The Airplane That Could!
|
|
- Peregrine Booth
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Airplane That Could! Critical Design Review December 6 th, 2008 Haoyun Fu Suzanne Lessack Andrew McArthur Nicholas Rooney Jin Yan Yang Yang
2 Agenda Criteria Preliminary Designs Down Selection Features Trade Studies Wing and Empennage Design Fuel Tank System Center of Gravity / Static Stability Take-off and Landing Analysis V-n Diagrams Wing Air Loads Load Path Cost Analysis 2
3 Criteria Relief Delivery Mission Transoceanic Mission 30 ton payload 10 ton payload 2,500 takeoff distance 2,500 takeoff distance Cruise speed Mach 0.8 Cruise speed Mach nm cruise range 3,200 nm cruise range Wet grass, 3,000 by 200 landing zone Wet grass, 2,500 by 200 landing zone Air Force FDCV Mission 65 ton payload 5,500 takeoff distance Cruise speed Mach nm cruise range (one refueling) Wet grass, 3,500 by 200 landing zone 3
4 500 nm cruise Divert Takeoff Climb Loiter Attempt to Land or Land Climb Loiter Land Relief Mission Divert Profile 500 nm cruise RTB cruise Takeoff Climb Loiter Land and Unload Cargo Climb Loiter Land 3200 nm Cruise Divert Relief Mission Return to Base Profile Takeoff Climb Loiter Attempt to Land or Land Climb Loiter Land Transoceanic Mission Profile Takeoff Climb 5000 nm Cruise/Air Refueling Loiter Attempt to Land or Land Divert Climb Loiter Land FDCV Delivery Mission Profile 4
5 Preliminary Designs Red Configuration FEMA Mission Low Wing Three Engines Conventional Empennage White Configuration FEMA Mission High Wing Two Engines T-Tail Empennage Blue Configuration Air Force FDCV Mission High Wing Four Engines H-Tail Empennage 5
6 Preliminary Design Comparison Criteria Red White Blue Mission FEMA FEMA Air Force + FEMA Range (nm) 3,200 3,200 2,800 W TO (lbs) 184, , ,000 W E (lbs) 89,600 89, ,000 T/W W/S (psf) Mach Cruise Speed SL (ft) 2,330 2,330 2,990 STO (ft) 2,370 2,370 3,460 C Lmax TO C Lmax Landing Wing Span (ft) AR Fuselage Length (ft) Landing Stall Speed (knots) Cost (Millions 2008 USD) $217.3 $215.8 $
7 Down Selection White Configuration -> Thomas 7
8 Down Selection High Wing Ground clearance for large flaps Reduced floating effect Reduced engine-debris encounters Cargo floor close to ground Propulsion System Two tractor engines Externally blown flaps meet required C Lmax Engines more reliable with today's technology Engines are easy to inspect 8
9 Down Selection T-tail Configuration Reduced horizontal and vertical stabilizer volume coefficients End plate effect Clean air Single fuselage attachment point Avoids rudder blanketing at high angles of attack Cost FEMA: $215.8 million Air Force: $287.1 million Cannot justify a more expensive plane for FEMA 9
10 Thomas Overview and Comparison Criteria Thomas White Ilyushin IRTA-21 Lockheed C-130 Boeing C-17 W TO (lbs) 192, , , , ,000 W E (lbs) 95,200 89,600 N/A 79, ,500 Max Payload (lbs) 60,000 60,000 40,785 48, ,900 T/W N/A 0.1 (P/W) 0.28 W/S (psf) N/A Range (nm) 3,200 3,200 1,349 2,832 4,200 Cruise Mach S L (ft) 2,490 2,330 4,430 2,550 3,000 S TO (ft) 2,450 2,370 4,270 3,050 7,740 C Lmax TO 2 2 N/A N/A N/A C Lmax Landing N/A N/A 4.75 Aspect Ratio N/A Clean Stall Speed (knots) Landing Stall Speed (knots) N/A N/A N/A N/A
11 Thomas Dimensions 11
12 Thomas Features Cockpit Two Flight Crew One Loadmaster One Potential Observer Loadmaster Station Desk Fold-down Chair Lavatory Closet 12
13 Interior Design and Layout - Cockpit 13
14 Interior Design and Layout: Lavatory, Closet, and Loadmaster Station CAD Representation of the Lavatory (upper left), the closet (upper right), and loadmaster station (right) 14
15 Landing Gear Layout Thomas Nose Landing Gear Thomas Main Landing Gear 15
16 Trade Studies Drivers Take-off Distance Landing Distance Gross Take-off Weight Empty Weight Parameters Thrust-to-Weight: 0.31, 0.41, 0.51 Wing Loading: 67, 77, 87 Aspect Ratio: 6.0, 6.7,
17 Trade Studies Optimized Parameters: Aspect Ratio 7.4 Thrust-to-Weight 0.36 Wing Loading 86 Gross Take-off Weight (lbs) 189,500 17
18 Wing Design Super Critical airfoils: Boeing root RAE tip Aerodynamic twist -3 degrees Criteria Thomas Take-off Weight (lb) 192,000 Wing Loading (lb/ft 2 ) 86 Reference Area (ft 2 ) 2,380 Aspect Ratio 7.4 Span (ft) 133 Sweep (degrees) 28 Dihedral (degrees) -3 18
19 High Lift and Control Devices High Lift Devices: Externally blown flaps 25% of chord Slats 20% of chord Control Devices: Ailerons 30% of chord Spoilers Criteria Thomas C Lmax 3.32 Clean C Lmax 1.7 Delta Flaps C Lmax 1.32 Flaps % of Span 14%-74% Flaps c'/c 1.25 Delta Slat C Lmax 0.3 Slats % of Span 14%-90% Slats c'/c 1.2 Aileron % of Span 75%-99% 19
20 Aerodynamic Parameters Parameter Cruise Condition Lift Coefficient Drag Coefficient Moment Coefficient Oswald Efficiency 0.97 Incidence Angle (deg) 0.83 Spiral Stability
21 Empennage Design T-tail NACA 0009 Airfoil Passed One-Engine-Inoperative test Parameter Horizontal Tail Vertical Tail Volume Coefficient Aspect Ratio Taper Ratio Sweep Angle ( ) Incidence Angle ( ) 0 0 Dihedral ( ) -3 0 Tail Area (ft 2 )
