NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis"

Transcription

1 Gibson Traffic Consultants 2802 Wetmore Avenue Suite 220 Everett, WA NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for: Renton School District Jurisdiction: City of Newcastle January 2014 GTC #13-055

2 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT & ACCESS METHODOLOGY & ANALYSIS SCOPING EXISTING CONDITIONS Transit Service Roadway Network Existing Volumes and Level of Service FUTURE CONDITIONS Trip Generation Trip Distribution Baseline Volumes and Level of Service Future with Project Volumes and Level of Service Baseline Volumes and Level of Service Future with Project Volumes and Level of Service Opening Year Parking Demand/Supply Pedestrian Improvements TRAFFIC MITIGATION On-Site/Access Improvements Off-Site Mitigation/Improvements CONCLUSIONS LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Site Vicinity Map... 2 Figure 2: Existing AM Peak-Hour Turning Movements... 7 Figure 3: Existing School PM Peak-Hour Turning Movements... 8 Figure 4: Existing PM Peak-Hour Turning Movements... 9 Figure 5: Trip Distribution AM Peak-Hour Figure 6: Trip Distribution School PM Peak-Hour Figure 7: Trip Distribution PM Peak-Hour Figure 8: 2016 Baseline Traffic Volumes AM Peak-Hour Figure 9: 2016 Baseline Traffic Volumes School PM Peak-Hour Figure 10: 2016 Baseline Traffic Volumes PM Peak-Hour Figure 11: 2016 Future With Traffic Volumes AM Peak-Hour Figure 12: 2016 Future With Traffic Volumes School PM Peak-Hour Figure 13: 2016 Future with Traffic Volumes PM Peak-Hour Figure 14: 2023 Baseline Traffic Volumes AM Peak-Hour Figure 15: 2023 Baseline Traffic Volumes School PM Peak-Hour Figure 16: 2023 Baseline Traffic Volumes PM Peak-Hour Figure 17: 2023 Future With Traffic Volumes AM Peak-Hour Figure 18: 2023 Future With Traffic Volumes School PM Peak-Hour Figure 19: 2023 Future with Traffic Volumes PM Peak-Hour Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC # i

3 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Level of Service Criteria for Intersections... 4 Table 2A: Existing Level of Service Summary AM Peak-Hour... 5 Table 2B: Existing Level of Service Summary School PM Peak-Hour... 6 Table 2C: Existing Level of Service Summary PM Peak-Hour... 6 Table 3: Middle School Trip Generation Summary Table 4A: Future Level of Service Summary AM Peak-Hour Table 4B: Future Level of Service Summary School PM Peak-Hour Table 4C: Future Level of Service Summary PM Peak-Hour ATTACHMENTS Trip Generation Calculations... A Count Data... B 2016 Turning Movement Calculations... C 2023 Turning Movement Calculations... D Existing AM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... E Existing School PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... F Existing PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... G 2016 Baseline AM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... H 2016 Baseline School PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... I 2016 Baseline PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... J 2016 Future With AM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... K 2016 Future With School PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... L 2016 Future With PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... M 2023 Baseline AM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... N 2023 Baseline School PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... O 2023 Baseline PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... P 2023 Future With AM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... Q 2023 Future With School PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... R 2023 Future With PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis... S Transit Data... T School Boundary... U Mitigation... V Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC # ii

4 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis 1. INTRODUCTION Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. (GTC) has been retained to complete a traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the Newcastle Middle School. Renton School District (RSD) is proposing to reconstruct/replace Newcastle Middle School, which is located on the east side of 116 th Avenue SE south of SE 68 th Street/Newcastle Way in the City of Newcastle. A site vicinity map is included in Figure 1. The school will be a middle school serving grades 6 th to 8 th with school hours from 7:55 AM to 2:35 PM. The school is anticipated on having a maximum capacity of 850 students within approximately 110,000 Square Feet (SF) per information provided by Stewart Shusterman, Facilities Project Manager for Renton School District. It is anticipated that there would be upwards of 80 staff members. The anticipated district boundary extends from Lake Washington to Jericho Place NE and from SE 60 th Street to NE 4 th Street (see attachment U-1). Hazelwood Elementary School is located directly south of the proposed school site with the hours from 8:30 AM to 3:10 PM. From our observations this amount of stagger between the school times allows each school to operate independently with little to no combined interaction on the street system. The primary scoping and analysis methodology for the Newcastle Middle School is based on discussions with Kerry Sullivan, Assistant City Engineer with the City of Newcastle. This report summarizes GTC s traffic analysis and findings. 2. PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT & ACCESS The Newcastle Middle School is being designed with a capacity of 850 students in 110,000 SF. The new site will provide a parent drop-off/pick-up loop (one access) off of 116 th Avenue SE, a bus loop with staff parking (one access) off of 116 th Avenue SE, and a one-way staff/delivery/drop-off/pick-up loop (two accesses) with access to Newcastle Way. The parking lots are proposed to have a total of 132 parking spaces. The two drop-off/pick-up areas would include room for approximately 49 vehicles before reaching the access. The bus loop will have enough room for up to 12 buses. The proposed school is scheduled for full facility build-out by the 2016/2017 school year. Therefore, 2016 has been used as the opening year in the analysis. Also, the City of Newcastle TIA Guidelines identifies a minimum forecast period of 10 years; therefore, analysis has also been conducted for The separate bus and parent site accesses help to maximize the safety of the site by separating traffic flows as much as possible. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

5 119TH AVE SE N #1 112TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE #5 #2 NEWCASTLE WAY 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL 116TH AVE SE 125TH AVESE #4 #3 SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND # SCHOOL SITE STUDY INTERSECTION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 1 SITE VICINITY MAP

6 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis 3. METHODOLOGY & ANALYSIS SCOPING Peak-hour level of service (LOS) is determined using the methodology described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), TRB Special Report 209 and Synchro 7.0 software developed by Trafficware. Trip generation for the site is calculated using data contained in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9 th Edition (2012). The data was used to calculate the daily trip generation and PM peak-hour trip generation. However, the AM peak-hour and School PM peak-hour trip generation is based on local data collected at Tyee Middle School (located approximately 4 miles northeast of the proposed school) that shows trip generation rates higher than ITE. This has been used to determine a worst case traffic impact. Data at Tyee was collected when that project was conducted in November The accesses were counted from 7-9 AM and 2-4 PM to encompass the school hours from 8:30 AM to 3:18 PM. The existing accesses to Tyee Middle School for the 810 existing students had 261 inbound and 200 outbound trips during the critical AM peak hour (7:30 8:30 AM) and 151 inbound and 137 outbound trips during the afternoon school peak hour (3:00-4:00 PM). This was approved for use by the City of Bellevue in the January 2009 Traffic & Parking Study. GTC utilized a 3.0-percent annual compounding growth rate to account for background traffic growth in the site vicinity based on the City of Newcastle TIA Guidelines. Per the scoping discussions, GTC analyzed AM peak-hour, School PM peak-hour, and PM peak-hour level of service at four existing intersections: th Avenue SE at SE 64 th Street Two-Way Stop-Controlled th Avenue SE at Newcastle Way All-Way Stop-Controlled th Avenue SE at SE 76 th Street Two-Way Stop-Controlled 4. Coal Creek Pkwy at Newcastle Way Signalized Daily volumes and speed data was collected just east of the corner at the intersection of 112 th Avenue SE at Newcastle Way/SE 68 th Street. Also, an AM peak-hour count was collected at 112 th Avenue SE at Newcastle Way. Traffic congestion on roadways is generally measured in terms of LOS at critical intersections. In accordance with the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, roadway facilities and intersections are rated between LOS A and F, with LOS A being free flow and LOS F being forced flow or overcapacity conditions. The LOS at signalized intersections and all-way stop-controlled intersections are based on the average stopped delay for all entering vehicles. The LOS at two-way stop-controlled intersections is based on stopped delay times for the critical approach or movement(s). Geometric characteristics and conflicting traffic movements are taken into consideration when determining LOS values. A summary of the level of service criteria has been included in Table 1. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

7 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis Table 1: Level of Service Criteria for Intersections Level of 1 Service Expected Delay Intersection Control Delay (Seconds per Vehicle) Unsignalized Intersections Signalized Intersections A Little/No Delay <10 <10 B Short Delays >10 and <15 >10 and <20 C Average Delays >15 and <25 >20 and <35 D Long Delays >25 and <35 >35 and <55 E Very Long Delays >35 and <50 >55 and <80 F Extreme Delays 2 >50 >80 The acceptable level of service at arterial to local access intersections within the City of Newcastle is level of service D and level of service E in the Community Business Center (CBC). Matt Palmer, responsible for the traffic analysis and report, is a licensed professional engineer (Civil) in the State of Washington and a current member of the Washington State section of ITE. 1 Source: Highway Capacity Manual LOS A: Free-flow traffic conditions, with minimal delay to stopped vehicles (no vehicle is delayed longer than one cycle at signalized intersection). LOS B: Generally stable traffic flow conditions. LOS C: Occasional back-ups may develop, but delay to vehicles is short term and still tolerable. LOS D: During short periods of the peak hour, delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial but are tolerable during times of less demand (i.e. vehicles delayed one cycle or less at signal). LOS E: Intersections operate at or near capacity, with long queues developing on all approaches and long delays. LOS F: Jammed conditions on all approaches with excessively long delays and vehicles unable to move at times. 2 When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

8 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis 4. EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.1 Transit Service King County Metro Transit provides public transit service within King County. There are two Metro Transit routes, 114 and 240, which provide service in the vicinity of 132 nd Avenue SE and Newcastle Way. Route 114 connects Downtown Seattle to the Renton Highlands through Newcastle and runs every 30 minutes in the AM to Seattle and PM to Renton Highlands. Route 240 provides service from the Bellevue Transit Center to Renton with headways every 30 minutes throughout the entire day. 4.2 Roadway Network 116 th Avenue SE is a three-lane collector arterial with a posted speed limit of 30 mph with curb, gutter, and sidewalk on both sides of the roadway. Newcastle Way is a two-lane minor arterial with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. There are 8-9 foot shoulders currently along Newcastle Way along the school frontage. There are marked crosswalks crossing 116 th Avenue SE located at several intersections in the site vicinity. There is also a 20 mph School Zone along the school frontage of both roadways. 4.3 Existing Volumes and Level of Service Existing turning movement counts at all the study intersections were obtained by the independent count firm, All Traffic Data (ATD) on Tuesday April 16, The existing peakhour turning movement volumes are shown at the study intersections during the AM peak-hour (7-9 AM), School PM peak-hour (2-4 PM), and PM peak-hour (4-6 PM) in Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4, respectively. Based on the existing counts, channelization and intersection control the existing level of service is summarized for the AM peak-hour in Table 2A, School PM peak-hour in Table 2B, and for the PM peak-hour in Table 2C. The existing level of service calculations are included in the attachments. Table 2A: Existing Level of Service Summary AM Peak-Hour Intersections 112 th Avenue SE at SE 64 th Street 116 th Avenue SE at SE 68 th Street 116 th Avenue SE at SE 76 th Street Coal Creek Pkwy at Newcastle Way SE 112 th Avenue SE at SE 68 th Street Existing Conditions LOS E C B C B Delay 38.5 sec 22.9 sec 11.1 sec 29.0 sec 12.0 sec Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

9 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis Table 2B: Existing Level of Service Summary School PM Peak-Hour Intersections 112 th Avenue SE at SE 64 th Street 116 th Avenue SE at SE 68 th Street 116 th Avenue SE at SE 76 th Street Coal Creek Pkwy at Newcastle Way SE Existing Conditions LOS C B A C Delay 15.4 sec 10.8 sec 9.1 sec 30.2 sec Table 2C: Existing Level of Service Summary PM Peak-Hour Intersections 112 th Avenue SE at SE 64 th Street 116 th Avenue SE at SE 68 th Street 116 th Avenue SE at SE 76 th Street Coal Creek Pkwy at Newcastle Way SE Existing Conditions LOS C B A C Delay 16.2 sec 12.2 sec 9.9 sec 33.1 sec Under the Existing conditions the only intersection that will exceed the City of Newcastle LOS standards is the intersection of 112 th Avenue SE at SE 64 th Street. This intersection only exceeds the LOS standard during the AM peak-hour and only for the eastbound left-turn movement from Lake Washington Blvd turning to the north. The City had identified this intersection in the December 11, 2003 adopted Transportation Element as requiring improvement. The recommended project was to install a signal at the intersection. This project is also identified in the City of Newcastle Traffic Impact Fee Ordinance No that the School is subject to. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

10 119TH AVE SE N TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL TH AVE SE , SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX AM PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 2 EXISTING TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES AM-PEAK-HOUR

11 119TH AVE SE N 112TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL 120 1, TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX SCHOOL PM PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 3 EXISTING TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES SCHOOL PM PEAK-HOUR

12 119TH AVE SE N 112TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL 110 1, TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX PM PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 4 EXISTING TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES PM PEAK-HOUR

