Surviving a Crash in Rear Seats: Addressing the Needs from a Diverse Population
|
|
- Philip Simmons
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Surviving a Crash in Rear Seats: Addressing the Needs from a Diverse Population Jingwen Hu, PhD UMTRI-Biosciences MADYMO USER MEETING 2016
2 Research Themes Safety Design Optimization Laboratory Testing Injury Biomechanics and Occupant Protection Computational Modeling Crash Data Analysis Statistical Morphology
3 Research Motivation Older Child Rear Seat Environments Adult Infant
4 Background What are the leading injuries in rear seat? Mainly by high seat belt loading We all know that wearing your seat belt is safer than being unbelted, but can we improve on that? Mainly by the contact to the back of the front seat and B-pillar Data based on Kuppa et al and Arbogast et al
5 Rear-Seat Passengers ~20% of second-row passengers are ages 6-12 (smaller in body size than most adults) Harness restraints Add-On Boosters??? Adult Belt Systems
6 Rear Seat Belt Anchorage Locations Rear seat lap-belt angles span the entire range of angles permitted by FMVSS 210 Lab Conditions Belt anchorage locations varied significantly among different vehicles SAE J826 H-Point FMVSS 210 Zone Inboard Outboard Vehicle Anchorages Data from 28 second-row outboard seats
7 Rear Seat Cushion Length Most rear seats are too long for most children ages 4-17 Children = ages 4-17 years BPL = buttock-popliteal (thigh) length SCL = seat cushion length Good fit: BPL > SCL Is 4 9 (145 cm) truly a magic number? Huang and Reed (2006) SAE
8 Study Design Older Child Optimal Designs Rear Seat Environments Optimal Designs Adult Infant
9 Scalable MADYMO ATD Model Modified pelvis/abdomen to respond more realistically to belt interaction Seat model has facet surface and two cylinders simulating anti-submarining components 6 Year Old 8 Year Old 10 Year Old 12 Year Old Scaled body size, inertial properties, and stiffness, with realistic seating posture
10 Validation Example
11 Sled vs. Simulation 6YO Long Seat Rearward Anchors 6YO Short Seat Forward Anchors
12 Sled vs. Simulation 10YO Long Seat Rearward Anchors 10YO Short Seat Rear Anchors
13 Design Optimizations Design Variable Range Lap belt anchorage as measured in vehicles (spans FMVSS 210) D-ring Seat length Cushion stiffness Cushion support as measured in vehicles mm % of Caravan seat 15mm higher/lower than that from Caravan seat Objectives: minimize head and knee excursions Constraint: peak torso rotation from 10 to 20 deg (forward of vertical) Algorithm: NSGA-II (genetic algorithm), 50 generations with 50 simulations per generation, ~2500 runs Optimization for 6, 9, and 12 YO separately
14 Optimal Belt Geometry For Older Child Optimal belt anchorage locations depend on body size 6YO Optimum Side View Forward (mm) 12YO Optimum
15 Adult and CRS Sled Test Matrix Test ID NT1101 NT1102 NT1103 NT1104 NT1105 NT1106 ATD CRABI 12MO CRABI 12MO CRABI 12MO CRABI 12MO CRABI 12MO CRABI 12MO Cushion length Seatbelt geometry Cushion stiffness CRS/ hardware 450 mm Mid standard Snugride mm Mid Standard Snugride mm 350 mm 400 mm 6YO Optimal 6YO Optimal 6YO Optimal Standard Snugride 30 Stiffer Snugride 30 Standard Snugride mm Mid Stiffer Snugride mm 400 mm 350 mm NT1108 HIII mm Mid Standard Shin bar NT1109 HIII mm Mid Standard Shin bar NT1110 HIII 50 NT1111 HIII 50 NT1112 HIII mm 350 mm 350 mm 6YO Optimal 6YO Optimal 6YO Optimal Standard Stiffer Standard Shin bar Shin bar No shin bar NT1113 HIII mm Mid Stiffer Shin bar Mid FMVSS213 6YO Optimal
16 Model Validation Against Sled Tests Short Cushion Long Cushion
17 Model Validation Against Sled Tests Side View Top View
18 Design Optimizations Design Variable Range Lap belt anchorage as measured in vehicles (spans FMVSS 210) D-ring Seat length Cushion stiffness Cushion support as measured in vehicles mm % of Caravan seat 15mm higher/lower than that from Caravan seat Objectives Constraint Adults Minimize head and knee excursions Peak torso angle 10-20º past vertical Objectives Constraint Infants in RF-CRS Minimize CRS angle and 3ms chest-g HIC Algorithm: NSGA-II (genetic algorithm), 50 generations with 50 simulations per generation, ~2500 runs
19 Optimal Belt Geometry 6YO Optimum Adult Optimum Side View Forward (mm) RF-CRS Optimum
20 Optimal Seat Cushion Design Variables 6YO Children Adults Infants in RF-CRS Cushion Length Shortest Shortest Longest Cushion Stiffness Middle Lowest Highest Supporting Structure Highest High Highest Preventing Submarining Balancing Head & Knee Excursions Reducing CRS Rotation & Movement