22 Propulsion System Pratt & Whitney PW2043 turbofan PW2000 series/f117-pw-100 used on Boeing 757, Ilyushin Il-96M, and Boeing C-17 PW2000 Series Fan Tip Diameter (in) 78.5 Length (in) Take-off Thrust (lbf, PW2043) 42,600 Bypass Ratio 6 Weight (lbf) 8,721 Specific Fuel Consumption (lb/lbf-hr)
23 Fuel Tank System Transoceanic Mission requires 70,000 lbs of fuel Nose and forward fuselage tanks move fuel CG location from 45 ft to 30 ft Fuel management provides CG stability during loading Parameter Thomas Wing Fuel Tank Weight (lbs) 87,800 Wing Fuel Tank Volume (gal/ft 3 ) 13,000/1,740 Nose Fuel Tank Weight (lbs) 8,400 Nose Fuel Tank Volume (gal/ft 3 ) 1,200/170 Forward Fuselage Fuel Tank Weight (lbs) 10,200 Forward Fuselage Fuel Tank Volume (gal/ft 3 ) 1,500/200 23
24 Fuel Tank System: Nose and Forward Fuselage Fuel Tanks Nose Fuel Tank Fuselage Fuel Tank 24
25 Fuel Tank System: Wing Fuel Tanks 25
26 Weight (lb) Center of Gravity Excursion and Static Stability Center of Gravity Total Excursion: 8.2% Case X Center of Gravity (ft) Xbar Center of Gravity Static Margin (%) Empty Empty + Loading Cargo + Fuel (Loading Payload) Neutral Point: 51.6 ft Passes longitudinal, lateral, and ground clearance tests Empty + Loaded Cargo + Crew (Landing) Empty + Loaded Cargo + Crew + Full Fuel (Takeoff) Take-off Landing Loading Empty Xbar CG (normalized by MAC) 26
27 Take-off Meets take-off distance requirement < 1% margin Height after Transition: 154 ft Balanced field Length: 900 ft Segment Thomas S G (ft) 284 S R (ft) 650 S T (ft) 1,560 S C (ft) 0 Total Take-off distance (ft) 2,494 27
28 Landing Meets landing distance requirement on wet grass < 1% margin Calculated without thrust reversers Built in safety factor of 1.66 Segment Thomas S a (ft) 450 S F (ft) 630 S FR (ft) 540 S B (ft) 1,120 Total landing distance (ft) 2,490 28
29 V-n Diagrams: Minimum Weight Condition (121,000 lbs) 29
30 V-n Diagrams: Maximum Weight Condition (192,000 lbs) 30
31 Wing Air Load Distributions Minimize aircraft weight while meeting safety standards The aircraft structure must: Withstand the proof load without detrimental distortion Not fail until ultimate load has been achieved. Obtain distributed load on wings by combining AVL results with the proper equations. Finite element method used to calculate aerodynamic loads in the body-fixed coordinate system. 31
32 Bending Moment in the X-direction for Maximum Weight 32
33 Load Path Layout Longerons and Stringers Fuselage Bulkhead Wind Box Carry-through Wing Spars
34 Manufacturer Cost Overview Cost Analysis Results are given in Millions of 2008 USD Customer price and Net Present Value Program Profit are based on 10% margin rate Thomas RDT&E $3,208 Flyaway $4,319 Program Cost (RDT&E + Flyaway) $7,527 Program Cost per Plane $215.1 Customer Price per Plane $236.6 Contribution Margin $103.8 Breakeven Quantity 31.8 NPV Program Profit $
35 FEMA Life-Cycle Cost Cost Analysis Results are given in millions of 2008 USD Operating Cost per Flight Hour in 2008 USD: $16,500 Life-Cycle Cost is based on an aircraft service life of 21 years Program Cost (RDT&E + Flyaway) Customer Price per Plane Thomas $7,527 $236.6 Operating Cost $12,520 Operating Cost per Plane $357.7 Disposal Cost $210.1 Total Life Cycle Cost $21,011 35
36 36
37 Design Methodology Historical Aircraft Preliminary Sizing Initial Cost Analysis Three Configurations Red, White, and Blue CATIA models Detailed Design Aspects Down-Select Process Refined Thomas Aircraft V-n Diagrams AVL Analysis Structural Loads Revised Cost 3D Printing Model 37
38 Aircraft Sizing Preliminary Sizing Take-off Climb Cruise Speed Ceiling Landing Thrust-to-Weight and Wing Loading Relief Transoceanic Thrust-to-Weight Ratio Wing Loading (psf) C Lmax Take-off C Lmax Landing
39 Individual Weights Items Utilize Composites Relief Mission Weights (lb) Transoceanic Mission Weights (lb) Wing 21,450 21,450 Horizontal Tail 3,855 3,900 Vertical Tail 1,646 1,600 Fuselage 38,195 38,200 Main Landing Gear 7,495 7,500 Nose Landing Gear 1,320 1,300 Installed Engines 18,420 18,400 Payload 60,000 20,000 Crew Fuel 36,600 70,000 W E 95,200 95,200 W TO 192, ,800 39
40 Landing Gear Sizing Criteria Thomas Nose Total Tire Load (lb) 23,000 Main Total Tire Load (lb) 207,000 Nose Gear Bogeys 1 Main Gear Bogeys 4 Nose Gear Wheels / Bogey 2 Main Gear Wheels / Bogey 2 Nose Weight per Wheel (lb) 11,500 Main Weight per Wheel (lb 25,900 Nose Tire Diameter (inch) 25 Main Tire Diameter (inch) 40 Nose Tire Width (inch) 7 Main Tire Width (inch) 14 KEbraking (106 ft-lb/s) 12 40
41 Positioning Landing Gear Position Thomas Xng(nose landing gear) ft 16.2 Yng(nose landing gear) ft 0 Zng(nose landing gear) ft 3 Xmg (main landing gear)ft 58 Ymg (main landing gear)ft 5.9 Zmg (main landing gear)ft 3 Ztip(the height of the tip of the fuselage from the ground) 12.4 This configuration passes the longitudinal tip-over test, lateral tip-over test, and meets the ground clearance criteria. 41
42 Thomas Design Cost Overview - Preliminary Design Review Estimates DAPCA IV Results (in Millions of 2008 USD) Red White/Thomas Blue RDT&E $2,946 $2,946 $8,626 Flyaway $3,967 $3,920 $24,004 Program Cost (RDT&E + Flyaway) $6,913 $6,866 $32,631 Program Cost per Plane $197.5 $196.2 $261.0 Customer Price per Plane $217.3 $215.8 $287.1 Contribution Margin $103.9 $103.8 $95.1 Breakeven Quantity