13 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis 5. FUTURE CONDITIONS 5.1 Trip Generation It is GTC s understanding that the school is designed for a maximum enrollment of 850 students, per input from the school administration staff and architects. Trip generation is typically based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9 th Edition (2012) using LUC 522, middle/junior high school. This data was used to calculate the daily trip generation and PM peak-hour trip generation. However, the AM peak-hour and School PM peak-hour trip generation is based on local data collected at Tyee Middle School (located approximately 4 miles northeast of the proposed school) that shows trip generation rates higher than ITE. This has been used to determine a worst case traffic impact and has been described in more detail in the Methodology section of this report. The AM peak-hour for Tyee is 5.55% higher than ITE data and the School PM peak-hour for Tyee is 20% higher than the ITE data. The site is anticipated to generate 1,377 ADT with 485 during the AM peak-hour, 306 during the School PM peakhour, and 136 during the PM peak-hour. The maximum expected enrollment at Newcastle Middle School is 850 students. The trip generation is summarized in Table 3. Table 3: Middle School Trip Generation Summary Average AM Peak-Hour School PM Peak-Hour PM Peak-Hour Students Daily Trips Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total 850 MS 1, Trip Distribution Trip distribution is based on the existing traffic counts in the site vicinity and the potential school boundary. It is estimated that 40% of the site traffic will travel to/from the south on 116 th Avenue SE and 5% to/from the north of Newcastle Way on 116 th Avenue SE. On Newcastle Way 15% of the site traffic would travel to/from the west of 116 th Avenue SE and 40% to/from the east of 116 th Avenue SE. Detailed trip distributions are shown in Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7 for the AM peak-hour, School PM peak-hour and PM peak-hour respectively. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

14 119TH AVE SE N TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST TH AVE SE RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE 125TH AVESE PL RD AVE SE 5 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE AM LEGEND 25 PEAK NEW AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS TRIP DISTRIBUTION % TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 5 NEW SCHOOL TRIP DISTRIBUTION AM PEAK-HOUR

15 119TH AVE SE N TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST TH AVE SE RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE 125TH AVESE PL RD AVE SE 5 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE SCHOOL PM LEGEND 25 PEAK NEW SCHOOL PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS TRIP DISTRIBUTION % TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 6 NEW SCHOOL TRIP DISTRIBUTION SCHOOL PM PEAK-HOUR

16 119TH AVE SE N TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST TH AVE SE RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE 125TH AVESE PL RD AVE SE 5 LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE PM LEGEND 25 PEAK NEW PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS TRIP DISTRIBUTION % TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 7 NEW SCHOOL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PM PEAK-HOUR

17 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis Baseline Volumes and Level of Service Based on standard SEPA type analysis the expected opening year has been analyzed. The 2016 baseline (future without project) turning movement volumes are estimated by applying a 3.0% annual compounding growth rate to the existing turning movement volumes per the City traffic impact analysis guidelines. The 2016 baseline turning movement volumes for the AM peakhour, School PM peak-hour, and PM peak-hour are shown in Figures 8, Figure 9, and Figure 10, respectively. With the addition of baseline growth the level of service is summarized for the AM peak-hour in Table 4A, School PM peak-hour in Table 4B, and for the PM peak-hour in Table 4C. The baseline level of service calculations are included in the attachments Future with Project Volumes and Level of Service The 2016 future with project turning movement volumes are calculated by adding all of the school traffic based on the trip distribution to the 2016 baseline turning movement volumes. The 2016 future with project turning movement volumes for the AM peak-hour, School PM peakhour, and PM peak-hour are shown in Figures 11, Figure 12, and Figure 13, respectively. With the addition of school traffic the level of service is summarized for the AM peak-hour in Table 4A, School PM peak-hour in Table 4B, and for the PM peak-hour in Table 4C. With the school traffic added to the study intersections; only the intersection of 112 th Avenue SE at SE 64 th Street exceeds the city s LOS standard during the AM peak-hour only. All of the study intersections will operate at acceptable City of Newcastle Intersection Standards used for SEPA impact evaluation during the School PM peak-hour and street PM peak-hour. The 2016 future with level of service calculations are included in the attachments. The AM peak-hour analysis has been provided for SEPA disclosure per discussions with the City as it s typically only the PM peak-hour for determining capacity needs Baseline Volumes and Level of Service Per the City scoping a 10 year planning outlook was also requested in addition to the typical SEPA impact review. The 2023 baseline (future without project) turning movement volumes are estimated by applying a 3.0% annual compounding growth rate to the existing turning movement volumes per the City traffic impact analysis guidelines. The 2023 baseline turning movement volumes for the AM peak-hour, School PM peak-hour, and PM peak-hour are shown in Figures 14, Figure 15, and Figure 16, respectively. With the addition of baseline growth the level of service is summarized for the AM peak-hour in Table 4A, School PM peak-hour in Table 4B, and for the PM peak-hour in Table 4C. The baseline level of service calculations are included in the attachments. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

18 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis Future with Project Volumes and Level of Service The 2023 future with project turning movement volumes are calculated by adding all of the school traffic based on the trip distribution to the 2023 baseline turning movement volumes. The 2023 future with project turning movement volumes for the AM peak-hour, School PM peakhour, and PM peak-hour are shown in Figures 17, Figure 18, and Figure 19, respectively. With the addition of school traffic the level of service is summarized for the AM peak-hour in Table 4A, School PM peak-hour in Table 4B, and for the PM peak-hour in Table 4C. All of the study intersections will operate at acceptable City of Newcastle Intersection Standards used for SEPA impact evaluation with the included City of Newcastle signalization projects that are part of the cost fee basis. The 2023 future with level of service calculations are included in the attachments. Table 4A: Future Level of Service Summary AM Peak-Hour Intersections 112 th Avenue SE at SE 64 th Street 2016 Future Conditions 2023 Future Conditions Existing Conditions without With without With Project Project Project Project LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay E 38.5 sec F 61.8 sec F 89.7 sec F sec F sec With Signalization B 13.3 sec B 18.1 sec 116 th Ave SE at SE 68 th St (Newcastle Wy) C 22.9 sec D 34.0 sec C 20.7 sec F 92.9 sec E 42.2 sec With Signalization B 10.4 sec B 12.1 sec 116 th Avenue SE at SE 76 th Street Coal Creek Pkwy at Newcastle Way SE 112 th Avenue SE at SE 68 th Street 116 th Avenue SE at Site Access B 11.1 sec B 12.0 sec C 18.6 sec B 11.5 sec C 15.3 sec C 29.0 sec C 34.2 sec D 35.3 sec E 72.1 sec E 73.3 sec B 12.0 sec B 12.5 sec B 13.4 sec B 14.5 sec C 15.5 sec B 13.2 sec B 14.2 sec The school district is contributing towards the 112 th Avenue /SE 64 th Street and 116 th Street/SE 68 th Street future signalization that were used in the cost fee basis to determine the City traffic impact fee. One of the projects is the signalization of 112 th Avenue SE at SE 64 th Street, this is included in the with project analysis. A possible interim improvement that would satisfy the 2016 with project level of service at LOS C with 22.7 seconds of delay could be turning the intersection into an all-way stop-control intersection. The total impact of the school in 2023 represents only 5.6% of the total intersection volume. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

19 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis The intersection of 116 th Avenue SE at SE 68 th Street will be improved with the school project with the addition of a westbound left-turn lane and a two-way left-turn lane along the school s frontage. This additional westbound left-turn lane will improve the intersection delay more than the delay added by the project. This intersection is also on the collection list for signalization. At the intersection of 116 th Avenue SE at SE 76 th Street the total intersection volume will be 34% higher without the project by 2023 using the City identified growth rate and will be 67% higher with the project in Therefore, the peak-hour factor for the intersection was increased from 0.70 to 0.90 which is a consistent engineering practice when volumes are increased by over 30% and peak spreading is anticipated (lower the peak-hour factor the less consistent the traffic volume is throughout the hour). Table 4B: Future Level of Service Summary School PM Peak-Hour Intersections 112 th Avenue SE at SE 64 th Street 116 th Avenue SE at SE 68 th Street 116 th Avenue SE at SE 76 th Street Coal Creek Pkwy at Newcastle Way SE 116 th Avenue SE at Site Access 2016 Future Conditions 2023 Future Conditions Existing Conditions without With without With Project Project Project Project LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay C 15.4 sec C 17.2 sec C 18.7 sec B 25.6 sec D 29.2 sec B 10.8 sec B 11.7 sec C 15.6 sec C 15.6 sec D 26.1 sec A 9.1 sec A 9.5 sec B 10.9 sec B 10.6 sec B 12.9 sec C 30.2 sec C 32.8 sec C 34.5 sec D 43.5 sec E 57.0 sec B 11.3 sec B 11.9 sec Table 4C: Future Level of Service Summary PM Peak-Hour Intersections 112 th Avenue SE at SE 64 th Street 116 th Avenue SE at SE 68 th Street 116 th Avenue SE at SE 76 th Street Coal Creek Pkwy at Newcastle Way SE 116 th Avenue SE at Site Access 2016 Future Conditions 2023 Future Conditions Existing Conditions without With without With Project Project Project Project LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay C 16.2 sec C 18.4 sec C 19.1 sec D 30.4 sec D 32.4 sec B 12.2 sec B 13.8 sec C 16.1 sec C 23.7 sec D 32.9 sec A 9.9 sec B 10.4 sec B 11.1 sec B 12.6 sec B 13.8 sec C 33.1 sec D 38.2 sec D 39.6 sec E 73.3 sec E 79.5 sec B 10.7 sec B 11.3 sec Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

20 119TH AVE SE N TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL TH AVE SE , SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX AM PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 8 BASELINE 2016 AM PEAK WITHOUT SCHOOL INTERSECTION VOLUMES

21 119TH AVE SE N 112TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL 131 1, TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX SCHOOL PM PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 9 BASELINE 2016 SCHOOL PM PEAK WITHOUT SCHOOL INTERSECTION VOLUMES

22 119TH AVE SE N 112TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL 120 1, TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX PM PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 10 BASELINE 2016 PM PEAK WITHOUT SCHOOL INTERSECTION VOLUMES

23 119TH AVE SE N TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL TH AVE SE , SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX AM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 11 FUTURE 2016 AM PEAK WITH SCHOOL INTERSECTION VOLUMES

24 119TH AVE SE N 112TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL 139 1, TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX SCHOOL PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 12 FUTURE 2016 SCHOOL PM PEAK WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION VOLUMES

25 119TH AVE SE N 112TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL 123 1, TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 13 FUTURE 2016 PM PEAK WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION VOLUMES

26 119TH AVE SE N TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL TH AVE SE , SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX AM PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 14 BASELINE 2023 AM PEAK WITHOUT SCHOOL INTERSECTION VOLUMES

27 119TH AVE SE N 112TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL 161 1, TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX SCHOOL PM PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 15 BASELINE 2023 SCHOOL PM PEAK WITHOUT SCHOOL INTERSECTION VOLUMES

28 119TH AVE SE N 112TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL 148 2, TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX PM PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 16 BASELINE 2023 PM PEAK WITHOUT SCHOOL INTERSECTION VOLUMES

29 119TH AVE SE N TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL TH AVE SE , SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX AM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 17 FUTURE 2023 AM PEAK WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION VOLUMES

30 119TH AVE SE N 112TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL 169 1, TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX SCHOOL PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 18 FUTURE 2023 SCHOOL PM PEAK WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION VOLUMES

31 119TH AVE SE N 112TH AVE SE SE 60TH ST SE 64TH ST 120TH AVE SE 123RD AVE SE COAL CREEK PKWY SE NEWCASTLE WAY 125TH AVESE 133RD AVE SE RIPLEY LN SE SE 76TH ST LAKE WASHINGTON BLVD N MONTEREY PL NE SE 77TH PL SE 75TH PL SE 74TH 122ND PL SE PL 151 2, TH AVE SE SE 88TH ST SE 89TH PL GIBSON TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS NEWCASTLE MIDDLE SCHOOL (850 STUDENTS) CITY OF NEWCASTLE LEGEND XXX PM PEAK-HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT VOLUMES TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY GTC # FIGURE 19 FUTURE 2023 PM PEAK WITH PROJECT INTERSECTION VOLUMES

32 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis Opening Year Parking Demand/Supply The City of Newcastle Municipal Code, NMC , identifies the parking requirement for a middle school is 1 parking stall per classroom and 1 parking stall per 10 students. Based on 42 classrooms and 850 middle school students the City of Newcastle code requires a minimum of 127 parking stalls. Additionally, GTC reviewed the ITE Parking Generation 4 th Edition (85 required parking spaces) and the parking demand of Tyee Middle School in Bellevue (112 required parking spaces) which has a similar student population as the proposed middle school to determine other possible parking requirements. Per the latest site plan, the Newcastle Middle School is proposing to provide student dropoff/pick-up from both 116 th Avenue SE and Newcastle Way. This would provide over 1,075 feet of effective drop-off/pick-up on-site and also provide relief to the 116 th Avnenue/Newcastle Way intersection so that parents from the east do not need to travel through that all-way stop intersection. to The school will have a single access point to the parent/staff loop on the west side of the site off of 116 th Avenue SE which would provide a maximum storage of 790 feet (36 vehicles) and a loop off of Newcastle Way where there would be an additional 285 feet (13 vehicles) of a queue space. The site will also be providing 132 on-site parking spaces plus a separate bus loop with room for up to 12 buses. The proposed parking provided will exceed City of Newcastle Code and will also provide enough drop-off/pick-up space to accommodate parent demand based on observations of similar schools in particular Tyee Middle School in Bellevue which has a similar student population. Tyee has 882 students enrolled based on October 2013 data and has approximately 840 feet of storage approved by the City of Bellevue to accommodate on site queuing. Additional parking will be available at Hazelwood Elementary School for band and orchestra events at the proposed middle school. 5.8 Pedestrian Improvements In addition to the standard, curb, gutter, planter and 8 foot sidewalk along the sites frontage along the south side of Newcastle Way the school district will be providing a 5 foot sidewalk on the north side of Newcastle Way from 116 th Avenue SE to 119 th Avenue SE. The north side sidewalk is not along the school s frontage and is not a typical requirement. There are very few walking trips today on the north side and no houses accessing Newcastle Way between 116 th Avenue SE to 119 th Avenue SE. Instead of the north side sidewalk, there have been discussions about providing a marked crosswalk on the west side of 119 th Avenue SE as well as enhanced school zone signing to facilitate pedestrians crossing this legal unmarked crosswalk to the school (south) side where full frontage improvements will be constructed. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