21 Summaries From the test data: the 6YO optimal belt geometry and seat design can provide acceptable but not optimal protection to adults and infants in RF-CRS Tradeoff 1: More vertical lap belt that best prevents submarining for belted children is sub-optimal for adults and infants in RF-CRS Tradeoff 2: Short seat cushion that best prevents submarining for belted children would increase RF-CRS rotation in frontal crashes The design tradeoffs indicate the benefit for using adaptive/adjustable restraint systems in rear seat
22 Advanced Restraint Technologies Belt Configurations 3-Pt Belt 4-Pt Belt X Suspender Pre-Tensioning Retractor PT Buckle PT Anchor PT Load Limiting Progressive LL Constant LL Digressive LL Switchable LL Inflatables Inflatable Belt Bag In Roof SCaRAB
23 Crash Conditions Rear seat compartment Based on a compact vehicle Crash pulse NCAP fleet severe vs. NCAP fleet soft Crash angle 0 deg vs. 15 deg to the right ATD Occupants H-III 6YO / H-III 5 th / THOR 50 th / H-III 95 th Front seat position Mid (left) vs. more forward (right)
24 Sled Tests with 5 th - Videos Baseline 3-pt Belt with PT and LL 4-pt Belt with PT and LL SCaRAB Bag in Roof Inflatable Belt Crash condition: 0 deg with severe pulse
25 Sled Tests with 5 th Injury Measures Crash condition: 0 deg with severe pulse
26 Model Validation Generally, good correlations have been achieved for each ATD with each advanced restraint system. 3pt belt with PT+LL 4pt belt SCaRAB Bag in Roof
27 Design Optimization Targets 6 Year Old Excursion (mm) Head Neck Chest HIC BrIC Neck T (kn) Neck C (kn) Nij Chest D <480 <700 <0.87 <1.49 <1.82 <1.0 <40 mm 5th <500 <700 <0.87 <2.62 <2.52 <1.0 Minimize THOR <580 <700 <0.87 <4.17 <4.00 <1.0 Minimize 95th <600 <700 <0.87 <5.44 <5.44 <1.0 Minimize Combined Probability of Chest Injury for 5 th, THOR, & 95 th Minimize *All injury measures should be less than those in the baseline tests
28 3-Point Belt DoE CLL no Airbag Baseline System Retractor Pre-tensioner Constant Load Limiter (CLL) Factors Additional Pre-tensioners: Anchor and/or Buckle Load Limiter Levels: 8 to 10.5 mm torsion bar Dynamic Locking Tongue (DLT) Observations Severe Pulse None met the constraints Soft Pulse 10 % (QTY 5) met the constraints Constraints Matrix Pulse 6yo 5th THOR 95th Comb Severe 0% 13% 0% 2% 0% Soft 27% 75% 63% 67% 10%
29 Recommendations Soft Pulse Anchor PT / Buckle PT / 9mm TB / no airbag Driver side / Passenger side
30 3-Point Belt with Airbag DoE Baseline System Retractor Pre-tensioner Constant Load Limiter Factors Advanced Feature: SCaRAB or BiR Additional Pre-tensioners: Anchor / Buckle Load Limiter Levels: 8 to 9 mm torsion bar Dynamic Locking Tongue (DLT) Observations 6 runs met all 4 occupants and left & right side constraints 12 runs met all but one of the 4 occupants and left & right side constraints Constraints Matrix Constraints Met SCaRAB BiR 6yo 94% 58% 5th 79% 98% THOR 58% 23% 95th 88% 100% 0 deg Severe Pulse Only
31 Recommendations Severe Pulse Anchor PT / Buckle PT / DLT / 9mm TB / SCaRAB Driver side
32 5 th - 0 Severe - Videos CONFIDENTIAL/PROPRIETARY - the information in this document is confidential/proprietary to TRW Automotive. Any disclosure of this information without the prior written consent of TRW is strictly prohibited.
33 5 th - 0 Severe - Injury Measures System HIC Ax Tens Ax Comp Nij Chest Comp BrIC Percentage of IARV s USNCAP Baseline Advanced-Belt Only Advanced-Belt & Bag Star Rating EURO-NCAP Pjoint Head Neck Chest Femur Sum Injury Risks HIC Neck T Neck C Nij Chest D BrIC Baseline 49.3% 80.6% 0.0% 37.2% 44.1% 92.3% Baseline 95% Advanced-Belt Only 6.0% 5.9% 0.0% 16.5% 14.5% 22.5% Adv Belt 33% Advanced-Belt & Bag 3.0% 0.0% 0.1% 7.9% 6.2% 13.5% Adv Belt & Bag 16%
34 Test Summary Average of injury risk reduction from the baseline restraint system ATD Restraints HIC Neck T Neck C Chest D BrIC HIII 6YO HIII 5th HIII 95th THOR 50th Belt Only -24.1% -33.3% -0.5% -20.5% -46.9% Belt & Bag -24.1% -99.5% -0.5% -32.2% -56.1% Belt Only -31.2% -67.2% -0.1% -24.5% -52.5% Belt & Bag -34.3% -73.2% 0.0% -29.5% -62.0% Belt Only -26.6% -34.5% 0.0% -40.3% -31.8% Belt & Bag -34.4% -35.3% 0.0% -39.6% -58.8% Belt Only 9.6% -25.7% 0.0% 0.8% -18.6% Belt & Bag -18.4% -94.4% 0.0% 1.0% -46.4%
35 Conclusions Generally speaking, advanced restraints reduce the injury risks for all the four sizes of ATDs. It is possible to meet the IARV s with an advanced belt only and an advanced belt and bag system with a soft pulse. The addition of a properly optimized airbag reduced the head and neck loads and had the potential to reduce the chest loads. The reduction in chest compression from THOR 50 th did not occur on the advanced restraint system like they did for the Hybrid III ATDs.
