The J2 Universal Tool-Kit Supporting Accident Investigation
|
|
- Felix Walker
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The J2 Universal Tool-Kit Supporting Accident Investigation AIRCRAFT MODELLING AND PERFORMANCE PREDICTION SOFTWARE Key Aspects INTRODUCTION PA C/R Navajo Accident Objectives MODEL BUILDING Aircraft Description Geometry Assembling the Model TESTING AND QUALIFYING THE MODEL Sanity Checks Reference Checks PRELIMINARY ACCIDENT MODELLING Updating the Model Initialising the Scenario Preliminary Dynamic Investigation Adding the Detachment Force AAIB INSPECTOR WORKSHOP Additional Information Matching the AAIB Findings CONCLUSIONS Supporting and Supplementing the Evidence Pilot Evaluations.
2 INTRODUCTION The AAIB asked the question whether the j2 Universal Tool-Kit, a full flight sciences design, modelling and analysis tool, could be used to investigate the characteristics of crash scenarios. When this was confirmed, j2 were requested to investigate the scenario of a particular accident that had occurred. The results were compared to the findings from the report which is available in the public domain. PA C/R Navajo Accident The AAIB investigator provided the following case information and a series of questions/objectives. The problem calculate the response of the aircraft due to a section of the outer left wing becoming detached due to tree strikes. The outer 2.4m of wing detached due to impacts with trees, which coincidentally ties in with the outboard end of the left flap i.e. no left aileron remaining. Representation of Accident - Note that the scan shows a PA Chieftain with a longer fuselage than the Navajo, but the wing is the same on both aircraft.
3 Aircraft details Weight at time of accident = 5,800lbs Fuel on board at time of accident = 300ltr CG position = 27.5 aft of datum Landing gear was DOWN Flaps set 10 degrees Engines set to low power, props fully fine Airspeed at point of impact with trees = 115 KIAS Objectives 1. Assuming that the outer 2.3m of the left wing is instantaneously detached, and the right aileron floats at zero deflection (aileron cable circuit now no longer continuous due to damage to left wing), demonstrate the roll due to the imbalance 2. Apply a Point Load at the severed end of the left wing, due to the detachment forces of the severed portion of left wing. Can J2 calculate the aircraft response in pitch, roll and yaw to the left yawing moment? 3. Combine the above two effects to create a simulation of the flight path of the aircraft following detachment of the left wing section?
4 MODEL BUILDING As the information provided was limited, the first stage of any project is to try to gather as much information as possible. Whilst the investigator would be able to access some data from the manufacturers directly, this was not available to j2 at this point, so all information had to be sourced from data that was available in the public domain. Aircraft Description On 30 September 1964 Piper flew the prototype of a new twin-engine executive aircraft which was then the largest built by the company. Identified at first as the Piper PA-31 Inca, the aircraft had been re-designated as the PA-31 Navajo when deliveries began on 17 April A six/eight-seat corporate/ commuter transport of cantilever low-wing monoplane configuration with retractable tricycle landing gear, it was powered by two 224kW Avco Lycoming IO-540-K flat-six engines, and was available in optional Standard, Commuter and Executive versions with differing interior layouts. Made available at the same time was the optional PA-31T Turbo Navajo, which differed only by having two 231kW TIO-540-A turbocharged engines, and the range was extended in 1970 by introduction of the PA-PA-31P Pressurized Navajo with a fail-safe fuselage structure in the pressurised section and two 317kW Avco Lycoming TIGO-541-E1A engines. Production of the PA-31 Navajo ended during 1972 and at the same time the company introduced for 1973 the PA Navajo Chieftain which, by comparison with its predecessor, had the fuselage lengthened by 0.61m and was powered by two 261kW TIO-540-J2BD turbocharged engines driving counter-rotating propellers. A significant advance in the Navajo family came on 22 October 1973 when Piper flew the first production example of the PA-31T Cheyenne, which combined an airframe generally similar to that of the Pressurized Navajo with two 462kW Pratt & Whitney Aircraft of Canada PT6A-28 turboprop engines. In the following year an additional model of the Turbo Navajo was made available, the PA Turbo Navajo C/R, which introduced a 242kW version of the counterrotating engines installed in the Chieftain. Production of the PA-31P pressurized Navajo ended during 1977, at which time a total of 248 had been built, but at the same time the company introduced a new version of the Cheyenne, the PA-31T-1 Cheyenne I, the original Cheyenne then becoming re-designated PA-31T Cheyenne II. Deliveries of the new Cheyenne I, which differed primarily from its predecessor by having 373kW Pratt & Whitney Aircraft of Canada PT6A-11 turboprop engines, began towards the end of April The Cheyenne range was extended for 1981 by introduction of the PA-31T-Cheyenne IIXL, with the fuselage lengthened by 0.61m and 559kW Pratt & Whitney Aircraft of Canada PT6A-135 engines flat-rated to 462kW. In 1982 production of the PA-31 Navajo terminated after 1,317 had been built. Later production versions of the Navajo family include the PA Navajo C/R, PA Chieftain and the PA-31T-1 Cheyenne I, PA-31T Cheyenne II and PA-31T-2 Cheyenne IIXL. However, the loss of the Navajo was compensated for in 1983 by introduction of the PA-31P-350 Mojave, which basically combined the airframe of the Cheyenne II with the powerplant of the PA Chieftain.
5 Summary Aircraft Dimensions Wing span 40 ft 8 in Length 34 ft 7 in Height 11ft 3in Cabin Dimensions Height: 4.25 ft Width: 4.15 ft Length: 8.6 ft Volume: 151 ft 3 Door Height: 3.5 ft Door Width: 2.25 ft Baggage External: 63 ft 3 Occupancy Crew: 1 or 2 Passengers: 5-7 Weight and Balance Empty weight 4,250 lb Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) 8,130 lb Max Landing Weight: 6,500 lb Fuel Capacity: 1,122 lb Payload with Full Fuel: 1,284 lb Payload Max: 2,070 lb Propulsion Two Lycoming engines Left TIO-540-J2BD Right LTIO-540-J2BD Horsepower 2,575 RPM ea. Propeller Manufacturer Hartzell Hub Model Left HC-E3YR-2A Hub Model Right HC-EY3YR-2AL Number of blades 3 Performance Altitude Limits Maximum Operating Altitude 27,000 ft Service Ceiling 28,300 ft
6 Speeds Normal Cruise Speed: Max Cruise Speed: Climb Rate All Engines: Climb Rate One Engine Inop: V s Stall Speed V A -Manoeuvring Speed V Mo -Maximum operating Speed V FE -Flaps Extend Speed Mid: Full: V LE -Maximum Landing Gear Operating Speed Range Normal Range: Max Range: Full Range (vfr): Max Range (vfr): Landing Distance Landing Distance: Balanced Field Length: 178 kts 226 kts 1,395 fpm 115 fpm 63.5 kts (flaps down) 162 KIAS 187 KIAS 152 KIAS 130 KIAS 130 KIAS 640 NM 810 NM 757 NM 927 NM 2,902 ft 1,750 ft Geometry The geometry is obtained from various sources (including Jane s AWA) and aircraft 3-Views. Where data is not available, it is estimated from aircraft of a similar class. Wing Span 12.4m Area 21.3m 2 AR 7.37 Chord Root - Jane s, at fuselage intersection 2.610m Inboard Section Projected to 3.135m Outboard Section Projected to 2.465m Tip 0.97m mac Airfoil Root Tip NACA 63A415 NACA 63A212
7 Dihedral 5 Twist Root +1.5 Tip -1 Sweep LE % % 0.0 Wing Geometry for Use in Model Build
8 Wing Geometry for use in Model Build Flaps and Aileron Geometry for Use in Model Build
9 Horizontal Tail Span 5.52m Area 5.603m 2 AR Chord Root 1.380m Tip 0.650m mac 1.059m Airfoil Root NACA 0011 Tip NACA 0011 Dihedral 0 Twist Root 0 Tip 0 Sweep LE % 5.81
10 Horizontal Tail Geometry for use in Model Build Vertical Tail Span 2.1m Area m 2 AR (for symmetric wing) Chord Root 2.070m Tip 0.690m mac 1.495m Airfoil Root NACA 0011 Tip NACA 0011 Dihedral 0 Twist Root 0 Tip 0
11 Sweep LE % Vertical Tail Geometry for use in Model Build Assembling the Model Once the research had been performed and the geometry identified the next stage was to establish the aerodynamic characteristics for the lifting surfaces, fuselage and undercarriage. Lifting Surfaces The lifting surfaces were calculated by putting the airfoil section information into JavaFoil and running analyses over a range of angle of attack values at the cruise Reynolds Number. The analysis for the wing was performed for Root and Tip Airfoil Sections with a range of flap deployments, and a range of aileron deployments. Although the Flaps do not extend to the tips, and the ailerons are not up to the fuselage section, the airfoil is only known at these sections. By putting the values of the root and tips in, and specifying the limits for the flaps and ailerons, the JavaFoil software will interpolate the information only over the region specified. The Ailerons were calculated as a plain flap at 25% chord. For the Flaps, these were identified as single slotted at 20% chord. As no geometry was available for these, a set of coordinates and pivot point were calculated for the root and tip airfoil sections.