33 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis The City of Newcastle have discouraged implementation of a marked crosswalk in this location and have instead requested a full sidewalk improvement on the north side of Newcastle Way as this is part of the Newcastle Way (SE 68 th Street) ultimate improvement project. WSDOT Design Manual identifies a minimum level landing area of 4 feet by 4 feet at the top of a perpendicular ramp or the bottom of a parallel curb ramp. This in addition to the sidewalk would provide adequate storage for pedestrian waiting to cross Newcastle Way to get to the school. 6. TRAFFIC MITIGATION 6.1 On-Site/Access Improvements The following on-site/access improvement will be constructed by the district or is recommended to enhance the traffic flow and safety conditions at the site access: All outbound accesses should be stop-controlled with a STOP signs on the site access approaches. Bus/Staff Only Signs should be placed on either side of the bus entrance driveway with a secondary sign that identifies school times. Construct a bus loop with spaces for up to 12 buses with access to 116 th Avenue SE and staff parking for 42 vehicles. Construct a new visitor/staff parking lot off of 116 th Aenue SE with 60 parking stalls and a drop-off/pick-up loop with room for 36 vehicles (approximately 790 feet). Reconstruct the staff/delivery parking lot off of Newcastle Way with 30 parking stalls maintaining the existing one-way eastbound flow and providing drop-off/pick-up space for 13 vehicles (approximately 285 feet). Provide a walkway/path from the school entrance to the site frontage. Provide curb gutter sidewalk/planter along north side frontage (south side of Newcastle Way). Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

34 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis 6.2 Off-Site Mitigation/Improvements Provide a curb, gutter, and 5 foot sidewalk on the north side of Newcastle Way from 116 th Avenue SE to 119 th Avenue SE. Provide a center left-turn lane along Newcastle Way from 116 th Avenue SE to approximately 119 th Avenue SE as ROW and tapers allow. Note: The City of Newcastle has adopted a traffic mitigation fee to pay for capacity roadway projects in the city. The fee for a middle/junior high school is $2.01 per square foot. The school is proposing 110,000 SF and would be required to pay $221,100 in mitigation fees. These fees will go to improvements which include widening to a 3-lane section and provisions for sidewalks on both sides of Newscastle Way from 116 th Avenue SE east to 123 rd Avenue SE also signalization of Lake Washington Blvd at 112 th Avenue SE and signal/turn lanes on Newcastle Way at 116 th Avenue SE. As the school district will also be widening Newcastle Way to provide bicycle lanes, two-way left-turn lane and sidewalk from 116 th Avenue SE to the school property line to the east side of the site this mitigation fee should be credited to this off-site sidewalk improvements. All of the off-site study intersections operate at acceptable LOS for the School PM peak-hour and street PM peak-hour even under the 10 year planning horizon. For the opening year analysis, the 116 th Avenue SE/SE 68 th Street/Newcastle Way intersection would degrade to LOS F with just background growth even if the school was not constructed. With the westbound left-turn lane constructed by the school along Newcastle Way and the school at full occupancy it operates at LOS C for the morning peak as an all-way stop. For the 10 year planning horizon the westbound left-turn constructed by the school would improve the intersection from a LOS F without project to a LOS E with project. Also, with a signal that is part of the City s traffic mitigation fee basis it would operate at LOS B. It should also be noted that the analysis was conducted for the worst case with higher than ITE volume that assumed all school traffic from the east using the intersection. With the provision of a drop-off/pick-up loop on the north side of the site the traffic from the east would no longer need to go through that intersection therefore reducing even further the delay expected at this intersection. Therefore, no additional mitigation other than the westbound left-turn lane and provision of drop-off/pick-up loop from the Newcastle Way entrance is recommended for this intersection to mitigate the schools impacts Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

35 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis For the opening year analysis, the 112 th Avenue SE/SE 64 th Street intersection would degrade to LOS F for the eastbound left to northbound 112 th Avenue SE with just back ground growth even if the school was not constructed. For the opening a year an all-way stop could improve that movement to LOS E. However, this may not be desirable as it would increase delay for the primary north-south movement along 112 th Avenue SE. Additionally, it appears this movement may be cut-through traffic avoiding I-405 and any improvement of this intersection may just encourage more traffic to avoid I-405 onto the city streets. If the City signal as part of the City s traffic mitigation fee basis is ultimately constructed or even a mini roundabout is constructed it would operate at acceptable LOS even for the 10 year planning horizon. The school project traffic accounts for only about 5% of the future traffic volume at this intersection and 0% of the actual eastbound left-turn movement that operates below standards. Therefore, GTC would not recommend any additional mitigation at this time as the intersection operates at acceptable LOS for both the School PM peak-hour and street PM peak-hour. 7. CONCLUSIONS The 110,000 Square Feet (SF) middle school will serve grades 6 th to 8 th with a maximum of 850 students. The school hours are from 7:55 AM to 2:35 PM. The middle school is estimated to generate a total of 1,377 average daily trips with 485 trips (276 inbound/209 outbound) during the AM peak-hour, 306 trips (159 inbound/147 outbound) during the School PM peak-hour, and 136 trips (67 inbound/69 outbound) during the PM peak-hour. All of the study intersections would operate at acceptable LOS for the critical School PM peakhour and street PM peak-hour periods. Ultimate improvements along Newcastle Way (SE 68 th Street) would actually provide better AM peak-hour LOS at 116 th Avenue SE than without the school project. The 112 th AvenueSE/SE 64 th Street intersection would operate below city LOS standards with or without the project for the AM peak-hour. However, the school would only account for about 5% of the future volumes and the city has an ultimate improvement project identified on its fee basis projects that would provide improvement at that location if ultimately deemed desirable. The school district should not be required to construct any off-site intersection improvements with the payment of mitigation fees of $2.01 per square foot. Alternatively, the construction of a north side sidewalk and a center left-turn lane from 116 th Avenue SE to approximately 119 th Avenue SE would provide proportionate share mitigation for is impacts to the city street system. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

36 Newcastle Middle School Traffic Impact Analysis The City of Newcastle Code identifies the parking requirement for a middle school is 1 parking stall per classroom and 1 parking stall per 10 students. Based on 42 classrooms and 850 middle school students the City of Newcastle code requires a minimum of 127 parking stalls. Per the latest site plan, the Newcastle Middle School is proposing 132 on-site parking spaces plus a drop-off/pick-up area with room for 49 vehicles in two drop-off/pick-up areas. In addition, there will be a separate bus loop with room for up to 12 buses. The proposed parking will exceed the City of Newcastle Code, ITE Parking Generation 4 th Edition (85 required parking spaces), and the parking demand of Tyee Middle School in Bellevue (112 required parking spaces) which has a similar student population. The proposed school will also provide enough drop-off/pick-up space to accommodate anticipated parent demand based on observations of similar schools in particular Tyee Middle School in Bellevue which has a similar student population. Additional parking will be available at Hazelwood Elementary School for band and orchestra events at the proposed middle school. Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. January 2014 info@gibsontraffic.com GTC #

37 Trip Generation Calculations A

38 Newcastle Middle School GTC # Trip Generation for: Weekday (a.k.a.): Average Weekday Daily Trips (AWDT) LAND USES VARIABLE ITE LU code Trip Rate Gross Trips % IN % OUT In+Out (Total) % of Gross Trips Internal Crossover Trips In+Out (Total) TOTAL PASS-BY In+Out (Total) % of Ext. Trips NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS In+Out (Total) DIVERTED LINK % of Ext. Trips In+Out (Total) NEW PASS-BY DIVERTED LINK In+Out (Total) NEW In Out In Out In Out Middle School 850 Student % 50% % % 0 0% A - 1

39 Newcastle Middle School GTC # Trip Generation for: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour between 7 and 9 AM (a.k.a.): Weekday AM Peak Hour LAND USES VARIABLE ITE LU code Trip Rate Gross Trips % IN % OUT In+Out (Total) % of Gross Trips Internal Crossover Trips In+Out (Total) TOTAL PASS-BY In+Out (Total) % of Ext. Trips NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS In+Out (Total) DIVERTED LINK % of Ext. Trips In+Out (Total) NEW PASS-BY DIVERTED LINK In+Out (Total) NEW In Out In Out In Out Middle School 850 Student GTC % 43% 485 0% % 0 0% A - 2

40 Newcastle Middle School GTC # Trip Generation for: Weekday, Peak Hour of Generator LAND USES VARIABLE ITE LU code Trip Rate Gross Trips % IN % OUT In+Out (Total) % of Gross Trips Internal Crossover Trips In+Out (Total) TOTAL PASS-BY In+Out (Total) % of Ext. Trips NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS In+Out (Total) DIVERTED LINK % of Ext. Trips In+Out (Total) NEW PASS-BY DIVERTED LINK In+Out (Total) NEW In Out In Out In Out Middle School 850 Student GTC % 48% 306 0% % 0 0% A - 3

41 Newcastle Middle School GTC # Trip Generation for: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour between 4 and 6 PM (a.k.a.): Weekday PM Peak Hour LAND USES VARIABLE ITE LU code Trip Rate Gross Trips % IN % OUT In+Out (Total) % of Gross Trips Internal Crossover Trips In+Out (Total) TOTAL PASS-BY In+Out (Total) % of Ext. Trips NET EXTERNAL TRIPS BY TYPE IN BOTH DIRECTIONS DIRECTIONAL ASSIGNMENTS In+Out (Total) DIVERTED LINK % of Ext. Trips In+Out (Total) NEW PASS-BY DIVERTED LINK In+Out (Total) NEW In Out In Out In Out Middle School 850 Student % 51% 136 0% % 0 0% A - 4

42 Newcastle Middle School GTC # AM Peak-Hour New New AM Peak Hour Trips New New AM Peak Hour Trips % ADT In Out Total % ADT In Out Total 100% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % A - 5

43 Newcastle Middle School GTC # School PM Peak-Hour New New School PM Peak Hour Trips New New School PM Peak Hour Trips % ADT In Out Total % ADT In Out Total 100% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % A - 6

44 Newcastle Middle School GTC # PM Peak-Hour New New PM Peak Hour Trips New New PM Peak Hour Trips % ADT In Out Total % ADT In Out Total 100% % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % % A - 7

45 Count Data B

46 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & Lake Washington Blvd SE & SE 64th St 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St Out 0 In Out HR R T L 2 In 3 HR 0 HL 1 BL 0 BR 0 Peds 0 Peds Lake Washington Blvd SE Out 160 In L 37 T 9 R 0 Peds 0 Peds R 29 BR 0 T 16 0 HL L 2 In 47 Out 57 SE 64th St 0 Peds L 63 BL T R Out 76 In th Ave SE Intersection NB SB EB WB SEB Volume HV% 2.5% 2.2% 3.3% 1.9% 6.4% 0.0% PHF Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM B - 1

47 Total Vehicle Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & Lake Washington Blvd SE & SE 64th St Tuesday, April 16, :00 AM to 9:00 AM 15-Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound Pedestrians Start 112th Ave SE Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Interval Crosswalk Time L BL T R HV L T R HR HV HL L T R HV L T BR R HV HL BL BR HR HV Total North South East West NE NW SE SW 07: : : : : : : : Total Survey , Peak Hour Summary 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound Pedestrians By Approach 112th Ave SE Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Total Crosswalk Approach Approach Approach Approach Approach West NE HV HV HV HV HV North South East NW SE SW In Out Total %HV 2.2% 3.3% 1.9% 6.4% 0.0% 2.5% PHF orthboun Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound By 2th Ave Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Total Movement L BL T R Total L T R HR Total HL L T R Total L T BR R Total HL BL BR HR Total Volume PHF Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound Pedestrians Start 112th Ave SE Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Interval Crosswalk Time BL T T R HR L T R BR BL BR HR Total West NE L R HV L HV HL HV L T R HV HL HV North South East NW SE SW 07: : : : : B - 2

48 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & SE 68th St 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM Tuesday, April 16, th Ave SE SE 68th St Peds Peds 0 Peds Peds 2 SE 68th St th Ave SE Approach PHF HV% Volume EB % 98 WB % 580 NB % 231 SB % 30 Intersection % 939 Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM B - 3

49 Total Vehicle Summary HV 6.7% PHF 0.83 In 30 1 Out HV 1.7% PHF 0.96 Mark Skaggs (206) Out In In Out 116th Ave SE & SE 68th St Tuesday, April 16, :00 AM to 9:00 AM HV 13.3% PHF Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 7:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Survey , Out In % 0.70 HV PHF Peak Hour Summary 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM Peak Hour Summary 7:30 AM to 8:30 AM By Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Total Crosswalk In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV North South East West Volume %HV 6.9% 6.7% 13.3% 1.7% 4.4% PHF Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Movement L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total Total Volume PHF Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 7:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM B - 4

50 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & SE 76th St 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM Tuesday, April 16, th Ave SE SE 76th St Peds Peds 0 Peds Peds 0 SE 76th St th Ave SE Approach PHF HV% Volume EB % 102 WB % 8 NB % 248 SB % 228 Intersection % 586 Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM B - 5

51 Total Vehicle Summary HV 1.8% PHF 0.74 In Out HV 12.5% PHF 0.67 Mark Skaggs (206) Out In In Out 116th Ave SE & SE 76th St Tuesday, April 16, :00 AM to 9:00 AM HV 1.0% PHF Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 7:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Survey Out In % 0.67 HV PHF Peak Hour Summary 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM Peak Hour Summary 7:45 AM to 8:45 AM By Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Total Crosswalk In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV North South East West Volume %HV 3.2% 1.8% 1.0% 12.5% 2.4% PHF Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Movement L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total Total Volume PHF Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 7:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM B - 6