36 Acknowledgement: UMTRI, NHTSA, ZF TRW, ESTECO, and TASS Thanks! Jingwen Hu, PhD
Optimizing Seat Belt and Airbag Designs for Rear Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes
Stapp Car Crash Journal, Vol. 61 (November 2017), pp. 67 100 Copyright 2017 The Stapp Association 201-0 Optimizing Seat Belt and Airbag Designs for Rear Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes Jingwen
More informationDOT HS July Assessing the Restraint Performance Of Vehicle Seats and Belt Geometry Optimized for Older Children
DOT HS 812 048 July 2014 Assessing the Restraint Performance Of Vehicle Seats and Belt Geometry Optimized for Older Children DISCLAIMER This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation,
More informationTransport Canada. Child Occupant Protection Research. Considerations for Future Regulations. Suzanne Tylko Chief of Crashworthiness Research
CRS-03-13 Transport Canada Child Occupant Protection Research & Considerations for Future Regulations Suzanne Tylko Chief of Crashworthiness Research 3 rd Informal Child Restraint System Meeting May 13,
More informationComparison of the 6YO ATD kinematics restrained in Booster CRSs Sled Experiments in frontal, oblique and side impacts
Comparison of the 6YO ATD kinematics restrained in Booster CRSs Sled Experiments in frontal, oblique and side impacts N. Duong 12 1 Children Hospital of Philadelphia; 2 Drexel University ABSTRACT Unintentional
More informationIDENTIFYING PRIORITIES FOR IMPROVING REAR SEAT OCCUPANT PROTECTION KATHLEEN D. KLINICH CAROL A. C. FLANNAGAN
UMTRI-2009-46 MARCH 2009 IDENTIFYING PRIORITIES FOR IMPROVING REAR SEAT OCCUPANT PROTECTION KATHLEEN D. KLINICH CAROL A. C. FLANNAGAN i Technical Report Documentation Page 2. Government Accession No. 3.
More informationADVANCED RESTRAINT SY S STEM (ARS) Y Stephen Summers St NHTSA Ve NHTSA V hi hhicle S Saf t e y t R Resear R h c 1
ADVANCED RESTRAINT SYSTEM (ARS) Stephen Summers NHTSA Vehicle Safety Research 1 CRASH AVOIDANCE METRICS PARTNERSHIP (CAMP) ARS 4 year Cooperative research program Demonstrate restraint systems that can
More informationRenault Mégane Hatch 83% 78% 60% 56% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR. Renault Mégane Hatch 1.5dCi 'Life', LHD SPECIFICATIONS SAFETY EQUIPMENT
Renault Mégane Hatch Renault Mégane Hatch 1.5dCi 'Life', LHD 83% 78% 60% 56% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Renault Mégane Hatch 1.5dCi 'Life', LHD Body type 5 door hatchback Year of
More informationARE SMALL FEMALES MORE VULNERABLE TO LOWER NECK INJURIES WHEN SEATED SUFFICIENTLY AWAY FROM THE STEERING WHEEL IN A FRONTAL CRASH?