12 Flap Geometry for NACA 63A212 Airfoil Section Flap Geometry for NACA 63A415 Airfoil Section
13 Detail of Slot Geometry for Flaps Flow Field with Flaps Deployed Notes To partially account for the spanwise lift distribution, the values for the coefficients calculated at the root were calculated using double the aspect ratio of the wing whilst those for the tips were calculated using half the aspect ratio.
14 From here we were able to establish the clean airfoil section details, and the increments due to the flaps and the ailerons Flaps 0 Flaps 5 Flaps 10 Flaps 15 Flaps 25 Flaps 35 Flaps α [ ] Lift Coefficient for Root Airfoil Section Flaps 0 Flaps 5 Flaps 10 Flaps 15 Flaps 25 Flaps 35 Flaps α [ ] Drag Coefficient for Root Airfoil Section
15 Flaps 0 Flaps 5 Flaps 10 Flaps 15 Flaps 25 Flaps 35 Flaps α [ ] Pitching Moment Coefficient for Root Airfoil Section A similar approach was used for the NACA0011 Airfoil with a plan flap for Elevator (37%) and Rudder (40%).
16 Fuselage To calculate the fuselage characteristics, the fuselage profile along with a simple lifting surface geometry was run through DatCom. The resulting data is then collated into tables and the fuselage contribution extracted. Fuselage and Lifting Surface Geometry used with DatCom Undercarriage The undercarriage data was calculated from methods found in Roskam. Propulsion The propulsion system was broken into 2 sections. Engines The engines were simple powerplants that provided a direct link between the pilot throttle and the output power of the engine. The engines were limited in their maximum power. Propeller The propeller takes the power from the engine and converts it into a thrust using the true airspeed and the propeller efficiency. The efficiency was fixed at 70%. Whilst this is not the most accurate approach, the variation in thrust that will occur over the crash profile will be very minimal and as such an almost constant thrust can be assumed calculated from the thrust requirements to maintain steady flight prior to the crash event. Mass & Inertia Whilst the Mass and CG position were specified in the initial request, this did not include the inertia for the aircraft. The inertias were calculated using Radius of Gyration and the approach outlined in Roskam.
17 Assembly With all the data and geometry defined, the final stage is to put it all together. The Aircraft model is assembled in j2 software using the structural components and layout of the real aircraft. Each item was also given its reference location relative to their parent. The Centre of Gravity (C of G) CG, Location of the Lift (NP) and in the case of Propulsion Items the Centre of Thrust (C of T) was defined. The Z-Location of the undercarriage NP is variable dependant up the deployment of the gear. The aerodynamics for the fuselage can be added at this stage because they are independent upon anything else. Structural Items on the Aircraft Model X Locations of Structural Items Relative to the Centre of the Nose (-ve Aft)
18 Z Locations of Structural Items Relative to the Centre of the Nose (-ve Up) With the structure laid out, the next stage is to add the lifting surfaces. This is done through adding in the stripped items. Each stripped item contains the geometry of the lifting surface, including dihedral and twist. With each horizontal item a maximum and minimum Y value is included to account for the start and stop point. In this way we can use the same geometry for all the wing components. The j2 software will only calculate the values for the appropriate spanwise positions. Different Spanwise Max & Min for Each Surface
19 The final stage is to add the aerodynamics. This is taken from the values calculated earlier. For the wing, the coefficients are functions of the local angle of attack and the spanwise locations. This takes into account the change in airfoil section. With the Ailerons and Flaps, there is an additional parameter in the lookup tables for the relative surface deflection. For the clean wing the values with no surface deflection are added. For the Ailerons and Flaps the values are the increments in the coefficients due to the surface deflection only. Adding in the Aerodynamics When considering the Horizontal and Vertical Tail, the Elevator and Rudder were assumed to be full span. In this case the total values for the clean surface and the contributions due to the surface deflection are included in a single coefficient. One aspect that needs to be considered is the downwash from the wing to the Horizontal Tail. This uses the methods outlined in Roskam, using the geometry and relative locations of the Wing and Horizontal Tail. To account for the fact that there is downwash at zero angle of attack, an alpha equivalent value is used. This is calculated from the lift curve slope of the clean wing, and the total lift for the wing, including flaps. This alpha equivalent value is used in the downwash gradient calculations. The value of the downwash is then applied to the horizontal tail through applying a constant deflection (twist) to the whole tail. Calculating the Downwash and Applying a Twist to the Horizontal Tail With the strip aerodynamics complete, we add in the propulsion characteristics, the undercarriage drag contributions and the mass and inertia. The complete aircraft model can now be qualified.
20 TESTING AND QUALIFYING THE MODEL With a completed model, the first stage is to run a series of tests. These tests serve two purposes. The first is to ensure that the model has been assembled correctly, and that there are no unusual characteristics present. The second purpose of the tests is to check that the values the model is outputting are in line with expected results. Two types of tests can be run: Sanity Checks This is where the j2 Universal Tool-Kit is used as a virtual wind tunnel. A series of alpha and beta sweeps will be run along with angular velocities to identify the total static characteristics for the aircraft, and the dynamic derivatives. These numbers can be compared to values from an aircraft of a similar type and class to ensure that they are not wildly different. Reference Checks The reference checks are when there are real data for the aircraft under test. This could be wind tunnel data, or flight test data or whatever scenarios/data are available. In these situations, the model can be set up to mimic the same condition and the resultant values calculated and compared. Sanity Checks When running the sanity checks on the piper Navajo, the results for the static/dynamic derivatives and surface contributions were found by running a range of sweeps for alpha and beta, and then for each of the control surfaces. Additional roll, pitch and yaw rate cases were also run over a range of angle of attack values. The derivatives were calculated and results were then compared to those for Airplane B in Roskam s Airplane Design: Part VI. These analyses can be set-up and re-used for different aircraft with the results plotted on a template chart. This provides consistency and speed in the analytical process.