52 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) Coal Creek Pkwy & SE 72nd Pl 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl Peds Peds 2 Peds Peds 3 SE 72nd Pl Coal Creek Pkwy Approach PHF HV% Volume EB % 211 WB % 386 NB % 2,092 SB % 276 Intersection % 2,965 Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM B - 7

53 Total Vehicle Summary HV 2.2% PHF 0.80 In Out 2, HV 2.1% PHF 0.92 Mark Skaggs (206) Out In In Out Coal Creek Pkwy & SE 72nd Pl Tuesday, April 16, :00 AM to 9:00 AM HV 5.2% PHF , Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 7:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Survey 374 3, , Out In 2, % 0.98 HV PHF Peak Hour Summary 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM Peak Hour Summary 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM By Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Total Crosswalk In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV North South East West Volume 2, , ,120 2, , %HV 1.2% 2.2% 5.2% 2.1% 1.7% PHF Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Movement L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total Total Volume 207 1, , ,965 PHF Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 7:00 AM 190 1, , :15 AM 207 1, , :30 AM 187 1, , :45 AM 182 1, , :00 AM 184 1, , B - 8

54 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & SE 68th St 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM Tuesday, April 16, th Ave SE Peds Peds 0 Peds Peds 0 SE 68th St th Ave SE Approach PHF HV% Volume EB % 0 WB % 495 NB % 4 SB % 86 Intersection % 585 Count Period: 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM B - 9

55 Total Vehicle Summary HV 16.3% PHF 0.86 In 86 Out HV 2.6% PHF 0.95 Mark Skaggs (206) Out In In Out 112th Ave SE & SE 68th St Tuesday, April 16, :00 AM to 9:00 AM HV 0.0% PHF Minute Interval Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 112th Ave SE 112th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Interval Crosswalk Time T R HV L T HV L R HV Total North South East West 7:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM Total Survey , Out In 4 0.0% 0.50 HV PHF Peak Hour Summary 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM Peak Hour Summary 7:15 AM to 8:15 AM By Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians 112th Ave SE 112th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Total Crosswalk In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total In Out Total HV North South East West Volume %HV 0.0% 16.3% 0.0% 2.6% 4.6% PHF Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By 112th Ave SE 112th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Movement T R Total L T Total Total L R Total Total Volume PHF Rolling Hour Summary 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 112th Ave SE 112th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Interval Crosswalk Time T R HV L T HV L R HV Total North South East West 7:00 AM :15 AM :30 AM :45 AM :00 AM B - 10

56 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & Lake Washington Blvd SE & SE 64th St 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St Out 3 In Out HR R T L 4 In 6 HR 2 HL 0 BL 0 BR 0 Peds 0 Peds Lake Washington Blvd SE Out 170 In L 15 T 44 R 0 Peds 0 Peds R 8 BR 1 T 11 1 HL L 0 In 20 Out 46 SE 64th St 0 Peds L BL T R Out 162 In th Ave SE Intersection NB SB EB WB SEB Volume HV% 4.3% 6.4% 1.7% 3.4% 10.0% 16.7% PHF Count Period: 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM B - 11

57 Total Vehicle Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & Lake Washington Blvd SE & SE 64th St Tuesday, April 16, :00 PM to 4:00 PM 15-Minute Interval Summary 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound Pedestrians Start 112th Ave SE Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Interval Crosswalk Time L BL T R HV L T R HR HV HL L T R HV L T BR R HV HL BL BR HR HV Total North South East West NE NW SE SW 14: : : : : : : : Total Survey , Peak Hour Summary 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound Pedestrians By Approach 112th Ave SE Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Total Crosswalk Approach Approach Approach Approach Approach West NE HV HV HV HV HV North South East NW SE SW In Out Total %HV 6.4% 1.7% 3.4% 10.0% 16.7% 4.3% PHF orthboun Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound By 2th Ave Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Total Movement L BL T R Total L T R HR Total HL L T R Total L T BR R Total HL BL BR HR Total Volume PHF Rolling Hour Summary 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound Pedestrians Start 112th Ave SE Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Interval Crosswalk Time BL T T R HR L T R BR BL BR HR Total West NE L R HV L HV HL HV L T R HV HL HV North South East NW SE SW 14: : : : : B - 12

58 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & SE 68th St 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM Tuesday, April 16, th Ave SE SE 68th St Peds Peds 1 Peds Peds 1 SE 68th St th Ave SE Approach PHF HV% Volume EB % 168 WB % 293 NB % 207 SB % 43 Intersection % 711 Count Period: 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM B - 13

59 Total Vehicle Summary HV 2.3% PHF 0.67 In 43 3 Out HV 3.4% PHF 0.85 Mark Skaggs (206) Out In In Out 116th Ave SE & SE 68th St Tuesday, April 16, :00 PM to 4:00 PM HV 3.0% PHF Minute Interval Summary 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 2:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Survey , Out In % 0.66 HV PHF Peak Hour Summary 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM Peak Hour Summary 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM By Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Total Crosswalk In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV North South East West Volume %HV 5.8% 2.3% 3.0% 3.4% 3.9% PHF Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Movement L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total Total Volume PHF Rolling Hour Summary 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 2:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM B - 14

60 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & SE 76th St 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM Tuesday, April 16, th Ave SE SE 76th St Peds Peds 0 Peds Peds 0 SE 76th St th Ave SE Approach PHF HV% Volume EB % 132 WB % 8 NB % 102 SB % 229 Intersection % 471 Count Period: 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM B - 15

61 Total Vehicle Summary HV 2.2% PHF 0.65 In Out HV 0.0% PHF 0.40 Mark Skaggs (206) Out In In Out 116th Ave SE & SE 76th St Tuesday, April 16, :00 PM to 4:00 PM HV 0.0% PHF Minute Interval Summary 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 2:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Survey Out In % 0.77 HV PHF Peak Hour Summary 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM Peak Hour Summary 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM By Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Total Crosswalk In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV North South East West Volume %HV 2.0% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% PHF Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Movement L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total Total Volume PHF Rolling Hour Summary 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 2:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM B - 16

62 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) Coal Creek Pkwy & SE 72nd Pl 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl Peds Peds 1 Peds Peds 8 SE 72nd Pl Coal Creek Pkwy Approach PHF HV% Volume EB % 360 WB % 303 NB % 623 SB % 1,305 Intersection % 2,591 Count Period: 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM B - 17

63 Total Vehicle Summary HV 1.8% PHF 0.82 In Out 1, , HV 2.0% PHF 0.88 Mark Skaggs (206) Out In In Out Coal Creek Pkwy & SE 72nd Pl Tuesday, April 16, :00 PM to 4:00 PM HV 3.1% PHF Minute Interval Summary 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 2:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Survey , , Out 1, In % 0.90 HV PHF Peak Hour Summary 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM Peak Hour Summary 3:00 PM to 4:00 PM By Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Total Crosswalk In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV North South East West Volume 623 1,241 1, , , , %HV 1.8% 1.8% 3.1% 2.0% 2.0% PHF Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Movement L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total Total Volume , , ,591 PHF Rolling Hour Summary 2:00 PM to 4:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 2:00 PM , :15 PM , :30 PM , :45 PM , :00 PM , , B - 18

64 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & Lake Washington Blvd SE & SE 64th St 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St Out 2 In Out HR R T L 0 In 1 HR 0 HL 0 BL 1 BR 0 Peds 0 Peds Lake Washington Blvd SE Out 246 In L 29 T 67 R 0 Peds 0 Peds R 14 BR 0 T 13 1 HL L 0 In 27 Out 49 SE 64th St 0 Peds L BL T R Out 237 In th Ave SE Intersection NB SB EB WB SEB Volume HV% 0.7% 0.6% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% PHF Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM B - 19

65 Total Vehicle Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & Lake Washington Blvd SE & SE 64th St Tuesday, April 16, :00 PM to 6:00 PM 15-Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound Pedestrians Start 112th Ave SE Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Interval Crosswalk Time L BL T R HV L T R HR HV HL L T R HV L T BR R HV HL BL BR HR HV Total North South East West NE NW SE SW 16: : : : : : : : Total Survey , Peak Hour Summary 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound Pedestrians By Approach 112th Ave SE Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Total Crosswalk Approach Approach Approach Approach Approach West NE HV HV HV HV HV North South East NW SE SW In Out Total %HV 0.6% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% PHF orthboun Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound By 2th Ave Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Total Movement L BL T R Total L T R HR Total HL L T R Total L T BR R Total HL BL BR HR Total Volume PHF Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Southeastbound Pedestrians Start 112th Ave SE Lake Washington Blvd SE Lake Washington Blvd SE SE 64th St SE 64th St Interval Crosswalk Time BL T T R HR L T R BR BL BR HR Total West NE L R HV L HV HL HV L T R HV HL HV North South East NW SE SW 16: : : : : B - 20

66 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & SE 68th St 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Tuesday, April 16, th Ave SE SE 68th St Peds Peds 1 Peds Peds 2 SE 68th St th Ave SE Approach PHF HV% Volume EB % 222 WB % 336 NB % 226 SB % 77 Intersection % 861 Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM B - 21

67 Total Vehicle Summary HV 0.0% PHF 0.77 In 77 2 Out HV 0.6% PHF 0.94 Mark Skaggs (206) Out In In Out 116th Ave SE & SE 68th St Tuesday, April 16, :00 PM to 6:00 PM HV 0.5% PHF Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 4:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Survey , Out In % 0.93 HV PHF Peak Hour Summary 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Peak Hour Summary 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM By Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Total Crosswalk In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV North South East West Volume %HV 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.6% 0.3% PHF Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Movement L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total Total Volume PHF Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 68th St SE 68th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 4:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM B - 22

68 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) th Ave SE & SE 76th St 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Tuesday, April 16, th Ave SE SE 76th St Peds Peds 1 Peds Peds 5 SE 76th St th Ave SE Approach PHF HV% Volume EB % 185 WB % 6 NB % 102 SB % 274 Intersection % 567 Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM B - 23

69 Total Vehicle Summary HV 0.7% PHF 0.84 In Out HV 0.0% PHF 0.50 Mark Skaggs (206) Out In In Out 116th Ave SE & SE 76th St Tuesday, April 16, :00 PM to 6:00 PM HV 0.0% PHF Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 4:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Survey , Out In % 0.77 HV PHF Peak Hour Summary 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM Peak Hour Summary 5:00 PM to 6:00 PM By Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Total Crosswalk In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV North South East West Volume %HV 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% PHF Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Movement L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total Total Volume PHF Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start 116th Ave SE 116th Ave SE SE 76th St SE 76th St Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 4:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM B - 24

70 Peak Hour Summary Mark Skaggs (206) Coal Creek Pkwy & SE 72nd Pl 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM Tuesday, April 16, 2013 Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl Peds Peds 2 Peds Peds 7 SE 72nd Pl Coal Creek Pkwy Approach PHF HV% Volume EB % 488 WB % 364 NB % 583 SB % 1,684 Intersection % 3,119 Count Period: 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM B - 25

71 Total Vehicle Summary HV 1.1% PHF 0.93 In Out 1, , HV 1.4% PHF 0.89 Mark Skaggs (206) Out In In Out Coal Creek Pkwy & SE 72nd Pl Tuesday, April 16, :00 PM to 6:00 PM HV 2.0% PHF Minute Interval Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 4:00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM :00 PM :15 PM :30 PM :45 PM Total Survey , , Out 1, In % 0.95 HV PHF Peak Hour Summary 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM Peak Hour Summary 4:45 PM to 5:45 PM By Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Total Crosswalk In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV In Out Total HV North South East West Volume 583 1,739 2, , , , %HV 1.5% 1.1% 2.0% 1.4% 1.4% PHF Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound By Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Movement L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total L T R Total Total Volume , , ,119 PHF Rolling Hour Summary 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM Interval Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrians Start Coal Creek Pkwy Coal Creek Pkwy SE 72nd Pl SE 72nd Pl Interval Crosswalk Time L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV L T R HV Total North South East West 4:00 PM , , :15 PM , , :30 PM , , :45 PM , , :00 PM , , B - 26

72 Percent 1.5% 74.1% 14.2% 0.4% 4.7% 1.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% AM Peak 08:00 10:00 08:00 06:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 08:00 Vol PM Peak 17:00 18:00 16:00 12:00 13:00 12:00 17:00 20:00 15:00 Vol Page 1 All Traffic Data Services Inc NE 27th St Renton, WA Ph Site Code: A SE 68TH ST E/O 112TH AVE SE EB Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Tue Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classed Total 04/16/ : : : : : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Grand Total Percent 1.5% 74.1% 14.2% 0.4% 4.7% 1.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% B - 27

73 Percent 1.4% 73.5% 15.6% 0.6% 4.3% 0.4% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% AM Peak 08:00 07:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 08:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 Vol PM Peak 15:00 15:00 15:00 15:00 13:00 12:00 14:00 12:00 12:00 12:00 Vol Page 2 All Traffic Data Services Inc NE 27th St Renton, WA Ph Site Code: A SE 68TH ST E/O 112TH AVE SE WB Start Cars & 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 Axl 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Not Tue Time Bikes Trailers Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Classed Total 04/16/ : : : : : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Grand Total Percent 1.4% 73.5% 15.6% 0.6% 4.3% 0.4% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% B - 28

74 Peak 15:00 14:00 15:00 18:00 17:00 00:00 19:00 18:00 Vol Page 1 All Traffic Data Services Inc NE 27th St Renton, WA Ph Site Code: A SE 68TH ST E/O 112TH AVE SE EB Start 16-Apr Tue Time Tue Total 85th 04/16/ : : : : : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Daily 15th Percentile : 21 MPH 50th Percentile : 25 MPH 85th Percentile : 29 MPH 95th Percentile : 30 MPH B - 29 Mean Speed(Average) : 25 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : MPH Number in Pace : 2141 Percent in Pace : 86.4% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0.0%