43 Assumptions Used to Separate RDT&E Costs and Flyaway Costs Hours Percentage Spent in Development (RDT&E) Percentage Spent in Production (Flyaway) Engineering 80% 20% Tooling 95% 5% Manufacturing 5% 95% Quality Control 5% 95% 43
44 Preliminary Design Review DAPCA IV Model Inputs by Configuration Model Input Red White Blue Empty Weight (lbs) 90,000 90, ,000 Takeoff Weight (lbs) 184, , ,000 Max Speed (knots) Production Quantity Flight Tested Aircraft Total Engines Engine Max Thrust (lbf) 25,000 37,000 50,000 Engine Max Mach Engine Turbine Temperature (ºR) 2, , , Cost Avionics Rate/pound $5,219 $5,219 $5,219 Avionics Weight 3.00% 3.00% 2.00% 44 Percentage
45 Empennage Design 45
46 One-Engine-Inoperative 25 rudder deflection Take-off conditions, where speed is the lowest and, consequently, the moment created by the rudder deflection is the lowest Critical Engine-Out Yawing Moment (lb ft) Drag-Induced Yawing Moment (lb ft) Sum of Critical Engine-Out and Drag-Induced Yawing Moments (lb ft) Moment due to Rudder Deflection (lb ft) 760, , ,000 2,806,000 46
47 Balanced Field Length Take-off field length required, including obstacle clearance, if an engine fails at a speed at which the stop distance and the remaining take-off distance are equal Minimum required is 2000 feet with a 50 feet obstacle clearance Value for Thomas is around 900 feet 47
48 Figure 1: Shear loading in the X-direction for critical points with maximum weight 48
49 Figure 2: Shear loading in the Z-direction for critical points with maximum weight 49
50 Figure 4: Bending Moment in the Z-direction for critical points with maximum weight 50
51 Figure5: Torsional Moment in the y-direction for critical points with maximum weight 51
52 Figure 6: Shear loading in the X-direction for critical points with minimum weight 52
53 Figure 7: Shear loading in the Z-direction for critical points with minimum weight 53
54 Figure 8: Bending Moment in the X-direction for critical points with minimum weight 54
55 Figure 9: Bending Moment in the Z-direction for critical points with minimum weight 55
56 Figure10: Torsional Moment in the y-direction for critical points with minimum weight 56
TEAM Four Critical Design Review. Kai Jian Cheong Richard B. Choroszucha* Lynn Lau Mathew Marcucci Jasmine Sadler Sapan Shah Chongyu Brian Wang
TEAM Four Critical Design Review Kai Jian Cheong Richard B. Choroszucha* Lynn Lau Mathew Marcucci Jasmine Sadler Sapan Shah Chongyu Brian Wang 03.XII.2008 0.1 Abstract The purpose of this report is to
More informationAircraft Design Conceptual Design
Université de Liège Département d Aérospatiale et de Mécanique Aircraft Design Conceptual Design Ludovic Noels Computational & Multiscale Mechanics of Materials CM3 http://www.ltas-cm3.ulg.ac.be/ Chemin
More informationAE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design Final Examination. Instructor: Prof. Dr. Serkan ÖZGEN Date:
Instructor: Prof. Dr. Serkan ÖZGEN Date: 11.01.2012 1. a) (8 pts) In what aspects an instantaneous turn performance is different from sustained turn? b) (8 pts) A low wing loading will always increase
More informationAIRCRAFT DESIGN SUBSONIC JET TRANSPORT
AIRCRAFT DESIGN SUBSONIC JET TRANSPORT Analyzed by: Jin Mok Professor: Dr. R.H. Liebeck Date: June 6, 2014 1 Abstract The purpose of this report is to design the results of a given specification and to
More informationINDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR Removable, Low Noise, High Speed Tip Shape Tractor Configuration, Cant angle, Low Maintainence Hingelesss, Good Manoeuverability,
More informationAE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Estimation of Critical Performance Parameters. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering Fall 2015
AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Estimation of Critical Performance Parameters Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering Fall 2015 Airfoil selection The airfoil effects the cruise speed,
More informationAIAA UNDERGRADUATE TEAM DESIGN COMPETITION PROPOSAL 2017
TADPOLE AIAA UNDERGRADUATE TEAM DESIGN COMPETITION PROPOSAL 2017 Conceptual Design of TADPOLE Multi-Mission Amphibian MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY 5-10-2017 Team Member AIAA Number Contact Details
More information31 st Annual American Helicopter Society Student Design Competition: Graduate Submission
Rotorcraft Adaptive and Morphing Structures Lab The Emperor UAV: Executive Summary George Jacobellis Alex Angilella Jean-Paul Reddinger Andrew Howard Matthew Misiorowski Michael Pontecorvo Jayanth Krishnamurthi
More informationTAKEOFF PERFORMANCE ground roll
TAKEOFF PERFORMANCE An airplane is motionless at the end of a runway. This is denoted by location O. The pilot releases the brakes and pushes the throttle to maximum takeoff power, and the airplane accelerates
More informationThree major types of airplane designs are 1. Conceptual design 2. Preliminary design 3. Detailed design
1. Introduction 1.1 Overview: Three major types of airplane designs are 1. Conceptual design 2. Preliminary design 3. Detailed design 1. Conceptual design: It depends on what are the major factors for