21 Results to Initial Sanity Checks
22 From the Sanity checks, the majority of characteristics were within the expected ranges for this class of aircraft. Where there was a discrepancy, in the Roll Damping ( ), where this was slightly higher than expected, this was easily corrected by adding a correction factor to the overall model. Reference Checks Having got the model to a point that it is showing the appropriate characteristics for an aircraft of this class, the next stage was to try some Reference Checks. For these, information was found from the University of Tennessee Space Institute who have their own Piper Navajo that is used for research and experimentation. From this aircraft various tests have been run than in turn have produced some aerodynamic characteristics. By replicating the tests and comparing the results from j2 Universal Tool-Kit to those from the real aircraft, further corrections can be found. In this scenario, we have already built an aircraft model with the mass and cg characteristics relating to the crash to be investigated. As expected, these are not the same conditions as for the Experiment. Therefore, a new Delta Model was created where the mass and cg information matched the UTSI Test. The Aircraft was then initialised to the same flight conditions and a further set of tests performed to enable the data to be compared (classic flight matching). Once the initial tests had been performed and the results compared, it was found that whilst the Lift Curve Slope ( ) was comparable, there was an initial lift offset ( ) error. Small Drag Coefficient errors were also found. Static corrections to the Lift and Drag for the Clean Wing were added to the Clean Wing strips local coefficients and the test cases re-run. The corrections identified were shown to produce acceptable results. Corrections to Mass & CG to Match UTSI Test Point
23 Comparison of Lift Coefficient (Before and After Correction) to the UTSI Experimental Values Comparison of Drag Coefficient (Before and After Correction) to the UTSI Experimental Values Once the corrections were shown to produce acceptable results, these were added back to the baseline model. At the same time a small correction to the roll damping was also added as a global coefficient on the Total Airframe.
24 Corrections to,,, Applied to the Baseline Model Correction to Applied to the Complete Airframe From here the sanity checks were re-run to establish the impact of the changes to Wing Lift and Roll Damping to the Overall Dynamic Derivatives. These now fit into the acceptable ranges.
25 Updated Roll Rate Characteristics
26 PRELIMINARY ACCIDENT MODELLING Updating the Model When modelling the crash, we did not want to impact directly on the baseline model that we have tested and qualified. The best approach was to create a delta model where the adjustments could be made to account for the tree strike and the resulting loss of the outboard section of the wing. This was done instantly within the j2 software On the delta model, 2 new inputs were added. Wing Lost (m) This enabled us to define how much of the wing, in metres, was severed as the analysis is taking place. Detachment Force (N) This enabled us to add a force, in Newtons, to the model to represent the impulse when hitting the tree. New Inputs on Crash Delta Model These were then connected into the model. The value from the Wing Lost (m) input was added to the left outboard value (Min.y) of the clean wing geometry thus reducing the span of the left wing. As this is driven from an input, the value of the Wing Lost (m) can be modified at any time during the analyses
27 Changing the span of the Left Wing When considering adding a force to account for the tree strike, a Propulsion Item was used as this could have a force added directly. The engine was given a tilt value of so that it was always horizontal to the ground regardless as to orientation of the aircraft. The force to be applied would be at the new wing tip position, and would be equal to the Detachment Force (N) value that can be entered as an input. Initialising the Scenario Adding the Tree Strike Force to the Model The next stage was to initialise the aircraft. As there was no information given regarding the flight path angle, the aircraft was initialised in straight and level flight over a range of approach angles. Using the trim rules built into the j2 Universal Tool-Kit, it was very easy to set the aircraft up in any configuration. The aircraft was initialised with: Flaps at 10 Landing Gear Down Elevator Trimming out Any Pitch Acceleration Wings Level Constant Airspeed of 115 KCAS Flight Path Angle from -7 to 0 Zero Forward Acceleration Altitude aligned to flight path angle so after 5s the altitude is 60ft
28 Trim Model Defining the Start Points for the Analyses From here the initialisation was performed using the delta model.
29 Completed Analyses Initialising Model Preliminary Dynamic Investigation The first objective was to identify the rolling characteristics of the aircraft with the wing section removed. To do this a response model was set up that allowed the aircraft to travel unaffected for 5s and then at 5s a step input of +2.4 was added to the Wing Lost (m) input. As shown before, this will result in the Left Wing having a semi-span of 3.8m. The aerodynamics within j2 will now ignore any contributions outboard of 3.8m on the left wing, but will include all the contributions from the right wing. Defining the Instantaneous Loss of 2.4m of the Left Wing Starting from the Level Flight Initial Condition (gamma=0 ), the response of the aircraft to this event was analysed. The analysis automatically terminates when the aircraft hits the ground.
30 Lateral Response to Instantaneous Loss of 2.4m Left Wing As we can see from the above chart, when the left wing section is lost, there is an imbalance in the lift with increased lift on the right wing and reduced lift on the left wing. This results in a negative rolling moment (to the left). In this scenario, the aircraft reaches a maximum roll rate of 24 /s, to the left, and a bank angle of almost 90, left wing down, before impact with the ground. What can also be seen here is the time from tree-strike to impact is approximately 4.5s. Whilst charts are very useful at showing us the behaviour of the aircraft, it is often still difficult to fully interpret the complete behaviour. It is especially difficult in a situation such as this where the aircraft is moving in all 3 axes. In this situation, engineers will typically resort to using small models to follow the attitude values of the aircraft to try to fully understand what is happening. This is not necessary with j2, as it is possible to instantly take the time history generated and display it in a 3-D Virtual Environment Playback. Within this playback, it is possible to move around the aircraft, viewing it from different angles, zoom in/out, and speed up/slow down time to get a more detailed and highly visual understanding of what actually happens.
31 3-D Playback of Preliminary Study Adding the Detachment Force Having satisfied Objective 1, the next stage was to see what would happen should a detachment force be applied. A method for applying a force to the model has already been created, so the next stage was to add in the detachment force through the response model. It was estimated that the time taken to sever the wing at the flight speed would have been approximately 0.03 seconds. So to account for this, an initial force was applied that then dissipated over 0.03s and then ceased. This force was combined with the wing loss to build the scenario. Combining the Detachment Force and the Severed Wing in a Response Model No value for the detachment force was provided, so the mechanism used allowed for different forces to be applied to help to identify what was probable. An initial estimate for the force was calculated by j2.
32 The Detachment Force Applied to the Wing at the Severed Location We can now re-run the response analysis from the same start point as before and chart the new values, without writing any code. Lateral Response to Instantaneous Loss of 2.4m Left Wing and Detachment Force We can see from the new chart that the reaction is much more violent. There is an instantaneous yawing moment due to the impact with the tree that causes the aircraft to yaw up to -50 /s. This Yaw rate increases the lift over the right wing which gives an even greater rolling moment such that the aircraft now reaches a maximum roll rate of 140 /s, to the left, and a maximum bank angle of 130, left wing down, before impact with the ground.
33 3-D Playback of Wing Loss plus Detachment Force At this point the primary 3 Objectives had been satisfied, and the next stage was to discuss our findings with the AAIB inspector.