ARE SMALL FEMALES MORE VULNERABLE TO LOWER NECK INJURIES WHEN SEATED SUFFICIENTLY AWAY FROM THE STEERING WHEEL IN A FRONTAL CRASH? Chandrashekhar Simulation Technologies LLC United States Paper Number
More informationThis paper details the development of the latest potential updates to the FMVSS No. 213 seat assembly 4 including the assembly s geometry,
DEVELOPMENT OF A REPRESENTATIVE SEAT ASSEMBLY FOR NO. 23 Kedryn Wietholter Cristina Echemendia Allison E. Louden National Highway Traffic Safety Administration United States of America 7-043 ABSTRACT Federal
More informationASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF STEERING WHEEL AIR BAGS FOR DRIVERS SEATED IN WHEELCHAIRS DURING FRONTAL CRASH TESTS
ASSESSING THE PERFORMANCE OF STEERING WHEEL AIR BAGS FOR DRIVERS SEATED IN WHEELCHAIRS DURING FRONTAL CRASH TESTS Christopher Wiacek Aloke Prasad National Highway Traffic Safety Administration United States
More informationSTUDY ON CAR-TO-CAR FRONTAL OFFSET IMPACT WITH VEHICLE COMPATIBILITY
STUDY ON CAR-TO-CAR FRONTAL OFFSET IMPACT WITH VEHICLE COMPATIBILITY Chang Min, Lee Jang Ho, Shin Hyun Woo, Kim Kun Ho, Park Young Joon, Park Hyundai Motor Company Republic of Korea Paper Number 17-0168
More informationDriver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)
Ford Tourneo Courier Ford Tourneo Courier 1.5 diesel 'Trend', LHD 84% 84% 74% 56% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Ford Tourneo Courier 1.5 diesel 'Trend', LHD Body type 5 door hatchback
More informationDriver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)
Subaru Outback Subaru Outback 2.0 diesel 'EyeSight', LHD 85% 87% 70% 73% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Subaru Outback 2.0 diesel 'EyeSight', LHD Body type 5 door wagon Year of publication
More informationTHUMS User Community
THUMS User Community Therese Fuchs, Biomechanics Group, Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Munich therese.fuchs@med.uni-muenchen.de, tel. +49 89 2180 73365 Munich, 9th of April 2014 Agenda 1. What
More informationRenault Kadjar 81% 89% 74% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Renault Kadjar Small Off-Road 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 89% 81% Pedestrian Safety Assist 74% 71% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Renault Kadjar 1.5dCi 'ZEN', LHD 5 door hatchback Year Of
More informationMazda 2 78% 86% 84% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Mazda 2 Supermini 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 86% 78% Pedestrian Safety Assist 84% 64% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Mazda 2 1.5 'Core', LHD - 5 door hatchback Year Of Publication 2015 Kerb
More informationHyundai i20 73% 85% 79% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Hyundai i20 Supermini 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 85% 73% Pedestrian Safety Assist 79% 64% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Hyundai i20 1.2 GLS, LHD 5 door hatchback Year Of Publication 2015
More informationTRL s Child Seat Rating, (TCSR) Front Impact Testing Specification
TRL s Child Seat Rating, (TCSR) Front Impact Testing Specification Revision 1 Prepared by TRL Limited July 2009 Foreword The UN-ECE Regulation provides a baseline level of safety for child restraint systems
More informationFull Width Test ECE-R 94 Evaluation of test data Proposal for injury criteria Way forward
Full Width Test ECE-R 94 Evaluation of test data Proposal for injury criteria Way forward Andre Eggers IWG Frontal Impact 19 th September, Bergisch Gladbach Federal Highway Research Institute BASt Project
More informationAdult Occupant. Pedestrian. Toyota Hilux Double-Cab, 2.4 diesel 4x4, mid grade, LHD. Belt pretensioner. Side head airbag.
Toyota Hilux Standard Safety Equipment 2016 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 85% 82% Pedestrian Safety Assist 73% 25% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Toyota Hilux Double-Cab, 2.4 diesel 4x4, mid grade,
More informationFIAT % 66% 53% 27% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
FIAT 500 Standard Safety Equipment 2017 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 66% 49% Pedestrian Safety Assist 53% 27% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Fiat 500 1.2 Pop, LHD - 3 door hatchback Year Of Publication
More informationSuzuki Vitara 85% 89% 76% 75% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Suzuki Vitara Supermini 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 89% 85% Pedestrian Safety Assist 76% 75% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Suzuki Vitara 1.6 GL+, LHD - 5 door hatchback Year Of Publication
More informationChild safety CHILD SEATS
Child safety CHILD SEATS S Do not use a child restraint on a seat with an operational air bag in front of it. There is a risk of death or serious injury when the air bag deploys. The best place for a child,
More informationWheelchair Transportation Principles I: Biomechanics of Injury
Wheelchair Transportation Principles I: Biomechanics of Injury Gina Bertocci, Ph.D. & Douglas Hobson, Ph.D. Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology University of Pittsburgh This presentation
More informationSuzuki Vitara 85% 89% 76% 75% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Suzuki Vitara Supermini 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 89% 85% Pedestrian Safety Assist 76% 75% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Suzuki Vitara 1.6 GL+, LHD 5 door hatchback Year Of Publication
More informationAdult Occupant. Pedestrian
Ford S-MAX Large MPV 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 87% 87% Pedestrian Safety Assist 79% 71% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Ford Galaxy 2.0 diesel 'Titanium', LHD 5 door wagon Year Of Publication
More informationAirbags SAFETY INFORMATION
Airbags Your vehicle is equipped with several types of airbags: front airbags, front knee airbags, side airbags, and side curtain airbags. Front Airbags (SRS) The front SRS airbags inflate in a moderate-to-severe
More informationFIAT Panda 45% 16% 47% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant.
FIAT Panda Standard Safety Equipment 2018 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 45% 16% Vulnerable Road Users Safety Assist 47% 7% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type FIAT Panda Easy 1.2 Fire, LHD - 5 door hatchback
More informationKia Soul EV 84% 82% 59% 56% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR. Soul EV 81.4kW EV 'SX', LHD SPECIFICATIONS SAFETY EQUIPMENT
Kia Soul EV Soul EV 81.4kW EV 'SX', LHD 84% 82% 59% 56% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Soul EV 81.4kW EV 'SX', LHD Body type 5 door wagon Year of publication 2014 Kerb weight 1513kg
More informationAudi TT 68% 81% 64% 82% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Pedestrian.