More informationHeavy Lifters Design Team. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Free-Weight Final Report Spring 2007
Heavy Lifters Design Team Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Free-Weight Final Report Spring 2007 The Heavy Lifters Leslie Mehl AIAA # 281854 Daniel Opipare AIAA #275371 Dzejna Mujezinovic
More informationFlugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design SS Part 35 points, 70 minutes, closed books. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME. Date:
DEPARTMENT FAHRZEUGTECHNIK UND FLUGZEUGBAU Flugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design SS 2015 Duration of examination: 180 minutes Last Name: Matrikelnummer: First Name: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME Date:
More informationDesign Considerations for Stability: Civil Aircraft
Design Considerations for Stability: Civil Aircraft From the discussion on aircraft behavior in a small disturbance, it is clear that both aircraft geometry and mass distribution are important in the design
More informationAircraft Design in a Nutshell
Dieter Scholz Aircraft Design in a Nutshell Based on the Aircraft Design Lecture Notes 1 Introduction The task of aircraft design in the practical sense is to supply the "geometrical description of a new
More informationAppenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis
Appenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis The vehicle summary is presented in the form of plots and descriptive text. Two alternative mission altitudes were analyzed and both meet the desired mission duration.
More informationJetBiz. Six and Eight Passenger Business Jets
JetBiz Presents the Six and Eight Passenger Business Jets In response to the 2016 2017 AIAA Foundation Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Request for Proposal Presented by California State
More informationChapter 2 Lecture 5 Data collection and preliminary three-view drawing - 2 Topic
Chapter 2 Lecture 5 Data collection and preliminary three-view dra - 2 Topic 2.3 Preliminary three-view dra Example 2.1 2.3 Preliminary three-view dra The preliminary three-view dra of the airplane gives
More informationInitech Aircraft is proud to present the JTC-2 E Swingliner in response to the
ii Executive Summary Initech Aircraft is proud to present the JTC-2 E Swingliner in response to the 2006-2007 AIAA undergraduate design competition. The Swingliner has been developed as a survivable transport
More informationAeroTactic Company. FF-1 Rainbird
AeroTactic Company presents the FF-1 Rainbird In response to the 2015-2016 AIAA Foundation Graduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Presented by California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Aerospace
More informationChapter 3: Aircraft Construction
Chapter 3: Aircraft Construction p. 1-3 1. Aircraft Design, Certification, and Airworthiness 1.1. Replace the letters A, B, C, and D by the appropriate name of aircraft component A: B: C: D: E: 1.2. What
More informationDesign of Ultralight Aircraft
Design of Ultralight Aircraft Greece 2018 Main purpose of present study The purpose of this study is to design and develop a new aircraft that complies with the European ultra-light aircraft regulations
More informationNew Design Concept of Compound Helicopter
New Design Concept of Compound Helicopter PRASETYO EDI, NUKMAN YUSOFF and AZNIJAR AHMAD YAZID Department of Engineering Design & Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur,
More informationAN ADVANCED COUNTER-ROTATING DISK WING AIRCRAFT CONCEPT Program Update. Presented to NIAC By Carl Grant November 9th, 1999
AN ADVANCED COUNTER-ROTATING DISK WING AIRCRAFT CONCEPT Program Update Presented to NIAC By Carl Grant November 9th, 1999 DIVERSITECH, INC. Phone: (513) 772-4447 Fax: (513) 772-4476 email: carl.grant@diversitechinc.com
More informationLecture 5 : Static Lateral Stability and Control. or how not to move like a crab. G. Leng, Flight Dynamics, Stability & Control
Lecture 5 : Static Lateral Stability and Control or how not to move like a crab 1.0 Lateral static stability Lateral static stability refers to the ability of the aircraft to generate a yawing moment to
More informationChapter 10 Miscellaneous topics - 2 Lecture 39 Topics
Chapter 10 Miscellaneous topics - 2 Lecture 39 Topics 10.3 Presentation of results 10.3.1 Presentation of results of a student project 10.3.2 A typical brochure 10.3 Presentation of results At the end
More informationblended wing body aircraft for the
Feasibility study of a nuclear powered blended wing body aircraft for the Cruiser/Feeder eede concept cept G. La Rocca - TU Delft 11 th European Workshop on M. Li - TU Delft Aircraft Design Education Linköping,
More information2008/2009 AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design
2008/2009 AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design 2 3 Executive Summary Fusion Aeronautics presents the HB-86 Navigator as a solution to the 2008-2009 AIAA Undergraduate Aircraft Design Competition RFP.