75 Grand Total TOTAL STATS th Percentile : 21 MPH 50th Percentile : 25 MPH 85th Percentile : 29 MPH 95th Percentile : 30 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 25 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : MPH Number in Pace : 2141 Percent in Pace : 86.4% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0.0% B - 30

76 Peak 09:00 14:00 08:00 07:00 06:00 07:00 07:00 Vol Page 3 All Traffic Data Services Inc NE 27th St Renton, WA Ph Site Code: A SE 68TH ST E/O 112TH AVE SE WB Start 16-Apr Tue Time Tue Total 85th 04/16/ : : : : : : : : : : : PM : : : : : : : : : : : Daily 15th Percentile : 21 MPH 50th Percentile : 26 MPH 85th Percentile : 30 MPH 95th Percentile : 32 MPH B - 31 Mean Speed(Average) : 25 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : MPH Number in Pace : 2574 Percent in Pace : 80.5% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0.0%

77 Grand Total TOTAL STATS th Percentile : 21 MPH 50th Percentile : 26 MPH 85th Percentile : 30 MPH 95th Percentile : 32 MPH Mean Speed(Average) : 25 MPH 10 MPH Pace Speed : MPH Number in Pace : 2574 Percent in Pace : 80.5% Number of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0 Percent of Vehicles > 55 MPH : 0.0% B - 32

78 Page 1 All Traffic Data Services Inc NE 27th St Renton, WA Ph Site Code: A SE 68TH ST E/O 112TH AVE SE Start 15-Apr-13 Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun Week Average Time EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB 12:00 AM * * 23 3 * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * 4 1 * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * 5 3 * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * 8 5 * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * 6 22 * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 PM * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * :00 * * * * * * * * * * * * Lane Day AM Peak 11:00 07:00 11:00 07:00 Vol PM Peak 18:00 15:00 18:00 15:00 Vol Comb. Total ADT Not Calculated B - 33

79 2016 Turning Movement Calculations C

80 1 112th Ave SE 64th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 1 Existing Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE 29 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 374 SE 64th St 903 SE 64th St 104 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE 32 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 69 2 Years of Growth = SE 64th St 986 SE 64th St 113 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE SE 64th St 72 SE 64th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 64th St 1,058 SE 64th St 113 North th Ave SE C-1

81 2 116th Ave SE 68th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 2 Existing Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 1 116th Ave SE 60 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 546 SE 68th St 939 SE 68th St 704 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 1 116th Ave SE 66 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = SE 68th St 1,026 SE 68th St 770 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 292 SE 68th St 195 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 1 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 1,318 SE 68th St 965 North th Ave SE C-2

82 3 116th Ave SE 76th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 3 Existing Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE 4 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 326 SE 76th St 586 SE 76th St 11 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE 4 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 69 0 Years of Growth = SE 76th St 639 SE 76th St 11 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 193 SE 76th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 832 SE 76th St 11 North th Ave SE C-3

83 4 Coal Creek Newcastle W Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 4 Existing 276 2,396 2,120 Average Weekday , AM Peak Hour 29 Coal Creek Pkwy 136 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 659 Newcastle Way 2,965 Newcastle Way 495 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,380 2,092 Future without Project 301 2,618 2,317 Average Weekday , AM Peak Hour 32 Coal Creek Pkwy 149 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = Newcastle Way 3,241 Newcastle Way 542 North Total Growth = Coal Creek Pkwy , ,601 2,286 Total Project Trips Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 14 Coal Creek Pkwy Newcastle Way 146 Newcastle Way 0 North Coal Creek Pkwy Future with Project 315 2,643 2,328 Average Weekday , AM Peak Hour 46 Coal Creek Pkwy Newcastle Way 3,387 Newcastle Way 542 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,722 2,355 C-4

84 5 112th Ave SE 68th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 5 Existing Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE 494 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 0 SE 68th St 585 SE 68th St 580 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE 540 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 0 1 Years of Growth = 3 0 SE 68th St 639 SE 68th St 634 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE SE 68th St 72 SE 68th St 72 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE SE 68th St 711 SE 68th St 706 North th Ave SE C-5

85 1 112th Ave SE 64th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 1 Existing Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 9 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 295 SE 64th St 635 SE 64th St 66 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 10 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 54 0 Years of Growth = SE 64th St 695 SE 64th St 73 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE SE 64th St 46 SE 64th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 64th St 741 SE 64th St 73 North th Ave SE C-6

86 2 116th Ave SE 68th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 2 Existing Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 3 116th Ave SE 12 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 349 SE 68th St 711 SE 68th St 569 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 3 116th Ave SE 13 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = SE 68th St 777 SE 68th St 622 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 0 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 184 SE 68th St 122 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 3 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 961 SE 68th St 744 North th Ave SE C-7

87 3 116th Ave SE 76th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 3 Existing Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 5 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 279 SE 76th St 471 SE 76th St 16 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 5 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 36 1 Years of Growth = SE 76th St 513 SE 76th St 17 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 122 SE 76th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 635 SE 76th St 17 North th Ave SE C-8

88 4 Coal Creek Newcastle W Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 4 Existing 1,305 2, Average Weekday 120 1, School PM Peak Hour 120 Coal Creek Pkwy 120 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 734 Newcastle Way 2,591 Newcastle Way 545 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,241 1, Future without Project 1,426 2, Average Weekday 131 1, School PM Peak Hour 131 Coal Creek Pkwy 131 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = Newcastle Way 2,831 Newcastle Way 596 North Total Growth = Coal Creek Pkwy , ,356 2, Total Project Trips Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 8 Coal Creek Pkwy Newcastle Way 91 Newcastle Way 0 North Coal Creek Pkwy Future with Project 1,434 2, Average Weekday 139 1, School PM Peak Hour 139 Coal Creek Pkwy Newcastle Way 2,922 Newcastle Way 596 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,393 2, C-9

89 1 112th Ave SE 64th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 1 Existing Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 14 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 424 SE 64th St 730 SE 64th St 76 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 15 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 55 0 Years of Growth = SE 64th St 797 SE 64th St 82 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE SE 64th St 21 SE 64th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 64th St 818 SE 64th St 82 North th Ave SE C-10

90 2 116th Ave SE 68th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 2 Existing Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 2 116th Ave SE 21 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 393 SE 68th St 861 SE 68th St 686 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 2 116th Ave SE 23 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = SE 68th St 941 SE 68th St 750 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 0 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 82 SE 68th St 54 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 2 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 1,023 SE 68th St 804 North th Ave SE C-11

91 3 116th Ave SE 76th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 3 Existing Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 3 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 335 SE 76th St 567 SE 76th St 9 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 3 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 30 2 Years of Growth = SE 76th St 619 SE 76th St 9 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 54 SE 76th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 673 SE 76th St 9 North th Ave SE C-12

92 4 Coal Creek Newcastle W Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 4 Existing 1,684 2, Average Weekday 110 1, PM Peak Hour 110 Coal Creek Pkwy 94 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 913 Newcastle Way 3,119 Newcastle Way 635 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,739 2, Future without Project 1,840 2, Average Weekday 120 1, PM Peak Hour 120 Coal Creek Pkwy 103 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = Newcastle Way 3,408 Newcastle Way 694 North Total Growth = Coal Creek Pkwy , ,900 2, Total Project Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 3 Coal Creek Pkwy Newcastle Way 41 Newcastle Way 0 North Coal Creek Pkwy Future with Project 1,843 2, Average Weekday 123 1, PM Peak Hour 123 Coal Creek Pkwy ,038 Newcastle Way 3,449 Newcastle Way 694 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,918 2, C-13

93 2023 Turning Movement Calculations D

94 1 112th Ave SE 64th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 1 Existing Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE 29 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 374 SE 64th St 903 SE 64th St 104 North th Ave SE Future without Project 203 1, Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE 39 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 85 3 Years of Growth = SE 64th St 1,214 SE 64th St 141 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE SE 64th St 72 SE 64th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project 244 1, Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 64th St 1,286 SE 64th St 141 North th Ave SE D-1

95 2 116th Ave SE 68th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 2 Existing Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 1 116th Ave SE 60 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 546 SE 68th St 939 SE 68th St 704 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 1 116th Ave SE 81 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = SE 68th St 1,261 SE 68th St 946 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 292 SE 68th St 195 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 1 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 1,553 SE 68th St 1,141 North th Ave SE D-2

96 3 116th Ave SE 76th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 3 Existing Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE 4 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 326 SE 76th St 586 SE 76th St 11 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE 5 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 85 0 Years of Growth = SE 76th St 788 SE 76th St 14 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 193 SE 76th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 981 SE 76th St 14 North th Ave SE D-3

97 4 Coal Creek Newcastle W Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 4 Existing 276 2,396 2,120 Average Weekday , AM Peak Hour 29 Coal Creek Pkwy 136 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 659 Newcastle Way 2,965 Newcastle Way 495 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,380 2,092 Future without Project 371 3,220 2,849 Average Weekday , AM Peak Hour 39 Coal Creek Pkwy 183 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = Newcastle Way 3,985 Newcastle Way 666 North Total Growth = Coal Creek Pkwy , ,198 2,811 Total Project Trips Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 14 Coal Creek Pkwy Newcastle Way 146 Newcastle Way 0 North Coal Creek Pkwy Future with Project 385 3,245 2,860 Average Weekday , AM Peak Hour 53 Coal Creek Pkwy ,032 Newcastle Way 4,131 Newcastle Way 666 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,319 2,880 D-4

98 5 112th Ave SE 68th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 5 Existing Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE 494 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 0 SE 68th St 585 SE 68th St 580 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE 664 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 0 1 Years of Growth = 10 0 SE 68th St 786 SE 68th St 779 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE SE 68th St 72 SE 68th St 72 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday AM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE SE 68th St 858 SE 68th St 851 North th Ave SE D-5

99 1 112th Ave SE 64th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 1 Existing Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 9 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 295 SE 64th St 635 SE 64th St 66 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 12 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 66 0 Years of Growth = SE 64th St 854 SE 64th St 89 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE SE 64th St 46 SE 64th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 64th St 900 SE 64th St 89 North th Ave SE D-6

100 2 116th Ave SE 68th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 2 Existing Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 3 116th Ave SE 12 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 349 SE 68th St 711 SE 68th St 569 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 4 116th Ave SE 16 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = SE 68th St 954 SE 68th St 764 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 0 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 184 SE 68th St 122 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 4 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 1,138 SE 68th St 886 North th Ave SE D-7

101 3 116th Ave SE 76th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 3 Existing Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 5 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 279 SE 76th St 471 SE 76th St 16 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 7 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 44 1 Years of Growth = SE 76th St 633 SE 76th St 21 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 122 SE 76th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 755 SE 76th St 21 North th Ave SE D-8

102 4 Coal Creek Newcastle W Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 4 Existing 1,305 2, Average Weekday 120 1, School PM Peak Hour 120 Coal Creek Pkwy 120 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 734 Newcastle Way 2,591 Newcastle Way 545 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,241 1, Future without Project 1,754 2, Average Weekday 161 1, School PM Peak Hour 161 Coal Creek Pkwy 161 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = Newcastle Way 3,483 Newcastle Way 733 North Total Growth = Coal Creek Pkwy , ,668 2, Total Project Trips Average Weekday School PM Peak Hour 8 Coal Creek Pkwy Newcastle Way 91 Newcastle Way 0 North Coal Creek Pkwy Future with Project 1,762 2, Average Weekday 169 1, School PM Peak Hour 169 Coal Creek Pkwy ,078 Newcastle Way 3,574 Newcastle Way 733 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,705 2, D-9

103 1 112th Ave SE 64th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 1 Existing Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 14 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 424 SE 64th St 730 SE 64th St 76 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 19 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 67 0 Years of Growth = SE 64th St 980 SE 64th St 102 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 0 112th Ave SE SE 64th St 21 SE 64th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 64th St 1,001 SE 64th St 102 North th Ave SE D-10

104 2 116th Ave SE 68th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 2 Existing Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 2 116th Ave SE 21 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 393 SE 68th St 861 SE 68th St 686 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 3 116th Ave SE 28 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = SE 68th St 1,157 SE 68th St 922 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 0 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 82 SE 68th St 54 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 3 116th Ave SE SE 68th St 1,239 SE 68th St 976 North th Ave SE D-11

105 3 116th Ave SE 76th St Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 3 Existing Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 3 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 335 SE 76th St 567 SE 76th St 9 North th Ave SE Future without Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE 4 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% 36 3 Years of Growth = SE 76th St 760 SE 76th St 12 North Total Growth = th Ave SE Total Project Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 54 SE 76th St 0 North th Ave SE Future with Project Average Weekday PM Peak Hour th Ave SE SE 76th St 814 SE 76th St 12 North th Ave SE D-12

106 4 Coal Creek Newcastle W Page 1 of 1 Synchro ID: 4 Existing 1,684 2, Average Weekday 110 1, PM Peak Hour 110 Coal Creek Pkwy 94 Year: 4/16/ Data Source: ATD 913 Newcastle Way 3,119 Newcastle Way 635 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,739 2, Future without Project 2,263 3, Average Weekday 148 2, PM Peak Hour 148 Coal Creek Pkwy 126 Year: Growth Rate = 3.0% Years of Growth = 10 1,227 Newcastle Way 4,192 Newcastle Way 854 North Total Growth = Coal Creek Pkwy , ,337 3, Total Project Trips Average Weekday PM Peak Hour 3 Coal Creek Pkwy Newcastle Way 41 Newcastle Way 0 North Coal Creek Pkwy Future with Project 2,266 3, Average Weekday 151 2, PM Peak Hour 151 Coal Creek Pkwy ,268 Newcastle Way 4,233 Newcastle Way 854 North Coal Creek Pkwy , ,355 3, D-13