Audi TT Roadster Sport 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 81% 68% Pedestrian Safety Assist 82% 64% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Audi TT 2.0TFSI 'Sport', FWD, RHD - 3 door hatchback Year Of Publication
More informationHonda HR-V 79% 86% 72% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Honda HR-V Small Family Car 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 86% 79% Pedestrian Safety Assist 72% 71% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Honda HR-V 1.6 'ES', RHD 5 door hatchback Year Of Publication
More informationRenault Trafic 91% 52% 53% 57% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Renault Trafic Business and Family Van 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 52% 91% Pedestrian Safety Assist 53% 57% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Renault Trafic dci 115 Combi, LHD - 8/9 seat van
More informationAudi TT SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Roadster sports. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear FRONTAL CRASH PROTECTION
Audi TT Roadster Sport Adult Occupant Child Occupant Pedestrian Safety Assist SPECIFICATION Tested Model Audi TT 2.0TFSI 'Sport', FWD, RHD Body Type 3 door hatchback Year Of Publication 2015 Kerb Weight
More informationOpel/Vauxhall Karl 72% 74% 68% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Opel/Vauxhall Karl Supermini 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 74% 72% Pedestrian Safety Assist 68% 64% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Opel Karl/Vauxhall Viva 1.0 Enjoy, LHD - 5 door hatchback Year
More informationDacia Duster 66% 71% 56% 37% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Dacia Duster Standard Safety Equipment 2017 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 71% 66% Pedestrian Safety Assist 56% 37% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Dacia Duster 1.5 diesel, LHD - 5 door SUV Year Of
More informationDriver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)
Toyota Aygo Toyota Aygo 1 x-play, LHD 80% 80% 62% 56% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Toyota Aygo 1 x-play, LHD Body type 5 door hatchback Year of publication 2014 Kerb weight 874kg VIN
More informationAirbags SAFETY INFORMATION. Your vehicle is equipped with several types of airbags: front airbags, side airbags, and side curtain airbags.
Airbags Your vehicle is equipped with several types of airbags: front airbags, side airbags, and side curtain airbags. Front Airbags (SRS) The front SRS airbags inflate in a moderate-to-severe frontal
More informationFord Mustang (reassessment)
Ford Mustang (reassessment) Standard Safety Equipment 2017 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 72% 32% Pedestrian Safety Assist 78% 61% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Ford Mustang 5.0 Fastback, LHD - 2
More informationSkoda Superb 86% 86% 76% 71% SPECIFICATION ADVANCED REWARDS TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Pedestrian.
Skoda Superb Large Family Car 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 86% 86% Pedestrian Safety Assist 71% 76% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Skoda Superb 2.0 TDI 'Ambition', LHD - 5 door liftback Year
More informationFiat 500X 85% 86% 74% 64% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small MPV. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Fiat 500X Small MPV 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 86% 85% Pedestrian Safety Assist 74% 64% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Fiat 500X 1.6 diesel 'Pop Star', LHD - 5 door hatchback Year Of Publication
More informationOpel/Vauxhall Vivaro SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear
Opel/Vauxhall Vivaro Business and Family Van Adult Occupant Child Occupant Pedestrian Safety Assist SPECIFICATION Tested Model Renault Trafic dci 115 Combi, LHD Body Type 8/9 seat van Year Of Publication
More informationEUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP)
EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION Implementation 1 st January 2020 Copyright 2018 Euro NCAP - This work is the intellectual property of Euro
More informationMG3 69% 71% 59% 38% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR. MG3 1.5VTi-TECH 3Form Sport, RHD SPECIFICATIONS SAFETY EQUIPMENT
MG3 MG3 1.5VTi-TECH 3Form Sport, RHD 69% 71% 59% 38% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model MG3 1.5VTi-TECH 3Form Sport, RHD Body type 5 door hatchback Year of publication 2014 Kerb weight 1150kg
More informationUPDATE ON NHTSA'S OBLIQUE RESEARCH PROGRAM
UPDATE ON NHTSA'S OBLIQUE RESEARCH PROGRAM James Saunders Dan Parent National Highway Traffic Safety Administration CURRENT RESEARCH OBJECTIVE QUESTION Is there a difference in vehicle response, occupant
More informationDriver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (single), Passenger (single)
Citroën Berlingo Citroën Berlingo 1.6 diesel 'Confort', LHD 56% 74% 63% 48% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Citroën Berlingo 1.6 diesel 'Confort', LHD Body type 5 door hatchback Year
More informationEUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION
EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL ADULT OCCUPANT PROTECTION Table of
More informationFord S-MAX 87% 87% 79% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large MPV. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Ford S-MAX Large MPV 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 87% 87% Pedestrian Safety Assist 79% 71% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Ford Galaxy 2.0 diesel 'Titanium', LHD 5 door wagon Year Of Publication
More informationDriver (Single Stage), Passenger (Single Stage) Driver (dual), Passenger (dual)