34 AAIB INSPECTOR WORKSHOP Once the primary objectives had been satisfied, a short workshop was arranged, where we could present our results and discuss the findings with the AAIB Inspector. The Initial presentation of method and results was understood, and various key points of the modelling and scenario we agreed upon. However, there was viewed to be some discrepancy between the evidence found by the AAIB inspector and the orientation of the aircraft, from the modelling, as it hit the ground. The evidence trail from the crash indicated that the aircraft hit the ground in the following sequence, Right Wing Tip, Right Engine, Nose. Whereas the modelling indicated, that the left wing would strike the ground first. Additional Information When discussing the discrepancies, further information was provided that was not presented in the original data supplied to j2. In the first instance, the tree strike took place on a hill, and the impact with the ground was 120ft below that location. Secondly, the aircraft was on a gradual descent, approx. 3, as shown from the radar track. Below is an extract of the AAIB Report, available in the Public Domain. The aircraft s left wing had struck two 80 ft pine trees approximately 20 ft below treetop height, causing the outer 2.2 m of the left wing, outboard of the left flap, to fragment and detach. Witness marks on the severed tree trunks indicated that the roll attitude of the aircraft at impact with the trees was wings level. The wreckage trail, from the point of the initial tree strikes to the aircraft s final resting position, was 230 m in length and was orientated on a heading of 298 M. Parts of all major sections of the structure and flying controls were identified at the accident site. The first ground impact scar was 185 m beyond the initial tree strike and had been made by the right wingtip; it was 20 cm wide and the narrowness of this mark indicated that the roll angle at ground impact was approximately 90 right wing low. The ground impact marks and distribution of the wreckage indicated that following the right wingtip strike, the right engine hit the ground and detached, shortly after which the aircraft impacted heavily on its nose. The absence of any significant ground scars between the nose impact crater and the main wreckage indicated that the aircraft then bounced a distance of 34 m, before finally coming to rest facing uphill. G-BWHF Radar Track (Map terrain elevations are shown in metres)
35 Adding an Offset (Disturbance) to the Initial Altitude Whilst this information was different to the original information presented, it was easy to accommodate these changes instantly. To account for the change in height, the response was simply offset by 120ft and as we had already initialised the aircraft over several flight path angles the analysis was run from the 3 descent initial conditions. Response Results to Updated Altitude and Approach What can be seen when we change the initial altitude and flight path angle is that there is very little difference between the Initial Conditions that matched the AAIB Report and the baseline case. As expected, the approach angle has very little effect on the maximum Roll Rate (P) and despite the flight lasting a little longer due to the increased altitude, the aircraft does not achieve any larger a bank angle as the roll rate dropped considerable by the time the aircraft is approaching the ground such that there is very little increase in bank angle.
36 Comparison of Bank Angle for the Original Case and Using the Initial Conditions from the AAIB Report Matching the AAIB Findings Part of the Workshop with the AAIB Inspector was to look at evaluating different scenarios in real time based on additional information as it is presented. Due to the flexibility and power of the j2 Universal Tool-Kit we were able to study numerous and varied what-if scenarios to identify what conditions may have occurred to present an impact similar to that found through the debris trail. We had already established that the physics model and aerospace knowledge dictates that the aircraft will have a negative (left wing down) roll rate for an incident of this type. Thus we knew that the only way for the right wing to hit the ground first was for the aircraft to rotate beyond the inverted position (180 ) before impact. Therefore the first objective was to identify what areas of the analysis may need adjusting to achieve this scenario within reasonable limits. Three areas were investigated: Aircraft Inertia The inertia estimated for the model may be slightly high. In addition, losing part of the wing would reduce the roll inertia further. A trade study could be performed to identify the effect of reducing the inertia. Roll Damping The roll damping had already been found to be slightly high for the class of aircraft, and a correction had been applied. A study of the effect of a further reduction in the roll damping coefficient could be performed. Detachment Force This had been estimated from simple calculations. A trade study could be performed to assess the bank angle when changing the values of the impact force.
37 Control Surface Deflection The original briefing explained that the aileron cables were severed but the aileron remained at 0 deflection. However, previous Accident Studies performed by j2 have found that there is a major impact when a control surface is able to float during a dynamic manoeuvre. If the cables had been severed, then it was highly likely that the right aileron would move freely as a result of the aircraft dynamics and inertia. All the studies were quickly and easily performed and the resulting flights charted and visualised during the 2 hour workshop with the AAIB Inspector watching and commenting. This meant we were able to perform live analysis with a qualified inspector adding knowledge and experience into the process concurrently. Roll Characteristics The model was first updated by reducing its roll inertia (I XX ) and the scenario ran again. It was quickly found that to get the aircraft to roll beyond 180 the roll inertia would need to be reduced to a level that it was deemed to be unrealistic. The next stage was to look at the roll damping. As with the roll inertia, the level of change required to achieve the desired result was viewed to be too severe to be realistic. A final study was run to see if a realistic reduction in roll inertia and roll damping would cause the desired effect. This was shown not to be the case. Detachment Force When looking at the detachment force, it was increased by 10% to see what sort of impact this may have on the overall bank angle of the aircraft. It was found that this increase would be sufficient to roll the aircraft over to the right wing. Lateral Response to 10% Increase in Detachment Force
38 Right Wing Hits the Ground first with 10% increase in Detachment Force Control Surfaces From previous accident studies performed by j2, it has been identified that when left to float (i.e. Control Cables Snapped) control surface are unlikely to remain at zero deflection. This is especially true when there are highly dynamic manoeuvres. As such, it was decided that the right aileron may move following the crash. The motion of the aileron was dependent upon the roll acceleration and damped out by the roll rate. Driving the Ailerons using the Roll Dynamics
39 Lateral Response to Floating Aileron Left Aileron Deflection when Floating It can be seen that the aircraft rolls beyond the inverted position and the aileron deflects up to 8. However, when looking at the visualisation we can see that the rotation is insufficient for the right wing to hit first.
40 Right Engine First with Aileron Floating Combinations With a small increase in the Detachment Force or a small deflection of floating aileron both increase the bank angle beyond the inverted. Whilst the detachment force increase can achieve the desired situation alone, a 10% increase was viewed to be too much of a correction. Similarly, any further aileron deflection was assumed to be too large. As such a combination situation was put together. The Detachment Force was increased by 5% and the impact of the roll acceleration (P ) on the aileron was reduced slightly. The aileron characteristics were adjusted and re-flown several times and each time the flight was visualised instantly to see what the aileron deflection was, and how the aircraft impacted with the ground. After only a few attempts, a response was found that appeared to fit the evidence very closely. The Detachment Force was within limits, and the resultant Floating Right Aileron Deflection was within limits. The aircraft orientation upon termination of the flight was 95 Right Wing Down. Thus the right wing tip hits the ground first, followed by right engine and finally nose.
41 Lateral Response to Combination Scenario Aileron Deflection during Combination Scenario
42 Ground Impact with Combination Scenario One final sanity check was to look at the predicted distance the aircraft travelled from impact with the tree to the first impact with the ground. Flight Path Profile
43 What was found from the analysis was that the analyses terminated when the aircraft was 191m from the tree. If we look at the first impact with the ground, this is calculated at 184.5m from the impact with the tree. This compares very well to the 185m presented as evidence from the crash site.