More informationDESIGN OF A FIFTH GENERATION AIR SUPERIORITY FIGHTER AIRCRAFT
Proceedings of the International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Renewable Energy 2015 (ICMERE2015) 26 29 November, 2015, Chittagong, Bangladesh ICMERE2015PI152 DESIGN OF A FIFTH GENERATION AIR
More informationPAC 750XL PAC 750XL PAC-750XL
PAC 750XL The PAC 750XL combines a short take off and landing performance with a large load carrying capability. The PAC 750XL is a distinctive type. Its design philosophy is reflected in the aircraft's
More information1.1 REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFTS
CHAPTER 1 1.1 REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFTS Remotely Piloted aircrafts or RC Aircrafts are small model radiocontrolled airplanes that fly using electric motor, gas powered IC engines or small model jet engines.
More informationAIRCRAFT DESIGN MADE EASY. Basic Choices and Weights. By Chris Heintz
AIRCRAFT DESIGN MADE EASY By Chris Heintz The following article, which is a first installement of a two-part article, describes a simple method for the preliminary design of an airplane of conventional
More informationAIAA Foundation Student Design Competition 2015/16. Undergraduate Individual Aircraft
AIAA Foundation Student Design Competition 2015/16 Undergraduate Individual Aircraft Conceptual Design of TAJ PEGASUS A Long Range Container Transportation Aircraft Designer & Author : Waheedullah Taj
More informationHawker Beechcraft Corporation on March 26, 2007
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION A00010WI Revision 8 Hawker Beechcraft 390 March 26, 2007 TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. A00010WI This data sheet, which is part of Type Certificate
More informationFlugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design WS 10/ Klausurteil 30 Punkte, 60 Minuten, ohne Unterlagen. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME
DEPARTMENT FAHRZEUGTECHNIK UND FLUGZEUGBAU Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME Flugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design WS 10/11 Bearbeitungszeit: 180 Minuten Name: Matrikelnummer.: Vorname: Punkte: von 68 Note:
More informationAircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, 2012 Chapter 11 Aircraft Weight Distribution Tables
Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, 01 Chapter 11 Aircraft Weight Distribution Tables No Component group Elements Weight X cg Y cg Z cg 1 Wing 1.1. Wing main structure 1..
More informationCONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT Agricultural Unmanned Aircraft System (AUAS) Team Two-CAN Team Member Albert Lee (Team Leader) Chris Cirone Kevin Huckshold Adam Kuester Jake Niehus Michael Scott Area of Responsibility
More informationTheory of Flight. Main Teaching Points. Definition Parts of an Airplane Aircraft Construction Landing Gear Standard Terminology
Theory of Flight 6.01 Aircraft Design and Construction References: FTGU pages 9-14, 27 Main Teaching Points Parts of an Airplane Aircraft Construction Standard Terminology Definition The airplane is defined
More informationME 408 Aircraft Design Final Report for Team FSLAP Four-Seat Light Airplane
ME 408 Aircraft Design Final Report for Team FSLAP Four-Seat Light Airplane Matt Mayo Chris Hayes Bryant Ramon Designed in 1956 more Cessna 172 Skyhawk s have been built than any other aircraft in history,
More informationSystems Group (Summer 2012) 4 th Year (B.Eng) Aerospace Engineering Candidate Carleton University, Ottawa,Canada Mail:
Memo Airport2030_M_Family_Concepts_of_Box_Wing_12-08-10.pdf Date: 12-08-10 From: Sameer Ahmed Intern at Aero Aircraft Design and Systems Group (Summer 2012) 4 th Year (B.Eng) Aerospace Engineering Candidate
More informationAeronautical Engineering Design II Sizing Matrix and Carpet Plots. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering Spring 2014
Aeronautical Engineering Design II Sizing Matrix and Carpet Plots Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering Spring 2014 Empty weight estimation and refined sizing Empty weight of the airplane
More informationDUCHESS BE-76 AND COMMERCIAL MULTI ADD-ON ORAL REVIEW FOR CHECKRIDE
DUCHESS BE-76 AND COMMERCIAL MULTI ADD-ON ORAL REVIEW FOR CHECKRIDE The Critical Engine The critical engine is the engine whose failure would most adversely affect the airplane s performance or handling
More informationA Game of Two: Airbus vs Boeing. The Big Guys. by Valerio Viti. Valerio Viti, AOE4984, Project #1, March 22nd, 2001
A Game of Two: Airbus vs Boeing The Big Guys by Valerio Viti 1 Why do we Need More Airliners in the Next 20 Years? Both Boeing and Airbus agree that civil air transport will keep increasing at a steady
More informationGeneral Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/images/f-16c-19990601-f-0073c-007.jpg Adam Entsminger David Gallagher Will Graf AOE 4124 4/21/04 1 Outline
More informationAE 440: Conceptual Design Report for the Agricultural Unmanned Aircraft System. X Duster: XD 44X
AE 440: Conceptual Design Report for the Agricultural Unmanned Aircraft System X Duster: XD 44X Aerodynamics and Team Leader: Timothy Lingner Configuration: Matthew Fuesz Cost and Components: Wesley Hammes
More informationJODEL D.112 INFORMATION MANUAL C-FVOF
JODEL D.112 INFORMATION MANUAL C-FVOF Table of Contents I General Description...4 Dimensions:...4 Powertrain:...4 Landing gear:...4 Control travel:...4 II Limitations...5 Speed limits:...5 Airpeed indicator