Jeep Renegade Jeep Renegade 1.6 diesel Limited FW, LHD 87% 85% 65% 74% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model Jeep Renegade 1.6 diesel Limited FW, LHD Body type 5 door SUV Year of publication
More informationFiat Panda Cross 77% 70% 50% 46% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Fiat Panda Cross Supermini 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 70% 77% Pedestrian Safety Assist 50% 46% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type FIAT Panda Cross 1.3 MJ 4X4-5 door hatchback Year Of Publication
More informationVW Passat VW Passat 2.0 TDI 'Comfortline', LHD
VW Passat VW Passat 2.0 TDI 'Comfortline', LHD 85% 87% 66% 76% DETAILS OF TESTED CAR SPECIFICATIONS Tested model VW Passat 2.0 TDI 'Comfortline', LHD Body type 5 door hatchback Year of publication 2014
More informationWHEELCHAIR TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS W/c Tiedown and Occupant Restraint Systems-WTORS
WHEELCHAIR TRANSPORTATION STANDARDS W/c Tiedown and Occupant Restraint Systems-WTORS Douglas Hobson, Ph.D. RERC on Wheeled Mobility Department of Rehabilitation Science and Technology University of Pittsburgh
More informationHonda Jazz 85% 93% 73% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Honda Jazz Supermini 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 93% 85% Pedestrian Safety Assist 73% 71% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Honda Jazz 1.3 'Comfort', LHD - 5 door hatchback Year Of Publication
More informationPeugeot Rifter 81% 91% 58% 68% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Peugeot Rifter Standard Safety Equipment 2018 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 91% 81% Vulnerable Road Users Safety Assist 58% 68% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Peugeot Rifter BlueHDi 100 Allure, LHD
More informationEUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION
EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION Version 7.0.1 Copyright 2015 Euro NCAP - This work is the intellectual property of Euro NCAP. Permission
More informationSimulation and Validation of FMVSS 207/210 Using LS-DYNA
7 th International LS-DYNA Users Conference Simulation Technology (2) Simulation and Validation of FMVSS 207/210 Using LS-DYNA Vikas Patwardhan Tuhin Halder Frank Xu Babushankar Sambamoorthy Lear Corporation
More informationFord Fiesta 84% 87% 64% 60% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Ford Fiesta Standard Safety Equipment 2017 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 87% 84% Pedestrian Safety Assist 64% 60% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Ford Fiesta - 5 door hatchback Year Of Publication
More informationSkoda Kodiaq 77% 92% 71% 54% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Skoda Kodiaq Standard Safety Equipment 2017 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 92% 77% Pedestrian Safety Assist 71% 54% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Skoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI "Ambition", LHD - 5 door SUV
More informationSCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005
SCOPE OF ACCREDITATION TO ISO/IEC 17025:2005 AUTOLIV ASP, INC. Autoliv North America 1320 Pacific Dr. Auburn Hills, MI 48326 Warren Short 248 276 3840 warren.short@autoliv.com MECHANICAL Valid To: April
More informationPotential Use of Crash Test Data for Crashworthiness Research
Potential Use of Crash Test Data for Crashworthiness Research M Paine* and M Griffiths** * Vehicle Design and Research Pty Ltd, Beacon Hill NSW, Australia. ** Road Safety Solutions Pty Ltd, Caringbah NSW,
More informationANCAP Test Protocol. Child Occupant Protection v7.2a
ANCAP Test Protocol. Child Occupant Protection v7.2a JANUARY 2018 PREFACE During the test preparation, vehicle manufacturers are encouraged to liaise with ANCAP and to observe the way cars are set up for
More informationPotential Effects of Deceleration Pulse Variations on Injury Measures Computed in Aircraft Seat HIC Analysis Testing
Potential Effects of Deceleration Pulse Variations on Injury Measures Computed in Aircraft Seat HIC Analysis Testing K Friedman, G Mattos, K Bui, J Hutchinson, and A Jafri Friedman Research Corporation
More informationVolvo XC40 87% 97% 71% 76% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Volvo XC40 Standard Safety Equipment 2018 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 97% 87% Vulnerable Road Users Safety Assist 71% 76% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Volvo XC40 D4 AWD Momentum - 5 door SUV
More informationKia Picanto 64% 79% 54% 25% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Kia Picanto Standard Safety Equipment 2017 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 79% 64% Pedestrian Safety Assist 54% 25% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Kia Picanto 1.0 GLS, LHD - 5 door hatchback Year Of
More informationToyota Hilux 82% 93% 83% 63% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. With Safety Pack. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Toyota Hilux With Safety Pack 2016 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 93% 82% Pedestrian Safety Assist 83% 63% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Safety pack Body Type Toyota Hilux Double-Cab, 2.4 diesel 4x4, mid grade,
More informationKia Optima 86% 89% 67% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Kia Optima Large Family Car 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 89% 86% Pedestrian Safety Assist 67% 71% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type KIA Optima 1.7 diesel 'EX', LHD 4 door sedan Year Of Publication
More informationSubaru Levorg 83% 92% 75% 68% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Subaru Levorg Standard Safety Equipment 2016 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 92% 83% Pedestrian Safety Assist 75% 68% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Subaru Levorg 1.6 GT-S, LHD - 5 door estate Year