44 CONCLUSIONS Supporting and Supplementing the Evidence The model build, analysis performed was able to satisfy all the objectives presented by the AAIB inspector and provide dynamic video footage of the scenario. The subsequent workshop with the AAIB inspector was able to fill in the additional information provided and use this to identify how the aircraft was able to rotate almost 270 from impact with the trees. These results were consistent with the AAIB findings including the location of the first impact with the ground. AAIB Photo of Crash Site and Corresponding j2 Flight Path
45 From being presented with the project to the final workshop and identifying a scenario to match the AAIB findings was 10man days. This shows that the j2 Universal Tool-Kit is not only a very powerful and capable tool for investigating air accidents, but the results can be obtained in a fraction of the time of more traditional approaches. Automatic Generated Playback of Flight from j2 Virtual
46 Pilot Evaluations One further capability available when working with the j2 Universal Tool-Kit is the ability to fly the aircraft in a manned simulator without the need to write and develop any code. This means that as the aircraft model is being developed, it can be tested and evaluated by a pilot concurrently. Finally, when the delta model was constructed to add the tree strike force and loss of wing, it is possible to have these automatically added into the Instructor/Operator Station and can be injected at any time. This means the controllability of the aircraft after the tree strike can be fully evaluated. Configurable Simulator provided by j2 Pilot Providing a Fully Integrated System with Engineering Workstation Directly Integrated with Desktop or High Fidelity Simulator For further information please go to or contact info@j2aircraft.com
Design Considerations for Stability: Civil Aircraft
Design Considerations for Stability: Civil Aircraft From the discussion on aircraft behavior in a small disturbance, it is clear that both aircraft geometry and mass distribution are important in the design
More informationXIV.C. Flight Principles Engine Inoperative
XIV.C. Flight Principles Engine Inoperative References: FAA-H-8083-3; POH/AFM Objectives The student should develop knowledge of the elements related to single engine operation. Key Elements Elements Schedule
More informationLecture 5 : Static Lateral Stability and Control. or how not to move like a crab. G. Leng, Flight Dynamics, Stability & Control
Lecture 5 : Static Lateral Stability and Control or how not to move like a crab 1.0 Lateral static stability Lateral static stability refers to the ability of the aircraft to generate a yawing moment to
More informationINVESTIGATION OF ICING EFFECTS ON AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRCRAFT AT TSAGI
INVESTIGATION OF ICING EFFECTS ON AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AIRCRAFT AT TSAGI Andreev G.T., Bogatyrev V.V. Central AeroHydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI) Abstract Investigation of icing effects on aerodynamic
More informationPerformance means how fast will it go? How fast will it climb? How quickly it will take-off and land? How far it will go?
Performance Concepts Speaker: Randall L. Brookhiser Performance means how fast will it go? How fast will it climb? How quickly it will take-off and land? How far it will go? Let s start with the phase
More informationThe Airplane That Could!
The Airplane That Could! Critical Design Review December 6 th, 2008 Haoyun Fu Suzanne Lessack Andrew McArthur Nicholas Rooney Jin Yan Yang Yang Agenda Criteria Preliminary Designs Down Selection Features
More informationPAC 750XL PAC 750XL PAC-750XL
PAC 750XL The PAC 750XL combines a short take off and landing performance with a large load carrying capability. The PAC 750XL is a distinctive type. Its design philosophy is reflected in the aircraft's
More informationAN ADVANCED COUNTER-ROTATING DISK WING AIRCRAFT CONCEPT Program Update. Presented to NIAC By Carl Grant November 9th, 1999
AN ADVANCED COUNTER-ROTATING DISK WING AIRCRAFT CONCEPT Program Update Presented to NIAC By Carl Grant November 9th, 1999 DIVERSITECH, INC. Phone: (513) 772-4447 Fax: (513) 772-4476 email: carl.grant@diversitechinc.com
More informationAIRCRAFT DESIGN SUBSONIC JET TRANSPORT
AIRCRAFT DESIGN SUBSONIC JET TRANSPORT Analyzed by: Jin Mok Professor: Dr. R.H. Liebeck Date: June 6, 2014 1 Abstract The purpose of this report is to design the results of a given specification and to
More informationAppenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis
Appenidix E: Freewing MAE UAV analysis The vehicle summary is presented in the form of plots and descriptive text. Two alternative mission altitudes were analyzed and both meet the desired mission duration.
More informationTYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET
TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. EASA.A.607 for BS 115 Type Certificate Holder BLACKSHAPE S.P.A. Strada Statale 16 KM 841+900 70043 Monopoli (BA) ITALY For models: BS 115 TE.CERT.00048-001 European Aviation
More informationAircraft Design Conceptual Design
Université de Liège Département d Aérospatiale et de Mécanique Aircraft Design Conceptual Design Ludovic Noels Computational & Multiscale Mechanics of Materials CM3 http://www.ltas-cm3.ulg.ac.be/ Chemin
More informationChapter 10 Miscellaneous topics - 2 Lecture 39 Topics
Chapter 10 Miscellaneous topics - 2 Lecture 39 Topics 10.3 Presentation of results 10.3.1 Presentation of results of a student project 10.3.2 A typical brochure 10.3 Presentation of results At the end
More informationAE 451 Aeronautical Engineering Design Final Examination. Instructor: Prof. Dr. Serkan ÖZGEN Date:
Instructor: Prof. Dr. Serkan ÖZGEN Date: 11.01.2012 1. a) (8 pts) In what aspects an instantaneous turn performance is different from sustained turn? b) (8 pts) A low wing loading will always increase
More informationProp effects (Why we need right thrust) Torque reaction Spiraling Slipstream Asymmetric Loading of the Propeller (P-Factor) Gyroscopic Precession
Prop effects (Why we need right thrust) Torque reaction Spiraling Slipstream Asymmetric Loading of the Propeller (P-Factor) Gyroscopic Precession Propeller torque effect Influence of engine torque on aircraft
More informationThis Flight Planning Guide is published for the purpose of providing specific information for evaluating the performance of the Cessna Corvalis TT.
May 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS This Flight Planning Guide is published for the purpose of providing specific information for evaluating the performance of the Cessna Corvalis TT. This guide is developed from
More informationHigh aspect ratio for high endurance. Mechanical simplicity. Low empty weight. STOVL or STOL capability. And for the propulsion system:
Idealized tilt-thrust (U) All of the UAV options that we've been able to analyze suffer from some deficiency. A diesel, fixed-wing UAV could possibly satisfy the range and endurance objectives, but integration
More informationAIR TRACTOR, INC. OLNEY, TEXAS
TABLE OF CONTENTS LOG OF REVISIONS... 2 DESCRIPTION... 4 SECTION 1 LIMITATIONS... 5 SECTION 2 NORMAL PROCEDURES... 8 SECTION 3 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES... 8 SECTION 4 MANUFACTURER'S SECTION - PERFORMANCE...
More informationAIRCRAFT DESIGN MADE EASY. Basic Choices and Weights. By Chris Heintz
AIRCRAFT DESIGN MADE EASY By Chris Heintz The following article, which is a first installement of a two-part article, describes a simple method for the preliminary design of an airplane of conventional
More information1.1 REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFTS
CHAPTER 1 1.1 REMOTELY PILOTED AIRCRAFTS Remotely Piloted aircrafts or RC Aircrafts are small model radiocontrolled airplanes that fly using electric motor, gas powered IC engines or small model jet engines.
More informationXIV.D. Maneuvering with One Engine Inoperative
References: FAA-H-8083-3; POH/AFM Objectives The student should develop knowledge of the elements related to single engine operation. Key Elements Elements Schedule Equipment IP s Actions SP s Actions
More informationWelcome to the Airbus A380 Basic Manual for Virtual Air Cadet Airlines.
Welcome to the Airbus A380 Basic Manual for Virtual Air Cadet Airlines. Performance figures: Max operating speed: 340kts / M0.89 Max gear speed: 250kts / M0.55 Max flap speeds: Code: Select all Flaps Speed
More informationAirframes Instructor Training Manual. Chapter 6 UNDERCARRIAGE
Learning Objectives Airframes Instructor Training Manual Chapter 6 UNDERCARRIAGE 1. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss in more detail the last of the Four Major Components the Undercarriage (or
More informationAIRCRAFT INSPECTION REPORT. For CESSNA 172 RG
OSU, MAE 4223 Class Report 4 May 2001 AIRCRAFT INSPECTION REPORT For CESSNA 172 RG i This report documents the results of simulated FAA airworthiness flight testing conducted in accordance with Note and
More informationFLASHCARDS AIRCRAFT. Courtesy of the Air Safety Institute, a Division of the AOPA Foundation, and made possible by AOPA Services Corporation.
