9.31K K 20.24K 16.90K 10.13K 6.76K 1 Uses a 10% interest rate and useful life data from the manufacturers survey, when available. 4 February 23, 2010

5 K 15.57K 13.00K 7.79K 5.19K K 13.86K 11.56K 6.93K 4.62K Average 48.58K 19.41K 16.00K 9.70K 6.47K B Alternative NOx Emission Limit Rule established an alternative NOx emission limit of 70 ppmv for those existing emission units with an annual capacity factor of 30% or less. The annual capacity factor is the ratio of the amount of fuel burned by an emission unit in a calendar year to the amount it could have burned if it had operated all year around; in other words, it represents a 30% of the potential annual fuel consumption for the emission unit. This alternative emission threshold has been established for existing seasonal emission units for which installation of advanced control technology would not have a significant impact in reducing NOx emissions due to irregular operation of the emission unit. Spreckels Sugar Company operates three boilers which are not equipped with any type of NOx controls. The three natural gas boilers were installed in 1977 and will have to comply with Rule RACT requirements. The operation of these boilers is seasonal and therefore retrofitting of the boilers to comply with the 30 3% O2 may not be cost effective. Spreckels Sugar Company has indicated that its natural gas boilers will be retrofitted with Flue Gas Recirculation technology to comply with the 70 3% O2. Table 4 Spreckels Sugar Company Potential NOx Reductions 70 ppm to 30 ppm (Year Average Natural Gas Consumption) Emission Unit (MMBtu/hr) Average Natural Gas Used MMBtu/year NOx Emissions at 70 ppm 3% O2 ( lb/mmbtu) (tpy) NOx Emissions at 30 ppm 3% O2 (0.036 lb/mmbtu) (tpy) Potential NOx Reductions (tpy) CE Boiler , Union Boiler Auxiliary Boiler , , Table 5 Spreckels Sugar Company Cost Effectiveness Evaluation Emission Unit Approximate (MMBtu/hr) Annual Cost for Retrofitting at 30 ppm Cost per Ton of NOx Reductions Based on Potential Reductions Cost Effective (yes/no) CE Boiler K 16.21K No Union Boiler K 99.92K No Auxiliary Boiler K K No 5 February 23, 2010

6 Imperial Irrigation District operates one boiler which is currently equipped with selective catalytic reduction system for NOx control (SCR system). This unit was installed in 1968 without any NOx controls. This boiler has a heat input capacity of MMBtu/hr. In 2000 the boiler was retrofitted with the SCR system to meet the 140 pounds per hour limit of the ICAPCD Rule 400. The operation of this boiler is seasonal by nature and therefore further retrofitting of this boiler to comply with the 30 3% O2 may not be cost effective. Imperial Irrigation District has indicated that it will adjust the operation of its natural gas boiler to comply with the 70 3% O2. The ICAPCD Cost Effectiveness evaluation does not analyze cost effectiveness for Imperial Irrigation District size boiler. The facility provided the estimated capital and installation cost for retrofitting of Unit 4 Boiler to meet the 30 ppmv limit of Rule The ICAPCD staff estimated the cost effectiveness for retrofitting the Unit 4 boiler from 70 ppmv to 30 ppmv. Table 6 presents cost effectiveness evaluation for retrofitting the Unit 4 boiler to 30 ppmv. This evaluation indicates that based on the $8,000-$10,000 threshold established by the ICAPCD for RACT determination, it is not cost effective to require unit 4 to retrofit to 30 ppmv but rather limit operation of this unit at 70 ppmv and 30% capacity factor. Table 6 Cost of NOx Control for Boilers Unit 4 Boiler MMBtu/hr NOx emission limit, ppm 30 Capital and Installation cost, $ 4,250K Capital cost amortization factor 2 Equivalent annual capital cost K of controls 3, $ Annual repair and 5K maintenance cost, $ Annual operation cost, $ 40K Annual source test cost, $ 4K Total annual cost, $ K Average annual emissions reduction, TPY Cost Effectiveness, $/Ton 18.33K Cost Effective? No 2 Uses a 10% interest rate and useful life data from the manufacturers survey, when available. 3 Uses average capital and installation costs. 6 February 23, 2010

COST EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION. A. Selective Catalytic Reduction System

COST EFFECTIVENESS EVALUATION. A. Selective Catalytic Reduction System was installed with a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) and is able to comply with a NOx emission limit of 9 ppmv when operating with natural gas and 13 ppmv when operating under diesel fuel. In addition,