More informationSCS-527 Sea Duck. May 10, 2017
SCS-527 Sea Duck May 10, 2017 AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition 2016-2017 Austin Collett Matthew Salter Shawn Sinclair Name AIAA Number Signature Austin Collett 760598 Matthew Salter
More informationAIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design
Homeland Defense Interceptor (HDI) 2005 2006 AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Group Members and Responsibilities Name Discipline AIAA Number John Borgie Configuration and Systems 268357 Ron Cook
More informationHumming Aerospace Version 9 Blade ti
Humming Aerospace Version 9 Blade ti Designed By J Falk Hummingair LLC The Version 9 is a prototype carbon fiber intensive aircraft designed from the nose back to be much more efficient than existing aircraft
More informationDesign of a High Altitude Fixed Wing Mini UAV Aerodynamic Challenges
Design of a High Altitude Fixed Wing Mini UAV Aerodynamic Challenges Hemant Sharma 1, C. S. Suraj 2, Roshan Antony 3, G. Ramesh 4, Sajeer Ahmed 5 and Prasobh Narayan 6 1, 2, 3, 4 CSIR National Aerospace
More informationTEAM AEROHEAD AERONAUTICS
Presents AA SB-01 Response to 2008/2009 AIAA Foundation Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Presented by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University TEAM AEROHEAD AERONAUTICS From left
More informationKarpuk Aircraft KR-1 Multi-Mission Amphibian
Karpuk Aircraft KR-1 Multi-Mission Amphibian Response to 2016/2017 AIAA Foundation Graduate Individual Aircraft Design Competition Presented by Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University (Daytona Beach) Department
More informationThe Sonic Cruiser A Concept Analysis
International Symposium "Aviation Technologies of the XXI Century: New Aircraft Concepts and Flight Simulation", 7-8 May 2002 Aviation Salon ILA-2002, Berlin The Sonic Cruiser A Concept Analysis Dr. Martin
More informationECO-CARGO AIRCRAFT. ISSN: International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR) Volume 1, Issue 2, August 2012
ECO-CARGO AIRCRAFT Vikrant Goyal, Pankhuri Arora Abstract- The evolution in aircraft industry has brought to us many new aircraft designs. Each and every new design is a step towards a greener tomorrow.
More informationCessna Citation Model Stats
Cessna Citation Model Stats Cessna Citation Sovereign - Dimensions Length 63 ft 6 in (19.35 m) Height 20 ft 4 in (6.20 m) Wingspan 72 ft 4 in (22.04 m) Wing Wing Area Wing Sweep Wheelbase Tread 516 sq
More informationMultidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft with Tip-Mounted Engines
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft with Tip-Mounted Engines NASA Design MAD Center Advisory Board Meeting, November 14, 1997 Students: J.M. Grasmeyer, A. Naghshineh-Pour,
More informationTYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET
TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. EASA.IM.A.073 for Beechcraft 390 (PREMIER I and IA) Type Certificate Holder: Textron Aviation Inc. One Cessna Boulevard Wichita, Kansas 67215 USA For Models: Model 390 1
More informationAircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, 2012 Chapter 3 Aircraft Conceptual Design. Tables
Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, 2012 Chapter 3 Aircraft Conceptual Design Tables No Component Primary function Major areas of influence 1 Fuselage Payload accommodations
More informationA SOLAR POWERED UAV. 1 Introduction. 2 Requirements specification
A SOLAR POWERED UAV Students: R. al Amrani, R.T.J.P.A. Cloosen, R.A.J.M. van den Eijnde, D. Jong, A.W.S. Kaas, B.T.A. Klaver, M. Klein Heerenbrink, L. van Midden, P.P. Vet, C.J. Voesenek Project tutor:
More informationDesign of a New Stratotanker. A Project. Presented to the Aerospace Engineering Faculty. San Jose State University
Design of a New Stratotanker A Project Presented to the Aerospace Engineering Faculty San Jose State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science Degree in Aerospace
More informationMultidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Strut-Braced Wing Transonic Transport
Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Strut-Braced Wing Transonic Transport John F. Gundlach IV Masters Thesis Defense June 7,1999 Acknowledgements NASA LMAS Student Members Joel Grasmeyer Phillipe-Andre
More informationAir Buzz. 32nd Annual AHS International Student Design Competition
Air Buzz 32nd Annual AHS International Student Design Competition Faculty Advisor: Dr. Daniel Schrage, Daniel.Schrage@aerospace.gatech.edu Ezgi Selin Akdemir esakdemir@gmail.com Undergraduate Middle East
More informationCONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF UTM 4-SEATER HELICOPTER. Mohd Shariff Ammoo 1 Mohd Idham Mohd Nayan 1 Mohd Nasir Hussain 2
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN OF UTM 4-SEATER HELICOPTER Mohd Shariff Ammoo 1 Mohd Idham Mohd Nayan 1 Mohd Nasir Hussain 2 1 Department of Aeronautics Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
More informationDimensions And Areas. 1. General. A. Airplane Dimensions and Areas
Dimensions And Areas 600: DIMENSIONS AND AREAS 1. General This section describes those diagrams and text which shows the area, dimensions, stations, access doors, and physical locations of the structural
More informationCONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND AERODYNAMIC STUDY OF JOINED-WING BUSINESS JET AIRCRAFT