AIRCRAFT FLASHCARDS Courtesy of the Air Safety Institute, a Division of the AOPA Foundation, and made possible by AOPA Services Corporation. Knowing your aircraft well is essential to safe flying. These
More informationAERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING
AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING SHIBIN MOHAMED Asst. Professor Dept. of Mechanical Engineering Al Ameen Engineering College Al- Ameen Engg. College 1 Aerodynamics-Basics These fundamental basics first must be
More informationCessna Aircraft Short & Soft Field Takeoff & Landing Techniques
Cessna Aircraft Short & Soft Field Takeoff & Landing Techniques Objectives / Content For short- and soft-field takeoff and landing operations in CAP Cessna aircraft, review: Standards (from ACS) Procedures
More informationY. Lemmens, T. Benoit, J. de Boer, T. Olbrechts LMS, A Siemens Business. Real-time Mechanism and System Simulation To Support Flight Simulators
Y. Lemmens, T. Benoit, J. de Boer, T. Olbrechts LMS, A Siemens Business Real-time Mechanism and System Simulation To Support Flight Simulators Smarter decisions, better products. Contents Introduction
More informationPilatus Aircraft Ltd. P.O. Box 992 CH Stans SWITZERLAND
F -3 1 of 7 This Data Sheet which is a part of Type Certificate No. F -3 prescribes conditions and limitations under which the product, for which the Type Certification was issued, meets the airworthiness
More informationDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. 1A13
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. 1A13 1A13 Revision 27 Revo, Inc. COLONIAL C-1 COLONIAL C-2 LAKE LA-4 LAKE LA-4A LAKE LA-4P LAKE LA-4-200 LAKE
More informationAircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, 2012 Chapter 11 Aircraft Weight Distribution Tables
Aircraft Design: A Systems Engineering Approach, M. Sadraey, Wiley, 01 Chapter 11 Aircraft Weight Distribution Tables No Component group Elements Weight X cg Y cg Z cg 1 Wing 1.1. Wing main structure 1..
More informationHawker Beechcraft Corporation on March 26, 2007
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION A00010WI Revision 8 Hawker Beechcraft 390 March 26, 2007 TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. A00010WI This data sheet, which is part of Type Certificate
More informationPreface. Acknowledgments. List of Tables. Nomenclature: organizations. Nomenclature: acronyms. Nomenclature: main symbols. Nomenclature: Greek symbols
Contents Preface Acknowledgments List of Tables Nomenclature: organizations Nomenclature: acronyms Nomenclature: main symbols Nomenclature: Greek symbols Nomenclature: subscripts/superscripts Supplements
More informationPowertrain Design for Hand- Launchable Long Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
Powertrain Design for Hand- Launchable Long Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Stuart Boland Derek Keen 1 Justin Nelson Brian Taylor Nick Wagner Dr. Thomas Bradley 47 th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE JPC Outline
More informationLateral Directional Flight Considerations
Lateral Directional Flight Considerations This section discusses the lateral-directional control requirements for various flight conditions including cross-wind landings, asymmetric thrust, turning flight,
More informationDO NOT WRITE ON THIS TEST FEB 2013 Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test. Cessna - 182
DO NOT WRITE ON THIS TEST FEB 2013 Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test Cessna - 182 For the following questions, you will need to refer to the Pilots Information Manual for the C-182R. The bonus questions
More informationGyroplane questions from Rotorcraft Commercial Bank (From Rotorcraft questions that obviously are either gyroplane or not helicopter)
Page-1 Gyroplane questions from Rotorcraft Commercial Bank (From Rotorcraft questions that obviously are either gyroplane or not helicopter) "X" in front of the answer indicates the likely correct answer.
More informationFlugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design SS Part 35 points, 70 minutes, closed books. Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME. Date:
DEPARTMENT FAHRZEUGTECHNIK UND FLUGZEUGBAU Flugzeugentwurf / Aircraft Design SS 2015 Duration of examination: 180 minutes Last Name: Matrikelnummer: First Name: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Dieter Scholz, MSME Date:
More informationGeneral Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon
General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/images/f-16c-19990601-f-0073c-007.jpg Adam Entsminger David Gallagher Will Graf AOE 4124 4/21/04 1 Outline
More informationCHAPTER 11 FLIGHT CONTROLS
CHAPTER 11 FLIGHT CONTROLS CONTENTS INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 GENERAL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationAIRLINE TRANSPORT PILOTS LICENSE ( FLIGHT PERFORMANCE AND PLANNING)
032 01 00 00 PERFORMANCE OF SINGLE-ENGINE AEROPLANES NOT CERTIFIELD UNDER JAR/FAR 25 (LIGHT AEROPLANES) PERFORMANCE CLASS B 032 01 01 00 Definitions of terms and speeds used Define the following terms
More informationPA-28R 201 Piper Arrow
Beale Aero Club Aircraft Written Test PA-28R 201 Piper Arrow (Required passing score: 80%) 1. If an engine power loss occurs immediately after take off, the pilot s reaction should be to: a. maintain safe
More informationAerodynamic Testing of the A400M at ARA. Ian Burns and Bryan Millard
Aerodynamic Testing of the A400M at ARA by Ian Burns and Bryan Millard Aircraft Research Association Bedford, England Independent non-profit distributing research and development organisation Set up in
More informationDUCHESS BE-76 AND COMMERCIAL MULTI ADD-ON ORAL REVIEW FOR CHECKRIDE
DUCHESS BE-76 AND COMMERCIAL MULTI ADD-ON ORAL REVIEW FOR CHECKRIDE The Critical Engine The critical engine is the engine whose failure would most adversely affect the airplane s performance or handling
More informationThe following slideshow and talk were presented at the Uber Elevate Summit on April 25 th, The text included here is an approximate transcript
The following slideshow and talk were presented at the Uber Elevate Summit on April 25 th, 2017. The text included here is an approximate transcript of the speech given by Jay Carter, founder and CEO of
More informationFokker 50 - Limitations GENERAL LIMITATIONS MASS LIMITATIONS. Page 1. Minimum crew. Maximum number of passenger seats.