More informationCitroën Berlingo 91% 81% 68% 58% SPECIFICATION TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Adult Occupant. Child Occupant. Vulnerable Road Users
Citroën Berlingo Standard Safety Equipment 2018 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 91% 81% Vulnerable Road Users Safety Assist 58% 68% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Peugeot Rifter BlueHDi 100 Allure,
More informationCMVSR 208 OCCUPANT RESTRAINT SYSTEMS IN FRONTAL IMPACT
CMVSR 208 OCCUPANT RESTRAINT SYSTEMS IN FRONTAL IMPACT revised: 2014-09-12 LEGEND FAS: A & LB: LB: : DSP Fully Automatic System Automatic plus Lap Belt Lap Belt Lap Belt plus Shoulder Belt Lap Shoulder
More informationUsing Injury Data to Understand Traffic and Vehicle Safety
Using Injury Data to Understand Traffic and Vehicle Safety Carol A. Flannagan, Ph.D. Center for the Management of Information for Safe and Sustainable Transportation (CMISST), Biosciences, UMTRI Injury
More informationEUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION
EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION Version 7.2.1 Version 7.2.1 Preface During the test preparation, vehicle manufacturers are encouraged to
More informationAustralian Pole Side Impact Research 2010
Australian Pole Side Impact Research 2010 A summary of recent oblique, perpendicular and offset perpendicular pole side impact research with WorldSID 50 th Thomas Belcher (presenter) MarkTerrell 1 st Meeting
More informationLexus RX 82% 91% 77% 79% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Lexus RX Large Off-Road 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 91% 82% Pedestrian Impact Protection Safety Assist 79% 77% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Lexus RX 450h, LHD - 5 door SUV Year Of Publication
More informationAirbags. Your vehicle is equipped with three types of airbags: front airbags, side airbags, and side curtain airbags.
Airbags Your vehicle is equipped with three types of airbags: front airbags, side airbags, and side curtain airbags. Front Airbags (SRS) The front SRS airbags inflate in a moderate-to-severe frontal collision
More informationFord Galaxy 87% 87% 79% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large MPV. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Ford Galaxy Large MPV 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 87% 87% Pedestrian Safety Assist 79% 71% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Ford Galaxy 2.0 diesel 'Titanium', LHD - 5 door wagon Year Of Publication
More informationANCAP Assessment Protocol. Adult Occupant Protection v8.0.2
ANCAP Assessment Protocol. Adult Occupant Protection v8.0.2 JANUARY 2018 PREFACE During the test preparation, vehicle manufacturers are encouraged to liaise with ANCAP and to observe the way cars are set
More informationSuzuki Swift 75% 83% 69% 25% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Suzuki Swift Standard Safety Equipment 2017 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 83% 75% Pedestrian Safety Assist 69% 25% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Suzuki Swift 1.2L GL, RHD - 5 door hatchback Year
More informationANALYTICAL EVALUATION OF AN ADVANCED INTEGRATED SAFETY SEAT DESIGN IN FRONTAL, REAR, SIDE, AND ROLLOVER CRASHES
ANALYTICAL EVALUATION OF AN ADVANCED INTEGRATED SAFETY SEAT DESIGN IN FRONTAL, REAR, SIDE, AND ROLLOVER CRASHES Mostafa Rashidy, Balachandra Deshpande, Gunasekar T.J., Russel Morris EASi Engineering Robert
More informationHEAVY VEHICLES TEST AND ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL
HEAVY VEHICLES TEST AND ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL Version 1.2 Euro NCAP OCTOBER 2012 EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME Copyright 2012 Euro NCAP - This work is the intellectual property of Euro NCAP. Permission
More informationSide impact protection in non-integral CRS First feedback on 440 mm. 52 nd Meeting of the UN Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems
Side impact protection in non-integral CRS First feedback on 440 mm 52 nd Meeting of the UN Informal Group on Child Restraint Systems 18-06-15 1 CONTENTS Background and context Overview of CLEPA investigation
More informationAnalysis of a Frontal Impact of a Formula SAE Vehicle David Rising Jason Kane Nick Vernon Joseph Adkins Dr. Craig Hoff Dr. Janet Brelin-Fornari
Analysis of a Frontal Impact of a Formula SAE Vehicle David Rising Jason Kane Nick Vernon Joseph Adkins Dr. Craig Hoff Dr. Janet Brelin-Fornari Kettering University Overview Introduction Formula SAE Impact
More informationRenault Trafic SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Business and Family Van. Year Of Publication Driver Passenger Rear
Renault Trafic Business and Family Van Adult Occupant Child Occupant Pedestrian Safety Assist SPECIFICATION Tested Model Renault Trafic dci 115 Combi, LHD Body Type 8/9 seat van Year Of Publication 2015
More informationEUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP)
EUROPEAN NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAMME (Euro NCAP) TESTING PROTOCOL CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION Implementation 1 st January 2018 Version 7.2 Copyright Euro NCAP 2017 - This work is the intellectual property
More informationFIAT Tipo 60% 82% 62% 25% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
FIAT Tipo Standard Safety Equipment 2016 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 82% 60% Pedestrian Safety Assist 62% 25% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type FIAT Tipo 1.6 MultiJet, LHD - 5 door hatchback Year
More informationCitroën C3 Aircross 82% 85% 64% 60% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant.