28 TH INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND AERODYNAMIC STUDY Kim Ern Foong* and Harijono Djojodihardjo** Universiti Putra Malaysia *Graduate, **Professor, and corresponding
More informationOverview and Team Composition
Overview and Team Composition Aerodynamics and MDO Andy Ko Joel Grasmeyer* John Gundlach IV* Structures Dr. Frank H. Gern Amir Naghshineh-Pour* Aeroelasticity Erwin Sulaeman CFD and Interference Drag Philippe-Andre
More informationAAE 451 Conceptual Design Review
AAE 451 Conceptual Design Review May 6, 2010 Team 1 Alex Mondal Beth Grilliot Brien Piersol Heath Cheung Jason Liu Jeff Cohen Jeremy Wightman Kit Fransen Lauren Hansen Nick Walls Ryan Foley Tim Fechner
More informationThe Peregrine AEROSPACE ENGINEERING. 2003/2004 AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition. -an E/STOL, Airport Adaptive Regional Jet-
The Peregrine AEROSPACE ENGINEERING 2003/2004 AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition -an E/STOL, Airport Adaptive Regional Jet- Designed by Team ASCENT i The Peregrine -an E/STOL, Airport
More informationUltralight airplane Design
Ultralight airplane Design Ultralight airplane definitions: Airworthiness authorities define aircraft as vehicles that can rise or move in the air and enforce strict regulations and requirements for all
More informationL 298/70 Official Journal of the European Union
L 298/70 Official Journal of the European Union 16.11.2011 MODULE 12. HELICOPTER AERODYNAMICS, STRUCTURES AND SYSTEMS 12.1 Theory of Flight Rotary Wing Aerodynamics 1 2 Terminology; Effects of gyroscopic
More information7. PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF A SINGLE AISLE MEDIUM RANGE AIRCRAFT
7. PRELIMINARY DESIGN OF A SINGLE AISLE MEDIUM RANGE AIRCRAFT Students: R.M. Bosma, T. Desmet, I.D. Dountchev, S. Halim, M. Janssen, A.G. Nammensma, M.F.A.L.M. Rommens, P.J.W. Saat, G. van der Wolf Project
More informationDESIGN OF A 4-SEAT, GENERAL AVIATION, ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT. Arvindhakshan Rajagopalan. San José State University
DESIGN OF A 4-SEAT, GENERAL AVIATION, ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT by Arvindhakshan Rajagopalan A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering at San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the
More informationB737 Performance. Takeoff & Landing. Last Rev: 02/06/2004
B737 Performance Takeoff & Landing Last Rev: 02/06/2004 Takeoff Performance Takeoff Performance Basics Definitions: Runway Takeoff Distances Definitions: Takeoff Speeds JAR 25 Requirements Engine failure
More informationEmber Aviation LAT-1
Ember Aviation Presents the LAT-1 In response to the 2015 2016 AIAA Foundation Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Presented by California Polytechnic State University, Pomona Aerospace Engineering
More informationAeroplane Aerodynamics and Flight Controls 1 2
11.1 Theory of Flight 11.1.1. Aeroplane Aerodynamics and Flight Controls 1 2 Operation and effect of: roll control: ailerons and spoilers, pitch control: elevators, stabilators, variable incidence stabilisers
More informationProject Erinyes AUVSI Student UAV Competition
Project Erinyes AUVSI Student UAV Competition Overall Design Team Aerospace Team Matt Derginer John Malaney Ryan Siffring Lucas Siron Adam Warden Avionics Team Jeremy Blackburn Cheick Guey Ayman Sheik
More informationHybrid-Electric General Aviation Aircraft (HEGAA)
2017 2018 Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Hybrid-Electric General Aviation Aircraft (HEGAA) Presented by Federal University of Uberlândia Department of Aerospace Engineering Minas Gerais,
More informationAgricultural Unmanned Aircraft System (AUAS)
Agricultural Unmanned Aircraft System (AUAS) Team Two-CAN Albert Lee (TL) Jacob Niehus Adam Kuester Chris Cirone Michael Scott Kevin Huckshold 1 Presentation Overview Configuration Selection (KH) Initial
More informationAERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING SHIBIN MOHAMED Asst. Professor Dept. of Mechanical Engineering Al Ameen Engineering College Al- Ameen Engg. College 1 Aerodynamics-Basics These fundamental basics first must be
More informationFinal Proposal AIAA Undergraduate Design Competition
Final Proposal 2008-2009 AIAA Undergraduate Design Competition Submitted: June, 2009 Page 2 Greenspan Preliminary Design Team Jason Riopelle Scott Buttrill David M. Cross Team Leader and Noise Stability
More informationAE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Propulsion and Fuel System Integration. Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering December 2017
AE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design I Propulsion and Fuel System Integration Prof. Dr. Serkan Özgen Dept. Aerospace Engineering December 2017 Propulsion system options 2 Propulsion system options 3
More informationCReSIS UAV Critical Design Review: The Meridian
CReSIS UAV Critical Design Review: The Meridian William Donovan University of Kansas 2335 Irving Hill Road Lawrence, KS 66045-7612 http://cresis.ku.edu Technical Report CReSIS TR 123 June 25, 2007 This
More informationDESIGN OF AN ARMAMENT WING FOR A LIGHT CATEGORY HELICOPTER
International Journal of Engineering Applied Sciences and Technology, 7 Published Online February-March 7 in IJEAST (http://www.ijeast.com) DESIGN OF AN ARMAMENT WING FOR A LIGHT CATEGORY HELICOPTER Miss.