GENERAL LIMITATIONS Minimum crew Cockpit: Two pilots Maximum number of passenger seats Sixty-two (62) Maximum operating altitudes Maximum operating pressure altitude: Maximum take-off and landing pressure
More informationDEVELOPMENT OF A CARGO AIRCRAFT, AN OVERVIEW OF THE PRELIMINARY AERODYNAMIC DESIGN PHASE
ICAS 2000 CONGRESS DEVELOPMENT OF A CARGO AIRCRAFT, AN OVERVIEW OF THE PRELIMINARY AERODYNAMIC DESIGN PHASE S. Tsach, S. Bauminger, M. Levin, D. Penn and T. Rubin Engineering center Israel Aircraft Industries
More informationDesign of Ultralight Aircraft
Design of Ultralight Aircraft Greece 2018 Main purpose of present study The purpose of this study is to design and develop a new aircraft that complies with the European ultra-light aircraft regulations
More informationEnvironmentally Focused Aircraft: Regional Aircraft Study
Environmentally Focused Aircraft: Regional Aircraft Study Sid Banerjee Advanced Design Product Development Engineering, Aerospace Bombardier International Workshop on Aviation and Climate Change May 18-20,
More informationNew Design Concept of Compound Helicopter
New Design Concept of Compound Helicopter PRASETYO EDI, NUKMAN YUSOFF and AZNIJAR AHMAD YAZID Department of Engineering Design & Manufacture, Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur,
More informationInitial / Recurrent Ground Take-Home Self-Test: The Beechcraft 58 Baron Systems, Components and Procedures
Initial / Recurrent Ground Take-Home Self-Test: The Beechcraft 58 Baron Systems, Components and Procedures Flight Express, Inc. This take-home self-test partially satisfies the recurrent ground training
More informationAircraft Design in a Nutshell
Dieter Scholz Aircraft Design in a Nutshell Based on the Aircraft Design Lecture Notes 1 Introduction The task of aircraft design in the practical sense is to supply the "geometrical description of a new
More informationElmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test
DO NOT WRITE ON THIS TEST FEB 2013 Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test Cessna - 182 For the following questions, you will need to refer to the Pilots Information Manual for the C-182R. The bonus questions
More informationB737 Performance. Takeoff & Landing. Last Rev: 02/06/2004
B737 Performance Takeoff & Landing Last Rev: 02/06/2004 Takeoff Performance Takeoff Performance Basics Definitions: Runway Takeoff Distances Definitions: Takeoff Speeds JAR 25 Requirements Engine failure
More informationTYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET
TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. EASA.IM.A.073 for Beechcraft 390 (PREMIER I and IA) Type Certificate Holder: Textron Aviation Inc. One Cessna Boulevard Wichita, Kansas 67215 USA For Models: Model 390 1
More informationINDEX. Preflight Inspection Pages 2-4. Start Up.. Page 5. Take Off. Page 6. Approach to Landing. Pages 7-8. Emergency Procedures..
INDEX Preflight Inspection Pages 2-4 Start Up.. Page 5 Take Off. Page 6 Approach to Landing. Pages 7-8 Emergency Procedures.. Page 9 Engine Failure Pages 10-13 Propeller Governor Failure Page 14 Fire.
More informationEuropean Aviation Safety Agency
Page 1/8 European Aviation Safety Agency EASA TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET Cirrus Design SF50 Type Certificate Holder: Cirrus Design Corporation 4515 Taylor Circle Duluth, Minnesota 55811 United States
More informationWeight & Balance. Let s Wait & Balance. Chapter Sixteen. Page P1. Excessive Weight and Structural Damage. Center of Gravity
Page P1 Chapter Sixteen Weight & Balance Let s Wait & Balance Excessive Weight and Structural Damage 1. [P2/1/1] Airplanes are designed to be flown up to a specific maximum weight. A. landing B. gross
More informationChapter 2 Lecture 5 Data collection and preliminary three-view drawing - 2 Topic
Chapter 2 Lecture 5 Data collection and preliminary three-view dra - 2 Topic 2.3 Preliminary three-view dra Example 2.1 2.3 Preliminary three-view dra The preliminary three-view dra of the airplane gives
More informationFlight Stability and Control of Tailless Lambda Unmanned Aircraft
IJUSEng 2013, Vol. 1, No. S2, 1-4 http://dx.doi.org/10.14323/ijuseng.2013.5 Editor s Technical Note Flight Stability and Control of Tailless Lambda Unmanned Aircraft Pascual Marqués Unmanned Vehicle University,
More informationWind Tunnel Measurement Of Aerodynamic Characteristics Of A Generic Eurocopter Helicopter
Wind Tunnel Measurement Of Aerodynamic Characteristics Of A Generic Eurocopter Helicopter by Engr. Assoc. Prof. Dr Shuhaimi Mansor, MIEM, P. Eng. Experimental aerodynamic studies on a generic model of
More informationCIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY SAFETY REGULATION GROUP MICROLIGHT TYPE APPROVAL DATA SHEET (TADS) NO: BM 55 ISSUE: 6
TYPE: Shadow Series D & DD (1) MANUFACTURER CFM Aircraft Ltd (ceased trading) BMAA is responsible for continued airworthiness (2) UK IMPORTER None (3) CERTIFICATION BCAR Section S (First example Issue
More informationCharles H. Zimmerman promoted his Flying Pancake design from 1933 to 1937 while working for the
Model Number : V-173 Model Name : Flying Pancake Model Type: Proof of Concept, Fighter Charles H. Zimmerman promoted his Flying Pancake design from 1933 to 1937 while working for the National Advisory
More information10th Australian International Aerospace Congress
AUSTRALIAN INTERNATIONAL AEROSPACE CONGRESS Paper presented at the 10th Australian International Aerospace Congress incorporating the 14th National Space Engineering Symposium 2003 29 July 1 August 2003
More informationShadow Series D & DD
Shadow Series D & DD 1 MANUFACTURER CFM Aircraft Ltd (ceased trading) BMAA is responsible for continued airworthiness 2 UK IMPORTER None 3 CERTIFICATION BCAR Section S (First example Issue 1 dated April
More informationEuropean Aviation Safety Agency
TCDS EASA.A.109 ASI AVIATION Page 1 of 10 European Aviation Safety Agency EASA TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET EASA.A.109 F 406 Type Certificate Holder : ASI AVIATION 14 allée René Fonck 51100 REIMS France
More informationTYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET
TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. EASA.A.610 for Type Certificate Holder Game Composites Ltd. Ground Floor Flat 56 Queen s Gate, London, SW7 5JW, United Kingdom For models: TE.CERT.00048-001 European Aviation
More informationDESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A MICRO AIR VEHICLE (µav) CONCEPT: PROJECT BIDULE
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A MICRO AIR VEHIE (µav) CONCEPT: PROJECT BIDULE Mr T. Spoerry, Dr K.C. Wong School of Aerospace, Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering University of Sydney NSW 6 Abstract This
More informationCIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY SAFETY REGULATION GROUP MICROLIGHT TYPE APPROVAL DATA SHEET (TADS) NO: BM 41 ISSUE: 7
TYPE: Shadow Series CD (1) MANUFACTURER CFM Aircraft Ltd (ceased trading) BMAA is responsible for continued airworthiness (2) UK IMPORTER None (3) CERTIFICATION BCAR Section S (First example Advanced Issue
More informationEuropean Aviation Safety Agency
TCDS IM.A.226 Cessna Aircraft Company Page 1 of 20 European Aviation Safety Agency EASA TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET Cessna Model 208 Type Certificate Holder: Cessna Aircraft Company P.O. Box 7704 Wichita,
More informationLiberty Aerospace, Inc. Section 1 SECTION 1 GENERAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
Liberty Aerospace, Inc. Section 1 SECTION 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 1-3 Airplane Three Views... 1-4 Descriptive Data... 1-5 Engine... 1-5 Propeller... 1-5 Fuel... 1-5 Oil... 1-5 Maximum Certificated
More informationCIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY SAFETY REGULATION GROUP MICROLIGHT TYPE APPROVAL DATA SHEET (TADS) NO: BM 41 ISSUE: 7. Shadow Series CD
Shadow Series CD 1 MANUFACTURER CFM Aircraft Ltd (ceased trading) BMAA is responsible for continued airworthiness 2 UK IMPORTER None 3 CERTIFICATION BCAR Section S (First example Advanced Issue dated March
More informationDimensions And Areas. 1. General. A. Airplane Dimensions and Areas
Dimensions And Areas 600: DIMENSIONS AND AREAS 1. General This section describes those diagrams and text which shows the area, dimensions, stations, access doors, and physical locations of the structural
More informationUltralight airplane Design
Ultralight airplane Design Ultralight airplane definitions: Airworthiness authorities define aircraft as vehicles that can rise or move in the air and enforce strict regulations and requirements for all
More informationFlight Test Evaluation of C-130H Aircraft Performance with NP2000 Propellers
Flight Test Evaluation of C-130H Aircraft Performance with NP2000 Propellers Lance Bays Lockheed Martin - C-130 Flight Sciences Telephone: (770) 494-8341 E-Mail: lance.bays@lmco.com Introduction Flight
More informationINDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY KANPUR Removable, Low Noise, High Speed Tip Shape Tractor Configuration, Cant angle, Low Maintainence Hingelesss, Good Manoeuverability,
More informationChapter 3: Aircraft Construction
Chapter 3: Aircraft Construction p. 1-3 1. Aircraft Design, Certification, and Airworthiness 1.1. Replace the letters A, B, C, and D by the appropriate name of aircraft component A: B: C: D: E: 1.2. What
More informationECO-CARGO AIRCRAFT. ISSN: International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research (IJSETR) Volume 1, Issue 2, August 2012
ECO-CARGO AIRCRAFT Vikrant Goyal, Pankhuri Arora Abstract- The evolution in aircraft industry has brought to us many new aircraft designs. Each and every new design is a step towards a greener tomorrow.