Citroën C3 Aircross Standard Safety Equipment 2017 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 85% 82% Pedestrian Safety Assist 64% 60% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Citroën C3 Aircross Feel Puretech 82, LHD
More informationKia Niro 80% 83% 57% 59% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Kia Niro Standard Safety Equipment 2016 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 83% 80% Pedestrian Safety Assist 57% 59% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Kia Niro GL, 1.6GDI Hybrid, LHD - 5 door hatchback Year
More informationStudy on the Influence of Seat Adjustment on Occupant Head Injury Based on MADYMO
5th International Conference on Advanced Engineering Materials and Technology (AEMT 2015) Study on the Influence of Seat Adjustment on Occupant Head Injury Based on MADYMO Shucai Xu 1, a *, Binbing Huang
More informationPeugeot % 86% 67% 58% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Peugeot 3008 Standard Safety Equipment 2016 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 86% 85% Pedestrian Safety Assist 67% 58% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Peugeot 3008 1,6l Hdi Active - 5 door SUV Year Of
More informationInvestigation of Potential Mitigation of Driver Injury in Heavy Truck Frontal and Rollover Crashes
Investigation of Potential Mitigation of Driver Injury in Heavy Truck Frontal and Rollover Crashes Nathan Schulz, M.S.C.E. Chiara Silvestri Dobrovolny, Ph.D. Texas A&M Transportation Institute TRB IRSC
More informationKia Sportage 83% 90% 66% 71% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Small Off-Road. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Kia Sportage Small Off-Road 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 90% 83% Pedestrian Safety Assist 66% 71% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type KIA Sportage 1.7 diesel GL, LHD 5 door wagon Year Of Publication
More informationHyundai Santa Fe 88% 94% 67% 76% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Hyundai Santa Fe Standard Safety Equipment 2018 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 94% 88% Vulnerable Road Users Safety Assist 67% 76% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Hyundai Santa Fe 2.2CRDi, LHD - 5
More informationANCAP Test Protocol. Child Occupant Protection v7.2.1
ANCAP Test Protocol. Child Occupant Protection v7.2.1 JANUARY 2018 PREFACE During the test preparation, vehicle manufacturers are encouraged to liaise with ANCAP and to observe the way cars are set up
More informationOpel/Vauxhall Grandland X
Opel/Vauxhall Grandland X Standard Safety Equipment 2017 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 84% 87% Pedestrian Safety Assist 63% 60% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Opel/Vauxhall Grandland X 1.6 diesel,
More informationToyota Aygo 63% 74% 64% 25% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Standard Safety Equipment. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Toyota Aygo Standard Safety Equipment 2017 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 74% 63% Pedestrian Safety Assist 64% 25% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Toyota Aygo 1.0 x-play, LHD - 5 door hatchback Year
More informationSAFETY ENHANCED INNOVATIONS FOR OLDER ROAD USERS. EUROPEAN COMMISSION EIGHTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME HORIZON 2020 GA No
SAFETY ENHANCED INNOVATIONS FOR OLDER ROAD USERS EUROPEAN COMMISSION EIGHTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME HORIZON 2020 GA No. 636136 Deliverable No. Deliverable Title Dissemination level D3.2a Elderly Overweight
More informationRenault Talisman 84% 86% 68% 76% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Large Family Car. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant.
Renault Talisman Large Family Car 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 86% 84% Pedestrian Safety Assist 68% 76% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Renault Talisman 1.5dCi, LHD 4 door sedan Year Of Publication
More informationAdvanced Airbags The airbags have advanced features to help reduce the likelihood of airbagrelated injuries to smaller occupants.
Airbags Your vehicle is equipped with three types of airbags: front airbags, side airbags, and side curtain airbags. Front Airbags (SRS) The front SRS airbags inflate in a moderate-to-severe frontal collision
More informationANCAP Assessment Protocol. Child Occupant Protection v7.2a
ANCAP Assessment Protocol. Child Occupant Protection v7.2a JANUARY 2018 PREFACE During the test preparation, vehicle manufacturers are encouraged to liaise with ANCAP and to observe the way cars are set
More informationAirbags. Your vehicle is equipped with three types of airbags: front airbags, side airbags, and side curtain airbags.
Airbags Safety Your vehicle is equipped with three types of airbags: front airbags, side airbags, and side curtain airbags. Front Airbags (SRS) The front SRS airbags inflate in a moderate-to-severe frontal
More informationLancia Ypsilon 79% 44% 64% 38% SPECIFICATION SAFETY EQUIPMENT TEST RESULTS. Supermini. Child Occupant. Adult Occupant. Safety Assist.
Lancia Ypsilon Supermini 2015 Adult Occupant Child Occupant 44% 79% Pedestrian Safety Assist 64% 38% SPECIFICATION Tested Model Body Type Lancia New Ypsilon 1.2 Gold, LHD 5 door hatchback Year Of Publication
More informationFact or Fiction. Rev. March
Fact or Fiction Rev. 2 What is Fact or Fiction? New technology requires us as Technicians to continuously learn and understand new child restraints and developments within the industry. Some changes have
More information