More informationEnvironautics EN-1. Aircraft Design Competition. Presented by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Environautics EN-1 Response to the 2009-2010 AIAA Foundation Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Competition Presented by Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Left to Right: Justin Cox, Julien
More informationHigh aspect ratio for high endurance. Mechanical simplicity. Low empty weight. STOVL or STOL capability. And for the propulsion system:
Idealized tilt-thrust (U) All of the UAV options that we've been able to analyze suffer from some deficiency. A diesel, fixed-wing UAV could possibly satisfy the range and endurance objectives, but integration
More informationAutomatic Aircraft Configuration Redesign The Application of MDO Results to a CAD File
Automatic Aircraft Configuration Redesign The Application of MDO Results to a CAD File Daniel P. Raymer, Ph.D. Conceptual Research Corp. (www.aircraftdesign.com) MDO2CAD - 1 Overview Integration of MDO
More informationCERBERUS UCAV: Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle.
CERBERUS UCAV: Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle. Team members: Marina Kats, Alex Konevsky, Tomer Buium, Oran Katzuni, Matan Argaman, Jacob Frumkin, Amir Levy. Project supervisor: Mr. Dror Artzi Abstract
More informationExecutive Summary. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics
Executive Summary 29 MAY 2016 Undergraduate Design Report Executive Summary 1 Mission Requirements In response to the Design Competition sponsored by Bell Helicopter, the aim of NUAA Undergraduate Team
More informationFlying Wing. Matt Statzer Bryan Williams Mike Zauberman. 17 March
Flying Wing http://www.nurflugel.com/nurflugel/northrop/n-1m/n1m_refurbished_1.jpg Matt Statzer Bryan Williams Mike Zauberman http://www.geocities.com/witewings/bwb/gallerydetail-1-6.html 17 March 2003
More informationAn Integrated Approach to the Design-Optimization of an N+3 Subsonic Transport
An Integrated Approach to the Design-Optimization of an N+3 Subsonic Transport Mark Drela MIT Aero & Astro AIAA 28th Applied Aerodynamics Conference 30 Jun 10 Motivation: NASA s N+3 Program Identify concepts
More informationDESIGN. BUILD. FLY Design Report. AIAA Foundation. Cessna Aircraft Company. Raytheon Missile Systems
DESIGN. BUILD. FLY. 2014-2015 Design Report AIAA Foundation Cessna Aircraft Company Raytheon Missile Systems Table Of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary... 4 2.0 Management Summary... 6 3.0 Conceptual Design...
More informationDesign of Supersonic Transport
Design of Supersonic Transport A project present to The Faculty of the Department of Aerospace Engineering San Jose State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of
More informationLOW BOOM FLIGHT DEMONSTRATOR (LBFD)
Concept Development of the Quiet Supersonic Technology Aircraft LOW BOOM FLIGHT DEMONSTRATOR (LBFD) Peter Iosifidis Program Manager Overview Background Why Now for a Quiet Supersonic Technology X-plane?
More informationCIRRUS AIRPLANE MAINTENANCE MANUAL
DIMENSIONS AND AREAS 1. GENERAL This section describes those diagrams and text which shows the area, dimensions, stations, access doors, and physical locations of the structural members of the airplane.
More informationTeam 2. AAE451 System Requirements Review. Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney
Team 2 AAE451 System Requirements Review Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek John Tegah Chris Simpson Outline
More informationThe J2 Universal Tool-Kit Supporting Accident Investigation
The J2 Universal Tool-Kit Supporting Accident Investigation AIRCRAFT MODELLING AND PERFORMANCE PREDICTION SOFTWARE Key Aspects INTRODUCTION PA-31-325 C/R Navajo Accident Objectives MODEL BUILDING Aircraft
More informationState of Israel Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Authority TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET
State of Israel Ministry of Transport Civil Aviation Authority TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET TC number: Revision: Aircraft make: Aircraft model: IA298 New BRM Aero BRISTELL RG This Data Sheet which is part
More informationAn Airport Adaptive Regional Transport with a Secondary Role to Support Homeland Security AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design
An Airport Adaptive Regional Transport with a Secondary Role to Support Homeland Security 2003-2004 AIAA Undergraduate Team Aircraft Design Volant Moving quickly or nimbly and apt to fly Volant Team Roster
More information10th Australian International Aerospace Congress
AUSTRALIAN INTERNATIONAL AEROSPACE CONGRESS Paper presented at the 10th Australian International Aerospace Congress incorporating the 14th National Space Engineering Symposium 2003 29 July 1 August 2003
More informationClassical Aircraft Sizing I
Classical Aircraft Sizing I W. H. Mason from Sandusky, Northrop slide 1 Which is 1 st? You need to have a concept in mind to start The concept will be reflected in the sizing by the choice of a few key
More informationNorth American F-86F Sabre USER MANUAL. Virtavia F-86F Sabre DTG Steam Edition Manual Version 1
North American F-86F Sabre USER MANUAL 0 Introduction The F-86 Sabre was a natural replacement for the F-80 Shooting Star. First introduced in 1949 for the United States Air Force, the F-86 featured excellent
More information