107 Existing AM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis E

108 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing AM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS E B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS E B Intersection Summary Average Delay 10.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Existing AM E-1

109 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing AM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS A D B A Intersection Summary Delay 22.9 HCM Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Existing AM E-2

110 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing AM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A B B Intersection Summary Delay 11.1 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Existing AM E-3

111 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing AM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 8.3% 20.8% 20.8% 6.7% 19.2% 19.2% 22.5% 65.8% 0.0% 6.7% 50.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D D B D E C E C E B GTC (MJP) Existing AM E-4

112 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing AM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay Approach LOS D D C C Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # # #60 81 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.86 Intersection Signal Delay: 29.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Existing AM E-5

113 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing AM.syn 5: 112th Avenue SE & SE 68th Street Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 36.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Existing AM E-6

114 Existing School PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis F

115 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing School PM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 4.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Existing School PM F-1

116 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing School PM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS A B A A Intersection Summary Delay 10.8 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Existing School PM F-2

117 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing School PM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Summary Delay 9.1 HCM Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Existing School PM F-3

118 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing School PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 13.3% 23.3% 23.3% 7.5% 17.5% 17.5% 17.5% 53.3% 0.0% 15.8% 51.7% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D D A C E B E B E C GTC (MJP) Existing School PM F-4

119 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing School PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay Approach LOS C D C C Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 30.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.1% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service C Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Existing School PM F-5

120 Existing PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis G

121 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing PM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Existing PM G-1

122 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing PM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B B B B Intersection Summary Delay 12.2 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Existing PM G-2

123 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing PM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A A B Intersection Summary Delay 9.9 HCM Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Existing PM G-3

124 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 10.8% 20.8% 20.8% 7.5% 17.5% 17.5% 13.3% 58.3% 0.0% 13.3% 58.3% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay GTC (MJP) Existing PM G-4

125 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Existing PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS E D A D E B E B E C Approach Delay Approach LOS D D C C Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # # # Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Existing PM G-5

126 2016 Baseline AM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis H

127 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 AM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS F B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS F B Intersection Summary Average Delay 16.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 AM H-1

128 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 AM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS A E B B Intersection Summary Delay 34.0 HCM Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 AM H-2

129 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 AM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A B B Intersection Summary Delay 12.0 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 AM H-3

130 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 AM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 8.3% 20.8% 20.8% 6.7% 19.2% 19.2% 22.5% 65.8% 0.0% 6.7% 50.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS E D B D E C E C E B GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 AM H-4

131 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 AM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay Approach LOS D D C C Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # # #983 #65 87 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.92 Intersection Signal Delay: 34.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 AM H-5

132 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 AM.syn 5: 112th Avenue SE & SE 68th Street Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 39.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 AM H-6

133 2016 Baseline School PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis I

134 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 School PM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 4.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 School PM I-1

135 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 School PM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B B A A Intersection Summary Delay 11.7 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 School PM I-2

136 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 School PM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Summary Delay 9.5 HCM Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 School PM I-3

137 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 School PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 13.3% 23.3% 23.3% 7.5% 17.5% 17.5% 17.5% 53.3% 0.0% 15.8% 51.7% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D D A D E B E B E C GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 School PM I-4

138 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 School PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay Approach LOS C D C C Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.2% Analysis Period (min) 15 Intersection LOS: C ICU Level of Service D Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 School PM I-5

139 2016 Baseline PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis J

140 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 PM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 PM J-1

141 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 PM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B C B B Intersection Summary Delay 13.8 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 PM J-2

142 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 PM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A A B Intersection Summary Delay 10.4 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 PM J-3

143 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 10.8% 20.0% 20.0% 7.5% 16.7% 16.7% 12.5% 59.2% 0.0% 13.3% 60.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 PM J-4

144 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2016 PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS F D B D F B F B E C Approach Delay Approach LOS D E C C Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # # # Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.92 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Baseline 2016 PM J-5

145 2016 Future With AM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis K

146 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 AM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS F C A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS F C Intersection Summary Average Delay 21.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 AM K-1

147 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 AM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B D B B Intersection Summary Delay 20.7 HCM Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 AM K-2

148 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 AM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A C C Intersection Summary Delay 18.6 HCM Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 AM K-3

149 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 AM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 6.7% 16.7% 16.7% 6.7% 16.7% 16.7% 28.3% 70.0% 0.0% 6.7% 48.3% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS F D B D F C E C E B GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 AM K-4

150 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 AM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay Approach LOS F E C C Queue Length 50th (ft) ~ Queue Length 95th (ft) # # #65 93 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.11 Intersection Signal Delay: 35.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 AM K-5

151 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 AM.syn 5: 112th Avenue SE & SE 68th Street Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 AM K-6

152 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 AM.syn 6: Access & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol 334 vc2, stage 2 conf vol 639 vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) 5.4 tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 4.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 AM K-7

153 2016 Future With School PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis L

154 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 School PM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 4.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 School PM L-1

155 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 School PM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B C B B Intersection Summary Delay 15.6 HCM Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 School PM L-2

156 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 School PM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A A B Intersection Summary Delay 10.9 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 School PM L-3

157 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 School PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 13.3% 23.3% 23.3% 7.5% 17.5% 17.5% 17.5% 53.3% 0.0% 15.8% 51.7% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS D D A D E B E B E C GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 School PM L-4

158 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 School PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay Approach LOS C D C D Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 34.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 School PM L-5

159 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 School PM.syn 5: Access & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol 280 vc2, stage 2 conf vol 464 vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) 5.4 tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 School PM L-6

160 2016 Future With PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis M

161 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 PM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C B Intersection Summary Average Delay 5.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 PM M - 1

162 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 PM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B C B B Intersection Summary Delay 16.1 HCM Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 PM M - 2

163 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 PM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A A B Intersection Summary Delay 11.1 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 PM M - 3

164 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 10.8% 20.0% 20.0% 7.5% 16.7% 16.7% 12.5% 59.2% 0.0% 13.3% 60.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 PM M - 4

165 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS F D B D F B F B E C Approach Delay Approach LOS D E D C Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # # # Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 39.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 PM M - 5

166 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2016 PM.syn 5: Access & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol 283 vc2, stage 2 conf vol 430 vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) 5.4 tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2016 PM M - 6

167 2023 Baseline AM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis N

168 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 AM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS F C A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS F C Intersection Summary Average Delay 67.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 AM N-1

169 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 AM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B F B B Intersection Summary Delay 92.9 HCM Level of Service F Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 AM N-2

170 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 AM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A B B Intersection Summary Delay 11.5 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 AM N-3

171 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 AM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 6.7% 16.7% 16.7% 6.7% 16.7% 16.7% 28.3% 70.0% 0.0% 6.7% 48.3% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS F D B D F D E E F B GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 AM N-4

172 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 AM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay Approach LOS F F E C Queue Length 50th (ft) ~ ~ ~ Queue Length 95th (ft) # #446 # #1327 # Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.32 Intersection Signal Delay: 72.1 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 AM N-5

173 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 AM.syn 5: 112th Avenue SE & SE 68th Street Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS A B Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 AM N-6

174 2023 Baseline School PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis O

175 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 School PM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS D C A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS D C Intersection Summary Average Delay 6.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 School PM O - 1

176 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 School PM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B C B B Intersection Summary Delay 15.6 HCM Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 School PM O - 2

177 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 School PM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A A B Intersection Summary Delay 10.9 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 School PM O - 3

178 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 School PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 11.7% 20.0% 20.0% 8.3% 16.7% 16.7% 15.0% 52.5% 0.0% 19.2% 56.7% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS F D A D E B F B E D GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 School PM O - 4

179 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 School PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay Approach LOS D D C D Queue Length 50th (ft) Queue Length 95th (ft) # # # #860 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.97 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 School PM O - 5

180 2023 Baseline PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis P

181 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 PM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS D B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS D B Intersection Summary Average Delay 8.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 PM P - 1

182 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 PM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C E C B Intersection Summary Delay 23.7 HCM Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 PM P - 2

183 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 PM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A B B Intersection Summary Delay 12.6 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 PM P - 3

184 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 10.0% 19.2% 19.2% 7.5% 16.7% 16.7% 11.7% 57.5% 0.0% 15.8% 61.7% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 PM P - 4

185 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\Baseline 2023 PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS F E C E F B F B E E Approach Delay Approach LOS F F D E Queue Length 50th (ft) ~ ~ ~ ~1047 Queue Length 95th (ft) #304 # #144 # # #1184 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.18 Intersection Signal Delay: 73.3 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 107.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Baseline 2023 PM P - 5

186 2023 Future With AM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis Q

187 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 AM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS F C A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS F C Intersection Summary Average Delay 83.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 AM Q-1

188 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 AM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B F C B Intersection Summary Delay 42.2 HCM Level of Service E Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 AM Q-2

189 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 AM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A C B Intersection Summary Delay 15.3 HCM Level of Service C Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 AM Q-3

190 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 AM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 6.7% 16.7% 16.7% 6.7% 16.7% 16.7% 28.3% 70.0% 0.0% 6.7% 48.3% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS F D B D F D E E F B GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 AM Q-4

191 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 AM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay Approach LOS F F E C Queue Length 50th (ft) ~ ~ ~ Queue Length 95th (ft) # #446 #198 #404 #1327 # Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.42 Intersection Signal Delay: 73.3 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 111.0% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 AM Q-5

192 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 AM.syn 5: 112th Avenue SE & SE 68th Street Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS A C Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 AM Q-6

193 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 AM.syn 6: Access & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol 397 vc2, stage 2 conf vol 702 vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) 5.4 tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS C B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 4.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 AM Q-7

194 2023 Future With School PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis R

195 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 School PM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS D C A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS D C Intersection Summary Average Delay 6.9 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 School PM R-1

196 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 School PM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C E C B Intersection Summary Delay 26.1 HCM Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 School PM R-2

197 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 School PM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A B B Intersection Summary Delay 12.9 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 School PM R-3

198 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 School PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 13.3% 23.3% 23.3% 7.5% 17.5% 17.5% 17.5% 53.3% 0.0% 15.8% 51.7% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS E D A D E B F B E E GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 School PM R-4

199 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 School PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Approach Delay Approach LOS D D D E Queue Length 50th (ft) ~842 Queue Length 95th (ft) # # # #218 #944 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.08 Intersection Signal Delay: 57.0 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 School PM R-5

200 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 School PM.syn 5: Access & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol 336 vc2, stage 2 conf vol 522 vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) 5.4 tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 3.2 Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 School PM R-6

201 2023 Future With PM Peak-Hour Level of Service Analysis S

202 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 PM.syn 1: SE 64th Street & 112th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol vc2, stage 2 conf vol vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS D B A A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS D B Intersection Summary Average Delay 9.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 PM S - 1

203 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 PM.syn 2: SE 68th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 NB 2 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS C F C B Intersection Summary Delay 32.9 HCM Level of Service D Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 PM S - 2

204 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 PM.syn 3: SE 76th Street & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total (vph) Volume Left (vph) Volume Right (vph) Hadj (s) Departure Headway (s) Degree Utilization, x Capacity (veh/h) Control Delay (s) Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B A B C Intersection Summary Delay 13.8 HCM Level of Service B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 PM S - 3

205 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type pm+pt Perm pm+pt Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) Minimum Split (s) Total Split (s) Total Split (%) 10.8% 20.0% 20.0% 7.5% 16.7% 16.7% 12.5% 59.2% 0.0% 13.3% 60.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) Yellow Time (s) All-Red Time (s) Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead-Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode None None None None None None None None None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/c Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 PM S - 4

206 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 PM.syn 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR LOS F E C E F B F B E F Approach Delay Approach LOS E F D F Queue Length 50th (ft) ~ ~ ~ ~1076 Queue Length 95th (ft) #298 # #133 # # #164 #1213 Internal Link Dist (ft) Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) Starvation Cap Reductn Spillback Cap Reductn Storage Cap Reductn Reduced v/c Ratio Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 120 Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated-Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.14 Intersection Signal Delay: 79.5 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.7% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Newcastle Way & Coal Creek Pkwy SE GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 PM S - 5

207 H:\2013\13-055\Synchro\FutureW 2023 PM.syn 5: Access & 116th Avenue SE Newcastle MS (13-055) Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type TWLTL TWLTL Median storage veh) 2 2 Upstream signal (ft) px, platoon unblocked vc, conflicting volume vc1, stage 1 conf vol 345 vc2, stage 2 conf vol 515 vcu, unblocked vol tc, single (s) tc, 2 stage (s) 5.4 tf (s) p0 queue free % cm capacity (veh/h) Direction, Lane # WB 1 WB 2 NB 1 SB 1 SB 2 Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right csh Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS B B A Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 GTC (MJP) Future With 2023 PM S - 6

208 Transit Data T

209 Page 1 of 1 T /7/2013

210 Route King County Metro Transit Page 1 of 1 Route 114 Weekday: To Renton Highlands Effective September 28, 2013 thru February 14, 2014 Downtown Seattle Bell St & 7th Ave 2nd Ave & Spring St 5th Ave S & S Jackson St Coal Creek Pkwy SE & I-405 Newport Hills 119th Ave SE & SE 58th St Newcastle Transit Center Coal Creek Pkwy SE & Newcastle Way Renton Highlands Union Ave NE & NE 4th St Union Ave SE & SE 2nd Pl 4:04 pm 4:11 pm 4:21 pm * 4:40 pm * 4:47 pm * 4:53 pm * 5:08 pm * 5:14 p m * 4:34 pm 4:41 pm 4:51 pm * 5:10 pm * 5:17 pm * 5:23 pm * 5:38 pm * 5:44 p m * 5:01 pm 5:08 pm 5:18 pm * 5:37 pm * 5:44 pm * 5:50 pm * 6:05 pm * 6:11 p m * 5:33 pm 5:40 pm 5:50 pm * 6:09 pm * 6:16 pm * 6:22 pm * 6:37 pm * 6:43 p m * S Schedule Notes The following notes apply only if the codes are found in the schedule: * - This is an estimated timepoint. Special Service Information Route 114 does NOT operate on Nov. 11 & 29, Dec. 24 & 26 thru 31 and Jan. 20 when Metro operates its Reduced Weekday service levels. WSDOT-Funded additional trips: Metro, with support from the Washington State Department of Transportation, has added weekday trips on bus routes that travel on corridors affected by construction. More trips may be added in the future if needed. T /7/2013