More informationClean Sky 2. LifeCraft Demonstrationt (IADP RC 2 & ITDs) Consultation meetings Brussels th December 2012 OUTLINE
Clean Sky 2 LifeCraft Demonstrationt (IADP RC 2 & ITDs) Consultation meetings Brussels 10-14 th December 2012 1 1 LifeCraft - The Compound Demo OUTLINE Presentation of the Compound R/C Concept Impact &
More informationElmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test
DO NOT WRITE ON THIS TEST JAN 2014 Elmendorf Aero Club Aircraft Test SENECA II For the following questions, you will need to refer to the Pilots Information Manual for the PA-34-200T. USE ANSWER SHEET
More informationIntroduction. Fuselage/Cockpit
Introduction The Moravan Zlin 242L is a fully aerobatic 2 seat aircraft designed to perform all advanced flight maneuvers within an envelope of -3.5 to +6 Gs. Many military and civilian flight-training
More informationEFFECT OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS ON PERFORMANCE OF WIND TURBINE
Chapter-5 EFFECT OF SURFACE ROUGHNESS ON PERFORMANCE OF WIND TURBINE 5.1 Introduction The development of modern airfoil, for their use in wind turbines was initiated in the year 1980. The requirements
More informationTYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET
Issue: 03 Date: 25/07/2018 TYPE-CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. EASA.IM.A.636 for Model 3000 Type Certificate Holder Textron Aviation Defense LLC 9709 East Central 67206 Wichita, Kansas United States of America
More informationFLIGHT CONTROLS SYSTEM
FLIGHT CONTROLS SYSTEM DESCRIPTION Primary flight control of the aircraft is provided by aileron, elevator and rudder control surfaces. The elevator and rudder control surfaces are mechanically operated.
More informationCHAPTER 2 THE TUTOR. Introduction
CHAPTER 2 THE TUTOR Introduction 1. AEFs. The Royal Air Force has 12 units throughout the country known as Air Experience flights (AEFs). Their role is to provide air experience flying for cadets and they
More informationLAA TYPE ACCEPTANCE DATA SHEET TADS 064 STEEN SKYBOLT
Issue 2 New format. Additional notes on maximum gross weight Revision A Notes added to section 3.4 regarding Marquart Charger undercarriage. Dated 03/01/18 Dated 08/01/18 JV JV This TADS is intended as
More informationJODEL D.112 INFORMATION MANUAL C-FVOF
JODEL D.112 INFORMATION MANUAL C-FVOF Table of Contents I General Description...4 Dimensions:...4 Powertrain:...4 Landing gear:...4 Control travel:...4 II Limitations...5 Speed limits:...5 Airpeed indicator
More informationGACE Flying Club Aircraft Review Test 2018 N5312S & N5928E. Name: GACE #: Score: Checked by: CFI #:
GACE Flying Club Aircraft Review Test 2018 N5312S & N5928E Name: GACE #: Score: Checked by: CFI #: Date: (The majority of these questions are for N5312S. All N5928E questions will be marked 28E) 1. What
More informationDEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. A16EA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION A16EA Revision 15 True Flight Holdings LLC AA-5, AA-5A, AA-5B AG-5B September 18, 2009 TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET NO. A16EA This data sheet,
More informationVan s Aircraft RV-7A. Pilot s Operating Handbook N585RV
Van s Aircraft RV-7A Pilot s Operating Handbook N585RV PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS SPAN:..25 0 LENGTH...20 4 HEIGHT:.. 7 10 SPEED: Maximum at Sea Level...180 knots Cruise, 75% Power at 8,000 Ft...170 knots
More informationMethodology for Distributed Electric Propulsion Aircraft Control Development with Simulation and Flight Demonstration
1 Methodology for Distributed Electric Propulsion Aircraft Control Development with Simulation and Flight Demonstration Presented by: Jeff Freeman Empirical Systems Aerospace, Inc. jeff.freeman@esaero.com,
More informationTest Flying should only be performed by a pilot who is licensed, rated and experienced on the aircraft type.
Test Flying Procedure: Test Flying should only be performed by a pilot who is licensed, rated and experienced on the aircraft type. In particular, the test pilot should have recently demonstrated an ability
More informationHumming Aerospace Version 9 Blade ti
Humming Aerospace Version 9 Blade ti Designed By J Falk Hummingair LLC The Version 9 is a prototype carbon fiber intensive aircraft designed from the nose back to be much more efficient than existing aircraft
More informationBoeing B-47 Stratojet USER MANUAL. Virtavia B-47E Stratojet DTG Steam Edition Manual Version 2
Boeing B-47 Stratojet USER MANUAL 0 Introduction The Boeing B-47 was the first swept-wing multi-engine bomber in service with the USAF. It was truly a quantum leap in aviation history, and is the forerunner
More informationSection 2: Basic Aerobatics
Section 2: Basic Aerobatics Airplane Considerations and Control Setup Primary to Aerobatic Airplane Transition Parallel Positioning B-34 Basic Aerobatics Introduction Aerobatics is unarguably the most
More informationInvestigation Report.
Investigation Report. Status: Final Date: 27 JAN 08 Time: 11.30 UT Type: Piper PA 18-150 (180 HP) Operator: Royal Verviers Aviation Registration: OO-OAW C/N : 4828 msn : 18-5346 Manufacturing Date: 1957
More informationSystems Group (Summer 2012) 4 th Year (B.Eng) Aerospace Engineering Candidate Carleton University, Ottawa,Canada Mail:
Memo Airport2030_M_Family_Concepts_of_Box_Wing_12-08-10.pdf Date: 12-08-10 From: Sameer Ahmed Intern at Aero Aircraft Design and Systems Group (Summer 2012) 4 th Year (B.Eng) Aerospace Engineering Candidate
More informationStudy on Flow Fields in Variable Area Nozzles for Radial Turbines
Vol. 4 No. 2 August 27 Study on Fields in Variable Area Nozzles for Radial Turbines TAMAKI Hideaki : Doctor of Engineering, P. E. Jp, Manager, Turbo Machinery Department, Product Development Center, Corporate
More informationCESSNA 182 TRAINING MANUAL. Trim Control Connections
Trim Control Connections by D. Bruckert & O. Roud 2006 Page 36 Flaps The flaps are constructed basically the same as the ailerons with the exception of the balance weights and the addition of a formed
More informationDevelopment of a Variable Stability, Modular UAV Airframe for Local Research Purposes
Development of a Variable Stability, Modular UAV Airframe for Local Research Purposes John Monk Principal Engineer CSIR, South Africa 28 October 2008 Outline A Brief History of UAV Developments at the
More information