211 Route King County Metro Transit Page 1 of 1 Route 114 Weekday: To Downtown Seattle Effective September 28, 2013 thru February 14, 2014 Renton Highlands Union Ave SE & SE 2nd Pl Union Ave NE & NE 4th St Newcastle Transit Center Coal Creek Pkwy SE & Newcastle Way Newport Hills 119th Ave SE & SE 58th St Coal Creek Pkwy SE & 119th Ave SE Downtown Seattle 4th Ave & Pike St Howell St & 9th Ave 5:32 am 5:37 am 5:48 am 5:54 am 5:59 am * 6:22 am * 6:27 am * 6:00 am 6:05 am 6:16 am 6:22 am 6:27 am * 6:50 am * 6:56 am * 6:32 am 6:37 am 6:51 am 6:57 am 7:03 am * 7:26 am * 7:32 am * 7:09 am 7:14 am 7:28 am 7:34 am 7:41 am * 8:05 am * 8:11 am * 7:43 am 7:48 am 8:02 am 8:08 am 8:14 am * 8:39 am * 8:45 am * N Schedule Notes The following notes apply only if the codes are found in the schedule: * - This is an estimated timepoint. Special Service Information Route 114 does NOT operate on Nov. 11 & 29, Dec. 24 & 26 thru 31 and Jan. 20 when Metro operates its Reduced Weekday service levels. WSDOT-Funded additional trips: Metro, with support from the Washington State Department of Transportation, has added weekday trips on bus routes that travel on corridors affected by construction. More trips may be added in the future if needed. T /7/2013

212 Page 1 of /7/2013 T - 4

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1

Lacey Gateway Residential Phase 1 Lacey Gateway Residential Phase Transportation Impact Study April 23, 203 Prepared for: Gateway 850 LLC 5 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 02 Bellevue, WA 98005 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering West

More information

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis

APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis APPENDIX B Traffic Analysis Rim of the World Unified School District Reconfiguration Prepared for: Rim of the World School District 27315 North Bay Road, Blue Jay, CA 92317 Prepared by: 400 Oceangate,

More information

Proposed Commercial Service at Paine Field Traffic Impact Analysis

Proposed Commercial Service at Paine Field Traffic Impact Analysis Gibson Traffic Consultants 80 Wetmore Avenue Suite 0 Everett, WA 980.9.86 Prepared for: Federal Aviation Administration July 0 GTC #09-07 TABLE OF CONTENTS. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.... PROJECT IDENTIFICATION....

More information

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014.

King County Metro. Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis. Downtown Southend Transit Study. May 2014. King County Metro Columbia Street Transit Priority Improvements Alternative Analysis Downtown Southend Transit Study May 2014 Parametrix Table of Contents Introduction... 1 Methodology... 1 Study Area...

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. The following is an outline of the traffic analysis performed by Hales Engineering for the traffic conditions of this project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study addresses the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Shopko redevelopment located in Sugarhouse, Utah. The Shopko redevelopment project is located between 1300 East and

More information

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT for Sunrise Elementary School Replacement PREPARED FOR: Puyallup School District PREPARED BY: 6544 NE 61 st Street, Seattle, WA 98115 ph: (26) 523-3939 fx: (26) 523-4949

More information

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado

King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Traffic Impact Study King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for: Galloway & Company, Inc. T R A F F I C I M P A C T S T U D Y King Soopers #116 Thornton, Colorado Prepared for Galloway & Company

More information

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards

CHAPTER 9: VEHICULAR ACCESS CONTROL Introduction and Goals Administration Standards 9.00 Introduction and Goals 9.01 Administration 9.02 Standards 9.1 9.00 INTRODUCTION AND GOALS City streets serve two purposes that are often in conflict moving traffic and accessing property. The higher

More information

Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis

Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 9821 425.339.8266 Weaver Road Senior Housing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish January 218 GTC #17-37

More information

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS

LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS LAWRENCE TRANSIT CENTER LOCATION ANALYSIS 9 TH STREET & ROCKLEDGE ROAD / 21 ST STREET & IOWA STREET LAWRENCE, KANSAS TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FEBRUARY 214 OA Project No. 213-542 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...

More information

10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis

10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 2813 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98201 425.339.8266 10 th Street Residences Development Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish September 2018

More information

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017

2.0 Development Driveways. Movin Out June 2017 Movin Out June 2017 1.0 Introduction The proposed Movin Out development is a mixed use development in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of West Broadway and Fayette Avenue in the City of Madison.

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois

Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Traffic Impact Analysis West Street Garden Plots Improvements and DuPage River Park Garden Plots Development Naperville, Illinois Submitted by April 9, 2009 Introduction Kenig, Lindgren, O Hara, Aboona,

More information

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL REPORT for Sartori Elementary School PREPARED FOR: Renton School District PREPARED BY: October 13, 2016 Sartori Elementary School Transportation Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS APPENDIX C1 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DESIGN YEAR TRAFFIC ANALYSIS February 2018 Highway & Bridge Project PIN 6754.12 Route 13 Connector Road Chemung County February 2018 Appendix

More information

Transportation & Traffic Engineering

Transportation & Traffic Engineering Transportation & Traffic Engineering 1) Project Description This report presents a summary of findings for a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) performed by A+ Engineering, Inc. for the Hill Country Family

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Emerald Isle Commercial Development Prepared by SEPI Engineering & Construction Prepared for Ark Consulting Group, PLLC March 2016 I. Executive Summary A. Site Location The Emerald

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT. Vallejo, CA. Prepared For: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR SONIC DRIVE-IN RESTAURANT Vallejo, CA Prepared For: ELITE DRIVE-INS, INC. 2190 Meridian Park Blvd, Suite G Concord, CA 94520 Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road,

More information

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA

Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center. Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Proposed location of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Vicinity map of Camp Parkway Commerce Center Southampton County, VA Camp Parkway Commerce Center is a proposed distribution and industrial center to be

More information

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment

Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Traffic Impact Study Speedway Gas Station Redevelopment Warrenville, Illinois Prepared For: Prepared By: April 11, 2018 Table of Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Existing Conditions... 4 Site Location...

More information

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By:

TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. Sacramento, CA. Prepared For: MBK Homes. Prepared By: TALMONT TOWNHOMES MADISON KENNETH SPA TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Sacramento, CA Prepared For: MBK Homes Prepared By: KD Anderson & Associates 3853 Taylor Road, Suite G Loomis, California 95650 (916) 660-1555

More information

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc.

Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Clean Harbors Canada, Inc. Proposed Lambton Landfill Expansion Environmental Assessment Terms of Reference Transportation Assessment St. Clair Township, Ontario September 2009 itrans Consulting Inc. 260

More information

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study

Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study Vanier Parkway and Presland Road Residential Development Transportation Impact Study Final Report (Revised) March 2011 Submitted to: Groupe Lépine Ottawa Project No. 09-1613 Submitted by: Groupe Lépine

More information

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Traffic Impact Study Plainfield, Illinois August 2018 Prepared for: Seefried Industrial Properties, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Introduction 3 Existing Conditions

More information

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT

TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT DRAFT TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899 BEVERLY BOULEVARD PROJECT WEST HOLLYWOOD, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 2013 PREPARED FOR BEVERLY BOULEVARD ASSOCIATION PREPARED BY DRAFT TRANSPORTATION STUDY FOR THE 8899

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis. Yelm East Gateway Planned Action

Traffic Impact Analysis. Yelm East Gateway Planned Action Traffic Impact Analysis Planned Action Yelm, Washington November 2014 Traffic Impact Analysis Project Information Project: Prepared for: Evergreen Pacific Fund, LLC Steve Guidinger 2724 Alki Avenue SW,

More information

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA

TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN REPORT KING OF PRUSSIA ROAD & RAIDER ROAD RADNOR TOWNSHIP PENNSYLVANIA PREPARED FOR: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM 34 CIVIC CENTER BOULEVARD PHILADELPHIA, PA 1987 (61)

More information

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place

Table of Contents. Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place Traffic Impact Analysis Capital One Building at Schilling Place Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 1. Introduction... 4 2. Project Description... 4 3. Background Information... 4 4. Study Scope...

More information

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis

Date: February 7, 2017 John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis Memorandum Date: February 7, 07 To: From: Subject: John Doyle, Z-Best Products Robert Del Rio. T.E. Z-Best Traffic Operations and Site Access Analysis Introduction Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc.

More information

Traffic Engineering Study

Traffic Engineering Study Traffic Engineering Study Bellaire Boulevard Prepared For: International Management District Technical Services, Inc. Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-3580 November 2009 Executive Summary has been requested

More information

One Harbor Point Residential

One Harbor Point Residential Residential Gig Harbor, WA Transportation Impact Analysis January 23, 2017 Prepared for: Neil Walter Company PO Box 2181 Tacoma, WA 98401 Prepared by: TENW Transportation Engineering NorthWest 11400 SE

More information

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015

MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES. September 2, 2015 5500 New Albany Road Columbus, Ohio 43054 Phone: 614.775.4500 Fax: 614.775.4800 Toll Free: 1-888-775-EMHT emht.com 2015-1008 MINERVA PARK SITE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY M/I HOMES September 2, 2015 Engineers

More information

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON CUBES SELF-STORAGE MILL CREEK TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON 1. INTRODUCTION This report summarizes traffic impacts of the proposed CUBES Self-Storage Mill Creek project in comparison to the traffic currently

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For:

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR. McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA. Prepared For: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR McDONALD S RESTAURANT IN CARMICAEL Sacramento County, CA Prepared For: McDonald s USA, LLC Pacific Sierra Region 2999 Oak Road, Suite 900 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Prepared By:

More information

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street

2. Valley Circle Boulevard/Andora Avenue/Baden Avenue and Lassen Street IV.J TRANSPORTATION 1. INTRODUCTION This section presents an overview of the existing traffic and circulation system in and surrounding the project site. This section also discusses the potential impacts

More information

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION

4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 4.14 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 4.14.1 Summary Table 4.14-1 summarizes the identified environmental impacts, proposed mitigation measures, and residual impacts of the proposed project with regard to

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT

Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT Traffic Impact Analysis 5742 BEACH BOULEVARD MIXED USE PROJECT CITY OF BUENA PARK Prepared by Project No. 14139 000 April 17 th, 2015 DKS Associates Jeffrey Heald, P.E. Rohit Itadkar, T.E. 2677 North Main

More information

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study

Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study Alpine Highway to North County Boulevard Connector Study prepared by Avenue Consultants March 16, 2017 North County Boulevard Connector Study March 16, 2017 Table of Contents 1 Summary of Findings... 1

More information

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road

RE: A Traffic Impact Statement for a proposed development on Quinpool Road James J. Copeland, P.Eng. GRIFFIN transportation group inc. 30 Bonny View Drive Fall River, NS B2T 1R2 May 31, 2018 Ellen O Hara, P.Eng. Project Engineer DesignPoint Engineering & Surveying Ltd. 200 Waterfront

More information

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC.

INTERSECTION ANALYSIS PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) FOR LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR PARK AVENUE AND BRADDOCK ROAD (FROSTBURG, MD) Prepared for: City of Frostburg, Maryland & Allegany County Commissioners Prepared by: LENHART TRAFFIC CONSULTING, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING

More information

Appendix C. Traffic Study

Appendix C. Traffic Study Appendix C Traffic Study TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary PAGE 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Scope of Work... 1 1.2 Study Area... 2 2.0 Project Description... 3 2.1 Site Access... 4 2.2 Pedestrian

More information

STAFF REPORT # CHANGE OF ZONING

STAFF REPORT # CHANGE OF ZONING STAFF REPORT #17-2000-0007 CHANGE OF ZONING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: November 16, 2017 (Applicant Provided Materials / Traffic Study = Blue) 1. APPLICATION: A public hearing for an application

More information

LCPS Valley Service Center

LCPS Valley Service Center Traffic Impact Study LCPS Valley Service Center Loudoun County, Virginia November 4, 2015 Prepared For: Loudoun County Public Schools 21000 Education Court Ashburn, VA 20148 Prepared by: 1140 Connecticut

More information

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development

Traffic Impact Study for Proposed Olive Boulevard Development Traffic Impact Study for Proposed 11330 Olive Boulevard Development Creve Coeur, Missouri July 7, 2017 Prepared For: 11330 Olive Boulevard Development 11330 Olive Boulevard Creve Coeur, Missouri 63141

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SHORTBREAD LOFTS 2009 MODIFICATION Chapel Hill, North Carolina Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill, NC Prepared by: Architects-Engineers-Planners, Inc. November 2009 Traffic Impact

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY. USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY for USD #497 Warehouse and Bus Site Prepared by: Jason Hoskinson, PE, PTOE BG Project No. 16-12L July 8, 216 145 Wakarusa Drive Lawrence, Kansas 6649 T: 785.749.4474 F: 785.749.734

More information

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report

APPENDIX E. Traffic Analysis Report APPENDIX E Traffic Analysis Report THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK EAGLE RIVER TRAFFIC MITIGATION PHASE I OLD GLENN HIGHWAY/EAGLE RIVER ROAD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Eagle River, Alaska

More information

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT

Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Escondido Marriott Hotel and Mixed-Use Condominium Project TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT Prepared for Phelps Program Management 420 Sixth Avenue, Greeley, CO 80632 Prepared by 5050 Avenida Encinas, Suite

More information

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for:

TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY Prepared for: TIMBERVINE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO JANUARY 2014 Prepared for: Hartford Companies 1218 W. Ash Street Suite A Windsor, Co 80550 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES 2272 Glen Haven Drive

More information

MEMO VIA . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To:

MEMO VIA  . Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers. To: MEMO To: Ms. Amy Roth DPS Director, City of Three Rivers VIA EMAIL From: Michael J. Labadie, PE Julie M. Kroll, PE, PTOE Brandon Hayes, PE, P.Eng. Fleis & VandenBrink Date: January 5, 2017 Re: Proposed

More information

Existing Traffic Conditions

Existing Traffic Conditions May 14, 2014 Ms. Lorraine Weiss City of San Mateo 330 West 20 th Avenue San Mateo, CA 94403 Subject: Traffic Operational Study for the Proposed Tilton Avenue Residential Development in San Mateo, California

More information

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project

Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis. Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project Appendix C-5: Proposed Refinements Rail Operations and Maintenance Facility (ROMF) Traffic Impact Analysis Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project July 25, 218 ROMF Transportation Impact Analysis Version

More information

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc.

IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc. IRSCH REEN Hirsch/Green Transportation Consulting, Inc. February 6, 2013 Mr. David Weil Director of Finance St. Matthew s Parish School 1031 Bienveneda Avenue Pacific Palisades, California 90272 RE: Trip

More information

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for:

L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY Prepared for: L1TILE BEARS DAY CARE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO MAY 2012 Prepared for: Hillside Construction, Inc. 216 Hemlock Street, Suite B Fort Collins, CO 80534 Prepared by: DELICH ASSOCIATES

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis Update

Traffic Impact Analysis Update Willow Bend Traffic Impact Analysis Update TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS

More information

FIRGROVE ELEMENTARY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

FIRGROVE ELEMENTARY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 1 FIRGROVE ELEMENTARY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction... 3 II. Project Description... 3 III. Existing Conditions... 6 IV. Future Traffic Demand... 10 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...

More information

Section 5.0 Traffic Information

Section 5.0 Traffic Information Section 5.0 Traffic Information 10.0 TRANSPORTATION MDM Transportation Consultants, Inc. (MDM) has prepared an evaluation of transportation impacts for the proposed evaluation for the expansion of the

More information

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions.

This letter summarizes our observations, anticipated traffic changes, and conclusions. Mr. David Jorschumb Project Manager Boulder Valley School District Re: Review of proposed school access improvements at the Foothills Elementary School in Boulder Dear Mr. Jorschumb, At your request, the

More information

Appendix G Traffic and Parking Report

Appendix G Traffic and Parking Report Appendix G Traffic and Parking Report TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Executive Summary... v 1.0 Introduction... 1 1.1 Study Area... 3 2.0 Project Description... 4 2.1 Site Location... 4 2.2 Existing Project

More information

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario

Re: Addendum No. 4 Transportation Overview 146 Mountshannon Drive Ottawa, Ontario April 18 th, 2017 Mr. Kevin Yemm Vice President, Land Development Richraft Group of Companies 2280 St. Laurent Boulevard, Suite 201 Ottawa, Ontario (Tel: 613.739.7111 / e-mail: keviny@richcraft.com) Re:

More information

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study

West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study West Hills Shopping Centre Lowe s Expansion Traffic Impact Study Prepared for: Armel Corporation January 2015 Paradigm Transportation Solutions Ltd. 22 King Street South, Suite 300 Waterloo ON N2J 1N8

More information

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for:

BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: BARRHAVEN FELLOWSHIP CRC 3058 JOCKVALE ROAD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: Barrhaven Fellowship CRC 3058 Jockvale Road Ottawa, ON K2J 2W7 December 7, 2016 116-649 Report_1.doc D. J.

More information

Lakeside Terrace Development

Lakeside Terrace Development Lakeside Terrace Development City of Barrie, County of Simcoe Traffic Brief for: Type of Document: Final Report Project Number: JDE 1617 Date Submitted: April 29 th, 216 4/29/16 John Northcote, P.Eng.

More information

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis

TRAFFIC DATA. Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. AM LOS Analysis Existing Derousse Ave./River Rd. PM LOS Analysis Appendix E NJ TRANSIT Pennsauken Junction Transit Center and Park & Ride RiverLINE and Atlantic City Line Pennsauken Township, Camden County, New Jersey TRAFFIC DATA Background Traffic Information for

More information

VOA Vista Drive Residential housing Development TIA Project #13915 TABLE OF CONTENTS

VOA Vista Drive Residential housing Development TIA Project #13915 TABLE OF CONTENTS VOA Vista Drive Residential housing Development TIA Project #13915 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 2 Project Background... 2 Conditions... 2 Findings... 3 Recommendations... 4 Introduction... 6

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION

TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY DERRY GREEN CORPORATE BUSINESS PARK MILTON SECONDARY PLAN MODIFICATION DECEMBER 24 UPDATED

More information

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas.

Traffic Impact Analysis. Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas. Traffic Impact Analysis Alliance Cole Avenue Residential Site Dallas, Texas February 15, 2018 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Dallas, Texas Project #064524900 Registered Firm F-928 Traffic Impact Analysis

More information

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan

Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan Parking Stalls Mercer Island Center for the Arts Parking Management Plan June 15, 2016 This Parking Management Plan (P) covers all tenants at the Mercer Island Center for the Arts (MICA) campus, including

More information

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS)

Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Vincentian PUDA Collier County, FL 10/18/2013 Prepared for: Global Properties of Naples Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2614 Tamiami Trail N, Suite 615 1205

More information

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a

Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island. Page 1. No comments n/a Letter EL652 City of Mercer Island Page 1 No comments n/a Page 2 Response to comment EL652 1 Section 4.5.3 of the Final EIS presents the range of potential impacts of the project. This project also lists

More information

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject

Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. HNTB Project File: Subject TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To Kumar Neppalli Traffic Engineering Manager Town of Chapel Hill From Craig Scheffler, P.E., PTOE HNTB North Carolina, P.C. Cc HNTB Project File: 38435 Subject Obey Creek TIS 2022

More information

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS

ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS ANDERSON PROPERTY SITE ANALYSIS Introduction The Montgomery County Department of Transportation (MCDOT) initiated a feasibility study in the fall of 2012 to evaluate the need for transit service expansion

More information

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017

Bennett Pit. Traffic Impact Study. J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado. March 3, 2017 Bennett Pit Traffic Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Weld County, Colorado March 3, 217 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson,

More information

Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2. Prepared By:

Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2. Prepared By: TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR THE TTC MCNICOLL BUS GARAGE CITY OF TORONTO Prepared For: Toronto Transit Commission 1138 Bathurst Street Toronto, Ontario M5R 3H2 Prepared By: Canada Inc. 4th Floor, 3 Leek Crescent

More information

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis

Ingraham High School Parking and Traffic Analysis Parking and Traffic Analysis Seattle, WA Prepared for: URS Corporation 1501 4th Avenue, Suite 1400 Seattle, WA 98101-1616 Mirai Transportation Planning & Engineering 11410 NE 122nd Way, Suite 320 Kirkland,

More information

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways.

The key roadways in the project vicinity are described below. Exhibit displays the existing number of lanes on the study roadways. 4.2 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION This section presents the key assumptions, methods, and results of analysis for the transportation and circulation impacts of the proposed project. This section is based on

More information

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study

Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study Sound Transit East Link: Bus/LRT System Integration Study Prepared For: Sound Transit King County Metro Mercer Island WSDOT Prepared By: CH2M HILL July, 2014 1 SOUND TRANSIT EAST LINK: BUS/LRT SYSTEMES

More information

Attachment F Transportation Technical Memorandum

Attachment F Transportation Technical Memorandum Attachment F Transportation Technical Memorandum Sounder Yard and Shops Facility Project Transportation Technical Memorandum March 25, 216 Prepared for: Sound Transit Prepared by: Parsons Brinckerhoff

More information

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for:

GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT. Prepared for: GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 1618, 1622 ROGER STEVENS DRIVE OTTAWA, ONTARIO TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Invecta Development (Ottawa) Corporation 758 Shanks Height Milton, ON L9T 7P7 May

More information

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS D & B COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction...3 II. Project Description...3 III. Existing Conditions...3 IV. Future Traffic Conditions...8 V. Conclusions and Mitigation...14

More information

Construction Realty Co.

Construction Realty Co. MEMORANDUM TO: FROM : Jeff Pickus Construction Realty Co. Luay R. Aboona, PE Principal 9575 West Higgins Road, Suite 400 Rosemont, Illinois 60018 p: 847-518-9990 f: 847-518-9987 DATE: May 22, 2014 SUBJECT:

More information

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC

IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC IV. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS J. TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC This Section summarizes the information provided in the Traffic Study for the Santa Monica College Bundy Campus Master Plan (Traffic Study),

More information

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS

TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS TRAFFIC PARKING ANALYSIS NAPA FLEA MARKET COUNTY OF NAPA Prepared for: Tom Harding Napa-Vallejo Flea Market 33 Kelly Road American Canyon, CA 9453 Prepared by: 166 Olympic Boulevard, Suite 21 Walnut Creek,

More information

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report

Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report Downtown One Way Street Conversion Technical Feasibility Report As part of the City s Transportation Master Plan, this report reviews the technical feasibility of the proposed conversion of the current

More information

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis

RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis RTID Travel Demand Modeling: Assumptions and Method of Analysis Overall Model and Scenario Assumptions The Puget Sound Regional Council s (PSRC) regional travel demand model was used to forecast travel

More information

Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS

Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Appendix H TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Teichert Boca Quarry Expansion Traffic Impact Analysis Prepared for Teichert Aggregates Prepared by TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. LSC Transportation Consultants, Inc.

More information

Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015

Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015 Traffic Management Plan and Queuing Analysis Lakehill Preparatory School Z145-235 2720 Hillside Drive, Dallas, TX October 27, 2015 Introduction: The Lakehill Preparatory School is located on the northeast

More information

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT

TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION FINAL REPORT TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS RIZZO CONFERENCE CENTER EXPANSION Chapel Hill, North Carolina FINAL REPORT Prepared for: The Town of Chapel Hill, NC Prepared by: Architects-Engineers-Planners, Inc. December 2010

More information

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development

Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development Traffic Impact Study Proposed Hotel and Restaurant Development Marbledale Road Tuckahoe, NY PREPARED FOR BILLWIN DEVELOPMENT AFFILIATES, LLC 365 WHITE PLAINS ROAD EASTCHESTER, NY. 10709 PREPARED BY Engineering

More information

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1

MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF. Prepared for: ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 MERIVALE PRIORITY SQUARE 2852 MERIVALE ROAD CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION BRIEF Prepared for: 2190986ONT Inc. 25 Winding Way Nepean, Ontario K2C 3H1 October 6, 2010 110-502 Report_1.doc D. J. Halpenny

More information

Transportation Technical Report

Transportation Technical Report Transportation Technical Report Puyallup Station Access Improvements Transportation Technical Report 4 South Jackson Street Seattle, WA 984 2826 February 26 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Puyallup

More information

7359 WISCONSIN AVENUE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND

7359 WISCONSIN AVENUE MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND 7359 WISCONSIN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND September 1, 2017 7359 Wisconsin Avenue September 2017 7359 WISCONSIN Local Area Transportation Review Montgomery County, Maryland September 1, 2017 Prepared

More information

Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project

Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project Draft Report: West Berkeley Bowl Project July 2004 Prepared for: The City of Berkeley 1031-1925 F EHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS 3685 Mt. Diablo Blvd. #301 Lafayette, CA 94549 925-284-3200 Fax:

More information

Revised Report. Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel Center at Washington Square Shopping Center. In The City of Petaluma.

Revised Report. Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel Center at Washington Square Shopping Center. In The City of Petaluma. Revised Report Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel Center at Washington Square Shopping Center In The Pleasanton Fresno Sacramento Santa Rosa TJKM www.tjkm.com Revised Report Traffic Study for Safeway Fuel

More information

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited

105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study. Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited 105 Toronto Street South, Markdale Transportation Impact Study Paradigm Transportation Solutions Limited December 2016 Project Summary Project Number 162060 December 2016 Client Zelinka Priamo Ltd 318

More information

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction

TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Part A: Introduction TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM To: David J. Decker Decker Properties, Inc. 5950 Seminole Centre Ct. Suite 200 Madison, Wisconsin 53711 608-663-1218 Fax: 608-663-1226 www.klengineering.com From: Mike Scarmon, P.E.,

More information

Environmental Assessment Derry Road and Argentia Road Intersection

Environmental Assessment Derry Road and Argentia Road Intersection Air and Noise Study Environmental Assessment Derry Road and Argentia Road Intersection Project 11-4295 City of Mississauga, Region of Peel October 17, 2014 1 Region of Peel Environmental Assessment for

More information

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS

IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS for the South Novato Transit Hub Study Prepared by: January 11, 2010 DKS Associates With Wilbur Smith Associates IMPROVEMENT CONCEPTS Chapter 1: Introduction 1. INTRODUCTION The strategic

More information

Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis

Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Gibson Traffic Consultants, Inc. 8 Rockefeller Avenue Suite B Everett, WA 98 45.9.8 Sweetwater Landing Traffic Impact Analysis Jurisdiction: City of Snohomish February 8 GTC #7-87 Sweetwater Landing Traffic

More information

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND

MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND MILLERSVILLE PARK TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, MARYLAND Prepared for: Department of Public Works Anne Arundel County Prepared by: URS Corporation 4 North Park Drive, Suite 3 Hunt Valley,

More information